1: %%UNIX --- UPDATED ON 13/8/97
2: %====================================================================%
3: % sprocl.tex 27-Feb-1995 %
4: % This latex file rewritten from various sources for use in the %
5: % preparation of the standard proceedings Volume, latest version %
6: % by Susan Hezlet with acknowledgments to Lukas Nellen. %
7: % Some changes are due to David Cassel. %
8: %====================================================================%
9:
10: \documentstyle[sprocl]{article}
11:
12: \font\eightrm=cmr8
13:
14: \input{psfig}
15:
16: \bibliographystyle{unsrt} %for BibTeX - sorted numerical labels by
17: %order of first citation.
18:
19: \arraycolsep1.5pt
20:
21: % A useful Journal macro
22: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}
23:
24: % Some useful journal names
25: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}
26: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
27: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}
28: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}
29: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.} B}
30: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}
31: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}
32: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} C}
33:
34: % Some other macros used in the sample text
35: \def\st{\scriptstyle}
36: \def\sst{\scriptscriptstyle}
37: \def\mco{\multicolumn}
38: \def\epp{\epsilon^{\prime}}
39: \def\vep{\varepsilon}
40: \def\ra{\rightarrow}
41: \def\ppg{\pi^+\pi^-\gamma}
42: \def\vp{{\bf p}}
43: \def\ko{K^0}
44: \def\kb{\bar{K^0}}
45: \def\al{\alpha}
46: \def\ab{\bar{\alpha}}
47: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
48: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
49: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
50: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
51: \def\CPbar{\hbox{{\rm CP}\hskip-1.80em{/}}}%temp replacemt due to no font
52:
53: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
54: %%BEGINNING OF TEXT
55: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
56:
57: \begin{document}
58:
59: \title{
60: Prompt $J/\psi$ Polarization
61: at the Tevatron}
62:
63: \author{Jungil Lee\footnote{
64: Talk given at 5th Workshop on QCD,
65: 3-7 January 2000, Villefranche-sur-Mer, France.
66: }}
67:
68: \address{II. Institute of Theoretical Physics,\\
69: University of Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany\\
70: E-mail: jungil@mail.desy.de}
71: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72: % You may repeat \author \address as often as necessary %
73: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
74:
75: \maketitle\abstracts{
76: The polarization of prompt $J/\psi$ at the Tevatron is calculated
77: within the nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD) factorization framework.
78: The contribution from radiative decays of P-wave charmonium states decreases,
79: but does not eliminate,
80: the transverse polarization at large transverse momentum.
81: The prediction agrees with measurements
82: from the CDF collaboration at intermediate values of $p_T$,
83: but disagrees at the large values of $p_T$ measured.
84: }
85:
86: The NRQCD factorization approach to inclusive quarkonium
87: production~\cite{B-B-L}
88: makes the remarkable prediction that in hadron collisions
89: $J^{PC} = 1^{--}$ quarkonium states
90: should be transversely polarized at large $p_T$~\cite{Cho-Wise}.
91: In high-energy $p \bar p$ collisions,
92: the dominant contribution to the charmonium production rate at large $p_T$
93: comes from gluon {\it fragmentation}~\cite{B-F}.
94: At leading order in $\alpha_s$,
95: a $Q \overline{Q}$ pair with small relative momentum
96: created by the virtual gluon is
97: in a color-octet $^3S_1$ state
98: with the same transverse polarization as the almost on-shell gluon.
99: Due to the approximate heavy quark spin symmetry of NRQCD,
100: $1^{--}$ quarkonium states from the pair should have a
101: large transverse polarization at sufficiently large $p_T$.
102: Recent measurements at the Tevatron by the CDF collaboration seem to be in
103: contradiction with this prediction~\cite{CDF-psipol}.
104:
105: A convenient measure of the polarization is
106: $\alpha = (T-2L)/(T+2L)$, where $T$ and $L$ are the transverse
107: and longitudinal polarization fractions in the hadron CM frame.
108: The variable $\alpha$
109: describes the angular distribution of leptons from the decay
110: of the $J/\psi$ with respect to the $J/\psi$ momentum.
111: Beneke and Rothstein studied the dominant fragmentation mechanisms for
112: producing longitudinally polarized $1^{--}$ states~\cite{Beneke-Rothstein}.
113: For charmonium production at the Tevatron,
114: one should also take into account the {\it fusion}
115: contributions from parton processes $i j \to c \bar c + k$
116: since fragmentation does not yet dominate for most of the $p_T$ region.
117: The polarization variable $\alpha$
118: for direct $J/\psi$ and direct $\psi'$ at the Tevatron
119: have been predicted by Beneke and
120: Kr\"amer~\cite{Beneke-Kramer} and by Leibovich~\cite{Leibovich}.
121: They predicted that $\alpha$ should be small for $p_T$ below about 5 GeV,
122: but then should begin to rise dramatically.
123: On the contrary, the CDF data shows no sign of transverse polarization
124: of direct $\psi'$
125: at large $p_T$~\cite{CDF-psipol}.
126:
127: The CDF collaboration has also measured the
128: polarization of {\it prompt} $J/\psi$~\cite{CDF-psipol}
129: ({\it i.e.} $J/\psi$'s that do not come from the decay of $B$ hadrons).
130: The advantage of this measurement is that the number of $J/\psi$ events
131: is larger than for $\psi'$ by a factor of about 100.
132: On the other hand, theoretical predictions of the polarization of
133: prompt $J/\psi$ are complicated since the prompt signal includes
134: $J/\psi$'s that come from decays of the higher charmonium
135: states $\chi_{c1}$, $\chi_{c2}$, and $\psi'$~\cite{CDF-chi,CDF-chi12}.
136: The polarization of $J/\psi$ from $\psi'$ not via $\chi_c$ is
137: straightforward to calculate, since the spin is unchanged by the transition.
138: The polarization of $J/\psi$ from $\chi_c$ and of
139: $J/\psi$ from $\psi'$ via $\chi_c$ is more complicated,
140: because the $\chi_{cJ}$'s are produced in various spin states
141: and they decay into $J/\psi$ through radiative transitions~\cite{BKL}.
142: Therefore, it is interesting to investigate the cascade effect in this problem.
143:
144: The {\it NRQCD factorization formula} for the differential cross section for
145: the inclusive production of a charmonium state $H$ of momentum $P$
146: and spin quantum number $\lambda$ has the schematic form
147: %----------------------
148: \begin{equation}
149: d \sigma^{H_\lambda(P)} \;=\;
150: d \sigma^{c \bar c_n(P)} \;
151: \langle O^{H_\lambda(P)}_n \rangle,
152: \label{sig-fact}
153: \end{equation}
154: %----------------------
155: where the implied sum on $n$ extends over
156: all the color and angular momentum states of the $c\bar c$ pair.
157: The $c \bar c$ cross sections $d \sigma^{c \bar c_n}$, which are independent of
158: $H$, can be calculated using perturbative QCD.
159: All dependence on the state $H$ is contained within the
160: nonperturbative NRQCD matrix elements(ME's)
161: $\langle O^{H_\lambda(P)}_n \rangle$.
162: The Lorentz indices, which are suppressed in (\ref{sig-fact}),
163: are contracted with those of $d \sigma^{c \bar c_n}$
164: to give a scalar cross section.
165: The symmetries of NRQCD can be used to reduce
166: the tensor ME's $\langle O^{H_\lambda(P)}_n \rangle$
167: to scalar ME's $\langle O^H_n \rangle$ that are
168: independent of $P$ and $\lambda$.
169: One may calculate the cross section for polarized quarkonium
170: once the relevant scalar ME's are known.
171:
172: In $p \bar p$ collisions, the parton processes that dominate the
173: $c \bar c$ cross section depend on $p_T$.
174: If $p_T$ is of order $m_c$, the {\it fusion} processes dominate.
175: These include the parton processes $i j \to c \bar c + k$,
176: with $i,j=g,q,\bar q$ and $q = u,d,s$.
177: At $p_T$ much larger than $m_c$,
178: the parton cross sections are dominated by
179: {\it fragmentation} processes.
180: To get a consistent LO evaluation of polarization parameter $\alpha$
181: in this region, one should take care.
182: Since we are interested in the LO prediction of $\alpha$, we should first
183: get a LO prediction of longitudinal fraction $L/(T+L)$.
184: The LO contributions to $L$ are order-$\alpha_s^2$
185: processes $g\to c\overline{c}+g$, while the only
186: contribution to $T$ is the order-$\alpha_s$ process
187: $g \to c \bar c_8(^3S_1)$ \cite{Beneke-Rothstein}.
188: Inclusion of the longitudinal part in the fragmentation process is
189: crucial in the calculation of $\alpha$ even though it has only a small
190: contribution to the total cross section.
191: The fragmentation function is evolved using the
192: standard homogeneous timelike evolution equation.
193: Since $c \bar c_8(^3S_1)\to \psi_\lambda(nS)$ is included in both
194: the fragmentation and the fusion process, we interpolate
195: between the fusion cross section at low $p_T$ and the fragmentation
196: cross section at high $p_T$~\cite{BKL,Cho-Leibovich}.
197: In all the other $c \bar c\to H$ channels, we use the fusion cross section.
198:
199: The color-singlet ME's can be determined
200: phenomenologically from the decay rates for
201: $\psi(nS)\to \ell^+\ell^-$ and $\chi_{c2}\to\gamma\gamma$~\cite{Maltoni}.
202: The color-octet ME's are phenomenological
203: parameters and they are determined from production data at the
204: Tevatron~\cite{CDF-psi,CDF-chi}.
205: In case of $\chi_{c}$,
206: we have a good agreement with the CDF data on the ratio
207: $\chi_{c1}/\chi_{c2}$~\cite{CDF-chi12}.
208: More details on the analysis methods are explained in
209: Refs.~\cite{BKL,Kniehl-Kramer}.
210: There are numerous theoretical uncertainties in the polarization
211: calculation. In our analysis, we allow the variations in
212: PDF (CTEQ5L and MRST98LO)~\cite{PDF},
213: factorization and fragmentation scales ($\mu_T/2- 2\mu_T$),
214: charm quark mass ($1.45-1.55$ GeV), respectively,
215: where $\mu_T = (4 m_c^2 + p_T^2)^{1/2}$.
216: We also take into account the uncertainties in the ME's,
217: $\langle O_8(^1S_0) \rangle$ and
218: $\langle O_8(^3P_0) \rangle$~\cite{BKL}.
219:
220: \begin{figure}
221: \begin{center}
222: \begin{tabular}{c}
223: \psfig{file=lee1a.epsi,height=7.8cm}\\
224: \psfig{file=lee1b.epsi,height=7.8cm}
225: \end{tabular}
226: \end{center}
227: \caption{
228: Polarization variable $\alpha$ vs. $p_T$
229: for (a) direct $\psi'$ and (b) prompt $J/\psi$
230: compared to CDF data.
231: }
232: \end{figure}
233:
234: Let us compare our results for $\alpha$ with the CDF data.
235: We present our result in the form of an error band obtained by
236: combining in quadrature all the theoretical errors described previously.
237: In Fig.~1(a), we compare our result for direct $\psi'$
238: as a function of $p_T$ with the CDF data~\cite{CDF-psipol}.
239: But the error bars in the CDF data are too large to draw any
240: definitive conclusions.
241: We next consider the polarization variable $\alpha$ for prompt $J/\psi$.
242: The method for calculating cascade effect in prompt $J/\psi$ polarization
243: is explained in Ref.~\cite{BKL}.
244: In Fig.~1(b), we compare our result for $\alpha$
245: as a function of $p_T$ with the CDF data~\cite{CDF-psipol}.
246: Our result for $\alpha$ is small around $p_T=5$ GeV, but it increases
247: with $p_T$.
248: Our result is in good agreement with the CDF measurement
249: at intermediate values of $p_T$,
250: but it disagrees
251: in the highest $p_T$ bin, where the CDF measurement is consistent with 0.
252: The solid lines in Fig.~1(b) are the central curves of $\alpha$ for
253: direct $J/\psi$ and for $J/\psi$ from $\chi_c$.
254: The $\alpha$ for direct $J/\psi$ is smaller than that
255: for direct $\psi'$, because the ME's are different~\cite{BKL}.
256: In the moderate $p_T$ region,
257: the contributions from $\psi'$ and from $\chi_c$ add to give an increase
258: in the transverse polarization of prompt $J/\psi$
259: compared to direct $J/\psi$. In the high $p_T$ region,
260: the contributions from $\psi'$ and $\chi_c$ tend to cancel.
261:
262: The CDF measurement of the polarization of prompt $J/\psi$
263: presents a serious challenge to the NRQCD factorization formalism
264: for inclusive quarkonium production.
265: The qualitative prediction that $\alpha$ should increase
266: at large $p_T$ seems inescapable.
267: However, it is still worthwhile to investigate the NLO effect
268: in the fragmentation processes, since the dramatic discrepancy appears
269: at large $p_T$.
270: Recently, Braaten and Lee performed the full NLO calculation of the
271: color-octet $^3S_1$ gluon fragmentation function
272: for polarized heavy quarkonium~\cite{BL}.
273: It is not sufficient to get NLO prediction of $\alpha$, but one can first
274: study the production rate at large $p_T$ in NLO accuracy.
275:
276: In Run II of the Tevatron, the data sample for $J/\psi$ should be
277: more than an order of magnitude larger than in Run I,
278: which will allow both the production rate and the polarization
279: to be measured with higher precision and out to larger values of $p_T$.
280: If the result continues to disagree with the predictions
281: of the NRQCD factorization approach, it would indicate a serious flaw in our
282: understanding of inclusive charmonium production.
283: The predictions of low-order perturbative QCD for the
284: spin-dependence of $c \bar c$ cross sections could be wrong,
285: or the use of NRQCD to understand the systematics
286: of the formation of charmonium from the $c \bar c$ pair could be flawed,
287: or $m_c$ could simply be too small to apply
288: the factorization approach to the charmonium system.
289:
290:
291: \section*{Acknowledgments}
292: The author thanks Eric Braaten and Bernd A. Kniehl for their enjoyable
293: collaboration on the subject discussed here.
294: This work was supported in part by
295: the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
296:
297:
298: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% REFERENCES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
299: %%\baselineskip=22pt
300: \section*{References}
301: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
302:
303: \bibitem{B-B-L}
304: G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, and G.P. Lepage, \Journal{\PRD}{51}{1125}{1995};
305: {\bf 55}, 5855(E) (1997).
306:
307: \bibitem{Cho-Wise}
308: P. Cho and M.B. Wise, \Journal{\PLB}{346}{129}{1995}.
309:
310:
311: \bibitem{B-F}
312: E. Braaten and S. Fleming, \Journal{\PRL}{74}{3327}{1995}.
313:
314: \bibitem{CDF-psipol} CDF Collaboration, hep-ex/0004027.
315:
316: \bibitem{Beneke-Rothstein}
317: M. Beneke and I.Z. Rothstein, \Journal{\PLB}{372}{157}{1996};
318: {\bf 389}, 769(E) (1996).
319:
320: \bibitem{Beneke-Kramer}
321: M. Beneke and M. Kr\"amer, \Journal{\PRD}{55}{5269}{1997}.
322:
323: \bibitem{Leibovich}
324: A. Leibovich, \Journal{\PRD}{56}{4412}{1997}.
325:
326: \bibitem{CDF-chi} CDF Collaboration, \Journal{\PRL}{79}{578}{1997}.
327: \bibitem{CDF-chi12} CDF Collaboration, CDF Note 3121.
328:
329: \bibitem{BKL}E. Braaten, B. Kniehl and J. Lee, hep-ph/9911436.
330:
331: \bibitem{Cho-Leibovich}
332: P. Cho and A. Leibovich, \Journal{\PRD}{53}{150}{1996};
333: {\it ibid.} {\bf 53}, 6203 (1996).
334: \bibitem{Maltoni}
335: F. Maltoni, private communication
336: on world average of $\Gamma(\chi_{c2}\to\gamma\gamma)$.
337:
338: \bibitem{CDF-psi}
339: CDF Collaboration, \Journal{\PRL}{79}{572}{1997}.
340:
341: \bibitem{Kniehl-Kramer}
342: B.A. Kniehl and G. Kramer, {\it Eur. Phys. J.} {\bf C 6}, 493 (1999);
343: \Journal{\PRD}{60}{014006}{1996}.
344:
345: \bibitem{PDF}
346: A.D. Martin, R.G. Roberts, W.J. Stirling, and R.S. Thorne,
347: {\it Eur. Phys. J.} {\bf C 4}, 463 (1998);
348: CTEQ Collaboration, hep-ph/9903282.
349:
350: \bibitem{BL}
351: E. Braaten and J. Lee, hep-ph/0004228.
352:
353: \end{thebibliography}
354: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
355: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
356: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
357: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
358: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
359: \end{document}
360:
361: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
362: %% End of sprocl.tex
363: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
364:
365:
366:
367:
368: