1: \documentstyle[12pt,cite,amssymb,epsf]{article} 

2: 

3: \title{

4: \begin{flushright}

5: {\normalsize Yaroslavl State University\\

6:              Preprint YARU-HE-00/03\\

7:              hep-ph/0003216} \\[5mm]

8: \end{flushright}

9: Lepton pair production by high-energy neutrino 

10: in an external electromagnetic field}

11: 

12: \author{{A.V.~Kuznetsov, N.V.~Mikheev, D.A.~Rumyantsev}\\ [7mm] 

13: {\small\it Division of Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics,}\\

14: {\small\it Yaroslavl State University, Sovietskaya 14,}\\

15: {\small\it 150000 Yaroslavl, Russian Federation}}

16: 

17: \date{}

18: 

19: \begin{document}

20: 

21: \maketitle

22: 

23: \begin{abstract} 

24: The process of the lepton pair production by a neutrino propagating in an 

25: external electromagnetic field is investigated in the framework of 

26: the Standard Model. Relatively simple exact expression for the 

27: probability as the single integral is obtained, which is suitable 

28: for a quantitative analysis. 

29: \end{abstract}

30: 

31: Nowadays, it is well established that a medium makes an active influence 

32: on the quantum processes. It stimulates a constantly growing interest 

33: in the particle physics in medium, especially in view of possible 

34: astrophysical manifestations.

35: It should be noted that a consideration of an intense electromagnetic field

36: as the medium, along with a dense matter, is physically justified indeed. 

37: Really, the field 

38: strengths inside the astrophysical objects can reach the critical 

39: Schwinger value $B_e = m_e^2/e \simeq 4.41 \cdot 10^{13}$ G

40: \footnote{We use natural units in which $c = \hbar = 1.$}, 

41: and even could exceed it essentially. 

42: On the other hand, the situation is possible when the so-called field 

43: dynamical parameter $\chi$ of the relativistic particle~\footnote{Its 

44: definition is:

45: $\chi = e (p_\alpha F_{\alpha \beta} F_{\beta \sigma} p_\sigma)^{1/2}/m^3$, 

46: where $p_\alpha$ is the particle four-momentum, $F_{\alpha \beta}$ is the 

47: electromagnetic field tensor.} 

48: propagating in a relatively weak electromagnetic field, $F < B_e$ 

49: ($F = {\cal E}$ and/or $B$), could appear rather high. 

50: In this case the field in the particle rest 

51: frame can exceed essentially the critical value and is very close to 

52: the crossed field ($\vec {\cal E} \perp \vec B$, ${\cal E}=B$). 

53: Thus, the calculation in a constant crossed field

54: is the relativistic limit

55: of the calculation in an arbitrary relatively weak smooth field. 

56: Consequently, the results obtained in a crossed field 

57: possesses a great extent of generality, and acquires interest by itself.

58: 

59: It is known that such intense electromagnetic fields 

60: allow the processes which are kinematically 

61: forbidden in vacuum, such as the creation of the lepton pair by a neutrino, 

62: $\nu \to \nu \ell^- \ell^+ \, (\ell = e, \mu, \tau)$. 

63: It should be noted, that the $\ell^- \ell^+$ pair 

64: can have a sufficiently large space-like total momentum

65: in an electromagnetic field, due to the specific kinematics of 

66: a charged particle in this field. 

67: Therefore, the process with a relativistic neutrino becomes purely 

68: diagonal with respect to the neutrino flavor and is insensitive to its mass 

69: and to the mixing in the lepton sector.

70: 

71: The theoretical study of the process of the electron - positron pair 

72: production by a neutrino in the crossed field limit has a rather long 

73: history~\cite{Chob,Bor83,Knizh,Bor93,KM97}.

74: A correct type of the dependence of the probability 

75: on the dynamical parameter $\chi$ in the leading log approximation, namely, 

76: $\sim \chi^2 \ln \chi$, was found in the paper~\cite{Chob}, where the 

77: numerical coefficient was wrong, however. 

78: In the succeeding papers attempts were made to adjust this coefficient and 

79: to find the next post-logarithm terms which could appear quite essential 

80: when $\ln \chi$ was not very large. 

81: 

82: According to the definition of the problem in the crossed field 

83: approximation, one should speak about the 

84: ultrarelativistic neutrino only, which exists as the left-handed one due 

85: to the chiral type of its interaction in the frame of the Standard Model, 

86: even if the neutrino mass is non-zero. 

87: A lack of understanding of the fact that nonpolarized ultrarelativistic 

88: neutrinos did not exist in Nature, often led to the appearance of an 

89: erroneous extra factor 1/2 in expressions for the probabilities of the 

90: processes with initial neutrinos, due to an unphysical averaging over the 

91: neutrino polarizations, see e.g. the papers~\cite{Skob95,Bor99}. 

92: 

93: The results for the probability of the process $\nu \to \nu e^- e^+$ 

94: in the crossed field, which were obtained in the listed papers, had 

95: essential distinctions. 

96: This probability for the case of a high-energy neutrino ($\chi \gg 1$) 

97: can be presented in the following form 

98: %

99: \begin{equation}

100: w(\nu \to \nu e^- e^+) \, = \, K \, w_0 \,\chi^2 

101: \, \left(\ln \chi - {1 \over 2} ln 3 - \gamma_E + \Delta \right),

102: \label{eq:w0}

103: \end{equation}

104: 

105: \noindent 

106: where

107: %

108: \begin{equation}

109: w_0 \, = \, 

110: \frac{G_F^2 \,(g_V^2 + g_A^2) \,m_e^6}

111: {27 \pi^3 E_\nu},

112: \label{eq:w00}

113: \end{equation}

114: 

115: \noindent 

116: $\gamma_E = 0.577 \dots$ is the Euler constant, $g_V, g_A$ are the constants 

117: in the effective local Lagrangian of the $\nu \nu e e$ interaction, see 

118: Eq.~(\ref{eq:L}) below. 

119: In the recent paper~\cite{Bor99} devoted to the 

120: study of the massive neutrino decay $\nu_i \to \nu_j e^- e^+ 

121: \,(m_i > m_j + 2 m_e)$ in an external field, a comparance was also made 

122: of various results for the process probability. However, the statement which

123: was made in~\cite{Bor99} about a mutual agreement of the results was 

124: incorrect, in our opinion. 

125: Really, the constants $K$ and $\Delta$ introduced in 

126: Eq.~(\ref{eq:w0}), were obtained by the authors as follows, see Table 1.

127: 

128: \begin{table}[h]

129: \caption{The constants $K$ and $\Delta$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:w0}), 

130: obtained in various papers}

131: 

132: \begin{center}

133: \begin{tabular}{|ll|c|c|}\hline

134: & & &  \\ 

135: & & $K$ & $\Delta$ \\[5mm] 

136: \hline 

137: & & &  \\ 

138: %

139: Choban, Ivanov & 1969~\cite{Chob}

140: & $\frac{29}{1024 \pi}$ & --- \\[5mm]

141: %

142: Borisov et al. & 1983~\cite{Bor83}

143: & 1 & $- 2 \ln 2 - {389 \over 384} + {9 \over 128} 

144: \frac{g_V^2 - g_A^2}{g_V^2 + g_A^2}$\\[5mm]

145: %

146: Knizhnikov et al. & 1984~\cite{Knizh}

147: & ${9 \over 16}{E_\nu \over m_e}$ & --- \\[5mm]

148: %

149: Borisov et al. & 1993~\cite{Bor93}

150: & ${1 \over 2}$ & $ + {5 \over 4} $\\[5mm]

151: %

152: Kuznetsov, Mikheev & 1997~\cite{KM97}

153: & 1 & $ - {29 \over 24}$\\[5mm]

154: %

155: Borisov, Zamorin & 1999~\cite{Bor99}

156: & ${1 \over 2}$ & $ - {29 \over 24}$\\[5mm]

157: \hline

158: \end{tabular}

159: \end{center}

160: 

161: \end{table}

162: 

163: Note that in the papers~\cite{Chob,Bor99} calculations were performed 

164: for the case 

165: of the electron -- neutrino interaction via the $W$ - boson only. 

166: To compare our Eq.~(\ref{eq:w0}) with the results of these papers,

167: one should suppose in this formula $g_V = g_A = 1$~\cite{Chob}, 

168: and $g_V = g_A = |U_{ei} U_{e3}|$~\cite{Bor99}, correspondingly. 

169: Loss of the factor $m_e/E_\nu$ in the resulting expressions for the 

170: probability in Ref.~\cite{Knizh} was not the numerical mistake but 

171: rather the physical one, because it led to the loss of Lorentz

172: invariance of the product of the probability and the neutrino energy.

173: 

174: As it was mentioned above, the formula~(\ref{eq:w0}) for the probability 

175: described a rather particular case of $\ln \chi \gg 1$. 

176: On the other hand, the situation is realized under some physical conditions 

177: where the dynamical parameter takes the values which are moderately large, 

178: namely, $\chi \gg 1$, but $\ln \chi \sim 1$. 

179: The crossed-field approximation is valid in this case, but the condition

180: $\ln \chi \gg 1$ fails, and a consideration is necesary in Eq.~(\ref{eq:w0}) 

181: of the next terms of expansion over the inverse powers of the large 

182: dynamical parameter $\chi$. The expressions for the probability at an

183: arbitrary value of the $\chi$ parameter, presented in some of the listed 

184: papers, have a cumbersome form of multiple integrals, which are not suitable 

185: for an analysis. 

186: 

187: Hence the problem is urgent of obtaining the probability of the lepton pair 

188: ($e^- e^+$ or $\mu^- \mu^+$) production by a neutrino propagating in 

189: the crossed field for an arbitrary value of the $\chi$ parameter. 

190: In this paper we present our result for the probability of the process 

191: $\nu \to \nu \ell^- \ell^+$ which is rather simple and suitable for 

192: a quantitative analysis. 

193: 

194: We will consider the case of relatively low momentum transfers

195: ($|q^2| \ll m_W^2\,$). Under this condition, the weak interaction of 

196: neutrinos with charged leptons can be considered in the local limit 

197: by using the effective Lagrangian 

198: 

199: \begin{equation}

200: {\cal L} \, = \, \frac{G_F}{\sqrt 2} 

201: \big [ \bar \ell \gamma_{\alpha} (g_V - g_A \gamma_5) \ell \big ] \,

202: \big [ \bar \nu \gamma^{\alpha} (1 - \gamma_5) \nu \big ] \,,

203: \label{eq:L}

204: \end{equation}

205: 

206: \noindent where $g_V = \pm 1/2 + 2 sin^2 \theta_W, \, g_A = \pm 1/2$.

207: Here the upper signs correspond to the situation when the neutrino flavor 

208: coinsides with the lepton $\ell$ flavor ($\nu = \nu_\ell$), 

209: in this case both $Z$ and $W$ boson exchange takes part 

210: in a process. The lower signs correspond to the case 

211: $\nu = \nu_{\ell'}, \, \ell' \ne \ell$, when the $Z$ boson exchange 

212: is only presented in the Lagrangian~(\ref{eq:L}). 

213: 

214: We omit the details of calculations which can be found e.g. in our 

215: paper~\cite{KM97}, and present here the result for the probability 

216: in a form of the single integral containing the Airy function:

217: 

218: %

219: \begin{eqnarray}

220: w(\nu \to \nu \ell^- \ell^+) 

221:  = \, \frac{G_F^2 \,(g_V^2 + g_A^2) \,m_\ell^6 \,\chi_\ell^2}{27 \pi^4 E_\nu} 

222: \, \int\limits_0^1 u^2 d u \,z\, \Phi(z) 

223: \Bigg \lbrace {4 \over 1 - u^2} \left( 2 L(u) - {29 \over 24} \right) 

224: \nonumber \\

225: - {15 \over 2} L(u) - {47 \over 48} 

226: + {1 \over 8} 

227: \left(1 + (1 - u^2) L(u) \right) \left(33 - {47 \over 4}

228: (1 - u^2) \right) 

229: \nonumber \\

230: + {9 \over 16} \frac{g_A^2}{g_V^2 + g_A^2} 

231: \left[48 L(u) + 2 -

232: \left(1 + (1 - u^2) L(u) \right) \left(28 - 3 (1 - u^2) \right) 

233: \right] \Bigg \rbrace.

234: \label{eq:w1}

235: \end{eqnarray}

236: 

237: \noindent 

238: Here $\chi_\ell$ is the dynamical parameter of the lepton with the mass

239: $m_\ell$, 

240: 

241: \noindent 

242: $\chi_\ell = 

243: e (p_\alpha F_{\alpha \beta} F_{\beta \sigma} p_\sigma)^{1/2}/m_\ell^3$, 

244: $\Phi (z)$ is the Airy function

245: %

246: \begin{equation}

247: \Phi (z) \, = \, \int\limits_0^\infty d t \cos 

248: \left(z t + {t^3 \over 3} \right), \quad

249: z \, = \, \left( \frac{4}{\chi_\ell (1 - u^2)} \right)^{2/3}, \quad

250: L(u) \, = \, {1 \over 2 u} \ln {1 + u \over 1 - u}.

251: \label{eq:Phi}

252: \end{equation}

253: 

254: \noindent 

255: In the case when $\chi_\ell \ll 1$, one immediately obtains from 

256: Eq.~(\ref{eq:w1}) the formula for the probability containing the 

257: well-known exponential suppression:

258: %

259: \begin{equation}

260: w(\chi_\ell \ll 1)

261:  =  \frac{3 \, \sqrt{6} \, G_F^2 \, m_\ell^6}{(16 \pi)^3 E_\nu} \,

262: (3 g_V^2 + 13 g_A^2) \,

263: \chi_\ell^4 \, \exp \left(- {8 \over 3 \chi_\ell} \right),

264: \label{eq:w2}

265: \end{equation}

266: 

267: \noindent 

268: which agrees with corresponding formula of Ref.~\cite{Bor93}. 

269: 

270: In the case when $\chi_\ell \gg 1$, it is easy to obtain from 

271: Eq.~(\ref{eq:w1}) the formula~(\ref{eq:w0}), where $K = 1,\, 

272: \Delta = -29/24$, in agreement with the result of Ref.~\cite{KM97}. 

273: It is not difficult also to find from our Eq.~(\ref{eq:w1}) 

274: the next term of expansion over the inverse powers of the 

275: dynamical parameter $\chi_\ell$. One obtains:

276: %

277: \begin{eqnarray}

278: w(\chi_\ell \gg 1)

279: & = & \frac{G_F^2 \,(g_V^2 + g_A^2) \,m_\ell^6 \,\chi_\ell^2}{27 \pi^3 E_\nu} 

280: \, \bigg \lbrace \ln \chi_\ell - {1 \over 2} ln 3 - \gamma_E - {29 \over 24} 

281: \nonumber \\

282: & - & {1 \over \chi_\ell^{2/3}} \, {9 \over 56} \,

283: \frac{3^{1/3} \pi^2}{\left[\Gamma \left( {2 \over 3} \right) \right]^4}

284: \, \frac{19 g_V^2 - 63 g_A^2}{g_V^2 + g_A^2} 

285: \bigg \rbrace, 

286: \label{eq:w3}

287: \end{eqnarray}

288: 

289: \noindent where $\Gamma (x)$ is the gamma function.

290: 

291: It is seen from Eq.~(\ref{eq:w3}) that the correction term

292: $\sim \chi_\ell^{-2/3}$ is not universal. It is relatively small and 

293: negative in the case when the neutrino flavor coinsides with the charged 

294: lepton flavor $(\nu_e \to \nu_e e^- e^+, \, \nu_\mu \to \nu_\mu \mu^- \mu^+)$. 

295: When the flavors of the neutrino and of the charged lepton are different

296: $(\nu_\mu \to \nu_\mu e^- e^+, \, \nu_e \to \nu_e \mu^- \mu^+)$, 

297: the correction term is positive and relatively large.

298: 

299: The dependence of the probability of the process

300: $\nu \to \nu \ell^- \ell^+$ on the dynamical parameter $\chi_\ell$ 

301: in the region where its value is moderately large, is represented 

302: in Figs. 1 and 2. One can see that the correction term 

303: $\sim \chi_\ell^{-2/3}$ is more likely to worsen than to improve 

304: the presentation of the probability in this region. 

305: As the analysis shows, this term has a sense just 

306: of the correction for the values $\chi_\ell \gtrsim 10^5$ only. 

307: 

308: Therefore, our exact formula~(\ref{eq:w1}) should be used in a detailed 

309: analysis of the probability of the lepton pair production by a neutrino 

310: propagating in an external electromagnetic field, when the value of

311: the dynamical parameter $\chi_\ell$ is moderately large. 

312: 

313: \bigskip

314: 

315: \noindent 

316: {\bf Acknowledgements}  

317: 

318: We thank A.V.~Borisov for useful discussion which stimulated this research.

319: 

320: The work is supported in part by 

321: the Russian Foundation for Basic Research under the Grant N~98-02-16694.

322: 

323: \begin{thebibliography}{9}

324: \bibitem{Chob}

325:    E.A.~Choban, A.N.~Ivanov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 56 (1969) 194.

326: 

327: \bibitem{Bor83}

328:    A.V.~Borisov, V.Ch.~Zhukovskii, B.A.~Lysov, Izv. Vuz. Fiz. 8 (1983) 30 

329:    [Sov. Phys. J. 26 (1983) 701].

330: 

331: \bibitem{Knizh}

332:    M.Yu.~Knizhnikov, A.V.~Tatarintsev, Vestn. MGU, ser. Fiz., Astron. 

333:    25, N 3 (1984) 26.

334: 

335: \bibitem{Bor93}

336:    A.V.~Borisov, A.I.~Ternov, V.Ch.~Zhukovsky, Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 489. 

337: 

338: \bibitem{KM97}

339:    A.V.~Kuznetsov, N.V.~Mikheev, Phys. Lett. B 394 (1997) 123; 

340:    Yad. Fiz. 60 (1997) 2038 [Phys. At. Nucl. 60 (1997) 1865].

341: 

342: \bibitem{Skob95}

343:    V.V.~Skobelev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 108 (1995) 3 [JETP 81 (1995) 1].

344: 

345: \bibitem{Bor99}

346:    A.V.~Borisov, N.B.~Zamorin, Yad. Fiz. 62 (1999) 1647.

347: 

348: \end{thebibliography}

349: 

350: \bigskip

351: 

352: \centerline{\bf Figure captions}

353: 

354: \bigskip

355: 

356: {\bf Fig. 1}

357: 

358: The dependence of the probability of the process

359: $\nu \to \nu \ell^- \ell^+$ on the moderately large

360: dynamical parameter $\chi_\ell$ in the case when the neutrino flavor 

361: coinsides with the charged lepton flavor 

362: $(\nu_e \to \nu_e e^- e^+, \, \dots)$:

363: {\it a)} from the exact formula~(\ref{eq:w1});

364: {\it b)} from the approximate formula~(\ref{eq:w0});

365: {\it c)} from the formula~(\ref{eq:w3}) with the 'correction'

366: $\sim \chi_\ell^{-2/3}$.

367: 

368: \bigskip

369: 

370: {\bf Fig. 2}

371: 

372: The same as in Fig. 1, in the case when the flavors of the neutrino and 

373: of the charged lepton are different

374: $(\nu_\mu \to \nu_\mu e^- e^+, \, \dots)$.

375:  

376: \newpage

377: \thispagestyle{empty}

378: 

379: \begin{figure}[ht]

380: \epsffile[122 270 483 701]{nullfi1.ps}

381: \caption{A.V.~Kuznetsov et al., ``Lepton pair production \dots''}

382: \end{figure}

383: 

384: \newpage

385: \thispagestyle{empty}

386: 

387: \begin{figure}[ht]

388: \epsffile[122 270 483 701]{nullfi2.ps}

389: \caption{A.V.~Kuznetsov et al., ``Lepton pair production \dots''}

390: \end{figure}

391: 

392: \end{document}

393: