1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \textheight=23cm \textwidth=14.4cm
3: \topmargin=-1.5cm
4: \leftmargin=0.5cm
5: \overfullrule=0pt
6: \def\int {\intop \limits}
7: \def\oint {\ointop \limits}
8: \def\fnote#1{\footnote}
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \newcommand{\dst}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}}
12: \newcommand{\barl}{\begin{array}{rl}}
13: \newcommand{\ball}{\begin{array}{ll}}
14: \newcommand{\ear}{\end{array}}
15: \newcommand{\barc}{\begin{array}{c}}
16: \newcommand{\e}{\mbox{${\bf e}$}}
17: \newcommand{\J}{\mbox{${\bf J}$}}
18: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
19: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
20: \newcommand{\aq}[1]{\label{#1}}
21: \renewcommand \theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
22:
23:
24: \title{Anomalous magnetic moment of the electron in a medium}
25: \author{V. N. Baier
26: and V. M. Katkov\\
27: Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,\\ Novosibirsk, 630090,
28: Russia}
29:
30: \maketitle
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33: Radiative effects are considered for an electron moving in a
34: medium in the presence of an external electromagnetic field.
35: Anomalous magnetic moment (AMM) of the electron in $\alpha$-order
36: is calculated under these conditions in the form of
37: two-dimensional integral. Behavior of AMM of high energy electron
38: under influence of multiple scattering in a medium is analyzed.
39: Both mentioned effects lead to reduction of AMM.
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \newpage
43: \section{Introduction}
44:
45: The contributions of higher orders of the perturbation theory
46: over the interaction with an electromagnetic field give the
47: electromagnetic radiative corrections to the electron mass and
48: lead to appearance of the anomalous magnetic moment (AMM) of the
49: electron \cite{S}. It is known that under influence of an external
50: electromagnetic field these effects in particular the AMM of
51: electron are changed essentially \cite{BKS1}, \cite{BKF}. Here we
52: consider how the mentioned effects modify in a medium.
53:
54: The correction to the electron mass is described by the amplitude
55: defined by the diagram of the electron self-energy. We use the
56: operator quasiclassical method (see \cite{BKF}, \cite{BLP},
57: \cite{BKS}). In this method the mentioned amplitude is described
58: by the diagram where the electron first radiates a photon passing
59: to a virtual state and then absorbs it. This corresponds to use
60: of the non-covariant perturbation theory where in the high energy
61: region only the contribution of this diagram survives. For the
62: electron with energy $\varepsilon \gg m~(m$ is the electron mass)
63: this process occurs in a rather long time (or at a rather long
64: distance) known as the lifetime of the virtual state
65: \begin{equation}
66: l_f=\frac{2\varepsilon}{q_c^2},
67: \label{1.1}
68: \end{equation}
69: where $q_c \geq m$ is the characteristic transverse momentum of
70: the process, the system $\hbar=c=1$ is used. When the virtual
71: electron is moving in a medium it scatters on atoms. The mean
72: square of momentum transfer to the electron from a medium on the
73: distance $l_f$ is
74: \begin{equation}
75: q_s^2=4\pi Z^2\alpha^2n_a\ln(q_c^2 a^2)l_f,
76: \label{1.2}
77: \end{equation}
78: where $\alpha=e^2=1/137$, $Z$ is the charge of nucleus, $n_a$ is
79: the number density of atoms in the medium, $a$ is the screening
80: radius of atom.
81:
82: In the case of weak scattering $q_s \equiv \sqrt{q_s^2} \ll m$
83: the influence of a medium is weak, in this case $q_c=m$. At high
84: energy it is possible that $q_s \geq m$.In this case the
85: characteristic value of the momentum transfer (giving the main
86: contribution into the spectral probability) is defined by the
87: value of $q_c$. The self-consistency condition is
88: \begin{equation}
89: q_c^2=q_s^2=\frac{8\pi \varepsilon Z^2\alpha^2n_a\ln(q_c^2
90: a^2)}{q_c^2} \geq m.
91: \label{1.3}
92: \end{equation}
93: With $q_c$ increase the lifetime of the virtual state \ref{1.1}
94: decreases and correspondingly the corrections to the electron
95: mass and AMM of the electron are suppressed.
96:
97: In the present paper we consider a motion of the charged particle
98: in a medium in presence of an external electromagnetic field. In
99: Sec.2 the general expressions for the correction to the electron
100: mass and for AMM of the electron are derived to order $\alpha$ of
101: the perturbation theory. In Sec.3 we analyze the influence of
102: medium on AMM of the electron in detail.
103:
104:
105: \section{Radiative corrections to the electron mass}
106: \setcounter{equation}{0}
107:
108: In the frame of the operator quasiclassical method the probability of
109: photon emission which will be used below is
110: \begin{equation}
111: dw=\frac{\alpha}{(2\pi)^2} \frac{d^3k}{\omega}
112: \int_{}^{}dt_1dt_2 R^{\ast}(t_2)R(t_1)
113: \exp\left\{-i\frac{\varepsilon}{\varepsilon-\omega}[kx(t_2)-
114: kx(t_1)] \right\},
115: \label{2.0}
116: \end{equation}
117: where $k=(\omega, {\bf k})$ is the four-momentum of photon, $k^2=0$,
118: $x(t)=(t, {\bf r}(t))$, $R(t)$ is the matrix element depending on particle
119: spin. To calculate the combination $R^{\ast}(t_2)R(t_1)$
120: it is convenient to start from Eq.(7.59) of \cite{BKS}. Summing over
121: the final electron polarization we find that the combination
122: $R^{\ast}(t_2)R(t_1)$ in the expression for
123: the probability of radiation (\ref{2.0}) has the form
124: \begin{equation}
125: R^{\ast}(t_2)R(t_1) = \frac{\varepsilon}{2\varepsilon'\gamma^2}
126: \left\{\frac{\omega^2}{\varepsilon\varepsilon'}+
127: \left(\frac{\varepsilon}{\varepsilon'}+\frac{\varepsilon'}{\varepsilon}
128: \right){\bf p}{\bf p}'+i\frac{\omega}{\varepsilon}
129: (({\bf p}'-{\bf p})\times{\bf v}) \mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$} \right\},
130: \label{2.15}
131: \end{equation}
132: where $\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}$ is the vector describing the
133: initial polarization of the electron (in its rest frame), ${\bf
134: p}= \gamma \mbox{\boldmath$\vartheta$}(t_1)$ and ${\bf p}'=\gamma
135: \mbox{\boldmath$\vartheta$}(t_2)$. The first two terms coincide
136: with Eq.(7.60) of \cite{BKS} (unpolarized electrons), the third
137: term depends on electron polarization.
138:
139: In the paper \cite{BK1}(see also \cite{BK2}) we derived the
140: following expression for the spectral distribution of the
141: probability of radiation per unit time for unpolarized electron
142: \begin{eqnarray}
143: && \frac{dW}{d\omega}=\frac{2\alpha m^2}{\varepsilon^2} {\rm Im}T,
144: \nonumber \\
145: && T=\left<0|R_1\left(G^{-1}-G_0^{-1}\right)+ R_2 {\bf
146: p}\left(G^{-1}-G_0^{-1}\right){\bf p}|0\right>, \label{2.1}
147: \end{eqnarray}
148: where
149: \begin{eqnarray}
150: && \hspace{-4mm} W = \frac{dw}{dt},\quad
151: R_1=\frac{\omega^2}{\varepsilon\varepsilon'},\quad
152: R_2=\frac{\varepsilon}{\varepsilon'}+\frac{\varepsilon'}{\varepsilon},
153: \quad\varepsilon'=\varepsilon-\omega;
154: \nonumber \\
155: && \hspace{-4mm}G_0={\cal H}_0+1,\quad {\cal H}_0={\bf p}^2,\quad
156: {\bf
157: p}=-i\mbox{\boldmath$\nabla$}_{\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}},\quad
158: G={\cal H}+1,\quad {\cal H}={\bf
159: p}^2-iV(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}), \quad
160: \nonumber \\
161: &&
162: \hspace{-4mm}V(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$})=Q\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}^2
163: \left(L_1+\ln \frac{4}{\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}^2}-2C \right),
164: \quad Q=\frac{2\pi Z^2\alpha^2\varepsilon \varepsilon'
165: n_a}{m^4\omega},\quad L_1=\ln \frac{a_{s2}^2}{\lambda_c^2},
166: \nonumber \\
167: && \hspace{-4mm}\frac{a_{s2}}{\lambda_c}=183Z^{-1/3}{\rm
168: e}^{-f},\quad
169: f=f(Z\alpha)=(Z\alpha)^2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k(k^2+(Z\alpha)^2)},
170: \label{2.2}
171: \end{eqnarray}
172: here $C=0.577216 \ldots$ is Euler's constant, $n_a$ is the number
173: density of atoms in the medium, $\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}$ is
174: the coordinate in the two-dimensional space measured in the
175: Compton wavelength $\lambda_c$, which is conjugate to the space
176: of the transverse momentum transfers measured in the electron
177: mass $m$.
178:
179: The total probability of radiation $W$ is connected with imaginary
180: part of the radiative correction to the electron mass according to
181: \begin{equation}
182: m\Delta m=\varepsilon \Delta \varepsilon,\quad -2{\rm Im}\Delta
183: \varepsilon=W,\quad {\rm Im}~\Delta m = - \frac{\varepsilon}{2m}
184: W.
185: \label{2.3}
186: \end{equation}
187: Since the amplitude $T$ is the analytic function of the potential
188: $V$ we have that
189: \begin{equation}
190: \Delta m = -\alpha m \int_{0}^{\varepsilon}
191: \frac{d\omega}{\varepsilon}T.
192: \label{2.4}
193: \end{equation}
194: One can derive this formula considering the self-energy diagram
195: and the corresponding amplitude of forward scattering of electron
196: (see Eqs.(12.18) and (12.39) in \cite{BKF}).
197: Here it is helpful also to use the approach formulated in \cite{BK3}.
198:
199: In the presence of a homogeneous external field the Hamiltonian
200: (\ref{2.2}) acquires the linear over coordinate term. One can find
201: the explicit form of this term using the Eq.(7.84) of \cite{BKS}
202: and carrying out the scale transformation of variables according
203: to Eq.(2.7) of \cite{BK1}:
204: \begin{equation}
205: \Delta{\cal H}=\frac{2}{u}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$},
206: \label{2.5}
207: \end{equation}
208: where
209: \begin{equation}
210: \mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}=\frac{\varepsilon}{m^3}{\bf F},\quad
211: {\bf F}=e({\bf E}_{\perp}+{\bf v}\times {\bf H}),\quad
212: u=\frac{\omega}{\varepsilon'},
213: \label{2.5a}
214: \end{equation}
215: here ${\bf E}_{\perp}$ is the electric field strength transverse
216: to the velocity of particle ${\bf v}$, ${\bf H}$ is the magnetic
217: field strength, $\chi=|\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}|$ is the known parameter
218: characterizing quantum effects in the radiation process.
219:
220: We split the potential $V(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$})$ in the same
221: way as in Eq.(2.17) of \cite{BK1}:
222: \begin{eqnarray}
223: && V(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$})=V_c(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$})
224: +v(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}),\quad V_c(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$})=
225: q\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}^2, \quad q=QL_c,
226: \nonumber \\
227: &&L_c \equiv L(\varrho_c)
228: =\ln \frac{a_{s2}^2}{\lambda_c^2 \varrho_c^2},\quad
229: v(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$})=-\frac{q\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}^2}{L_c}
230: \left(\ln \frac{\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}^2}{4\varrho_c^2}+2C \right).
231: \label{2.6}
232: \end{eqnarray}
233: The definition of the parameter $\varrho_c$ will be considered below.
234: According to this splitting and taking into account
235: the addition to the Hamiltonian (\ref{2.5}) we present the propagators in
236: Eq.(\ref{2.1}) as
237: \begin{equation}
238: G^{-1}-G_0^{-1} = G^{-1} - G_F^{-1}+ G_F^{-1} -G_0^{-1},
239: \label{2.8}
240: \end{equation}
241: where
242: \begin{eqnarray}
243: && G_F= {\cal H}_F+1,\quad G=G_F-iv,
244: \nonumber \\
245: && {\cal H}_F = {\bf p}^2+V_F,\quad V_F=-iV_c
246: +\frac{2}{u}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}.
247: \label{2.9}
248: \end{eqnarray}
249: The representation of the propagator $G^{-1}$ permits to carry out
250: its decomposition over the "perturbation" $v$
251: \begin{equation}
252: G^{-1} - G_F^{-1} = G_F^{-1} iv G_F^{-1} + G_F^{-1} iv G_F^{-1}
253: iv G_F^{-1} + \ldots
254: \label{2.10}
255: \end{equation}
256: The procedure of matrix elements calculation in this decomposition
257: was formulated in \cite{BK1}, see Eqs.(2.30), (2.31). Here the
258: basic matrix element is \newline
259: $<\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1|G_F^{-1}|\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2>$.
260: The matrix element for the case when an external field is absent
261: was calculated in \cite{BK1}, Eqs.(2.20)-(2.27):
262: \begin{eqnarray}
263: \hspace{-12mm}&& <\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1|G_c^{-1}|\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2>
264: =i\int_{0}^{\infty}dt \exp(-it)
265: K_c(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1, \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2, t),\quad
266: G_c= {\bf p}^2 +1 -iq\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}^2,
267: \nonumber \\
268: \hspace{-12mm}&&K_c(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1, \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2, t)=
269: \frac{\nu}{4\pi i \sinh \nu t} \exp \left\{ \frac{i\nu}{4}
270: \left[ (\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1^2+\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2^2)
271: \coth \nu t - \frac{2}{\sinh \nu t}
272: \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2\right] \right\},
273: \label{2.11}
274: \end{eqnarray}
275: where $\nu=2\sqrt{iq}$.
276:
277: The matrix element of propagator $G_F^{-1}$ can be obtained from
278: (\ref{2.11}) by transformation of the Hamiltonian ${\cal H}_F$ to
279: the quadratic form over coordinate
280: \begin{equation}
281: {\cal H}_F={\bf p}^2 -iq\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}^2+
282: \frac{2}{u}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}= {\bf p
283: }^2
284: -iq\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}'^{2}-i\frac{\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}^2}{qu^2},\quad
285: \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}'=\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}+i\frac{\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}}{qu}
286: \label{2.12}
287: \end{equation}
288: In the new variables the Hamiltonian (\ref{2.12}) has the form
289: similar to (\ref{2.9}) and one can use (\ref{2.11}). Substituting
290: into (\ref{2.11}) $\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_{1,2}\rightarrow
291: \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}'_{1,2}$ and taking into account the
292: constant term in the Hamiltonian (\ref{2.12}) we obtain
293: \begin{eqnarray}
294: \hspace{-16mm}&& K_F(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1,
295: \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2, t)=K_c(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1,
296: \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2,
297: t)K_{\chi}(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1,
298: \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2, t)
299: \nonumber \\
300: \hspace{-16mm}&&K_{\chi}(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1,
301: \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2,
302: t)=\exp\left[-\frac{4i\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}^2t}{u^2\nu^2}\left(
303: 1-\frac{2}{\nu t}\tanh \frac{\nu
304: t}{2}\right)-\frac{2i}{u\nu}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_1+
305: \mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}_2)\tanh \frac{\nu t}{2}\right].
306: \label{2.13}
307: \end{eqnarray}
308:
309:
310: The presence in the problem under consideration the axial vector
311: \begin{equation}
312: {\bf H}_R=\gamma({\bf H}_{\perp}+{\bf E}\times {\bf v})
313: \label{2.14}
314: \end{equation}
315: leads to appearance in Eqs.(\ref{2.1}) and (\ref{2.4}) additional
316: terms depending on the electron polarization
317: $\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}$ (see Eq.(\ref{2.15})). According to
318: analysis performed in Subsec.7.4 of \cite{BKS} and in \cite{BK1}
319: the vector ${\bf p}'$ in (\ref{2.15}) gets over to the operator
320: ${\bf p}$ standing in the formula (\ref{2.1}) for $T$ from the
321: right of the propagator $G^{-1}$ and the vector ${\bf p}$ in
322: (\ref{2.15}) gets over to the operator ${\bf p}$ standing in the
323: formula (\ref{2.1}) for $T$ from the left of the propagator
324: $G^{-1}$. As a result we have for the addition to $T$ in
325: Eqs.(\ref{2.1}) and (\ref{2.4}) depending on the spin vector
326: $\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}$:
327: \begin{equation}
328: T \rightarrow T + T_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}},\quad
329: T_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}}=i\frac{\omega}{\varepsilon} \left(
330: <0|(G^{-1}{\bf p}-{\bf p}G^{-1})|0>\times{\bf v} \right)
331: \mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}.
332: \label{2.16}
333: \end{equation}
334: For the radiative correction to the electron mass
335: we have respectively
336: \begin{equation}
337: \Delta m \rightarrow \Delta M =
338: \Delta m + \Delta m_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}}.
339: \label{2.16a}
340: \end{equation}
341: It should be noted that expressions for $T$ (\ref{2.1}) and
342: (\ref{2.16}) have universal form while the specific of the
343: particle motion is contained in the propagator $G^{-1}$ through
344: the effective potential
345: \begin{equation}
346: V_{eff}(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$})=-iV(\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$})
347: +\frac{2}{u}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}\mbox{\boldmath$\varrho$}.
348: \label{2.17}
349: \end{equation}
350:
351: In the present paper we restrict ourselves to the main term
352: in the decomposition (\ref{2.8}). This means that result will have
353: the logarithmic accuracy over the scattering (but not over an external
354: field). With regard for an external field the parameter $\varrho_c$
355: in Eq.(\ref{2.6}) is defined by a set of equations:
356: \begin{eqnarray}
357: && \varrho_c =1\quad {\rm for}\quad 4\frac{\chi^2}{u^2}+4QL_1 \leq 1;
358: \nonumber \\
359: && 4Q\varrho_c^4 \left[4\frac{\chi^2}{u^2}+|\nu(\varrho_c)|^2 \right]=1
360: \quad {\rm for} \quad 4\frac{\chi^2}{u^2}+ 4QL_1 \geq 1,
361: \label{2.18}
362: \end{eqnarray}
363: where $\nu=2\sqrt{iq}$, $q=QL_c$, $L_1$ and $Q$ are defined in
364: Eq.(\ref{2.2}), $L_c$ is defined in Eq.(\ref{2.6}).
365:
366: The matrix elements entering into the mass correction
367: have in the used approximation the following form
368: \begin{eqnarray}
369: && \left<0|G_F^{-1}-G_0^{-1} |0\right>
370: =\frac{1}{4\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)\left(\frac{\nu}{\sinh \nu t}\varphi
371: -\frac{1}{t} \right)dt,
372: \nonumber \\
373: && \left<0|{\bf p}(G_F^{-1}-G_0^{-1}){\bf p} |0\right>
374: =-\frac{1}{4\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)\Bigg[\frac{\nu}{\sinh \nu t}
375: \Bigg(\frac{4\chi^2}{u^2\nu^2}\tanh^2\frac{\nu t}{2}
376: \nonumber \\
377: && +\frac{i\nu}{\sinh \nu t} \Bigg)\varphi -\frac{i}{t^2}
378: \Bigg]dt,\quad \left<0|(G_F^{-1}{\bf p}-{\bf p}G_F^{-1}) |0\right>
379: =\frac{\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}}{2\pi u}
380: \int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)\frac{\varphi}{\cosh^2 \frac{\nu
381: t}{2}}dt,
382: \nonumber \\
383: && \varphi \equiv \varphi(\chi, \nu, t)
384: =\exp\left[-\frac{4i\chi^2t}{\nu^2 u^2}\left( 1-\frac{2}{\nu
385: t}\tanh\frac{\nu t}{2} \right) \right].
386: \label{2.19}
387: \end{eqnarray}
388: The two first equations are consistent with obtained in
389: \cite{BKS2}. Thus, in the used approximation ($G=G_F$) we have for
390: $T_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}}$ Eq.(\ref{2.16})
391: \begin{equation}
392: T_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}}=\frac{i}{2\pi u}\frac{\omega}{\varepsilon}
393: \int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)\frac{\varphi}{\cosh^2 \frac{\nu t}{2}}dt
394: (\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}{\bf v}),
395: \label{2.20}
396: \end{equation}
397: where $(\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}{\bf v})=
398: (\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\cdot(\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}\times{\bf v}))$.
399:
400:
401:
402: \section{Anomalous magnetic moment of electron}
403: \setcounter{equation}{0}
404:
405: Within relativistic accuracy (up to terms of higher order over
406: $1/\gamma$) the combination of vectors entering in
407: Eq.(\ref{2.20}) can be written as (see Eq.(12.19) in \cite{BKF}
408: and \cite{BKS3})
409: \begin{equation}
410: (\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}{\bf v})=
411: 2\mu_0\frac{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}{\bf H}_R}{m},
412: \label{3.1}
413: \end{equation}
414: where ${\bf H}_R$ defined in Eq.(\ref{2.14}) is the magnetic field
415: in the electron rest frame. Here we use that
416: $\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}=\chi{\bf s}$, where ${\bf s}$ is the unit
417: vector in the direction of acceleration (this vector is used in
418: \cite{BKF}).
419:
420: In the electron rest frame one can consider the value Re~$\Delta
421: m_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}}$ depending on the electron spin as the
422: energy of interaction of the AMM of electron with the magnetic
423: field ${\bf H}_R$ (see Eq.(12.23) in \cite{BKF} and \cite{BKS3})
424: \begin{equation}
425: {\rm Re}~\Delta m_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}}=-\mu'
426: \mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}{\bf H}_R,
427: \label{3.2}
428: \end{equation}
429:
430: Taking into account Eqs.(\ref{2.4}), (\ref{2.16}), (\ref{2.16a}),
431: (\ref{2.20}), (\ref{3.1}), (\ref{3.2}) we obtain the following
432: general expression for the AMM of electron moving in a medium in
433: the presence of an external electromagnetic field:
434: \begin{equation}
435: \frac{\mu'}{\mu_0}=-\frac{\alpha}{\pi} {\rm Im}~
436: \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{du}{(1+u)^3}
437: \int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)\frac{\varphi}{\cosh^2 \frac{\nu t}{2}}dt
438: \label{3.3}
439: \end{equation}
440:
441: In the absence of scattering ($\nu \rightarrow 0$) the expression
442: (\ref{3.3}) gets over into the formula for the AMM of electron in external
443: field (see Eq.(12.24) in \cite{BKF} and \cite{R}, \cite{BKS3})
444: \begin{equation}
445: \frac{\mu'}{\mu_0}=-\frac{\alpha}{\pi} {\rm Im}~
446: \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{du}{(1+u)^3}
447: \int_{0}^{\infty}
448: \exp\left[-it\left(1+\frac{\chi^2 t^2}{3u^2} \right)\right]dt
449: \label{3.4}
450: \end{equation}
451:
452: In the weak external field ($\chi \ll 1, \varphi \simeq 1$) we
453: obtain the formula for the AMM of electron under influence of
454: multiple scattering
455: \begin{equation}
456: \frac{\mu'}{\mu_0}=-\frac{\alpha}{\pi} {\rm Im}~
457: \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{du}{(1+u)^3}
458: \int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)\frac{1}{\cosh^2 \frac{\nu
459: t}{2}}dt=\frac{\alpha}{2\pi}r,
460: \label{3.5}
461: \end{equation}
462: where
463: \begin{eqnarray}
464: && r={\rm Re}J,\quad J=2i\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{du}{(1+u)^3}
465: \int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)\frac{1}{\cosh^2 \frac{\nu t}{2}}dt
466: \nonumber \\
467: && =4i\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{du}{(1+u)^3}
468: \frac{1}{\nu}\left[\frac{2i}{\nu}\beta\left(\frac{i}{\nu} \right)-1 \right],
469: \nonumber \\
470: && \beta=\frac{1}{2}\left[\psi\left(\frac{1+x}{2} \right)-
471: \psi\left(\frac{x}{2} \right) \right],
472: \label{3.6}
473: \end{eqnarray}
474: where $\psi(x)$ is the logarithmic derivative of the gamma function.
475:
476: The dependence of the AMM of electron on its energy $\varepsilon$ in gold
477: is shown in Fig. It is seen that at energy $\varepsilon=500$~GeV
478: value of AMM is 0.85 part of standard quantity of AMM (SQ), at energy
479: $\varepsilon=1$~TeV it is 0.77 part of SQ and at energy
480: $\varepsilon=5.5$~TeV it is 0.5 part of SQ.
481: Actually in all heavy elements the behavior of AMM of
482: electron will be quite similar, i.e. the scale of energy where the
483: AMM of electron deviates from SQ is of order of TeV.
484:
485: In the case of weak effect of multiple scattering
486: \begin{equation}
487: \nu^2=\frac{i}{u}\nu_b^2,\quad
488: \nu_b^2=\frac{\varepsilon}{\varepsilon_e},\quad
489: \varepsilon_e=m\left(8\pi
490: Z^2\alpha^2n_a\lambda_c^3L_1\right)^{-1},
491: \label{3.7}
492: \end{equation}
493: where $\varepsilon_e$ is the characteristic electron energy
494: starting with the multiple scattering distorted the whole
495: spectrum of radiation ($\varepsilon_e=2.6$~TeV in gold and it has a
496: similar value for heavy elements).
497: Integrating in Eq.(\ref{3.6}) by parts over
498: the variable $t$ we find
499: \begin{equation}
500: J=1+f,\quad f=f(\nu_b)= -2\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{du}{(1+u)^3}
501: \int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)\frac{\tanh \frac{\nu t}{2}}{\cosh^2
502: \frac{\nu t}{2}}dt. \label{3.8}
503: \end{equation}
504: The asymptotic behavior of the function $f$ at $\nu_b \ll
505: 1~(\varepsilon \ll \varepsilon_e)$ calculated in Appendix:
506: \begin{equation}
507: f(\nu_b)= \nu_b^2\left[-\frac{\pi}{2}+2i\left(\ln \frac{2}{\nu_b}
508: +C-\frac{7}{4}+A \right)\right],
509: \label{3.9}
510: \end{equation}
511: where
512: \begin{equation}
513: A=\int_{0}^{\infty}\left(3 \ln t \tanh t +\frac{\sinh t
514: -t}{t^2}\right)\frac{dt}{\cosh^3t} = -0.364291\ldots
515: \label{3.10}
516: \end{equation}
517: Substituting this result into (\ref{3.5}) we obtain for AMM of
518: electron at $\varepsilon \ll \varepsilon_e$
519: \begin{equation}
520: \frac{\mu'}{\mu_0}=\frac{\alpha}{2\pi}\left(1-
521: \frac{\pi}{2}\frac{\varepsilon}{\varepsilon_e}\right).
522: \label{3.11}
523: \end{equation}
524:
525: At very high energy $\varepsilon \gg \varepsilon_e$
526: the effect of multiple scattering becomes strong. In this case
527: (see Eq.(3.3) in \cite{BK2})
528: \begin{equation}
529: \nu^2=\frac{i\varepsilon}{u \varepsilon_e}\left(1+\frac{1}{2L_1}
530: \ln\frac{\varepsilon}{\varepsilon_e u} \right),
531: \label{3.12}
532: \end{equation}
533: the main contribution into the integral (\ref{3.6}) give the
534: regions $u \sim 1$ and $t \sim 1/|\nu| \ll 1$. Making the
535: substitution of variable as in (\ref{a.8}) and expanding the
536: exponent as in Appendix we have from (\ref{a.11}) the asymptotic
537: expansion of AMM of electron:
538: \begin{equation}
539: r=\frac{2\pi}{\alpha} \frac{\mu'}{\mu_0}=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{2}}
540: \sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_c}{\varepsilon}}\left(1-
541: \frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{\varepsilon_c}{\varepsilon}\right), \quad
542: \varepsilon_c =\varepsilon_e\frac{L_1}{L_0},\quad
543: L_0=L_1+\frac{1}{2}\ln \frac{\varepsilon}{\varepsilon_e}.
544: \label{3.13}
545: \end{equation}
546: Redefinition of the characteristic energy $\varepsilon_e \rightarrow
547: \varepsilon_c$ is connected with enlargement of the radiation cone
548: (in comparison with $1/\gamma$) or in another terms with increasing
549: of the characteristic transverse momentum transfers due to the multiple
550: scattering.
551:
552: \section{Spin correction to the intensity of radiation}
553: \setcounter{equation}{0}
554:
555: To obtain the additional term in the radiation intensity depending
556: on the spin of the radiating electron one has to substitute the formula
557: (\ref{2.20}) into expression for the spectral distribution of the
558: probability of radiation per unit time Eq.(\ref{2.1}) and to multiply it
559: on the photon energy $\omega$. As a result we obtain the mentioned term
560: \begin{equation}
561: I_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}}=
562: (\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}{\bf v})
563: \frac{\alpha m^2}{\pi} {\rm Re} \int_{0}^{\infty}
564: \frac{udu}{(1+u)^4}
565: \int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)\frac{\varphi}{\cosh^2 \frac{\nu t}{2}}dt.
566: \label{4.1}
567: \end{equation}
568: So for polarized electrons the total intensity of radiation
569: is the sum of Eq.(3.8) of \cite{BK2} and
570: $I_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}} L_{rad}^0/\varepsilon$ ({\ref{4.1}}).
571:
572: At $\varepsilon \ll \varepsilon_e$ one can decompose
573: $\cosh^{-2} \nu t/2 \simeq 1- \nu^2 t^2/4$ in integral over $t$ in
574: (\ref{4.1}). We find
575: \begin{equation}
576: I_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}} \simeq
577: (\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}{\bf v})
578: \frac{\alpha m^2}{6\pi} \frac{\varepsilon}{\varepsilon_e},\quad
579: \frac{I_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}}}{I} \simeq \frac{2}{3}
580: (\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}{\bf v}),
581: \label{4.2}
582: \end{equation}
583: Where $I$ is given by Eq.(3.9) of \cite{BK2}.
584:
585: In the opposite case of large energies $\varepsilon \gg \varepsilon_e$
586: the main contribution into integrals in ({\ref{4.1}}) gives the region
587: $u \sim 1,~t \ll 1$. Then substituting the exponent by unity we find
588: \begin{eqnarray}
589: && I_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}} \simeq
590: (\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}{\bf v})
591: \frac{\alpha m^2}{\pi}\sqrt{\frac{2\varepsilon_c}{\varepsilon}}
592: \int_{0}^{\infty} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{u^{3/2}du}{(1+u)^4}
593: =(\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}{\bf v})
594: \frac{\alpha m^2}{8\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_c}{\varepsilon}}
595: \nonumber \\
596: && \frac{I_{\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}}}{I} \simeq \frac{4}{9}
597: \frac{\varepsilon_c}{\varepsilon}
598: (\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}\mbox{\boldmath$\chi$}{\bf v}),
599: \label{4.3}
600: \end{eqnarray}
601: where $I$ is given by Eq.(3.11) of \cite{BK2}.
602:
603: \section{Conclusion}
604: \setcounter{equation}{0}
605:
606: Here we discuss the possibility of experimental observation of
607: influence of medium on the AMM of electron. At a very high energy
608: where the observation becomes feasible the rotation angle $\varphi$
609: of the spin vector $\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$}$ in the transverse
610: to the particle velocity ${\bf v}$ magnetic field ${\bf H}$ depends
611: only on the value of AMM and doesn't depend on the particle
612: energy:
613: \begin{equation}
614: \varphi =\left(\frac{m}{\varepsilon}+ \frac{\mu'}{\mu_0}
615: \right)\frac{e H}{m}l \simeq
616: r\frac{\alpha}{2\pi}\frac{H}{H_0}\frac{l}{\lambda_c}, \label{5.1}
617: \end{equation}
618: where $l$ is the path of electron in the field, $H_0=m^2/e=4.41
619: \cdot 10^{13}$~Oe. The dependence of $r$ on energy $\varepsilon$ is
620: found in Sec.3 and shown in Fig.
621:
622: Since at radiation of hard photons in a medium the picture is
623: quite complicated:energy losses, cascade processes, spin flip and
624: depolarization, it is desirable to measure the particles which
625: don't radiate photons on the path $l$. The number of such
626: particles $N$ is determined by the total probability of radiation
627: in a medium found in \cite{BK2}, Eqs.(3.12)-(3.14):
628: \begin{eqnarray}
629: && N=N_0\exp(-\psi(\varepsilon)),\quad
630: \psi(\varepsilon)=W(\varepsilon)l=\frac{k(\varepsilon)\varphi_{SQ}}
631: {2\chi(\varepsilon_e)};\quad
632: k(\varepsilon)=W(\varepsilon)L_{rad}^0,
633: \nonumber \\
634: && (L_{rad}^0)^{-1}
635: =\frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\frac{m^2}{\varepsilon_e},\quad
636: \chi(\varepsilon_e)=\frac{\varepsilon_e}{m}\frac{H}{H_0},
637: \label{5.2}
638: \end{eqnarray}
639: where $\varphi_{SQ}$ is the rotation angle for standard value of
640: AMM in QED ($r=1$), $N_0$ is the number of initial electrons. With
641: energy increase the function $k(\varepsilon)$ decreases \cite{BK2}
642: \begin{equation}
643: k(\varepsilon \ll \varepsilon_e) \simeq \frac{4}{3}\left( \ln
644: \frac{\varepsilon_e}{\varepsilon}+1.96 \right),\quad
645: k(\varepsilon = \varepsilon_e) \simeq 3.56, \quad k(\varepsilon
646: \gg \varepsilon_e) \simeq
647: \frac{11\pi}{4\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_e}{\varepsilon}}.
648: \label{5.3}
649: \end{equation}
650: The crucial part of the experiment is an accuracy of measurement
651: of electron polarization before target and after target. If one
652: supposes that spin rotation angle can be measured with accuracy
653: noticeably better than 1/10 then we can put that
654: $(1-r)\varphi_{SQ}=1/10$. In the gold we find for the energy
655: $\varepsilon=\varepsilon_e=2.61~$TeV and the magnetic field $H=4
656: \cdot 10^{5}$Oe that $1-r = 0.371$, the path of electron in the
657: target is $l \simeq 1~$cm and number of electron traversing the
658: target without energy loss is $N \simeq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-5} N_0$.
659: This estimates show that the measurement of the effect found in
660: this paper will be feasible in the not very distant future.
661:
662:
663: {\bf Acknowledgments}
664: \vspace{0.2cm}
665: This work
666: was supported in part by the Russian Fund of Basic Research under Grant
667: 00-02-18007.
668:
669: \setcounter{equation}{0}
670: \Alph{equation}
671:
672: \appendix
673:
674: \section{Appendix}
675:
676: In the case $\nu_b \ll 1$ (\ref{3.7}) we present the function
677: $f(\nu)$ (\ref{3.8}) as
678: \begin{eqnarray}
679: && f(\tilde{\nu})=f_1(\tilde{\nu})+f_2(\tilde{\nu}),\quad
680: \nu=\frac{\tilde{\nu}}{\sqrt{u}},
681: \nonumber \\
682: && f_1=-2\int_{0}^{\infty}\nu
683: \frac{du}{(1+u)^3}\int_{0}^{\infty}\displaystyle{\frac{\exp(-it)}{\cosh^3\frac{\nu
684: t}{2}}}\left(\sinh\frac{\nu t}{2}-\frac{\nu t}{2}\right)dt,
685: \nonumber \\
686: && f_2 =-\int_{0}^{\infty}\nu^2
687: \frac{du}{(1+u)^3}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\exp(-it)}{\cosh^3\frac{\nu
688: t}{2}}dt.
689: \label{a.1}
690: \end{eqnarray}
691: In the integral in $f_1$ the main contribution give $u \sim
692: \nu_b^2 \ll 1$ so that
693: \begin{equation}
694: f_1=-2\tilde{\nu}\int_{0}^{\infty}
695: \frac{du}{\sqrt{u}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\displaystyle{\frac{\exp(-it)}{\cosh^3\frac{\tilde{\nu}
696: t}{2\sqrt{u}}}}\left(\sinh\frac{\tilde{\nu}
697: t}{2\sqrt{u}}-\frac{\tilde{\nu} t}{2\sqrt{u}}\right)dt.
698: \label{a.2}
699: \end{equation}
700: Substituting variables $x=\sqrt{u}$ and $z=\nu t/2x$ we have
701: \begin{equation}
702: f_1=2\tilde{\nu}^2\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{z^2} \frac{\sinh
703: z-z}{\cosh^3z}dz. \label{a.3}
704: \end{equation}
705: The function $f_2$ we present as
706: \begin{eqnarray}
707: \hspace{-12mm}&&
708: f=f_2^{(1)}+f_2^{(2)},~f_2^{(1)}=\tilde{\nu}^2\int_{0}^{\infty}
709: \frac{du}{u}\left(\frac{1}{1+u}-\frac{1}{(1+u)^3}\right)
710: \int_{0}^{\infty}\displaystyle{\frac{\exp(-it)}{\cosh^3\frac{\tilde{\nu}
711: t}{2\sqrt{u}}}}t dt
712: \nonumber \\
713: \hspace{-12mm}&& \simeq
714: -\tilde{\nu}^2\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{2+u}{(1+u)^3}du =
715: -\frac{3}{2}\tilde{\nu}^2,
716: \nonumber \\
717: \hspace{-12mm}&& f_2^{(2)} =-\tilde{\nu}^2\int_{0}^{\infty}
718: \frac{du}{u(1+u)}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\exp(-it)}{\cosh^3\frac{\tilde{\nu}
719: t}{2\sqrt{u}}}t dt=-\tilde{\nu}^2\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{1+x}
720: \int_{0}^{\infty}\displaystyle{\frac{\exp(-it)}{\cosh^3\frac{\tilde{\nu}
721: t}{2}\sqrt{x}}}t dt.
722: \label{a.4}
723: \end{eqnarray}
724: Introducing in the last integral the variable
725: $z=\tilde{\nu}^2t^2x/4$ we find
726: \begin{equation}
727: f_2^{(2)} =-\tilde{\nu}^2\int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it)t dt
728: \int_{0}^{\infty}
729: \frac{dz}{\left(z+\tilde{\nu}^2t^2/4\right)\cosh^3\sqrt{z}}
730: \label{a.5}
731: \end{equation}
732: Integrating in (\ref{a.5}) by parts over the variable $z$ we find
733: \begin{eqnarray}
734: \hspace{-12mm}&&
735: f_2^{(2)} \simeq -\tilde{\nu}^2
736: \int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-it) \left(-\ln \frac{\tilde{\nu}^2 t^2}{4}
737: + \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{3}{2\sqrt{z}} \ln z \frac{\sinh \sqrt{z}}
738: {\cosh^4\sqrt{z} }dz \right) t dt
739: \nonumber \\
740: \hspace{-12mm}&&
741: =2\tilde{\nu}^2\left(\frac{i\pi}{2}-\psi(2)-\ln \frac{\tilde{\nu}}{2}+
742: 3\int_{0}^{\infty}\ln x \frac{\tanh x}{\cosh^3x}dx \right).
743: \label{a.6}
744: \end{eqnarray}
745: Combining the results (\ref{a.3}), (\ref{a.4}) and (\ref{a.7})
746: we obtain
747: \begin{eqnarray}
748: \hspace{-12mm}&&
749: f(\tilde{\nu}) = 2\tilde{\nu}^2
750: \left(\frac{i\pi}{2}+\ln \frac{2}{\tilde{\nu}}-\frac{7}{4}+C+A \right),
751: \nonumber \\
752: \hspace{-12mm}&&
753: A=\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\cosh^3x}\left(\frac{\sinh x -x}{x^2}
754: +3 \ln x \tanh x \right) dx.
755: \label{a.7}
756: \end{eqnarray}
757:
758: In the case $|\tilde{\nu}| \gg 1$ we present the integral in
759: Eq.(\ref{3.6}) as
760: \begin{equation}
761: J(\tilde{\nu}) =\frac{4i}{\tilde{\nu}}\int_{0}^{\infty}
762: \frac{\sqrt{u}du}{(1+u)^3}\int_{0}^{\infty}
763: \frac{dt}{\cosh^2t}\exp\left(-i\frac{2\sqrt{u}t}{\tilde{\nu}}\right).
764: \label{a.8}
765: \end{equation}
766: To calculate the first three terms of the decomposition of
767: $J(\tilde{\nu})$ over $1/\tilde{\nu}$ one can expands the
768: exponent in the last integral
769: \begin{equation}
770: \exp\left(-i\frac{2\sqrt{u}t}{\tilde{\nu}}\right)=1-\frac{2i\sqrt{u}t}{\tilde{\nu}}-
771: \frac{2ut^2}{\tilde{\nu}^2}.
772: \label{a.9}
773: \end{equation}
774: The next term of this decomposition contains the logarithmic
775: divergence of the integral over $u$ and to calculate the term of
776: the order $1/\tilde{\nu}^3$ one has to use another approach. Using
777: the known integrals
778: \begin{eqnarray}
779: \hspace{-12mm}&& \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{t dt}{\cosh^2t}=\ln
780: 2,\quad \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{t^2dt}{\cosh^2t}=\frac{\pi^2}{12},
781: \nonumber \\
782: \hspace{-12mm}&& \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sqrt{u}du}{(1+u)^3}
783: =\frac{\pi}{8},\quad \int_{0}^{\infty}
784: \frac{u^{3/2}du}{(1+u)^3}=\frac{3\pi}{8},
785: \label{a.10}
786: \end{eqnarray}
787: we obtain at $|\tilde{\nu}|\gg
788: 1(\tilde{\nu}=\sqrt{i}|\tilde{\nu}|$)
789: \begin{eqnarray}
790: \hspace{-12mm}&& J(\tilde{\nu}) \simeq \frac{4i}{\tilde{\nu}}
791: \left[\frac{\pi}{8}-\frac{i}{\tilde{\nu}}\ln
792: 2-\frac{\pi^3}{16\tilde{\nu}^2}\right],\quad {\rm
793: Re}J(\tilde{\nu}) \simeq
794: \frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{2}|\tilde{\nu}|}\left(1-\frac{\pi^2}{2|\tilde{\nu}|^2}\right),
795: \nonumber \\
796: \hspace{-12mm}&& {\rm Im}J(\tilde{\nu}) \simeq
797: \frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{2}|\tilde{\nu}|} \left(1-\frac{8\sqrt{2}\ln 2
798: }{\pi |\tilde{\nu}|}+\frac{\pi^2}{2|\tilde{\nu}|^2}\right).
799: \label{a.11}
800: \end{eqnarray}
801:
802:
803:
804:
805: \newpage
806:
807: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
808: \bibitem{S} J. Schwinger, Phys.Rev. {\bf 73} (1948) 416; {\bf 76}
809: (1949) 790.
810: \bibitem{BKS1} V.N.Baier, V.M.Katkov and V.M.Strakhovenko,
811: Lett. Nuovo Cimento {\bf 15} (1976) 149; Sov. J. Nuc. Phys. {\bf
812: 24} (1976) 197.
813: \bibitem{BKF} V. N. Baier, V. M. Katkov, and V. S. Fadin,
814: {\it Radiation from Relativistic Electrons} (in Russian),
815: Atomizdat, Moscou, 1973.
816: \bibitem{BLP} V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P.
817: Pitaevskii, {\em Quantum Electrodynamics}, 2nd ed. Pergamon
818: Press, Oxford, 1982.
819: \bibitem{BKS} V.N.Baier, V.M.Katkov and V.M.Strakhovenko,
820: {\em Electromagnetic Processes at High Energies in Oriented
821: Single Crystals}, World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore, 1998.
822: \bibitem{BK1} V. N. Baier and V. M. Katkov,
823: Phys.Rev. D {\bf 57} (1998) 3146, \newline hep-ph/9709214.
824: \bibitem{BK2} V. N. Baier and V. M. Katkov,
825: Phys.Rev.D {\bf 62} (2000) 036008, \newline hep-ph/0002097.
826: \bibitem{BK3} V.N.Baier, V.M.Katkov, Preprint BINP 2000-46, Novosibirsk, 2000,
827: \newline hep-ph/0005215.
828: \bibitem{BKS2} V.N.Baier, V.M.Katkov and V.M.Strakhovenko,
829: Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 67} (1988) 70.
830: \bibitem{R} V.I.Ritus,
831: Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 30} (1970) 1181.
832: \bibitem{BKS3} V.N.Baier, V.M.Katkov and V.M.Strakhovenko,
833: Sov. Phys. Doklady {\bf 16} (1971) 230.
834:
835:
836:
837: \end{thebibliography}
838:
839: \newpage
840:
841: {\bf Figure captions}
842:
843: \vspace{15mm} Anomalous magnetic moment(AMM) of electron in units
844: $\alpha/2\pi$ ($r$ in Eq.(\ref{3.6}))~in gold vs electron energy
845: in TeV.
846:
847: \end{document}
848: