1: 

2: \setcounter{chapter}{0}

3: \setcounter{section}{0}

4: \setcounter{subsection}{0}

5: \setcounter{figure}{0}

6: 

7: \chapter*{Publication VIII}

8: \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Polarized single top production at leptonic colliders from

9: broken R parity interactions incorporating CP violation}

10: 

11: \newpage

12: 

13: \vspace{10 mm}

14: \begin{center}

15: {  }

16: \end{center}

17: \vspace{10 mm}

18: 

19: \clearpage

20: 

21: 

22: 

23: \begin{center}

24: {\bf \huge Polarized single top production at leptonic colliders from

25: broken R parity interactions incorporating CP violation}

26: \end{center} 

27: \vspace{2cm}

28: \begin{center}

29: M. Chemtob, G. Moreau

30: \end{center} 

31: \begin{center}

32: {\em  Service de Physique Th\'eorique \\} 

33: { \em  CE-Saclay F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, Cedex France \\}

34: \end{center} 

35: \vspace{1cm}

36: \begin{center}

37: {Phys. Rev. {\bf D61} (2000) 116004, hep-ph/9910543}

38: \end{center}

39: \vspace{2cm}

40: \begin{center}

41: Abstract  

42: \end{center}

43: \vspace{1cm}

44: %\begin{center}

45: {\it

46: The contribution from the R parity violating interaction, $\l '_{ijk}

47: L_i Q_j D_k^c $, in the associated production of a top quark

48: (antiquark) with a charm antiquark (quark) is examined for high energy

49: leptonic colliders.  We concentrate on the reaction, $l^-+l^+\to ( t

50: \bar c) + (c \bar t ) \to (b \bar l \nu \bar c) +(\bar b l \bar \nu c

51: ) $, associated with the semileptonic top decay. A set of

52: characteristic dynamical distributions for the signal events is

53: evaluated and the results contrasted against those from the standard

54: model W-boson pair production background. The sensitivity to

55: parameters (R parity violating coupling constants and down-squark

56: mass) is studied at the energies of the CERN LEP-II collider and the

57: future linear colliders.  Next, we turn to a study of a CP-odd

58: observable, associated with the top spin, which leads to an asymmetry

59: in the energy distribution of the emitted charged leptons for the pair

60: of CP-conjugate final states, $b \bar l \nu \bar c$ and $\bar b l \bar

61: \nu c $.  A non vanishing asymmetry arises from a CP-odd phase,

62: embedded in the R parity violating coupling constants, through

63: interference terms between the R parity violating amplitudes at both

64: the tree and loop levels.  The one-loop amplitude is restricted to the

65: contributions from vertex corrections to the photon and Z-boson

66: exchange diagram. We predict unpolarized and polarized rate

67: asymmetries of order $ O(10 ^{-3}) - O(10 ^{-2}) $. An order of

68: magnitude enhancement may be possible, should the R parity violating

69: coupling constants $\l '_{ijk}$ exhibit a hierarchical structure in

70: the quarks and leptons generation spaces.

71: }

72: %\end{center}

73: 

74: \newpage

75: 

76: 

77: 

78: 

79: \section{Introduction}

80: \label{h:secintro}

81: 

82: \setcounter{equation}{0}

83: 

84: The flavor non diagonal fermion-antifermion pair production,

85: $l^-l^+\to f_J \bar f_{J'},$ where $ J\ne J' $ are flavor labels,

86: represents a class of reactions where the high energy colliders could

87: contribute their own share in probing new physics incorporating flavor

88: changing and/or CP violation effects.  As is known, the standard model

89: contributions here are known to be exceedingly small, whereas

90: promising contributions are generally expected in the standard model

91: extensions.  (Consult ref.  \cite{h:chemtob} for a survey of the

92: literature.)  Of special interest is the case where a top quark

93: (antiquark) is produced in association with a lighter (charm or up)

94: antiquark (quark). The large top mass entails a top lifetime, $

95: \tau_{top} = [1.56 \ GeV ({m_t\over 180 \ GeV})^3]^{-1} $,

96: significantly shorter than the QCD hadronization time, $ 1/\L _{QCD}$,

97: which simplifies the task of jet reconstruction. \cite{h:toprev} The top

98: polarization effects also constitute a major attraction.

99: \cite{h:donoghue,h:topol0,h:kane,h:schmidt,h:chang1} The large top mass entails

100: a spin depolarization time of the top which is longer than its

101: lifetime, $\tau _{depol} = [1.7 MeV ({180\over m_t}) ]^{-1} >

102: \tau_{top} $, thus providing an easy access to top polarization

103: observables.  Polarization studies for the top-antitop pair production

104: reaction, in both production and decay, have been actively pursued in

105: recent years.  \cite{h:toppol,h:bartl,h:rigolin} (An extensive literature

106: can be consulted from these references.)

107: 

108: It appears worthwhile applying similar ideas to the flavor non

109: diagonal fermion pair production process involving a single top

110: production.  This reaction has motivated several theoretical studies

111: aimed at both leptonic ($ l^- l^+ , \ e \g $ and $\g \g $) and

112: hadronic ($ p \bar p , \ pp$) colliders.  Exploratory theoretical

113: studies have been pursued at an implicit level, via the consideration

114: of higher dimension contact interactions \cite{h:hikasa,h:han,h:abraham},

115: and at an explicit level, via the consideration of mechanisms

116: involving leptoquarks, \cite{h:barger} an extended Higgs doublet sector,

117: \cite{h:atwood,h:atwood1} supersymmetry based on the minimal

118: supersymmetric standard model with an approximately broken R parity,

119: \cite{h:chemtob,h:datta,h:oakes1,h:mahanta,h:litte} quark flavor mixing,

120: \cite{h:koide} standard model loops and four matter generations,

121: \cite{h:chang,h:huang99} or higher order standard model processes with

122: multiparticle final states, $ l^-l^+ \to t\bar c \nu \bar \nu

123: $. \cite{h:hou2} A survey of the current studies is provided in

124: ref.\cite{h:han}.

125: 

126: In this work, pursuing an effort started in our previous paper,

127: \cite{h:chemtob} we consider a test of the R parity violating (RPV)

128: interactions aimed at the top-charm associated production.  Our study

129: will focus on the contributions to the process, $ l^-l^+\to (t\bar c)

130: +(\bar t c) $, arising at the tree level from the trilinear RPV

131: interactions, $\l '_{ijk} L_i Q_j D_k^c $, via a $ \tilde d_{kR} $

132: squark exchange.  We examine the signal associated with the (electron

133: and muon) charged semileptonic decay channel of the top, $ t\to b W ^+

134: \to b l^+ \nu $.  The final states, $ (b l^+ \nu \bar c) + (\bar b l^-

135: \bar \nu c ), \ [l=e,\ \mu ] $ consist of an isolated energetic

136: charged lepton, accompanied by a pair of $ b $ and $ c $ quark

137: hadronic jets and missing energy.  The standard model background may

138: arise from the W-boson pair production reaction, $l^+ l ^-\to W^+W^-$,

139: and possibly, in the case of an imperfect $ b $ quark tagging, from

140: the $ b - \bar b $ quark pair production reaction, $l^+ l ^-\to b \bar

141: b $, followed by a semileptonic decay of one of the b quarks, $b \to c

142: l^- \bar \nu $.

143: 

144: The present work consists of two main parts. In the first part, we

145: discuss the signal associated with the top semileptonic decay channel.

146: We evaluate a set of characteristic dynamical distributions for the

147: signal and for the standard model background and obtain predictions

148: for the effective rates based on a judicious choice of selection cuts

149: on the final state kinematical variables.  Our discussion will develop

150: along similar lines as in a recent work of Han and Hewett, \cite{h:han}

151: which was focused on the contributions initiated by the dimension, $

152: \cddd =6$, four fields couplings of the Z-boson with fermion pairs and

153: the neutral Higgs boson.  In the second part of the paper, we examine

154: a specific CP-odd top polarization observable which corresponds to an

155: asymmetry in the energy distribution of the final state charged lepton

156: with respect to the sign of its electric charge.

157: 

158: The contents of the paper are organised into 3 sections.  In Section

159: \ref{sec2}, we focus on the total and partial semileptonic decay rates

160: for both the signal and standard model background, allowing for the

161: case of an imperfect $ b $ quark tagging.  We discuss the constraints

162: from the indirect bounds on the RPV coupling constants, study the

163: dependence of rates on the down-squark mass parameter and evaluate a

164: set relevant dynamical distributions that are of use in devising an

165: appropriate set of selection cuts.  In Section \ref{sec3}, we discuss

166: a test of CP violation involving top polarization effects. The CP

167: violating observable arises through interference terms between the

168: tree and one-loop contributions to the amplitude and a CP-odd phase

169: which is embodied in the RPV coupling constants.  Following an

170: approach similar to one used in earlier proposals,

171: \cite{h:schmidt,h:chang1} we describe the top production and decay by

172: means of a factorization approximation and examine the induced charge

173: asymmetry in the energy distribution of the final state charged

174: leptons. The production amplitudes are evaluated in the helicity

175: basis.  Our main conclusions are summarized in Section \ref{sec4}.

176: 

177: 

178: \section{Top-charm associated production}

179: \label{sec2}

180: 

181: \setcounter{equation}{0}

182: 

183: \subsection{ Integrated rates}

184: 

185: In a $ l^- l^+$ collision, the tree level transition amplitude for

186: single top production, as initiated by the RPV interactions, $ \l

187: '_{ijk} L_iQ_jD_k^c $, proceeds via the $u$-channel exchange of a

188: right-handed down-squark, $\tilde d_{kR}$, as represented in

189: Fig.\ref{h:fig1}.  By use of a Fierz ordering identity, the transition

190: amplitude for the flavor non diagonal production of an up

191: quark-antiquark pair, $ l^- (k) + l^+ (k') \to u_J (p) +\bar u_{J'}

192: (p') $, can be written in the form of a Lorentz covariant vectorial

193: coupling,

194: \begin{eqnarray}

195: M^{JJ'}_{t}= -{\l ^{'\star }_{lJk} \l '_{lJ'k} \over 2(u-m^2_{\tilde

196: d_{kR} }) } \bar v_L(k') \g^\mu u_L(k)\bar u_L(p)\g_\mu v_L(p').

197: \label{h:eq1pp}

198: \end{eqnarray}

199: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

200: \begin{figure}[t]

201: \begin{center}

202: \leavevmode \psfig{figure=topfey.eps,width=3.in}

203: \end{center}

204: \caption{Feynman diagram for the tree level amplitude of the process,

205: $ l^+l^- \to \bar c t \to \bar c b l^+ \nu $.}

206: \label{h:fig1}

207: \end{figure}

208: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

209: We shall specialize henceforth to the case of electron-positron

210: colliders, corresponding to the choice $ l=1$ for the generation

211: index.  The squared amplitude, summed over the initial and final

212: fermion spins, reads: \cite{h:chemtob}

213: \begin{eqnarray}

214: \sum_{pol} \vert M^{JJ'}_t \vert ^2 &=& N_c \bigg \vert -{ \l'_{1J'k}

215: \l {'^\star } _{1Jk} \over 2(u-m^2_{\tilde d_{kR} } )} \bigg \vert ^2

216: 16 (k\cdot p')(k'\cdot p ) .

217: \label{equ1p}

218: \end{eqnarray}

219: The production rate for unpolarized initial leptons, integrated over

220: the scattering angle in the interval, $ 0\le \vert \cos \t \vert \le

221: x_c$, is given by the analytic formula,

222: \begin{eqnarray}

223: \s &= &{ N_c \vert \l'_{1J'k} \l^{'\star } _{1Jk} \vert ^2 \over 64

224: \pi s^{2} } [(u_--u_+) +(2\tilde m^2-m_J^2 -m_{J'} ^2 )\ln \vert

225: {u_--\tilde m^2 \over u_+-\tilde m^2} \vert \cr & -& (\tilde

226: m^2-m_J^2)(\tilde m^2-m_{J'}^2) ({1\over u_--\tilde m^2 } -{1\over

227: u_+-\tilde m^2 } ) ],

228: \label{equ1q}

229: \end{eqnarray}

230: where, $ u_\pm = m_J^2 -\sqrt s (E_p \pm p x_c )$.  For the top-charm

231: associated production case, in the limit, $ m_J = m_t >> m_{J'} = m_c

232: $, one has, $ u_+ \simeq m_t^2 -s, \ u_- \simeq 0$.  For fully

233: polarized initial beams, since the RPV amplitude selects a single

234: helicity configuration for the initial state leptons, $l^-_L l^+_R$,

235: (left handed $l^-$ and right handed $ l^+$) the corresponding

236: polarized rate would be still described by the same formula as above,

237: only with an extra enhancement factor of $4$.  The predicted rates for

238: $ t\bar c $ production are controlled by quadratic products of the RPV

239: coupling constants, $\l ^{'\star }_{13k} \l '_{12k},\ [ k=1,2,3]$ and

240: the squark mass, $m_{\tilde d_{kR} }$, denoted for short as, $\tilde

241: m$. Allowing for the existence in the RPV interactions of an up-quark

242: flavor mixing, such as would be induced by the transformation from

243: flavor to mass basis, one may express the amplitude in terms of a

244: single RPV coupling constant and the CKM matrix, $V$, by rewriting the

245: coupling constant dependence as, $ \l'_{12k} \l {'^\star } _{13k} \to

246: \l _{1Mk}^{'\star } \l '_{1M'k} (V^\dagger )_{M'2}(V^\dagger ) ^\star

247: _{M3} $, and selecting the maximal contribution associated with the

248: configurations, $M=M'=2 $ or $ 3$.  This yields the order of magnitude

249: estimate, $\l _{13 k} ^{'\star } \l '_{12 k} \to \vert \l '_{12k}\vert

250: ^2 (V ^\dagger )_{22} (V^\dagger )^\star _{23} \approx 2 \vert \l

251: '_{12k}\vert ^2 \l^2 $ or $ 2 \vert \l '_{13k}\vert ^2 \l^2 $,

252: respectively, where, $\l \approx \sin \t_c \approx 0.22 $, denotes the

253: Cabibbo angle parameter.

254: 

255: We pause briefly to recall the current bounds on the RPV coupling

256: constants of interest in the present study. \cite{h:reviews} The

257: relevant single coupling constant bounds are, $ \l '_{12k} < 4.

258: \times 10^{-2} ,\ \l '_{13k} < 0.37 $ (charged current universality);

259: $ \l '_{1j1} < 3 \times 10^{-2} $ (atomic physics parity violation); $

260: \l '_{12k} < 0.3-0.4, \ \l '_{13k} < 0.3 \ - \ 0.6 $ (neutral current

261: universality); and $\l '_{122} < 7. \times 10^{-2},\ \l '_{133} < 3.5

262: \times 10^{-3} $ (neutrino Majorana mass).  \cite{h:godbole} The

263: superpartners scalar particles masses are set at $ 100 \ GeV$. Unless

264: otherwise stated, all the dummy flavor indices for quarks and leptons

265: are understood to run over the three generations.  Using the above

266: results for individual coupling constants bounds, we may deduce for

267: the following upper bounds on the relevant quadratic products,

268: \cite{h:grossman} $ \l '_{13k} \l '_{12k} < [O(10^{-3}), \ O(10^{-2}), \

269: O(10^{-4})] , [k=1,2,3]$.  The indirect quadratic products bounds, $

270: \l '_{ijk} \l '_{i' 3k} < 1.1 \times 10^{-3} , \ \l '_{ijk} \l '_{i' j

271: 3} < 1.1 \times 10^{-3} , \ [ i' =1,2 ] $ ($B \to X_q \nu \bar \nu $)

272: are roughly comparable to these single coupling constants bounds.  We

273: also note that using the CKM flavor mixing along with a single

274: dominant coupling constant in the current basis, as described at the

275: end of the previous paragraph, may not be especially beneficial in

276: avoiding the above stronger pair product bound.  The bound on the

277: corresponding coupling constant factor, $ 2 \vert \l '_{13k}\vert ^2

278: \l^2 < O(10^{-2}) $, is competitive for the generation indices, $

279: k=1,3$.

280: 

281: 

282: 

283: Numerical results for the integrated rates have already been reported

284: in previous works \cite{h:mahanta,h:chemtob}.  Setting the relevant RPV

285: coupling constants at the reference value, $\l '= 0.1 $, one predicts

286: rates of order $ 1 \ - \ 10 \ fb$, for $ \tilde m = O (100) \ GeV$.

287: As the center of mass energy varies in the interval, $\sqrt s = 192 \

288: - \ 1000 \ GeV$, the rates rise sharply from threshold, reaching

289: smoothly a plateau around $ \sqrt s \simeq 400 \ GeV$. This contrasts

290: with the predictions from gauge boson mediated higher dimension

291: interactions \cite{h:han} where the rise of the rates with incident

292: energy is a more gradual one.  The rates are also found to have a

293: strong dependence on $\tilde m$, which weakens for increasing center

294: of mass energies.  One may roughly parametrize the dependence on $ s $

295: and $ \tilde m$ by the approximate scaling law, $\s \approx ({\l ' \l

296: ' \over 0.01 } )^2 ({100 \ GeV \over \tilde m })^{x (s)},$ where the

297: power exponent is a fastly decreasing function of energy, taking the

298: approximate values, $ x (s) \approx [3.65, \ 1.86, \ 0.94] $, at,

299: $\sqrt s =[0. 192, \ 0.5 , \ 1. ] \ TeV$.

300: 

301: Although the predicted rates seem to be severely constrained by the

302: above indirect bounds, one could envisage an optimistic scenario where

303: the supersymmetry decoupling limit, $\tilde m \to \infty $, is

304: realized with fixed values for the products, $ \l '_{ijk} ({100 \

305: GeV\over \tilde m }) \approx 0.1 $, consistently with the current

306: indirect bounds.  The results obtained with this prescription are

307: displayed in Figure \ref{h:fig2}.  The integrated rates now depend on $

308: \tilde m $ as, $ \s \propto ({100 \ GeV \over \tilde m })^{-4+x (s)}$,

309: which leads at high energies to an enhancement by up to three orders

310: of magnitudes, compared to the case where the RPV coupling constants

311: are taken independent of $\tilde m$. The initial energy of LEP-II

312: falls right in the regime where the cross section is sharply rising

313: with increasing initial energy.  The decrease with increasing $\tilde

314: m$ is stronger at LEP-II energies than at the future linear colliders

315: energies.  Note that at the largest values of the superpartner mass,

316: $\tilde m \simeq 1.  \ TeV$, the RPV coupling constants in our

317: prescription enter a strong coupling regime ($\l ' =O( 1) $) and it is

318: not clear then whether the tree level prediction makes sense.

319: 

320: 

321: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

322: \begin{figure} [t]

323: \begin{center}

324: \leavevmode \psfig{figure=figmasse.eps,width=17cm}

325: \end{center}

326: \caption{The total integrated rate for the RPV induced reaction, $

327: l^+l^- \to( t \bar c) +(\bar t c) $, setting the values of the

328: relevant coupling constants as, $ \l '_{12k} = \l '_{ 13k} =0.1 \ (

329: \tilde m /100 \ GeV ) $, is plotted in window $(A)$ as a function of

330: center of mass energy, $ s^{1/2} $ for fixed down squark mass, $

331: \tilde m =[ 100, \ 200, \ 500, \ 1000 ] \ GeV $ and in window $(B)$ as

332: a function of $\tilde m$ for fixed $s^\ud =[ 192, \ 500, \ 1000 ] \

333: GeV $. We integrate over an interval of the scattering angle, $ 0\le

334: \vert \cos \t \vert \le 0.9848 $, corresponding to an opening angle

335: with respect to the beams axis larger than $10^{o } $. }

336: \label{h:fig2}

337: \end{figure}

338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

339: Next, we consider the process incorporating the top semileptonic

340: decay, as pictured by the Feynman diagram shown in Fig.\ref{h:fig1}. We

341: assume that the top decay is dominated by the electroweak semileptonic

342: decay channel, with branching fraction, $ B (t\to b +W^+) \approx

343: 1$. We also include the pair of CP-conjugate final states, $t\bar c $

344: and $c \bar t$ production, which multiplies the rate by a factor of

345: $2$. Note, however, that we restrict ourselves to the $ u_{J'} = c$

346: charm quark mode only.  The numerical results for rates, including a

347: branching fraction factor of ${2\over 9} $ (experimental value, $

348: 21.1\% $) to account for the $W \to l \nu , \ [l= e, \ \mu ]$ decay

349: channels, are displayed in Table \ref{h:table1}.  We also show the

350: standard model background rate from the $W $-boson pair production,

351: $l^-l^+\to (W^+ W^-) \to ( \ l^+ \nu \bar u_i d_j ) + ( l^- \bar \nu

352: \bar d_j u_i) $, with one $ W$-boson decay leptonically and the other

353: hadronically, where $ i, \ j $ are generation indices.  The

354: irreducible background from, $ W ^- \to \bar c b $ or $ W ^+ \to \bar

355: b c$, is strongly suppressed, due to the small branching factor, given

356: approximately by, $ 0.32 \vert V_{cb} \vert ^2 \approx 5 \ 10 ^{-4}$.

357: It is safer, however, to allow for the possibility where the light

358: quark hadronic jets could be misidentified as $ b $ quark hadronic

359: jets.  Accounting for the leptonic decay for one of the $W$-boson and

360: the hadronic decay for the other $ W$-boson, introduces for the total

361: rate, which includes all the subprocesses, the branching fraction

362: factor, $ 2\times (21.1 \pm 0.64 )\% \times (67.8\pm 1.0)\% = 0.286

363: \pm 0.024$.  Our numerical results in Table \ref{h:table1} for the

364: standard model background rates are in qualitative agreement with

365: those quoted ($ \s = [2252, \ 864] \ fb$ at $ s^\ud = [0.5, \ 1. ] \

366: TeV$) by Han and Hewett.  \cite{h:han} One should be aware of the

367: existence of large loop corrections to the $ W^+ W^-$ production rate,

368: especially at high energies. The predictions including the electroweak

369: and QCD standard model one-loop contributions read, \cite{h:beenakker}

370: $\s = [4624, \ 1647, \ 596 ] \ fb$ at $ s^\ud = [0.192, \ 0.5, \ 1. ]

371: \ TeV$.  We conclude therefore that our use of the tree level

372: predictions for the $ W^+W^-$ background overestimates the true cross

373: sections by $ [9\%, 20 \%, 32 \%] $ at the three indicated energies.

374: 

375: 

376: 

377: 

378: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

379: \begin{table} 

380: \begin{center}

381: \vskip 1 cm

382: \vskip 0.5cm

383: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}

384: \hline

385: $ Energy (TeV) $ & $ 0.192 $& $0.5 $ & $1.0 $ \\ 

386: \hline

387: Total rate $ \s (fb) $ & $ 4.099 $& $ 4.291 $ & $1.148$ \\ 

388: \hline

389: Signal (fb) & $ 0.68 $ & $ 0.91 $ & $ 0.24 $ \\

390: \hline  

391: $W^+W^-$ Background (fb) & $ 5076$ & $ 2080 $ & $ 876 $ \\  

392: \hline

393: Cut Signal (fb) & $ 0.54 $ & $ 0.74 $ & $ 0.21$ \\  

394: \hline

395: $W^+W^-$ Cut Background (fb) & $ 17. $ & $5.0 $ & $ 2.6 $ \\ 

396: \hline

397: \end{tabular}

398: \end{center}

399: \caption{ Production rates for the top-charm production signal and the

400: W-boson pair production background.  The line entries give

401: successively the total integrated rate for the reaction, $l^+l^- \to (

402: t \bar c) + (c \bar t )$, using, $\l '= 0.1, \ \tilde m =100 \ GeV$,

403: the rate for signal events, $(b \bar l \nu \bar c) +(\bar b l \bar \nu

404: c ) $, associated with the top semileptonic decay, the W-boson pair

405: production background rate, $l^-l^+\to W^+ W^-\to (l^+ \nu \bar u_i

406: d_j ) + (l^-\bar \nu \bar d_j u_i ) $, and the corresponding cut

407: signal and background rates, as obtained by applying the selection

408: cuts quoted in the text.  The results include the first two

409: generations of charged leptons, $ \ l=e, \ \mu $. }

410: \label{h:table1}

411: \end{table}

412: %

413: % \\ \tableline

414: %

415: 

416: Let us discuss briefly other possible sources of background. The next

417: important contribution is that arising from the non resonant W-boson

418: virtual propagation in the amplitude with the intermediate $ W^+ W^-$

419: bosons branching into four fermions ($l \nu q\bar q'$).  This could be

420: possibly estimated by subtracting the resonant contribution from the

421: total background cross sections, weighted by the suitable branching

422: factors, as independently evaluated by numerical methods in the

423: literature.  The results for the integrated total cross sections, $

424: l^-l^+ \to (4 f) + (4 f + \g )$, \cite{h:bardin} including the initial

425: state radiation and Coulomb corrections, indicate that the off-shell

426: contributions amount to a small relative correction lower than $

427: O(10\% ) $.  Alternatively, one may consider, after reconstructing the

428: neutrino momentum from the missing energy, a procedure to impose

429: suitable cuts on the $ bW$ invariant mass, aimed at suppressing the

430: non resonant production background.

431: 

432:  One other potentially important background is that arising from the

433: $b- \bar b$ quark pair production reaction, $l^+l^- \to \g ^\star / Z

434: \to b \bar b \to \bar b ( cl^-\bar \nu ) + b (\bar cl^+\nu ) $.

435: \cite{h:mahanta} The numerically derived predictions for the rates, as

436: obtained by means of the PYTHIA generator, are: $ \s = [1.631 \ 10^4 ,

437: \ 2.12 \ 10^ 3 , \ 5.35 \ 10^2 ] \ fb$, at $ s^\ud = [0.192, \ 0.5, \

438: 1. ] TeV$.  It would appear desirable, in view of these large

439: predicted rates, to eliminate this background by performing a double $

440: b $ quark tagging analysis on the events sample. This can be performed

441: at a reasonably low cost, given that the detection efficiency of $b$

442: quark jets is currently set at $ 50\%$.  If one performs a single $ b

443: $ quark tagging, the rates for the corresponding events, $l^+l^- \to

444: \g ^\star / Z \to b \bar b \to ( cl^-\bar \nu ) \bar b $, are reduced

445: by a branching fraction, $ B(b \to c l \nu ) \approx 10\% $, but this

446: is compensated by the probability of misidentifying a light quark jet

447: as a $ b $ quark jet, which lies at the small value of $ 0.4 \% $ with

448: the current silicon vertex techniques.  If no $ b $ quark tagging is

449: performed at all, then the above large rates may make it necessary to

450: resort to an analysis of isolation cuts of the type to be discussed in

451: the next subsection.

452: 

453: \subsection{Distributions  for the semileptonic top decay events}

454: \label{sec21} 

455: In order to separate the signal from background, we consider the same

456: set of characteristic final state kinematical variables as proposed in

457: the study by Han and Hewett. \cite{h:han} These are the maximum and

458: minimum energy of the two jets, $ E_j^{high}, \ E_j^ {low}$, the dijet

459: invariant mass, $ M_{jj} $, the charged lepton energy, $E_l,$ and

460: rapidity, $y_l = \ud \log {E_l +p_{l\parallel } \over E_l-p_{l

461: \parallel } } $.  The distributions in these $6$ variables for the

462: signal and background, at a center of mass energy, $ \sqrt s = 0.5

463: TeV$, are plotted in Fig.\ref{figtopp}.  These numerical results were

464: obtained by means of the PYTHIA \cite{h:sjostrand} event generator. One

465: notices marked differences between signal and background.  The maximum

466: jet energy distribution is uniformly distributed for the background

467: but sharply peaked for the signal, where the peak position is

468: determined by the top mass and the incident energy as, $m_t^2 = (m_c^2

469: -s +2\sqrt s E_p)$.  The minimum jet energy is uniformly distributed

470: for both signal and background, but happily the corresponding

471: intervals are very partially overlapping.  The signal events rapidity

472: distributions for the maximum energy jet are more central for signal

473: than background. A similar trend holds for the lepton rapidity

474: distributions.  The dijet invariant mass is a most significant

475: variable in discriminating against the background due to its

476: pronounced peak at the $ W $ mass. For the signal, the dijet invariant

477: mass is uniformly spread out. Although we do not show here the

478: distributions for the top mass reconstruction, this also features a

479: strong contrast between a strongly peaked signal and a uniform

480: background. The lepton energy distributions for the signal and

481: background are peaked at the opposite low and high energy ends of the

482: physical interval, respectively. This is a familiar effect associated

483: with the correlation between the W-boson spin polarization, which is

484: predominantly longitudinal in the top decay and transverse in the

485: direct W-boson decay, and the velocity of the emitted charged lepton.

486: In the signal decay amplitude, $ t \to b\bar l \nu $, the fact that

487: the left handed b-quark must carry the top polarization, forces the

488: lepton to travel with opposite velocity to that of top.  In the

489: background decay amplitude, $ W^-\to l \bar \nu $, the charged lepton

490: is emitted with a velocity pointing in the same direction as that of

491: the W-boson. Thus, the Lorentz boost effects on the emitted charged

492: leptons act in opposite ways for the signal and background events.

493: 

494: 

495: 

496: While the above distinctive features between signal and background

497: events get further pronounced with increasing center of mass energy,

498: opposite trends occur as the initial energy is lowered.  The

499: distributions at the LEP-II center of mass energy, $ \sqrt s = 0.192 \

500: TeV,$ are plotted in Fig.\ref{figtopp192}.  At this energy, the

501: monovalued distribution for the signal jet, which is now the softer

502: lower energy jet, is still well separated from the corresponding

503: background jet distribution.  So, this variable, along with the dijet

504: invariant mass stand up as useful discrimation tests for the signal.

505: By contrast, the energy and rapidity distributions for the maximum

506: signal jet may not be easily distinguished from the

507: background. Similarly, the lepton energy distributions in the signal

508: and background are overlapping due to the small Lorentz boost effect.

509: 

510: The distributions obtained with the RPV interactions are rather

511: similar to those found with the higher dimension operator

512: mechanism. \cite{h:han} This is due to the formal structure of the RPV

513: amplitude, involving an effective $u$-channel vector particle

514: exchange.  In fact, the selection cuts proposed by Han and Hewett

515: \cite{h:han} appear to be quite appropriate also in the RPV case, and,

516: for convenience, we recapitulate below the cut conditions used to

517: characterize the selected events.

518: 

519: $ E_j^{low} < 20,\ E_j^ {high} > 60,\ E_l > 0,\ \d_{jj}> 10,\ \d_t <

520: 5, \quad [ \sqrt s = 192] $

521: 

522: $ E_j^{low} > 20,\ E_j^ {high} > 200,\ E_l < 150, \ \d_{jj}> 10,\ \d_t

523: < 40, \quad [\sqrt s = 500 ] $

524: 

525: $ E_j^{low} > 20,\ E_j^ {high} > 460,\ E_l< 350,\ \d_{jj} > 10,\ \d_t

526: < 100.  \quad [\sqrt s = 1000] $

527: 

528:  The above listed variables correspond to the minimum and maximum

529: energy of the two jets, $ E_j^ {low} , \ E_j^{high}, $ the charged

530: lepton energy, $E_l, $ the distance between the dijet invariant mass

531: and W-boson mass, $\d_{jj} = \vert M_{jj} -m_W \vert, $ the distance

532: of the reconstructed top mass to the true mass, $ \d_t = \vert

533: m_t^{reconst}-m_t \vert $.  The assigned numerical values are all

534: expressed in GeV units.  Besides the above cuts, we also impose the

535: usual detection cuts on energies and rapidities, $ E_{j,l} > 10 \ GeV,

536: \ \vert \eta_{j,l} \vert < 2$, aimed at removing the particles

537: travelling too close to the beam pipe.  We allow for the detection

538: efficiency of the particle energies only in an approximate way,

539: namely, by accounting for the following approximate uncertainties, $\D

540: E /E = 40 \%, \ 10 \%$, on the jets and lepton energies, respectively,

541: at the level of imposing the above selection cuts, rather than by the

542: usual procedure of performing a Gaussian smearing of the particle

543: energies.

544:  

545: The numerically evaluated efficiencies on the signal and background

546: events are, $ \e_S \simeq 0.8 , \ \e_B \simeq 3. 10^{-3} $, with a

547: very weak dependence on the center of mass energy and, for the signal,

548: a weak dependence on the mass parameter $\tilde m$, which was set at $

549: \tilde m = 100 \ GeV$ in the numerical simulations.  After applying

550: the cuts, the background rates are, $ \s_B \e_B = [ 17., \ 5., \ 2. ]

551: \ fb, $ and the signal rates, $ \s_S\e_S = [ 0.68, \ 0.74, \ 0.21 ] \

552: fb $, for $\sqrt s = [192., \ 500., \ 1000 ] \ GeV$.  The results for

553: the cut signal and background rates, as given in Table \ref{h:table1},

554: show that the background is very significantly reduced by the cuts.

555: The situation is clearly far more favorable for the future linear

556: colliders than for LEP-II.  Nevertheless, the number of surviving

557: signal events is still one order of magnitude below that of the

558: surviving background, so that the option of cutting down the

559: background by means of a $b $ quark tagging procedure is to be

560: preferred since the ensuing reduction would be much more drastic. An

561: integrated luminosity of $\call = 100 \ fb^{-1}$ would lead to a

562: number of signal events, $(\l '_{12k} \l'_{13k} /10^{-2} ) \times

563: O(30) $.

564: 

565: 

566: We have also performed an indicative event generator study of the

567: background, $ l^+l^-\to b \bar b \to l^\pm + hadrons $, restricting

568: consideration to the emitted charged leptons only. A jet

569: reconstruction of the partonic level distributions is a task beyond

570: the scope of the present work. We focus on the first charged lepton

571: emitted during the semileptonic decays of the produced $B , \ \bar B $

572: mesons, since this carries the largest velocity. As seen on

573: Fig.\ref{figtopp}, the distribution for the first emitted charged

574: lepton energy is peaked at low energies.  One expects that the most

575: energetic lepton is that produced in the semileptonic decays of the $B

576: $ mesons.  The rapidity distribution is less central than for the

577: signal and nearly overlaps with that of the $ W^+W^-$ background.

578: Therefore, imposing the additional lower bound cut on the lepton

579: energy, say, at $ E_l > 20 \ GeV$, for $s^\ud = 500 GeV$, should be

580: sufficient to appreciably suppress the $ b-\bar b$ background without

581: much affecting the signal.

582: 

583: 

584: We may infer the reach with respect to the free parameters by

585: evaluating the statistical significance ratio for a discovery, as

586: defined by, $ \hat \sigma = {S\over \sqrt { S+B} } ,\ S = \s_{S} \call

587: ,\ B =\s_{B} \call $, where $ \call $ denotes the integrated

588: luminosity.  Setting this at the value, $ \hat \sigma = 3 $,

589: corresponding to a $ 95 \% $ confidence level, one deduces a

590: dependence of the RPV coupling constant as a function of the

591: superpartner mass parameters for a fixed initial energy and integrated

592: luminosity.  The sensitivity reach contour plot for the relevant

593: parameters, $ \l ' \l '= \l '_{12k} \l _{13k} ^{'\star } $ and $\tilde

594: m = m_{ \tilde d _{kR} } $, is shown in Fig.\ref{figsens}.  We note

595: that the sensitivity limit on the product of coupling constants, $ \l

596: ' \l '$, scales with the luminosity approximately as, $ 1/ \sqrt \call

597: $.  While the reach on the RPV coupling constants products, $\l

598: '_{12k} \l '_{13k} < O(10^{-1}) $, lies well above the current

599: indirect bounds, this covers a wide interval of the down squark mass

600: which extends out to $ 1 TeV$.  To compare with analogous collider

601: physics processes, we note that while the flavor diagonal fermion pair

602: production reactions, $ e^-e^+ \to f_J\bar f_J$, may have a higher

603: sensitivity reach, these are limited to information on the single

604: coupling constants, $ \l '_{1jk}$ \cite{h:choudhee}.  The special

605: reaction, $ e^-e^+ \to b\bar b $, proceeding via a sneutrino

606: $s$-channel resonance, may probe quadratic products such as, $

607: \l_{131} \l '_{333} $, \cite{h:erler} or $ \l_{131} \l '_{311}$

608: \cite{h:kalitev} at levels of $ O(10^{-3})$, but this is subject to the

609: existence of a wide sneutrino resonance.  The $t\bar b$ associated

610: production at the hadronic Fermilab Tevatron \cite{h:datta,h:oakes1} and

611: the Cern LHC \cite{h:oakes1} colliders can be initiated via a charged

612: slepton $ \tilde e_{iL} $ $s$-channel exchange. The sensitivity reach

613: on the linear combination of quadratic coupling constants products,

614: $\l'_{i11} \l'_{i33} $, is of order $ 10^{-2} - 10^{-1}$. This

615: information should prove complementary to that supplied by our study

616: aimed at the leptonic colliders.  To conclude this brief comparison,

617: we observe that the information provided by the single top production

618: reaction appears to be rather unique in view of the very

619: characteristic signature of the associated events.

620: 

621: 

622: 

623: \begin{figure} [t]

624: %\leavevmode \psfig{figure=topp500.eps}

625: \centerline{ \psfig{figure=topp500.eps} }

626: \vskip 1 cm

627: \caption{ Normalized dynamical distributions associated with the

628: signal events, $l^+l^-\to (t \bar c) +(\bar t c) \to (b l^+ \nu \bar

629: c) +( \bar b l^-\bar \nu c)$, (dashed line) at $\tilde m =100 \ GeV$,

630: and the background events, $ l^+l^-\to W^+W^- \to ( l^+ \nu \bar q q'

631: ) + ( l^- \bar \nu q\bar q' ) $, (continuous line) at a center of mass

632: energy, $ s^\ud = 500 \ GeV$. The kinematical variables in the

633: histograms, from left to right and up to down, are the jets maximum

634: energy, the jets minimum energy, the rapidity for the highest energy

635: jet, the di-jet invariant mass, the charged lepton energy and the

636: charged lepton rapidity.  The charged lepton energy and rapidity

637: distributions are also plotted for the $ b-\bar b$ background

638: production events, $ l^+l^-\to b \bar b \to l^\pm + hadrons $ (dotted

639: line).  }

640: \label{figtopp}

641: \end{figure}

642: 

643: 

644: \begin{figure} [t]

645: \centerline{ \psfig{figure=topp192.eps} }

646: \vskip 1 cm

647: \caption{ Same distributions as in Fig.\ref{figtopp}, at a center of

648: mass energy $ s^\ud = 192 \ GeV$. }

649: \label{figtopp192}

650: \end{figure}

651: 

652: 

653: \begin{figure} [t]

654: \centerline{ \psfig{figure=sens.eps}}

655: \vskip 1.  cm

656: \caption{ Sensitivity reach plot for the RPV coupling constants

657: product, $\l '_{12k} \l '_{13k} /0.01$, as a function of the down

658: squark mass, $\tilde m$, for fixed center of mass energy, $ s^\ud =[

659: 192. \ , 500 , \ 1000 ] \ GeV$, and corresponding fixed integrated

660: luminosity, $ \call = [2., \ 100., \ 100. ]\ fb^{-1} $, using an

661: acceptancy for the background, $ \e _B = 3\ 10 ^{-3} $, and an

662: acceptancy for the signal, $ \ \e_S = 0.8 $, assumed to be independent

663: of $\tilde m$.}

664: \label{figsens}

665: \end{figure}

666: 

667: 

668: \section{Top polarization observables and a test of  CP violation}

669: \label{sec3}

670: 

671: \setcounter{equation}{0}

672: 

673: Should single top production become experimentally observable in the

674: future, an important next step to take is in examining top

675: polarization observables.  In this section, we present an approximate

676: study for the top semileptonic decay signal in top-charm associated

677: production aiming at a test of CP violation.  We exploit an idea which

678: was developed in early studies of $ t-\bar t$

679: production. \cite{h:kane,h:schmidt} Interesting extensions are currently

680: pursued \cite{h:toppol,h:bartl,h:rigolin}. The basic observation is that any

681: CP-odd quantity depending on the top polarization, such as the

682: difference of rates between the pair of CP conjugate reactions, $ \s (

683: l^- l^+ \to t_L \bar c ) - \s ( l^- l^+ \to \bar t_R c ) $, can become

684: observable by analyzing the top polarization through the kinematical

685: distributions of its emitted decay ($b$ quark or charged lepton)

686: products.  An especially interesting observable is the charged lepton

687: energy distribution for a polarized top.  Any finite contribution to

688: the CP-odd observables must arise through an interference term

689: involving imaginary parts of loop and tree amplitudes factors, the

690: loop amplitude factor bringing a CP-even final state interaction

691: complex phase with the CP-odd relative complex phase arising from the

692: coupling constants in the product of loop and tree amplitudes.

693: 

694: \subsection{Helicity basis amplitudes} 

695: \label{sec30}

696:  Building on our previous work, \cite{h:chemtob} we shall combine the

697: tree level RPV induced amplitude discussed in Section \ref{sec2} with

698: the one-loop RPV induced amplitude associated to the photon and

699: Z-boson exchange diagrams, restricting ourselves to the vertex

700: corrections in the electroweak neutral current vertices, $ \g \bar f

701: _J (p) f_{J'} (p') $ and $ \ Z \bar f _J (p) f_{J'} (p') $.  The

702: Z-boson vertex admits the general Lorentz covariant decomposition,

703: \begin{eqnarray}

704: J_\mu ^{ Z }& = & - {g \over 2 \cos \t_ W} \G ^{JJ'} _\mu (Z), \cr \G

705: ^{JJ'} _\mu (Z) & =& \g_\mu ( A ^{JJ'}_L(f) P_L + A ^{JJ'}_ R (f) P_R)

706: +{1\over m_J +m_{J'}} \s_{\mu \nu } (p+p')^\nu (i a ^{JJ'} +\g_5 d

707: ^{JJ'} ), \cr & &

708: \label{equ321}

709: \end{eqnarray}

710: where the vectorial vertex functions, $ A^{JJ'} _{L , R} = A^{JJ'} _{L

711: , R}\vert_{tree} + A^{JJ'} _{L , R}\vert_{loop}$, have a tree level

712: contribution given by, $ A_{L,R} ^{ JJ' }\vert _{ tree} = \d_{JJ'}

713: a_{L,R} (f), \ a_{L,R} (f) = 2T_3^{L,R} -2Q(f) \sin ^2 \t_W $, and the

714: tensorial vertex functions, $ a^{JJ'},\ d^{JJ'} $, are associated with

715: the anomalous transition magnetic moment and the CP-odd, P-odd

716: electric transition dipole moment, respectively.  An analogous

717: decomposition applies for the photon, $J_\mu ^{\g } = -{g \sin \t_ W

718: \over 2 } \G ^{JJ'}_\mu ( \g ),$ with $ a_{L,R} (f) =2Q(f) $,

719: determined by the electric charge $Q(f)$.  It is convenient to work

720: with the $ Z f _J\bar f_{J'}$ vertex in the alternate Lorentz

721: covariant decomposition, $\G ^{JJ'} _\mu (Z) =\g_\mu (\capa -\capb

722: \g_5 ) + \ud (p-p')_\mu (\capc -\capd \g_5 ),$ where the vertex

723: functions, $\capa , \ \capb , \ \capc , \ \capd $, (omitting the up

724: quarks generation indices $ J, \ J'$ for convenience) are related to

725: the previously defined vectorial and tensorial ones,

726: eq. (\ref{equ321}), as,

727: \begin{eqnarray}

728: \capa & =& {1\over 2} (A ^{JJ'}_L(f) +A ^{JJ'}_R(f) ) +a ^{JJ'} , \

729: \capb = {1\over 2} (A ^{JJ'}_L (f) -A ^{JJ'}_R (f) ) + { m_J -m_{J'}

730: \over m_J +m_{J'} }i d ^{JJ'} , \cr \capc & =& -{2 \over m_J +m_{J'} }

731: a ^{JJ'} , \ \capd = -{2 \over m_J +m_{J'} } i d ^{JJ'}.

732: \label{equ51}

733: \end{eqnarray} 

734: The one-loop Z-boson exchange amplitude may then be written in the

735: form,

736: \begin{eqnarray}

737: M^{JJ'}_l (Z) & = &\bigg ({g\over 2 \cos \t_W}\bigg )^2 \bar v (\vec

738: k',\mu ')\g_\s \bigg (a(e_L) P_L+a(e_R)P_R \bigg )u(\vec k, \mu )

739: {1\over s-m_Z^2+im_Z\G_Z} \cr \times &&\bar u (\vec p,\l ) [\g^\s

740: (\capa -\capb \g_5 ) + \ud (p-p')^\s (\capc -\capd \g_5 ) ] v({\vec p

741: ' }, \l ') .

742: \label{equ322}

743: \end{eqnarray}

744: Combining the above loop amplitude with the RPV tree amplitude,

745: eq. (\ref{h:eq1pp}), which we rewrite as,

746: \begin{eqnarray}

747: M ^{JJ'} _t = \calr \bar v \g_\mu (1-\g_5) u \bar u \g^\mu (1-\g_5) v,

748: \quad \calr= -{ \l _{1Jk}^{'\star } \l '_{1 J'k} \over 8

749: (u-m^2_{\tilde d_{kR } } ) } ,

750: \label{equ323}

751: \end{eqnarray}

752: one obtains,

753: \begin{eqnarray} 

754: M^{JJ'}&=& M^{JJ'} _t + M^{JJ'} _l(Z) = [ ( G a^+ \capa + \calr )( \g

755: _\mu )( \g ^\mu ) - ( G a^+ \capb + \calr )( \g _\mu )( \g ^\mu \g_5)

756: \cr & - & ( G a^- \capa + \calr )( \g _\mu \g_5)( \g ^\mu ) + ( G a^-

757: \capb + \calr )( \g _\mu \g_5 )( \g ^\mu \g_5) \cr & + & \ud

758: (p-p')^\mu [ G a^+ \capc ( \g _\mu )( 1) - G a^+ \capd ( \g _\mu )(

759: \g_5) - G a^- \capc ( \g _\mu \g_5 )( 1) + G a^- \capd ( \g _\mu \g_5

760: )( \g_5) ], \cr & &

761: \label{equ52}

762: \end{eqnarray}

763: where, $ a^\pm = \ud (a_L(e)\pm a_R(e)),$ and we have omitted writing

764: the contractions of the Dirac spinors indices for the initial and

765: final fermions, respectively.  The photon exchange contribution can be

766: incorporated by treating the parameters $ a^\pm $ as operators acting

767: on the vertex functions, $\capa ,\ \capb , \ \capc , \ \capd $, by

768: means of the formal substitutions,

769: \begin{eqnarray}

770: G a^\pm \capa & =& G_Z {a_L(e) \pm a_R(e) \over 2} \bigg ( {A^{JJ'} _L

771: (f) \pm A^{JJ'} _R (f) \over 2} + a^{JJ'} \bigg ) \cr & & + G_\g { 2 Q(f)

772: \choose 0} \bigg ( { A_L^ { \g JJ'} (f) \pm A_R ^{ \g JJ'} (f) \over

773: 2}+ a^{JJ'} \bigg ) , \cr G_Z & =& ({g\over 2 \cos \t_W })^2 {1\over

774: s-m_Z^2 +im_Z \G_Z} , \ G_\g = ({g\sin \t_W \over 2 })^2 {1\over s}.

775: \label{equ53}

776: \end{eqnarray}

777: Analogous formulas to the above ones hold for the other products, $ G

778: a^\pm \capb ,\ G a^\pm \capc ,\ G a^\pm \capd.$ We have labelled the

779: vertex functions for the photon current by the suffix $\g $. The

780: formulas expressing the RPV one-loop contributions to the vertex

781: functions are provided in Appendix \ref{appexa}, quoting the results

782: derived in our previous work. \cite{h:chemtob} The amplitude $ M^{JJ'}$

783: in eq.(\ref{equ52}) may be viewed as a $ 4\times 4 $ matrix in the

784: fermions polarization space, $ (f(p, \l ) \bar f_{J'} (p', \l ') \vert

785: M \vert l^+ (k',\mu ') l^- (k, \mu ) ) $.  The various products in

786: eq. (\ref{equ52}) for the matrix elements with respect to the two

787: pairs of Dirac spinors separate into 8 distinct terms.  The

788: calculation of the helicity amplitudes is most conveniently performed

789: with the help of the `Mathematica' package.  Of the $16$

790: configurations only the $ 8$ helicity off diagonal configurations in

791: the initial fermions are non vanishing.  The explicit formulas for the

792: helicity amplitudes are provided in Appendix \ref{appexa}.

793: 

794: 

795: \subsection{Charged lepton energy distribution}

796: \label{sec31}

797: The differential cross section for top production and decay is

798: described in the factorization approximation. Ignoring the spin

799: correlations, which corresponds to dropping the spin non diagonal

800: contributions between the production and decay stages, yields:

801: \begin{eqnarray}

802: d\sigma & =&{\vert p \vert \over 128 \pi s \vert k \vert } {m_t \over

803: \pi } \int d(\cos \t ) \sum_{ \l } \vert M_{prod} (l^-l^+\to t_\l \bar

804: c)\vert ^2 \int dp^2 {1\over \vert p^2 -m_t^2 +im_t \G_t\vert ^2 }

805: d\G_t ,\cr d \G_t& = &{1\over (2\pi )^3 8 m_t }\overline { \sum } _ {

806: \l ' } \vert M_{dec} (t_{ \l '} \to b l^+ \nu ) \vert ^2 dE ^ \star _l

807: dE^\star _b .

808: \label{equ1}

809: \end{eqnarray}

810: The production amplitude is denoted, $M_{prod}$, the top decay

811: amplitude, $ M_{dec}$, and $ \l , \ \l ' = \pm 1 $, are polarization

812: labels, which will also be written for short as, $\pm $ .  We shall

813: assume a narrow resonance approximation for the top propagator, $\vert

814: p^2 -m_t^2 +im_t \G_t\vert ^{-2} \to {\pi \over m_t \G_t } \d (p^2

815: -m_t^2)$.  For the energies of interest, all the leptons and quarks,

816: with the exception of the top, may be treated as massless.  Two frames

817: of interest are the laboratory $(l^-l^+$) rest frame and the top rest

818: frame.  The letters denoting momentun variables in the $l^-l^+ $

819: center of mass (laboratory) frame are distinguished from those in the

820: top rest frame by the addition of a star. Standard kinematical methods

821: \cite{h:kajan} can be used to transform variables between these frames.

822: Exploiting the rotational invariance, one may conveniently choose to

823: work in the spatial frame where the top momentum lies in the $ xOz $

824: plane ($\theta , \phi =0 $) and the charged lepton points in an

825: arbitrary direction described by the spherical angles, $ \t_{l},

826: \phi_{l}$. The relations between angles may be obtained by use of the

827: spherical triangle identities, for example, the angle between lepton

828: and top reads, $ \cos \t_{lt} = \cos \t_{l} \cos \t + \sin \t_{l} \sin

829: \t \cos \phi_l.$ The Lorentz boost from the top rest frame to the

830: laboratory frame, involves a velocity parameter, $ \vec v= \vec p/E_p,

831: \ \beta = p/E_p, \ \g = (1-\b ^2)^{-1/2}= E_p/m_t, $ and yields for

832: the charged lepton momentum four vector and polar angle relative to

833: the top momentum, $E^\star _l =\g (E_l - \vec v \cdot \vec k_l ),\quad

834: \vec k^\star _l= \vec k_l +\g \vec v ({\g \vec v \cdot \vec k_l \over

835: \g +1} -E_l ), \quad \cos \t_{lt} ^\star ={\cos \t_{lt}-\b \over 1- \b

836: \cos \t_{lt} }$.

837: 

838: The top differential semileptonic decay rate has been thoroughly

839: studied in the literature.  \cite{h:kuhn} One representation convenient

840: for our purposes is the double differential rate with respect to the

841: final charged lepton energy, $ E^\star _l$, and the final lepton and

842: neutrino invariant mass squared, $ W ^2 = (k_l+k_ \nu )^2$.  The

843: result for the unpolarized rate carries no dependence on the

844: scattering angles and reads, quoting from ref.\cite{h:kuhn},

845: \begin{eqnarray}

846: d\G _t&= &{N_lG_F^2m_t^5\over 16\pi^3 } dx_l \int dy { x_l

847: (x_M-x_l)\over (1- y \xi)^2 +\g ^2 }, \cr &=& {N_lG_F^2m_t^5\over

848: 16\pi^3 } {2\over m_t} {x_l (x_M-x_l) \over \g \xi } \tan^{-1} {\g \xi

849: x_l (x_M-x_l) \over (1+\g ^2) (1-x_l) -\xi x_l (x_M-x_l ) }\

850: dE_l^\star .

851: \label{h:equ4}

852: \end{eqnarray}

853: The kinematical variables for the emitted charged lepton and neutrino

854: are defined as, $ x_l =2E_l^\star /m_t, \ y= W^2/m_t^2, \ [ W=k_l+k_

855: \nu ] $ with the bounds, $ 0< x_l< x_M , \ 0< y < {x_l (x_M-x_l) \over

856: 1-x_l } $ and we employ the following notations, $ N_l $ for the

857: number of light lepton flavors, $ \g = \G_W/m_W,\ \xi = m_t^2/m_W^2,\

858: x_M =1-\e^2, \ \e =m_b/m_t , \ \tan ^{-1} A = Artan \vert A \vert +

859: \pi \t (-A) $.  Recall that the number of light lepton flavors, $ N_l

860: $, is set to $ N_l =2$ in our analysis.  A useful trick to obtain the

861: distribution with respect to the laboratory frame lepton energy, $

862: E_l$, is to choose the top momentum along the $Oz$ axis fixed frame

863: and introduce the top rest frame electron energy by means of the

864: change of variable, $ (E _l , \cos \t^\star _l) \to ( E _l, E ^\star

865: _l)$, associated with the Lorentz boost between the top rest frame and

866: the laboratory frame, $ E_l= \g E_l^\star (1+\b \cos \t ^\star _l)

867: $. The result reads,

868: \begin{eqnarray}

869: {d \G_t \over dE_l }=\int_{-1}^{+1} d \cos \t_l^\star {d^2 \G_t \over

870: dE_l d \cos \t _l ^ \star } = {2\over m_t \g \b } \int_{x_l^-}

871: ^{x_l^+} { d x_l\over x_l } {d ^2 \G _t \over d x_l d \cos \t _l ^

872: \star } ,

873: \label{equ41}

874: \end{eqnarray}

875: where the integration interval over $ x_l $ is bounded at, $x^\pm _l =

876: { 2 E_l \over m_t \g (1\pm \b ) }$.

877: 

878: \subsection{Top polarization observables}

879: \label{sec32} 

880:  An essential use will be made of the factorization property of the

881: double differential distribution for the top decay semileptonic rate

882: with respect to the emitted lepton energy and angle relative to the

883: top spin polarization vector. This distribution is described at the

884: tree level as, $ {d ^2\G_t \over dE_l ^\star d \cos \psi_l } = {d\G_t

885: \over dE_l ^\star } {1+\cos \psi_l \over 2} $, where, $ \cos \psi_l

886: =-s(p) \cdot k_l $, is the angle between the lepton momentum and the

887: top spin polarization vector, $s_\mu (p)$, in the top rest frame.

888: Equivalently, $ {d ^2 \G _t \over d x_l d \cos \t _l ^ \star } = {d \G

889: _t \over d x_l } { 1+\cos \psi_l \over 2 } { d\cos \psi_l \over d \cos

890: \t _l ^ \star }$. \cite{h:kuhn} As it turns out, this representation

891: remains valid to a good approximation when one-loop QCD corrections

892: are included. \cite{h:kuhn2} We choose to describe the top polarization

893: in the spin helicity formalism, using techniques familiar from

894: previous works. \cite{h:kane,h:topfor} The definition for the helicity

895: basis Dirac spinors is provided in Appendix \ref{appexa}.  Since the

896: polarization axis coincides then with the top momentum, the dependence

897: on $\psi_l $ can also be simply rewritten as, $ (1+ \cos \psi_l )/2 =(

898: 1 + \l \cos \t_l ^\star )/2 ,$ such that, $ \l = [- 1, +1] $,

899: correspond to $[L,R]$ helicity, respectively.

900: 

901: The helicity amplitudes associated to the pair of CP-conjugate

902: processes are related by the action of $ CP$ as, $ <f_{\l }\bar f'_{\l

903: ' } \vert M \vert l^+_{ \mu '} l^- _{ \mu } > \to <f '_{-\l '} \bar

904: f_{-\l } \vert M \vert l^+_{- \mu } l^- _{- \mu ' } >.$ Unlike the

905: process, $ l^+ l^- \to t\bar t$, where both the initial and final

906: states are self-conjugate under CP, here only the initial state is

907: self-conjugate, while the action of CP relates the different final

908: states, $ t\bar c $ and $ c \bar t$.  Let us express the amplitudes

909: for the pair of CP-conjugate processes as sums of tree and loop terms,

910: $ M^{JJ'} = a_0 +\sum_\a b_\a f_\a(s+i\e ) , \ \bar M^{JJ'} = a^\star

911: _0 +\sum_\a b^\star _\a f_\a(s+i\e ) $, where the loop terms, $b_\a

912: f_\a(s+i\e ) $, are linear combinations with real coefficients of the

913: vertex functions, $ A^{JJ'}_{L}, \ A^{JJ'}_{R}, \ a^{JJ'} , \ i

914: d^{JJ'} $, with the energy dependent complex functions, $ f_\a (s+i\e

915: ) $, representing the factors in loop amplitudes which include the

916: absorptive parts.  In terms of these notations, a CP asymmetry

917: associated with the difference of rates for the pair of CP-conjugate

918: processes in some given CP-conjugate configurations of the particles

919: polarizations, can be written schematically as,

920: \begin{eqnarray} 

921: \vert <\l \l ' \vert M \vert \mu ' \mu >\vert^2 & - & \vert <-\l ' -\l

922: \vert M \vert -\mu - \mu ' >\vert^2 \propto \sum_\a Im (a_0 b_{\a

923: }^\star ) Im (f_\a (s+i\e ) ) \cr & - & \sum _{\a < \a '} Im (b_\a

924: b_{\a '} ^\star ) Im (f_\a (s+i\e ) f_{\a '} ^\star (s+i\e ) ) .

925: \end{eqnarray} 

926: Thus, the necessary conditions for a non vanishing polarized asymmetry

927: to arise from the tree-loop interference term are a relative complex

928: CP-odd phase between the tree and loop coupling constants and an

929: absorptive part from the loop terms.  The angle integrated production

930: rates for the CP-conjugate reactions, $ l^+ l^- \to t \bar c$ and $

931: l^+ l^- \to c \bar t$, for the case of polarized top and antitop,

932: respectively, are obtained by summing over the polarization of the $c,

933: \ \bar c $ quarks as,

934: \begin{eqnarray} 

935: \sigma (t_{L})& =& \sigma (t_L \bar c _R ) + \sigma (t_L \bar c _L ) ,

936: \ \sigma (t_{R}) = \sigma (t_R \bar c _L) + \sigma (t_R \bar c _R ),

937: \cr \sigma (\bar t_{L})& =& \sigma (\bar t_L c _R ) + \sigma (\bar t_L

938: c _L ) , \ \sigma (\bar t_{R}) = \sigma (\bar t_R c _L) + \sigma (\bar

939: t_R c _R ).

940: \label{equ54}

941: \end{eqnarray}

942: Forming the half differences and sums of rates, $ \d \sigma = \ud (

943: \sigma (t_L) -\sigma (t_R) ) , \ \d \bar \sigma =\ud ( \sigma (\bar

944: t_R) -\sigma (\bar t_L) ), \ \sigma _{av} = \ud ( \sigma (t_L) +\sigma

945: (t_R) ), \ \bar \sigma _{av}= \ud ( \sigma (\bar t_R) +\sigma (\bar

946: t_L) )],$ such that, $\sigma (t_{L, R } ) = \sigma _{av} \pm \d \sigma

947: , \ \bar \sigma (t_{ R, L }) =\bar \sigma _{av} \pm \d \bar \sigma ,$

948: one can define the following two CP-odd combinations,

949: \begin{eqnarray}

950: \cala = {\sigma _{av} -\bar \sigma _{av} \over \sigma _{av} +\bar

951: \sigma _{av} }= {\sigma _{t\bar c} - \sigma _{\bar t c} \over \sigma

952: _{t\bar c} + \sigma _{\bar t c} } , \quad \cala ^{pol} & =& { \d

953: \sigma -\d \bar \sigma \over \sigma _{av} + \bar \sigma _{av} },

954: \label{equ55}

955: \end{eqnarray}

956: which will be designated as unpolarized and polarized integrated rate

957: asymmetries.  The above definition for the unpolarized asymmetry, $

958: \cala $, is identical to the one studied in our previous

959: work. \cite{h:chemtob} The asymmetries depend on the RPV coupling

960: constants through the ratio of loop to tree amplitudes as, $ Im ( { \l

961: ^{'\star } _{iJk } \l '_{iJ'k} \over \l ^{'\star } _{1Jk'} \l

962: '_{1J'k'} } ) \propto \sin \psi $, where the dependence on the CP

963: violation angle parameter, $\psi $, reflects the particular

964: prescription adopted in this study to include the CP-odd phase.  The

965: index $ k ' $ refers to the d-squark generation in the tree amplitude

966: and the indices $ i, k $ to the fermion-sfermion generations for the

967: internal fermion-sfermion pairs, $ {d_k \choose \tilde e^\star _{iL}}

968: , \ {e^c_i \choose \tilde d_{kR}} $, in the loop amplitude.

969: 

970:   It is important not to confuse the above analysis with that of the

971: top-antitop pair production, $ l^- l^+ \to t\bar t$, where a CP-odd

972: asymmetry observable for a single final state may be defined in terms

973: of the difference of helicity configurations, $ \s (t_L \bar t_L ) -

974: \s (t_R \bar t_R ) $.  A non vanishing value for the corresponding

975: difference of polarized rates can only arise via tree-loop

976: interference terms involving the absorptive part of the top quark

977: electric dipole moment, $ Im (d^{JJ}) $. \cite{h:schmidt,h:chang1} One

978: should note here that the one-loop contribution of the RPV $\l '$

979: interactions to $ Im (d_t ^{JJ}) $ vanishes.  Two closely related

980: processes, which are amenable to an analogous treatment, are the

981: $b\bar b$ quark pair \cite{h:valencia} and $\tau ^+ \ \tau ^-$ lepton

982: pair production.  Double spin correlation observables for the latter

983: reaction, $ l^- l^+ \to \tau ^- \tau ^+ $, have been examined in a

984: recent work.  \cite{h:shalom} We note that the RPV $\l $ interactions

985: can give a non vanishing contribution to $ Im (d_\tau ^{JJ}) $.

986: 

987: The results for the rate asymmetries are displayed in

988: Fig.\ref{figbspol}.  The numerical results for the unpolarized case

989: (window $(A)$ in Fig.\ref{figbspol}) update the results presented in

990: ref. \cite{h:chemtob} since the present calculation includes the

991: contributions from the Lorentz covariant tensorial ($\s _{\mu \nu }$)

992: coupling which were ignored in our previous work.  \cite{h:chemtob} The

993: asymmetry for the polarized case (window $(B)$ in Fig.\ref{figbspol})

994: involves the difference of the spin helicity asymmetry in the total

995: production cross sections for the CP mirror conjugate top and antitop

996: mirror reactions. While this CP-odd polarized asymmetry is not

997: directly observable, it enters as an important intermediate quantity

998: in evaluating the measurable kinematic distributions of the top decay

999: products dependent on the top spin.  We have assumed all the relevant

1000: RPV coupling constants to be equal and set the CP-odd phase at $\sin

1001: \psi =1$. The rapid change in slope for the $\tilde m =200\ GeV$ case

1002: are due to the threshold effect from the imaginary part in the

1003: superpartner one-loop contributions, which set at $ \sqrt s = 400 \

1004: GeV$.  Aside from this large discontinuous contribution, one sees that

1005: both asymmetries comprise another contribution which is nearly

1006: independent of $\tilde m$ and increases smoothly with the initial

1007: energy.  Both asymmetries, $ \cala $ and $ \cala^{pol} $, take values

1008: of order a few $ 10^{-3} $, reaching $ O(10^{-2}) $ at the highest

1009: incident energies.

1010: 

1011: The statistical uncertainties on the asymmetry may be evaluated in

1012: terms of the signal cross sections and the integrated luminosity by

1013: considering the approximate definition, $ \d \cala = 1/ [\call (\s

1014: _{t\bar c} + \s _{\bar t c})] ^\ud $.  Using the same input value for

1015: the luminosity $ \call = 100.  \ fb ^{-1} $ at the three cm energies,

1016: $\sqrt s =[0.192, \ 0.5 , \ 1. ] \ TeV$, along with the cut signal

1017: rates in Table \ref{h:table1}, we obtain statistical errors on the

1018: asymmetries of order $ O(10^{-1})$. These values lie nearly two order

1019: of magnitudes above the value obtained for the signal. At this point,

1020: it is important to observe that in getting the above estimates for the

1021: rates we have been using somewhat conservative assignments for the RPV

1022: coupling constants.  As already noted, the single top production cross

1023: sections could possibly be two order of magnitudes larger if we were

1024: to use coupling constants values of order, $\l '_{12k} \l '_{13k}

1025: \simeq 10^{-1}$.  Such values are compatible with the indirect bounds

1026: only for the extreme down squark mass $ \tilde m = O(1\ TeV)$ range.

1027: In the hypothetical case where the production rates would be enhanced

1028: by two order of magnitudes, the statistical errors on the asymmetries

1029: would correspondingly get reduced by a factor $ O(10^{-1})$, thereby

1030: reaching the same order of magnitude as the signal asymmetries.

1031: Nevertheless, as plotted in window $(A)$ of Fig.\ref{figbspol}, the

1032: corresponding errors would still be somewhat larger than the signals.

1033: We should note here that the contribution to the one-loop amplitude

1034: from internal sfermion and fermion lines belonging to the third

1035: generation is controlled by the coupling constants quadratic product,

1036: $ \l '_{323} \l '_{333} $, which is subject to weak constraints.

1037: Should the RPV coupling constants exhibit a hierarchical structure

1038: with respect to the quarks and leptons generations, one cannot exclude

1039: the possibility of a factor $10$ enhancement from the ratio, $ Im ( \l

1040: ^{'\star }_{323} \l '_{333} / \l ^{'\star } _{123} \l '_{133} )$.

1041: Such an order of magnitude gain on this ratio would raise the

1042: asymmetries up to $ O(10^{-1})$ bringing them well above the

1043: experimental uncertainties.  Lastly, we observe that a more complete

1044: formula for the uncertainties on the asymmetries reads, $ (\d \cala

1045: )^2 = 2 (\d \s_{t\bar c})^2 [1- C +(1+C) \cala ^2 ]/ (\s _{t\bar c} +

1046: \s _{\bar t c})^2 $, where we used equal standard deviations for the

1047: CP conjugate reactions rates, $ \d \s_{t\bar c} = \d \s_{\bar t c} $,

1048: and denoted the correlated error on these two rates as, $ C = <\d

1049: \s_{t\bar c} \d \s_{\bar t c}> / \d \s_{t\bar c}^2 $.  Clearly, an

1050: improvement on the statistical treatment of the $ t\bar c +\bar t c$

1051: events sample, allowing for a positive non vanishing value of the

1052: error correlation associated with the identification of isolated

1053: single negatively and positively charged lepton events, should greatly

1054: help in reducing the experimental uncertainties caused by the small

1055: event rates.

1056: 

1057: 

1058: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1059: \begin{figure} [t]

1060: \centerline{ \psfig{figure=bspol.eps,width=17cm} }

1061: \vskip 1 cm

1062: \caption{ The CP-odd production rate asymmetries as a function of the

1063: center of mass energy, $ s^\ud $, for fixed values of the down squark

1064: mass, $\tilde m = [100, \ 200, \ 500 , \ 1000 ] \ GeV$.  The left hand

1065: plot $ (A)$ gives the unpolarized asymmetry, $ \cala = ( \sigma _{av}

1066: - \bar \sigma _{av} ) /(\sigma _{av} + \bar \sigma _{av} )$.  The

1067: upper bounds for the absolute values of the statistical errors on the

1068: asymmetries, as evaluated with $\l '_{12k}\l '_{13k} =0.1, \ \tilde m

1069: = 100 \ GeV$ and integrated luminosities $\call =100.  \ fb^{-1}$ are

1070: shown as full circles.  The right hand plot $ (B) $ gives the spin

1071: polarization dependent asymmetry, $\cala ^{pol} = (\d \sigma -\d \bar

1072: \sigma ) /(\sigma _{av} + \bar \sigma _{av} ) $. }

1073: \label{figbspol}

1074: \end{figure}

1075: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1076: 

1077: The energy distribution for the negatively and positively charged

1078: leptons in the pair of CP-conjugate reactions may be defined as,

1079: \begin{eqnarray}

1080: <\s ^+> \equiv <{ d \sigma ^+ \over dE_l }> = < \sigma (t_L) f_L +

1081:  \sigma (t_R) f_R > , \cr \quad <\sigma ^- > \equiv < { d \sigma ^- \over

1082:  dE_l }> = < \sigma ( \bar t_R) f_L + \sigma (\bar t_L) f_R >,  

1083: \label{equ56}

1084: \end{eqnarray}

1085: where the correlations between the top spin lepton momentum are

1086: described by the factors, $ f_{L,R}= \ud (1\mp \cos \t^\star _l )$,

1087: and the brackets stand for the angular integration.  The occurrence of

1088: angular correlation factors of opposite signs in the $\bar t$

1089: production case accounts for the kinematical fact that the antitop is

1090: oriented in space with a momentum $ - \vec p$. A CP-odd charge

1091: asymmetry observable with respect to the charged lepton energy

1092: distribution may be defined by considering the following normalized

1093: difference of distributions,

1094: \begin{eqnarray}

1095: \D \cala ^{pol} & =& { <\s ^+ > - <\s ^- > \over <\s ^+ > + <\s ^- > }

1096: ={ (\sigma _{av} -\bar \sigma _{av}) +< (\d \sigma - \d \bar \sigma )

1097: (f_L -f_R) > \over (\sigma _{av} +\bar \sigma _{av}) + < (\d \sigma +

1098: \d \bar \sigma ) (f_L -f_R) > }.

1099: \label{equ57}

1100: \end{eqnarray}

1101: The numerical results for the charged lepton energy distributions and

1102: for the above defined charge asymmetry in the lepton energy

1103: distributions are displayed in Fig.\ref{figenasy}.  (Note that the

1104: transverse energy distribution, in the plane orthogonal with respect

1105: to the top momentum, may be simply obtained as, ${ d\G \over dE_{lT}}

1106: = { d\G \over dE_{l}} {1\over \sin \t_{lt} ^\star }$.  The

1107: distribution in the plane orthogonal to the collision axis is less

1108: trivial to evaluate since this requires an additional integration over

1109: the lepton azimuthal angle.)  The energy distributions for the

1110: unpolarized cross section essentially reproduce the results found in

1111: our above quoted event generator predictions, Fig.\ref{figtopp}.  The

1112: energy distributions for the polarized asymmetry lie at values of

1113: order of magnitude, $O( 10^{-3}) $, always retaining the same positive

1114: sign as the lepton energy varies.  For a fixed energy of the emitted

1115: lepton, the asymmetry increases with the initial energy, reaching

1116: values of order $O( 10^{-2}) $.  In window $(B)$ of Fig.\ref{figenasy}

1117: we have plotted the experimental uncertainties using the same inputs

1118: for the luminosities and the rates as in the discussion of the

1119: unpolarized asymmetries given above.  To ease the comparison with

1120: experiment, we divide the charged leptons energy interval into three

1121: bins of width $ 100 GeV$ each, centered at the three lepton energies,

1122: $ E_l= (50,\ 150,\ 250 ) \ GeV $.  The statistical errors on the

1123: asymmetries in the energy distributions lie at the same level as those

1124: associated to the total asymmetries, so that similar conclusions

1125: should apply.  Setting ourselves within the same optimistic scenario

1126: by using $\l '_{12k} \l '_{13k} =10^{-1}$ and $\call= 100 fb^{-1}$, we

1127: obtain expected errors of order $ O(10^{-2})$. These values are

1128: insufficient for a comfortable identification of a signal asymmetry.

1129: However, we reiterate, as in the above discussion, that an enhancement

1130: of the signal asymmetries to an observable level of $ O(10^{-1})$, due

1131: to a hierarchical structure in the generation dependence of the $\l

1132: '_{ijk}$, is a real possibility.

1133: 

1134: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1135: \begin{figure} [t]

1136: %\psfig{figure=distlep.eps}

1137: \centerline{ \psfig{figure=enasy.eps,width=16cm} }

1138: \vskip 1 cm

1139: \caption{Energy distribution for the charged lepton as a function of

1140: the laboratory frame lepton energy, for a set of center of mass

1141: energy, $ s^\ud =[ 192, \ 500 , \ 1000] \ GeV$.  The parameters are

1142: set at, $ \l ' =0.1, \ \tilde m =100 \ GeV$.  The left hand plot $ (A)

1143: $ gives the differential lepton energy distribution, $ { d \sigma

1144: \over dE_l }$. The right hand plot $ (B) $ gives the asymmetry in the

1145: energy distribution for leptons of opposite charges in the

1146: CP-conjugate final state channels, $(t\bar c) $ and $ \ (c\bar t)$: $

1147: \D \cala ^{pol}= [ {d \sigma ^+ \over d E_l} - {d \sigma ^- \over d

1148: E_l}]/ [{d \sigma ^+ \over d E_l} + {d \sigma ^- \over d E_l} ].$ The

1149: upper bounds for the absolute values of the statistical errors on the

1150: asymmetries, as evaluated with $\l '_{12k}\l '_{13k} =0.1$ and with

1151: integrated luminosities, $\call =100. \ fb^{-1}$, are shown for three

1152: energy bins of width $ 100 \ GeV$ each, centered at the charged lepton

1153: energies, $ E_l= (50,\ 150,\ 250 ) \ GeV $.  The results for three

1154: values of the center of mass energy, $ s^\ud =[ 192, \ 500 , \ 1000] \

1155: GeV$ are displayed by full triangles, squares and circles. }

1156: 

1157: \label{figenasy}

1158: \end{figure}

1159: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1160: \section{Conclusions}

1161: \label{sec4}

1162: 

1163: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1164: 

1165: We have demonstrated that single top production through the RPV

1166: interactions could be observed at the future linear colliders or else

1167: be used to set bounds on the RPV coupling constants, $ \l ' _{12k} \l

1168: '_{13k} < O(10^{-2})$, over a wide interval for the down squark mass,

1169: $ m _{\tilde d_{kR} } < 1. \ TeV$.  The $ b $ quark tagging would help

1170: greatly to overcome the background. Even with an imperfect $ b $ quark

1171: tagging, it is still possible to drastically reduce the background,

1172: from $ WW $ and $ b\bar b$, without much harming the signal. The

1173: analysis of top polarization observables via the semileptonic decay

1174: channel of the top allows to test for the presence of a CP violating

1175: complex phase, embedded in quadratic products of the RPV coupling

1176: constants. We have focused on the asymmetry in the energy

1177: distributions of the charged leptons in the CP-conjugate pair of final

1178: states, $b l^+ \nu \bar c$ and $\bar b l^- \bar \nu c $, obtaining

1179: asymmetries of order $ 10^{-3} \ - \ 10^{-2} $ for the incident

1180: energies expected at the future leptonic colliders.  These values lie

1181: somewhat below the anticipated limits of observability.  However, it

1182: may be possible to obtain enhanced values of order $ 10^{-1}$, should

1183: the RPV coupling constants $\l'_{ijk}$ exhibit large hierarchies with

1184: respect to the quarks or leptons generations.  Future promising

1185: extensions might include analogous reactions accessible with

1186: lepton-photon or photon-photon colliding beams, $ l \g \to t\bar c , \

1187: \g \g \to t\bar c $, where the expected production rates are

1188: substantially larger than those for the $ l^-l^+ $ colliders.

1189: 

1190: \clearpage

1191: 

1192: \appendix

1193: 

1194: \setcounter{subsection}{0} 

1195: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1196: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}

1197: %\renewcommand{\thesubsection}{A.\arabic{subsection}}

1198: 

1199: %\section*{ \centerline {\bf A} }

1200: \section{Helicity amplitudes and one-loop \rpv vector boson vertex functions}

1201: \label{appexa}

1202: 

1203: {\bf Helicity amplitudes.}

1204: 

1205:  The helicity spin basis Dirac spinors for a fermion or an

1206: antifermion, of mass $ m$ and four momentum, $ k_\mu = (E_k = (k^2

1207: +m^2) ^\ud, \vec k)$, and polar coordinates, $ \vec k = (\t , \phi )$,

1208: can be written in the form of direct products of the Dirac spinor

1209: two-component space with the the two-component space of Pauli helicity

1210: basis spinors, $ \phi _\l (\vec k) , $ satisfying, $ \vec \s \cdot

1211: \hat k \phi _\l (\vec k) = \l \phi _\l (\vec k). $ In the Dirac

1212: representation for the Dirac matrices, $\g_0 = \b ,\ \vec \g = \b \vec

1213: \a ,\ \g_5 = \pmatrix{0 & 1 \cr -1 & 0}$, the spinors read,

1214: \begin{eqnarray}

1215: u(\vec k, \l )&=& \sqrt {\e_k }\pmatrix {1\cr \tilde k \l } \times

1216: \phi _\l (\vec k ), \ v(\vec k, \l )=\sqrt { \e_k } \pmatrix {- \tilde

1217: k \l \cr 1 } \times \phi_{-\l } (\vec k) ,\ \cr \phi _{-1}(\vec k) &

1218: =& \pmatrix{-\sin (\t /2) e^{-i\phi } \cr \cos (\t /2) } , \phi

1219: _{+1}(\vec k) = \pmatrix { \cos (\t /2) \cr \sin (\t /2) e^{+i\phi }

1220: },

1221: \label{equ5}

1222: \end{eqnarray}

1223: where, $\e_k= E_k+m, \ \tilde k= \vert \vec k \vert /(E_k+m), $ and $

1224: \chi_{\l }, \ [\l =\pm 1] $, are the Pauli spinors in the basis with a

1225: fixed quantization axis identified with the spatial three-axis, $Oz$.

1226: The helicity basis spin eigenstates with a space parity reversed three

1227: momentum are defined as, $\phi_{\l } (-\vec k) = e^{ -i (\phi + \pi )

1228: (\l ' -\l )/2 } (e^{-i{(\pi -\t ) \over 2} \s_y })_{\l '\l } \chi_{\l

1229: ' } = \phi_{\l } (\vec k)\vert _{[\t \to \pi -\t , \ \phi \to \phi

1230: +\pi ]} $.

1231: 

1232: 

1233: The $8$ non vanishing helicity amplitudes for the process, $ l^+(k' ,

1234: \mu ') + l^- (k, \mu) \to u_J (p, \l ) +\bar u_{J'} (p', \l ') $, are

1235: listed in the formulas below:

1236: \begin{eqnarray} M_1= M(+-+-) & = & 4 \calf \, [ - ( ( 1 + {\tilde

1237: p}\, {\tilde p'} ) \, ( {\ya} + {\yb} ) \ + ( {\tilde p} + {\tilde p'}

1238: ) \, ( {\yc} + {\yd} ) ] \, {{\sin ^2({{\t } / {2}})}}, \cr M_2= M

1239: (+-++) & = & 2 \calf \, [ ( -1 + {\tilde p}\, {\tilde p'} ) \, (

1240: {\ya}+ {\yb}) + ( {\tilde p} - {\tilde p'} \ ) \, {\yc} + ( {\tilde p}

1241: - {\tilde p'} \ ) \, {\yd} \cr & + & 2\,p\, ( {\tilde p} + {\tilde p'}

1242: ) \, ( {\ye} + {\yf}) + 2\,p\, ( 1 + {\tilde p}\, {\tilde p'} ) \,(

1243: {\yg} + {\yh}) ] \,\sin (\t ) ,\cr M_3= M (-++-) & = & -4 \calf \, [ -

1244: ( 1 + {\tilde p}\, {\tilde p'} \ ) \, ( -\ya + {\yb} ) - ( {\tilde p}

1245: + {\tilde p'} \ ) \, ( {\yc} - {\yd} ) ] \, {{\cos^2 ({ {\t } / {2}})}

1246: } ,\cr M_4 = M (-+++) & = & 2 \calf \, [ ( -1 + {\tilde p}\, {\tilde

1247: p'} \ ) \,(-\ya + {\yb} ) + ( - {\tilde p} + {\tilde p'} \ ) \, (

1248: {\yc} - {\yd}) \cr & -& 2\,p\, ( {\tilde p} + {\tilde p'} ) \, ( {\ye}

1249: - {\yf}) - 2\,p\, ( 1 + {\tilde p}\, {\tilde p'} ) \, ( {\yg} - {\yh}

1250: ] \,\sin (\t ) ,\cr M_5 = M (+---)& = & 2 \calf \, [ ( -1 + {\tilde

1251: p}\, {\tilde p'} ) \, ( {\ya} + {\yb}) + ( - {\tilde p} + {\tilde p'}

1252: \ ) \, {\yc} + ( - {\tilde p} + {\tilde p'} \ ) \, {\yd} \cr & + &

1253: 2\,p\, ( {\tilde p} + {\tilde p'} ) \, ( {\ye} + {\yf}) - 2\,p\, ( 1 +

1254: {\tilde p}\, {\tilde p'} ) \, ( {\yg} - {\yh}) ] \,\sin (\t ) ,\cr

1255: M_6= M (+--+) & = & -4 \calf \, [ (1+ {\tilde p}\, {\tilde p'} ) \, (

1256: {\ya} + {\yb}) + ( {\tilde p} + {\tilde p'} ) \, ( {\yc} + {\yd} ) ]

1257: \, {{\cos ^2({{\t } / {2}})} } ,\cr M_7= M (-+--) & = & 2 \calf \, [ (

1258: -1 + {\tilde p}\, {\tilde p'} \ ) \,( - {\ya} + {\yb} ) + ( {\tilde p}

1259: - {\tilde p'} \ ) \, ( {\yc} - {\yd}) \cr & - & 2\,p\, ( {\tilde p} +

1260: {\tilde p'} ) \,( {\ye} - {\yf}) + 2\,p\, ( 1 + {\tilde p}\, {\tilde

1261: p'} ) \, ( {\yg} - {\yh} ) ] \,\sin (\t ) ,\cr M_8= M ( -+-+) & = & 4

1262: \calf \, [ - ( 1 + {\tilde p}\, {\tilde p'} ) \, ( {\ya} - {\yb} ) - (

1263: {\tilde p} + {\tilde p'} ) \, ( {\yc} - {\yd} ) ] \, {{\sin ^2({{\t }

1264: / {2}})}}.

1265: \label{equ7}

1266: \end{eqnarray}

1267: The arguments refer to the fermions helicity in the following order, $

1268: M_i((h_{e^+},h_{e^-} ,h_f ,h_{\bar f} ) $.  The remaining helicity

1269: amplitudes, omitted from the above list, are understood to vanish

1270: identically. We denote by $\t $ the top scattering angle, $\cos \t =

1271: \vec k \cdot \vec p $, by $ [E_p, E '_{p }] =(s\pm m_J^2 \mp m_{J'}^2

1272: )/2\sqrt s $, the top and charm quarks energies, and use the following

1273: abbreviated notations, $ \tilde p = {p\over E_p +m_J }, \ \tilde p ' =

1274: {p\over E '_{p } +m_{J'} }, \ \calf = {1\over 2} [s (E_p +m_J) (E

1275: '_{p} + m_{J'} )] ^\ud , $ along with the useful compact notations,

1276: \begin{eqnarray}

1277: X_1& = & G a^ + \capa +\calr, \ X_2= G a^- \capa +\calr, \ X_3 = G a^+

1278: \capb +\calr ,\ X_4 = G a^- \capb + \calr , \ \cr X_5& =& \ud G a^+

1279: \capc , \ X_6= \ud G a^- \capc , \ X_7 = \ud G a^+ \capd , \ X_8=\ud G

1280: a^- \capd ,

1281: \label{equ7p}

1282: \end{eqnarray}

1283: where $ G a^\pm \capa , \cdots $ are defined in eq. (\ref{equ53}),

1284: $\calr $ in eq. (\ref{equ323}), and $\capa , \cdots , \capd $, in

1285: eq. (\ref{equ51}).

1286: 

1287: \vspace{2.cm}

1288: 

1289: {\bf One-loop RPV vector boson vertex functions.}

1290: 

1291:  The one-loop vertex functions, as derived in \cite{h:chemtob}, are

1292: given by the formulas,

1293: \begin{eqnarray}

1294: && A_L^{JJ' } = \FLU [ {a_L(u) }\, {B_1^{(2)}} + {a(f_L)}\, {{

1295: {m_f}}^2} C_0 + {a(\tilde f')} ( 2 {\tilde C_{24}} + 2 \ m_J^2\, (

1296: {\tilde C_{12}}\, - {\tilde C_{21}}\, + {\tilde C_{23}}\, - {\tilde

1297: C_{11}}\, ) ) \cr &+& {a(f_R)}\, ( {B_0^{(1)}} - 2\, {C_{24}} - {{

1298: {m_{\tilde f'}}}^2} {C_0} + {{ {m_{J}}}^2} ( C_0 +3 C_{11} -2C_{12}

1299: +2C_{21} -2C_{23} ) -m_{J'}^2 C_{12} ) ], \cr && A_R^{JJ'} = \FLU m_J

1300: m_{J'} [ 2 {a(\tilde f')}\, ( - {\tilde C_{23}} + {\tilde C_{22}} ) +

1301: {a(f_R)}\, ( -C_{11} +C_{12} -2C_{23} +2 {C_{22}} ) \, ] \cr && {

1302: a^{JJ'}\choose - id^{JJ'} } = \FLU {m_J +m_{J'} \over 4}\bigg [ \pm

1303: m_J [ a(f_R) (C_{11}-C_{12}+C_{21}-C_{23}) \cr & -& a(\tilde f ')

1304: (\tilde C_{11}+\tilde C_{21}-\tilde C_{12}-\tilde C_{23}) ] + m_{J'}

1305: [a(f_R) (C_{22}-C_{23}) +a(\tilde f ') (\tilde C_{23}-\tilde C_{22}) ]

1306: \bigg ].

1307: \label{h:eqm11}

1308: \end{eqnarray} 

1309: The relevant configurations for the internal fermion and sfermion

1310: propagating in the loop are: $ {f \choose \tilde f'} = {d_k \choose

1311: \tilde e^\star _{iL}} , \ {e^c_i \choose \tilde d_{kR}} $.  The

1312: notations for the Passarino-Veltman two-point and three-point

1313: integrals, as specified in our work, \cite{h:chemtob} are defined

1314: according to the following conventions, $B_A^{(1)}= B_A(-p-p', m_f,

1315: m_f), \ B_A^{(2)}= B_A(-p , m_f, m_{\tilde f'}), \ [A =0,1] $ and $C_A

1316: = C_A (-p,-p',m_f,m_{\tilde f'} , m_f) , \tilde C_A = C_A

1317: (-p,-p',m_{\tilde f'}, m_f,m_{\tilde f'}) .  \ [ A= 0, 11,

1318: 12,21,22,23]$ The integral functions with a tilde are associated with

1319: the one-loop diagram for the sfermion current.

1320: 

1321: 

1322: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1323: 

1324: \bibitem{h:chemtob} M. Chemtob and G. Moreau, \pr {\bf D59}, 116012

1325: (1999)

1326: 

1327: \bibitem{h:toprev} C. Quigg, hep-ph/9802320; S. Willenbrock,

1328: hep-ph/9709355

1329: 

1330: \bibitem{h:donoghue} J. Donoghue and G. Valencia, \prl {\bf 58}, 451

1331: (1987); ibidem, {\bf 60}, 243 (1988) (E); C.A. Nelson, \pr {\bf D41},

1332: 2805 (1990)

1333: 

1334: \bibitem{h:topol0} D. Atwood and A. Soni, \pr {\bf D45}, 2405 (1992);

1335: W. Bernreuther, T. Schr\" oder, and T.N. Pham, \pl {\bf B279}, 389

1336: (1992); W. Bernreuther, O. Nachtmann, P. Overmann, and T.  Schr\"

1337: oder, \np {\bf B388}, 53 (1992); B. Grzadkowski and J. Gunion, \pl

1338: {\bf B287}, 237 (1992)

1339: 

1340: \bibitem{h:kane} G.L. Kane, G.A. Ladinsky, and C.P. Yuan, \pr {\bf D45},

1341: 124 (1992)

1342: 

1343: \bibitem{h:schmidt} C. R. Schmidt and M.E. Peskin, \prl {\bf 69}, 410

1344: (1992); C.R. Schmidt, \pl {\bf B293}, 111 (1992)

1345: 

1346: 

1347: 

1348: \bibitem{h:chang1} D. Chang and W.-Y. Keung, \pl {\bf B305} (1993) 261;

1349: D. Chang, W.-Y. Keung, and I. Phillips, \np {\bf B408} (1993) 286;

1350: ibidem, {\bf B429}, 255 (1994) (E)

1351: 

1352: 

1353: 

1354: \bibitem{h:toppol} W. Bernreuther and A. Brandenburg, \pr {\bf D49},

1355: 4481 (1994); T. Arens and L.M. Seghal, \pr {\bf D50}, 4372 (1994);

1356: P. Poulose and S. Rindani, \pl {\bf B349}, 379 (1995); B. Grzadkowski

1357: and Z. Hioki, \np {\bf B484}, 17 (1997); H.-Y. Zhou, \pr {\bf D58},

1358: 114002 (1998)

1359: 

1360: 

1361: 

1362: \bibitem{h:bartl} A. Bartl, E. Christova, T. Gajdosik, and W. Majerotto,

1363: \pr {\bf D58}, 074007 (1998); ibidem, \pr {\bf D59}, 077503 (1999)

1364: \bibitem{h:rigolin} W. Hollik, J.I. Illana, S. Rigolin, C. Schappacher,

1365: and D. St\"ockinger, \np {\bf B551}, 3 (1999); ibidem, {\bf B557}, 407

1366: (1999)

1367: 

1368: \bibitem{h:hikasa} K.-I.  Hikasa \pl {\bf B149}, 221 (1984)

1369: 

1370: \bibitem{h:han} T. Han and J.L. Hewett, hep-ph/9811237

1371: 

1372: 

1373: \bibitem{h:abraham} K.J. Abraham, K. Whisnant, and B.-L. Young, \pl {\bf

1374: B419}, 381 (1998)

1375: 

1376: 

1377: \bibitem{h:barger} V. Barger and H. Hagiwara, \pr {\bf D37}, 3320 (1988)

1378: 

1379: \bibitem{h:atwood} D. Atwood, L. Reina, and A. Soni, \pr {\bf D53}, 1199

1380: (1996); ibidem {\bf D55}, 3157 (1997); \prl {\bf 75}, 3800 (1995)

1381: 

1382: \bibitem{h:atwood1} D. Atwood, S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam, and A. Soni, \pr

1383: {\bf D54}, 5412 (1996)

1384: 

1385: \bibitem{h:datta} A. Datta, J.M. Yang, B.-L. Young, and X. Zhang, \pr

1386: {\bf D56}, 3107 (1997)

1387: 

1388: \bibitem{h:oakes1} R.J. Oakes, K. Whisnant, J.M. Yang, B.-L. Young, and

1389: X. Zhang, \pr {\bf D57}, 534 (1998)

1390: 

1391: \bibitem{h:mahanta} V. Mahanta and A. Ghosal, \pr {\bf D57}, 1735 (1998)

1392: 

1393: \bibitem{h:litte} Z.-H. Yu, H. Pietschmann, W.-G. Ma, L. Han, and J. Yi,

1394: hep-ph/9903471; ibidem, hep-ph/9910323

1395: 

1396: 

1397: \bibitem{h:koide} Y. Koide, hep-ph/9701261

1398: 

1399: \bibitem{h:chang} C.H. Chang, X.-Q. Li, J.-X. Wang, and M.-Z. Yang, \pl

1400: {\bf B313}, 389 (1993)

1401: 

1402: \bibitem{h:huang99} C.S. Huang, X.-H. Wu, and S.H. Zhu, \pl {\bf B452},

1403: 143 (1999)

1404: 

1405: \bibitem{h:hou2} S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam, A. Soni, and J. Wudka, \prl

1406: {\bf 79}, 1217 (1997); ibidem, \pr {\bf D57}, 2957 (1998); W.-S. Hou,

1407: G.-L. Lin and C.-Y. Ma, \pr {\bf D56}, 7434 (1997); D. Atwood and

1408: M. Sher, \pl {\bf B411}, 306 (1997)

1409: 

1410: 

1411: \bibitem{h:reviews} G. Bhattacharyya, Susy '96, \np B (Proc. Suppl.)

1412: {\bf 52A} (1997) 83

1413: 

1414: \bibitem{h:godbole} R.M. Godbole, R.P. Roy, and X. Tata, \np {\bf B401},

1415: 67 (1993)

1416: 

1417: \bibitem{h:grossman} Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti, and E. Nardi, \np {\bf

1418: B465}, 369 (1996)

1419: 

1420: \bibitem{h:beenakker} W. Beenakker and A. Denner,

1421: Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf A9}, 4837 (1994)

1422: 

1423: \bibitem{h:bardin} D. Bardin, M. Bilenky, A. Olachevsky, and T. Riemann,

1424: \pl {\bf B308}, 403 (1993)

1425: 

1426: 

1427: \bibitem{h:sjostrand} T. Sj\"ostrand, Comput. Phys. Comm. {\bf 82}, 74

1428: (1994)

1429: 

1430: \bibitem{h:choudhee} D. Choudhury, \pl {\bf B376}, 201 (1996)

1431: 

1432: \bibitem{h:erler} J. Erler, J. Feng, and N. Polonsky, \prl {\bf 78},

1433: 3012 (1997)

1434: 

1435: 

1436: \bibitem{h:kalitev} J. Kalinowski, R. R\"{u}ckl, H. Spiesberger, and

1437: P.M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. {\bf B414}, 297 (1997)

1438: 

1439: \bibitem{h:kajan} E.  Byckling and K.  Kajantje, ``Particle

1440: Kinematics'', John Wiley and Sons, London, 1973

1441: 

1442: \bibitem{h:kuhn} M. Jezabek and J.H.  K\"uhn, \np {\bf 320}, 20 (1989)

1443: 

1444: 

1445: \bibitem{h:kuhn2} A. Czarnecki, M. Jezabek, and J.H.  K\"uhn, \np {\bf

1446: 351}, 70 (1991); M. Jezabek and J.H.  K\"uhn, \pl {\bf B329}, 317

1447: (1994)

1448: 

1449: 

1450: \bibitem{h:topfor} G.R. Farrar and F. Neri, \pl {\bf B130}, 109 (1980);

1451: G.A. Ladinsky, \pr {\bf D39}, 2515 (1989)

1452: 

1453: \bibitem{h:valencia} G. Valencia and A. Soni, \pl {\bf B263}, 517 (1991)

1454: 

1455: \bibitem{h:shalom} S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam, and A. Soni, \prl {\bf 80},

1456: 4629 (1998)

1457: 

1458: \end{thebibliography}

1459: 

1460: 

1461: