1: \section{Analysis of \BdsJpsi}
2: \label{sec:qt} The time-independent transition amplitudes for
3: $B^0$ and $\overline{B}^0$ states into the final $CP$ eigenstate,
4: $f_{CP}$, are parametrized as in \cite{extractinggamma}:
5: \begin{eqnarray}
6: \braket{f_{CP}}{H}{B^0_q} \equiv \mathcal{A}_q & = & N_q
7: \left[1-{a}_qe^{i{\theta}_q}e^{i\gamma}\right] \equiv N_q z_q
8: \label{eq:Adef}\\ \braket{f_{CP}}{H}{\overline{B}^0_q} \equiv
9: \overline{\mathcal{A}}_q & = & \eta N_q
10: \left[1-{a}_qe^{i{\theta}_q}e^{-i\gamma}\right] \equiv \eta
11: N_q\overline{z}_q \label{eq:Abardef}
12: \end{eqnarray}
13: where $\eta$ is the $CP$ eigenvalue of $f_{CP}$, $\theta$ is a
14: strong phase, and $q\in\{d,s\}$. The amplitude at time $t$ for an
15: initial $B/\overline{B}$ meson to decay then becomes:
16: \begin{eqnarray}
17: |A_q(t)|^2 & = & \frac{|N_q|^2}2\left[ (R_L+\epspq
18: R_L^1)e^{-\Gamma_Lt}
19: +(R_H+\epspq R_H^1)e^{-\Gamma_Ht}\right. \nonumber \\ & &
20: \left.\hspace{5.mm}+2e^{-\Gamma t}\left[(A_D+\epspq
21: A_D^1)\cos(\DeltaMt{}) + (A_M(1-\frac{\epspq}{2})\sin(\DeltaMt{})
22: \right] \right] \label{eq:sqampt}\\ & & \nonumber \\
23: |\overline{A}_q(t)|^2 &
24: = & \frac{|N_q|^2}2\left[ (R_L+\epspq
25: \overline{R}_L^1)e^{-\Gamma_Lt} +(R_H+\epspq
26: \overline{R}_H^1)e^{-\Gamma_Ht}\right. \nonumber \\ & &
27: \left.\hspace{5.mm}-2e^{-\Gamma t}\left[(A_D+\epspq
28: \overline{A}_D^1)\cos(\DeltaMt{}) + (A_M(1+\frac{\epspq}{2})
29: \sin(\DeltaMt{}) \right] \right]\label{eq:sqamptbar}
30: \end{eqnarray}
31: where we define rate functions as in \cite{extractinggamma},
32: except that we here give the formulae to first order in the small
33: parameter $\epspq\equiv |\frac{p}{q}|^2-1$, where $p$ and $q$ are
34: the standard factors parametrizing the $B$ meson mass eigenstates
35: in terms of flavour states \cite{aftertop}. As there is, however,
36: only small possibility for new physics to result in a large
37: \epspq\, we henceforth ignore this parameter. The rate functions
38: entering the above are defined by ($\phi_q$ is the $B_q-\overline{B}_q$
39: mixing phase):
40: \begin{eqnarray}
41: R_L & \equiv & \frac12(|z_q|^2 +|\overline{z}_q|^2+2\eta \Re\{
42: z_q^*\overline{z}_qe^{i\phi_q} \}) \label{def:RL} \\
43: R_H &
44: \equiv & \frac12(|z_q|^2+|\overline{z}_q|^2-2\eta \Re\{
45: z_q^*\overline{z}_qe^{i\phi_q} \}) \\
46: A_D & \equiv & \frac12
47: (|z_q|^2-|\overline{z}_q|^2) \\
48: A_M & \equiv & -\eta\Im\{ z_q^*
49: \overline{z}_q e^{i\phi_q} \}\label{def:AM} \\
50: R_L^1 & \equiv
51: & -\frac12(|\overline{z}_q|^2+\eta \Re\{
52: z_q^*\overline{z}_qe^{i\phi_q} \}) = -\frac12 (R_L+A_D)
53: \label{def:RL1} \\
54: R_H^1 &
55: \equiv & -\frac12(|\overline{z}_q|^2-\eta \Re\{
56: z_q^*\overline{z}_qe^{i\phi_q} \}) = -\frac12 (R_H-A_D) \\
57: A_D^1 & \equiv & \frac12
58: |\overline{z}_q|^2 = \frac12\left(\frac12(R_H+R_L)-A_D\right) \\
59: \overline{R}_L^1 & \equiv &
60: \frac12(|z_q|^2+\eta \Re\{ z_q^*\overline{z}_qe^{i\phi_q} \})
61: = \frac12 (R_L+A_D)\\
62: \overline{R}_H^1 & \equiv & \frac12(|z_q|^2 - \eta \Re\{
63: z_q^*\overline{z}_qe^{i\phi_q} \}) = \frac12 (R_H-A_D)\\
64: \overline{A}_D^1 &
65: \equiv & \frac12 |z_q|^2 = \frac12\left(\frac12(R_H+R_L) A_D\right)
66: \label{def:AM1bar}
67: \end{eqnarray}
68: With regard to the final state itself, a few comments are
69: necessary regarding the octet-singlet mixing in the $\eta$
70: system. This mixing, parametrized by the mixing angle $\theta_P$,
71: is still a controversial issue (for current experimental values, see e.g.\
72: \cite{europhys}), so
73: rather than using some specific value for $\theta_P$, we rewrite
74: the $\eta$ wavefunction in the following way: \label{sec:etameson}
75: \begin{eqnarray}
76: \eta & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}-2s\bar{s})\cos(\theta_P) -
77: \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}+s\bar{s})\sin(\theta_P) \nonumber
78: \\ & \equiv &
79: N_\eta(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}) + S_\eta (s\bar{s})
80: \label{eq:etaparm}
81: \end{eqnarray}
82: \begin{equation}
83: N_\eta \equiv
84: \frac{\cos(\theta_P)}{\sqrt{6}}-\frac{\sin(\theta_P)}{\sqrt{3}}
85: \hspace*{1.5cm} S_\eta \equiv
86: \frac{-\sin(\theta_P)}{\sqrt{3}}-\frac{2\cos(\theta_P)}{\sqrt{6}}
87: \end{equation}
88: which is the definition we shall use in the following.
89: \subsection{The time-independent amplitudes}
90: The expressions given above for $|A_q(t)|^2$ and
91: $|\overline{A}_q(t)|^2$ depend on the time-independent amplitudes
92: parametrized by eqs.~(\ref{eq:Adef}) and (\ref{eq:Abardef}). In
93: non-leptonic processes, these amplitudes can generally not be
94: evaluated by any method relying on the factorization approach due
95: to final state interaction (FSI) effects. In the present work,
96: however, we do not need an explicit calculation. Rather, we wish
97: to obtain a parametrization of the $B_d$ and $B_s$ amplitudes
98: that will allow us to relate them by SU(3) flavour symmetry. To
99: arrive at such a parametrization, it is sufficient to use the
100: method of quark topologies which does not require the ability to
101: solve the full theory and which allows a systematic classification of
102: long-distance contributions (for a recent update on this method,
103: see \cite{non-leptonic}). With the topologies listed in
104: figure~\ref{tab:QT}, we obtain the following\footnote{The computational
105: details can be found in an unpublished project. Please contact the author
106: if a copy is needed.}:
107: \FIGURE[ht]{
108: \begin{fmffile}{QT1}
109: \setlength{\extrarowheight}{6pt}
110: \begin{tabular}{cccccc} & & & & & \\
111: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\hspace*{1cm}\input{E}\hspace*{1cm}} &
112: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\input{EA1}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\input{EA2}} \\
113: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\textsf{EMISSION}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\textsf{EMISSION
114: ANNIHILATION 1}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\textsf{EMISSION ANNIHILATION 2}} \\
115: \hspace*{1.5cm} & \hspace*{1.5cm} & \hspace*{1.5cm} & \hspace*{1.5cm} &
116: \hspace*{1.5cm} & \hspace*{1.5cm}\\
117: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\input{PE}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\input{DPA}} & \\
118: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\textsf{PENGUIN EMISSION}} &
119: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\textsf{DOUBLE PENGUIN ANNIHILATION}} &
120: \end{tabular}\end{fmffile}\vspace*{-3mm}
121: \caption{Quark topologies in \BdsJpsi. The gray blobs denote the contracted
122: short-distance parts.\label{tab:QT}}}
123: \begin{eqnarray}
124: A(\BdJpsi) & = & N_\eta\left(\lbd{c} A_d + \lbd{u} B_d\right) +
125: \lbd{u}N_\eta\left[D_d + \frac{\lbd{c}}{\lbd{u}}\zeta_d + \xi_d
126: \right]\label{eq:simpampd}\\
127: A(\BsJpsi) & = & S_\eta\left(\lbs{c} A_s + \lbs{u} B_s\right) +
128: \lbs{u}N_\eta\left[D_s + \frac{\lbs{c}}{\lbs{u}}\zeta_s + \xi_s
129: \right] \label{eq:simpamps}
130: \end{eqnarray}
131: with the definitions:
132: \begin{eqnarray}
133: A_x & \equiv & \expt{1,2}{ccx}{E} + \expt{1,2}{ccx}{PE} +
134: \expen{x}{c}{E} +
135: \smsum{q}\expen{x}{q}{PE}\\
136: B_x & \equiv & \expt{1,2}{uux}{PE} + \expen{x}{c}{E} + \smsum{q}
137: \expen{x}{q}{PE}\\
138: D_x & \equiv & \expt{1,2}{uux}{EA2}\\
139: \zeta_x & \equiv &
140: \frac{2N_\eta+S_\eta}{N_\eta}\left(\expt{1,2}{ccx}{EA1} +
141: \expt{1,2}{ccx}{DPA} + \expen{x}{c}{EA1}
142: + \smsum{q}\expen{x}{q}{DPA} \right) \nonumber\\
143: & & \hspace{15mm}+ \expen{x}{u}{EA2}+ \expen{x}{d}{EA2}+
144: \scriptstyle{\frac{S_\eta}{N_\eta}}\displaystyle\expen{x}{s}{EA2}
145: \label{eq:genamppar1}\\
146: \xi_x & \equiv &
147: \frac{2N_\eta+S_\eta}{N_\eta}\left(\expt{1,2}{uux}{DPA} +
148: \expen{x}{c}{EA1} + \smsum{q}\expen{x}{q}{DPA} \right) \nonumber\\
149: & & \hspace{15mm}+\expen{x}{u}{EA2}+\expen{x}{d}{EA2}+
150: \scriptstyle{\frac{S_\eta}{N_\eta}}\displaystyle\expen{x}{s}{EA2}
151: \label{eq:genamppar2}
152: \end{eqnarray}
153: where $\lambda_{bq}^{q'} \equiv V_{q'b}^*V_{q'q}$,
154: $\expt{i}{uud}{X}$ denotes the insertion of the OPE operator
155: \OPE{i} having external quark lines $buud$ into topology
156: \topl{X}, and \expt{pen}{(u)d}{X} denotes the combined
157: contribution of the QCD penguin operators \OPE{3-6}. The
158: quark content is denoted $(q)d,(q)s$ where $q$ is the flavour of
159: the $q\bar{q}$ pair coming from the gluon and $d$ or $s$ are from the
160: flavour-changing $b$-quark transition. It should be mentioned
161: that, relative to the current-current operators \OPE{1,2}, the
162: electroweak (QCD) penguins contain an extra power of $\alpha_{EM}$
163: ($\alpha_s$). In neither the $B_d$ nor the $B_s$ case are the dominant
164: current-current contributions CKM suppressed relative to the penguins, and so
165: we expect $|A_{EWP}|/|A_{CC}|=\mathcal{O}(10^{-2})=|A_{EWP}|/|A_{QCDP}|$. I
166: have therefore neglected elelectroweak penguin contributions in the above
167: analysis.
168:
169: Noting that the $\zeta$ and $\xi$ terms are SU(3) suppressed and
170: that the $D$ terms are OZI suppressed (see figure~\ref{tab:QT}),
171: we neglect these and obtain:
172: \begin{eqnarray}
173: \mathcal{A}_d = A(\BdJpsi) & = &
174: N_\eta\left( V_{cb}^*V_{cd}A_d + V_{ub}^*V_{ud}B_d \right) \nonumber \\
175: & \equiv & N_d \left[ 1-{a}_de^{i{\theta}_d}e^{i\gamma}\right] \label{eq:finalparmd}\\
176: \mathcal{A}_s = A(\BsJpsi) & = &
177: S_\eta\left( V_{cb}^*V_{cs}A_s + V_{ub}^*V_{us}B_s \right) \nonumber \\
178: & \equiv &
179: N_s\left[1-{a}_s{\textstyle{\frac{\lambda^2}{1-\lambda^2}}}e^{i{\theta}_s}e^{i\gamma}\right]
180: \label{eq:finalparms}
181: \end{eqnarray}
182: with
183: \begin{eqnarray}
184: N_d \equiv -N_\eta A \lambda^3 A_d\hspace{3mm} , & \hspace{3mm}
185: {a}_d \equiv R_b
186: \left(1-\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\right)\left|\frac{B_d}{A_d}\right|\hspace{3mm}
187: , &\hspace{3mm} \theta_d \equiv
188: \mbox{Arg}\left\{\textstyle\frac{B_d}{A_d}\right\}
189: \label{eq:dparams}
190: \\
191: N_s \equiv S_\eta A \lambda^2 A_s
192: \left(1-\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\right)\hspace{3mm} , &\hspace{3mm}
193: {a}_s \equiv R_b
194: \left(1-\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\right)\left|\frac{B_s}{A_s}\right|
195: \hspace{3mm} , &\hspace{3mm} \theta_s \equiv -
196: \mbox{Arg}\left\{\textstyle\frac{B_s}{A_s}\right\}
197: \label{eq:sparams}
198: \end{eqnarray}
199: and the Wolfenstein parameters \cite{extractinggamma}:
200: \begin{eqnarray}
201: \lambda \equiv |V_{us}|=0.22, \hspace{2.6mm} & \hspace{2.6mm}
202: A\equiv \frac{1}{\lambda^2}|V_{cb}|=0.81 \pm 0.06, \hspace{2.6mm}
203: & \hspace{2.6mm} R_b \equiv \frac{1}{\lambda} \left|
204: \frac{V_{ub}}{V_{cb}} \right| = 0.41 \pm 0.07
205: \end{eqnarray}
206: With eqs.~(\ref{eq:finalparmd}) and (\ref{eq:finalparms}) we have
207: recovered exactly the form of eq.~(\ref{eq:Adef}) by which we
208: parametrized the time-independent amplitudes, but in a form that
209: explicitly separates the CKM structure from the strong
210: amplitudes. This is of essential use below.
211:
212: %%% Local Variables:
213: %%% mode: latex
214: %%% TeX-master: "JHEP_paper"
215: %%% End:
216: