1: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}
2: \documentstyle[aps,12pt,preprint,epsfig]{revtex}
3: %\tightenlines
4:
5: \pagestyle{plain}
6: \def \to {\rightarrow}
7: \def \beq {\begin{equation}}
8: \def \eeq {\end{equation}}
9: \def \ba {\begin{eqnarray}}
10: \def \ea {\end{eqnarray}}
11: \def \jpsi {J/\psi}
12: \def \< {\langle}
13: \def \> {\rangle}
14: \draft
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{Polarizations of $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ in hadroproduction at
18: Tevatron
19: in the $k_t$ factorization approach}
20: \author{Feng Yuan}
21: \address{\small {\it Department of Physics, Peking University, Beijing
22: 100871, People's Republic of China\\
23: Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik der Universit\"at, Philosophenweg 19,
24: D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany}}
25: \author{Kuang-Ta Chao}
26: \address{\small {\it China Center of Advanced Science and Technology
27: (World Laboratory), Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China\\
28: and Department of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871,
29: People's Republic of China}}
30: \maketitle
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33: We present a calculation for the polarizations
34: of $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ produced in the hadron collisions at the Fermilab
35: Tevatron.
36: Various color octet channels including ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$, ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$,
37: and
38: ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ as well as contributions from $\chi_{cJ}$ decays are
39: considered in
40: the $k_t$ factorization
41: approach. We find that in a rather wide range of the transverse momenta of
42: $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$, the production rates could be dominated by the
43: ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ channel, and the predicted
44: polarizations from the ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ channel and $\chi_{cJ}$
45: feeddown contributions
46: are roughly compatible with the preliminary CDF data.
47: This might provide a possible release from the conflict between the
48: NRQCD collinear parton model calculations and the CDF data.
49: \end{abstract}
50: \pacs{PACS number(s): 12.40.Nn, 13.85.Ni, 14.40.Gx}
51:
52: Heavy quarkonium production in high energy collisions provide
53: important information on both perturbative and nonperturbative QCD.
54: In recent years, heavy quarkonium production has attracted much attention
55: from both theory and experiment.
56: To explain the $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ surplus problem
57: of large transverse momentum production at the Fermilab Tevatron\cite{fa},
58: the color-octet production mechanism was introduced for the
59: description of heavy quarkonium production\cite{surplus} based
60: on the NRQCD factorization framework\cite{nrqcd}.
61: However, most recently the CDF collaboration has reported
62: preliminary measurements on the polarizations of the promptly
63: produced charmonium states\cite{pola}, which appear not to
64: support the color-octet predictions that the directly produced $S$-wave
65: quarkonia have transverse polarizations at large $p_T$
66: \cite{th-pola,beneke}.
67: In \cite{braaten}, the authors further
68: considered the feeddown contributions from
69: $\chi_c$ decays, and found the prompt $J/\psi$ polarization disagree with
70: the CDF data at large $p_T$ by 3 standard deviations.
71: In \cite{ktf1}, we have performed a calculation of the production rates
72: for
73: $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ at Tevatron in the newly advocated $k_t$
74: factorization
75: approach\cite{teryaev}, and we find that within the color-singlet model
76: the production rates of $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ can be
77: enhanced by a factor of 20 compared to the leading order predictions
78: in the naive collinear parton
79: model, but are still below the data by at least one order of magnitude.
80: Therefore in order to explain the $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ productions at
81: Tevatron we still need to call for the contributions from color-octet
82: channels.
83: This conclusion has been confirmed by another independent study on the
84: $J/\psi$ production in the $k_t$ factorization approach\cite{t1}.
85: In this letter we will report a calculation for
86: the contributions of color-octet
87: channels not only to the cross sections but also to the polarizations
88: of the $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$.
89:
90: The $k_t$-factorization approach differs greatly from the
91: conventional collinear approximation because it takes the non-vanishing
92: transverse momenta of the scattering partons into account.
93: This approach was previously advocated for the study of heavy quark
94: production
95: at high energy hadron colliders\cite{ca,co}.
96: Recently, more phenomenological studies were performed along this
97: direction by several
98: groups\cite{ryskin,zotov,hagler}, and some successes seem to be achieved
99: by
100: comparing the calculations with experimental
101: data on heavy quark production at the DESY HERA and the Fermilab Tevatron
102: \cite{zotov,hagler,schleper}. Especially
103: for $b$ and $\bar b$ production, the $k_t$ factorization approach may
104: provides a successful resolution for the long standing conflict between
105: the NLO collinear parton model prediction and the experimental data
106: at the Tevatron \cite{hagler}.
107: From these and the most recent studies on charmonium production
108: \cite{ktf1,teryaev,t1},
109: we see that for heavy quark and quarkonium
110: production in the present $p_T$ region at the Tevatron,
111: the improved $k_t$ factorization approach may play a very important role
112: and bring significant enhancements
113: compared with the
114: conventional collinear parton model. For the $b$ quark production the
115: enhancement is about a factor of $2$, while for the color-singlet $J/\psi$
116: production a more dramatical
117: enhancement, which is about a factor of $20$, has been found \cite{ktf1}.
118: In this paper we will
119: work along this line, to further study $J/\psi$ polarization at the
120: Tevatron
121: by including the color-octet channels.
122: We find that the $k_t$ factorization approach may provide a possible way
123: to understand both the observed production rates and polarizations of
124: $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$.
125:
126: Under the $k_t$ factorization approach, a process can be
127: factorized as the hard scattering cross section convoluted with the
128: so called unintegrated gluon distribution of the proton. For example,
129: the polarized cross section for a charmonium state $H$ at the Tevatron
130: can be written as the following form,
131: \begin{equation}
132: \label{xs}
133: \frac{d\sigma(p\bar p\rightarrow H^{(\lambda)} X)}{d^2P_Tdy}=\int dx_1dx_2
134: d^2q_{1T}d^2q_{2T}\frac{f(x_1;q_{1T}^2)}{q_{1T}^2}
135: \frac{f(x_2;q_{2T}^2)}{q_{2T}^2}\times \hat \sigma (g_1^*g_2^*\rightarrow
136: H^{(\lambda)}+X),
137: \end{equation}
138: where $P_T$ and $y$ are the transverse momentum and rapidity of the
139: charmonium
140: state $H$, and $\lambda$ denotes its helicity.
141: $f(x;q_{T}^2)$ is the unintegrated gluon distribution function,
142: which can be related to the conventional gluon distribution by
143: \begin{equation}
144: xg(x,\mu^2)=\int^{\mu^2} \frac{dq_T^2}{q_T^2}f(x;q_T^2).
145: \end{equation}
146: In Eq.~(1), the hard scattering cross section
147: $\hat \sigma(H^{(\lambda)})$ describes the production of $H$
148: from two off-shell gluons fusion process,
149: which will depend on the incident gluons' longitudinal momentum fractions
150: $x_1,~x_2$ and transverse momenta $q_{1T},~q_{2T}$.
151: In the collinear approximation, the cross section $\hat \sigma$ does not
152: depend on
153: $q_{1T}$ and $q_{2T}$, and then Eq.~(1) will go back to the conventional
154: collinear parton model result for the production of state $H$.
155: However, as mentioned above, the incident partons' $q_t$ may play
156: an important
157: role for heavy quarkonium production, and may not be neglected.
158: To derive the cross section $\hat \sigma$, we closely follow the
159: BFKL approach in which gauge invariance of the interaction
160: vertices is guaranteed order by order.
161: For example, to get the gauge invariant amplitude for $J/\psi$ production
162: from ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel, we must include extra term contributions
163: (see Fig.~1(c) of \cite{ktf1})
164: which will finally result in an effective (Lipatov) vertex for three-gluon
165: interaction.
166:
167: For direct $J/\psi$ production at the Tevatron, because the color-singlet
168: contribution underestimates the experimental data\cite{ktf1}
169: by at least an order of magnitude
170: in the $k_t$ factorization approach,
171: we need to consider the color-octet
172: contributions, for which we will have the
173: LO (leading order) gluon fusion processes,
174: \begin{equation}
175: gg\rightarrow c\bar c[{}^1S_0^{(8)},{}^3P_J^{(8)},{}^3S_1^{(8)}]
176: \rightarrow J/\psi+X,
177: \end{equation}
178: where various possible color-octet channels for the $c\bar c$ are
179: considered.
180: Note that these $2\rightarrow 1$ subprocesses do not contribute
181: to $J/\psi$ ($\psi'$)
182: production at large $p_T$ in the collinear parton model. However, in the
183: $k_t$ factorization approach, these processes contribute to large $p_T$
184: production, because the initial partons' transverse momenta will
185: lead to $J/\psi$ having transverse momentum.
186: In this context, the transverse momentum of $J/\psi$ will be the sum of
187: the transverse momenta of the two incident partons,
188: $\vec{P}_T^\psi=\vec{q}_{1T}+\vec{q}_{2T}$.
189: For $\chi_{cJ}$ production, the inclusive production rates have been
190: calculated in \cite{teryaev}, where they find there is no need for the
191: color-octet
192: contributions to $\chi_{cJ}$ production. So, in this paper we will also
193: only
194: consider the color-singlet contributions to $\chi_{cJ}$ polarizations,
195: and then calculate their feeddown contributions to $J/\psi$ polarization.
196: For numerical calculations, we set $m_c=1.5GeV$ and
197: choose the unintegrated gluon distribution
198: of \cite{martin}. We set the scales $\mu^2$ for
199: the strong coupling constant $\alpha_s(\mu^2)$ in the
200: hard scattering cross section $\hat \sigma$
201: to be $q_{1T}^2$ for the interaction
202: vertex associated with the incident gluon $q_1$, and
203: $q_{2T}^2$ for the vertex associated with $q_2$\cite{ktf1,teryaev,levin}.
204:
205: We first give the numerical results for the $P_T$ distributions of the
206: inclusive cross sections for direct $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ production at
207: the Tevatron compared with the experimental data.
208: Fig.~1 is for $J/\psi$, and Fig.~2 for $\psi'$.
209: As a qualitative estimate we will use just one individual color-octet
210: channel to fit the cross sections observed by CDF.
211: The solid lines correspond to the ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ channel by taking the
212: color-octet matrix elements as:
213: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^1S_0)\rangle =0.10GeV^3$ for $J/\psi$ and
214: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi'}({}^1S_0)\rangle =0.03GeV^3$ for $\psi '$,
215: while
216: other matrix elements are set to be zero,
217: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi(\psi')}({}^3P_0)\rangle =
218: \langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi(\psi')}({}^3S_1)\rangle =0$.
219: The dashed lines correspond to the ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$ channel:
220: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^3P_0)\rangle /m_c^2 =0.025GeV^3$ for $J/\psi$ and
221: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi'}({}^3P_0)\rangle /m_c^2=0.005GeV^3$ for $\psi '$,
222: while
223: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi(\psi')}({}^1S_0)\rangle =
224: \langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi(\psi')}({}^3S_1)\rangle =0$.
225: The dotted lines correspond to the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel:
226: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^3S_1)\rangle =0.007GeV^3$ for $J/\psi$ and
227: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi'}({}^3S_1)\rangle =0.0025GeV^3$ for $\psi '$,
228: while
229: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi(\psi')}({}^1S_0)\rangle =
230: \langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi(\psi')}({}^3P_0)\rangle =0$.
231: For $J/\psi$ production, from Fig.~3 we can see that the ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$
232: and
233: ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$ channels can both rather well describe the Tevatron data,
234: especially for the shapes of the differential cross sections.
235: Whereas the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel gives an inadequate shape for the
236: differential
237: cross sections compared with the experimental data.
238: For $\psi'$ production, at first sight all the three curves seem to
239: roughly agree with data.
240: However, we can still see that the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel
241: overestimates the production rate of $\psi'$ at large $P_T$.
242: For both $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ the theoretical predictions
243: for ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel drop more
244: slowly as $P_T$ increases than the experimental data.
245: This is mainly because for ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel there are additional
246: terms (see Fig.~1b and c of \cite{ktf1}), which give main contributions
247: at large $P_T$, but these terms do not
248: contribute to the ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ and ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$ processes.
249: The disagreements between theoretical predictions for the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$
250: contributions and experimental data show that
251: in the present $p_T$ region ($p_T<20GeV$) at the Tevatron, the
252: ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$
253: channel may not be the dominant one to the direct $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$
254: production in the $k_t$ factorization approach.
255: This result is very different from the collinear parton model
256: calculations,
257: where the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel overwhelmingly dominates the $S$-wave
258: quarkonium production at moderate and large transverse momentum at the
259: Tevatron\cite{surplus,beneke}.
260:
261: This difference has significant consequence on the polarization
262: predictions
263: of $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$. We recall that in the
264: collinear parton model the NRQCD formalism predicts $S$-wave quarkonia
265: being transversely polarized dominantly due to the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$
266: gluon fragmentation contributions\cite{th-pola,beneke}.
267: However, in the $k_t$ factorization approach, the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$
268: channel may not dominate the $S$-wave quarkonium production, so the
269: previous
270: conclusion of transverse polarization at large $P_T$ may be changed.
271: In the following we will study the polarizations of $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$
272: in the $k_t$ factorization approach.
273: In Fig.~3, we present our result for the $\psi'$ polarization at Tevatron.
274: Because it receives no feeddown contributions from higher lying
275: charmonium states,
276: the polarization of $\psi'$ is only due to the direct production
277: from the color-octet processes.
278: In this figure, we give each individual contributions from these octet
279: processes in the $k_t$ factorization approach.
280: The solid line is for the ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$
281: contribution, the dashed line for the ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$,
282: and the dotted-dashed line for the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$.
283: From this figure we can see that the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ channel contributes
284: to the transversely polarized $\psi'$ as it contributes in the collinear
285: parton model approach.
286: Whereas the ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ channel contributes to the unpolarized, and
287: ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$ contributes to the longitudinally polarized.
288: If ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ could dominate $\psi'$ production
289: at the Tevatron (see Fig.~2), the $\psi'$ will be unpolarized.
290: This is consistent with the experimental data, which show that
291: in the available $p_T$ region the $\psi'$ seems to be unpolarized (though
292: with
293: large errors).
294: So, the experimental data on $\psi'$ polarization support the
295: ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ dominance on $\psi'$ production.
296:
297: We then study the $J/\psi$ polarization. The polarization data
298: of $J/\psi$ are for the prompt production, i.e., including the direct
299: production and the feeddown contributions from $\chi_{cJ}$ and $\psi'$
300: decays. The $\psi'$ feeddown contributions to $J/\psi$ polarization can be
301: obtained from the above $\psi'$ polarization calculations multiplied by
302: the
303: decay branching ratio of $\psi'$ to $J/\psi$.
304: (Note that the observed transitions of $\psi'$ to $J/\psi$ involve no spin
305: flips, so this part of contribution has the same behavior as $\psi'$
306: polarization.)
307: To obtain the feeddown contributions from the $\chi_{cJ}$ decays, we
308: must convolute the $\chi_{cJ}$ polarized cross sections with their
309: decay branching ratios of $\chi_{cJ}\rightarrow J/\psi \gamma$.
310: We find that in the $k_t$ factorization approach $\chi_{cJ}$ feeddown
311: contributes to $J/\psi$ being a little transversely polarized.
312: The polarization parameter $\alpha$ for $J/\psi$ from $\chi_{cJ}$ decays
313: approaches to $0.5$ at large $p_T$.
314: This is different from the collinear parton model calculations
315: which predict that $\alpha$ approaches to about $0.24$ at large
316: $p_T$\cite{wise,braaten}.
317: (Note that the polarizations of $\chi_{cJ}$ themselves are
318: very interesting for testing the
319: $k_t$ factorization approach, and has been presented in\cite{ktf2}).
320: All of these contributions including the direct contributions and the
321: feeddown
322: contributions to the $J/\psi$ polarization are plotted in Fig.~4.
323: As in Fig.~3 for $\psi'$, we also plot in this figure the individual
324: contributions
325: from the three color-octet processes for the direct polarizations,
326: and then combine them
327: with the $\chi_{cJ}$ and $\psi'$ feeddown contributions for the prompt
328: polarizations
329: compared with the experimental data from the CDF collaboration.
330: The thinner lines are for the direct polarizations, and the thicker
331: lines for the prompt polarizations.
332: The solid lines are for ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ contributions,
333: the dashed lines for ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$ , the dotted-dashed
334: lines for ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$, and the dotted line for the $\chi_{cJ}$
335: feeddown contribution.
336: We see that in general the polarizations increase as $p_T$ increases.
337: For example, for the ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$ direct production the value of
338: polarization
339: parameter $\alpha(\psi)$ (being longitudinal) varies from
340: $-0.63$ at $p_T=5GeV$ to $-0.38$ at $p_T=20GeV$. For the ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$
341: direct production $\alpha(\psi)$ (being transverse) varies from $0.72$
342: to $0.96$ in the same $p_T$ range. The $\chi_c$ feed down contribution
343: will
344: reduce the extremities of $\alpha(\psi)$ in direct productions.
345: From this figure we find again that the ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ dominance
346: together with the $\chi_c$ feed down contribution will lead to the
347: predicted prompt $J/\psi$ polarization in rough
348: agreement with the Tevatron data except the one at about $p_T=16.7 GeV$
349: which, however, has very large errors.
350: We note that this seemingly nontrivial behavior of $J/\psi$ polarization
351: at $p_T=16.7 GeV$ (being longitudinal)
352: can not be explained consistently with the moderate $p_T$ data
353: (being transverse) in our approach.
354: If the CDF data at $p_T=16.7GeV$ is further confirmed by
355: CDF or D0 experiments in the future with higher statistics,
356: the above mechanism may fail.
357:
358: Concluding our analysis, we find that the ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ channel
359: dominance is the only reasonable realization of the polarization
360: data of $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ in the $k_T$ factorization approach.
361: To see this point more clearly, we can perform a $\chi^2$ analysis
362: for theoretical comparison with the experimental data.
363: For $\psi'$ polarization data, ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ channel gives the smallest
364: value
365: of $\chi^2$ ($\chi^2/dof=0.61$) as expected.
366: Moreover, inclusion of other channels
367: does not improve the fit. For example, including the
368: ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ contribution would make the fit even worse, and when
369: including ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$ contribution the fit is in the same
370: manner as ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ alone but with a little
371: higher $\chi^2/dof$ ($=0.83$).
372: For $J/\psi$ polarization, the result for the fit is similar. I.e.,
373: ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ alone gives the smallest $\chi^2$ value
374: ($\chi^2/dof=1.85$), and inclusion of ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$ gives a
375: even worse fit, while inclusion of ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ gives the same quality
376: fit as ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ alone with
377: a little higher $\chi^2/dof$ ($=2.13$).
378: So, with the available statistics at present,
379: the polarization data of $J/\psi$
380: and $\psi'$ may indicate a strong signal of ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$
381: dominance for $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ production.
382:
383: The ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ dominance has a straightforward consequence
384: that the other two matrix elements $\langle {\cal
385: O}_8^{\psi}({}^3S_1)\rangle$
386: and $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^3P_0)\rangle$ must be
387: much smaller than $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^1S_0)\rangle$.
388: This is quite different from the naive expectation based on
389: the NRQCD velocity scaling rules, which predict no big difference
390: between these three matrix elements
391: ($\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^1S_0)\rangle$ scales as $v^6$, while
392: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^3S_1)\rangle$
393: and $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^3P_0)\rangle$ both scale as $v^7$).
394: But, the values of
395: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi(\psi')}({}^1S_0)\rangle$ we used in
396: Figs.~1-2 are smaller than the relevant color-singlet matrix elements
397: by about an order of magnitude (e.g., the observed $J/\psi$ leptonic
398: decay width leading to
399: $\langle {\cal O}_1^{\psi}({}^3S_1)\rangle=1.06GeV^3$).
400: This is roughly consistent with the NRQCD velocity scaling rule
401: estimate. As for the other two matrix elements
402: $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^3S_1)\rangle$
403: and $\langle {\cal O}_8^{\psi}({}^3P_0)\rangle$,
404: there might be some dynamical reasons (associated with the nonperturbative
405: evolution processes) to suppress their values and violate the
406: velocity scaling rules\cite{wong}, or there might be some
407: new counting rules for
408: charmonium system to suppress their values\cite{fleming}.
409:
410: Some theoretical uncertainties must be addressed before concluding.
411: First there is an uncertainty coming from the scale choice used for the
412: numerical calculations. We have set the scales to be $q_{1T}^2$ or
413: $q_{2T}^2$
414: which are also adopted by some previous studies
415: \cite{hagler,levin}.
416: If we set these scales both equal to $p_T^2(\psi)+m_c^2$, the cross
417: sections
418: for the three color-octet channels will be lowered down
419: with the normalization factor changing from $1$ to about $0.6$
420: both for $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$.
421: But this change has little effects on the shapes of the
422: curves in Figs.~1-2. So, our conclusion for the ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ dominance
423: will not change
424: with the scale changes.
425: Another uncertainty may come from the
426: parameterizations of the unintegrated gluon distributions, for which,
427: however, it is
428: difficult to give an estimate because we
429: have little knowledge about it at present.
430: On the other hand, we note
431: that the parameterization provided by \cite{martin} are obtained from an
432: excellent fit to $F_2(x,Q^2)$ in a very large window of $x$ and $Q^2$
433: in the $k_t$ factorization approach,
434: which may be viewed as a reliable determination of these quantities.
435:
436: In conclusion, in this paper we have calculated the $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$
437: production rates and polarizations in hadroproduction at the Tevatron
438: in the $k_t$ factorization approach.
439: Various color-octet contributions including
440: ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$, ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$, and
441: ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$ as well as contributions from $\chi_{cJ}$ decays are
442: considered
443: in this approach.
444: We find that in a rather wide range of the transverse momenta of
445: $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$, the production rates could be dominated by the
446: ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ channel, and the predicted
447: polarizations are in rough agreement with the preliminary Tevatron
448: data.
449: However, to draw the final conclusion on heavy quarkonium
450: production mechanism
451: in high energy hadron collisions,
452: we still need more accurate experimental data on large $p_T$
453: production cross sections and polarizations.
454: We also need more solid theoretical
455: calculations such as NLO corrections to the color-octet processes
456: discussed
457: above, and a more reliable estimate
458: for the so-called unintegrated gluon distribution function. It is
459: worthwhile
460: to make further investigations along this direction.
461:
462: While the calculation in this paper was finished we noticed
463: a paper by Ph.~H\"aegler et al. \cite{t1},
464: who studied the $J/\psi$ production rate in the
465: $k_t$ factorization approach with color octet channels. Their result is
466: similar to ours for the calculation of cross sections.
467:
468: \acknowledgments
469: This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation
470: of China, the Education Ministry of China, and the State
471: Commission of Science and Technology of China.
472:
473: \begin{references}
474: \bibitem{fa} CDF collaboration, F. Abe {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. Lett.
475: {\bf 69}, 3704 (1992); Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 71}, 2537 (1993);
476: Phys. Rev.
477: Lett. {\bf 79}, 572 (1997); Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79}, 578 (1997)
478:
479: \bibitem{surplus} E. Braaten and S. Fleming, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74},
480: 3327 (1995);
481: M. Cacciari, M. Greco, M.L. Mangano and A. Petrelli,
482: Phys. Lett. {\bf B356} 553 (1995).
483:
484: \bibitem{nrqcd} G.T. Bodwin, L. Braaten, and G. P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. D51
485: 1125 (1995); Err: {\it ibid.}, {\bf D55}, 5853 (1997).
486:
487: \bibitem{pola} CDF collaboration, T. Affolder {\it et al}.,
488: Phys. Rev. Lett.
489: {\bf 85} 2886;
490: CDF Note 4876, 5027, 5029.
491:
492: \bibitem{th-pola} P. Cho and M. Wise, Phys. Lett. {\bf B346}, 129 (1995).
493:
494: \bibitem{beneke} M. Beneke and M. Kr\"amer, Phys. Rev.{\bf D 55}, 5269
495: (1997).
496:
497: \bibitem{braaten} E. Braaten, B.A. Kniehl, and J. Lee, Phys. Rev. {\bf
498: D62}
499: 094005 (2000);
500: B.A. Kniehl and J. Lee, hep-ph/0007292.
501:
502: \bibitem{ktf1} F. Yuan and K.T. Chao, Phys. Rev. {\bf D63}, 034006 (2001).
503:
504: \bibitem{teryaev} P. H\"agler, {\it et al.}, hep-ph/0004263, to appear in
505: Phys. Rev. Lett.
506:
507: \bibitem{t1} P. H\"agler,{\it et al.}, hep-ph/0008316.
508:
509: \bibitem{ca} S. Catani, M. Ciafaloni, and F. Hautmann, Phys. Lett. {\bf
510: B242},
511: 97 (1990); Nucl. Phys. {\bf B366}, 135 (1991).
512:
513: \bibitem{co} J.C. Collins and R.K. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B360}, 3
514: (1991).
515:
516:
517: \bibitem{ryskin} M.G. Ryskin, {\it et al.}, Z. Phys. {\bf C69}, 269
518: (1996);
519: Eur. Phys. J., {\bf C6}, 313
520: (1999); hep-ph/9907507; hep-ph/0007238;
521: hep-ph/0011111, and reference there in.
522:
523: \bibitem{zotov} S.P. Baranov,{\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bf B428}, 377
524: (1998);
525: Phys. Lett. {\bf B458}, 389 (1999); Phys. Lett. {\bf 491}, 111
526: (2000);
527: and reference therein.
528:
529: \bibitem{hagler} P. H\"agler, {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62},
530: 071502(R)
531: (2000).
532:
533: \bibitem{schleper} see also P. Schleper, talk presented at ICHEP 2000,
534: Osaka, Japan, July 2000.
535:
536: \bibitem{martin} J. Kwiecinski, A.D. Martin, and A.M. Stasto, Phys. Rev.
537: {\bf D56}, 3991 (1997).
538:
539: \bibitem{levin} E.M. Levin, M.G. Ryskin, Yu.M. Shabelski, and
540: A.G. Shuvaev,
541: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 53}, 657 (1991); {\it ibid.},
542: {\bf 54}, 867 (1992).
543:
544: \bibitem{wise} P. Cho, M.B. Wise, and S.P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. {\bf D51},
545: 2039 (1995).
546:
547: \bibitem{ktf2} F. Yuan and K.T. Chao, Phys. Lett. {\bf B500}, 99 (2001).
548:
549:
550: \bibitem{wong} C.Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. {\bf D60}, 114025 (1999).
551:
552: \bibitem{fleming} S. Fleming, A. K. Leibovich, I. Z. Rothstein,
553: hep-ph/0012062.
554:
555: \end{references}
556:
557: \newpage
558: \centerline{\bf \large Figure Captions}
559: \vskip 1cm
560: \noindent
561: FIG. 1. The $p_T$ distribution of direct $J/\psi$ production cross section
562: at the Tevatron in the $k_t$ factorization approach. The solid line is for
563: ${}^1S_0^{(8)}$ contribution, the dashed line for ${}^3P_J^{(8)}$, and
564: the dotted-dashed line for ${}^3S_1^{(8)}$.
565:
566: \noindent
567: FIG. 2. The same as Fig.~1 but for $\psi'$.
568:
569: \noindent
570: FIG. 3. Prompt $\psi'$ polarization at the Tevatron.
571:
572:
573: \noindent
574: FIG. 4. Prompt $J/\psi$ polarization at the Tevatron.
575: The thinner lines are for the direct polarizations, and the thicker lines
576: for the prompt polarizations.
577:
578:
579: \end{document}
580:
581:
582:
583: