1: %% ****** Start of file template.aps ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12: %
13: % This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
14: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
15: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
16: %
17: % Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
18: % author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
19: % For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.
20: % Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, or rmp for journal
21: % Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes
22: % Add 'showpacs' option to make PACS codes appear
23: % Add 'showkeys' option to make keywords appear
24: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
25: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
26: %\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
27: %\documentclass[aps,prd,preprint,groupedaddress,showpacs]{revtex4}
28: \documentclass[aps,prd,twocolumn,groupedaddress,showpacs,floatfix]{revtex4}
29:
30: % You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references
31: % Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS
32: % BibTeX style file (bst file), so only uncomment the line
33: % below if necessary.
34: %\bibliographystyle{apsrev}
35:
36: \usepackage[dvips]{graphics}
37: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
38: \usepackage{psfrag}
39: \usepackage{longtable}
40: \usepackage{amsfonts}
41:
42: \begin{document}
43:
44: % Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report
45: % number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.
46: % Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.
47: % Use the 'preprintnumbers' class option to override journal defaults
48: % to display numbers if necessary
49:
50: \preprint{COLO-HEP-466}
51: \preprint{May, 2001}
52:
53: %Title of paper
54: \title{CP Violation in a Supersymmetric $SO(10) \times U(2)_{F}$ Model}
55:
56: % repeat the \author .. \affiliation etc. as needed
57: % \email, \thanks, \homepage, \altaffiliation all apply to the current
58: % author. Explanatory text should go in the []'s, actual e-mail
59: % address or url should go in the {}'s for \email and \homepage.
60: % Please use the appropriate macro foreach each type of information
61:
62: % \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last
63: % \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the
64: % other information
65: % \affiliation can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
66: \author{Mu-Chun Chen}
67: \email[]{mu-chun.chen@colorado.edu}
68: \author{K.T. Mahanthappa}
69: \email[]{ktm@verb.colorado.edu}
70: %\homepage[]{Your web page}
71: %\thanks{}
72: %\altaffiliation{}
73: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Colorado,
74: Boulder, CO80309-0390, U.S.A.}
75:
76: %Collaboration name if desired (requires use of superscriptaddress
77: %option in \documentclass). \noaffiliation is required (may also be
78: %used with the \author command).
79: %\collaboration can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
80: %\collaboration{}
81: %\noaffiliation
82:
83: %\date{\today}
84:
85: \begin{abstract}
86: A model based on SUSY $SO(10)$ combined with $U(2)$
87: family symmetry constructed recently by the authors
88: is generalized to include phases in the mass matrices leading to CP violation.
89: In contrast with the commonly used effective operator approach,
90: $\overline{126}$-dimensional Higgs fields are utilized to construct the Yukawa
91: sector. $R$-parity symmetry is thus preserved at low energies. The
92: {\it symmetric} mass textures arising from the left-right symmetry breaking
93: chain of $SO(10)$ give rise to very good predictions for quark and lepton
94: masses and mixings. The prediction for $\sin 2\beta$ agrees with the average
95: of current bounds from BaBar and Belle. In the neutrino sector, our
96: predictions are in good agreement with results from atmospheric neutrino
97: experiments. Our model accommodates both the LOW and QVO solutions to the solar
98: neutrino anomaly; the matrix element for neutrinoless double beta decay is
99: highly suppressed. The leptonic analog of the Jarlskog invariant,
100: $J_{CP}^{l}$, is predicted to be of $O(10^{-2})$.
101: \end{abstract}
102:
103: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
104: \pacs{12.15Ff,12.10Kt,14.60Pq}
105:
106: % insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this
107: %\keywords{}
108:
109: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract and \pacs
110: \maketitle
111:
112: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
113: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
114: %{\bf Introduction}
115: %\label{}
116: %\subsection{}
117: %\subsubsection{}
118:
119: $SO(10)$ has long been thought to be an attractive candidate for a
120: grand unified theory (GUT) for a number of reasons: First of all, it unifies
121: all the $15$ known fermions with the right-handed neutrino for each family
122: into one $16$-dimensional spinor representation. The seesaw mechanism then
123: arises very naturally, and the non-zero neutrino masses can thus be explained.
124: Since a complete quark-lepton symmetry is achieved, it has the promise for
125: explaining the pattern of fermion masses and mixing. Because $B-L$ contained
126: in $SO(10)$ is broken in symmetry breaking chain to SM, it also has the
127: promise for baryogenesis. Recent atmospheric neutrino oscillation data from
128: Super-Kamiokande indicates non-zero neutrino masses. This in turn gives very
129: strong support to the viability of $SO(10)$ as a GUT group. Models based on
130: $SO(10)$ combined with discrete or continuous family symmetry have been
131: constructed to understand the flavor problem~\cite{Chen:2000fp,Albright:2000sz}.
132: Most of the models utilize ``lopsided'' mass textures which usually require
133: more parameters and therefore are less constrained. Furthermore, the
134: right-handed neutrino Majorana mass operators in most of these models are made
135: out of $16_{H} \times 16_{H}$ which breaks the $R$-parity at a very
136: high scale. We have recently constructed a
137: realistic model based on supersymmetric $SO(10)$ combined with $U(2)$ family
138: symmetry~\cite{Chen:2000fp} (referred to as ``CM'' hereafter) which
139: successfully predicts the low energy fermion masses and mixings. Since we
140: utilize {\it symmetric} mass textures and $\overline{126}$-dimensional Higgs
141: representations
142: for the right-handed neutrino Majorana mass operator, our
143: model is more constrained in addition to having $R$-parity
144: conserved~\cite{Mohapatra:su}. The aim of this paper is to generalize this
145: model to include phases in the mass matrices which lead to CP violation. We
146: first summarize our model followed by analytic analyses of the complex mass
147: textures. And then the implications of our model for neutrino mixing and CP
148: violation are presented.
149:
150: {\bf The Model:}
151: The details of our model based on $SO(10) \times U(2)_{F}$ are contained
152: in CM. The following is an outline of its salient features. In order to
153: specify the superpotential uniquely, we invoke
154: $Z_{2} \times Z_{2} \times Z_{2}$ discrete symmetry. The matter fields are
155: \begin{displaymath}
156: \psi_{a} \sim (16,2)^{-++} \quad (a=1,2), \qquad
157: \psi_{3} \sim (16,1)^{+++}
158: \end{displaymath}
159: where $a=1,2$ and the subscripts refer to family indices; the superscripts
160: $+/-$ refer to $(Z_{2})^{3}$ charges. The Higgs fields which break $SO(10)$
161: and give rise to mass matrices upon acquiring VEV's are
162: \begin{eqnarray}
163: (10,1):\quad & T_{1}^{+++}, \quad T_{2}^{-+-},\quad
164: T_{3}^{--+}, \quad T_{4}^{---}, \quad T_{5}^{+--} \nonumber\\
165: (\overline{126},1):\quad & \overline{C}^{---}, \quad \overline{C}_{1}^{+++},
166: \quad \overline{C}_{2}^{++-}
167: \end{eqnarray}
168: Higgs representations $10$ and $\overline{126}$ give rise to Yukawa couplings
169: to the matter fields which are symmetric under the interchange of family
170: indices. The left-right symmetry breaking chain of $SO(10)$ is
171: \begin{equation}
172: \label{eq:SB}
173: \begin{array}{lll}
174: SO(10) & \longrightarrow & SU(4) \times SU(2)_{L} \times SU(2)_{R}\\
175: & \longrightarrow & SU(3) \times SU(2)_{L} \times SU(2)_{R} \times
176: U(1)_{B-L}\\
177: & \longrightarrow & SU(3) \times SU(2)_{L} \times U(1)_{Y} \\
178: & \longrightarrow & SU(3) \times U(1)_{EM}
179: \end{array}
180: \end{equation}
181: The $U(2)$ family symmetry is broken in two steps \cite{Barbieri:1997ww} and
182: the mass hierarchy is produced using the Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism
183: \cite{Froggatt:1979nt}:
184: \begin{equation}
185: \label{eq:steps}
186: U(2) \stackrel{\epsilon M}{\longrightarrow}
187: U(1) \stackrel{\epsilon' M}{\longrightarrow}
188: nothing
189: \end{equation}
190: and $M$ is the UV-cutoff of the effective theory above which the family
191: symmetry is exact, and $\epsilon M$ and $\epsilon^{'} M$ are the VEV's
192: accompanying the flavon fields given by
193: \begin{eqnarray}
194: (1,2): \quad & \phi_{(1)}^{++-}, \quad \phi_{(2)}^{+-+}, \quad \Phi^{-+-}
195: \nonumber\\
196: (1,3): \quad & S_{(1)}^{+--}, \quad S_{(2)}^{---}, \quad
197: \Sigma^{++-}
198: \end{eqnarray}
199: The various aspects of VEV's of Higgs and flavon fields are given in CM.
200:
201: The superpotential for our model is
202: \begin{equation}
203: W = W_{Dirac} + W_{\nu_{RR}} + W_{flavon}
204: \end{equation}
205: \begin{eqnarray}
206: W_{Dirac}=\psi_{3}\psi_{3} T_{1}
207: + \frac{1}{M} \psi_{3} \psi_{a}
208: \left(T_{2}\phi_{(1)}+T_{3}\phi_{(2)}\right)
209: \nonumber\\
210: + \frac{1}{M} \psi_{a} \psi_{b} \left(T_{4} + \overline{C}\right) S_{(2)}
211: + \frac{1}{M} \psi_{a} \psi_{b} T_{5} S_{(1)}
212: \nonumber\\
213: W_{\nu_{RR}}=\psi_{3} \psi_{3} \overline{C}_{1}
214: + \frac{1}{M} \psi_{3} \psi_{a} \Phi \overline{C}_{2}
215: + \frac{1}{M} \psi_{a} \psi_{b} \Sigma \overline{C}_{2}
216: \end{eqnarray}
217: where $W_{flavon}$ is the superpotential involving only flavon fields which
218: give rise to their VEV's given in Eq.~(34) of CM~\cite{vev}. The mass matrices
219: then can be read from the superpotential to be
220: \begin{eqnarray}
221: M_{u,\nu_{LR}} & = &
222: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
223: 0 & 0 & \left<10_{2}^{+} \right> \epsilon'\\
224: 0 & \left<10_{4}^{+} \right> \epsilon & \left<10_{3}^{+} \right> \epsilon \\
225: \left<10_{2}^{+} \right> \epsilon' & \left<10_{3}^{+} \right> \epsilon &
226: \left<10_{1}^{+} \right>
227: \end{array} \right)
228: \nonumber\\
229: & = &
230: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
231: 0 & 0 & r_{2} \epsilon'\\
232: 0 & r_{4} \epsilon & \epsilon \\
233: r_{2} \epsilon' & \epsilon & 1
234: \end{array} \right) M_{U}
235: \end{eqnarray}
236: \begin{eqnarray}
237: M_{d,e} & = &
238: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
239: 0 & \left<10_{5}^{-} \right> \epsilon' & 0 \\
240: \left<10_{5}^{-} \right> \epsilon' & (1,-3)\left<\overline{126}^{-} \right>
241: \epsilon & 0\\ 0 & 0 & \left<10_{1}^{-} \right>
242: \end{array} \right)
243: \nonumber\\
244: & = &
245: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
246: 0 & \epsilon' & 0 \\
247: \epsilon' & (1,-3) p \epsilon & 0\\
248: 0 & 0 & 1
249: \end{array} \right) M_{D}
250: \end{eqnarray}
251: where
252: %\begin{equation}
253: %\label{eq:higgsvev}
254: $M_{U} \equiv \left<10_{1}^{+} \right>$,
255: $M_{D} \equiv \left<10_{1}^{-} \right>$,
256: $r_{2} \equiv \left<10_{2}^{+} \right> / \left<10_{1}^{+} \right>$,
257: $r_{4} \equiv \left<10_{4}^{+} \right> / \left<10_{1}^{+} \right>$ and
258: $p \equiv \left<\overline{126}^{-}\right> / \left<10_{1}^{-} \right>$.
259: The right-handed neutrino mass matrix is
260: \begin{eqnarray}
261: M_{\nu_{RR}} & = &
262: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
263: 0 & 0 & \left<\overline{126}_{2}^{'0} \right> \delta_{1}\\
264: 0 & \left<\overline{126}_{2}^{'0} \right> \delta_{2}
265: & \left<\overline{126}_{2}^{'0} \right> \delta_{3} \\
266: \left<\overline{126}_{2}^{'0} \right> \delta_{1}
267: & \left<\overline{126}_{2}^{'0} \right> \delta_{3} &
268: \left<\overline{126}_{1}^{'0} \right> \end{array} \right)
269: \nonumber\\
270: & = &
271: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
272: 0 & 0 & \delta_{1}\\
273: 0 & \delta_{2} & \delta_{3} \\
274: \delta_{1} & \delta_{3} & 1
275: \end{array} \right) M_{R}
276: \label{Mrr}
277: \end{eqnarray}
278: with $M_{R} \equiv \left<\overline{126}^{'0}_{1}\right>$.
279: (This is one of the five sets of symmetric texture combinations (labeled set
280: (v)) proposed by Ramond, Roberts and Ross~\cite{Ramond:1993kv}.)
281: Here, the superscripts $+/-/0$ refer to the sign of the hypercharge.
282: It is to be noted that there is a factor of $-3$ difference between the $(22)$
283: elements of mass matrices $M_{d}$ and $M_{e}$. This is due to the CG
284: coefficients associated with $\overline{126}$; as a consequence, we obtain the
285: phenomenologically viable Georgi-Jarlskog relations~\cite{Georgi:1979df}.
286:
287: In CM, VEV's were taken to be real. In general, all VEV's are complex
288: leading to {\it spontaneous} CP violation which is the subject matter of this
289: paper.
290:
291: {\bf Analytical Analysis of Mass Textures:}
292: In our convention, the Yukawa couplings $Y_{i}, \; (i=u,d,e,\nu_{LR})$ are
293: defined in the way that the left-handed fields are on the right, and the charge
294: conjugate fields are on the left. In the quark sector, they read
295: \begin{displaymath}
296: \mathcal{L}_{mass} = -Y_{u} \overline{U}_{R} Q_{L} H_{u}
297: - Y_{d} \overline{D}_{R} Q_{L} H_{d} + h.c.
298: \end{displaymath}
299: And the charged current interaction is given by
300: \begin{displaymath}
301: \mathcal{L}_{cc} = \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}}
302: (W_{\mu}^{+} \overline{U}_{L} \gamma_{\mu}
303: D_{L}) + h.c.
304: \end{displaymath}
305: Here we have written the Lagrangian in the weak basis.
306: The Yukawa matrices are diagonalized by the bi-unitary transformations
307: \begin{eqnarray}
308: Y_{u}^{diag} = V_{u_{R}} Y_{u} V_{u_{L}}^{\dagger}
309: = diag(y_{u},y_{c},y_{t})
310: \nonumber\\
311: Y_{d}^{diag} = V_{d_{R}} Y_{d} V_{d_{L}}^{\dagger}
312: = diag(y_{d},y_{s},y_{b})
313: \end{eqnarray}
314: where $V_{R}$ and $V_{L}$ are the right-handed and left-handed rotations
315: respectively, and all the eigenvalues $y_{i}$'s are real and non-negative.
316: To extract the left-handed (right-handed) rotation matrices, we need to
317: consider the diagonalization of the hermitian quantity
318: $Y^{\dagger}Y$ ($Y Y^{\dagger}$).
319: The Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix is then given by
320: \begin{equation}
321: V_{CKM} = V_{u_{L}} V_{d_{L}}^{\dagger}
322: = \left(
323: \begin{array}{ccc}
324: V_{ud} & V_{us} & V_{ub}\\
325: V_{cd} & V_{cs} & V_{cb}\\
326: V_{td} & V_{ts} & V_{tb}
327: \end{array}
328: \right)
329: \end{equation}
330: The unitary matrix $V_{CKM}$ has in general $6$ phases. By phase
331: redefinition of the quarks, one can remove $5$ of them. The remaining one
332: phase is one of the sources for CP violation. A parameterization
333: independent measure for the CP violation is the Jarlskog invariant
334: \cite{Jarlskog:1985cw}, defined as
335: $J_{CP}^{q} \equiv Im \{ V_{11}V_{12}^{\ast}V_{21}^{\ast}V_{22} \}$.
336: And the three angles of the CKM unitarity triangle are defined as
337: \begin{equation}
338: \begin{array}{ll}
339: \alpha \equiv
340: Arg(-\frac{V_{td}V_{tb}^{\ast}}{V_{ud}V_{ub}^{\ast}}), & \quad
341: \beta \equiv
342: Arg(-\frac{V_{cd}V_{cb}^{\ast}}{V_{td}V_{tb}^{\ast}})\\
343: \gamma \equiv
344: Arg(-\frac{V_{ud}V_{ub}^{\ast}}{V_{cd}V_{cb}^{\ast}}) &
345: \end{array}
346: \end{equation}
347:
348: In the lepton sector, the charged lepton Yukawa matrix is diagonalized
349: by
350: \begin{equation}
351: Y_{e}^{diag} = V_{e_{R}} Y_{e} V_{e_{L}}^{\dagger}
352: = diag(y_{e},y_{\mu},y_{\tau})
353: \end{equation}
354: And the effective light left-handed Majorana neutrino mass matrix
355: (obtained after using the seesaw mechanism)
356: is diagonalized by an unitary matrix $V_{\nu_{LL}}$:
357: \begin{equation}
358: M_{\nu_{LL}}^{diag} = V_{\nu_{LL}} M_{\nu_{LL}} V_{\nu_{LL}}^{T}
359: = diag(m_{\nu_{1}},m_{\nu_{2}},m_{\nu_{3}})
360: \end{equation}
361: where the eigenvalues $y_{e,\mu,\tau}$ and
362: $m_{\nu_{1},\nu_{2},\nu_{3}}$ are real and non-negative.
363: The leptonic mixing matrix, the Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (MNS) matrix,
364: can be parameterized by
365: \begin{widetext}
366: \begin{equation}
367: U_{MNS} \equiv V_{e_{L}}V_{\nu_{LL}}^{\dagger}
368: =
369: \left(
370: \begin{array}{ccc}
371: c_{12}c_{13} &
372: s_{12}c_{13} &
373: s_{13}\\
374: -s_{12}c_{23}-c_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{l}} &
375: -c_{12}c_{23}-s_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{l}} &
376: s_{23}c_{13}e^{i\delta_{l}}\\
377: s_{12}s_{23}-c_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{l}} &
378: -c_{12}s_{23}-s_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{l}} &
379: c_{23}c_{13}e^{i\delta_{l}}
380: \end{array}
381: \right)
382: \left(
383: \begin{array}{ccc}
384: 1 & &\\
385: & e^{i \frac{\alpha_{21}}{2}} & \\
386: & & e^{i\frac{\alpha_{31}}{2}}
387: \end{array}
388: \right)
389: \end{equation}
390: \end{widetext}
391: Note that the Majorana condition,
392: \begin{equation}
393: C(\overline{\nu}_{j})^{T} = \nu_{j}
394: \end{equation}
395: where $C$ is the charge conjugate operator, forbids the rephasing of the
396: Majorana fields. Therefore, we can only remove $3$ of the $6$ phases
397: present in the unitary matrix $U_{MNS}$ by redefing the charged lepton fields.
398: Note that $U_{MNS}$ is the product of an unitary matrix, analogous to the CKM
399: matrix which has one phase (the so-called universal phase), $\delta_{l}$,
400: and a diagonal phase matrix which contains two phases
401: (the so-called Majorana phases), $\alpha_{21}$ and $\alpha_{31}$.
402: The leptonic analog of the Jarlskog invariant, which measures the
403: CP violation due to the universal phase, is given by
404: \begin{equation}
405: J_{CP}^{l} \equiv Im\{ U_{\mu 2} U_{e3} U_{\mu 3}^{\ast} U_{e2}^{\ast} \}
406: \end{equation}
407: For the Majorana phases, the rephasing invariant CP violation measures are
408: \cite{Nieves:1987pp}
409: \begin{equation}
410: S_{1} \equiv Im\{ U_{e1} U_{e3}^{\ast} \}, \qquad
411: S_{2} \equiv Im\{ U_{e2} U_{e3}^{\ast} \}
412: \end{equation}
413: From $S_{1}$ and $S_{2}$, one can then determine the Majorana phases
414: \begin{equation}
415: \begin{array}{l}
416: \cos \alpha_{31} = 1 - 2 \frac{S_{1}^{2}}{\vert U_{e1} \vert^{2}
417: \vert U_{e3} \vert^{2}}\\
418: \cos (\alpha_{31} - \alpha_{21})
419: = 1 - 2 \frac{S_{2}^{2}}{\vert U_{e2} \vert^{2}
420: \vert U_{e3} \vert^{2}}
421: \end{array}
422: \end{equation}
423:
424: The Lagrangian is invariant under the following weak-basis phase
425: transformations
426: \begin{eqnarray}
427: U_{L} \rightarrow U_{L}^{'} = K_{L}^{+} U_{L}, \quad &
428: D_{L} \rightarrow D_{L}^{'} = K_{L}^{+} D_{L}\nonumber\\
429: U_{R} \rightarrow U_{R}^{'} = K_{R}^{u} U_{R}, \quad &
430: D_{R} \rightarrow D_{R}^{'} = K_{R}^{d} D_{R}
431: \end{eqnarray}
432: \begin{equation}
433: Y_{u} \rightarrow Y_{u}^{'} = K_{R}^{u} Y_{u} K_{L}, \quad
434: Y_{d} \rightarrow Y_{d}^{'} = K_{R}^{d} Y_{u} K_{L}
435: \end{equation}
436: where $K_{L}^{+}$, $K_{R}^{u}$, and $K_{R}^{d}$ are diagonal phase matrices.
437: We are interested in complex symmetric textures resulting from the
438: $SO(10)$ relations:
439: \begin{eqnarray}
440: Y_{u} & = & \left(
441: \begin{array}{ccc}
442: 0 & 0 & a e^{i\gamma_{a}} \\
443: 0 & b e^{i\gamma_{b}} & c e^{i\gamma_{c}} \\
444: a e^{i\gamma_{a}} & c e^{i\gamma_{c}} & e^{i\gamma}
445: \end{array}
446: \right) d
447: \nonumber\\
448: Y_{d} & = & \left(
449: \begin{array}{ccc}
450: 0 & e e^{i\gamma_{e}} & 0 \\
451: e e^{i\gamma_{e}} & f e^{i\gamma_{f}} & 0 \\
452: 0 & 0 & e^{i\gamma_h}
453: \end{array}
454: \right) h
455: \nonumber\\
456: Y_{\nu_{LR}} & = & \left(
457: \begin{array}{ccc}
458: 0 & 0 & a e^{i\gamma_{a}} \\
459: 0 & b e^{i\gamma_{b}} & c e^{i\gamma_{c}} \\
460: a e^{i\gamma_{a}} & c e^{i\gamma_{c}} & e^{i\gamma}
461: \end{array}
462: \right) d
463: \nonumber\\
464: Y_{e} & = & \left(
465: \begin{array}{ccc}
466: 0 & e e^{i\gamma_{e}} & 0 \\
467: e e^{i\gamma_{e}} & -3 f e^{i\gamma_{f}} & 0 \\
468: 0 & 0 & e^{i\gamma_h}
469: \end{array}
470: \right) h\nonumber
471: \end{eqnarray}
472: with $a \simeq b \ll c \ll 1$ and $e \ll f \ll 1$.
473: The weak-basis phase transformations mentioned above enable us to reduce the
474: number of phases to two, $\theta \equiv (\gamma_{b}-2\gamma_{c}-\gamma)$ and
475: $\xi \equiv (\gamma_{e}-\gamma_{f}+\gamma_{c}-\gamma_{a})$.
476: Then we have
477: \begin{eqnarray}
478: Y_{u, \nu_{LR}} & = & \left(
479: \begin{array}{ccc}
480: 0 & 0 & a\\
481: 0 & b e^{i\theta} & c\\
482: a & c & 1
483: \end{array}
484: \right) d
485: \nonumber\\
486: Y_{d,e} & = & \left(
487: \begin{array}{ccc}
488: 0 & e e^{-i\xi} & 0 \\
489: e e^{i\xi} & (1,-3) f & 0 \\
490: 0 & 0 & 1
491: \end{array}
492: \right) h
493: \label{phaseremoved}
494: \end{eqnarray}
495: We then diagonalize the mass matrices analytically. In the
496: leading order, the mass eigenvalues are given by
497: \begin{eqnarray}
498: \label{eq:masses}
499: m_{u} & \simeq & \frac{a^{2} b d}{\vert -b e^{i\theta} + c^{2} \vert} v_{u}
500: \nonumber\\
501: m_{c} & \simeq & \vert (-b e^{i\theta}+c^{2})\vert d v_{u}
502: \nonumber\\
503: m_{t} & \simeq & d v_{u}
504: \nonumber\\
505: m_{d} & \simeq & \frac{e^{2} f h}{e^{2}+f^{2}}v_{d}
506: \nonumber\\
507: m_{s} & \simeq & \frac{(2e^{2} f + f^{3}) h}{e^{2} + f^{2}}v_{d}
508: \nonumber\\
509: m_{b} & = & hv_{d}
510: \nonumber\\
511: m_{e} & \simeq & \frac{3e^{2} f h}{e^{2} + 9 f^{2}}v_{d}
512: \nonumber\\
513: m_{\mu} & \simeq & \frac{6e^{2} f h + 27 f^{3} h}{e^{2} + 9 f^{2}}v_{d}
514: \nonumber\\
515: m_{\tau} & = & hv_{d}
516: \end{eqnarray}
517: The CKM matrix elements are given by
518: \begin{eqnarray}
519: \label{ckm}
520: V_{ud} & \simeq & (1-\frac{1}{2}\frac{e^{2}}{f^{2}})
521: - (\frac{e}{f})(\frac{a}{c})e^{-i\delta_{q}}
522: \nonumber\\
523: V_{us} & \simeq & \frac{e}{f} + \frac{a}{c} e^{-i\delta_{q}}
524: \nonumber\\
525: V_{ub} & \simeq & a e^{-i\delta_{q}}
526: \nonumber\\
527: V_{cd} & \simeq & - \frac{a}{c}e^{i\delta_{q}} - \frac{e}{f}
528: \nonumber\\
529: V_{cs} & \simeq &
530: (1-\frac{1}{2}\frac{e^{2}}{f^{2}})
531: - (\frac{e}{f})(\frac{a}{c})e^{i\delta_{q}}
532: \nonumber\\
533: V_{cb} & \simeq & c
534: \nonumber\\
535: V_{td} & \simeq & \frac{e}{f} c
536: \nonumber\\
537: V_{ts} & \simeq & -c
538: \nonumber\\
539: V_{td} & \simeq & 1 - \frac{1}{2} c^{2}
540: \end{eqnarray}
541: The phase $\delta_{q}$ is given by
542: \begin{eqnarray}
543: \delta_{q} & \simeq & \tan^{-1} (-\frac{a}{c} \sin (\theta^{'}-\xi))
544: \nonumber\\
545: & - & \tan^{-1} (-\frac{e}{f} \frac{a}{c} \sin(\theta^{'}-\xi))
546: + (\theta^{'}-\xi)
547: \end{eqnarray}
548: where
549: \begin{equation}
550: \label{eq:phase}
551: \theta^{'} \simeq \tan^{-1} (
552: b\sin\theta - 2 \frac{b^{3}}{a^{2}}\sin^{2}\theta
553: -2 \frac{b}{a^{2}} \sin \theta
554: )
555: \end{equation}
556: The form of the CKM matrix in Eq.~(\ref{ckm}) is also the one favored in
557: \cite{Rasin:1997pn}.
558:
559: In the lepton sector, similar diagonalization is carried out, and the charged
560: lepton diagonalization matrix is
561: \begin{equation}
562: V_{e} = V_{d} \; (b \rightarrow -3b)
563: \end{equation}
564: We obtain bimaximal mixing in the neutrino sector and
565: $\Delta m_{atm}^{2} \gg \Delta m_{\odot}^{2}$ by choosing
566: \cite{Chen:2000fp}
567: \begin{equation}
568: M_{\nu_{LL}} \simeq
569: \left(
570: \begin{array}{ccc}
571: 0 & 0 & t\\
572: 0 & 1 & 1\\
573: t & 1 & 1
574: \end{array}
575: \right)
576: \frac{d^{2}v_{u}^{2}}{M_{R}}
577: \end{equation}
578: In the basis where the Yukawa matrices take the forms of
579: Eq.~(\ref{phaseremoved}), this implies that the right-handed neutrino mass
580: matrix, Eq.~(\ref{Mrr}), has the following elements:
581: \begin{eqnarray}
582: \label{delta}
583: \delta_{1} & \simeq & \frac{a^{2}}{2a-2ac+c^{2}t}
584: \nonumber\\
585: \delta_{2} & \simeq &
586: \frac{b^{2}t e^{2i\theta}}{2a-2ac+c^{2}t}
587: \nonumber\\
588: \delta_{3} & \simeq &
589: \frac{a(c-be^{i\theta})+bct e^{i\theta}} {2a-2ac+c^{2}t}
590: \end{eqnarray}
591: The three eigenvalues of $M_{\nu_{LL}}$ are
592: \begin{eqnarray}
593: m_{\nu_{1}} & \simeq & (\frac{t}{\sqrt{2}}-\frac{t^{2}}{8})
594: \frac{d^{2}v_{u}^{2}}{M_{R}}
595: \nonumber\\
596: m_{\nu_{2}} & \simeq & (\frac{t}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{t^{2}}{8})
597: \frac{d^{2}v_{u}^{2}}{M_{R}}
598: \nonumber\\
599: m_{\nu_{3}} & \simeq & (2 + \frac{t^{2}}{4})
600: \frac{d^{2}v_{u}^{2}}{M_{R}}
601: \end{eqnarray}
602: Note that since $V_{e_{L}}$ is approximately an identity matrix,
603: $U_{MNS} \approx V_{\nu_{LL}}^{\dagger}$.
604: Consequently, with the present experimental status, it is not possible to make
605: unique predictions for the leptonic CP violating phases from the fitting of the
606: absolute values of the $MNS$ matrix elements, as was done in the quark sector.
607: We therefore assume that the light neutrino mass matrix to be real. And the
608: leptonic CP violation will solely due to the phase present in $Y_{e}$.
609:
610: {\bf RGE Analysis:}
611: We use the following inputs at $M_{Z}=91.187 \; GeV$:
612: \begin{eqnarray}
613: m_{u} & = & 2.32 \; MeV (2.33^{+0.42}_{-0.45}) \nonumber\\
614: m_{c} & = & 677 \; MeV (677^{+56}_{-61}) \nonumber\\
615: m_{t} & = & 182 \; GeV (181^{+}_{-}13) \nonumber\\
616: m_{e} & = & 0.485 \; MeV (0.486847) \nonumber\\
617: m_{\mu} & = & 103 \; MeV (102.75) \nonumber\\
618: m_{\tau} & = & 1.744 \; GeV (1.7467) \nonumber\\
619: \vert V_{us} \vert & = & 0.222 (0.219-0.224) \nonumber\\
620: \vert V_{ub} \vert & = & 0.0039 (0.002-0.005) \nonumber\\
621: \vert V_{cb} \vert & = & 0.036 (0.036-0.046) \nonumber
622: \end{eqnarray}
623: where the values extrapolated from experimental data are given inside the
624: parentheses~\cite{Fusaoka:1998vc}.
625: These values correspond to the following set of input parameters
626: at the GUT scale, $M_{GUT} = 1.03 \times 10^{16} \; GeV$:
627: \begin{displaymath}
628: a=0.00246, \quad b=3.50 \times 10^{-3}, \quad c=0.0320
629: \end{displaymath}
630: \begin{displaymath}
631: \quad d=0.650, \quad \theta=0.110
632: \end{displaymath}
633: \begin{displaymath}
634: e=4.03 \times 10^{-3}, \quad f=0.0195
635: \end{displaymath}
636: \begin{equation}
637: \label{input}
638: h=0.0686, \quad \xi=-0.720
639: \end{equation}
640: \begin{equation}
641: g_{1}=g_{2}=g_{3}=0.746
642: \end{equation}
643: the one-loop renormalization group equations for the MSSM spectrum with three
644: right-handed neutrinos
645: \cite{Babu:1993qv}
646: are solved numerically down to the effective
647: right-handed neutrino mass scale, $M_{R}$. At $M_{R}$, the seesaw mechanism
648: is implemented. We then solve the two-loop RGE's for the MSSM spectrum
649: \cite{Arason:1992ic}
650: down to the SUSY breaking scale, taken to be $m_{t}(m_{t})=176.4 \; GeV$, and
651: then the SM RGE's from $m_{t}(m_{t})$ to the weak scale, $M_{Z}$.
652: We assume that
653: $\tan \beta \equiv \frac{v_{u}}{v_{d}} = 10$, with
654: $v_{u}^{2} + v_{d}^{2} = (246/\sqrt{2} \; GeV) ^{2}$. At the weak scale
655: $M_{Z}$, the predictions for
656: $\alpha_{i}
657: \equiv \frac{g_{i}^{2}}{4\pi}$ are
658: \begin{displaymath}
659: \alpha_{1}=0.01663,
660: \quad \alpha_{2}=0.03374,
661: \quad \alpha_{3}=0.1242
662: \end{displaymath}
663: These values compare very well with the values extrapolated to $M_{Z}$ from the
664: experimental data~\cite{Fusaoka:1998vc},
665: $(\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2},\alpha_{3})=
666: (0.01696,0.03371,0.1214 {\scriptstyle + \atop -} 0.0031)$.
667: The predictions at the weak scale $M_{Z}$ for the
668: charged fermion masses, the CKM matrix elements and the CP violation measures,
669: are summarized in TABLE~\ref{table:ckm} (after taking
670: into account the SUSY threshold correction
671: \cite{Hall:1994gn},
672: $\Delta_{b} = -0.15$)
673: along with the experimental values extrapolated to $M_{Z}$
674: \cite{Fusaoka:1998vc}.
675:
676: \begin{table}
677: \caption{
678: The predictions for the charged fermion masses, the
679: CKM matrix elements and the CP violation measures.
680: \label{table:ckm}}
681: \begin{ruledtabular}
682: \begin{tabular}{l c | c c l c c c l}
683: & & & & experimental results \qquad \qquad
684: & & & & predictions at $M_{z}$ \\
685: & & & & extrapolated to $M_{Z}$ \qquad \qquad
686: & & & & \\
687: \hline
688: $\frac{m_{s}}{m_{d}}$
689: & & & & $17 \sim 25$
690: & & & & $25$\\
691: $m_{s}$
692: & & & & $93.4^{+11.8}_{-13.0}MeV$
693: & & & & $85.66 MeV$\\
694: $m_{b}$
695: & & & & $3.00^{+}_{-}0.11GeV$
696: & & & & $3.147 GeV$\\
697: \hline
698: $\vert V_{ud} \vert$
699: & & & & $0.9745-0.9757$
700: & & & & $0.9751$\\
701: $\vert V_{cd} \vert$
702: & & & & $0.218-0.224$
703: & & & & $0.2218$\\
704: $\vert V_{cs} \vert$
705: & & & & $0.9736-0.9750$
706: & & & & $0.9744$\\
707: $\vert V_{td} \vert$
708: & & & & $0.004-0.014$
709: & & & & $0.005358$\\
710: $\vert V_{ts} \vert$
711: & & & & $0.034-0.046$
712: & & & & $0.03611$\\
713: $\vert V_{tb} \vert$
714: & & & & $0.9989-0.9993$
715: & & & & $0.9993$ \\
716: $J_{CP}^{q}$
717: & & & & $(2.71^{+}_{-}1.12) \times 10^{-5}$
718: & & & & $1.748 \times 10^{-5}$ \\
719: $\sin 2\alpha$
720: & & & & $-0.95 \; - \; 0.33$
721: & & & & -0.8913\\
722: $\sin 2\beta$
723: & & & & $0.59^{+}_{-}0.14^{+}_{-}0.05$ (BaBar)
724: & & & & $0.7416$ \\
725: & & & & $0.99^{+}_{-}0.14^{+}_{-}0.06$(Belle)
726: & & & &\\
727: $\gamma$
728: & & & & $34^{0}-82^{0}$
729: & & & & $34.55^{0} \; (0.6030 rad)$
730: \end{tabular}
731: \end{ruledtabular}
732: \end{table}
733:
734: The current result from the atmospheric neutrino experiment is
735: \cite{Fukuda:2000np}
736: \begin{eqnarray}
737: \Delta m_{23}^{2} & = & (1.3 - 8) \times 10^{-3} eV^{2}
738: (\text{best fit}: 3.3 \times 10^{-3}) \nonumber\\
739: \sin^{2} 2\theta & = & 1 \nonumber
740: \end{eqnarray}
741: In the solar neutrino sector,
742: the current best fit from the solar neutrino experiment data for each of the
743: solution is given by
744: \cite{Gonzalez-Garcia:2000ae}:
745: \pagebreak
746: \begin{eqnarray}
747: LMA: & \mbox{(large angle MSW with larger mass squared)}
748: \nonumber\\
749: & \Delta m^{2} = 3.2
750: \times 10^{-5} eV^{2} \nonumber\\
751: & \tan^2 \theta=0.33,
752: \quad \sin^{2}2\theta=0.75
753: \nonumber\\
754: LOW: & \mbox{(large angle MSW with smaller mass squared)}
755: \nonumber\\
756: & \Delta m^{2} = 1 \times 10^{-7} eV^{2} \nonumber\\
757: & \tan^{2} \theta = 0.67, \quad \sin^{2} 2\theta=0.96
758: \nonumber\\
759: SMA: & \mbox{(small angle MSW)}
760: \nonumber\\
761: & \Delta m^{2} = 5.0 \times 10^{-6} eV^{2} \nonumber\\
762: & \tan^{2} \theta = 0.0006, \quad \sin^{2}2\theta=0.0024
763: \nonumber\\
764: QVO: & \mbox{(quasi-vacuum oscillation)}
765: \nonumber\\
766: & \Delta m^{2} = 8.6 \times 10^{-10} eV^{2} \nonumber\\
767: & \tan^{2} \theta = 1.5, \quad \sin^{2}2\theta=0.96
768: \nonumber
769: \end{eqnarray}
770: At present, none of these solutions can be ruled out \cite{Bahcall:2001hv}.
771: The current bound on $\vert U_{e\nu_{3}} \vert$ from CHOOZ experiment is
772: \cite{Apollonio:1999ae}
773: \begin{displaymath}
774: \vert U_{e\nu_{3}} \vert \le 0.16
775: \end{displaymath}
776: Our model favors both the LOW and QVO solution.
777: The LOW solution is obtained with the following set of
778: parameters:
779: \begin{equation}
780: M_{R} = 2.012 \times 10^{13} GeV, \quad t = 0.088
781: \end{equation}
782: which give rise to, using Eq.~(\ref{delta}),
783: \begin{eqnarray}
784: \delta_{1} & = & 0.001247 \nonumber\\
785: \delta_{2} & = & 2.221 \times 10^{-4} e^{i \; (0.2201)} \nonumber\\
786: \delta_{3} & = & 0.01648 e^{-i \;(0.001711)} \nonumber
787: \end{eqnarray}
788: This gives rise to three light neutrino masses
789: \begin{eqnarray}
790: m_{\nu_{1}} & = & 0.001711 \; eV \nonumber\\
791: m_{\nu_{2}} & = & 0.001762 \; eV \nonumber\\
792: m_{\nu_{3}} & = & 0.05438 \; eV \nonumber
793: \end{eqnarray}
794: and the squared-mass differences are
795: \begin{eqnarray}
796: \Delta m_{atm}^{2} & = & 2.954 \times 10^{-3} \; eV^{2} \nonumber\\
797: \Delta m_{\odot}^{2} & = & 1.769 \times 10^{-7} \; eV^{2}
798: \end{eqnarray}
799: And the MNS matrix is given by
800: \begin{displaymath}
801: \vert U_{MNS} \vert =
802: \left(
803: \begin{array}{ccc}
804: 0.6743 & 0.7346 & 0.07497\\
805: 0.5427 & 0.4322 & 0.7202\\
806: 0.5008 & 0.5230 & 0.6897
807: \end{array}
808: \right)
809: \end{displaymath}
810: This translates into
811: \begin{eqnarray}
812: \sin^{2} 2 \theta_{atm} \equiv 4 \vert U_{\mu \nu_{3}} \vert^{2}
813: (1-\vert U_{\mu \nu_{3}} \vert^{2}) = 0.9986
814: \nonumber\\
815: \sin^{2} 2 \theta_{\odot} \equiv 4 \vert U_{e \nu_{2}} \vert^{2}
816: (1-\vert U_{e \nu_{2}} \vert^{2}) = 0.9937
817: \nonumber
818: \end{eqnarray}
819: and the MNS matrix element $\vert U_{e\nu_{3}} \vert$ is predicted to be
820: $0.07497$, in very good agreement with the experimental result. The leptonic
821: analog of the Jarlskog invariant is predicted to be
822: \begin{displaymath}
823: J_{CP}^{l} \equiv Im \{ U_{11}
824: U_{12}^{\ast}
825: U_{21}^{\ast} U_{22} \}
826: = -0.008147
827: \end{displaymath}
828: The matrix element for the neutrinoless double beta
829: $(\beta\beta_{0\nu})$ decay,
830: $\vert < m > \vert$,
831: is given in terms of the rephasing invariant quantities by
832: \begin{eqnarray}
833: \vert < m > \vert ^{2} & = &
834: m_{1}^{2} \vert U_{e1} \vert^{4} + m_{2}^{2} \vert U_{e2} \vert^{4}
835: + m_{3}^{2} \vert U_{e3} \vert^{4}
836: \nonumber\\
837: & + &
838: 2m_{1}m_{2} \vert U_{e1} \vert^{2} \vert U_{e2} \vert^{2} \cos\alpha_{21}
839: \nonumber\\
840: & + &
841: 2m_{1}m_{3} \vert U_{e1} \vert^{2} \vert U_{e3} \vert^{2} \cos\alpha_{31}
842: \nonumber\\
843: & + &
844: 2m_{2}m_{3} \vert U_{e2} \vert^{2} \vert U_{e3} \vert^{2}
845: \cos(\alpha_{31}-\alpha_{21})\nonumber
846: \\
847: \end{eqnarray}
848: The current upper bound for $\vert < m > \vert$
849: from the experiment is $0.2 \; eV$ \cite{Baudis:1999xd}.
850: The two Majorana phases $(\alpha_{31},\alpha_{21})$ are $(0.9708,-1.326)$;
851: they give rise to a highly suppressed
852: $\vert<m>\vert = 1.359 \times 10^{-3} \; eV$\cite{Chen:2001gk}.
853: The three heavy neutrino masses are given by
854: \begin{eqnarray}
855: \label{Mr:low}
856: M_{1} & = & 9.412 \times 10^{7} GeV \nonumber\\
857: M_{2} & = & 1.486 \times 10^{9} GeV \nonumber\\
858: M_{3} & = & 2.013 \times 10^{13} GeV \nonumber
859: \end{eqnarray}
860:
861: The QVO solution is obtained with:
862: \begin{equation}
863: M_{R} = 1.217 \times 10^{14} GeV, \quad t = 0.0142
864: \end{equation}
865: which give rise to,
866: \begin{eqnarray}
867: \delta_{1} & = & 0.001267 \nonumber\\
868: \delta_{2} & = & 3.641 \times 10^{-5} e^{i \; (0.2201)} \nonumber\\
869: \delta_{3} & = & 0.01502 e^{-i \;(0.01074)} \nonumber
870: \end{eqnarray}
871: The three light neutrino masses are predicted to be
872: \begin{eqnarray}
873: m_{\nu_{1}} & = & 2.856 \times 10^{-4} \; eV \nonumber\\
874: m_{\nu_{2}} & = & 2.870 \times 10^{-4} \; eV \nonumber\\
875: m_{\nu_{3}} & = & 5.587 \times 10^{-2} \; eV \nonumber
876: \end{eqnarray}
877: and the squared-mass differences are
878: \begin{eqnarray}
879: \Delta m_{atm}^{2} & = & 3.122 \times 10^{-3} \; eV^{2} \nonumber\\
880: \Delta m_{\odot}^{2} & = & 7.584 \times 10^{-10} \; eV^{2} \nonumber
881: \end{eqnarray}
882: And the MNS matrix is given by
883: \begin{displaymath}
884: \vert U_{MNS} \vert =
885: \left(
886: \begin{array}{ccc}
887: 0.6794 & 0.7318 & 0.05310\\
888: 0.5302 & 0.4513 & 0.7178\\
889: 0.5072 & 0.5107 & 0.6942
890: \end{array}
891: \right)
892: \end{displaymath}
893: This translates into
894: \begin{eqnarray}
895: \sin^{2} 2 \theta_{atm} = 0.9991, \quad
896: \sin^{2} 2 \theta_{\odot} = 0.9950
897: \nonumber
898: \end{eqnarray}
899: and the MNS matrix element $\vert U_{e\nu_{3}} \vert$ is predicted to be
900: $0.05310$, in very good agreement with the experimental result. The leptonic
901: analog of the Jarlskog invariant is predicted to be
902: \begin{displaymath}
903: J_{CP}^{l} = -0.008110
904: \end{displaymath}
905: The two Majorana phases $(\alpha_{31},\alpha_{21})$ are $(1.385,-0.4976)$
906: and the matrix element for $\beta\beta_{0\nu}$ is predicted to be
907: \protect\linebreak
908: $\vert<m>\vert=3.07 \times 10^{-4}$ eV.
909: The three heavy right-handed Majorana neutrino masses are
910: \begin{eqnarray}
911: M_{1} & = & 3.699 \times 10^{7} GeV \nonumber\\
912: M_{2} & = & 2.341 \times 10^{10} GeV \nonumber\\
913: M_{3} & = & 1.218 \times 10^{14} GeV \nonumber
914: \end{eqnarray}
915: Our model can also produce the LMA solution by properly choosing the
916: values for $M_{R}$ and $t$; however, the prediction for $U_{e\nu_{3}}$
917: violates the experimental bound, leading to the elimination of the LMA
918: solution in our model.
919:
920: A few words concerning baryonic asymmetry are in order. Even though the
921: sphaleron effects destroy baryonic asymmetry, it could be produced as an
922: asymmetry in the generation of $(B-L)$ at a high scale because of lepton
923: number violation due to the decay of heavy right-handed Majorana
924: neutrinos~\cite{Fukugita:1986hr},
925: which in turn is converted into baryonic asymmetry due to sphalerons.
926: But in our model this mechanism produces baryonic asymmetry of $O(10^{-13})$
927: which is too small to account for the observed value of
928: $(1.7-8.3) \times 10^{-11}$~\cite{Olive:1999ij},
929: reasons being that the mass of the lightest right-handed Majorana neutrino
930: is too small {\it and} the $1-3$ family mixing of right-handed neutrinos is too
931: large, leading, in essence, to the violation of the out-of-equilibrium
932: condition required by Sakharov~\cite{Sakharov:1967dj}.
933: So a mechanism other than leptogenesis is
934: required to explain baryonic asymmetry.
935:
936: {\bf Summary:}
937: We have generalized our recently constructed model based on SUSY
938: $SO(10)$ combined with $U(2)$ family symmetry
939: to include phases in the mass matrices leading to CP violation. In
940: contrast with the commonly used effective operator approach,
941: $\overline{126}$-dimensional Higgs fields are utilized to construct the Yukawa
942: sector. $R$-parity symmetry is thus preserved at low energies. The {\it
943: symmetric} mass textures arising from the left-right symmetry breaking chain
944: of $SO(10)$ give rise to very good predictions for quark and lepton masses and
945: mixings. The prediction for $\sin 2\beta$ agrees with the average of current bounds from
946: BaBar and Belle. In the neutrino sector, our predictions are in good agreement
947: with results from atmospheric neutrino experiments. Our model allows
948: both the LOW and QVO solutions to the solar neutrino anomaly, and the matrix
949: element for $\beta \beta_{0\nu}$ decay is highly suppressed. The leptonic
950: analog of the Jarlskog invariant, $J_{CP}^{l}$, is predicted to be of
951: $O(10^{-2})$. It is interesting to note that, in the Yukawa sector, the model
952: predicts $(12+3)$ masses, $(6+3)$ mixing angles and $(4+3)$ phases (- the
953: additional $3$'s in the parentheses refer to the right-handed neutrino sector)
954: in terms of nine parameters given in Eq.~(\ref{input}) and $t$ and $M_{R}$, a
955: total of eleven parameters.
956:
957: % If in two-column mode, this environment will change to single-column
958: % format so that long equations can be displayed. Use
959: % sparingly.
960: %\begin{widetext}
961: % put long equation here
962: %\end{widetext}
963:
964: % figures should be put into the text as floats.
965: % Use the graphics or graphicx packages (distributed with LaTeX2e)
966: % and the \includegraphics macro defined in those packages.
967: % See the LaTeX Graphics Companion by Michel Goosens, Sebastian Rahtz,
968: % and Frank Mittelbach for instance.
969: %
970: % Here is an example of the general form of a figure:
971: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
972: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
973: % Use the figure* environment if the figure should span across the
974: % entire page. There is no need to do explicit centering.
975:
976: % \begin{figure}
977: % \includegraphics{}%
978: % \caption{\label{}}
979: % \end{figure}
980:
981: % Surround figure environment with turnpage environment for landscape
982: % figure
983: % \begin{turnpage}
984: % \begin{figure}
985: % \includegraphics{}%
986: % \caption{\label{}}
987: % \end{figure}
988: % \end{turnpage}
989:
990: % tables should appear as floats within the text
991: %
992: % Here is an example of the general form of a table:
993: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
994: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
995: % Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the
996: % \begin{tabular}{} command.
997: % The ruledtabular enviroment adds doubled rules to table and sets a
998: % reasonable default table settings.
999: % Use the table* environment to get a full-width table in two-column
1000: % Add \usepackage{longtable} and the longtable (or longtable*}
1001: % environment for nicely formatted long tables. Or use the the [H]
1002: % placement option to break a long table (with less control than
1003: % in longtable).
1004: % \begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages
1005: % \caption{\label{}}
1006: % \begin{ruledtabular}
1007: % \begin{tabular}{}
1008: % Lines of table here ending with \\
1009: % \end{tabular}
1010: % \end{ruledtabular}
1011: % \end{table}
1012:
1013: % Surround table environment with turnpage environment for landscape
1014: % table
1015: % \begin{turnpage}
1016: % \begin{table}
1017: % \caption{\label{}}
1018: % \begin{ruledtabular}
1019: % \begin{tabular}{}
1020: % \end{tabular}
1021: % \end{ruledtabular}
1022: % \end{table}
1023: % \end{turnpage}
1024:
1025: % Specify following sections are appendices. Use \appendix* if there
1026: % only one appendix.
1027:
1028: % If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.
1029: \begin{acknowledgments}
1030: We would like to thank Rabi Mohapatra for bringing to our attention the
1031: interesting aspect of baryogenesis. This work was supported, in part,
1032: by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE FG03-05ER40892.
1033: \end{acknowledgments}
1034:
1035: % Create the reference section using BibTeX:
1036: \bibliography{cp}
1037:
1038: \end{document}
1039: %
1040: % ****** End of file template.aps ******
1041:
1042: