1: %\format=latex
2: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}
3: %\begin{document}
4: %--------------------------------------------
5: %\pagenumbering{}
6:
7: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
8: \tableofcontents
9: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
10: %------------------This is Section 1---------------------------------
11: \mysection{Introduction}
12: %----------------------------------------------------------
13:
14: %-- justify low scale and the choice of mc2 as matching
15:
16: Deep-inelastic lepton-hadron scattering experiments
17: probe the internal structure of hadrons.
18: The lepton-hadron inclusive cross sections
19: may be written in terms of structure functions, which
20: depend on the virtuality of the probe $Q^2$.
21: Three structure functions $F_1$, $F_2$ and $F_L$
22: are necessary to describe neutral current (photon and $Z$-boson
23: exchange) and charged current ($W$-boson exchange) reactions.
24: In perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD)
25: the probe interacts with partonic constituents of the hadron.
26: There are probability densities $f(x,\mu^2)$
27: to find partons carrying a fraction $x$ ($0 < x \le 1$) of the
28: longitudinal momentum of the hadron at a mass factorization scale $\mu$.
29: Therefore the $F_i$, $i=1,2,L$ also depend on $x$ and $\mu$.
30:
31: The operator product expansion (OPE)
32: allows the structure functions to be written as convolutions of
33: the parton (quark and gluon) probability densities
34: with partonic hard scattering cross sections
35: (or coefficient functions). The latter can be calculated in pQCD.
36: Even though the former cannot be calculated in pQCD,
37: their $\mu$ dependence is determined by a set of
38: integro-differential equations,
39: the (Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov)-Altarelli-Parisi
40: evolution equations \cite{ap}, which follow from
41: renormalization group analysis.
42: Discussions of the pQCD description of deep inelastic
43: scattering reactions are available in \cite{rob} and \cite{esw}.
44: The probability densities and splitting functions are defined
45: in the modified-minimal-subtraction ($\overline{\rm MS}$) scheme.
46:
47: For simplicity we will call the above equations the evolution equations.
48: They describe processes where a massless parton
49: (quark or gluon) carrying a fraction of the longitudinal
50: momentum of the incoming hadron radiates
51: a massless parton and becomes a (different)
52: massless parton with a different momentum fraction.
53: The probability for this process to happen is determined
54: by splitting functions which are computed order-by-order
55: in pQCD. The leading-order (LO) and next-to-leading order (NLO)
56: splitting functions have been known for some time \cite{gp}, \cite{gw},
57: \cite{frs}, \cite{gry}, \cite{fkl}, \cite{hn} and the results
58: are summarized in a convenient form in \cite{esw}.
59: Recently some moments of the next-to-next-to-leading order
60: (NNLO) splitting functions have been
61: calculated in \cite{mom}, see also \cite{grac} and \cite{nevo} .
62: If the $x$-dependence of the quark and gluon densities
63: in a hadron are parametrized at one value of $\mu$, (say at $\mu_0$,)
64: then the solutions of the evolution equations with the
65: above LO, NLO or NNLO splitting functions yield the
66: $x$ dependence of the massless parton densities at a different $\mu$.
67: There is a second scale in the pQCD theory,
68: the renormalization scale, which appears in argument of the
69: the running coupling $\alpha_{s}$.
70: It is usually set to be the same as the mass factorization scale $\mu$
71: so $\alpha_s = \alpha_s(\mu^2)$.
72:
73: The flavor dependence of the quark and anti-quark densities is governed by
74: the flavor group, which is SU(2) for the up and down quarks, SU(3) for the
75: up, down and strange quarks etc. Therefore is is convenient to
76: form flavor non-singlet and flavor (pure) singlet combinations
77: of densities. The
78: former have their own evolution equations. The latter mix with the gluons
79: and the combined evolution is described by matrices which obey
80: coupled integro-differential equations.
81:
82: A number of methods to solve the evolution equations for
83: the parton densities have been proposed, including
84: direct $x$-space methods, \cite{miya}, \cite{botje},
85: \cite{pasc}, \cite{brnv}, \cite{mrst98}, \cite{cteq5},
86: orthogonal polynomial methods
87: \cite {cfr}, \cite{cori}, and Mellin-transform methods \cite{riemer},
88: \cite{grv98}.
89: A compilation of parton density sets is available in
90: \cite{pb}.
91:
92: The best method, which should be both accurate and fast,
93: depends on region chosen in $x$ and $\mu^2$.
94: Currently the requirements are that the code be able to evolve
95: densities from a minimum $\mu^2$ near 0.26 ${\rm GeV}^2$ up to
96: a maximum $\mu^2$ near $10^6$ ${\rm GeV}^2$
97: required for QCD studies for the future Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
98: The range in $x$ is from a minimum value
99: near $10^{-5}$ up to a maximum near unity. We use
100: the direct $x$-space method, with the following additional features.
101:
102: One of our aims is a better treatment of parton density evolution
103: for "light" $u$, $d$ and $s$ quarks near the heavy flavor
104: thresholds chosen to be at the charm and the bottom
105: quark masses ($m_c$ and $m_b$ respectively). The
106: parton density description must be modified to incorporate
107: new $c$ and $b$ "heavy" quark densities as the evolution
108: scale increases. The implementation of the NLO and NNLO matching
109: conditions across heavy flavor thresholds in the variable flavor
110: number schemes (VFNS) \cite{acot}, \cite{csn}, \cite{cbot}, \cite{csh}
111: involve large cancellations between
112: various terms in the expressions for the structure functions.
113: Poor numerical accuracy in the solution for the
114: evolution of the parton densities at small scales would
115: spoil these cancellations and ruin the VFNS predictions.
116: We achieve the required accuracy by avoiding one numerical integration
117: in our program so we analytically calculate
118: the weights for the exact LO, the exact NLO and
119: the approximate NNLO splitting functions.
120: The approximate NNLO splitting functions are taken from
121: \cite{3loop1},\cite{3loop2}, while the relevant operator matrix
122: elements (OMEs), which provide the matching conditions
123: on the parton densities across heavy flavor thresholds,
124: are taken from \cite{bmsn1}.
125:
126: Since we start the scale evolution from a set of densities
127: (input boundary conditions) at a low scale $\mu = \mu_0 \ll m_c$,
128: the running coupling $\alpha_s(\mu^2)$ is large.
129: We therefore use the exact solution of the NLO equation for
130: $\alpha_s$ and match the values on both sides of the heavy
131: flavor thresholds to three decimal places.
132: We mention here that the NNLO matching conditions on $\alpha_s$
133: across heavy flavor thresholds are available in \cite{2loop} and \cite{2loop2}.
134: Our program evolves both light and heavy parton densities in LO, NLO
135: and NNLO from a minimum $x$ equal to $10^{-7}$ to a maximum $x$
136: equal to unity, a mimimum $\mu^2 = 0.26$
137: $ ({\rm GeV})^2$ in LO and $\mu^2 = 0.40$
138: $ ({\rm GeV})^2$ in NLO and NNLO and and a maximum $\mu^2 = 10^6$
139: $ ({\rm GeV})^2$.
140: Results have been published in \cite{csn}, \cite{cbot},
141: \cite{csh} and \cite{cs}. Here we give a detailed write up of the program.
142: %\end{document}
143:
144:
145:
146:
147:
148:
149:
150:
151:
152:
153:
154:
155: