hep-ph0106260/dis.tex
1: %%UNIX --- UPDATED ON 13/8/97  
2: %====================================================================%
3: %                  sprocl.tex     27-Feb-1995                        %
4: % This latex file rewritten from various sources for use in the      %
5: % preparation of the standard proceedings Volume, latest version     %
6: % by Susan Hezlet with acknowledgments to Lukas Nellen.              %
7: % Some changes are due to David Cassel.                              %
8: %====================================================================%
9: 
10: \documentstyle[sprocl,epsbox]{article}
11: 
12: \font\eightrm=cmr8
13: 
14: %\input{psfig}
15: 
16: \bibliographystyle{unsrt} %for BibTeX - sorted numerical labels by
17:                           %order of first citation.
18: 
19: \arraycolsep1.5pt
20: 
21: % A useful Journal macro
22: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}
23: 
24: % Some useful journal names
25: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}
26: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
27: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}
28: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}
29: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.}  B}
30: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}
31: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}
32: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} C}
33: \def\slash#1{{\mathpalette\c@ncel{#1}}} % TeXbook, bottom of p360
34: \def\pslash{\rlap/{\mkern-1mu p}}
35: \def\nslash{\rlap/{\mkern-1mu n}}
36: 
37: % Some other macros used in the sample text
38: \def\st{\scriptstyle}
39: \def\sst{\scriptscriptstyle}
40: \def\mco{\multicolumn}
41: \def\epp{\epsilon^{\prime}}
42: \def\vep{\varepsilon}
43: \def\ra{\rightarrow}
44: \def\ppg{\pi^+\pi^-\gamma}
45: \def\vp{{\bf p}}
46: \def\ko{K^0}
47: \def\kb{\bar{K^0}}
48: \def\al{\alpha}
49: \def\ab{\bar{\alpha}}
50: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
51: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
52: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
53: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
54: \def\CPbar{\hbox{{\rm CP}\hskip-1.80em{/}}}%temp replacemt due to no font
55: 
56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
57: %%BEGINNING OF TEXT                           
58: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
59: 
60: \begin{document}
61: 
62: \title{SINGLE-SPIN ASYMMETRIES AND SOFT-GLUON POLES
63: \footnote{Talk presented at the conference DIS2001 held at Bologna, Italy,
64: from April 27 to May 1, 2001.}}
65: 
66: \author{YUJI KOIKE}
67: 
68: \address{Department of Physics, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181,
69: Japan\\E-mail: koike@nt.sc.niigata-u.ac.jp} 
70: 
71: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72: % You may repeat \author \address as often as necessary      %
73: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
74: 
75: \maketitle\abstracts{Mechanism for the
76: single transverse spin asymmeties in the pion production,
77: $p^\uparrow + p'\to \pi(\ell_T) + X$, 
78: and the $\Lambda$ hyperon polarization, 
79: $p + p' \to \Lambda^\uparrow (\ell_T)+ X$, is investigated in 
80: the framework of QCD factorization theorem.
81: We identify all the soft-gluon pole contributions
82: coming from the twist-3
83: distribution and/or fragmentation functions
84: and show that they give rise to large asymmetries at large $x_F$.
85: }
86: 
87: \section{Introduction}
88: The interest in the
89: single transverse spin asymmety $A_N$ in the pion production,
90: $N(P,S_\perp) + N(P')\to \pi(\ell_T) + X$,
91: and the hyperon (typically 
92: $\Lambda$) polarization $P_\Lambda$ in the unpolarized
93: $NN$ collision,
94: $N(P) + N(P') \to \Lambda(\ell_T,S_\perp) + X$, 
95: resides in the fact that
96: they probe quark-gluon correlation in the hadrons
97: (higher twist effect) 
98: which is not included in the parton model. 
99: Without it, the partonic cross sections are strongly
100: suppressed by $m_q/Q$ ($m_q$ is a quark mass and $Q$ is a hard scale involved)
101: and gives negligible asymmetries.
102: %Therefore these asymmetries provide us with a good opportunity
103: %to understand quark-gluon substructure of the hadrons.
104: 
105: In this talk,  I will discuss $A_N$ and $P_\Lambda$
106: in the framework of the collinear factorization.  According to
107: the generalized QCD factorization theorem,
108: the cross section for $A_N$ typically 
109: consists of three kinds of twist-3 cross sections, 
110: \bea
111: &{\rm (A)}&\quad G_a(x_1,x_2)\otimes q_b(x')\otimes 
112: \widehat{q}_{c\to \pi}(z)\otimes
113: \hat{\sigma}^1_{ab\to c},
114: \label{eq1}\\
115: &{\rm (B)}&\quad
116: \delta q_a(x)\otimes E_b(x_1',x_2') \otimes 
117: \widehat{q}_{c\to \pi}(z)\otimes 
118: \hat{\sigma}^2_{ab\to c},\\
119: &{\rm (C)}&\quad
120: \delta q_a(x)\otimes q_b(x') \otimes 
121: \widehat{E}_{c\to \pi}(z_1,z_2)\otimes
122: \hat{\sigma}^3_{ab\to c},
123: \eea  
124: and $P_\Lambda$ likewise receives two contributions,
125: \bea
126: &{\rm (A')}&\quad E_a(x_1,x_2)\otimes q_b(x')\otimes 
127: \delta \widehat{q}_{c\to \Lambda}(z)\otimes
128: \hat{\sigma}^4_{ab\to c},\\
129: &{\rm (C')}&\quad
130: q_a(x)\otimes q_b(x') \otimes 
131: \widehat{G}_{c\to \Lambda}(z_1,z_2)\otimes
132: \hat{\sigma}^5_{ab\to c}.
133: \label{eq2}
134: \eea  
135: Here the functions with two variables (momentum fractions)
136: $G_a(x_1,x_2)$, $E_a(x_1,x_2)$, $\widehat{E}_{c\to \pi}(z_1,z_2)$
137: $\widehat{G}_{c\to \Lambda}(z_1,z_2)$ are twist-3 quantities:
138: $G_a$ and $E_a$ are, respectively,  
139: the transversely polarized distribution
140: and the unpolarized distribution functions in the nucleon.
141: The functions with a hat, 
142: $\widehat{E}_{c\to \pi}$ and 
143: $\widehat{G}_{c\to \Lambda}$ are, respectively,
144: the unpolarized fragmentation 
145: function for the pion and the transversely polarized 
146: fragmentation function for $\Lambda$.
147: $a$, $b$ and $c$ stand for the parton's species.
148: Other functions are twist-2; 
149: $q_b(x)$ the unpolarized distribution (quark or gluon), 
150: $\delta q_a(x)$ the transversity distribution,
151: $\widehat{q}_{c\to\pi}$ the unpolarized fragmentation function and 
152: $\delta\widehat{q}_{c\to\Lambda}$ the transversity fragmentation
153: function for $\Lambda$.  
154: %The symbol $\otimes$ denotes convolution. 
155: $\hat{\sigma}^1_{ab\to c}$ {\it etc} represents the partonic cross section
156: for the process
157: $a+b \to c + anything$ which yields large transverse momentum of
158: the parton $c$. 
159: Note that 
160: $\delta q_a$, $E_a$, $\delta\widehat{q}_{c\to\Lambda}$ and
161: $\widehat{E}_{c\to\pi}$
162: are chiral-odd, and (B), (C) and (A') contain two chiral-odd functions,
163: which should appear in a pair along a fermion line in the 
164: diagram for the cross sections.
165: 
166: 
167: \section{Twist-3 distribution and fragmentation functions}
168: Relevant
169: twist-3 distributions are defined from a 
170: quark-gluon correlation in the nucleon
171: \bea
172: M_{Fij}^\alpha (x_1,x_2)
173: =\int {d\lambda\over 2\pi}\int {d\mu\over 2\pi} e^{i\lambda x_1}
174: e^{i\mu (x_2-x_1)} \langle PS|\bar{\psi}_j(0)
175: gF^{\alpha +}(\mu n)\psi_i(\lambda n)
176: |PS\rangle,
177: \eea
178: and they are classified in eqs.(7)-(9) of Ref.\cite{KKp1}.
179: Likewise the twist-3 fragmentation functions are defined from
180: \bea
181: \widehat{M}_{Fij}^\alpha (z_1,z_2) &=&\sum_X
182: \int {d\lambda\over 2\pi}\int {d\mu\over 2\pi} e^{-i\lambda/z_1}
183: e^{-i\mu (1/z_2-1/z_1)}\nonumber\\
184: &\times&\langle 0 |\psi_i(0)|HX\rangle
185: \langle HX | gF^{\alpha \beta}(\mu n) n_\beta\bar{\psi}_j(\lambda n) | 0\rangle.
186: \label{frag}
187: \eea
188: Similarly to ${M}_F^\alpha (x,y)$,
189: $\widehat{M}_F^\alpha (z_1,z_2)$ is decomposed
190: to define twist-3 fragmentation funcitons as
191: \bea
192: \widehat{M}_F^\alpha (z_1,z_2)
193: &=& M/4 \pslash \epsilon^{\alpha p n S_\perp} \widehat{G}_F(z_1,z_2)/z_2
194: -iM/4\pslash \gamma_5 S_\perp^\alpha \widehat{G}^5_F(z_1,z_2)/z_2
195: \nonumber\\
196: &-&iM(S\cdot n)/4 \gamma_5 (p^\alpha\nslash\pslash -\gamma^\alpha\pslash)
197: \widehat{H}_F(z_1,z_2)/z_2\nonumber\\
198: &+&M/4 
199: \gamma_5 \pslash\gamma_\nu \epsilon^{\nu\alpha n p}\widehat{E}_F(z_1,z_2)
200: /z_2+\cdots,
201: \eea
202: where $\cdots$ stands for the twist higher than 3.
203: In (\ref{frag}), if one shifts the gluon field strength 
204: $gF^{\alpha \beta}(\mu n) n_\beta$ into the matrix element
205: with $\psi(0)$ and call it $\widehat{M}^\alpha_{FR}(z_1,z_2)$, 
206: similar decomposition of $\widehat{M}^\alpha_{FR}$
207: defines another fragmentation 
208: functions 
209: ($\widehat{G}_{FR}$, $\widehat{G}^5_{FR}$, $\widehat{H}_{FR}$,
210: $\widehat{E}_{FR}$).  But these functions are related to 
211: ($\widehat{G}_{F}$, $\widehat{G}^5_{F}$, $\widehat{H}_{F}$,
212: $\widehat{E}_{F}$) by the hermiticity.  In addition if we assume naive time 
213: reversal invariance, 
214: these functions become real and obey the relation 
215: $\widehat{G}_{FR}(z_1,z_2) = \widehat{G}_F(z_2,z_1)$,
216: $\widehat{E}_{FR}(z_1,z_2) = \widehat{E}_F(z_2,z_1)$, 
217: $\widehat{G}^5_{FR}(z_1,z_2) = -\widehat{G}^5_F(z_2,z_1)$,
218: $\widehat{H}_{FR}(z_1,z_2) = -\widehat{H}_F(z_2,z_1)$.
219: We assume this symmetry property in our analysis.
220: 
221: 
222: \section{Result for the asymmeties}
223: 
224: With the complete set of the distribution and fragmentation functions up to
225: twist-3, one can derive the cross section formula corresponding to
226: (\ref{eq1})-(\ref{eq2}).  We follow the previous analyses
227: Ref.\cite{QS91} - Ref.\cite{KKh} and 
228: employ the {\it valence-quark soft-gluon} approximation
229: to analyze the cross section.
230: In this approximation we keep only the terms with the derivative
231: of the twist-3 functions
232: such as $d E_F(x,x)/dx$ and $d\widehat{E}_F(z,z)/dz$.
233: This approximation should be valid 
234: at large $x_F\to 1$, which probe 
235: the region with large $x$, small $x'$
236: and large $z$ in (\ref{eq1})-(\ref{eq2}) where the relations such as  
237: $|dE_F(x,x)/dx| >> E_F(x,x)$ and 
238: $|d\widehat{E}_F(z,z)/dz| >> \widehat{E}_F(z,z)$ hold.  
239: The (B) term for $A_N$ may cause enhancement in the asymmetry at
240: $x_F \to -1$, but it turns out that it is negligible in all kinematic region
241: because of the smallness of the hard cross section 
242: $\hat{\sigma}^2$\,(Ref.\cite{KKp2}). 
243: 
244: 
245: To get a rough feeling on how each term for $A_N$ and $P_\Lambda$
246: behaves, we show the (C) term for $A_N$ in Fig.1, and (A') and (C')
247: term for $P_\Lambda$ in Fig. 2.  We use the same distribution and 
248: fragmentation functions used in Refs.\cite{KKp2,KKh}.  For the twist-3
249: functions, we make an extention of the ansatz 
250: taken in Ref.\cite{QS99}-Ref.\cite{KKh},
251: $G_F^a(x,x)=K_a q^a(x)$,
252: $E_F^a(x,x)=K'_a \delta q^a(x)$,
253: $\widehat{G}_F^a(x,x)=\widetilde{K}_a \widehat{q}^a(x)$,
254: $\widehat{E}_F^a(x,x)=\widetilde{K}'_a \widehat{q}^a(x)$,
255: and set $K_u=-K_d=0.07$, $K'_a=\widetilde{K}_a = K_a$ ($a=u,d$),
256: and $\widetilde{K}'_u=-0.11$, $\widetilde{K}'_d=-0.19$.
257: This choice of $\widetilde{K}'_a$ is simply motivated to 
258: reproduce $A_N$ approximately at large $x_F$.  
259: 
260: \begin{figure}[h]
261: \center
262: \epsfile{file=pion_odd.eps,scale=0.45}
263: \caption{(C) contribution to $A_N$ for $\pi^{\pm,0}$.  \label{figB}}
264: \end{figure}
265: 
266: \begin{figure}[h]
267: \center
268: \epsfile{file=lambda.eps,scale=0.45}
269: \caption{
270: (A') (Chiral-odd with Scenarios 2 and 3 for $\delta\hat{q}$,
271: and (C') (Chiral-even) contributions to $P_\Lambda$.}
272: \end{figure}
273: 
274: 
275: One sees from Fig.1 that the (C) term alone can give equally good fit
276: to the E704 data as the (A) term studied in Ref.\cite{QS99}.
277: The (C') contribution also gives rise the rising behavior 
278: of $P_\Lambda$ at large $x_F$.
279: 
280: To summerize, we have presented an analysis for $A_N$ and $P_\Lambda$
281: in the framework of QCD factorization, in particular, the soft gluon-pole 
282: contribution with the twist-3 fragmentation functions is identified.
283: With a moderate model assumption
284: for the twist-3 fragmentation fuctions, 
285: derivative of the twist-3 fragmentation function also gives
286: the rising behavior of the asymmetry at large $x_F$.
287: 
288: 
289: 
290: 
291: \section*{Acknowledgments}
292: I would like to thank George Sterman for helpful discussions.
293: This work is supported in part by RIKEN and the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific 
294: Research (No. 12640260) of Monbusho.
295: 
296: 
297: \section*{References}
298: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
299: 
300: \bibitem{QS91} J. Qiu and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 67} (1991) 2264;
301: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B378} (1992) 52.
302: 
303: \bibitem{QS99} J. Qiu and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. {\bf D59} (1999) 014004.
304: 
305: \bibitem{KKp1} Y. Kanazawa and Y. Koike, 
306: \Journal{\PLB}{478}{121}{2000}.
307: 
308: \bibitem{KKp2} Y. Kanazawa and Y. Koike, 
309: \Journal{\PLB}{490}{99}{2000}.
310: 
311: \bibitem{KKh} Y. Kanazawa and Y. Koike, hep-ph/0012225,
312: Phys. Rev. {\bf D64} in press.
313: 
314: \end{thebibliography}
315: 
316: \end{document}
317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
318: %% End of sprocl.tex  
319: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
320: 
321: 
322: 
323: 
324: 
325: 
326: 
327: 
328: