1: \documentstyle[prd,preprint,tighten,aps,%
2: amssymb,amsfonts,newlfont,graphicx]{revtex}
3: %\bibliographystyle{physrev3}
4: \begin{document}
5: \draft
6: \preprint{
7: \begin{tabular}{r}
8: DFTT 23/00
9: \\
10: arXiv:hep-ph/0006026
11: \end{tabular}
12: }
13: \title{Statistical treatment of detection cross-section uncertainties in
14: the analysis of solar neutrino data}
15: \author{M.V. Garzelli and C. Giunti}
16: \address{INFN, Sez. di Torino, and Dip. di Fisica Teorica,
17: Univ. di Torino, I--10125 Torino, Italy}
18: \date{June 13, 2000}
19: \maketitle
20: \begin{abstract}
21: We propose a modification to the standard
22: statistical treatment of the detection cross-section uncertainties in
23: the analysis of solar neutrino data.
24: We argue that the uncertainties
25: of the energy-averaged cross sections of the different
26: neutrino fluxes in the same experiment
27: should be treated as correlated.
28: We show that the resulting allowed regions for the
29: neutrino oscillation parameters are significantly larger
30: than the ones obtained with uncorrelated uncertainties.
31: \end{abstract}
32: \pacs{PACS numbers: 26.65.+t, 14.60.Pq, 14.60.Lm}
33:
34: The discrepancy between solar neutrino data
35: \cite{Homestake-98,GALLEX-99,SAGE-99,SK-sun-lp99}
36: and the predictions of the Standard Solar Model (SSM)
37: \cite{BP98},
38: known as the ``solar neutrino problem'',
39: represents one of the evidences
40: in favor of neutrino oscillations (see \cite{BGG-review-98}).
41: The statistical analysis of solar neutrino data
42: allow to obtain information
43: on the values of the neutrino oscillation parameters.
44: The latest solar neutrino data
45: \cite{Homestake-98,GALLEX-99,SAGE-99,SK-sun-lp99}
46: have been analyzed in the framework of two-neutrino mixing
47: \cite{Concha-sun-99,%
48: Bahcall-Krastev-Smirnov-SNO-99,%
49: Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-3nu-00},
50: three-neutrino mixing
51: \cite{Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-3nu-00}
52: and
53: four-neutrino mixing
54: \cite{Concha-foursolar-00}.
55:
56: One of the crucial ingredients in the analysis of solar neutrino data
57: is the calculation of the statistical covariance matrix $V$
58: of the uncertainties.
59: This matrix determines the $\chi^2$ of the fit through the formula
60: \begin{equation}
61: \chi^2
62: =
63: \sum_{j_1,j_2}
64: \left( R^{\mathrm{(thr)}}_{j_1} - R^{\mathrm{(exp)}}_{j_1} \right)
65: (V^{-1})_{j_1j_2}
66: \left( R^{\mathrm{(thr)}}_{j_2} - R^{\mathrm{(exp)}}_{j_2} \right)
67: \,.
68: \label{chi2}
69: \end{equation}
70: Here
71: $R^{\mathrm{(exp)}}_{j}$
72: is the event rate measured in the $j^{\mathrm{th}}$ experiment
73: and
74: $R^{\mathrm{(thr)}}_{j}$
75: is the corresponding theoretical event rate,
76: that depends on the neutrino fluxes predicted by the SSM
77: and on the properties of neutrinos that modify the flux along the
78: neutrino propagation.
79: In the case of two-neutrino oscillations the
80: theoretical event rate
81: depends on the mass-squared difference
82: $\Delta m^2 \equiv m_2^2 - m_1^2$
83: and on the mixing angle $\vartheta$
84: (see \cite{BGG-review-98}).
85:
86: The covariance matrix $V$
87: includes the uncertainties of the experimental rates $R^{\mathrm{(exp)}}_{j}$,
88: and
89: the uncertainties of the theoretical rates $R^{\mathrm{(thr)}}_{j}$,
90: quantified by the experimental and theoretical covariance matrices
91: $V^{\mathrm{(exp)}}$
92: and
93: $V^{\mathrm{(thr)}}$,
94: respectively.
95: Since experimental and theoretical errors are independent,
96: the corresponding uncertainties can be added in quadrature:
97: \begin{equation}
98: V
99: =
100: V^{\mathrm{(exp)}}
101: +
102: V^{\mathrm{(thr)}}
103: \,.
104: \label{V}
105: \end{equation}
106:
107: Here we are concerned with the covariance matrix of theoretical uncertainties,
108: $V^{\mathrm{(thr)}}$,
109: that can be written as the sum of two independent contributions,
110: \begin{equation}
111: V^{\mathrm{(thr)}}
112: =
113: V^{\mathrm{(cs)}}
114: +
115: V^{\mathrm{(fx)}}
116: \,,
117: \label{Vth}
118: \end{equation}
119: where
120: $V^{\mathrm{(cs)}}$
121: is the covariance matrix of the errors due to the uncertainties
122: of the detection cross sections
123: and
124: $V^{\mathrm{(fx)}}$
125: is the covariance matrix of the errors due to the uncertainties
126: of the neutrino fluxes.
127: Very convenient expressions for these matrices have been presented in
128: Refs.~\cite{Fogli-Lisi-correlations-95,Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-3nu-00}.
129: These expressions have been used by many authors
130: for the statistical analysis of solar neutrino data
131: in terms of neutrino oscillations
132: \cite{Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-3nu-00,%
133: Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-Quasi-vacuum-00,%
134: Bahcall-Krastev-Smirnov-SNO-99,%
135: Concha-sun-99,%
136: Concha-foursolar-00,%
137: Concha-dark-00,%
138: Friedland-vo-00,%
139: Friedland-dark-00}.
140:
141: Here we would like to examine closely the expression
142: given in
143: \cite{Fogli-Lisi-correlations-95,Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-3nu-00}
144: for the covariance matrix of the detection cross section:
145: \begin{equation}
146: V^{\mathrm{(cs)}}_{j_1j_2}
147: =
148: \delta_{j_1j_2}
149: \sum_{i} \left( R_{ij_1}^{\mathrm{(thr)}} \Delta\ln C_{ij_1} \right)^2
150: \,,
151: \label{Vcs1}
152: \end{equation}
153: where
154: $R_{ij}$
155: is the event rate in the detector $j$
156: due to the neutrino flux produced in the $i^{\mathrm{th}}$
157: thermonuclear reaction in the sun
158: ($i=pp,pep,\mathrm{He}p,\mathrm{Be},\mathrm{B},
159: \mathrm{N},\mathrm{O},\mathrm{F}$)
160: and
161: $C_{ij}$
162: is the corresponding energy-averaged cross section.
163: The quantity
164: $
165: \Delta\ln C_{ij}
166: =
167: \Delta C_{ij} / C_{ij}
168: $
169: is the relative uncertainty
170: of the cross section $C_{ij}$,
171: whose value is given in Ref.~\cite{Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-3nu-00}.
172:
173: The expression (\ref{Vcs1})
174: is based on two assumptions:
175: 1) the errors of the detection cross sections in different experiment
176: are independent;
177: 2) the errors of energy-averaged cross section of the different
178: neutrino fluxes in the same experiment are uncorrelated.
179: Indeed,
180: in Eq.~(\ref{Vcs1})
181: the errors of energy-averaged cross section of the different
182: neutrino fluxes in the same experiment,
183: $R_{ij}^{\mathrm{(thr)}} \Delta\ln C_{ij}$,
184: are added in quadrature to the corresponding diagonal element
185: $V^{\mathrm{(cs)}}_{jj}$.
186:
187: We think that the first assumption is appropriate,
188: but the second one is questionable.
189: This is due to the fact that
190: the correlations
191: between the uncertainties of each detection cross section
192: at different energies is not known.
193: Moreover,
194: the uncertainties of the energy-averaged cross section of the
195: neutrino fluxes that have an overlap of energy ranges
196: are certainly not uncorrelated.
197:
198: Since the correlations of
199: the errors of energy-averaged cross section of the different
200: neutrino fluxes in the same experiment
201: are not known,
202: the correct attitude consists in adopting the most conservative approach,
203: assuming a complete correlation.
204: In this case the errors must be added linearly:
205: \begin{equation}
206: V^{\mathrm{(cs)}}_{j_1j_2}
207: =
208: \delta_{j_1j_2}
209: \left( \sum_{i} R_{ij_1}^{\mathrm{(thr)}} \Delta\ln C_{ij_1} \right)^2
210: \,.
211: \label{Vcs2}
212: \end{equation}
213: This approach has been also recommended in
214: Ref.~\cite{Bahcall-gallium-97},
215: that is the standard reference
216: for the detection cross section in Gallium experiments.
217: Let us notice that it reflects a rather realistic possibility:
218: that in which the errors of the cross section
219: in a given experiment have the same sign at all energies.
220:
221: We have performed a fit of the total rates
222: measured in solar neutrino experiments
223: in terms of oscillations between two active neutrinos
224: ($\nu_e\to\nu_\mu$ or $\nu_e\to\nu_\tau$)
225: in order to study the change of the
226: allowed regions for the neutrino oscillation parameters
227: $\Delta{m}^2$ and $\vartheta$
228: when the expression (\ref{Vcs2}) for
229: $V^{\mathrm{(cs)}}$ is used in place of Eq.~(\ref{Vcs1}).
230: The results of our fits are presented in
231: Figs.~\ref{msw-unc}--\ref{vo-cor}.
232: We have used the latest measurements of the event rates
233: in the Homestake
234: \cite{Homestake-98}
235: and Super-Kamiokande
236: \cite{SK-sun-lp99}
237: experiments,
238: and the weighted average of the rates measured in the two Gallium experiments
239: GALLEX \cite{GALLEX-99}
240: and SAGE \cite{SAGE-99}.
241: The values of these rates are given in Table I of Ref.~\cite{Concha-sun-99}.
242:
243: Our calculation of the theoretical event rates
244: $R_{ij}^{\mathrm{(thr)}}$
245: follows the standard method described in several papers
246: for matter-enhanced MSW transitions
247: \cite{Kuo-Pantaleone-RMP-89,%
248: Krastev-Petcov-ANALYTIC-88,%
249: Krastev-Petcov-unconventional-93}
250: and
251: vacuum oscillations
252: \cite{Krastev-petcov-vo-92,%
253: Krastev-Petcov-unconventional-93}.
254: We calculate the MSW survival probability of $\nu_e$'s in the Sun
255: using the standard analytic prescription
256: \cite{Parke-86,%
257: Krastev-Petcov-ANALYTIC-88,%
258: Kuo-Pantaleone-RMP-89,%
259: BGG-review-98}
260: and the level-crossing probability
261: appropriate for an exponential density profile
262: \cite{Petcov-analytic-87,Kuo-Pantaleone-RMP-89}.
263: We calculate the regeneration in the Earth
264: using a two-step model of the Earth density profile,
265: that is known to produce results that do not differ appreciably
266: from those obtained with the correct density profile.
267: We have used the tables of neutrino fluxes,
268: solar density and radiochemical detector cross sections
269: available in Bahcall's web page \cite{Bahcall-WWW}.
270: We have neglected the matter effects that slightly affect the
271: vacuum oscillation solutions of the solar neutrino problem,
272: as discussed in
273: \cite{Friedland-vo-00,Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-Quasi-vacuum-00}.
274: In Figs.~\ref{msw-unc}--\ref{vo-cor} we have used as abscissa the parameter
275: $\tan^2 \vartheta$
276: that allows a better view of the regions at large mixing angles
277: with respect to the usual parameter $\sin^2 2 \vartheta$.
278: The parameter
279: $\tan^2 \vartheta$ has been employed in the past
280: in the framework of three-neutrino mixing
281: \cite{Fogli-Lisi-Scioscia-95,%
282: Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-sun-96,%
283: Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Scioscia-sacrifice-97}
284: and its use in the framework of two-neutrino mixing
285: has been recently advocated in \cite{Friedland-dark-00}
286: because it allows to explore the possible presence of allowed
287: regions with $\vartheta > \pi/4$.
288:
289: The allowed regions in
290: Figs.~\ref{msw-unc}--\ref{vo-cor}
291: are calculated through the constraint
292: $\chi^2 \leq \chi^{2}_{\mathrm{min}} + \Delta\chi^2(\alpha)$,
293: where
294: $\chi^{2}_{\mathrm{min}}$
295: is the global minimum of the $\chi^2$,
296: $\chi^{2}_{\mathrm{min}} = 0.42$
297: for
298: $\Delta{m}^2 = 5.1 \times 10^{-6} \, \mathrm{eV}^2$
299: and
300: $\tan^2 \vartheta = 1.6 \times 10^{-3}$
301: in both cases of uncorrelated
302: (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs1}))
303: and correlated
304: (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs2}))
305: cross section uncertainties.
306: We consider confidence levels $\alpha = 0.90, 0.95, 0.99$
307: (the regions inside the solid, short-dashed and long-dashed contours,
308: respectively)
309: for two degrees of freedom,
310: which give
311: $\Delta\chi^2(0.90) = 4.61$,
312: $\Delta\chi^2(0.95) = 5.99$,
313: and
314: $\Delta\chi^2(0.99) = 9.21$.
315:
316: The linear addition in (\ref{Vcs2})
317: of the uncertainties of the detection cross section
318: lead to larger values of the diagonal elements of the covariance matrix $V$
319: and to smaller values of the $\chi^2$ in Eq.~(\ref{chi2}),
320: with respect to the case of uncorrelated uncertainties (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs1})).
321: Since the variation of $\chi^2$
322: in the space of the neutrino oscillation parameters
323: $\tan^2\vartheta$,
324: $\Delta{m}^2$
325: near the minimum of the $\chi^2$
326: is proportional to $V^{-1}$
327: (the contribution of the variation of $V^{-1}$ is negligible near the minimum),
328: \begin{equation}
329: \delta\chi^2
330: \simeq
331: 2
332: \sum_{j_1,j_2}
333: \left( R^{\mathrm{(thr)}}_{j_1} - R^{\mathrm{(exp)}}_{j_1} \right)
334: (V^{-1})_{j_1j_2}
335: \left(
336: \frac{\partial R^{\mathrm{(thr)}}_{j_2}}{\partial (\tan^2\vartheta)}
337: \,
338: \delta{(\tan^2\vartheta)}
339: +
340: \frac{\partial R^{\mathrm{(thr)}}_{j_2}}{\partial (\Delta{m}^2)}
341: \,
342: \delta{(\Delta{m}^2)}
343: \right)
344: \,,
345: \label{Dchi2}
346: \end{equation}
347: the slope of the $\chi^2$
348: is smaller in the case of correlated uncertainties (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs2}))
349: than in the case of uncorrelated uncertainties (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs1})).
350: Therefore,
351: we expect to obtain larger allowed regions
352: in the case of correlated uncertainties,
353: with respect to those obtained with uncorrelated uncertainties.
354:
355: Figures \ref{msw-unc} and \ref{msw-cor}
356: show the MSW allowed regions obtained using
357: the expressions
358: (\ref{Vcs1}) and (\ref{Vcs2})
359: for
360: $V^{\mathrm{(cs)}}$, respectively.
361: One can see that all the three MSW allowed regions,
362: usually called SMA
363: (for $\Delta{m}^2 \simeq 5 \times 10^{-6} \, \mathrm{eV^2}$
364: and $\tan^2 \vartheta \simeq 10^{-3}$),
365: LMA
366: (for $\Delta{m}^2 \simeq 2 \times 10^{-5} \, \mathrm{eV^2}$
367: and $\tan^2 \vartheta \simeq 0.3$)
368: and LOW
369: (for $\Delta{m}^2 \simeq 10^{-7} \, \mathrm{eV^2}$
370: and $\tan^2 \vartheta \simeq 0.5$),
371: are larger when the expressions
372: (\ref{Vcs2})
373: with correlated cross section uncertainties
374: is used.
375: The minimum and maximum values of
376: $\tan^2\vartheta$
377: and
378: $\Delta{m}^2$
379: in the 99\% CL allowed regions in Fig.~\ref{msw-unc} (unc)
380: and Fig.~\ref{msw-cor} (cor)
381: are listed in Table~\ref{ranges}
382: and
383: the difference between these regions
384: is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{msw-99}.
385: One can see that the SMA-cor region is slightly larger
386: than the SMA-unc region.
387: The LMA-cor region is appreciably larger
388: than the LMA-unc region,
389: allowing values of $\Delta{m}^2$ and $\tan^2\vartheta$
390: as high as
391: $3.5\times10^{-4} \, \mathrm{eV}^2$
392: and
393: $0.82$,
394: in contrast to the upper limits
395: $2.4\times10^{-4} \, \mathrm{eV}^2$
396: and
397: $0.67$
398: for the LMA-unc region.
399: The larger effects occur in the LOW region.
400: In the LOW-cor region
401: $\tan^2\vartheta$
402: can be as large as 1,
403: corresponding to maximal mixing,
404: and
405: $
406: 2.4\times10^{-8} \, \mathrm{eV}^2
407: \leq
408: \Delta{m}^2
409: \leq
410: 3.5\times10^{-7} \, \mathrm{eV}^2
411: $,
412: whereas in the LOW-unc region
413: $\tan^2\vartheta \leq 0.82$
414: and
415: $
416: 5.6\times10^{-8} \, \mathrm{eV}^2
417: \leq
418: \Delta{m}^2
419: \leq
420: 2.6\times10^{-7} \, \mathrm{eV}^2
421: $.
422:
423: Figures \ref{vo-unc} and \ref{vo-cor}
424: show the vacuum oscillation allowed regions obtained
425: with uncorrelated (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs1})) and correlated (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs2}))
426: cross section uncertainties,
427: respectively.
428: One can see that the allowed regions obtained
429: with correlated cross section uncertainties
430: are significantly larger that the ones obtained with
431: uncorrelated cross section uncertainties.
432: For example,
433: the 99\% CL allowed region at
434: $
435: \Delta{m}^2
436: \simeq
437: 5 \times 10^{-10} \, \mathrm{eV}^2
438: $
439: is considerably larger
440: with correlated
441: cross section uncertainties
442: (Fig.~\ref{vo-cor})
443: than with uncorrelated ones
444: (Fig.~\ref{vo-unc}),
445: and
446: the 90\% CL allowed region in
447: Fig.~\ref{vo-cor}
448: at
449: $
450: \Delta{m}^2
451: \simeq
452: 2.7 \times 10^{-10} \, \mathrm{eV}^2
453: $
454: does not exist in Fig.~\ref{vo-unc}.
455:
456: In conclusion,
457: we have proposed a modification
458: of the standard
459: statistical treatment of the detection cross-section uncertainties in
460: the analysis of solar neutrino data.
461: We have argued that,
462: because of lack of information,
463: a conservative approach should be used in the treatment
464: of the correlations between
465: the energy-averaged cross sections of the different
466: neutrino fluxes in the same experiment,
467: leading to the assumption of correlated errors
468: and
469: to a linear addition of the uncertainties.
470: We have shown in Figs.~\ref{msw-unc}--\ref{vo-cor}
471: that the resulting allowed regions
472: for the neutrino oscillation parameters are significantly larger
473: than those obtained with uncorrelated
474: detection cross sections uncertainties.
475: We think that the appropriate treatment of the
476: detection cross section uncertainties proposed here
477: will be rather important in the future,
478: when more precise solar neutrino data
479: obtained in the Super-Kamiokande,
480: SNO \cite{SNO-99},
481: Borexino \cite{Borexino-98},
482: GNO \cite{GNO-99}
483: and other
484: experiments
485: will be published.
486:
487: \acknowledgments
488:
489: We would like to thank A. Bottino for useful suggestions
490: and encouragement.
491: C.G. would like to thank P. Krastev, E. Lisi, H. Murayama and S. Petcov
492: for useful discussions on the fit of solar neutrino data.
493:
494: %\bibliography{bib}
495:
496: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
497:
498: \bibitem{Homestake-98}
499: B.~T. Cleveland {\em et~al.},
500: \newblock Astrophys. J. {\bf 496}, 505 (1998).
501: %%CITATION = ASJOA,496,505;%%
502:
503: \bibitem{GALLEX-99}
504: GALLEX, W.~Hampel {\em et~al.},
505: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B447}, 127 (1999).
506: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B447,127;%%
507:
508: \bibitem{SAGE-99}
509: SAGE, J.~N. Abdurashitov {\em et~al.},
510: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf C60}, 055801 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9907113.
511: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C60,055801;%%
512:
513: \bibitem{SK-sun-lp99}
514: Y. Suzuki (Super-Kamiokande Coll.), Talk presented at the XIX \textit{Int.
515: Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies}, Stanford, Aug.
516: 1999 (http://lp99.slac.stanford.edu).
517:
518: \bibitem{BP98}
519: J.~N. Bahcall, S.~Basu, and M.~H. Pinsonneault,
520: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B433}, 1 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805135.
521: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B433,1;%%
522:
523: \bibitem{BGG-review-98}
524: S.~M. Bilenky, C.~Giunti, and W.~Grimus,
525: \newblock Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 43}, 1 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9812360.
526: %%CITATION = PPNPD,43,1;%%
527:
528: \bibitem{Concha-sun-99}
529: M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, P.C. de Holanda, C. Pena-Garay and J.W.F. Valle,
530: arXiv:hep-ph/9906469.
531:
532: \bibitem{Bahcall-Krastev-Smirnov-SNO-99}
533: J.N. Bahcall, P.I. Krastev and A.Yu. Smirnov, arXiv:hep-ph/9911248.
534:
535: \bibitem{Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-3nu-00}
536: G.~L. Fogli, E.~Lisi, D.~Montanino, and A.~Palazzo,
537: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D62}, 013002 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9912231.
538: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D62,013002;%%
539:
540: \bibitem{Concha-foursolar-00}
541: C. Giunti, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and C. Pena-Garay, arXiv:hep-ph/0001101.
542:
543: \bibitem{Fogli-Lisi-correlations-95}
544: G.~L. Fogli and E.~Lisi,
545: \newblock Astropart. Phys. {\bf 3}, 185 (1995).
546: %%CITATION = APHYE,3,185;%%
547:
548: \bibitem{Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Palazzo-Quasi-vacuum-00}
549: G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi, D. Montanino and A. Palazzo, arXiv:hep-ph/0005261.
550:
551: \bibitem{Concha-dark-00}
552: M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and C. Pena-Garay, arXiv:hep-ph/0002186.
553:
554: \bibitem{Friedland-vo-00}
555: A. Friedland, arXiv:hep-ph/0002063.
556:
557: \bibitem{Friedland-dark-00}
558: A. de Gouvea, A. Friedland and H. Murayama, arXiv:hep-ph/0002064.
559:
560: \bibitem{Bahcall-gallium-97}
561: J.~N. Bahcall,
562: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf C56}, 3391 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9710491.
563: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C56,3391;%%
564:
565: \bibitem{Kuo-Pantaleone-RMP-89}
566: T.~K. Kuo and J.~Pantaleone,
567: \newblock Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 61}, 937 (1989).
568: %%CITATION = RMPHA,61,937;%%
569:
570: \bibitem{Krastev-Petcov-ANALYTIC-88}
571: P.~I. Krastev and S.~T. Petcov,
572: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B207}, 64 (1988).
573: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B207,64;%%
574:
575: \bibitem{Krastev-Petcov-unconventional-93}
576: P.~I. Krastev and S.~T. Petcov,
577: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B299}, 99 (1993).
578: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B299,99;%%
579:
580: \bibitem{Krastev-petcov-vo-92}
581: P.~I. Krastev and S.~T. Petcov,
582: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B285}, 85 (1992).
583: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B285,85;%%
584:
585: \bibitem{Parke-86}
586: S.~J. Parke,
587: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 57}, 1275 (1986).
588: %%CITATION = PRLTA,57,1275;%%
589:
590: \bibitem{Petcov-analytic-87}
591: S.~T. Petcov,
592: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B200}, 373 (1988).
593: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B200,373;%%
594:
595: \bibitem{Bahcall-WWW}
596: J.N. Bahcall, {WWW} page: http://{\-}www.{\-}sns.{\-}ias.{\-}edu/{\-}\~{}jnb/.
597:
598: \bibitem{Fogli-Lisi-Scioscia-95}
599: G.~L. Fogli, E.~Lisi, and G.~Scioscia,
600: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D52}, 5334 (1995), hep-ph/9506350.
601: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D52,5334;%%
602:
603: \bibitem{Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-sun-96}
604: G.~L. Fogli, E.~Lisi, and D.~Montanino,
605: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D54}, 2048 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9605273.
606: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D54,2048;%%
607:
608: \bibitem{Fogli-Lisi-Montanino-Scioscia-sacrifice-97}
609: G.~L. Fogli, E.~Lisi, D.~Montanino, and G.~Scioscia,
610: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D56}, 4365 (1997), hep-ph/9706230.
611: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D56,4365;%%
612:
613: \bibitem{SNO-99}
614: J. Boger \textit{et al.}, arXiv:nucl-ex/9910016.
615:
616: \bibitem{Borexino-98}
617: Borexino, F.~von Feilitzsch,
618: \newblock Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 40}, 123 (1998).
619: %%CITATION = PPNPD,40,123;%%
620:
621: \bibitem{GNO-99}
622: GALLEX and GNO, T.~A. Kirsten,
623: \newblock Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 77}, 26 (1999).
624: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,77,26;%%
625:
626: \end{thebibliography}
627:
628: \begin{table}[p!]
629: \begin{center}
630: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
631: &
632: $\tan^2\vartheta_{\mathrm{min}}$
633: &
634: $\tan^2\vartheta_{\mathrm{max}}$
635: &
636: $\Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{min}}$ $(\mathrm{eV}^2)$
637: &
638: $\Delta{m}^2_{\mathrm{max}}$ $(\mathrm{eV}^2)$
639: \\
640: \hline
641: SMA-unc
642: &
643: $3.3\times10^{-4}$
644: &
645: $2.9\times10^{-3}$
646: &
647: $3.8\times10^{-6}$
648: &
649: $1.0\times10^{-5}$
650: \\
651: \hline
652: SMA-cor
653: &
654: $3.0\times10^{-4}$
655: &
656: $3.2\times10^{-3}$
657: &
658: $3.8\times10^{-6}$
659: &
660: $1.0\times10^{-5}$
661: \\
662: \hline
663: LMA-unc
664: &
665: $0.14$
666: &
667: $0.67$
668: &
669: $6.2\times10^{-6}$
670: &
671: $2.4\times10^{-4}$
672: \\
673: \hline
674: LMA-cor
675: &
676: $0.14$
677: &
678: $0.82$
679: &
680: $5.6\times10^{-6}$
681: &
682: $3.5\times10^{-4}$
683: \\
684: \hline
685: LOW-unc
686: &
687: $0.45$
688: &
689: $0.82$
690: &
691: $5.6\times10^{-8}$
692: &
693: $2.6\times10^{-7}$
694: \\
695: \hline
696: LOW-cor
697: &
698: $0.41$
699: &
700: $1.0$
701: &
702: $2.4\times10^{-8}$
703: &
704: $3.5\times10^{-7}$
705: \\
706: \end{tabular}
707: \end{center}
708: \caption{ \label{ranges}
709: Minimum and maximum values of
710: $\tan^2\vartheta$
711: and
712: $\Delta{m}^2$
713: in the 99\% CL allowed regions in Fig.~\ref{msw-unc}
714: (unc rows)
715: and
716: in Fig.~\ref{msw-cor}
717: (cor rows).
718: }
719: \end{table}
720:
721: \begin{figure}[p!]
722: \begin{center}
723: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{msw-unc.eps}}
724: \end{center}
725: \caption{ \label{msw-unc}
726: Allowed regions for the neutrino oscillation parameters
727: $\Delta{m}^2$ and $\tan^2\vartheta$
728: in the case of MSW resonant transitions in the Sun
729: and
730: uncorrelated
731: detection cross section uncertainties (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs1})).
732: The regions inside the solid, short-dashed and long-dashed contours
733: are allowed,
734: respectively,
735: at 90\%, 95\% and 99\% confidence level.
736: }
737: \end{figure}
738:
739: \begin{figure}[p!]
740: \begin{center}
741: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{msw-cor.eps}}
742: \end{center}
743: \caption{ \label{msw-cor}
744: Allowed regions for
745: $\Delta{m}^2$ and $\tan^2\vartheta$
746: in the case of MSW resonant transitions in the Sun
747: and
748: correlated
749: detection cross section uncertainties (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs2})).
750: The regions inside the solid, short-dashed and long-dashed contours
751: are allowed,
752: respectively,
753: at 90\%, 95\% and 99\% confidence level.
754: }
755: \end{figure}
756:
757: \begin{figure}[p!]
758: \begin{center}
759: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{msw-99.eps}}
760: \end{center}
761: \caption{ \label{msw-99}
762: Allowed regions at 99\% CL for
763: $\Delta{m}^2$ and $\tan^2\vartheta$
764: in the case of MSW resonant transitions in the Sun.
765: The regions within the solid and dashed contours have been obtained,
766: respectively,
767: with
768: correlated (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs2}))
769: and
770: uncorrelated (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs1}))
771: detection cross section uncertainties.
772: }
773: \end{figure}
774:
775: \begin{figure}[p!]
776: \begin{center}
777: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{vo-unc.eps}}
778: \end{center}
779: \caption{ \label{vo-unc}
780: Allowed regions for the neutrino oscillation parameters
781: $\Delta{m}^2$ and $\tan^2\vartheta$
782: in the case of vacuum oscillations from the Sun to the Earth
783: and
784: uncorrelated
785: detection cross section uncertainties (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs1})).
786: The regions inside the solid, short-dashed and long-dashed contours
787: are allowed,
788: respectively,
789: at 90\%, 95\% and 99\% confidence level.
790: }
791: \end{figure}
792:
793: \begin{figure}[p!]
794: \begin{center}
795: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{vo-cor.eps}}
796: \end{center}
797: \caption{ \label{vo-cor}
798: Allowed regions for
799: $\Delta{m}^2$ and $\tan^2\vartheta$
800: in the case of vacuum oscillations from the Sun to the Earth
801: and
802: correlated
803: detection cross section uncertainties (Eq.~(\ref{Vcs2})).
804: The regions inside the solid, short-dashed and long-dashed contours
805: are allowed,
806: respectively,
807: at 90\%, 95\% and 99\% confidence level.
808: }
809: \end{figure}
810:
811: \end{document}
812: