1: \chapter{Summary\label{chap:sum}}
2:
3: \vfill
4: In this thesis we have presented the first complete NLO QCD calculation
5: of the spin-dependent production of heavy quarks in collisions of
6: (point-like) photons and hadrons. Furthermore, we have included
7: our work on the spin-dependent hadroproduction of heavy
8: quarks. In order to obtain the full NLO QCD corrections
9: for the latter reaction, we still have to
10: sum and simplify the already calculated gluon-gluon virtual
11: loop contributions. All other partonic cross sections of these
12: two processes have been completed and are documented here.
13: We have tried to provide a sort of mini-review of the
14: methods applied in our calculation: On one hand, we explain how they
15: are derived from the basic framework of (perturbative) QCD.
16: On the other hand, we demonstrate how they are used efficiently
17: in practice. To the best of our knowledge, some of the techniques
18: have not been explained before either in detail, like the
19: automatic partial fractioning of angular variables, or at all,
20: like the systematic expansion of hypergeometric functions.
21: We hope that it will prove advantageous for future
22: perturbative QCD calculations that all the needed
23: methods now have been collected in one reference.
24:
25: Our main goal has been
26: to provide the theoretical basis for an experimental determination
27: of the polarized gluon distribution $\Delta g$ in open heavy quark
28: production.
29: For this reason we have presented predictions
30: for spin asymmetries at experiments that will either take data soon
31: (COMPASS \cite{cit:com1,*cit:com2} and RHIC
32: \cite{cit:rhic1,*cit:rhic2,*cit:rhic3,*cit:rhic4})
33: or have a chance to be realized in the near
34: future (polarized HERA \cite{cit:herapol}).
35: We have improved our previous hadron level predictions
36: \cite{cit:letter,cit:long} by investigating the theoretical
37: uncertainties due to the not precisely known heavy quark (pole) mass
38: and by using cuts on the transverse momentum to enhance the spin
39: asymmetries.
40: One should keep in mind that
41: our NLO calculations are indispensable
42: for a meaningful interpretation of future experimental data:
43: First, our NLO predictions are much more
44: stable against variations of the renormalization and factorization
45: scales than the LO ones.
46: Second, in the reactions considered here
47: several Feynman graph topologies occur
48: for the first time in NLO, which
49: yield large contributions both close to the production threshold and at
50: high energies. Thus LO calculations may be misleading
51: and should ultimately be replaced by NLO ones.
52: Finally, we have discussed in this paper the current
53: state of comparisons between theory
54: and experimental data in the analogous unpolarized case. From this
55: discussion
56: we conclude that a measurement of only the {\em ratio} of polarized and
57: unpolarized cross sections will not be sufficient.
58: The unpolarized cross section itself has to be measured,
59: if our goal to determine $\Delta g$ is to remain realistic.
60:
61: After this general overview, we now give
62: a brief description of the salient features
63: of our work chapter by chapter.
64: In the introduction we have emphasized that
65: the full QCD improved parton model is required to describe
66: experimental data on the spin of the nucleon and that
67: the polarized gluon distribution
68: $\Delta g$ represents the major remaining uncertainty of
69: this model. Polarized exclusive reactions can be used
70: to determine $\Delta g$ better and
71: open heavy quark production is our suggestion.
72: \chf{chap:born} shows how one can
73: obtain polarized and unpolarized cross sections simultaneously
74: by projecting onto helicities,
75: which makes checks against previous unpolarized calculations
76: possible. Also the LO cross sections and the
77: $2\rightarrow 2$ phase space have been derived there in
78: $n=4+\vep$ dimensions for later use with the
79: dimensionally regulated NLO pieces.
80:
81: The treatment of the
82: virtual loops occurring in NLO has been elucidated
83: in the next chapter.
84: The Passarino-Veltman decomposition \cite{cit:passvelt} of the
85: occurring tensor integrals has been derived
86: there. This decomposition is simple in principle, but the results are very
87: lengthy. Take for illustration a
88: 4PF tensor integral of third rank, it has
89: thirteen different Lorentz covariant structures, so one has
90: to calculate thirteen parts for just one matrix element.
91: Each of these parts is multiplied by a scalar coefficient, which
92: is in general a complicated function of basic
93: scalar integrals, invariants, and in particular also of
94: the heavy quark mass.
95: We have constructed a program that computes these coefficients, have
96: checked the lengthy general expressions, and
97: have simplified them for each specific
98: case. Second, the re-calculation of all the needed basic
99: scalar integrals \cite{cit:bkns}, which we have included here,
100: was non-trivial in the case of vertex and
101: box integrals. The main problems are the calculation in
102: non-integer $4+\vep$ dimensions, the branch cuts of the occurring
103: functions, and the increased complexity of the integral kernels due to
104: the non-vanishing heavy quark mass.
105:
106: In \chf{chap:renorm} we have spent some time on the renormalization
107: procedure, since the $\msbm$ scheme we employ is widely used, but not
108: well documented in the literature. We have demonstrated how
109: subtracting the heavy quark loop part of the gluon
110: self-energy changes the running of the strong coupling constant
111: $\alps$, so that only light flavors contribute.
112: Furthermore, we have explicitly
113: shown how the commonly used effective renormalization
114: formula for the coupling constant sums up all the counterterms,
115: except for the one connected to mass renormalization. So
116: mass renormalization has to be performed separately.
117: Our treatment of the real
118: contributions has been expounded in the next chapter.
119: Since we have used the HVBM scheme \cite{cit:hvbm1,*cit:hvbm2} for
120: extending $\gamma_5$ and $\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$
121: to $n\/$-dimensions, we first had to generalize
122: the $n\/$-dimensional $2\rightarrow 3$ phase space integration
123: by deriving an integral operator for the ensuing $\vep\/$-dimensional
124: ``hat-space'' terms.
125:
126: In addition, we have created a program
127: which {\em automatically} rewrites the phase space
128: integration over the six different angular Mandelstam variables as a sum
129: of basic angular integrals. Extensive partial fractioning is needed
130: for this and we have explained the procedure in detail.
131: We have also recalculated the needed basic angular integrals
132: \cite{cit:bkns} here, explaining how ``tricks'' can be used to
133: reduce their number considerably. Most of the
134: integrals have been extended to ${\cal O}(\vep)$, which
135: may prove useful for future calculations.
136: Finally, we have demonstrated in this chapter
137: how phase space slicing isolates the
138: soft real singularities, so that they can be canceled
139: analytically against the infrared virtual ones.
140:
141: Mass factorization is another topic which is seldomly explored in
142: detail. So in \chf{chap:mfak} we have bridged the gap between
143: the general formulae and the practical prescriptions by exhibiting
144: the factorization of collinear singularities for
145: one of our subprocesses. This also enables us to
146: derive the LO renormalization group equations.
147: Naturally we have compiled the other needed factorization formulae
148: as well. In the next chapter we have
149: calculated the other subprocesses. In each case we have shown
150: the needed set of Feynman diagrams and the
151: final parton level results.
152: In order to facilitate comparisons with our
153: calculation, we have displayed the total partonic cross sections for each
154: of the subprocesses.
155: Furthermore we have analyzed the properties of these partonic
156: cross sections, in particular their spin dependence and size
157: at threshold and at high energies.
158:
159: We have checked our unpolarized
160: results either analytically (for the virtual plus ``soft'' real part)
161: or numerically (for the ``hard'' real part) against previous
162: unpolarized calculations \cite{cit:bkns,cit:smith3,cit:smne}.
163: Also the ``abelian'' parts
164: of $\vec{g}\vec{\gamma}\rightarrow\overline{Q}$
165: have been compared with the polarized and
166: unpolarized NLO results
167: for $\vec{\gamma}\vec{\gamma}\rightarrow\overline{Q}$
168: \cite{cit:ngg1,*cit:ngg2}. Finally, we have checked
169: each subprocess separately
170: against the almost completely independent calculation of
171: Dr. M. Stratmann: First, the matrix elements
172: have been compared analytically. Second, the
173: agreement after integration (loop and phase space, respectively),
174: has been tested. Third, the programs for the partonic
175: cross sections (and later for the hadron level predictions)
176: give the same results.
177: The {\tt Fortran} source code of our photoproduction program,
178: which includes a simple script based user interface for future use
179: by other people, is about 100~KByte long.
180: Considerable time has been spent on testing the program,
181: for example by re-inserting
182: all the programmed {\tt Fortran} partonic cross sections into
183: {\tt Mathematica} and comparing them with the original
184: results\footnote{Very recently a second calculation of the complete NLO QCD
185: corrections to polarized photoproduction has been
186: finished \cite{cit:newco}. Their virtual, soft, and collinear
187: contributions are in full agreement \cite{cit:newco}. However,
188: in {\em numerical} comparisons at the {\em hadron} level
189: differences of a few percent are seen \cite{cit:newco}.
190: In order to pin down the origin of these minor discrepancies, we hope
191: that the authors of \cite{cit:newco} will publish details about their
192: {\em parton} level results and about comparisons of their
193: unpolarized results to previous unpolarized calculations.}.
194:
195: The final chapter then considers the hadron level and the
196: main points already have been discussed above. In the appendices we
197: have collected some technical material. In particular
198: \apf{chap:tricks} contains additional
199: topics of general interest, for
200: example the automatic calculation of color factors.
201: To sum up, we have presented NLO QCD calculations that will be
202: used to interpret experimental results very soon. It is probable
203: that our knowledge about the polarized gluon distribution
204: $\Delta g$, and thus of the spin of the nucleon, will be improved
205: considerably by the experimental measurements and
206: their theoretical analysis in NLO QCD.
207: