1: \documentstyle[prd,aps,epsfig]{revtex}
2: %preprint HD-THEP-01-18
3: %\voffset=-.5cm
4: %\hoffset=0.3cm
5: %\textwidth=17cm
6: %\textheight=24.5cm
7: \begin{document}
8: \title{Weak annihilation in the rare radiative $B\to \rho\gamma$ decay}
9: \author{M. Beyer,$^a$
10: D. Melikhov,$^{b,c}$
11: N. Nikitin, $^c$ and
12: B. Stech$^b$}
13: \address{$^a$ Fachbereich Physik, Universit\"at Rostock,
14: Universit\"atsplatz, 3, D-18051, Rostock, Germany \\
15: $^b$ Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at Heidelberg,
16: Philosophenweg 16, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany \\
17: $^c$
18: Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119899, Moscow, Russia}
19: \maketitle
20: \begin{abstract}
21: The ampitude of the $B\to\rho\gamma$ decay induced by the flavour-changing neutral currents
22: contains the penguin contribution and the weak-annihilation contribution generated by the
23: 4-quark operators in the effective Hamiltonian. The penguin contribution is known quite well.
24: We analyze the weak-annihilation which is suppressed by the heavy-quark mass compared
25: to the penguin contribution.
26:
27: In the factorization approximation, the weak annihilation amplitude is represented in terms of the leptonic
28: decay constants and the meson-photon matrix elements of the weak currents. The latter contain
29: the $B\gamma$, $\rho\gamma$ transition form factors and contact terms determined by the
30: equations of motion. We calculate the $B\gamma$ and $\rho\gamma$ form factors within the
31: relativistic dispersion approach and obtain numerical estimates for the weak annihilation amplitude.
32: \end{abstract}
33:
34: \section{Introduction}
35: The investigation of rare semileptonic $B$ decays induced by the
36: flavour-changing neutral current transitions $b\to s$ and $b\to d$ represents an important
37: test of the Standard Model or its extentions.
38: Rare decays are forbidden at the tree level in the Standard Model and occur through
39: loop diagrams. Thus they provide the possibility to probe the structure of the
40: electroweak sector at large mass scales from contributions of virtual particles in the loop
41: diagrams. Interesting
42: information about the structure of the theory is contained in the Wilson coefficents in the
43: effective Hamiltonian which describes the $b\to s,d$ transition at low energies. These Wilson
44: coefficients take different values in different theories with testable
45: consequences in rare $B$ decays.
46:
47: Among rare $B$ decays the radiative decays $b\to s\gamma$ and $b\to d\gamma$ have the
48: largest probabilites. The $b\to s\gamma$ transitions are CKM favoured and have larger
49: branching ratios than the $b\to d\gamma$ transitions.
50: The $b\to s\gamma$ transition has been observed by CLEO in the exclusive channel
51: $B\to K^*\gamma$ in 1993 and measured inclusively in 1995.
52: The $B\to \rho\gamma$ decay will be extensively studied by BaBar and BELLE.
53:
54: The main uncertainty in the theoretical analysis of $B$ decays is connected with
55: long-distance QCD effects arising from the presence of hadrons in initial and
56: final states. In inclusive decays these effects are under better control,
57: however from inclusive measurements it is more difficult to obtain precise results.
58:
59: The decay amplitude contains two different contributions:
60: one arising from the electromagnetic penguin operator and another from the 4-fermion
61: operators in the effective Hamiltonian. One of the effects generated by the
62: 4-fermion operators is the weak annihilation (WA).
63: Further details about short- and long-distance effects in the radiative decays
64: can be found in recent publications \cite{gp,m2001,ap,ppp} and references therein.
65:
66: In the $B\to K^*\gamma$ decay the weak annihilation is negligible compared to the
67: penguin effect: it is suppressed by two powers of the small parameter $\lambda\simeq 0.2$
68: of the Cabbibo-Kabayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix. In $B\to \rho\gamma$
69: both effects have the same order in $\lambda$ and must be taken into account.
70:
71: The penguin contribution has been analyzed in several ways and is known quite well.
72: On the other hand, the WA in $B\to \rho\gamma$ has been studied in less detail: the relevant
73: form factors were analyzed within sum rules \cite{sr1,sr2}
74: and perturbative QCD \cite{korch}. However, some contributions to these form factors were
75: neglected. These contributions may be relevant if precise measurements become available.
76:
77: The aim of this paper is to analyze the weak annihilation for the $B^-\to \rho^-\gamma$
78: decay more closely.
79:
80: In the factorization approximation, the weak-annihilation amplitude can be represented as the product
81: of meson leptonic decay constants and matrix elements of the weak current between
82: meson and photon. The latter contain the meson-photon transition form factors and
83: contact terms which are determined by the equations of motion. The photon can be emitted from the
84: loop containing the $b$ quark which is described by $B\gamma$ transition form factors. It can also
85: be emitted from the loop containing only light quarks described by the $\rho\gamma$
86: transition form factors (Fig \ref{fig:diag}).
87:
88: We calculate the $B\gamma$ form factors within the relativistic dispersion approach which
89: expresses these form factors in terms of the $B$ meson wave function.
90: We demonstrate that the form factors calculated by the dispersion approach
91: behave in the limit $m_b\to\infty$ in agreement with perturbative QCD.
92: The $B$ meson wave function was previously tested in the $B\to$ light meson weak decays and
93: is known quite well, allowing us to provide reliable numerical estimates for the $B\gamma$ form factors.
94: \begin{center}
95: \begin{figure}[hb]
96: \mbox{\epsfig{file=diag.eps,width=10cm}}
97: \caption{\label{fig:diag}
98: Diagrams describing the weak annihilation process for $B\to\rho\gamma$ in the factorization approximation:
99: (a) The photon is emitted from the loop containing the $b$ quark,
100: (b) The photon is emitted from the loop containing only light quarks.}
101: \end{figure}
102: \end{center}
103:
104: The $\rho\gamma$ transition form factor is related to the divergence of the vector and
105: axial-vector currents. In the case of the axial-vector current it is
106: proportional to the light-quark masses if the classical equation of motion is applied.
107: Because the quark momenta in the loop are high, these masses have to be identified with
108: current quark masses. For this reason the corresponding $\rho\gamma$ form factor was neglected in previous
109: analyses \cite{gp,sr1}.
110: We find however that this argument is not correct: this form factor
111: remains finite in the limit of vanishing light quark mass $m\to 0$ and behaves like
112: $\sim M_\rho f_\rho/M_B^2$ which means the violation of the classical equation of motion.
113: We present the result for the $\rho\gamma$ transition form factor but leave a detailed
114: discussion
115: of the anomaly appearing for the matrix element
116: $\langle \rho\gamma|\partial_\nu A_\nu|0\rangle$ for a special publication.
117:
118: Finally, we provide numerical estimates of the weak-annihilation amplitude
119: taking into account the $B\gamma$, $\rho\gamma$ transition form factors, and the
120: contact term contributions.
121:
122: In Section II the effective Hamiltonian for the $b\to d$ transition and the general
123: structure of the amplitude are presented. In Section III we discuss the photon emission from the
124: $B$ meson loop and obtain the $B\gamma$ transition form factors within the dispersion
125: approach.
126: Section IV contains results for the $\rho\gamma$ transition form factors.
127: In Section V the numerical estimates are given. The concluding Section
128: summarises our results.
129:
130: %\newpage
131: %____________________________________________________________________________________
132: \section{The effective Hamiltonian, the amplitude and the decay rate}
133: The amplitude of the weak radiative
134: $B\to \rho$ transition is given by the matrix element of the effective Hamiltonian
135: for the $b\to d$ transition
136: \begin{eqnarray}
137: A(B\to\rho\gamma)=\langle \gamma(q_1)\rho(q_2)|H_{\rm eff}(b\to d)|B(p) \rangle,
138: \end{eqnarray}
139: where $p$ is the $B$ momentum, $q_2$ is the $\rho$ momentum, and $q_1$ is the photon
140: momentum, $p=q_1+q_2$, $q_1^2=0$, $q_2^2=M_\rho^2$, $p^2=M_B^2$.
141: The effective weak Hamiltonian has the structure\cite{gsw}:
142: \begin{eqnarray}
143: \label{Heff}
144: H_{\rm eff}(b\to d) &=& \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\,\xi_t
145: C_{7\gamma}(\mu){\cal O}_{7\gamma}
146: -\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}{\xi_u}
147: \left (C_1(\mu){\cal O}_1+C_2(\mu){\cal O}_2\right),
148: \end{eqnarray}
149: where only operators relevant for the penguin and weak ahnnihilation effects are listed.
150: $G_F$ is the Fermi constant, $\xi_q=V^*_{qd}V_{qb}$, $C_i$'s are the Wilson
151: coefficients and ${\cal O}_i$'s are the basis operators
152: \begin{eqnarray}
153: {\cal O}_{7\gamma} &=& \frac{e}{8\pi^2}\,
154: \bar d_{\alpha}\sigma_{\mu\nu}
155: m_b(\mu)\left (1+\gamma_5\right )\, b_{\alpha}\, F_{\mu\nu}, \\
156: {\cal O}_1 &=& \bar d_{\alpha}\gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma_5)u_{\alpha}\;
157: \bar u_{\beta}\gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma_5) b_{\beta},\nonumber
158: \\
159: {\cal O}_2 &=& \bar d_{\alpha}\gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma_5) u_{\beta}\;
160: \bar u_{\beta}\gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma_5) b_{\alpha},\nonumber\\
161: \end{eqnarray}
162: with the following notation: $e=\sqrt{4\pi\alpha_{\rm em}}$,
163: $\gamma^5=i\gamma^0\gamma^1\gamma^2\gamma^3$,
164: $\sigma_{\mu\nu}=i\left [\gamma_{\mu},\gamma_{\nu}\right ]/2$,
165: $\epsilon^{0123}=-1$ and
166: ${\rm Sp}\left (\gamma^5\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^{\beta}\right )
167: =4i\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}$, $F_{\mu\nu}={\partial_\mu A_\nu-\partial_\nu A_\mu}$.
168:
169: The amplitude can be parametrized as follows
170: \begin{eqnarray}
171: A(B^-\to\rho^-\gamma)=\frac{eG_F}{\sqrt{2}}
172: \left[
173: \epsilon_{q_1\epsilon^\ast_1 q_2 \epsilon_2^\ast}F_{\rm PC}
174: +i \epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} \left(g_{\nu\mu}\,pq_1-p_\mu q_{1\nu}\right)F_{\rm PV}
175: \right],
176: \end{eqnarray}
177: where $F_{\rm PC}$ and $F_{\rm PV}$ are the parity-conserving and
178: parity-violating invariant amplitudes, respectively.
179: $\epsilon_2$($\epsilon_1$) is the
180: $\rho$-meson (photon) polarization vector. We use the short-hand notation
181: $\epsilon_{abcd}=\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}a^{\alpha}b^{\beta}c^{\mu}d^{\nu}$
182: for any 4-vectors $a,b,c,d$.
183:
184: For the decay rate one finds
185: \begin{eqnarray}
186: \label{rate}
187: \Gamma(B^-\to\rho^-\gamma)=\frac{G^2_F\,\alpha_{em}}{16}M_B^3
188: \left(1-{M^2_\rho}/{M_B^2}\right)^3
189: \left( |F_{\rm PC}|^2+|F_{\rm PV}|^2 \right).
190: \end{eqnarray}
191: %\newpage
192:
193: %*************************************************************************************************************************
194: \subsection{The penguin amplitude}
195: The main contribution to the amplitude is given by the
196: electromagnetic penguin operator $O_{7\gamma}$:
197: \begin{eqnarray}
198: A_{\rm peng}(B\to\rho\gamma)&=&
199: -\frac{eG_F}{\sqrt{2}}\xi_t C_7\frac{m_b}{2\pi^2} T_1(0)
200: \left(
201: \epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^* q_2 \epsilon_2^*}
202: +i\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}(g_{\nu\mu}\,pq_1-p_\mu q_{1\nu})
203: \right),
204: \end{eqnarray}
205: where $T_1$ is the form factor of the $B\to\rho$ transition through
206: the tensor current \cite{wsb,m,ms}.
207: The corresponding contribution to the invariant amplitudes is therefore
208: \begin{eqnarray}
209: \label{fpeng}
210: F^{\rm peng}_{\rm PC}=F^{\rm peng}_{\rm PV}=-\xi_t C_7\frac{m_b}{2\pi^2}T_1(0).
211: \end{eqnarray}
212:
213: %*************************************************************************************************************************
214: \subsection{The weak annihilation amplitude}
215: The radiative $B\to\rho \gamma$ transition also receives contribution from the
216: 4-fermion operators ${\cal O}_1$ and ${\cal O}_2$.
217: For the charged $B^-\to\rho^-(q_2)\gamma(q_1)$ transition the corresponding amplitude reads
218: \begin{eqnarray}
219: \label{WA}
220: A_{\rm WA}(B^-\to\rho^-\gamma)&=&-\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\xi_u
221: \langle \rho(q_2)\gamma(q_1)|\bar d\gamma_\nu(1-\gamma_5)u\cdot
222: \bar u\gamma_\nu(1-\gamma_5)b|B(p)\rangle,
223: \end{eqnarray}
224: In what follows we suppress the lable WA.
225: Neglecting the nonfactorizable soft-gluon exchanges, i.e. assuming vacuum saturation,
226: the complicated matrix element in Eq. (\ref{WA}) is reduced to simpler quantities -
227: the meson-photon matrix elements of the bilinear quark currents and the
228: meson decay constants. The latter are defined as usual
229: \begin{eqnarray}
230: \langle \rho(q_2)|\bar d\gamma_\nu u|0\rangle &=& \epsilon_{2\nu}^\ast M_\rho f_\rho, \qquad f_\rho>0,
231: \nonumber \\
232: \langle 0|\bar u\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 b|B(p)\rangle &=& ip_\nu f_B,\qquad f_B>0.
233: \end{eqnarray}
234: It is convenient to isolate the parity-conserving contribution which emerges from the
235: product of the two equal-parity currents, and the parity-violating contribution
236: which emerges from the product of the two opposite-parity currents.
237:
238: \subsubsection{The parity-violating amplitude}
239: The parity-violating amplitude has the form
240: \begin{eqnarray}
241: \label{apva}
242: A_{\rm PV}(B\to\rho\gamma)&=&\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\xi_u a_1
243: \left\{
244: \langle \rho\gamma|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
245: \langle 0|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B \rangle
246: +
247: \langle \rho|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
248: \langle \gamma|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B \rangle \right\}.
249: \end{eqnarray}
250: Here $a_1$ is an effective Wilson coefficient, which we take as $a_1=C_1+C_2/N_c$
251: at the scale $\sim$ 5 GeV.
252:
253: The first term is a contact term which can be calculated using the equations
254: of motion for the quark fields \cite{gp}.
255: Setting $m_u=m_d$, we find
256: \begin{eqnarray}
257: \label{term1}
258: \langle \rho\gamma|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
259: \langle 0|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B \rangle=
260: ip_\nu f_B \langle \rho\gamma|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle =
261: f_B \langle \rho\gamma|\partial_\nu(\bar d \gamma_\nu u)|0 \rangle =
262: ie\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} \;g_{\mu\nu}M_\rho f_\rho f_B.
263: \end{eqnarray}
264: The $B\to\gamma$ amplitude in the second term of (\ref{apva})
265: can be parametrized as follows
266: \begin{eqnarray}
267: \label{term2}
268: \langle \gamma(q_1)|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B(p) \rangle=
269: ie\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} \, \left[
270: (g_{\nu\mu}\,pq_1-p_\mu q_{1\nu})\frac{2F_A}{M_B}
271: -p_\mu q_{1\nu} \frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}\right].
272: \end{eqnarray}
273: It contains the form factor $F_A(q_2^2=M_\rho^2)$, and the contact term proportional to $f_B$
274: (the derivation of this relation is given in the Appendix).
275:
276: Summing the contributions of the photon emission from the $B$-meson loop and the $\rho$-meson
277: loop gives the amplitude $A_{\rm PV}$ which can be represented in the form
278: $A_{\rm PV}=\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} T_\mu$ with
279: $q_1^\mu T_\mu=0$ as required by gauge invariance.
280: Thus, the weak-annihilation contribution to the form factor $F_{\rm PV}$
281: for the $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ decay is\footnote{We note that for the $B^+\to\rho^+\gamma$
282: the term proportional to $f_B$ changes sign (see Appendix), and also
283: $F_A^{B^+}=-F_A^{B^-}$ as can be obtained from charge conjugation of
284: the amplitude $A_{\rm PV}$. For the $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ decay the term $\sim f_B$ is absent.}
285: \begin{eqnarray}
286: \label{fpv}
287: F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}=\xi_u a_1 f_\rho M_\rho\;\left[\frac{2F_{A}}{M_B}+\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}\right].
288: \end{eqnarray}
289: The two contact terms which are present in the amplitudes of the photon
290: emission from the $B$ meson loop and from the $\rho$-meson loop do not cancel each other
291: (we disagree here with the claim of Ref. \cite{sr2}) but lead to a nonvanishing contribution proportional to $f_B$.
292:
293: \subsection{The parity-conserving amplitude}
294: This amplitude reads
295: \begin{eqnarray}
296: \label{apc}
297: A_{\rm PC}(B\to\rho\gamma)&=&-\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\xi_u a_1
298: \left\{\langle \rho|\bar d\gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle \langle \gamma|\bar u \gamma_\nu b|B \rangle
299: +
300: \langle \gamma\rho|\bar d\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 u |0 \rangle
301: \langle 0| \bar u\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 b|B \rangle \right\}.
302: \end{eqnarray}
303: The $B\to\gamma$ amplitude from the first term in the brackets contains the form factor
304: $F_V(q_2^2=M_\rho^2)$:
305: \begin{eqnarray}
306: \langle \gamma(q_1)|\bar u\gamma_\nu b|B(p)\rangle =
307: e\,\epsilon_{\nu\mu p q_1} \epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} \;\frac{2F_V}{M_B}.
308: %,\qquad
309: %\epsilon_2^\nu\langle \gamma(q_1)|\bar u\gamma_\nu b|B(p)\rangle=
310: %-e\,\epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^\ast q_2\epsilon_2^\ast}\;{2F_V}/{M_B}.
311: \end{eqnarray}
312: The second term in (\ref{apc}) can be reduced to the divergence of the
313: axial-vector current and contains another form factor, $G_V$: namely,
314: \begin{eqnarray}
315: \langle 0|\bar u\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 b|B\rangle
316: \langle \gamma\rho|\bar d\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 u|0 \rangle=
317: f_B \langle \gamma\rho|\partial_\nu \bar d\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 u |0 \rangle=
318: e\,f_B G_V \epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^\ast q_2\epsilon_2^\ast}.
319: \end{eqnarray}
320: Thus, the weak annihilation contribution to $F_{\rm PC}$ reads
321: \begin{eqnarray}
322: \label{fpc}
323: F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}=\xi_u a_1 M_\rho f_\rho\left[\frac{2F_V}{M_B}-\frac{f_B\;G_V}{M_\rho f_\rho}\right].
324: \end{eqnarray}
325: Summing up, within the factorization approximation the weak annihilation amplitude
326: can be expressed in terms of the three form factors $F_A$, $F_V$, and $G_V$.
327:
328: %\newpage
329: %=========================================================================================================
330: \section{The form factors $F_A$ and $F_V$}
331: In this section we derive the formulas for the form factors $F_{A,V}$ within the dispersion approach
332: to the transition form factors. This approach has been formulated in detail in
333: \cite{m} and applied to the weak decays of heavy mesons in \cite{ms}. Recall that the
334: form factors $F_{A,V}$ describe the transition of the $B$-meson to the photon with the momentum
335: $q_1$, $q_1^2=0$, induced by the axial-vector (vector) current with the momentum transfer
336: $q_2$, $q_2^2=M_\rho^2$. For technical reasons, it is convenient to treat the form factor $F_{A(V)}$ as describing the
337: amplitude of the photon-induced transition of the $B$-meson into a $b\bar u$ axial-vector
338: (vector) virtual particle with the corresponding factor $1/(s-q_2^2)$ in the dispersion integral.
339: Then we can directly apply the equations obtained in \cite{m} for the
340: meson-meson transition form factors.
341:
342: \subsection{The form factor $F_A$}
343: The form factor $F_A$ is given by the diagrams of Fig \ref{fig:Fa}.
344: Fig \ref{fig:Fa}a shows $F_A^{(b)}$,
345: the contribution to the form factor of the process when the $b$ quark interacts with the
346: photon; Fig \ref{fig:Fa}b describes the contribution of the process when the quark $u$ interacts while
347: $b$ remains a spectator. One has
348: \begin{eqnarray}
349: F_A=F_A^{(b)}+F_A^{(u)}.
350: \end{eqnarray}
351: \begin{center}
352: \begin{figure}[hb]
353: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig1.eps,width=10cm}}
354: \caption{\label{fig:Fa}
355: Diagrams for the form factor $F_A$: a) $F_A^{(b)}$, b) $F_A^{(u)}$.}
356: \end{figure}
357: \end{center}
358: The $B^-$ meson is described
359: by the vertex $\bar b(k_b)\; i\gamma_5 u(k_u)\;G(s)/{\sqrt{N_c}}$, with
360: $G(s)=\phi_B(s)(s-M_B^2)$. The $B$-meson wave function $\phi_B$ is normalized according to the relation \cite{m}
361: \begin{eqnarray}
362: \label{norma}
363: \frac{1}{8\pi^2}\int\limits_{(m_b+m_u)^2}^\infty ds \phi_B^2(s)
364: \left({s-(m_b-m_u)^2}\right)\frac{\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_b^2,m_u^2)}{s}=1.
365: \end{eqnarray}
366: Here $\lambda(a,b,c)=(a-b-c)^2-4bc$ is the triangle function.
367:
368: It is convenient to change the direction of the quark line in the loop diagram of
369: Fig \ref{fig:Fa}b. This is done by performing the charge conjugation of the matrix element
370: and leads to a sign change for the $\gamma_\nu\gamma_5$ vertex.
371:
372: Now both diagrams in Fig \ref{fig:Fa} a,b are reduced to the diagram of Fig \ref{fig:Fat}
373: which defines the
374: form factor $F_A^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)$: Setting $m_1=m_b$, $m_2=m_u$ gives $F_A^{(b)}$:
375: $F_A^{(b)}=Q_b F_A^{(1)}(m_b,m_u)$. Similarly, setting $m_1=m_u$, $m_2=m_b$
376: gives $F_A^{(u)}$, $F_A^{(u)}=-Q_u F_A^{(1)}(m_u,m_b)$.
377: \begin{center}
378: \begin{figure}[hb]
379: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig11.eps,width=3cm}}
380: \caption{\label{fig:Fat}
381: The triangle diagram for $F_A^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)$. The cut corresponds to calculating the
382: imaginary part in the variable $p^2$. }
383: \end{figure}
384: \end{center}
385: For the diagram of Fig \ref{fig:Fat} (quark 1 emits the photon, quark 2 is the spectator)
386: the trace reads
387: \begin{eqnarray}
388: \nonumber
389: -{\rm Sp}\;i\gamma_5(m_2-\hat k_2)\gamma_\nu\gamma_5(m_1+\hat k'_1)\gamma_\mu(m_1+\hat k_1)=
390: 4i(k_1+k_1')_\mu(m_1 k_2+m_2 k_1)_\nu+
391: 4i(g_{\mu\nu}q_\alpha-g_{\mu\alpha}q_\nu)(m_1 k_2+m_2 k_1)_\alpha.
392: \end{eqnarray}
393: The spectral density of the form factor $F^{(1)}_A(m_1,m_2)$ in the variable $p^2$, $p=k_1+k_2$,
394: is the coefficient of the structure $g_{\mu\nu}$ obtained after the integration of the trace over
395: the quark phase space. Performing necessary calculations, we arrive at the following single dispersion integral
396: \begin{eqnarray}
397: \label{fadisp}
398: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(1)}&=&\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int\limits_{(m_b+m_u)^2}^\infty
399: \frac{ds\;\phi_B(s)}{(s-M_\rho^2)}\left\{
400: \left(m_1\log\left(\frac{s+m_1^2-m_2^2+\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}
401: {s+m_1^2-m_2^2-\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}\right)
402: +(m_2-m_1)\frac{\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_b^2,m_u^2)}{s}
403: \right)\right.
404: \nonumber\\
405: &&+\left. \frac{1}{pq_1}\left(
406: \frac{\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_b^2,m_u^2)}{2s}-
407: m_1^2\log\left(\frac{s+m_1^2-m_2^2+\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}
408: {s+m_1^2-m_2^2-\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}\right)\right)
409: \right\}.
410: \end{eqnarray}
411: For $q_1^2=0$ one has $pq_1=(M_B^2-M_\rho^2)/2$.
412:
413: Now, let us analyze the behaviour of the form factor in the limit $m_b\to\infty$.
414: To this end it is convenient to rewrite the spectral representation (\ref{fadisp})
415: in terms of the light-cone variables as follows (see \cite{lc} for details)
416: \begin{eqnarray}
417: \label{fa-lc}
418: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)&=&\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx_1 dx_2 dk_\perp^2}{x_1^2 x_2}\delta(1-x_1-x_2)
419: \frac{\phi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_1x_2+m_2 x_1-(m_1-m_2)k_\perp^2/pq_1\right\}.
420: \end{eqnarray}
421: Here $x_i$ is the fraction of the $B$-meson light-cone momentum carried by the
422: quark $i$, and $s=m_1^2/x_1+m_2^2/x_2+k_\perp^2/x_1x_2$.
423: For the form factors $F_{A}^{(u)}$ and $F_{A}^{(b)}$ one obtains
424: \begin{eqnarray}
425: \label{fau}
426: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(u)}&=&-Q_u\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx dk_\perp^2}{x_u^2 x_b}
427: \frac{\phi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_u\,x_b+m_b\,x_u+\frac{2(m_b-m_u)k_\perp^2}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}
428: \right\}, \nonumber
429: \\
430: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(b)}&=&\;\;\;Q_b\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx dk_\perp^2}{x_b^2 x_u}
431: \frac{\phi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_b\,x_u+m_u\,x_b+\frac{2(m_u-m_b)k_\perp^2}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}
432: \right\}, \nonumber
433: \end{eqnarray}
434: with
435: \begin{eqnarray}
436: s=\frac{m_b^2}{x_b}+\frac{m_u^2}{x_u}+\frac{k_\perp^2}{x_u x_b}.
437: \end{eqnarray}
438: Let us recall that the $B$-meson decay constant has the following representation
439: in terms of the wave function \cite{m}:
440: \begin{eqnarray}
441: \label{fp}
442: f_B&=&\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx dk_\perp^2}{x_u x_b}
443: \frac{\phi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_u\,x_b+m_b\,x_u\right\}.
444: \end{eqnarray}
445: Due to the wave function $\phi_B(s)$, the integral in the heavy quark limit is dominated
446: by the region $x_u=\bar\Lambda/m_b$, $x_b=1-\bar\Lambda/m_b$,
447: where $\bar\Lambda$ is a constant of order $M_B-m_b$. This leads to the following expansion
448: of the form factors in the $1/m_b$ series
449: \begin{eqnarray}
450: \label{hqlimit}
451: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(u)}&=&-Q_u\frac{f_b}{\bar\Lambda m_b}+...\nonumber\\
452: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(b)}&=&\;\;\,\,Q_b\frac{f_b}{m_b^2}+...
453: \end{eqnarray}
454: Clearly, the dominant contribution in the heavy quark limit comes from the process
455: when the light quark emits the photon, whereas the emission of the photon from the heavy
456: quark gives only a $1/m_b$ correction. The expressions (\ref{hqlimit}) for the form factor
457: $F_{A}^{(u)}$ agrees with the result of Ref. \cite{korch},
458: while we have found a different sign for $F_{A}^{(b)}$.
459:
460: %+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
461: %\newpage
462: \subsection{The form factor $F_V$}
463: The consideration of the form factor $F_{V}$ is very similar to the form factor $F_{A}$.
464: $F_V$ is determined by the two diagrams shown in Fig \ref{fig:Fv}:
465: Fig \ref{fig:Fv}a gives $F_V^{(b)}$, the contribution of the process when the $b$ quark interacts with the
466: photon; Fig \ref{fig:Fv}b describes the contribution of the process when the quark $u$ interacts.
467: One has
468: \begin{eqnarray}
469: F_V=F_V^{(b)}+F_V^{(u)}.
470: \end{eqnarray}
471: \begin{center}
472: \begin{figure}[hb]
473: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=10cm}}
474: \caption{\label{fig:Fv}Diagrams for the form factor $F_V$: a) $F_V^{(b)}$, b) $F_V^{(u)}$.}
475: \end{figure}
476: \end{center}
477: It is again convenient to change the direction of the quark line in the loop diagram of
478: Fig \ref{fig:Fv}b
479: describing $F_V^{(u)}$
480: by performing the charge conjugation of the matrix element. For the vector current $\gamma_\nu$
481: in the vertex the sign does not change (in contrast to the $\gamma_\nu\gamma_5$ case
482: considered above).
483:
484: Then both diagrams in Fig \ref{fig:Fv} a, b are
485: reduced to the diagram of Fig \ref{fig:Fvt} which gives the
486: form factor $F_V^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)$: Setting $m_1=m_b$, $m_2=m_u$ gives $F_V^{(b)}$:
487: $F_V^{(b)}=Q_b F_V^{(1)}(m_b,m_u)$; Setting $m_1=m_u$, $m_2=m_b$
488: gives $F_V^{(u)}$, $F_V^{(u)}=Q_u F_V^{(1)}(m_u,m_b)$.
489: \begin{center}
490: \begin{figure}[hb]
491: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig22.eps,width=3cm}}
492: \caption{\label{fig:Fvt} The triangle diagram for $F_V^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)$.
493: The cut corresponds to calculating the imaginary part in the variable $p^2$.}
494: \end{figure}
495: \end{center}
496: The trace corresponding to the diagram of Fig 4 (1 - active quark, 2 - spectator) reads
497: \begin{eqnarray}
498: -{\rm Sp}\;
499: i\gamma_5(m_2-\hat k_2)\gamma_\nu (m_1+\hat k'_1)\gamma_\mu(m_1+\hat k_1)=
500: -4\epsilon_{\nu\mu \alpha q_1}(m_1 k_2+m_2 k_1)_\alpha.
501: \nonumber
502: \end{eqnarray}
503: The spectral representation for the form factor takes the form
504: \begin{eqnarray}
505: \nonumber
506: \frac{2}{M_B}F_V^{(1)}=\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int\limits_{(m_b+m_u)^2}^\infty
507: \frac{ds\phi_B(s)}{(s-M_\rho^2)}\left\{
508: (m_2-m_1)\frac{\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_b^2,m_u^2)}{s}+
509: m_1\log\left(\frac{s+m_1^2-m_2^2+\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}
510: {s+m_1^2-m_2^2-\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}\right)
511: \right\}.
512: \end{eqnarray}
513: To analyze the heavy quark limit $m_b\to\infty$ we again represent the form factor
514: in terms of the light-cone variables
515: \begin{eqnarray}
516: \label{fv-lc}
517: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(1)}&=&-\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}
518: \int \frac{dx_1 dx_2 dk_\perp^2}{x_1^2 x_2}\delta(1-x_1-x_2)
519: \frac{\phi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left(m_1x_2+m_2 x_1\right).
520: \end{eqnarray}
521: For $F_{V}^{(u)}$ and $F_{V}^{(b)}$ the corresponding expressions read
522: \begin{eqnarray}
523: \label{fvu}
524: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(u)}&=&-Q_u\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx dk_\perp^2}{x_u^2 x_b}
525: \frac{\phi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_u\,x_b+m_b\,x_u\right\}, \nonumber
526: \\
527: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(b)}&=&-Q_b\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx dk_\perp^2}{x_b^2 x_u}
528: \frac{\phi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_b\,x_u+m_u\,x_b\right\}, \nonumber
529: \end{eqnarray}
530: By the same procedure as used for $F_A$, we obtain in the limit $m_b\to\infty$
531: \begin{eqnarray}
532: \label{hqlimit1}
533: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(u)}&=&-Q_u\frac{f_b}{\bar\Lambda m_b}+...\nonumber\\
534: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(b)}&=&-Q_b\frac{f_b}{m_b^2}+...
535: \end{eqnarray}
536: The dominant contribution in the heavy quark limit again comes from the process
537: when the light quark emits the photon. Now both form factors $F_{V}^{(u)}$ and $F_{V}^{(b)}$
538: in (\ref{hqlimit1}) perfectly agree with the expansions obtained in \cite{korch}.
539:
540: As seen from Eqs. (\ref{hqlimit}) and (\ref{hqlimit1}), one finds $F_A=F_V$ in the heavy quark limit,
541: in agreement with the large-energy effective theory \cite{leet}.
542:
543: %********************************
544: %\newpage
545: \section{The form factor $G_V$}
546: The form factor $G_V$ is determined by the divergence of the matrix element of the charged current
547: between the vacuum and the $\rho^-\gamma$ state,
548: \begin{eqnarray}
549: ip_\nu\langle \gamma(q_1)\rho^-(q_2)|\bar d\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 u|0\rangle=
550: eG_V \epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^\ast q_2\epsilon_2^\ast}.
551: \end{eqnarray}
552: The corresponding diagrams are shown in Fig \ref{fig:rhogamma}.
553: \begin{center}
554: \begin{figure}[hb]
555: \mbox{\epsfig{file=fig6.eps,width=7cm}}
556: \caption{\label{fig:rhogamma} Diagrams describing the amplitude
557: $\langle \gamma(q_1)\rho^-(q_2)|\bar d \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 q|0\rangle$, $p=q_1+q_2$, $p^2=M_B^2$.
558: The diagram (a) is multiplied by the $d$-quark charge, and the
559: the diagram (b) is multiplied by the $u$-quark charge.
560: The cut corresponds to the calculation of the imaginary part in the variable $q_2^2$. }
561: \end{figure}
562: \end{center}
563: If the classical equations of motion are applied, the form factor $G_V$ is proportional to the
564: light-quark masses.
565: This is the reason why this form factor was neglected in previous
566: analyses \cite{gp,sr1}. However, a proper calculation shows that this argument is not correct:
567: in fact the classical equations
568: of motions do not hold and the divergence contains the anomaly.
569:
570: The anomalous behavior of the divergence of the axial-vector current in the chiral limit
571: is a well-known phenomenon discovered in the two-photon amplitude
572: $\langle \gamma\gamma|\partial_\nu \bar q\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 q|0\rangle$ \cite{abj}.
573: A very clear way to demonstrate the anomaly is to start with the matrix element of the axial vector
574: current and to calculate the spectral representations for the relevant form factors.
575: The anomaly is then obtained by performing the divergence at the final stage of the calculation \cite{dz}.
576: A similar treatment applied to the matrix element $\langle \gamma\rho^-|\bar d\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 u|0\rangle$
577: leads to the form factor $G_V$ which does not vanish in the limit $m\to 0$.
578: We will present a detailed discussion of the anomaly in radiative $B$ decays in a separate
579: publication \cite{ms1}. Here we only quote the final result: considering the spectral
580: representation in the variable $q_2^2$ and introducing the appropriate $\rho$-meson radial wave function
581: $\psi_\rho(s)$, one finds the following expression for the form factor $G_V$
582: \begin{eqnarray}
583: \label{gvd}
584: G_V=\sqrt{N_c}(Q_u+Q_d)\left[-\frac{M_B^2}{4\pi^2}\int\frac{ds\;\psi_\rho(s)\,(s-M_\rho^2)}{(s-M_B^2-i0)^2}\right].
585: \end{eqnarray}
586: $\psi_\rho(s)$ is normalized according to the relation (for massless quarks)
587: \begin{eqnarray}
588: \label{norma1}
589: \frac{1}{8\pi^2}\int\limits_{0}^\infty ds\; s\;|\psi_\rho(s)|^2=1.
590: \end{eqnarray}
591: Clearly, $G_V$ is finite for $m=0$ which means a violation of the classical equations
592: of motion for the axial-vector current. Eq. (\ref{gvd}) describes the anomaly which
593: takes place for the $\gamma\rho$ final state as well as for the $\gamma\gamma$ one.
594: There is however an important difference between the two cases:
595: For the $\gamma\gamma$ final state the divergence remains finite in the limit $m\to 0$ and
596: $p^2=M_B^2\to\infty$.
597: For the $\rho\gamma$ final state the divergence is finite for $m\to 0$ but
598: decreases as $1/p^2$ for $p^2\to\infty$.
599: It is convenient to introduce the parameter $\kappa$ such that
600: \begin{eqnarray}
601: \label{kappa}
602: G_V= (Q_u+Q_d)\;\kappa\frac{M_\rho f_\rho}{M_B^2},
603: \end{eqnarray}
604: with $\kappa$ staying finite for $m=0$ and $M_B\to\infty$.
605:
606:
607: %*****************************************************************************
608: %\newpage
609: \section{Numerical estimates}
610: Let us write once more the penguin and the weak annihilation contributions to
611: the $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ amplitude:
612: \begin{eqnarray}
613: F^{\rm peng}_{\rm PV}&=&F^{\rm peng}_{\rm PC}=-\xi_t C_7\frac{m_b}{2\pi^2}T_1(0),
614: \nonumber\\
615: F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}&=&\xi_u a_1 M_\rho f_\rho\;\left[\frac{2F_{A}}{M_B}+\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2} \right].
616: \nonumber\\
617: \label{formulas}
618: F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}&=&\xi_u a_1 M_\rho f_\rho\;\left[\frac{2F_V}{M_B}-\frac{f_B G_V}{M_\rho f_\rho}\right].
619: \end{eqnarray}
620: The scaling behavior of the form factors in the limit $M_B\to\infty$ reads
621: \begin{eqnarray}
622: T_1(0)\sim M_B^{-3/2} \cite{scaling},
623: \quad F_{A,B}\sim M_B^{-1/2}, \quad G_V\sim M_B^{-2}
624: \end{eqnarray}
625: such that
626: \begin{eqnarray}
627: F^{\rm peng}\sim M_B^{-1/2}, \quad F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV,PC}\sim M_B^{-3/2}.
628: \end{eqnarray}
629: The terms proportional to $f_B$ ($f_B\sim 1/\sqrt{M_B}$) are $1/M_B$-suppressed
630: compared with the terms containing $F_{A,V}$.
631: As we see below numerically this leads to a suppression by a factor of $4-5$.
632:
633: We now proceed to numerical estimates for the $B$-meson decay.
634: The scale-dependent Wilson coefficients $C_i(\mu)$ and $a_1(\mu)$ take the following values
635: at the renormalization scale $\mu\simeq 5$ GeV \cite{gsw}:
636: \begin{eqnarray}
637: C_1=1.1,\qquad C_2=-0.241, \qquad C_{7\gamma}=-0.312, \qquad a_1=C_1+C_2/N_c\simeq 1.02.
638: \end{eqnarray}
639: The penguin form factor was previously calculated within the dispersion approach with the result
640: $T_1^{B^-\to\rho^-}(0)=0.27\pm 0.3$ \cite{ms}. Using the same parameters and the $B$ meson wave
641: function as in \cite{ms} we obtain the form factors $F_{A,B}$ shown in Table I.
642: Our result for the form factor $F_V$ is in good agreement with the estimates from other approaches.
643: The form factor $F_A$ agrees well with the constraints from perturbative QCD and turns out to be considerably
644: larger than the corresponding sum rule estimate.
645:
646: The value of the $G_V$ is very sensitive to the details of the $\rho$ meson wave function
647: $\psi_\rho$. The reason for that is the presence of the term $(s-M_\rho^2)$ in the integrand in Eq.
648: (\ref{gvd}) which changes sign in the integration region. Assuming $\psi_\rho(s)\simeq {\beta^2}/{(\beta^2+s)^2}$ and setting
649: $\beta=0.8$ GeV, which gives a good description of the $\rho$ meson radius, leads to
650: $\kappa=-1.8$. However, this value has a large uncertainty.
651: Conservatively, we take $|\kappa|<2.0$ and use this result for further estimates.
652: The form factor $G_V$ does not contribute more than a few \% to the full amplitude, but
653: can sizeably correct the weak-annihilation part.
654:
655: Using the obtained form factors and the decay constants $f_B=0.18$ GeV, $f_\rho=0.21$ GeV
656: we arrive at the following estimates (we show contributions of different terms in Eq. (\ref{formulas}) separately):
657: \begin{eqnarray}
658: F^{\rm peng}&=&\xi_t\;20\;{\rm MeV},
659: \nonumber\\
660: F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}&=&\xi_u\; \left\{
661: -7.8\;({\rm cont.\; of}\; F_A)+\;
662: 2.2\;({\rm cont.\; of}\; f_B)\right\}\;{\rm MeV}
663: =-5.6\;\xi_u\;{\rm MeV}
664: \nonumber\\
665: F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}&=&\xi_u\;\left\{-6.0\;({\rm cont.\; of\;} F_V)
666: \pm\;0.7\rm ({cont.\; of\;} G_V)\right\}\;{\rm MeV}
667: =-(6.0\pm 0.7)\;\xi_u\;{\rm MeV}.
668: \end{eqnarray}
669:
670: Taking into account errors in the form factors, for the ratios of the
671: weak-annihilation to the penguin amplitudes we find
672: \begin{eqnarray}
673: \label{results}
674: {\rm parity-violating} &:&\qquad {F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}}/{F^{\rm peng}_{\rm PV}}
675: \simeq -(0.28\pm 0.025)\;{\xi_u}/{\xi_t},
676: \nonumber\\
677: {\rm parity-conserving} &:&\qquad {F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}}/{F^{\rm peng}_{\rm PC}}
678: \simeq -(0.3\pm 0.05)\;{\xi_u}/{\xi_t}.
679: \end{eqnarray}
680: $|\xi_u/\xi_t|\simeq 0.4$ in the Standard Model.
681:
682: Our results for $F^{\rm peng}$ and $F^{\rm WA}$ agree with the sum rules
683: \cite{sr2} which reported the ratio
684: $F^{\rm WA}/F^{\rm peng}\simeq -0.3\;{\xi_u}/{\xi_t}$.
685: We would like to notice, however, that the anatomy of $F^{\rm WA}$ in our analysis is
686: different. For instance, we have found $F_A$ considerably larger than the sum rule result.
687: But after including the contact term $\sim f_B$ which was not taken into account in
688: \cite{sr2}, we have come to $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}$ close to the sum rule estimate.
689:
690: The calculated form factors and the ratios of the weak-annihilation to the penguin
691: amplitudes is one of the necessary ingredients for the calculation of the
692: branching ratios of the $B\to\rho\gamma$ decays, Isospin and CP Asymmetries.
693: In addition to the above ratios, these quantities contain the phase induced by the strong
694: interactions and the CP-violating phase of the CKM matrix (see \cite{ap,ppp} for details).
695: The corresponding analysis was done recently in \cite{ap} using the value
696: $F^{\rm WA}/F^{\rm peng}\simeq -0.3\;{\xi_u}/{\xi_t}$.
697:
698:
699:
700: %==================================================================================================
701: \begin{table}[htb]
702: \caption{\label{table:results} Results for the weak-annihilation form factors
703: $F_A$, $F_V$ and $G_V$ for the $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ decay. The accuracy of our estimates
704: is about 10\%. The sum rule results are recalculated from \protect\cite{sr2} according to the relation
705: $F_{A,V}=-F^{\rm SR}_{1,2}{M_B}/{f_{\rho^-}}$. The results from \protect\cite{korch}
706: are recalculated according to $F_{A,V}=-\frac{1}{2}f^{\protect\cite{korch}}_{A,V}$ for
707: $\bar \Lambda=0.5$ GeV.}
708: \centering
709: \begin{tabular}{|l|r|r|r|}
710: & Disp Approach & SR \cite{sr2} & pQCD\cite{korch} \\
711: \hline
712: $-F_{A}$ & 0.120 & 0.073 & $>$0.09 \\
713: $-F_{V}$ & 0.092 & 0.091 & $>$0.09 \\
714: $|G_V|$ & $<$0.004 & &
715: \end{tabular}
716: \end{table}
717:
718: %==================================================================================================
719: \section{Conclusion}
720: We have analyzed the weak annihilation for the radiative decay $B\to\rho\gamma$
721: in the factorization approximation.
722:
723: \noindent 1. We have calculated the form factors $F_A$ and $F_V$ describing
724: the photon emission from the $B$ meson loop within the relativistic dispersion
725: approach. We have performed the $1/m_b$ expansion of the form factors and demonstrated that the form factors
726: of the dispersion approach exhibit a behaviour in agreement with the large-energy limit of QCD.
727:
728: \noindent 2. We have analyzed the contribution to the weak annihilation amplitude from the diagram
729: when the photon is emitted from the loop containing only light quarks.
730: For the parity-conserving process this quantity is related to the divergence of
731: the axial-vector current
732: \begin{eqnarray}
733: \langle \gamma(q_1)\rho^-(q_2)|\partial_\nu \bar d \gamma_\nu \gamma_5 u|0\rangle=
734: e\epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^\ast q_2\epsilon^\ast_2}(Q_u+Q_d)\;\kappa\;{f_\rho M_\rho}/{M_B^2}.
735: \end{eqnarray}
736: with $\kappa$ staying finite in the chiral limit $m\to 0$.
737: This result means the violation of the classical equations of motion and represents an anomaly which has the
738: same origin as the anomaly of the matrix element
739: $\langle \gamma(q_1)\gamma(q_2)|\partial_\mu A_\mu|0\rangle$.
740: The value of $\kappa$ is found to be sensitive to subtle details of the $\rho$-meson wave function.
741: Conservatively, we estimate $|\kappa|\lesssim 1$.
742:
743: \noindent 3. We have also included contact terms which were missed in some of the
744: previous analyses. Numerical estimates for the
745: weak annihilation contribution to the $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ amplitude are given
746: in Eq. (\ref{results}).
747:
748: It was noticed in \cite{sr1} that the weak annihilation mechanism
749: is crucial for the $D\to \rho\gamma$ decays in which it dominates over the penguin mechanism.
750: It is therefore very important to take into account all the contribitions to the weak
751: annihilation amplitude listed above for a proper description of the rare radiative $D$ decays.
752:
753: \acknowledgments
754: We are grateful to O. Nachtmann, O. P\`ene and
755: V. I. Zakharov for useful discussions and to K. Schubert for interest in this work.
756: We also like to thank Th. Feldmann for a critical reading of a preliminary
757: version of the paper. The work was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung,
758: BMBF project 05 HT 9 HVA3, and the Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst (DAAD).
759:
760: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
761: \bibitem{gp}
762: B. Grinstein and D. Pirjol, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 093002 (2000).
763: \bibitem{m2001} D. Melikhov, N. Nikitin, S. Simula, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 430}, 332 (1998);
764: D. Melikhov, hep-ph/0104111.
765: \bibitem{ap}A. Ali and A. Parkhomenko, hep-ph/0105302.
766: \bibitem{ppp}S. Bosch and G. Buchalla, hep-ph/0106081.
767: \bibitem{sr1} A. Khodjamirian, G. Stoll, D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 358}, 129 (1995).
768: \bibitem{sr2} A. Ali and V. M. Braun, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 359}, 223 (1995).
769: \bibitem{korch} G. Korchemsky, D. Pirjol, T.-M. Yan, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 114510 (2000).
770: \bibitem{gsw} B. Grinstein, M. B. Wise and M. J. Savage, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B319}, 271 (1989);\\
771: A. Buras and M. M\"unz, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 52}, 186 (1995).
772: \bibitem{wsb} M. Wirbel, B. Stech, and C. Bauer, Z. Phys. C {\bf 29}, 637 (1985).
773: \bibitem{m}
774: D. Melikhov, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 53}, 2460 (1996); D {\bf 56}, 7089 (1997).
775: \bibitem{ms} M. Beyer, D. Melikhov, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 451}, 121 (1999), \\
776: D. Melikhov, B. Stech, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 014006 (2000).
777: \bibitem{lc} V. V. Anisovich, D. Melikhov, B. C. Metsch, H. R. Petry,
778: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 563}, 549 (1993); \\
779: V. V. Anisovich, D. Melikhov, V. Nikonov, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 5295 (1995);
780: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 55}, 2918 (1997).
781: \bibitem{leet} G. Charles et al, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}, 014001 (1999).
782: \bibitem{abj} S. Adler, Phys. Rev. {\bf 177}, 2426 (1969); \\
783: J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, Nuovo Cimento, {\bf 60A}, 47 (1969).
784: \bibitem{dz} A. D. Dolgov and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B27}, 525 (1971);\\
785: V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 42}, 1208 (1990).
786: \bibitem{ms1}
787: D. Melikhov and B. Stech, paper in preparation.
788: \bibitem{scaling} P. Ball and V. M. Braun, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 55}, 5561 (1997).
789: %\bibitem{bb} P. Ball and V. M. Braun, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 094016 (1999).
790: \end{thebibliography}
791:
792: %\newpage
793: \section{Appendix: transversity of the parity-violating amplitude. }
794: \noindent The parity-violating amplitude (\ref{apva}) is given by the sum of the two terms
795: \begin{eqnarray}
796: A^{\rm PV}(B^-\to\rho\gamma^-)\sim A^{\rm PV}_1+A^{\rm PV}_2
797: \end{eqnarray}
798: where
799: $A^{\rm PV}_1=\langle \rho^-(q_2)|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
800: \langle \gamma(q_1)|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B^-(p) \rangle$
801: and $A^{\rm PV}_2=
802: \langle \rho^-(q_2)\gamma(q_1)|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
803: \langle 0|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B^-(p) \rangle$.
804:
805: \noindent 1. We start with $A^{\rm PV}_1$. Let us write
806: $\langle \gamma(q_1)|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B^-(p) \rangle=e\,\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} T^B_{\mu\nu}$ with
807: \begin{eqnarray}
808: T^B_{\mu\nu}(p,q)&=&i\int dx e^{iqx}\langle 0|T(J_\mu(x),\bar u\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 b)|B^-(p)\rangle,
809: \end{eqnarray}
810: where
811: $J_\mu(x)=\frac23\bar u\gamma_\mu u
812: -\frac13 \bar d\gamma_\mu d
813: -\frac13 \bar b\gamma_\mu b$ is the electromagnetic quark current.
814: The amplitude has the following Lorentz structure
815: \begin{eqnarray}
816: \label{qq}
817: T^B_{\mu\nu}=i\left(g_{\mu\nu}pq_1-p_{\mu}q_{1\nu}\right)F_{1A}(q_1^2)
818: +i\left(q_1^2\,p_{\mu}-{pq_1}\,q_{1\mu}\right)q_{1\nu}F_{2A}(q_1^2)
819: +i\left(q_1^2\,p_{\mu}-{pq_1}\,q_{1\mu}\right)p_{\nu}F_{3A}(q_1^2)
820: +\frac{ip_{\mu}p_\nu}{pq_1} C,
821: \end{eqnarray}
822: where $C$ is the contact term.
823: The contact term can be determined using the conservation of the electromagnetic current
824: $\partial_\mu J_\mu=0$, which leads to the relation
825: \begin{eqnarray}
826: \label{eq3}
827: q_\mu T^B_{\mu\nu}(p,q)=-\langle 0|[\hat Q, \bar d\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 u]|B^-(p)\rangle
828: =Q_Bf_B p_\nu=-if_B p_\nu
829: \end{eqnarray}
830: for the $B^-$ meson. This gives $C=-f_B$. Notice that for the $B^0$-meson the contact term is absent.
831: For the radiative decay $q_1^2=0$ so we find
832: \begin{eqnarray}
833: A^{\rm PV}_1&=&
834: ie\,f_\rho M_\rho \epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}\left\{
835: (g_{\mu\nu}pq_1-p_{\mu}q_{1\nu})F_{1A}(0)-p_\mu p_{\nu} \frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}\right\}
836: \nonumber\\
837: &=&
838: ie\,f_\rho M_\rho \epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}\left\{
839: (g_{\mu\nu}pq_1-p_{\mu}q_{1\nu})F_{1A}(0)-p_\mu q_{1\nu}\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}\right\}.
840: \end{eqnarray}
841:
842: \noindent 2. Using the equation of motion for the quark fields ($Q_u=2/3\;e$, $Q_d=-1/3\;e$)
843: \begin{eqnarray}
844: i\gamma_\nu\partial^\nu q(x)&=& m q(x) - Q_q A_\nu \gamma^\nu q(x),
845: \nonumber\\
846: i\partial^\nu \bar q(x)\gamma_\nu&=& -m \bar q(x) + Q_q A_\nu \bar q(x)\gamma^\nu ,
847: \end{eqnarray}
848: one obtains for $A_2^{\rm PV}$
849: \begin{eqnarray}
850: A^{\rm PV}_2&=&ip_\nu f_B \langle \rho^-\gamma|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle=
851: f_B \langle \rho^-\gamma|\partial_\nu(\bar d \gamma_\nu u)|0 \rangle
852: \nonumber\\
853: &=&-(Q_d-Q_u)e\,\langle \rho^-\gamma|A^\nu \bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
854: =e\,\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu} g_{\mu\nu}f_\rho M_\rho f_B +O(m_u,m_d).
855: \end{eqnarray}
856:
857: \noindent 3. For the sum we find
858: \begin{eqnarray}
859: A^{\rm PV}_1+A^{\rm PV}_2=ie\,f_\rho f_B M_\rho \epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}
860: \left(g_{\mu\nu}pq_1-p_{\mu}q_{1\nu}\right)\left[F_{1A}(0)+\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}\right]
861: \end{eqnarray}
862: and obtain the relation (\ref{fpv}) after setting $F_{1A}=2F_A/M_B$.
863: For the $B^0\to \rho^0\gamma$ decay the term proportional to $f_B$ is absent.
864:
865: \end{document}
866: %==================================================================================================
867: \begin{table}[htb]
868: \caption{\label{table:comparison} The penguin and the weak-annihilation invariant amplitudes
869: for the $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ and $B^0(b\bar d)\to\rho^0\gamma$ decays}
870: \centering
871: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
872: Quantity & $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ & $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ \\
873: \hline
874: $F^{peng}$ &
875: $-\xi_t C_7\frac{m_b}{2\pi^2}T^{B^-\to\rho^-}_1(0)$ &
876: $-\xi_t C_7\frac{m_b}{2\pi^2}T^{B^0\to\rho^0}_1(0)$ \\
877: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}$ &
878: $\xi_u a_1 M_\rho f_\rho\;\left(\frac{2F^{B^-}_{A}}{M_B}+\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2} \right)$ &
879: $\xi_u a_2 M_\rho f_{\rho^0}\;\left(\frac{2F^{B^0}_{A}}{M_B}\right)$ \\
880: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}$ &
881: $\xi_u a_1 M_\rho f_\rho\;\left(\frac{2F^{B^-}_V}{M_B}-(Q_u+Q_d)\;\kappa\frac{f_B}{M^2_B}\right)$ &
882: $\xi_u a_2 M_\rho f_{\rho^0}\;\left(\frac{2F^{B^0}_V}{M_B}-2\;Q_u\;\kappa\frac{f_B}{M^2_B}\right)$
883: \end{tabular}
884: \end{table}
885: