1: \section{Introduction}
2:
3: There has been much activity in the last few years in an attempt to
4: understand the physics of nuclear and hadronic processes in the
5: regime where Bjorken's $x$ becomes very small
6: \cite{MV94}--\cite{Elena00} (see also \cite{AM1} for a pedagogical
7: presentation and more references).
8: The remarkable feature about this
9: regime is that the gluon density in the hadron wavefunction becomes
10: so high that perturbation theory breaks down even for a small
11: coupling constant, by strong non-linear effects.
12:
13: The important new phenomenon which is expected in
14: these conditions is {\it parton saturation} \cite{GLR,MQ,FS}, which is
15: the fact that the density of partons per unit phase space
16: $(dN/d^2p_\perp\,dy\,d^2x_\perp)$
17: cannot grow forever as $x$ becomes arbitrarilly small
18: [here, $y\equiv \ln(1/x)$ is the parton rapidity].
19: If this growth were to occur, then the cross section for deep
20: inelastic scattering at fixed $Q^2$ would grow unacceptably large and
21: eventually violate unitarity bounds. One rather expects the cross
22: section to approach some asymptotic value at high energy, that is,
23: to saturate. It is also intuitively
24: obvious that this should happen, since if the phase space density
25: becomes too large, repulsive interactions are generated among the
26: gluons, and eventually it will be
27: energetically unfavorable to increase the density anyfurther.
28:
29: As $x$ becomes smaller and smaller, the gluon density increases faster,
30: and is the driving force towards saturation. This is the reason why,
31: in what follows, we shall concentrate exclusively on the gluon dynamics.
32: Saturation is expected at a gluon phase-space density of order
33: $1/\alpha_s\/$ \cite{GLR,JKMW97,KM98}, a value typical of condensates.
34: This estimate, together with the fact that gluons are massless bosons,
35: leads naturally to the expectation that the saturated gluons
36: form a new form of matter, which is a Bose condensate.
37: Since gluons carry color which is a
38: gauge-dependent quantity, any gauge-invariant formulation
39: will neccessarily involve an average over all colors, to restore
40: the invariance. This averaging procedure bears a formal resemblance to
41: the averaging over background fields done for spin glasses \cite{PS79}.
42: The new matter will be therefore
43: called the {\it Color Glass Condensate} (CGC). This matter is
44: universal in that it should describe the high gluon density part of any
45: hadron wavefunction at sufficiently small $x$.
46:
47: The CGC picture holds
48: in a frame in which the hadron propagates at the speed of light and,
49: by Lorentz contraction, appears
50: as an infinitesimally thin two-dimensional sheet located at
51: the light-cone. The formalism supporting this picture is in
52: terms of a {\it classical effective theory} valid for some
53: range of $x$, or longitudinal momentum\footnote{See Sect. 2.1
54: for the definition of light-cone coordinates and momenta.} $p^+$.
55: In this theory, originally proposed by McLerran
56: and Venugopalan to describe the gluon distribution in large nuclei
57: \cite{MV94}, the valence quarks of the hadron (and, more generally,
58: the ``fast'' partons, i.e., the partons which carry a large fraction of the
59: hadron longitudinal momentum) are treated as sources for a classical
60: color field which represents the small-$x$, or ``soft'',
61: gluons in the hadron wavefunction.
62: The classical approximation is appropriate since the
63: saturated gluons have large occupation numbers $\sim 1/\alpha_s$,
64: and can thus be described
65: by {classical} color fields with large amplitudes $A^i\sim 1/g$.
66:
67: When going to smaller values of $x$, or lower longitudinal
68: momenta $p^+$,
69: one must integrate out the degrees of freedom
70: associated with this change of scale \cite{JKMW97}.
71: This is done in perturbation theory for the quantum gluons
72: (to leading logarithmic accuracy),
73: but to {\it all} orders in the strong background
74: fields $A^i$ which represent the condensate.
75: This entails a change in the effective theory, which is governed
76: by a functional, {\it non-linear}, evolution equation originally
77: derived by Jalilian-Marian, Kovner, Leonidov and Weigert (JKLW)
78: \cite{JKLW97,JKLW99a}.
79: This is a functional Fokker-Planck equation for the statistical
80: weight function associated with the random variable $\rho_a(x)$
81: ($\equiv$ the effective color charge density of the fast gluons).
82:
83: One of the consequences of the JKLW renormalization group equation
84: it that it predicts the evolution of the gluon distribution function.
85: In the low density, or weak-field limit, this equation
86: linearizes and reduces to the BFKL equation \cite{BFKL},
87: as shown in Ref. \cite{JKLW97}. But in the saturation
88: regime, where $A^i\sim 1/g$, the JKLW equation is fully
89: non-linear, and will be discussed in great detail
90: in this and the accompanying paper
91: (to be referred to as ``Paper I'' and ``Paper II'' in what follows).
92: In particular, in Paper II,
93: we will show that this leads to the Balitsky-Kovchegov
94: equation in the large-$N_c$ limit (with $N_c$ the number of colors).
95: There is currently a discrepancy between the computations
96: of Refs. \cite{JKW99,JKLW99b,KM00,KMW00}
97: and those by Balitsky \cite{B} and Kovchegov \cite{K}.
98: The additional terms argued in \cite{KMW00} do actually not show up
99: in our computation \cite{ILM00II}.
100:
101: In the previous arguments, we have implicitly assumed the QCD
102: coupling constant $\alpha_s$ to be small, which can be justified as
103: follows: Associated with saturation, there is a characteristic
104: transverse momentum scale $Q_s$ (a function of $x$),
105: which is proportional to the density of gluons per unit area:
106: \be
107: Q_s^2\, \propto \,{ 1 \over {\pi R^2}}\,{{dN} \over {dy}}\,,
108: \ee
109: where $R$ is the radius of the hadron\footnote{This
110: can certainly be defined for a nucleus, but even for a proton it is
111: a meaningful quantity since,
112: as we shall see, the typical transverse momentum at
113: small $x$ becomes large, so that one can properly resolve the
114: transverse extent of the hadron.}. $Q_s$ is the typical
115: momentum scale of the saturated gluons, and increases with $1/x$
116: (see, e.g., Refs. \cite{JKMW97,KM98,AM1}).
117: Thus, for sufficiently small $x$, $Q_s^2 \gg \Lambda^2_{QCD}$,
118: and the coupling ``constant'' $\alpha_s(Q^2_s)$ is weak indeed.
119: (In any explicit calculation, the condition
120: $Q_s^2 \gg \Lambda^2_{QCD}$ must be
121: verified a posteriori, for consistency.)
122:
123: To summarize, the system under consideration
124: is a weakly coupled high density system described
125: by classical gluon fields. This is still non-perturbative,
126: in the sense that the associated non-linear effects
127: cannot be expanded in perturbation theory. But the
128: non-perturbative aspects can now be studied in the simpler
129: setting of a classical theory, via a combination of
130: analytical and numerical methods
131: (see, e.g., Refs. \cite{MV94,KMW,JKMW97,KM98,KV00,AM1}).
132: In particular, in this context, it has been demonstrated
133: \cite{JKMW97,KM98} that saturation occurs indeed,
134: via non-linear dynamics.
135:
136:
137: The purpose of this paper and its sequel is twofold:
138: first, to carefully rederive the JKLW evolution equation,
139: by matching classical and quantum correlations;
140: second, to render this equation precise and
141: fully explicit, %in view of subsequent applications,
142: by computing its coefficients to all orders in the color field
143: which describes the Color Glass Condensate.
144: This requires an exact background field
145: calculation which will be prepared by the analysis in Paper I,
146: and presented in detail in Paper II.
147:
148: Many of the results we shall present (especially in Paper I)
149: are known in one form or another, and can be found in the
150: literature. We shall nevertheless attempt to be comprehensive
151: and pedagogical in our present treatment, in order to clarify
152: several subtle points
153: which have been often overlooked in the previous literature.
154: To be specific, let us spell out here the new features of our
155: analysis, to be presented below in this paper:
156:
157: \begin{itemize}
158:
159: \item
160: The effective theory for the soft fields is stochastic Yang-Mills
161: theory with a random color source localized near the light-cone
162: ($x^-\simeq 0$) [see Sect. 2.1]. In previous work,
163: this source has been generally taken as a delta function at
164: $x^-=0$. Here, we find that in order to do a
165: sensible computation, it is necessary at intermediate steps to
166: spread out the source in $x^-$, that is, to take its longitudinal
167: structure into account.
168:
169:
170: \item
171: For our `spread out' source, we describe in
172: detail the structure of the classical solution for the background field.
173: We do this by relating the solution in the light cone gauge
174: ($A^+=0$) to the solution in the covariant gauge ($\partial_\mu A^\mu=0$).
175: We thus obtain an explicit expression for the background field
176: in terms of the source in the {\it covariant} gauge [see Sect. 2.3].
177: This indicates that the source which is generated by quantum
178: evolution must be evaluated in the covariant gauge as well.
179:
180:
181: \item
182: The quantum evolution of the effective theory is obtained by
183: integrating out quantum fluctuations in a rapidity interval
184: $\Delta y=\ln(1/b)$ (with $b\ll 1$) to leading order in
185: $\alpha_s\ln(1/b)$, but to all orders in the strong background
186: fields [cf. Sect. 3.2.1].
187: The quantum correlations induced in this
188: way are then transferred to the stochastic classical theory,
189: via a renormalization group equation of the Fokker-Planck
190: type [cf. Sect. 3.2.2].
191: To prove the equivalence between the classical and
192: quantum theories, we explicitly compute the induced field correlators
193: $\langle A^iA^j\dots\rangle$ in both theories and show that they
194: are the same, to the order of interest [cf. Sect. 3.2].
195:
196:
197: \item
198: The original JKLW renormalization group equation is written in terms
199: of the color source in the {\it light-cone} gauge \cite{JKLW99a}.
200: When reexpressing this equation in terms of the
201: source in the {\it covariant} gauge, we find that we must subtract
202: out a term related to classical vacuum polarization,
203: so that the classical and quantum theory properly match [see Sect. 3.3].
204:
205:
206: \item
207: The non-linear evolution equation involves functional
208: differentiations with respect to the source strength.
209: With sources spread out and with explicit results from the
210: covariant gauge, we have an explicit and transparent definition
211: of these functional differentiations [see Sect. 3.2.2].
212:
213: \item
214: The background fields are independent of the light-cone time $x^+$,
215: but inhomogeneous, and even singular, in $x^-$. To cope with that,
216: we find that it is more convenient to integrate the
217: quantum fluctuations in layers of $p^-$ (the light-cone energy),
218: rather than of $p^+$ [cf. Sect. 3.4]. Accordingly, we have no
219: ambiguity associated with possible singularities at $p^- = 0$.
220:
221:
222: \item
223: The gauge-invariant action describing the coupling of the
224: quantum gluons to the classical color source is non-local
225: in time \cite{JKLW97}. Thus, the proper formulation of the
226: quantum theory is along a Schwinger-Keldysh
227: contour in the complex time plane [cf. Sect. 4].
228: However, in the approximations of interest, and given the
229: specific nature of the background,
230: the contour structure turns out not to be essential,
231: so one can restrict oneself to the previous
232: formulations in real time \cite{JKLW97,JKLW99a}.
233:
234: \item
235: We carefully fix the gauge in the quantum calculations.
236: In the light-cone gauge, the gluon propagator has singularities
237: at $p^+ = 0$ associated with the residual
238: gauge freedom under $x^-$--independent gauge transformations. We resolve
239: these ambiguities by using a retarded $i\epsilon$ prescription
240: [cf. eq.~(\ref{LCPROP}) and Sect. 6.3], which is chosen for consistency
241: with the boundary conditions imposed on the classical background field.
242: We could have equally well used an advanced prescription. However,
243: other gauge conditions, such as
244: Leibbrandt-Mandelstam or principal value prescriptions,
245: are for a variety of technical reasons shown to be
246: unacceptable \cite{ILM00II}.
247:
248: \item
249: The choice of a gauge prescription has the interesting
250: consequence to affect the spatial distribution of the source in
251: $x^-$, and thus to influence the way we visualize the generation of
252: the source via quantum evolution. With our retarded prescription,
253: the source has support only at positive $x^-$ [see Sect. 5.1].
254:
255: \item
256: We verify explicitly that the obtention of the
257: BFKL equation as the weak-field limit of the general
258: renormalization group equation
259: is independent of the gauge-fixing prescription [cf. Sect. 5].
260:
261: \end{itemize}
262:
263: Once these various points are properly understood, the
264: background field calculation in Paper II becomes unambiguous
265: and well defined.
266: As a result of this calculation, the coefficients in the
267: JKLW equation will be obtained explicitly in terms of the color
268: source in the covariant gauge \cite{ILM00II}.
269: With such explicit expressions in hand,
270: we hope that the functional evolution equation can be solved,
271: via analytic or numerical methods, or both,
272: at least in particular limits. In fact, as we shall see in Paper II,
273: in the large $N_c$ limit our results become equivalent to the equation
274: proposed by Balitsky \cite{B} and Kovchegov \cite{K},
275: for which an analytic solution has been recently given \cite{W}.
276:
277: { The ultimate goal of this and related analyses is to
278: derive the properties of hadronic physics at arbitrarily high energies
279: from first principles, that is, from QCD.
280: We conjecture that there will be universal behaviour for all hadrons in the
281: high energy limit. The work we present here is a step in proving this,
282: and in developing a formalism which allows for explicit calculations
283: in the saturation regime.
284:
285:
286: The present paper is organized as follows:
287: In Section 2, we discuss the solution to the classical
288: Yang-Mills equations with a color source
289: which define the Mclerran-Venugopalan model.
290: In Section 3, we derive the non-linear evolution equation
291: by matching classical and quantum correlations.
292: In Section 4, we formulate the quantized version of the
293: Mclerran-Venugopalan model (on a complex-time contour), and
294: derive Feynman rules for the coefficients of the
295: renormalization group equation. In Section 5, we use the
296: weak field, or BFKL, limit of the general evolution equations
297: to test properties like the longitudinal distribution of the induced
298: source, the equivalence between the renormalization group analysis
299: in $p^+$ and in $p^-$, and the sensitivity to the $i\epsilon$
300: prescription in the LC-gauge propagator.
301: In Section 6, we explicitly construct the gluon propagator
302: in the presence of the background field describing the
303: Color Glass Condensate. This propagator is the main ingredient
304: of the quantum calculations to be presented in Paper II
305: \cite{ILM00II}.
306:
307: }