1: %=======================================================================
2: % This manuscript is in REVTEX
3: % 06/17/2001
4: %=======================================================================
5: \documentstyle[preprint,aps,prl,floats,epsf]{revtex}
6: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps,floats,epsf]{revtex}
7:
8: %%------------
9: %% NEW Trick
10: %%------------
11: \newif\ifmad
12: %\madtrue % for Madison and Linux processing
13: \madfalse % for non-Madison processing
14:
15: \ifmad
16: \makeatletter
17: \ifx\every@math@size\undefined\else
18: \let\old@expast\@expast
19: \def\@expast#1{\old@expast{#1}\let\@tempa\reserved@a}
20: \fi
21: \makeatother
22: \fi
23: %%----------------------------------------------------------------
24:
25: \tightenlines %% LANL requests single line spacing to save paper.
26:
27: %=======================================================================
28: % TITLE PAGE
29: %=======================================================================
30:
31: %-----------------------------------
32: % Preprint Number
33: %-----------------------------------
34: \preprint{\font\fortssbx=cmssbx10 scaled \magstep2
35: \hbox to \hsize{
36: \hfill$\vcenter{\hbox{\bf MADPH-01-1231}
37: \hbox{\bf OKHEP-01-04}
38: \hbox{\bf hep-ph/0106189}
39: \hbox{June 2001}}$ }
40: }
41:
42: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
43: % BEGIN DOCUMENT
44: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
45: \begin{document}
46: %\draft
47:
48: %-----------------------------------
49: % Title
50: %-----------------------------------
51: \title{\vspace*{.25in}
52: Implications of new CMB data for neutralino dark matter}
53:
54: %-----------------------------------
55: % Authors
56: %-----------------------------------
57: \author{V. Barger$^a$ and Chung Kao$^b$}
58:
59: %-----------------------------------
60: % Address
61: %-----------------------------------
62: \address{
63: $^a$Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin,
64: Madison, WI 53706 \\
65: $^b$Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma,
66: Norman, OK 73019}
67:
68: %\date{\today}
69:
70: \maketitle
71:
72: \thispagestyle{empty}
73:
74: %-----------------------------------
75: % Abstract
76: %-----------------------------------
77: \begin{abstract}
78:
79: The combination of new cosmic microwave background data with
80: cosmological priors has determined the physical cold dark matter (cdm)
81: density to be $\Omega_{\rm cdm} h^2 = 0.13\pm0.01$. We find the
82: corresponding regions of parameters in the minimal supergravity
83: model for which the lightest neutralino is the cdm particle.
84: We then compare with the muon anomalous magnetic moment ($a_\mu$)
85: measurement, the mass of the lighter CP-even Higgs boson ($h^0$),
86: the trilepton search at the upgraded Fermilab Tevatron collider,
87: and a direct search for relic neutralinos.
88: The intersection of $\Omega_{\rm cdm} h^2$ and $a_\mu$ constraints
89: selects $\tan\beta\approx 40-45$.
90:
91: \end{abstract}
92:
93:
94: %=======================================================================
95: % BEGIN MAIN TEXT
96: %=======================================================================
97: \newpage
98:
99: Recent precision measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB)
100: anisotropy~\cite{Boomerang,DASI,Maxima} place restrictive constraints
101: on the densities of matter and dark energy in the Universe.
102: The results of parameter extraction from the CMB data made in conjunction with
103: other cosmological priors (flat universe, supernovae, large-scale structure)
104: give a baryon density\footnote{The Hubble constant at the present time
105: is expressed as $H_0 = 100 h \; \rm km\; s^{-1} \; Mpc^{-1}$.}$^,
106: $\footnote{The relative density, $\Omega = \rho/\rho_{\rm c}$,
107: is the ratio of the density $\rho$ to the critical density
108: $\rho_{\rm c}$ which would close the Universe.}
109: $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.022\pm0.003$, which is very consistent with the
110: predictions of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis theory.
111: A cold dark matter density $\Omega_{\rm cdm} h^2 = 0.13\pm0.01$
112: is extracted \cite{Boomerang,DASI}.
113: This restrictive range for $\Omega_{\rm cdm} h^2$
114: has significant impact on the allowed masses of cold dark matter
115: particles of supersymmetry origin, which we study here.
116:
117: The lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) of a supersymmetry theory
118: with a conserved $R$-parity\footnote{The Standard Model particles and
119: Higgs bosons have $R=+1$ and their superpartners have $R=-1$.}
120: is a preferred candidate for cold dark matter.
121: In the minimal supergravity (mSUGRA) model \cite{sugra},
122: supersymmetry (SUSY) is broken in a hidden sector and SUSY breaking
123: is communicated to the observable sector through gravitational interactions.
124: %
125: For most of the mSUGRA parameter space, the LSP is the lightest neutralino
126: ($\chi_1^0$), which is a linear combination of gauginos
127: ($\widetilde B, \widetilde W_3$) and and higgsinos ($\widetilde
128: H_1, \widetilde H_2$) that are superpartners of gauge bosons ($B, W_3$)
129: and Higgs bosons ($H_1, H_2$).
130:
131: Neutralinos existed abundantly in the early Universe in thermal
132: equilibrium with other particles; their pair annihilations were balanced
133: by pair creation. As the Universe cooled, the neutralino density became
134: Boltzmann-suppressed.
135: %
136: Deviation from thermal equilibrium began when the temperature reached
137: the freeze-out temperature $T_f \simeq m_{\chi^0_1}/20$.
138: After the temperature dropped to $\sim{1\over5}T_f$,
139: the annihilation rate became equal to the expansion rate and
140: $n_{\chi^0_1} = H/\left<\sigma v\right>$, where $H$ is the Hubble
141: expansion rate at that temperature.
142: %
143: Here $\left<\sigma v\right>$ is the thermally averaged cross section
144: times neutralino velocity\cite{jkg}.
145: The relic mass density became
146: %
147: \begin{equation}
148: \Omega_{\chi_1^0} h^2 = n_{\chi_1^0} m_{\chi_1^0} / \rho_{\rm c} = H
149: m_{\chi_1^0} / \left( \left< \sigma v \right> \rho_c \right)
150: \end{equation}
151: %
152: and the neutralinos remained as cold dark matter.
153:
154: \bigskip\noindent
155: \underline{\bf mSUGRA Model\ }
156: The predicted $\Omega_{\chi_1^0}$ in the mSUGRA model increases with
157: $m_{\chi_1^0}$, except where resonances of neutral Higgs bosons ($H^0,A^0$)
158: enhance $\left<\sigma v\right>$ and thereby suppress $\Omega_{\chi_1^0}$.
159: Previous analyses made to limit the mSUGRA mass parameters allowed broad
160: regions of the cdm density, typically
161: $0.1 \alt\Omega_{\chi_1^0} h^2 \alt 0.5$~\cite{run2}.
162: With the very restrictive range now selected from the CMB data and priors,
163: we can expect much tighter constraints on the mass spectrum
164: of supersymmetric (SUSY) particles.
165: %
166: In the present study we consider the $2\sigma$ cdm density range
167: $0.11\alt \Omega_{\chi_1^0} h^2 \alt 0.15$ determined by the CMB analyses.
168: %
169: We evolve supersymmetry masses and couplings from the grand unified
170: scale using two-loop renormalization equations~\cite{run2}.
171: The mSUGRA parameters are a scalar mass ($m_0$),
172: a gaugino mass ($m_{1/2}$), a trilepton coupling ($A_0$),
173: the sign of a Higgs mixing parameter ($\mu$), and
174: the ratio of Higgs field vacuum expectation values at the electroweak
175: scale ($\tan\beta = v_2/v_1$).
176: The value of $A_0$ only significantly affects results for high $\tan\beta$;
177: we initially take $A_0 = 0$ and study the $A_0$ dependence later.
178: %
179: Moreover, we focus on $\mu>0$, in the sign convention of Ref.~\cite{run2},
180: since positive $\mu$ is preferred by mSUGRA
181: calculations of the $b\to s\gamma$ decay branching
182: fraction~\cite{bsg1,bsg2} and required if the $2.6\sigma$
183: deviations of the muon anomalous magnetic moment
184: $a_\mu={1\over2}(g-2)_\mu$ from the Standard Model (SM) \cite{muon1}
185: are of supersymmetry origin\cite{muon2,drees,baer01}.
186:
187: \bigskip\noindent
188: \underline{\bf CDM Density\ }
189: The dark blue bands in Figure 1 show regions
190: in the $m_0$ versus $m_{1/2}$ plane
191: where the predicted $\Omega_{\rm cdm} h^2$ is within the CMB $2\sigma$ range.
192: The four panels of the figure display $\tan\beta$ values of 3, 10, 35, and 50.
193: The chargino search at LEP\,2 \cite{SUSY} excludes
194: $m_{\chi_1^\pm} < 103$~GeV,
195: and the Higgs search at LEP\,2 excludes $0.5<\tan\beta < 2.4$ \cite{Higgs}.
196: %
197: At $\tan\beta = 3$, 10 and 35, there are pockets of allowed masses
198: with $m_0,m_{1/2}\alt 400$~GeV. We note that the lightest neutralino mass
199: is related to $m_{1/2}$ by \cite{omhs97}
200: %
201: \begin{equation}
202: m_{\chi_1^0} \simeq 0.435m_{1/2} -2.8 \sin2\beta -10.4
203: \end{equation}
204: %
205: and the lightest chargino mass is given by
206: $m_{\chi_1^\pm} \approx 2m_{\chi_1^0}$.
207: %
208: The low mass pockets at $\tan\beta = 3$ and 10 allowed by the CMB range of
209: $\Omega_{\rm cdm} h^2$ have chargino and neutralino masses that are
210: accessible at Run~II of the Tevatron collider\cite{run2}.
211: There is an additional narrow allowed band extending to high $m_{1/2}$,
212: where $\chi^0_1 - \tilde\tau_1$ coannihilation dominates\footnote{
213: We use the calculations of coannihilation in Ref.~\cite{Toby}.}
214: \cite{Toby,Arnowitt:2001yh};
215: the region just below this band is excluded because the charged
216: $\tilde\tau_1$ would be the LSP there.
217: When $\tan\beta$ is increased to 35, the allowed masses in the pocket region
218: increase and also a new narrow window opens at high $m_0$, just below
219: the theoretically excluded boundary from electroweak symmetry breaking.
220: Then at $\tan\beta=50$, the approximate maximum value for which the
221: theory is perturbative, solutions exist only at high $m_0$ and $m_{1/2}$
222: masses. The allowed bands and the empty regions in Fig.~1(d)
223: can be qualitatively understood in terms of the $s$-channel
224: Higgs resonance effects.
225:
226: \bigskip\noindent
227: \underline{\bf Muon $\bf g-2$\ }
228: The reported $2.6\sigma$ deviation of the muon anomalous magnetic
229: moment~\cite{muon1} from its predicted SM value has triggered
230: supersymmetry explanations (see e.g.\ Ref.~\cite{muon2,baer01}).
231: Interestingly, the low mass pockets in Figs.~1(a,b,c) from our cdm
232: analysis have considerable overlap with the $2\sigma$ region favored
233: by the E821 measurement~\cite{baer01}. The dashed curves in Fig.~1
234: show the mSUGRA predictions for
235: \begin{eqnarray}
236: %
237: \Delta a_\mu = \left[a_\mu - a_\mu({\rm SM})\right] / 10^{-10}.
238: %
239: \label{eq:damuon}
240: %
241: \end{eqnarray}
242: The curves represent
243: the central value of the measurement $\Delta a_\mu(\rm exp)=43$ and
244: its $2\sigma$ uncertainties $\Delta a_\mu({\rm exp}) \pm 2\sigma = 75, 11$.
245: At large $\tan\beta$, the chargino-sneutrino loop diagram
246: is the dominant SUSY contributor to $\Delta a_\mu$.
247:
248: \bigskip\noindent
249: \underline{\bf Lightest Higgs Boson\ }
250: The LEP\,2 collaborations found a tentative signal for a Higgs boson
251: with mass of 115~GeV \cite{Higgs}. The contours of mSUGRA parameters
252: for which this mass is predicted are shown in Figure~1.
253: %
254: We calculate the masses and couplings in the Higgs sector with one-loop
255: corrections from the top, the bottom and the tau Yukawa interactions
256: in the RGE-improved one-loop effective potential \cite{one-loop}
257: at the scale $Q = \sqrt{m_{\tilde{t}_L}m_{\tilde{t}_R}}$ \cite{Baer97}.
258: %
259: With this scale choice, the RGE improved one-loop corrections
260: approximately reproduce the dominant two-loop perturbative calculation
261: of the mass of the lighter CP-even Higgs scalar ($m_h$) \cite{two-loop}.
262: %
263: We note that pocket regions at $\tan\beta = 3, 10$ have
264: $m_h \alt 100$ GeV, 115 GeV respectively,
265: and are thus not favored by the LEP\,2 Higgs search.
266: However, at $\tan\beta = 10$, the coannihilation band overlaps
267: with $m_h \agt 115$ GeV.
268:
269: \bigskip\noindent
270: \underline{\bf Trileptons at Run~II\ }
271: Systematic studies have been made of potential for supersymmetry
272: discovery in Run~II at the upgraded Fermilab Tevatron collider
273: \cite{run2}. The most promising signal is trileptons from
274: chargino--neutralino ($\chi_1^\pm \chi_2^0$) associated production.
275: Figure~1 shows the $3\sigma$ signal contours with 30~fb$^{-1}$
276: luminosity \cite{trilepton}.
277: The CMB allowed mass regions at $\tan\beta \alt 10$ have considerable
278: overlap with the trilepton signal regions accessible at Run~II.
279:
280: \bigskip\noindent
281: \underline{\bf Direct Neutralino Detection\ }
282: In the mSUGRA model the $\chi^0_1-$nucleon scattering cross-section
283: depends strongly on the values of $\tan\beta$ and $m_{\chi^0_1}$ \cite{jkg},
284: increasing with $\tan\beta$ but decreasing with $m_{\chi^0_1}$.
285: The expected event rate in a $^{73}$Ge detector for
286: $m_{\chi^0_1} \simeq 120$~GeV and $\tan\beta=35$
287: is about 0.015 events/kg-day~\cite{Brhlik}.
288: The CDMS experiment in the Soudan mine expects to obtain
289: a 2500 kg-day exposure on Germanium~\cite{cdms}.
290: %
291: The CDMS-Soudan experiment should observe at least 10 events
292: due to neutralino scattering
293: at $\tan\beta = 10$ with $m_{\chi^0_1} \alt 120$ GeV ($m_{1/2} \alt 300$ GeV)
294: or
295: at $\tan\beta = 35$ with $m_{\chi^0_1} \alt 160$ GeV ($m_{1/2} \alt 400$ GeV)
296: \cite{Brhlik}.
297:
298: \bigskip\noindent
299: \underline{\bf Indirect Neutralino Detection\ }
300: The CMB solutions at the largest $\tan\beta$ have neutralinos masses
301: above 200~GeV. Large ice and water detectors
302: (AMANDA, IceCube, ANTARES) can detect the high energy neutrinos from
303: the annihilations of such heavy relic neutralinos that have
304: gravitationally accumulated in the Sun~\cite{bhhk}.
305:
306: \bigskip\noindent
307: \underline{\bf Intersection of Constraints\ }
308: The $2 \sigma$ bands in Fig.~1 for $\Omega_{\rm cdm} h^2$ overlap
309: the $2 \sigma$ ranges of the $\Delta a_\mu$ measurement,
310: with different allowed $m_{1/2}$, $m_0$ mass regions in each $\tan\beta$ case.
311: If we ask for a more restrictive intersection of
312: the $\Omega_{\rm cdm} h^2$ bands with the 1$\sigma$ allowed ranges
313: for $\Delta a_\mu$, high $\tan\beta$ values of order 40 to 45
314: are selected as shown in Fig.~2.
315:
316: A further constraint of $m_h =$ 115 GeV gives $m_{1/2} \sim 300$ GeV
317: and $m_0 \approx 350-550$ GeV for $\tan\beta \simeq 40-45$.
318: The corresponding SUSY particle masses are listed in Table II.
319:
320: \bigskip\noindent
321: \underline{\bf Infrared Fixed Point\ }
322: In SUGRA models with approximate $b-\tau$ Yukawa unification
323: at the grand unified scale, the renormalization group equations
324: have solutions dominated by the quasi-fixed point of the top
325: Yukawa coupling, which can be realized at high $\tan\beta$ \cite{BBOP,IRFP2}.
326: Moreover, high $\tan\beta$ texture models for the quark and the lepton
327: mass matrices \cite{DHR} require large values of $\tan\beta$.
328:
329: \bigskip\noindent
330: \underline{\bf Summary\ }
331: We have determined the narrow regions of mSUGRA parameter space that can
332: account for the restrictive cold dark matter density range
333: inferred from recent CMB measurements.
334: Our results are given in Figure~1 for four choices of $\tan\beta$.
335:
336: i) At $\tan\beta \alt 10$, the $a_\mu$ measurement within 2$\sigma$
337: can be explained and a trilepton signal is predicted in Run\,II
338: at the Tevatron; however, $m_h \alt 110$ GeV at $\tan\beta = 3$ makes
339: this value of $\tan\beta$ less likely.
340:
341: ii) At $\tan\beta = 35$, both the measured $a_\mu$ within 2$\sigma$
342: and the $m_h = 115$~GeV hint from LEP\,2 are consistent with the CMB band;
343: the trilepton signal here is marginal.
344:
345: iii) At $\tan\beta=50$, the allowed bands from
346: $\Omega_{\rm cdm}h^2$ and $\Delta a_\mu$
347: are overlapping near the 2$\sigma$ limit of $\Delta a_\mu \sim 11$.
348:
349: iv) Consistency of $\Omega_{\rm cdm}h^2$ within the 1$\sigma$ uncertainty
350: range of the $a_\mu$ measurement selects $\tan\beta \approx 40-45$.
351: We emphasize that this result does not depend on the Higgs mass.
352: The dependence of the solution on the trilinear coupling ($A_0$)
353: is illustrated in Table I.
354:
355: v) With $m_h = 115$~GeV as an additional constraint, supersymmetric particle
356: masses are approximately determined as given in Table II.
357: The dependence on $\tan\beta$ is illustrated there.
358: The predicted Higgs width is about 5~MeV,
359: compared to the SM Higgs width of 3~MeV.
360: A broader Higgs width would ease beam resolution requirements for muon
361: collider Higgs factories\cite{physrep}.
362:
363: Analysis of further data already taken on $a_\mu$~\cite{muon1} will reduce
364: its uncertainty by about a factor of 2 and allow even closer specification
365: of mSUGRA parameters derived from the overlap of $\Delta a_\mu$
366: and the CMB favored neutralino relic density.
367:
368: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
369: % THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
370: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
371: \section*{Acknowledgments}
372:
373: We are grateful to Michal Brhlik, Gi-Chol Cho, Toby Falk and Francis Halzen
374: for beneficial discussions.
375: %
376: This research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy
377: under Grants No. DE-FG02-95ER40896 and No. DE-FG03-98ER41066,
378: and in part by the University of Wisconsin Research Committee
379: with funds granted by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.
380:
381: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
382: % REFERENCES
383: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
384: \begin{references}
385: %
386: \bibitem{Boomerang}
387: C.~B.~Netterfield {\it et al.} [BOOMERANG collaboration],
388: %``A measurement by BOOMERANG of multiple peaks
389: % in the angular power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background,''
390: astro-ph/0104460.
391: %
392: \bibitem{DASI}
393: C.~Pryke {\it et al.} [DASI collaboration],
394: %``Cosmological Parameter Extraction from the First Season
395: % of Observations with DASI,''
396: astro-ph/0104490.
397: %
398: \bibitem{Maxima}
399: A.~Balbi {\it et al.} [MAXIMA collaboration],
400: %``Constraints on cosmological parameters from MAXIMA-1,''
401: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 545}, L1 (2000).
402:
403: %------------------------------------
404: % mSUGRA
405: %------------------------------------
406: \bibitem{sugra}
407: A.~Chamseddine, R.~Arnowitt and P.~Nath,
408: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 49}, 970 (1982);
409: L.~Iba\~nez and G.~Ross, Phys. Lett. {\bf B110}, 215 (1982);
410: R.~Barbieri, S.~Ferrara and C.~Savoy, Phys. Lett. {\bf B119}, 343 (1982);
411: L.J.~Hall, J.~Lykken and S.~Weinberg, Phys. Rev. {\bf D27}, 2359 (1983).
412:
413: \bibitem{jkg}
414: G.~Jungman, M.~Kamionkowski and K.~Griest,
415: %``Supersymmetric dark matter,''
416: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 267}, 195 (1996);
417: and references therein.
418:
419: \bibitem{run2} For a comprehensive review, see
420: V.~Barger, C.E.M.~Wagner {\it et al.},
421: Report of the SUGRA Working Group for Run II of the Tevatron,
422: hep-ph/0003154.
423:
424: \bibitem{bsg1}
425: P.~Nath and R.~Arnowitt, Phys. Lett. {\bf B336}, 395 (1994);
426: Phys. Rev. {\bf D54}, 2374 (1996);
427: V.~Barger, M.S.~Berger, P.~Ohmann and R.J.~Phillips,
428: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D51}, 2438 (1995).
429: %
430: \bibitem{bsg2}
431: H.~Baer and M.~Brhlik, Phys. Rev. {\bf D55} (1997) 3201;
432: H.~Baer, M.~Brhlik, D.~Castano and X.~Tata,
433: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 015007 (1998);
434: and references therein.
435:
436: \bibitem{muon1}
437: H.~N.~Brown {\it et al.} [Muon g-2 Collaboration],
438: %``Precise measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment,''
439: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 2227 (2001).
440:
441: \bibitem{muon2}
442: Some recent supersymmetry analyses of $a_\mu$ can be found in:
443: %
444: A.~Czarnecki and W.~J.~Marciano,
445: %``The muon anomalous magnetic moment: A harbinger for 'new physics',''
446: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 013014 (2001);
447: %
448: L.~L.~Everett, G.~L.~Kane, S.~Rigolin and L.~Wang,
449: %``Implications of muon g-2 for supersymmetry and
450: % for discovering superpartners directly,''
451: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 3484 (2001);
452: %
453: J.~L.~Feng and K.~T.~Matchev,
454: %``Supersymmetry and the anomalous anomalous magnetic moment of the muon,''
455: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 3480 (2001);
456: %
457: E.~A.~Baltz and P.~Gondolo,
458: %``Implications of muon anomalous magnetic moment
459: % for supersymmetric dark matter,''
460: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 5004 (2001);
461: %
462: U.~Chattopadhyay and P.~Nath,
463: %``Upper limits on sparticle masses from g-2 and the possibility
464: % for discovery of SUSY at colliders and in dark matter searches,''
465: hep-ph/0102157;
466: %
467: J.~Ellis, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,
468: %``Combining the muon anomalous magnetic moment with other constraints
469: % on the CMSSM,''
470: hep-ph/0102331;
471: %
472: R.~Arnowitt, B.~Dutta, B.~Hu and Y.~Santoso,
473: %``Muon g-2, dark matter detection and accelerator physics,''
474: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 505}, 177 (2001);
475: %
476: S.~P.~Martin and J.~D.~Wells,
477: %``Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in supersymmetric theories,''
478: hep-ph/0103067;
479: %
480: G.~Cho and K.~Hagiwara,
481: %``Supersymmetric contributions to muon g-2 and
482: % the electroweak precision measurements,''
483: hep-ph/0105037.
484: %
485: \bibitem{drees}
486: M.~Drees, Y.~G.~Kim, T.~Kobayashi and M.~M.~Nojiri,
487: %``Direct detection of neutralino dark matter and
488: % the anomalous dipole moment of the muon,''
489: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 115009 (2001).
490: %
491: \bibitem{baer01} H.~Baer, C.~Balazs, J.~Ferrandis and X.~Tata,
492: %``Impact of muon anomalous magnetic moment on supersymmetric models,''
493: hep-ph/0103280; and references therein.
494:
495: %------------------------------------
496: % LEP2 Chargino Search
497: %------------------------------------
498: \bibitem{SUSY}
499: The LEP\,2 SUSY working group,
500: http://www.cern.ch/lepsusy/, Charginos, large m0 (LEPSUSYWG/01-03.1).
501:
502: %------------------------------------
503: % LEP2 Higgs Search
504: %------------------------------------
505: \bibitem{Higgs}
506: The LEP Higgs working group,
507: http://lephiggs.web.cern.ch/LEPHIGGS/www/;
508: LHWG note 2001-2.
509:
510: \bibitem{omhs97}
511: V.~Barger and C.~Kao,
512: %``Relic density of neutralino dark matter in supergravity models,''
513: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 3131 (1998).
514:
515: \bibitem{Toby}
516: J.~Ellis, T.~Falk, G.~Ganis, K.~A.~Olive and M.~Srednicki,
517: %``The CMSSM parameter space at large tan beta,''
518: hep-ph/0102098;
519: J.~Ellis, T.~Falk, K.~A.~Olive and M.~Srednicki,
520: %``Calculations of neutralino stau coannihilation channels and
521: % the cosmologically relevant region of MSSM parameter space,''
522: Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 13}, 181 (2000);
523: and references therein.
524: %\cite{Arnowitt:2001yh}
525: %
526: \bibitem{Arnowitt:2001yh}
527: R.~Arnowitt, B.~Dutta and Y.~Santoso,
528: %``Coannihilation effects in supergravity and D-brane models,''
529: hep-ph/0102181.
530:
531: \bibitem{one-loop}
532: Y.~Okada, M.~Yamaguchi and T.~Yanagida,
533: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 85}, 1 (1991);
534: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B262}, 54 (1991);
535: H.~Haber and R.~Hempfling, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 66}, 1815 (1991);
536: J.~Ellis, G.~Ridolfi and F.~Zwirner,
537: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B257}, 83 (1991);
538: M.~Bisset, Ph.D. thesis, University of Hawaii (1994).
539:
540: \bibitem{Baer97}
541: H.~Baer, C.~Chen, M.~Drees, F.~Paige and X.~Tata,
542: %``Collider phenomenology for supersymmetry with large tan(beta),''
543: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79}, 986 (1997).
544:
545: \bibitem{two-loop}
546: M.~Carena {\it et al.},
547: %``Reconciling the two-loop diagrammatic and
548: % effective field theory computations of the mass
549: % of the lightest CP-even Higgs boson in the MSSM,''
550: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 580}, 29 (2000);
551: J.~R.~Espinosa and R.~Zhang,
552: %``Complete two-loop dominant corrections to the mass
553: % of the lightest CP-even Higgs boson
554: % in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,''
555: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 586}, 3 (2000);
556: and references therein.
557:
558: \bibitem{trilepton}
559: V.~Barger and C.~Kao,
560: %``Trilepton signature of minimal supergravity
561: % at the upgraded Tevatron,''
562: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 115015 (1999)
563: and references therein.
564:
565: \bibitem{Brhlik}
566: H.~Baer and M.~Brhlik,
567: %``Neutralino dark matter in minimal supergravity:
568: % Direct detection vs. collider searches,''
569: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 567 (1998).
570:
571: \bibitem{cdms} CDMS II Proposal, March 1999;
572: R.~J.~Gaitskell,
573: %``Towards one tonne direct wimp detectors: Have we got what it takes?,''
574: astro-ph/0106200.
575:
576: \bibitem{bhhk}
577: V.~Barger, F.~Halzen, D.~Hooper and C.~Kao,
578: %``Indirect search for neutralino dark matter
579: % with high energy neutrinos,''
580: hep-ph/0105182; and references therein.
581:
582: \bibitem{BBOP}
583: V.~Barger, M.~S.~Berger, P.~Ohmann and R.~J.~Phillips,
584: %``Phenomenological implications of the m(t) RGE fixed point
585: % for SUSY Higgs boson searches,''
586: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 314}, 351 (1993).
587: %
588: \bibitem{IRFP2}
589: C.~D.~Froggatt, R.~G.~Moorhouse and I.~G.~Knowles,
590: %``Supersymmetric renormalization group fixed points
591: % and third generation fermion mass predictions,''
592: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 298}, 356 (1993).
593:
594: \bibitem{DHR}
595: S.~Dimopoulos, L.~J.~Hall and S.~Raby,
596: %``A Predictive framework for fermion masses in supersymmetric theories,''
597: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 68}, 1984 (1992);
598: .%``A Predictive ansatz for fermion mass matrices
599: % in supersymmetric grand unified theories,''
600: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 45}, 4192 (1992).
601:
602: \bibitem{physrep}
603: V. Barger, M.S. Berger, T. Han, and J.F. Gunion,
604: Phys. Rep. {\bf 286}, 1 (1997).
605:
606: \end{references}
607:
608: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
609: % TABLES
610: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
611: \newpage
612:
613: %------------------------
614: % TABLE I
615: %------------------------
616: \begin{table}
617: %
618: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
619: %
620: $A_0$ & $m_{\chi^0_1}$ & $m_{\chi^\pm_1}$ & $m_A$ & $m_h$
621: & $\Omega_{\chi^0_1} h^2$ & $\Delta a_\mu$ \\
622: %
623: \hline
624: %
625: $-300$ & 120 & 223 & 401 & 117 & 0.19 & 44 \\
626: %
627: $-200$ & 120 & 221 & 398 & 116 & 0.16 & 45 \\
628: %
629: $-100$ & 119 & 220 & 394 & 116 & 0.14 & 46 \\
630: %
631: 0 & 119 & 218 & 392 & 115 & 0.13 & 47 \\
632: %
633: $+100$ & 119 & 217 & 388 & 115 & 0.11 & 48 \\
634: %
635: $+200$ & 118 & 215 & 385 & 114 & 0.10 & 49 \\
636: %
637: $+300$ & 118 & 214 & 383 & 114 & 0.10 & 50
638: %
639: \end{tabular}
640: %
641: \caption{
642: The relic density of neutralino dark matter ($\Omega_{\chi^0_1} h^2$),
643: the SUSY contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment
644: ($\Delta a_\mu$) [Eq.~(\ref{eq:damuon})],
645: and masses of the lightest neutralino ($\chi^0_1$),
646: the lighter chargino ($\chi^\pm_1$),
647: the CP-odd Higgs pseudoscalar ($A^0$),
648: and the lighter CP-even Higgs scalar ($h^0$),
649: for $\tan\beta = 40$, $m_{1/2} = 300$ GeV, $m_0 = 350$ GeV,
650: and several values of the trilinear coupling ($A_0$).
651: %
652: The masses and the trilinear coupling $A_0$ are in the units of GeV.
653: }
654: %
655: \label{table1}
656: %
657: \end{table}
658:
659: %------------------------
660: % TABLE II
661: %------------------------
662: \begin{table}
663: %
664: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
665: %
666: $\tan\beta$ & $m_A$ & $\Omega_{\chi^0_1} h^2$ & $\Delta a_\mu$ \\
667: %
668: \hline
669: %
670: 35 & 453 & 0.32 & 37 \\
671: %
672: 37 & 437 & 0.25 & 39 \\
673: %
674: 40 & 411 & 0.16 & 42 \\
675: %
676: 42 & 391 & 0.12 & 44 \\
677: %
678: 45 & 360 & 0.06 & 48
679: %
680: \end{tabular}
681: %
682: \caption{
683: The relic density of neutralino dark matter ($\Omega_{\chi^0_1} h^2$),
684: the SUSY contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment
685: ($\Delta a_\mu$) [Eq.~(\ref{eq:damuon})],
686: and mass of the CP-odd Higgs pseudoscalar ($A^0$) in GeV,
687: for $m_{1/2} = 300$ GeV, $m_0 = 400$ GeV, $A_0 = 0$,
688: and several values of $\tan\beta$.
689: %
690: For all these values of $\tan\beta$,
691: $m_{\chi^0_1} =$ 119 GeV, $m_{\chi^\pm_1} =$ 218 GeV, $m_h =$ 115 GeV,
692: and $\Gamma_h = 4.8$ MeV, where $\Gamma_h$ is the decay width
693: of the lighter CP-even Higgs boson ($h^0$).
694: }
695: %
696: \label{table2}
697: %
698: \end{table}
699:
700: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
701: % FIGURES
702: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
703: \newpage
704:
705: %------------
706: % FIG. 1
707: %------------
708: \begin{figure}
709: %
710: \centering\leavevmode
711: \epsfxsize=6in
712: \epsffile{cmb1.eps}
713:
714: \bigskip
715: \caption[]{
716: %
717: Regions of relic density for neutralino dark matter satisfying
718: the $2\sigma$ constraint from the new CMB data (dark blue bands)
719: ($0.11 \le \Omega_{\chi^0_1} h^2 \le 0.15$)
720: in the ($m_{1/2},m_0$) plane of the mSUGRA model
721: with $\mu >0$ and $A_0 = 0$ for (a) $\tan\beta = 3$,
722: (b) $\tan\beta = 10$, (c) $\tan\beta=35$ and (d) $\tan\beta=50$.
723: %
724: Also shown are the contours in the parameter space for
725: (i) SUSY contributions of $\Delta a_\mu = 11$, 43, 75
726: as defined in Eq.~(\ref{eq:damuon}), representing the measured value
727: and its 2$\sigma$ uncertainties,
728: (ii) the mass of the lighter CP even Higgs boson $m_h = 115$ GeV, and
729: (iii) the 3$\sigma$ observation potential for a trilepton signal
730: at the upgraded Fermilab Tevatron.
731: %
732: The hatched regions are excluded by theoretical requirements
733: [having electroweak symmetry breaking, the correct vacuum (tachyon free)
734: and $\chi^0_1$ as the LSP]
735: or by the chargino search at LEP\,2 \cite{SUSY}.
736: %
737: \label{fig:omhs1}
738: %
739: }\end{figure}
740:
741: %------------
742: % FIG. 2
743: %------------
744: \begin{figure}
745: %
746: \centering\leavevmode
747: \epsfxsize=6in
748: \epsffile{cmb2.ps}
749:
750: \bigskip
751: \caption[]{
752: %
753: Regions of the relic density allowed by the CMB data (dark blue bands)
754: for (a) $\tan\beta = 40$ and (b) $\tan\beta=45$;
755: the SUSY contributions of $\Delta a_\mu = 27$, 43 and 59,
756: represent the measured value and its 1$\sigma$ uncertainties.
757: %
758: \label{fig:omhs2}
759: %
760: }\end{figure}
761:
762: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
763: % END DOCUMENT
764: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
765: \end{document}
766:
767: