1: \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \textwidth 16cm
4: \textheight 24cm
5: \hoffset -1cm
6: \voffset -2cm
7:
8: \def\la{\mathrel{\mathpalette\fun <}}
9: \def\ga{\mathrel{\mathpalette\fun >}}
10: \def\fun#1#2{\lower3.6pt\vbox{\baselineskip0pt\lineskip.9pt
11: \ialign{$\mathsurround=0pt#1\hfil##\hfil$\crcr#2\crcr\sim\crcr}}}
12:
13: %------------------------------------------------
14: \begin{document}
15: \begin{titlepage}
16: \thispagestyle{empty}
17:
18: \hfill ITEP-PH-2/2000
19:
20: \hfill IFIC-00/39
21:
22: \hfill SINP MSU 2000-20/624
23:
24: \hfill \today
25:
26: \vspace*{1cm}
27: \begin{center}
28: \Large \bf On the search for 50 GeV neutrinos
29: \end{center}
30:
31: \vspace*{1cm}
32:
33: \begin{center}
34: \large V.A.~Ilyin \\
35: {\normalsize \it SINP MSU, 119899 Moscow, Russia} \\
36: {\normalsize \sf ilyin@theory.npi.msu.su}
37: \end{center}
38:
39: \begin{center}
40: \large M.~Maltoni \\
41: {\normalsize \it Instituto de F\'{\i}sica Corpuscular~--~C.S.I.C.,} \\
42: {\normalsize \it Departament de F\'{\i}sica Te\`orica,
43: Universitat de Val\`encia,} \\
44: {\normalsize \it Edificio Institutos de Paterna, Apt.~22085,
45: E-46071 Valencia, Spain} \\
46: {\normalsize \sf maltoni@ific.uv.es}
47: \end{center}
48:
49: \begin{center}
50: \large V.A.~Novikov, L.B~Okun \\
51: {\normalsize \it ITEP, 117218 Moscow, Russia} \\
52: {\normalsize \sf novikov@heron.itep.ru} \hspace{0.5cm}
53: {\normalsize \sf okun@heron.itep.ru}
54: \end{center}
55:
56: \begin{center}
57: \large A.N.~Rozanov \\
58: {\normalsize \it ITEP and CPPM, IN2P3-CNRS, Univ. M\'{e}diterran\'{e}e, F-13288,
59: Marseilles, France} \\
60: {\normalsize \sf rozanov@cppm.in2p3.fr}
61: \end{center}
62:
63: \begin{center}
64: \large M.I.~Vysotsky \\
65: {\normalsize \it ITEP, 117218 Moscow, Russia} \\
66: {\normalsize \sf vysotsky@heron.itep.ru}
67: \end{center}
68:
69: \vspace{2cm}
70:
71: \begin{abstract}
72: Using the computer code CompHEP we estimate the number of events and the
73: background, at LEP II and TESLA, for the reaction $e^+ e^- \to
74: N\bar{N}\gamma$, where $N$ is a hypothetical Dirac neutrino with mass of the
75: order of 50 GeV.
76: \end{abstract}
77:
78: \end{titlepage}
79:
80: \newpage
81: %----------------------------------------------------------------
82:
83: \vspace{0.5cm}
84: {\large \bf 1. Introduction}
85: \vspace{0.3cm}
86:
87: The precision measurements of ``invisible width" of $Z$-bosons prove that
88: there exist only three ordinary neutrinos: $\nu_e$, $\nu_{\mu}$,
89: $\nu_{\tau}$ \cite{1}. Precision measurements of other $Z$-observables when
90: compared with calculations of radiative corrections exclude the existence
91: of the fourth generation of fermions in the case when the fourth neutrino
92: $N$ is heavy ($M_N \ga 100$ GeV) \cite{2}. However, as was shown recently
93: \cite{3}, the radiative corrections become small if $m_N \sim m_Z/2$. Thus
94: the existence of fourth generation with charged lepton and quarks being
95: heavy ($M\ga 100$ GeV) but with neutrino being ``light" ($M_N \sim 50$ GeV)
96: is still an open possibility.
97:
98: As was proposed a long time ago \cite{6}, the cross section of
99: $e^+e^-$-annihilation into an invisible final state can be inferred from
100: observation of initial state bremsstrahlung. In LEP II experiments
101: \cite{ALEPH,DELPHI,L3,OPAL} the production of final states involving one
102: energetic photon,
103: \begin{equation}
104: e^+ e^- \to \gamma + \; {\rm "nothing"} \;\; ,
105: \label{1}
106: \end{equation}
107: was studied at centre-of-mass energies up to 202 GeV. In context of our
108: discussion ``nothing" means: a) $\nu_\mu\bar\nu_\mu$ and $\nu_\tau
109: \bar\nu_\tau$ produced in decays of real and virtual $Z$ bosons, b) $\nu_e
110: \bar\nu_e$, where two mechanisms contribute, through $s$-channel $Z$ boson
111: and from $t$-channel exchange of $W$ boson, and c) $N\bar N$ pair from
112: virtual $Z$ bosons.
113:
114: The aim of this note is to present results of calculation of the
115: differential cross sections of the reaction (\ref{1}) for various values of
116: $m_N$ and of $\sqrt{s_{e^+ e^-}}$, and perform the {\it Signal/Background}
117: (S/B) analysis for the search for ``50 GeV neutrino" at LEP II and future
118: linear collider TESLA \cite{ee500}. The calculation has been performed
119: using the computer code CompHEP \cite{CompHEP}.
120:
121: The fourth generation leptons were introduced in the Standard Model
122: Lagrangian as an isodoublet for left-handed components of massive fermions
123: (including neutrino) and isosinglet for right-handed states. Then, we
124: assume vanishing mixing with the fourth generation -- mixing angle between
125: the fourth generation neutrino and those of first three generations should
126: be less than $10^{-6}$ \cite{100}.
127:
128: Higher order QED corrections connected with radiation from initial electron
129: and positron states were taken into account by using the ``structure
130: function" technique: the squared matrix elements in the Born approximation
131: were convoluted with the {\it Initial State Radiation} (ISR) structure
132: function \cite{ISR} at the scale parameter $Q=\sqrt{s}$. We found that ISR
133: enlarges the signal cross sections by about 8-3\% for $M_N=46-50$ GeV,
134: while background is not changed or slightly decreased for these values of
135: neutrino mass because of opposite effect in $\nu_e\bar\nu_e$ and two other
136: (muonic an tauonic) channels. Note, that on the $Z$-peak shoulder this
137: enhancement is much higher, about 20-30\% both for the signal and
138: background.
139:
140: SM parameters were set in calculations as $M_Z=91.1884$ GeV,
141: $\Gamma_Z=2.45$ GeV, $M_W=80.343$ GeV. Couplings at electroweak vertices
142: were normalized to $\alpha(m_e)\cdot\alpha(M_Z)^2= (1/137)\cdot(1/128)^2$,
143: thus taking $W$ and $Z$ couplings at the electroweak scale while the photon
144: emission vertex is kept in the classical limit.
145:
146:
147: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
148: \vspace{0.5cm}
149: {\large\bf 2. \hspace{0.5cm} 50 GeV neutrinos at LEP II}
150: \vspace{0.3cm}
151:
152: As we have mentioned already, the single photon final states were analyzed
153: by all LEP II experiments \cite{ALEPH,DELPHI,L3,OPAL} and no deviations
154: from SM predictions were observed. There were established limits on
155: additional photon production in the context of different ``new physics"
156: hypotheses, in particular in SUSY models and low scale gravity models with
157: extra dimensions. It is clear, that these data can be used also to
158: establish the limits on the mass of the fourth generation (Dirac) neutrino
159: in the discussed mass range $m_N\sim 50$ GeV, what was not done yet as we
160: know. In this section we make a phenomenological analysis of possible
161: limits on $m_N$ taking into account LEP II data, being collected already
162: \cite{ALEPH,DELPHI,L3,OPAL},
163:
164: \begin{center}
165: \begin{tabular}{llll}
166: 1997-1998 & $\sqrt{s}=182,189$ GeV, & $\sim 226$ pb$^{-1}$/Coll., &
167: ${\cal L}_{tot}=904.2$ pb$^{-1}$; \\
168: 1999 & $\sqrt{s}=192-202$ GeV, & $\sim 230$ pb$^{-1}$/Coll., &
169: ${\cal L}_{tot}=923$ pb$^{-1}$,
170: \end{tabular}
171: \end{center}
172:
173: \noindent
174: and data from current (final) run with collision energies $199.9-208.7$ GeV
175: (average energy 205 GeV). From LEPII schedule one can expect that it will
176: be delivered about 200 pb$^{-1}$ during the 2000 run. Thus, four
177: experiments will accumulate in total 800 pb$^{-1}$ additional data.
178:
179: In Fig.~\ref{fig:Minv200-360} (upper left side plot) the distribution on
180: ``invisible" mass $M_{inv}$ (invariant mass of the neutrino
181: pair)\footnote{$M_{inv}$ is directly connected with another variable
182: frequently used, $x_\gamma\equiv E_\gamma/E_{beam}=1-M_{inv}^2/s$.} is
183: represented for SM background and the $N\bar N$ signal for $\sqrt{s}=200$
184: GeV and different values of $N$ masses, $M_N=46-100$ GeV. Here we applied
185: kinematical cuts on the photon polar angle and transverse momentum,
186: $|\cos\vartheta_\gamma|<0.95$ and $p_T^\gamma>0.0375\sqrt{s}$, being the
187: ALEPH selection criteria \cite{ALEPH}. Other experiments tried to include
188: in the analysis also events with smaller photon polar angles and lower
189: transverse momenta. E.g. DELPHI collected events with photon emmited at
190: angles up to $3.8^\circ$.
191:
192: One can see that the S/B ratio is better on the $Z$-peak shoulder. However,
193: for higher significance of the $N\bar N$ signal, evaluated as
194: $N_S/\sqrt{N_B}$, one should include whole interval on $M_{inv}$ allowed
195: kinematically. For example, for statistics 230 pb$^{-1}$ the signal
196: significance is 0.72 for $m_N=48$ GeV, see Table~\ref{tab:sign200} for
197: details. In this case SM predicts about 212 events per experiment with only
198: 9 events with massive neutrino pair. Here we have taken into account the
199: photon detection efficiency -- in the ALEPH Monte-Carlo analysis
200: \cite{ALEPH} it was estimated at the level 74\%. For other experiments the
201: photon detection efficiency is lower, but they used wider selection
202: criteria.
203:
204: Let us now look how the $N\bar N$ signal significance depends on angular
205: and transverse momentum cuts. In the Table~\ref{tab:cuts200} the cross
206: sections for SM background and $N\bar N$ signal (with $m_N=48$ GeV) are
207: given for three values of the angular and $p_T$ cuts. One can see that the
208: signal significance is higher for weaker cuts.
209:
210: Then, we found that, in spite of the $N\bar N$ signal being due to
211: $s$-channel diagrams, while large contribution to the SM background is due
212: to $t$-channel $W$-exchange, the angular distributions have similar shape
213: for signal and background; that is clearly seen on Fig.~\ref{fig:theta200}.
214: Thus, it seems that there are no chances to improve the signal significance
215: by using more complicated selection criteria, e.g. exploiting the
216: correlation between photon polar angle and $p_T$.
217:
218: The general conclusion from this analysis is that one should collect single
219: photon events with the weakest kinematical cuts allowed by detector
220: construction and conditions to suppress reducible background (e.g. Bhabha
221: scattering). Of course, only a careful simulation can give answer what are
222: the optimal selection criteria for the search for ``50 GeV neutrino". In
223: what follows we use ALEPH selection criteria, $|\cos\vartheta_\gamma|<0.95$
224: and $p_T^\gamma>0.0375\sqrt{s}$, and apply cut $M_{inv}>2m_N$.
225:
226: On Fig.~\ref{fig:cs-mN} the signal and background cross sections and signal
227: significances (for different samples of data) are represented as a function
228: of $m_N$. One can derive that only the analysis based on combined data from
229: all four experiments both from 1997-1999 runs ($\sqrt{s}=182-202$ GeV) and
230: from the current run, in total $\sim 2600$ pb$^{-1}$, can exclude at 95\%
231: CL the interval of $N$ mass up to $\sim 50$ GeV.
232:
233:
234: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
235: \vspace{0.5cm}
236: {\large \bf 3. \hspace{0.5cm} 50 GeV neutrinos at TESLA}
237: \vspace{0.3cm}
238:
239: From the point of view of expected cross sections the increase in energy
240: leads to the decrease both of the signal and the background. This can be
241: seen from comparing the left-side plots on Fig.~\ref{fig:cs-mN}. However
242: this decrease may be over compensated by the proposed increase of
243: luminosity of the future linear $e^+ e^-$-collider. Thus for TESLA the
244: expected year luminosity at the first stage ($\sqrt{s}=360$ or 500 GeV) is
245: 300 ${\rm fb}^{-1}$ \cite{TESLA}.
246:
247: Further advantage of the linear collider is the possibility to use
248: polarized beams (80\% circular polarization for electrons and 60\% for
249: positrons). This is important in suppressing the cross section of $e^+ e^-
250: \to \nu_e\bar{\nu}_e\gamma$ as this reaction goes mainly through the
251: $t$-channel exchange of the $W$ boson and gives substantial contribution to
252: the background\footnote{For ``light" neutrinos $45 \; {\rm GeV} < M_N < 50$
253: GeV the ratio of $s$ channel to $t$ channel contributions is enhanced at
254: the shoulder of $Z$-peak.}. However, even without exploiting the beam
255: polarization the advantage of TESLA in the total number of events is
256: extremely important. Thus, Standard Model is expected to give approximately
257: 0.3 million single photon events for $M_{inv}>100$ GeV while the number of
258: 50 GeV neutrino pairs would be about 4000. On Fig.~\ref{fig:cs-mN} (lower
259: plots) the signal and background cross sections, as well the significance,
260: are represented for TESLA as a function of $N$ mass. Here we applied cuts
261: $|\cos\vartheta_\gamma|<0.95$, $p_T^\gamma>0.0375\sqrt{s}$ and
262: $M_{inv}>2m_N$, and assumed photon detection efficiency to be 74\%,
263: similarly to the LEP II case.
264:
265: With such numbers, although the signal over background ratio is still small
266: (2.3-0.5\% for $m_N=45-100$ GeV correspondingly) the significance of the
267: signal is excellent, higher than 2 for the whole interval of N neutrino
268: mass under discussion. It means that fourth generation Dirac neutrino will
269: be excluded at the 95\% CL in TESLA experiment. However, if such a neutrino
270: exists this new particle will be discovered with $5\sigma$ significance
271: after one year of the TESLA operation at first stage if $m_N<60$ GeV.
272:
273: %--------------------------------------------------------
274: \vspace{0.5cm}
275: {\large\bf Conclusions}
276: \vspace{0.3cm}
277:
278: The total sample of single photon events from all four LEP II detectors
279: can exclude the 50 GeV neutrinos at the 95\% CL or show the evidences of
280: their existence with only $2\sigma$ significance.
281:
282: The future TESLA experiment at its first stage (with collision energy 360
283: or 500 GeV) will be able to exclude or discover fourth generation, if one
284: combines TESLA results with the bounds from radiative corrections \cite{2}.
285:
286: %--------------------------------------------------------
287: \vspace{0.5cm}
288: {\large\bf Acknowledgements}
289: \vspace{0.3cm}
290:
291: We thank P.Coyle, A.Tilquin, A.Ealet and R.Tanaka for useful discussions.
292:
293: The work of V.N., L.O. and M.I. have been supported by RFBR grants
294: 98-02-17372 and 00-15-96562, V.N. and M.V. are supported by RFBR grant
295: 98-02-17453 as well. L.O. acknowledges the A. von Humboldt Award. The work
296: of M.M. is supported by DGICYT under grant PB98-0693 and by the TMR network
297: grant ERBFMRX-CT96-0090 of the European Union. The work of V.I. has been
298: partially supported by the CERN-INTAS 99-377 and RFBR-DFG 99-02-04011
299: grants and by St.Petersburg Grant Center.
300:
301: %-------------------------------------------------------------
302: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
303:
304: \bibitem{1}
305: D.Karlen, "Review of Particle Physics", Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C3} (1998) 319.
306:
307: \bibitem{2}
308: J.Erler and P.Langacker, "Review of Particle Physics", Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C3}
309: (1998) 90.
310:
311: \bibitem{3}
312: M.Maltoni et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B476} (2000) 107.
313:
314: \bibitem{6}
315: A.Dolgov, L.Okun and V.Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B41} (1972) 197.
316:
317: \bibitem{ALEPH}
318: "ALEPH Collaboration, Single- and Multi-Photon Production in $e^+e^-$
319: Collisions at Centre-of-Mass Energies between 188.6 and 201.6 GeV,
320: ALEPH 2000-008, CONF 2000-005, contribution
321: to Moriond Conference, March 2000, France".
322:
323: "ALEPH Collaboration, Single- and Multi-Photon Production in $e^+e^-$
324: Collisions at a Centre-of-Mass Energy of 183 GeV",
325: Phys. Lett. {\bf B429} (1998) 201.
326:
327: \bibitem{DELPHI}
328: "DELPHI Collaboration, Update at 192-202 GeV of the Analysis of Single
329: Photon Events with Missing Energy", DELPHI 2000-023, CONF 344, contribution
330: to Moriond Conference, March 2000, France".
331:
332: "DELPHI Collaboration, Photon Events with Missing Energy at 183 and 189
333: GeV", CERN-EP-2000-021, Jan. 2000.
334:
335: \bibitem{L3}
336: "L3 Collaboration, Single and Multi-Photon Events with Missing Energy
337: in $e^+e^-$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 192-202$ GeV",
338: L3 Note 2523, contribution to Moriond Conference, March 2000, France".
339:
340: "L3 Collaboration: Single and Multi-Photon Events with Missing Energy in
341: $e^+e^-$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}=189$ GeV",
342: Phys. Lett. {\bf B470} (1999) 268.
343:
344: "L3 Collaboration: Single and Multi-Photon Events with missing energy in
345: $e^+e^-$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}=183$ GeV",
346: Phys. Lett. {\bf B444} (1998) 503.
347:
348: \bibitem{OPAL}
349: "OPAL Collaboration: Photonic Events with Missing Energy in $e+e-$
350: Collisions at $\sqrt(s) = 192-206$ GeV", contributed abstract for
351: ICHEP2000.
352:
353: "OPAL Collaboration, Photonic Events with Missing Energy
354: in $e^+e^-$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}= 189$ GeV", PR306,
355: CERN-EP-2000-050, 6 April 2000.
356:
357: "OPAL Collaboration, Search for Anomalous Photonic Events with
358: Missing Energy in $e^+e^-$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}=189$ GeV",
359: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C8} (1999) 23.
360:
361: \bibitem{ee500} E.Accomando et al., "Physics with $e^+e^-$ linear colliders"
362: Phys. Rep. {\bf 299} (1998) 1.
363:
364: P Zerwas, "Physics with an e+e- linear collider at high luminosity",
365: DESY 99-178, hep-ph/0003221, March 2000.
366:
367:
368: \bibitem{CompHEP}
369: A.Pukhov et al.,
370: "CompHEP -a package for Feynman diagram evaluation and multi-particle phase
371: space integration", CompHEP user's manual, v.3.3.
372: Preprint INP MSU 98-41/542, 1998; hep-ph/9908288.
373:
374: \bibitem{100}
375: Review of Particle Physics, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C3} (1998) 321.
376:
377: \bibitem{ISR}
378: E.Kuraev and V.Fadin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 41} (1985) 466.
379:
380: S.Jadach and M.Skrzypek, Z. Phys. {\bf C49} (1991) 577.
381:
382: {\it see also discussion of ISR effects for LEP II processes in:}
383: "Physics at LEP2", ed. by G.Altarelli, T.Sj\"{o}strand and F.Zwirner,
384: CERN 96-01; "Four-Fermion Production in Electron-Positron Collisions"
385: (LEP2-MC Workshop, 1999-2000), ed. by M.W.Gruenewald
386: and G.Passarino, hep-ph/0005309.
387:
388: \bibitem{TESLA}
389: {\it see, e.g., list of current TESLA reference parameters in}
390:
391: {\sf http://www.desy.de/~njwalker/ecfa-desy-wg4/parameter\_list.html}
392:
393: \end{thebibliography}
394:
395: %-----------------------------------------------------------
396: \clearpage
397: {\large\bf Tables}
398:
399: \vspace{2cm}
400:
401: \begin{table}[hb]
402: \begin{center}
403: \begin{tabular}{|l|llllll|}
404: \hline
405: max $M_{inv}$ GeV & - & - & 140 & 130 & 120 & 110 \\
406: min $M_{inv}$ GeV & $2 m_N$ & 97.5 & 97.5 & 97.5 & 97.5 & 97.5 \\
407: \hline
408: $\sigma_{SM}$ pb & 1.243 & 1.175 & 0.402 & 0.333 & 0.268 & 0.196 \\
409: $\sigma_{N\bar N}$ pb &0.0529 &0.0512 &0.0269 &0.0228 &0.0182 &0.0125 \\
410: \hline
411: $N_S/\sqrt{N_B}$, 230 pb$^{-1}$ &0.720 &0.716 &0.644 &0.598 &0.571 &0.428 \\
412: \hline
413: \end{tabular}
414: \end{center}
415: \caption{Cross sections and $N\bar N$ signal significance for
416: different values of the $M_{inv}$ cut.
417: $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV and $m_N=48$ GeV.
418: Cuts applied: $|\cos\vartheta_\gamma|<0.95$ and
419: $p_T^\gamma>0.0375\sqrt{s}$.
420: \label{tab:sign200}}
421: \end{table}
422:
423: \vspace{2cm}
424:
425: \begin{table}[hb]
426: \vspace{2cm}
427: \begin{tabular}{|l|lll|lll|lll|}
428: \hline
429: $\vartheta_\gamma>$ & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{3}
430: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{18.2}
431: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{30} \\
432: deg & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{}
433: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{($|\cos\vartheta_\gamma|<0.95$)}
434: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{} \\
435: \hline
436: $p_T^\gamma>$ & 1 & 7.5 & 15 & 1 & 7.5 & 15 & 1 & 7.5 & 15 \\
437: GeV & & & & & & & & & \\
438: \hline
439: $\sigma_{SM}$pb&6.089 &2.731 &1.682 &3.620 &1.947 &1.410 &2.668 &1.458 &1.082\\
440: $\sigma_{N\bar N}$pb&0.153 &0.0706&0.0436&0.0903&0.0527&0.0392&0.0668&0.0400
441: &0.0304\\
442: \hline
443: $N_S/\sqrt{N_B}$,
444: & 0.942 & 0.648 & 0.509 & 0.720 & 0.573 & 0.501 & 0.620 &
445: 0.502 & 0.443\\
446: 230 pb$^{-1}$ & & & & & & & & & \\
447: \hline
448: \end{tabular}
449: \caption{Cross sections and $N\bar N$ signal significance
450: for different values of the cuts on photon polar angle and transverse
451: momentum.
452: $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV, $m_N=48$ GeV.
453: The cut $M_{inv}>2m_N$ is applied.
454: \label{tab:cuts200}}
455: \end{table}
456:
457:
458: %-----------------------------------------------------------
459: \clearpage
460: {\large\bf Figures}
461:
462:
463: \begin{figure}[hb]
464: \unitlength=1cm
465: \vspace*{1.5cm}
466: \begin{picture}(16,14.5)
467: \put(0,8){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{minv200.eps}}
468: \put(8,8){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{sb200.eps}}
469: \put(0,0){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{minv360.eps}}
470: \put(8,0){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{sb360.eps}}
471: \end{picture}
472: %\vspace*{1cm}
473: \caption{
474: The left side plots: $d\sigma/d M_{inv}$ (in pb) for
475: Standard Model and for the different values of $m_N$.
476: The right side plots: the {\it Signal/Background} ratio as a function of
477: $M_{inv}$.
478: Cuts applied: $|\cos\vartheta_\gamma|<0.95$ and $p_T^\gamma>0.0375\sqrt{s}$.
479: The photon detection efficiency 74\% is assumed.
480: \label{fig:Minv200-360} }
481: \end{figure}
482:
483: \begin{figure}[hb]
484: \unitlength=1cm
485: \vspace*{1.5cm}
486: \begin{center}
487: \begin{picture}(16,8)
488: \put(0,0){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{200th1.eps}}
489: \put(8,0){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{200th15.eps}}
490: \end{picture}
491: %\vspace*{1cm}
492: \end{center}
493: \caption{Distribution on photon polar angle for the Standard Model and for
494: the $N\bar N$ signal with $m_N=48$ GeV. The cut $M_{inv}>2m_N$ is applied.
495: \label{fig:theta200} }
496: \end{figure}
497:
498:
499: \begin{figure}[hb]
500: \unitlength=1cm
501: %\vspace*{1.5cm}
502: \begin{center}
503: \begin{picture}(16,16)
504: \put(0,8){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{cs-mn200.eps}}
505: \put(8,8){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{sign-mn200.eps}}
506: \put(0,0){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{cs-mn360.eps}}
507: \put(8,0){\epsfxsize=8cm \leavevmode \epsfbox{sign-mn360.eps}}
508: \end{picture}
509: %\vspace*{1cm}
510: \end{center}
511: \caption{Cross sections for the $N\bar N$ signal and SM background (left side plots)
512: and $N\bar N$ signal significances at different statistics (right side plots)
513: as function of the neutrino mass.
514: Cuts applied: $M_{inv}>2m_N$, $|\cos\vartheta_\gamma|<0.95$ and
515: $p_T^\gamma>0.0375\sqrt{s}$.
516: For the significance the photon detection efficiency 74\% is assumed.
517: \label{fig:cs-mN} }
518: \end{figure}
519:
520:
521: \end{document}
522: