1: \documentstyle[aps,prd,eqsecnum,epsf]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[preprint,eqsecnum,aps]{revtex}
3:
4: \begin{document}
5:
6: %------------------------------
7: \newcommand{\gsim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-1.ex}{$\stackrel
8: {\textstyle>}{\textstyle\sim}$}}}
9: \newcommand{\lsim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-1.ex}{$\stackrel
10: {\textstyle<}{\textstyle \sim}$}}}
11: \newcommand{\square}{\kern1pt\vbox{\hrule height
12: 1.2pt\hbox{\vrule width 1.2pt\hskip 3pt
13: \vbox{\vskip 6pt}\hskip 3pt\vrule width 0.6pt}\hrule
14: height 0.6pt}\kern1pt}
15:
16: %%%%% singlefig %%%%%
17: \newcommand{\singlefig}[2]{
18: \begin{center}
19: \begin{minipage}{#1}
20: \epsfxsize=#1
21: \epsffile{#2}
22: \end{minipage}
23: \end{center}}
24: %
25: %%%%% figcaption %%%%%
26: \newenvironment{figcaption}[2]{
27: \vspace{0.3cm}
28: \refstepcounter{figure}
29: \label{#1}
30: \begin{center}
31: \begin{minipage}{#2}
32: \begingroup \small FIG. \thefigure: }{
33: \endgroup
34: \end{minipage}
35: \end{center}}
36: %
37:
38: %------------------------------
39:
40: \draft
41: \title{{\bf New constraints on multi-field inflation
42: with nonminimal coupling\\}}
43: \author{Shinji Tsujikawa\thanks{electronic
44: address: shinji@gravity.phys.waseda.ac.jp}
45: and Hiroki Yajima\thanks{electronic
46: address: yajima@gravity.phys.waseda.ac.jp}}
47: \address{Department of Physics, Waseda University,
48: Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan\\[.3em]}
49: \date{\today}
50: \maketitle
51: \begin{abstract}
52: We study the dynamics and perturbations
53: during inflation and reheating in a multi-field model
54: where a second scalar field $\chi$ is nonminimally coupled to
55: the scalar curvature $(\frac12 \xi R\chi^2$). When $\xi$ is positive,
56: the usual inflationary prediction for large-scale anisotropies is hardly
57: altered while the $\chi$ fluctuation in sub-Hubble
58: modes can be amplified during preheating for large $\xi$.
59: For negative values of $\xi$, however,
60: long-wave modes of the $\chi$ fluctuation exhibit exponential
61: increase during inflation, leading to the strong enhancement of
62: super-Hubble metric perturbations even when $|\xi|$ is
63: less than unity. This is because the effective $\chi$ mass becomes
64: negative during inflation. We constrain the strength of $\xi$ and
65: the initial $\chi$ by the amplitude of produced
66: density perturbations. One way to avoid nonadiabatic growth of
67: super-Hubble curvature perturbations is to stabilize the $\chi$ mass
68: through a coupling to the inflaton.
69: Preheating may thus be necessary in these models to protect
70: the stability of the inflationary phase.
71: \end{abstract}
72:
73: %\vskip 1pc \pacs{PACS 98.80.Cq} ]
74: \pacs{PACS 98.80.Cq}
75:
76: \baselineskip = 20pt
77:
78: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
79: % %
80: \section{Introduction} %
81: % %
82: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
83:
84: The idea of inflation is remarkable in the sense that it can not only
85: solve the horizon and flatness problems of the standard big bang cosmology,
86: but provides seeds of density perturbations relevant for the
87: large scale structure\cite{Kolb}. The perturbations give an imprint on the
88: Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies,
89: whose temperature fluctuations can be analyzed by present observations.
90: The inflationary paradigm typically predicts the nearly scale-invariant
91: primordial power spectrum\cite{den1,den2}, which is consistent with
92: observations of Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite.
93: Since the accuracy of measurements is expected to be improved in
94: future observations, it is very important to fully understand
95: the primordial power spectrum predicted by the inflationary paradigm.
96:
97: Generally, it is assumed that only one scalar field called
98: {\it inflaton} determines the dynamics of inflation, which leads to
99: the exponential expansion of the universe when inflaton slowly
100: evolves along the sufficiently flat potential.
101: In the single-field model, density perturbations are typically ``frozen''
102: when a physical scale crosses the Hubble radius during inflation.
103: This makes it possible to evaluate the power spectrum at the end of
104: inflation by equating it at the first horizon crossing.
105: In preheating era after inflation, the fluctuation of inflaton
106: can be enhanced by parametric resonance\cite{pre1,pre2}, which
107: may stimulate the growth of metric perturbations.
108: In the single-field case, however, the super-Hubble curvature perturbation
109: is typically conserved during preheating\cite{mpre1},
110: while sub-Hubble modes can be amplified in some models
111: of inflation\cite{mpre2} including the nonminimally coupled
112: inflationary model\cite{nonminiinflaton}.
113: As long as the system is a single-field model,
114: and the stress-energy is conserved, nonadiabatic growth of
115: the large-scale curvature perturbation can not be expected
116: during inflation and reheating including
117: generalized Einstein theories\cite{Hwang}.
118:
119: Multi-field inflationary scenarios have received much
120: attention for the generality of inflation and preheating.
121: In fact, density perturbations in multi-field models
122: were analytically derived by several authors in the scheme of the
123: slow-roll approximation\cite{multi}.
124: In the presence of more than two scalar fields, large-scale
125: curvature perturbations are not necessarily conserved due to
126: the existence of isocurvature perturbations.
127: In the context of scalar-tensor gravity theories, several
128: authors\cite{multi2,multi3} studied density perturbations in the two-field system
129: where there exists a Brans-Dicke or dilaton field in addition to inflaton.
130: In particular, Garc\'{\i}a-Bellido and Wands \cite{multi3} constrained
131: parameters of the gravity theories by comparing the predicted spectral index
132: with observational datas.
133: In addition to this, since the higher-dimensional generalized Kaluza-Klein
134: theories\cite{KK} also give rise to a dilaton field by reducing the effective
135: four-dimensional theories, it is worth investigating
136: to predict the primordial power spectrum in the presence of inflaton in
137: generalized Einstein theories from a cosmological point of view.
138: In this respect, Berkin and Maeda\cite{BM} studied the
139: new and chaotic inflationary models with a dilaton potential
140: $U(\sigma)=0$, and constrained the parameters of models by produced
141: density perturbations. Multiple scalar fields
142: also play important roles in the assisted inflation with exponential
143: potentials\cite{assisted}. This scenario was recently extended to the assisted
144: chaotic inflation induced by higher-dimensional theories\cite{assisted2}, and
145: density perturbations were calculated in Ref.\cite{assisted3}.
146:
147: In preheating era, scalar fields coupled to inflaton can be
148: resonantly amplified, which is typically more efficient
149: than in the single-field case. It was also pointed out that there is also
150: an interesting possibility that super-Hubble metric perturbations
151: will be excited due to the growth of field
152: perturbations\cite{mpre3,mpre4,mpre5}.
153: Since growth of metric perturbations can be expected as long as
154: scalar fields are not severely damped in the inflationary
155: period~\cite{suppress,suppress2} and are enhanced during preheating,
156: it is important to take care the dynamics of scalar fields during
157: inflation. When the effective mass of scalar fields is heavy relative to
158: the Hubble parameter $H$, long wave modes of field fluctuations exhibit
159: exponential decrease during inflation~\cite{suppress}.
160: In contrast, ``light'' fields such as inflaton whose masses are
161: smaller than $H$ are hardly affected by the
162: inflationary suppression~\cite{mpre4},
163: and can lead to the enhancement of super-Hubble metric perturbations
164: in preheating era if they are amplified by parametric resonance\cite{mpre5}.
165: In this respect, one of the present authors recently
166: investigated the evolution of field and metric perturbations
167: in the presence of a dilaton field with quadratic
168: inflaton potential\cite{shinji}, and found that the curvature
169: perturbation in cosmological relevant modes remains almost
170: constant in this model (Candelas Weinberg model, see Ref.~\cite{CW}),
171: including the backreaction effect of created particles.
172:
173: From the viewpoint of quantum field theories
174: in curved spacetime, nonminimal couplings naturally arise,
175: with their own nontrivial renormalization group flows.
176: The ultra-violet fixed point of these flows are often divergent,
177: implying that nonminimal couplings may be important
178: at high energies\cite{BOS}.
179: In the single-field case with a nonminimally coupled inflaton field,
180: Futamase and Maeda\cite{FM} studied the dynamics of chaotic
181: inflation, and found that the nonminimal coupling is constrained as
182: $|\xi|~\lsim~10^{-3}$ in the quadratic potential,
183: by the requirement of sufficient amount of inflation.
184: On the other hand, such a constraint is absent in the self-coupling
185: potential for negative $\xi$, and as a bonus, the fine tuning problem of
186: the self-coupling $\lambda$ in the minimally coupled case
187: can be relaxed by large negative values of $\xi$\cite{SBB,FU}.
188: Several authors evaluated scalar and tensor perturbations
189: generated during inflation\cite{MS,spectral,KF} and
190: preheating\cite{nonminiinflaton} in this model.
191: Since the system is reduced to the single-field model with some modified
192: inflaton potential by a conformal transformation,
193: the super-Hubble curvature perturbation remains almost constant, while
194: metric preheating is found to be vital in sub-Hubble scales\cite{nonminiinflaton}.
195:
196: In the multi-field model with inflaton and a nonminimally
197: coupled scalar field $\chi$, it was found that $\chi$ particles
198: can be efficiently produced {\it during inflation} when $\xi$ is
199: negative in the unperturbed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker
200: background\cite{SH}.
201: The dynamics of scalar fields strongly depends
202: on the coupling $\xi$. In fact, although the exponential suppression
203: of super-Hubble $\chi$ modes will take place
204: for positive $\xi$ due to large effective mass relative to the Hubble rate,
205: they can grow exponentially by negative instability for $\xi<0$.
206: Then it is expected that negative
207: nonminimal coupling may lead to the enhancement of
208: super-Hubble metric perturbations during inflation.
209: In addition to this, it is of interest how metric preheating
210: proceeds in large scales, since the $\chi$ fluctuation can also
211: be amplified by parametric resonance when $|\xi|$ is greater than
212: of order unity\cite{nonminimalpre2,nonminimalpre3}.
213: In this paper, motivated by above considerations, we will
214: make precise analysis about the evolution of field and metric
215: perturbations during inflation and preheating
216: in the presence of a nonminimally coupled scalar field $\chi$.
217: We believe that our study will be important in the sense that
218: we can constrain the strength of nonminimal coupling
219: by the COBE normalization.
220: In the case where the power spectrum exceeds the observational
221: upper bound by negative nonminimal coupling, we will give
222: one escape route from nonadiabatic growth of super-Hubble
223: metric perturbations.
224:
225:
226: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
227: \section{The model and basic equations}
228: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
229: We investigate a model where a massless scalar field $\chi$ is
230: nonminimally coupled with the scalar curvature $R$
231: in the presence of an inflaton field $\phi$:
232: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
233: \begin{eqnarray}
234: {\cal L}= \sqrt{-g} \left[ \frac{1}{2\kappa^2}R
235: -\frac{1}{2}(\nabla \phi)^2
236: -V(\phi)
237: -\frac{1}{2}(\nabla \chi)^2
238: -\frac12 \xi R \chi^2
239: \right],
240: \label{B1}
241: \end{eqnarray}
242: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
243: where $G \equiv \kappa^{2}/8\pi =m_{\rm pl}^{-2}$ is a
244: gravitational coupling constant, and $\xi$ is a nonminimal
245: coupling. In this paper, we adopt the quadratic potential
246: for inflaton,
247: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
248: \begin{eqnarray}
249: V(\phi)=\frac12 m^2\phi^2.
250: \label{B2}
251: \end{eqnarray}
252: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
253: The variation of the action Eq.~$(\ref{B1})$ yields the following field
254: equations:
255: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
256: \begin{eqnarray}
257: \frac{1-\xi\kappa^2\chi^2}{\kappa^2}G_{\mu\nu} &=&
258: 2\xi\chi(g_{\mu\nu}\square\chi-\nabla_{\mu}\nabla_{\nu}\chi)
259: -g_{\mu\nu}V(\phi)+(\nabla_{\mu}\phi)(\nabla_{\nu}\phi)-
260: \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu} (\nabla^{\lambda}\phi)
261: (\nabla_{\lambda}\phi) \nonumber \\
262: &+& (1-2\xi)(\nabla_{\mu}\chi)(\nabla_{\nu}\chi)-
263: \left(\frac{1}{2}-2\xi \right)
264: g_{\mu\nu} (\nabla^{\lambda}\chi)(\nabla_{\lambda}\chi),
265: \label{B4}
266: \end{eqnarray}
267: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
269: \begin{eqnarray}
270: \square\phi-V'(\phi)=0,
271: \label{B5}
272: \end{eqnarray}
273: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
274: \begin{eqnarray}
275: \square\chi-\xi\chi R=0,
276: \label{B6}
277: \end{eqnarray}
278: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
279: where a prime denotes the derivative with respect to $\phi$.
280:
281: Let us consider the perturbed metric in the longitudinal gauge
282: around a Friedmann-Lema$\hat{\i}$tre-Robertson-Walker
283: (FLRW) background
284: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
285: \begin{eqnarray}
286: ds^2=-(1+2\Phi)dt^2
287: +a^2(t)(1-2\Psi)\delta_{ij} dx^i dx^j,
288: \label{B3}
289: \end{eqnarray}
290: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
291: with $a(t)$ the scale factor, and $\Phi, \Psi$ are
292: gauge-invariant potentials\cite{den2}.
293: Decomposing scalar fields into $\varphi_J(t,{\bf
294: x}) \to \varphi_J (t)+\delta\varphi_J(t,{\bf x})~
295: (J=1, 2)$, where $\varphi_J (t)$ are homogeneous parts
296: and $\delta\varphi_J(t,{\bf x})$ are
297: gauge-invariant fluctuations, we obtain the following
298: background equations for the Hubble parameter
299: $H \equiv \dot{a}/a$ and scalar fields $\varphi_J (t)$:
300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
301: \begin{eqnarray}
302: H^2=\frac{\kappa^2}{3(1-\xi\kappa^{2}\chi^{2})}
303: \left[\frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^2+V(\phi)+\frac{1}{2}
304: \dot{\chi}^2+6\xi H \chi\dot{\chi} \right],
305: \label{B7}
306: \end{eqnarray}
307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
308: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
309: \begin{eqnarray}
310: \dot{H}=-\frac{\kappa^2}{2(1-\xi\kappa^{2}\chi^{2})}
311: \left[\dot{\phi}^2+(1-2\xi)\dot{\chi}^2-2\xi\chi
312: (\ddot{\chi}-H\dot{\chi}) \right],
313: \label{B60}
314: \end{eqnarray}
315: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
316: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
317: \begin{eqnarray}
318: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+V'(\phi)=0,
319: \label{B8}
320: \end{eqnarray}
321: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
322: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
323: \begin{eqnarray}
324: \ddot{\chi}+3H\dot{\chi}+\xi R\chi =0,
325: \label{B9}
326: \end{eqnarray}
327: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
328: where the scalar curvature $R$ is given by
329: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
330: \begin{eqnarray}
331: R &=& 6(2H^2+\dot{H}) \nonumber \\
332: &=& \frac{\kappa^2}{1-\xi\kappa^{2}\chi^{2}}
333: \left[-\dot{\phi}^2+4V(\phi)-\dot{\chi}^2+18\xi H \chi \dot{\chi}
334: +6\xi(\dot{\chi}^2+\chi\ddot{\chi}) \right].
335: \label{B10}
336: \end{eqnarray}
337: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
338: The Fourier modes of the linearized perturbed
339: Einstein equations are written as\cite{Hwang}
340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
341: \begin{eqnarray}
342: \Psi_k=\Phi_k-\frac{2\xi\kappa^2\chi}
343: {1-\xi\kappa^{2}\chi^{2}} \delta\chi_k,
344: \label{B11}
345: \end{eqnarray}
346: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
347: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
348: \begin{eqnarray}
349: \dot{\Psi}_k+\left(H-\frac{\xi\kappa^2\chi\dot{\chi}}
350: {1-\xi\kappa^{2}\chi^{2}}\right) \Phi_k=\frac{\kappa^2}
351: {2(1-\xi\kappa^{2}\chi^{2})} \left[\dot{\phi}\delta\phi_k+
352: (1-2\xi)\dot{\chi}\delta\chi_k-2\xi\chi(\delta\dot{\chi}_k
353: -H\delta\chi_k) \right],
354: \label{B12}
355: \end{eqnarray}
356: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
357: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
358: \begin{eqnarray}
359: \delta\ddot{\phi}_k+3H\delta\dot{\phi}_k+
360: \left[ \frac{k^2}{a^2} +V''(\phi) \right] \delta\phi_k=
361: 2(\ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi})\Phi_k+
362: \dot{\phi}(\dot{\Phi}_k+3\dot{\Psi}_k),
363: \label{B13}
364: \end{eqnarray}
365: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
366: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
367: \begin{eqnarray}
368: \delta\ddot{\chi}_k+3H\delta\dot{\chi}_k+
369: \left( \frac{k^2}{a^2} +\xi R \right)\delta \chi_k=
370: 2(\ddot{\chi}+3H\dot{\chi})\Phi_k
371: +\dot{\chi}(\dot{\Phi}_k+3\dot{\Psi}_k)
372: -\xi\chi \delta R_k,
373: \label{B14}
374: \end{eqnarray}
375: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
376: with
377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
378: \begin{eqnarray}
379: \delta R_k=-\left[12(2H^2+\dot{H})\Phi_k+
380: 6 H (\dot{\Phi}_k+4\dot{\Psi}_k)+6\ddot{\Psi}_k
381: -\frac{2k^2}{a^2}\Phi_k+\frac{4k^2}{a^2}\Psi_k
382: \right].
383: \label{B15}
384: \end{eqnarray}
385: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
386: Note that $\Phi_k$ and $\Psi_k$ do not coincide in the
387: nonminimally coupled case, due to the
388: nonvanishing anisotropic stress.
389: In the absence of the nonminimally coupled $\chi$ field
390: (i.e. single-field case), there exists a conserved quantity
391: $\zeta_k \equiv -\Psi_k+(\Psi_k+\dot{\Psi}_k/H)H^2/\dot{H}$
392: for super-Hubble $k$ modes in the linear perturbations\cite{den2}.
393: During reheating phase, although entropy perturbations
394: can be produced when $\dot{\phi}$ periodically passes through
395: zero, curvature perturbations in super-Hubble scales
396: are typically conserved in single-field models\cite{mpre1}
397: including the nonminimally coupled inflaton case\cite{nonminiinflaton}.
398: Even in generalized Einstein theories including scalar-tensor
399: and higher-curvature gravity theories, it was found that the conserved
400: structure in large scales still holds in the single-field case\cite{Hwang}.
401: Due to this adiabaticy of the curvature perturbation, we only take care
402: the perturbation at the first horizon crossing in order to evaluate the
403: inflationary power spectrum.
404:
405: In the multi-field case, however, the curvature perturbation
406: on uniform-density hypersurfaces\cite{Hwang},
407: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
408: \begin{eqnarray}
409: \zeta_k \equiv -\Psi_k+\frac{H^2(1-\xi\kappa^2\chi^2)}
410: {\dot{H}(1-\xi\kappa^2\chi^2)+2H\xi\kappa^2\chi\dot{\chi}}
411: \left(\Psi_k+\frac{\dot{\Psi}_k}{H}\right),
412: \label{C40}
413: \end{eqnarray}
414: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
415: includes the isocurvature perturbation\cite{multi,multi2,multi3},
416: which can vary nonadiabatically during inflation and reheating.
417: In fact, in the present model, since
418: the homogeneous $\chi$ and the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation
419: in small $k$-modes can be strongly excited for negative $\xi$
420: as is found in Eqs.~$(\ref{B9})$ and $(\ref{B14})$,
421: this will stimulate the growth of super-Hubble metric
422: perturbations and produce entropy perturbations.
423: On the other hand, for positive $\xi$,
424: it is expected that long-wave $\chi$ modes
425: will exponentially decrease during inflation due to the large effective
426: $\chi$ mass relative to the Hubble rate\cite{suppress,suppress2},
427: which may not lead to the nonadiabatic growth of curvature perturbations
428: on super-Hubble scales even if field fluctuations will exhibit parametric
429: amplifications in reheating phase.
430: In the next section, we will make a detailed analysis about
431: the dynamics of field and metric perturbations during inflation
432: and reheating.
433:
434:
435: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
436: \section{Cosmological perturbations during inflation and reheating}
437: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
438: Let us first review the dynamics of inflation with potential $(\ref{B2})$
439: in the absence of the nonminimally coupled $\chi$ field.
440: Neglecting the $\dot{\phi}$ term in Eq.~$(\ref{B7})$ and
441: the $\ddot{\phi}$ term in Eq.~$(\ref{B8})$, we obtain the following
442: approximate relation during inflation:
443: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
444: \begin{eqnarray}
445: H \approx \sqrt{\frac{4\pi}{3}}\frac{m}{m_{\rm pl}}\phi,~~~~
446: \dot{\phi} \approx -\frac{m^2}{3H}\phi.
447: \label{C1}
448: \end{eqnarray}
449: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
450: Combining these relations is to give
451: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
452: \begin{eqnarray}
453: \phi=\phi(0)-\frac{m_{\rm pl}}{\sqrt{12\pi}}mt,
454: \label{C2}
455: \end{eqnarray}
456: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
457: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
458: \begin{eqnarray}
459: a=a(0) \exp \left[ \sqrt{\frac{4\pi}{3}} \frac{m}{m_{\rm pl}}
460: \left\{ \phi(0)t-\frac{m_{\rm pl}}{\sqrt{48\pi}}mt^2 \right\}
461: \right],
462: \label{C3}
463: \end{eqnarray}
464: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
465: where $\phi(0)$ and $a(0)$ are initial values of inflaton and
466: the scale factor, respectively. In the initial stage of inflation,
467: the scale factor evolves exponentially as
468: $a \sim a(0) \exp [ \sqrt{4\pi/3}(m/m_{\rm pl})\phi(0) t ]$.
469: With the increase of the last term in
470: Eq.~$(\ref{C3})$, the expansion rate slows down, which is
471: followed by the oscillating stage of inflaton.
472: In order to solve several cosmological puzzles of the standard
473: big bang cosmology, the number of
474: e-foldings $N \equiv \ln (a/a(0))$ is required to be $N~\gsim~55$,
475: by which the initial value of inflaton is constrained as
476: $\phi(0)~\gsim~3m_{\rm pl}$.
477: The inflationary period ends when the slow-roll parameter
478: $\epsilon \equiv (V'/V)^2/2\kappa^2$ grows of order unity, which
479: corresponds to $\phi \sim 0.3 m_{\rm pl}$.
480:
481: If nonminimal coupling is taken into account, the dynamics of inflation
482: can be changed. In fact, growth of the $\chi$ field affects
483: the Hubble parameter by Eq.~$(\ref{B7})$, which also alters
484: the evolution of inflaton by Eq.~$(\ref{B8})$.
485: Let us first investigate the evolution of the $\chi$
486: fluctuation approximately.
487: Neglecting the contribution of metric perturbations in Eq.~$(\ref{B14})$
488: and introducing a new scalar field $\delta X_k \equiv a \delta\chi_k$ and
489: a conformal time $\eta \equiv \int a^{-1}dt$, Eq.~$(\ref{B14})$
490: yields
491: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
492: \begin{eqnarray}
493: \delta X_k''+\left[ k^2-(1-6\xi)\frac{a''}{a}\right]\delta X_k=0,
494: \label{C6}
495: \end{eqnarray}
496: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
497: where a prime denotes the derivative with respect to the conformal time.
498: This solution can be expressed by the combinations of the Hankel
499: functions $H_{\nu}^{(J)}$ ($J=1, 2$)\cite{SH}:
500: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
501: \begin{eqnarray}
502: \delta\chi_k=a^{-1} [c_1 \sqrt{\eta} H_{\nu}^{(2)}(k \eta)
503: +c_2 \sqrt{\eta} H_{\nu}^{(1)}(k \eta)],
504: \label{C4}
505: \end{eqnarray}
506: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
507: where the order $\nu$ of the Hankel functions is given by
508: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
509: \begin{eqnarray}
510: \nu^2=\frac94 -12\xi.
511: \label{C5}
512: \end{eqnarray}
513: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
514: Note that the choice of $c_1=\sqrt{\pi}/2$ and $c_2=0$ corresponds
515: to the state of the Bunch-Davies vacuum.
516: The solution of the homogeneous $\chi$ field also looks the
517: form of Eq.~$(\ref{C4})$ with $k=0$.
518:
519: The Hankel functions take the following form in the limit of
520: $k\eta \to 0$\cite{Kaiser}:
521: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
522: \begin{eqnarray}
523: H_{\nu}^{(2,1)}(k\eta) \to \pm \frac{i}{\pi} \Gamma(\nu)
524: \left(\frac{k\eta}{2}\right)^{-\nu},
525: \label{C7}
526: \end{eqnarray}
527: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
528: where $\Gamma(\nu)$ is the Gamma function with order $\nu$.
529: Taking notice of the relation $\eta \approx -1/(aH)$ during inflation,
530: we easily find from Eq.~$(\ref{C4})$ that long-wave
531: $\delta\chi_k$ modes exponentially increase as $\delta\chi_k \sim
532: a^{\nu-3/2}$ when $\nu>3/2$.
533: This case corresponds to the negative $\xi$ by Eq.~$(\ref{C5})$,
534: leading to the particle creation during inflation by negative instability
535: as noted in Ref.~\cite{SH}.
536: This efficient particle production for low momentum modes
537: is expected to enhance metric perturbations
538: for wavelengths larger than the Hubble radius,
539: due to the increase of the rhs of Eq.~$(\ref{B12})$.
540: This will also stimulate the growth of field perturbations
541: as expected by Eqs.~$(\ref{B13})$ and $(\ref{B14})$.
542: In contrast, for positive $\xi$, long-wave
543: $\delta\chi_k$ modes decay exponentially in
544: de Sitter background. Especially for the case of
545: $\xi>3/16$ where $\nu$ takes complex values, $\delta\chi_k$
546: decreases as $\sim a^{-3/2}$.
547: This makes the $\chi$ term in the rhs of
548: Eq.~$(\ref{B12})$ unimportant and super-Hubble metric
549: perturbations will not be strongly amplified even taking into
550: account the parametric amplification of $\chi$ and $\delta\chi_k$ modes
551: during preheating as shown in Ref.~\cite{suppress} in the model of
552: $V(\phi,\chi)=\frac12 m^2\phi^2+\frac12 g^2\phi^2\chi^2$.
553:
554: Before analyzing the dynamics of the system, we should mention
555: initial conditions of field fluctuations.
556: For positive frequency $\omega_k^2>0$, we typically choose the
557: conformal vacuum state $\delta\varphi_k=1/\sqrt{2\omega_k}$
558: and $\delta\dot{\varphi}_k=(-i\omega_k -H)\delta\varphi_k$.
559: However, in de Sitter background with nonminimal coupling,
560: the frequency of scalar fields can take negative values.
561: Hence we adopt the de Sitter invariant vacuum
562: state given by\cite{BD80}
563: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
564: \begin{eqnarray}
565: \delta X_k(\eta_0)=\frac{1}{k^{3/2}}\left[ ik+\frac{a'(\eta_0)}{a(\eta_0)}
566: \right] \exp(ik\eta_0),~~~\delta X_k'(\eta_0)=
567: \frac{1}{k^{1/2}}\left[ ik+\frac{a'(\eta_0)}{a(\eta_0)}
568: -\frac{i}{k}\left(\frac{a'(\eta_0)}{a(\eta_0)}\right)'
569: \right]\exp(ik\eta_0).
570: \label{C8}
571: \end{eqnarray}
572: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
573: In the case of $k \gg a'(\eta_0)/a(\eta_0)$, this takes the similar
574: form as the conformal vacuum state, while mode functions
575: depend on the choice of the vacuum for small $k$.
576: However, in the context of the inflationary power spectrum, it is known
577: that different choice of initial conditions has little affect
578: on the results\cite{den2}.
579:
580: In what follows, we numerically study the evolution of
581: scalar fields and super-Hubble metric perturbations for positive
582: and negative values of $\xi$ during inflation and reheating, and
583: also investigate the case where the coupling between
584: $\phi$ and $\chi$~($\frac12 g^2\phi^2\chi^2$) is introduced
585: at the end of this section.
586:
587:
588: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
589: \subsection{Case of $\xi>0$}
590: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
591: Let us first consider the minimally coupled case ($\xi=0$)
592: before analyzing the positive $\xi$ case.
593: In this case, the inflationary period proceeds as in the
594: single-field case, as long as $\chi$ is initially small
595: relative to inflaton.
596: We plot in Fig.~1 the evolution of
597: the metric perturbation $\Psi_k (=\Phi_k)$ and the curvature
598: perturbation $\zeta_k$ for a cosmological mode $k=a_0H_0$
599: where $a_0$ denotes the scale factor about 55 e-foldings
600: before the end of inflation.
601: The initial value of inflaton is chosen as
602: $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$, in which case the inflationary period
603: continues until $mt \approx 20$, leading to about 57 e-foldings
604: at the end of inflation.
605: The curvature perturbation,
606: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
607: \begin{eqnarray}
608: \zeta_k = -\Psi_k+\frac{H^2}{\dot{H}}
609: \left(\Psi_k+\frac{\dot{\Psi}_k}{H}\right),
610: \label{C41}
611: \end{eqnarray}
612: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
613: remains almost constant on large-scales as is clearly seen in
614: Fig.~1.
615:
616: When the system enters the reheating stage, $\dot{\phi}$
617: periodically passes through zero, during which entropy
618: perturbations can be produced\cite{mpre3}.
619: Nevertheless, this process is not strong
620: enough to lead to the overall increase of $\zeta_k$ and $\Phi_k$
621: in super-Hubble modes (see Fig.~1).
622: Not only scalar field fluctuations
623: for low momentum modes are not relevantly amplified,
624: but metric preheating is inefficient on large scales for $\xi=0$.
625:
626: Let us define the power-spectrum of $\zeta_k$ as
627: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
628: \begin{eqnarray}
629: {\cal P}_{\zeta_k}\equiv
630: \frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}|\zeta_k|^2=\frac{|\tilde{\zeta}_k|^2}{2\pi^2},
631: \label{C9}
632: \end{eqnarray}
633: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
634: where $\tilde{\zeta}_k$ is defined by
635: $\tilde{\zeta}_k \equiv k^{3/2}\zeta_k$.
636: Assuming that $\zeta_k$ remains conserved in cosmological
637: scales until it reenters the Hubble length in the
638: matter-dominant stage, the power spectrum
639: at the end of inflation [$={\cal P}_{\zeta_k}(t_e)$] can be
640: related with the density perturbation $\delta_H(k)$
641: at the horizon reentry as\cite{den2,multi3}
642: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
643: \begin{eqnarray}
644: \delta_H^2(k) \approx \frac{4}{25} {\cal P}_{\zeta_k}(t_e).
645: \label{C25}
646: \end{eqnarray}
647: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
648: For the inflaton mass $m \sim 10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$
649: regulated by CMB observations, numerical calculations give
650: $\tilde{\zeta}_k \approx 2.4 \times 10^{-4}$ at the end of inflation.
651: Then we obtain the density perturbation as $\delta_H(k)
652: \approx 2 \times 10^{-5}$ by the relation $(\ref{C25})$.
653:
654: %%%%%%%%%%
655: \begin{figure}
656: \begin{center}
657: \singlefig{12cm}{Fig1.eps}
658: \begin{figcaption}{Fig1}{12cm}
659: The evolution of $\tilde{\zeta}_k \equiv k^{3/2} \zeta_k$ and
660: $\tilde{\Psi}_k \equiv k^{3/2}\Psi_k$ during inflation and reheating
661: for a super-Hubble mode $k=a_0H_0$ in the case of
662: $\xi=0$ with $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$ and initial values
663: $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$, $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
664: The inflationary period ends at $mt \approx 20$, after which
665: the system enters the reheating stage. In this case, since the
666: system is effectively identical with the single-field case,
667: $\tilde{\zeta}_k$ is conserved.
668: {\bf Inset}: The evolution of field perturbations $\delta\tilde{\phi}_k
669: \equiv k^{3/2} \delta\phi_k/m_{\rm pl}$ and $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k
670: \equiv k^{3/2} \delta\chi_k/m_{\rm pl}$.
671: \end{figcaption}
672: \end{center}
673: \end{figure}
674: %%%%%%%%%%
675:
676: For positive $\xi$, $\chi$ and long-wave $\delta\chi_k$
677: modes exponentially decrease during inflation.
678: This decreasing rate strongly depends on the strength of the
679: coupling $\xi$. When $0<\xi<3/16$, the order $\nu$ of the
680: Hankel function is in the range of $0<\nu<3/2$,
681: and long-wave $\delta\chi_k$ modes evolve
682: as $\delta\chi_k \sim a^{-(3/2-\nu)}$. In Fig.~2,
683: we plot the evolution of $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k \equiv k^{3/2}
684: \delta\chi_k/m_{\rm pl}$ for several $\xi$ with
685: initial values $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
686: For $\xi=0.01$, $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k$ decreases only by one order of
687: magnitude during inflation. With the increase of $\xi$, the inflationary
688: suppression becomes relevant and the decreasing rate is getting larger.
689: When $\xi>3/16$ (i.e., $\nu^2<0$), super-Hubble $\delta\chi_k$
690: fluctuations decay as $\delta\chi_k \sim a^{-3/2}$ irrespective of
691: the coupling $\xi$.
692: This means that the amplitude of $\delta\chi_k$ at the end of inflation
693: depends on the total amount of inflation.
694: In the simulation of initial values $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$ and
695: $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$, $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k$ decreases of order
696: $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k~\lsim~10^{-40}$ since the number of e-foldings
697: is about $N \sim 57$ in this case.
698: The homogeneous $\chi$ field is also affected
699: by this suppression. Hence $\chi$ dependent terms in
700: the rhs of Eq.~$(\ref{B12})$ can be negligible relative to the $\phi$
701: dependent term, leading to the conservation of the super-Hubble
702: curvature perturbation during inflation.
703:
704: As is found in Eq.~$(\ref{B10})$, the scalar curvature reduces with the
705: decrease of inflaton, unless the $\chi$ field is amplified.
706: When the kinetic term of inflaton becomes comparable
707: to its potential energy, the scalar curvature begins to oscillate
708: due to the oscillation of inflaton.
709: It is well known that $\chi$ particles coupled to $\phi$ can be
710: nonperturbatively produced by parametric resonance during preheating
711: era\cite{pre2}. In the present model, we can also expect the
712: amplification of the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation due to the oscillating scalar
713: curvature. This geometric preheating scenario was studied in
714: Ref.~\cite{nonminimalpre2,nonminimalpre3} neglecting
715: metric perturbations.
716: In Fig.~2, we find that the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation undergoes
717: the parametric excitation during the reheating era ($mt~\gsim~20$)
718: for the coupling $\xi~\gsim~10$, while there is no growth for
719: $\xi~\lsim~1$. With the increase of $\xi$, the growth rate of
720: $\delta\chi_k$ gets gradually larger, leading to the efficient particle
721: production. Nevertheless, as deeply studied in Ref.~\cite{nonminimalpre3},
722: larger values of $\xi$ do not necessarily result in the larger amount of
723: the final fluctuation, due to the suppression effect of the $\chi$ particle
724: production itself.
725: In fact, the final variance takes the maximum value at
726: $\xi=100 \sim 200$~\cite{nonminimalpre3}.
727: This indicates that long-wave $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuations are still
728: much smaller relative to inflaton fluctuations even in the case of
729: $\xi~\gsim~100$ because of the very small amplitude at the end of inflation.
730: As a result, the existence of the preheating era does not lead to
731: the enhancement of super-Hubble metric perturbations, whose source terms
732: in the rhs of Eq.~$(\ref{B12})$ are completely dominated by
733: the inflaton-dependent term.
734: We have numerically checked that the curvature perturbation $\zeta_k$ and
735: metric perturbations $\Psi_k$, $\Phi_k$ on large scales
736: exhibit the same behavior as shown in Fig.~1,
737: as long as the initial value of $\chi$ at the onset of inflation
738: is much smaller than $\phi$.
739: As a result, the adiabatic picture of large-scale cosmological perturbations
740: in the single-field case still holds even during preheating in the presence of
741: the positive nonminimal coupling.
742:
743: %%%%%%%%%%
744: \begin{figure}
745: \begin{center}
746: \singlefig{12cm}{Fig2.eps}
747: \begin{figcaption}{Fig2}{12cm}
748: Suppression of the field fluctuation $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k$
749: during inflation and reheating for a
750: super-Hubble mode $k=a_0H_0$ in the case of
751: $\xi=0.01, 0.1, 0.2, 10, 100$ with $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$ and
752: initial values $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$, $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
753: When $0<\xi<3/16$, $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k$
754: decreases as $\sim a^{(-3/2-\nu)}$, while $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k
755: \sim a^{-3/2}$ for $\xi>3/16$ independent of the strength of $\xi$.
756: The homogeneous $\chi$ field exhibits the similar behavior.
757: \end{figcaption}
758: \end{center}
759: \end{figure}
760: %%%%%%%%%%
761:
762: We should mention the evolution of $\delta\chi_k$ and $\Psi_k, \Phi_k$
763: in sub-Hubble modes during preheating.
764: For large $k$-modes, the adiabatic solution for
765: the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation is estimated by Eq.~$(\ref{C8})$ as
766: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
767: \begin{eqnarray}
768: |\delta \tilde{\chi}_k| \approx \bar{k}\frac{m}{m_{\rm pl}},~~~~
769: |\delta \dot{\tilde{\chi}}_k|/m \approx \bar{k}^2 \frac{m}{m_{\rm pl}},
770: \label{C10}
771: \end{eqnarray}
772: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
773: where $\bar{k} \equiv k/(ma_I)$ with $a_I$ the scale factor
774: at the beginning of preheating.
775: Since sub-Hubble modes correspond to $\bar{k}~\gsim~1$,
776: the amplitude of the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation at the end
777: of inflation is found to be
778: $|\delta\tilde{\chi}_k|~\gsim~m/m_{\rm pl} \sim 10^{-6}$,
779: which is not strongly suppressed
780: compared with the super-Hubble case.
781: Then the growth of the total variance
782: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
783: \begin{eqnarray}
784: \langle \delta\chi^2 \rangle \equiv \frac{1}{2\pi^2}\int k^2 |\delta\chi_k|^2 dk
785: =\frac{m_{\rm pl}^2}{2\pi^2}\int |\delta\tilde{\chi}_k|^2 d (\log k),
786: \label{C11}
787: \end{eqnarray}
788: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
789: is typically governed by sub-Hubble modes.
790: This situation is similar to the preheating scenario with the
791: $\frac12 g^2\phi^2\chi^2$ coupling\cite{suppress}.
792: We depict in Fig.~3 the evolution of $\delta\chi_k$, $\delta\phi_k$,
793: and $\Psi_k$ in preheating phase for a sub-Hubble mode
794: $\bar{k}=3$ with $\xi=100$.
795: While the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation exhibits parametric excitation
796: by the oscillating scalar curvature, we find that sub-Hubble metric
797: perturbations are hardly enhanced during preheating.
798: In spite of the unsuppressed initial conditions for sub-Hubble
799: $\delta\chi_k$ and $\delta\dot{\chi}_k$ modes in the
800: rhs of Eq.~$(\ref{B12})$, the homogeneous components $\chi$
801: and $\dot{\chi}$ are strongly damped as in the case of super-Hubble
802: $\delta\chi_k$ modes.
803: Then we can not expect the strong amplification of sub-Hubble
804: metric perturbations, due to the suppression of $\chi$-dependent source
805: terms in Eq.~$(\ref{B12})$. However, this result may change if we take
806: into account second order metric perturbations~\cite{SMP}
807: as in Ref.~ \cite{suppress}, which we do not consider in this paper.
808: Since the rhs of Eq.~$(\ref{B13})$ can be negligible and the resonant term
809: is absent in the lhs, the inflaton fluctuation is also hardly amplified
810: as is found in Fig.~3 even in the presence of metric perturbations.
811:
812: For positive $\xi$, we conclude that the curvature perturbation in
813: cosmologically relevant scales is conserved
814: during inflation and preheating as long as $\chi$ is initially small
815: relative to $\phi$.
816:
817: %%%%%%%%%%
818: \begin{figure}
819: \begin{center}
820: \singlefig{12cm}{Fig3.eps}
821: \begin{figcaption}{Fig3}{12cm}
822: The evolution of $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k$, $\delta\tilde{\phi}_k$, and
823: $\tilde{\Psi}_k$ during preheating for a
824: sub-Hubble mode $\bar{k}=3$ with $\xi=100$ and $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$.
825: Note that we start integrating from the end of inflation, and choose
826: initial values as $\phi(0)=0.28m_{\rm pl}$ and
827: $\chi(0)=10^{-40}m_{\rm pl}$ with the $\delta\chi_k$
828: fluctuation $(\ref{C10})$.
829: $\Phi_k$ almost coincides with $\Psi_k$ in this case.
830: \end{figcaption}
831: \end{center}
832: \end{figure}
833: %%%%%%%%%%
834:
835:
836: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
837: \subsection{Case of $\xi<0$}
838: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
839:
840: Let us next proceed to the case of negative $\xi$.
841: In this case, $\chi$ and long-wave $\delta\chi_k$
842: modes can be enhanced during inflation by negative instability
843: as is found by Eqs.~$(\ref{B9})$ and $(\ref{B14})$.
844: The analytic estimation of Eq.~$(\ref{C4})$ which neglects
845: metric perturbations includes the following growing solution
846: in small $k$-modes:
847: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
848: \begin{eqnarray}
849: |\delta\chi_k| \propto a^c,~~~~{\rm with}~~~~c=\frac32
850: \left(\sqrt{1+\frac{16}{3}|\xi|}-1\right).
851: \label{C12}
852: \end{eqnarray}
853: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
854: This growth rate gets larger with the increase of $|\xi|$.
855: The exponential increase of the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation also stimulates
856: the growth of super-Hubble metric perturbations as is found in
857: Eq.~$(\ref{B12})$. Then metric perturbations will strengthen
858: field resonances by Eqs.~$(\ref{B13})$ and $(\ref{B14})$
859: in the perturbed metric case,
860: as we numerically study it later.
861: What we are mainly concerned with is how the dynamics and
862: produced perturbations are modified during inflation
863: and preheating by negative nonminimal coupling.
864:
865: Let us first consider the case of $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$
866: where the number of e-foldings reaches $N \sim 57$
867: in the absence of the $\chi$ field.
868: If the negative nonminimal coupling is taken into account,
869: the total amount of inflation is not necessarily sufficient to
870: solve cosmological puzzles.
871: For example, when $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$, the dynamics of
872: inflation is modified due to the enhancement of the $\chi$ field
873: for $|\xi|~\gsim~0.02$.
874:
875: %%%%%%%%%%
876: \begin{figure}
877: \begin{center}
878: \singlefig{12cm}{Fig4.eps}
879: \begin{figcaption}{Fig4}{12cm}
880: The evolution of $\phi$ and $\chi$ fields
881: during inflation and reheating for a super-Hubble mode
882: $k=a_0H_0$ in the case of $\xi=-0.05$ and initial values
883: $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$, $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$
884: with $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$. The $\chi$ field rapidly
885: grows by negative instability, whose effect terminates inflation
886: at $mt \approx 13$.
887: {\bf Inset}: $\phi$ and $\chi$ vs $t$ for $\xi=-0.005$.
888: In this case, the $\chi$ field is hardly enhanced.
889: \end{figcaption}
890: \end{center}
891: \end{figure}
892: %%%%%%%%%%
893:
894: In Fig.~4, we plot the evolution of the homogeneous
895: $\phi$ and $\chi$ fields for $\xi=-0.05$ with initial values
896: $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
897: The negative nonminimal coupling leads to the growth the $\chi$ field,
898: which catches up the $\phi$ field for $mt \approx 10$.
899: In the initial stage where $\phi$ is larger than $\chi$,
900: the dynamics of inflation is approximately described
901: by Eqs.~$(\ref{C2})$ and $(\ref{C3})$.
902: However, after $\chi$ exceeds $\phi$ for $mt~\gsim~10$,
903: these relations can no longer be applied.
904: With the increase of $\chi$, the potential $V(\phi)$ becomes
905: gradually unimportant relative to $\chi$-dependent terms in
906: Eq.~$(\ref{B7})$ and the $1/(1-\xi\kappa^2\chi^2)$ factor also
907: gets smaller, the Hubble expansion rate decreases
908: faster than in the $\xi=0$ case.
909: Then inflation ends at $mt_e \approx 13$ with the e-folding number
910: $N \approx 42$. Note that these values are smaller than in the
911: minimally coupled case, $mt_e \approx 20$ and $N \approx 58$.
912: Since the decrease of the scalar curvature $R=6(2H^2+\dot{H})$ is accompanied by
913: the decrease of $H$, the growth of the $\chi$ field typically becomes
914: irrelevant after the inflationary period terminates (see Fig.~4).
915: We show in the inset of Fig.~4 the evolution of
916: $\phi$ and $\chi$ for $\xi=-0.005$. In this case, the $\chi$ field
917: is hardly amplified, which results in almost the same dynamics of
918: inflation as in the $\xi=0$ case.
919:
920: %%%%%%%%%%
921: \begin{figure}
922: \begin{center}
923: \singlefig{12cm}{Fig5.eps}
924: \begin{figcaption}{Fig5}{12cm}
925: Growth of field fluctuations $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k$ and
926: $\delta\tilde{\phi}_k$ during inflation and reheating
927: for a super-Hubble mode
928: $k=a_0H_0$ in the case of $\xi=-0.05$ and initial values
929: $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$, $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$
930: with $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$. Both field fluctuations are
931: amplified during inflation.
932: {\bf Inset}: $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k$ and $\delta\tilde{\phi}_k$
933: vs $t$ for $\xi=-0.05$ neglecting metric perturbations.
934: Although $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k$ is enhanced as in the perturbed
935: metric case, $\delta\tilde{\phi}_k$ does not grow in the absence
936: of metric perturbations.
937: \end{figcaption}
938: \end{center}
939: \end{figure}
940: %%%%%%%%%%
941:
942: In Fig.~5 we show the evolution of large-scale $\delta\chi_k$
943: and $\delta\phi_k$ fluctuations for $\xi=-0.05$ with
944: $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
945: We numerically found that the growth of field perturbations is relevant
946: for $|\xi|~\gsim~0.02$.
947: In the case of $\xi=-0.05$, $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuations in small $k$-modes
948: are enhanced from the beginning as described in Eq.~$(\ref{C12})$ with
949: $c\approx 0.188$. Recalling that the total amount of inflation is about
950: $N \approx 42$, $|\delta\chi_k|$ is amplified about $10^3$
951: times during inflation by the analytic estimation of Eq.~$(\ref{C12})$
952: neglecting metric perturbations.
953: We plot in the inset of Fig.~5 the evolution of long-wave
954: field perturbations in the unperturbed metric case [i.e., setting $\Psi_k=
955: \Phi_k=0$ in Eqs.~$(\ref{B13})$ and $(\ref{B14})$].
956: We can easily confirm that numerical calculations coincide
957: with the analytic result $(\ref{C12})$ fairly well.
958: In the perturbed metric case,
959: the evolution of the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation is almost the same as in the
960: unperturbed metric case except for the final short stage of inflation,
961: which indicates that the $\xi R$ term in the lhs of Eq.~$(\ref{B14})$
962: mainly determines the growth of $\delta\chi_k$ even taking into account
963: metric perturbations.
964:
965: In contrast, the difference appears in the inflaton fluctuation.
966: If we neglect metric perturbations, the $\delta\phi_k$ fluctuation
967: does not grow nonperturbatively in the massive inflaton model.
968: Including metric perturbations, the enhancement of $\chi$ and
969: $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuations in small $k$-modes stimulates the growth
970: of super-Hubble metric perturbations by Eq.~$(\ref{B12})$.
971: Then the rhs of Eq.~$(\ref{B13})$ leads to the amplification of the
972: $\delta\phi_k$ fluctuation, which is absent in the rigid spacetime
973: case. This difference is clearly seen in Fig.~5.
974:
975: %%%%%%%%%%
976: \begin{figure}
977: \begin{center}
978: \singlefig{12cm}{Fig6.eps}
979: \begin{figcaption}{Fig6}{12cm}
980: The evolution of the curvature perturbation $\tilde{\zeta}_k$
981: during inflation and reheating for a super-Hubble mode
982: $k=a_0H_0$ in the cases of $\xi=-0.05$ and $\xi=-0.005$ with
983: $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$, $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$, and
984: $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$. We find that $\tilde{\zeta}_k$
985: grows nonperturbatively during inflation for $\xi=-0.05$,
986: while it is conserved for $\xi=-0.005$.
987: {\bf Inset}: The evolution of super-Hubble metric perturbations
988: $\tilde{\Psi}_k$ and $\tilde{\Phi}_k$
989: for $\xi=-0.05$ and $\xi=-0.005$.
990: \end{figcaption}
991: \end{center}
992: \end{figure}
993: %%%%%%%%%%
994:
995: Let us investigate the evolution of the curvature perturbation
996: $\zeta_k$ and metric perturbations $\Psi_k$ and $\Phi_k$
997: on large scales.
998: Since the growth of metric perturbations is accompanied by
999: the excitement of the $\chi$ field fluctuation, $\zeta_k$ increases
1000: during inflation when $|\xi|~\gsim~0.02$ with initial
1001: values $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
1002: In Fig.~6, we show the evolution of $\Psi_k$ and $\Phi_k$
1003: for $\xi=-0.05$ and $\xi=-0.005$.
1004: When $\xi=-0.005$, $\Psi_k$ almost coincides
1005: with $\Phi_k$ as in the case of $\xi \ge 0$.
1006: For $\xi=-0.05$, however, super-Hubble metric perturbations
1007: are strongly amplified during inflation, leading to the distortions
1008: in the CMB spectrum. Note that the difference of
1009: $\Psi_k$ and $\Phi_k$ appears in this case, due to the enhancement
1010: of the $\chi$ field fluctuation.
1011: While the super-Hubble curvature perturbation is conserved
1012: for $\xi=-0.005$, it exhibits rapid growth during inflation
1013: for $\xi=-0.05$.
1014: This means that the standard picture of adiabatic perturbations in the
1015: single-field case can no longer be applied in the presence of the
1016: nonminimally coupled $\chi$ field with negative coupling.
1017:
1018: In TABLE I, we show the number of e-foldings, the homogeneous
1019: $\chi$ field, and the super-Hubble curvature perturbation
1020: at the end of inflation for several values of $\xi$ with initial
1021: conditions $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
1022: Since the enhancement of the $\chi$ field is weak for
1023: $|\xi|~\lsim~0.02$, $\zeta_k$ remains constant during inflation.
1024: For $|\xi|~\gsim~0.02$, the rapid growth of $\chi$ makes
1025: the inflationary period terminate earlier as confirmed in TABLE I.
1026: This leads to the smaller amount of inflation with the increase
1027: of $|\xi|$. For example, when $\xi=-1$, the system soon enters
1028: the reheating stage after only 4 e-foldings.
1029: We have to caution that large $|\xi|$ does not necessarily
1030: yield the larger values of $\chi$ and $\zeta_k$ at the end of inflation,
1031: because the duration of inflation gets shorter.
1032: In fact, $\zeta_k$ decreases with the increase of $|\xi|$ for
1033: $|\xi|~\gsim~0.05$, although large $|\xi|$ also leads to the
1034: distortions in the anisotropies of CMB.
1035: The important point is that the successful inflationary scenario
1036: can be completely violated with the existence of the large negative
1037: nonminimal coupling.
1038:
1039: %%%%%%%%%%
1040: \begin{figure}
1041: \begin{center}
1042: \singlefig{12cm}{Fig7.eps}
1043: \begin{figcaption}{Fig7}{12cm}
1044: The parameter regions of the coupling $\xi$ and the initial
1045: $\chi(0)$ where the inflationary scenario proceeds in successful way
1046: or not, for the case of $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$ and
1047: $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$. We find that large negative coupling
1048: prevents successful inflation unless we choose small values of $\chi(0)$.
1049: \end{figcaption}
1050: \end{center}
1051: \end{figure}
1052: %%%%%%%%%%
1053:
1054: Let us consider the case where initial values of $\chi$ are changed.
1055: With the decrease of $\chi(0)$, larger $|\xi|$
1056: is required for the growth of curvature perturbations.
1057: When $\chi(0)$ is close to the order of $m_{\rm pl}$,
1058: $\chi$ soon catches up inflaton even for not so large values of
1059: $|\xi|$, which prevents successful inflation. In this case, inflation
1060: typically terminates with small amount of e-foldings before $\zeta_k$
1061: begins to grow significantly.
1062: We present two-dimensional plots of $\xi$ and
1063: $\chi(0)$ which divide the ``allowed" and ``ruled out " regions
1064: in Fig.~7 for the case of $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$.
1065: The ``allowed" regions mean that conditions
1066: of $\delta_H(k)<2\times 10^{-5}$ and $N>55$ are both satisfied
1067: at the end of inflation for the inflaton mass $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$.
1068: When $\chi(0)~\lsim~0.1m_{\rm pl}$, the separating curve is mainly
1069: determined by the condition of $\delta_H(k)<2\times 10^{-5}$
1070: (i.e., $\zeta_k$ remains almost constant on super-Hubble scales).
1071: For $\chi(0)~\gsim~0.1m_{\rm pl}$, the condition of $N>55$ plays
1072: the dominant role rather than that of the density perturbation.
1073: It is important to note that wide ranges of parameters are ruled out
1074: even in the case of $|\xi|~\lsim~0.1$ unless we take smaller values
1075: of $\chi(0)$. When $|\xi|~\gsim~1$, we find that nonlinear growth of
1076: super-Hubble curvature perturbations is inevitable even
1077: for very small initial $\chi$ as $\chi(0)=10^{-50}m_{\rm pl}$.
1078:
1079: One may consider that allowed regions may become wider if initial
1080: values of inflaton are larger. However, this is not generally true.
1081: Since larger values of $\phi$ correspond to the larger potential energy,
1082: the inflationary period during which the $\phi$ field dominates the
1083: dynamics of the system is longer. This prolonged inflation leads to
1084: the amplification of super-Hubble $\zeta_k$ as well as
1085: the $\chi$ field fluctuation.
1086: For example, when $\phi(0)=4m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$
1087: with $\xi=-0.02$, $\zeta_k$ grows up to $\tilde{\zeta}_k \approx 0.07$,
1088: while for the smaller value $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$, $\zeta_k$ remains
1089: almost constant for the same value of $\xi$.
1090: For $\phi(0)=4m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$,
1091: the allowed values of $\xi$ are found to be $|\xi|~\lsim~0.01$,
1092: whose condition is tighter than in the case of $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$.
1093: When $\chi(0)$ is close to of order unity,
1094: larger values of $\phi(0)$ typically make the e-folding number larger,
1095: which can broaden allowed regions in some cases.
1096: For example, when $\phi(0)=4m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=m_{\rm pl}$,
1097: the allowed values are $|\xi|~\lsim~0.007$, while $|\xi|~\lsim~0.001$
1098: for $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=m_{\rm pl}$.
1099: However, when $\phi(0)$ takes further large values as
1100: $\phi(0)~\gsim~10m_{\rm pl}$, $\zeta_k$ grows nonadiabatically
1101: even for $\xi=-0.001$.
1102: This indicates that large $\phi(0)$ does not necessarily result
1103: in the successful inflation in the presence of negative
1104: nonminimal coupling.
1105:
1106: In the reheating phase, parametric amplification of the $\chi$
1107: fluctuation is relevant only for the case of
1108: $\xi~\lsim~-1$\cite{nonminimalpre2,nonminimalpre3},
1109: because the scalar curvature gradually decreases during inflation.
1110: However, such large values of $|\xi|$ generally prevents
1111: the successful inflationary scenario as explained above,
1112: which will be ruled out even if $\chi(0)$ is initially very small.
1113: This is in contrast with the positive $\xi$ case where
1114: exponential suppression of long-wave modes in the $\delta\chi_k$
1115: fluctuation do not affect on the dynamics of inflation.
1116: In the absence of other interactions, negative nonminimal coupling leads
1117: to the strong distortions on CMB in wide ranges of parameters.
1118:
1119:
1120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1121: \subsection{The $\frac12g^2\phi^2\chi^2$ coupling is taken into account}
1122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1123:
1124: So far, we have not considered the interaction between $\phi$ and
1125: $\chi$ fields. Taking into account the simple four-point coupling
1126: $\frac12 g^2\phi^2\chi^2$ provides a way to escape nonadiabatic
1127: growth of super-Hubble curvature perturbations.
1128: The background equations for the scale factor and inflaton
1129: are obtained by changing $V(\phi)=\frac12 m^2\phi^2$ to
1130: $V(\phi,\chi)=\frac12 m^2\phi^2+\frac12 g^2\phi^2\chi^2$ in
1131: Eqs.~$(\ref{B7})$ and $(\ref{B8})$.
1132: The homogeneous $\chi$ and the $\delta\chi_k$
1133: fluctuation satisfy
1134: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1135: \begin{eqnarray}
1136: \ddot{\chi}+3H\dot{\chi}+(g^2\phi^2+\xi R)\chi =0,
1137: \label{D2}
1138: \end{eqnarray}
1139: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1140: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1141: \begin{eqnarray}
1142: \delta\ddot{\chi}_k+3H\delta\dot{\chi}_k+
1143: \left( \frac{k^2}{a^2} +g^2\phi^2+\xi R \right)\delta \chi_k=
1144: 2(\ddot{\chi}+3H \dot{\chi})\Phi_k+\dot{\chi}
1145: (\dot{\Phi}_k+3\dot{\Psi}_k)
1146: -\xi\chi \delta R_k -2g^2\phi\chi\delta\phi_k.
1147: \label{D3}
1148: \end{eqnarray}
1149: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1150: Then the effective mass of the $\chi$ and super-Hubble $\delta\chi_k$
1151: modes are given by
1152: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1153: \begin{eqnarray}
1154: m_{\rm eff}^2=g^2\phi^2+\xi R.
1155: \label{D4}
1156: \end{eqnarray}
1157: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1158: Neglecting the contribution of the $\chi$ field relative to inflaton
1159: in Eq.~$(\ref{B10})$, the scalar curvature is approximately written as
1160: $R \approx 2\kappa^2m^2\phi^2$ during inflation, which yields
1161: the relation
1162: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1163: \begin{eqnarray}
1164: m_{\rm eff}^2 \approx \left[g^2+16\pi\xi
1165: \left(\frac{m}{m_{\rm pl}}\right)^2\right]\phi^2.
1166: \label{D5}
1167: \end{eqnarray}
1168: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1169: When $\xi<0$, the negative effective mass leads to the exponential
1170: increase of $\chi$ and long-wave $\delta\chi_k$ modes during inflation.
1171: This effect is weakened in the presence of
1172: the $g$ coupling. Especially for the positive effective mass,
1173: which corresponds to
1174: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1175: \begin{eqnarray}
1176: g>4\sqrt{\pi} \frac{m}{m_{\rm pl}} \sqrt{|\xi|},
1177: \label{D6}
1178: \end{eqnarray}
1179: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1180: the $\chi$ particle production is shut off in inflationary phase.
1181:
1182: Neglecting metric perturbations, we have the analytic solution
1183: $(\ref{C4})$, where the order of the Hankel functions
1184: is given by\cite{SH}
1185: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1186: \begin{eqnarray}
1187: \nu^2=\frac94-12\xi-\frac{g^2\phi^2}{H^2}.
1188: \label{D7}
1189: \end{eqnarray}
1190: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1191: Since the Hubble expansion rate is approximately written as
1192: $H^2\approx 4\pi/3(m/m_{\rm pl})^2\phi^2$ during inflation,
1193: we obtain
1194: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1195: \begin{eqnarray}
1196: \nu^2 \approx \frac94-12\xi-\frac{3g^2}{4\pi}
1197: \left( \frac{m_{\rm pl}}{m}\right)^2 .
1198: \label{D8}
1199: \end{eqnarray}
1200: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1201: Eq.~$(\ref{D6})$ corresponds to cancelling the
1202: second term in Eq.~$(\ref{D8})$ by the $g$ term.
1203: When $\nu^2<0$, i.e.,
1204: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1205: \begin{eqnarray}
1206: g>4\sqrt{\pi} \frac{m}{m_{\rm pl}} \sqrt{|\xi|+\frac{3}{16}},
1207: \label{D9}
1208: \end{eqnarray}
1209: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1210: $\chi$ modes exponentially decrease as $\propto a^{-3/2}$
1211: in the similar way as the large positive $\xi$ case.
1212: When $g$ ranges in the region of
1213: $4\sqrt{\pi}(m/m_{\rm pl}) \sqrt{|\xi|}<g<
1214: 4\sqrt{\pi}(m/m_{\rm pl})\sqrt{|\xi|+3/16}$,
1215: $\chi$ decays more slowly as $\propto a^{-(3/2-\nu)}$.
1216: However, as long as the condition $(\ref{D6})$ is satisfied and
1217: $\chi$ is initially small relative to $\phi$, the $\chi$ field hardly
1218: affects the dynamics of inflation,
1219: which results in the conservation of the curvature perturbation
1220: $\zeta_k$ on super-Hubble scales.
1221:
1222: Let us consider concrete cases. In Fig.~8 we plot the evolution
1223: of a long-wave $\delta\chi_k$ mode for $\xi=-0.05$ and several
1224: values of $g$ with initial conditions $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$
1225: and $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
1226: When $g=0$, the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation exhibits exponential increase
1227: during inflation, leading to the nonadiabatic growth of super-Hubble
1228: curvature perturbations.
1229: In the presence of the $g$ coupling, the conditions of Eqs.~$(\ref{D6})$
1230: and $(\ref{D9})$ yield $g>1.6 \times 10^{-6}$
1231: and $g>3.5 \times 10^{-6}$, respectively,
1232: for the typical mass scale $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$.
1233: As is found in Fig.~8, $\delta\chi_k$ decreases very rapidly as
1234: $\propto a^{-3/2}$ for $g=5.0 \times 10^{-6}$, while its decreasing rate is
1235: smaller for $g=2.0 \times 10^{-6}$.
1236: In both cases, however, large-scale curvature perturbations
1237: remain almost constant during inflation and reheating
1238: (see the inset of Fig.~8).
1239:
1240: %%%%%%%%%%
1241: \begin{figure}
1242: \begin{center}
1243: \singlefig{12cm}{Fig8.eps}
1244: \begin{figcaption}{Fig8}{12cm}
1245: The evolution of the field fluctuation $\delta\tilde{\chi}_k$
1246: during inflation and reheating for a
1247: super-Hubble mode $k=a_0H_0$ in the cases of $g=0$, $2 \times10^{-6}$,
1248: and $5 \times 10^{-6}$ with $\xi=-0.05$, $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$, and
1249: initial values $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$, $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
1250: {\bf Inset}: $\tilde{\zeta}_k$ vs $t$ for $g=0$, $2 \times10^{-6}$,
1251: and $5 \times 10^{-6}$. For the values of $g$ which satisfy the relation
1252: $(\ref{D6})$, i.e, $g>1.6 \times 10^{-6}$, the curvature perturbation
1253: is conserved in large scales.
1254: \end{figcaption}
1255: \end{center}
1256: \end{figure}
1257: %%%%%%%%%%
1258:
1259: In the case of $|\xi| \gg 1$, Eq.~$(\ref{D9})$ approximately
1260: takes the form of Eq.~$(\ref{D6})$, which reads
1261: $g~\gsim~7.1 \times 10^{-6}\sqrt{|\xi|}$ for the inflaton mass
1262: $m=10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$. Even for very large values of $|\xi|$ such as
1263: $\xi=-10^4$, the $\xi$ effect can be removed for
1264: $g~\gsim~7.1 \times 10^{-4}$.
1265: If the coupling between $\phi$ and $\chi$ is greater than of order
1266: $10^{-3}$, the $\chi$ particle production
1267: during inflation discussed in Ref.~\cite{SH} will be irrelevant.
1268: When $g~\gsim~10^{-3}$, since the $g$ effect is typically dominant
1269: relative to the negative nonminimal coupling unless $|\xi|$ is
1270: unnaturally large, $\chi$ particles are created
1271: during preheating in the usual manner due to the
1272: $g$ resonance\cite{pre2}.
1273: Since long-wave $\chi$ modes are
1274: exponentially suppressed during inflation for the case of
1275: $g \gg 7.1 \times 10^{-6}\sqrt{|\xi|}$, the existence of
1276: the preheating era does not lead to the amplification of super-Hubble
1277: metric perturbations, which provides the standard conservation law of
1278: large-scale curvature perturbations.
1279:
1280:
1281: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1282: \section{Conclusions}
1283: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1284:
1285: We have studied the dynamics and perturbations in the multi-field
1286: inflation with a nonminimally coupled $\chi$ field.
1287: When the coupling $\xi$ is positive, $\chi$
1288: and long-wave $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuations are exponentially
1289: suppressed in de Sitter background.
1290: In this case, the existence of the $\chi$ field hardly affects the
1291: dynamics of inflation, and the ordinary adiabatic
1292: scenario in large-scale curvature perturbations is not modified
1293: as long as $\chi$ is initially small relative to inflaton.
1294: Although $\chi$ fluctuations grow by parametric resonance
1295: during preheating after inflation
1296: for large values of $\xi (\gg 1)$, this process is not sufficient
1297: to enhance super-Hubble metric perturbations, since the
1298: inflationary suppression is strong.
1299:
1300: In contrast, negative nonminimal coupling can lead to the strong
1301: inflationary $\chi$ particle production in long-wave modes.
1302: This exponential increase of the $\chi$ fluctuation makes
1303: super-Hubble metric perturbations grow too,
1304: which violates the standard conservation property of
1305: large-scale curvature perturbations in adiabatic inflation models.
1306: We find that even the coupling $|\xi|$ less than unity yields
1307: the exponential growth of the $\chi$ fluctuation in small $k$-modes,
1308: which terminates the inflationary period earlier than
1309: in the minimally coupled case.
1310: This effect reduces the total amount of inflation (e-foldings),
1311: in addition to the nonadiabatic increase of super-Hubble
1312: curvature perturbations.
1313: Large values of $|\xi|$ greater than unity make the inflationary phase
1314: very short, whose amount of inflation is typically insufficient
1315: for the success of the inflationary scenario.
1316: We have constrained the strength of negative nonminimal coupling by two
1317: requirements that the large-scale curvature perturbation is almost conserved
1318: and the number of e-foldings satisfies $N>55$.
1319: Since the evolution of the $\chi$ fluctuation depends on its initial value
1320: at the beginning of inflation, we examined the allowed regions in
1321: two-dimensional plots of $\xi$ and $\chi(0)$.
1322: With the increase of $|\xi|$, we require smaller values of $\chi(0)$
1323: for the successful inflationary scenario. When $|\xi|~\gsim~1$,
1324: we find that strong enhancement of large-scale curvature perturbations
1325: is inevitable even for very small values of $\chi(0)$.
1326:
1327: As one escape route from nonadiabatic growth of super-Hubble
1328: metric perturbations, we considered the interaction
1329: $\frac12g^2\phi^2\chi^2$ between $\phi$ and $\chi$ fields.
1330: Introducing this coupling makes the effective $\chi$ mass heavy,
1331: which suppresses the inflationary $\chi$ particle production
1332: by negative nonminimal coupling.
1333: If two couplings satisfy the condition $(\ref{D6})$,
1334: the $\chi$ fluctuation does not exhibit exponential increase during inflation.
1335: This protects super-Hubble curvature perturbations from being amplified,
1336: because the system is effectively dominated by inflaton in this case.
1337:
1338: Although we have considered the simple massive inflationary
1339: model, strong enhancement of
1340: long-wave $\chi$ fluctuations by negative nonminimal coupling
1341: will occur in potential-independent way in de Sitter background.
1342: Since the scalar curvature is approximately
1343: written as $R\approx 4\kappa^2V(\phi)$ during inflation,
1344: super-Hubble curvature perturbations as well as $\chi$ fluctuations
1345: will also grow nonperturbatively in other models of inflation
1346: while the potential energy $V(\phi)$ slowly decreases.
1347: In addition to this, exponential increase of cosmological perturbations
1348: leads to the production of inflaton particles.
1349: In spinodal inflation models\cite{spinodal} where the second
1350: derivative of $V(\phi)$ changes sign,
1351: the inflaton fluctuation in small $k$-modes exhibits exponential increase
1352: when $V''(\phi)<0$ even in the single-field case.
1353: It is of interest to study the dynamics and perturbations in this model
1354: with a nonminimally coupled $\chi$ field, in which amplifications
1355: of the inflaton fluctuation may further strengthen super-Hubble metric
1356: perturbations.
1357:
1358: There are other issues which we did not address in this paper.
1359: Since negative nonminimal coupling works to violate the scale-invariance
1360: of the CMB spectrum, we should also consider the spectral index to
1361: constrain the strength of $\xi$ by observations.
1362: In the single-field case, the spectral tilts are evaluated in
1363: generalized Einstein theories in Ref.~\cite{spectral}, which may be
1364: interesting to extend to the multi-field case including the nonminimally
1365: coupled $\chi$ field.
1366: In addition to this, although we did not consider backreaction effects
1367: in this paper, detailed studies including second order
1368: metric perturbations\cite{SMP} will be needed toward complete
1369: understanding of the multi-field inflation and preheating.
1370: These issues are left to future works.
1371:
1372: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1373: \section*{ACKOWLEDGMENTS}
1374: We thank Bruce A. Bassett for detailed and insightful comments
1375: and Eiichiro Komatsu, Kei-ichi Maeda, and Takashi Torii
1376: for useful discussions. We also thank David I. Kaiser for
1377: providing us a useful note\cite{Kaiser}. This work was supported partially
1378: by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research Fund of the Ministry of Education,
1379: Science and Culture (No. 09410217), and by the Waseda University
1380: Grant for Special Research Projects.
1381: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1382:
1383: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1384: \bibitem{Kolb}
1385: E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, {\it The Early Universe}
1386: (Addison-Wesley,
1387: Redwood City, California, 1990); A. D. Linde, {\it Particle
1388: Physics and Inflationary Cosmology} (Harwood, Chur, Switzerland,
1389: 1990).
1390: \bibitem{den1}
1391: V. F. Mukhanov and G. Chibisov, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Ther. Fiz, 33,
1392: 549 (1981); A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 49},
1393: 1110 (1982); S. W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. {\bf B115}, 295 (1982);
1394: J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner,
1395: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 28}, 679 (1983).
1396: \bibitem{den2}
1397: J. M. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 22}, 1882 (1980);
1398: V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger,
1399: Phys. Rep. {\bf 215}, 293 (1992);
1400: A. R. Liddle and D. H. Lyth, {\it ibid}. {\bf 231}, 1 (1993).
1401: \bibitem{pre1}
1402: J. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 42}, 2491
1403: (1990); A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, Sov. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 51},
1404: 273 (1990).
1405: \bibitem{pre2}
1406: L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf
1407: 73}, 3195 (1994); Y. Shtanov, J. Trashen, and R. H. Brandenberger,
1408: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 51}, 5438 (1995); S. Khlebnikov and I. I. Tkachev,
1409: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77}, 219 (1996); L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A.
1410: Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56}, 3258 (1997).
1411: \bibitem{mpre1}
1412: H. Kodama and T. Hamazaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 96}, 949
1413: (1996); Y. Nambu and A. Taruya, {\it ibid}. {\bf 97}, 83
1414: (1997); F. Finelli and R. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}
1415: 1362 (1999); M. Parry and R. Easther, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59} 061301
1416: (1999).
1417: \bibitem{mpre2}
1418: M. Parry and R. Easther, hep-ph/9910441;
1419: M. Parry, {\em Topics in Inflationary Preheating},
1420: PhD Thesis.
1421: \bibitem{nonminiinflaton}
1422: S. Tsujikawa and B. A. Bassett, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62},
1423: 043510 (2000); S. Tsujikawa, K. Maeda, and T. Torii,
1424: {\it ibid}. {\bf 61}, 103501 (2000).
1425: \bibitem{Hwang}
1426: J. Hwang, Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf 7}, 1613 (1990);
1427: {\it ibid}. Phys. Rev. D {\bf 42}, 2601 (1990);
1428: {\it ibid}. Astrophys. J. {\bf 375}, 443 (1991).
1429: \bibitem{multi}
1430: J. Garc\'{\i}a-Bellido and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 53},
1431: 437 (1996); M. Sasaki and E. Stewart, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 95},
1432: 71 (1996); V. F. Mukhanov and P. J. Steinhardt,
1433: Phys. Lett. {\bf B422}, 52 (1998).
1434: \bibitem{multi2}
1435: A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, astro-ph/9502002,
1436: {\it Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on General Relativity
1437: and Gravitation}.
1438: \bibitem{multi3}
1439: J. Garc\'{\i}a-Bellido and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 6739 (1995).
1440: \bibitem{KK}
1441: G. Magnano, M. Ferraris, and M. Francavigla, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.
1442: {\bf 19}, 465 (1987); A. Jakubiec and J. Kijowski,
1443: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 37}, 1406 (1988); K. Maeda, {\it ibid}.
1444: {\bf 39}, 3159 (1989).
1445: \bibitem{BM}
1446: A. L. Berkin and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 44}, 1691 (1991).
1447: \bibitem{assisted}
1448: A. R. Liddle, A. Mazumdar, and F. E. Schunck,
1449: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 061301 (1998);
1450: K. A. Malik and D. Wands, {\it ibid}. {\bf 59},
1451: 123501 (1999); E. J. Copeland, A. Mazumdar,
1452: and N. J. Nunes, {\it ibid}. {\bf 61}, 105005 (1999).
1453: \bibitem{assisted2}
1454: P. Kanti and Olive, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}, 043502 (1999);
1455: {\it ibid}. Phys. Lett. {\bf B464}, 192 (1999).
1456: \bibitem{assisted3}
1457: N. Kaloper and A. R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 123513 (2000).
1458: \bibitem{mpre3}
1459: B. A. Bassett, D. I. Kaiser, and R. Maartens,
1460: Phys. Lett. {\bf B455}, 84 (1999);
1461: B. A. Bassett, F. Tamburini, D. I. Kaiser, and
1462: R. Maartens, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B561}, 188 (1999).
1463: \bibitem{mpre4}
1464: B. A. Bassett and F. Viniegra, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 043507 (2000);
1465: B. A. Bassett, C. Gordon, R. Maartens,
1466: and D. I. Kaiser, {\it ibid}. 061302(R) (2000).
1467: \bibitem{mpre5}
1468: F. Finelli and R. Brandenberger, hep-ph/0003172;
1469: S. Tsujikawa, B. A. Bassett, and F. Viniegra, hep-ph/0006354;
1470: Z. P. Zibin, R. Brandenberger, and D. Scott, hep-ph/0007219.
1471: \bibitem{suppress}
1472: P. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 023505 (2000);
1473: K. Jedamzik and G. Sigl, {\it ibid}. 023519 (2000);
1474: A. R. Liddle, D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik, D. Wands,
1475: {\it ibid}. 103509(R) (2000).
1476: \bibitem{suppress2}
1477: D. Wands, K. Malik, D. H. Lyth, and A. Liddle,
1478: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 043527 (2000).
1479: \bibitem{shinji}
1480: S. Tsujikawa, JHEP {\bf 0007}, 024 (2000).
1481: \bibitem{CW}
1482: S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. {\bf 125B}, 265 (1983);
1483: P. Candelas and S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys.
1484: {\bf B237}, 397 (1984).
1485: \bibitem{BOS}
1486: I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov, and I.L. Shapiro, {\em Effective
1487: action in quantum gravity}, IOP, Bath (1992).
1488: \bibitem{FM}
1489: T. Futamase and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 39}, 399 (1989).
1490: \bibitem{SBB}
1491: D. S. Salopek, J. R. Bond, and J. M. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 40},
1492: 1753 (1989).
1493: \bibitem{FU}
1494: R. Fakir and W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 41}, 1783 (1990).
1495: \bibitem{MS}
1496: N. Makino and M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 86}, 103 (1991);
1497: D. S. Salopek, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 69}, 3602 (1992).
1498: \bibitem{spectral}
1499: D. I. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 4295 (1995).
1500: \bibitem{KF}
1501: E. Komatsu and T. Futamase, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58},
1502: 023004 (1998); {\it ibid}. {\bf 59}, 064029 (1999).
1503: \bibitem{SH}
1504: V. Sahni and S. Habib, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 1766 (1998).
1505: \bibitem{nonminimalpre2}
1506: B. A. Bassett and S. Liberati,
1507: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 021302 (1998).
1508: \bibitem{nonminimalpre3}
1509: S. Tsujikawa, K. Maeda, and T. Torii,
1510: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}, 063515 (1999);
1511: see also {\it ibid}. 123505 (1999).
1512: \bibitem{Kaiser}
1513: D. I. Kaiser, {\it Notes on quantizing a very-massive
1514: scalar field in de Sitter spacetime, unpublished} (1999).
1515: \bibitem{BD80}
1516: N. D. Birrel and P. C. W. Davies,
1517: {\em Quantum fields in curved space} (1980).
1518: \bibitem{spinodal}
1519: D. Cormier and R. Holman, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60},
1520: 041301 (1999); {\em ibid}. {\bf 62}, 023520 (2000);
1521: S. Tsujikawa and T. Torii, {\em ibid}. 043505 (2000).
1522: \bibitem{SMP}
1523: L. R. Abramo, R. H. Brandenberger, and V. F. Mukhanov,
1524: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56}, 3248 (1997);
1525: Y. Nambu, gr-qc/0006031.
1526: \end{thebibliography}
1527:
1528: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1529: %\newpage
1530: \vspace{1cm}
1531: \begin{table}
1532: \caption{The time $mt_f$, the number of e-foldings $N$,
1533: the value $\chi_f$, and the super-Hubble curvature perturbation
1534: $\tilde{\zeta}_k$ at the end of inflation with initial values
1535: $\phi(0)=3m_{\rm pl}$ and $\chi(0)=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$.
1536: With the increase of $|\xi|$, the duration
1537: of inflation becomes shorter, which results in the smaller
1538: amount of e-foldings. We also find that large values of
1539: $|\xi|$ ($|\xi|>0.02$) leads to the nonadiabatic
1540: increase of the curvature perturbation due to
1541: the enhancement of the $\chi$ field.
1542: }
1543:
1544: \vskip .3cm
1545: \noindent
1546: \begin{tabular}{crcccccclc}
1547: ~& $\xi$ & ~& $mt_f$ &~& $N$
1548: & $\chi_f/m_{\rm pl}$ &~& $\tilde{\zeta}_k$ &~\\
1549: \hline
1550: ~&$-0.005$ & ~& 18 & ~& 57 & 0.0031 &~ & 0.00023 &~\\
1551: ~& $-0.01$ & ~& 18 & ~& 57 & 0.0094 &~ & 0.00023 &~\\
1552: ~& $-0.05$ & ~& 12 & ~& 41& 2.0 &~ & 0.031 &~\\
1553: ~& $-0.1$ & ~& 8 & ~& 23 & 2.7 &~ & 0.018 &~\\
1554: ~& $-1$ & ~& 3 &~& 4 & 1.7 &~ & 0.0028 &~
1555: \end{tabular}
1556: \end{table}
1557: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1558:
1559:
1560: \end{document}
1561:
1562: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1563: %%%%% uu-files (figures) %%%
1564: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1565:
1566: