1:
2:
3: \chapter{Twist Four $F_L$ for Light-Front Bound
4: States}
5: Higher twist or power suppressed contributions to the DIS structure
6: functions involve non-trivial non-perturbative information on the
7: structure of hadrons. As we mentioned before, the most important point
8: of our approach based on light-front Hamiltonian QCD is that both
9: perturbative and non-perturbative calculations are possible within the
10: same framework \cite{c6hari1}. We have calculated the twist four part of
11: the longitudinal structure function $F_L$ in the previous chapter for
12: a dressed quark and a dressed gluon state in perturbation theory.
13: When the target
14: is a bound state in QCD like a nucleon or a meson, one can use the
15: same technique of Fock space expansion of the target state, but then
16: has to know the bound state wave function. The analysis of QCD bound
17: states in $3+1$ dimension in light-front Hamiltonian theory is highly
18: complicated and it requires the recently developed similarity
19: renormalization technique \cite{c6sim}. The spectra of the heavy quark
20: bound states like
21: charmonium and bottomonium have been investigated using this technique
22: \cite{c6mar}. However, the analysis of the structure functions requires
23: knowledge about the bound state wave functions, the analytic form of
24: which is not obtained so far. This is because, the similarity
25: renormalization technique generates an additional confining
26: interaction in the effective Hamiltonian in $O(g^2)$ which makes it
27: impossible to solve the effective Hamiltonian analytically even in the
28: leading order in bound state Hamiltonian perturbation theory \cite{c6mar}.
29:
30: In this chapter, we investigate the twist four part of $F_L$ for a
31: meson in $1+1$ dimensional QCD. We explicitly show that the sum rule
32: which we derived in the previous chapter is obeyed in this case by
33: virtue of t'Hooft equation. In order to understand the calculational
34: procedure in $3+1$ dimension, we perform a simpler but interesting
35: analysis. We calculate the twist-four part of the longitudinal
36: structure function for a positronium-like bound state in light-front
37: QED in the weak coupling limit. In this limit, QCD results are not expected
38: to differ much from the QED results. As a result, this analysis is important since it
39: tests and illustrates the approach in QCD. The advantage here is that,
40: in the weak coupling limit, the bound state equation can be solved
41: analytically and the wave function is known. This allows an analytic
42: understanding of the problem. We refer to our original works,
43: \cite{c6prd,c6as}.
44:
45: The plan of this chapter is as follows.
46: In chapter 6.1, we calculate twist four part of $F_L$ for a meson in $1+1$
47: dimensional QCD and explicitly verify the sum rule.
48: In section 6.2, we calculate the twist
49: four longitudinal structure function for a positronium-like state in
50: light-front QED in the weak coupling limit and
51: verify sum rule for $F^{\tau=4}_L$ in this case. We also
52: show that it reduces to a relation connecting the kinetic and potential
53: energies to the binding energy of positronium. In section 6.3, we
54: analytically calculate $F^{\tau=4}_L$ using the wave function for
55: positronium.
56: Discussions and conclusions are given in section 6.4. The bound state equation
57: for positronium in light front QED in the weak coupling limit is derived in
58: Appendix C.
59:
60:
61: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
62: \section{$1+1$ Dimensional QCD: Explicit Calculations}\label{c611}
63: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
64: In the previous chapter, we have derived a sum rule for the twist four part
65: of the longitudinal structure function $F_L$. We have shown that the sum
66: rule is obeyed in perturbative QCD for dressed quark and gluon targets.
67: In this section, we turn to
68: two-dimensional QCD
69: in order to test the sum rule in a non-perturbative context.
70: In 1+1 dimensions, in $A^+=0$ gauge, we have,
71: \begin{eqnarray}
72: \int_0^1 {dx \over x} F_{L(q)}^{\tau=4}(x) = { 2 \over Q^2} \langle P \mid
73: \Big [ \theta^{+-}_q(0) + \theta^{+-}_g(0) \Big ] \mid P \rangle,
74: \end{eqnarray}
75:
76: with $
77: \theta^{+-}_q = 2 m^2 {\psi^{+}}^\dagger { 1 \over i \partial^+} \psi^+ $
78: is the fermionic part of the light-front QCD Hamiltonian density in $1+1$
79: dimension and $ \theta^{+-}_g = - 4 g^2 {\psi^{+}}^\dagger T^a \psi^+
80: {1 \over (\partial^+)^2}
81: {\psi^{+}}^\dagger T^a \psi^+$ is the gluonic part.
82: We consider the standard one pair ($q \overline{q}$) approximation to the
83: meson ground state. Explicit evaluations show that
84: \begin{eqnarray}
85: {F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)} \over x} = {4 \over Q^2} \psi^*(x)
86: {m^2 \over x (1-x)} \psi(x),\\
87: \int_0^1 dx {F^{\tau=4}_{L(g)} \over x} = {4 \over Q^2}(-) C_f {
88: g^2 \over \pi} \int_0^1 dx \int_0^1 dy \psi^*(x)
89: { \psi(y)-\psi(x)\over (x-y)^2}.
90: \end{eqnarray}
91:
92: Here $\psi(x)$ is the ground state wave function for the meson. Thus
93: \cite{c6prd}
94: %Next we consider the gluonic contribution. The range of $x$ in terms arising
95: %from normal ordering is necessarily from zero to infinity instead of being
96: %from zero to one. One can altogether avoid this situation as follows.
97: %If we take the four fermion operator to be normal ordered, we get a divergent
98: %contribution in the bare theory, namely
99: %where $ \psi(x) $ is the ground state wave function for the meson. To carry
100: %out renormalization, we add a suitable counterterm so that the divergence at
101: %$x=y$ is removed. In the renormalized theory, we have,
102: \begin{eqnarray}
103: \int_0^1 {dx \over x} F^{\tau=4}_{L}(x) = { 4 \over Q^2} \int_0^1 dx
104: \psi^*(x) \Big [ {m^2 \over x (1-x)} \psi(x)
105: - C_f {g^2 \over \pi} \int_0^1 dy { \psi(y) - \psi(x) \over (x-y)^2}
106: \Big ].
107: \end{eqnarray}
108: The bound state equation obeyed by the
109: ground state wave function $\psi(x)$ for the meson in the truncated space of
110: a quark-antiquark pair is the t'Hooft equation:
111: \begin{eqnarray}
112: M^2 \psi(x) = {m^2 \over x (1-x)} \psi(x) - C_f {g^2 \over \pi} \int dy {
113: \psi(y) - \psi(x) \over (x-y)^2}
114: \end{eqnarray}
115: together with the normalization condition $ \int_0^1 dx \psi^2(x)=1$,
116: we easily verify that the twist four longitudinal structure function of the
117: meson obeys the sum rule
118: \begin{eqnarray}
119: \int_0^1 {dx \over x} F_L^{\tau=4} = { 2 \over Q^2} \langle P \mid
120: \theta^{+-}(0) \mid P \rangle = 4 {M^2 \over Q^2}.
121: \end{eqnarray}
122:
123:
124: In the same model, the contribution to the twist two structure function from
125: the fermionic constituents is given by
126: \begin{eqnarray}
127: F_{2(q)}(x) = (x+ 1-x) \psi^*(x) \psi(x) = \psi^*(x) \psi(x).
128: \end{eqnarray}
129: Note that, since there are no partonic gluons or sea in this model, the
130: longitudinal momentum of the meson is carried entirely by the valence quark
131: and anti-quark. Thus the momentum sum rule is saturated by the fermionic
132: part of the longitudinal momentum density. On the other hand, light-front
133: energy density is shared between fermionic and gauge bosonic parts and as a
134: consequence the fermions carry only a fraction of the hadron mass.
135: This seemingly paradoxical situation further illuminates the difference
136: between the physical content of the $F_2$ and $ F^{\tau=4}_L$ sum rules.
137:
138:
139: To get a quantitative picture, next, we explicitly calculate the structure
140: functions $F_{2(q)}(x)$ and ${F_{L(q)}(x) \over x}$ for the ground state
141: meson in two-dimensional QCD. We have parameterized the ground state wave
142: function as
143: \be
144: \psi(x) = {\cal N} x^s (1-x)^s.
145: \e
146:
147: The factor ${\cal N}$ is determined from the normalization condition
148: $ \int_0^1 dx \psi^*(x) \psi(x) =1$ and $s$ is the variational parameter.
149: We have
150: \be
151: M^2=\int dx \psi^*(x){m^2 \over x (1-x)} \psi(x) - C_f {g^2 \over \pi} \int
152: dx \int dy {
153: \psi^*(x) \psi(y) - \psi^*(x)\psi(x) \over (x-y)^2}.
154: \end{eqnarray}
155: The first term in the left hand side is the kinetic energy of the fermions
156: and the other is the interaction. Substituting the above wave function and
157: also using the normalization condition, we get
158: \be
159: M^2=m^2{\beta(2s, 2s)\over \beta(2s+1, 2s+1)}-{g^2\over \pi}C_f {[s(\beta(s,
160: s+1))^2-\beta(2s, 2s)]\over \beta(2s+1, 2s+1)}
161: \e
162: where
163: $\beta(n, m)= \int_0^1 dx x^{n-1}(1-x)^{m-1}$.
164:
165: We determined the value of
166: $s$ variationally by minimizing $M^2$ for given values of $m^2$ and $g^2$.
167: The resulting structure functions are
168: presented in Fig. 1 for two different values of $m^2$.
169:
170: \begin{figure}
171: \centerline{\rotatebox{90}{\epsfxsize=.3\textwidth\epsfbox{flp1.ps}}
172: \hspace{6mm}
173: \rotatebox{90}{\epsfxsize=.3\textwidth\epsfbox{flp2.ps}}}
174: \vskip 5mm
175: \caption{Fermionic contributions to the structure functions
176: $F_2(x)$ and ${F_L^{\tau=4} \over x}$ for the
177: ground state meson in the 't Hooft model for two different values of $m$,
178: the quark
179: mass. (a): $ m =5$, $ s = 4.96$. (b) $ m =1$, $ s = .70$. The parameter
180: $s$ appearing in the wave function is determined by a variational
181: calculation. We have set $C_f {g^2\over \pi}=1$.}
182: \end{figure}
183: \vspace{3mm}
184:
185:
186: Since both the quark and anti-quark have
187: equal mass in the model, both structure
188: functions are symmetric about $x={1 \over 2}$. When the fermions are heavy
189: (Fig. 1(a)), the system is essentially non-relativistic and
190: the structure functions are significant only near the region $x={1
191: \over 2}$. When the fermions become lighter (Fig 1(b)),
192: contribution to the structure function from the end-point regions become
193: significant indicating substantial high momentum components in the ground
194: state wave function. Note that ${ F_{L(q)} \over x}$
195: measures the fermion kinetic energy (in light-front coordinates). The
196: exponent $s$ in the wave function is a function of the fermion mass and
197: $s$ decreases as $ m$ decreases. In the massless limit, $s$ vanishes
198: \cite{c6berg} so that the wave function for the ground state becomes $ \psi(x) =
199: \theta(x) \theta(1-x)$. This results in a flat $F_2$ structure function.
200: However, because of the presence of $m^2$, $F^{\tau=4}_{L(q)}$ vanishes.
201: Because of an exact cancellation between the self-energy and gluon exchange
202: contributions, the gluonic part of the $F^{\tau=4}_{L}$ also vanishes.
203: Thus the sum rule is satisfied exactly since, in the zero quark mass limit,
204: the ground state meson is massless in two-dimensional QCD.
205:
206: In the next section, we investigate the twist four longitudinal structure
207: function for a positronium in $3+1$ dimension in light-front QED.
208:
209: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
210: \section{Twist Four Longitudinal Structure Function for a Positronium in
211: $3+1$ Dimensional QED}\label{c6qed}
212: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
213:
214: We consider a positronium like bound state $\mid P \rangle$ given by
215: \be
216: \mid P \rangle &=& \sum_{\sigma_1, \sigma_2}
217: \int {dk_1^+ d^2 k_1^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_1^+}}
218: \int {dk_2^+ d^2 k_2^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_2^+}}
219: \nonumber \\
220: && \phi_2(P \mid k_1, \sigma_1; k_2, \sigma_2) \sqrt{2 ((2 \pi)^3 P^+}
221: \delta^3(P-k_1-k_2) b^\dagger(k_1, \sigma_1) d^\dagger(k_2,\sigma_2) \mid 0
222: \rangle \nonumber \\
223: &&~~~~~~ + \sum_{\sigma_1,\sigma_2,\lambda_3}
224: \int {dk_1^+ d^2 k_1^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_1^+}}
225: \int {dk_2^+ d^2 k_2^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_2^+}}
226: \int {dk_3^+ d^2 k_3^\perp \over \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 k_3^+}}
227: \nonumber \\
228: &&~~~~~~~~ \phi_3(P \mid k_1, \sigma_1; k_2, \sigma_2; k_3, \lambda_3)
229: \sqrt{2 (2 \pi)^3 P^+} \delta^3(P-k_1 -k_2 -k_3)
230: \nonumber \\
231: &&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~b^\dagger(k_1 ,\sigma_1)
232: d^\dagger (k_2, \sigma_2) a^\dagger(k_3, \lambda_3) \mid 0 \rangle.
233: \label{c6e8}
234: \e
235:
236: Here $\phi_2$ is the probability amplitude to find an electron and positron in
237: the positronium, $\phi_3 $ is the probability amplitude to find an electron,
238: positron and a photon in the positronium.
239: We restrict ourselves to the three particle sector.
240:
241: We calculate $F^{\tau=4}_4$ in the weak coupling limit in light-front QED
242: using light front gauge, $A^+=0$. We truncate the Fock state upto the three
243: particle sector. This approximation includes the
244: effect of dynamical photon.
245: It can be shown that,
246: for a weak coupling theory the results are the same as obtained using a non-relativistic
247: approximation. However, the entire calculation is fully relativistic and
248: exact in the leading order in $\alpha$ \cite{c6bur}. It can be shown that the recently developed
249: similarity renormalization scheme for light-front QED gives the same results
250: in the leading order in bound state perturbation theory as in the weak coupling treatment and particle number
251: truncation \cite{c6billy}.
252:
253: The twist-4 part of the fermionic component of the longitudinal structure
254: function is given by
255: \be
256: F^{\tau=4}_{L(f)}(x) = {M}_1 + {M}_2,
257: \e
258: \begin{eqnarray}
259: {M}_1~=~{ 1 \over Q^2}~ {x^2 (P^+)^2 \over 2 \pi}~ \int dy^- ~
260: e^{-{ i \over
261: 2}P^+y^-x}~\langle P \mid \overline{\psi}(y^-) \gamma^- \psi(0)-
262: \overline{\psi}(0) \gamma^- \psi(y^-) \mid P \rangle,
263: \label{c6e10}
264: \end{eqnarray}
265: and
266: \begin{eqnarray}
267: {M}_2 &=&-{(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
268: { 1 \over Q^2} {x^2 (P^+)^2 \over 2 \pi}~
269: \int dy^- ~e^{-{ i \over
270: 2}P^+y^-x}~\langle P \mid \overline{\psi}(y^-) \gamma^+
271: \psi(0)\nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
272: \overline{\psi}(0) \gamma^+ \psi(y^-)\mid P \rangle.
273: \label{c6e11}
274: \end{eqnarray}
275:
276: We shall take the mass of the state $\mid P \rangle$ to be M and the electron
277: and positron mass to be $m$. In the weak coupling (non-relativistic) limit, the helicity
278: dependence of the wave function factorizes away, so it is sufficient to
279: consider one helicity sector. Here we shall take the two particle state with
280: $\s_1$ and $\s_2$ up.
281:
282: For a positronium state, $\mid P \rangle$ given by Eq. (\ref{c6e8}) we obtain
283: \be
284: {F^{\tau=4}_{L(f)}(x)}_{diag} &=&(M_1)_{diag} + (M_2)_{diag}
285: \nonumber\\&&~~~~= {4\ov Q^2} \int dx_1 d^2\k_1^\p ((\k_1^\p)^2+m^2) {\mid \psi_2
286: \mid }^2 \Big [ \delta (x-x_1) + \delta(1-x-x_1) \Big ] \nonumber\\&&~~~~
287: +{4\ov Q^2}\sum \int dx_1 d^2
288: \k_1^\p \int dx_2 d^2\k_2^\p {\mid \psi_3 \mid }^2 \Big [
289: ((\k_1^\p)^2+m^2)\delta(x-x_1) + \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
290: ((\k_2^\p)^2+m^2) \delta(x-x_2) \Big ].
291: \label{c6f1}
292: \e
293: The off-diagonal contributions to $ F^{\tau=4}_{L(f)}(x)$ comes from $ M_1 $
294: alone.
295: \be
296: (M_1)_{off-diag} = -{4\ov Q^2} {e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}}\int dx_1d^2\k_1^\p \int
297: dyd^2\k^\p \Big [ M_1^a + M_1^b + M_1^c + M_1^d \Big ]
298: \e
299: where
300: \be
301: M_1^a = {1\ov {E(x_1-y)^2}}\Big [ {2(\k_1^\p)^2 y \ov x_1}\delta(x-x_1) -
302: {2(\k^\p)^2 x_1\ov y} \delta (x-y) \Big ]
303: {\mid \psi_2^{\s_1\s_2} (x_1, \k_1^\p)\mid }^2,
304: \label{c6u1}
305: \e
306: \be
307: M_1^b = {1\ov {E(x-y)^2}}\Big [ -(\k_1^\p)^2\delta(x-x_1) + (\k^\p)^2
308: \delta(x-y) \Big ] \nonumber\\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~\Big (
309: \psi_2^{*\s_1\s_2} (x_1, \k_1^\p) \psi_2^{\s_1\s_2} ( y,\k^\p) + h.c. \Big
310: ),
311: \label{c6u2}
312: \e
313: \be
314: M_1^c = {1\ov {E'(y-x_1)^2}} \Big [ {2(\k_1^\p)^2y\ov
315: (1-x_1)}\delta(1-x-x_1) - {2(\k^\p)^2 (1-x_1)\ov y} \delta (x-1+y) \Big ]
316: \nonumber\\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~{\mid \psi_2^{\s_1\s_2}
317: (x_1, \k_1^\p)\mid}^2,
318: \label{c6u3}
319: \e
320: \be
321: M_1^d = {1\ov {E'(y-x_1)}}\Big [ (\k^\p)^2 \delta (x+y-1) - (\k_1^\p)^2
322: \delta (1-x-x_1) \Big ]\nonumber\\~~~~~~~~~~~~\Big ( \psi_2^{*\s_1\s_2} (x_1, \k_1^\p)
323: \psi_2^{\s_1\s_2}( y,\k^\p) + h. c. \Big ).
324: \label{c6u4}
325: \e
326: In this calculation we have taken all operators to be normal ordered.
327: Also, in Eqs. (\ref{c6u1})- (\ref{c6u4}) we have neglected
328: all mass terms in the vertex, since as described in Appendix C, these terms are
329: suppressed in the weak coupling limit. The energy denominators are given
330: by
331: \be
332: E=M^2-{{(\k^\perp)^2+m^2}\over y}-{{(\kappa_1^\perp)^2+m^2}\over
333: 1-x_1}-{(\kappa_1^\perp-\k^\perp)^2\over x_1-y}\nonumber\\
334: E'=M^2-{{(\kappa_1^\perp)^2+m^2}\over x_1}-{{(\k^\perp)^2+m^2}\over
335: y}-{(\kappa_1^\perp-\k^\perp)^2\over (y-x_1)}.
336: \label{c6u5}
337: \e
338:
339: We define the twist four longitudinal photon structure function as in the
340: previous chapter,
341: \be
342: F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(x) &=& { 1 \over Q^2} {x P^+ \over 2 \pi} \int dy^- ~
343: e^{-{i \over 2} P^+ y^- x} \nonumber \\
344: && ~~~~~\Big [ \langle P \mid (-) F^{+ \lambda}(y^-) F^-_{\lambda}(0) +
345: { 1 \over 4} g^{+-} F^{\lambda \sigma} (y^-) F_{\lambda \sigma}(0) \mid
346: P \rangle \nonumber \\
347: && ~~~~~~~ - {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2} \langle P \mid F^{+ \lambda}(y^-)
348: F^+_{\lambda}(0) \mid P \rangle + ( y^- - 0)\Big ].
349: \e
350:
351:
352: Now, from the definition of $ F_{L(f)}^{\tau=4}(x)$ and $F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(x) $
353: it can be verified explicitly that
354: \be
355: F_{L(f)}^{\tau=4}(-x) = - F_{L(f)}^{\tau=4}(x),\\
356: F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(-x) =- F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(x).
357: \e
358: $ F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(x)$ has both diagonal and off-diagonal parts. As before,
359: we take all operators to be normal ordered and we get
360: \be
361: {{ F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(x)}\ov x}_{diag}&=& {4\ov Q^2} \int dx_1d^2\k_1^\p \int dy
362: d^2\k^\p
363: {\mid \psi_3 \mid }^2 {(-\k_1^\p-\k^\p)^2 \ov (1-x_1-y)} \delta ( 1-x_1-x-y)
364: \nonumber\\&&-{4\ov Q^2} {4e^2\ov
365: {2(2\pi)^3}}\int dx_1d^2\k_1^\p \int dyd^2\k^\p \psi_2^*(x_1,
366: \k_1^\p)\nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
367: \psi_2(y,\k^\p){1\ov {(x_1 - y)^2}}\delta(x_1-x-y).
368: \e
369: The second term in the right hand side is the contribution of the instantaneous
370: interaction.
371: The off-diagonal contribution is
372: \be
373: { F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(x)}_{off-diag} = G_1 + G_2,
374: \e
375: where
376: \be
377: G_1 &=& -{4\ov Q^2} {e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}} \int dx_1 d^2\k_1^\p \int dy
378: d^2\k^\p {x\ov E(x_1-y)^2} \nonumber\\&&~\Big [ \Big ( -4{ (\k_1^\p - \k^\p)^2\ov
379: (x_1-y)} + {2(\k_1^\p)^2\ov x_1} - {2(\k^\p)^2\ov y} \Big )
380: {\mid \psi_2^{\s_1\s_2} (x_1, \k_1^\p)\mid
381: }^2\nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~
382: +\Big ( {2(\k_1^\p-\k^\p)^2\ov {x_1-y)}} + {(\k_1^\p)^2\ov (1-x_1)} -
383: {(\k^\p)^2\ov (1-y)} \Big )
384: \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\Big ( \psi_2^{*\s_1\s_2} (x_1, \k_1^\p)
385: \psi_2^{\s_1\s_2} (y,\k^\p) + h.c. \Big )\Big ]
386: \delta (x-x_1 +y),
387: \e
388: \be
389: G_2 &=& -{4\ov Q^2} {e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}} \int dx_1 d^2\k_1^\p \int dy
390: d^2\k^\p {x\ov {E'(y-x_1)^2}} \nonumber\\&&\Big [\Big (-{4(\k_1^\p -\k^\p)^2\ov
391: (y-x_1)} - {2(\k^\p)^2\ov (1-y)} + {2(\k_1^\p)^2\ov (1-x_1)} \Big )
392: {\mid \psi_2^{\s_1\s_2} (x_1, \k_1^\p)\mid
393: }^2\nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~
394: +\Big (-{2(\k_1^\p -\k^\p)^2\ov
395: (y-x_1)} - {(\k^\p)^2\ov y} + {(\k_1^\p)^2\ov x_1} \Big )
396: \nonumber\\ &&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\Big ( \psi_2^{*\s_1\s_2} (x_1, \k_1^\p)
397: \psi_2^{\s_1\s_2} ( y,\k^\p) + h.c. \Big )\Big ]
398: \delta (x_1+x-y)
399: \e
400: where $E$ and $E'$ are given by Eq. (\ref{c6u5}).
401:
402: From these expressions, we calculate
403: \be
404: \lefteqn{\int_0^1 {{ F_{L(q)}^{\tau=4}(x) + F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(x)}\ov x} dx
405: = {4\ov Q^2} \int dxd^2\k^\p {\psi_2}^* \psi_2 \Big [ {(\k^\p)^2\ov
406: x} + { (\k^\p)^2\ov {1-x}} \Big ]} \nonumber\\&&
407: +{4\ov Q^2} \sum \int dxd^2\k^\p
408: \int dy d^2q^\p {\psi_3}^* \psi_3 \Big [ {(\k^\p)^2\ov
409: {x}} + { (q^\p)^2 \ov y}+ {(-\k^\p - q^\p)^2\ov (1-x-y)} \Big ]
410: \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~+{4\ov Q^2}{e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}}\int dxd^2\k^\p
411: \int dy d^2q^\p [ A_1 + A_2 + B_1 + B_2] \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~
412: - {4\ov Q^2} { 4e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}}\int dxd^2\k^\p \int dy d^2q^\p {1\ov
413: (x-y)^2} \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \psi_2^*(x,\k^\p)\psi_2( y, q^\p)
414: \label{c6c4}
415: \e
416: where
417: \be
418: A_1 = {1\ov E}{1\ov (x-y)}\Big [V_1
419: {\mid \psi_2^{\s_1 \s_2} (x,\k^\p) \mid }^2 + V_2
420: \psi_2^{*\s_1 \s_2} (x,\k^\p)\psi_2^{\sigma_1\sigma_2}(y,q^\p)\Big ]
421: \label{c6a1}
422: \e
423: and
424: \be
425: A_2 &=&{1\ov E'}{1\ov (y-x)}\Big [{V'}_2
426: \psi_2^{*\sigma_1\sigma_2}
427: (x,\kappa^\perp)\psi_2^{\sigma_1\sigma_2}(y,q^\p)
428: \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
429: + {V'}_1
430: {\mid \psi_2^{\s_1 \s_2} (x,\k^\p) \mid }^2\Big ],
431: \label{c6a2}
432: \e
433: \be
434: B_1&=& {1\ov E}{1\ov (x-y)} \Big [ V_1
435: {\mid \psi_2^{\s_1 \s_2} (x,\k^\p) \mid }^2
436: \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+V_2
437: \psi_2^{\s_1 \s_2} (x,\k^\p)\psi_2^{*\sigma_1\sigma_2}
438: (y,q^\p)\Big ],
439: \label{c6c1}
440: \e
441: \be
442: B_2&=& {1\ov E'}{1\ov (y-x)} \Big [{V'}_2
443: \psi_2^{\sigma_1\sigma_2}
444: (x,\kappa^\perp)\psi_2^{*\sigma_1\sigma_2}
445: (y,q^\p) \Big ]
446: \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
447: {V'}_1{\mid \psi_2^{\s_1 \s_2} (x,\k^\p) \mid }^2\Big ].
448: \label{c6c2}
449: \e
450: Here $V_1, V_2, {V'}_1$ and ${V'}_2$ are given by
451: \be
452: V_1 = \Big [{2(\k^\p-q^\p)^2\ov (x-y)^2} + {(x+y)\ov (x-y)}\Big ( {(\k^\p)^2
453: \ov x^2} +
454: {{(q^\p)^2}\ov y^2}\Big )\Big ],
455: \e
456: \be
457: V_2 = {V'}_2 = \Big [{(\k^\p)^2(1-2x)\ov {x(1-x)(x-y)}}+
458: {(q^\p)^2(2y-1) \ov {y(1-y)(x-y)}} -{2(\k^\p-q^\p)^2\ov (x-y)^2} \Big ],
459: \e
460: \be
461: {V'}_1 = \Big [{2(\k^\p-q^\p)^2\ov (x-y)^2} + {(2-x-y)\ov (y-x)
462: }
463: \Big ( {(\k^\p)^2 \ov {(1-x)^2}} +
464: {{(q^\p)^2}\ov {(1-y)^2}}\Big )\Big ].
465: \e
466:
467: In these
468: expressions we have kept only those terms in the vertex which survive in the
469: non-relativistic limit. The helicities $\s_1$ and $\s_2$ are both up and
470: we have neglected all mass terms in the vertex since
471: in this limit they are suppressed. Also in the weak coupling (non-relativistic) limit,
472: we consider only photon exchange interactions and the
473: off-diagonal terms proportional to ${\mid \psi_2 \mid
474: }^2 $ originating from self energy effects can be neglected.
475:
476: Now, from the expression of $\psi_3$ given in Appendix C, we get
477: \be
478: \int dxd^2\k^\p \int dy d^2q^\p {\mid \psi_3 \mid }^2 = { e^2\ov
479: {2(2\pi)^3}} \int dx d^2\k^\p \int dyd^2q^\p \Big [ {1\ov E} B_1 +
480: {1\ov E'} B_2 \Big ]
481: \label{c6c3}
482: \e
483: where $B_1$ and $B_2$ are given earlier.
484: Using this, one can write the second term in the right hand side of Eq. (\ref{c6c4}) as
485: \be
486: \lefteqn{{4\ov Q^2} {e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}} \int dxd^2\k^\p \int dyd^2q^\p
487: \Big [ {1\ov E} B_1 + {1\ov E'} B_2 \Big ]} \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~
488: \Big [ {{(\k^\p)^2 + m^2}\ov x} + {{(q^\p)^2
489: + m^2} \ov y} + {(-\k^\p-q^\p)^2\ov (1-x-y)} \Big ].
490: \e
491: Considering the fact that the total energy is conserved, one can write this
492: as
493: \be
494: -{4\ov Q^2} {e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}}\int dxd^2\k^\p \int dyd^2q^\p
495: ( B_1 + B_2).
496: \e
497: So we get
498: \be
499: \int_0^1 {{ F_{L(q)}^{\tau=4}(x) + F_{L(g)}^{\tau=4}(x)}\ov x} dx
500: &=& {4\ov Q^2} \int dxd^2\k^\p {\psi_2}^* \psi_2 [ {(\k^\p)^2\ov
501: x} + { (\k^\p)^2\ov {1-x}} ]\nonumber\\&&
502: +{4\ov Q^2}{e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}}\int dxd^2\k^\p
503: \int dy d^2q^\p [ A_1 + A_2 ] \nonumber\\
504: &&~~~~~~~~~
505: - {4\ov Q^2} { 4e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}}\int dxd^2\k^\p \int dy d^2q^\p {1\ov
506: (x-y)^2} \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~
507: \psi_2^*(x,\k^\p, 1-x, -\k^\p)\psi_2( y, q^\p).
508: \e
509: Also, if we denote ${(\k^\p)^2 + m^2} \ov {x(1-x)}$ by $M^2_o$, then in the
510: non-relativistic limit, it can be shown that
511: \be
512: M^2 - M^2_0 \simeq O(e^4).
513: \e
514: So we neglect this difference in the energy denominators
515: and replace the bound state mass in $E$ and $E'$ by
516: $ M^2 = {{(\k^\p)^2 + m^2}\over x(1-x)}$. The energy
517: denominators then become
518: \be
519: E = {{(\k^\p)^2 + m^2 } \ov x} - {{ (q^\p)^2 + m^2 }\ov y} - {{ (\k^\p -
520: q^\p)^2} \ov {x-y}} \nonumber\\
521: = -{1\ov (x-y)} [ ({m\ov x})^2 (x-y)^2 + (\k^\p- q^\p)^2]
522: \e
523: and\\
524: \be
525: E' = {{(\k^\p)^2 + m^2 } \ov {1-x}} - {{ (q^\p)^2 + m^2 }\ov {1-y}}
526: + {{ (\k^\p -
527: q^\p)^2 }\ov {x-y}} \nonumber\\
528: = {1\ov (x-y)} [ ({m\ov {1-x}})^2 (x-y)^2 + (\k^\p-q^\p)^2].
529: \e
530: We get, in this limit,
531: \be
532: \int_0^1 {{ F_L^{\tau=4}(x)}\ov x} dx&=& {4\ov Q^2} \int dx d^2\k^\p {\mid
533: \psi_2 \mid }^2 {{(\k^\p)^2 + m^2}\ov {x(1-x)}} \nonumber\\&&
534: -{4\ov Q^2}{2e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}} \int dyd^2q^\p\psi^*_2( x, \k^\p, 1-x,
535: -\k^\p) \psi_2(y,q^\p,
536: 1-y,-q^\p) \nonumber\\&&~~~~
537: \Big [ \Big ({m\ov x}\Big )^2 {1\ov { (\k^\p-q^\p)^2 +({m\ov
538: x})^2(x-y)^2}}\nonumber\\&&~~~~~~ +
539: \Big ({m\ov (1-x)}\Big )^2 {1\ov { (\k^\p-q^\p)^2 + ({m\ov (1-x)})^2(x-y)^2}}\Big
540: ].
541: \label{c6c5}
542: \e
543: Here in the weak coupling limit we have omitted the spin indices. We can see that the interaction part of $\int_0^1 {{ F_L^{\tau=4}(x)}\ov x}
544: dx$ has exactly the same form as in non-relativistic bound state equation
545: (see Appendix C) and hence in the leading order
546: it can be related to the expectation value of the Coulomb interaction. Since
547: $\k^\p$ and $q^\p$ are small in the non-relativistic limit, all $(\k^\p)^2$
548: and
549: $(q^\p)^2$ dependence in the numerator of the interaction terms are neglected
550: compared to the $m^2$ dependent terms. However, the term proportional to
551: ${(\k^\p - q^\p)^2\ov (x-y)^2}$ cannot be neglected because both $x$ and $y$
552: are almost equal and this term cancels the contribution from the
553: instantaneous interaction in the non-relativistic limit. Both of
554: these terms originate from $F_{L(g)}$ and one can see that only the gauge
555: bosonic part of the longitudinal structure function is important for the
556: Coulomb interaction in the weak coupling limit. The $m^2$ terms in the
557: energy denominators combine with the other terms to give the non-vanishing
558: contribution. The fermionic part of the longitudinal structure function
559: gives contribution to the kinetic
560: energy of the fermions. Reminding oneself that we are working in the
561: light-front gauge and not in the Coulomb gauge, this is a manifestation of
562: the gauge invariance of the separation of the Hamiltonian density into a
563: fermionic and a gauge bosonic part.
564:
565:
566: The Fermionic part of the Hamiltonian density is given by
567: \begin{eqnarray}
568: \theta^{+-}_f = i \overline{\psi}\gamma^- \partial^+ \psi
569: = 2 {\psi^{+}}^\dagger \Big [ \alpha^\perp.(i \partial^\perp + gA^\perp) +
570: \gamma^0m \Big ] {1\over {i \partial^+}} \Big [ \alpha^\perp . (i
571: \partial^\perp + gA^\perp) + \gamma^0m \Big ] \psi^+.
572: \end{eqnarray}
573: The gauge bosonic part of the Hamiltonian density is given by\\
574: \begin{eqnarray}
575: \theta^{+-}_g = - F^{+ \lambda} F^{-}_{\lambda}+ { 1 \over 4}
576: g^{+-} (F_{\lambda \sigma})^2 =
577: { 1 \over 4} \Big (\partial^+ A^{- }\Big )^2 +
578: { 1 \over 2} F^{ij} F_{ij}
579: \nonumber \\
580: = (\partial^i A^j)^2
581: + 2e \partial^i A^i \left( \frac{1}{\partial^+}
582: \right) 2 (\psi^+)^{\dagger}
583: \psi^+ \nonumber \\~~~ + e^2 \left( \frac{1}{\partial^+}
584: \right) 2 (\psi^+)^{\dagger}
585: \psi^+
586: \left( \frac{1}{\partial^+}\right)
587: 2 (\psi^+)^{\dagger}
588: \psi^+.
589: \end{eqnarray}
590: The fermionic part of the longitudinal momentum density is given by
591: \begin{eqnarray}
592: \theta^{++}_{f} = i \overline{\psi} \gamma^+ \partial^+ \psi.
593: \end{eqnarray}
594:
595: The gauge bosonic part of the longitudinal momentum density
596: \begin{eqnarray}
597: \theta^{++}_{g} = - F^{+ \lambda } F^-_{\lambda }.
598: \end{eqnarray}
599: For a positronium like bound state, we calculate the matrix element of
600: $\theta_f^{+-}$ and $ \theta_g^{+-}$. The matrix elements have both diagonal
601: and off diagonal contribution. The diagonal contribution to the matrix element
602: from the fermionic and the gauge bosonic part is given by
603: \begin{eqnarray}
604: \lefteqn{{\Big[\langle P \mid\theta^{+-}\mid P \rangle -
605: {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
606: \langle P \mid \theta^{++} \mid P \rangle \Big
607: ]}_{diag}=}\nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~2\int
608: dx_1d^2\kappa_1^\perp \psi^*_2\psi_2 \Big [{(\kappa_1^\perp)^2 \over {x_1}} +
609: {(\kappa_2^\perp)^2 \over (1- x_1)}\Big ]+ \nonumber\\& &{2\int dx_1d^2\kappa_1^\perp
610: \int dx_2d^2\kappa_2^\perp \psi_3^*\psi_3 \Big [{(\kappa_1^\perp)^2 \over {x_1}} +
611: {(\kappa_2^\perp)\over {x_2}} + {(-\kappa_1^\perp -\kappa_2^\perp)^2
612: \over (1-x_1 -x_2)}}\Big ]\nonumber\\& &~~~~
613: -{8e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}} \int dx_1 d^2\k_1^\p \int dy d^2\k^\p
614: \psi_2^*(x_1,\k_1^\p)
615: \psi_2(y, \k^\p) {1\ov
616: {(x-y)^2}}
617: \end{eqnarray}
618: where $\theta^{+-}=\theta^{+-}_f + \theta^{+-}_g$.
619:
620: The off-diagonal part can be written as
621: \be
622: { \Big [ \langle P \mid \theta^{+-} \mid P \rangle - {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
623: \langle P \mid \theta^{++} \mid P\rangle \Big ]}_{off-diag}
624: ={\cal V}_1 +{\cal V}_2
625: \e
626: where,
627: \be
628: {\cal V}_1= {2e^2\over {2(2\pi)^3}} \int dx d^2\kappa^\perp
629: \int dy d^2q^\p \Big [ {1\ov E}{1\ov (x-y)} \Big [2V_1
630: {\mid \psi_2^{\s_1 \s_2} (x,\k^\p) \mid }^2
631: \nonumber\\+V_2
632: (\psi_2^{*\s_1 \s_2} (x,\k^\p)\psi_2^{\sigma_1\sigma_2}(y,q^\p)+ h. c.) \Big
633: ],
634: \e
635:
636: \be
637: {\cal V}_2= {2e^2\over {2(2\pi)^3}} \int dx d^2\kappa^\perp \int dy
638: d^2q^\perp
639: {1\ov E'}{1\ov (y-x)} \Big [
640: 2{V'}_1
641: {\mid \psi_2^{\s_1 \s_2} (x,\k^\p) \mid }^2 \nonumber\\+{V'}_2
642: (\psi_2^{\sigma_1\sigma_2}
643: (x,\kappa^\perp,1-x,-\kappa^\perp)\psi_2^{\sigma_1\sigma_2}(y,q^\p)+
644: h. c.) \Big ].
645: \e
646: Here the expressions for $V_1, V_2, {V'}_1, {V'}_2, E$ and $E'$ are
647: given earlier. As before, we have taken the two particle state with both
648: $\s_1$ ,$\s_2$ up.
649:
650: Considering only the photon exchange interactions and putting $M^2=M_0^2$ in
651: the energy denominators as before, one obtains in the non-relativistic limit
652: for a weak coupling theory
653: \be
654: \lefteqn{ \Big [ \langle P \mid \theta^{+-} \mid P \rangle - {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
655: \langle P \mid \theta^{++} \mid P\rangle \Big ] =
656: 2 \int dx d^2\k^\p {\mid
657: \psi_2 \mid }^2 {{(\k^\p)^2 + m^2}\ov {x(1-x)}}} \nonumber\\~~&&
658: -2{2e^2\ov {2(2\pi)^3}} \int dyd^2q^\p\psi^*_2( x, \k^\p, 1-x,
659: -\k^\p) \psi_2(y,q^\p,
660: 1-y,-q^\p) \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
661: \Big [ ({m\ov x})^2 {1\ov { (\k^\p-q^\p)^2 + ({m\ov
662: x})^2(x-y)^2}} \nonumber\\&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
663: ({m\ov (1-x)})^2 {1\ov { (\k^\p-q^\p)^2
664: + ({m\ov (1-x)})^2(x-y)^2}}\Big ].
665: \label{c6d3}
666: \e
667: Introducing the three vector $\vec{p}$ (see Appendix C), this can be written
668: as
669: \be
670: \Big [ \langle P \mid \theta^{+-} \mid P \rangle - {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
671: \langle P \mid \theta^{++} \mid P\rangle \Big ] = 2 \int d^3\vec{p} {\mid
672: \phi(\vec{p})\mid }^2 4 [(\vec{p})^2 + m^2] \nonumber\\~~~~ -{{4e^2}\ov
673: {2(2\pi)^3}} \int d^3\vec{p}\int d^3\vec{p'} \phi^*(\vec{p}) \phi(\vec{p'})
674: {4m\ov ( \vec{p} - \vec{p'})^2 }.
675: \e
676: Multiplying the bound state equation (see Appendix C) by $\phi^*(\vec{p})$ and
677: integrating we get
678: \be
679: M^2 = \int d^3\vec{p} {\mid
680: \phi(\vec{p})\mid }^2 4 [(\vec{p})^2 + m^2] -{{2e^2}\ov
681: {2(2\pi)^3}} \int d^3\vec{p}\int d^3\vec{p'} \phi^*(\vec{p}) \phi(\vec{p'})
682: {4m\ov ( \vec{p} - \vec{p'})^2 }.
683: \label{c6d4}
684: \e
685: Hence from Eqs. (\ref{c6c5}), (\ref{c6d3}) and (\ref{c6d4}) it can be seen that the
686: sum rule is satisfied in the lowest order in weak coupling limit
687: for a positronium target in light-front QED and it can be written as
688: \be
689: \int_0^1 {{ F_L^{\tau=4}(x)}\ov x} dx = {2\ov Q^2}\Big [ \langle P \mid \theta^{+-} \mid P \rangle - {(P^\perp)^2 \over (P^+)^2}
690: \langle P \mid \theta^{++} \mid P\rangle \Big ]
691: = 4{M^2\ov Q^2}.
692: \e
693: In the non-relativistic limit for a weak coupling theory,
694: \be
695: M^2 = 4m^2 + 4mB_e,
696: \e
697: where $B_e$ is the binding energy of positronium.
698:
699: From Eq. (\ref{c6d4}) we obtain
700: \be
701: B_e = \int d^3\vec{p} {\mid
702: \phi(\vec{p})\mid }^2 {(\vec{p})^2\ov m} -{{2e^2}\ov
703: {2(2\pi)^3}} \int d^3\vec{p}\int d^3\vec{p'} \phi^*(\vec{p}) \phi(\vec{p'})
704: {1\ov ( \vec{p} - \vec{p'})^2}.
705: \e
706: The first term in the right hand side is the kinetic energy with ${m\over 2}$ being the reduced
707: mass of the two body system and the second term is the expectation value of
708: the Coulomb interaction. So we see that in the weak coupling limit, the sum
709: rule reduces to a relation connecting the kinetic and potential energies to
710: the binding energy.
711:
712: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
713: \section{$F_L^{\tau=4}$ for the Ground State of Positronium}\label{c6pos}
714: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
715:
716: The bound state equation (see Appendix C) can be analytically solved for QED,
717: which is the primary motivation for studying QED. The ground state wave
718: function of positronium is given by
719: \be
720: \phi_{\nu,s_e,s_{e'}}( \vec{p},s,s') = \phi_{\nu}(\vec{p}) \delta_{s_e,s}
721: \delta_{s_{e'},s'}
722: \e
723: where $s_e$ and $s_{e'}$ label the spin quantum numbers of the electron and
724: positron respectively and $\nu$ denotes all the other quantum numbers, $\nu
725: = n,l,m$ correspond with the standard non-relativistic quantum numbers of
726: hydrogen.
727: The spin part factorizes out and the normalization condition is given in
728: Appendix C.
729: The wave function is given by
730: \be
731: \phi_{\nu}(\vec{p}) = {4(e_n)^{5\ov 2}\ov ((e_n)^2 +
732: (\vec{p})^2)^2}Y_{\nu}(\Omega_p),
733: \e
734:
735: where
736: \be
737: e_n = {m\alpha\ov {2n}},
738: \e
739: and
740: \be
741: Y_\nu(\Omega_p) = Y_{n,l,m}(\Omega)
742: \e
743: are Hyperspherical harmonics. Here $0 \leq \mid m \mid \leq l \leq n-1$.
744:
745: For 1s state of positronium, we have
746: \be
747: Y_{1,0,0} = {1\ov {\sqrt {2{\pi}^2}}}.
748: \e
749: In terms of $x$ and $\k^\p$, the 1s state wave function can be written as
750: \be
751: \phi_2(x,\k^\p) = \sqrt{m\ov {\pi}^2} {4(e_1)^{5\ov 2}\ov {\Big [ (e_1)^2 - m^2 +
752: {1\ov 4} { {(\k^\p)^2 + m^2} \ov {x(1-x)}} \Big ]}^2}
753: \e
754: which agrees with \cite{c6brod} for non-relativistic $x \simeq {1\ov 2}$.
755:
756: The leading order contributions to the structure functions $F_2(x)$ and
757: $F_L^{\tau=4}(x)$ can be directly evaluated using this wave function.
758: \be
759: F_2(x)&=& \int d^2\k^\p {\mid \psi_2(x,\k^\p)\mid }^2
760: \nonumber\\&=& \int d^2\k^\p {Ax^4(1-x)^4 \ov {\Big [ m^2[(1-2x)^2 +
761: {\alpha}^2x(1-x)] + (\k^\p)^2\Big ]}^4}
762: \e
763: where $A=4.78 \times {10}^{-12} (Mev)^6$.
764: The integral is convergent and can be evaluated analytically
765: introducing a cutoff
766: $\Lambda$ and taking the limit $\Lambda \rightarrow \infty$ in the end. We get
767: \be
768: F_2(x) = 28.15 \times {10}^{-11} {x^4(1-x)^4\ov {\Big [ (1-2x)^2 +
769: {\alpha}^2 x(1-x) \Big ]}^3}.
770: \e
771: Near $x={1\ov 2}$, $F_2(x) \simeq 1861.22 x(1-x)$.
772: $F_2(x)$ is very sharply peaked at $x={1\ov 2}$.
773:
774: The twist four longitudinal structure function is given by
775: \be
776: {F_L^{\tau=4}\ov x}&=& {4\ov Q^2} \int d^2\k^\p {(\k^\p)^2 \ov {x(1-x)}}
777: {\mid \psi_2 \mid }^2
778: \nonumber\\&&
779: ={4\ov Q^2} \int d^2\k^\p {{A(\k^\p)^2 x^3 (1-x)^3 }\ov
780: {\Big [ m^2 [(1-2x)^2 + {\alpha}^2 x(1-x)] + (\k^\p)^2 \Big ]}^4}.
781: \e
782: Here we have considered only the $(\k^\p)^2$ dependent part, the integral of
783: which is directly connected to the kinetic energy of the electron-positron
784: pair.
785: Evaluating the integral analytically, we get
786: \be
787: {F_L(x)\ov x} = 14.7 \times {10}^{-11} {1\ov Q^2}{x^3(1-x)^3\ov {\Big [
788: (1-2x)^2 + {\alpha}^2 x(1-x) \Big ]}^2}.
789: \e
790: $Q^2 {F_L(x)\ov x}$ is sharply peaked at $x={1\over 2}$. Near the maximum
791: \be
792: {{F_L(x)\ov x}Q^2 \simeq 14.7 \times {10}^{-11}
793: {1\ov {{\alpha}^4 x(1-x)}}}.
794: \e
795: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
796: \section{Discussions}\label{c6dis}
797: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
798: To summarize, in this chapter, we have investigated the twist-four longitudinal structure
799: function for a meson in $1+1$ dimensional QCD and also for a positronium like bound state in light-front QED in the weak
800: coupling limit.
801:
802: In the previous chapter, we have derived a new sum rule for the twist four
803: part of the longitudinal structure function.
804: The validity of the sum rule has been explicitly checked in two dimensional
805: QCD ('t Hooft model). To get a qualitative picture of the twist four
806: structure function we have computed numerically both $F_2$ and $F_L$
807: structure functions in the 't Hooft model for the
808: ground state wave function calculated using a variational ansatz.
809:
810: In the weak coupling limit in light-front QED, we get expressions that look similar to the
811: familiar non-relativistic expressions, but the entire calculation is fully
812: relativistic in the leading order in bound state perturbation theory. We have explicitly verified a sum rule for $F^{\tau=4}_L$ that we
813: previously proposed. We have shown that in the weak coupling
814: limit, the sum rule reduces to a relation connecting the kinetic and the
815: potential energies to the binding energy of positronium. We have also shown
816: that, in this limit, the fermionic part of $F^{\tau=4}_L$ contributes only
817: to the kinetic energy of the fermions and not to the interactions.
818:
819: The twist four part of the longitudinal structure function is important
820: since it is the leading non-perturbative contribution to $F_L$. The leading
821: twist contribution to $F_L$ is perturbative, in contrast to the case of
822: $F_2$. This analysis for a bound state in weak-coupling light-front QED is
823: quite interesting since it gives an idea of what goes in such a calculation
824: in light-front QCD.
825: The situation in light-front QCD is somewhat different
826: because similarity renormalization group technique generates a confining
827: interaction even in $O(g^2)$ in the effective Hamiltonian which
828: makes it impossible to solve the bound state equation analytically.
829: However, similarity renormalization upto $O(e^2)$ does not produce any
830: additional interaction in the effective QED Hamiltonian and in the weak
831: coupling limit, one can work with the canonical Hamiltonian. Similarity
832: renormalization results agree with the results using particle number
833: truncation in the weak coupling limit for light-front QED. Inspite of
834: these differences, the overall computational framework in QCD is the same
835: and this analysis in light-front QED allows an analytic understanding of the
836: problem.
837: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
838:
839: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
840: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
841:
842:
843: \bibitem{c6hari1} A. Harindranath, R. Kundu, W. M. Zhang, Phys. Rev. {\bf D
844: 59}, 094012, (1999).
845:
846:
847:
848: \bibitem{c6sim} S. D. Glazek and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 48}, 5863,
849: (1993); S. D. Glazek and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 49}, 4214,
850: (1993); K. G. Wilson, T. S. Walhout, A. Harindranath, W. M. Zhang, R. J.
851: Perry and S. D. Glazek, Phys. Rev {\bf D 49}, 6720 (1994).
852:
853: \bibitem{c6mar} M. Brisudova and R. J. Perry, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 54}, 1831,
854: (1996); M. Brisudova, R. J. Perry and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf
855: 78}, 1227 (1997); W. M. Zhang, Phys. Rev. {\bf D56}, 1528 (1997).
856:
857: \bibitem{c6prd} A. Harindranath, R. Kundu, A. Mukherjee, J. P. Vary, Phys. Lett
858: {\bf B 417}, 361, (1998); A. Harindranath, R. Kundu, A. Mukherjee, J. P. Vary,
859: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 58}, 114022, (1998).
860:
861: \bibitem{c6as} A. Mukherjee, hep-ph/0104175.
862:
863: \bibitem{c6berg} H. Bergknoff, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B122}, 215 (1977).
864:
865: \bibitem{c6bur} M. Burkardt, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 373}, 371, (1992).
866:
867: \bibitem{c6billy} {\it `Light-Front Hamiltonian Approach to the Bound State
868: Problem in Quantum Electrodynamics'}, B. D. Jones, Ph. D. thesis, The Ohio
869: State University, 1997.
870:
871:
872: \bibitem{c6brod} S. J. Brodsky and G. P. Leapage, Phys. Rev. {\bf D22}, 2157,
873: (1980).
874:
875: \end{thebibliography}
876:
877: %\end{document}