1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{fleqn,espcrc2}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: % \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
10:
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: % if you have landscape tables
14: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
15: \usepackage{cite}
16: \usepackage{array,dcolumn} % belongs to LaTeX2e tools
17: \usepackage{axodraw}
18: % put your own definitions here:
19: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
20: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
21: % ...
22:
23: \newcommand{\hs}{\hspace*{0.5cm}}
24: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
25: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
26: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
27: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
28: %
29: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
30: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
31: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
32:
33: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
34: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed
35: Post-Script}
36:
37: % declarations for front matter
38: \title{ Atomic parity violation in cesium
39: and implications for the 3 - 3 - 1 models}
40: %\author{Hoang Ngoc Long\address[MCSD]{{\it The Abdus Salam International
41: \author{Hoang Ngoc Long\address{{\it The Abdus Salam International
42: Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy}}\thanks{On leave from
43: Institute of Physics, NCST,
44: P.O.Box 429, Bo Ho, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam. E-mail
45: address: hnlong@iop.ncst.ac.vn} and
46: Le Phuoc Trung\address{{\it HCMC Institute of Physics, Mac Dinh Chi 1,
47: Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam}}}
48:
49: \begin{document}
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52: The parity violation in cesium atom is analysed
53: in the framework of the models based on the
54: $\mbox{SU}(3)_C\times \mbox{SU}(3)_L \times
55: \mbox{U}(1)_N$ gauge group.
56: It is shown that in the minimal version, the main
57: contribution to a deviation of weak charge
58: $\Delta Q_W$ due to direct $Z'$ exchange is negative.
59: New data on parity violation in the
60: cesium atom seems not favour to the minimal version, while
61: it gets a positive value in the version with
62: right-handed neutrinos. We obtain
63: a bound on the $Z'$ mass at a range from
64: 1.4 TeV to 2.6 TeV. The allowed regions for
65: the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle are also derived.\\
66: PACS number(s): 11.30.Er,12.15.Ji,12.15.Mm,12.60.Cn
67: \vspace{1pc}
68: \end{abstract}
69:
70: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
71: \maketitle
72:
73: \section{Introduction}
74: One prediction of the standard model (SM) is the existence
75: of the atomic parity violation (APV).
76: The new data on the APV in cesium atom~\cite{ben} has
77: caused extensive interest and reviews~\cite{view}.
78: Parity violation in the SM results from
79: exchanges of weak gauge bosons. In electron-hadron
80: neutral-current processes parity violation is due to
81: the vector axial-vector interaction in the Lagrangian.
82: The measurement is stated in terms of the weak charge
83: $Q_W$, which parameterizes the parity violating Lagrangian.
84: The value reported
85: \begin{equation}
86: \label{first}
87: Q_W ( ^{133}_{55} {\rm Cs} ) = -72.06 \pm 0.28
88: ({\rm expt}) \pm 0.34 ({\rm theo})
89: \end{equation}
90: represents a considerable improvement over the
91: previous determination~\cite{fir}. Compared to the SM
92: prediction $Q_W^{SM}$, the deviation $\Delta Q_W$ is
93: \begin{equation}
94: \label{data}
95: \Delta Q_W \equiv Q_W({\rm Cs}) - Q_W^{\rm SM}({\rm Cs})
96: = 1.03 \pm 0.44\;,
97: \end{equation}
98: which is $2.3~ \sigma$ away from the SM prediction. This value
99: has been widely used for analysis of possible new physics.
100:
101:
102: \begin{table*}[htb]
103: \caption{Vector and axial-vector coupling constants relevant for APV
104: in cesium atom for the SM and for two 3 - 3 - 1 models}
105: \label{table1}
106: \newcommand{\m}{\hphantom{$-$}}
107: \newcommand{\cc}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}}
108: \renewcommand{\tabcolsep}{2pc} % enlarge column spacing
109: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2} % enlarge line spacing
110: \medskip
111: \centering
112: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
113: \hline
114: Standard model & 3 - 3 - 1 model with RH neutrinos &
115: Minimal 3 - 3 - 1 model \\
116: \hline
117: \hline
118: $ a_e =\frac{1}{2} $ & $a'_e =-\frac{1}{2}
119: \frac{1}{\sqrt{3-4 s_W^2}} $ & $ a'_e=
120: \frac{\sqrt{1-4 s^2_W}}{2 \sqrt{3}}\ $\\
121: $ v_u=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{4 s_W^2}{3} $ &
122: $ v'_u=-(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{4 s_W^2}{3})
123: \frac{1}{\sqrt{3-4 s_W^2}} $ &
124: $v'_u=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}}\frac{(-
125: 1+6s_W^2)}{\sqrt{1-4s_W^2}} $ \\
126: $ v_d=-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{2s_W^2}{3} $ & $v'_d=-
127: (\frac{1}{2}-\frac{s_W^2}{3})\frac{1}{\sqrt{3-4
128: s_W^2}} $ &
129: $v'_d=- \frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-4s_W^2}} $\\
130: \hline
131: \end{tabular}\\[2pt]
132: %The experimental values are given in ref. \cite{Eato75}.
133: \end{table*}
134:
135:
136:
137: Among the beyond SM extensions, the
138: recent proposed models based on the
139: $\mbox{SU}(3)_C\times \mbox{SU}(3)_L \times \mbox{U}(1)_N$ gauge
140: group \cite{ppf,fhpp,rhnm,mpp} (hereafter 3 - 3 - 1
141: models) have the following
142: intriguing features: firstly, the models are anomaly free only if
143: the number of families $N$ is a multiple of three. Further, from
144: the condition of QCD asymptotic freedom, which means $N < 5$, it
145: follows that $N$ is equal to 3. The second characteristic is that
146: the Lagrangians of these models possess the Peccei-Quinn
147: symmetry naturally, hence the strong $CP$ problem can be solved in
148: an elegant way \cite{pal}. The third interesting feature is that
149: one of the quark families is treated differently from the other
150: two. This could lead to a natural explanation of the
151: unbalancing heavy top quark in the fermion mass
152: hierarchy.
153:
154: There are two main versions of
155: the 3 - 3 - 1 models: the {\it
156: minimal} model in which all lepton components $(\nu, l, l^c)_L$ of
157: each family belong to one and same lepton triplet and a variant,
158: in which right-handed (RH) neutrinos are
159: included, i.e. $(\nu, l, \nu^c)_L$ (hereafter we call it the model
160: with right-handed neutrinos \cite{rhnm,mpp}). New gauge bosons in the
161: minimal model are bileptons
162: ($Y^\pm, X^{\pm\pm}$) carrying lepton number $L =\pm 2$ and a new $Z'$.
163: In the second model, the bileptons with lepton number $L =\pm 2$
164: are singly--charged $Y^\pm$ and {\it neutral} gauge bosons $X^0,
165: X^{*0}$ , and both are responsible for lepton--number violating
166: interactions. Thus, with the present group extension there are five
167: new gauge bosons and all these particles are heavy. Getting mass
168: limits for these particles is one of the central tasks
169: of further studies.
170:
171: We notice that it is rather easy to get bounds on masses
172: of the bileptons following from, for example, the ``wrong''
173: muon decay data, from the anomalous magnetic moments of the
174: muon~\cite{kls} or from radiative corrections~\cite{fh,li}.
175: New neutral gauge boson beyond the photon and the $Z$
176: of the SM has long been considered as one
177: of the most interesting topics. However, getting bounds on
178: mass of the $Z'$ in these models is rather difficult. Perhaps the
179: APV is one of the most suitable subjects for this
180: purpose. The aim of this paper is to consider the
181: atomic parity violation in the 3 - 3 - 1 models and imply it
182: to get bounds on mass of the $Z'$ boson.
183:
184: \section{Atomic parity violation in the minimal
185: 3 - 3 - 1 model}
186:
187: Basic to the analysis of the experiments on parity
188: violation in atoms is the electron-quark effective Lagrangian
189: \begin{equation}
190: {\cal L}_{eff}=\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{e}\gamma_\mu
191: \gamma_5e)(C_{1u}\bar{u}\gamma_\mu u + C_{1d}
192: \bar{d}\gamma_\mu d).
193: \label{sta}
194: \end{equation}
195:
196:
197: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
198: \setcounter{figure}{0}
199: \begin{figure*}[t]
200: \centerline{\epsfxsize=12cm\epsffile{apvm.ps}}
201: \caption{\label{fig0}{\em $\Delta Q_W^m$ as
202: a function of $M_{Z'}$. The continuous line is
203: obtained by neglecting the contribution from the
204: $Z-Z'$ mixing. }}
205: \end{figure*}
206: \vspace*{0.3cm}
207:
208:
209: We see that it involves only electron coupling being axial
210: (or spin dependent) and quark coupling vector. This interaction
211: between the electron and the nucleus is thus coherent,
212: proportional to the total weak charge. There is a similar
213: interaction which is also generated by direct $Z$ exchange,
214: but with the electron coupling being vector and the nuclear
215: coupling axial vector. This kind of interaction is inhibited:
216: the axial coupling to the nucleus is no longer coherent
217: (only the last unpaired nucleon contributes), and the electron
218: vector coupling is quite suppressed ($\sim$ 0.026). In addition,
219: one knows that the electromagnetic interaction of atomic
220: electrons with the nuclear anapole moment may generate a
221: measurable spin dependence in atomic parity violation
222: experiments. This interaction, which is considerably smaller
223: than the coherent $Z$ interaction, may exceed the direct
224: nuclear spin dependent parity violation for heavy
225: atoms \cite{ha}. Hence one may neglect the nuclear spin
226: dependent parity violations.
227:
228:
229: %%%%%%%%%%%
230: \setcounter{figure}{1}
231: \begin{figure*}[thb]
232: \centerline{\epsfxsize=12cm\epsffile{amp.ps}}
233: \caption{\label{fig1}{\em $\Delta Q_W^m$ as
234: a function of $\phi$. The continuous line refers
235: to $M_{Z'}=600$ GeV, the dashed line -- 1200 GeV.}}
236: \end{figure*}
237: \vspace*{0.3cm}
238:
239:
240: The experimental results are usually quoted in terms of the
241: related so-called weak charge
242: \begin{equation}
243: Q_W=-2[C_{1u}(2Z+N)+C_{1d}(Z+2N)],
244: \end{equation}
245: where $Z$ and $N$ are the number of protons and neutrons,
246: respectively, of the atom considered.
247: We are interested in the deviation $\Delta Q_W=Q_W-Q_W^{SM}$ with
248: respect to the SM predictions. This deviation is given as~\cite{al}
249: \begin{eqnarray}
250: \label{delta}
251: \Delta Q_W&=&\left[ \left(1+4\frac{s^4_W}{\cos
252: 2\theta_W}\right)Z-N \right]\Delta \rho_M \nonumber\\
253: &&+16 \left[(2Z+N)(a_e v'_u+a'_e v_u )\right.\nonumber\\
254: &&+\left. (Z+2 N)(a_e v'_d+a'_e v_d)
255: \right]\phi
256: \label{dev}\\
257: &&+16 \left[(2Z+N)a'_e v'_u\right.\nonumber\\
258: &&\left.+(Z+2N)a'_e
259: v'_d\right]\frac{m^2_{Z}}{M^2_{Z'}},\nonumber
260: \end{eqnarray}
261: where $\phi$ is the mixing angle between the new gauge boson $Z'$
262: and the canonical $Z$, $v_f$, $a_f$,
263: $v'_f$, $a'_f$ are couplings of $Z$, $Z'$ to fermions.
264: The couplings are defined in the neutral interactions
265: \begin{eqnarray}
266: {\cal L}(Z)&=&\frac{g}{2\cos \theta_W}\sum_f(v_f
267: \bar{f}\gamma_{\mu}f+a_f \bar{f}\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_5f)Z^{\mu},
268: \nonumber\\
269: {\cal L}(Z')&=&\frac{g}{2\cos\theta_W}\sum_f(v'_f
270: \bar{f}\gamma_{\mu}f+a'_f \bar{f}\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_5f)Z'^{\mu},
271: \nonumber
272: \end{eqnarray}
273: where the summation is over all relevant fermions.
274: The coupling constants relevant for calculations of
275: APV in the cesium atom for the SM, 3 - 3 - 1 model
276: with RH neutrinos and the minimal version are presented
277: in Table 1, in which the
278: usual notation is used: $s_W\equiv \sin \theta_W$. More details on
279: the 3 - 3 - 1 models can be found in Refs.~\cite{ppf,rhnm,dng}.
280:
281: We notice that the first term on the right-handed side of
282: Eq. (\ref{dev}) is
283: proportional to $\Delta \rho_M$, which is an additional
284: contribution to the $\rho$ parameter arising from the mixing.
285: This term receives two independent contributions. The first one
286: comes from the overall
287: $\rho$ factor on the right-handed side of Eq. (2.15) in
288: \cite{al}. The second one arises from a shift in $\sin^2 \theta_W$,
289: which is proportional to $\Delta \rho_M$. The second term is due
290: to the $Z-Z'$ mixing. These two terms are ultimately
291: dependent upon the mixing angle $\phi$ and particle content.
292: The third term, which is
293: proportional to the squared mass ratio $m_Z^2/M_{Z'}^2$,
294: is due to the direct $Z'$ exchange.
295:
296: In the 3 - 3 - 1 models, deviation of
297: the parameter $\Delta \rho_M$ gets contributions
298: from both oblique corrections and the
299: $Z-Z'$ mixing, and it relates to the
300: oblique radiative parameter $T$ ~\cite{ta} as
301: the following
302: \begin{equation}
303: \Delta \rho_M= \alpha T.
304: \end{equation}
305:
306: In the minimal model, it was shown that~\cite{fh,li}
307: \begin{eqnarray}
308: T^{ m}&=&\frac{3\sqrt{2}G_F}{16\pi^2\alpha}
309: \left[M_{++}^2 + M_+^2\right.\nonumber\\
310: &&\left. - \frac{2M_{++}^2M_+^2}{M_{++}^2-M_+^2}
311: \ln \frac{M_{++}^2}{M_+^2}
312: \right] \nonumber \\
313: & &+\frac{1}{4\pi\ s^2_W}
314: \left[2\bar{F}_0(0,M_{++},M_+)\right. \nonumber\\
315: &&+3\left.
316: t^2_W \ln\frac{M_{++}^2}{M_+^2}
317: \right]\nonumber\\
318: &&+ \frac{\tan^2 \phi}{\alpha} \left( \frac{
319: M^2_{Z'}}{m^2_{Z}} - 1 \right),
320: \label{ttotm}
321: \end{eqnarray}
322: where ${\bar F}_0(s,M,m)\equiv \int_0^1 dx \ln
323: [(1-x)M^2 +xm^2-x(1-x)s] -\ln Mm $, and
324: $M_+, M_{++}$ stand for masses of the singly-
325: and doubly-charged gauge bosons
326: $Y^+, X^{++}$, respectively.
327: The first two terms in
328: (\ref{ttotm}) are polynomial in the ratio between
329: mass splitting and the bilepton mass~\cite{li}:
330: $\varepsilon \equiv \varepsilon(M_+,M_{++}) = \frac{M_+^2 -
331: M_{++}^2}{M_{++}^2}$. The superscript $ m$ in $T^{m}$
332: refers to the parameter in the minimal version.
333:
334: By the spontaneous symmetry breaking, the bilepton mass
335: splitting is given (see N. A. Ky {\it et al} in~\cite{kls})
336: \be
337: |M_{++}^2 - M_+^2| \leq 3~ m^2_W.
338: \label{msip}
339: \ee
340: Therefore the parameter $\varepsilon$ is bounded too.
341: This leads to limitation in the $T$ parameter.
342:
343: With the $Z'$ mass in a range of 1 TeV scale, the
344: last term in (\ref{ttotm}) gives just contribution of
345: about 4\% to the $T^{m}$ parameter~\cite{li}.
346:
347: The $Z-Z'$ mixing angle $\phi$ is constrained~\cite{dng}:
348: $ -5 \times 10^{-3} \leq \phi \leq 7\times
349: 10^{-4}$, hence the two last terms in (\ref{dev}) give
350: a dominant contribution.
351:
352: Using the following data~\cite{pdg}:
353: $s_W^2 = 0.23117, m_Z = 91.1882 {\rm GeV}, M_+ = 230 \
354: {\rm GeV}, M_{++}=300\ {\rm GeV}$, we obtain
355: \be
356: \Delta Q_W^m \simeq - 0.01 - 1210.07 \phi - 184.32
357: \left(\frac{m_Z^2}{M_{Z'}^2}\right).
358: \label{detm}
359: \ee
360:
361: In Fig. 1 we plot the
362: direct $Z'$ exchange contribution
363: (the continuous line) and
364: $\Delta Q_W^m$ (the dashed line) as a function of
365: $M_{Z'}$.
366: We see that the direct $Z'$ exchange contribution
367: is negative. The coefficient of $\phi$ in the
368: second term - the $Z-Z'$ mixing contribution is
369: negative too. Therefore the total
370: $\Delta Q_W^m$ get a negative value if $\phi$ is positive.
371: This circumstance is excluded at 99\% CL (see R.
372: Casalbuoni {\it et al.} in~\cite{view}).
373: The dashed line corresponds to the total
374: $\Delta Q_W^m$ at the $\phi = - 1.5 \times 10^{-3}$.
375: In this case the constraint for the $Z'$ mass is
376: $1.15\ {\rm TeV} \le M_{Z'} \le 2.2 $ TeV.
377:
378: %%%%%%%%%%%%
379: \setcounter{figure}{2}
380: \begin{figure*}[t]
381: \centerline{\epsfxsize=12cm\epsffile{apvr.ps}}
382: \caption{\label{fig2}{\em $\Delta Q_W^r$ as
383: a function of $M_{Z'}$.
384: The continuous line is
385: obtained by neglecting the contribution from the
386: $Z-Z'$ mixing. }}
387: \end{figure*}
388: \vspace*{0.3cm}
389:
390:
391: In Fig. 2 we plot $\Delta Q_W^m$ as a function
392: of the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle $\phi$ at two values for $M_{Z'}=600$
393: GeV (the dashed line) and $M_{Z'} = 1200$ GeV (the
394: continuous line). However we can make
395: the $\Delta Q_W^m$ positive by taking
396: $\phi$ is negative and large enough, say in order
397: of few $\times 10^{-3}$.
398: In conclusion, to be consistent with the new data on
399: parity violation in the cesium atom, the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle
400: $\phi$ in the minimal 3 - 3 - 1 model has to be negative and is
401: in order of a few $\times 10^{-3}$
402: \bea
403: -0.0045 &\leq & \phi \leq -0.004\
404: {\rm for}\ M_{Z'} = 600\ {\rm GeV},\nonumber\\
405: -0.002 &\leq & \phi \leq -0.0018\
406: {\rm for}\ M_{Z'} = 1200\ {\rm GeV}.\nonumber
407: \eea
408:
409: \section{Atomic parity violation in the
410: 3 - 3 - 1 model with RH neutrinos}
411:
412: In the model with RH neutrinos the bileptons
413: $ Y^+, X^0$ make an $SU(2)_L$ doublet with
414: hypercharge $Y=\frac 1 2$. The $T$ parameter
415: in this model is given as~\cite{li}
416: \begin{eqnarray}
417: T^{ r}& = & \frac{3\sqrt{2}G_F}{16\pi^2\alpha}
418: \left[
419: M_+^2 + M_0^2 - \frac{2M_+^2M_0^2}{M_+^2-M_0^2}
420: \ln \frac{M_+^2}{M_0^2}
421: \right] \nonumber \\
422: & & + \frac{1}{4\pi\ s^2_W}
423: \left[ 2 \bar{F}_0(0,M_+,M_0) + \
424: t^2_W \ln\frac{M_+^2}{M_0^2}
425: \right]\nonumber\\
426: &&+ \frac{\tan^2 \phi}{\alpha} \left( \frac{
427: M^2_{Z' }}{m^2_{Z }} - 1 \right),
428: \label{ttot}
429: \end{eqnarray}
430: where $M_+, M_{0}$ stand for masses of the singly-charged
431: and neutral gauge bosons $Y^+, X^{0}$, respectively.
432: Again, the first two terms in (\ref{ttot}) are polynomial
433: in $\epsilon \equiv \epsilon(M_+,M_0) = \frac{M_+^2 -
434: M_0^2}{M_0^2}$.
435:
436:
437: %%%%%%%%%%%
438: \setcounter{figure}{3}
439: %\begin{figure*}[b]
440: \begin{figure*}[thb]
441: \centerline{\epsfxsize=12cm\epsffile{arp.ps}}
442: \caption{\label{fig3}{\em $\Delta Q_W^r$ as
443: a function of $\phi$. The continuous line refers
444: to $M_{Z'}=1200$ GeV, the dashed line -- 2600 GeV.}}
445: \end{figure*}
446: \vspace*{0.5cm}
447:
448:
449: As before, the spontaneous symmetry breaking gives
450: the bilepton mass splitting~\cite{li}
451: \be
452: |M_{0}^2 - M_+^2| \leq m^2_W.
453: \label{ms2}
454: \ee
455: Hence the parameter $\epsilon$ is bounded shorter
456: than one in the minimal version. The contribution
457: from the first term in (\ref{dev}) is negligible.
458:
459: The $Z-Z'$ mixing angle $\phi$ is also constrained to be
460: very small $ -2 \times 10^{-4} \leq \phi \leq 3\times
461: 10^{-3}$, therefore the last term in (\ref{dev}) gives
462: a dominant contribution.
463:
464: Taking into account that~\cite{li}: $M_+ = 230
465: \ {\rm GeV}, M_{0}=250 \ {\rm GeV}$, we get
466: \be
467: \Delta Q_W^r \simeq - 0.00092 - 490.71 \phi + 482.99
468: \left(\frac{m_Z^2}{M_{Z'}^2}\right).
469: \label{detr}
470: \ee
471: Here the sign of the last term is plus.
472: The coefficient of $\phi$
473: in the second term of $\Delta Q_W^r$, where $ r$
474: refers to the model with RH neutrinos, is negative
475: and is much smaller than those in the minimal version.
476: \vspace*{0.5cm}
477:
478: In Fig. 3 we plot the direct $Z'$ exchange contribution
479: (the continuous line) and
480: $\Delta Q_W^r$ (the dashed line) as a function of $M_{Z'}$.
481: Here we take the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle $\phi = 0.001$.
482: The contribution of the second
483: term is negative if the mixing angle $\phi$ is
484: positive. However it is just 10\% of total value.
485: From the figure we get the constraint for the $Z'$ mass:
486: $1.4\ {\rm TeV} \le M_{Z'} \le 1.9\ {\rm TeV}$
487: in the case of the total $\Delta Q_W^r$.
488: This number is slightly higher:
489: $1.7\ {\rm TeV} \le M_{Z'} \le 2.6\ {\rm TeV}$
490: in the case of neglecting the $Z-Z'$ mixing.
491:
492: In Fig. 4 we plot $\Delta Q_W^r$ as a function
493: of the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle $\phi$ at two values for $M_{Z'}=1200$
494: GeV (the dashed line) and $M_{Z'}=2600$ GeV (the
495: continuous line). From the figure it follows that an allowed
496: region for the mixing angle is
497: \bea
498: 0.0028 &\leq& \phi \leq 0.0046\ \
499: {\rm for}\ M_{Z'} = 1200\ \ {\rm GeV},\nonumber\\
500: - 0.0018 &\leq & \phi \leq 0\ \
501: {\rm for}\ M_{Z'} = 2600\ \ {\rm GeV}.\nonumber
502: \eea
503:
504: Summarizing this section, we conclude that the APV data
505: provides a large room for the 3 - 3 - 1 model with
506: RH neutrinos.
507:
508: \section{Conclusions}
509:
510: We have considered parity violation in the cesium atom.
511: It is shown that in the minimal version the main
512: contribution to a deviation of weak charge
513: $\Delta Q_W$ due to direct $Z'$ exchange, is {\it negative}.
514: To make the deviation positive, the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle
515: $\phi$ has to be {\it negative} and large enough, say in order
516: of few $\times 10^{-3}$. In the case of
517: $\phi = - 0.0015$ the constraint for
518: the $Z'$ mass is
519: $1.15\ {\rm TeV} \le M_{Z'} \le 2.2\ {\rm TeV}$.
520: New data on parity violation in the
521: cesium atom seems not favour to the minimal version.
522:
523: The deviation of weak charge in the 3 - 3 -1 model
524: with RH neutrinos is {\it positive}
525: and is mainly from the $Z'$ exchange.
526: For the mixing angle $\phi = 0.001$
527: we get the constraint for the $Z'$ mass:
528: $1.4\ {\rm TeV} \le M_{Z'} \le 1.9\ {\rm TeV}$
529: in the case of the total $\Delta Q_W^r$.
530: Neglecting the $Z-Z'$ mixing we get
531: the constraint:
532: $1.7\ {\rm TeV} \le M_{Z'} \le 2.6\ {\rm TeV}$.
533: If mass of the $Z'$ lying around present experimental
534: limit of about 600 GeV~\cite{exp}, then the allowed region
535: for the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle in the minimal version is:
536: $-0.0045 \leq \phi \leq - 0.004$, which is comparable to
537: limit extracted from the $Z$-decay experiments.
538: For the model with RH neutrinos, in order to have a mixing
539: angle consistent to that from the $Z$ decay data, i.e.
540: $\phi \approx -2 \times 10^ {-4} \div 3 \times 10^{-3}$,
541: mass of the $Z'$ has to be heavier than 1 TeV.
542:
543: Finally, we mention that parity violation
544: in the cesium atom provides a useful tool for
545: getting bounds on mass of the new $Z'$ and its mixing
546: with the Z boson in the SM.
547:
548: {\bf Acknowledgments}
549:
550: One of the authors (H. N. L.) would like to thank the Abdus Salam
551: International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy for financial
552: support and hospitality. This work was supported in part
553: by the Natural Science Council of Vietnam.
554:
555: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
556: \bibitem{ben} S. C. Bennett, C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett.
557: 82 (1999) 2484.
558: \bibitem{view} R. Casalbuoni, S. De Curtis, D. Dominici and
559: R. Gatto, Phys. Lett. B 460 (1999) 135 ;
560: J. L Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 016006;
561: V. Barger and K. Cheung, Phys. Lett. B 480 (2000) 149;
562: J. Erler and P. Langacker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 212.
563: \bibitem{fir} C. S. Wood, {\it et al.,} Science 275
564: (1997) 1759.
565: \bibitem{ppf} F. Pisano and V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D 46
566: (1992) 410; P. H. Frampton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2889.
567: \bibitem{fhpp} R. Foot, O.F. Hernandez, F. Pisano and
568: V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 4158.
569: \bibitem{rhnm}R. Foot, H. N. Long and Tuan A. Tran,
570: Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) R34; H. N. Long, Phys. Rev. D
571: 53 (1996) 437; Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 4691.
572: \bibitem{mpp}J. C. Montero, F. Pisano and V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev.
573: D 47 (1993) 2918.
574: \bibitem{pal}P. B. Pal, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 1659.
575: \bibitem{kls} H. Fujii, S. Nakamura and K. Sasaki,
576: Phys. Lett. B 299 (1993) 342;
577: N. A. Ky, H. N. Long and D. V. Soa,
578: Phys. Lett. B 486 (2000) 140.
579: \bibitem{fh} K. Sasaki, Phys. Lett. B 308 (1993) 297;
580: P. H. Frampton and M. Harada,
581: Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 09513.
582: \bibitem{li} H. N. Long and T. Inami, Phys. Rev. D 61
583: (2000) 075002.
584: \bibitem{ha} W. C. Haxton, Science 275
585: (1997) 1753.
586: \bibitem{al} G. Altarelli, R. Casalbuoni, S. De Curtis,
587: N. Di Bartolomeo, F. Feruglio and
588: R. Gatto, Phys. Lett. B 261 (1991) 146.
589: \bibitem{dng}D. Ng, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4805.
590: \bibitem{ta} M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev.
591: Lett. 65 (1990) 964; Phys. Rev, D 46 (1992) 381.
592: \bibitem{pdg} D. E. Groom {\it et al}., Particle Data Group,
593: Eur. Phys. J. C 15 (2000) 1.
594: \bibitem{exp} CDF Collaboration, F. Abe {\it et al}.,
595: Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 2192.
596: \end{thebibliography}
597:
598: \end{document}
599:
600:
601:
602:
603:
604:
605:
606:
607:
608:
609:
610:
611:
612:
613:
614:
615:
616:
617:
618:
619:
620:
621:
622:
623:
624: