1: \documentstyle[12pt, epsf]{article}

2: \setlength{\footheight}{0.cm}

3: \setlength{\textwidth}{16.3cm}%{19.8cm}

4: \setlength{\textheight}{23.6cm}%{27.5cm}

5: %\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-1.5cm}%{-1cm}

6: %\setlength{\evensidemargin}{-1.5cm}%{-1cm}

7: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0cm}

8: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0cm}

9: \setlength{\topmargin}{-1.9cm}%{-3.5cm}

10: \parskip=6pt

11: \parindent=0pt

12: %\setlength{\baselineskip}{1.0cm}

13: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.4}%{1.4}

14: %\pagestyle{plain}

15: \newcommand{\cs}{{\cal S}}

16: \newcommand{\csbc}{{\cal S}_{B \leftrightarrow C}}

17: \newcommand{\cl}{{\cal L}}

18: \newcommand{\clbc}{{\cal L}_{B \leftrightarrow C}}

19: \newcommand{\ca}{{\cal A}}

20: \newcommand{\cabc}{{\cal A}_{B \leftrightarrow C}}

21: \newcommand{\cat}{{\cal A}_{tot}}

22: \newcommand{\cf}{{\cal F}}

23: \newcommand{\cfbc}{{\cal F}_{B \leftrightarrow C}}

24: \newcommand{\cc}{{\cal C}}

25: \newcommand{\ccbc}{{\cal C}_{B \leftrightarrow C}}

26: \newcommand{\cz}{{\cal J}} % May want to use J later

27: \newcommand{\czbc}{{\cal J}_{B \leftrightarrow C}}

28: \newcommand{\lr}{\leftrightarrow}

29: \newcommand{\rl}{\leftrightarrow}

30: \newcommand{\pbx}{\bp \rightarrow -\bp}

31: \newcommand{\ti}{{\otimes}}

32: \newcommand{\st}{{s\bar{s}}}

33: \newcommand{\sqq}{{S_{q\bar{q}}}}

34: \newcommand{\Eta}{{\Omega}}

35: \newcommand{\T}{{\Im}}

36: \newcommand{\bp}{{\bf p}}

37: \newcommand{\bk}{{\bf k}}

38: \newcommand{\bx}{{\bf x}}

39: \newcommand{\by}{{\bf y}}

40: \newcommand{\bz}{{\bf z}}

41: \newcommand{\bzz}{{\bf 0}}

42: \newcommand{\Tr}{{\mbox{Tr}}}

43: \newcommand{\btab}{\begin{tabbing}}

44: \newcommand{\etab}{\end{tabbing}}

45: \newcommand{\eqntimes}{\mbox{} \times}

46: \newcommand{\eqnhspace}{\hspace{3em}}

47: %\newcommand{\intereqnvspace}{\vspace{-1.4ex}}

48: \newcommand{\intereqnvspace}{\vspace{-2.1ex}}

49: \newcommand{\eqnneghspace}{\hspace{-6ex}}

50: \newcommand{\beqn}{\begin{equation}}

51: \newcommand{\eeqn}{\end{equation}}

52: \newcommand{\barr}[1]{\begin{array}{#1}}

53: \newcommand{\earr}{\end{array}}

54: \newcommand{\beqna}{\begin{eqnarray}}

55: \newcommand{\eeqna}{\end{eqnarray}}

56: \newcommand{\btablec}{\begin{table} \begin{center}}

57: \newcommand{\etablec}{\end{center} \end{table}}

58: \newcommand{\lapprox}{\stackrel{<}{\scriptstyle \sim}}

59: \newcommand{\rapprox}{\stackrel{>}{\scriptstyle \sim}}

60: \newcommand{\gapproxeq}{\lower.7ex\hbox{$\;\stackrel{\textstyle>}

61: {\sim}\;$}}

62: %\newcommand{\plabel}[1]{\label{#1} \mbox{ \small  \sc  #1} \hspace{0.2cm}}

63: \newcommand{\plabel}[1]{\label{#1}}

64: %\newcommand{\pbibitem}[1]{\bibitem{#1} \mbox{\small \sc #1} \hspace{0.2cm}}

65: \newcommand{\pbibitem}[1]{\bibitem{#1}}

66: \marginparwidth=3cm

67: \marginparsep=0.6cm

68: %\def\question#1{}

69: \def\question#1{{{\marginpar{\tiny \sc #1}}}}

70: \input epsf

71: 

72: \begin{document}

73: \title{

74: \begin{flushright} 

75: \small{hep-ph/0007216} \\ 

76: \small{LA-UR-00-2143} 

77: \end{flushright} 

78: \vspace{0.6cm}  

79: \Large\bf Filter for strangeness in $J^{PC}$ exotic four--quark states}

80: \vskip 0.2 in

81: \author{Philip R. Page\thanks{\small \em E-mail:

82: prp@lanl.gov}\\{\small \em  Theoretical Division, Los Alamos

83: National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA}}

84: %\date{September 1998}

85: \date{}

86: \maketitle

87: \begin{abstract}{Symmetrization selection rules for the decay of

88: four--quark states to two $J=0$ mesons are analysed in a non --

89: field theoretic context with

90: isospin symmetry. The OZI allowed decay of an isoscalar 

91: $J^{PC}=\{1,3,\ldots\}^{-+}$ exotic state to 

92: $\eta^{'}\eta$ or $f_0^{'}f_0$ is only allowed for four--quark 

93: components of the state containing one $s\bar{s}$ pair, providing a

94: filter for strangeness content in these states. 

95: Decays of four--quark $a_0$ states are narrower than otherwise expected.

96: If the experimentally

97: observed $1^{-+}$ enhancement in $\eta\pi$ is resonant, it is

98: qualitatively in agreement with being a four--quark state. 

99: }

100: \end{abstract}

101: \bigskip

102: 

103: Keywords: symmetrization, selection rule, four--quark state, 

104: decay, $J^{PC}$ exotic

105: 

106: PACS number(s): \hspace{.2cm}11.15.Pg \hspace{.2cm}12.38.Aw 

107: \hspace{.2cm} 12.39.Mk \hspace{.2cm} 13.25.Jx

108: 

109: \vspace{1cm}

110: 

111: Ever since the original work in the MIT bag model, 

112: it has been recognized

113: that multiquark states containing strange quarks can often have {\it lower}

114: energies than those with only

115: the equivalent light (up or down) quarks \cite{bag}, leading to the

116: prediction of the stability of strangelets.

117: For four--quark ($q\bar{q}q\bar{q}$)

118: states, the same conclusion

119: was reached in potential models \cite{semay}. 

120: 

121: In this Letter symmetrization selection rule II \cite{sel},

122: i.e. the case of isospin symmetry, is exhaustively 

123: analysed for the decay

124: of four--quark states to two $J=0$ hybrid or conventional

125: mesons  in QCD, expanding the earlier analysis 

126: \cite{sel}.

127: Decay topologies of (hybrid) 

128: mesons and glueballs to two (hybrid) mesons were considered

129: before \cite{sel}. The possibility of six--quark or higher multi--quark 

130: states is not considered.

131: It is shown that certain decays signal the presence of

132: strangeness in decaying 

133: $J^{PC}$ exotic four--quark states, providing an experimental tool to

134: verify the claimed presence of strangeness in these states. 

135: Decays also allow us to distinguish between the hybrid, glueball

136:  or four--quark

137: character of a decaying $J^{PC}$ exotic state. There are also implications

138: for non--exotic four--quark states.

139: 

140: We first consider states built only from isospin $\frac{1}{2}$ 

141: quarks, i.e. $u$ and $d$ quarks.

142: For four--quark states A  we are free to choose any 

143: basis to construct the flavour state. Labelling the quarks as $q_1\bar{q}_2q_3\bar{q}_4$,

144: and grouping $q_1\bar{q}_2$ and $q_3\bar{q}_4$ (denoted by $X$ and $Y$)

145: together, the four--quark flavour state is

146: 

147: \beqn \label{f1} |I_A I_A^z I_X I_Y \rangle \equiv

148: \sum_{I_X^zI_Y^z}

149: \;\langle I_A I_A^z | I_X I_X^z I_Y I_Y^z 

150: \rangle |X\rangle \; |Y\rangle  

151: \eeqn

152: where we summed over all isospin projections\footnote{

153: Because $X$ and $Y$ are merely labels, the states will be constructed 

154: to be representations of the label group, i.e. either symmetric or 

155: antisymmetric under $X\leftrightarrow Y$ exchange.

156: Models where the dynamics are truncated in such a way that 

157: $q_1\bar{q}_2$ occur in one meson, and $q_3\bar{q}_4$ in another, i.e.

158: where four--quark states are viewed as molecules of mesons, are {\it not}

159: included in our discussion. This is because, e.g. for

160: an $\eta\pi$ molecule, one can define $q_1$ and $\bar{q}_2$ to be in $\eta$. 

161: Label symmetry requires that $q_1$ and $\bar{q}_2$ can also be in 

162: $\pi$. But this is impossible by assumption. It should be noted that in QCD there is

163: nothing special about $q_1\bar{q}_2$ as opposed to $q_3\bar{q}_4$, so that

164: $X\leftrightarrow Y$ exchange is allowed.}. States can be verified to

165: satisfy the

166: orthonormality condition $\langle I_A I_A^z I_X I_Y |I_A^{'} I_A^{z'} I_X^{'} I_Y^{'} \rangle 

167: = \delta_{I_AI_A^{'}}\delta_{I_A^zI_A^{z'}}\delta_{I_XI_X^{'}}\delta_{I_YI_Y^{'}}$.

168: 

169: In this Letter we consider four--quark states with integral isospin.

170: When $I_A = 0$, the physical state is a linear combination of $|0\: 0\: 0 \: 0 \rangle$

171: and $|0\: 0\: 1 \: 1 \rangle$. For $I_A = 2$, the physical state is $|2\: I_A^z \: 1 \: 1 \rangle$.

172: Thus in both cases $I_X = I_Y$. When $I_A=1$, the physical state is a linear combination of 

173: $|1\: I_A^z 1\: 1 \rangle , \; |1\: I_A^z 1\: 0 \rangle$ and $|1\: I_A^z 0\: 1 \rangle$.

174: For $I_A=1$, we define new

175: states $|1\: I_A^z \pm\rangle \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1\: I_A^z 1\: 0 \rangle \pm |1\: I_A^z 0\: 1 \rangle)$.

176: The presence of $s\bar{s}$ pairs is now explored.

177: By convention, we choose a single strange

178: pair to correspond to labels $q_3 = s$ and $\bar{q}_4=\bar{s}$, so that

179: 1 and 2 still labels $u,d$ quarks. The four--quark state is

180: $ |I_A I_A^z I_X s\bar{s} \rangle \equiv |X\rangle \; s\bar{s}$,

181: either isovector or isoscalar. 

182: Another possibility is $|00c\bar{c}s\bar{s}\rangle\equiv c\bar{c}

183: s\bar{s}$.

184: For two strange pairs, the state

185: is $|0 0 s\bar{s}s\bar{s} \rangle \equiv s\bar{s}s\bar{s}$.

186: Other states are obtained by freely interchanging strange, charm and

187: bottom quarks.

188: Explicit forms for some of the neutral states are given in Table 1.

189: 

190: \begin{table}[t]

191: \begin{center}

192: \begin{tabular}{|l|l||l|l|}

193: \hline %------------------------

194: \multicolumn{2}{|l||}{Isospin 2 four--quark:}&$|000\st\rangle$ & $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}) s\bar{s}$\\ \cline{1-2}

195: $|20 11\rangle$ &$\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}(-u\bar{d}d\bar{u}-d\bar{u}u\bar{d}$&

196: %$|00\st\st\rangle$ & $s\bar{s}s\bar{s}$

197: & \\ \cline{3-4}

198:                 &$+u\bar{u}u\bar{u}-u\bar{u}d\bar{d}-d\bar{d}u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}d\bar{d})$                           &\multicolumn{2}{|l|}{Isospin 1 four--quark:}\\ \cline{1-4}

199: \multicolumn{2}{|l||}{Isospin 0 four--quark:}&$|10 11\rangle$ & $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (d\bar{u}u\bar{d}-u\bar{d}d\bar{u})$\\ \cline{1-2}

200: $|0000\rangle$  &$\frac{1}{2}(u\bar{u}u\bar{u}+u\bar{u}d\bar{d}+d\bar{d}u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}d\bar{d})$&$|10 + \rangle$ & $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (u\bar{u}u\bar{u}-d\bar{d}d\bar{d})$\\

201: $|0011\rangle$  &$-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(u\bar{d}d\bar{u}+d\bar{u}u\bar{d}$&$|10 - \rangle$ & $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (u\bar{u}d\bar{d}-d\bar{d}u\bar{u})$\\ 

202:                 &$+\frac{1}{2}(u\bar{u}u\bar{u}-u\bar{u}d\bar{d}-d\bar{d}u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}d\bar{d})$&$|10 1\st\rangle$ & $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (u\bar{u}-d\bar{d}) s\bar{s}$\\ 

203: %\cline{5-6}\cline{1-4} %---------------------------

204: \hline %------------------------

205: \end{tabular}

206: \caption{Explicit neutral four--quark flavour states.

207: % $|I_A I_A^z I_X I_Y \rangle$ (see Eq. \protect\ref{f1}).

208: }

209: \end{center}

210: \end{table}

211: 

212: 

213: We shall be interested in decay and production $A\rl

214: BC$ processes in the rest frame of A. For simplicity we shall usually

215: refer to the decay process $A\rightarrow BC$, but the statements shall be equally

216: valid for the production process $A\leftarrow BC$.

217: The decay of an isospin $I_A$ four--quark state to two states with integral 

218: isospins $I_B$ and $I_C$ is considered \cite{note}.

219: The strong interactions include all interactions

220: described by QCD. The quarks and antiquarks in A are assumed to travel in all possible 

221: complicated paths going forward and backward in time and emitting and absorbing

222: gluons until they emerge in B and C. We shall restrict B and C to angular momentum $J=0$ states with valence quark--antiquark content and arbitrary gluonic excitation, i.e. to hybrid or conventional mesons. B and C can be radial

223: excitations or ground states, with $J^{P} =

224: 0^{-}$ or $0^{+}$. If C--parity is a good quantum number, 

225: $J^{PC} = 0^{-+},0^{+-},0^{++}$ or $0^{--}$ are allowed. Since $0^{-+}$ and

226: $0^{++}$ ground state

227: meson states B and C are most likely to be allowed by phase space, they are used in

228: the examples.

229: 

230: Assume that states B and C are identical in all respects except, in principle,

231: their flavour and their equal but

232: opposite momenta $\bp$ and $ -\bp$.

233: Hence $B$ and $C$ have the same parity, $C$--parity, radial and gluonic 

234: excitation, as well

235: as the same internal structure. However, they are not required to have 

236: the same energies or masses \cite{sel}.

237: One possible example is $\eta$ and $\pi$.  

238: 

239: The decay  amplitude is a product of

240: the flavour overlap $\cf$ and the ``remaining'' overlap. We shall be interested

241: in the exchange properties of $\cf$ when the labels that specify the flavour

242: of the states $B$ and $C$ are formally exchanged, denoted by $B\rl C$. 

243: In cases where $\cf$ is non--zero and transforms into itself, which will be

244: of particular interest, define $\cfbc \equiv f \cf$. 

245: 

246: If a quark (or antiquark) in  A  ends up  

247: in the particle with momentum $\bp$, there is also the possibility that 

248: it would end up in the particle with momentum $-\bp$. 

249: Hence for a given topology in Figure 1,

250: e.g. 6a, there are in principle {\it two} topologically

251: distinct amplitudes. Furthermore, each of topologies 

252: 4--6 is separately distinct. They are labelled analogous to

253: earlier conventions \cite{sel}.

254: 

255: 

256: \begin{figure}

257: \begin{center}

258: \leavevmode

259: \hspace{-.3cm}\hbox{\epsfxsize=5 in}

260: \epsfbox{fournew.eps}

261: \vspace{+.3cm}

262: \leavevmode

263: \hspace{-.3cm}\hbox{\epsfxsize=5 in}

264: \epsfbox{top6.eps}

265: \vspace{1.2cm}\caption{Connected topologies.}

266: \vspace{-1cm}

267: \leavevmode

268: \hspace{-.3cm}\hbox{\epsfxsize=5 in}

269: \epsfbox{fourdisconnect.eps}

270: \vspace{1.2cm}\caption{Disconnected topologies.}

271: \end{center}

272: \end{figure}

273: 

274: 

275: It is possible to omit the following proof of the results of this Letter

276: and continue directly to the statement of the results, which can be 

277: found where Table 2 is discussed in the text.

278: 

279: The flavour state of a $q\bar{q}$ pair is 

280: 

281: \beqn\plabel{fl}

282: |H\rangle = \sum_{h\bar{h}} H_{h\bar{h}} |h\rangle |\bar{h}\rangle

283: \hspace{1cm} \mbox{where} \hspace{.4cm} H_{h\bar{h}} = \langle I_H I_H^z | \frac{1}{2}h \frac{1}{2}-\bar{h}\rangle

284: (-1)^{\frac{1}{2}-\bar{h}}

285: \eeqn

286: and $|\frac{1}{2}\rangle = u,\; |-\frac{1}{2}\rangle = d,\; |\bar{\frac{1}{2}}\rangle = \bar{u}$ and $

287: |-\bar{\frac{1}{2}}\rangle = \bar{d}$. This just yields the usual $I=1$ flavour $-u\bar{d}, \;\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(u\bar{u}-d\bar{d}), \; d\bar{u}$ for $I^z = 1,0,-1$ and $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d})$ for $I=0$. The advantage of this

288: way of identifying flavour is that any pair creation or annihilation 

289: that takes place will do so with $I=0$ pairs $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sum_{h\bar{h}}\delta_{h\bar{h}}|h\rangle |\bar{h}\rangle$ being formed

290: out of the vacuum, making the operator trivial.

291: 

292: In order to illuminate the method, we discuss the case where

293: only $u,d$ quarks participate in the decay. The presence of strange quarks

294: only simplifies the overlap. From Eqs. \ref{f1} and \ref{fl}, the

295: flavour overlap $\cf$ is

296: 

297: \beqna\plabel{ov}

298: \lefteqn{\hspace{-2.9cm}\sum_{ a_1\; a_2\; a_3\; a_4\; b\; \bar{b}\; c\; \bar{c}\; I_X^z\; I_Y^z } \;

299: \langle I_A I_A^z | I_X I_X^z I_Y I_Y^z \rangle\;

300: \langle I_XI_X^z | \frac{1}{2} a_1  \frac{1}{2} -a_2 \rangle\;

301: (-1)^{\frac{1}{2}-a_1}\; 

302: \langle I_YI_Y^z | \frac{1}{2} a_3  \frac{1}{2} -a_4 \rangle \; 

303: (-1)^{\frac{1}{2}-a_3}\; 

304: \nonumber } \\ & &   \eqntimes  

305: \langle I_B I_B^z | \frac{1}{2} b  \frac{1}{2} -\bar{b} \rangle\;

306: (-1)^{\frac{1}{2}-b} \;

307: \langle I_C I_C^z | \frac{1}{2} c  \frac{1}{2} -\bar{c} \rangle \;

308: (-1)^{\frac{1}{2}-c} \mbox{ KD} 

309: \eeqna

310: where ``KD'' is a set of Kronecker delta functions that specifies how the

311: quark lines connect in the

312: decay topology. Specialize to topology 6a as an example. From Figure 1

313: ``KD'' is $\delta_{a_1 b} \delta_{a_2 \bar{c}} \delta_{a_3 a_4} 

314: \delta_{\bar{b} c}$. If one formally interchanges all labels $B$

315: and $C$ in Eq. \ref{ov}, it can be verified that

316: $\cf \rightarrow (-1)^{I_X+I_B+I_C} \cf$.

317: Since the overlap is non--zero only when $I_Y=0$ (due to the

318: $q_3\bar{q}_4$ pair annihilating), it follows by conservation of isospin

319: that

320: $I_A=I_X$, so that $\cf \rightarrow i \cf$, 

321: where $i\equiv (-1)^{I_A+I_B+I_C}$. Thus $f=i$.

322: This, as well as the fact that

323: the overlap vanishes when $I_Y=1$, are indicated in Table 2.

324: 

325: \begin{table}[ht]

326: \begin{center}

327: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|r||l|l|r||l|c|r|}

328: \hline %------------------------

329: \multicolumn{3}{|l||}{Isospin 0 four--quark}&

330: \multicolumn{3}{|l||}{Isospin 1 four--quark}&

331: \multicolumn{3}{|l|}{Isospin 2 four--quark}\\

332: \hline %------------------------

333: Top. & State & $f$ & Top. & State & $f$ & Top. & State & $f$ \\

334: \hline \hline %------------------------

335: 4   & $|0000\rangle$ & $i$ & 4   & $|1I^z_A 11\rangle\;\dagger$ & $-i$ & 4   & $|2I^z_A 11\rangle$ & $i$ \\ 

336:     & $|0011\rangle$ & $i$ &    & $|1I^z_A + \rangle\;\dagger$ & $ i$ &  5   & $|2I^z_A 11\rangle$ & $i$ \\ \cline{7-9}

337:     & $|00\st\st\rangle\;\P$ & $i$ &    & $|1I^z_A - \rangle\;\S$ & $ i$  \\ 

338: 5   & $|0000\rangle\;\P$ & $i$& 5   & $|1I^z_A 11\rangle\;\S$ & $ i$  \\ 

339:     & $|0011\rangle\;\S$ & $i$ & & $|1I^z_A + \rangle\;\dagger$ & $ i$  \\ 

340:     & $|000\st\rangle\;\P$ & $\ni$&    & $|1I^z_A - \rangle\;\dagger$ & $-i$  \\ 

341:     & $|c\bar{c}s\bar{s}\rangle\;\P$ & $\ni$ &    & $|1I^z_A 1\st\rangle\;\dagger$& $\ni$ \\ 

342:     & $|00\st\st\rangle\;\P$ & $i$ &  6a,b    & $|1I^z_A + \rangle$ & $ i$  \\ 

343: 6a,b& $|0000\rangle$ & $i$&& $|1I^z_A - \rangle$ & $ i$  \\ 

344:     & $|000\st\rangle\;\ddagger$ & $i$&  & $|1I^z_A 1\st\rangle\;\amalg$& $ i$ \\ 

345:     & $|c\bar{c}s\bar{s}\rangle\;\P$ & $i$& 6c,d     & $|1I^z_A 11\rangle$ & $ i$  \\

346:     & $|00\st\st\rangle\;\P$ & $i$&  & $|1I^z_A + \rangle$ & $ i$  \\ \cline{4-6}

347: 6c,d& $|0000\rangle$ & $i$\\

348:     & $|0011\rangle$ & $i$ \\

349:     & $|00\st\st\rangle\;\P$ & $i$ \\

350: \cline{1-3} %---------------------------

351: \end{tabular}

352: \caption{Behaviour of the (non--vanishing) flavour overlap $\cf$ for the decay of the indicated four--quark state

353: to two mesons under $B\rl C$ exchange, i.e. $\cfbc = f \cf$, in the topology under consideration.

354:  The symbol $\ni$ denotes that 

355: $\cf$ has no simple transformation properties

356: under $B\rl C$ exchange, so that there is no symmetrization selection rule.

357:  If a state is not indicated for a given topology it means that $\cf$

358: vanishes.

359: When decay is not allowed by isospin conservation, ${\cal F}=0$ as expected.

360: This happens when

361: $\bf{I}_A \neq \bf{I}_B + \bf{I}_C$ or $I^z_A \neq I^z_B + I^z_C$,

362: or when $I_A=I_B=I_C = 1$ and $I^z_A = I^z_B = I^z_C = 0$.

363: $\dagger$ $\cf\neq 0$ only if $I_B\neq I_C$. 

364: $\S$ $\cf\neq 0$ only if $I_B = I_C=1$. 

365: $\P$ $\cf\neq 0$ only if $I_B = I_C=0$. 

366: $\ddagger$ In topology 6b ${\cal F} \neq 0$ only if $I_B = I_C=0$.

367: $\amalg$ $\cf\neq 0$ only in topology 6a.} 

368: \end{center}

369: \end{table}

370: 

371: Let $C^0_A$ be the C--parity of a neutral state $A$.  For charged

372: states (with no $C$--parity), we assume that at least one of the states in the isomultiplet

373: it belongs to has a well--defined C--parity, denoted by $C^0_A$.

374: G--parity conservation $G_A = G_B G_C$ and the relation

375: $G=(-1)^{I}C_A^0$ imply that $C^0_A = i$, as was noted in

376: section 2.2 of

377: ref. \cite{sel}. 

378: 

379: It was shown in Eq. 3 of ref. \cite{sel} that the

380: decay vanishes, called a symmetrization selection rule, if the parity $P_A = -f$.

381: If $f=i$, then $P_A = -f = -i = -C^0_A$, i.e. state A is $CP$ odd.

382: Since states B and C both have $J=0$, it follows by conservation of

383: angular momentum that an $L$--wave

384: decay would necessitate $J_{A} = L$. Hence states A have $J^{PC} = 

385: 0^{+-}, 1^{-+}, 2^{+-}, 3^{-+}, \ldots$, which are all exotic $J^{PC}$

386: not found in the quark model, so that these states are not 

387: conventional mesons. A

388: charged state A (with no C--parity) should have a neutral isopartner with

389: the foregoing $J^{PC}$.

390: If $f=-i$, the same reasoning shows that states A have non--exotic $J^{PC} = 

391: 0^{++}, 1^{--}, 2^{++}, 3^{--}, \ldots$. 

392: 

393: 

394: 

395: 

396: The {\it results} of 

397: our analysis for topologies 4--6 are summarized in Table 2.

398: For topology 7 in Figure 2 

399: the flavour overlap has in general no simple transformation 

400: properties under $B \lr C$ exchange, corresponding to lack of 

401: symmetrization selection rules. Topology 8 is discussed further below. 

402: Topologies 4--6 are called ``connected'' and are allowed by the

403: Okubo--Zweig--Iizuka (OZI) rule \cite{ozi}, while topologies 7--8 are 

404: ``disconnected'' and suppressed by the OZI rule.

405: {\it In the topology in Figure 1 under 

406: consideration an entry $i$ indicates that the decay

407:  of the corresponding four--quark component

408: vanishes for $J^{PC}=0^{+-},\; 1^{-+},\; 2^{+-},\; 3^{-+}, \ldots$

409: four--quark states. 

410: Ditto for an entry $-i$, except that

411: the four--quark state has 

412: $J^{PC}=0^{++ },\; 1^{--},\; 2^{++},\; 3^{--}, \ldots$.}

413: It immediately becomes clear that the decay of the four--quark states

414: with the $J^{PC}$ just mentioned is less than what one would na\"{\i}vely

415: expect, making them more stable.

416: 

417: To make the use of Table 2 clear, we consider the example to the decay

418: of an isovector $1^{-+}$ state to $\eta\pi$ in topologies 4--6. 

419: The $1^{-+}$ state is a linear combination of flavour wave functions

420: $|1I^z_A11\rangle$, $|1I^z_A+\rangle$, $|1I^z_A-\rangle$ and 

421: $|1I^z_A1s\bar{s}\rangle$. Referring to Table 2,

422: the $|1I^z_A11\rangle$ component decays in 

423: topology 4 only, $|1I^z_A-\rangle$ in topology 5 only and 

424: $|1I^z_A1s\bar{s}\rangle$ in topology 5 only. The $|1I^z_A+\rangle$

425: component does not decay.

426: 

427: The implications of Table 2 for the two $J^{PC}$ sequences

428: are now analysed.

429: 

430: 

431: {\it Decay of

432: $J^{PC}=0^{+-},\; 1^{-+},\; 2^{+-},\; 3^{-+}, \ldots$ four--quark states

433: to two $J=0$ mesons:}

434: 

435: We arrive at the following conclusions:

436: 

437: \begin{enumerate}

438: 

439: \item If $I_A=2$ or $I_A=I_B=I_C=1$, contributions from {\it all} four--quark

440: topologies vanish. They also vanish for all 

441: hybrid meson and glueball topologies

442: \cite{sel}. If $I_A=0$ and $I_B=I_C=1$, contributions from all connected

443: four--quark topologies vanish. They also vanish for the connected

444: hybrid meson topology \cite{sel}.

445: 

446: \item Contributions from all ``non -- fall apart'' connected topologies 6 vanish.

447: 

448: \item \plabel{zero} If $I_A=0$ and $I_B=I_C=0$, and the decay is non--vanishing, this comes from

449: either a single $s\bar{s}$ four--quark component

450: which decays via ``fall apart'' connected topology 5 or from disconnected 

451: topologies.

452: Also note that the decay cannot come from connected hybrid 

453: meson decay \cite{sel}.

454: Assuming the OZI rule that disconnected topologies are suppressed,

455: one discovers that a non--vanishing decay only comes from a 

456: single $s\bar{s}$ four--quark component. This isolates the presence of 

457: an $s\bar{s}$ component in the state, i.e. acts like a strangeness filter.

458: It has been noted \cite{lipkin1} that $u\bar{u},d\bar{d}$ components of a four--quark state

459: can in perturbation theory be expected to mix substantially via single gluon exchange with

460: $s\bar{s}$, although flavour mixing of this kind has been found to be $\lapprox 10\%$

461: in a model calculation \cite{semay}.

462: 

463: \item \plabel{one} If $I_A=1$ and $I_B\neq I_C$, decay does not come from the $|1I^z_A + \rangle$ component. 

464: 

465: \end{enumerate}

466: 

467: {\sf Examples: } There are no examples involving $\pi\pi$  final  states 

468: that are not

469: forbidden by well--known selection rules of QCD, e.g. G--parity or

470: $CP$ conservation,

471: or generalized Bose symmetry. Hence there is no new selection rules arising 

472: from item 1.

473: From the last two items we obtain the following examples:

474: 

475: Item \ref{zero}: Isoscalar $1^{-+},\; 3^{-+}, \ldots \rightarrow \eta^{'}\eta,

476: \; f_0^{'}f_0$ indicates a

477: four--quark component with a single $s\bar{s}$ in the initial state.

478: 

479: Item \ref{one}: Isovector $1^{-+},\; 3^{-+}, \ldots \rightarrow \eta\pi,\; \eta^{'}\pi,\;  f_0a_0,\;  f_0^{'}a_0$ does not come from a

480: $|1I^z_A + \rangle$ component in the initial state.

481: 

482: {\it Decay of

483: $J^{PC}=0^{++ },\; 1^{--},\; 2^{++},\; 3^{--}, \ldots$ four--quark states

484: to two $J=0$ mesons:}

485: 

486: In the cases that $I_A=1$ and $I_B\neq I_C$ some contributions vanish, making the states

487: narrower than otherwise expected.

488: 

489: {\sf Examples:} Isovector $0^{++ },\; 2^{++}, \ldots \rightarrow \eta\pi,\; \eta^{'}\pi,\;  f_0a_0,\;  f_0^{'}a_0$ is narrower than otherwise expected.

490: 

491: 

492: The decays can only be found to vanish by symmetrization selection rules 

493: if the quark structure of the decay is analysed. Models which only analyse

494: decay at the hadronic level, do not incorporate the selection rule:

495: The decay of four--quark $a_0(980)\rightarrow\eta\pi$ was recently

496: modelled at the hadronic level \cite{fari}.

497: 

498: The validity of the preceding discussion should be viewed within the

499: context of the restrictions on the final states $B$ and $C$ discussed

500: earlier.

501: 

502: This concludes the main results of this Letter.

503: A few final remarks are in order.

504: 

505: If one does not assume isospin symmetry

506: \cite{foot}, i.e. considers both QCD and QED,

507: the initial four--quark states

508: with different isospin will in general mix, yielding a complicated

509: behaviour for the flavour overlap under $B\rl C$ exchange in Table 2.

510: There are two exceptions. Firstly, for doubly charged states A 

511: (those with $I^z_A=\pm 2$ in the third column of

512: Table 1) $f=i$ in topologies 4 and 5.

513: Secondly, for all decays in topologies 6, $f=i$. Hence

514:  the symmetrization selection rule remains

515: valid in these cases even without isospin symmetry. One can verify that

516: each of these cases is an application of symmetrization selection rule I

517: of ref. \cite{sel}: the case without isospin symmetry. 

518: 

519: Consider topology 8 where two ``raindrops'' or a ``half--doughnut''

520: is created from the vacuum after the four--quark state has annihilated.

521: There are similar topologies for an initial meson or glueball \cite{sel}.

522: These topologies can be analysed without the need for isospin symmetry.

523: The ``half--doughnut'' can be shown to apply only for decays already known 

524: to vanish by $CP$ conservation or Bose symmetry \cite{sel}.

525: From the symmetrization selection rule III of ref. \cite{sel}, decay in

526: ``raindrop'' topologies vanish in those cases where

527: the $B\rl C$ exchanged diagram is 

528: topologically distinct from the original diagram.

529: 

530: It needs to be emphasized that this Letter analyses the flavour structure

531: of various decay topologies in a generic way, which should subsume the

532: treatments of numerous models of QCD. However, it is {\it not} a 

533: field theoretic treatment, and can hence not be regarded as predictions

534: of QCD as a field theory. This becomes evident when one studies the following

535: condition for the validity of our conclusions. We assume that states B and C 

536: are identical in all respects except, in principle, their flavour.

537: Although this requirement is needed here, it is not sufficient, as a recent 

538: field theoretical analysis demonstrates \cite{large}: The requirement is not 

539: needed for at least on--shell $\eta$ and $\pi$ states $B$ and $C$ in 

540: a certain energy range and for certain quark masses.

541: 

542: A candidate state $\hat{\rho}(1405)$

543: with width $333\pm 50$ MeV, decaying to $\eta\pi$, and possibly to

544: $\eta^{'}\pi$, has been reported \cite{pdg}. 

545: It is interesting to note that a quark model calculation finds the

546: lightest  $1^{-+}$ four--quark state at $1418$ MeV, although it is an

547: isoscalar with flavour wave function $|000s\bar{s} \rangle$ \cite{semay}. 

548: The isovector state is heavier \cite{priv}.

549: If the $\hat{\rho}(1405)$  is resonant and has 

550: a substantial branching ratio of $\eta\pi$, 

551: this decay mode may discriminate against the hybrid interpretation

552: of the state. This is because  

553: only the (presumably suppressed) OZI forbidden hybrid meson topology 

554: contributes \cite{sel,large}.  

555: We predict that the OZI allowed decays of an isovector

556:  $1^{-+}$ only arise from certain four--quark components, so that the

557: detection of substantial branching ratios 

558: in $\eta\pi$ or $\eta^{'}\pi$ signals such a component. 

559: %Since the $s\bar{s}$ component

560: %in $\eta,\eta^{'}$ is similar, and due to  P--wave phase space we expect $\eta^{'}\pi < \eta\pi$.

561: 

562: 

563: Useful discussions with L. Burakovsky and C. Coriano are acknowledged. This

564: research is supported by the Department of Energy under contract

565: W-7405-ENG-36.

566: 

567: \begin{thebibliography}{9}

568: 

569: \pbibitem{bag} R.L. Jaffe, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D15} (1977) 267; 

570: {\it ibid.} 281; {\bf D17} (1978) 1444; 

571: Chan H.-M., H. H$\o$gaasen, {\it Phys. Lett. } {\bf B72} (1978) 400.

572: 

573: \pbibitem{semay} C. Semay, B. Silvestre--Brac, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D51} (1995) 1258.

574: 

575: \pbibitem{sel} P.R. Page, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B401} (1997) 313, and references therein.

576: 

577: \pbibitem{note} Final states with flavour $c\bar{s},\; s\bar{c},\;

578:  b\bar{s},\;  s\bar{b},\; c\bar{b},\; b\bar{c}$ are not considered.

579: 

580: \pbibitem{ozi} S. Okubo, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B5} (1963) 165; G. Zweig,

581: CERN Report No. 8419/TH412 (1964); I. Iizuka, {\it Prog. Theor. Phys.}

582: {\bf 38} (1966) 21.

583: 

584: \pbibitem{lipkin1} F.E. Close, H.J. Lipkin, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf

585: B196} (1987) 245.

586: 

587: \pbibitem{fari} D. Black, A.H. Fariborz, J. Schechter, {\it Phys. Rev.} 

588: {\bf D61} (1999) 074001.

589: 

590: \pbibitem{foot} It is possible to show that the behaviour of $\cal F$

591: under $B\rl C$ exchange remains the same as in Table 2 even without 

592: assuming isospin symmetry, when a neutral four-quark state decays

593: to two neutral states, i.e. when $I_A^z=I_B^z=I_C^z=0$ in Table 2.

594: 

595: \pbibitem{large} P.R. Page, hep-ph/9911301.

596: 

597: \pbibitem{pdg}  Particle Data Group (C. Caso {\it et al.}), 

598: {\it Eur. Phys. J. } {\bf C3} (1998) 1.

599: 

600: \pbibitem{priv} C. Semay, {\it private communication}.

601: 

602: %\pbibitem{tuan} S.-F. Tuan, recent hep-ph.

603: 

604: %\pbibitem{claudio} C. Coriano, P.R. Page, M. Johnson, {\it in preparation}.

605: 

606: %\pbibitem{pene} F. Iddir {\it et al.,  Phys. Lett.} {\bf B207} (1988) 325.

607: 

608: %\pbibitem{lipkin} H.J. Lipkin, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf 219} (1989) 99.

609: 

610: 

611: %\pbibitem{lebed} R.F. Lebed, {\it Czech. J. Phys.} {\bf 49} (1999) 1273.

612: 

613: %\pbibitem{don} A. Donnachie, P.R. Page, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D58} (1999) 114012. 

614: 

615: %\pbibitem{meshkov} C.A. Levinson, H.J. Lipkin, S. Meshkov, {\it N. Cim.} {\bf 32} (1964) 1376.

616: 

617: %\pbibitem{penesize} A. Le Yaouanc {\it et al.  Phys. Lett.} {\bf B205} (1988) 564; {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B79} (1978) 459.   

618: 

619: %\pbibitem{cbar} A. Abele {\it et al.} (CBAR Collab), {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B446} (1999) 349.\question{more references?} 

620: 

621: %\pbibitem{bnl} S.-U. Chung, private communication; N.M. Cason {\it et al.} (E852 Collab.) {\it Proc. of HADRON'95} (Manchester, 1995),  eds. M.C. Birse {\it et al.}, p. 55.

622: 

623: \end{thebibliography}

624: 

625: 

626: \end{document}

627: 

628: 

629: 

630: