1: \documentstyle[aps,prd,eqsecnum,twocolumn,epsf]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[prd,twocolumn,eqsecnum,aps]{revtex}
3: %\documentstyle[prd,eqsecnum,aps]{revtex}
4: %\documentstyle[preprint,eqsecnum,aps]{revtex}
5:
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: % Command Definitions
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9:
10: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
11: \newcommand{\beqn}{\begin{eqnarray}}
12: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
13: \newcommand{\eeqn}{\end{eqnarray}}
14: \newcommand{\vp}{\varphi}
15: \newcommand{\dvp}{\delta\varphi}
16: \newcommand{\ts}{\textstyle}
17: \newcommand{\rd}{\displaystyle{\cdot}}
18: \newcommand{\gsim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-1.ex}{$\stackrel
19: {\textstyle>}{\textstyle\sim}$}}}
20: \newcommand{\lsim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-1.ex}{$\stackrel
21: {\textstyle<}{\textstyle \sim}$}}}
22: \newcommand{\square}{\kern1pt\vbox{\hrule height
23: 1.2pt\hbox{\vrule width 1.2pt\hskip 3pt
24: \vbox{\vskip 6pt}\hskip 3pt\vrule width 0.6pt}\hrule
25: height 0.6pt}\kern1pt}
26:
27:
28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29: \begin{document}
30:
31: \draft
32: \twocolumn[\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname
33: @twocolumnfalse\endcsname
34:
35: \title{Brane preheating}
36: \author{Shinji Tsujikawa$^1$, Kei-ichi Maeda$^{1,2}$ and Shuntaro
37: Mizuno$^1$ \\~}
38: \address{$^1$Department of Physics, Waseda University, Okubo 3-4-1,
39: Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan\\[-1em]~}
40: \address{$^2$ Advanced Research Institute for Science and Engineering,
41: Waseda University, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan\\[-.7em]~}
42:
43: \date{\today}
44: \maketitle
45: \begin{abstract}
46: We study brane-world preheating in massive chaotic inflationary scenario
47: where scalar fields are confined on the 3-brane. Assuming that quadratic
48: contribution in energy densities dominates the Hubble expansion rate during preheating,
49: the amplitude of inflaton decreases slowly relative to the standard
50: dust-dominated case. This leads to an efficient production of $\chi$ particles
51: via nonperturbative decay of inflaton even if its coupling is of order
52: $g=10^{-5}$. We also discuss massive particle creation heavier than
53: inflaton, which may play important roles for the baryo- and
54: lepto-genesis scenarios.
55: \end{abstract}
56: \vskip 0.5pc
57: \pacs{pacs: 98.80.Cq}
58: \centerline{WUAP-00/29}
59: \vskip 1pc
60: ]
61:
62:
63: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
64: % %
65: \section{Introduction} %
66: % %
67: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
68:
69: Recent studies of superstring or M-theory predict that our universe may
70: consist of a brane world embedded in a higher-dimensional spacetime
71: \cite{braneori,HW,Anto}.
72: In particular, it was shown that
73: the 10-dimensional $E_8 \times E_8$ heterotic
74: string theory, which is a strong candidate to describe
75: our real world, is equivalent to an 11-dimensional M-theory
76: compactified to ${\bf M}^{10} \times {\bf S}^1/Z_2$\cite{HW}.
77: Then the 10-dimensional spacetime is
78: expected to be compactified into ${\bf M}^{4}\times {\bf CY}^{6}$. Therein
79: the standard model particles are confined on the 3-dimensional brane. On
80: the other hand, gravitons propagate in the full spacetime.
81:
82: In conventional Kaluza-Klein theories, extra dimensions are
83: compactified on some manifolds in order to obtain 4-dimensional effective
84: gravity theories. In contrast, Randall and Sundrum \cite{RS} recently
85: proposed a new type of compactification, in which extra dimension is not
86: compact but gravity is effectively 3-dimensional. Their model indicates
87: that we are living on the 3-brane with positive tension embedded in
88: 5-dimensional anti de-Sitter bulk spacetime. This idea invokes a
89: particular interest for the evolution of the early universe, which may
90: exhibit some deviations from the standard cosmology by the modifications of
91: 4-dimensional Einstein equations on the brane \cite{brane_cos,SMS}.
92:
93: In this respect, cosmological inflation was investigated by several
94: authors\cite{MWBH,brane_inflation}
95: in the context of the brane-world scenario where scalar fields are confined
96: on the 3-brane.
97: The effect of the brane in higher dimensions induces extra terms in
98: 4-dimensional effective gravity especially for high energies, e.g., a
99: quadratic term of energy density,
100: which leads to the larger amount of inflation relative to standard
101: inflationary scenarios.
102:
103: If the modifications due to extra dimensions persist in the post inflationary
104: phase, this may nontrivially affect on the process of
105: reheating. In the early stage of reheating, particles coupled to inflaton are
106: efficiently created by the nonperturbative and
107: nonequilibrium process which is
108: called preheating\cite{TB,KLS,KT,Boy}. Since the particle production during
109: preheating is sensitive to the background evolution\cite{KLS}, it is
110: expected that the standard picture of preheating will be altered due to the
111: modifications in Einstein equations on the brane. In fact we will show
112: that the brane-world preheating broadens the parameter ranges of coupling
113: constants where particles are efficiently produced.
114:
115:
116:
117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
118: \section{Brane inflation }
119: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
120: In the brane world scenario by Randall-Sundrum\cite{RS},
121: where gravity as well as
122: matter field are effectively confined on the 3-brane
123: in the 5-dimensional spacetime,
124: the 5-dimensional Einstein equations can be recast in the following
125: gravitational equations on the brane \cite{SMS}:
126: %
127: \beqn
128: ^{(4)}G_{\mu\nu}=-\Lambda_4 g_{\mu\nu}+\frac{8\pi}{M_{\rm pl}^2}
129: T_{\mu\nu}+\frac{1}{M_5^6} \pi_{\mu\nu}-E_{\mu\nu},
130: \label{geq}
131: \eeqn
132: %
133: where $T_{\mu\nu}$ and $\pi_{\mu\nu}$ represent the energy-momentum
134: tensor on the brane and the quadratic term in $T_{\mu\nu}$, respectively.
135: $E_{\mu\nu}$ is a part of 5-dimensional Weyl tensor, which carries the
136: information in the bulk. Note that the four- and five-dimensional
137: gravitational constants, $M_{\rm pl}$ and $M_5$, are related with the
138: 3-brane tension, $\lambda$, as $ \lambda=48\pi {M_5^6}/{M_{\rm pl}^2}.
139: $\footnote{Our notation of the 5-dimensional Planck mass, $M_5$, does not
140: include the $\sqrt{8\pi}$ factor, which is different from the definition in
141: Ref.~\cite{MWBH}.}
142: Here the 4-dimensional cosmological constant
143: $\Lambda_4$ is assumed to be zero.
144:
145: Let us analyze the gravitational equation (\ref{geq}) in cosmological
146: contexts. Adopting a flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric as a
147: background spacetime on the brane, we find the following Friedmann
148: equation\cite{brane_cos,SMS,MWBH}
149: %
150: \beqn
151: H^2 \equiv \left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)^2=\frac{8\pi}{3M_{\rm pl}^2}
152: \rho \left(1+\frac{\rho}{2\lambda}\right),
153: \label{hubble}
154: \eeqn
155: %
156: where $a$ and $\rho$ are the scale factor and the energy density of the matter
157: on the brane, respectively. We have ignored the so-called ``dark" radiation
158: $E_{\mu\nu}$, which rapidly decreases as $\sim a^{-4}$ during
159: inflation even if it exists.
160:
161: At high energies the $\rho^2$ term is expected to play important roles
162: to determine the evolution of the Universe. Hereafter we will assume that
163: the quadratic term dominates during inflation and preheating, i.e., the
164: condition, $\rho~\gsim~2\lambda$, holds until the end of preheating.
165: The inflaton field confined on the brane satisfies
166: the Klein-Gordon equation,
167: %
168: \beqn
169: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+V'(\phi)=0.
170: \label{phi}
171: \eeqn
172: %
173: Note that during inflation the quadratic contribution in Eq.~(\ref{hubble})
174: increases the Hubble expansion rate, which makes the evolution of inflaton
175: slower by Eq.~(\ref{phi}).
176: Another Einstein equation in the quadratic-term dominant stage yields
177: %
178: \beqn
179: \frac{\ddot{a}}{a}=\frac{\pi}{3M_{\rm pl}^2\lambda}
180: \left(\dot{\phi}^2+2V \right) \left(2V-5\dot{\phi}^2\right).
181: \label{ddota}
182: \eeqn
183: %
184: This implies that inflation ends around $2V \simeq 5\dot{\phi}^2$.
185: In the massive chaotic inflationary scenario with a potential,
186: $V(\phi)=\frac12 m^2\phi^2$, this condition gives
187: %
188: \beqn
189: \phi_F \simeq 3\left(\frac{M_5}{m}\right)^{1/2} M_5,
190: \label{phiend}
191: \eeqn
192: %
193: where we used the slow-roll condition,
194: $\dot{\phi}\simeq -m^2\phi/3H \simeq -4M_5^3/\phi$ in Eq.~(\ref{phi}).
195:
196: The inflaton mass, $m$, should be constrained by comparing the amplitude of
197: density perturbations produced during inflation with the CMB anisotropy.
198: This is typically done by evaluating the curvature perturbation, $\zeta$,
199: around the 55 e-foldings before the end of inflation, if $\zeta$ is
200: conserved on large scales. It was shown in Ref.~\cite{Wands} that the
201: conservation of $\zeta$ holds for adiabatic perturbations irrespective of
202: the form of gravitational equations by considering the local conservation
203: of the energy-momentum tensor. In the presence of a second scalar field,
204: $\chi$, curvature perturbations include isocurvature (entropy)
205: perturbations\cite{Wands,GWBM}, which provides the source of nonadiabatic
206: pressure perturbations. However, as long as $\chi$ does not exhibit strong
207: growth during inflation as in the nonminimally coupled case\cite{TY},
208: $\zeta$ remains conserved even in the multi-field case\cite{multi}. In
209: fact, in the massive chaotic inflationary scenario with the interaction
210: $\frac12 g^2\phi^2\chi^2$, $\chi$ is suppressed during inflation for large
211: couplings $g$ required for the $\chi$ particle production during
212: preheating\cite{sup}, which ensures the conservation of $\zeta$ on large
213: scales. Although we will use this result here, the Weyl tensor $E_{\mu\nu}
214: $ will bring the 5-dimensional information into the brane, which may alter
215: the result \cite{brane_perturbation1}. More careful analysis will be
216: required regarding the evolution of $\zeta$
217: during inflation\cite{brane_perturbation2}.
218:
219:
220: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
221: \begin{figure}
222: \epsfxsize = 3.5in
223: \epsffile{Fig1.eps}
224: \caption{The evolution of the inflaton condensate,
225: $\tilde{\phi}=(m/M_5)^{1/2}\phi/M_5$, during inflation and reheating.
226: We start integrating with the initial value in Eq.~(\ref{phicobe}). Inflation
227: ends around $\tilde{\phi} \simeq 3$ as estimated by Eq.~(\ref{phiend}).
228: The system enters the reheating stage around $\tilde{\phi} \simeq 1$.
229: {\bf Inset:} The evolution of the number of e-foldings,
230: $N=\int_{t_*}^{t_F} H dt$. We find that 55 e-foldings are achieved
231: during inflation.}
232: \label{Fig1}
233: \end{figure}
234: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
235:
236: Calculating the number of e-foldings: $N \equiv \int_{t_*}^{t_F} H dt$, and
237: setting $N=55$, we obtain the value of inflaton when scales relevant for the
238: CMB anisotropy crossed outside the Hubble radius,
239: %
240: \beqn
241: \phi_* \simeq 10\left(\frac{M_5}{m}\right)^{1/2} M_5.
242: \label{phicobe}
243: \eeqn
244: %
245: The spectra of density perturbations at horizon re-entry can be evaluated
246: as $\delta_H=(2/5)|\zeta|_{k=aH}=(2/5)H\delta\phi/\dot{\phi}|_{k=aH}$,
247: where the subscript, $k=aH$, denotes the values at first horizon crossing.
248: Making use of the relation $\delta\phi \simeq H/2\pi$ at first horizon
249: crossing\footnote[2]{While the formula used here is based on the assumption of
250: the Bunch-Davies vacuum, the present
251: expansion law is different from the de Sitter one, which may change the
252: expression of $\delta_H$.}, we find
253: %
254: \beqn
255: \delta_H \simeq \frac{1}{\left(24\sqrt{5\pi}\right)^2}
256: \left(\frac{m}{M_5}\right)^4 \left(\frac{\phi_*}{M_5}\right)^{5}.
257: \label{deltaH}
258: \eeqn
259: %
260: The COBE normalization gives $\delta_H \simeq 2 \times 10^{-5}$,
261: which constrains the mass of inflaton as
262: %
263: \beqn
264: m/M_5 \simeq 1.4 \times 10^{-4}.
265: \label{mass}
266: \eeqn
267: %
268: The ratio of
269: Eq.~(\ref{mass}) is crucial to determine the efficiency of parametric
270: resonance during preheating. We should caution again that the result of
271: Eq.~(\ref{mass}) could be modified by a careful study of the quantum theory
272: in the brane-world inflation and the evolution of cosmological perturbations
273: in the 5-dimensional Einstein equations
274: \cite{brane_perturbation1,brane_perturbation2}.
275:
276: We have numerically
277: solved the background equations (\ref{hubble}) and (\ref{phi}) with the
278: initial value (\ref{phicobe}), and confirmed that analytic estimations are
279: in good agreement with numerical results (see Fig.~1).
280:
281:
282: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
283: \section{Brane preheating}
284: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
285:
286: Let us investigate a two-field model where the second scalar field, $\chi$, is
287: coupled to massive inflaton, $\phi$, with a four-leg interaction, $\frac12
288: g^2\phi^2\chi^2$:
289: %
290: \beqn
291: V(\phi,\chi)=\frac12 m^2\phi^2+\frac12 g^2\phi^2\chi^2
292: +\frac12 m_{\chi}^2\chi^2,
293: \label{effpotential}
294: \eeqn
295: %
296: where $m_{\chi}$ is a mass of the $\chi$ field.
297: We consider perturbations of scalar fields on the 3-brane in the
298: flat FRW background and implement backreaction effects of
299: produced particles at second order \cite{KLS}.
300:
301: Decomposing the scalar fields into homogeneous parts and
302: fluctuations as $\phi(t,{\bf x}) \to \phi(t)+\delta \phi(t, {\bf x})$
303: and $\chi(t,{\bf x}) \to \chi(t)+\delta \chi(t, {\bf x})$, the
304: equation for the homogeneous part of inflaton can be written as
305: %
306: \beqn
307: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+\left(m^2+g^2
308: \langle\chi^2\rangle \right)\phi=0,
309: \label{phit}
310: \eeqn
311: %
312: where $\langle\chi^2\rangle$ is the expectation value of $\chi^2$, which
313: works as backreaction at the final stage of preheating. Neglecting the
314: contribution of inflaton fluctuations which can be negligible in the
315: present model unless rescattering effects are taken into account, each
316: Fourier mode of the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation satisfies
317: %
318: \beqn
319: \delta\ddot{\chi}_k+3H\delta\dot{\chi}_k+
320: \left[\frac{k^2}{a^2}+g^2\phi^2(t)+m_{\chi}^2 \right]
321: \delta\chi_k=0.
322: \label{deltachi}
323: \eeqn
324: %
325: The oscillation of the inflaton condensate leads to parametric
326: amplification of the $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuation, whose variance is defined by
327: %
328: \beqn
329: \langle \delta\chi^2 \rangle = \frac{1}{2\pi^2}
330: \int k^2 |\delta\chi_k^2| dk.
331: \label{varaince}
332: \eeqn
333: %
334: Note that the equation for $\chi(t)$ is obtained by substituting
335: $k=0$ in Eq.~(\ref{deltachi}), whose evolution is similar to
336: the long wave $\delta\chi_k$ modes.
337:
338: Assuming that the linear term of $\rho$ in Eq.~(\ref{hubble}) can
339: be neglected relative to the quadratic term during the whole stage of
340: preheating, the Hubble parameter satisfies
341: %
342: \beqn
343: H=\frac{1}{6M_5^3} \Bigl[ \frac12 \dot{\phi}^2 &+& \frac12
344: m^2\phi^2+\frac12 \dot{\chi}^2+ \frac12 m_{\chi}^2\chi^2+\frac12
345: g^2\phi^2\chi^2 \nonumber \\
346: &+& \rho_{\phi}+\rho_{\chi} \Bigr],
347: \label{hubble2}
348: \eeqn
349: %
350: where $\rho_{\phi}$ and $\rho_{\chi}$ are the energy densities
351: of produced particles. In the stage where contributions of $\chi$
352: are negligible in Eqs.~(\ref{phit}) and (\ref{hubble2}),
353: making use of the time averaged relation,
354: $\langle\frac12\dot{\phi}^2\rangle _T=\langle V(\phi) \rangle_T$,
355: gives the following approximate solutions for the scale factor
356: and the background inflaton field:
357: %
358: \beqn
359: a = a_i \left(\frac{t}{t_i} \right)^{1/3},~~~
360: \phi(t) = \Phi(t) \sin mt,
361: \label{aapprox}
362: \eeqn
363: %
364: where the amplitude, $\Phi(t)$, is
365: %
366: \beqn
367: \Phi(t)=2\left(\frac{M_5}{m}\right)^{3/2}
368: \sqrt{\frac{m}{t}}.
369: \label{phiapprox}
370: \eeqn
371: %
372: This evolution is different from the standard results
373: in the dust-dominated preheating scenario,
374: $a \propto t^{2/3}$ and $\Phi(t) \propto t^{-2}$ \cite{KLS}.
375: Particle creations in an expanding universe are strongly affected
376: by the change of background evolution.
377:
378: Introducing a new variable, $\delta X_k=a^{3/2}\delta\chi_k$,
379: and neglecting a curvature term in the frequency of $\delta X_k$
380: which is unimportant during reheating, we find that
381: Eq.~(\ref{deltachi}) is reduced to the Mathieu equation
382: %
383: \beqn
384: \frac{d^2}{dz^2} \delta X_k+
385: \left(A_k-2q \cos2z \right)\delta X_k=0,
386: \label{mathieu}
387: \eeqn
388: %
389: where $z=mt$ and
390: %
391: \beqn
392: A_k &=& 2q+\frac{k^2}{m^2a^2}+\frac{m_{\chi}^2}
393: {m^2}, \nonumber \\
394: q &=& \frac{g^2\Phi^2(t)}{4m^2}
395: =g^2\left(\frac{M_5}{m}\right)^3 \frac{1}{z}.
396: \label{rparameter}
397: \eeqn
398: %
399: The efficiency of resonance strongly depends upon the
400: initial value of $q$ ($=q_i$).
401: In the standard preheating scenario where $q$ decreases as
402: $q \sim t^{-2}$, we require the coupling, $g~\gsim~10^{-4}$
403: which corresponds to $q_i~\gsim~100$, for the relevant
404: growth of $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuations\cite{KLS}.
405:
406: In contrast, in the brane-world preheating, $q$ evolves more slowly as $q
407: \sim t^{-1}$, which indicates that large $q_i$ much greater than unity is
408: not required for $\chi$ particle productions to occur. This has some
409: analogies with the nonminimally coupled $\chi$ field in the $R^2$ inflation
410: model where slow decrease of the oscillating scalar curvature ($R \propto
411: t^{-1}$) leads to strong preheating\cite{nonminimal}. The ratio $m/M_5$ is
412: an important factor to determine the strength of resonance. Adopting the
413: value of Eq.~(\ref{mass}) which comes from the CMB constraints, one obtains
414: %
415: \beqn
416: q \simeq 0.36\left(10^6g\right)^2 \frac{1}{z}.
417: \label{qest}
418: \eeqn
419: %
420: The coherent oscillation of inflaton turns on around $z \simeq \pi/2$,
421: which yields the relation, $q_i \simeq (10^6g)^2/5$.
422: When $m_{\chi}=0$, we find numerically that $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuations
423: exhibit exponential increase for $g~\gsim~5 \times 10^{-6}$, corresponding
424: to $q_i~\gsim~5$.
425:
426: Let us consider concrete cases with a massless $\chi$ field. When $g=5 \times
427: 10^{-6}$, the variance $\langle\delta\chi^2\rangle$ increases at the
428: initial stage, but its growth stops around $mt \simeq 35$ (see Fig.~2).
429: Although $\chi$ particles are created while $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuations
430: pass through instability bands with the decrease of $q$ due to cosmic
431: expansion, no creation occurs once $q$ drops down to $1/4 \sim 1/3$, since
432: no instability bands exist there\cite{KLS}. Actually, substituting $z=35$
433: for Eq.~(\ref{qest}) gives the value, $q \simeq 0.26$, which coincides well
434: with the above estimation.
435:
436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
437: \begin{figure}
438: \epsfxsize = 3.5in
439: \epsffile{Fig2.eps}
440: \caption{The evolution of the variance,
441: $\langle\delta\tilde{\chi}^2\rangle
442: \equiv \langle\delta\chi^2\rangle/M_5^2$,
443: during preheating for
444: $g=5 \times 10^{-6}$ and $g=1 \times 10^{-5}$ with $m_{\chi}=0$.
445: While resonance soon terminates at the initial stage for $g=5 \times 10^{-6}$,
446: $\chi$ particles are sufficiently produced for $g=1 \times 10^{-5}$.
447: {\bf Inset}: $\langle\delta\tilde{\chi}^2\rangle$ vs $t$ for the case of
448: $g=2 \times 10^{-3}, m_{\chi}=10m$.
449: The $\chi$ particle whose mass is greater than the inflaton mass, $m$,
450: can be sufficiently created for $g>2 \times 10^{-5}$. }
451: \label{Fig2}
452: \end{figure}
453: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
454:
455:
456: With the increase of $g$, the duration during which the $\chi$ field
457: stays in instability bands gets longer.
458: In Fig.~2 we plot the evolution of $\langle\delta\chi^2\rangle$ for
459: $g=10^{-5}$. We find that the field reaches a short plateau
460: around $25~\lsim~mt~\lsim~50$ after some growth in the initial stage.
461: This corresponds to the stability region around $1~\lsim~q~\lsim~2$, after
462: which $\langle\delta\chi^2\rangle$ begins to grow again since the field
463: passes through the first instability band around $1/3~\lsim~q~\lsim~1$. In
464: this case the backreaction effect of created $\chi$ particle is marginally
465: important at the final stage of preheating.
466:
467: When $g~\gsim~10^{-5}$, the backreaction effect plays an important
468: role to shut off the resonance. While the growth rate of
469: $\delta\chi_k$ fluctuations gets larger with $g$ being increased, the final
470: variance begins to be suppressed, since resonance becomes less efficient
471: when the $g^2\langle\chi^2\rangle$ term in Eq.~(\ref{phit}) grows
472: to the order of $m^2$.
473: Numerical simulations based on the Hartree approximation
474: imply that the final variance slowly
475: decreases for $g~\gsim~10^{-4}$. In order to estimate the
476: correct size of fluctuations,
477: however, we need to include the rescattering effect
478: (i.e., mode-mode coupling), which becomes important when particles are
479: sufficiently excited \cite{KT}.
480:
481: If the $\chi$ mass is taken into account,
482: this generally works as a suppression
483: for an efficient preheating. However, as long as the mass effect does not
484: make the $\chi$ field deviate from instability bands,
485: massive $\chi$ particles can be resonantly amplified. For example
486: $\chi$ particles with mass
487: $m_{\chi}=m$ are created for $g~\gsim~2 \times 10^{-5}$; and when
488: $m_{\chi}=10m$, $g~\gsim~2 \times 10^{-3}$ (See the inset of Fig.~2).
489: Since heavy particles whose masses are a few times greater than the
490: inflaton mass are sufficiently produced even when
491: $g~\gsim~10^{-4}$, this may play an important role for the success
492: of the GUT scale baryogenesis scenario\cite{baryo1,baryo2}. It will be
493: particularly interesting to estimate the baryon asymmetry produced in
494: preheating, taking into account the decay of $\chi$ particles as
495: in Ref.~\cite{baryo2}.
496:
497: The spin 1/2 (and higher) quantum fields can be also produced
498: during preheating\cite{fermion1,fermion2},
499: although the Pauli's exclusion principle restricts the
500: occupation number as $n_k \le 1$.
501: Consider a massive fermion field $\psi$ with a bare mass $m_{\psi}$, which is
502: coupled to inflaton with a Yukawa interaction, $h\phi\bar{\psi}\psi$. Then
503: the Dirac equation is written in the form:
504: %
505: \beqn
506: (i\gamma^{\mu}\nabla_{\mu}-m_{\rm eff})\psi=0,
507: \label{dirac}
508: \eeqn
509: %
510: where $m_{\rm eff}$ is the effective mass of fermion, defined by
511: %
512: \beqn
513: m_{\rm eff}=m_{\psi}+h\phi.
514: \label{effmass}
515: \eeqn
516: %
517: In an expanding universe with the FRW background, fermion production
518: takes place around the region where $m_{\rm eff}$ vanishes,
519: which corresponds to the value, $\phi_*=-m_{\psi}/h$ \cite{fermion2}.
520: Fermions are periodically created when
521: the inflaton passes through $\phi_*$, as long
522: as the relation $m_{\psi}<|h\Phi|$ is satisfied. Substituting
523: Eq.~(\ref{aapprox}) with Eq.~(\ref{phiapprox}) for Eq.~(\ref{effmass}),
524: one finds that the minimum effective
525: mass is achieved for $mt=3\pi/2$, yielding the upper limit of massive
526: fermion production as
527: %
528: \beqn
529: m_{\psi}~\lsim~h\left(\frac{M_5}{m}\right)^{3/2}m \simeq (10^6h)m.
530: \label{uplimit}
531: \eeqn
532: %
533: This implies that heavy fermions much greater than the inflaton mass are
534: easily excited unless $h$ is small as $h~\lsim~10^{-6}$.
535: Since the amplitude of inflaton decreases slowly relative
536: the standard preheating, this may delay the time at which fermion
537: creations are frozen.
538: It will be worth investigating how massive fermions produced in
539: brane preheating affect the leptogenesis scenario\cite{lepto}.
540:
541:
542: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
543: \section{Conclusions and discussions}
544: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
545:
546: We have studied preheating in the 3-brane world in the massive
547: chaotic inflationary scenario. While the existence of the brane in higher
548: dimensions works to increase
549: the amount of inflation via quadratic modifications
550: of energy density, its effect in preheating is to make the adiabatic
551: damping of the inflaton slower.
552: Considering the $\chi$ field coupled to inflaton via interaction, $\frac12
553: g^2\phi^2\chi^2$, we find that massless $\chi$ particles exhibit strong
554: amplification even when the coupling $g$ is small as $g=5 \times 10^{-6}$,
555: due to the modifications of the background evolution. We have also
556: verified that massive scalar and fermionic particles heavier than inflaton
557: can be nonperturbatively produced, which may play important roles for the
558: baryo- and lepto-genesis scenarios.
559:
560: Although we have restricted ourselves in the massive inflaton case,
561: the self coupling inflationary scenario
562: with an effective potential, $V(\phi)=\frac14
563: \lambda\phi^4+\frac12 g^2\phi^2\chi^2$,
564: has a different structure of resonance.
565: In this case introducing a new variable, $\delta X_k=a\delta\chi_k$,
566: Eq.~(\ref{deltachi}) is reduced to the following Lam\'e equation
567: in the linear stage of preheating:
568: %
569: \beqn
570: \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\delta X_k+\left[\kappa^2+\frac{g^2}{\lambda}
571: {\rm cn}^2\left(x, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \right] \delta X_k=0,
572: \label{lame}
573: \eeqn
574: %
575: where $x\equiv \sqrt{\lambda}\phi_i\eta$
576: and $\kappa^2 \equiv k^2/(\lambda\phi_i^2)$,
577: with $\eta \equiv \int a^{-1}dt$ being a conformal time.
578: The ${\rm cn}\left(x, 1/\sqrt{2}\right)$ is the elliptic function which
579: is well approximated as ${\rm cn}\left(x, 1/\sqrt{2}\right) \approx
580: \cos(0.8472x)$.
581: Since the effect of the adiabatic damping of inflaton does not appear in the
582: frequency of $\delta X_k$,
583: the strength of resonance is determined by the ratio, $g^2/\lambda$,
584: which is the same as the standard scenario discussed in Ref.~\cite{selfpre}.
585: Despite this, the slow growth of the scale factor makes the redshift of
586: $\delta\chi_k$ less efficient due to the relation of
587: $\delta\chi_k=a^{-1}\delta X_k$,
588: which will provide the larger growth of the variance, $\langle\delta\chi^2\rangle$.
589:
590: The enhancement of field perturbations can lead to the growth of
591: metric perturbations\cite{mpre1,mpre2}, which is particularly important
592: for the formation of primordial black holes\cite{PBH}.
593: This requires a consistent study of cosmological perturbations
594: including the effect of the 5-dimensional bulk,
595: which we leave to future work.
596:
597:
598: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
599: \section*{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
600: We thank Bruce A. Bassett and David Wands
601: for useful discussions. This work was partially
602: by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research Fund of the Ministry of
603: Education, Science and Culture (Specially Promoted Research No.08102010)
604: and by the Yamada foundation.
605:
606: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
607: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
608:
609: %higher-dimensional universe
610: \bibitem{braneori}
611: V.A. Rubakov and M.E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett.
612: {\bf 125B}, 139 (1983);
613: M. Visser, {\it ibid}. {\bf 159B}, 22 (1985).
614:
615: \bibitem{HW}
616: P. Ho\v{r}ava and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B460}, 506 (1996).
617:
618: \bibitem{Anto}
619: I. Antoniadis, Phys. Lett. {\bf 246B}, 377 (1990);
620: N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and
621: G. Dvali, {\it ibid}. {\bf 429B}, 263 (1998);
622: I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed,
623: S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali, {\it ibid}. {\bf 436B}, 257 (1998).
624:
625: \bibitem{RS}
626: L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 4690 (1999).
627:
628: \bibitem{brane_cos}
629: A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut, K. S. Stelle, and D. Waldram,
630: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59}, 086001 (1999);
631: H. S. Reall, {\it ibid}. 103506 (1999);
632: A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut, and D. Waldram,
633: {\it ibid}. D {\bf 60}, 086001 (1999);
634: N. Kaloper, {\it ibid}. 123506 (1999);
635: C. Csaki, M. Graesser, C. Kolda, and J. Terning,
636: Phys. Lett. {\bf 462B}, 34 (1999);
637: P. Kanti, I. I. Kogan, K. A. Olive,
638: and M. Prospelov, {\it ibid}. {\bf 468B}, 31 (1999);
639: P. Bin\'{e}truy, C.
640: Deffayet, and D. Langlois, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B565}, 269 (2000).
641: \bibitem{SMS}
642: T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62},
643: 024012 (2000).
644:
645: % Brane inflation
646: \bibitem{MWBH}
647: R. Maartens, D. Wands, B. A. Bassett, and I. P. C. Heard,
648: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 041301 (2000).
649:
650: \bibitem{brane_inflation}
651: T. Nihei, Phys. Lett. {\bf 465B}, 81 (1999);
652: A. Mazumdar, {\it ibid}. {\bf 490B}, 251 (2000);
653: hep-ph/0008087;
654: L. Mendes and
655: A. R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 103511 (2000); E. J. Copeland,
656: A. R. Liddle, and J. E. Lidsey, astro-ph/0006421.
657:
658:
659: %preheating
660: \bibitem{TB}
661: J. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 42}, 2491
662: (1990); Y. Shtanov, J. Trashen, and R. H. Brandenberger,
663: {\it ibid}. {\bf 51}, 5438 (1995).
664:
665: \bibitem{KLS}
666: L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
667: {\bf 73}, 3195 (1994); Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56}, 3258 (1997).
668:
669: \bibitem{KT}
670: S. Khlebnikov and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77}, 219
671: (1996); {\it ibid}. {\bf 79}, 1607 (1997).
672:
673: \bibitem{Boy}
674: D. Boyanovsky {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 51}, 4419 (1995);
675: {\it ibid}. {\bf 54}, 7570 (1996).
676:
677: %zeta during inflation
678: \bibitem{Wands}
679: D. Wands, K. A. Malik, D. H. Lyth, and A. R. Liddle,
680: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 043527 (2000).
681:
682: \bibitem{GWBM}
683: C. Gordon, D. Wands, B. A. Bassett, and R. Maartens,
684: astro-ph/0009131.
685:
686: \bibitem{TY}
687: S. Tsujikawa and H. Yajima,
688: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 123512 (2000).
689:
690: \bibitem{multi}
691: A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, astro-ph/9502002;
692: J. Garc\'{\i}a-Bellido and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52},
693: 6739 (1995); {\it ibid}. {\bf 53}, 437 (1996).
694:
695: \bibitem{sup}
696: K. Jedamzik and G. Sigl, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 023519 (2000);
697: P. Ivanov, {\it ibid}. 023505 (2000).
698:
699: \bibitem{brane_perturbation1}
700: H. Kodama, A. Ishibashi, and O. Seto, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62},
701: 064002 (2000); K. Koyama and J. Soda, {\it ibid}. 123502 (2000).
702:
703: \bibitem{brane_perturbation2}
704: C. Gordon and R. Maartens, hep-th/0009010;
705: D. Langlois, R. Maartens, M. Sasaki,
706: and D. Wands, hep-th/0012044.
707:
708: \bibitem{nonminimal}
709: S. Tsujikawa, K. Maeda, and T. Torii,
710: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}, 123505 (1999);
711: see also {\it ibid}. 063515 (1999).
712:
713: \bibitem{baryo1}
714: E. W. Kolb, A. D. Linde, and A. Riotto,
715: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77}, 4290 (1996).
716:
717: \bibitem{baryo2}
718: E. W. Kolb, A. Riotto, and I. I. Tkachev,
719: Phys. Lett. {\bf 423B}, 104 (1999).
720:
721:
722: \bibitem{fermion1}
723: J. Baacke, K. Heitman, and C. Patzold, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58},
724: 125013 (1998); P. B. Greene and L. Kofman,
725: Phys. Lett. {\bf 448B}, 6 (1999).
726:
727: \bibitem{fermion2}
728: G. F. Giudice, M. Peloso, A. Riotto, and I. I. Tkachev, JHEP
729: {\bf 9908}, 014 (1999);
730: S. Tsujikawa, B. A. Bassett, and F. Viniegra, {\it ibid}. {\bf 0008}, 019 (2000).
731:
732: \bibitem{lepto}
733: G. F. Giudice, A. Riotto, and I. I. Tkachev, JHEP
734: {\bf 9908}, 009 (1999).
735:
736:
737: \bibitem{selfpre}
738: D. I. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 53}, 1776 (1995);
739: P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky,
740: {\it ibid}. {\bf 56}, 6175 (1997).
741:
742:
743: \bibitem{mpre1}
744: B. A. Bassett, D. I. Kaiser, and R. Maartens,
745: Phys. Lett. {\bf 455B}, 84 (1999);
746: B. A. Bassett, F. Tamburini, D. I.
747: Kaiser, and R. Maartens, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B561}, 188 (1999).
748:
749: \bibitem{mpre2}
750: B. A. Bassett and F. Viniegra, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 043507 (2000);
751: F. Finelli and R. Brandenberger, {\it ibid}. 083502 (2000);
752: R. Easther and M . Parry, {\it ibid}. 103503 (2000);
753: J. P. Zibin, R. Brandenberger, and D. Scott, hep-ph/0007219 (2000);
754: F. Finelli and S. Khlebnikov, hep-ph/0009093.
755:
756: \bibitem{PBH}
757: A. M. Green and K. A. Malik, hep-ph/0008113;
758: B. A. Bassett and S. Tsujikawa, hep-ph/0008328.
759:
760: \end{thebibliography}
761: \end{document}
762:
763: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
764: %%% uu-files
765: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
766:
767: