1:
2: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
3:
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6:
7: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0in}
8: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0in}
9: \setlength{\textwidth}{6.25in}
10: \setlength{\topmargin}{-0.25in}
11: \setlength{\textheight}{8.5in}
12: \def\lsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower4pt\hbox{\hskip1pt$\sim$}}
13: \raise1pt\hbox{$<$}}} %less than or approx. symbol
14: \def\gsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower4pt\hbox{\hskip1pt$\sim$}}
15: \raise1pt\hbox{$>$}}} %greater than or approx. symbol
16: \def\ut#1{$\underline{\smash{\vphantom{y}\hbox{#1}}}$}
17: \def\overleftrightarrow#1{\vbox{\ialign{##\crcr
18: $\leftrightarrow$\crcr
19: \noalign{\kern 1pt\nointerlineskip}
20: $\hfil\displaystyle{#1}\hfil$\crcr}}}
21: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.0}
22:
23: \newcommand {\be}{\begin{equation}}
24: \newcommand {\ee}{\end {equation}}
25:
26: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote})}
27:
28: \begin{document}
29:
30: \hspace{12cm}{\bf TUM/T39-00-22}\\
31:
32: \hspace{12cm}{\bf NT@UW-00-033}\\
33:
34:
35: \begin{center}
36: {\bf Coordinate Space
37: Distributions of Antiquark Flavor Asymmetries\\ in the Proton
38: \footnote{work supported in part by BMBF, by the Alexander von
39: Humboldt Foundation and by the US Dept. of Energy}}
40: \end{center}
41: %-\vspace{.25 in}
42: \begin{center}
43: {Ernest M. Henley$^{a,b}$, Thorsten Renk$^{c}$, and Wolfram Weise$^{c}$}
44:
45: {\small \em $^{a}$ Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle,
46: WA 98195, USA} \\
47: {\small \em $^{b}$ Institute for Nuclear Theory, University of Washington,
48: Seattle, WA 98195, USA }\\
49: {\small \em $^{c}$ Physik Department, Technische Universit\"{a}t M\"{u}nchen,
50: D85747 Garching, GERMANY}
51: %\maketitle
52: \end{center}
53: \vspace{0.25 in}
54: \begin{abstract}
55:
56: We examine the space-time properties of the distributions of
57: $(\bar {d} - \bar{u})$ and $
58: \bar{d}/\bar{u}$ in the proton. The difference of the antiquark distributions
59: shows the expected peak at the approximate pion Compton wavelength and
60: is supportive of the thesis
61: that the meson cloud of the nucleon is at the origin of the asymmetry of
62: $(\bar {d} - \bar{u})$, with the pion cloud playing a dominant role.
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65:
66: \vspace {0.25 in}
67:
68:
69: The partonic distribution functions of the proton,
70: particularly the flavor dependence of the antiquark distributions, remain of
71: considerable interest. Experimentally, the
72: NMC measurement of the integral of
73: $(\bar{d} - \bar{u})$ \cite{NMC}, and the more recent
74: measurements of the ratio $\bar{d}/\bar{u}$ by means of the Drell-Yan
75: process \cite {NA51,E866} provide evidence for the excess of $\bar{d}$ over
76: $\bar{u}$ in the proton. Similar results
77: for $(\bar{d} - \bar{u})$ were obtained by HERMES
78: \cite{hermes}. One of the simplest (physically "anschaulich") explanations
79: for the excess is based on the meson cloud model
80: and the Sullivan process. This model can explain the
81: momentum fraction (Bjorken x-dependence) of the
82: $(\bar{d} - \bar{u})$ distribution (for reviews, see
83: \cite{S&T}). Pions play the leading
84: role in this context, while the detailed description
85: of the ratio $\bar{d}/\bar{u}$ may also require correlated
86: $q\bar{q}$ pairs of heavier mass\cite{E866,AH,AHM}.
87:
88: In this Letter we do not wish to dwell on the differences between
89: theoretical models and experiment, but examine the spacetime
90: properties of the flavor distribution asymmetries in order to see whether
91: they offer any clues as to their origin.
92: In order to obtain the distribution functions in
93: coordinate space, we follow Piller et al. \cite {Pil} and
94: V\"{a}nttinen et al. \cite {Va}.
95: We work with light-cone variables and
96: introduce the dimensionless coordinate spacetime variable $z =
97: y \cdot P$, where $P$ is the momentum of the nucleon.
98: The
99: light cone distance is $y^+ \equiv t + y_3 = 2z/M$, with $M$
100: the nucleon mass. The dimensionless space variable
101: $z$ is conjugate to Bjorken $x$ and $z \simeq 5$ corresponds to
102: $y^+ \simeq 2$ fm or a longitudinal distance of approximately 1 fm.
103:
104: In the first instance we use empirical
105: distribution functions and differences thereof.
106: In accordance with the charge conjugation properties
107: of momentum space quark distributions we find the coordinate space
108: distribution of the sea quarks as
109:
110: \begin{equation}
111: Q_{sea}(z,Q^2) = \int_0^1 dx \left[q_{sea}(x,Q^2) +\bar{q}(x,Q^2) \right]\sin(zx)
112: \label {1}
113: \end{equation}
114:
115: \noindent
116: Decomposing this result into the contributions from quarks and
117: antiquarks of different flavours we arrive at an expression for the
118: asymmerty in coordiante space:
119:
120: \begin{equation}
121: (\bar{D} - \bar{U})(z,Q^2)= \int_0^1 dx \left[ \bar{d}(x,Q^2) - \bar{u}(x,Q^2)\right]\sin(zx)
122: \label {1a}
123: \end{equation}
124:
125: The distribution functions $\bar{d}(x), \bar{u}(x)$ have been obtained from
126: various deep inelastic electron scattering scattering and Drell-Yan
127: experiments by CTEQ5 and other groups \cite{CTEQ5,MRST,GRV}. In Fig.1 we
128: show $(\bar{d} - \bar{u})$ and $(\bar{D} - \bar{U})$
129: obtained from Eq.(\ref{1a}) and the CTEQ5, the MRST and the GRV analysis.
130: We observe that all three parameterizations agree fairly well between
131: each other except for
132: small values of $x$ or large $z$.
133: Therefore we will mainly use the results from CTEQ5 in the following
134: for comparison to the pion cloud model.
135:
136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
137:
138: \begin{figure}[!htb]
139: \begin{center}
140: \epsfig{file=fig1_f.eps, width=\textwidth}
141: \end{center}
142: \caption{Momentum space and coordinate space distribution of the
143: $\bar{d} -\bar{u}$ asymmetry in the proton at $Q^2 = 4$ GeV$^2$, based on the
144: parameterizations \cite{CTEQ5,MRST,GRV}.}
145: \end{figure}
146:
147: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
148:
149:
150: Investigating the coordinate space distribution, we see that
151: for $Q^2 = 4 \,$GeV$^2$
152: the peak of $(\bar{D} - \bar{U})$
153: occurs at $z \simeq 3$ or at $y^+ \simeq 1.2 $ fm. The half-width of
154: the peak extends from $ z \simeq 1 - 10$ or $ y^+ \simeq 0.4 -4 $ fm.
155: This is a region where the pion and perhaps more massive $q\bar{q}$ states \cite{AHM}
156: contribute. We recall that at 3-4 fm, the valence quark distribution has fallen to
157: less than 25\% of its peak value.
158:
159:
160: In Fig.~\ref{DoverU} we show the ratio $R(z)= \bar{D}(z) / \bar{U}(z)$ as a function of
161: $z$. Here the small z region is expected to be constant because
162: $\bar{q}(x) \simeq 0$ for $x \geq 0.35$, so that for $z \leq 1$, Eq.
163: (\ref{1})
164: becomes
165:
166:
167: \begin{equation}
168: \bar{Q}(z) \simeq z \int_0^1 \bar{q}(x) \,x\; dx = constant \cdot z \; .
169: \end{equation}
170:
171: \noindent
172: It follows that the ratio $R(z) $ is a constant for $z \lsim 1$. Most of the "action"
173: takes place where the derivative of $R(z)$ differs appreciably from zero, which
174: again occurs for $ z \simeq 2-10$, corresponding to distance scales
175: comparable to the size of the nucleon. We interpret these features as being
176: supportive of a meson cloud as the primary cause for the excess of
177: $\bar{d}(x)$ over $\bar{u}(x)$ in the proton.
178:
179:
180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
181:
182: \begin{figure}[htb]
183: \begin{center}
184: \epsfig{file=fig3_f.eps,width=10.5cm}
185: \end{center}
186: \caption{\label{DoverU}The Ratio $ R(z)=\bar{D}(z) / \bar{U}(z)$ in coordinate space
187: for different parametrizations.}
188: \end{figure}
189:
190: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
191:
192:
193:
194: In order to make a detailed comparison with the meson cloud model and
195: Sullivan process, we have used it in its simplest form with only pions and
196: no $\Delta$ and have concentrated on $(\bar{d} - \bar{u})$ because the
197: detailed description of the
198: ratio $\bar{d}/ \bar{u}$ also requires the perturbative contribution
199: from gluon splitting which is expected to be symmetric in $\bar{d}$ and
200: $\bar{u}$.
201:
202: We provide the usual formulae \cite{S&T} for the effects of the
203: meson cloud (and Sullivan process).
204: The wave function of the proton is
205: written in terms of Fock states with and without mesons:
206:
207: \begin{eqnarray}
208: \mid p\rangle = \sqrt{Z}\mid p\rangle_{\rm bare} + \sum_{MB}\int dy\;
209: d^2 k_\perp\; \phi_{BM}(y,k_\perp^2)
210: \mid B(y,\vec{k}_\perp) M(1-y, - \vec{k}_\perp)\rangle \;.
211: \end{eqnarray}
212:
213: \noindent
214: Here $\sqrt{Z}$ is a wavefunction renormalization constant, $\phi_{BM}(y,k_\perp^2) $
215: is the probability amplitude for finding a physical nucleon in a state
216: consisting of a baryon, $B$, with longitudinal momentum fraction y, and a meson,
217: $M$, of
218: momentum fraction $(1-y)$ and squared transverse relative momentum $k_\perp^2$.
219:
220: The quark distribution function $q(x)$ of a proton is given by
221:
222: \begin{equation}
223: q(x) = q^{\rm bare}(x) + \delta q(x) \; ,
224: \end{equation}
225:
226: \noindent
227: with
228:
229: \begin {eqnarray}
230: \delta q(x) = \sum_{MB}
231: \left(\int_x^1 f_{MB}(y) q_M \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\frac{dy}{y} \;
232: +\int_x^1 f_{BM}(y) q_B \left(\frac{x}{y} \right) \frac{dy}{y}\right),
233: \end{eqnarray}
234:
235: \noindent
236: where $q_M$ and $q_B$ are the quark distributions in the meson and baryon,
237:
238: \begin{equation}
239: f_{MB}(y) = f_{BM}(1-y) \; ,\label{sym}
240: \end{equation}
241:
242: \begin{equation}
243: f_{BM}(y) = \int_0^\infty\mid\phi_{BM}(y,k_\perp^2)\mid^2~d^2k_\perp\;.
244: \end{equation}
245:
246: \noindent
247: The meson--baryon vertex function $\phi_{BM}$ includes a cutoff factor
248:
249: \begin{equation}
250: G_M (t,u) = \exp{\frac {t- m_M^2}{2 \Lambda_M^2}}
251: \exp{{ u - m_B^2\over 2\Lambda_M^2}} \; ,
252: \end{equation}
253:
254: \noindent
255: where $\Lambda_M$ is a cut-off parameter for pions and $t$ and $u$
256: are the usual Mandelstam kinematical
257: variables, expressed in terms of $\vec{ k}_\perp$ and $y$.
258: Such a form is required to respect the identity
259: (\ref{sym})\cite{S&T, Szczurek:1996ur}.
260:
261:
262: The cut-off required in the model is taken from ref. \cite {S&T}, but
263: it is also varied to study its effect. We found that the cutoff basically
264: regulates the overall normalization of the result and used the value
265: which leads to the best fit ($\Lambda_M$ = 0.85 GeV).
266:
267: The expressions for the
268: splitting functions $f_{MB}(y)$ are those given by \cite {S&T}
269: as derived in
270: Ref.~\cite{holtmann}.
271: We include only the pion; then the renormalization constant of the
272: "bare" quark is $Z = 1-3 n_\pi$ where $n_\pi$ is the
273: probability to find a neutral pion in the cloud.
274:
275: We need the valence quark distributions in the pion \cite{sutton},
276: $q_M(x)$, which is given at $Q^2 = 4$ GeV $^2$ as
277:
278: \begin{eqnarray}
279: x q_M(x)=0.99x^{0.61}(1-x)^{1.02},
280: \end{eqnarray}
281:
282: \noindent
283: and its $Q^2$ evolution.
284: At this point, a problem arises caused by the fact that the parton
285: distributions of the pion were extracted from $\pi N$ scattering assuming
286: that the nucleon ones are known.
287: Since in our approach the nucleon also has an admixture of the pion cloud,
288: the extraction of the
289: pionic parton distributions is not fully consistent within this framework
290: and therefore we do not expect a perfect agreement with data in the end.
291: We do not need the
292: bare nucleon sea since it averages out in the difference
293: $(\bar{d} - \bar{u})$, which is our main interest.
294:
295:
296: The results of our calculations for $\bar{d}(x)-\bar{u}(x)$,
297: using a cutoff $\Lambda_M = 0.85$ GeV,
298: are compared to CTEQ5
299: in Fig.~\ref{PCvsCTEQ}.
300:
301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
302:
303: \begin{figure}[htb]
304: \begin{center}
305: \epsfig{file=fig4_f.eps,width=\textwidth}
306: \end{center}
307: \caption{\label{PCvsCTEQ}The asymmetry $\bar{d}-\bar{u}$ in momentum space and
308: $\bar{D}-\bar{U}$ in coordinate space in the pion cloud model calculations
309: and in the CTEQ5 parametrization.}
310: \end{figure}
311:
312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
313:
314:
315: \noindent
316: Also shown in this figure is the space coordinate transform $\bar{D} - \bar{U}$.
317: The peak occurs for a somewhat lower z than obtained by CTEQ5,
318: however the overall agreement is obvious.
319:
320:
321: Finally, Fig.~\ref{Evolution} shows the $Q^2$ evolution of the results obtained
322: within the pion cloud model and in the CTEQ5 asymmetry.
323: The $Q^2$ dependence of the pion cloud asymmetry evidently has
324: the same qualitative feature as
325: in the $Q^2$ evolution of the CTEQ5 results, namely a shift of
326: the peak to higher $z$ and a decrease of the maximum peak value
327: with increasing $Q^2$.
328:
329:
330:
331: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
332:
333: \begin{figure}[!htb]
334: \begin{center}
335: \epsfig{file=fig5_f.eps,width=\textwidth}
336: \end{center}
337: \caption{\label{Evolution}
338: $Q^2$-evolution of $\bar{D} -\bar{U}$ in the pion cloud model
339: and in the CTEQ5 parameterization.}
340: \end{figure}
341:
342: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
343:
344: We summarize and conclude with the following observations. The spacetime coordinate
345: representation of sea quark distributions offers detailed insights, additional to
346: their momentum space form, into the flavour asymmetry $\bar{d}-\bar{u}$ of
347: antiquarks. In the $Q^2$ range between 5 and 25 GeV$^2$,
348: this asymmetry is maximal in coordinate space at length scales (1.2 -- 1.6) fm
349: characteristic of the pion cloud of the nucleon. These features are
350: evident in the empirical asymmetry distributions, and they
351: are well undersood in the pion cloud model.
352: Additional contributions of heavier masses may assist
353: in reproducing the detailed behaviour of the $\bar{d}/\bar{u}$ ratio.
354:
355: \vspace{3ex}
356:
357: We thank Gunther Piller and Lech Mankiewicz for helpful
358: comments and discussions.
359:
360:
361:
362:
363: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
364:
365: \bibitem {NMC} P. Amaudruz et al., NMC Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett.
366: {\bf 66} (1991) 2712
367:
368: \bibitem{NA51} A. Baldit et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf 332} (1994) 244
369:
370: \bibitem{E866} E866 Collaboration, E.A. Hawker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.
371: {\bf 80} (1998) 3715 ; J.C. Peng et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf D58} (1999) 092004
372:
373: \bibitem{hermes} K. Ackerstaff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81} (1998) 5519
374:
375: \bibitem {S&T} J. Speth and A.W. Thomas, {\it Advances in Nuclear Physics},
376: Vol. 24, ed. J.W. Negele and E.W. Vogt (Plenum Press, NY) 1998; S. Kumano,
377: Phys. Reports {\bf 303} (1998) 183 %%CITATION = PRPLC,303,183;%%
378:
379: \bibitem{AH} M. Alberg, T. Falter and E. M. Henley, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A644}
380: (1998) 93
381:
382: \bibitem {AHM} M. Alberg, E.M. Henley and G.A. Miller, Phys. Lett.
383: {\bf 471} (2000) 396
384:
385: \bibitem{Pil} G. Piller and W. Weise, Phys. Reports. {\bf 330} (2000) 1
386:
387: \bibitem {Va} M. V\"{a}nttinen, G. Piller, L. Mankiewicz, W.Weise and K.J. Eskola,
388: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A3} (1998) 351; P. Hoyer and M. V\"{a}nttinen,
389: Z. Phys. C74 (1997) 113.
390:
391: \bibitem {CTEQ5} H. L. Lai el al., Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C12} (2000) 375
392:
393: \bibitem{MRST} A. D. Martin, R. G. Roberts, W. K. Stirling, R. S. Thorne,
394: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C14} (2000) 133
395:
396: \bibitem {GRV} M. Gl\"{u}ck, E. Reya and A. Vogt, Eur.Phys.J. {\bf C5} (1998) 461
397:
398: \bibitem{Szczurek:1996ur}
399: A.~Szczurek, M.~Ericson, H.~Holtmann and J.~Speth,
400: %``Testing the meson cloud in the nucleon in Drell-Yan processes,''
401: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A596} (1996) 397
402: %hep-ph/9602213.
403: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A596,397;%%
404: \bibitem {holtmann} H. Holtmann,
405: Dissertation, University of Bonn (1995)
406:
407: \bibitem{sutton}P.J.~Sutton, A.D.~Martin, R.G.~Roberts and W.J.~Stirling,
408: %``Parton distributions for the pion extracted from Drell-Yan and prompt
409: % photon experiments,''
410: Phys. Rev. {\bf D45} (1992) 2349
411: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D45,2349;%%
412: \end{thebibliography}
413: \end{document}
414:
415:
416:
417:
418: