1: \documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}
2: %\usepackage{draftcopy}
3:
4: \voffset0cm
5: \hoffset0cm
6: \oddsidemargin0cm
7: \evensidemargin0cm
8: \topmargin0cm
9: \textwidth16.cm
10: \textheight22.cm
11: \setlength{\arraycolsep}{0.5mm}
12:
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: %The following macro is from world_sci.sty, originally written for DPF91
15:
16: \catcode`@=11
17: % Collapse citation numbers to ranges. Non-numeric and undefined labels
18: % are handled. No sorting is done. E.g., 1,3,2,3,4,5,foo,1,2,3,?,4,5
19: % gives 1,3,2-5,foo,1-3,?,4,5
20: \newcount\@tempcntc
21: \def\@citex[#1]#2{\if@filesw\immediate\write\@auxout{\string\citation{#2}}\fi
22: \@tempcnta\z@\@tempcntb\m@ne\def\@citea{}\@cite{\@for\@citeb:=#2\do
23: {\@ifundefined
24: {b@\@citeb}{\@citeo\@tempcntb\m@ne\@citea\def\@citea{,}{\bf
25: ?}\@warning
26: {Citation `\@citeb' on page \thepage \space undefined}}%
27: {\setbox\z@\hbox{\global\@tempcntc0\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname\relax}%
28: \ifnum\@tempcntc=\z@ \@citeo\@tempcntb\m@ne
29: \@citea\def\@citea{,}\hbox{\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname}%
30: \else
31: \advance\@tempcntb\@ne
32: \ifnum\@tempcntb=\@tempcntc
33: \else\advance\@tempcntb\m@ne\@citeo
34: \@tempcnta\@tempcntc\@tempcntb\@tempcntc\fi\fi}}\@citeo}{#1}}
35: \def\@citeo{\ifnum\@tempcnta>\@tempcntb\else\@citea\def\@citea{,}%
36: \ifnum\@tempcnta=\@tempcntb\the\@tempcnta\else
37: {\advance\@tempcnta\@ne\ifnum\@tempcnta=\@tempcntb \else
38: \def\@citea{--}\fi
39: \advance\@tempcnta\m@ne\the\@tempcnta\@citea\the\@tempcntb}\fi\fi}
40: \catcode`@=12
41: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42:
43: \begin{document}
44: \title{\vskip-3cm{\baselineskip14pt
45: \centerline{\normalsize DESY 00-107\hfill ISSN 0418-9833}
46: \centerline{\normalsize hep-ph/0007292\hfill}
47: \centerline{\normalsize June 2000\hfill}}
48: \vskip1.5cm
49: Polarized $J/\psi$ from $\chi_{cJ}$ and $\psi^\prime$ Decays at the Tevatron}
50: \author{{\sc Bernd A. Kniehl and Jungil Lee}\\
51: {\normalsize II. Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at
52: Hamburg,}\\
53: {\normalsize Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761 Hamburg, Germany}}
54:
55: \date{}
56:
57: \maketitle
58:
59: \thispagestyle{empty}
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: We calculate the partonic cross sections for the hadroproduction of polarized
63: $\chi_{cJ}$ mesons using the factorization formalism of nonrelativistic QCD.
64: We also describe how the polarization is passed on to the $J/\psi$ mesons in
65: the radiative feed-down $\chi_{cJ}\to J/\psi+\gamma$ and in the double-cascade
66: decays of $\psi^\prime$ mesons via $\chi_{cJ}$ intermediate states.
67: These represent the missing ingredients needed to predict the polarization of
68: prompt $J/\psi$ mesons at the Fermilab Tevatron.
69:
70: \medskip
71:
72: \noindent
73: PACS numbers: 13.85.-t, 13.85.Ni, 14.40.Gx
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76: \newpage
77:
78: \section{Introduction}
79:
80: Since its discovery in 1974, the $J/\psi$ meson has provided a useful
81: laboratory for quantitative tests of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and, in
82: particular, of the interplay of perturbative and nonperturbative phenomena.
83: The factorization formalism of nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD) \cite{bbl} provides
84: a rigorous theoretical framework for the description of heavy-quarkonium
85: production and decay.
86: This formalism implies a separation of short-distance coefficients, which can
87: be calculated perturbatively as expansions in the strong-coupling constant
88: $\alpha_s$, from long-distance matrix elements (ME's), which must be extracted
89: from experiment.
90: The relative importance of the latter can be estimated by means of velocity
91: scaling rules, {\it i.e.} the ME's are predicted to scale with a definite
92: power of the heavy-quark ($Q$) velocity $v$ in the limit $v\to 0$.
93: In this way, the theoretical predictions are organized as double expansions in
94: $\alpha_s$ and $v$.
95: A crucial feature of this formalism is that it takes into account the complete
96: structure of the $Q\overline{Q}$ Fock space, which is spanned by the states
97: ${}^{2S+1}L_J^{(a)}$ with definite spin $S$, orbital angular momentum $L$,
98: total angular momentum $J$, and colour multiplicity $a=\underline{1}$,
99: $\underline{8}$.
100: In particular, this formalism predicts the existence of colour-octet processes
101: in nature.
102: This means that $Q\overline{Q}$ pairs are produced at short distances in
103: colour-octet states and subsequently evolve into physical (colour-singlet)
104: quarkonia by the nonperturbative emission of soft gluons.
105: The greatest triumph of this formalism was that it was able to correctly
106: describe the cross section of inclusive charmonium hadroproduction measured in
107: $p\overline{p}$ collisions at the Fermilab Tevatron \cite{abe}, which had
108: turned out to be more than one order of magnitude in excess of the theoretical
109: prediction based on the traditional colour-singlet model (CSM) \cite{bai,hum}.
110:
111: The {\it experimentum crucis} of the NRQCD factorization formalism is the
112: measurement of the polarization of charmonium with quantum numbers
113: $J^{PC}=1^{--}$, {\it i.e.} $J/\psi$ and $\psi^\prime$ mesons, in direct
114: hadroproduction, which is predicted to be fully transverse at sufficiently
115: large values of the transverse momentum ($p_T$) \cite{cw}.
116: A convenient measure of the polarization is provided by the variable
117: \begin{equation}
118: \alpha=\frac{\sigma_T-2\sigma_L}{\sigma_T+2\sigma_L},
119: \label{eq:alp}
120: \end{equation}
121: where $\sigma_T$ and $\sigma_L$ are the transverse and longitudinal components
122: of the total cross section $\sigma=\sigma_T+\sigma_L$, respectively.
123: The unpolarized case is characterized by $\alpha=0$, while $\alpha=1$ and $-1$
124: correspond to fully transverse and longitudinal polarizations, respectively.
125: As for the $J/\psi$ and $\psi^\prime$ mesons, $\alpha$ is best measured by
126: analyzing the angular distributions of their decays to $\mu^+\mu^-$ pairs,
127: which are proportional to $1+\alpha\cos^2\theta^*$, where $\theta^*$ is the
128: angle between the $\mu^+$ direction in the charmonium rest frame and the
129: charmonium direction in the laboratory frame.
130: The first such measurement was recently performed for $\psi^\prime$ mesons by
131: the CDF Collaboration at the Tevatron \cite{aff}.
132: Unfortunately, the statistics are still too low to allow for a meaningful
133: test of the NRQCD prediction \cite{ben,lei}.
134: In the same experiment, the polarization was also measured for prompt $J/\psi$
135: mesons, {\it i.e.} those which do not stem from the decays of bottom-flavored
136: hadrons, with about a hundred times more statistics.
137: This makes it necessary to include in the theoretical prediction the
138: production of polarized $J/\psi$ mesons via the decays of the heavier
139: charmonium states $\chi_{c1}$, $\chi_{c2}$, and $\psi^\prime$, which are
140: directly produced.
141: In fact, these feed-down channels make up approximately 15\%, 15\%, and 10\%
142: of the prompt-$J/\psi$ signal, respectively.
143: There is an additional, yet smaller contribution to prompt $J/\psi$ production
144: from the double-cascade decays of directly produced $\psi^\prime$ mesons via
145: $\chi_{cJ}$ intermediate states.
146: The purpose of this paper is to provide analytic results for the missing
147: ingredients which are necessary to make quantitative predictions for all these
148: contributions.
149: The resulting prediction for $\alpha$ has already been presented in
150: Ref.~\cite{bkl}.
151: It is consistent with the CDF data at intermediate values of $p_T$, but it
152: disagrees by about three standard deviations from the data point of largest
153: $p_T$.
154:
155: In order to predict $\alpha$ for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons to lowest order (LO)
156: in the NRQCD factorization formalism, we need the polarized cross sections for
157: the partonic subprocesses $a+b\to c\overline{c}(n)+d$, where
158: $a,b,d=g,q,\overline{q}$ with $q=u,d,s$, for $n={}^3S_1^{(1,8)}$,
159: ${}^3P_J^{(1,8)}$, and ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$.
160: The corresponding results for the unpolarized case are well established
161: \cite{bai,hum,cho}.
162: The polarized cross sections may be found in Refs.~\cite{lei,bkv}, with the
163: exception of those for the $P$-wave colour-singlet $c\overline{c}$ Fock states
164: $n={}^3P_1^{(1)}$ and ${}^3P_2^{(1)}$, which are relevant for the $\chi_{c1}$
165: and $\chi_{c2}$ mesons.
166: These missing results could have already been obtained in the CSM, before the
167: advent of the NRQCD factorization formalism.
168: However, the calculation is somewhat tedious, especially for the spin-two case
169: of $\chi_{c2}$.
170: The calculation is further complicated by the fact that $\alpha$ is measured
171: in the hadronic center-of-mass (CM) frame, so that one cannot benefit from the
172: usual simplifications which occur when one chooses the partonic CM frame.
173: Instead, the cross section does not only depend on the partonic Mandelstam
174: variables, but also on the boost factor relating the partonic and hadronic
175: CM frames.
176: Therefore, the helicity amplitude method, which provides a powerful tool for
177: the treatment of complicated partonic subprocesses, such as
178: $g+g\to\chi_{c2}+g$ without polarization, cannot be directly employed.
179: In Refs.~\cite{ben,lei,bkv}, a Lorentz-covariant formalism for describing the
180: polarization of massive spin-one particles in the hadronic CM frame was
181: elaborated.
182: We adopt this formalism and extend it to the spin-two case.
183: Furthermore, we need the probabilities for the transitions from the
184: $c\overline{c}$ Fock states of the $\chi_{c1}$, $\chi_{c2}$, and $\psi^\prime$
185: mesons to those of the $J/\psi$ meson in the presence of polarization.
186: Owing to heavy-quark spin symmetry, they are trivial for the single-cascade
187: decay of the $\psi^\prime$ meson.
188: The results for the ${}^3P_1^{(1)}$ and ${}^3P_2^{(1)}$ channels may be found
189: in Ref.~\cite{cwt}, where gluon fragmentation to polarized $\chi_{c1}$ and
190: $\chi_{c2}$ mesons with subsequent radiative feed-down to polarized $J/\psi$
191: mesons was studied.
192: The missing pieces of information are provided here.
193:
194: This paper is organized as follows.
195: In Sec.~\ref{sec:vector}, we present a general Lorentz-covariant formalism
196: which allows us to conveniently describe the partonic cross sections for the
197: inclusive production of massive spin-one and spin-two bosons, the helicities
198: of which are fixed in the hadronic CM frame.
199: In Sec.~\ref{sec:cascade}, we decompose the cross section for the prompt
200: production of longitudinal $J/\psi$ mesons into the direct, single-cascade,
201: and double cascade contributions, and we explain how the various components
202: factorize into cross sections of partonic subprocesses
203: $a+b\to c\overline{c}(n)+d$ with definite $c\overline{c}$ helicity, scalar
204: ME's, and measured branching fractions.
205: In Sec.~\ref{sec:alpha}, we present separate theoretical predictions of
206: $\alpha$ for $J/\psi$ mesons from the single-cascade decays of $\chi_{c1}$,
207: $\chi_{c2}$, and $\psi^\prime$ mesons, and from the double-cascade decays of
208: $\psi^\prime$ mesons via $\chi_{cJ}$ intermediate states.
209: Our conclusions are summarized in Sec.~\ref{sec:discussion}.
210: In Appendix~\ref{sec:appendix}, we present the ingredients which enter the
211: analytic expressions for the polarized cross sections of the partonic
212: subprocesses $a+b\to c\overline{c}(n)+d$, with $n={}^3P_1^{(1)}$ and
213: ${}^3P_2^{(1)}$, which represent the missing links for the theoretical
214: prediction of $\alpha$ from prompt $J/\psi$ mesons.
215:
216: \section{Covariant Tensor Decomposition of Polarized Cross Sections}
217: \label{sec:vector}
218:
219: The partonic cross sections for the production of massive spin-one and
220: spin-two bosons, the polarizations of which are to be measured in the hadronic
221: CM frame, depend not only on the partonic Mandelstam variables, but also on
222: the boost factor relating the partonic and hadronic CM frames.
223: A Lorentz-covariant formalism to deal with this problem in the spin-one case
224: was elaborated in Refs.~\cite{ben,lei,bkv}.
225: It can be applied to the direct production of polarized $J/\psi$, $\chi_{c1}$,
226: and $\psi^\prime$ mesons.
227: In order to also include $\chi_{c2}$ mesons in the polarization analysis, we
228: need to generalize this formalism to the spin-two case.
229: Prior to doing that, we recall the spin-one formalism.
230:
231: In the following, we work in the hadronic CM frame.
232: Let $\epsilon^\mu(\lambda)$ be the polarization four-vector of a spin-one
233: boson $H$ with mass $M$, four-momentum $P$, and helicity $\lambda$.
234: In the case of longitudinal polarization ($\lambda=0$), a Lorentz-covariant
235: expression reads \cite{ben,bkl,bkv}:
236: \begin{equation}
237: \epsilon^\mu(0)=Z^\mu
238: =\frac{(P\cdot Q/M)P^\mu-MQ^\mu}{\sqrt{(P\cdot Q)^2-M^2s}},
239: \label{eq:lon}
240: \end{equation}
241: where $Q$ is the total four-momentum of the colliding hadrons and $s=Q^2$.
242: It is convenient to decompose the polarization sum,
243: \begin{equation}
244: \rho^{\mu\nu}
245: =\sum_{\lambda=-1}^1\epsilon^{\mu*}(\lambda)\epsilon^{\nu}(\lambda)
246: =-g^{\mu\nu}+\frac{P^\mu P^\nu}{M^2},
247: \end{equation}
248: into longitudinal and transverse components as
249: \begin{equation}
250: \rho^{\mu\nu}=\sum_{|\lambda|=0}^1\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu},
251: \label{eq:dec}
252: \end{equation}
253: where
254: \begin{equation}
255: \rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu}
256: =\sum_{\lambda=\pm|\lambda|}\epsilon^{\mu*}(\lambda)\epsilon^{\nu}(\lambda).
257: \end{equation}
258: Specifically, we have
259: \begin{equation}
260: \rho_0^{\mu\nu}=Z^\mu Z^\nu,\quad
261: \rho_1^{\mu\nu}=\rho^{\mu\nu}-\rho_0^{\mu\nu}.
262: \end{equation}
263:
264: Let ${\cal M}$ be the transition matrix element of the partonic subprocess
265: \begin{equation}
266: a(p_a)+b(p_b)\to H(P,\lambda)+d,
267: \label{eq:process}
268: \end{equation}
269: where the four-momenta and helicities given in parentheses refer to the
270: hadronic CM frame.
271: %, and $p_d=p_a+p_b-P$ due to four-momentum conservation.
272: If we average the absolute square of ${\cal M}$ over the spin and colour
273: states of the initial-state partons $a$ and $b$, and sum over
274: $\lambda=\pm|\lambda|$ and the spin and colour states of the final-state
275: parton $d$, we can write the outcome as
276: \begin{equation}
277: \overline{|{\cal M}|_{|\lambda|}^2}=S_{\mu\nu}\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu},
278: \label{eq:mat}
279: \end{equation}
280: where $S^{\mu\nu}$ is a rank-two Lorentz tensor which depends on $p_a$, $p_b$,
281: and $P$.
282: Exploiting the the symmetry and orthogonality properties
283: $\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu}=\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\nu\mu}$ and
284: $P_\mu\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu}=0$, respectively, we can decompose
285: $S^{\mu\nu}$ as
286: \begin{equation}
287: S^{\mu\nu}=F\sum_{i=1}^{4}c_is_i^{\mu\nu},
288: \label{eq:s1}
289: \end{equation}
290: where the common factor $F$ and the coefficients $c_i$ are scalar functions
291: of the partonic Mandelstam variables
292: \begin{eqnarray}
293: \hat s&=&(p_a+p_b)^2,\nonumber\\
294: \hat t&=&(p_a-P)^2,\nonumber\\
295: \hat u&=&(p_b-P)^2,
296: \label{eq:man}
297: \end{eqnarray}
298: which satisfy the relation $\hat s+\hat t+\hat u=M^2$, and
299: \begin{eqnarray}
300: s_1^{\mu\nu}&=&g^{\mu\nu},\nonumber\\
301: s_2^{\mu\nu}&=&p_a^\mu p_a^\nu,\nonumber\\
302: s_3^{\mu\nu}&=&p_b^\mu p_b^\nu,\nonumber\\
303: s_4^{\mu\nu}&=&p_a^\mu p_b^\nu.
304: \end{eqnarray}
305:
306: We now turn to the spin-two case.
307: Let $\epsilon^{\mu\nu}(\lambda)$ be the polarization tensor of a spin-two
308: boson $H$ with mass $M$, four-momentum $P$, and helicity $\lambda$.
309: It can be constructed from the polarization four-vectors of two spin-one
310: bosons with the same mass and four-momentum with the help of the addition
311: theorem for two angular momenta as \cite{gub}
312: \begin{equation}
313: \epsilon^{\mu\nu}(\lambda)=\sum_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2=-1}^1
314: \langle1,\lambda_1;1,\lambda_2|2,\lambda\rangle
315: \epsilon^\mu(\lambda_1)\epsilon^\nu(\lambda_2),
316: \end{equation}
317: where $\langle1,\lambda_1;1,\lambda_2|2,\lambda\rangle$ are Clebsch-Gordon
318: coefficients.
319: Similarly to Eq.~(\ref{eq:dec}), we decompose the polarization sum,
320: \begin{equation}
321: \rho^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}
322: =\sum_{\lambda=-2}^2\epsilon^{\mu\nu*}(\lambda)\epsilon^{\rho\sigma}(\lambda)
323: =\frac{1}{2}\left(\rho^{\mu\rho}\rho^{\nu\sigma}
324: +\rho^{\mu\sigma}\rho^{\nu\rho}\right)
325: -\frac{1}{3}\rho^{\mu\nu}\rho^{\rho\sigma},
326: \end{equation}
327: as
328: \begin{equation}
329: \rho^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}
330: =\sum_{|\lambda|=0}^2\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma},
331: \end{equation}
332: where
333: \begin{equation}
334: \rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}
335: =\sum_{\lambda=\pm|\lambda|}\epsilon^{\mu\nu*}(\lambda)
336: \epsilon^{\rho\sigma}(\lambda).
337: \end{equation}
338: Specifically, we have \cite{cwt}
339: \begin{eqnarray}
340: \rho_0^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&
341: \frac{1}{6}\left(2\rho_0^{\mu\nu}-\rho_1^{\mu\nu}\right)
342: \left(2\rho_0^{\rho\sigma}-\rho_1^{\rho\sigma}\right),\nonumber\\
343: \rho_1^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&
344: \frac{1}{2}\left(\rho_0^{\mu\rho}\rho_1^{\nu\sigma}
345: +\rho_0^{\mu\sigma}\rho_1^{\nu\rho}+\rho_0^{\nu\rho}\rho_1^{\mu\sigma}
346: +\rho_0^{\nu\sigma}\rho_1^{\mu\rho}\right),\nonumber\\
347: \rho_2^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&
348: \frac{1}{2}\left(\rho_1^{\mu\rho}\rho_1^{\nu\sigma}
349: +\rho_1^{\mu\sigma}\rho_1^{\nu\rho}-\rho_1^{\mu\nu}\rho_1^{\rho\sigma}
350: \right).
351: \end{eqnarray}
352:
353: We now consider the case when $H$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:process})
354: represents a spin-two boson.
355: Then, Eq.~(\ref{eq:mat}) is replaced by
356: \begin{equation}
357: \overline{|{\cal M}|_{|\lambda|}^2}
358: =S_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma},
359: \label{eq:two}
360: \end{equation}
361: where $S^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$ is a rank-four Lorentz tensor which depends on
362: $p_a$, $p_b$, and $P$.
363: Making use of the symmetry, orthogonality, and tracelessness properties
364: $\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}=\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\rho\sigma\mu\nu}=
365: \rho_{|\lambda|}^{\nu\mu\rho\sigma}$,
366: $P_\mu\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}=0$, and
367: $g_{\mu\nu}\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}=0$, respectively, we can
368: constrain the decomposition of $S^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$ to be of the form
369: \begin{equation}
370: S^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}=F\sum_{i=1}^{10}c_is_i^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma},
371: \label{eq:s2}
372: \end{equation}
373: where $F$ and $c_i$ are scalar functions of $\hat s$, $\hat t$, and $\hat u$,
374: defined in Eq.~(\ref{eq:man}), and
375: \begin{eqnarray}
376: s_1^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&g^{\mu\rho}g^{\nu\sigma},\nonumber\\
377: s_2^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&g^{\mu\rho}p_a^\nu p_a^\sigma,\nonumber\\
378: s_3^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&g^{\mu\rho}p_b^\nu p_b^\sigma,\nonumber\\
379: s_4^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&g^{\mu\rho}p_a^\nu p_b^\sigma,\nonumber\\
380: s_5^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&p_a^\mu p_a^\nu p_a^\rho p_a^\sigma,\nonumber\\
381: s_6^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&p_b^\mu p_b^\nu p_b^\rho p_b^\sigma,\nonumber\\
382: s_7^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&p_a^\mu p_a^\nu p_a^\rho p_b^\sigma,\nonumber\\
383: s_8^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&p_b^\mu p_b^\nu p_b^\rho p_a^\sigma,\nonumber\\
384: s_9^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&p_a^\mu p_a^\nu p_b^\rho p_b^\sigma,\nonumber\\
385: s_{10}^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}&=&p_a^\mu p_b^\nu p_a^\rho p_b^\sigma.
386: \end{eqnarray}
387:
388: The dependence on the reference frame of the measurement enters through
389: Eq.~(\ref{eq:lon}) and resides in the factors
390: $s_{i\mu\nu}\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu}$ and
391: $s_{i\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\rho_{|\lambda|}^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$, which are
392: independent of the partonic subprocess.
393: These factors explicitly depend on the longitudinal-momentum fractions which
394: the partons $a$ and $b$ receive from the hadrons from which they spring.
395: Their calculation is straightforward, and we refrain from listing them here.
396: The functions $F$ and $c_i$ in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:s1}) and (\ref{eq:s2}) are
397: independent of the hadron momenta and the reference frame; they only depend on
398: the partonic subprocess.
399: The set of these functions which are relevant for the direct hadroproduction of
400: polarized ${}^3S_1$ charmonium ($H=J/\psi,\psi^\prime$) in the NRQCD
401: factorization formalism may be found in Refs.~\cite{lei,bkv}.
402: This includes the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel, which also contributes in the cases
403: $H=\chi_{c1},\chi_{c2}$.
404: In Appendix~\ref{sec:appendix}, we provide the missing sets of functions
405: pertinent to the latter two cases, namely those associated with the
406: ${}^3P_1^{(1)}$ and ${}^3P_2^{(1)}$ channels, respectively.
407:
408: \section{Polarization in Cascade}
409: \label{sec:cascade}
410:
411: We now explain how to calculate the polarization variable $\alpha$, defined in
412: Eq.~(\ref{eq:alp}), for prompt $J/\psi$ production in the NRQCD factorization
413: formalism.
414: Our approach not only applies to hadroproduction, but also to any other
415: production mechanism, such as photoproduction, deep-inelastic scattering,
416: $e^+e^-$ annihilation, two-photon scattering, {\it etc.}
417: It is convenient to calculate $\alpha$ from the unpolarized cross section
418: $\sigma$ and its longitudinal component $\sigma_L$.
419: Prompt $J/\psi$ mesons originate from direct $J/\psi$ production, from
420: single-cascade decays of directly produced $\chi_{cJ}$ and $\psi^\prime$
421: mesons, and from double-cascade decays of directly produced $\psi^\prime$
422: mesons via $\chi_{cJ}$ intermediate states.
423: The unpolarized cross section $\sigma^{{\rm prompt}~J/\psi}$ is simply
424: obtained by adding the unpolarized cross sections of the various
425: direct-production processes multiplied with the appropriate branching
426: fractions.
427:
428: The calculation of the longitudinal cross section
429: $\sigma_L^{{\rm prompt}~J/\psi}$ is more involved.
430: In the following, we explain how it can be expressed in terms of the reduced
431: partonic cross sections $\hat\sigma_{|\lambda|}(n)$ for the production of
432: $c\overline{c}$ pairs in Fock states $n$ with definite absolute helicities
433: $|\lambda|$, scalar ME's, and branching fractions.
434: We have
435: \begin{equation}
436: \sigma_L^{{\rm prompt}~J/\psi}
437: =\sigma_L^{{\rm direct}~J/\psi}+\sigma_L^{\chi_{cJ}}
438: +\sigma_L^{\psi^\prime}+\sigma_L^{\psi^\prime\to\chi_{cJ}}.
439: \label{eq:pro}
440: \end{equation}
441: The cross sections for the direct production of polarized $J/\psi$ and
442: $\psi^\prime$ mesons is given by
443: \begin{equation}
444: \sigma_{L,T}^{{\rm direct}~\psi}=\sum_n\hat\sigma_{0,1}(n)
445: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\psi}(n)\right\rangle,
446: \label{eq:dir}
447: \end{equation}
448: where the summation is over $n={}^3S_1^{(1)}$, ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$,
449: ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$, and ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$.
450: The relevant reduced partonic cross sections $\hat\sigma_{0,1}(n)$ may be
451: extracted from Refs.~\cite{lei,bkv}.
452: Equation~(\ref{eq:dir}) allows us to obtain the first term in
453: Eq.~(\ref{eq:pro}).
454:
455: In the NRQCD factorization formalism, the radiative decay
456: $\chi_{cJ}\to J/\psi+\gamma$ is approximately treated as an electric dipole
457: transition.
458: Due to heavy-quark spin symmetry, the helicity of the $J/\psi$ meson is then
459: given by the third spin component $m_S$ of the $\chi_{cJ}$ meson.
460: Thus, angular-momentum conservation constrains the transition probability of a
461: $\chi_{cJ}$ meson with helicity $m_J$ to a longitudinally polarized $J/\psi$
462: meson, with $m_S=0$, to be proportional to
463: $\sum_{m_L=-1}^1|\langle1,m_L;1,0|J,m_J\rangle|^2$.
464: By applying this kind of analysis to the leading $c\overline{c}$ Fock states
465: $n={}^3P_J^{(1)}$ and ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ relevant for the $\chi_{cJ}$ mesons, we
466: find the second term in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pro}) to be
467: \begin{eqnarray}
468: \sigma_L^{\chi_{cJ}}&=&
469: \left[\frac{1}{3}\hat\sigma_0\left({}^3P_0^{(1)}\right)
470: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3P_0^{(1)}\right)\right\rangle
471: +\frac{1}{3}\hat\sigma_0\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)
472: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle\right]
473: B(\chi_{c0}\to J/\psi+\gamma)\nonumber\\
474: &&{}+\left\{\frac{1}{2}\hat\sigma_1\left({}^3P_1^{(1)}\right)
475: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3P_0^{(1)}\right)\right\rangle
476: +\left[\frac{1}{2}\hat\sigma_0\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)
477: +\frac{1}{4}\hat\sigma_1\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)\right]
478: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle
479: \right\}\nonumber\\
480: &&{}\times B(\chi_{c1}\to J/\psi+\gamma)
481: +\left\{\left[\frac{2}{3}\hat\sigma_0\left({}^3P_2^{(1)}\right)
482: +\frac{1}{2}\hat\sigma_1\left({}^3P_2^{(1)}\right)\right]
483: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3P_0^{(1)}\right)\right\rangle
484: \right.\nonumber\\
485: &&{}+\left.
486: \left[\frac{17}{30}\hat\sigma_0\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)
487: +\frac{13}{60}\hat\sigma_1\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)\right]
488: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle
489: \right\}B(\chi_{c2}\to J/\psi+\gamma).
490: \label{eq:chi}
491: \end{eqnarray}
492: Here, we made use of the multiplicity relations
493: \begin{eqnarray}
494: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{cJ}}\left({}^3P_J^{(1)}\right)\right\rangle
495: &=&(2J+1)
496: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3P_0^{(1)}\right)\right\rangle,
497: \nonumber\\
498: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{cJ}}\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle
499: &=&(2J+1)
500: \left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle,
501: \end{eqnarray}
502: which follow to leading order in $v^2$ from heavy-quark spin symmetry.
503: To leading order in $v^2$, the absolute value of the first derivative of the
504: radial wave function of $P$-wave charmonium at the origin
505: $\left|R_P^\prime(0)\right|$, which is one of the input parameters of the CSM,
506: is related to
507: $\left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3P_0^{(1)}\right)\right\rangle$ by
508: $\left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3P_0^{(1)}\right)\right\rangle
509: =3N_c\left|R_P^\prime(0)\right|/(2\pi)$, where $N_c=3$.
510: The combinatorial factors multiplying the terms in Eq.~(\ref{eq:chi}) which
511: involve $\hat\sigma_{|\lambda|}\left({}^3P_J^{(1)}\right)$ agree with those
512: found in Ref.~\cite{cwt}.
513:
514: The hadronic decay $\psi^\prime\to J/\psi$ proceeds predominantly through a
515: double chromoelectric dipole transition.
516: Since transitions involving a spin flip are suppressed and the recoil momentum
517: of the $J/\psi$ meson is negligible, the $J/\psi$ meson has the same helicity
518: as the $\psi^\prime$ meson.
519: Thus, the third term in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pro}) may be evaluated as
520: \begin{equation}
521: \sigma_L^{\psi^\prime}=\sigma_L^{{\rm direct}~\psi^\prime}
522: B(\psi^\prime\to J/\psi+X).
523: \end{equation}
524:
525: The fourth term in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pro}) may be derived in a similar fashion as
526: the contribution to $\sigma_L^{\chi_{cJ}}$ from the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel,
527: and it reads
528: \begin{eqnarray}
529: \sigma_L^{\psi^\prime\to\chi_{cJ}}&=&
530: \frac{1}{3}\sigma_L^{{\rm direct}~\psi^\prime}
531: B(\psi^\prime\to\chi_{c0}+\gamma)B(\chi_{c0}\to J/\psi+\gamma)\nonumber\\
532: &&{}+\left(\frac{1}{2}\sigma_L^{{\rm direct}~\psi^\prime}
533: +\frac{1}{4}\sigma_T^{{\rm direct}~\psi^\prime}\right)
534: B(\psi^\prime\to\chi_{c1}+\gamma)B(\chi_{c1}\to J/\psi+\gamma)\nonumber\\
535: &&{}+\left(\frac{17}{30}\sigma_L^{{\rm direct}~\psi^\prime}
536: +\frac{13}{60}\sigma_T^{{\rm direct}~\psi^\prime}\right)
537: B(\psi^\prime\to\chi_{c2}+\gamma)B(\chi_{c2}\to J/\psi+\gamma).
538: \label{eq:dou}
539: \end{eqnarray}
540:
541: \section{Numerical Analysis}
542: \label{sec:alpha}
543:
544: We are now in a position to explore the phenomenological implications of the
545: analytic results presented in Secs.~\ref{sec:vector} and \ref{sec:cascade},
546: and Appendix~\ref{sec:appendix} for the inclusive hadroproduction of polarized
547: $J/\psi$ mesons at the Tevatron, with CM energy $\sqrt s=1.8$~TeV.
548: As in the CDF analysis \cite{aff}, we consider the $p_T$ distribution
549: $d\sigma/dp_T$, integrated over the rapidity interval $|y|\le0.6$.
550: We work at leading order in the NRQCD factorization formalism.
551: We use the MRST98LO parton density functions (PDF's) of the proton \cite{mar}
552: and evaluate $\alpha_s(\mu)$ from the one-loop formula with
553: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}=174$~MeV \cite{mar}.
554: We set the renormalization and factorization scales $\mu$ equal to the
555: transverse mass $m_T=\sqrt{4m_c^2+p_T^2}$, with $m_c=1.5$~GeV.
556: We adopt the nonperturbative ME's appropriate for our choice of PDF's from
557: Table~I of Ref.~\cite{bkl}.
558: As for the $J/\psi$ and $\psi^\prime$ mesons, fits to the Tevatron data do not
559: simultaneously constrain
560: $\left\langle{\cal O}^\psi\left({}^1S_0^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle$ and
561: $\left\langle{\cal O}^\psi\left({}^3P_0^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle$, but only
562: the linear combination
563: $M_r=\left\langle{\cal O}^\psi\left({}^1S_0^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle
564: +r\left\langle{\cal O}^\psi\left({}^3P_0^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle/m_c^2$,
565: with some optimal value of $r$.
566: For simplicity, we assume that
567: $\left\langle{\cal O}^\psi\left({}^1S_0^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle=
568: r\left\langle{\cal O}^\psi\left({}^3P_0^{(8)}\right)\right\rangle/m_c^2=
569: M_r/2$.
570: We adopt the values of the relevant branching fractions from Ref.~\cite{cas}.
571: We essentially work within the fusion picture, where the $c\bar c$ bound state
572: is formed in the primary hard-scattering process.
573: In the high-$p_T$ regime, only those partonic subprocesses survive where the
574: $c\bar c$ pair is created from a single gluon which is close to its mass
575: shell.
576: These contributions, which contain large logarithms of the form
577: $\ln(m_T/2m_c)$, are conveniently implemented by using fragmentation functions
578: (FF's).
579: These logarithms are then resummed by evolving the FF's from their starting
580: scale $\mu=2m_c$ up to the scale $\mu=m_T$.
581: In the case of the unpolarized cross section $\sigma^{{\rm prompt}~J/\psi}$,
582: we approximately include this resummation by multiplying the fusion cross
583: section $\hat\sigma\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)$ with the ratio of the
584: corresponding fragmentation cross sections with final-state factorization
585: scales $\mu=m_T$ and $\mu=2m_c$.
586: In the case of the longitudinal cross section
587: $\sigma_L^{{\rm prompt}~J/\psi}$, we include the LO fragmentation cross
588: sections $\hat\sigma_0(n)$ with $n={}^3S_1^{(8)}$, ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$, and
589: ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$ \cite{br}, which are of order $\alpha_s^4$.
590: These contributions are particularly important because the corresponding
591: fusion cross sections vanish to order $\alpha_s^3$.
592: Further details concerning the implementation of the fragmentation
593: contributions may be found in Ref.~\cite{bkl}.
594:
595: \begin{figure}[ht]
596: \begin{center}
597: \epsfig{figure=a_chibw.epsi,width=\textwidth}
598: \end{center}
599: \caption{Polarization variable $\alpha$ as a function of $p_T$ for direct
600: $J/\psi$ mesons, for those from single-cascade decays of $\chi_{cJ}$ and
601: $\psi^\prime$ mesons, for those from double-cascade decays of $\psi^\prime$
602: mesons via $\chi_{cJ}$ intermediate states, and for prompt ones.}
603: \label{fig:alp}
604: \end{figure}
605:
606: In Fig.~\ref{fig:alp}, we study the $p_T$ dependence of the polarization
607: variable $\alpha$ for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons.
608: For comparison, we also show $\alpha$ for the various production mechanisms
609: which contribute to the prompt-$J/\psi$ signal, namely direct $J/\psi$
610: production, single-cascade decays of directly produced $\chi_{cJ}$ and
611: $\psi^\prime$ mesons, and double-cascade decays of directly produced
612: $\psi^\prime$ mesons via $\chi_{cJ}$ intermediate states.
613: A quantitative understanding of the asymptotic large-$p_T$ behaviour of
614: $\alpha$ may be obtained by observing that, in this limit, inclusive
615: charmonium production dominantly proceeds via the gluon fragmentation process
616: $g\to c\overline{c}\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)$ \cite{by}.
617: Since large-$p_T$ gluons are almost on shell and thus predominantly
618: transversely polarized, $\hat\sigma_1\left({}^3S_1^{(8)}\right)$ should
619: greatly exceed all other reduced partonic cross sections at large $p_T$ values
620: \cite{bf}.
621: It hence follows that, for directly produced $J/\psi$ mesons, $\alpha$
622: approaches unity in the large-$p_T$ limit \cite{cw}.
623: By heavy-quark spin symmetry, the same is true for $J/\psi$ mesons from
624: single-cascade decays of $\psi^\prime$ mesons \cite{bkl}.
625: The situation is more involved for $J/\psi$ mesons from the radiative
626: feed-down of $\chi_{cJ}$ mesons and for those from double-cascade decays of
627: $\psi^\prime$ mesons.
628: Inspecting Eqs.~(\ref{eq:chi}) and (\ref{eq:dou}) in the large-$p_T$ limit, we
629: can derive the asymptotic expression
630: \begin{equation}
631: \alpha=\frac{60x_0+15x_1+21x_2}{60x_0+75x_1+73x_2},
632: \end{equation}
633: where $x_J=(2J+1)B(\chi_{cJ}\to J/\psi+\gamma)$ in the first case and
634: $x_J=B(\psi^\prime\to\chi_{cJ}+\gamma)B(\chi_{cJ}\to J/\psi+\gamma)$ in the
635: second one.
636: Experimental data suggests that
637: $B(\chi_{c0}\to J/\psi+\gamma)\ll B(\chi_{c1}\to J/\psi+\gamma)\approx
638: 2B(\chi_{c2}\to J/\psi+\gamma)$ and that $B(\psi^\prime\to\chi_{cJ}+\gamma)$
639: is approximately independent of $J$ \cite{cas}.
640: We thus obtain $\alpha^{\chi_{cJ}}\approx39/163\approx0.24$ and
641: $\alpha^{\psi^\prime\to\chi_{cJ}}\approx51/223\approx0.23$.
642: (Without these approximations, we find $\alpha^{\chi_{cJ}}\approx0.24$ and
643: $\alpha^{\psi^\prime\to\chi_{cJ}}\approx0.24$.)
644: From Fig.~\ref{fig:alp} we see that the corresponding predictions at
645: $p_T=30$~GeV are already very close to these asymptotic values.
646: Finally, we observe that the predicted $p_T$ distribution of $\alpha$ from
647: prompt $J/\psi$ mesons is relatively close to the prediction for direct
648: $J/\psi$ mesons.
649: As is evident from Fig.~\ref{fig:alp}, this is a consequence of a strong
650: cancellation between the $\chi_{cJ}\to J/\psi+\gamma$ and
651: $\psi^\prime\to J/\psi+X$ channels, which could not have been anticipated
652: without explicit calculation.
653:
654: \section{Conclusions}
655: \label{sec:discussion}
656:
657: The very recent measurement of the polarization of prompt $J/\psi$ mesons at
658: the Tevatron \cite{aff} offers a unique opportunity to test the NRQCD
659: factorization formalism \cite{bbl}, which postulates the existence of
660: color-octet processes in nature.
661: The theoretical prediction of prompt-$J/\psi$ polarization is complicated by
662: the contributions due to the feed-down from heavier charmonium states, which
663: come in addition to the direct-$J/\psi$ contribution and make up about 40\% of
664: the prompt-$J/\psi$ rate.
665: Specifically, one needs to consider the single-cascade decays of directly
666: produced $\chi_{c1}$, $\chi_{c2}$, and $\psi^\prime$ mesons, and the
667: double-cascade decays of directly produced $\psi^\prime$ mesons via
668: $\chi_{cJ}$ intermediate states.
669: In this paper, we provided, in analytic form, the missing ingredients which
670: are necessary to make this prediction.
671: These include the cross sections of the partonic subprocesses
672: $a+b\to c\overline{c}(n)+d$ with $n={}^3P_1^{(1)}$ and ${}^3P_2^{(1)}$, and
673: the probabilities for the transitions from the $c\overline{c}$ Fock states of
674: the $\chi_{c1}$, $\chi_{c2}$, and $\psi^\prime$ mesons to those of the
675: $J/\psi$ meson in the presence of polarization.
676: We presented quantitative predictions, in terms of the polarization variable
677: $\alpha$, for the various production mechanisms which contribute to the
678: prompt-$J/\psi$ signal.
679: In the large-$p_T$ limit, $\alpha$ approaches the asymptotic values
680: $\alpha^{{\rm direct}~J/\psi}=\alpha^{\psi^\prime}=1$ and
681: $\alpha^{\chi_{cJ}}\approx\alpha^{\psi^\prime\to\chi_{cJ}}\approx0.24$.
682:
683: A comprehensive discussion of $\alpha$ for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons together
684: with a conservative analysis of the theoretical errors may be found in
685: Ref.~\cite{bkl}.
686: The theoretical prediction \cite{bkl} is consistent with the CDF data
687: \cite{aff} at intermediate values of $p_T$, but it exceeds the data point of
688: largest $p_T$ by about three standard deviations of the latter.
689: For the time being, it is premature to conclude that this represents
690: experimental evidence against the NRQCD factorization formalism.
691: On the theoretical side, the prediction should be improved by the inclusion of
692: next-to-leading-order corrections in $\alpha_s$ and $v^2$, which are not yet
693: available.
694: This could have an appreciable effect, since
695: $\alpha_s(2m_c)\approx v^2\approx0.3$ is not actually so small against unity.
696: On the experimental side, Run~II of the Tevatron is expected to increase the
697: presently available charmonium data sample by roughly a factor of 20.
698: This will allow for the polarization to be measured with higher precision and
699: out to larger values of $p_T$.
700: Furthermore, it should then be feasible to discriminate between the various
701: channels which constitute the prompt-$J/\psi$ signal, as is presently done in
702: the measurement of the unpolarized cross section.
703: Should the discrepancy persist despite concerted theoretical and experimental
704: progress, then one possible explanation could be that the NRQCD factorization
705: formalism fails for charmonium simply because $m_c$ is too small.
706: Other effects, such as the one due to nonvanishing intrinsic transverse
707: momenta of the initial-state gluons \cite{hae}, might be important.
708: It is, therefore, worthwhile to perform parallel studies for polarized
709: bottomonium.
710:
711: %\bigskip
712: \newpage
713: \centerline{\bf ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
714: \smallskip
715:
716: We thank Eric Braaten for his initial contribution, for useful discussions,
717: and for carefully reading the manuscript.
718: J.L. thanks Winfried Neun for technical advice concerning programming with
719: REDUCE.
720: The work of J.L. was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
721: through Research Fellowship No.\ IV-KOR/1056268.
722: This work was supported in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through
723: Grant No.\ KN~365/1-1, by the Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und Forschung
724: through Grant No.\ 05~HT9GUA~3, and by the European Commission through the
725: Research Training Network {\it Quantum Chromodynamics and the Deep Structure
726: of Elementary Particles} under Contract No.\ ERBFMRX-CT98-0194.
727:
728: \renewcommand {\theequation}{\Alph{section}.\arabic{equation}}
729: \begin{appendix}
730: \setcounter{equation}{0}
731:
732: \section{\boldmath
733: Partonic Cross Sections for Color-Singlet Production of Polarized $\chi_{c1}$
734: and $\chi_{c2}$ Mesons
735: \unboldmath}
736: \label{sec:appendix}
737:
738: In this appendix, we present the ingredients which are necessary to describe
739: the direct hadroproduction of polarized $\chi_{c1}$ and $\chi_{c2}$ mesons via
740: the color-singlet channels $n={}^3P_1^{(1)}$ and ${}^3P_2^{(1)}$,
741: respectively.
742: The reduced differential cross sections $d\hat\sigma_{|\lambda|}/d\hat t$ of
743: the partonic subprocesses $a+b\to c\overline{c}(n)+d$, where the
744: $c\overline{c}$ pair has absolute helicity $|\lambda|$, are given by
745: \begin{equation}
746: \frac{d\hat\sigma_{|\lambda|}}{d\hat t}=\frac{1}{16\pi\hat s^2}
747: \overline{|{\cal M}|_{|\lambda|}^2}.
748: \end{equation}
749: Here, the partons $a$, $b$, and $d$ are treated as massless, while the charm
750: quark $c$ has mass $m_c$.
751: In the spin-one (spin-two) case, $\overline{|{\cal M}|_{|\lambda|}^2}$ is
752: given by Eq.~(\ref{eq:mat}) (Eq.~(\ref{eq:two})), which contains the
753: process-dependent tensor $S^{\mu\nu}$ ($S^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$).
754: The functions $F$ and $c_i$ which appear in the Lorentz decomposition of the
755: latter according to Eq.~(\ref{eq:s1}) (Eq.~(\ref{eq:s2})) are listed below.
756: As in Eq.~(\ref{eq:chi}), the color-singlet ME
757: $\left\langle{\cal O}^{\chi_{c0}}\left({}^3P_0^{(1)}\right)\right\rangle$
758: has been factored out.
759: Summing over $|\lambda|$, we recover the well-known results for the
760: unpolarized case \cite{hum}.
761: As a further check for our analytical analysis, we also verified the
762: differential cross sections of the partonic subprocesses
763: $a+b\to c\overline{c}\left({}^3P_0^{(1)}\right)+d$, relevant for the
764: hadroproduction of $\chi_{c0}$ mesons, given in Ref.~\cite{hum}.
765:
766: \noindent
767: $q\overline{q}\to c\overline{c}\left({}^3P_1^{(1)}\right)+g$:
768: \begin{eqnarray}
769: F
770: &=&
771: -\frac{64(4\pi\alpha_s)^3}{81m_c(\hat{t}+\hat{u})^4},
772: \nonumber\\
773: c_1&=&
774: \hat{t}\hat{u},
775: \nonumber\\
776: c_2&=&
777: 2\hat{t},
778: \nonumber\\
779: c_3&=&
780: 2\hat{u},
781: \nonumber\\
782: c_4&=&
783: 2(\hat{t}+\hat{u}).
784: \end{eqnarray}
785:
786: \noindent
787: $q\overline{q}\to c\overline{c}\left({}^3P_2^{(1)}\right)+g$:
788: \begin{eqnarray}
789: F
790: &=&
791: \frac{128(4\pi\alpha_s)^3m_c}{81\hat{s}^2(\hat{t}+\hat{u})^4},
792: \nonumber\\
793: c_1&=&
794: \hat{s}(\hat{t}+\hat{u})^2,
795: \nonumber\\
796: c_2&=&
797: 4\left[
798: \hat{s}^2+\hat{t}^2+2\hat{s}(\hat{t}+\hat{u})
799: \right],
800: \nonumber\\
801: c_3&=&
802: 4\left[
803: \hat{s}^2+\hat{u}^2+2\hat{s}(\hat{t}+\hat{u})
804: \right],
805: \nonumber\\
806: c_4&=&
807: 8\left[
808: \hat{s}^2-\hat{t}\hat{u}+2\hat{s}(\hat{t}+\hat{u})
809: \right],
810: \nonumber\\
811: c_5&=&c_6=
812: 8\hat{s},
813: \nonumber\\
814: c_7&=&c_8=
815: 16\hat{s},
816: \nonumber\\
817: c_9&=&
818: -16(\hat{t}+\hat{u}),
819: \nonumber\\
820: c_{10}&=&
821: 16(\hat{s}+\hat{t}+\hat{u}).
822: \end{eqnarray}
823:
824: \noindent
825: $gq\to c\overline{c}\left({}^3P_1^{(1)}\right)+q$:
826: \begin{eqnarray}
827: F
828: &=&
829: \frac{8(4\pi\alpha_s)^3}{27 m_c(\hat{s}+\hat{u})^4},
830: \nonumber\\
831: c_1&=&
832: \hat{s}\hat{u},
833: \nonumber\\
834: c_2&=&
835: 2\hat{s},
836: \nonumber\\
837: c_3&=&0,
838: \nonumber\\
839: c_4&=&
840: 2(\hat{s}-\hat{u}).
841: \end{eqnarray}
842:
843: \noindent
844: $gq\to c\overline{c}\left({}^3P_2^{(1)}\right)+q$:
845: \begin{eqnarray}
846: F
847: &=&
848: -\frac{16(4\pi\alpha_s)^3m_c}{27\hat{t}^2(\hat{s}+\hat{u})^4},
849: \nonumber\\
850: c_1&=& \hat{t}(\hat{s}+\hat{u})^2,
851: \nonumber\\
852: c_2&=& 4\left[\hat{s}^2+\hat{t}^2+2\hat{t}(\hat{s}+\hat{u})\right],
853: \nonumber\\
854: c_3&=& 4\hat{s}^2\hat{u}^2,
855: \nonumber\\
856: c_4&=& 8 \hat{s}(\hat{s}+\hat{u}),
857: \nonumber\\
858: c_5&=&8\hat{t},
859: \nonumber\\
860: c_6&=&c_8=0,
861: \nonumber\\
862: c_7&=&
863: 16\hat{t},
864: \nonumber\\
865: c_9&=&
866: -16(\hat{s}+\hat{u}),
867: \nonumber\\
868: c_{10}&=& 16(\hat{s}+\hat{t}+\hat{u}).
869: \end{eqnarray}
870:
871: \noindent
872: $gg\to c\overline{c}\left({}^3P_1^{(1)}\right)+g$:
873: \begin{eqnarray}
874: F
875: &=&
876: \frac{(4\pi\alpha_s)^3}
877: {6 m_c(\hat{s}+\hat{t})^4(\hat{t}+\hat{u})^4(\hat{u}+\hat{s})^4},
878: \nonumber\\
879: c_1&=&
880: -2\hat{s}^2\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{s}\hat{t}+\hat{t}\hat{u}+\hat{u}\hat{s})
881: (\hat{s}^2+\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2-2\hat{s}\hat{t}-2\hat{t}\hat{u}-2\hat{u}\hat{s})
882: \nonumber\\
883: &&{}
884: - \hat{s}^2\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{s}+\hat{t}+\hat{u})
885: \left[\hat{s}\hat{t}(\hat{s}+\hat{t})
886: +\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}+\hat{u})
887: +\hat{u}\hat{s}(\hat{u}+\hat{s})\right]
888: \nonumber\\
889: &&{}
890: - (\hat{s}\hat{t}+\hat{t}\hat{u}+\hat{u}\hat{s})
891: \left[\hat{s}^3\hat{t}^3(\hat{s}-\hat{t})^2
892: +\hat{t}^3\hat{u}^3(\hat{t}-\hat{u})^2
893: +\hat{u}^3\hat{s}^3(\hat{u}-\hat{s})^2\right],
894: \nonumber\\
895: c_2&=&
896: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
897: 2(\hat{s}+\hat{t})^2
898: \left\{
899: \hat{s}^2(\hat{t}+\hat{u})
900: \left[
901: \hat{s}(\hat{s}-\hat{t})(\hat{s}-\hat{u})(\hat{t}+\hat{u})
902: - \hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}-\hat{u})^2
903: \right]
904: \right.
905: \nonumber\\
906: &&\left.{}
907: +(\hat{t}-\hat{u})
908: \left[\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2-\hat{s}(\hat{t}+\hat{u})\right]
909: \left[ \hat{s}^2\hat{t}^2+\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2+\hat{u}^2\hat{s}^2
910: +\hat{s}\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{s}+2\hat{t})\right]
911: \right\}
912: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
913: ,
914: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
915: \nonumber\\
916: c_3&=&c_2|_{\hat{t}\leftrightarrow \hat{u}} ,
917: \nonumber\\
918: c_4&=&
919: 4(\hat{t}+\hat{u})^2\left\{
920: \hat{s}^3(\hat{s}^4+\hat{t}^4+\hat{u}^4)
921: - \hat{s}\hat{t}\hat{u}\left[\hat{s}^4
922: +\hat{s}^2(5\hat{t}^2-7\hat{t}\hat{u} +5\hat{u}^2)
923: + \hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^2-3\hat{t}\hat{u}+\hat{u}^2)\right]
924: \right\}
925: \nonumber\\
926: &&{}
927: -4(\hat{t}+\hat{u})
928: (\hat{t}-\hat{u})^2\left[ \hat{s}^4(\hat{t}+2\hat{u})(2\hat{t}+\hat{u})
929: - \hat{s}^2\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2)
930: + \hat{t}^3\hat{u}^3 \right].
931: \end{eqnarray}
932: \noindent
933: $gg\to c\overline{c}\left({}^3P_2^{(1)}\right)+g$:
934: \begin{eqnarray}
935: F&=&
936: \frac{
937: 8(4\pi\alpha_s)^3m_c
938: }{ 3(\hat{s}\hat{t}\hat{u})^2(\hat{s}+\hat{t})^4
939: (\hat{t}+\hat{u})^4(\hat{u}+\hat{s})^4
940: },
941: \nonumber\\
942: c_1&=&
943: \hat{s}\hat{t}\hat{u}
944: (\hat{s}+\hat{t})^2(\hat{t}+\hat{u})^2(\hat{u}+\hat{s})^2
945: (\hat{s}^2+\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2)
946: (\hat{s}\hat{t}+\hat{t}\hat{u}+\hat{u}\hat{s})^2,
947: \nonumber\\
948: c_2&=&2
949: (\hat{s}+\hat{t})^2
950: \left\{
951: 4\hat{u}^8\hat{s}\hat{t}(\hat{s}+\hat{t})^2
952: + \hat{u}^7\hat{s}\hat{t}(\hat{s}+\hat{t})
953: (7\hat{s} + 26\hat{s}\hat{t} +7\hat{t}^2)
954: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
955: - \hat{u}^6\left[\hat{s}^6+\hat{t}^6 - 5\hat{s}\hat{t}(\hat{s}^4+\hat{t}^4)
956: - 45\hat{s}^2\hat{t}^2(\hat{s}^2+\hat{t}^2) - 87\hat{s}^3\hat{t}^3\right]
957: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
958: + \hat{u}^5\hat{s}^2\hat{t}^2(\hat{s}+\hat{t})
959: (32\hat{s}^2 + 71\hat{s}\hat{t}+32\hat{t}^2)
960: + \hat{u}^4\hat{s}^2\hat{t}^2\left[ 10(\hat{s}^4+\hat{t}^4)
961: + 64\hat{s}\hat{t}(\hat{s}^2+\hat{t}^2) + 105\hat{s}^2\hat{t}^2\right]
962: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
963: + \hat{u}^3\hat{s}^3\hat{t}^3
964: (\hat{s}+\hat{t})(17\hat{s}^2 + 32\hat{s}\hat{t} + 17\hat{t}^2)
965: + \hat{u}^2\hat{s}^4\hat{t}^4
966: ( 8\hat{s}^2 + 11\hat{s}\hat{t} +8\hat{t}^2)
967: - \hat{u}\hat{s}^5\hat{t}^5(\hat{s} + \hat{t})
968: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
969: - \hat{s}^6\hat{t}^6
970: \right\},
971: \nonumber\\
972: c_3&=&c_2|_{\hat{t}\leftrightarrow \hat{u}},
973: \nonumber\\
974: c_4&=&-2
975: (\hat{s}+\hat{t})(\hat{s}+\hat{u})
976: \left\{
977: \hat{s}^6(\hat{t}^2-\hat{u}^2)^2(\hat{t}+2\hat{u})(2\hat{t}+\hat{u})
978: - \hat{s}^5\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{t}+\hat{u})
979: (3\hat{t}+5\hat{u})(5\hat{t}+3\hat{u})
980: \right. \nonumber\\
981: &&{} \left.
982: - \hat{s}^4\hat{t}\hat{u}
983: \left[ 3(\hat{t}^6+\hat{u}^6) + 28\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^4+\hat{u}^4)
984: + 83\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2) + 114\hat{t}^3\hat{u}^3 \right]
985: \right. \nonumber\\
986: &&{} \left.
987: - \hat{s}^3\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2
988: \left[11(\hat{t}^5+\hat{u}^5) + 53\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^3+\hat{u}^3)
989: + 92\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{t}+\hat{u}) \right]
990: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
991: - \hat{s}^2\hat{t}^3\hat{u}^3
992: (\hat{t}+\hat{u})^2(13\hat{t}^2 + 10\hat{t}\hat{u} + 13\hat{u}^2)
993: - \hat{s}\hat{t}^4\hat{u}^4
994: (\hat{t}+\hat{u})(5\hat{t}^2 + 6\hat{t}\hat{u} + 5\hat{u}^2)
995: - 2\hat{t}^6\hat{u}^6
996: \right\},
997: \nonumber\\
998: c_5&=&4
999: \hat{s}\hat{t}\hat{u}^2(\hat{s}+\hat{t})^2
1000: (2\hat{s}\hat{t}+\hat{t}\hat{u}+\hat{u}\hat{s})^2
1001: \left[
1002: 2\hat{u}(\hat{s}+\hat{t}+\hat{u})^2
1003: + (\hat{s}+\hat{t})(\hat{s}\hat{t}-\hat{u}^2)
1004: \right],
1005: \nonumber\\
1006: c_6&=&c_5|_{\hat{t}\leftrightarrow \hat{u}},
1007: \nonumber\\
1008: c_7&=&4
1009: \hat{s}\hat{t}\hat{u}^2(\hat{s}+\hat{t})
1010: \left[
1011: \hat{t}^5(\hat{s} + \hat{u})(5\hat{s}^2 + 12\hat{s}\hat{u} + 5\hat{u}^2)
1012: + \hat{s}^3\hat{u}^3(3\hat{s}^2 + 4\hat{s}\hat{u} + 3\hat{u}^2)
1013: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
1014: + \hat{u}^5\hat{t}(11\hat{s}^2 + 13\hat{s}\hat{t} + 5\hat{t}^2)
1015: + \hat{u}^4\hat{t}
1016: (37\hat{s}^3 + 68\hat{s}^2\hat{t} + 43\hat{s}\hat{t}^2 + 8 \hat{t}^3)
1017: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
1018: + \hat{u}^3\hat{s}\hat{t}
1019: (43\hat{s}^3 + 132\hat{s}^2\hat{t} + 124\hat{s}\hat{t}^2 + 45\hat{t}^3)
1020: + \hat{u}^2\hat{s}^2\hat{t}
1021: (19\hat{s}^3 + 110\hat{s}^2\hat{t} + 156\hat{s}\hat{t}^2 + 82\hat{t}^3)
1022: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
1023: + \hat{u}\hat{s}^3\hat{t}^2(31\hat{s}^2 + 83\hat{s}\hat{t} + 61\hat{t}^2)
1024: + \hat{s}^4\hat{t}^3(11\hat{s} + 16\hat{t})
1025: \right],
1026: \nonumber\\
1027: c_8&=&c_7|_{\hat{t}\leftrightarrow \hat{u}},
1028: \nonumber\\
1029: c_9&=&4
1030: (\hat{s}+\hat{t})(\hat{s}+\hat{u})
1031: \left\{
1032: \hat{s}^5 \left[2(\hat{t}^6+\hat{u}^6)
1033: + 5\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^4+\hat{u}^4)
1034: + 4\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{t}^2+ \hat{t}\hat{u} + \hat{u}^2)\right]
1035: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
1036: + \hat{s}^4\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}+\hat{u})\left[3(\hat{t}^4+\hat{u}^4)
1037: - \hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}+\hat{u})^2 \right]
1038: - 2\hat{s}^3\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2\left[ \hat{t}^4+\hat{u}^4
1039: + 6\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2) + 9\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2 \right]
1040: \right. \nonumber\\ &&{} \left.
1041: - \hat{s}^2\hat{t}^3\hat{u}^3(\hat{t}+\hat{u}) (\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2)
1042: + 4\hat{s}\hat{t}^4\hat{u}^4(\hat{t}+\hat{u})^2
1043: + 2\hat{t}^5\hat{u}^5(\hat{t}+\hat{u})
1044: \right\},
1045: \nonumber\\
1046: c_{10}&=&-4
1047: \left\{
1048: \hat{s}^7\left[2(\hat{t}^6+\hat{u}^6)
1049: + 2\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^4+\hat{u}^4)
1050: - 21\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2)
1051: - 46\hat{t}^3\hat{u}^3 \right]
1052: \right. \nonumber\\
1053: &&{} \left.
1054: +\hat{s}^6(\hat{t}+\hat{u})\left[ 2(\hat{t}^6+\hat{u}^6)
1055: + 4\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^4+\hat{u}^4)
1056: - 53\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2) - 134\hat{t}^3\hat{u}^3 \right]
1057: \right. \nonumber\\
1058: &&{} \left.
1059: + \hat{s}^5\hat{t}\hat{u}\left[2(\hat{t}^6+\hat{u}^6)
1060: -43\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^4+\hat{u}^4)
1061: -256\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2)-428\hat{t}^3\hat{u}^3\right]
1062: \right. \nonumber\\
1063: &&{} \left.
1064: - \hat{s}^4\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2(\hat{t}+\hat{u})\left[15(\hat{t}^4+\hat{u}^4)
1065: + 136\hat{t}\hat{u}(\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2) + 264\hat{t}^2\hat{u}^2 \right]
1066: \right. \nonumber\\
1067: &&{} \left.
1068: - \hat{s}^3\hat{t}^3\hat{u}^3(\hat{t}+\hat{u})^2
1069: (32\hat{t}^2 + 93\hat{t}\hat{u} + 32\hat{u}^2)
1070: - \hat{s}^2\hat{t}^4\hat{u}^4(\hat{t} + \hat{u})
1071: (19\hat{t}^2 + 34\hat{t}\hat{u} + 19\hat{u}^2)
1072: \right. \nonumber\\
1073: &&{} \left.
1074: + 2\hat{t}^6\hat{u}^6(\hat{s}+\hat{t} + \hat{u})
1075: \right\}.
1076: \end{eqnarray}
1077:
1078: \end{appendix}
1079:
1080: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1081:
1082: \bibitem{bbl}
1083: G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, and G. P. Lepage,
1084: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 1125 (1995); {\bf 55}, 5855(E) (1997).
1085:
1086: \bibitem{abe} CDF Collaboration, F. Abe {\it et al.},
1087: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf69}, 3704 (1992);
1088: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf71}, 2537 (1993);
1089: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf75}, 1451 (1995);
1090: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf79}, 572 (1997);
1091: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf79}, 578 (1997).
1092:
1093: \bibitem{bai} R. Baier and R. R\"uckl,
1094: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf 102B}, 364 (1980);
1095: Z. Phys.\ C {\bf19}, 251 (1983).
1096:
1097: \bibitem{hum}
1098: B. Humpert,
1099: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf184}, 105 (1987);
1100: R. Gastmans, W. Troost, and T. T. Wu,
1101: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf184}, 257 (1987);
1102: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B291}, 731 (1987).
1103:
1104: \bibitem{cw}
1105: P. Cho and M. B. Wise,
1106: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf346}, 129 (1995).
1107:
1108: \bibitem{aff}
1109: CDF Collaboration, T. Affolder {\it et al.},
1110: Report No.\ FERMILAB-PUB-00-090-E and hep-ex/0004027.
1111:
1112: \bibitem{ben}
1113: M. Beneke and M. Kr\"amer,
1114: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5269 (1997).
1115:
1116: \bibitem{lei}
1117: A. K. Leibovich,
1118: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 4412 (1997).
1119:
1120: \bibitem{bkl}
1121: E. Braaten, B. A. Kniehl, and J. Lee,
1122: Report No.\ DESY~99-175 and hep-ph/9911436, to appear in Phys.\ Rev.\ D.
1123:
1124: \bibitem{cho} P. Cho and A. K. Leibovich,
1125: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf53}, 150 (1996);
1126: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf53}, 6203 (1996).
1127:
1128: \bibitem{bkv}
1129: M. Beneke, M. Kr\"amer, and M. V\"anttinen,
1130: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 4258 (1998).
1131:
1132: \bibitem{cwt}
1133: P. Cho, M. B. Wise, and S. P. Trivedi,
1134: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 2039 (1995).
1135:
1136: \bibitem{gub}
1137: B. Guberina, J. H. K\"uhn, R. D. Peccei, and R. R\"uckl,
1138: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B174}, 317 (1980).
1139:
1140: \bibitem{mar}
1141: A. D. Martin, R. G. Roberts, W. J. Stirling, and R. S. Thorne,
1142: Eur.\ Phys.\ J. C {\bf 4}, 463 (1998).
1143:
1144: \bibitem{cas}
1145: Particle Data Group, C. Caso {\it et al.},
1146: Eur.\ Phys.\ J. C {\bf3}, 1 (1998).
1147:
1148: \bibitem{br}
1149: M. Beneke and I. Z. Rothstein,
1150: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 372}, 157 (1996); {\bf 389}, 769(E) (1996).
1151:
1152: \bibitem{by}
1153: E. Braaten and T. C. Yuan,
1154: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 71}, 1673 (1993).
1155:
1156: \bibitem{bf}
1157: E. Braaten and S. Fleming,
1158: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 3327 (1995).
1159:
1160: \bibitem{hae}
1161: Ph.\ H\"agler, R. Kirschner, A. Sch\"afer, L. Szymanowski, and O. V. Teryaev,
1162: Report No.\ TPR-00-06 and hep-ph/0004263.
1163:
1164: \end{thebibliography}
1165:
1166: \end{document}
1167:
1168: