1:
2: \chapter{Twist Four Longitudinal Structure Function in Light-Front QCD}
3: In chapter 4, we have outlined our approach based on light-front
4: Hamiltonian QCD to DIS. In this chapter and in the next three chapters we
5: shall discuss the problems that we have investigated in this research program.
6:
7: In this chapter, we shall analyze twist four longitudinal structure
8: function.
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10: \section{Motivation for Studying Twist Four $F_L$}
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12:
13:
14: The higher twist contributions or power corrections to DIS structure
15: functions play a very important role in the SLAC kinematical range
16: \cite{c5dasu}. The longitudinal structure function $F_L$ involves coefficient functions
17: which are zero at zeroth order and the lowest twist contributions in this
18: case involves calculations to the same order in $\alpha_s$ as the NLO results
19: for $F_2$ \cite{c5amanda}. Thus, twist four contributions to $F_L$ are extremely important.
20: These are the first non-perturbative contributions to $F_L$.
21: The higher
22: twist contributions to the unpolarized structure functions $F_2$ and $F_L$
23: have been analyzed previously in operator product expansion method \cite{c5js}
24: and also
25: in the Feynman diagram approach \cite{c5efp}. Qiu has given an alternate method based
26: on special propagators utilizing some unique features of light-front
27: coordinates \cite{c5qiu}. At twist four level, in the OPE analysis, there appears a
28: proliferation of operators. The operators are not all independent and they
29: are related through the equation of motion and the analysis is highly complex.
30: On the other hand, in the Feynman diagram approach, it has been shown that
31: one can make contact with light-front current algebra analysis, namely, twist
32: four part of $F_L$ can be expressed as the Fourier transform of the hadronic
33: matrix element of the minus component of light-front bilocal current.
34: It is important to go beyond phenomenological parametrizations for a proper
35: understanding of the higher twist effects.
36: However, even after many years of investigations, an intuitive physical
37: picture of the interaction dependence of twist four longitudinal structure
38: function is lacking. In our analysis we get an intuitive picture of $F_L$.
39:
40:
41:
42: Another important problem of current interest is the perturbative aspect of
43: the twist four matrix element. Simple power
44: counting indicates that in the bare theory the
45: twist four matrix element contains quadratic divergences. Understanding the
46: origin and nature of these divergences will be quite helpful in finding
47: procedures to remove them (the process of renormalization).
48:
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50: \section{Plan of This Chapter}
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
52:
53: In this chapter, we show that using light-front Hamiltonian QCD
54: framework, one can resolve outstanding issues associated with the twist four
55: contribution to the longitudinal structure function.
56: Our starting point is the Bjorken-Johnson-Low (BJL)
57: expansion for the forward virtual photon-hadron Compton scattering
58: amplitude. This leads us to the commutator of currents which we present in
59: detail for arbitrary flavors in SU(3). Next we consider the specific case of
60: electromagnetic currents and arrive at expressions for the twist two part of
61: $F_2$ and twist four part of $F_L$ in terms of specific flavor
62: dependent form factors.
63: We identify the integral of ${F_L(x) \over x}$ with
64: the fermionic part of the light-front QCD Hamiltonian density. The
65: consideration of mixing in the flavor singlet channel
66: leads us to the definition of the twist four longitudinal gluon
67: structure function and then we find a sum rule, free from radiative
68: corrections.
69:
70: The sum rule which the physical structure function has to satisfy involves the
71: physical mass of the hadron which is a finite quantity. A theoretical
72: evaluation of the sum rule which starts with the bare theory, on the other
73: hand, will contain various divergences
74: depending on the regulator
75: employed. In order to compare with the physical answer resulting from the
76: measurement, we need to renormalize the result by adding counterterms. For
77: the dressed parton target, for example, these counterterms are dictated
78: by
79: mass counterterms in the light-front Hamiltonian perturbation theory. For a
80: dressed gluon target, calculations show that quadratic
81: divergences are generated and one does not automatically get the result
82: expected for a massless target. The divergence generated is shown to be
83: directly related to the gluon mass shift in old fashioned perturbation
84: theory. To a given order in perturbation theory, counterterms have to be
85: added to the calculated structure function. The precise selection of
86: counterterms is dictated entirely
87: by the regularization and renormalization of the
88: light-front QCD Hamiltonian. The choice of counterterms in the
89: Hamiltonian, in turn, determines the counterterms to be added to the
90: longitudinal structure function which results in a theoretical prediction of
91: the physical longitudinal structure function. We recall that in Hamiltonian
92: perturbation theory we cannot
93: automatically generate a massless gluon
94: by the use of dimensional regularization. The point we emphasize is that the
95: twist four longitudinal structure function is one to one related to the
96: Hamiltonian density and that there is no arbitrary freedom in this
97: relationship.
98:
99:
100: To understand the nature of quadratic divergences, we evaluate
101: the twist four longitudinal structure functions for quark and
102: gluon target each dressed through lowest order in perturbation theory.
103: The sum rule allows us to relate these
104: divergences to quark and gluon mass corrections in QCD in
105: time-ordered light-front perturbation theory. Finally we discuss
106: the relevance of our results for the problem of the partitioning
107: of hadron masses
108: in QCD.
109:
110:
111:
112: The plan of this chapter is as follows. In Sec. 5.3 we derive the expressions for
113: the twist two structure function $F_2$ and the twist four longitudinal
114: structure function
115: $F_L$ using the BJL expansion and equal time ($x^+$) current algebra and
116: also taking into account the flavor structure.
117: The flavor singlet expressions are given in Sec. 5.4. The sum
118: rule for $F_L$ is derived in Sec. 5.5. In Sec. 5.6 we
119: evaluate $F_L$ for a massless quark dressed through lowest order
120: in perturbation theory
121: and explicitly verify the sum rule. Then we evaluate $F_L$ in
122: perturbation theory for dressed quark (massive)
123: and dressed gluon target. In Sec. 5.7 we discuss the
124: issue of the breakup of hadron mass in QCD in the context of our sum rule.
125: Finally, in Sec. 5.8, we discuss the implication of our results. Our
126: notations and conventions have been clarified in Appendix B. We also
127: refer to our original papers, \cite{c5fl1,c5fl2}.
128: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
129: \section{Longitudinal Structure Function: Flavor Structure}
130: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
131: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
132: %\section{Flavor structure}
133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
134: %The electromagnetic current
135: %\begin{equation}
136: %J^{\mu}(x) = J^\mu_3(x) + {1 \over \sqrt{3}} J^\mu_8(x).
137: %\end{equation}
138: In this section we present the expressions for structure functions for
139: arbitrary flavors in SU(3) which follow from the use of the
140: Bjorken-Johnson-Low
141: expansion and light-front current algebra.
142: In terms of the flavor current
143: $J_a^\mu(x) = {\overline \psi}(x) \gamma^\mu {\lambda_a \over 2} \psi(x)$,
144: the hadron tensor relevant for deep inelastic scattering is given by
145: \begin{equation}
146: W^{\mu \nu}_{ab} = {1\over 4\pi} \int d^4 \xi~ e^{iq \cdot \xi}
147: \langle P |[J^\mu_{a}(\xi), J^\nu_{b}(0)]|P \rangle.
148: \label{c5wmn}
149: \end{equation}
150: The forward virtual photon-hadron Compton scattering amplitude is given by
151: \begin{eqnarray}
152: T^{\mu \nu}_{ab} &=& i \int d^4\xi e^{iq\cdot \xi} \langle P |
153: T(J^\mu_{a}(\xi) J^\nu_{b}(0)) |P \rangle.
154: \end{eqnarray}
155: We have
156: \begin{equation}
157: T^{\mu \nu}_{ab} (x,Q^2) = 2 \int_{-\infty}^\infty d{q'}^+
158: {W^{\mu \nu}_{ab} (x',Q^2) \over {q'}^+ - q^+} ~.
159: \label{c5disp}
160: \end{equation}
161:
162: Using the BJL expansion \cite{c5jac}, we have
163: \begin{equation}
164: T^{\mu \nu}_{ab} = - {1\over q^-}
165: \int d\xi^- d^2 \xi_\bot e^{iq\cdot \xi}
166: \langle P | [J^\mu_{a}(\xi), J^\nu_{b}(0)]_{
167: \xi^+=0}| P \rangle \, + ... \label{c5tmn}
168: \end{equation}
169: where $ ... $ represents higher order terms in the expansion which we ignore
170: in the following.
171: In the limit of large $q^-$, from Eq. (\ref{c5wmn}), we have
172: \begin{eqnarray}
173: W^{+-}_{ab} = {1 \over 2 } F_{L(ab)} + (P^\perp)^2 { F_{2(ab)} \over \nu}+ {P^\perp.
174: q^\perp \over x \nu} F_{2 (ab)}, \label{c5lqwmn}
175: \end{eqnarray}
176: with $ x = { -q^2 \over 2 \nu}$ and $ \nu =P.q$.
177: On the other hand, from Eq. (\ref{c5tmn}),
178: \begin{eqnarray}
179: Limit_{q^- \rightarrow \infty} ~~ T^{+-}_{ab} = - {1\over q^-}
180: \int d\xi^- d^2 \xi_\bot e^{iq\cdot \xi}
181: \langle P | [J^+_{a}(\xi), J^-_{b}(0)]_{
182: \xi^+=0}| P \rangle \, . \label{c5tpm}
183: \end{eqnarray}
184:
185: The components of the
186: flavor current $J_a^\mu(x)$
187: obey the equal- $x^+$ canonical commutation relation (to be specific, we
188: consider SU(3) of flavors)
189: \begin{eqnarray}
190: \left [ J_a^+(x), J_b^-(y) \right ]_{x^+=y^+} ~=~
191: 2 i f_{abc} ~{\overline \psi}(x)~ \gamma^-{ \lambda_c \over 2} \psi(x)~
192: \delta^2(x^\perp - y^\perp) ~ \delta(x^- - y^-) \nonumber \\
193: ~~~~~- ~{ 1 \over 2} ~\partial^+_x ~\Bigg [ \epsilon(x^- - y^-)~
194: \Big [i f_{abc} ~
195: {\cal V}_c^-(x \mid y)~ +~ i d_{abc}~ {\overline {\cal V}}_c^- (x \mid y) \Big ]
196: \delta^2 (x^\perp - y^\perp) \Bigg ] \nonumber \\
197: ~ ~~~~+~ { 1 \over 2}~ i f_{abc} ~\epsilon(x^- - y^-)~ \partial^i_x~ \Bigg [
198: \delta^2(x^\perp - y^\perp)~ \Big [ {\cal V}^i_c(x \mid y)~ - ~\epsilon^{ij}
199: ~{\overline {\cal A}}^j_c (x \mid y) \Big ] \Bigg ] \nonumber \\
200: ~ ~~~~~+~ { 1 \over 2}~ i d_{abc}~ \epsilon(x^- - y^-) ~\partial^i_x~ \Bigg [
201: ~\delta^2(x^\perp - y^\perp) ~ \Big [ {\overline {\cal V}}^i_c(x \mid y)
202: ~ +~ \epsilon^{ij}~{\cal A}^j_c (x \mid y) \Big ] \Bigg ]. \label{c5cuco}
203: \end{eqnarray}
204: In deriving the above relations, use has been made of the relation
205: \begin{eqnarray}
206: \lambda_a \lambda_b = i f_{abc} \lambda_c + d_{abc} \lambda_c.
207: \end{eqnarray}
208: Here $a$, $b$, $c$ run from $0$ to $8$.
209: We have defined the bilocal currents as follows.
210: \begin{eqnarray}
211: {\cal V}^\mu_c(x \mid y) &=& { 1 \over 2} \Big [
212: {\overline \psi}(x) { \lambda_c \over 2} \gamma^\mu
213: \psi(y) + {\overline \psi}(y) { \lambda_c \over 2} \gamma^\mu \psi(x)
214: \Big ], \nonumber \\
215: {\overline {\cal V}}^\mu_c(x \mid y ) &=& { 1 \over 2 i} \Big [
216: {\overline \psi}(x) { \lambda_c \over 2} \gamma^\mu
217: \psi(y) - {\overline \psi}(y) { \lambda_c \over 2} \gamma^\mu \psi(x)
218: \Big ], \nonumber \\
219: {\cal A}^\mu_c(x \mid y) & =& { 1 \over 2 } \Big [
220: {\overline \psi}(x) { \lambda_c \over 2} \gamma^\mu \gamma^5
221: \psi(y) + {\overline \psi}(y) { \lambda_c \over 2} \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 \psi(x)
222: \Big ], \nonumber \\
223: {\overline {\cal A}}^\mu_c(x \mid y) &=& { 1 \over 2 i} \Big [
224: {\overline \psi}(x) { \lambda_c \over 2} \gamma^\mu \gamma^5
225: \psi(y) - {\overline \psi}(y) { \lambda_c \over 2} \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 \psi(x)
226: \Big ]. \label{c5bi}
227: \end{eqnarray}
228: Further, we introduce the bilocal form factors
229: \begin{eqnarray}
230: \langle P \mid {\cal V}^\mu_c(\xi \mid 0) \mid P \rangle &=& P^\mu
231: V^1_c(\xi^2,
232: P.\xi) + \xi^\mu V^2_c(\xi^2, P.\xi), \\
233: \langle P \mid {\overline {\cal V}}^\mu_c(\xi \mid 0) \mid P \rangle &
234: =& P^\mu {\overline V}^1_c(\xi^2,
235: P.\xi) + \xi^\mu {\overline V}^2_c(\xi^2, P.\xi). \label{c5bff}
236: \end{eqnarray}
237: From Eqs (\ref{c5tpm}) and (\ref{c5cuco}), we get
238: \begin{eqnarray}
239: Limit_{q^- \rightarrow \infty} ~~ q^- ~ T^{+-}_{ab} =
240: -2 i f_{abc} P^- \Gamma_c ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\nonumber \\
241: + {q^+ \over 2} \int d\xi^- e^{{i \over 2} q^+ \xi^-} \epsilon(\xi^-)
242: \Big [ f_{abc} ~
243: \langle P \mid {\cal V}_c^-(\xi \mid 0)~ \mid P \rangle +~ d_{abc}~
244: \langle P \mid {\overline {\cal V}}_c^- (\xi \mid 0) \mid P \rangle \Big ]
245: \nonumber \\
246: - {q^i \over 2} \int d\xi^- e^{{i \over 2} q^+ \xi^-} \epsilon(\xi^-)
247: \Big [ f_{abc} ~
248: \langle P \mid {\cal V}_c^i(\xi \mid 0)~ \mid P \rangle +~ d_{abc}~
249: \langle P \mid {\overline {\cal V}}_c^i (\xi \mid 0) \mid P \rangle \Big ].
250: \label{c5lqtmn}
251: \end{eqnarray}
252: It is to be noted that matrix elements of ${\cal A}^\mu_c(x \mid y)$ do not contribute to
253: unpolarized scattering.
254: Using the dispersion relation given in Eq. (\ref{c5disp}), together with Eqs.
255: (\ref{c5lqwmn}) and (\ref{c5lqtmn}) and comparing the coefficient of $q^i$ on
256: both sides, we get
257: \begin{eqnarray}
258: {F_{2(ab)}(x) \over x} = { i \over 4 \pi} \int d \eta e^{-i \eta x} \Big [
259: f_{abc} V_c^1(\eta) + d_{abc} {\overline V}_c^1(\eta) \Big ].
260: \end{eqnarray}
261: Comparing the coefficients of $q^+$ on both sides, we get
262: \begin{eqnarray}
263: F_{L(ab)}(x) &=& { 1 \over Q^2} { i \over \pi}
264: { (q^+)^2 \over P^+} \int d \eta e^{ -
265: i \eta x} \Big [ f_{abc} \langle P \mid
266: {\cal V}_c^-(\xi \mid 0)\mid P \rangle +
267: d_{abc} \langle P \mid {\overline {\cal V}}_c^-
268: (\xi \mid 0) \mid P \rangle \Big ] \nonumber \\
269: & & - {(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} { i \over \pi P^+} x^2
270: \int d\eta e^{-i \eta x} \Big [ f_{abc} \langle P \mid {\cal V}_c^+(\xi
271: \mid 0) \mid P \rangle \nonumber\\&&~~~~+ d_{abc} \langle P \mid {\overline
272: {\cal V}}_c^+(\xi \mid 0) \mid P \rangle\Big ].
273: \end{eqnarray}
274: We have introduced $ \eta = { 1 \over 2} P^+ \xi^-$.
275:
276: Note that our result for $F_L$ differs from the one given in the literature
277: \cite{c5cjt}. The difference can be traced to the expression for $F_L$ that
278: one employs. It is customary \cite{c5cjt,c5efp} to ignore target mass $M^2$ in
279: the expression for $F_L$ (see Appendix B). This leads to an incorrect
280: expression for $F_L$ which in turn will lead to an incorrect sum rule (see
281: section 5.5).
282:
283:
284: The electromagnetic current
285: \begin{equation}
286: J^{\mu}(x) = J^\mu_3(x) + {1 \over \sqrt{3}} J^\mu_8(x).
287: \end{equation}
288: From the flavor structure of electromagnetic current, we observe that, only
289: $d_{abc}$ contributes to the structure functions in deep-inelastic
290: electron-hadron scattering. Explicitly, we have,
291: \begin{eqnarray}
292: {F_2(x) \over x} = { i \over 2 \pi P^+} \int d \eta e^{ - i \eta x}
293: \langle P \mid {\overline {\cal V}}^+( \xi \mid 0) \mid P \rangle.
294: \end{eqnarray}
295:
296: The longitudinal structure function is given by
297: \begin{eqnarray}
298: F_{L}(x) &=& { 2 \over Q^2} { i \over \pi}
299: { (q^+)^2 \over P^+} \int d \eta e^{ -
300: i \eta x} \langle P \mid {\overline {\cal V}}^-(\xi \mid 0) \mid P \rangle
301: \nonumber \\
302: %\nonumber \\ && \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad
303: %+ y^- {\overline V}^2 (\eta) \Bigg ] \nonumber \\
304: && \qquad \qquad \qquad - 2 {(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} { i \over \pi P^+} x^2
305: \int d\eta e^{-i \eta x} \langle P \mid {\overline {\cal V}}^+ (\xi \mid 0)
306: \mid P \rangle .
307: \end{eqnarray}
308:
309: We have defined the functions
310:
311: \begin{eqnarray}
312: {\overline {\cal V}}^\pm (\xi \mid 0)=
313: \left({2 \over 3}\right)^{3 \over 2}{\overline {\cal V}}^\pm_0(\xi \mid 0) +
314: { 1 \over 3}
315: {\overline {\cal V}}^\pm_3(\xi \mid 0) +
316: { 1 \over 3 \sqrt{3}}
317: {\overline {\cal V}}^\pm_8 (\xi \mid 0).
318: \end{eqnarray}
319:
320: In arriving at our final results
321: we have used explicit values of the structure constants
322: of $SU(3)$,
323: \begin{eqnarray}
324: d_{338} = { 1 \over \sqrt{3}}, ~~ d_{888} = - { 1 \over \sqrt{3}}, ~~
325: d_{330} = d_{880} = \sqrt{2 \over 3}.
326: \end{eqnarray}
327: ${\overline {\cal V}}^\mu_0$ is the flavor singlet component of the fermion
328: bilocal vector current.
329: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
330: \section{Flavor Singlet Case}
331: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
332: In the flavor singlet channel, for simplicity, we do not explicitly write
333: the flavor charge dependence.
334: The BJL limit, together with light-front current
335: algebra \cite{c5jac} in $A^+=0$ gauge, the tools used in the pre-QCD era, lead
336: to the
337: twist four part of the fermionic contribution to the longitudinal
338: structure function
339: \begin{eqnarray}
340: F^{\tau=4}_{L(f)}(x) = i { 1 \over Q^2} {(xP^+)^2 \over \pi} \int dy^- e^{- {i \over 2}P^+
341: y^- x} \langle P \mid \overline{\cal J}^- (y \mid 0) \mid P \rangle -
342: 4 {(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} x F_{2(f)}(x) \label{c5flBJL1}
343: \end{eqnarray}
344: where $f$ represents a quark ($q$) or anti-quark (${\bar q}$) or both
345: depending on the target $ \mid P \rangle$, and
346: where the twist two contribution to the $F_{2(f)}$ structure function
347: \begin{eqnarray}
348: {F_{2(f)} (x) \over x} = i { 1 \over 4 \pi } \int dy^- e^{- {i \over 2}P^+
349: y^- x} \langle P \mid \overline{\cal J}^+(y \mid 0) \mid P \rangle .
350: \label{c5f21}
351: \end{eqnarray}
352: %Here $P^- = {(P^\perp)^2 + M^2 \over P^+}$.
353: The bilocal current operator
354: \begin{eqnarray}
355: \overline{\cal J}^\mu(y \mid 0) = { 1 \over 2 i} \left [ \overline{\psi} (y)
356: \gamma^\mu \psi(0) - \overline{\psi}(0) \gamma^\mu \psi(y) \right ].
357: \label{c5bcodef}
358: \end{eqnarray}
359: Note that in the case of quark (anti-quark)
360: contributions, the second (first) term
361: in the expression for the bilocal current in Eq. (\ref{c5bcodef}) vanishes,
362: because of a momentum non-conserving delta function.
363: We have
364: \begin{eqnarray}
365: F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}(x) = {\cal M}_1 +
366: {\cal M}_2, \label{c5fld}
367: \end{eqnarray}
368: with
369: \begin{eqnarray}
370: {\cal M}_1~=~{ 1 \over Q^2}~ {x^2 (P^+)^2 \over 2 \pi}~ \int dy^- ~
371: e^{-{ i \over
372: 2}P^+y^-x}~\langle P \mid \overline{\psi}(y^-) \gamma^- \psi(0) \mid P \rangle,
373: \label{c5flf1}
374: \end{eqnarray}
375: and
376: \begin{eqnarray}
377: {\cal M}_2=-{(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
378: { 1 \over Q^2} {x^2 (P^+)^2 \over 2 \pi}~
379: \int dy^- ~e^{-{ i \over
380: 2}P^+y^-x}~\langle P \mid \overline{\psi}(y^-) \gamma^+ \psi(0) \mid P \rangle.
381: \label{c5flf2}
382: \end{eqnarray}
383: ${\cal M}_1$ contains the `bad' (minus) component of bilocal current
384: operator. This involves the constrained field ${\psi^-}$ and one has to use
385: the equation of constraint to eliminate it.
386:
387: Using
388: $\overline{\psi}(y^-) \gamma^- \psi(0) = 2 {\psi^{-}}^\dagger(y^-)
389: \psi^-(0)$, where
390: \begin{eqnarray}
391: \psi^-(z) = { 1 \over 4 i} \int dy^- \epsilon(z^- - y^-) \Big
392: [ \alpha^\perp . (i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp)+
393: \gamma^0 m \Big ] \psi^+(y^-),
394: \end{eqnarray}
395: and
396: $\epsilon(x^-) = - { i \over \pi} P \int {d \omega \over \omega} e^{{i \over
397: 2 } \omega x^-}$,
398: we arrive at
399: \begin{eqnarray}
400: {\cal M}_1 &=& { 1 \over \pi Q^2 } \int dy^- e^{-{ i \over 2}P^+ y^-x} \langle P
401: \mid {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) \nonumber \\
402: &&\Big [ \alpha^\perp. \big [ i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp(y)
403: \big ] + \gamma^0 m \Big ] \Big [
404: \alpha^\perp . \big [ i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp(0) \big ] +
405: \gamma^0 m \Big ] \psi^+(0)
406: \mid P \rangle, \label{c5fl1}
407: \end{eqnarray}
408: and
409: \begin{eqnarray}
410: {\cal M}_2 &=& - 2 {(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} { 1 \over 2 \pi} x^2
411: \int dy^- e^{-
412: { i \over 2} P^+y^-x} \langle P \mid {\psi^{+}}^{\dagger}(y^-) \psi^+(0) \mid P
413: \rangle .
414: %& =& - { 4 \over Q^2} (P^\perp)^2 x F_{2(q)}(x).
415: \label{c5fl2}
416: \end{eqnarray}
417:
418: We see that the elimination of the constrained field ${\psi^-}$ brings in
419: interaction ($g$) dependent terms in the operator in ${\cal M}_1$. In fact,
420: this feature distinguishes higher twist contributions from the leading
421: twist, since it directly involves quark-gluon interactions.
422: Thus we have obtained an expression for the twist four part of the fermionic
423: component of the longitudinal structure function.
424:
425: After the establishment of QCD as the underlying theory of strong
426: interactions,
427: the twist four part of the quark contributions to
428: the longitudinal structure function has been given in the
429: limits of vanishing target transverse momentum and
430: massless quark and in the $A^+=0$ gauge using the QCD
431: factorization method \cite{c5efp,c5qiu}
432: \begin{eqnarray}
433: F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)} (x)&=& { 1 \over \pi Q^2 } \int dy^- e^{-{ i \over 2}P^+ y^-x} \langle P
434: \mid {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) \nonumber \\
435: &&~~~~~~~ \big [ i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp(y) \big ].\alpha^\perp
436: \alpha^\perp . \big [ i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp(0) \big ] \psi^+(0)
437: \mid P \rangle . \label{c5fact}
438: \end{eqnarray}
439:
440: Using Eqs. (\ref{c5fld}), (\ref{c5fl1}), and (\ref{c5fl2}), and taking
441: the limit of vanishing target transverse momentum and massless quark,
442: our result given in Eq. (\ref{c5flBJL1}) reduces to that obtained via the QCD
443: factorization method.
444:
445: Note that the expression for $ F_{L(q)}^{\tau=4}$ given in Eq.
446: (\ref{c5flBJL1})
447: appears to violate transverse boost invariance since it involves $P^\perp$. But, we exhibit below
448: with explicit
449: calculations in Sec. 5.6 that the $P^\perp$ dependence cancels between Eqs.
450: (\ref{c5fl1}) and (\ref{c5fl2}) so that the full $F_{L(q)}^{\tau=4}$
451: is indeed boost invariant.
452:
453:
454: \vskip .2in
455: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
456: \section{Sum Rule for the Twist Four Longitudinal
457: Structure Function}
458: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
459: \vskip .2in
460:
461: From Eq. (\ref{c5f21}) it follows that $ F_{2(f)}(-x) = F_{2(f)}(x)$ and
462: from Eq. (\ref{c5flBJL1}) we explicitly find that $
463: F_{L(f)}^{\tau=4}(-x) = -F^{\tau=4}_{L(f)}(x) $.
464: Consider the integral
465: \begin{eqnarray}
466: \int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}dx {F^{\tau=4}_{L(f)}(x) \over x}&=&
467: 2 \int_{0}^{ \infty}dx
468: {F^{\tau=4}_{L(f)}(x)
469: \over x} \nonumber \\
470: &=& \int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty} {dx \over x} \Bigg [
471: i { 1 \over Q^2} {(xP^+)^2 \over \pi} \int dy^- e^{- {i \over 2}P^+
472: y^- x} \nonumber \\
473: && \times \Big [ \langle P \mid \overline{\cal J}^- (y \mid 0) \mid P \rangle -
474: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2} \langle P \mid \overline{\cal J}^+(y \mid 0)
475: \mid P \rangle \Big ] \Bigg ].
476: \end{eqnarray}
477: The part containing $\overline{\cal J}^-$ can be written as
478: \be
479: {(P^+)^2\over {2 \pi Q^2}}\int dx \Big [ \int dy^-{\pp\over {\pp
480: y^-}}(e^{{i\over 2}P^+y^-})({2\over {iP^+}})\langle P \mid
481: \overline\psi(0)\gamma^-\psi(y^-)\mid P\rangle
482: \nonumber\\~~~~~\int dy^-{\pp \over {\pp y^-}} (e^{-{i\over
483: 2}P^+y^-})({-2\over {iP^+}}) \langle P \mid
484: \overline\psi(0)\gamma^-\psi(y^-)\mid P\rangle,
485: \e
486: where in the first term, we have changed $y^-$ to $-y^-$ and used
487: translational invariance of the matrix element. Interchanging the orders of
488: $x$ and $y^-$ integrations and carrying out the $x$ integration, we get,
489: from the above expression,
490: \be
491: {2iP^+\over Q^2}\int dy^- \langle P \mid
492: \overline\psi(0)\gamma^-\pp^+\psi(0)\mid P\rangle \delta({1\over 2}P^+y^-)
493: \nonumber\\={4i\over Q^2}\langle P \mid
494: \overline\psi(0)\gamma^-\pp^+\psi(0)\mid P\rangle.
495: \e
496: Similar manipulations can be done for the part containing $\overline{\cal J}^+$
497: and we arrive at \cite{c5bgj},
498:
499: \begin{eqnarray}
500: \int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty} dx {F_{L(f)}^{\tau=4}(x,Q^2) \over x} &=&
501: { 4 \over Q^2} \Big [
502: \langle P \mid i \overline{\psi} \gamma^- \partial^+ \psi|_{(0)}
503: \mid P \rangle \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~- {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
504: \langle P \mid i \overline{\psi} \gamma^+ \partial^+ \psi |_{(0)} \mid P
505: \rangle \Big ].
506: \end{eqnarray}
507: Identifying $ i \overline{\psi} \gamma^- \partial^+ \psi = \theta^{+-}_q$, the
508: fermionic part of the light-front QCD Hamiltonian density and
509: $i \overline{\psi} \gamma^+ \partial^+ \psi = \theta^{++}_q$, the fermionic
510: part of the light-front QCD longitudinal momentum density,
511: (see Eqs. (\ref{c5denp}) and
512: (\ref{c5denh}) below),
513: we have:
514:
515: \begin{eqnarray}
516: \int_{0}^{1} dx {F_{L(f)}^{\tau=4}(x,Q^2) \over x} = { 2 \over Q^2} \Big [
517: \langle P \mid \theta_q^{+-}(0) \mid P \rangle - {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
518: \langle P \mid \theta^{++}_q(0) \mid P \rangle \Big ], \label{c5flsr1}
519: \end{eqnarray}
520: where we have used the fact that the physical structure function
521: vanishes for $x >1$.
522:
523:
524: The integral of ${F^{\tau=4}_{L(f)} \over x}$ is therefore
525: related to the hadron matrix
526: element of the (gauge invariant) fermionic part of the light-front
527: {\it Hamiltonian density}.
528: This result
529: manifests the physical content and the non-perturbative nature of the
530: twist-four part of the
531: longitudinal structure function.
532:
533: The fermionic operator matrix elements appearing in Eq. (\ref{c5flsr1})
534: change with $Q^2$ as a result of the mixing of quark and gluon operators in
535: QCD under renormalization.
536: Next we analyze the operator mixing and derive a new
537: sum rule at the twist four level.
538:
539: The symmetric, gauge-invariant energy-momentum tensor in QCD is
540: given by
541: \begin{eqnarray}
542: \theta^{\mu \nu} &=& { 1\over 2} \overline{\psi} i \big [ \gamma^\mu D^\nu +
543: \gamma^\nu D^\mu \big ] \psi
544: -F^{\mu \lambda a} F^{\nu}_{~ \lambda a} + {1 \over 4} g^{\mu \nu}
545: (F_{\lambda \sigma a } )^2 \nonumber \\
546: && -g^{\mu \nu} \overline{\psi} \left ( i \gamma^\lambda D_\lambda -
547: m \right ) \psi.
548: \label{c5emt}
549: \end{eqnarray}
550: The last term vanishes using the equation of motion.
551: Here $F^{\mu \nu a}=\pp^\mu A^{\nu a}-\pp^\nu A^{\mu a}+ gf_{abc}
552: A^\mu_bA^\nu_c.$
553: {\it Formally,} we split the energy momentum tensor into a
554: $``$fermionic" part $\theta^{\mu \nu}_{q}$ representing the first term in
555: Eq. (\ref{c5emt}) and a $``$gauge bosonic"
556: part $ \theta^{\mu \nu}_g$ representing the second and third terms in Eq.
557: (\ref{c5emt}).
558: %\begin{eqnarray}
559: %\theta^{\mu \nu}_q = { 1 \over 2} \overline{\psi} i \Big [ \gamma^\mu D^\nu +
560: %\gamma^\nu D^\mu \Big ] \psi,
561: %\end{eqnarray}
562: %and
563: %\begin{eqnarray}
564: %\theta^{\mu \nu}_g = -F^{\mu \lambda a} F^{\nu}_{ \lambda a } +
565: %{1 \over 4} g^{\mu \nu}
566: %(F_{\lambda \sigma a })^2 .
567: %\end{eqnarray}
568: To be consistent with the study of
569: deep inelastic structure function formulated in the $A^+=0$ gauge,
570: we shall work in the same gauge.
571: We have, for the fermionic part of the longitudinal momentum density,
572: \begin{eqnarray}
573: \theta^{++}_{q} = i \overline{\psi} \gamma^+ \partial^+ \psi. \label{c5denp}
574: \end{eqnarray}
575: For the fermionic part of
576: the Hamiltonian density, we have
577: \begin{eqnarray}
578: \theta^{+-}_q = i {\psi^{+}}^\dagger \partial^- \psi^+ + g {\psi^{+}}^\dagger
579: A^- \psi^+ + i {\psi^{-}}^\dagger \partial^+ \psi^-.
580: \end{eqnarray}
581: %with
582: %\begin{eqnarray}
583: %\theta^{+-(1)}_q = i {\psi^{+}}^\dagger \partial^- \psi^+ +
584: %g {\psi^{+}}^\dagger
585: %A^- \psi^+,
586: %\end{eqnarray}
587: %and
588: %\begin{eqnarray}
589: %\theta^{+-(2)}_q = i {\psi^{-}}^\dagger \partial^+ \psi^-.
590: %\end{eqnarray}
591: Using the Dirac equation for the fermion, we find that the sum of the
592: first two terms equals the third term in the above equation. Therefore,
593: \begin{eqnarray}
594: \theta^{+-}_q &=& i \overline{\psi} \gamma^- \partial^+ \psi =
595: 2 i {\psi^{-}}^\dagger \partial^+ \psi^- \label{c5denh} \\
596: &=& 2 {\psi^{+}}^\dagger \Big [ \alpha^\perp.(i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp)
597: + \gamma^0 m \Big ]
598: { 1 \over i \partial^+} \Big [ \alpha^\perp . (i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp)
599: + \gamma^0 m \Big ] \psi^{+} \label{c5thetaqf}.
600: \end{eqnarray}
601:
602: The gauge boson part of the Hamiltonian density is given by
603: \newpage
604: \begin{eqnarray}
605: \theta^{+-}_g &=& - F^{+ \lambda a} F^{-}_{\lambda a}+ { 1 \over 4}
606: g^{+-} (F_{\lambda \sigma a})^2 =
607: { 1 \over 4} \Big (\partial^+ A^{- a}\Big )^2 +
608: { 1 \over 2} F^{ij a } F^{a}_{ij}
609: \nonumber \\
610: &=& (\partial^i A_a^j)^2 + 2gf^{abc}A_a^i A_b^j \partial^i A_c^j
611: + \frac{g^2}{2}
612: f^{abc} f^{ade} A_b^i A_c^j A_d^i A_e^j \nonumber \\
613: && ~~~~~~~~~~ + 2g \partial^i A_a^i \left( \frac{1}{\partial^+}
614: \right) (f^{abc} A_b^j \partial^+ A_c^j + 2 (\psi^+)^{\dagger}
615: T^a \psi^+ ) \nonumber \\
616: && ~~~~~~~~~~ + g^2 \left( \frac{1}{\partial^+}
617: \right) (f^{abc} A_b^i \partial^+ A_c^i + 2 (\psi^+)^{\dagger}
618: T^a \psi^+ )
619: \left( \frac{1}{\partial^+}\right)
620: (f^{ade} A_d^j \partial^+ A_e^j \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~
621: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + 2 (\psi^+)^{\dagger} T^a
622: \psi^+ ) \nonumber \\
623: \label{c5thetagf}
624: %&=& \left(\partial^i A^i \right)^2 + { 1\over 2} F^{ij}F_{ij} -
625: %4 g { 1\over \partial^+}
626: %\left ( \partial^i A^i \right ) (\psi^+)^\dagger \psi^+ + 4 g^2 \Big ({ 1
627: %\over \partial^+} (\psi^+)^\dagger \psi^+ \Big )^2
628: \end{eqnarray}
629: where we have used the equation of constraint for the gauge field.
630:
631: We define the twist four longitudinal gluon structure function
632: \begin{eqnarray}
633: F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(x) &=& { 1 \over Q^2} {x P^+ \over 2 \pi} \int dy^- ~
634: e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \nonumber \\
635: && ~~~~~\Big [ \langle P \mid (-) F^{+ \lambda a}(y^-) F^-_{\lambda a}(0) +
636: { 1 \over 4} g^{+-} F^{\lambda \sigma a} (y^-) F_{\lambda \sigma a}(0)+(y^-
637: \leftrightarrow 0) \mid
638: P \rangle \nonumber \\
639: && ~~~~~~~ - {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2} \langle P \mid F^{+ \lambda a}(y^-)
640: F^+_{\lambda a}(0) +(y^- \leftrightarrow 0)\mid P \rangle \Big ].
641: \end{eqnarray}
642: Then we have
643: \begin{eqnarray}
644: \int_0^1 { dx \over x} \Big [ F_{L(q)}^{\tau=4} + F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4} \Big ] =
645: \int_0^1 { dx \over x} F_{L}^{\tau=4} &=& { 2 \over Q^2}
646: \Big [ \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}(0) \mid P \rangle -
647: \nonumber\\&&~{(P^\perp)^2 \over
648: (P^+)^2} \langle P \mid \theta^{++}(0) \mid P \rangle \Big ].
649: \label{c5flsr2}
650: \end{eqnarray}
651: Neglect of $M^2$ in the expression of $F_L$ (see Appendix B) will lead to
652: $(P^\perp)^2+M^2$ instead of $(P^\perp)^2$ in the right hand side of the
653: above equation and this would spoil the correct sum rule.
654:
655: We have
656: \begin{eqnarray}
657: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}(0) \mid P \rangle = 2 P^+ P^- = 2 (M^2 +
658: (P^\perp)^2)~~ {\rm and} ~~ \langle P \mid \theta^{++}(0) \mid P \rangle = 2
659: (P^+)^2,
660: \end{eqnarray}
661: where $M$ is the invariant mass of the hadron.
662: Thus we arrive at the new sum rule for the twist four part of the
663: longitudinal structure function
664: \begin{eqnarray}
665: \int_0^1 { dx \over x} F_L^{\tau=4} = 4 {M^2 \over Q^2}. \label{c5flsr}
666: \end{eqnarray}
667: To our knowledge, this is the first sum rule at the twist four level of deep
668: inelastic scattering or for QCD in general.
669: \vskip .2in
670: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
671: \section{Dressed Parton Calculations}
672: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
673: \subsection{Dressed Quark with Zero Mass}
674: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
675:
676: Next, we investigate the implications of Eq. (\ref{c5flsr1})
677: for quadratic divergences in $F_{L(q)}^{\tau=4}$.
678: For simplicity, we select a dressed quark target
679: and evaluate the structure functions
680: to order $g^2$. That is, we take the state
681: $ \mid P \rangle$ to be a dressed quark
682: consisting of bare states of a quark and a quark plus
683: a gluon:
684: \begin{eqnarray}
685: \mid P, \sigma \rangle &=& \phi_1 b^\dagger(P,\sigma) \mid 0 \rangle
686: \nonumber \\
687: && + \sum_{\sigma_1,\lambda_2} \int
688: {dk_1^+ d^2k_1^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_1^+}}
689: \int
690: {dk_2^+ d^2k_2^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_2^+}}
691: \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 P^+} \delta^3(P-k_1-k_2) \nonumber \\
692: && ~~~~~\phi_2(P,\sigma \mid k_1, \sigma_1; k_2 , \lambda_2) b^\dagger(k_1,
693: \sigma_1) a^\dagger(k_2, \lambda_2) \mid 0 \rangle.
694: \end{eqnarray}
695:
696: Here we have truncated the expansion at the quark-gluon level.
697: We introduce the Jacobi momenta, $(x_i,\kappa_i^\perp)$, where,
698: \be
699: k_i^+=x_iP^+, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~k_i^\perp=\kappa_i^\perp+x_iP^\perp
700: \e
701: so that
702: \be
703: \sum x_i=1, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\sum \kappa^\perp_i=0.
704: \label{c5reljac}
705: \e
706: The amplitudes $\phi_1, \phi_2$ are related to the corresponding boost
707: invariant amplitudes as
708: \be
709: \phi_1=\psi_1, ~~~~~~\sqrt {P^+}\phi_2(k_i^+,k_i^\perp)=
710: \psi_2(x_i,\kappa_i^\perp).
711: \e
712: Using the notation, $x=x_1, \kappa^\perp_1=\kappa^\perp$ and Eq.
713: (\ref{c5reljac}) we have
714: \be
715: \lefteqn{\psi_2^{s,\lambda}(x,\kappa^\perp)={1\over
716: {[M^2-{{m^2+(\kappa^\perp)^2}\over x}- {(\kappa^\perp)^2\over {1-x}}]}}}
717: \nonumber\\& &{g\over {\sqrt {2(2\pi)^3}}}T^a {1\over {\sqrt {1-x}}}
718: [ -2 {\kappa^\perp\over {1-x}}-{{\sigma^\perp \cdot \kappa^\perp-im}\over x}
719: \sigma^\perp-im \sigma^\perp]\epsilon^{\perp*}_\lambda.\label{c5psi2}
720: \e
721: Here $M$ and $m$ are the masses of the dressed and bare quarks respectively.
722: The state is
723: normalized to one, and from the normalization condition, we obtain
724: \be
725: {\mid \psi_1 \mid}^2=1-{\alpha_s\over {2 \pi}} C_f
726: \int_\epsilon^{1-\epsilon} dx {{1+x^2}\over {1-x}}{\rm ln}
727: {Q^2\over \mu^2}
728: \label{c5nq}
729: \e
730: within order $\alpha_s$. Here $\epsilon$ is a small cutoff on $x$.
731:
732: First we work in the massless limits for the
733: dressed and bare quarks.
734: \begin{eqnarray}
735: {\cal M}_1 &=& { 1 \over \pi Q^2 } \int dy^- e^{-{ i \over 2}P^+ y^-x} \langle P
736: \mid {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) \nonumber \\
737: &&~~~~~~~ \big [ i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp(y) \big ].\alpha^\perp
738: \alpha^\perp . \big [ i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp(0) \big ] \psi^+(0)
739: \mid P \rangle, \label{c5fls1}
740: \end{eqnarray}
741: and
742: \begin{eqnarray}
743: {\cal M}_2 = - 4{ (P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} x F_{2(q)}(x).
744: \label{c5fls2}
745: \end{eqnarray}
746: As mentioned before, in this case, it is sufficient to keep only the first
747: term of the bilocal operator.
748: Note that the matrix elements appearing in Eqs. (\ref{c5fl1}), (\ref{c5fl2}),
749: (\ref{c5thetaqf}), and (\ref{c5thetagf})
750: involve products of operators. We treat them as normal ordered which is sufficient for our
751: purposes here.
752: However, in doing so, the terms we drop are quadratically divergent and they will affect
753: only the counterterm structure.
754:
755:
756: %We treat the bilocal operators appearing in Eqs. (\ref{c5fl1}) and (\ref{c5fl2})
757: %with the normal-ordered prescription.
758: We express the operators in terms of two component fermion field, $\xi$, and
759: use the Fock space expansion of the fields $\xi$ and $A^i$.
760: First we evaluate the contribution ${\cal M}_2$ given in
761: Eq. (\ref{c5fls2}). The operator in this case involves the `good' (plus)
762: component of the bilocal current which is independent of interaction
763: and the matrix element receives only diagonal contribution from the single
764: particle and two particle Fock space sectors. ${\cal M}_2$ is proportional to
765: $F_2$. A detailed derivation of the
766: structure function $F_2$ for a dressed quark state is given in \cite{c5rajen}.
767: We obtain
768: \begin{eqnarray}
769: {\cal M}_2= -4 C_f{(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} x^2 \Big [ \delta(1-x) + {\alpha_s \over 2
770: \pi} {\rm ln} \Lambda^2 \big [ { 1+x^2 \over 1-x} - \delta(1-x) \int dy {1+y^2 \over 1-y}
771: \big ] \Big ]\label{c5fl2f}
772: \end{eqnarray}
773: where we have cutoff the transverse momentum integral at $\Lambda$.
774: Note that the result in Eq. (\ref{c5fl2f}) violates transverse boost invariance.
775: In the above expression, we have used Eqs. (\ref{c5nq}) and (\ref{c5psi2}). Here,
776: $C_f={{N^2-1}\over {2N}}$ for SU(N).
777:
778: ${\cal M}_1$ involves the `bad' (minus) component of bilocal current and the
779: operator depends upon interaction.
780: We have, from Eq. ({\ref{c5fls1}),
781: \begin{eqnarray}
782: {\cal M}_1
783: &=& -{ 1 \over \pi Q^2} \int dy^- e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \langle P \mid
784: {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) (\partial^\perp)^2 \psi^+(0) \mid P \rangle
785: \nonumber \\
786: && ~~~+ g{ 1 \over \pi Q^2} \int dy^- e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \langle P \mid
787: {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) i \partial^\perp . \alpha^\perp \alpha^\perp.
788: A^\perp(0) \psi^+(0) \mid P \rangle \nonumber \\
789: && ~~~+ g{ 1 \over \pi Q^2} \int dy^- e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \langle P \mid
790: {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) \alpha^\perp.A^\perp(y) i \partial^\perp .\alpha^\perp
791: \psi^+(0) \mid P \rangle \nonumber \\
792: && ~~~+ g^2{ 1 \over \pi Q^2} \int dy^- e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \langle P \mid
793: {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) A^\perp(y).A^\perp(0) \mid P \rangle \\
794: &&\equiv {\cal M}_1^{a}+{\cal M}_1^{b}+{\cal M}_1^{c}+{\cal M}_1^{d}.
795: \end{eqnarray}
796: Here, the operator in ${\cal M}_1^a$ only does not depend explicitly upon
797: interaction and will have diagonal contributions. ${\cal M}_1^b$ and ${\cal
798: M}_1^c$ explicitly depend upon $g$ and the contributions will come due to
799: the interference between the one particle and two particle sectors. This
800: type of off-diagonal contributions are absent in the structure function
801: $F_2$ and they involve quark-gluon dynamics.
802: Since the operators in Eq. (\ref{c5fls1}) are taken to be normal ordered,
803: the
804: contribution of ${\cal M}_1^{d}$ vanishes to order $g^2$.
805:
806: Explicit calculation leads to the diagonal Fock basis contributions
807: \begin{eqnarray}
808: ({\cal M}_1)_{diag}=
809: {\cal M}_1^{a} &=& 4 C_f{(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} x^2 \Big [ \delta(1-x) + {\alpha_s
810: \over 2 \pi} {\rm ln} \Lambda^2 \big [ {1+x^2 \over 1-x} - \delta(1-x) \int dy { 1+ y^2
811: \over 1-y} \big ] \Big ] \nonumber \\
812: && ~~~~+ C_f{g^2 \over 2 \pi^2} {\Lambda^2 \over Q^2}{ 1+x^2 \over 1-x} .
813: \end{eqnarray}
814: The first term here explicitly cancels the term ${\cal M}_2$ given in
815: Eq. (\ref{c5fl2f}), thus the $P^\perp$ dependence goes away. Here, we have
816: used the expression of $\psi_2$ given by Eq. (\ref{c5psi2}) and Eq. (\ref{c5nq}).
817:
818: Off-diagonal contributions will come from ${\cal M}_1^b$ and ${\cal M}_1^c$
819: and these matrix elements will contain $\psi_2^* \psi_1$ and its Hermitian
820: conjugate. The following results are obtained after substituting $\psi_2$:
821: \begin{eqnarray}
822: ({\cal M}_1)_{nondiag}={\cal M}_1^{b}+{\cal M}_1^{c} =
823: -C_f{g^2 \over \pi^2} {\Lambda^2 \over Q^2}
824: {1 \over 1-x}.
825: \end{eqnarray}
826:
827: Adding all the contributions, we have
828: \begin{eqnarray}
829: F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}(x) = - C_f{ g^2 \over 2 \pi^2}
830: {\Lambda^2 \over Q^2}(1+x).
831: \label{c5fltot}
832: \end{eqnarray}
833: %Now the question is, do we understand the answer we obtained in the bare
834: %theory? Do we know how to renormalize the divergences?
835:
836: %In the cutoff theory we face the following problems:
837:
838: As anticipated from power counting, we have generated quadratic
839: divergences for $F_L$ in the bare theory. This quadratic divergence arises
840: from $\kappa^\perp$ integration. Now we are faced with two
841: issues:
842: (a) What is the principle for adding counterterms? (b) What
843: determines the finite parts of the counterterms?
844:
845: Further, since $F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}$ is directly related to the
846: physical longitudinal cross
847: section, we expect $F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}$ to be positive definite
848: (see, for example, Ref.
849: \cite{c5efp}).
850: %Furthermore we expect $F_L$ to be free from end point
851: %singularities in the longitudinal space.
852: From our answers we see that we get a negative answer which is free
853: from end point singularities but is quadratically divergent.
854: Note that it is easy to show from our expressions in Eqs. (\ref{c5fl1}) and
855: (\ref{c5fl2})
856: for a free quark of mass $m$,
857: $F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}=4 {m^2 \over Q^2} \delta(1-x) $, a
858: well-known result.
859: %If we include the normal ordering contribution, we formally
860: %get a positive answer which however suffers from the end point singularity.
861: %Thus the answers we have generated are both ambiguous and unacceptable.
862:
863: Now, the question is whether we can invoke the sum rule to get insight into the
864: answers we obtained in the bare theory and also determine the
865: counterterm structures to be added for renormalization.
866: To investigate whether our sum rule can throw some light on this problem
867: first we have to check the validity of the sum rule to order $g^2$ in
868: perturbative QCD. Towards this goal
869: we have to evaluate
870: the expectation value of the $+-$ component of the energy-momentum
871: tensor which we consider in the following.
872:
873:
874: Now we show that the sum rule relating the integral of ${F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}(x)
875: \over x}$ to the fermionic part of the light-front Hamiltonian density helps
876: us to understand the results we obtained for $F_L$ for a dressed quark in
877: the bare theory and indicates how to add counterterms to renormalize
878: the theory.
879:
880: %We again consider the operators to be normal ordered.
881: %We have
882: %\begin{eqnarray}
883: %F_L^{F-d} = {g^2 \over 2 \pi^2} { 1 + x^2 \over 1-x} {\Lambda^2 \over Q^2}, ~~
884: %F_L^{F-o-d} = - {g^2 \over \pi^2 } { 1 \over 1-x} {\Lambda^2 \over Q^2}.
885: %\end{eqnarray}
886: %Using the sum rule, Eq..(\ref{c5flsr}), we get,
887: A straightforward evaluation leads to
888: \begin{eqnarray}
889: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0) \mid P \rangle_{nondiag} =
890: -C_f{ 1 \over 2}{g^2
891: \over \pi^2} \Lambda^2 \int
892: {dx \over x} { 1 \over 1-x}, \label{c5tfode}
893: \end{eqnarray}
894:
895: \begin{eqnarray}
896: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0) \mid P \rangle_{diag} -
897: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
898: \langle P \mid \theta^{++}_{q}(0) \mid P \rangle_{diag} = C_f{ 1 \over 2}{g^2
899: \over 2 \pi^2} \Lambda^2 \int
900: {dx \over x} { 1 + x^2 \over 1-x}.\label{c5tfde}
901: \end{eqnarray}
902:
903: Adding the diagonal and off-diagonal contributions from the fermionic part
904: of the Hamiltonian density, we arrive at
905: \begin{eqnarray}
906: {2 \over Q^2} \Big [ \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0) \mid P \rangle
907: - {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}\langle P \mid \theta^{++}_q(0) \mid P \rangle \Big ] =
908: - C_f { g^2 \over 2 \pi^2}
909: {\Lambda^2 \over Q^2}\int { dx \over x} (1+x).
910: \label{c5thetatot}
911: \end{eqnarray}
912: In all the $x$ integrations we have taken a small $x$ cutoff $\epsilon$.
913: Comparison of Eqs. (\ref{c5fltot}) and (\ref{c5thetatot}) immediately shows that
914: the relation given in Eq. (\ref{c5flsr1}) has been successfully tested to order $g^2$ in perturbative
915: QCD in the bare theory.
916:
917: It is now clear that the quadratic divergences we have generated in
918: $F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}$ are
919: directly related to the fermion mass shift due to the
920: fermionic part
921: of the light-front Hamiltonian density in perturbation theory. Since we want
922: the renormalized fermion mass to be zero, we need to add counterterms to the
923: Hamiltonian density. This precisely dictates the counterterms to be added to
924: $F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}$ in order to renormalize via the relation given in Eq.
925: (\ref{c5flsr1}).
926:
927: To complete the discussion of the fermion mass shift, we now consider the
928: contributions from the gluonic part of the Hamiltonian
929: density.
930: %We drop the normal ordering contributions.
931:
932: Take the off-diagonal contribution arising from
933: \begin{eqnarray}
934: {\cal M}_3= -\langle P \mid 4 g { 1 \over \partial^+} \Big ( \partial^i
935: A^{ia}
936: \Big ) {\psi^{+}}^\dagger T^a \psi^+ \mid P \rangle.
937: \end{eqnarray}
938: A straightforward evaluation leads to
939: \begin{eqnarray}
940: {\cal M}_3 = -C_f{g^2 \over 2 \pi^2}
941: \Lambda^2 \int { dx \over x} \Big [ { 2x^2 \over (1-x)^2} + {x \over 1-x}
942: \Big ]. \label{c5tgode}
943: \end{eqnarray}
944: Thus from Eqs. (\ref{c5tfode}) and (\ref{c5tgode}) we have
945: \begin{eqnarray}
946: \langle P \mid \Big [ \theta^{+-}_{q} (0) + \theta^{+-}_{g} (0) \Big
947: ] \mid P
948: \rangle_{nondiag} = - C_f{ g^2 \over 2 \pi^2} \Lambda^2 \int { dx \over x} {1 + x^2
949: \over (1-x)^2}. \label{c5todtot}
950: \end{eqnarray}
951:
952:
953: Next let us consider diagonal contributions.
954: From the gauge boson part of the Hamiltonian density, we have,
955: \begin{eqnarray}
956: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_{g} (0)\mid P \rangle_{diag}
957: - {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2} \langle P \mid \theta^{++}_{g}(0)
958: \mid P \rangle_{diag}
959: = C_f{ g^2 \over 4 \pi^2} \Lambda^2 \int { dx \over 1-x}{1 + x^2
960: \over 1-x}. \label{c5tgde}
961: \end{eqnarray}
962: Adding the diagonal contributions from the fermion and gauge boson parts,
963: i.e., Eqs. (\ref{c5tfde}) and (\ref{c5tgde}) we
964: arrive at
965: \begin{eqnarray}
966: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}(0) \mid P \rangle_{diag} - {(P^\perp)^2 \over
967: (P^+)^2} \langle P
968: \mid \theta^{++}(0) \mid P \rangle_{diag} = C_f{ g^2 \over 4 \pi^2} \Lambda^2
969: \int { dx \over x} {1+x^2 \over (1-x)^2}. \label{c5tdtot}
970: \end{eqnarray}
971: Thus the total contribution (quark and gluons) to the expectation
972: value of the Hamiltonian density is given by
973: \begin{eqnarray}
974: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-} (0) \mid P \rangle -
975: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2} \langle P \mid \theta^{++}(0)
976: \mid P \rangle = - C_f{ g^2 \over 4 \pi^2} \Lambda^2 \int {dx \over x} { 1+x^2 \over
977: (1-x)^2}.
978: \end{eqnarray}
979: This result is directly related to the mass shift of the fermion to order
980: $g^2$ in light-front perturbation theory. In the $x^+$ ordered perturbation
981: theory, upto order $g^2$, contribution to the mass shift of the quark comes
982: from three diagrams,
983: (a) one gluon exchange interaction, (b) instantaneous fermion interaction,
984: (c) instantaneous gluon interaction. It can be shown that, the contribution
985: to the fermion mass shift due to (a) in the limit of zero bare quark
986: mass is, (see Eq. (4.10) in Ref. \cite{c5qcd2}),
987: \begin{eqnarray}
988: \delta p_1^- = -{ 1 \over 2 P^+} C_f{g^2 \over 4 \pi^2} \Lambda^2 \int
989: {dx \over x} {1+x^2 \over (1-x)^2}.
990: \end{eqnarray}
991:
992:
993: Note that in the massless limit we encountered only quadratic divergences in the twist
994: four part of the longitudinal structure function. The case of a massive
995: quark is discussed in the next section.
996:
997:
998: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
999: \subsection{Dressed Quark with Non-zero Mass}
1000: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1001:
1002: We select the target to be a massive dressed quark
1003: and evaluate the structure functions
1004: to order $g^2$. That is, we take the state
1005: $ \mid P \rangle$ to be a dressed quark
1006: consisting of bare states of a quark and a quark plus
1007: a gluon, as before
1008: \begin{eqnarray}
1009: \mid P, \sigma \rangle &=& \phi_1 b^\dagger(P,\sigma) \mid 0 \rangle
1010: \nonumber \\
1011: && + \sum_{\sigma_1,\lambda_2} \int
1012: {dk_1^+ d^2k_1^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_1^+}}
1013: \int
1014: {dk_2^+ d^2k_2^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_2^+}}
1015: \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 P^+} \delta^3(P-k_1-k_2) \nonumber \\
1016: && ~~~~~\phi_2(P,\sigma \mid k_1, \sigma_1; k_2 , \lambda_2) b^\dagger(k_1,
1017: \sigma_1) a^\dagger(k_2, \lambda_2) \mid 0 \rangle.
1018: \end{eqnarray}
1019:
1020: In the last section,
1021: we have shown that the twist four longitudinal structure function has
1022: quadratic
1023: divergences in perturbation theory. In this section, we show that for a
1024: massive quark, in addition to quadratic divergences, logarithmic divergences
1025: are generated.
1026: The state is normalized to one. As before, we introduce the Jacobi momenta.
1027: We have
1028: \begin{eqnarray}
1029: F_L = {\cal M}_1 + {\cal M}_2
1030: \end{eqnarray}
1031: where
1032: %The expression for
1033: %$F_L$ is still given in terms of ${\cal M}_1$ and ${\cal M}_2$ with
1034: \begin{eqnarray}
1035: {\cal M}_1 &=& { 1 \over \pi Q^2 } \int dy^- e^{-{ i \over 2}P^+ y^-x} \langle P
1036: \mid {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) \nonumber \\
1037: &&\Big [ \alpha^\perp. \big [ i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp(y)
1038: \big ] + \gamma^0 m \Big ] \Big [
1039: \alpha^\perp . \big [ i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp(0) \big ] +
1040: \gamma^0 m \Big ] \psi^+(0) \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~+ h.c.
1041: \mid P \rangle, \label{c5flm}
1042: \end{eqnarray}
1043: and
1044: \begin{eqnarray}
1045: {\cal M}_2 = - 4{ (P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} x F_{2(q)}(x),
1046: \label{c5fls2m}
1047: \end{eqnarray}
1048: where $\mid P \rangle$ now has a mass $M$ and $m$ is the bare quark mass.
1049:
1050: In the case of quark contributions, the second term in the expression for
1051: the bilocal current in Eq. (\ref{c5bi}) vanishes.
1052: First we evaluate the contribution ${\cal M}_2$ given in
1053: Eq. (\ref{c5fls2m}).
1054: We obtain
1055: \begin{eqnarray}
1056: {\cal M}_2&=&~ -4 {(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} x^2 \Big [ \delta(1-x)
1057: + {g^2 \over 8
1058: \pi^3} C_f \Big (\int d^2k_\perp {{ 1+x^2 \over 1-x} k^2_\perp + (1-x)^3m^2
1059: \over [m^2(1-x)^2 +k^2_\perp]^2}\nonumber\\&&~~~~- \delta(1-x) \int dyd^2k_\perp
1060: {{ 1+y^2 \over 1-y} k^2_\perp + (1-y)^3m^2
1061: \over [m^2(1-y)^2 + k^2_\perp]^2}
1062: \Big ) \Big ],\label{c5flf}
1063: \end{eqnarray}
1064: where $C_f = {N^2 - 1 \over 2N}$ for $SU(N)$.
1065:
1066:
1067: Here we have presented the result without working out the transverse
1068: integration to maintain a greater degree of transparency.
1069:
1070: It is to be mentioned that, to calculate all the matrix elements involved in
1071: $F_L$, one has to use the expression of $\psi_2$ given in Eq. (\ref{c5psi2}).
1072: It can be easily seen from Eq. (\ref{c5psi2}) that the term which in linear in
1073: quark mass $m$ causes helicity flip of the quark. Linear mass terms do not
1074: contribute in $F_L$. However, in the two-particle sector, the diagonal part
1075: of the matrix element involves $\psi_2^* \psi_2$ and contribution comes from
1076: the terms quadratic in $m$.
1077:
1078: The contribution from ${\cal M}_1$ is split into four parts
1079: with additional contributions coming from quark mass terms
1080: and can be written as follows.
1081: \begin{eqnarray}
1082: {\cal M}_1
1083: & =& { 1 \over \pi Q^2} \int dy^- e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \langle P \mid
1084: {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-)\big ( -(\partial^\perp)^2 + m^2\big)\psi^+(0) \mid P
1085: \rangle\nonumber \\
1086: && ~~~+ g{ 1 \over \pi Q^2} \int dy^- e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \langle P \mid
1087: {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) (i \partial^\perp . \alpha^\perp +\gamma^0m)\alpha^\perp.
1088: A^\perp(0) \psi^+(0) \mid P \rangle \nonumber \\
1089: && ~~~+ g{ 1 \over \pi Q^2} \int dy^- e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \langle P \mid
1090: {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) \alpha^\perp.A^\perp(y) (i \partial^\perp .\alpha^\perp
1091: +\gamma^0 m)\psi^+(0) \mid P \rangle \nonumber \\
1092: && ~~~+ g^2{ 1 \over \pi Q^2} \int dy^- e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \langle P \mid
1093: {\psi^{+}}^\dagger(y^-) A^\perp(y).A^\perp(0) \psi^+(0)\mid P \rangle \\
1094: &&\equiv {\cal M}_1^{a}+{\cal M}_1^{b}+{\cal M}_1^{c}+{\cal M}_1^{d}.
1095: \label{c5mtot}
1096: \end{eqnarray}
1097: Since the operators in Eq. (\ref{c5flm}) are taken to be normal ordered,
1098: the
1099: contribution of ${\cal M}_1^{d}$ vanishes to order $g^2$.
1100:
1101: In this case also, ${\cal M}_1^a$ gives diagonal contribution and
1102: ${\cal M}_1^b$ and ${\cal M}_1^c$ give off-diagonal contribution.
1103: Explicit calculation leads to the diagonal Fock basis contributions
1104: \begin{eqnarray}
1105: ({\cal M}_1)_{diag}=
1106: {\cal M}_1^{a} &=&4 {(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} x^2 \Big [ \delta(1-x)
1107: + {g^2 \over 8
1108: \pi^3} C_f \Big ( \int d^2k_\perp {{ 1+x^2 \over 1-x} k^2_\perp + (1-x)^3m^2
1109: \over [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]^2}\nonumber\\&& ~~~
1110: - \delta(1-x) \int dyd^2k_\perp
1111: {{ 1+y^2 \over 1-y} k^2_\perp + (1-y)^3m^2
1112: \over [m^2(1-y)^2 + k^2_\perp]^2} \Big )
1113: \Big ]\nonumber\\&&+
1114: {4 m^2 \over Q^2}\delta(1-x)\Big [1- C_f {g^2 \over 8
1115: \pi^3} \int dyd^2k_\perp {{ 1+y^2 \over 1-y} k^2_\perp + (1-y)^3m^2
1116: \over [m^2(1-y)^2 + k^2_\perp]^2}\Big ]\nonumber\\&& +
1117: {4 C_f \over Q^2} {g^2 \over 8
1118: \pi^3} \int d^2k_\perp (k^2_\perp + m^2) {{ 1+x^2 \over 1-x} k^2_\perp +
1119: (1-x)^3m^2 \over [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]^2}.
1120: \end{eqnarray}.
1121:
1122:
1123: The first term here explicitly cancels the term ${\cal M}_2$ given in
1124: Eq. (\ref{c5flf}).
1125:
1126: Off-diagonal contributions
1127: \begin{eqnarray}
1128: ({\cal M}_1)_{nondiag}={\cal M}_1^{b}+{\cal M}_1^{c} &=&
1129: {C_f \over Q^2}{g^2 \over \pi^3} \Big [\delta(1-x) \int dyd^2k_\perp
1130: {m^2(1-y) \over [m^2(1-y)^2
1131: +k^2_\perp]}\nonumber\\&&~~
1132: - \int d^2k_\perp {k^2_\perp +
1133: m^2(1-x)^2 \over (1-x)[m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]}\Big].
1134: \end{eqnarray}
1135:
1136: The linear in $m$
1137: terms in ${\cal M}_1^b$ and ${\cal M}_1^c$ receives contributions from the
1138: mass dependent term in $\psi_2$. As a result, in the final expressions, these are
1139: quadratic in $m$.
1140:
1141: Adding all the contributions, we have
1142: \begin{eqnarray}
1143: F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}(x) &=& {4 m^2 \over Q^2} \delta(1-x)
1144: + {4 C_f \over Q^2} {g^2 \over 8
1145: \pi^3}\Big [ \int d^2k_\perp (k^2_\perp + m^2)
1146: {{ 1+x^2 \over 1-x} k^2_\perp +
1147: (1-x)^3m^2 \over [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]^2}\nonumber\\&&-\delta(1-x)
1148: m^2 \int dyd^2k_\perp {{ 1+y^2 \over 1-y} k^2_\perp + (1-y)^3m^2
1149: \over [m^2(1-y)^2 + k^2_\perp]^2}\Big ]
1150: \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~- {C_f \over Q^2}{g^2 \over \pi^3}\Big [
1151: \int d^2k_\perp {k^2_\perp +
1152: m^2(1-x)^2 \over (1-x)[m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]}
1153: \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-\delta(1-x) \int dyd^2k_\perp {m^2(1-y)
1154: \over [m^2(1-y)^2 + k^2_\perp]}\Big].
1155: \label{c5fltotm}
1156: \end{eqnarray}
1157: Here we have used $M=m$, since the difference that it entails is higher
1158: order in the coupling. Note that we are getting back the free quark answer
1159: once we switch off the interaction. Also, the dressed
1160: mass-less quark answer can be
1161: easily regenerated by putting $M=m=0$. Note that the $k_\perp$-integration
1162: now produces logarithmic divergences with the expected quadratic one.
1163:
1164: To check the sum rule explicitly, we evaluate the right hand side of Eq. (\ref{c5flsr1}) next.
1165: A straightforward evaluation leads to
1166: \begin{eqnarray}
1167: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0) \mid P \rangle_{nondiag} =
1168: -C_f{g^2 \over 2\pi^3} \int dxd^2k_\perp{k^2_\perp +
1169: m^2(1-x)^3 \over x(1-x)}{1 \over [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]}
1170: \end{eqnarray}
1171: \begin{eqnarray}
1172: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0) \mid P \rangle_{diag} -
1173: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
1174: \langle P \mid \theta^{++}_{q}(0) \mid P
1175: \rangle_{diag} =\nonumber\\~~~
1176: 2m^2 +
1177: 2 C_f {g^2 \over 8
1178: \pi^3} \int dxd^2k_\perp {k^2_\perp +(1-x) m^2 \over x} {{ 1+x^2 \over 1-x} k^2_\perp +
1179: (1-x)^3m^2 \over [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]^2}.
1180: \end{eqnarray}
1181: Adding the diagonal and off-diagonal contributions from the fermionic part
1182: of the Hamiltonian density and multiplying it by ${2 \over Q^2}$ one obtains
1183: the right hand side of the sum rule. Comparing it with the integral of ${F_L^{\tau=4}
1184: \over x}$, where $F_L$ is given in Eq. (\ref{c5fltotm}), one easily sees that
1185: the sum rule is verified.
1186: %Calculating $\langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_g(0)
1187: %\mid P \rangle$ and $\langle P \mid \theta^{++}_g(0)
1188: %\mid P \rangle$ for the massive quark and proceeding exactly through the
1189: %same steps as in the last
1190: %section, we again see the connection of $F_L$ with the fermion mass shift,
1191: %as we did in the case of mass-less quark.
1192:
1193:
1194: To see the connection of $F_L$ with the fermionic mass shift, we calculate
1195: the contribution of the gluonic part of the energy momentum
1196: tensor $\theta^{+-}$ to
1197: the sum rule for the total $F_L$. Explicit calculation gives
1198: \begin{eqnarray}
1199: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_g(0) \mid P \rangle_{nondiag} =
1200: -C_f{g^2 \over 2\pi^3} \int dxd^2k_\perp{(1+x) k_\perp^2 \over (1-x)^2}{1
1201: \over
1202: [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]}
1203: \end{eqnarray}
1204: \begin{eqnarray}
1205: \lefteqn{\langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_g(0) \mid P \rangle_{diag} -
1206: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
1207: \langle P \mid \theta^{++}_g(0) \mid P
1208: \rangle_{diag} =}\nonumber\\&&
1209: 2 C_f {g^2 \over 8
1210: \pi^3} \int dxd^2k_\perp {k^2_\perp \over (1-x)} {{ 1+x^2
1211: \over 1-x} k^2_\perp +
1212: (1-x)^3m^2 \over [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]^2}.
1213: \end{eqnarray}
1214: Thus, we get
1215: \begin{eqnarray}
1216: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0)+\theta^{+-}_g(0) \mid P \rangle_{nondiag}
1217: = \nonumber \\
1218: -C_f{g^2 \over 2\pi^3} \int dxd^2k_\perp{{(1+x^2) \over 1-x}k_\perp^2
1219: +(1-x)^3m^2 \over x(1-x)}{1
1220: \over
1221: [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]},
1222: \end{eqnarray}
1223: \begin{eqnarray}
1224: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0)+\theta^{+-}_g(0) \mid P \rangle_{diag} -
1225: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
1226: \langle P \mid \theta^{++}+\theta^{++}_g(0) \mid P
1227: \rangle_{diag} = \nonumber\\
1228: 2 C_f {g^2 \over 8
1229: \pi^3} \int dxd^2k_\perp {{(1+x^2) \over 1-x}k_\perp^2
1230: +(1-x)^3m^2 \over x(1-x)}{1
1231: \over
1232: [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]}.
1233: \end{eqnarray}
1234: Adding diagonal and off-diagonal contributions, we get,
1235: \begin{eqnarray}
1236: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}(0) \mid P \rangle -
1237: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
1238: \langle P \mid \theta^{++}(0) \mid P
1239: \rangle = \nonumber\\~~~
1240: - C_f {g^2 \over 4
1241: \pi^3} \int dxd^2k_\perp {{(1+x^2) \over 1-x}k_\perp^2
1242: +(1-x)^3m^2 \over x(1-x)}{1
1243: \over
1244: [m^2(1-x)^2 + k^2_\perp]}.
1245: \end{eqnarray}
1246:
1247: Note that this result is connected to the full
1248: fermion mass shift $ \delta p_1^-$ in
1249: second order perturbation theory. We have (see Eq. (4.10)) in Ref.
1250: \cite{c5qcd2}, in the massive case,
1251: \begin{eqnarray}
1252: \delta p_1^- = - { 1 \over 2 P^+} C_f {g^2 \over 4 \pi^3} \int dx d^2 k_\perp
1253: { {(1+x^2) \over 1-x} k_\perp^2 + (1-x)^3 m^2 \over x(1-x)}
1254: { 1 \over [m^2 (1-x)^2 + k_\perp^2]}.
1255: \end{eqnarray}
1256:
1257: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1258: \subsection{Dressed Gluon}
1259: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1260: In this section we check the sum rule explicitly for a dressed gluon target.
1261: We consider the gluon to be composed of a bare gluon and a
1262: quark anti-quark pair.
1263: \begin{eqnarray}
1264: \mid P, \sigma \rangle &=& \phi_1 a^\dagger(P,\lambda) \mid 0 \rangle
1265: \nonumber \\
1266: && + \sum_{\sigma_1,\sigma_2} \int
1267: {dk_1^+ d^2k_1^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_1^+}}
1268: \int
1269: {dk_2^+ d^2k_2^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_2^+}}
1270: \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 P^+} \delta^3(P-k_1-k_2) \nonumber \\
1271: && ~~~~~\phi_2(P,\sigma \mid k_1, \sigma_1; k_2 , \sigma_2) b^\dagger(k_1,
1272: \sigma_1) d^\dagger(k_2, \sigma_2) \mid 0 \rangle.
1273: \label{c5glu}
1274: \end{eqnarray}
1275:
1276: $\phi_1$ is the probability amplitude of finding one bare gluon and
1277: $\phi_2$ is the probability amplitude of finding one quark-antiquark pair in
1278: the dressed gluon. We introduce the Jacobi momenta $x, \kappa^\perp$.
1279: The boost invariant amplitude $\psi_2$ is written in terms of $\psi_1$ from
1280: the light-front bound state equation (see chapter 3):
1281: \be
1282: \psi_2(x, \kappa^\perp, 1-x, -\kappa^\perp)= {g\over {2 (2\pi)^3}} {x
1283: (1-x)\over {(\kappa^\perp)^2}} \chi^\dagger_{\sigma'}
1284: \Big [ -{(\sigma^\perp \cdot \kappa^\perp) \over x} + {\sigma^\perp \cdot
1285: (\sigma^\perp \cdot \kappa^\perp)\over {1-x}}\Big ] \chi_\sigma
1286: \epsilon_\lambda^\perp \psi_1.
1287: \label{c5psiglu}
1288: \e
1289: From this, we get
1290: \be
1291: \sum_{spins} \int d^2\kappa^\perp {\mid \psi_2 \mid}^2 = {g^2\over (2
1292: \pi)^3} \int {d^2\kappa^\perp \over (\kappa^\perp)^2} [ x^2+(1-x)^2] {\mid
1293: \psi_1 \mid}^2.
1294: \label{c5norglu}
1295: \e
1296: The target gluon and the bare quark and anti-quark masses are taken to be
1297: zero. Note that, to the order $g^2$, there will be a contribution from
1298: the two-gluon Fock sector due to the non-abelian nature of the gauge coupling.
1299: For simplicity, we exclude that contribution. It is easy to
1300: incorporate that contribution by
1301: trivially extending our calculation presented here.
1302:
1303: $F_L$ can be written in terms of ${\cal M}_1$ and ${\cal M}_2$ given
1304: in Eqs. (\ref{c5flm}-\ref{c5fls2m}),
1305: where $\mid P \rangle$ now stands for the dressed gluon represented by
1306: Eq. (\ref{c5glu}). In this case, contribution comes from both components of
1307: bilocal current. It can be easily seen that $F_L$ for a free gluon is zero.
1308: Explicit calculation gives
1309: \begin{eqnarray}
1310: {\cal M}_2&=&~ -4 {(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} x F_{2(q)}^{dressed-gluon}\nonumber\\
1311: &=&~ - {x^2(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2} {g^2 \over \pi^2}N_f T_f
1312: \big[ x^2 + (1-x)^2 \big] {\rm ln} \Lambda^2 .
1313: \end{eqnarray}
1314: Here $T_f={1 \over 2}$ and $N_f$ is the number of flavors.
1315:
1316:
1317: ${\cal M}_1$ is again divided into four parts as in Eq. (\ref{c5mtot}) and explicit
1318: calculation in this case gives the following.
1319: \begin{eqnarray}
1320: {\cal M}_{1(diag)} ={\cal M}_{1(a)}&=&{x^2(P^\perp)^2 \over Q^2}
1321: {g^2 \over \pi^2}N_f T_f
1322: \big[ x^2 + (1-x)^2 \big] {\rm ln} \Lambda^2 \nonumber\\&&~~~
1323: +{\Lambda^2 \over Q^2}{g^2\over \pi^2}N_f
1324: T_f \big[ x^2 + (1-x)^2 \big]\label{c5gl1},
1325: \end{eqnarray}
1326: \begin{eqnarray}
1327: {\cal M}_{1(off-diag)}&=&{\cal M}_{1(b)}+{\cal M}_{1(c)}\nonumber\\
1328: &=&-{\Lambda^2 \over Q^2}{g^2\over \pi^2}N_f T_f 2 (1-x).
1329: \label{c5gl2}
1330: \end{eqnarray}
1331: In the above results, we have used Eq. (\ref{c5psiglu}) and Eq. (\ref{c5norglu}).
1332: Thus, we get
1333: \begin{eqnarray}
1334: F_L={\Lambda^2 \over Q^2} N_fT_f { g^2 \over \pi^2} \big[x^2 +(1-x)^2
1335: -2(1-x) \big].
1336: \label{c5flgl}
1337: \end{eqnarray}
1338: On the other hand, we get
1339: \begin{eqnarray}
1340: \lefteqn{\langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0) \mid P \rangle_{diag} -
1341: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
1342: \langle P \mid \theta^{++}_{q}(0) \mid P \rangle_{diag}
1343: =}\nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1344: \Lambda^2 N_f T_f {g^2 \over 4\pi^2}\int dx \big[ {x^2 +(1-x)^2 \over
1345: x(1-x)}\big ]
1346: \label{c5thd}
1347: \end{eqnarray}
1348: and
1349: \begin{eqnarray}
1350: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0) \mid P \rangle_{off-diag} =
1351: - \Lambda^2 N_f T_f {g^2 \over 2\pi^2}\int dx \big[ {x^2 +(1-x)^2 \over
1352: x(1-x)}\big]
1353: \label{c5thod}.
1354: \end{eqnarray}
1355: Adding diagonal and off-diagonal contributions, we get
1356: \begin{eqnarray}
1357: \langle P \mid \theta^{+-}_q(0) \mid P \rangle -
1358: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
1359: \langle P \mid \theta^{++}_{q}(0) \mid P \rangle =-
1360: \Lambda^2 N_f T_f {g^2 \over 4\pi^2}\int dx \big[ {x^2 +(1-x)^2 \over
1361: x(1-x)}\big]
1362: \label{c5thgl}.
1363: \end{eqnarray}
1364:
1365: Note that this result is connected
1366: to the gluonic mass shift $\delta q_2^-$ due to pair production, since the
1367: contribution from the gluonic part of the energy-momentum tensor
1368: $\theta^{+-}_g$ in this case vanishes.
1369: In the massless limit, we have (see Eq. (4.40) in Ref. (\cite{c5qcd2}), gluonic
1370: mass shift due to pair production is
1371: \begin{equation}
1372: \delta q_2^- = -{1 \over 2P^+}
1373: \Lambda^2 N_fT_f{g^2 \over 4\pi^2}\int dx \big[ {x^2 +(1-x)^2 \over
1374: x(1-x)}\big].
1375: \end{equation}
1376: From Eq. (\ref{c5flgl}) we compute $\int dx {F_L \over x}$. Since
1377: $x$-integration is from $0$ to $1$, it can be written in the following form.
1378: \begin{eqnarray}
1379: \int dx {F_L \over x} =-
1380: {\Lambda^2 \over Q^2} N_fT_f{g^2 \over 2\pi^2}\int dx \big[ {x^2 +(1-x)^2 \over
1381: x(1-x)}\big].\label{c5flint}
1382: \end{eqnarray}
1383: Comparing Eq. (\ref{c5thgl}) and Eq. (\ref{c5flint}), one explicitly
1384: verifies
1385: the sum rule for a dressed gluon target.
1386:
1387: As we have emphasized, in the bare theory, the twist four longitudinal
1388: structure function is afflicted with divergences. We have to add
1389: counterterms to carry out the renormalization procedure so that we have
1390: physical answers. The sum rule for the bare theory clearly shows that the
1391: quadratic divergences generated are directly related to the gluon mass shift
1392: in second order light-front perturbation theory arising from an intermediate
1393: quark anti-quark pair. As we mentioned earlier, in light-front Hamiltonian
1394: perturbation theory one cannot automatically generate a
1395: massless gluon by dimensional regularization. In order to ensure a massless
1396: gluon in second order
1397: perturbation theory, we have to add the negative of the shift as a counterterm.
1398: After adding the counterterm, the gluon mass shift in second order perturbation
1399: theory is zero and the twist four longitudinal structure function for a
1400: massless gluon becomes zero. Thus, after renormalization, the sum rule is
1401: satisfied, with a trivial (i.e., zero) gluon longitudinal structure
1402: function.
1403:
1404:
1405: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1406: \section{Partition of the Hadron Mass in QCD}
1407: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1408: As is well-known, experiments that measure the twist-two part of the $F_2$
1409: structure function yield information on the fraction of longitudinal momenta
1410: carried by the charged parton constituents of the
1411: hadron (quarks and anti-quarks). The sum rule
1412: we have derived yields other useful information about
1413: the hadron structure. Namely, our sum rule shows that experiments to measure
1414: the twist four part of the longitudinal structure function will directly reveal the
1415: fraction of the hadron mass carried by charged parton components of the hadron.
1416: This sum rule is richer in content since it involves dynamics.
1417: The light-front Hamiltonian provides theoretical insight into this
1418: fraction as follows.
1419:
1420:
1421: According to our analysis, the twist four part of the longitudinal structure
1422: function is directly related to the fermionic part of the light-front QCD
1423: Hamiltonian density $\theta^{+-}_q$ in the gauge $A^+_a=0$.
1424: explicitly we have
1425: \begin{eqnarray}
1426: \theta^{+-}_q = 2 {\psi^{+}}^\dagger \Big [ \alpha^\perp.(i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp)
1427: + \gamma^0 m \Big ]
1428: { 1 \over i \partial^+} \Big [ \alpha^\perp . (i \partial^\perp + g A^\perp)
1429: + \gamma^0 m \Big ] \psi^{+}.
1430: \end{eqnarray}
1431: Thus we have the fermion kinetic energy contribution given by
1432: \begin{eqnarray}
1433: \theta^{+-}_{q(free)} = 2 {\psi^+}^\dagger \big [ - (\partial^\perp)^2 + m^2
1434: \big ] \psi^+
1435: \end{eqnarray}
1436: and the interaction dependent part given by
1437: \begin{eqnarray}
1438: \theta^{+-}_{q(int)} &=& 2 g {\psi^+}^\dagger \Big [ \alpha^\perp . A^\perp {
1439: 1 \over i \partial^+}( \alpha^\perp . i \partial^\perp + \gamma^0 m ) +
1440: ( \alpha^\perp. i \partial^\perp + \gamma^0 m) { 1 \over i \partial^+}
1441: \alpha^\perp . A^\perp \Big ] \psi^+ \nonumber \\
1442: && ~~~~~~~~+ 2 g^2 {\psi^+}^\dagger \alpha^\perp. A^\perp \alpha^\perp.
1443: A^\perp \psi^+.
1444: \end{eqnarray}
1445: Note that the fermion kinetic energy constitutes only a
1446: part of the total contribution from fermions. Any theoretical estimate of
1447: the fermionic part of the longitudinal structure function
1448: necessarily has to involve off-diagonal contributions from Fock states
1449: differing in the number of gluons by one and two.
1450:
1451: It is important to emphasize the difference between equal time and light-front
1452: Hamiltonians in the context of our calculations. The equal-time Hamiltonian
1453: contains the scalar density term (${\bar \psi} \psi$) accompanying the quark
1454: mass $m$. In contrast, the quark mass appears quadratically in the free part of
1455: the light-front Hamiltonian. Recently the question of the partition of hadron
1456: masses in QCD has been addressed by Ji \cite{c5jib} in the context of the
1457: equal-time Hamiltonian and in terms of twist-two and twist-three
1458: observables. In his analysis, the extraction of the fraction of the hadron
1459: mass carried by the fermion constituents is not straightforward because of the
1460: presence of the scalar density term. The hadron expectation value of the
1461: strange quark scalar density remains unknown (experimentally). Our analysis,
1462: however, shows that the twist four longitudinal structure function, once
1463: extracted experimentally, directly yields the fraction of the hadron mass
1464: carried by fermionic constituents.
1465:
1466: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1467: \section{Discussions}
1468: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1469:
1470:
1471: Our results indicate that the experiments to measure the twist four
1472: longitudinal structure
1473: function reveal the fraction of the hadron mass carried by
1474: the charged parton components.
1475: Thus these experiments play a complementary role to
1476: the longitudinal momentum and helicity
1477: distribution information obtained at the twist two level. It is of interest
1478: to investigate the feasibility of the direct measurement of the twist four
1479: gluon structure function in high energy experiments. Recent work of Qiu,
1480: Sterman and collaborators have shown that semi-inclusive single jet
1481: production in deep inelastic scattering \cite{c5luo} and direct photon
1482: production in hadron nucleus scattering \cite{c5guo} provide direct measurement
1483: of twist
1484: four gluon matrix elements.
1485:
1486: We also note that in the pre-QCD era, there have been discussions about a
1487: possible $\delta (x)$ function contribution to the longitudinal structure function
1488: which may appear to invalidate the sum rule
1489: derived ignoring such subtleties. In
1490: two-dimensional QCD Burkardt has shown \cite{c5bur} that ${F_L \over x^2}$ has a
1491: delta function contribution which comes from surface terms and he has discussed implications of this for
1492: the sum rule for ${F_L \over x^2}$. Obviously, ${F_L \over x}$ will not be
1493: affected by such a singular contribution and in the next chapter, we show explicitly
1494: that the sum rule is verified in two-dimensional QCD by virtue of the
1495: 't Hooft equation.
1496:
1497: In the next chapter, we present a non-perturbative calculation
1498: of the longitudinal structure function for a
1499: meson-like bound state in $1+1$ dimensional QCD and for a positronium-like
1500: target in $3+1$ dimensional QED in weak coupling limit.
1501:
1502:
1503: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1504: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1505:
1506: \bibitem{c5dasu}
1507: S. D. Dasu {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 61}, 1061 (1988);
1508: L. W. Whitlow, S. Rock, A. Bodek, S. Dasu, and E. M.
1509: Riordan, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 250}, 193 (1990).
1510:
1511:
1512: \bibitem{c5amanda} A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, R. C. E. Devenish, A. De Roeck, Int.
1513: Jour. Mod. Phys. {\bf A 13}, 3385 (1998).
1514:
1515: \bibitem{c5js} R. L. Jaffe and M. Soldate, Phys. Lett. {\bf 105B}, 467
1516: (1981); Phys. Rev. {\bf D 26}, 49 (1982).
1517:
1518: \bibitem{c5efp} R. K. Ellis, W. Furmanski, and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys.
1519: {\bf B 212}, 29 (1983).
1520:
1521: \bibitem{c5qiu} J. Qiu, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 42}, 30 (1990).
1522:
1523: \bibitem{c5fl1} A. Harindranath, R. Kundu, A. Mukherjee, and
1524: J. P. Vary, Phys. Lett. {\bf B417}, 361 (1998).
1525:
1526:
1527: \bibitem{c5fl2} A. Harindranath, R. Kundu, A. Mukherjee and J. P. Vary,
1528: Phys. Rev. {\bf D58}, 114022 (1998).
1529:
1530: \bibitem{c5jac} R. Jackiw, in Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol.
1531: 62, edited by G. Hohler (Springer-Verlag, New York (1972));
1532: R. Jackiw, {\it Diverse Topics in Theoretical and
1533: Mathematical Physics}, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p.309.
1534:
1535: \bibitem{c5cjt} D. A. Dicus, R. Jackiw, and V. L. Teplitz, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 4},
1536: 1733 (1971).
1537:
1538: % \bibitem{c5polits} H. D. Politzer, Nucl.
1539: % Phys. {\bf B 172}, 349 (1980).
1540:
1541:
1542: \bibitem{c5bgj} In the pre-QCD era this result, for the case of
1543: vanishing target transverse momentum, was obtained by D. J.
1544: Broadhurst, J. F. Gunion, and R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 8}, 566
1545: (1973).
1546:
1547: \bibitem{c5rajen} {\it `Selected Topics in Light-Front Field Theory and
1548: Applications to the High Energy Phenomena'}, R. Kundu, Ph. D. thesis, University of
1549: Calcutta.
1550:
1551: % \bibitem{c5mira} J. L. Miramontes, M. A. Miramontes, and J. Sanchez Guillen,
1552: % Phys. Rev. {\bf D 40}, 2184 (1989).
1553:
1554: % \bibitem{c5ji} X. Ji, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 448}, 30 (1995).
1555:
1556:
1557: \bibitem{c5qcd2} Wei-Min Zhang and A. Harindranath, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 48}
1558: (1993) 4881.
1559:
1560: \bibitem{c5jib} X. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74}, 1071 (1995); X. Ji, Phys.
1561: Rev. {\bf D 52}, 271 (1995).
1562:
1563: \bibitem{c5luo} M. Luo, J. Qiu, and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 50}, 1951
1564: (1994).
1565:
1566: \bibitem{c5guo} X. Guo, and J. Qiu, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 53}, 6144 (1996).
1567:
1568: \bibitem{c5bur} M. Burkardt, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B373}, 613 (1992).
1569:
1570: %\bibitem{c5bsp} K.G. Wilson, T.S. Walhout, A. Harindranath, W.-M. Zhang, R.J.
1571: %Perry, and St. D. G{\l}azek, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 49}, 6720 (1994);
1572: %Wei-Min Zhang, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 56}, 1528 (1997); M. M.
1573: %Brisudova, R.J. Perry, and K.G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78} 1227
1574: %(1997).
1575: %Also see, S.J. Brodsky, H.-C. Pauli, and S.S. Pinsky, {\it Quantum
1576: %Chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone}, SLAC-PUB-7484,
1577: %hep-ph/9705477 and references therein.
1578:
1579: % \bibitem{c5hari1} A. Harindranath and Wei-Min Zhang, Phys. Lett. {\bf B
1580: % 390}, 359 (1997).
1581:
1582: % \bibitem{c5wh} Wei-Min Zhang and A. Harindranath, preprint (1996)
1583: % hep-ph/9606347.
1584:
1585: % \bibitem{c5hari2} A. Harindranath and Wei-Min Zhang,
1586: % Phys. Lett. {\bf B 408}, 347 (1997); hep-ph/9706419.
1587:
1588:
1589: % \bibitem{c5pqcd} J. Collins, D. Soper and G. Sterman, in {\it Perturbative
1590: % Quantum Chromo Dynamics}, ed. by A. Mueller
1591: % (World Scientific, Singapore 1989) p.1.
1592:
1593:
1594: %\bibitem{c5paper2} A. Harindranath, Rajen Kundu, and Wei Min Zhang, {\it Deep
1595: %Inelastic Structure Functions in Light-Front QCD: Radiative Corrections},
1596: %preprint, April 1998.
1597:
1598:
1599:
1600: \end{thebibliography}
1601:
1602:
1603: