1: \chapter{Light-Front Hamiltonian QCD Approach to DIS}
2: A large number of recent experiments on polarized and unpolarized deep
3: inelastic scattering are providing valuable information on the so called
4: `higher twist' or power suppressed contributions to DIS. A theoretical
5: understanding of these effects require non-perturbative information on the
6: structure of the hadron. There is an
7: urgent need to develop a non-perturbative approach to DIS which is
8: preferably based on physical intuitions but at the same time employs well
9: defined field theoretical calculational procedure. This goal is achieved in
10: light-front Hamiltonian QCD framework. We follow a recently
11: developed method \cite{c4nonpert} of calculating the structure functions which is a
12: combination of coordinate space approach based on light-front current
13: algebraic techniques and momentum space approach based on Fock space
14: expansion method in light-front theory in Hamiltonian QCD.
15:
16:
17:
18: The most intuitive approach to DIS is the parton model \cite{c4par} proposed by Feynman.
19: Partons were originally introduced as collinear, massless,
20: non-interacting pointlike constituents of the proton. However, the QCD governed
21: interacting partons need not be collinear and massless. Can one
22: generalize this concept to introduce field theoretic partons, which are
23: non-collinear and massive, but still on-mass-shell objects in an interacting
24: field theory? The answer is yes, and this is achieved in light-front
25: Hamiltonian QCD by introducing many body (or multi-parton) wave functions.
26:
27: In order to introduce these many body wave functions in the description of DIS
28: structure functions, we use Bjorken-Johnson-Low (BJL) expansion of the
29: scattering amplitude \cite{c4jack},
30: which is essentially a non-perturbative approach where the expansion
31: parameter is the inverse of the light-front energy of the probe (virtual
32: photon). The leading term in this expansion in the high energy limit
33: contains the matrix element of the equal light-front time current
34: commutator which can be evaluated, knowing the light-front
35: commutators/anticommutators between the field variables. Using optical
36: theorem (see Chapter 2)
37: one obtains the expressions of the structure functions as the
38: Fourier transform of the matrix elements of light-front bilocal vector and
39: axial vector currents. The bilocality is only in the longitudinal
40: (minus) direction and the matrix element is between the target hadron state.
41: In the next step, one uses the Fock space expansion of the target state
42: using Tamm-Dancoff truncation. This introduces multi-parton wave functions in
43: the expression of the structure functions. The structure functions, then,
44: can be evaluated once these wave functions renormalized at scale $Q$ are
45: known. At present major efforts are under way to calculate these wave
46: functions. It is important to emphasize here that, such an approach is
47: possible because of certain special properties of light-front formulation,
48: in particular, the fact that light-front boost is kinematical (see chapter
49: 3). The advantage
50: of this technique is that both perturbative and non-perturbative issues can
51: be addressed within the same framework. So, a unified description of
52: perturbative and non-perturbative QCD underlying the deep inelastic
53: structure functions can be realized.
54:
55: In this section, we briefly outline our approach and summarize the previous
56: works done using this formalism.
57:
58: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
59: \section{Structure Functions in the BJL Limit}\label{c4bjl}
60: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
61: The hadronic tensor $W^{\mu \nu}$ is given in terms of
62: hadronic matrix elements
63: of the current commutator as in chapter 2. However, it is not
64: equal-time or equal-$x^+$ commutator.
65: The DIS structure functions are related to the equal $x^+$ current
66: commutators through the BJL (high energy) limit of the forward virtual
67: photon-hadron Compton scattering amplitude $T^{\mu \nu}$ \cite{c4jack}:
68: \begin{equation} \label{c4lfccl}
69: T^{\mu \nu} \stackrel{{\rm large}~q^-}{=} - {1\over q^-}
70: \int d\xi^- d^2 \xi_\bot e^{iq\cdot \xi}
71: \langle PS | [J^\mu(\xi), J^\nu(0)]_{\xi^+=0}| PS\rangle + ...
72: \end{equation}
73:
74: where $q^-$ is the light-front energy of the virtual photon,
75: and $(\xi^+,\xi^-,\xi^i)$ are the light-front space-time
76: coordinates.
77: For large $Q^2$ and large $\nu$ limits in DIS, without any
78: loss of generality we can always select a Lorentz frame
79: such that the light-front energy $q^-$ of the virtual photon
80: becomes very large. Explicitly, in terms of light-front variables, we can
81: choose $q^+$ to be negative and finite for the virtual photon (since the
82: photon is virtual, longitudinal momentum can be negative).
83: Also, keeping $q^i$ to be finite, one can get large space-like $q^2$
84: ($Q^2 \rightarrow \infty$) by taking $q^-\rightarrow \infty$. In this case,
85: $x=-{q^+\over P^+}$ is positive and finite, since $q^+$ is negative while both
86: $q^+$ and $P^+$ are finite. So by taking the limit $q^- \rightarrow \infty$,
87: we do not go beyond the physical region of DIS. Also, in the large $Q^2$
88: region, we take only the first term in the above expansion since the higher
89: and higher terms are suppressed.
90:
91: The structure functions are related to the equal light-front time current
92: commutator by using optical theorem and dispersion relation (see chapter 2).
93: The light-front current commutator can be calculated exactly from
94: light-front QCD in the light-front gauge.
95:
96: It is worthwhile to point out that there exists an equal-time BJL expansion
97: of the scattering amplitude where the expansion parameter is ${1\over q^0}$.
98: But taking $q^0 \rightarrow \infty$ gives timelike $q^2$ which is unphysical
99: for DIS. In order to overcome this difficulty, one has to go over to the
100: complex $q^0$ plane and take $iq^0 \rightarrow \infty$. This increases the
101: complexity. Another important point is, equal-time BJL expansion gives an
102: infinite set of relations connecting the moments of the structure functions
103: to the corresponding term in the BJL expansion \cite{c4jack}. So in order to get the
104: structure functions, one has to invert these equations. Light-cone BJL
105: expansion instead gives the structure functions themselves in terms of the
106: light-cone current commutators.
107:
108: The various expressions of the DIS structure functions that are obtained in
109: the BJL limit and inserting the current commutator are given below:
110: \begin{eqnarray}
111: {F_2(x,Q^2)\over x}
112: &=& {1\over 4\pi P^+} \int d\eta e^{-i\eta x} \sum_\alpha
113: e^2_\alpha \langle PS| \overline{\psi}_\alpha (\xi^-)
114: \gamma^+ \psi_\alpha (0) \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~
115: - \overline{\psi}_\alpha (0)
116: \gamma^+ \psi_\alpha (\xi^-) |PS \rangle \label{c4f2+} \\
117: &=& {1\over 4\pi P^i_\bot} \int d\eta e^{-i\eta x} \sum_\alpha
118: e^2_\alpha \langle PS | \overline{\psi}_\alpha (\xi^-)
119: \gamma_\bot^i \psi_\alpha (0) \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
120: - \overline{\psi}_\alpha (0)
121: \gamma_\bot^i \psi_\alpha(\xi^-) |PS \rangle \, . \label{c4f2i}
122: \end{eqnarray}
123: \begin{eqnarray}
124: F_L(x,Q^2)
125: &=& {P^+\over 4\pi } \Bigg({2x\over Q}\Bigg)^2 \int d\eta
126: e^{-i\eta x} \sum_\alpha e^2_\alpha \langle PS|
127: \overline{\psi}_\alpha (\xi^-) \nonumber \\
128: & & ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \times
129: \Big(\gamma^--{P_\perp^2 \over (P^+)^2}
130: \gamma^+ \Big)\psi_\alpha
131: (0) - h.c. |PS \rangle \, . \label{c4fl}
132: % &=& {1\over 4\pi P^+} \Bigg({2x\over Q}\Bigg)^2
133: % \int d\eta e^{-i\eta x} \sum_\alpha
134: % e^2_\alpha \langle PS| \overline{\psi}_\alpha (\xi^-)
135: % \Big(\gamma^--{P^-\over P_\bot^i}\gamma^i_\bot \Big)
136: % \psi_\alpha (0) - h.c. |PS \rangle \, ,
137: \end{eqnarray}
138: Eq. (\ref{c4fl}) may be reduced to the same expression obtained
139: by the collinear expansion in the Feynman diagrammatic method up to the
140: order twist-four \cite{c4EPF}. But it is obtained directly here in the
141: leading order in the $1/q^-$ expansion without involving the concept
142: of twist expansion.
143: The polarized structure functions come out to be,
144: \begin{eqnarray}
145: g_1(x,Q^2)
146: &=& {1\over 8 \pi S^+} \int d\eta e^{-i\eta x} \sum_\alpha
147: e^2_\alpha \langle P S| \overline{\psi}_\alpha (\xi^-)
148: \gamma^+ \gamma_5 \psi_\alpha(0) + h.c. |PS \rangle , \label{c4g1}\\
149: g_T(x,Q^2)
150: &=& {1\over 8\pi S^i_T} \int d\eta
151: e^{-i\eta x} \sum_\alpha e^2_\alpha \langle PS|\overline{
152: \psi}_\alpha(\xi^-) \Big(\gamma^i -{P^i\over P^+}
153: \gamma^+ \Big)\gamma_5 \psi_\alpha(0)
154: \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+~ h.c. |PS \rangle
155: \, . \label{c4gt}
156: \end{eqnarray}
157: We refer to \cite{c4nonpert} for a detailed derivation of the above results. In
158: our work, these are the starting expressions. The detailed derivation of the
159: structure function $F_L$ taking into account the flavor structure is given
160: in the next chapter.
161: The above results are derived without recourse to perturbation theory,
162: and also without the use of the concept of collinear and massless partons.
163: Also, they are not derived using the twist expansion and these are the
164: leading terms in the ${1\over q^-}$ expansion and not the leading terms in
165: terms of twist, the target here is in
166: arbitrary Lorentz frame.
167: In the rest frame, these expressions reduce to those obtained by Jaffe and
168: Ji in the impulse approximation \cite{c4jaji} and also by Efremov {\it et.
169: al.} in
170: QCD field theoretic model \cite{c4efre}.
171: Also, the above expressions are valid only in the
172: light-front gauge, $A^+=0$, otherwise the bilocal expressions should involve
173: a path ordered exponential to ensure gauge invariance. Since the bilocality
174: is only in the longitudinal direction, the exponential factor is unity.
175:
176:
177: In the above expressions, the bilocal operators arise from the light-front
178: current commutator. It can be seen from Eq. (\ref{c4f2+}) and (\ref{c4f2i}) that the plus
179: (involving $\gamma^+$) and perp (involving $\gamma^\perp$) components of the
180: bilocal current are related to the same structure function $F_2$, whereas
181: the minus component (involving $\gamma^-$) is related to the longitudinal
182: structure function $F_L$. Explicit calculation shows that the minus component
183: involves the constrained field, $\psi^-$, which, when eliminated using
184: constraint equation, gives rise to interaction dependent terms in the
185: operator. This interaction dependence is absent in the plus component.
186: Similarly in the polarized structure function $g_1$, the operator involved
187: is the plus component of the axial vector current
188: which does not depend upon interactions whereas in transverse polarized
189: structure function $g_T$, the perp component is involved, which contains
190: $\psi^-$, elimination of which brings in interaction dependence.
191: The evolution of the structure functions $F_2$ and $g_1$ with $Q^2$ are
192: generated entirely from the target state in the leading log approximation.
193: In these cases, all the
194: complexities are buried in the target hadronic state and the operators
195: involved have simple structure. The situation is completely different for
196: the other two structure functions, namely $F_L$ and $g_T$, where complexity
197: is already there in the operator structure. The interaction dependence of
198: the operator gives off-diagonal contributions to the hadron matrix elements.
199:
200: The evaluation of the hadronic matrix elements is straightforward in this
201: approach and this clarifies the physical picture of DIS. In this framework,
202: we do not use dimensional regularization and the presence of $\gamma_5$ does
203: not produce any problem. Also, in contrast to the OPE formalism, the quark
204: mass effects can be included without any difficulty. In this approach, we
205: deal with probability amplitudes rather than probability densities and
206: interference effects are easy to handle.
207:
208: In the next section,
209: we briefly review the previous works done in this approach.
210:
211: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
212: \section{Review of Previous Works Done in This Approach}\label{c4rev}
213:
214: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
215: \subsection{$F_2$ From Transverse Component of Bilocal Current}
216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
217: Earlier in this section, we have written $F_2$ in terms of both plus and
218: perp components of bilocal current. That the perp component also gives the
219: same $F_2$ structure function is a new result and comes out directly from
220: our approach based on BJL limit and light-front Hamiltonian QCD. This is
221: different from \cite{c4jaffe}, according to which, the plus component is
222: twist two and perp component is twist three. So the perp component should
223: not have partonic interpretation. Explicit calculation shows that the
224: perp component involves the constrained field $\psi^-$. When it is
225: eliminated using the constraint equation, the expression for $F_2$ becomes,
226: \be
227: {F_2(x)\over x}={1\over {8 \pi}} {P^+\over P^1} \int dy^- e^{-{i\over 2}P^+
228: y^-x}\langle P\mid \xi^\dagger (y) [O_m+O_{k^\perp}+O_g] \xi(0)\mid P \rangle
229: +h.c.
230: \e
231: h.c. is the Hermitian conjugate and,
232: \be
233: O_m=im{1\over {i \pp^+}}\sigma^2,\nonumber\\
234: O_{k^\perp}={1\over {i\pp^+}}[i\pp^1-\sigma^3 \pp^2],\nonumber\\
235: O_g=g{1\over {i\pp^+}} [A^1+i\sigma^3A^2].
236: \e
237: There is an interaction term $O_g$ in the operator.
238: However, contribution from this term to the matrix
239: element vanishes and one gets the same structure function $F_2$ as from the
240: plus component and it carries the same parton interpretation \cite{c4matrix}.
241:
242: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
243: \subsection{Factorization of Hard and Soft Dynamics}
244: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
245:
246: Any general cross section in hadron physics contains both short distance and
247: long distance behavior and hence is not accessible to perturbative QCD.
248: Factorization theorem allows one to separate the two behaviors in a
249: systematic way. According to factorization theorem, the cross section can be
250: separated into two parts, the non-perturbative soft dynamics factors out of
251: the hard part \cite{c4fac}. So the hard (short distance) part of the cross section is calculated using
252: perturbative QCD and the soft (long distance) part is given in terms of a
253: set of operator matrix elements which have to be calculated
254: non-perturbatively using some non-perturbative techniques like lattice gauge
255: theory. This factorization theorem has not been proved for higher twist
256: contributions to the cross section. Recently, a factorization scheme is
257: presented in our approach based on light-front Hamiltonian QCD and Fock
258: space expansion \cite{c4nonpert}. The light-front Hamiltonian is separated into three parts,
259: depending on the hard and soft transverse momenta $k^\perp$,
260: \be
261: P^- = (P^-)^h + (P^-)^m + (P^-)^l
262: \e
263: where the soft part $(P^-)^l$ contains only those momenta for which
264: $(k^\perp)^2<\mu^2$ and hard part $(P^-)^h$ contains $Q^2>(k^\perp)^2>\mu^2$
265: where $\mu^2$ is some intermediate scale separating the hard and soft
266: dynamics. This is called factorization scale. $Q^2$ is the scale of the
267: virtual photon. The low energy effective Hamiltonian can, in principle, be
268: obtained by integrating out all modes with $(k^\perp)^2>\mu^2$ from the
269: canonical QCD Hamiltonian. The mixed part contains interaction and mixes
270: the hard and soft partons. The structure function can be written as,
271: \be
272: F_i(x,Q^2) \approx \int d \eta exp^{-i \eta x} \sum_\alpha e_\alpha^2 \langle
273: P S \mid {\bar \psi_\alpha}(\xi^-) \Gamma_i \psi_\alpha(0) \pm h.c.\mid P S
274: \rangle
275: \e
276: where $\Gamma_i$ denote the gamma matrices. The target bound state can be
277: expressed as,
278: \be
279: \mid P S \rangle =U_h \mid P S, \mu^2\rangle
280: \e
281: where $U_h=T^+ exp({-{i\over 2} \int^{-\infty}_0 dx^+ [(P^-)^h+ (P^-)^m]})$
282: and,
283: \be
284: (P^-)^l\mid P S, \mu^2 \rangle = {{(P^\perp)^2 +M^2}\over P^+} \mid P S,
285: \mu^2 \rangle.
286: \e
287: Then one can write,
288: \be
289: F_i(x,Q^2) \approx &&\int d\eta exp^{-i \eta x} \sum_\alpha e_\alpha^2
290: \sum_{n_1, n_2}\langle
291: P S, \mu^2 \mid n_1 \rangle \nonumber\\&&~
292: \langle n_2 \mid P S, \mu^2 \rangle \langle n_1
293: \mid U_h^{-1}[{\bar \psi_\alpha}(\xi^-) \Gamma_i \psi_\alpha(0) \pm h.c.]U_h
294: \mid n_2 \rangle
295: \e
296: where $\mid n_1 \rangle, \mid n_2 \rangle$ are complete sets of quark and
297: gluon Fock states with momenta $k_i^2 \le \mu^2$. The hard contribution is
298: described by the matrix element,
299: $\langle n_1
300: \mid U_h^{-1}[{\bar \psi_\alpha}(\xi^-) \Gamma_i \psi_\alpha(0) \pm h.c.]U_h
301: \mid n_2 \rangle $ which is evaluated in light-front Hamiltonian
302: perturbation theory. The soft contribution is characterized by an overlap of
303: the multiparton wave functions, $\langle
304: P S, \mu^2 \mid n_1 \rangle \langle n_2 \mid P S, \mu^2 \rangle \langle n_1
305: \mid $. For $F_2$ and $g_1$, $\mid n_1 \rangle= \mid n_2 \rangle= \mid n \rangle $,
306: only one parton actively takes part in the scattering process, the remaining
307: ones are spectators. Such a factorization scheme is valid for the $F_2$ and
308: $g_1$ structure functions. The structure function can be written as,
309: \be
310: F_i(x, Q^2) \approx \sum_\alpha e_\alpha^2 \int_x^1 dy P_{p p'} (y, x, {Q^2
311: \over \mu^2}) q_{\alpha i}(y, \mu^2)
312: \e
313: where $P_{p p'} (y, x, {Q^2\over \mu^2})$ are the leading hard contributions
314: to the structure functions, called splitting functions, and $q_{\alpha i}
315: (y, \mu^2) $ is called the distribution function which is to be
316: calculated by non-perturbative light-front QCD approaches to hadronic bound
317: states. Thus, a unified treatment of both perturbative and non-perturbative
318: aspects of DIS is possible in this framework.
319:
320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
321: \subsection{$F_2$ Structure Function, $Q^2$ Evolution and Sum Rule}
322: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
323: The factorization scheme shows that the dressed parton structure functions
324: are important, since they give informations on the splitting functions and
325: scaling violations. The $F_2$ structure function has been calculated for
326: dressed quark and gluon target states \cite{c4rad}. The state is expanded in Fock space
327: for a dressed quark in terms of bare states of quark and quark plus gluon
328: (upto $O(g^2)$) as,
329: \be
330: \mid P, \sigma \rangle &=& \phi_1 b^\dagger(P,\sigma) \mid 0 \rangle
331: \nonumber \\
332: && + \sum_{\sigma_1,\lambda_2} \int
333: {dk_1^+ d^2k_1^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_1^+}}
334: \int
335: {dk_2^+ d^2k_2^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_2^+}}
336: \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 P^+} \delta^3(P-k_1-k_2) \nonumber \\
337: && ~~~~~\phi_2(P,\sigma \mid k_1, \sigma_1; k_2 , \lambda_2) b^\dagger(k_1,
338: \sigma_1) a^\dagger(k_2, \lambda_2) \mid 0 \rangle
339: \e
340: where $\sigma$ is the helicity, $\phi_2$ is the probability amplitude to
341: find a bare quark of momentum $k_1$, helicity $\sigma_1$ and a bare gluon of
342: momentum $k_2$ and helicity $\lambda_2$ in the dressed quark.
343:
344: Explicit evaluation leads to, upto $O(\alpha_s)$,
345: \be
346: {F_2 (x, Q^2)\over x} = \delta(1-x)+ {\alpha_s \over {2 \pi}} C_f ln
347: {Q^2\over \mu^2} [{{1+x^2}\over {(1-x)_+}}+{3\over 2} \delta (1-x)].
348: \e
349: Here we have taken the state to be normalized to unity.
350: The first term in RHS is the parton model result and the next term is the
351: QCD correction. $ln{Q^2\over \mu^2}$ in the second term arises from the
352: transverse momentum integration of the field theoretic partons and it gives
353: rise to scaling violations. The collinear $(x=1)$ singularity is canceled
354: between the real and virtual gluon emission, which is indicated by the plus
355: prescription in the above expression. The Altarelli-Parisi splitting
356: function can be obtained from this expression:
357: \be
358: P_{qq}= C_f
359: {{1+x^2}\over {(1-x)_+}}+{3\over 2} \delta (1-x).
360: \e
361: It is known that the $F_2$ structure function gives the longitudinal
362: momentum sum rule. It has been shown that the integral of $F_2$ over $x$ is
363: related to the hadronic matrix element of the fermionic part of the
364: light-front QCD longitudinal momentum density $\theta^{++}$. Thus, it gives
365: the total fraction of the hadronic longitudinal momenta carried by the quarks
366: and antiquarks. The structure function for the gluons $F_2^g(x, Q^2)$ has
367: been calculated and it has been shown explicitly that the longitudinal
368: momentum sum rule is obeyed,
369: \be
370: \int_0^1 dx (F_2^q(x) + F_2^g(x))=1.
371: \e
372: This sum rule is verified upto $O(\alpha_s)$ in light-front Hamiltonian
373: perturbation theory.
374:
375: In order to understand the factorization of hard and soft dynamics in this
376: picture, $F_2$ has been calculated for a meson-like bound state by expanding
377: the target state in Fock space \cite{c4rad}. Upto $O(\alpha_s)$, one considers
378: the bare
379: states consisting of a quark-antiquark pair and quark-antiquark-gluon.
380: $Q^2$ evolution
381: of $F_2$ has been calculated and it has been shown that it factorizes into
382: soft ($0 \le k^\perp \le \mu)$ and hard $(\mu \le k^\perp \le \Lambda)$,
383: where $\Lambda$ is the cutoff on transverse momenta.
384:
385: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
386: \subsection{Polarized Structure Function: $g_1(x,Q^2)$ and Helicity Sum Rule}
387: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
388:
389: The first moment of the polarized structure function $g_1(x,Q^2)$ gives a
390: measure of the total intrinsic helicity contributions of quark and antiquark
391: in the nucleon. The EMC data in the late 80's produced a lot of
392: interest in
393: polarized structure function by confirming that Ellis-Jaffe sum rule,
394: according to which about 50-60 percent of the nucleon helicity should be
395: carried by
396: quarks and antiquarks, is violated. The EMC data showed that only a very
397: small fraction
398: of the nucleon helicity is carried by the charged constituents. This gave
399: rise to a lot of confusion in understanding the spin contribution of the
400: nucleon and this is what is known as the spin crisis. Later, it has been
401: shown by calculating the triangle graph anomaly that the gluon coming
402: from the anomaly graph interacts with the virtual photon. This leads to a
403: small quark/antiquark helicity contribution because of certain cancellations
404: \cite{c4ano}.
405: However, in the total helicity of the nucleon, in addition to the quark,
406: antiquark and gluon intrinsic helicity, one has to take into account the
407: orbital angular momenta of the constituents. In fact, the orbital angular
408: momentum of the constituents play a very important role in the nucleon
409: helicity. The role of orbital helicity has been investigated recently in
410: our approach \cite{c4or}. A detailed analysis of light-front helicity operator is needed
411: for this purpose. Light-front helicity operator $J_3$ (in the frame
412: $P^\perp=0$, $J^3$ is the helicity operator; see chapter 7) can be written in
413: terms of manifestly symmetric gauge invariant energy-momentum tensor
414: $\theta^{\mu \nu}$ in QCD as,
415: \be
416: J^3={1\over 2} \int dx^- d^2x^\perp [x^1 \theta^{+2}-x^2 \theta^{+1}].
417: \e
418: Recently it has been shown explicitly \cite{c4or} that $J_3$ constructed in light-front
419: gauge $A^+=0$, after eliminating the constrained variables $\psi^-$ and
420: $A^-$ using constraint equations, is independent of interaction and its form
421: agrees with the naive canonical form, provided we assume that the fields
422: vanish at the boundary. $J^3$ thus constructed can be separated into four
423: parts,
424: \be
425: J^3=J^3_{fi}+J^3_{fo}+J^3_{go} + J^3_{gi}
426: \e
427: where $J^3_{fi}$ is the fermion intrinsic part, $J^3_{fo}$ is the
428: fermion orbital part, $J^3_{go}$ is the gluon orbital part and $J^3_{gi}$
429: is the gluon intrinsic part. It has been shown that $J^3_{fi}$ is directly
430: related to the polarized structure function $g_1(x,Q^2)$ measured in
431: longitudinally polarized DIS. The helicity sum
432: rule can be written as
433: \be
434: \langle P S \mid J^3 \mid P S \rangle =\langle P S \mid J^3_{fi}+J^3_{fo}+
435: J^3_{go} + J^3_{gi}\mid P S \rangle = \pm {1\over 2},
436: \e
437: that is, the sum of the orbital and intrinsic helicities of the constituents
438: gives the nucleon helicity. This has been verified in perturbation theory
439: for a dressed quark a and dressed gluon explicitly.
440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
441: \subsection{Polarized Structure Function: $g_2(x,Q^2)$ and the Violation of
442: Wandzura Wilczek Relation in pQCD}
443: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
444: The polarized structure function $g_2(x,Q^2)$ is the least well known
445: structure function in DIS. The contribution of $g_2(x,Q^2)$ to the cross
446: section is suppressed by a factor of ${1\over Q}$ compared to the leading
447: contribution in the longitudinally polarized scattering. So it is commonly
448: known as higher twist effect. Wandzura and Wilczek showed that \cite{c4wand}
449: $g_2(x,Q^2)$ can be separated into two parts,
450: \be
451: g_2(x,Q^2)=g_2^{ww}(x,Q^2)+{\bar g_2}(x,Q^2)
452: \e
453: where ${\bar g_2}(x,Q^2)$ is a twist three piece and the twist two part is
454: related to $g_1(x,Q^2)$ through the Wandzura-Wilczek relation:
455: \be
456: g_2^{ww}(x,Q^2)=-g_1(x,Q^2) + \int_x^1 {dy\over y}g_1(x,Q^2).
457: \e
458: The twist three part was negligible in their model calculation and the quark
459: mass was neglected. Later, there has been a lot of interest in $g_2(x,Q^2)$.
460: The effect of the quark mass has been investigated \cite{c4alt} and it was
461: found that the twist three part is a direct quark-gluon interaction effect
462: and plays a very important role \cite{c4shur}. The importance of quark mass in
463: $g_2(x,Q^2)$ has been investigated recently in the light-front QCD approach
464: \cite{c4wan}. The pure transversely polarized structure function is defined as,
465: \be
466: g_T(x,Q^2)=g_1(x,Q^2)+g_2(x,Q^2).
467: \e
468: The expression for $g_T$ in terms of the hadronic matrix element of
469: light-front bilocal current has been given earlier. After one eliminates the
470: constrained fields using the constraint equations, the expression of $g_T$
471: becomes,
472: \be
473: g_T(x,Q^2)={1\over 8\pi S^i_T} \int d\eta
474: e^{-i\eta x} \langle PS| (O_m+O_{k_\perp}+O_g)+h.c.
475: |PS \rangle
476: \e
477: where
478: \be
479: O_m=m\psi_+^\dagger (\xi^-)Q^2\gamma_\perp ({1\over {i\pp^+}})\gamma_5
480: \psi_+(0),\\
481: O_{k_\perp}=-\psi_+^\dagger(\xi^-)Q^2 (\gamma_\perp {1\over
482: {\pp^-}}\gamma^\perp \cdot \pp^\perp +2{P_\perp\over P^+})\gamma_5
483: \psi_+(0),\\
484: O_g=g\psi_+^\dagger(\xi^-)Q^2(\gamma^\perp \cdot A^\perp(\xi^-){1\over
485: {i\pp^+}}\gamma_\perp \cdot \gamma_5 \psi_+(0).
486: \e
487: $g_T$ has been calculated for a transversely polarized quark state dressed
488: with one gluon. This state can be expressed in terms of helicity states as,
489: \be
490: \mid k^+,k^\perp,s^1 \rangle = {1\over {\sqrt 2}} (\mid
491: k^+,k^\perp,\uparrow \rangle \pm \mid k^+,k^\perp,\downarrow \rangle)
492: \e
493: with $s^1=\pm m_R$, and $m_R$ is the renormalized quark mass. For this state,
494: \be
495: g_T(x,Q^2)={e_q^2\over 2}\Big \{ \delta(1-x)+{\alpha_s\over {2\pi}} C_f
496: ln{Q^2\over \mu^2}\Big [{(1+2x-x^2)\over {(1-x)_+}}\Big ] \Big \}
497: \e
498: which is independent of quark mass. However, it is important to start from
499: massive theory and renormalize the quark mass in light-front Hamiltonian
500: perturbation theory. However, starting from a massless theory one gets wrong
501: result for $g_T$. The structure function $g_1$ can also be calculated for a
502: dressed quark in the same method and it can be verified that
503: Wandzura-Wilczek relation is not obeyed in perturbative QCD. It is also easy
504: to verify that the Burkhardt-Cottingham sum rule is obeyed, that is,
505: \be
506: \int_0^1 dx g_2(x, Q^2)=0.
507: \e
508:
509: In the next few chapters, we discuss the works that we have done in this
510: research program using this framework.
511:
512: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
513: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
514: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
515:
516: \bibitem{c4nonpert} A. Harindranath, R. Kundu and W. M. Zhang, Phys. Rev. {\bf
517: D59}, 094012, (1999).
518:
519: \bibitem{c4par} R. P. Feynman, {\it Photon Hadron Interactions} (Benjamin, New
520: York, 1972).
521:
522: \bibitem{c4jack} R. Jackiw,
523: {\it Diverse Topics in Theoretical and
524: Mathematical Physics}, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p.309.
525: Also see R. Jackiw, Spri. Tracts in Mod. Phys. Vol.
526: {\bf 62} (Springer, Berlin, 1971), p.1.
527:
528: \bibitem{c4EPF} R. K. Ellis, W. Furmanski and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. {\bf
529: B212}, 29 (1983).
530:
531:
532: \bibitem{c4jaji} R. L. Jaffe and X. Ji, Phys. Rev. {\bf D43}, 724 (1991).
533:
534: \bibitem{c4efre} A. V. Efremov and O. V. Teryaev, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf
535: 39}, 962 (1984).
536:
537: \bibitem{c4jaffe} R. L. Jaffe and X. Ji, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B375}, 527 (1992).
538:
539: \bibitem{c4matrix} A. Harindranath and W. M. Zhang, Phys. Lett. {\bf B390},
540: 359 (1997).
541:
542: \bibitem{c4fac} J. Collins, D. Soper and G. Sterman, in {\it Perturbative
543: Quantum Chromodynamics}, edited by A. Mueller (World Scientific, Singapore,
544: 1989), p.1.
545:
546: \bibitem{c4rad} A. Harindranath, R. Kundu, W. M. Zhang, Phys. Rev. {\bf
547: D59}, 094013, (1999).
548:
549: %\bibitem{c4emc} Ashman {\it et al}, Phys. Lett. {\bf B206}, 364 (1988).
550:
551: \bibitem{c4ano} R. D. Carlitz, J. C. Collins and A. H. Mueller, Phys. Lett.
552: {\bf B214}, 229 (1988); G. Altarelli and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. {\bf B212},
553: 391 (1988).
554:
555: \bibitem{c4or} A. Harindranath and R. Kundu, Phys. Rev. {\bf D59}, 116013
556: (1999).
557:
558: \bibitem{c4wand} S. Wandzura and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. {\bf B72}, 195
559: (1977).
560:
561: \bibitem{c4alt} G. Altarelli and S. Muzzetto, Preprint LPTENS 79/27 (1979); J.
562: Kodaira et al, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B159}, 99 (1979), {\bf B165}, 129 (1979).
563:
564: \bibitem{c4shur} E. V. Shuryak and A. I. Vainshtein, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B201},
565: 141 (1982).
566:
567: \bibitem{c4wan} A. Harindranath and W. M. Zhang, Phys. Lett. {\bf B408}, 347
568: (1997).
569: \end{thebibliography}
570:
571: