1: %*** File 'glu.tex'
2: % paper gluon fragmentation into glueballs and hybrids
3: %\rightline{MPI-PhT/97-46}
4: %\rightline{hep-ph/9707393}
5: %\rightline{January 22, 2000}
6: \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
7:
8: \usepackage{amsmath}
9: \usepackage{amssymb}
10: \usepackage{epsfig}
11: %
12: \newcommand{\epem}{\mbox{$e^+e^-$}}
13: \newcommand{\dgr}{^{\rm o}}
14:
15: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
16: \textwidth 14. cm
17:
18:
19: %define less than or approx. / greater than or approx. - math mode
20: \def\nostrocostrutto#1\over#2{\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0pt \rlap
21: {\raise.2ex\hbox{$#1$}}}
22: \lower.9ex\hbox{\kern-.190em $#2$}}}
23: \def\lsim{\nostrocostrutto < \over \sim} %less or around ...
24: \def\gsim{\nostrocostrutto > \over \sim} %greater or around...
25:
26:
27: %\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
28: %\newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
29: %\newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}
30: %\newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}
31: %
32: \newcommand{\eref}[1]{(\ref{#1})} % automatically puts ( ) around ref.s
33: \newcommand{\pp}{{$\pm$}}
34: %\newcommand{\N}{\overline{\mathcal N}}
35: \newcommand{\N}{{\mathcal N}}
36: \newcommand{\Nq}{{\mathcal N}_q}
37: \newcommand{\Ng}{{\mathcal N}_g}
38: \newcommand{\Ord}{{\mathcal O}}
39: %\newcommand{\labl}[1]{#1\label{#1}}
40: \newcommand{\labl}[1]{\label{#1}}
41: \newcommand{\MeV}{{\rm MeV}}
42: \newcommand{\GeV}{{\rm GeV}}
43: %\newcommand{\Qzpm}{Q_0^{+-}}
44: \newcommand{\Qzpm}{Q_0}
45: %\newcommand{\Lpm}{\Lambda^{+-}}
46: \newcommand{\Lpm}{\Lambda}
47: \newcommand{\qqbar}{$q\overline q\ $}
48: \newcommand{\degr}{{\rm o}}
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50: %The following macro is from world_sci.sty, originally written for DPF91
51:
52: \catcode`@=11
53: % Collapse citation numbers to ranges. Non-numeric and undefined labels
54: % are handled. No sorting is done. E.g., 1,3,2,3,4,5,foo,1,2,3,?,4,5
55: % gives 1,3,2-5,foo,1-3,?,4,5
56: \newcount\@tempcntc
57: \def\@citex[#1]#2{\if@filesw\immediate\write\@auxout{\string\citation{#2}}\fi
58: \@tempcnta\z@\@tempcntb\m@ne\def\@citea{}\@cite{\@for\@citeb:=#2\do
59: {\@ifundefined
60: {b@\@citeb}{\@citeo\@tempcntb\m@ne\@citea\def\@citea{,}{\bf ?}\@warning
61: {Citation `\@citeb' on page \thepage \space undefined}}%
62: {\setbox\z@\hbox{\global\@tempcntc0\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname\relax}%
63: \ifnum\@tempcntc=\z@ \@citeo\@tempcntb\m@ne
64: \@citea\def\@citea{,}\hbox{\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname}%
65: \else
66: \advance\@tempcntb\@ne
67: \ifnum\@tempcntb=\@tempcntc
68: \else\advance\@tempcntb\m@ne\@citeo
69: \@tempcnta\@tempcntc\@tempcntb\@tempcntc\fi\fi}}\@citeo}{#1}}
70: \def\@citeo{\ifnum\@tempcnta>\@tempcntb\else\@citea\def\@citea{,}%
71: \ifnum\@tempcnta=\@tempcntb\the\@tempcnta\else
72: {\advance\@tempcnta\@ne\ifnum\@tempcnta=\@tempcntb \else \def\@citea{--}\fi
73: \advance\@tempcnta\m@ne\the\@tempcnta\@citea\the\@tempcntb}\fi\fi}
74: \catcode`@=12
75: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
76:
77:
78: \begin{document}
79:
80: %****************************************************************
81:
82: % Titlepage
83:
84: %****************************************************************
85:
86: \setcounter{page}{0}
87: \thispagestyle{empty}
88: \begin{titlepage}
89:
90: % BUTP Nr.
91: \vspace*{-1cm}
92: \hfill \parbox{3.5cm}{BUTP-2000/04 \\ MPI-PhT/2000-11\\
93: March 13, 2000\\
94: %hep-ph/9811518\\
95: }
96: \vfill
97:
98: % Title
99: \begin{center}
100: {\large {\bf
101: Gluon Fragmentation into Glueballs and \\
102: Hybrid Mesons}
103: \footnote{Work
104: supported in part by the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds.} }
105: \vfill
106: % Authors
107: {\bf
108: Peter Minkowski } \\
109: Institute for Theoretical Physics \\
110: University of Bern \\
111: CH - 3012 Bern, Switzerland
112: \vspace*{0.3cm} \\
113: and \vspace*{0.3cm} \\
114: {\bf
115: Wolfgang Ochs } \\
116: Max Planck Institut f\"ur Physik \\
117: Werner Heisenberg Institut \\
118: D - 80805 Munich, Germany\\
119: % \vspace*{0.5cm} \\
120:
121: \end{center}
122:
123: \vfill
124:
125: \begin{abstract}
126: The constituent nature of candidate gluonic mesons can be studied by
127: comparing their production in quark and gluon jets.
128: The production rate for such mesons depends on the colour confinement
129: processes at the end of the perturbative evolution. Whereas we expect
130: enhanced production of hybrids in the fragmentation region
131: of a gluon jet, the rate for glueballs depends on the
132: relative importance of colour triplet and colour octet neutralization.
133: These neutralization processes can be studied
134: independently in events with large rapidity gaps.
135: If octet processes turn out important
136: the recently suggested lightest $J^{PC}=0^{++}$
137: glueball with mass around 1000 MeV should become visible already in the
138: spectrum of the leading charged particle pairs.
139:
140: \end{abstract}
141:
142: %\vspace{-15cm}
143:
144: %\rightline{MPI-PhT/97-46}
145: %\rightline{hep-ph/9707393}
146: %\rightline{January 22, 2000}
147:
148: \vfill
149: \end{titlepage}
150:
151: %****************************************************************
152:
153: %Wolfgang Ochs\thanks{E-mail address: wwo@mppmu.mpg.de}\\
154:
155: \newpage
156:
157: \section{Introduction}
158: A characteristic prediction of QCD in the non-perturbative sector concerns
159: the existence of mesons with gluons as valence constituents, either purely
160: gluonic mesons, ``glueballs'', or ``hybrids'', the bound states of
161: quark, antiquark and gluon.
162:
163: The search for glueballs is an important issue since the early days of QCD
164: \cite{HFPM} but their very
165: existence has not been definitely established
166: until today. Whereas there is general agreement
167: that the lightest
168: glueball should have quantum numbers $J^{PC}=0^{++}$ its mass remains
169: controversial. Moreover, as $q\overline q$ mesons exist with the same
170: quantum numbers the identification is difficult, in particular, as
171: there could be mixing between the different states as well.
172:
173: The important way to distinguish between the possibilities is the study
174: of production rates and decay branching ratios which are expected to be
175: sensitive to the constituent structure. Glueballs are expected
176: to be produced preferentially in a gluon rich environment such as
177: $J/\psi\to \gamma+X$, central production in hadron hadron collisions
178: by double Pomeron exchange and $p\overline p$ annihilation
179: into mesons near threshold. On the other hand, glueball production should be
180: suppressed in $\gamma\gamma$ collisions (see \cite{close} for survey).
181: All these reactions have been explored with
182: increasing accuracy in the past.
183:
184: Here we want to discuss another pair of reactions where glueball
185: or hybrid production
186: could be enhanced or suppressed, respectively.
187: In the fragmentation region of the quark jet the usual $q\overline q$
188: hadrons which carry the
189: initial quark as valence quark are enhanced, gluonic mesons are expected to
190: be suppressed. In analogy, one might expect gluonic mesons
191: to be enhanced in the fragmentation region of gluon jets and
192: $q\overline q$ states to be suppressed.
193: Correspondingly, one may study
194: the relevant particle systems ($\pi\pi,\ K\overline K,\
195: 4\pi\ldots)$ either at large momentum fraction (Feynman $x$), or
196: with some advantages, in the head
197: of the jet beyond a large rapidity gap (length $\Delta y$).
198: Of advantage are the similar kinematic conditions for both kinds of jets
199: and often the possibility of a measurement in the same experiment.
200: The own identity of gluon jets produced in hard collisions has been
201: established in various details according to the expectations from
202: perturbative QCD calculations (for review, see \cite{ko}).
203: There are plenty of gluon jets in the $e^+e^-\to q \overline q g$
204: final states and in hard $pp $ collisions which makes this type of studies
205: promising.
206:
207: Experimental studies along this line have not been carried out so far
208: although there is some history
209: to the idea to look for gluonic mesons in gluon jets.
210: Peterson and Walsh \cite{pw} suggested a
211: non-perturbative model with a leading isoscalar cluster in the
212: gluon jet which could be composed of
213: ordinary \qqbar mesons like $\eta,\eta',
214: \omega,\phi$ or glueballs.
215: An enhanced production of
216: $\eta'$ in gluon jets
217: because of its intrinsic $gg$ component has been
218: suggested by Fritzsch \cite{hf} in the explanation of the large decay rate
219: of $B$ into $\eta'$.
220: More recently, Roy and Sridhar \cite{rs,rw}
221: suggested the search for glueballs in gluon jets at large $x$
222: and considered a model with the
223: $g\to gb $ fragmentation being similar to $q\to \pi$ fragmentation.
224:
225: Whereas an earlier study at LEP \cite{l3} presented
226: evidence for an enhanced $\eta$ production in gluon jets at large $x$
227: the more recent studies of $\eta,\ \eta'$ mesons
228: \cite{aleph,opal} did not indicate any enhanced production
229: of isoscalar mesons in gluon jets.
230: No study has been published
231: yet for glueball or hybrid candidates.
232:
233: Whether the suggested systematics is realized in nature depends on the
234: (nonperturbative) colour neutralization mechanism and could be
235: quite different for ordinary \qqbar mesons, hybrids and glueballs.
236: We distinguish the
237: colour triplet and colour octet neutralization and suggest studies
238: which should reveal the relative importance of both mechanisms
239: independently of the existence of glueballs.
240: In any case, we expect the enhanced production of hybrids
241: in gluon jets -- if they really exist (see also \cite{wo}).
242:
243: \section{Status of glueballs and hybrids}
244:
245: %The mass of the glueballs is not easily deduced from the \qqbar spectroscopy
246: %and in a first study
247: %\cite{HFPM} different scenarios with low mass (around 1 GeV) and high mass
248: %(above 1.5 GeV) have been distinguished.
249:
250: Lattice calculations in quenched approximation
251: (without sea quarks) put the lightest
252: glueball with quantum numbers $J^{PC}=0^{++}$ near a mass of 1600 MeV
253: \cite{Morning,wein}
254: (for a review, see \cite{michael}).
255: First results from unquenched calculations \cite{lattunq}
256: are not yet conclusive but may
257: indicate a decrease of the glueball mass with decreasing quark mass.
258:
259: On the other hand, within the QCD sum rule
260: approach, a lighter gluonic component in the $0^{++}$ spectrum is required near
261: 1000 MeV \cite{nar} (earlier results in \cite{prenar}). Also the early
262: calculations in the MIT bag model \cite{bag}
263: prefer the low mass glueball around 1000 MeV.
264:
265: In a recent phenomenological analysis \cite{mo} it has been proposed
266: that the lightest $0^{++}$ glueball should be identified
267: with the very broad state
268: \begin{equation}
269: gb(0^{++}):\qquad M\ =\ 1000\ \rm{MeV},\qquad \Gamma\ = \ 500\ -\ 1000
270: \ \rm{MeV}
271: \label{gb0}
272: \end{equation}
273: which corresponds to both states $f_0(400-1200)$ and $f_0(1370)$ listed in the
274: particle data table \cite{pdg}. Whereas in some experimental
275: mass spectra there is a separate peak near 1370 MeV
276: the phase shift analyses of elastic and inelastic $\pi\pi$ scattering
277: do not indicate the phase movement corresponding to an ordinary
278: Breit Wigner resonance centered at this mass value. Rather -- after removal
279: of the narrow $f_0(980)$ -- the $\pi\pi$
280: elastic scattering phase shifts below 1500 MeV
281: are slowly rising and pass through $90^{\degr}$ near 1000 MeV; there
282: is no indication of a second resonance -- neither in the elastic \cite{mp}
283: nor in the inelastic channels \cite{mo}.
284:
285: Recent data on central production of particle pairs by the WA102 and GAMS
286: collaborations \cite{wa102pairs,gamspairs}
287: show again peaks in the mass spectra near $f_0(1370)$; the measured angular
288: distribution moments should now allow a judgement in favour
289: of the Breit-Wigner resonance
290: phase movement or against it from the interference with $f_2(1270)$;
291: the same applies also to
292: peripheral $\pi^0\pi^0$ production in $\pi p$ production by the E852
293: collaboration \cite{e852}. Relative phases may also be obtained in the
294: $4\pi$ final states measured by WA102 \cite{wa1024pi}. Such
295: analyses have the potential to further clarify whether
296: $f_0(1370)$ is a reasonably narrow ($\Gamma\sim 200-300$ MeV)
297: Breit-Wigner resonance or -- as we suggested \cite{mo} -- a component of a
298: yet broader object.
299:
300: The broad state $gb(1000)$ in (\ref{gb0}) is found
301: consistent with most expectations for production and decay of a glueball
302: and is therefore a respectable candidate. The main decay mode is $\pi\pi$,
303: but also $K\overline K$ and $\eta\eta$ above the respective thresholds
304: and possibly $\pi\pi e^+e^-$ \cite{km}. The identification of $f_0(1500)$
305: as lightest glueball is not supported by the finding of opposite signs
306: for the decay amplitude into $K\overline K$ and $\eta\eta$ \cite{mo}.
307:
308: There is even less experimental information about $0^{-+}$ and $2^{++}$
309: glueballs. Possible candidates according to the analysis of
310: ref. \cite{mo} are $\eta(1440)$ and $f_J(1710)$ with $J=2$.
311:
312: In the sector of hybrid mesons the spin-exotic state $1^{-+}$ is of
313: particular interest. Lattice results yield mass values around 1900 MeV
314: for this hybrid composed of light quarks and gluon in quenched approximation
315: and also in the first attempt including sea quarks
316: \cite{ukqcd,bernard,sesam,michael}.
317:
318: There is experimental evidence for resonances with exotic $1^{-+}$ quantum numbers
319: in the $\eta\pi$ system at masses around 1400 and 1600 MeV (for a
320: recent summary,
321: see Chung \cite{chung}). This result is lower than the lattice expectation by
322: around 500 MeV. This discrepency could be due to an incomplete calculation
323: or the observed states are not hybrid but other exotic states, for example
324: $q\overline q q\overline q$ states.
325:
326: \section{Hadron production and colour neutralization}
327:
328: An energetic quark or gluon emerging from a hard
329: collision process will generate a parton cascade
330: by subsequent gluon bremsstrahlung and quark pair
331: production.
332: The extension of such a cascade for a 100 GeV jet in space can be rather
333: large and exceed 100 f (see, for example \cite{dkmt,os}). The formation of
334: colour singlet systems should proceed during the evolution whenever
335: the separation of colour charges exceeds the confinement
336: length $R_c\sim 1$f. Two types of neutralization processes are possible
337: (see Fig. 1).
338: %
339: \begin{figure*}[t]
340: \begin{center}
341: %lower left. upper right positions
342: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=ochs1.ps,width=7.0cm,bbllx=3.2cm,bblly=9.2cm,bburx=18.cm,bbu
343: \mbox{\epsfig{file=P-001065.eps,width=10cm}}
344: \end{center}
345: %\vspace{-0.7cm}
346: \caption[]{
347: The colour neutralization (a) of an initial $q\overline q$ pair
348: by $\overline q q$ and (b) of an initial $gg$ pair by either double
349: colour triplet
350: $q\overline q$ or by colour octet $gg$}
351: \label{fig1}
352: \end{figure*}
353:
354: %
355: 1. Colour triplet neutralization.\\
356: Consider the production of a massive
357: $ q\overline q$ pair in a colour singlet state
358: in its restframe corresponding to
359: separating colour triplet
360: charges (possibly accompanied by secondary
361: partons from bremsstrahlung).
362: The colour field between the primary quarks can be neutralized eventually by
363: the (nonperturbative)
364: production of a soft quark antiquark pair.
365: This process of triplet neutralization may repeat itself for the
366: various branchings inside the quark gluon cascade until
367: the total energy is carried by
368: $q\overline q$ hadrons.
369: Also possible is the formation of hybrid mesons from the gluons at the end
370: of the perturbative cascade and the soft $q\overline q$.
371: An example for a quantitative description
372: of soft nonperturbative $q\overline q$
373: production is given by the chromoelectric flux tube model \cite{cnn}
374: which considers pair production in a static field. A systematic treatment
375: for relativistic particles connecting to perturbation theory has not yet been
376: achieved.
377:
378: 2. Colour octet neutralization.\\
379: In case of a primary colour singlet $gg$ pair the field between the
380: separating colour octet charges can be neutralized at the confinement
381: distance either by the production of a gluon pair or by the subsequent
382: production of two quark pairs.
383: Only the mechanism with gluon pair production could yield
384: pure gluonic bound states at the end.
385:
386: We introduce the relative probability of
387: triplet and octet neutralization by a phenomenological parameter
388: \begin{equation}
389: R_3\ =\ P_3/P_8. \label{ratio83}
390: \end{equation}
391: %from $P_3=4/3$ and $P_8=3$ as $R_3=4/13$
392: In the flux tube model of ref. \cite{cnn} the octet process was considered
393: negligible assuming a large effective gluon mass $>1 $ GeV in expectation of
394: a heavy glueball. We consider here the possibility of a light glueball and also
395: of a non-negligable soft $gg$ production rate.
396:
397: %Estimate of $R_3=4/9$ in fluxtube model ... (?)
398:
399: It is not obvious to what extent the two types of neutralization mechanisms
400: are realized in a particular
401: process. Common collision processes at particle accelerators
402: are initiated by quarks either as
403: constituents of external hadrons or after production through electromagnetic
404: or weak gauge bosons. A successive triplet neutralization by quark pairs
405: is then always possible even in a gluon dominated final state.
406: The octet neutralization could be an overall rare process
407: enhanced for particular kinematic configurations.
408:
409: Here we suggest such a configuration:
410: consider the production of a hard gluon
411: which travels without gluon radiation for a while forming a jet with a
412: large rapidity gap empty of hadrons. The probability for such events
413: decreases exponentially with the rapidity gap according to the Sudakov
414: formfactor \cite{os}.
415: In this case the hard isolated gluon builds up an
416: octet field to the remaining partons which is not distorted by multiple
417: gluon emissions and related colour neutralization processes of smaller
418: rapidity range, so the $gg$
419: octet mechanism may be enhanced and
420: will become clearly visible if it exists.
421:
422: The experimental test can be carried out independently of the
423: existence of glueballs. In case of $gg$ neutralization the total charge of
424: the head particles beyond the gap should be $Q=0$;
425: on the other hand, the charge
426: distribution in case of double triplet neutralization should have a
427: component with charges $Q=\pm 1$, a situation which is also met
428: for an equal mixture
429: of quark and antiquark jets with a gap.
430: Therefore, if the colour octet mechanism exists, the charge
431: distribution for the gluon gap events should be a mixture of both
432: components according to the probability $R_3$ in (\ref{ratio83}).
433:
434: In this test the gap $\Delta y$ should be large enough so that the leading
435: charges have approached a limiting distribution; only the charges which
436: correspond to the combination of the leading parton and the soft
437: neutralizing parton (or partons) are present. In this limit multiple exchanges
438: through the gap and leading charges $|Q|\geq 2$ should be absent.
439:
440: If the enhanced neutral component from octet neutralization
441: is not observed we would not expect a preferred source of glueballs
442: in gluon jets either. In this case glueballs would be produced through
443: their mixing with quarkonium states in any collision process
444: and not preferentially through their valence glue component.
445:
446: \section{Limiting charge distribution beyond the gap}
447:
448: For illustration we give an estimate of the limiting charge distribution
449: for sufficiently large $\Delta y$
450: in the head of the jet beyond the gap
451: for the case of triplet neutralization.
452: We assume that the charge is determined
453: in the quark jet by the charge of
454: the leading quark and an average soft antiquark and in case of gluon jet by
455: the average charge of the soft quarks and antiquarks.
456: In our estimate
457: we assume that soft $u,d,s$ quarks are produced with
458: relative probabilities $\gamma,\gamma,\gamma_s$
459: and we take $\gamma=0.4,\gamma_s=1-2\gamma=0.2$
460: as in ref. \cite{ff} in the example (i.e. the production ratio $s/u=0.5$).
461: More generally, $\gamma$ could depend on the energy scale of the separating
462: partons and we compare also with the extreme cases $\gamma=1/2\ (s/u=0)$
463: and $\gamma=1/3\ (s/u=1)$.
464:
465: The charge distribution in the head of the gluon jet is then given by
466: \begin{equation}
467: p_g(Q)\ = \ P_3 p_3^g(Q) +P_8p_8^g(Q)
468: \label{Qgjet}
469: \end{equation}
470: where the charge distributions for triplet and octet neutralization
471: $p_3^g(Q)$ and $p_8^g(Q)$ are given
472: in Table 1. As seen from the table, the probabilities vary within 10\%
473: for the different assumptions on the strange quark ratio $s/u$.
474: From the measurement of the charge
475: distribution (\ref{Qgjet}) one can determine the ratio $R_3$ in
476: (\ref{ratio83}), given the parameter $\gamma$.
477:
478: The corresponding analysis can be done as well in quark jets with a gap
479: to check the overall picture and study the parameter $\gamma$.
480: The charge
481: distribution in the head of the jet for different quarks and the
482: quark-antiquark average relevant to $e^+e^-$ events is given in Table 2.
483: For a superposition of different quark (anti-quark)
484: jets with probabilities $\hat P_q$
485: the charge distribution is given by
486: \begin{equation}
487: \hat P_{<q>}(Q)\ = \ \sum_q \hat P_q \ p_3^q(Q). \label{quarkcharge}
488: \end{equation}
489: There are some
490: differences between the gluon jet with triplet neutralization
491: and the $q\overline q$ average jet, but both are clearly separated from the
492: octet case which can therefore easily be identified with this method.
493:
494: \begin{table}[ht]
495: \caption{Leading charge distribution $p_3^g(Q)$ and $p_8^g(Q)$
496: in a gluon jet
497: in case of triplet neutralization by soft $u,d,s$ quarks and anti-quarks
498: for different values of the $s/u\equiv \gamma_s/\gamma$ ratio
499: and octet neutralization by gluons.
500: }
501: \[
502: \begin{array}{cccccc}
503: \hline
504: & \mbox{triplet}\ p_3^g(Q) & && & \mbox{octet}\ p_8^g(Q) \\
505: \hline
506: & s/u=(1-2\gamma)/\gamma
507: & s/u=0.5& s/u=0 & s/u=1.0 & g
508: \\
509: \hline
510: p_c^g(Q=0) & 1-2\gamma+2\gamma^2 & 0.52 & 0.5 & 0.56 & 1 \\
511: p_c^g(Q=1) & \gamma (1-\gamma) & 0.24 & 0.25 & 0.22 & 0 \\
512: p_c^g(Q=-1) & \gamma (1-\gamma) & 0.24 & 0.25 & 0.22 & 0 \\
513: \hline
514: \end{array} \]
515: \label{tab1}
516: \end{table}
517: %
518: %
519: \begin{table}[ht]
520: \caption{Leading charge distribution $p_3^q(Q)$ in quark jets;
521: numerical values for $s/u=0.5$.}
522: \[
523: \begin{array}{cccccccccc}
524: \hline
525: & u \mbox{ or } c & & (u+\overline u)/2 & d \mbox{ or } b& & (d+\overline d)/2
526: & s & &(s+\overline s)/2
527: \\
528: \hline
529: P_3(Q=0) &\gamma & 0.4 & 0.4 & \gamma & 0.4 & 0.4 & 1-\gamma & 0.6 &
530: 0.6\\
531: P_3(Q=1) &1-\gamma & 0.6 & 0.3 & 0 & 0.0 & 0.3 & 0 & 0.0 &
532: 0.2\\
533: P_3(Q=-1)& 0 & 0 & 0.3 & 1-\gamma& 0.6 & 0.3 & \gamma & 0.4 &
534: 0.2 \\
535: \hline
536: \end{array} \]
537: \label{tab2}
538: \end{table}
539:
540: \section{Fragmentation Region of Gluon and Quark Jets}
541:
542: The inclusive spectra of hadrons and other observables are well
543: described by the corresponding quantities at the parton level provided the
544: perturbative evolution is continued down to small values of the $k_T$ cutoff
545: in the cascade $Q_0\sim \Lambda_{QCD}$ (this phenomenological approach
546: is called ``local
547: parton hadron duality'', for reviews, see \cite{dkmt,ko}). In this picture
548: the $x$-distribution of hadrons in the gluon jet is steeper than in the
549: quark jet because of the stronger semi-soft gluon radiation in the gluon
550: jet.
551:
552:
553: As to the fragmentation region of the quark jet
554: it is by now well established that the
555: hadrons which carry the primary quark as a valence quark dominate at large
556: momentum fraction $x$ as expected in the parton model
557: \cite{feynman}.
558: The leading
559: hadron follows the distribution of the primary quark if it is
560: color-neutralized by a soft anti-quark.
561:
562: In the gluon jet, in case of triplet neutralization, the leading particles
563: are the hadrons formed by the primary gluon and the soft $q\overline q$
564: pairs. If there are hybrid mesons they may be formed in the fast
565: colour singlet $q\overline qg$ system, alternatively, the fast hadrons
566: are ordinary $q\overline q$ mesons formed at the end of the parton cascade
567: after having absorbed all gluon energy.
568: If the octet mechanism is at work
569: the leading gluon may also form a glueball.
570: On the other hand, in the quark jet neither the hybrid nor the glueball will
571: be leading if -- as we assume -- the leading quark is only neutralized in
572: colour by a soft antiquark. These properties are summarized in Table 3.
573:
574: \begin{table}[ht]
575: \caption{Production of leading hadrons in the jet}
576: \[
577: \begin{array}{ccccc}
578: \hline
579: & \mbox{neutralization} & \overline{q} q &
580: \mbox{hybrid} & \mbox{glueball}
581: \\
582: \hline
583: \mbox{quark jet} & \mbox{triplet} & \mbox{yes} & \mbox{no} &
584: \mbox{no}\\
585: \mbox{gluon jet} & \mbox{triplet} & \mbox{yes} & \mbox{yes} &
586: \mbox{no}\\
587: & \mbox{octet} & \mbox{no} & \mbox{no} & \mbox{yes}\\
588: \hline
589: \end{array} \]
590: \label{tab3}
591: \end{table}
592:
593: The constituent nature of a particular particle or resonance
594: according to Table 3 can best
595: be studied by comparing its production rate
596: in the fragmentation region
597: of quark and gluon jets.
598: One possibility is the study of the respective mass spectra at large $x$
599: (see also \cite{rs}); there may be considerable non-resonant background.
600: Another possibility is the study of particles
601: beyond the rapidity gap. For large gaps when the limiting charge
602: distribution is reached the background should be small.
603: As argued above the rapidity cut may enhance the possibility
604: for the octet mechanism.
605:
606: The comparison between quark and gluon jet is best carried out
607: for similar kinematic configuration: the same length $\delta y$ for the head
608: of the jet beyond
609: the gap in a frame with the nearest jets in angle
610: $\geq 90\dgr$.
611:
612: For the gluon jet
613: in $e^+e^-\to 3$ jets such a preferred frame
614: is reached after transforming first
615: into the restframe of $q\overline q$ and then
616: boosting along the $q\overline q$ direction until the $g$ jet is
617: perpendicular (see Fig. 2).
618: %
619: \begin{figure*}[ht]
620: \begin{center}
621: %lower left. upper right positions
622: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=ochs1.ps,width=7.0cm,bbllx=3.2cm,bblly=9.2cm,bburx=18.cm,bbu
623: \mbox{\epsfig{file=P-001066.eps,width=6cm}}
624: \end{center}
625: %\vspace{-0.7cm}
626: \caption[]{
627: Convenient frame to analyse gluon jets with a rapidity
628: gap $\Delta y$ in three jet events
629: in $e^+e^-$ annihilation.}
630: \label{fig2}
631: \end{figure*}
632:
633: In order to
634: correct for the different inclusive parton distributions in quark and
635: gluon jets and also in case of different available phase space
636: it is best to normalize the rates
637: to a well known $q\overline q$ hadron $h_{norm}$ ($\rho,\ f_2\ldots$)
638: of comparable mass. Along this way
639: we define the gluon factor $F_g$ for a hadron $h$
640: \begin{equation}
641: F_g(h/h_{norm})
642: \ =\ \frac{\sigma(g\to h)/\sigma(g\to h_{norm})}
643: {\sigma(q\to h)/\sigma(q\to h_{norm})}.
644: \label{gluon factor}
645: \end{equation}
646: Apparently, for a $q\overline q$ hadron
647: the gluon factor $F_g\approx 1$ and for a gluonic
648: meson $F_g \gg 1$.\footnote{
649: This quantity may be compared to the observable called
650: ``stickiness'' \protect\cite{chanowitz},
651: the ratio of radiative $J/\psi$ decay and $\gamma\gamma$ production for a
652: given hadron. In that case
653: the very different phase space and barrier factors
654: in both processes are taken into account in the definition
655: using an approximation appropriate for small masses;
656: for high masses this approximation becomes unreliable and yields
657: rather large unrealistic ratios.}
658:
659: According to our hypothesis about $gb(1000)$ as being
660: the lightest binary glueball
661: an effect $F_g > 1$ should be seen for the mass spectrum of $\pi^+\pi^-$ or
662: $\pi^0\pi^0$ around and below 1 GeV, i.e. in the simplest case already for
663: a neutral pair of charged particles. It may be compared with $\rho(770), \
664: f_2(1270)$. Other enigmatic states like the $f_0(980)$ can be tested for
665: their gluonic components as well. Heavier glueball candidates like
666: $f_0(1500)$ and $f_J(1710)$ may be studied through their $K\overline K$ decay
667: modes. Also the mass spectrum of all particles with total charge $Q=0$
668: in the head of the gluon jet
669: beyond the rapidity gap would be an interesting possibility for inclusive
670: glueball hunting.
671:
672: \section{Conclusions}
673: The limiting charge distribution in the leading cluster
674: of quark and gluon jets with sufficiently large
675: rapidity gap should reveal the relative importance of the octet
676: neutralization mechanism. The comparison of such events
677: in quark and gluon jets could then provide some clues about the
678: constituent nature of candidate gluonic mesons
679: with low background.
680: Inclusive particle spectra did not prove any unusual
681: behaviour in both kinds of jets so far, but particle correlations could do.
682: Interesting tests are already possible with
683: charged particle pairs.
684:
685:
686: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
687:
688: \bibitem{HFPM} H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski,
689: Nuovo Cim. {\bf 30A}, 393 (1975).
690:
691: \bibitem{close}
692: F.E. Close, Rep. Prog. Phys. {\bf 51}, 833 (1988).
693:
694: \bibitem{ko}
695: V.A.~Khoze and W.~Ochs,
696: Int.~J.~Mod.~Phys. {\bf A12}, 2949 (1997).
697:
698: \bibitem{pw}
699: C. Peterson and T.F. Walsh, Phys. Lett. {\bf B91}, 455 (1980).
700:
701: \bibitem{hf}
702: H. Fritzsch, Phys. Lett. {\bf B415}, 83 (1997).
703:
704: \bibitem{rs}
705: P. Roy, K. Sridhar, JHEP 9907, 013 (1999)
706: \bibitem{rw}
707: P. Roy, T.F. Walsh, Phys. Lett. {\bf B78}, 62 (1978).
708:
709: \bibitem{l3}
710: L3 coll: Phys. Lett. {\bf B371}, 126 (1996).
711:
712: \bibitem{aleph}
713: ALEPH coll: R. Barate et al., CERN-EP/99-105, July 1999, subm.
714: Eur. Phys. J. C.
715:
716: \bibitem{opal}
717: OPAL coll: OPAL Physics Note, PN407, July 1999.
718:
719: \bibitem{wo}
720: W. Ochs, ``Lightest Glueball and Scalar Meson Nonet in Production and
721: Decay'', Int. Europhys. Conf. on High-Energy
722: Physics, Tampere, Finland, 15-21 Jul 1999, hep-ph/9909241.
723:
724:
725:
726: \bibitem{Morning} C.J. Morningstar and M. Peardon, Phys. Rev.
727: {\bf D56}, 4043 (1997).
728:
729: \bibitem{wein}
730: A. Vaccarino, D. Weingarten,
731: Phys. Rev. {\bf D60}, 114501 (1999).
732:
733:
734: \bibitem{michael}
735: C. Michael, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A655}, 12 (1999).
736:
737: \bibitem{lattunq}
738: G. S. Bali et al.,
739: Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf 53}, 239 (1997);
740: {\bf 63}, 209 (1998).
741:
742: \bibitem{nar}
743: S. Narison, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B509}, 312 (1998).
744: \bibitem{prenar}
745: S. Narison and G. Veneziano, Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf A4}, 2751 (1989);\\
746: E. Bagan and T.G. Steele, Phys. Lett. {\bf B243}, 413 (1990).
747:
748: \bibitem{bag}
749: T. Barnes, F.E. Close, S. Monaghan, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B198}, 380 (1982).
750:
751: \bibitem{mo}
752: P. Minkowski and W. Ochs, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C9}, 283 (1999);\\
753: Proc. Workshop on Hadron Spectroscopy,
754: Frascati, March 1999, Italy, Eds. T. Bressani et al., Frascati Physics
755: Series XV, p.245 (1999).
756:
757: \bibitem{pdg}
758: Particle Data Group, C. Caso et al., Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C3}, 1 (1998).
759:
760: \bibitem{mp}
761: D. Morgan and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev.
762: {\bf D48}, 1185 (1993).
763:
764: \bibitem{wa102pairs}
765: WA102 Coll.: D. Barberis et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B453}, 316, 325 (1999).
766:
767: \bibitem{gamspairs}
768: GAMS Coll.: R. Bellazzini et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B467}, 296 (1999).
769:
770: \bibitem{e852}
771: E852 Coll.: J. Gunter et al.,
772: ``A partial wave analysis of the $\pi^0\pi^0$ system produced in $\pi^-p$
773: charge exchange collisions'',
774: hep-ex/0001038 (2000).
775:
776: \bibitem{wa1024pi}
777: WA102 Coll.: D. Barberis et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B471}, 440 (2000).
778:
779: \bibitem{km}
780: S. Kabana and P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. {\bf B472}, 155 (2000).
781:
782: \bibitem{ukqcd}
783: UKQCD Coll: P. Lacock, C. Michael, P. Boyle and P. Rowland, Phys. Rev. {\bf
784: D54}, 6997 (1996); Phys. Lett. {\bf B401}, 308 (1997).
785:
786: \bibitem{bernard}
787: C. Bernard et al., Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf 53}, 228 (1996); Phys.
788: Rev. {\bf D56}, 7039 (1997).
789:
790: \bibitem{sesam}
791: SESAM Coll.: P.Lacock and K. Schilling,
792: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 73}, 261 (1999).
793:
794: \bibitem{chung}
795: S.U. Chung,
796: Proc. Workshop on Hadron Spectroscopy,
797: Frascati, March 1999, Italy, Eds. T. Bressani et al., Frascati Physics
798: Series XV, p.603 (1999).
799:
800: \bibitem{dkmt}
801: Yu.L.~Dokshitzer, V.A.~Khoze, A.H.~Mueller and
802: S.I.~Troyan, ``Basics of Perturbative QCD'', Editions Fronti\`{e}re,
803: Gif-sur-Yvette, France (1991).
804:
805: \bibitem{os}
806: W. Ochs and T. Shimada,
807: ``Rapidity gaps in quark and gluon jets -- a perturbative approach'',
808: XXIX Int. Symp. QCD \& Multiparticle Production (ISMD99), Providence, RI, USA,
809: Aug. 1999, hep-ph/9911240.
810:
811: \bibitem{cnn}
812: A. Casher, H. Neuberger and S. Nussinov, Phys. Rev. {\bf D20}, 179 (1979).
813:
814: \bibitem{ff}
815: R.D. Field and R.P. Feynman, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B136}, 1 (1978).
816:
817: \bibitem{chanowitz}
818: M. Chanowitz, Proc. VI Int. Workshop on Photon Photon collisions, ed. R.
819: Lander, Lake Tahoe (World Scientific, 1984).
820:
821: \bibitem{feynman}
822: R.P. Feynman, in ``Photon-Hadron Interactions'', Frontiers in Physics,
823: W.A. Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts (1972).
824:
825: \end{thebibliography}
826:
827: %\input{ref}
828:
829: \end{document}
830:
831:
832: