1: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps]{revtex}
2: \documentstyle[prd,aps]{revtex}
3: \input epsf
4: \epsfverbosetrue
5: %\input epsfig
6:
7: %%%%% Personal Macros %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: %%% "symbol = from \ScriptA to \ScriptZ
9: \mathchardef\ScriptA="7241
10: \mathchardef\ScriptB="7242
11: \mathchardef\ScriptC="7243
12: \mathchardef\ScriptD="7244
13: \mathchardef\ScriptE="7245
14: \mathchardef\ScriptF="7246
15: \mathchardef\ScriptG="7247
16: \mathchardef\ScriptH="7248
17: \mathchardef\ScriptI="7249
18: \mathchardef\ScriptJ="724A
19: \mathchardef\ScriptK="724B
20: \mathchardef\ScriptL="724C
21: \mathchardef\ScriptM="724D
22: \mathchardef\ScriptN="724E
23: \mathchardef\ScriptO="724F
24: \mathchardef\ScriptP="7250
25: \mathchardef\ScriptQ="7251
26: \mathchardef\ScriptR="7252
27: \mathchardef\ScriptS="7253
28: \mathchardef\ScriptT="7254
29: \mathchardef\ScriptU="7255
30: \mathchardef\ScriptV="7256
31: \mathchardef\ScriptW="7257
32: \mathchardef\ScriptX="7258
33: \mathchardef\ScriptY="7259
34: \mathchardef\ScriptZ="725A
35:
36: \def\mapgeq{\mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel>\over{\smash{\scriptstyle\sim}\vphantom{_x}}$}}}
37: \def\mapleq{\mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel<\over{\smash{\scriptstyle\sim}\vphantom{_x}}$}}}
38: \def\mapgeqeq{\mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel>\over{\smash{\scriptstyle\approx}\vphantom{_2}}$}}}
39: \def\mapleqeq{\mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel<\over{\smash{\scriptstyle\approx}\vphantom{_2}}$}}}
40:
41: %%% #,$,%
42: \mathchardef\#="0023
43: \mathchardef\$="0024
44: \mathchardef\%="0025
45: \mathchardef\ddash="705C
46:
47: \mathchardef\lwavy="336E
48: \mathchardef\rwavy="336F
49: \mathchardef\biglwavy="331A
50: \mathchardef\bigrwavy="331B
51: \mathchardef\bigglwavy="3328
52: \mathchardef\biggrwavy="3329
53: \mathchardef\littlesum="0350
54: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
55:
56: \tighten
57: \draft
58: \begin{document}
59: \bibliographystyle{prsty}
60:
61: %\preprint{TOKAI-HEP/TH-0002}
62: \title{
63: Two-loop Radiative Neutrino Mechanism\\
64: in an $SU(3)_L\times U(1)_N$ Gauge Model
65: \footnote{to be published in Phys. Rev. D (2001). In {\it v2}, title \& introduction are modified and sections \& appendix are added; In {\it v3}, undefined latex citation indices in {\it v2} are removed.}
66: }
67:
68: \author{% %Use \sc for the family name
69: Teruyuki Kitabayashi$^a$
70: \footnote{E-mail:teruyuki@post.kek.jp}
71: and Masaki Yasu${\grave {\rm e}}^b$
72: \footnote{E-mail:yasue@keyaki.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp}
73: }
74:
75: \address{\vspace{5mm}$^a$
76: {\sl Accelerator Engineering Center} \\
77: {\sl Mitsubishi Electric System \& Service Engineering Co.Ltd.} \\
78: {\sl 2-8-8 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0045, Japan}
79: }
80: \address{\vspace{2mm}$^b$
81: {\sl Department of Natural Science\\School of Marine
82: Science and Technology, Tokai University}\\
83: {\sl 3-20-1 Orido, Shimizu, Shizuoka 424-8610, Japan\\and\\}
84: {\sl Department of Physics, Tokai University} \\
85: {\sl 1117 KitaKaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan}}
86: \date{TOKAI-HEP/TH-0002, June, 2000}
87: \maketitle
88:
89: \begin{abstract}
90: By using the $L_e$ $-$ $L_\mu$ $-$ $L_\tau$ symmetry, we construct an $SU(3)_L\times U(1)_N$ gauge model that provides two-loop radiative neutrino masses as well as one-loop radiative neutrino masses. The generic smallness of two-loop neutrino masses leading to $\Delta m^2_\odot$ compared with one-loop neutrino masses leading to $\Delta m^2_{atm}$ successfully explains $\Delta m^2_{atm}$ $>>$ $\Delta m^2_{\odot}$ by invoking the $L_e$ $-$ $L_\mu$ $-$ $L_\tau$ breaking. The Higgs scalar ($h^+$) that initiates radiative mechanisms is unified into a Higgs triplet together with the standard Higgs scalar ($\phi^+$, $\phi^0$) to form ($\phi^+$, $\phi^0$, $h^+$), which calls for three families of lepton triplets: ($\nu^i_L$, $\ell^i_L$, $\omega^i_L$) ($i$ = 1,2,3), where $\omega^i$ denote heavy neutral leptons. The two-loop radiative mechanism is found possible by introducing a singly charged scalar, which couples to $\ell^i_R\omega^j_R$ ($i,j$ = 2,3).
91: \end{abstract}
92: %\pacs{PACS: 12.60.-i, 13.15.+g, 14.60.Pq, 14.60.St}
93: \pacs{PACS: 12.60.-i, 13.15.+g, 14.60.Pq, 14.60.St\\Keywords: neutrino mass, radiative mechanism, lepton triplet}
94: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
95: \vspace{2mm}
96: %\newpage
97: %-----------------------------------%
98: \section{Introduction}
99: %-----------------------------------%
100: Atmospheric neutrino oscillations have been experimentally confirmed by the SuperKamiokande collaboration \cite{SuperKamiokande,RecentSK} and solar neutrinos have also been considered to be oscillating \cite{SolarNeutrino}. These oscillation phenomena indicate new phenomenology due to
101: massive neutrinos \cite{EarlyMassive} that requires new interactions beyond the conventional interactions in the
102: standard model. Neutrinos can
103: acquire masses through either seesaw mechanism \cite{SeeSaw} or radiative mechanism \cite{Zee,Babu,Radiative}.
104: Among others, the radiative mechanism of the Zee type \cite{Zee} has recently received
105: much attention \cite{ZeeType}. The resulting structure of neutrino mass matrix on the basis of three flavors is
106: characterized by
107: three off-diagonal elements. It is, then, found that in order to account for atmospheric neutrino oscillations
108: by the radiative mechanism, neutrinos will exhibit bimaximal mixing \cite{BiMaxmal,NearlyBiMaximal}.
109: This feature can be rephrased that there is a
110: conservation of $L_e$ $-$ $L_\mu$ $-$ $L_\tau$ \cite{LeLmuLtau}, where $L_e$ ($L_\mu$ or $L_\tau$) stands
111: for the electron (muon or tau) number.
112:
113: The radiative mechanism of the Zee type utilizes
114: \begin{enumerate}
115: \item a lepton-number-violating charged lepton ($\ell_L$)-neutrino ($\nu_L$) interaction,
116: \item an $SU(2)_L$-singlet charged Higgs scalar ($h^+$), and
117: \item a second $SU(2)_L$-doublet Higgs scalar ($\phi'$),
118: \end{enumerate}
119: which participate in one-loop diagrams to generate Majorana neutrino masses.
120: The simplest extension of the standard gauge group, $SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$, so as to include these extra
121: ingredients, especially for $h^+$, is to employ an $SU(3)_L\times U(1)_N$ gauge group \cite{SU3U1}.
122: The charged Higgs
123: scalar, $h^+$, can be identified with the third member of an $SU(3)_L$-triplet Higgs scalar and is unified in to
124: ($\phi^+$, $\phi^0$, $h^+$) together with the standard Higgs doublet ($\phi^+$, $\phi^0$) \cite{OkamotoYasue}.
125: It is also known that another advantage to use $SU(3)_L\times U(1)_N$
126: lies in the fact that three families of quarks and leptons are predicted if the anomaly free condition on
127: $SU(3)_L\times U(1)_N$ and the asymptotic free condition on $SU(3)_c$ are imposed.
128: These plausible properties have pushed us to examine how to implement one-loop radiative mechanism within
129: the $SU(3)_L\times U(1)_N$ framework \cite{OkamotoYasue,EarlyRadiativeNu,RadiativeNu,TreeNu}.
130:
131: In this report, we further study radiative
132: mechanism based on two-loop diagrams \cite{BabuType} in an $SU(3)_L\times U(1)_N$ model with ($\phi^+$, $\phi^0$, $h^+$) as a Higgs triplet \cite{OtherVariant}, which in turn requires three
133: families of heavy neutral leptons to be denoted by $\omega^i$ ($i$ = 1,2,3) \cite{HeavyLepton}, which are contained in
134: lepton triplets of ($\nu^i_L$, $\ell^i_L$, $\omega^i_L$).
135: It is anticipated that the interactions described by one-
136: and two-loop diagrams can be used to generate the observed atmospheric and
137: solar neutrino oscillations characterized by $\Delta m_{atm}^2>>\Delta m_\odot^2$
138: as have been stressed in Ref.\cite{OneTwoLoop}.
139: Namely, one-loop radiative mechanism controls atmospheric neutrino oscillations while further suppressed
140: effects from two-loop radiative mechanism provide solar neutrino oscillations.
141: To activate two-loop radiative mechanism, an extra scalar called $k^+$ is introduced, which
142: will couple to a lepton-number-violating $\ell_R$-$\omega_R$ \cite{Simplest}
143: and $\rho^{\prime +\dagger}{\bar \eta}^0k^+$, where $\rho^{\prime +}$ and ${\bar \eta}^0$ are
144: to be introduced in Eq.(\ref{Eq:HiggsEtaRhoChi}).
145:
146: %-----------------------------------%
147: \section{Model}
148: %-----------------------------------%
149: The present $SU(3)_L\times U(1)_N$ gauge model is specified by the $U(1)_N$ quantum number, $N/2$, which
150: is related to the hypercharge, $Y$, as $Y$ = $-\lambda^8/\sqrt{3}$ + $N$. The electric charge,
151: $Q_{em}$, is, thus, given by $Q_{em}$ = ($\lambda^3$ + $Y$)/2, where $\lambda^a$ is the $SU(3)$ generator
152: with Tr($\lambda^a\lambda^b$) = 2$\delta^{ab}$ ($a,b$ = 1$\sim$8).
153: The particle content can be summarized as follows:
154: %%%%%%%
155: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:LeptonTriplets}
156: & \psi^i_L = \left( \nu^i, \ell^i, \omega^i\right)^T_L:({\bf 3}, -\frac{1}{3}), \ \ \
157: \ell^i_R:~ ({\bf 1}, -1), \ \ \ \omega^i_R:~ ({\bf 1}, 0),
158: \end{eqnarray}
159: %%%%%%%
160: for leptons, where $\omega^i$ stand for three neutral heavy leptons,
161: %%%%%%%
162: \begin{eqnarray}
163: && Q^1_L = \left( u^1, d^1, u^{\prime 1}\right)^T_L:({\bf 3}, \frac{1}{3}), \ \ \
164: Q^{i=2,3}_L = \left( d^i, -u^i, d^{\prime i}\right)^T_L:({\bf 3^\ast}, 0),
165: \nonumber \\
166: && u^{1,2,3}_R:({\bf 1}, \frac{2}{3}), \ \ \ d^{1,2,3}_R:({\bf 1}, -\frac{1}{3}), \ \ \
167: u^{\prime 1}_R:({\bf 1}, \frac{2}{3}), \ \ \ d^{\prime 2,3}_R: ({\bf 1}, -\frac{1}{3}).
168: \label{Eq:ExtraQuarkTriplets}
169: \end{eqnarray}
170: %%%%%%%
171: for quarks. The values in the parentheses denote quantum numbers
172: based on the ($SU(3)_L$, $U(1)_N$) - symmetry. It is obvious that the pure
173: $SU(3)_L$ anomaly vanishes since there is an equal number of triplets of quarks and leptons and
174: antitriplets of quarks. Other anomalies are also cancelled.
175: Our Higgs scalars are given by
176: \begin{enumerate}
177: \item three triplets ($\eta$, $\rho$, $\chi$) that provides three members of the quark triplets as well as ordinary and heavy leptons, and one duplicate of $\rho$ ($\rho^\prime$) that initiates one-loop radiative mechanism as advocated by Ref.\cite{Duplicate},
178: %%%%%%%
179: \begin{eqnarray}
180: && \rho = (\rho^+, \rho^0, {\bar \rho^+})^T:({\bf 3}, \frac{2}{3}), \ \ \
181: \rho' = (\rho'^+, \rho'^0, {\bar \rho'^+})^T:({\bf 3}, \frac{2}{3}),
182: \nonumber \\
183: && \eta = (\eta^0, \eta^-, {\bar \eta}^0)^T:({\bf 3}, -\frac{1}{3}), \ \ \
184: \chi = ({\bar \chi}^0, \chi^-, \chi^0)^T:({\bf 3}, -\frac{1}{3}),
185: \label{Eq:HiggsEtaRhoChi}
186: \end{eqnarray}
187: %%%%%%%
188: from which quarks and leptons acquire masses through their vacuum expectation values (VEV's):
189: %%%%%%%
190: \begin{equation}\label{Eq:VEVs}
191: \langle 0|\eta |0\rangle = ( v_\eta, 0, 0)^T, \ \
192: \langle 0|\rho |0\rangle = (0, v_\rho, 0)^T, \ \
193: \langle 0|\chi |0\rangle = (0, 0, v_\chi)^T,
194: \end{equation}
195: %%%%%%%
196: where the orthogonal choice of these VEV's and the absence of $\langle 0|\rho' |0\rangle$ will be
197: guaranteed by appropriate Higgs interactions to be introduced;
198: \item one singly charged scalar that initiates two-loop radiative mechanism.
199: %%%%%%%
200: \begin{equation}\label{Eq:Singlet}
201: k^+: ({\bf 1}, 1),
202: \end{equation}
203: %%%%%%%
204: which will couple to $\ell^i_R\omega^j_R$ ($i,j$ = 2,3).
205: \end{enumerate}
206:
207: The model becomes acceptable for the present discussions if it satisfies the following requirements that
208: \begin{itemize}
209: \item the Higgs scalar, $\rho$, acquire a VEV and be responsible for creating mass terms for quarks and leptons,
210: \item the Higgs scalar, $\rho'$, acquire no VEV and be responsible for lepton-number-violating interactions,
211: \item flavor-changing interactions due to Yukawa interactions well be suppressed.
212: \end{itemize}
213: Since lepton-number-violating interactions can be described by
214: $\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma}\psi^i_{L\alpha}\psi^j_{L\beta}\rho_\gamma$, which will generate
215: the $\nu^i_L$-$\omega^j_L$ mixing owing to $\langle 0|\rho_2 |0\rangle$ $\neq$ 0, leading to a tree-level
216: neutrino mass matrix \cite{Duplicate}. Therefore, this coupling of $\rho$ should be avoided
217: in the radiative mechanism.
218: The model contains quarks with the same charge, whose mass terms can be generated by $\eta$ and $\chi$ between
219: $Q^1_L$ and up-type quarks and by $\eta^\dagger$ and $\chi^\dagger$ between $Q^{2,3}_L$ and down-type quarks.
220: To achieve flavor-changing-neutral-currents (FCNC)
221: suppression, Yukawa interactions must be constrained such that
222: a quark flavor gains a mass from only one Higgs field \cite{FCNC,FCNCSU3}.
223:
224: All these restrictions can be realized by requiring interactions be invariant under a discrete transformation
225: based on $Z_4$, which is given by
226: %%%%%%%
227: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:LeptonDiscrete}
228: & & \psi^{1,2,3}_L \rightarrow i\psi^{1,2,3}_L, \ \ \
229: \ell^{1,2,3}_R \rightarrow \ell^{1,2,3}_R, \ \ \
230: \omega^{1,2,3}_R \rightarrow -i\omega^{1,2,3}_R,
231: \end{eqnarray}
232: %%%%%%%
233: for leptons,
234: %%%%%%%
235: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:QuarkDiscrete}
236: & & Q^1_L \rightarrow iQ^1_L, \ \ \
237: Q^{2,3}_L \rightarrow -iQ^{2,3}_L, \ \ \
238: u^{1,2,3}_R \rightarrow u^{1,2,3}_R, \ \ \
239: d^{1,2,3}_R \rightarrow d^{1,2,3}_R, \ \ \
240: \nonumber \\
241: & & u^{\prime 1}_R \rightarrow -iu^{\prime 1}_R, \ \ \
242: d^{\prime 2,3}_R \rightarrow id^{\prime 2,3}_R,
243: \end{eqnarray}
244: %%%%%%%
245: for quarks, and
246: %%%%%%%
247: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:HiggsDiscrete}
248: & & \eta \rightarrow i\eta, \ \ \
249: \rho \rightarrow i\rho, \ \ \
250: \rho^\prime \rightarrow -\rho^\prime, \ \ \
251: \chi \rightarrow -\chi, \ \ \
252: k^+ \rightarrow ik^+,
253: \end{eqnarray}
254: %%%%%%%
255: for Higgs scalars. In addition to the discrete symmetry, we also impose the $L_e$ $-$ $L_\mu$ $-$ $L_\tau$
256: ($\equiv$ $L^\prime$)
257: conservation on our interactions to reproduce the observed atmospheric neutrino oscillations.
258: The quantum number, $L^\prime$, is assigned to be
259: 0 for ($\eta$, $\rho$, $\rho'$, $\chi$),
260: 1 for ($\psi^1_L$, $\ell^1_R$, $\omega^1_R$),
261: $-$1 for ($\psi^{2,3}_L$, $\ell^{2,3}_R$, $\omega^{2,3}_R$) and
262: 2 for $k^+$ and similarly for quarks. The non-vanishing lepton number is carried by $k^+$
263: with $L$=$-$2 and as well as by leptons with $L$=1.
264:
265: Yukawa interactions are controlled by the following lagrangian:
266: %%%%%%%
267: \begin{eqnarray}
268: -{\cal L}_Y & = &
269: \frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma}\sum_{i=2,3} f_{[1i]}
270: {\overline {\left( \psi_{\alpha L}^1 \right)^c}}\psi^i_{\beta L}\rho'_\gamma
271: +\sum_{i=1,2,3}{\overline {\psi^i_L}}\left( f^i_{\ell}\rho\ell_R^i+f^i_{\omega}\chi\omega^i_R\right)
272: \nonumber \\
273: & & +\sum_{i,j=2,3}f^{ij}_h{\overline {\left( \ell^i_R \right)^c}}\omega^j_Rk^+
274: + {\overline {Q^1_L}}\left(
275: \eta U^1_R + \rho D^1_R+\chi U^{\prime 1}_R
276: \right)
277: \nonumber \\
278: & & + \sum_{i=2,3}{\overline {Q^i_L}}\left(\rho^\ast U^i_R
279: +\eta^\ast D^i_R + \chi^\ast D^{\prime i}_R
280: \right)
281: + {\rm (h.c.)},
282: \label{Eq:Yukawa}
283: \end{eqnarray}
284: %%%%%%%
285: where $f$'s denote the Yukawa couplings and $f_{[ij]}$ = $-f_{[ji]}$. Right-handed quarks are
286: specified by $U^i_R$ = $\sum_{j=1}^3f^i_{uj}u^j_R$, $D^i_R$ = $\sum_{j=1}^3f^i_{dj}d^j_R$,
287: $U^{\prime i}_R$ = $f^i_{u^\prime 1}u^{\prime 1}_R$ and
288: $D^{\prime i}_R$ = $\sum_{j=2}^3f^i_{d^\prime j}d^{\prime j}_R$.
289: The charged lepton and heavy lepton mass matrices are taken to be diagonal.
290: We here note that
291: \begin{enumerate}
292: \item the $L$-breaking is supplied by ${\overline {\left( \psi_L^1 \right)^c}}\psi^i_L\rho'$ but all other interactions conserve both $L$ and $L^\prime$,
293: \item the coupling of $k^+$ to the first family is forbidden by the $L^\prime$ symmetry,
294: \item the absence of $\chi^\ast D^i_R$ and $\eta^\ast D^{\prime i}_R$ for $Q^{2,3}_L$ and of $\chi U^1_R$ and $\eta U^{\prime 1}_R$ for $Q^1_L$ ensures the suppression of FCNC.
295: \end{enumerate}
296: The Higgs interactions are described by
297: self-Hermitian terms composed of $\phi_\alpha\phi^\dagger_\beta$ ($\phi$ = $\eta$, $\rho$,
298: $\chi$, $k^+$) and by the non-self-Hermitian terms in
299: %%%%%%%
300: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:Conserved}
301: V_0 & = &
302: \lambda_0\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma}\eta_\alpha\rho_\beta\chi_\gamma +
303: \lambda_1\left( \rho^\dagger\eta \right) \left( \chi^\dagger\rho'\right) +
304: \lambda_2\left( \rho^\dagger\rho' \right) \left( \chi^\dagger\eta\right) + {\rm (h.c.)},
305: \end{eqnarray}
306: %%%%%%%
307: which conserves both $L$ and $L^\prime$, where $\lambda_{0,1,2}$ represent coupling constants.
308: To account for solar neutrino oscillations, the breaking of the $L^\prime$-conservation should be included
309: and is assumed to be furnished by
310: %%%%%%%
311: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:Broken}
312: V_b & = & \mu_b\rho^{\prime\dagger} \eta k^+ + {\rm (h.c.)},
313: \end{eqnarray}
314: %%%%%%%
315: which also breaks the $L$-conservation,
316: where $\mu_b$ represents a breaking scale of the $L^\prime$-conservation.
317: The orthogonal choice of VEV's of $\eta$, $\rho$ and $\chi$ as in
318: Eq.(\ref{Eq:VEVs}) is supported by $V_0$ if $\lambda_0$ $<$ 0.
319: It is because $V_0$ gets lowered if $\eta$, $\rho$ and $\chi$ develop VEV's. So, one can choose
320: VEV's such that $\langle 0|\eta_1 |0\rangle$ $\neq$ 0, $\langle 0|\rho_2 |0\rangle$ $\neq$ 0 and
321: $\langle 0|\chi_3 |0\rangle$ $\neq$ 0. However, the similar coupling of $\eta\rho^\prime\chi$ is
322: forbidden by the $Z_4$ symmetry; therefore, the requirement of $\langle 0|\rho^\prime |0\rangle$ = 0
323: is not disturbed. Also forbidden is the dangerous term of $\rho^\dagger\rho^\prime$ that would
324: induce a non-vanishing VEV of $\rho^\prime$. Finally, it should be noted that the $L$- and/or
325: $L^\prime$-breakings are supplied by the $\psi\psi\rho^\prime$- and $\rho^\prime\eta k^+$-terms
326: but all others conserve both $L$ and $L^\prime$.
327:
328: %-----------------------------------%
329: \section{Radiative Neutrino Masses}
330: %-----------------------------------%
331: The explicit form of Yukawa interactions relevant for the radiative neutrino mechanism is given by
332: %%%%%%%
333: \begin{eqnarray}
334: &&\sum_{i=2,3}\left\{f_{[1i]}\left[
335: \left( {\overline {\ell^{c1}_R}}\nu^i_L - {\overline {\nu^{1c}_R}}\ell^i_L \right){\bar \rho}^{\prime +}
336: +\left( {\overline {\omega^{c1}_R}}\ell^i_L - {\overline {\ell^{c1}_R}}\omega^i_L \right) \rho^{\prime +}
337: \right.\right.
338: \nonumber \\
339: && \left.\left.
340: \hspace{50pt}+\left( {\overline {\nu^{1c}_R}} \omega^i_L - {\overline {\omega^1_R}} \nu^i_L \right)
341: \rho^{\prime 0}
342: \right]-f^{ij}_h{\overline {\ell^{ci}_L}}k^+\omega^j_R\right\}
343: -f^i_{\ell i}\left( {\overline {\nu^i_L}}\ell^i_R\rho^+
344: + {\overline {\ell^i_L}}\ell^i_R\rho^0 \right)
345: \nonumber \\
346: &&\hspace{80pt}- f^i_{\omega i}\left( {\overline {\nu^i_L}}\omega^i_R\chi^-
347: + {\overline {\omega^i_L}}\omega^i_R\chi^0 \right)
348: + {\rm (h.c)}.
349: \label{Eq:NuMasses}
350: \end{eqnarray}
351: %%%%%%%
352: The combined use of these interactions with $V_0$ yields one-loop diagrams for $L^\prime$-conserving Majorana
353: neutrino mass terms as shown in Fig.\ref{Fig_1ab} (a) and (b), which correspond to
354: %%%%%%%
355: \begin{equation}\label{Eq:EffectiveCoupling1}
356: \left( \eta^\dagger\psi^1_L\right) \epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma}\rho_\alpha\chi_\beta\psi^{2,3}_{\gamma L}
357: +
358: \left( \eta^\dagger\psi^{2,3}_L\right) \epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma}\rho_\alpha\chi_\beta\psi^1_{\gamma L},
359: \end{equation}
360: %%%%%%%
361: leading to one-loop radiative masses to be denoted by $m^{(1)}_{12,13}$. On the other hand,
362: the $L^\prime$-violating $V_b$ provides two-loop
363: diagrams as depicted in Fig.\ref{Fig_2}, which correspond to an effective coupling
364: %%%%%%%
365: \begin{equation}\label{Eq:EffectiveCoupling2}
366: \epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma}\epsilon^{\alpha'\beta'\gamma'}
367: \psi^1_{\alpha L}\rho_\beta\chi_\gamma
368: \psi^1_{\alpha' L}\rho_{\beta'}\chi_{\gamma'},
369: \end{equation}
370: %%%%%%%
371: leading to two-loop radiative masses to be denoted by $m^{(2)}_{11}$.
372:
373: The resulting neutrino mass matrix is found to be
374: %%%%%%%
375: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:NUmass}
376: M_\nu = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
377: m^{(2)}_{11}& m^{(1)}_{12}& m^{(1)}_{13}\\
378: m^{(1)}_{12}& 0& 0\\
379: m^{(1)}_{13}& 0& 0\\
380: \end{array} \right),
381: \end{eqnarray}
382: %%%%%%%
383: where $m^{(1,2)}_{ij}$ are calculated to be
384: %%%%%%%
385: \begin{eqnarray}
386: m^{(1)}_{1i} &=& f_{[1i]} v_\eta v_\rho v_\chi
387: \left[
388: \lambda_1\frac{m^2_{\ell_i}F(m^2_{\ell_i}, m_{{\bar \rho}^{\prime 0}}^2, m_{\rho^+}^2)-
389: m^2_{\ell_1}F(m^2_{\ell_1}, m_{{\bar \rho}^{\prime 0}}^2, m_{\rho^+}^2)}{v^2_\rho} \right.
390: \nonumber \\
391: &&+\left. \lambda_2\frac{m^2_{\omega_i}F(m^2_{\omega_i}, m_{\rho^{\prime 0}}^2, m_{{\bar \chi}^0}^2)
392: -m^2_{\omega_1}F(m^2_{\omega_1}, m_{\rho^{\prime 0}}^2, m_{{\bar \chi}^0}^2)}{v^2_\chi}
393: \right] ,
394: \label{Eq:MatrixEntryIJ1} \\
395: m^{(2)}_{11} &=& -2\sum_{ij=2,3}\lambda_2 f_{[1i]}f_{[1j]}f^{ij}_hm_{\ell_i} m_{\omega_j}
396: \mu_b v_\rho v_\chi I_{two-loop}.
397: \label{Eq:MatrixEntryIJ2}
398: \end{eqnarray}
399: %%%%%%%
400: The mass parameters of $m_{\ell_i}$ ($\equiv$ $f^i_{\ell i}v_\rho$)
401: and $m_{\omega_i}$ ($\equiv$ $f^i_{\omega i}v_\chi$) are, respectively, the mass of the $i$-th
402: charged lepton and the mass of the $i$-th heavy neutral lepton and
403: masses of Higgs scalars are denoted by the subscripts in terms of their fields.
404: The function of $F$ and the two-loop integral of $I_{two-loop}$ are, respectively, given by
405: %%%%%%%
406: \begin{eqnarray}
407: &&F(x, y, z) = \frac{1}{16\pi^2}
408: \left[
409: \frac{x\log x}{(x-y)(x-z)}
410: +\frac{y\log y}{(y-x)(y-z)}
411: +\frac{z\log z}{(z-y)(z-x)}
412: \right],
413: \nonumber \\
414: \label{Eq:F_x_y}
415: \end{eqnarray}
416: %%%%%%%
417: and
418: %%%%%%%
419: \begin{eqnarray}
420: &&I_{two-loop} =
421: \frac{
422: G\left( {m_\ell^2 ,m_{{\bar \rho}^{\prime+}}^2 ,m_k^2 } \right)
423: }
424: {
425: m_k^2
426: }
427: \cdot
428: \frac{
429: G\left( {m_\omega^2 ,m_{{\bar \eta}^0}^2 ,m_k^2 } \right)
430: -G\left( {m_\omega^2 ,m_{{\bar \rho}^{\prime 0}}^2 ,m_k^2 } \right)
431: }
432: {
433: m_{{\bar \eta}^0}^2-m_{{\bar \rho}^{\prime 0}}^2
434: }
435: \label{Eq:I_two-loop}
436: \end{eqnarray}
437: %%%%%%%
438: with
439: %%%%%%%
440: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:G_x_y}
441: G\left( x,y,z \right) = \frac{1}{16\pi ^2 }\frac{x\ln \left( x/z \right) -
442: y\ln \left( y/ z\right)}{x-y}.
443: \end{eqnarray}
444: %%%%%%%
445: The explicit form of $I_{two-loop}$ of Eq.(\ref{Eq:I_two-loop}) is possible to obtain if
446: the squared mass of $k^+$, $m_k^2$, is much greater than the squared masses shown
447: inside parentheses in (\ref{Eq:I_two-loop}), namely, $m_k^2$ $\gg$
448: $m^2_{\ell^{2,3}}$, $m^2_{\omega^{2,3}}$, $m^2_{\bar \rho^{\prime 0,+}}$, $m^2_{\bar \eta^0}$.
449: The outline of its derivation is shown in the Appendix.
450:
451: The neutrino oscillations are characterized by $\Delta m^2_{atm}$ and $\Delta m^2_{\odot}$, which are given by
452: %%%%%%%
453: \begin{equation}\label{Eq:NUmass2}
454: \Delta m^2_{atm} = m^{(1)2}_{12} + m^{(1)2}_{13} (\equiv m^2_\nu), \ \ \
455: \Delta m^2_{\odot} = 2 m_\nu \vert m^{(2)}_{11}\vert,
456: \end{equation}
457: %%%%%%%
458: where the anticipated relation of $\vert m^{(2)}_{11}\vert$ $\ll$ $\vert m^{(1)}_{1i}\vert$
459: for $i$ = 2,3 has been used.
460: To enhance the bimaximal structure of $M_\nu $ in Eq.(\ref{Eq:NUmass}), we assume the equality of
461: $m_{\omega_2}$ = $m_{\omega_3}$ together with $f_{[12]}$ = $f_{[13]}$ in the heavy lepton sector and
462: $m_{\omega_1}$ $\neq$ $m_{\omega_{2,3}}$ to yield nonvanishing radiative corrections due to the
463: heavy-lepton-exchanges.
464: Tiny contributions from the ordinary lepton sector yield the deviation from the bimaximal structure.
465:
466: To get order of magnitude estimates of our parameters, we first use $\Delta m^2_{atm}$
467: $\sim$ $3\times 10^{-3}$ eV$^2$ for atmospheric neutrino oscillations\cite{SuperKamiokande,RecentSK,RecentAtm} to
468: mainly fix the lepton-number-violating coupling of $f_{[1i]}$ ($i$=2,3).
469: It is then shown that solar neutrino oscillations are to be characterized by $\Delta m^2_{\odot}$
470: $\sim$ $2 \times 10^{-10}$ eV$^2$. To be more specific, we use the following parameters to compute
471: $\Delta m^2_{atm}$ and $\Delta m^2_{\odot}$ in Eq.(\ref{Eq:NUmass2}):
472: \begin{itemize}
473: \item $\sqrt{v^2_{\eta}+v^2_{\rho}}$ = $v_{weak}$, where $v_{weak}$ = $( 2{\sqrt 2}G_F)^{-1/2}$ = 174 GeV,
474: since these are the sources of weak boson masses,
475: where $v_\rho$ = $v_{weak}$ and $v_\eta$ = $v_\rho$/10 are taken,
476: \item $v_\chi$ = 10$v_{weak}$ so that exotic particles acquire sufficiently large masses,
477: \item $m_{\omega_{2,3}}$ = $ev_\chi$ with $m_{\omega_{2,3}}-m_{\omega_1}$ = $m_{\omega_{2,3}}/10$,
478: where $e$ stands for the electromagnetic coupling,
479: \item $m_\eta$ = $m_{\rho^\prime}$ = $v_\rho$ and
480: $m_\chi$ = $m_k$ = $v_\chi$,
481: \item the following dimensionless couplings related to $L$- and $L^\prime$-conserving interactions are
482: kept to be order unity: $\lambda_1$ = $\lambda_2$ = $f_h^{ij}$ = 1 ($i,j$ = 2,3),
483: \item the dimensionless couplings related to $L$- or $L^\prime$-violating interactions are
484: considered to be small: $f_{[1i]}$ $\ll$ 1 and $\mu_b$ $\ll$ $v_\chi$, where $f_{[1i]}$ =
485: $10^{-7}$ (to reproduce $\Delta m^2_{atm}$) and $\mu_b$ = $ev_\chi$ are taken.
486: \end{itemize}
487: The adopted magnitude of $f_{[1i]}$ (=10$^{-7}$) can be seen from the rough
488: estimate of $m_{1i}^{(1)}$. By noticing that $F(m^2_\omega,m^2_{\rho^{\prime0}},m_k^2)$
489: $\sim$ $F(m^2_\omega,0,m_k^2)$ = $\ln(m_k^2/m^2_\omega)/(16\pi^2m_k^2)$,
490: we obtain
491: $m_{1i}^{(1)}$ $\sim$ $5f_{[1i]}\times 10^{-4}~{\rm GeV}$ ($i$=2,3).
492: This estimate certainly gives $f_{[1i]}$ $\sim 10^{-7}$
493: in order to obtain $m_{1i}^{(1)}$ = $\sqrt{\Delta m^2_{atm}/2}$ $\sim$ $4\times 10^{-2}$ eV for
494: $\Delta m_{atm}^2$ $\sim$ 3$\times 10^{-3}$ eV$^2$.
495: The numerical computation by
496: the exact formula of $I_{two-loop}$ involving Eq.(\ref{Eq:Result}) shown in the Appendix
497: reproduces $\Delta m^2_{atm}$ = $3 \times 10^{-3}$ eV$^2$ and yields
498: $\Delta m^2_{\odot}$ = $2 \times 10^{-10}$ eV$^2$. The approximate bimaximal
499: mixing is characterized by $\sin2\theta$ = 0.97 reflecting the contributions from the charged lepton-exchanges
500: to $m_{1i}^{(1)}$, where $\sin 2\theta$=1 corresponds to the bimaximal mixing.
501: One can observe that the estimated $\Delta m^2_{\odot}$ lies in the allowed region of the
502: observed $\Delta m^2_{\odot}$ for the vacuum oscillations \cite{SolarNeutrino,VOComment}.
503: Another case of $k^+$ with $L^\prime$ = $-2$ that couples to $e_Re_R$
504: yields $\Delta m^2_{\odot}$ $\sim$ $2 \times 10^{-10}(m_e/m_\tau )$ eV$^2$, which is inconsistent
505: with the solar neutrino oscillation data.
506:
507: %-----------------------------------%
508: \section{Summary}
509: %-----------------------------------%
510: Summarizing our discussions, we have clarified how two-loop radiative mechanism is implemented in
511: the $SU(3)_L$ $\times$ $U(1)_N$ model with the
512: lepton triplets ($\nu^i$, $\ell^i$, $\omega^i$)$^T$, where Zee's scalar, $h^+$, that has
513: initiated radiative mechanisms is unified into ($\phi^+$, $\phi^0$, $h^+$) together with the standard Higgs
514: doublet, ($\phi^+$, $\phi^0$).
515: The interactions respecting the
516: $L_e$ $-$ $L_\mu$ $-$ $L_\tau$ (=$L^\prime$) conservation are responsible for the one-loop radiative corrections,
517: which generate atmospheric neutrino oscillations, while solar neutrino oscillations are induced,
518: via two-loop radiative corrections, by
519: the explicit $L^\prime$-breaking, which is supplied by Higgs interactions involving a charged scalar
520: ($k^+$) with $L^\prime$ = 2,
521: which couples to $\tau^-_R\omega^{2,3}_R$. One-loop Majorana masses receive dominant contributions from the
522: heavy-lepton-exchanges
523: and the bimaximal structure is preferred by the approximate degeneracy between
524: $\omega^2$- and $\omega^3$-masses. It is, then, shown that, for $\Delta m^2_{atm}$ $\sim$
525: $3\times 10^{-3}$ eV$^2$, $\Delta m^2_\odot$ of order $10^{-10}$ eV$^2$ is obtained as the vacuum solution.
526: The approximate bimaximal structure is characterized by $\sin2\theta$ = 0.97.
527:
528: \begin{center}
529: {\bf ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
530: \end{center}
531:
532: One of the authors (M.Y.) is grateful to M. Matsuda for comments on the usefulness of two-loop diagrams.
533: The work of M.Y. is supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research No 12047223 from the
534: Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan.
535:
536: \noindent
537: {\bf \center Appendix\\}
538: In this Appendix, we describe the detailed evaluation of the two-loop integral of Eq.(\ref{Eq:I_two-loop}).
539: The relevant integration corresponding to Fig.\ref{Fig_2} reads
540: %%%%%%%
541: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:Start}
542: I_{two-loop} &=& \int \!\!
543: \frac{d^4 k}{\left( 2\pi \right)^{4}}
544: \frac{d^4 q}{\left( 2\pi \right)^{4}}
545: \frac{1}{k^2 - m_\ell^2 }
546: \frac{1}{k^2 - m_{\rho^\prime}^2 }
547: \frac{1}{q^2 - m_\omega^2 }
548: \nonumber \\
549: &&\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad
550: \cdot\frac{1}{q^2 - m_\eta^2 }
551: \frac{1}{q^2 - m_{\rho^\prime}^2 }
552: \frac{1}{\left( {k - q} \right)^2 - m_k^2 }.
553: \end{eqnarray}
554: %%%%%%%
555: By using that
556: %%%%%%%
557: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:Separate}
558: && \frac{1}{q^2 - m_\eta^2}\frac{1}{q^2 - m_{\rho^\prime}^2}=
559: \frac{1}{m_\eta^2-m_{\rho^\prime}^2}\left( \frac{1}{q^2 - m_\eta^2}-\frac{1}{q^2 - m_{\rho^\prime}^2}\right),
560: \end{eqnarray}
561: %%%%%%%
562: we find that
563: %%%%%%%
564: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:TwoLoop0}
565: &&I_{two-loop} = \frac{J\left(m_\eta^2 \right)-J\left(m_{\rho^\prime}^2 \right)}{m_\eta^2-m_{\rho^\prime}^2},
566: \end{eqnarray}
567: %%%%%%%
568: where
569: %%%%%%%
570: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:JStart}
571: J\left(m^2 \right) &=& \int \!\!
572: \frac{d^4 k}{\left( 2\pi \right)^{4}}
573: \frac{d^4 q}{\left( 2\pi \right)^{4}}
574: \frac{1}{k^2 - m_\ell^2 }
575: \frac{1}{k^2 - m_{\rho^\prime}^2 }
576: \frac{1}{q^2 - m_\omega^2 }
577: \frac{1}{q^2 - m^2 }
578: \frac{1}{\left( {k - q} \right)^2 - m_k^2 }.
579: \nonumber \\
580: \end{eqnarray}
581: %%%%%%%
582: After the integration over $k$ is performed, we reach
583: %%%%%%%
584: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:Result}
585: &&J\left(m^2 \right) = \int^1_0 \!\! dx\int^1_0 \!\! ydy
586: \frac{i}{16\pi ^2 \left[ y\left( {1 - y} \right) \right]}
587: I_{one-loop}\left( m_\omega^2,m^2,M(x,y)^2\right)
588: \end{eqnarray}
589: %%%%%%%
590: with
591: %%%%%%%
592: \begin{equation}\label{Eq:xyMass}
593: M(x,y)^2 = \frac{m_k^2 - \left( m_k^2 - m_{\rho^\prime}^2 \right)y - \left( m_{\rho^\prime}^2 - m_\ell^2 \right)xy}{y\left( 1 - y \right)},
594: \end{equation}
595: %%%%%%%
596: where $I_{one-loop}$ represents the one-loop integral expressed by $F$ of Eq.(\ref{Eq:F_x_y}):
597: %%%%%%%
598: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:OneLoopIntegral}
599: I_{one-loop}(a,b,c)&=& \int \!\! \frac{d^4 q}{\left( {2\pi } \right)^{4} }
600: \frac{1}{q^2 - a}\frac{1}{q^2 - b}\frac{1}{q^2 - c} = -iF\left( a,b,c\right).
601: \end{eqnarray}
602: %%%%%%%
603:
604: Under the approximation of $m_k^2$ $\gg$ $m^2,m_{\ell, \omega, \rho^\prime}^2$,
605: following the estimation of $J(m^2)$ shown in the Appendix of Ref.\cite{Appendix}, we find that
606: %%%%%%%
607: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:FinalResult}
608: J\left(m^2 \right) = \frac{{G\left( {m_\ell^2 ,m_{\rho^\prime}^2 ,m_k^2 } \right)
609: G\left( {m_\omega^2 ,m^2 ,m_k^2 } \right)}}{{m_k^2 }},
610: \end{eqnarray}
611: %%%%%%%
612: where
613: %%%%%%%
614: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Eq:FinalG_x_y}
615: G\left( x,y,z \right) = \frac{1}{16\pi ^2 }\frac{x\ln \left( x/z \right) -
616: y\ln \left( y/ z\right)}{x-y}.
617: \end{eqnarray}
618: %%%%%%%
619: Collecting these expressions, we finally obtain Eq.(\ref{Eq:I_two-loop}).
620: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
621: \begin{references}
622: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
623: \bibitem{SuperKamiokande} SuperKamiokande collaboration, Y. Fukuda {\it et al.},
624: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 1562 (1998); Phys. Lett. B {\bf 433}, 9 (1998) and {\bf 436}, 33 (1998).
625: See also K. Scholberg, hep-ex/9905016 (May, 1999).
626:
627: %
628: \bibitem{RecentSK}
629: Y. Takeuchi, Talk given at
630: \textit{the 30th Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics (ICHEP2000)},
631: 27 Jul. - 2 Aug., Osaka, Japan.
632:
633: \bibitem{SolarNeutrino}
634: See for exampe, J. N. Bahcall, P. I. Krastev and A.Yu.Smirnov,
635: Phys. Rev. D \textbf{58}, 096016 (1998); \textit{ibid}. \textbf{60}, 093001 (1999);
636: J. N. Bahcall, hep-ph/0002018 (Feb, 2000);
637: M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, P. C. de Holanda, C. Pena-Garay and J.W.F. Valle,
638: Nucl. Phys. B \textbf{573}, 3 (2000).
639:
640: %
641: \bibitem{EarlyMassive} Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 28}, 870 (1962).
642: See also B. Pontecorvo, JETP (USSR) {\bf 34}, 247 (1958);
643: B. Pontecorvo, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Piz. {\bf 53}, 1717 (1967);
644: V. Gribov and B. Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. {\bf 28B}, 493 (1969).
645:
646: %
647: \bibitem{SeeSaw} T. Yanagida, in {\it Proceedings of the Workshop on Unified
648: Theories and Baryon Number in the Universe} edited by A. Sawada and A. Sugamoto
649: (KEK Report No.79-18, Tsukuba, 1979), p.95; Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 64}, 1103 (1980);
650: M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, in {\it Supergravity} edited by P. van
651: Nieuwenhuizen and D.Z. Freedmann (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1979), p.315;
652: R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 44}, 912 (1980).
653:
654: \bibitem{Zee} A. Zee, Phys. Lett. {\bf 93B}, 389 (1980); {\bf 161B}, 141 (1985);
655: L. Wolfenstein, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B175}, 93 (1980).
656:
657: \bibitem{Babu} A. Zee, Nucl. Phys. {\bf 264B}, 99 (1986);
658: K. S. Babu, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 203}, 132 (1988); D. Chang, W-Y.Keung and P.B. Pal,
659: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 61}, 2420 (1988);
660: J.T. Peltoniemi, A. Yu. Smirnov and J.W.F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 286}, 321 (1992).
661: For a model with $\nu_R$, see, for example,
662: D. Choudhury, R. Gandhi, J.A. Gracey and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 50}, 3468 (1994).
663:
664: %
665: \bibitem{Radiative} For example, S. T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. {\bf 115B}, 401 (1982);
666: K. S. Babu and V. S. Mathur, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 196}, 218 (1987);
667: J. Liu, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 216}, 367 (1989);
668: D. Chang and W.-Y. Keung, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 39}, 1386 (1989);
669: W. Grimus and H. Neufeld, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 237}, 521 (1990);
670: B. K. Pal, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 44}, 2261 (1991);
671: W. Grimus and G. Nardulli, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 271}, 161 (1991);
672: A. Yu. Smirnov and Z. Tao, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 426}, 415 (1994).
673:
674: %
675: \bibitem{ZeeType}
676: A. Yu. Smirnov and M. Tanimoto, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{55}, 1665 (1997);
677: N. Gaur, A. Ghosal, E. Ma and P. Roy, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{58}, 071301 (1998);
678: C. Jarlskog, M. Matsuda, S. Skadhauge and M. Tanimoto, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{449}, 240 (1999);
679: Y. Okamoto and M. Yasu\`{e}, Prog. Theor. Phys. \textbf{101}, 1119 (1999);
680: P. H. Frampton and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{461}, 95 (1999);
681: G. C. McLaughlin and J. N. Ng, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{455}, 224 (1999);
682: A. S. Joshipura and S. D. Rindani, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{464}, 239 (1999);
683: J. E. Kim and J. S. Lee, hep-ph/9907452 (July, 1999);
684: N. Haba, M. Matsuda and M. Tanimoto, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{478}, 351 (2000);
685: C-K. Chua, X-G. He and W-Y. P. Hwang, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{479}, 224 (2000);
686: D. Chang and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{61}, 071303 (2000);
687: K. Cheung and O. C. W. Kong, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{61}, 113012 (2000);
688:
689: %
690: \bibitem{BiMaxmal}
691: D. V. Ahluwalia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A \textbf{13}, 2249 (1998);
692: V. Barger, P. Pakvasa, T. J. Weiler and K. Whisnant, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{437}, 107 (1998);
693: A. Baltz, A. S. Goldhaber and M. Goldhaber, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{81}, 5730 (1998);
694: M. Jezabek and Y. Sumino, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{440}, 327 (1998);
695: R. N. Mohapatra and S. Nussinov, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{441}, 299 (1998);
696: Y. Nomura and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{59}, 017303 (1999);
697: Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{451}, 129 (1999);
698: \textit{ibid}. \textbf{482}, 145 (2000);
699: I. Starcu and D.V.Ahluwalia, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{460}, 431 (1999);
700: H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{61}, 097301 (2000);
701: R. N. Mohapatra, A. P\'{e}rez-Lorenzana and C. A. de S. Pires, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{474}, 355 (2000).
702:
703: %
704: \bibitem{NearlyBiMaximal} H. Fritzsch and Z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 372}, 265 (1996);
705: M. Fukugida, M. Tanimoto and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 4429 (1998);
706: M. Tanimoto, Phys. Rev. D. {\bf 59}, 017304 (1999).
707:
708: %
709: \bibitem{LeLmuLtau} R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, D. Smith, A. Strumia and N. Weiner,
710: JHEP {\bf 12}, 017 (1998). See also,
711: S. T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. \textbf{110B}, 245 (1982);
712: C.N. Leung and S. T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. \textbf{125B}, 461 (1983);
713: A. Zee, in Ref.\cite{Babu}.
714: %
715: \bibitem{SU3U1}
716: F. Pisano and V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 46}, 410 (1992);
717: P.H. Frampton, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 69}, 2889 (1992);
718: D. Ng, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 49}, 4805 (1994).
719: See also M. Singer, J.W.F Valle and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 22}, 738 (1980).
720:
721: %
722: \bibitem{OkamotoYasue} Y. Okamoto and M. Yasu${\grave {\rm e}}$, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 466}, 267 (1999).
723:
724: %
725: \bibitem{EarlyRadiativeNu} R. Barbieri and R.N. Mohapatra, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 218}, 225(1989);
726: J. Liu, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 225}, 148(1989).
727:
728: %
729: \bibitem{RadiativeNu} V. Pleitez and M.D. Tonasse, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 48}, 5274 (1993);
730: F. Pisano, V. Pleitez and M.D. Tonasse, hep-ph/9310230 v2 (Feb., 1994);
731: P.H. Frampton, P.I. Krastev and J.T. Liu, Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A9}, 761 (1994);
732: M.B. Tully and G.C. Joshi, hep-ph/9810282 (Oct., 1998). See also J.W.F Valle and M. Singer,
733: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 28}, 540 (1983).
734:
735: %
736: \bibitem{TreeNu}
737: For mechanisms of well-suppressed tree-lever neutrino masses,
738: see M.B. Tully and G.C. Joshi, hep-ph/0011172 (Nov., 2000);
739: J.C. Montero, C.A. Pires and V. Pleitez, hep-ph/0011296 (Nov., 2000).
740:
741: %
742: \bibitem{BabuType}
743: For two-loop radiative models with the $L^\prime$ conservation, see
744: L. Lavoura, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 093011 (2000);
745: T. Kitabayashi and M. Yasu\`{e}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 490}, 236 (2000).
746:
747: %
748: \bibitem{OtherVariant} For a model with ($\phi^0$, $\phi^-$, $h^+$), see T. Kitabayashi and M. Yasu${\grave {\rm e}}$, hep-ph/0010087 (Oct., 2000).
749:
750: %
751: \bibitem{HeavyLepton}
752: M. Singer, J.W.F Valle and J. Schechter, in Ref.\cite{SU3U1};
753: F.-z. Chen, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 442}, 223 (1998);
754: V. Pleitez and M.D. Tonasse, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 430}, 174 (1998).
755:
756: %
757: \bibitem{OneTwoLoop} A.S. Joshipura and S.D. Rindani, in Ref.\cite{ZeeType};
758: D. Chang and A. Zee, in Ref.\cite{ZeeType}. See also,
759: J. T. Peltoniemi, A. Yu. Smirnov and J. W. F. Valle, in Ref. \cite{Babu};
760: J. T. Peltoniemu, D. Tommasini and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 298}, 383 (1993);
761: J. T. Peltoniemu and J. W. F. Valle, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 406}, 409 (1993).
762:
763:
764: %
765: \bibitem{Simplest} The simple extension would be to use $\ell_R\ell_Rk^{++}$ (as in \cite{Babu}) and
766: $\rho^{\prime +\dagger}\rho^{\prime +\dagger}k^{++}$.
767: However, it is impossible to form an
768: $SU(3)\times U(1)_N$-singlet that contains $\rho^{\prime +}\rho^{\prime +}$.
769:
770: %
771: \bibitem{Duplicate} R. Barbieri and R.N. Mohapatra, in Ref.\cite{EarlyRadiativeNu}.
772:
773: %
774: \bibitem{FCNC}
775: S.L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 15}, 1985 (1977);
776: H. Georgi and A. Pais, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 19}, 2746 (1979).
777:
778: %
779: \bibitem{FCNCSU3}
780: J.C. Montero, F. Pisano and V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 47}, 2918 (1993);
781: M. $\ddot{{\rm O}}$zer, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 54}, 4561 (1996);
782:
783: %
784: \bibitem{ZeeModelNU} C. Jarlskog, M. Matsuda, S. Skadhauge and M. Tanimoto, in Ref.\cite{ZeeType}.
785: See also, A.Yu. Smirnov and M. Tanimoto, in Ref.\cite{ZeeType}.
786:
787: %
788: \bibitem{RecentAtm} For recent analysis, see N. Fornengo, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J.W.F. Valle,
789: JHEP {\bf 7}, 006 (2000); Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 580}, 58 (2000).
790:
791: %
792: \bibitem{VOComment}
793: The announcement that the VO solution seems to be disfavored at the 95$\%$ confidence level has been made by the SuperKamiokande collaboration \cite{RecentSK}. However, it is stressed that this statement is not conclusive\cite{Takeuchi} and that theorists keep watching the VO solution to solar neutrino problem. See also C.E.C Lima, H.M. Portella and L.C.S. de Oliveira, hep-ph/0010038 v2 (Oct., 2000); R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, hep-ph/0011307 v2 (Nov., 2000).
794:
795: %
796: \bibitem{Takeuchi}
797: Y. Takeuchi, a talk at {\it Post Summer Institute 2000 on Neutrino Physics}, August 21-24, 2000, Fuji-Yoshida,
798: Japan.
799:
800: %
801: \bibitem{Appendix} T. Kitabayashi and M. Yasu${\grave {\rm e}}$, in Ref.\cite{BabuType}.
802: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
803: %\vspace{4mm}
804: \end{references}
805:
806: \noindent
807: {\bf \center Figure Captions\\}
808: \begin{figure}
809: \caption{One loop radiative diagrams for $\nu^1$-$\nu^i$ ($i$=2,3) via (a) charged leptons and
810: (b) heavy leptons.}
811: \label{Fig_1ab}
812: \end{figure}
813:
814: \begin{figure}
815: \caption{Two loop radiative diagrams for $\nu^1$-$\nu^1$.}
816: \label{Fig_2}
817: \end{figure}
818:
819: \newpage
820: \centerline{\epsfbox{fig.eps}}
821: \end{document}
822: \bye
823: