1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2:
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: %
5: % Power Law in Strong Interactions
6: %
7: % Last changes:
8: % 17.02.2001 Marek
9: % 19.02.2001 Mark
10: % 21.02.2001 Marek
11: % 26.02.2001 Mark
12: % 1.03.2001 Marek
13: % 07.06.2001 Marek
14: % 24.07.2001 Marek
15: % 24.07.2001 Marek
16: % 27.07.2001 Marek
17: % 31.07.2001 Marek
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %\documentstyle[12pt,fleqn,epsfig]{article}
20: %\documentstyle[aps,epsfig,preprint]{revtex}
21: \documentstyle[aps,epsfig]{revtex}
22: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}
23:
24: \textwidth=16cm
25: \textheight=23cm
26: \topmargin=0cm
27: \oddsidemargin=0cm
28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Here comes the paper %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30:
31: \begin{document}
32:
33: %\begin{center}
34: %{\bf INSTITUT~F\"{U}R~KERNPHYSIK,~UNIVERSIT\"{A}T~FRANKFURT}\\
35: %D - 60486 Frankfurt, August--Euler--Strasse 6, Germany
36: %\end{center}
37:
38: %\hfill IKF--HENPG/1--01
39:
40:
41: \vspace{2.5cm}
42: \begin{center}
43: {\Large \bf Power Law in Hadron Production
44: }
45: \end{center}
46:
47: \vspace{0.5cm}
48:
49: \begin{center}
50:
51: {\bf Marek Ga\'zdzicki}\footnote{E--mail: Marek.Gazdzicki@cern.ch}\\
52: \vspace{0.3cm}
53: CERN, Geneva, Switzerland \\
54: and\\
55: Institut f\"ur Kernphysik, Universit\"at Frankfurt\\
56: D--60486 Frankfurt, Germany\\[0.8cm]
57:
58: {\bf Mark I. Gorenstein}\footnote{E--mail: goren@th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de}\\
59: \vspace{0.3cm}
60: Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at Frankfurt\\
61: D--60054 Frankfurt, Germany\\
62: and\\
63: Bogolyubov Institute for
64: Theoretical Physics,
65: Kiev, Ukraine
66:
67: \end{center}
68:
69: %\newpage
70: \vspace{0.5cm}
71:
72: \begin{abstract}
73: \noindent
74: In high energy p($\overline{\rm{p}}$)+p
75: interactions the mean multiplicity and transverse mass spectra of
76: neutral mesons from $\eta$ to $\Upsilon$
77: ($m \cong 0.5\div 10$~GeV/c$^2$)
78: and the transverse mass spectra of pions
79: ($m_T >$ 1~GeV/c$^2$) reveal a remarkable
80: behaviour: they follow, over more than 10 orders of magnitude,
81: the power--law function:
82: $C\cdot m_{(T)}^{-P}$.
83: The parameters $C$ and $P$ are energy dependent, but similar
84: for all mesons produced at the same collision energy.
85: This scaling resembles that expected in the statistical
86: description of hadron production: the parameter $P$ plays the role of
87: a temperature and the normalisation constant
88: $C$ is analogous to the system volume.
89: The fundamental difference is, however, in the form of the
90: distribution
91: function.
92: In order to reproduce the experimental results and preserve
93: the basic structure of the statistical approach
94: the Boltzmann factor $e^{-E^*/T}$ appearing in standard
95: statistical mechanics has to be substituted by a power--law factor
96: $(E^*/\Lambda)^{-P}$.
97:
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: %\vspace{3cm}
101: %PACS: 12.40.-y, 12.60.-c
102:
103:
104: \newpage
105:
106: It is well established that basic properties of hadron
107: production in high energy collisions
108: approximately follow simple
109: rules of statistical mechanics.
110: A principal assumption of
111: statistical models of strong interactions
112: \cite{Ha:65} states that
113: the single particle energy distribution in the local rest frame
114: of hadronizing matter follows a Boltzmann form:
115: \renewcommand{\theequation}{B.1}
116: \begin{equation}\label{exp}
117: \frac{dn}{d {\bf p}^*}~\sim~ \exp\left(-\frac{E^*}{T}\right)~,
118: \end{equation}
119: where $E^* = \sqrt{m^2 + {\bf p}^{*2}}= m_T \cdot {\rm cosh}(y^*)$ is
120: the hadron energy
121: ($m_T \equiv \sqrt{m^2 + p_T^2}$ is the transverse mass and $y^*$
122: is the local hadron rapidity)
123: and $T$
124: is a common (for all particles) temperature parameter
125: usually extracted by a
126: comparison with the experimental data.
127: In the fixed rest frame (e.g. in the c.m. frame of
128: the colliding particles) the energy $E^*$ equals to
129: $m_T \cdot {\rm cosh}(y-y^{\prime})$, where $y$ and $y^{\prime}$
130: are the rapidities of considered particle and the `hadron fluid
131: elements' (fireballs), respectively.
132:
133: Integration of hadron distribution
134: along the collision axis (i.e. over $y$ and $y^{\prime}$
135: with an arbitrary rapidity distribution function, $f(y^{\prime})$,
136: of fireballs) leads to
137: an approximately (for $m_T >> T$) exponential form of
138: transverse mass spectrum \cite{Ha:65}:
139: \renewcommand{\theequation}{B.2}
140: \begin{equation}\label{mTexp}
141: \frac{dN}{m_Tdm_T}~ \sim ~\exp\left(-~\frac{m_T}{T}\right)~.
142: \end{equation}
143: According to this approach the final state hadrons should obey
144: this distribution providing that collective transverse
145: motion of hadronizing matter and contributions from resonance decays
146: are neglected.
147: Further integration over transverse mass yields an expression
148: for the mean hadron multiplicity, $N(m)$, which is also (for $m>>T$) governed
149: by the Boltzmann factor:
150: \renewcommand{\theequation}{B.3}
151: \begin{equation}\label{mexp}
152: N(m)~ \sim~ \exp\left(-~\frac{m}{T}\right)~.
153: \end{equation}
154: The exponential distributions (\ref{mTexp},\ref{mexp})
155: are confirmed in high energy particle collisions by numerous experimental
156: results on $p_T$ spectra in the transverse
157: momentum region $p_T \leq 2$ GeV/c
158: and on hadron yields
159: at $m \leq 2$ GeV/c$^2$ \cite{Be:97}
160: (a correction for contributions from resonance decays is necessary
161: for a detailed comparison with data).
162: For a given hadron species, $h$, the normalisation factors
163: in Eqs.(\ref{mTexp},~\ref{mexp}) are proportional to
164: a volume parameter $V$ (a sum of the proper volume of
165: `hadron fluid elements'), which has to be common for all hadrons,
166: following the assumption of statistical
167: production.
168: Additional factors are degeneracy factor $g = (2j+1)$, where $j$
169: is the particle spin,
170: and a chemical factor $\exp(\mu_h/T)$, which accounts for
171: material conservation laws in grand canonical approximation.
172: The chemical potential
173: $\mu_h$ equals to zero for neutral hadrons (i.e. for hadrons
174: with zero values of the conserved charges).
175: Consequently, for neutral hadrons the exponential distributions
176: (\ref{mTexp},~\ref{mexp})
177: with a common temperature parameter and a common
178: volume parameter (multiplied by the degeneracy factors $g$) are
179: expected to be valid.
180:
181: \vspace{0.3cm}
182: However, in high energy p+p interactions the measurements
183: of $\pi^0$ meson spectra in a high $p_T$ ($p_T > 2$~GeV/c) domain
184: show a strong deviation from the exponential shape.
185: In this region the distribution follows a power--law dependence
186: \cite{Da:80}.
187: In the standard, QCD--based, approach
188: this behaviour is attributed to the hard parton
189: scattering \cite{parton}.
190: A strong violation of the Boltzmann behaviour
191: in the high mass region
192: is also
193: seen in the case of
194: mean hadron multiplicities.
195: The hadron yields
196: from the $\eta$-meson ($m \cong$~0.55~GeV/c$^2$)
197: to the $J/\psi$-meson ($m \cong$~3.1~GeV/c$^2$) follow \cite{Ga:99}
198: approximately an exponential law (\ref{mexp}).
199: This is, however, not true any more for
200: the $\Upsilon$ meson ($m \cong$~9.5~GeV/c$^2$).
201: The experimental ratio of $\Upsilon$ to
202: $J/\psi$ mean multiplicity at 800 GeV/c is \cite{Al:96}
203: $$
204: \frac {\langle \Upsilon \rangle} {\langle J/\psi \rangle}~
205: \approx~ 10^{-3}~,
206: $$
207: whereas Boltzmann's exponential law predicts:
208: $$
209: \frac {\langle \Upsilon \rangle} {\langle J/\psi \rangle}~
210: \approx ~\exp\left(- \frac{m_{\Upsilon} - m_{J/\psi}}{T}\right)~
211: \approx ~10^{-16}~
212: $$
213: for typical value of $T \cong$~0.170 GeV.
214: Thus the standard statistical model underpredicts the
215: experimental data by more than 10 orders
216: of magnitude!
217:
218: \vspace{0.3cm}
219:
220:
221: In this letter we discuss a possibility to extend the statistical
222: approach of hadron production in elementary hadronic
223: interactions to the high
224: (transverse) mass domain.
225: Based on experimental data we postulate
226: that the energy spectrum in the local rest frame
227: of hadronizing matter is given by a
228: power--law distribution:
229: \renewcommand{\theequation}{P.1}
230: \begin{equation}\label{power}
231: \frac{dn}{d {\bf p}^*} ~\sim~ \left(\frac {E^*} {\Lambda}\right)^{-P}~,
232: \end{equation}
233: instead of the exponential Boltzmann distribution (\ref{exp}).
234: We assume further that the remaining structure of the statistical
235: approach is unchanged.
236: Two new parameters appear in the proposed
237: statistical power--law model:
238: a scale parameter $\Lambda$
239: and an exponent $P$, both are assumed to be common for all
240: hadrons.
241: We do not attempt here to introduce
242: proper canonical treatment of material conservation laws
243: needed for description of charged hadrons in
244: small systems
245: \cite{Ra:80,Be:97}.
246: Therefore, we limit our analysis to the case of
247: neutral mesons only.
248: Further on, in order to be able to neglect effects of
249: large resonance widths in the statistical treatment
250: we consider only narrow mesonic states.
251:
252: Integration of Eq. (\ref{power}) over longitudinal motion
253: results in a power--law transverse mass distribution:
254: \renewcommand{\theequation}{P.2}
255: \begin{equation}\label{mTp}
256: \rho(m_T)~\equiv ~
257: \frac {dN} {g~m_T^2~dm_T} ~= ~
258: C \cdot m_T^{-P}~,
259: \end{equation}
260: where $C$ is a normalisation parameter in which we absorbed
261: the dependence on
262: the scale ($\Lambda$) and volume ($V$) parameters.
263: As both $\Lambda$ and $V$ are assumed to be common
264: for all hadrons, so does the normalisation
265: parameter $C$.
266:
267: The integration of Eq. (\ref{mTp}) over transverse mass yields:
268: \renewcommand{\theequation}{P.3}
269: \begin{equation}\label{mp}
270: \rho(m)~\equiv ~ \frac {P-3}{g~m^3} \cdot N(m)~ =
271: ~C \cdot m^{-P}~,
272: \end{equation}
273: where $N(m)$ is the hadron multiplicity.
274:
275: Several nontrivial predictions of the
276: statistical power--law model follow from
277: Eqs. (\ref{mTp}) and (\ref{mp}):
278: \begin{itemize}
279: \item
280: both transverse mass spectra and hadron yields should
281: obey a power--law behaviour;
282: the power $P$ in the $m_T$--distribution, $\rho(m_T)$
283: (\ref{mTp}), and in the hadron yield formula, $\rho(m)$ (\ref{mp}),
284: should be the same,
285: \item
286: the normalisation constant $C$ also should be the same
287: for both $m_T$--distribution
288: (\ref{mTp}) and hadron yield spectrum (\ref{mp}),
289: \item
290: the power $P$ and the normalisation constant $C$ should be universal
291: (equivalent to the temperature and volume parameters in the standard
292: statistical approach),
293: i.e. they are the same for different hadron species.
294: \end{itemize}
295:
296:
297: In order to test these predictions we plot in Fig.~1
298: experimental results on $m_T$--spectra and hadron yields for
299: p+p interactions at $\sqrt{s} = 27\div30.8$~GeV
300: as a function of $m_T$ and $m$, respectively.
301: Within the statistical power--law
302: model,
303: results on both $\rho(m)$ vs $m$ and $\rho(m_T)$ vs $m_T$ should
304: follow the same dependence: $C\cdot m_{(T)}^{-P}$.
305:
306: Full dots in Fig.~1 indicate results on $\rho(m)$ calculated
307: for the mean multiplicity of hadrons: $\eta, \omega, \phi~
308: \cite{Ag:91}, J/\psi,
309: \psi'$ and $\Upsilon$ \cite{Al:96}, whereas triangles indicate the
310: data on $m_T$--spectra, $\rho(m_T)$, of neutral pions \cite{pi30}.
311: The measurements of $J/\psi, \psi'$ and $\Upsilon$ \cite{Al:96}
312: were performed for p+S interactions at 800 GeV/c.
313: The extrapolation to p+N interactions was done assuming
314: the $A^{0.92}$ dependence on nuclear mass number.
315: The measured energy dependence of midrapidity yield \cite{Ko:80}
316: was used to calculate multiplicities at $\sqrt{s} \approx 30$ GeV.
317: The $\pi^0$ measurements are done at central rapidities only.
318: In order to calculate the rapidity integrated distributions
319: needed for comparison with the model, we
320: use the following approximation:
321: $dN/dm_T = d^2N/(dm_T dy) \cdot \Delta y$, where $\Delta y = 1$.
322: Measurements of the transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^0$
323: mesons performed by several experiments at the ISR \cite{pi30} differ typically
324: by a factor of about 2.
325: This together with similar uncertainty introduced by the
326: extrapolation procedure for rapidity integrated distributions,
327: yield a relatively large systematic error on the absolute
328: normalisation of $\pi^0$ spectra.
329: An additional bias of a similar magnitude is possible due
330: to a missing correction for contributions from resonance decays.
331: A more detailed analysis is obviously needed in the future.
332: Nevertheless,
333: we observe a surprising agreement over more than 10 orders of magnitude
334: of the experimental results
335: with the expectations following from the statistical power--law model.
336: Typical deviations of the experimental points from the
337: universal power--law dependence are of about factor 2,
338: which is a similar magnitude as the systematic errors
339: estimated above.
340: In the power--law fits to the data the statistical and
341: 50\% systematic errors were added in squares.
342: The values of the parameter $P$ ($\cong 10$)
343: and the noramlization constant $C$ resulting from the
344: separate fits to the $m_T$ spectra and hadron
345: multiplicities are similar (for details see Table 1).
346: The solid
347: line in Fig.~1 indicates a fit to the multiplicity data.
348:
349: As seen from Fig.~1 the power--law model
350: (\ref{mTp},~\ref{mp}) works reasonably well even for intermediate values
351: of $m_{(T)}$ ($0.5\div 2$ GeV/c$^2$), where the exponential distributions
352: (\ref{mTexp},\ref{mexp}) are normally assumed,
353: e.g. the power--law function (\ref{mp}) seems to describe also
354: the data for $\eta$ and $\phi$ multiplicities.
355: This fact requires a further
356: study.
357:
358: In order to check whether the observed power--law
359: $m_T$--scaling is valid also for higher collision
360: energies we compiled data on $J/\psi$, $\psi'$
361: \cite{Ab:97},
362: $\Upsilon(1s)$, $\Upsilon(2s)$ and $\Upsilon(3s)$
363: \cite{Ab:95}
364: in p+$\overline{\rm{p}}$ interactions at
365: $\sqrt{s}$ = 1800 GeV
366: (the highest energy accessible today).
367: The $p_T$ distributions for the quarkonia
368: are measured at midrapidity and they allow to calculate
369: $\rho(m_T)$ spectra in this region.
370: The resulting distributions are indicated by open symbols
371: in Fig. 1 together with the line showing
372: the power--law fit ($P \cong 8$, for details see Table 1) to these data.
373: It is seen that the distributions of quarkonia
374: produced in p+$\overline{\rm{p}}$ interactions at
375: $\sqrt{s}$ = 1800 GeV follow approximately
376: the same power--law function.
377: The relative comparison of data for different quarkonia may be
378: biased by a systematic error of about 50\%
379: due to the use
380: of midrapidity spectra instead of spectra integrated over all
381: rapidities. Therefore, as previously, in the fit the square of the error
382: was calculated as a sum of the squares of statistical and
383: systematic (50\%) errors.
384:
385: There are no data on $\pi^0$ meson production in
386: p+$\overline{\rm{p}}$ interactions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 1800 GeV.
387: However, there are measurements of $\pi^0$ spectra performed
388: close to midrapidity ($y^* \approx 1.4$)
389: at $\sqrt{s}$ = 540 GeV which extend up
390: to $p_T \cong$ 40 GeV/c \cite{Ba:85}.
391: The resulting $\rho(m_T)$ distribution is shown in Fig. 2.
392: The fit of the power--law function indicated by a solid line
393: yields $P \cong 8$ (for details see Table 1),
394: the value similar to one obtained for quarkonium spectra at 1800 GeV.
395: The power--law fits to 30 and 1800 GeV data, indicated in
396: Fig. 2 for a comparison,
397: are both below the spectrum at 540 GeV.
398: This observation may suggest a possible violation of the scaling
399: for $\pi^0$ mesons at 1800 GeV.
400: This is because
401: one may expect a monotonic increase of $\rho(m_T)$ at fixed $m_T$ with
402: increasing collisions energy and this expectation is not obeyed by the 540 GeV data.
403: We note, however, that the measurements of $\pi^0$ spectrum at high $p_T$ region
404: were indirect due to difficulty to resolve single photons from $\pi^0$ decay.
405: Therefore, a direct measurements of $\pi^0$ spectrum at 1800 GeV are necessary
406: in order to verify a validity of the scaling in this domain.
407:
408: \vspace{0.5cm}
409:
410: What is the origin of the
411: power--law $m_T$--scaling observed in
412: p($\overline{\rm{p}}$)+p interactions and
413: not (yet) seen in the collisions of heavy nuclei \cite{au}?
414: The production of heavy hadrons (like $J/\psi$
415: and $\Upsilon$ mesons)
416: as well as the power--law behaviour of pion spectra at high $p_T$
417: are fitted by QCD inspired models \cite{parton,Ma:95}.
418: However different assumptions and
419: parameters enter in these models for $\pi^0$ and
420: quarkonia description.
421: Thus the observed power--law $m_T$--scaling seems to be
422: an unexpected and interesting feature of the data
423: which requires explanation.
424: In this context we list known to us developments which can be
425: helpful in attempts to understand the power--law $m_T$--scaling.
426: It was recently pointed out \cite{Bi:99} that quantum fluctuations of the string
427: tension may account for the thermal features of the hadron spectra.
428: A possible appearance of the power--law instead of Boltzmann spectrum
429: was suggested within thermal field theory \cite{Ma:00} in the low temperature and
430: high mass limit.
431: Generalization of standard thermodynamics to non--extensive systems
432: \cite{Ts:99} leads to distribution of energy in the canonical ensemble
433: with the power--law tail for high energies.
434:
435: Finally we
436: repeat the basic results presented in this letter.
437: Properly normalized multiplicities and $m_T$ spectra
438: of neutral mesons
439: from $\eta$ to $\Upsilon$ ($m\cong 0.5 \div 10 $~GeV/c$^2$)
440: and
441: $m_T$
442: spectra of $\pi^0$ meson ($m_T > 1$~GeV/c$^2$)
443: obey the $m_T$--scaling.
444: The scaling function has approximately the power--law form:
445: $m_{(T)}^{-P}$.
446: The values of parameter $P$ and normalisation
447: constant $C$ resulting from the fits to data on production of different mesons
448: at fixed collision energy are similar.
449: This scaling behaviour resembles that expected
450: in statistical mechanics:
451: the parameter $P$ plays the role of
452: temperature
453: and the normalisation constant $C$ is analogous to the system volume.
454: Thus the basic modification of the statistical approach
455: needed to reproduce the experimental results on hadron production
456: in p($\overline{\rm{p}}$)+p
457: interactions in the large $m_{(T)}$ domain is the change of the
458: shape of the distribution function.
459: The Boltzmann function $e^{-E^*/T}$ appearing in the standard
460: statistical mechanics has to be substituted by a power--law function
461: $(E^*/\Lambda)^{-P}$.
462:
463:
464: \vspace{1cm}
465: \noindent
466: {\bf Acknowledgements}
467:
468: We thank F. Becattini, K. A. Bugaev, L. Gerland, L.~Frankfurt,
469: Sh.~Matsumoto, C. Tsallis,
470: M.~Thoma, R. Renfordt, W.~Retyk and M.~Yoshimura for
471: discussion and comments to the manuscript.
472: We acknowledge financial support of DAAD, Germany.
473: The research described in this publication was made possible in part by
474: Award \# UP1-2119 of the U.S. Civilian Research and the Development
475: Foundation for the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union
476: (CRDF).
477:
478:
479:
480:
481:
482:
483: \newpage
484:
485:
486: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
487:
488:
489:
490:
491: \bibitem{Ha:65}
492: R. Hagedorn, Suppl. Nuovo Cimento {\bf 3} (1965) 147.
493:
494: \bibitem{Be:97}
495: F. Becattini and U. Heinz, Z. Phys. {\bf C76} (1997) 269,\\
496: F. Becattini, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 92} (2001) 137, \\
497: P. V. Chliapnikov, Phys. Lett. {\bf B462} (1999) 341 and
498: {\bf B470} (1999) 263.
499:
500: \bibitem{Da:80}
501: P. Darriulat, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.
502: {\bf 30} (1980) 159 and references therein.
503:
504: \bibitem{parton}
505: R. D. Field and R. P. Feynman,
506: Phys. Rev. {\bf D15} (1977) 2590, \\
507: R. P. Feynman, R. D. Field and G. C. Fox,
508: Phys. Rev. {\bf D18} (1978) 3320, \\
509: F. M. Borzumati and G. Kramer,
510: Z. Phys. {\bf C67} (1995) 137.
511:
512: \bibitem{Ga:99}
513: M. Ga\'zdzicki and M. I. Gorenstein,
514: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83} (1999) 4009.
515:
516: \bibitem{Al:96}
517: T. Alexopoulos et al. (E771 Collab.),
518: Phys. Lett. {\bf B374} (1996) 271.
519:
520: \bibitem{Ra:80}
521: J. Rafelski and M. Danos,
522: Phys. Lett. {\bf B97} (1980) 279.
523:
524: \bibitem{Ag:91}
525: M. Aguilar--Benitez et al. (LEBC-EHS Collab.),
526: Z. Phys. {\bf C50} (1991) 405.
527:
528: \bibitem{Ko:80}
529: C. Kourkoumelis et al.,
530: Phys. Lett. {\bf 91B} (1980) 481.
531:
532: \bibitem{pi30}
533: K. Eggert et al., Nucl. Phys. {\bf B98} (1975) 49, \\
534: A. Angelis et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf 79B} (1978) 505, \\
535: F. Busser et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf 46B} (1973) 471 and
536: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B106} (1976) 1, \\
537: C. Kourkoumelis et al., Z. Phys. {\bf C5} (1980) 95.
538:
539: \bibitem{Ab:97}
540: F. Abe et al. (CDF Collab.),
541: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79} (1997) 572.
542:
543: \bibitem{Ab:95}
544: F. Abe et al. (CDF Collab.),
545: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75} (1995) 4358.
546:
547: \bibitem{Ba:85}
548: M. Banner et al. (UA2 Collab.),
549: Z. Phys. {\bf C27} (1985) 329.
550:
551: \bibitem{au}
552: J. Harris et al. (STAR Collab.), Preceedings of Quark Matter
553: Conference, Stony Brook, January 2001.
554:
555: \bibitem{Ma:95}
556: M. L. Mangano, hep-ph/9507353,\\
557: G. A. Schuler, Z. Phys. {\bf C71} (1996) 317,\\
558: R. Vogt, Phys. Rep. {\bf 310} (1999) 197.
559:
560: \bibitem{Bi:99}
561: A. Bia{\l}as, Phys. Lett. {\bf B466} (1999) 301.
562:
563: \bibitem{Ma:00}
564: Sh. Matsumoto and M. Yoshimura,
565: Phys. Rev. {\bf D61}, 123508 (2000).
566:
567: \bibitem{Ts:99}
568: C. Tsallis, J. Stat. Phys. {\bf 52}, 479 (1988),\\
569: for recent review see also
570: Braz. J. Phys. {\bf 29} (1999) 1.
571:
572: \end{thebibliography}
573:
574: \newpage
575: {\bf Table 1}
576: \noindent
577: The values of the parameters ($P$ and $C$) resulting from the
578: power--law fits ($\rho(m_{(T)}) = C \cdot m_{(T)}^{-P}$) to various
579: data sets discussed in this letter (for details see text).
580: The values of $\chi^2/ndf$ are also
581: given.
582:
583: \vspace{1.5cm}
584:
585: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
586: \hline
587: & & & \cr
588: data set & $P$ & $C\cdot10^2$ (GeV$^(P-3)$) & $\chi^2/ndf$ \cr
589: & & & \cr
590: \hline
591: \hline
592: & & & \cr
593: ~~~neutral meson multiplicity at $\cong$30 GeV~~~ &~~~ 10.1 $\pm$ 0.3~~~
594: &~~~ 3.6 $\pm$ 1.0~~~ &~~~ 1.02 ~~~ \cr
595: & & & \cr
596: $m_T$--spectra of $\pi^0$ at $\cong$30 GeV & 9.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 6.1 $\pm$ 0.9 & 1.4 \cr
597: & & & \cr
598: $m_T$--spectra of quarkonia at 1800 GeV & 7.7 $\pm$ 0.4 &~~ 3.4~(+4.4,-2.0)~~ & 1.13 \cr
599: & & & \cr
600: $m_T$--spectra of $\pi^0$ at 540 GeV & 8.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 129 $\pm$ 15 & 1.3 \cr
601: & & & \cr
602: \hline
603: \end{tabular}
604:
605:
606:
607:
608:
609: \newpage
610:
611: \begin{figure}[p]
612: \epsfig{file=fig1.eps,width=14cm}
613: \vspace{0.5cm}
614: \caption{
615: Mean multiplicity of neutral
616: mesons (full dots) scaled to $\rho(m)$ (\ref{mp})
617: and transverse mass spectra of $\pi^0$
618: mesons (full triangles) scaled to $\rho(m_T)$ (\ref{mTp})
619: produced in p+p interactions at $\sqrt{s} \approx$~30~GeV
620: as well as the quarkonium $\rho(m_T)$ spectra
621: ($J/\psi$ -- crosses, $\psi'$ -- diamonds,
622: $\Upsilon(1s)$ -- stars, $\Upsilon(2s)$ -- triangles,
623: $\Upsilon(3s)$ -- squares)
624: for p+$\overline{\rm{p}}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 1800 GeV.
625: The solid lines indicate power--law fits to the data.
626: }
627: \label{fig1}
628: \end{figure}
629:
630: \newpage
631:
632: \begin{figure}[p]
633: \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=14cm}
634: \vspace{0.5cm}
635: \caption{The $\rho(m_T)$ spectra of $\pi^0$ meson
636: for p+$\overline{\rm{p}}$ interactions at
637: $\sqrt{s}$ = 540 GeV.
638: The solid line indicates a power--law fit to the 540 GeV data,
639: whereas the two dashed lines show the corresponding fits to
640: the results at 30 and 1800 GeV (see Fig. 1).
641: }
642: \label{fig2}
643: \end{figure}
644:
645:
646: \end{document}
647: