1: %Yee Dec. 13
2: %Darwin Nov. 26
3: \documentstyle[12pt,axodraw,graphics]{article}
4: \oddsidemargin 0mm \textheight 239mm \footheight 32mm
5: \evensidemargin 0mm \textwidth 160mm \footskip 15mm
6: \headheight 15mm \headsep 0mm \topmargin -25.4mm
7: \begin{document}
8: \pagestyle{empty}
9: \centerline{ \hfill SLAC-PUB-8714
10: \footnote{Work supported by the Department of Energy, Contract
11: DE-AC03-76SF00515}
12: }
13: \centerline{ \hfill hep-ph/y0012258}
14: \centerline{ \hfill November 2000}
15: %%%%%%%%%%<<<<<<<<<=======
16: %
17: \vskip 1cm
18: %
19: \begin{center}
20: {\bf \large
21: CP asymmetry in the Higgs decay into \\
22: the top pair due to the stop mixing}
23: \vskip 1cm
24: {Fred Browning$^{a}$, Darwin Chang$^{b,c}$, and Wai-Yee Keung$^{a}$}
25: \vskip 1cm
26: {\em $^a$Physics Department, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL
27: 60607-7059, USA}\\
28:
29: {\em $^b$NCTS and Physics Department, National Tsing-Hua University,\\
30: Hsinchu 30043, Taiwan, R.O.C.}\\
31:
32: {\em $^c$Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford,
33: CA 94309, USA}\\
34:
35:
36: \end{center}
37: %
38: \date{\today}
39: \vskip 1.5cm
40: \begin{abstract}
41: %
42: We investigate a potentially large CP violating asymmetry in the decay
43: of a neutral scalar or pseudoscalar Higgs boson into the $t\bar t$
44: pair. The source of the CP nonconservation is the complex mixing in
45: the stop $\tilde t_{L,R}$ sector. One of the interesting consequence
46: is the different rates of the Higgs boson decays into CP conjugate
47: polarized states.
48: %
49:
50: \end{abstract}
51: \vskip 0.5cm
52: %% \centerline{PACS numbers: 14.80.Cp, 14.60.Ef, 13.40.Em}
53: \vskip 0.5cm
54: %
55: \newpage
56: %
57:
58: %\narrowtext
59: \pagestyle{plain}
60: %
61:
62: \section{Introduction}
63: The standard model (SM) of particle interactions contains one CP
64: violating parameter, which is a complex phase in the quark
65: sector of the SM. This phase appearing in the quark mixing matrix
66: of the charged current is expected to account for
67: the observed CP violations in the $K$-$\overline{K}$ mixing, in the
68: $K$ decays, as well as in the potential CP violation in the
69: $B$-$\overline{B}$ system.
70:
71: However, it is generally believed that new physics beyond the SM must
72: exists. One of the major motivations for this is to understand the
73: seemingly unnaturalness of the Higgs mass at the electroweak scale in
74: the SM, the so-called gauge hierarchy problem. In addition, due to the
75: difficulties of the SM to account for the baryon asymmetry of the
76: universe as well as to resolve the strong CP problem, it is widely
77: accepted that new sources of CP violation are needed. The most
78: popular extension of the SM that addresses the hierarchy problem is
79: the supersymmetric standard model\cite{reviews,ref:higgshunt}. The extension has
80: many more new (super-)particles and parameters compared to the SM.
81: With all these new parameters, there are many possible new sources for
82: CP violation. The phenomenology of CP violation caused by these new
83: sources is rich and diverse. The effect of these new sources of CP
84: violation may surface in the data before any super-particle is
85: discovered.
86:
87: Even in the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM), which only
88: augments superpartners of known particles in SM, the Higgs sector
89: contains new sources of CP violation in its couplings to
90: super-particles. When the $\mu$ term in the Higgs superpotential and
91: the soft-SUSY-breaking $A$ terms are complex, the tri-boson-couplings
92: between the Higgs bosons and the squarks can contain CP violation.
93: In MSSM with the simplest universal soft supersymmetry breaking\cite{susycp},
94: there are two new CP violating couplings which can be defined to be the
95: phases of $\mu$ and $A$ terms in a convention that makes the others new
96: couplings real. Therefore, these new sources of CP violation are generic
97: of any supersymmetric theories.
98: In addition, they also have been used as one of the leading
99: sources of CP violation in a scheme to use MSSM to generate baryon number
100: asymmetry of the Universe in electroweak phase transition \cite{bau}.
101: Therefore, it should be important to look for collider phenomenology that
102: can check these mechanism.
103: For example, these complex couplings lead to a complex phase in the
104: mixing\cite{mix:stops} of stop states. It is the purpose of this paper to
105: investigate one consequence of this CP violating source in colliders.
106:
107: It is expected that the future colliders are able to produce CP
108: violation signals\cite{ref:CK,bohdan,Soni,seoul}
109: in the sectors of heavy particles.
110: In this article we study the CP asymmetry in the Higgs decay
111: into top pairs because the large top or stop
112: coupling to the Higgs particles can produce largest effect.
113:
114: In MSSM, even with soft breaking terms and $R$ symmetry breaking terms,
115: there is no tree level mixing between the scalar and the pseudoscalar
116: bosons.
117: Therefore their couplings can be discussed separately.
118: However, the scalar and the pseudoscalar bosons mix at one loop, and
119: their effect has to be taken into account as we will show later.
120:
121: \section{Stop Mixing}
122: The source of CP violation that we investigate here is due to the mixing
123: in the stop mass matrix.
124: We use the convention adopted in Ref.\cite{conv:stop}.
125: The mass matrix for the stop quarks in the left-right basis is given as
126: \begin{equation}
127: {\cal M}^2_{\tilde{t}} = \left(
128: \begin{array}{cc} m^2_{Q} + m^2_{t} +
129: \Delta_{\tilde{t}_{L}} m^2_{Z} \cos 2\beta &
130: -m_{t} (\mu \cot \beta + A_{t}^{*}) \\
131: -m_{t} (\mu^{*} \cot \beta + A_{t}) & m^2_{U} + m^2_{t} +
132: \Delta_{\tilde{t}_{R}} m^2_{Z} \cos 2\beta \end{array} \right),
133: \end{equation}
134: where
135: $ \Delta_{\tilde{t}_{L}}=\hbox{$1\over2$}-\frac{2}{3} \sin^2 \theta_{W}$,
136: and
137: $ \Delta_{\tilde{t}_{R}}= -\frac{2}{3} \sin^2 \theta_{W}$.
138: %%
139: The complex phase $\delta$ of the off-diagonal elements is the source
140: of CP violation.
141: \begin{equation}
142: \mu^{*} \cot \beta + A_{t} = |\mu^{*} \cot \beta + A_{t}| e^{i \delta}.
143: \end{equation}
144: The stop mass eigenstates, $\tilde{t}_{1}, \tilde{t}_{2}$, are related to the left and right stop states by an unitary mixing matrix
145: \begin{eqnarray}
146: \left( \begin{array}{c} \tilde{t_{L}} \\ \tilde{t_{R}}
147: \end{array} \right)
148: = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & e^{i \delta} \end{array} \right)
149: \left( \begin{array}{cc} \cos \theta & \sin \theta \\
150: -\sin \theta & \cos \theta \end{array} \right)
151: \left( \begin{array}{c} \tilde{t_{1}} \\
152: \tilde{t_{2}} \end{array} \right)
153: = {\bf U} \
154: \left( \begin{array}{c} \tilde{t_{1}} \\
155: \tilde{t_{2}} \end{array} \right)
156: \end{eqnarray}
157: %This then reduces to a single mixing matrix ${\bf U}$,
158: %\begin{eqnarray}
159: %\left( \begin{array}{c} \tilde{t_{L}} \\ \tilde{t_{R}}
160: %\end{array}\right)
161: %={\bf U} \left(\begin{array}{c}\tilde{t_{L}}\\ \tilde{t_{R}}\end{array}\right)
162: %=
163: %\left( \begin{array}{cc} \cos \theta & \sin \theta \\
164: %-\sin \theta \, e^{i \delta} & \cos \theta \, e^{i \delta} \end{array}%\right)
165: % \left( \begin{array}{c} \tilde{t_{1}} \\
166: %\tilde{t_{2}} \end{array} \right).
167: %\end{eqnarray}
168: The masses of these eigenstates are given by
169: \begin{equation}
170: m^2_{1,2}=\hbox{$1\over2$}
171: (m^2_{Q} + m^2_{U} + 2 m_{t}^2
172: + (\hbox{$1\over2$}-\hbox{$4\over3$} \sin^2\theta_W)
173: m_{Z}^2 \cos 2 \beta \mp \sqrt{R} ) \ ,
174: \end{equation}
175: \begin{equation}
176: R=\left( m^2_{Q} -m^2_{U} +
177: {1\over2} m_Z^2\cos2\beta\right)^2
178: + 4 m_{t}^2 |\mu \cot \beta + A^{*}_{t}|^2 \ .
179: \end{equation}
180: Here we denote $\tilde{t}_{1}$ as the lighter state.
181: The mixing angle is given as
182: \begin{equation}
183: \tan \theta = -\frac{[m_{Q}^2 - m_{U}^2 + \hbox{$1\over2$}
184: m_{z}^2 \cos 2\beta +
185: \sqrt{R}]}{2 m_{t} |\mu \cot \beta + A_{t}^{*}|}.
186: \end{equation}
187: %%
188: Strong gluino couplings to stops and tops in the left-right basis
189: is given by
190: \begin{equation}
191: {\cal L}_{\tilde g}
192: = - \sqrt{2} g_{s} \overline{t_{R}} \tilde{g} \tilde{t_{R}}
193: - \sqrt{2} g_{s} \overline{t_{L}} \tilde{g} \tilde{t_{L}} \ .
194: \end{equation}
195: In terms of mass eigenstates,
196: \begin{equation} {\cal L}_{\tilde g}
197: = -\sqrt{2} g_{s} \overline{t}(P_{R} \cos \theta - P_{L} \sin
198: \theta e^{i \delta}) \tilde{t_{1}} \tilde{g} - \sqrt{2} g_{s} \overline{t} ( P_{R} \sin
199: \theta + P_{L} \cos \theta e^{i \delta}) \tilde{t_{2}} \tilde{g},
200: \end{equation}
201: where $P_{L}$ is the left projection
202: $\hbox{$1\over2$}(1-\gamma^{5})$, and $P_{R}$ is
203: the right projection $ \hbox{$1\over2$}(1+\gamma^{5})$.
204: We also need the stop-stop coupling to $Z$,
205: \begin{equation}
206: {\cal L}_Z= -{g\over \cos \theta_{W}} \left[
207: (\hbox{$1\over2$} -\hbox{$2\over3$}\sin^2\theta_W)
208: \tilde{t}_{L}^{\dagger}\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{i\partial^\mu}\tilde{t}_{L}
209: -\hbox{$2\over3$}\sin^2\theta_W
210: \tilde{t}_{R}^{\dagger}\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{i\partial^\mu}\tilde{t}_{R}
211: \right]Z_{\mu} \ .
212: \end{equation}
213: After mixing, the Lagrangian for the $Z$ coupling
214: in the $ \tilde{t}_{1}$, $\tilde{t}_{2}$ basis is
215: \begin{equation}
216: {\cal L}_{Z} =
217: -\frac{g}{\cos \theta_{W}} \left[
218: \left( \hbox{$1\over2$}\cos^2 \theta
219: - \hbox{$2\over3$} \sin^2\theta_{W}\right)
220: \tilde{t}_{1}^{\dagger} \stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{i\partial^\mu}\tilde{t}_{1}
221: + \left( \hbox{$1\over2$} \sin^2\theta
222: - \hbox{$2\over3$} \sin^2\theta_{W}\right)
223: \tilde{t}_{2}^{\dagger}\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{i\partial^\mu}\tilde{t}_{2}
224: \right. \end{equation}
225: $$ \qquad\qquad \left.
226: +\hbox{$1\over4$}\sin(2\theta)
227: \left( \tilde t_1^\dagger \stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{i\partial^\mu} \tilde t_2
228: +\tilde t_2^\dagger \stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{i\partial^\mu} \tilde t_1 \right)
229: \right]Z_{\mu} \ . $$
230: Note that the last term is real in this phase convention.
231:
232: \section{The Higgs couplings to stops}
233: In MSSM, there is only one pseudoscalar boson., $A^0$. The pseudoscalar Higgs coupling to the stop squarks is given by the Lagrangian
234: \begin{equation} {\cal L}_{A}=
235: \left( \tilde{t}_{1}^\dagger \; \tilde{t}_{2}^\dagger \right)
236: {\bf T}^{A}
237: \left( \begin{array}{cc} \tilde{t}_{1} \\ \tilde{t}_{2} \end{array} \right).
238: A^0
239: \end{equation}
240: The matrix $ {\bf T}^{A} $ is given as
241: \begin{equation}
242: {\bf T}^{A} = \frac{m_{t}}{v_{2}}
243: \left( \begin{array}{cc} 2 \sin \theta \cos \theta \; {\rm Im} (\hat{A} )&
244: -i( \cos^2 \theta \hat{A}^{*} + \sin^2 \theta \hat{A}) \\
245: i( \cos^2 \theta \hat{A} + \sin^2 \theta \hat{A}^{*}) &
246: -2 \sin \theta \cos \theta \; {\rm Im} (\hat{A} )\end{array} \right),
247: \end{equation}
248: and $\hat{A}$ is defined as
249: $\hat{A} =(A_{t} \cos \beta - \mu^{*} \sin \beta)e^{-i \delta}$.
250: Note that the nonvanishing of $T^A_{11}$ or $T^A_{22}$ is a sure sign of CP
251: violation already (similar to $K_L \rightarrow 2 \pi$).
252: However, if for some reason $\mu$ and $A_t$ happen to have the same phase,
253: $T^A_{11}$ and $T^A_{22}$ will vanish because in this very special case the
254: phase in the stop mass matrix and that in the pseudoscalar couplings can be
255: removed simultaneously.
256:
257: The pseudoscalar Higgs coupling to the top quark is given by the following
258: Lagrangian,
259: \begin{equation}
260: {\cal L}^Y_{A}
261: = {g m_{t}\over 2 m_W}
262: \cot \beta \; \overline{t} i \gamma^{5} t A^0.
263: \end{equation}
264:
265: The neutral scalar Higgs sector is made up two scalar eigenstates,
266: $H^{0}$ and $h^{0}$.
267: There masses are given as
268: \begin{equation}
269: m^2_{H,h} = \hbox{$1\over2$} \left[ m^2_{A} + m^2_{Z} \pm
270: \sqrt{(m^2_{A} + m^2_{Z})^2 - 4 m^2_{A} m^2_{Z} \cos 2 \beta}\right].
271: \label{eq:treemass}
272: \end{equation}
273: Since in MSSM the constraint on the lightest scalar, $h$, is such that it is
274: too light to decay into the top pair, we shall concentrate on the decay of the
275: heavy Higgs boson, $H$, which can decay into the top pair.
276: Our general framework can also be used for the decay of the lighter
277: boson, $h$, of course, if for any reason that it should be heavy enough.
278: The heavy Higgs coupling to the stops in the left-right basis is given as
279: \begin{equation}
280: {\bf T}_0^{H}= \left( \begin{array}{cc}
281: -\frac{g m_{Z}}{\cos \theta_{W}}
282: \Delta_{\tilde t_L} \cos(\alpha+\beta) - \frac{g m_{t}^2 \sin \alpha}{m_{W}
283: \sin \beta} &
284: \frac{g m_{t}}{2 \sin \beta} (A_{t}^{*} \sin \alpha + \mu \cos \alpha)
285: \\ \frac{g m_{t}}{2 \sin \beta} (A_{t} \sin \alpha + \mu^{*} \cos \alpha)
286: & -\frac{g m_{Z}}{\cos \theta_{W}}
287: \Delta_{\tilde t_R} \cos(\alpha+\beta) -
288: \frac{g m_{t}^2 \sin \alpha}{m_W\sin \beta}
289: \end{array} \right), \end{equation}
290: where the mixing angle $\alpha$ is given in Ref. \cite{ref:higgshunt}.
291: This matrix must then be transformed into the stop mass eigenstates.
292: This is accomplished by using the stop mixing matrix,
293: \begin{equation}
294: {\bf T}^{H}= {\bf U}^{\dagger} {\bf T}_0^{H} {\bf U}.
295: \end{equation}
296: %%
297: Its Yukawa coupling is
298: \begin{equation} {\cal L}^Y_{H}
299: = \frac{g m_{t} \sin \alpha}{2 m_W \sin \beta}
300: \;\overline{t} t H^{0}.\end{equation}
301:
302:
303: \section{Helicity calculation of the matrix element}
304:
305: To get non-zero CP asymmetry in Higgs decays,
306: in addition to CP violating couplings,
307: it is necessary to get the absorptive parts from the decay
308: amplitudes in order to overcome the constraint from the $CPT$ theorem.
309: We labeled $S^I$ and $P^I$ as the absorptive form factors
310: of the Higgs or pseudo-Higgs couplings to the top quark.
311: They begin to appear at the 1-loop level, unlike
312: their dispersive parts $S$ and $P$, which can exist at the tree level,
313: %%
314: \begin{eqnarray}
315: {\cal M} = \overline{u}(p) \left[ (S+iS^I) {\bf 1} + i (P+iP^I) \gamma ^{5}
316: \right]
317: v(p')\ . \end{eqnarray}
318: %%
319: In the Weyl representation, the $\gamma$ matrices are given by
320: %%
321: \begin{eqnarray*} \gamma^{5}=
322: \left( \begin{array}{cc} -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}
323: \right) & \gamma^{0}= \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{array}
324: \right).
325: \end{eqnarray*}
326: The free spinors of momenta $p,p'$ and helicities
327: $\lambda, \lambda'$ are given by
328: %%
329: \begin{eqnarray}
330: u(p,\lambda)= \left( \begin{array}{c} \omega _{- \lambda} \chi_{+ \lambda} \\
331: \omega_{+\lambda} \chi _{+\lambda} \end{array} \right) \ ,
332: \qquad
333: v(p',\lambda)=
334: \left( \begin{array}{c} -\lambda' \omega _{+\lambda'} \chi_{-\lambda'}\\
335: \lambda' \omega_{-\lambda'} \chi _{-\lambda'} \end{array} \right),
336: \nonumber \end{eqnarray}
337: where the $\chi$'s are two component spinor eigenfunctions
338: %%
339: $\vec{\sigma} \cdot \hat{p} \; \chi_{\lambda} (p)
340: = \lambda \; \chi_{\lambda} $.
341: %%
342: The $\omega_{\pm}$ are functions
343: of the energy and momentum of the particles,
344: $\omega_{\pm}=\sqrt{E\pm |p|}$.
345: Notice that the helicities of $t\bar t$ must match
346: $\lambda'=\lambda$ because of conservation of angular momentum.
347: Our normalization of the spinor is
348: $u^{\dagger}_{\lambda} u_{\lambda} = v^{\dagger}_{\lambda} v_{\lambda}=2E$.
349: %%
350: The asymmetry between the left and right matrix elements is given by
351: \begin{equation} {\cal A}= \frac{|{\cal M}_{LL}|^2-|{\cal M}_{RR}|^2}
352: {|{\cal M}_{LL}|^2+|{\cal M}_{RR}|^2}.
353: \label{eq:assy}
354: \end{equation}
355: %%
356: The matrix elements are given by
357: %%
358: \begin{eqnarray}
359: {\cal M}_{LL} &=& \sqrt{s} [- \beta_t (S+iS^I) -i(P+iP^I)]\ ,\\
360: {\cal M}_{RR} &=& \sqrt{s} [- \beta_t (S+iS^I) +i(P+iP^I)]\ ,
361: \end{eqnarray}
362: with $\beta_t=(1-4m_t/s)^{1\over2}$ and $s=m_H^2$.
363: The asymmetry can finally be obtained using the definition from
364: Eq.~(\ref{eq:assy}),
365: %%
366: \begin{equation} {\cal A}=
367: \frac{2 \beta_{t} (PS^{I}-P^{I}S)}{P^{I2}+P^2+\beta_{t}^2S^2
368: +\beta_{t}^2 S^{I2}} \ . \label{eq:assy2}
369: \end{equation}
370: %%
371: Since we assume the Higgs boson has definite CP parity at the tree
372: level, the final state interactions due to exchanging gluons or gauge
373: bosons in Ref.~\cite{ref:CK} are not able to produce this CP asymmetry
374: at the one-loop level. However, the rich CP phases in the sector of
375: SUSY partners, especially the gluino and the stop, can give rise to
376: large ${\cal A}$. For scalar boson decay, the second term $P^{I}S$ in
377: ${\cal A}$ gives the leading contribution; while for pseudoscalar boson decay,
378: the first term, $PS^{I}$ is the leading contribution.
379:
380:
381: The polarization asymmetry is Eq.(\ref{eq:assy2}) can be translated
382: into the lepton energy asymmetry\cite{ref:CK,ref:Peskin,ref:kly}
383: in the final semileptonic channel $t\to b \ell^+\nu$. The
384: energy $E_0(\ell^+)$ distribution of a static $t$ quark decay
385: $t\rightarrow \ell^+\nu b$
386: is very simple in the narrow width $\Gamma_W$
387: approximation when $m_b$ is negligible.
388: %
389: \begin{equation}
390: f(x_0)= \left\{
391: \begin{array}{lll}
392: x_0 (1-x_0)/D & \quad\ & \mbox{if $m_W^2/m_t^2 < x < 1$}, \\
393: 0 & \quad\ & \mbox{otherwise.}
394: \end{array}
395: \right.
396: \end{equation}
397: %
398: Here we denote the scaling variable $x_0=2E_0(\ell^+)/m_t$ and
399: the normalization factor $D={1\over 6}-{1\over 2}(m_W/m_t)^4
400: +{1\over 3}(m_W/m_t)^6$.
401: When the $t$ quark is not static, but moves at a speed $\beta_t$
402: with helicity $L$ or $R$, the distribution expression becomes
403: a convolution,
404: %
405: \begin{equation}
406: f_{R,L}(x,\beta_t)=
407: \int_{x/(1+\beta_t)}^{x/(1-\beta_t)} f(x_0)
408: {\beta_t x_0 \pm (x-x_0) \over 2 x_0^2\beta_t^2}
409: dx_0
410: \;.
411: \end{equation}
412: %
413: Here $x=2E(\ell^+)/E_t$. The kernel above is related to the
414: $(1\pm\cos\psi)$ polar angular distribution.
415: %
416: Similar distributions for the $\bar t$ decay is related by CP
417: conjugation at the tree--level.
418: %
419: Using the polarization asymmetry formula in Eq.(\ref{eq:assy2}),
420: we can derive expressions for the energy distributions of
421: $\ell^-$ and $\ell^+$:
422: %
423: %
424: \begin{equation}
425: N^{-1}dN/dx(l^\pm)
426: =\hbox{$1\over2$}(1\pm{\cal A})f_L(x,\beta_t)+
427: \hbox{$1\over2$}(1\mp{\cal A})f_R(x,\beta_t)
428: \;.
429: \label{eq:dist}
430: \end{equation}
431: %
432: %
433: Here distributions are compared at the same energy for the lepton
434: and the anti--lepton at the rest frame of the Higgs boson,
435: $x(\ell^-)=x(\ell^+)=x=4E(\ell^\pm)/M_H$.
436: To prepare a large sample for analysis, we only require that each
437: event
438: has at least one prompt anti--lepton $\ell^+$
439: from the $t$ decay {\it or}
440: one prompt lepton $\ell^-$ from the $\bar t$ decay.
441: %
442:
443: \section{Absorptive parts of 3-point vertices}
444: We first study the triangle diagram via gluino exchange
445: in Fig.~1..
446: \begin{figure}
447: \begin{center}
448: \begin{picture}(160,80)(5,5)
449: \Text(120,75)[b]{$p \to$} \Text(120,8)[t]{$p' \to$}
450: \Line(100,70)(140,70) \Text(145,70)[l]{$t$}
451: \Line(100,10)(140,10) \Text(145,10)[l]{$\overline{t}$}
452: \DashLine(40,40)(100,70){5} \Text(70,65)[r]{$k,\tilde t_i$}
453: \DashLine(40,40)(100,10){5} \Text(70,20)[rt]{$k',\overline{\tilde t_j}$}
454: \Line(100,70)(100,10)
455: \Gluon(100,70)(100,10){4}{5} \Text(110,40)[l]{$\tilde g$}
456: \DashArrowLine(0,40)(40,40){5} \Text(20,45)[b]{$H,A$}
457: \end{picture}
458: \caption{Triangle diagram via gluino exchange}
459: \end{center}
460: \end{figure}
461:
462: \subsection{The ${\cal M}_{11}$ stop loop}
463:
464: When the intermediate state is
465: $\tilde{t}_{1} \overline{\tilde{t}_{1}}$, the Feynman rule gives
466: %%
467: \begin{eqnarray}
468: i {\cal M}_{11} & = & (-i \sqrt{2} g_{s} )^2 \int {\cal N}_{11}
469: \frac {i}
470: {k^2-m_{1}^2}
471: \frac{i}{k'^2-m_{1}^2} \frac{d^{4}q}{(2 \pi)^{4}}
472: iT_{11} C_{F},
473: \end{eqnarray}
474: where $ {\cal N}_{11}$ is defined as
475: \begin{equation} {\cal N}_{11} = \overline{u}(p)
476: (P_{R} \cos \theta - P_{L} \sin \theta e^{i \delta})
477: \frac{i(\not\!q + m_{\tilde{g}})}{q^2-m_{ \tilde{g}}^2}
478: (P_{L} \cos \theta - P_{R} \sin \theta e^{-i \delta}) v(p').
479: \end{equation}
480: %%
481: The color factor $C_{F}$ is $\frac{4}{3}$.
482: The absorptive part of the amplitude which is
483: needed for CP violation is obtained by cutting
484: across the momentums $k$ and $k'$.
485: %
486: \def\dum{
487: First we replace propagators that the cut is made
488: on with the on-shell conditions. Taking the momentum $k$ as
489: an example one gets
490: %
491: \begin{equation}
492: \int \frac{1}{k^2-m_{1}^2} \rightarrow
493: \int (-2 \pi i)\delta (k^2-m_{1}^2).
494: \end{equation}
495: The same must be done for the other momentum $k'$.
496: Now the integral is changed from $q$, the
497: transfer momentum, to the momenta $k$ and $k'$.
498: This is accomplished by changing the 4
499: dimension integration from $q$ to $k$ and $k'$.
500: Also a delta function is needed to make sure
501: that the conservation of energy is upheld,
502: %%
503: \begin{equation}
504: \frac{d^{4}q}{(2 \pi)^{4}} \rightarrow \frac{d^{4}k}{(2 \pi)^{4}}
505: \frac{d^{4}k'}{(2 \pi)^{4}} (2 \pi)^{4} \delta^{4} (k+k'-p-p') \ .
506: \end{equation}
507: }
508: %%%%
509: The discontinuity\cite{cut-rule} of the matrix element is
510: $$ {\rm Disc}(i {\cal M}_{11}) =
511: \frac{g_{s}^2 T_{11}}{8\pi}
512: \beta_{1} C_{F} $$
513: %%
514: \begin{equation}
515: \times \int \overline{u}(p)
516: { \not\!q (1-\gamma_5\cos2\theta)+ m_{\tilde{g}} \sin(2 \theta)
517: (-\cos \delta + i\gamma^5 \sin \delta)
518: \over q^2-m_{\tilde g}^2 } v(p') {d \Omega_{k} \over 4 \pi} \ .
519: \end{equation}
520: %%
521: The phase space integration involves the following forms,
522: \begin{equation}
523: J_{ij}\equiv
524: s\int \frac{1}{q^2-m_{\tilde{g}}^2} \frac{d \, \Omega_{k}}{4 \pi}.
525: = \frac{1}{\beta_{t} \beta_{ij}} \ln \left(
526: \frac{
527: \beta_{t}^2 + \beta_{ij}^2 -2 \beta_{t} \beta_{ij} +4 m_{\tilde{g}}^2/s}
528: {
529: \beta_{t}^2 + \beta_{ij}^2 + 2 \beta_{t} \beta_{ij} +4 m_{\tilde{g}}^2/s}
530: \right) ,\end{equation}
531: %%
532: \begin{equation} s \int \frac{q^{\mu}}{q^2-m_{\tilde{g}}^2}
533: \frac{d \Omega_{k}}{4 \pi} = -H_{ij} (p-p')^{\mu} + K_{ij} (p+p')^{\mu}.
534: \label{eq:HK}
535: \end{equation}
536: Multiplying both sides by $(p-p')_{\mu}$ the $H_{ij}$ function
537: can be isolated out because $(p+p')\cdot (p-p')$ is zero.
538: The $H_{ij}$ function for any intermediate mass $ m_{i}$ and $m_{j}$ is
539: %%
540: \begin{equation}
541: \beta_t^2 H_{ij} = 1 + \hbox{$1\over4$}(\beta_{ij}^2
542: - \beta_{t}^2 + 4 m_{\tilde{g}}^2/s)J_{ij} \ .
543: \end{equation}
544: %%
545: The $ \beta_{ij}$ function is given by
546: \begin{equation} \beta_{ij} = \sqrt{1-2(m_{i}^2+m_{j}^2)/s +
547: (m_{i}^2-m_{j}^2)^2/s^2}.
548: \end{equation}
549: Notice that when $ i=j $, $\beta_{ij}$ reduces to
550: $\beta_{i}= \sqrt{1-4m_{i}^2/s}$.
551: The function $K_{ij}$ is obtained by
552: contracting Eq.~(\ref{eq:HK}) with $p+p'$.
553: \begin{equation} K_{ij}=-\hbox{$1\over2$} J_{ij}(m_{i}^2-m_{j}^2)/s
554: \ . \end{equation}
555: Notice that for matrix elements with both the stop and the anti-stop
556: of the same type, the term proportional to $(p+p')$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:HK})
557: does not contribute.
558:
559: After this, the imaginary part of the matrix element is needed. The
560: imaginary parts are obtained by using the relation
561: \begin{equation}
562: {\rm Disc}({\cal M})= 2 i
563: \overline{u}(p) \left[ S^{I} {\bf 1} + P ^{I} i\gamma ^{5} \right]
564: v(p') \ .
565: \end{equation}
566: %%
567: \begin{eqnarray}
568: S^{I}_{11} & = & \frac{g_{s}^2 T_{11} \beta_{1}}{16 \pi s} C_{F}
569: \left(
570: +m_{\tilde{g}}J_{11}\sin(2\theta)\cos\delta+2m_t H_{11}
571: \right) \ , \nonumber\\
572: P^{I}_{11} & = & \frac{g_{s}^2 T_{11} \beta_{1}}{16 \pi s} C_{F}
573: \left(-m_{\tilde{g}}J_{11}\sin(2\theta)\sin\delta \right) \ .
574: \label{eq:oneone}
575: \end{eqnarray}
576:
577: \subsection{The ${\cal M}_{22}$ stop loop}
578: Similarly, we obtain results for the intermediate state
579: $\tilde{t}_{2} \overline{\tilde{t}_{2}}$.
580: The matrix element is given by
581: \begin{eqnarray} i {\cal M}_{22}
582: & = & (-i \sqrt{2} g_{s} )^2 \int {\cal N}_{22} \frac {i}
583: {k^2-m_{2}^2} \frac{i}{k'^2-m_{2}^2} \frac{d^{4}q}{(2 \pi)^{4}} iT_{22} C_{F},
584: \end{eqnarray}
585: where $ {\cal N}_{22}$ is given by
586: \begin{equation} {\cal N}_{22} = \overline{u}(p)
587: (P_{R} \sin \theta + P_{L} \cos \theta e^{i \delta})
588: \frac{i(\not\!q + m_{\tilde{g}})}{q^2-m_{ \tilde{g}}^2}
589: (P_{L} \sin \theta + P_{R} \cos \theta e^{-i \delta}) v(p').
590: \end{equation}
591: After integrating the phase space of the intermediate state in the cut
592: diagram, the form factors are
593: \begin{eqnarray} S^{I}_{22} & = &
594: \frac{g_{s}^2 T_{22} \beta_2}{16 \pi s} C_{F} \left(
595: -m_{\tilde g}J_{22}\sin(2\theta)\cos\delta+2m_t H_{22}
596: \right) \ ,\\
597: P^{I}_{22} & = & \frac{g_{s}^2 T_{22} \beta_2}{16 \pi s} C_{F} \left(
598: +m_{\tilde g}J_{22}\sin(2\theta)\sin\delta \right) \ . \nonumber
599: \label{eq:twotwo}
600: \end{eqnarray}
601:
602: \subsection{The ${\cal M}_{12}$ stop loop}
603:
604: The amplitude involving
605: the intermediate state $\tilde{t}_{1} \overline{\tilde{t}_{2}}$
606: is given by
607: \begin{eqnarray} i {\cal M}_{12} & = & 2 i^{6} g_{s}^2T_{12} C_{F}
608: \int {\cal N}_{12} \frac{1}{k^2-m_{1}^2} \frac{1}{k'^2-m_{2}^2}
609: \frac{d^{4}q}{(2 \pi)^{4}} \nonumber\\
610: {\cal N}_{12} & = & \overline{u}(p) (P_{R} \cos \theta -
611: P_{L} \sin \theta e^{i \delta}) \frac{(\not\!q +
612: m_{\tilde{g}})}{q^2-m_{ \tilde{g}}^2} (P_{L} \sin \theta + P_{R} \cos \theta
613: e^{-i \delta}) v(p').
614: \end{eqnarray}
615: For $\tilde{t}_{2} \overline{\tilde{t}_{1}}$, it is
616: \begin{eqnarray} i {\cal M}_{21} & = & 2 i^{6} g_{s}^2T_{21} C_{F}
617: \int {\cal N}_{21} \frac{1}{k^2-m_{2}^2} \frac{1}{k'^2-m_{1}^2}
618: \frac{d^{4}q}{(2 \pi)^{4}} \ , \\
619: {\cal N}_{21} & = & \overline{u}(p) (P_{R} \sin \theta +
620: P_{L} \cos \theta e^{i \delta}) \frac{(\not\!q +
621: m_{\tilde{g}})}{q^2-m_{ \tilde{g}}^2} (P_{L} \cos \theta - P_{R} \sin \theta
622: e^{-i \delta}) v(p')\ . \nonumber
623: \end{eqnarray}
624: After integrating over the intermediate phase space,
625: we add up the absorptive parts to give
626: %
627: \begin{eqnarray}
628: S^{I}_{12+21}&=&
629: -\frac{g_{s}^2 \beta_{12}}{8 \pi s} C_{F}
630: {\rm Re}\left[m_{\tilde g} T_{21}(\cos^2\theta e^{i\delta}
631: -\sin^2 \theta e^{-i \delta})\right]J_{12} \ , \\
632: P^{I}_{12+21}&=& -\frac{g_{s}^2 \beta_{12}}{8 \pi s} C_{F}
633: {\rm Im}\left[-m_{\tilde g}T_{21}(\sin^2\theta e^{-i\delta}
634: +\cos^2 \theta e^{i \delta}) \right. \nonumber\\ &&
635: \qquad \qquad \left.
636: + m_t\sin( 2 \theta) T_{21}(m_2^2-m_1^2)/ s\right]J_{12}
637: \ .
638: \end{eqnarray}
639: \section{Absorptive parts of 2-point vertices}
640: We study the bubble loops which involve only the $\overline{\tilde
641: t}\tilde t$ pair.
642: \subsection{$Z$ diagrams}
643: \begin{figure}
644: \begin{center}
645: \begin{picture}(65,50)(0,-40)
646: \Text(-8,-1)[t]{$l=p+p'$}
647: \DashLine(0,0)(20,0){4} \Text(0,8)[b]{$H\to$}
648: \DashCArc(30,0)(10,180,0){4} \Text(30,15)[b]{$\tilde t_i$}
649: \DashCArc(30,0)(10,0,-180){4} \Text(30,-15)[t]{$\tilde t_j$}
650: \Photon(40,0)(60,0){4}{3} \Text(50,8)[b]{$Z$}
651: \Line(60,0)(90,30) \Text(95,30)[l]{$t,p$}
652: \Line(60,0)(90,-30) \Text(95,-30)[l]{$\overline t,p'$}
653: \end{picture}
654: \end{center}
655: \caption{$Z$ exchange diagram}
656: \end{figure}
657: $Z$ diagrams that contain $\bar{\tilde{t}_{1}} \tilde{t}_{1}$ or
658: $\bar{\tilde{t}_2} \tilde{t}_{2}$ are identical zero because of the phase
659: space integration. This point will become obvious from the result of
660: the mixed intermediate states $\bar{\tilde{t}}_{1} \tilde{t}_{2}$ or
661: $\bar{\tilde{t}}_{2} \tilde{t}_{1}$.
662: The $ {\cal M}_{12}$ matrix element is given below,
663: \begin{eqnarray}
664: i {\cal M}_{12} & = &
665: \frac{g^2 T_{12} N_{C}}{4 \cos^2 \theta_{W}} \sin( 2 \theta)
666: \int {\cal N}_Z \frac{1}{l^2 - m_{Z}^2}
667: \frac{1}{ k^2-m_{1}^2}
668: \frac{1}{{k'}^2-m_{2}^2} \frac{d^{4}k}{(2 \pi)^{4}}, \nonumber
669: \end{eqnarray}
670: where $ {\cal N}_Z$ is given as
671: \begin{equation} {\cal N}_Z = \overline{u}(p) \gamma^{\mu}
672: \left(
673: \hbox{$1\over4$} - \hbox{$2\over3$} \sin^2 \theta_{W}
674: - \hbox{$1\over4$} \gamma^{5}
675: \right) v(p')
676: \left(g_{\mu\nu} -l_\mu l_\nu/ m_Z^2 \right) (k-k')_{\nu} \ .
677: \end{equation}
678: The $ {\cal M}_{21}$ matrix element is
679: very similar to the above matrix element,
680: with the substitution of $T_{12}$ by $T_{12}^{*}$,
681: \begin{equation}
682: P^{I}_{12+21;Z} =
683: \frac{g^2 N_{C}}{64 \pi} \frac{m_{t} \beta_{12} \sin (2 \theta)}
684: { m_{Z}^2\cos^2 \theta_{W} } \frac{m_{1}^2-m_{2}^2}{s} {\rm Im}(T_{12})
685: \ ,
686: \end{equation}
687: where the color factor $N_{C} =3$. This graph will contribute only to
688: CP violation of the scalar Higgs decay.
689: One may think that without gluino couplings in the graph, one
690: should be able to rotate away the CP violating phase in scalar coupling
691: $T^H_{12}$. However, such rotation will produce a complex phase in
692: $\tilde t_1^\dagger \tilde t_2 Z$ coupling in Eq.(10).
693:
694: \subsection{$A^0$--$H^0$ Mixing}
695:
696: The stop bubble loop induces $A^0$--$H^0$ Mixing. We study its
697: absorptive part which contributes to the CP violation.
698: %%
699: In the heavy Higgs mass limit of MSSM, $m_{A^0}$ and $m_{H^0}$ are quite
700: close to each other based on the tree-level mass relation
701: in Eq.(\ref{eq:treemass}).
702: However, it is known that there is large higher order correction to
703: the tree-level mass relation. Thus in our
704: following study we allow the masses $m_{A^0}$ and $m_{H^0}$ to vary
705: independently, not restricted by the tree-level formula.
706: %%
707: \begin{figure}
708: \begin{center}
709: \begin{picture}(65,60)(0,-30)
710: \DashLine(0,0)(20,0){4} \Text(10,8)[b]{$A^0$}
711: \DashCArc(30,0)(10,180,0){4} \Text(30,15)[b]{$\tilde t_i$}
712: \DashCArc(30,0)(10,0,-180){4} \Text(30,-15)[t]{$\tilde t_j$}
713: \Photon(40,0)(60,0){4}{3} \Text(50,8)[b]{$H^0$}
714: \Line(60,0)(90,30) \Text(95,30)[l]{$t$}
715: \Line(60,0)(90,-30) \Text(95,-30)[l]{$\overline t$}
716: \end{picture}
717: \end{center}
718: \caption{Higgs mixing diagram}
719: \end{figure}
720: The matrix element for the pseudoscalar Higgs turning into a stop pair,
721: then becoming the heavy Higgs, and finally decaying into a top pair,
722: is given as
723: \begin{equation}i
724: {\cal M}= \frac{i g m_{t} \sin \alpha}{2 m_{W} \sin \beta}
725: \overline{u}(p) v(p')
726: \sum_{ij} \int \frac{T_{ji}^{H^{0}}}{m_{A^0}^2-m_{H}^{2}}
727: \frac{T_{ij}^{A^{0}}}{(\frac{l}{2}+q)^{2}-m_{i}^{2}}
728: \frac{id^{4}q/(2 \pi)^{4}}{(\frac{l}{2}-q)^{2}-m_{j}^{2}} \ .
729: \end{equation}
730: Making the same cut as that in the $Z$ loop digram, we obtain
731: the imaginary part of the form factor,
732: \begin{equation}
733: S^I(A^0\to H^0\to\bar t t) = -
734: \frac{g m_{t}}{32 \pi m_{W}} {\sin \alpha \over \sin \beta}
735: \sum_{ij}\beta_{ij}
736: \frac{T^{H^{0}}_{ji} T^{A^{0}}_{ij}}{m_{A^0}^2 - m_{H^{0}}^{2}} \ .
737: \end{equation}
738: A similar expression is derived for
739: the heavy scalar Higgs decay,
740: \begin{equation}
741: P^I(H^{0}\to A^0\to \bar t t) = -
742: \frac{g m_{t}}{32 \pi m_{W}} \cot\beta
743: \sum_{ij} \beta_{ij}
744: \frac{T^{H^{0}}_{ji} T^{A^{0}}_{ij}}{ m_{H^0}^2-m_{A^{0}}^{2}} \ .
745: \end{equation}
746:
747: \section{Physical and Numerical Analyses}
748:
749: Before we plunge into the numerical analysis,
750: it is interesting to check the limit
751: in which the two stop states are accidentally degenerate. In that case,
752: $({\cal M}^2_{\tilde{t}})_{12} = ({\cal M}^2_{\tilde{t}})_{21} = 0$,
753: $({\cal M}^2_{\tilde{t}})_{11} = ({\cal M}^2_{\tilde{t}})_{22}$.
754: Therefore $\mu^{*} \cot \beta + A_{t}=0$,
755: and $\mu^{*}$ and $A_{t}$ should have
756: the same phase which can still serve as the source of CP violation.
757: In that case, $\theta$ and
758: $\delta$ in ${\bf U}$ in Eqs.(3),(12),(16) and in the definition of $\hat{A}$,
759: should be set to zero.
760:
761: Thus in this limit, the stop loops
762: do not contribute to
763: ${\cal M}_{11}$ and ${\cal M}_{22}$
764: in the pseudoscalar case, because
765: ${T}^{A}_{11} = {T}^{A}_{22} = 0$.
766: However they still give rise to
767: CP violation in ${\cal M}_{12}$, ${\cal M}_{21}$
768: because
769: ${T}^{A}_{12} = (-i m_t/v_2)(A^{*}_{t} \cos \beta - \mu\sin\beta)$.
770: %%
771: One may attempt to absorb this phase by rotating the phase of, say, the
772: right stop, however such rotation will lead to complex gluino-top-stop
773: couplings which cannot be rotated away because of the nonvanishing
774: gluino mass. From this, it is easy to understand why a factor of
775: gluino mass has to appear in Eq.(41) for $S^{I}_{12+21}$. Similarly,
776: for the scalar Higgs decay in the degenerate stop limit,
777: the stop loops still produce no CP violating effect in
778: ${\cal M}_{11}$ and ${\cal M}_{22}$,
779: because $\sin\theta = 0$
780: and only the term proportional to the gluino mass in $P^{I}_{12+21}$
781: contributes as reflected in Eq.(42).
782:
783: It is also straightforward
784: to note that in the degenerate limit, the contributions of both
785: $H^0$--$Z^0$ and $A^0$--$H^0$ bubble graphs vanish.
786: In the $H^0$--$Z^0$ case, the phase of the scalar Higgs, $H$,
787: coupling as well as that of the stop mixing can be rotated away simultaneously
788: (into the gluino couplings)
789: without affecting the $Z$ coupling and this is reflected
790: in $m^2_1 - m^2_2 =0$ factor in Eq.(44).
791: For $A^0$--$H^0$,
792: the phase of pseudoscalar coupling as well as that of the
793: scalar coupling can be rotated away simultaneously
794: also and this is reflected in
795: $$ \sum_{ij}\beta_{ij}T^{H^{0}}_{ji} T^{A^{0}}_{ij} =
796: \beta_{12}(T^{H^{0}}_{21} T^{A^{0}}_{12}
797: + T^{H^{0}}_{21} T^{A^{0}}_{12}) = 0 \ ,$$
798: in this particular limit.
799: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
800:
801: To illustrate our result numerically, in the following, we set the
802: parameters so that only the lighter stops states $\overline{\tilde
803: t_1} \tilde t_1$ are light enough to be on-shell for simplicity. In
804: such a scenario, only some of the above contributions are available.
805: In Fig.~4, we show the mass $m_1$ of the lightest stop versus
806: $\tan\beta$. The best current limit of the lowest bound on lightest
807: stop mass from LEP is about 95 GeV
808: \cite{ref:lepstopbound}, and this means that $\tan \beta < 3$ is
809: not allowed for the case $m_{Q}=m_{U}=300$GeV,
810: $\mu=500\,$GeV, $A_{t}=500 e^{\frac{i \pi}{4}}\,$GeV.
811: If one wishes to study the
812: possibility of a much heavier Higgs which can decay to all channels of
813: stops, the remaining diagrams can be easily incorporated into the
814: numerical analysis.
815:
816: \subsection{Pseudoscalar-Higgs Decay}
817:
818: In the model of our study, the $A^0$ remains its status as a
819: pseudoscalar boson at the tree level.
820: CP violation in the pseudoscalar Higgs decay into top pairs occurs
821: starting at the one-loop level.
822: The leading contribution requires
823: induced scalar form factor $S^I$ which, as we have shown, can be obtained
824: from the absorptive part due to the intermediate
825: $\overline{\tilde t}\tilde t$ state.
826: %%
827: Notice that there is no $Z$ loop contribution to $S^I$ in
828: the Higgs decay.
829: %
830: Fig.~5 show the asymmetry for the pseudoscalar
831: Higgs decay as defined by (\ref{eq:assy2}). Fig.~6 shows
832: the branching ratios of the pseudoscalar-Higgs decay to top pairs, bottom
833: pairs, and stop pairs. For small $ \tan \beta$ the decay channel is
834: mostly top pairs.
835:
836: \subsection{Higgs Decay}
837:
838: In the Higgs decay, the CP violation is caused by terms proportional
839: to the $P^I$ form factors. The $Z$ diagrams can contribute
840: in principle if not disallowed by the kinematics.
841: As stated before it does not contribute in our illustration because
842: we assume a heavy $\tilde{t}_{2}$.
843: Fig.~7 shows the CP asymmetry of the Higgs decay. The
844: branching ratios for the Higgs to decay into tops, bottoms, stops,
845: $W$'s, and $Z$'s are given in Fig.~8.
846: %%
847: %% Again small $\tan
848: %% \beta$ is preferred for the Higgs decay into top pairs.
849:
850: \section{Conclusion}
851: The complex mixing among the stop sector can produce CP asymmetry at the
852: level of a few percent in the final products of polarized $t\bar t$
853: states from the Higgs boson decay. Such asymmetry can be measured in
854: the energy spectra of the final leptons. Unlike the usual
855: two-Higgs-doublet model, the CP violation does not require the mixing
856: among $A^0$ and $H^0$ states at the tree level.
857:
858: This work was supported in parts by National Science Council of
859: R.O.C., and by U.S. Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-FG02-84ER40173).
860: %
861:
862:
863:
864:
865: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
866:
867: \begin{thebibliography} {99}
868: \bibitem{reviews}
869: H.P. Nilles, Phys. Rept. {\bf 110}, 1 (1984);\\
870: H. Haber and G. Kane, Phys. Rept. {\bf 117}, 75 (1985);\\
871: S. Dawson, hep-ph/9612229;\\
872: M. Drees, hep-ph/9611409;\\
873: M. Peskin, hep-ph/9705479; etc.
874: %
875: \bibitem{ref:higgshunt}
876: J. Gunion, H. Haber, G. Kane, and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter's Guide,
877: published by Addision-Wesley, New York (1990),
878: %
879: \bibitem{susycp}
880: For a recent review, see A. Masiero and L. Silvestrini, hep-ph/9711401 and references there-in.
881: %
882: \bibitem{bau}
883: For a recent review, see J. M. Cline, M. Joyce and K. Kainulainen, hep-ph/0006119
884: and references there-in.
885: %
886: \bibitem{mix:stops} P. Apostolos, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77} 4996, (1996).
887: %% "Higgs scalar-pseudoscalar trasitions at muon colliders"
888: %
889: \bibitem{ref:CK}
890: D. Chang and W.-Y. Keung, Phys. Lett. {\bf B305}, 261 (1993);
891: D. Chang, W.-Y. Keung, and I. Phillips, Phys. Rev. {\bf D48}, 3225 (1993);
892: and references therein.
893: %
894: \bibitem{bohdan} B. Grzadkowski Phys. Lett. {\bf B 338}, 71 (1994).
895: %% "Standerd model contributions to CP violation
896: %% in H->t tbar with two higgs models"
897: %
898: \bibitem{conv:stop} D. Chang, W.-F. Chang, W.-Y. Keung, hep-ph/9910465,
899: Phys. Lett. {\bf B478}, 239 (2000).
900: % "stop mixing convention"
901: %
902: \bibitem{seoul} S.Y. Choi and J. S. Lee, hep-ph/9907496 (1999);
903: %% "CP violation in fermionic higgs decay, charge higgs contirbution"
904: %%
905: E. Asakawa, S. Y. Choi, J. S. Lee, hep-ph/0005118 (2000).
906: % "mssm higgs sctor cp violation through third generation fermions pair
907: % production at muon colliders"
908: %
909: \bibitem{Soni} D. Atwood, A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 52}, 6271 (1995).
910: %% "Higgs CP violation at mu+ mu- colliders"
911: Additional CP--odd observables in collider physics have been studied
912: by
913: J.F. Donoghue and G. Valencia, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 58},
914: 451 (1987);
915: W. Bernreuther and O. Nachtmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 63}, 2787
916: (1989); G. Valencia and A. Soni, Phys. Lett. {\bf B263}, 517 (1991);
917: A.~Bilal, E. Mass\'o, and A. De R\'ujula, Nucl. Phys. {\bf 355}, 549
918: (1991).
919:
920: %
921: \bibitem{ref:Peskin}
922: C.R. Schmidt and M. E. Peskin, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 69}, 410 (1992).
923: %
924: \bibitem{ref:kly}
925: G.~Kane, G.A. Ladinsky, and C.--P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. {\bf D45}, 124
926: (1991).
927: %
928: \bibitem{cut-rule}
929: R.E. Cutkosky, J. Math. Phys. {\bf 1}, 429 (1960).
930: %
931: \bibitem{ref:lepstopbound}
932: LEP joint SUSY working group
933: (LEPSUSYWG) for ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL experiments, \\
934: note LEPSUSYWG/00-02.1
935: (http://lepsusy.web.cern.ch/lepsusy/).
936: \end{thebibliography}
937: \vskip 1cm
938:
939: \special{psfile=FIG4.eps hoffset=20 voffset=-300}
940: \vskip 280pt
941: \begin{itemize}
942: \item[Fig. 4] Light stop mass $m_1$ in GeV versus $\tan\beta$
943: for the case $m_{Q}=m_{U}= 250,300,350\,$GeV,
944: $\mu=500\,$GeV, $A_{t}=500 e^{\frac{i \pi}{4}}\,$GeV.
945:
946:
947: \newpage\ \quad \vskip -0.5cm
948:
949: \special{psfile=FIG5.eps hoffset=20 voffset=-300}
950: \vskip 280pt
951: \item[Fig. 5] Asymmetry of pseudoscalar Higgs decay,
952: $m_{Q}=300\,$Gev, $m_{U}=300\,$GeV,
953: $\mu=500\,$GeV, $A_{t}=500 e^{\frac{i \pi}{4}}\,$GeV,
954: $m_{A}=400\,$GeV, $m_{H}=420\,$GeV.
955:
956: \vskip 1.5cm
957:
958: \special{psfile=FIG6.eps voffset=-300 hoffset=20}
959: \vskip 280pt
960: \item[Fig. 6] Branching ratios for pseudoscalar Higgs decay,
961: $m_{Q}=300\,$Gev, $m_{U}=300\,$GeV,
962: $\mu=500\,$GeV, $A_{t}=500 e^{\frac{i \pi}{4}}\,$GeV,
963: $m_{A}=400\,$GeV, $m_{H}=420\,$GeV.
964:
965:
966: \newpage\ \quad\vskip -0.5cm
967:
968: \special{psfile=FIG7.eps hoffset=20 voffset=-300}
969: \vskip 280pt
970: \item[Fig. 7] Asymmetry of heavy Higgs decay,
971: $m_{Q}=300\,$Gev, $m_{U}=300\,$GeV,
972: $\mu=500\,$GeV, $A_{t}=500 e^{\frac{i \pi}{4}}\,$GeV,
973: $m_{A}=400\,$GeV,$m_{H}=420\,$GeV.
974:
975:
976: \vskip 1.5cm
977:
978: \special{psfile=FIG8.eps hoffset=20 voffset=-300}
979: \vskip 280pt
980: \item[Fig. 8] Branching ratios for heavy Higgs decay,
981: $m_{Q}=300\,$Gev, $m_{U}=300\,$GeV,
982: $\mu=500\,$GeV, $A_{t}=500 e^{\frac{i \pi}{4}}\,$GeV,
983: $m_{A}=400\,$GeV, $m_{H}=420\,$GeV.
984:
985: \end{itemize}
986: \end{document}
987: