1: \documentstyle[12pt]{article}

2: \setlength{\textwidth}{16cm}

3: \setlength{\textheight}{20.5cm}

4: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-9mm}

5: \addtolength{\topmargin}{-16mm}

6: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

7: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

8: 

9: \setlength{\parskip}{2mm}

10: \newlength{\extraspace}

11: \setlength{\extraspace}{.5mm}

12: \newlength{\extraspaces}

13: \setlength{\extraspaces}{2.5mm}

14: \newcounter{dummy}

15: 

16: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}

17: \addtolength{\abovedisplayskip}{\extraspaces}

18: \addtolength{\belowdisplayskip}{\extraspaces}

19: \addtolength{\abovedisplayshortskip}{\extraspace}

20: \addtolength{\belowdisplayshortskip}{\extraspace}}

21: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

22: 

23: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}

24: \addtolength{\abovedisplayskip}{\extraspaces}

25: \addtolength{\belowdisplayskip}{\extraspaces}

26: \addtolength{\abovedisplayshortskip}{\extraspace}

27: \addtolength{\belowdisplayshortskip}{\extraspace}}

28: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}

29: 

30: \newcommand{\newsection}[1]{

31: \vspace{15mm}

32: \pagebreak[3] \addtocounter{section}{1}

33: \setcounter{equation}{0}

34: \setcounter{subsection}{0}

35: \setcounter{footnote}{0}

36: %\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\protect\numberline{\arabic{section}}{#1}}

37: \begin{flushleft}

38: {\large\bf \thesection. #1}

39: \end{flushleft}

40: \nopagebreak

41: \medskip

42: \nopagebreak}

43: 

44: \newcommand{\newsubsection}[1]{

45: \vspace{1cm}

46: \pagebreak[3] \addtocounter{subsection}{1}

47: %\addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{\protect

48: %\numberline{\arabic{section}.\arabic{subsection}}{#1}}

49: \noindent{\bf \thesubsection. #1}

50: \nopagebreak

51: \vspace{2mm}

52: \nopagebreak}

53: 

54: \newcommand{\Tr}{{\rm Tr}}

55: 

56: \begin{document}

57: 

58: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{.8mm}

59: 

60: {\thispagestyle{empty}

61: %

62: \noindent \hspace{1cm} \hfill HD--THEP--00--55 \hspace{1cm}\\

63: \mbox{}                \hfill IFUP--TH/2000--41 \hspace{1cm}\\

64: \mbox{}                \hfill December 2000 \hspace{1cm}\\

65: 

66: \begin{center}\vspace*{0.4cm}

67: {\large\bf Evolution equations for the effective} \\

68: {\large\bf four-quark interactions in QCD} \\

69: \vspace*{1.0cm}

70: {\large Enrico Meggiolaro} \\

71: \vspace*{0.3cm}{\normalsize {Dipartimento di Fisica, \\ Universit\`a di

72: Pisa, \\ Via Buonarroti 2, \\ I-56127 Pisa, Italy.}} \\

73: \vspace*{0.8cm}

74: {\large Christof Wetterich} \\

75: \vspace*{0.3cm}{\normalsize {Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, \\

76: Universit\"at Heidelberg, \\ Philosophenweg 16, \\ D-69120 Heidelberg,

77: Germany.}} \\

78: \vspace*{1cm}{\large \bf Abstract}

79: \end{center}

80: \noindent

81: A nonperturbative renormalization group equation describes how the

82: momentum dependent four-quark vertex depends on an infrared cutoff.

83: We find a quasilocal one-particle irreducible piece generated by

84: (anomaly-free) multi-gluon exchange. It becomes important at a cutoff

85: scale where scalar and pseudoscalar meson-bound states are expected to

86: play a role. This interaction remains subleading as compared to the

87: effective one-gluon exchange contribution. The local instanton induced

88: four-quark interaction becomes dominant at a scale around 800 MeV.

89: In absence of a gluon mass the strong dependence of the one-gluon

90: exchange on the transferred momentum indicates that the pointlike

91: interactions of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model cannot give a very accurate

92: description of QCD. A pointlike effective four-quark interaction becomes

93: more realistic in case of spontaneous color symmetry breaking.

94: %

95: \vfill\eject

96: 

97: \newsection{Introduction}

98: 

99: \noindent

100: The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model \cite{A} has often been used as a

101: simple model for low-momentum strong interactions. After inclusion of

102: the chiral anomaly it gives a relatively successful description of the

103: chiral symmetry aspects of QCD and the associated properties of mesons

104: \cite{B}. A renormalization-group treatment based on exact flow

105: equations has provided a consistent picture of the chiral aspects of the

106: high temperature phase transition for two light quark flavors

107: \cite{C}. On the other hand it is well known that crucial properties of

108: long-distance QCD such as confinement cannot be accounted for by this

109: model. The NJL-model shares the chiral symmetries of QCD whereas color

110: symmetry appears only as a global symmetry. It is based on a pointlike

111: four-quark interaction

112: \be

113: \Gamma^{\rm (NJL)}_{\Lambda_{\rm NJL}} = \displaystyle\int {\rm d}^4x

114: ~\left\{ i\overline{\psi}^i_a \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi^a_i

115: + 2 \lambda_\sigma^{\rm(NJL)} \left( \overline{\psi}_{Lb}^i \psi^a_{Ri} \right)

116: \left( \overline{\psi}_{Ra}^j \psi^b_{Lj} \right) \right\} ~,

117: \label{1.1}

118: \ee

119: where $\Lambda_{\rm NJL}$ indicates that only fluctuations with momenta

120: $q^2 < \Lambda_{\rm NJL}^2$ should be included in the functional

121: integral. (Here $i,j = 1,2,3$ and $a,b = 1,2,3$ are the color and flavor

122: indices, respectively.) The quartic interaction may be supplemented by a local

123: anomaly term which is sixth order in the quark fields for three light

124: flavors. Also extensions with four-quark interactions in the vector

125: channel have been investigated \cite{B}.

126: 

127: From the perspective of QCD, integrating out the gluon fields as well

128: as all fermion fluctuations with (covariant) momenta larger than

129: $\Lambda_{\rm NJL}$ should lead to an effective action containing pieces

130: like (\ref{1.1}), together with possibly quite complicated

131: additional multi-fermion interactions. The question arises under which

132: circumstances and for which problems the NJL model (\ref{1.1}) can be

133: considered as a good approximation to the multi-quark interactions

134: obtained from QCD. As a first step towards an answer we compute in this

135: paper the four-quark vertex with the index structure appearing in

136: Eq. (\ref{1.1}). An investigation of its momentum dependence serves as a

137: test if the pointlike interaction of the NJL model is reasonable.

138: 

139: Our method to explore the physics at the nonperturbative scale

140: $\Lambda_{\rm NJL}\approx (500-800)$ MeV is based on truncations of

141: the exact nonperturbative renormalization group equation for the

142: effective average action \cite{D,4a,E,6a,Ellwanger94}. An

143: earlier study \cite{Ellwanger-Wetterich94} has followed the running of

144: the momentum-dependent effective four-quark interaction with initial

145: conditions ``mimicking'' QCD. In contrast, we start in this paper at

146: short distances from standard perturbative QCD. We observe that a

147: one-particle-irreducible (1PI) four-quark interaction is generated by box-type

148: diagrams and becomes indeed approximately pointlike for scales of the order

149: $\Lambda_{\rm NJL}$. Nevertheless, the contribution of the one-gluon exchange

150: to the effective four-quark vertex retains the characteristic momentum

151: dependence of a particle exchange in the $t$-channel. This contribution

152: dominates quantitatively over the NJL-interaction. Another pointlike

153: interaction arises from instanton effects. It becomes dominant at a

154: cutoff scale around 800 MeV. We show the different contributions to the

155: four-quark vertex in Fig. 2, where we present the case of massless

156: gluons. For massless gluons a pointlike NJL-interaction of the

157: type (\ref{1.1}) seems not to be a realistic approximation to the effective

158: four-quark vertex in QCD. The hypothesis that gluons acquire a mass

159: $M_V \approx 850$ MeV from spontaneous color symmetry breaking \cite{F}

160: is discussed later (Sect. 5). For massive gluons the approximation

161: of pointlike four-quark interactions can be defended. Nevertheless, any

162: quantitatively reliable approximation should retain the one-gluon exchange

163: in addition to the instanton interaction and the NJL-interaction (\ref{1.1}).

164: This is the setting used for gluon-meson duality \cite{F}.

165: 

166: The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we derive a truncated

167: nonperturbative flow equation for the scalar-exchange-like effective

168: momentum-dependent four-quark interaction in QCD. This effective one-particle

169: irreducible interaction arises from box-type diagrams. The ``box interaction''

170: is relevant for the physics of scalar and pseudoscalar mesons and therefore

171: for spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. In the limit where it becomes

172: independent of the momentum exchanged in the $t$-channel it can be

173: described by meson exchange. In Sect. 3 we study, by numerical methods,

174: the above-mentioned flow equation. We also present the perturbative expansion

175: of the flow equation and its solution and comment about some checks on the

176: validity of our approximations. In Sect. 4 we compare the box interaction

177: and the local instanton-induced four-quark interaction.

178: In Sect. 5 we discuss the hypothesis of spontaneous color symmetry

179: breaking, and a summary and conclusions are drawn in Sect. 6.

180: 

181: \newsection{Nonperturbative flow equations}

182: 

183: \noindent

184: i) EFFECTIVE AVERAGE ACTION

185: 

186: The effective average action $\Gamma_k$ \cite{D} generalizes the

187: generating functional for the 1PI correlation functions $\Gamma$

188: (effective action) for a situation where only fluctuations with

189: (covariant) momenta $q^2 > k^2$ are included in the functional integral.

190: It obtains by introducing an infrared cutoff $\sim k$ into the

191: original functional integral such that for $k\to 0$ one recovers the

192: effective action $\Gamma=\Gamma_{k\to 0}$. For a given $\Gamma_k$ at

193: nonzero $k$ the computation of $\Gamma$ from $\Gamma_k$ involves only

194: the fluctuations with $q^2 < k^2$. This is the setting one needs for the

195: effective NJL model. Our aim is therefore the computation of $\Gamma_k$

196: for $k=\Lambda_{\rm NJL}$. Since we do not know the precise value of

197: $\Lambda_{\rm NJL}$ we will consider arbitrary $k$ in the appropriate

198: nonperturbative range. More precisely, the NJL model is formulated in

199: terms of quark fields. Since we start with the QCD action involving

200: both quarks and gluons, the gluons should be integrated out. This may be

201: done by retaining the infrared cutoff only for the fermionic fields. One

202: then has to solve the gluon field equations obtained from $\Gamma_k$ as

203: a functional of the quark fields and reinsert the solution into

204: $\Gamma_k$ \cite{G,Wetterich96}. Typically, we will not

205: integrate out the gluon fluctuations with momenta smaller than $k$ in

206: this paper. Our results will nevertheless be a good guide for the

207: qualitative characteristics of the effective four-quark interactions.

208: 

209: The effective average action $\Gamma_k [A,c,\overline{c},

210: \psi,\overline{\psi}]$ for gluons $A$, ghosts $c$ and quarks $\psi$

211: obtains by a Legendre transform from a functional integral involving the

212: QCD classical action and an infrared regulator:

213: \be

214: S_k [A,c,\overline{c},\psi,\overline{\psi}] = S_{gauge} [A,c,\overline{c}] +

215: \Delta S_{k,gauge} [A,c,\overline{c}] + S_{F} [A,\psi,\overline{\psi}] +

216: \Delta S_{kF} [\psi,\overline{\psi}] ~.

217: \label{eq2}

218: \ee

219: Here the fermionic action $S_F$ is given by

220: \be

221: S_{F} [A,\psi,\overline{\psi}] = \displaystyle\int {\rm d}^4x~

222: \overline{\psi}^i_a i\gamma^\mu (D_\mu[A])_i^{\ j} \psi^a_j ~,

223: \label{eq3}

224: \ee

225: with $(D_\mu[A])_i^{\ j} = \delta_i^j \partial_\mu - i g A^z_\mu

226: (T^z)_i^{\ j}$ the covariant derivative in the fundamental representation.

227: Here $a$ denotes the flavor and we use two sorts of color indices

228: $z = 1, \ldots, N_c^2 - 1$ and $i,j = 1, \ldots, N_c$ for a gauge group

229: $SU(N_c)$. We consider, for simplicity, $N_f$ massless quarks: $a =

230: 1, \ldots, N_f.$ Throughout this paper we work in four-dimensional

231: Euclidean space, so that the matrices $\gamma^\mu$ in the previous

232: equation are the (hermitean) Euclidean $\gamma$-matrices. The gauge

233: part $S_{gauge}$ consists of three pieces

234: \be

235: S_{gauge} [A,c,\overline{c}] = S_{YM} [A] + S_{gf} [A]

236: + S_{gh} [A,c,\overline{c}] ~,

237: \label{eq4}

238: \ee

239: where $S_{YM}$ is the Yang-Mills action, given by:

240: \be

241: S_{YM} [A] =

242: {1 \over 4} \displaystyle\int {\rm d}^4x~ F^z_{\mu\nu} F^z_{\mu\nu} ~,

243: \label{eq5}

244: \ee

245: with

246: \be F^z_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A^z_\nu - \partial_\nu A^z_\mu

247: + g f^{zyw} A^y_\mu A^w_\nu ~.

248: \label{eq6}

249: \ee

250: The gauge-fixing part $S_{gf}$ reads

251: \be S_{gf} [A] = {1 \over 2\alpha}

252: \displaystyle\int {\rm d}^4x~ \partial_\mu A^z_\mu \partial_\nu A^z_\nu ~,

253: \label{eq7}

254: \ee

255: where $\alpha$ is the gauge parameter, and the ghost action $S_{gh}$

256: is given by

257: \be

258: S_{gh} [A,c,\overline{c}] = \displaystyle\int {\rm d}^4x~

259: \partial_\mu \overline{c}^z (\delta^{zw} \partial_\mu + gf^{zyw} A^y_\mu)

260:  c^w ~.

261: \label{eq8}

262: \ee

263: The infrared cutoff modifies the propagators. For the fermions, the

264: explicit expression $\Delta S_{kF} [\psi,\overline{\psi}]$ reads in

265: momentum space \cite{Ellwanger-Wetterich94,Wetterich96}

266: \be

267: \Delta S_{kF} [\psi,\overline{\psi}] = \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4q \over

268: (2\pi)^4}~ \overline{\psi}^i_a(q) R_{kF}(q) \psi^a_i(q) ~,

269: \label{eq9}

270: \ee

271: where we choose here

272: \ba

273: R_{kF}(q) &=& \gamma^\mu q_\mu

274: r_{kF}(q^2) ~, \nonumber \\

275: r_{kF}(q^2) &=& {{\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2} \over 1 - {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2}} ~.

276: \label{eq10}

277: \ea

278: In particular, the (regularized) free fermion propagator turns out

279: to be:

280: \be

281: \left[ G^{(F)}_{2,k} (q) \right]^{ab}_{ij} = \delta^{ab}

282: \delta_{ij} {\gamma^\mu q_\mu \over q^2 [1 + r_{kF}(q^2)]} =

283: \delta^{ab} \delta_{ij} \gamma^\mu q_\mu {1 - {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2}

284: \over q^2} ~.

285: \label{eq11}

286: \ee

287: The gauge infrared cutoff term $\Delta S_{k,gauge}

288: [A,c,\overline{c}]$ is the sum of a gluon infrared cutoff term and a

289: ghost infrared cutoff term: $\Delta S_{k,gauge} [A,c,\overline{c}] =

290: \Delta S_{kA} [A] + \Delta S_{k,gh} [c,\overline{c}]$. The explicit

291: expression of the gluon infrared cutoff term $\Delta S_{kA} [A]$ is

292: given by \cite{E,Ellwanger94}

293: \be

294: \Delta S_{kA} [A] = \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\int

295: {{\rm d}^4p \over (2\pi)^4}~ A^z_\mu(-p) R^{kA}_{\mu\nu}(p) A^z_\nu(p) ~,

296: \label{eq12}

297: \ee

298: where

299: \be R^{kA}_{\mu\nu} (p)= \left[ \delta_{\mu\nu} + \left( {1 \over \alpha} - 1

300: \right) {p_\mu p_\nu \over p^2} \right] {R}_{kA}(p^2) ~,

301: \label{eq13}

302: \ee

303: with

304: \be {R}_{kA}(p^2)

305:  = p^2 {{\rm e}^{-p^2/k^2} \over 1 - {\rm e}^{-p^2/k^2}} ~.

306: \label{eq14}

307: \ee

308: Finally, the ghost infrared cutoff term

309: $\Delta S_{k,gh} [c,\overline{c}]$ reads

310: \be

311: \Delta S_{k,gh} [c,\overline{c}] = \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4p \over

312: (2\pi)^4}~ \overline{c}^z(-p) R_{k,gh}(p^2) c^z(p) ~,

313: \label{eq15}

314: \ee

315: where

316: \be R_{k,gh}(p^2) = p^2 {{\rm e}^{-p^2/k^2} \over 1 - {\rm e}^{-p^2/k^2}} ~.

317: \label{eq16}

318: \ee

319: With this choice, the regularized ghost propagator becomes

320: \be

321: \left[ G^{(gh)}_{2,k} (q) \right]^{zy} = {\delta^{zy} \over p^2 +

322: R_{k,gh}(p^2)} = \delta^{zy} {1 - {\rm e}^{-p^2/k^2} \over p^2} ~.

323: \label{eq17}

324: \ee

325: 

326: It is well known \cite{E,6a,Ellwanger94} that the presence of the infrared

327: cutoff explicitly breaks gauge and hence BRS invariance: in particular, a

328: gluon mass term appears. A background field identity \cite{E} or modified

329: Slavnov-Taylor identities \cite{Ellwanger94,Ellwanger-et-al.96} can be

330: derived, which are valid for $k > 0$. They guarantee the BRS invariance of

331: the theory for $k \to 0$. Within a perturbative expansion of $\Gamma_k$,

332: one can derive an equation for a $k$-dependent mass term for the gauge fields

333: implied by the modified Slavnov-Taylor identities. For pure Yang-Mills theories

334: (i.e., with no fermions), regularized with the above infrared cutoff term

335: (\ref{eq12})--(\ref{eq14}), one finds the following result, at the

336: leading perturbative order \cite{Ellwanger94,G}:

337: \be

338: m^2_{kA} = {3 N_c

339: g_k^2 \over 128 \pi^2} k^2 (\alpha - 1) ~.

340: \label{eq18}

341: \ee

342: Here $\alpha$ is the gauge parameter, introduced in

343: Eq. (\ref{eq7}), and $g_k$ is the renormalized ($k$-dependent) coupling

344: constant. In the theory with regularized fermions that we are

345: considering, a contribution to the gluon mass also appears from the

346: fermion part of the gluon self-energy.

347: One finds, at the leading perturbative order:

348: \be

349: m^2_{kF} = {3 N_f g_k^2 \over 32

350: \pi^2} k^2 ~.

351: \label{eq19}

352: \ee

353: When including the gluon mass, the regularized gluon propagator

354: becomes, in the Feynman gauge $\alpha = 1$:

355: \be

356: \left[ G^{(A)}_{2,k}(p) \right]^{zy}_{\mu\nu} =

357: {\delta_{\mu\nu} \delta^{zy} \over p^2 + m_k^2 + R_{kA}(p^2)} ~,

358: \label{eq20}

359: \ee

360: where

361: \be

362: m_k^2 = m^2_{kA} + m^2_{kF} ~.

363: \label{eq21}

364: \ee

365: (Indeed, $m^2_{kA} = 0$ at the perturbative order $O(g_k^2)$ in the

366: Feynman gauge.) In other words, using the expression (\ref{eq14}) for

367: $R_{kA}(p^2)$:

368: \be

369: \left[ G^{(A)}_{2,k}(p) \right]^{zy}_{\mu\nu} =

370: \delta_{\mu\nu} \delta^{zy} { 1 - {\rm e}^{-p^2/k^2} \over p^2

371: + m_k^2 ( 1 - {\rm e}^{-p^2/k^2}) } ~.

372: \label{eq22}

373: \ee

374: 

375: We shall concentrate on the part $\Gamma^{(F)}_k [\psi,

376: \overline{\psi}]$ of the effective average action which depends

377: only on the fermion fields:

378: \be

379: \Gamma_k [A,c,\overline{c},\psi,\overline{\psi}] =

380: \Gamma^{(F)}_k

381: [\psi,\overline{\psi}] +\Gamma^{(A)}_k

382: [A,c,\overline{c},\psi,\overline{\psi}] ~.

383: \label{eq23}

384: \ee

385: In general, it can be expanded \cite{G,Wetterich96} as

386: \be

387: \Gamma^{(F)}_k [\psi,\overline{\psi}] =

388: \Gamma^{(F)}_{2,k} [\psi,\overline{\psi}] +

389: \Gamma^{(F)}_{4,k} [\psi,\overline{\psi}] + \ldots ~,

390: \label{eq24}

391: \ee

392: where $\Gamma^{(F)}_{2n,k} [\psi,\overline{\psi}]$ contains terms

393: with $2n$ fermion fields, i.e., of the form $\sim

394: (\overline{\psi}\psi)^n$. For $n = 1$, we have the bilinear

395: term\footnote{We omit in this paper the running of the fermion wave

396: function renormalization.}

397: \be

398: \Gamma^{(F)}_{2,k} [\psi,\overline{\psi}]

399: = \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4q \over (2\pi)^4}~

400: \overline{\psi}^i_a(q) \gamma^\mu q_\mu \psi^a_i(q) ~,

401: \label{eq25}

402: \ee

403: Similar to Refs. \cite{Ellwanger-Wetterich94,Wetterich96}, we

404: truncate the effective action by omitting $\Gamma^{(F)}_{2n,k}

405: [\psi,\overline{\psi}]$ with $n \ge 3$

406: and we concentrate on the behavior of the

407: four-quark interaction $(n=2)$. For $\Gamma^{(F)}_{4,k}

408: [\psi,\overline{\psi}]$ we adopt a chirally-invariant parametrization

409: \cite{Wetterich96}:

410: \ba

411: \lefteqn{ \Gamma^{(F)}_{4,k} [\psi,\overline{\psi}]

412: = - \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4p_1 \over (2 \pi)^4}

413: \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4p_2 \over (2 \pi)^4}

414: \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4p_3 \over (2 \pi)^4} \displaystyle\int {{\rm

415: d}^4p_4 \over (2 \pi)^4}~ (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)} (p_1+p_2-p_3-p_4) }

416: \nonumber \\ & & \times \left\{ \lambda_\sigma (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) {\cal

417: M}_\sigma (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) + \lambda_\rho (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) {\cal

418: M}_\rho (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) \right. \nonumber \\ & & \left. + \lambda_p

419: (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) {\cal M}_p (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) + \ldots \right\} ~,

420: \label{eq26}

421: \ea

422: where the four-fermion couplings $\lambda_i$ have the property:

423: \be

424: \lambda_i (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) = \lambda_i(-p_4,-p_3,-p_2,-p_1) ~,

425: \label{eq27}

426: \ee

427: and the usual invariant quantities $s$ and $t$ read

428: \be\label{2.27AA}

429: s = (p_1 + p_2)^2 = (p_3 + p_4)^2 ~, ~~~t = (p_1 - p_3)^2 = (p_2 - p_4)^2 ~.

430: \ee

431: The

432: four-fermion operators ${\cal M}_i$ are defined as:

433: \ba

434: {\cal M}_\sigma (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) &=&

435: - {1 \over 2} \left[ \overline{\psi}^i_a(-p_1)

436: \psi^b_i(p_2) \right] \left[ \overline{\psi}^j_b(p_4) \psi^a_j(-p_3)

437: \right] \nonumber \\ & & + {1 \over 2} \left[ \overline{\psi}^i_a(-p_1)

438: \gamma^5 \psi^b_i(p_2) \right] \left[ \overline{\psi}^j_b(p_4) \gamma^5

439: \psi^a_j(-p_3) \right] ~; \nonumber \\ {\cal M}_\rho (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4)

440: &=& + {1 \over 4} \left[ \overline{\psi}^i_a(-p_1) \gamma^\mu

441: \psi^b_i(p_2) \right] \left[ \overline{\psi}^j_b(p_4) \gamma_\mu

442: \psi^a_j(-p_3) \right] \nonumber \\ & & + {1 \over 4} \left[

443: \overline{\psi}^i_a(-p_1) \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 \psi^b_i(p_2) \right]

444: \left[ \overline{\psi}^j_b(p_4) \gamma_\mu \gamma^5 \psi^a_j(-p_3)

445: \right] ~; \nonumber \\ {\cal M}_p (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) &=& - {1 \over 2

446: N_c} \left[ \overline{\psi}^i_a(-p_1) \gamma^\mu \psi^a_i(-p_3) \right]

447: \left[ \overline{\psi}^j_b(p_4) \gamma_\mu \psi^b_j(p_2) \right] ~.

448: \label{eq28}

449: \ea

450: If $\lambda_\sigma$ does not depend on $t$, the term

451:  ${\cal M}_\sigma$ describes the exchange of color-singlet,

452: flavor-nonsinglet spin-0

453: scalar quark-antiquark states in the $s$ channel:

454: they correspond to the spin-0 pseudoscalar and scalar mesons.

455: Similarly, ${\cal M}_\rho$ describes

456: the exchange of color-singlet, flavor-nonsinglet spin-1 vector

457:  states in the $s$ channel: they correspond to the spin-1 vector

458: and axial vector

459: mesons. Finally, ${\cal M}_p$ describes the propagation of a color-

460: and flavor-singlet spin-1 vector state in the $t$ channel: these are

461: the quantum numbers of the pomeron.

462: We concentrate on the analysis (both analytical

463: and numerical) of the evolution equation for the scalar-like effective

464: four-fermion coupling $\lambda_\sigma$, which multiplies ${\cal M}_\sigma$

465: and is relevant for the physics of scalar and pseudoscalar mesons and

466: therefore for spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking.

467: The dots in Eq. (\ref{eq26})

468: stand for more complicated momentum structures, the contribution of the

469: chiral anomaly (to be discussed in Sect. 4) and terms breaking

470: the chiral flavor symmetry.

471: 

472: \noindent

473: ii) FLOW EQUATIONS

474: 

475: The exact flow equation for $\Gamma_k$ can be written as a formal derivative

476: of a renormalization group improved one-loop expression \cite{D}

477: \be

478: \partial_k \Gamma_k = {1 \over 2}

479: {\rm STr} \left[ \tilde\partial_k \ln (\Gamma^{(2)}_k + R_k) \right] ~,

480: \label{eq29}

481: \ee

482: where $\Gamma^{(2)}_k$ is the second functional

483: derivative with respect to the fields and $\tilde\partial_k$ acts only on

484: $R_k$ and not on $\Gamma^{(2)}_k$, i.e.:

485: \be

486: \tilde\partial_k \equiv {\partial R_k \over \partial k} {\partial \over

487: \partial R_k} ~.

488: \label{eq30}

489: \ee

490: Here $R_k$ is to be interpreted as a matrix

491: $R_k = {\rm diag}~ (R_{kA},R_{k,gh},R_{kF})$.

492: The trace involves a summation over indices and a momentum integration

493: and ``STr'' indicates an additional minus sign for the fermionic part.

494: Flow equations for $n$-point functions follow from appropriate

495: functional derivatives of Eq. (\ref{eq29}) with respect to the fields.

496: For their derivation it is sufficient to evaluate the corresponding

497: one-loop expressions in presence of the

498: infrared cutoff (with the vertices and propagators derived from

499: $\Gamma_k$) and then to take a formal $\tilde\partial_k$ derivative. This

500: permits the use of (one-loop) Feynman diagrams and standard

501: perturbative techniques.

502: 

503: Using these techniques, we have derived the flow equation for the

504: four-fermion (1PI) coupling $\lambda_\sigma$ by computing the relevant

505: one-loop diagrams from the effective average action $\Gamma_k

506: [A,c,\overline{c},\psi,\overline{\psi}]$: these diagrams are shown in Fig. 1.

507: Our truncation includes only two vertices: i) the usual

508: quark-gluon vertex and ii) the four-fermion (1PI) vertex

509: $\lambda_\sigma {\cal M}_\sigma$. We have

510: extracted from the relevant diagrams the contributions to the

511: $\sigma$-type four-fermion vertex ${\cal M}_\sigma$ and then

512: performed a formal $\tilde\partial_k$ derivative in the sense of

513: Eq. (\ref{eq30}). In this picture (which is different from the one used in

514: Ref. \cite{Ellwanger-Wetterich94}) the gluons are not integrated

515: out. Therefore, in addition to the contributions to the flow equation

516: coming from the infrared cutoff in the fermion lines inside a given Feynman

517: diagram, one has to consider also the ones from the infrared cutoff in

518: the gluon lines.

519: 

520: \noindent

521: iii) TRUNCATIONS AND THE FLOW EQUATION FOR $\lambda_\sigma$

522: 

523: In general, the function $\lambda_\sigma$ can depend on six independent

524: Lorentz-invariant products of the momenta

525: $\lambda_\sigma = \lambda_\sigma (s,t,p_1^2,p_2^2,p_3^2,p_4^2)$.

526: We have derived the evolution equation of $\lambda_\sigma$ for the

527: particular configuration of momenta $(p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) = (p,-p,-p,p)$,

528: so that $s = 0$, $t = 4 p^2$. In order to simplify the momentum structure,

529: we have made a further truncation, namely that $\lambda_\sigma$ depends only

530: on the invariant $t$: $\lambda_\sigma \simeq \lambda_\sigma (t)$.

531: Furthermore, our truncation restricts the quark-gluon interactions to

532: minimal coupling with a coupling constant depending on the gluon

533: momentum. We use the classical form of the (regularized) gluon

534: propagator\footnote{See \cite{Ellwanger-et-al.96,Bergerhoff} for an

535: investigation of the $q^2$-dependence of the gluon propagator by

536: means of nonperturbative flow equations.}.

537: Our truncation omits the influence of all multiquark interactions except those

538: proportional ${\cal M}_\sigma$ (\ref{eq28}).

539: Moreover, we neglect the possible effects from a $q^2$- and $k$-dependent

540: fermion wave-function renormalization $Z_{\psi,k}$.

541: 

542: With these approximations, we find the following result:

543: \ba

544: \lefteqn{ k\partial_k \lambda_\sigma (t) =

545: } \nonumber \\ & & = -{16 N_c \over k^2} \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4q

546: \over (2 \pi)^4} \left\{4\pi^2 \left( 1 - {3 \over 2 N_c^2} \right)

547: \alpha_k((p-q)^2) \alpha_k((p+q)^2) \right. \nonumber \\ &

548: & \times q^2 F_k(q) G_k(p-q) \left[ {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2} G_k(p+q) +F_k(q)

549: \Delta_k(p+q) \right] \nonumber \\

550:  & &- \pi\alpha_k((p+q)^2) q^2

551:  \left({1 \over 2 N_c^2}

552: \lambda_\sigma (4p^2) \left[ {\rm

553: e}^{-q^2/k^2} F_k(2p+q) G_k(p+q) \right.\right. \nonumber \\

554:  & & \left. + {\rm

555: e}^{-(2p+q)^2/k^2} F_k(q) G_k(p+q) + F_k(q) F_k(2p+q) \Delta_k(p+q)

556: \right] \nonumber \\

557: & & - \left.\left( 2 - {3 \over 2 N_c^2} \right)

558: \lambda_\sigma ((p-q)^2) F_k(q)

559:  \left[ 2{\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2} G_k(p+q) + F_k(q)

560: \Delta_k(p+q) \right]\right) \nonumber \\

561: & & \Biggl. + \lambda_\sigma

562: ((p-q)^2) \lambda_\sigma ((p+q)^2) q^2 {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2}

563: F_k(q) \Biggr\} ~.

564: \label{eq36}

565: \ea

566: Here we use the following shorthands:

567: \ba

568: F_k(q) &=& { 1 \over q^2 [1 + r_{kF}(q^2)]} =

569: { 1 - {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2} \over q^2 } ~; \nonumber \\

570: G_k(q) &=& { 1 \over q^2 + m_k^2 + {R}_{kA}(q^2) }

571: = { 1 - {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2} \over q^2 + m_k^2(1 - {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2}) } ~;

572: \nonumber \\

573: \Delta_k(q) &=& { (q^2)^2 {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2} \over

574: [ q^2 + m_k^2 (1 - {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2}) ]^2 } ~,

575: \label{eq37}

576: \ea

577: and employ

578: \ba

579: \widetilde{\partial}_k F_k(q) &=& {\partial

580: r_{kF}(q^2) \over \partial k} {\partial F_k(q) \over

581: \partial r_{kF}(q^2)} = -{2 \over k^3} {\rm e}^{-q^2/k^2} ~,

582: \nonumber \\

583:  \widetilde{\partial}_k G_k(q) &=& {\partial

584: {R}_{kA}(q^2) \over \partial k} {\partial G_k(q) \over

585: \partial {R}_{kA}(q^2)} = -{2 \over k^3} \Delta_k(q) ~.

586: \label{eq39}

587: \ea

588: The first two terms in the r.h.s. of Eq. (\ref{eq36}) (i.e., those proportional

589: to $\sim \alpha_k^2$ or $\sim \alpha_k \lambda_\sigma$) reflect the exchange of

590: gauge bosons [see Fig. 1a) $\div$ 1c)].

591: The last term (i.e., the one proportional to $\sim \lambda_\sigma^2$)

592: corresponds to the result of Ref. \cite{Ellwanger-Wetterich94} for the

593: truncation $\lambda_\sigma = \lambda_\sigma(t)$ [see Fig. 1d)].

594: 

595: \newpage\noindent

596: iv) RG-IMPROVEMENT OF THE GAUGE COUPLING

597: 

598: The flow equation (\ref{eq36}) is ``RG-improved'' in the sense that we use

599: everywhere a ``running'' coupling constant $\alpha_k(q^2) =

600: g_k^2(q^2)/4\pi$. Instead of computing $\alpha_k(q^2)$ by its own flow

601: equation, we use here an ``ad hoc'' relation to the two-loop running

602: gauge coupling:

603: \be

604: \alpha(\mu)= {1 \over 4\pi\beta_0 \ln (\mu^2/\Lambda^2_{QCD}) }

605: \left[ 1 - {\beta_1 \over \beta_0^2} { \ln [ \ln (\mu^2/\Lambda^2_{QCD}) ]

606: \over \ln (\mu^2/\Lambda^2_{QCD}) } \right] ~.

607: \label{eq40}

608: \ee

609: Here $\beta_0$ and $\beta_1$ are the two

610: first coefficients of the QCD $\beta$-function

611: \be

612: \beta (g) = \mu {dg \over d\mu } = -\beta_0 g^3 -\beta_1 g^5 + \ldots ~,

613: \label{eq41}

614: \ee

615: which, for a gauge group $SU(N_c)$ and $N_f$ quark flavors, are given by:

616: \be

617: \beta_0 = {1 \over (4\pi)^2} \Biggl[ { 11 N_c - 2 N_f

618: \over 3 } \Biggr] ~,~~~ \beta_1 = {1 \over (4\pi)^4} \left[

619: {34 \over 3} N_c^2 - \left( { 13 N_c^2 - 3 \over 3 N_c } \right) N_f \right] ~,

620: \label{eq42}

621: \ee

622: such that, for $N_c = 3$ and $N_f = 3$:

623: \be

624: \alpha(\mu) = { 4\pi \over 9 \ln (\mu^2/\Lambda^2_{QCD}) }

625: \left[ 1 - {64 \over 81} { \ln [ \ln (\mu^2/\Lambda^2_{QCD}) ] \over

626: \ln (\mu^2/\Lambda^2_{QCD}) } \right] ~.

627: \label{eq43}

628: \ee

629: For the relation between $q^2$, $k^2$ and $\mu^2$, we use two different

630: {\it ans\"atze}: (A) $\mu^2 = q^2 + k^2$, and (B) $\mu^2 = k^2$.

631: The first one (A) is motivated by the fact that both $q^2$ and $k^2$ act as

632: effective infrared cutoffs such that essentially the larger one counts.

633: The second one (B) neglects the dependence of the vertex on the gluon momentum.

634: The overall mass scale needs in addition the unknown ratio between

635: $\Lambda_{QCD}$ in the scheme relevant for the flow equations (ERGE-scheme)

636: to the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme. We therefore report all quantities

637: with dimension of $[mass]^n$ in units of $({\rm GeV} \cdot \Lambda_{QCD} /

638: \Lambda^{(3)}_{\overline{\rm MS}})^n$, where

639: $\Lambda^{(3)}_{\overline{\rm MS}}$ is the fundamental mass scale of QCD

640: in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ renormalization scheme (two-loop), with $N_f = 3$.

641: The experimental value $\alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.118(3)$ corresponds to

642: $\Lambda^{(3)}_{\overline{\rm MS}} \simeq 360$ MeV.

643: For comparison we will also use a fixed value of $\alpha$

644: corresponding to the scale $\mu = k_c = 1.5 \cdot \Lambda_{QCD} /

645: \Lambda^{(3)}_{\overline{\rm MS}}$ GeV, i.e., $\alpha_{k_c} \simeq 0.34$

646: \quad\

647: [{\it ansatz} (C)].

648: 

649: \newpage\noindent

650: v) ONE-GLUON-EXCHANGE CONTRIBUTION

651: 

652: The term $\lambda_\sigma {\cal M}_\sigma$ describes only the contribution to

653: the effective $\sigma$-type vertex coming from the 1PI graphs.

654: A four-quark interaction with a similar structure arises also

655: from one-gluon exchange which is not one-particle irreducible and

656: therefore does not contribute\footnote{In the

657: formulation \cite{Ellwanger-Wetterich94,G,Wetterich96} the one-gluon

658: exchange part is included in $\lambda_\sigma$.} to $\lambda_\sigma$

659: in the present formulation. Indeed, the four-fermion vertex induced by the

660: one-gluon exchange is given by \cite{Wetterich96}

661: \ba

662: \displaystyle \Delta\Gamma^{(1g)}=-\int {{\rm d}^4p_1

663: \over (2 \pi)^4} \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4p_2 \over (2 \pi)^4}

664: \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4p_3 \over (2 \pi)^4} \displaystyle\int {{\rm

665: d}^4p_4 \over (2 \pi)^4} (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)} (p_1+p_2-p_3-p_4) \times

666: & \nonumber \\ \times 2\pi\alpha_k((p_1-p_3)^2) \cdot G_k(p_1-p_3)

667: \cdot {\cal M} (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) ~,

668: \label{eq48}

669: \ea

670: where

671: \be

672: {\cal M} (p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4) =

673: \left[ \overline{\psi}^i_a(-p_1) \gamma^\mu (T^z)_i^{\ j} \psi^a_j(-p_3)

674: \right] \left[ \overline{\psi}^k_b(p_4) \gamma_\mu (T_z)_k^{\ l}

675: \psi^b_l(p_2) \right] ~.

676: \label{eq49}

677: \ee

678: By an appropriate Fierz transformation, one can show that

679: \be

680: {\cal M} = {\cal M}_\sigma + {\cal M}_\rho + {\cal M}_p ~,

681: \label{eq50}

682: \ee

683: where ${\cal M}_\sigma$, ${\cal M}_\rho$ and ${\cal M}_p$ have been

684: defined in Eq. (\ref{eq28}).

685: The total contribution in the $\sigma$-channel is therefore

686: $\sim (\lambda_\sigma+\lambda_\sigma^{(1g)}){\cal M}_\sigma$ with

687: \be

688: \lambda^{(1g)}_\sigma (t) = 2\pi\alpha_k(t)

689: {1 - e^{-t/k^2} \over t + m^2_k (1 - e^{-t/k^2})} ~.

690: \label{eq51}

691: \ee

692: This contribution remains nonlocal for $k\to 0$ if $m^2_k$ tends to zero in

693: this limit. The size of the 1PI contribution $\lambda_\sigma$ should be

694: compared with the effective coupling (\ref{eq51}).

695: 

696: \newpage

697: \newsection{Scale dependence of the four-quark interaction}

698: 

699: \noindent

700: i) PERTURBATION THEORY

701: 

702: In perturbation theory the 1PI four-quark interactions arise

703: from ``box'' and ``cross'' two-gluon exchange diagrams [see Fig. 1a) and 1b)].

704: For the part with the structure ${\cal M}_\sigma$ we find

705: the perturbative value $(t=4p^2)$

706: \ba

707: \lambda_\sigma^{(p)}(t) = 16\pi^2 N_c

708: \left( 1 - {3 \over 2 N_c^2} \right) \displaystyle\int {{\rm d}^4q \over

709: (2 \pi)^4} \alpha_k((p-q)^2) \alpha_k((p+q)^2)

710: \nonumber \\ \times q^2 [F_k(q)]^2 G_k(p-q) G_k(p+q) ~.

711: \label{eq45}

712: \ea

713: In particular, for $t = 0$ and momentum-independent $\alpha_k$

714: [{\it ansatz} (B)], the momentum integration can be performed explicitly.

715: One finds, for $N_c = 3$ and in the limit of a vanishing gluon mass term

716: $m^2_k = 0$:

717: \be

718: \lambda_\sigma^{(p)}(t = 0) = {5 \alpha_k^2 \over k^2} \cdot K_\sigma ~.

719: \label{3.1AA}

720: \ee

721: Here the constant

722: \ba

723: K_\sigma &=& 8\pi^2k^2 \int \frac{{\rm d}^4q}{(2\pi)^4}

724: q^2 [F_k(q)]^2 [G_k^0(q)]^2 ~, \nonumber \\

725: G_k^0(q) &=& G_k(q) \vert_{m_k^2 = 0} = {1 \over q^2 + R_{kA}(q^2)}

726: = {1-e^{-q^2/k^2} \over q^2} ~,

727: \label{3.1BB}

728: \ea

729: depends on the precise form\footnote{For the fermion

730: cutoff used in \cite{4a} one has to replace

731: $F^2\to F/q^2$.} of the infrared cutoff. For our choice

732: [see Eq. (\ref{eq14})] one finds

733: \be

734: K_\sigma = 2 \cdot [5 \ln 2 - 3 \ln 3] \simeq 0.34 ~.

735: \label{3.1CC}

736: \ee

737: For the purpose of comparison with our results in the following figures,

738: we quote the value corresponding to $k = k_c = 1.5 \cdot \Lambda_{QCD} /

739: \Lambda^{(3)}_{\overline{\rm MS}}$ GeV ($\alpha_{k_c} \simeq 0.34)$:

740: \be

741: \lambda_\sigma^{(p)}(t = 0) \vert_{k = k_c} \simeq 8.7 \times 10^{-2}

742: ~\left( {\rm GeV} \cdot \Lambda_{QCD} /

743: \Lambda^{(3)}_{\overline{\rm MS}} \right)^{-2} ~.

744: \label{3.1DD}

745: \ee

746: 

747: In order to get a feeling for the relative strength of the $\sigma$-channel

748: as compared to other types of 1PI four-quark interactions, we also present

749: here the full one-loop 1PI interaction for zero external momenta (i.e.,

750: $s = 0,~t = 0$).

751: For an arbitrary gauge parameter $\alpha$ one obtains the effective

752: (local) four-quark interaction

753: \ba

754: {\cal L}^{(F)(p)}_{4,k} &=& -\frac{g^4_k}{64\pi^2k^2}K_\sigma\nonumber\\

755: &&\left\{\left(\frac{9}{4}+\frac{9}{2}\alpha+\frac{3}{4}

756: \alpha^2\right)\left[\left(

757: \overline{\psi}^i_a\gamma^\mu\psi^a_j\right)\left(\overline{\psi}^j_b

758: \gamma_\mu\psi^b_i\right)\right.\right.

759: -\frac{1}{3}\left.\left(\overline{\psi}^i_a\gamma^\mu\psi_i^a\right)\left(

760: \overline{\psi}^j_b\gamma_\mu\psi^b_j\right)\right]\nonumber\\

761: &&-\frac{5}{2}\left(\overline{\psi}^i_a\gamma^\mu\gamma^5\psi^a_j\right)

762: \left(\overline{\psi}^j_b\gamma_\mu\gamma^5\psi^b_i\right)

763: \left.-\frac{11}{6}\left(\overline{\psi}^i_a\gamma^\mu\gamma^5\psi^a_i\right)

764: \left(\overline{\psi}^j_b\gamma_\mu\gamma^5\psi^b_j\right)\right\} ~.

765: \label{3.1EE}

766: \ea

767: We note that the first term has precisely the structure of the

768: one-gluon-exchange diagram $\sim{\cal M}$ (\ref{eq49}). We also

769: emphasize that there are several ways how to Fierz-transform

770: the expression (\ref{3.1EE}). Our truncation of keeping only

771: $\lambda_\sigma$ corresponds more precisely to state which

772: invariants are neglected.

773: 

774: It is straightforward to verify that the first term in the flow

775: equation (\ref{eq36}) for $\lambda_\sigma$ precisely corresponds

776: to the formal $\tilde\partial_k$ derivative of the

777: perturbative value (\ref{eq45}). For $t = 0$ the contribution

778: to $k\partial_k\lambda_\sigma$ obtains by replacing in

779: the r.h.s. of Eq. (\ref{3.1AA}) the constant $K_\sigma$ by

780: $-2 K_\sigma \simeq -0.68 ~$.

781: 

782: \noindent

783: ii) INITIAL CONDITION FOR THE FLOW EQUATION

784: 

785: In order to solve explicitly the flow equation (\ref{eq36}), we need to

786: fix the initial condition, i.e., the value of $\lambda_\sigma (t)$ at a

787: certain ``initial'' value $k = k_c$.

788: We assume that at the scale $k = k_c = 1.5 \cdot \Lambda_{QCD} /

789: \Lambda^{(3)}_{\overline{\rm MS}}$ GeV, where perturbation theory is

790: assumed to work well, the value of $\lambda_\sigma (t) \vert_{k = k_c}$

791: is well approximated by the leading perturbative contribution.

792: In other words, we use as initial condition for the flow

793: equation (\ref{eq36}):

794: \be

795: \lambda_\sigma(t) \vert_{k = k_c} = \lambda_\sigma^{(p)} (t) \vert_{k = k_c} ~.

796: \label{eq46}

797: \ee

798: We have then solved numerically the flow equation (\ref{eq36}) with

799: the initial condition (\ref{eq45}), (\ref{eq46}).

800: 

801: \noindent

802: iii) RESULTS

803: 

804: In Fig. 2 we plot the resulting $\lambda_\sigma (t)$ (for $N_c = 3$ and

805: $N_f = 3$) as a function of $k$, for the particular case $t = 0$. The

806: {\it continuous} line corresponds to

807: a running gauge coupling according to the {\it ansatz} (A).

808: The {\it dotted} line in the same figure represents

809: $\lambda_\sigma (t = 0)$ as a function of $k$ with the initial condition

810: $\lambda_\sigma (t) \vert_{k = k_c} = 0$, instead

811: of (\ref{eq45}), (\ref{eq46}). We observe the insensitivity with

812: respect to the precise choice of the initial condition.

813: The {\it dot-dashed} line is the value

814: of $\lambda_\sigma (t = 0)$ as a function of $k$ with the initial

815: condition (\ref{eq45}), (\ref{eq46}), but using everywhere (both in the

816: flow equation and in the initial condition) the momentum-independent

817: coupling constant $\alpha_k$ defined by Eq. (\ref{eq43}) with

818: $\mu^2 = k^2$ [{\it ansatz} (B)]. We observe a strong increase of

819: $\lambda_\sigma$ at a scale $k\approx 400-600$ MeV.

820: 

821: Comparison with perturbation theory is made in

822: Fig. 3. We plot the value of $\lambda_\sigma^{(p)} (t = 0)$,

823: defined by Eq. (\ref{eq45}), as a function of $k$ ({\it dotted} line).

824: The {\it dashed} line represents the value of $\lambda_\sigma^{(p)} (t = 0)$,

825: defined by Eq. (\ref{eq45}), as a function of $k$, but using the

826: momentum-independent coupling constant $\alpha_k$ defined by Eq.

827: (\ref{eq43}) with $\mu^2 = k^2$ [{\it ansatz} (B)].

828: In this case, the integration in Eq. (\ref{eq45}) can be performed explicitly

829: (neglecting also the gluon mass $m_k$ appearing in the function $G_k$) and one

830: obtains (for $N_c = 3$) the result (\ref{3.1AA})--(\ref{3.1CC}).

831: Finally, the {\it dot-dashed} line is obtained by using this

832: expression for $\lambda_\sigma^{(p)} (t = 0)$, but using the

833: fixed coupling constant $\alpha_k = \alpha_{k = k_c} \simeq 0.34$

834: [{\it ansatz} (C)].

835: 

836: In Fig. 4 we plot $\lambda_\sigma (t)$ ({\it continuous} line) as a

837: function of $t$ at the fixed value $k = 0.42 \cdot \Lambda_{QCD} /

838: \Lambda^{(3)}_{\overline{\rm MS}}$ GeV. At this scale the approximation

839: of the box-type four-quark interaction by a local NJL-vertex

840: (\ref{1.1}) is reasonable.

841: 

842: \noindent

843: iv) CHECKING THE APPROXIMATIONS

844: 

845: When inserting the effective action (\ref{eq23}), (\ref{eq26}) into the

846: flow equation (\ref{eq29}) and extracting only the contributions to the

847: $\sigma$-type four-fermion vertex ${\cal M}_\sigma$, one finds that in

848: the flow equation (\ref{eq36}) for the effective

849: coupling $\lambda_\sigma$ also other pieces proportional to $\sim

850: \lambda_i \lambda_j$ appear: these additional pieces are generated by

851: the four-fermion structures ${\cal M}_\rho$ and ${\cal M}_p$ and they

852: are put to zero in our truncation. Since only the retained contribution

853: $\sim \lambda_\sigma^2$ is proportional to the color factor $N_c$,

854: while all other terms of the form $\sim \lambda_i \lambda_j$ are

855: suppressed, our truncated evolution equation becomes exact in the

856: leading order in a $1/N_c$ expansion. Moreover, we have checked that

857: a multiplication of the term proportional to

858: $\lambda_\sigma^2$ in the flow equation (\ref{eq36}) by a factor

859: of ten does not strongly influence the results. The solution $\lambda_\sigma

860: (t)$ of the modified flow equation

861: is very near to the real solution of Eq. (\ref{eq36}) reported in

862: Figs. 2, 3 and 4. In other words, the terms of the form $\sim \lambda_i

863: \lambda_j$ do not seem to play a fundamental role in the flow equation

864: at the scales of $k$ reported here.

865: Neglecting the contributions from the $\rho$ and pomeron

866: channels does therefore not seem to be a too brutal approximation.

867: 

868: We have also tried to test the approximation involved in using the

869: two-loop expression for the running coupling constant. In order to do

870: this, we have considered a different version of the running coupling

871: constant in the flow equation (\ref{eq36}): we have taken for

872: $g_k^2(p^2)$ the usual two-loop expression when $g_k^2(p^2)|_{2-loop} <

873: 10$, while $g_k^2(p^2) = 10$ when $g_k^2(p^2)|_{2-loop} > 10$. In other

874: words, the new $g_k^2(p^2)$ stops running when it reaches the value

875: $g^2_k = 10$. Also in this case, the solution $\lambda_\sigma (t)$ of

876: the modified flow equation does not show any dramatic difference when

877: compared to the solution of Eq. (\ref{eq36}) reported in Figs. 2, 3

878: and 4.

879: 

880: Finally, since the one-particle irreducible four-point function

881: remains small in the momentum range of interest, a neglection

882: of the higher-order anomaly-free effective multiquark vertices

883: seems well motivated.

884: 

885: \newsection{Comparison with the instanton contribution}

886: 

887: \noindent

888: In Eq. (\ref{eq26}) we have chosen to parametrize $\Gamma^{(F)}_{4,k}

889: [\psi,\overline{\psi}]$ by using $U(N_f) \otimes U(N_f)$ chirally

890: symmetric operators ${\cal M}_\sigma$, ${\cal M}_\rho$ and ${\cal

891: M}_p$. In this section we supplement

892: the effect of the chiral anomaly. We add to the

893: effective four-quark interactions an

894: anomaly-induced term \cite{tHooft76}, which is $SU(2)

895: \otimes SU(2) \otimes U(1)_V$ invariant, but not $U(1)_A$ invariant.

896: 

897: In particular, for a nonvanishing mass $m_s$ of the strange quark,

898: the instanton-induced fermion

899: effective action for $N_f = 3$ includes a four-fermion contribution of

900: the form \cite{SVZ80}

901: \be

902: \Gamma^{(4)}_{inst} = \int {\rm d}^4 x~ \lambda^{(N_c)}_{inst} {\cal

903: O}^{(N_c)}_{4,inst} (x) ~,

904: \label{eq52}

905: \ee

906: where

907: \ba

908: \lefteqn{ {\cal O}^{(N_c)}_{4,inst} = \left( \delta^j_i

909: \delta^l_k - {1 \over N_c} \delta^l_i \delta^j_k \right) \times }

910: \nonumber \\

911:  & & \times \left\{ [\overline{u}^i u_j] [\overline{d}^k

912: d_l] - [\overline{u}^i d_j] [\overline{d}^k u_l] + [\overline{u}^i

913: \gamma^5 u_j] [\overline{d}^k \gamma^5 d_l] - [\overline{u}^i \gamma^5

914: d_j] [\overline{d}^k \gamma^5 u_l] \right\} ~,

915: \label{eq53}

916: \ea

917: This operator comes from $\Delta L^{(N_c)}_{3,I} + \Delta

918: L^{(N_c)}_{3,A}$, where $I =$ instanton and $A =$ anti-instanton, and

919: the effective coupling constant involves an integral over instanton

920: sizes $\rho$:

921: \ba

922: \lambda^{(N_c)}_{inst} &=& {(1.34)^3 m_s \over 2 (N_c^2 -1) }

923: \displaystyle\int_0^{1/k} {{\rm d}\rho \over \rho^4}~ d^{(N_c)}_0 (\rho)

924: (4\pi^2\rho^3)^2 \left(\frac{\alpha(1/\rho)}{\alpha(\overline{\mu})}

925: \right)^{-\frac{1}{4\pi^2\beta_0}} \nonumber \\

926:  & = & 0.35 \cdot {m_s \over k^3} \displaystyle\int_0^{1} {\rm d}z~ z^2

927: \left(\frac{\alpha(k/z)}{\alpha(\overline{\mu})}\right)^{-\frac{4}{9}}

928: \left[ {2\pi \over \alpha(k/z)} \right]^{6} \exp \left[ -{2\pi

929: \over \alpha(k/z)} \right] ~.

930: \label{eq54}

931: \ea

932: Here $\overline{\mu} = 1$ GeV is the renormalization scale for the

933: fermion fields and \cite{SVZ80,Shuryak82}:

934: \be d^{(N_c)}_0 (\rho) =

935: C_{N_c} \left[ {2\pi \over \alpha(1/\rho)} \right]^{2 N_c} \exp

936: \left[ -{2\pi \over \alpha(1/\rho)} \right] ~,

937: \label{eq55}

938: \ee

939: with

940: \be C_{N_c} = {4.6 \exp (-1.68

941: N_c) \over

942: \pi^2 (N_c - 1)! (N_c - 2)!} ~.

943: \label{eq56}

944: \ee

945: For $\alpha(1/\rho)$ we take the (two-loop) running coupling

946: constant (\ref{eq40}) with $\mu=1/\rho$.

947: For the mass of the strange quark we have

948: used the value $m_s \simeq 150$ MeV. For $N_c = 3$ and $N_f = 3$

949: one has $C_3 \simeq 1.51 \times 10^{-3}$ and we use (\ref{eq43}). We

950: have integrated the instanton length

951: scale $\rho$ between $0$ and $1/k$, since $k$ is an infrared cutoff

952: momentum scale. The {\it long-dashed} line in Fig. 2 is the value of

953: $\lambda^{(3)}_{inst}$ (which is $t$-independent!) as a function of $k$.

954: One concludes that the instanton-induced four-quark interaction

955: becomes dominant at a scale $k$ around (somewhat below) 800 MeV.

956: 

957: \newsection{Spontaneous color symmetry breaking?}

958: 

959: \noindent

960: It has been suggested \cite{F} that confinement can be described by the

961: Higgs phenomenon. In this picture the expectation value of a color-octet

962: quark-antiquark condensate $\chi_0$ gives a mass to the gluons

963: \be

964: M^2 = g^2_{eff} \chi_0^2 ~.

965: \label{5.1}

966: \ee

967: In the limit of three massless quarks the mass of all eight gluons

968: is equal. Due to spontaneous color symmetry breaking the physical

969: electric charge of the gluons is integer and

970: they carry precisely the quantum numbers of the known vector

971: mesons\footnote{See \cite{F} for a discussion of the singlet vector

972: meson state.} $\rho,K^*,\omega$. For this reason $M$

973: is identified with the average mass of the vector meson octet

974: $M_V \approx 850$ MeV. Confinement arises in this picture in complete

975: analogy to magnetic flux tubes in superconductors. A nonlinear

976: reformulation of the Higgs phenomenon preserves manifestly

977: the gauge symmetry and shows the equivalence of the confinement

978: and Higgs pictures \cite{Dual}. Instanton-induced six-quark

979: interactions destabilize the ``color symmetric vacuum'' and

980: have been proposed as the origin of dynamical color symmetry

981: breaking.

982: 

983: The results in the preceeding sections correspond

984: to a vanishing octet condensate $\chi_0 = 0$. In order to get

985: some information on the $\chi_0$-dependence of the effective

986: four-quark interactions we present in this section results for a

987: nonvanishing value of the induced gluon mass term $M^2_k$. Since

988: the precise relation between $g_{eff}$ in Eq. (\ref{5.1}) and the running

989: gauge coupling in our approximation ({\ref{eq43})

990: is nontrivial \cite{F}, we present results for two

991: different settings.

992: 

993: For the first setting (A) we simply add a constant gluon mass term

994: $M_k^2 = M_V^2 = (850~ {\rm MeV})^2$ in the propagator such that:

995: \be

996: m_k^2 = M_V^2 + m^2_{kA} + m^2_{kF} ~.

997: \label{5.2}

998: \ee

999: Moreover, we use a momentum-dependent running gauge coupling $\alpha (\mu)$,

1000: with $\mu^2 = q^2 + k^2 + M_V^2$.

1001: For the second setting (B) we work at constant $\chi_0 = 140$ MeV with a

1002: running perturbative gauge coupling (\ref{eq40}) $g^2_k = 4\pi\alpha$,

1003: i.e., $M_k^2 = g^2_k \chi_0^2$. This replaces the gluon mass term in

1004: Eq. (\ref{eq21}) by

1005: \be

1006: m^2_k = g^2_k \chi_0^2 + m^2_{kA} + m^2_{kF} ~.

1007: \label{5.3}

1008: \ee

1009: In this case, we use a momentum-dependent running gauge coupling

1010: $\alpha (\mu)$, with $\mu^2 = q^2 + k^2 + \overline{M}_k^2$, where

1011: $\overline{M}_k^2 = 4 \pi \alpha(\overline{\mu} = 600 ~{\rm MeV})

1012: \cdot \chi_0^2$.

1013: 

1014: In Figs. 5 and 6 we compare $\lambda_\sigma$ and $\lambda_\sigma^{(1g)}$ for

1015: different running gluon mass terms $m_k^2$ given by (\ref{5.2}) (A),

1016: (\ref{5.3}) (B), and (\ref{eq21}) (C). We observe that the gluon mass

1017: damps the increase of both $\lambda_\sigma$ and $\lambda_\sigma^{(1g)}$.

1018: On the other hand, a pointlike approximation to the anomaly-free

1019: four-quark interaction becomes now better justified, especially

1020: for (A).

1021: Thanks to the additional infrared cutoff

1022: $M_k^2$ the flow can formally be followed towards

1023: $k \to 0$ without encountering a problem from a diverging gauge coupling:

1024: the growth of the gauge coupling is reduced by the presence of the

1025: (nonvanishing) gluon mass term.

1026: One should not expect, however, that our results remain valid for very

1027: small $k$. Indeed, it has been argued that the quark wave

1028: function renormalization $Z_{\psi,k}$ multiplying the

1029: quark kinetic term\footnote{This wave function has been set

1030: $Z_{\psi,k}=1$ for the present work.} (\ref{eq25}) drops by a factor

1031: of about three as $k$ reaches a few hundred MeV. This reflects the binding

1032: of three quarks into a baryon. As a result, the running gauge coupling

1033: $g_k$ increases by a factor of three and the renormalized

1034: four-quark couplings $\lambda_\sigma$ and $\lambda_\sigma^{(1g)}$ become

1035: multiplied by a factor of nine.

1036: The running of the wave function renormalization

1037: becomes therefore important for low $k$. We have not

1038: included it here (except for its contribution to the

1039: running gauge coupling), and this is the reason why we do not explore

1040: very low values of $k$ even though the infrared problems are formally absent

1041: in presence of a nonzero gluon mass.

1042: 

1043: We finally note that, in presence of six quark interactions reflecting

1044: the axial anomaly, an octet condensate $\chi_0 \not= 0$ will also result

1045: in additional effective four-quark interactions linked to the anomaly.

1046: They are not included in the present investigation. We estimate their order

1047: of magnitude to be comparable to (or even larger than) the

1048: instanton contribution discussed in Sect. 4.

1049: 

1050: \newsection{Summary and conclusions}

1051: 

1052: \noindent

1053: In this paper we have explored the effective Nambu-Jona-Lasinio-type

1054: four-quark interactions at the nonperturbative scale

1055: $\Lambda_{\rm NJL} \approx (500-800)$ MeV.

1056: For this purpose we have used a method based on truncations

1057: of the exact nonperturbative renormalization group equation for the

1058: effective average action \cite{D,E,Ellwanger94}.

1059: More precisely, we have derived a truncated nonperturbative flow equation for

1060: the scalar-like effective momentum-dependent four-quark interaction in QCD.

1061: This type of interaction is relevant for the physics of scalar and pseudoscalar

1062: mesons and therefore for spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking.

1063: 

1064: The nonperturbative renormalization group equation describes how the

1065: momentum dependent four-quark vertex depends on an infrared cutoff $k$.

1066: The initial value of the vertex at short distances is computed from

1067: perturbative QCD. We have studied the above-mentioned flow equation both

1068: analytically, in the perturbative regime, and numerically, in the

1069: nonperturbative regime. For the nonperturbative regime we have derived

1070: the dependence of the scalar-like four-quark interaction on the infrared

1071: cutoff scale $k$ and on the momentum exhanged in the $t$-channel.

1072: The results are summarized in Figs. 2, 3 and 4.

1073: 

1074: We find that a quasilocal one-particle-irreducible (1PI) four-quark interaction

1075: is generated and becomes indeed approximately pointlike for scales of the order

1076: $\Lambda_{\rm NJL}$, where scalar and pseudoscalar meson-bound states are

1077: expected to play a role. The ``quasilocality'' of this ``box-interaction'' is

1078: put in evidence in Fig. 4, where the dependence on the momentum-scale

1079: is shown.

1080: 

1081: As discussed in Sect. 4, another pointlike interaction arises from instanton

1082: effects. In Fig. 2 a comparison is made between the strength of the

1083: box interaction and that of the local instanton-induced

1084: four-quark interaction. At scales of the order $\Lambda_{\rm NJL}$, the

1085: instanton interaction dominates.

1086: 

1087: Nevertheless, the contribution of the one-gluon exchange to the

1088: effective four-quark vertex retains the characteristic momentum

1089: dependence of a particle exchange in the $t$-channel.

1090: We show the different contributions to the four-quark vertex in

1091: Figs. 2, 3 and 4. The effective one-gluon exchange contribution remains

1092: substantially larger than the pointlike box-type interactions.

1093: In consequence, the pointlike interactions (\ref{1.1}) of the

1094: Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model cannot give a very accurate description of QCD

1095: if the gluons are massless.

1096: Models based on a pointlike instanton induced four-quark interaction

1097: look more favorable. Still, the one-gluon exchange is not negligible.

1098: 

1099: The results shown in Figs. 2, 3 and 4 have been obtained with the assumption of

1100: massless gluons (in the limit of vanishing infrared cutoff scale, $k \to 0$).

1101: In Sect. 5 we have discussed the intriguing hypothesis that gluons acquire

1102: a mass $M_V \approx 850$ MeV from spontaneous color symmetry breaking \cite{F}.

1103: Our results for a nonvanishing gluon mass are shown

1104: in Figs. 5 and 6. In particular, from Fig. 6, where the dependence on

1105: the momentum scale is shown, it is clear that for this scenario

1106: pointlike four-quark interactions can be defended as a much better

1107: approximation. Nevertheless, any quantitatively reliable

1108: approximation should retain the one-gluon exchange in addition to

1109: the instanton interaction and the

1110: NJL-interaction (\ref{1.1}).

1111: 

1112: We emphasize that our approximations for the flow equation in the

1113: nonperturbative range remain relatively crude, even if in Sect. 3 we have

1114: done some checks in order to test the validity of some of the many

1115: approximations involved. Our results should therefore only be trusted on a

1116: semi-quantitative level. In our opinion, they are nevertheless

1117: a good guide for the qualitative characteristics of the effective

1118: four-quark interactions at scales between a few hundred MeV and 1 GeV.

1119: 

1120: \vfill\eject

1121: 

1122: {\renewcommand{\Large}{\normalsize}

1123: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1124: \bibitem{A}

1125: Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. {\bf 122} (1961) 345.

1126: \bibitem{B}

1127: T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. {\bf 247} (1994) 221;\\

1128: J. Bijnens, Phys. Rep. {\bf 265} (1996) 369.

1129: \bibitem{C}

1130: J. Berges, D. Jungnickel and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59} (1999) 034010.

1131: \bibitem{D}

1132: C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 301} (1993) 90;

1133: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 352} (1991) 529; Z. Phys. C {\bf 57} (1993) 451;

1134: C {\bf 60} (1993) 461.

1135: \bibitem{4a}

1136: J. Berges, N. Tetradis and C. Wetterich, hep-ph/0005122.

1137: \bibitem{E}

1138: M. Reuter and C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 408} (1993) 91;

1139: B {\bf 417} (1994) 181.

1140: \bibitem{6a}

1141: M. Bonini, M. D'Attanasio and G. Marchesini, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 418} (1994) 81.

1142: \bibitem{Ellwanger94}

1143: U. Ellwanger, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 335} (1994) 364.

1144: \bibitem{Ellwanger-Wetterich94}

1145: U. Ellwanger and C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 423} (1994) 137.

1146: \bibitem{F}

1147: C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 462} (1999) 164;

1148: hep-ph/9908514 (to appear in Eur. Phys. J. C); hep-ph/0008150;

1149: hep-ph/0011076.

1150: \bibitem{G}

1151: C. Wetterich, hep-th/9501119.

1152: \bibitem{Wetterich96}

1153: C. Wetterich, Z. Phys. C {\bf 72} (1996) 139.

1154: \bibitem{Ellwanger-et-al.96}

1155: U. Ellwanger, M. Hirsch and A. Weber, Z. Phys. C {\bf 69} (1996) 687.

1156: \bibitem{Bergerhoff}

1157: B. Bergerhoff and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57} (1998) 1591.

1158: \bibitem{tHooft76}

1159: G. 't Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 37} (1976) 8;\\

1160: G. 't Hooft, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 14} (1976) 3432; D {\bf 18} (1978) 2199

1161: (Erratum).

1162: \bibitem{SVZ80}

1163: M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,

1164: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 163} (1980) 46.

1165: \bibitem{Shuryak82}

1166: E.V. Shuryak, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 203} (1982) 93.

1167: \bibitem{Dual}

1168: T. Banks and E. Rabinovici, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 160} (1979) 349;\\

1169: E. Fradkin and S. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 19} (1979) 3682;\\

1170: G. 't Hooft, in: {\it Recent Developments in Gauge Theories}

1171: (Plenum, New York, 1980), p. 135;\\

1172: S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby and L. Susskind, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 173} (1980) 208;\\

1173: T. Matsumoto, Phys. Lett. {\bf 97B} (1980) 131;\\

1174: M. Yasu\`e, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 42} (1990) 3169.

1175: \end{thebibliography}}

1176: 

1177: \vfill\eject

1178: 

1179: \noindent

1180: \begin{center}

1181: {\bf FIGURE CAPTIONS}

1182: \end{center}

1183: \vskip 0.5 cm

1184: \begin{itemize}

1185: \item [\bf Fig.~1.] One-loop diagrams for the flow equation

1186: (\ref{eq36}) for the four-fermion (1PI) coupling $\lambda_\sigma$.

1187: Five more diagrams similar to c) with gluon lines attached at

1188: different quark lines are not shown.

1189: \bigskip

1190: \item [\bf Fig.~2.] Scale dependence of the quartic four-quark

1191: coupling. \\

1192: {\it Continuous} line: $\lambda_\sigma (t = 0)$ as a

1193: function of $k$ with the initial condition as in

1194: Eqs. (\ref{eq45}), (\ref{eq46}). {\it Dotted} line: $\lambda_\sigma (t

1195: = 0)$ as a function of $k$ with the initial condition $\lambda_\sigma

1196: (t) \vert_{k = k_c} = 0$ [{\it ansatz} (A)].

1197: {\it Dot-dashed} line: the same as for

1198: the {\it continuous} line, but using everywhere (both in the flow

1199: equation and in the initial condition) the momentum-indepen\-dent

1200: coupling constant $\alpha$ [{\it ansatz} (B)]. {\it Dashed} line: the

1201: one-gluon-exchange contribution $\lambda^{(1g)}_\sigma (t = 0)$,

1202: defined by Eq. (\ref{eq51}), as a function of $k$. {\it Long-dashed}

1203: line: the instanton contribution $\lambda^{(3)}_{inst}$, defined by

1204: Eq. (\ref{eq54}), as a function of $k$.

1205: \bigskip

1206: \item [\bf Fig.~3.] Different approximations for $\lambda_\sigma$

1207: in perturbation theory. \\

1208: {\it Continuous} line: the same as in Fig. 2.

1209: {\it Dotted} line: $\lambda_\sigma^{(p)} (t = 0)$ versus $k$,

1210: momentum-dependent $\alpha$ [{\it ansatz} (A)].

1211: {\it Dashed} line: $\lambda_\sigma^{(p)} (t = 0)$ versus $k$,

1212: momentum-independent $\alpha$ [{\it ansatz} (B)].

1213: {\it Dot-dashed} line: $\lambda_\sigma^{(p)} (t = 0)$ versus $k$,

1214: constant $\alpha$ [{\it ansatz} (C)].

1215: \bigskip

1216: \item [\bf Fig.~4.] Dependence of the four-quark interaction on the

1217: transferred momentum $t$. \\

1218: We show $\lambda_\sigma (t)$ ({\it continuous} line) and the

1219: one-gluon-exchange contribution $\lambda^{(1g)}_\sigma (t)$ ({\it

1220: dashed} line) as functions of $t$ at the fixed value $k = 0.42 \cdot

1221: \Lambda_{QCD} / \Lambda^{(3)}_{\overline{\rm MS}}$ GeV.

1222: \bigskip

1223: \item [\bf Fig.~5.] Quartic coupling with spontaneous color symmetry

1224: breaking. \\

1225: {\it Continuous} and {\it dashed} lines: the same as in Fig. 2.

1226: Lower (A) and upper (B) {\it dotted} lines: $\lambda_\sigma (t = 0)$ versus $k$

1227: using the running gluon mass term $m_k^2$ given by Eq. (\ref{5.2}) (A)

1228: and Eq. (\ref{5.3}) (B).

1229: Lower (A) and upper (B) {\it dot-dashed} lines: $\lambda_\sigma^{(1g)} (t = 0)$

1230: versus $k$ using the running gluon mass term $m_k^2$ given by Eq. (\ref{5.2})

1231: (A) and Eq. (\ref{5.3}) (B).

1232: \bigskip

1233: \item [\bf Fig.~6.] Momentum dependence of quartic couplings with

1234: spontaneous color breaking. \\

1235: {\it Continuous} and {\it dashed} lines: the same as in Fig. 4.

1236: Lower (A) and upper (B) {\it dotted} lines: $\lambda_\sigma (t)$ versus $t$

1237: using the running gluon mass term $m_k^2$ given by Eq. (\ref{5.2}) (A)

1238: and Eq. (\ref{5.3}) (B).

1239: Lower (A) and upper (B) {\it dot-dashed} lines: $\lambda_\sigma^{(1g)} (t)$

1240: versus $t$ using the running gluon mass term $m_k^2$ given by Eq. (\ref{5.2})

1241: (A) and Eq. (\ref{5.3}) (B).

1242: \end{itemize}

1243: 

1244: \vfill\eject

1245: 

1246: %\pagestyle{plain}

1247: \pagestyle{empty}

1248: 

1249: \centerline{\bf Figure 1}

1250: \vskip 4truecm

1251: \begin{figure}[htb]

1252: \vskip 4.5truecm

1253: \special{psfile=Evo_fig1.ps hscale=100 vscale=100 voffset=-475 hoffset=-85}

1254: \end{figure}

1255: 

1256: \vfill\eject

1257: 

1258: \centerline{\bf Figure 2}

1259: \vskip 4truecm

1260: \begin{figure}[htb]

1261: \vskip 4.5truecm

1262: \special{psfile=Evo_fig2.ps hscale=100 vscale=100 voffset=-475 hoffset=-85}

1263: \end{figure}

1264: 

1265: \vfill\eject

1266: 

1267: \centerline{\bf Figure 3}

1268: \vskip 4truecm

1269: \begin{figure}[htb]

1270: \vskip 4.5truecm

1271: \special{psfile=Evo_fig3.ps hscale=100 vscale=100 voffset=-475 hoffset=-85}

1272: \end{figure}

1273: 

1274: \vfill\eject

1275: 

1276: \centerline{\bf Figure 4}

1277: \vskip 4truecm

1278: \begin{figure}[htb]

1279: \vskip 4.5truecm

1280: \special{psfile=Evo_fig4.ps hscale=100 vscale=100 voffset=-475 hoffset=-85}

1281: \end{figure}

1282: 

1283: \vfill\eject

1284: 

1285: \centerline{\bf Figure 5}

1286: \vskip 4truecm

1287: \begin{figure}[htb]

1288: \vskip 4.5truecm

1289: \special{psfile=Evo_fig5.ps hscale=100 vscale=100 voffset=-475 hoffset=-85}

1290: \end{figure}

1291: 

1292: \vfill\eject

1293: 

1294: \centerline{\bf Figure 6}

1295: \vskip 4truecm

1296: \begin{figure}[htb]

1297: \vskip 4.5truecm

1298: \special{psfile=Evo_fig6.ps hscale=100 vscale=100 voffset=-475 hoffset=-85}

1299: \end{figure}

1300: 

1301: \vfill\eject

1302: 

1303: \end{document}

1304: