1: \documentclass{article} % for standard LaTeX (LaTeX2e)
2: \usepackage{e} % for standard LaTeX (LaTeX2e)
3: \begin{document}
4: %
5: \branch{C} % Please specify the branch of EPJ
6: %%\DOI{123} % do not fill in
7: %%\idline{C}{1, 1--11}{1} % do not fill in
8: %%\editorial{}{}{}{} % do not fill in
9: %
10: \title{Electroweak corrections to the observables of $W$-boson
11: production at RHIC}
12: %
13: \author{V. A. Zykunov\inst{1}}
14: %
15: \institute{
16: Gomel State Technical University,\\
17: October Av. 48, 246746, Gomel, Belarus;\\
18: e-mail: zykunov@ggtu.belpak.gomel.by}
19: %
20: \PACS{12.15.Lk; 14.70.Fm; 13.88.+e}
21: %
22: \maketitle
23: %
24: \begin{abstract}
25: The processes of the single $W$-production in hadron-hadron collisions
26: are suggested for investigation of the nucleon spin.
27: An approach is proposed for the determination of
28: quark spin densities at low $x$.
29: The lowest order electroweak radiative corrections to
30: the observable quantities are calculated.
31: The numerical calculations of the cross sections
32: and the single spin asymmetries taking into consideration the
33: electroweak corrections at RHIC energies have been made.
34: \end{abstract}
35: %
36: %
37: \section{Introduction}
38: %
39: Despite remarkable success in solving the proton-spin problem, which was
40: risen by spin crisis \cite{EMC}, in experiments with fixed targets
41: at CERN \cite{CERN}, SLAC \cite{SLAC} and HERMES \cite{HERMES} a
42: conclusive solution to the problem of determination of $u-,d-,s-$ quark
43: and gluon polarizations has yet to be found.
44: Purely inclusive measurements determining the spin structure
45: functions for nucleons and deuteron are unfortunately
46: restricted to probe only certain combinations of the polarized
47: parton densities. A full analysis would
48: require additional inputs from other measurements to separate
49: different components.
50: For example, semi-inclusive measurements with SMC \cite{semi-SMC} and
51: HERMES \cite{semi-HERMES} allow to access to a variety of polarized
52: parton distributions. However, direct and separate measurements of
53: the polarized parton distributions will remain a limited
54: significance for some time.
55:
56: Some new combinations of the polarized quark densities
57: can be obtained from the experimental data on single spin asymmetries,
58: when the polarized target is used in conjunction with an (un)polarized
59: proton beam.
60: This opportunity is offered by
61: the dedicated RHIC spin program at BNL \cite{now16} which is
62: supposed to start in a short period of time.
63: Collider polarized experiments
64: STAR and PHENIX at the RHIC energy ($\sqrt{S} \approx 500 GeV$)
65: will be the point where a high energy nucleon-nucleon
66: spin physics will be studied by measuring a variety of spin asymmetries.
67: Besides, there are some prospects on an acceleration of the polarized
68: protons to $1 TeV$ at Fermilab Tevatron \cite{tevat} and these will
69: lead to similar physics, which will be accessible to
70: RHIC and possibly to HERA-$\stackrel{\rightarrow}{N}$ \cite{now15}.
71:
72: In this paper we are concerned with experiments which may provide
73: direct measurements of new independent combinations of the quark densities
74: in polarized nucleon. We will focus on inclusive single $W$-boson
75: production in hadron-hadron interactions with one longitudinally
76: polarized beam
77: %(polarization denoted by arrow)
78: \begin{equation}
79: N_1 \ + \stackrel{\rightarrow}{N_2} \rightarrow W^{\pm} + X \rightarrow l^{\pm} + X.
80: \label{1}
81: \end{equation}
82:
83: It's well known that the single spin asymmetry of the production of
84: $W$-bosons via
85: $\ \stackrel{\ }{p}\stackrel{\rightarrow}{p} \rightarrow W^{\pm }X$
86: (e.g. $A_L$ from Ref.\cite{AL})
87: is sensitive to the form of polarized quark distributions.
88: In Sec. 2 of our paper we get formulas for single asymmetries
89: of the process (1) for the case
90: when in the final state only charged lepton is detected.
91: Moreover, we will show the possibility of proposing reactions to study
92: the polarized quark densities in the region of small $x$.
93:
94: Radiative events originating from the loop diagrams and
95: (as we consider the inclusive process)
96: the processes with the emission of real photons, cannot be
97: removed by experimental methods and so they have to be
98: calculated theoretically and subtracted from measured
99: cross sections of proposed reactions.
100: In this paper the total $O(\alpha)$ electroweak radiative
101: corrections (EWC) to the cross sections and single spin
102: asymmetries have been calculated.
103: In Sec. 3 and 4 we present the contributions of additional
104: virtual and real emitted particles respectively.
105: Numerical analysis and conclusions can be found in Sec. 5.
106: Some technical details of calculations are presented in Appendices.
107:
108:
109: \section{Born cross section and single asymmetries}
110: %
111: The cross section for the inclusive hadronic reaction (see Fig.1,1)
112: is given in Quark Parton Model (QPM) by conventional formula
113: \begin{equation}
114: d\sigma_{ N_1 \stackrel{\rightarrow}{N_2} \rightarrow l^{\pm} X }=
115: \int dx_1 dx_2 \sum_{i,i';r1,r2} f_i^{(1),r1}(x_1,Q^2)
116: f_{i'}^{(2),r2}(x_2,Q^2)
117: d{{{\hat \sigma}^{\pm}}}_{ii'},
118: \label{cs}
119: \end{equation}
120: where $f_i^{(a),r}(x,Q^2)$ is the probability of finding constituent $i$
121: with the fraction $x$ of the hadron's momentum and helicity $r$
122: (at squared momentum transfer in the partonic reaction $Q^2$)
123: in hadron $a$ and ${d{{\hat \sigma}^{\pm}}}_{ii'}$ is the cross section for the
124: elementary process leading to the final state (see Fig.1).
125: The summation runs over all contributing parton configurations and over
126: helicities of first and second partons ($r_{1,2}=\pm 1$).
127: The meaning of
128: operator "hat" will be explained below.
129:
130: The process of the single $W$-boson production in hadron-hadron
131: collision can be described with a very good approximation
132: by two pair of quark-antiquark subprocesses.
133: So for the $W^-$ production we have
134: \begin{equation}
135: q_i(p_1)+{\bar q}_{i'}(p_2,\eta_2) \rightarrow W^-(q) \rightarrow
136: l^{-}(k_1)+{\bar \nu}(k_2),
137: \label{1qp}
138: \end{equation}
139: \begin{equation}
140: {\bar q}_i(p_1)+ q_{i'}(p_2,\eta_2) \rightarrow W^-(q)\rightarrow
141: l^{-}(k_1)+ {\bar \nu} (k_2),
142: \label{2qp}
143: \end{equation}
144: and for $W^+$ one
145: \begin{equation}
146: q_i(p_1)+{\bar q}_{i'}(p_2,\eta_2) \rightarrow W^+(q)\rightarrow
147: l^{+}(k_1)+ \nu (k_2),
148: \label{3qp}
149: \end{equation}
150: \begin{equation}
151: {\bar q}_i(p_1)+ q_{i'}(p_2,\eta_2) \rightarrow W^+(q)\rightarrow
152: l^{+}(k_1)+ \nu (k_2).
153: \label{4qp}
154: \end{equation}
155: Our notations are the following (see Fig.1,2):
156: $p_1$ is a 4-momentum of a first unpolarized (anti)quark with flavor $i$
157: and mass $m_1$;\
158: $p_2$ is a 4-momentum of a second (anti)quark with flavor $i'$ ($i'$ denotes
159: the weak isospin partner of the quark $i$), mass $m_2$
160: and polarization vector $\eta_2$;\
161: $k_1$ is a 4-momentum of a final charged lepton $l^-$ or $l^+$ with mass $m_l$;\
162: $k_2$ is a 4-momentum of (anti)neutrino,
163: $q=p_1+p_2$ is a 4-momentum of the $W$-boson with mass $m_W$.
164: We use the standard set of Mandelstam invariants for the partonic elastic
165: scattering
166: \begin{equation}
167: s=(p_1+p_2)^2,\ t=(p_1-k_1)^2,\ u=(k_1-p_2)^2.
168: \end{equation}
169:
170: Squaring the matrix elements of partonic subprocess
171: and (we use the covariant expression for
172: the polarization vector of $i'$ parton from \cite{vec_pol})
173: we get the invariant parton-parton cross section in the Breit-Wigner form
174: \begin{equation}
175: d \sigma_{ii'}^{\pm} = \frac{\alpha^2}{4N_cs_w^4}
176: \frac{|V_{ii'}|^2 B_{ii'}}
177: {s((s-m_W^2)^2+m_W^2\Gamma_W^2)}
178: \delta (p_1+p_2-k_1-k_2)
179: \frac{d^3k_1}{{k_1}_0}
180: \frac{d^3k_2}{2{k_2}_0},
181: \end{equation}
182: where \\
183: $1/N_c=1/3$ is a color factor,
184: $s_w=\sqrt{1-c_w^2}$ is a sine of the weak mixing angle,
185: $c_w=m_W/m_Z,$
186: $m_Z$ is the $Z$-boson mass,
187: $\Gamma_W$ is the $W$-boson width,
188: $V_{ii'}$ is Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa mixing matrix,\\
189: ${\displaystyle \hbox to 0.5cm{\hfill}
190: B_{ii'}= \left\{
191: \begin{array}{cc}
192: u^2(1-r_2p_{N_2}) \mbox{ \ \ \ \ \ \ for (\ref{1qp}) subprocess, }\\
193: t^2(1-r_2p_{N_2}) \mbox{ \ \ \ \ \ \ for (\ref{2qp}) subprocess, }\\
194: t^2(1+r_2p_{N_2}) \mbox{ \ \ \ \ \ \ for (\ref{3qp}) subprocess, }\\
195: u^2(1+r_2p_{N_2}) \mbox{ \ \ \ \ \ \ for (\ref{4qp}) subprocess, }
196: \end{array}
197: \right.
198: }$ \hfill \\
199: and $p_{N_2}$ is the degree of longitudinal polarization of a
200: second hadron such that $p_{N_2}=\pm 1$.
201:
202: The integration w.r.t. 4-momenta of unobservable (anti)neutrino gives
203: \begin{equation}
204: \int \frac{d^3k_2}{2{k_2}_0}
205: \delta (p_1+p_2-k_1-k_2) =
206: \delta (s+t+u-m_1^2-m_2^2-m_l^2).
207: \end{equation}
208: Then in accordance with QPM we substitute $p_{1(2)} \rightarrow x_{1(2)}P_{1(2)}$,
209: where $P_{1(2)}$ is 4-momenta of initial nucleons with masses $m_N$,
210: $x_{1(2)}$ is the fraction of the first (second) nucleon momentum
211: that is carried by the incoming quarks.
212: We shall denote this procedure by operator "hat".
213: Then we multiply by the parton densities of first and second hadrons,
214: sum over helicities of quarks and integrate over $x_1$, $x_2$
215: according to formula (\ref{cs}).
216:
217: Let us introduce the Mandelstam variables for hadronic reaction
218: \begin{equation}
219: S=2P_1P_2,\ T=-2P_1k_1,\ U=-2P_2k_1,
220: \end{equation}
221: (then $\hat s=x_1x_2S+m_1^2+m_2^2,\ \hat t=x_1T+m_1m_N+m_l^2,\
222: \hat u=x_2U+m_2m_N+m_l^2$)
223: and integrate w.r.t. $x_2$
224: with help of $\delta$-function and noting that in QPM
225: $$ \delta (\hat s + \hat t + \hat u -m_1^2-m_2^2-m_l^2) =
226: \frac{1}{D} \delta (x_2 + \frac{x_1(T+m_N^2)+m_l^2}{D}),
227: \ D=x_1S+U+m_N^2.$$
228: We can see that in this case $x_2=x_2^0 \equiv -(x_1(T+m_N^2)+m_l^2)/D $
229: and this substitution
230: corresponds to Born kinematics and we denote this by subscript
231: (or superscript) "0".
232:
233: Finally, let us consider the general form of the cross section
234: of hadronic process (\ref{1}).
235: In the hadron-hadron collisions the center of parton-parton masses frame
236: has an undetermined motion along the beam direction. Therefore
237: we use the standard in this case variables:
238: centre-of-mass energy ($\sqrt{S}$), component of the
239: detected particle vector transverse to the beam direction
240: ($|{k_1}_{\perp}| \equiv {k_1}_T$),
241: and pseudorapidity ($\eta$), which approximately equals rapidity $y$,
242: since in our case $m_l \ll {k_1}_T$; then we have for $T$ and $U$
243: \begin{equation}
244: T=-\sqrt{S}{k_1}_Te^{-\eta},\
245: U=-\sqrt{S}{k_1}_Te^{\eta}.
246: \end{equation}
247: Integrating w.r.t. azimuth $\Phi$ (it's possible
248: as the first initial hadron is unpolarized and the second one is
249: longitudinally polarized) we have phase space
250: $ d^3k_1/{k_1}_0 \Rightarrow \pi d\eta {k_1}_T^2 $,
251: and hence the Born cross section has the form
252: \begin{equation}
253: \sigma^{\pm}_0
254: = \sum_{i,i'} \int dx_1 q_i(x_1,Q^2) \Sigma_0,
255: \label{CS_born}
256: \end{equation}
257: where $\sigma^{\pm}$ denotes the double differential cross section
258: \begin{equation}
259: \sigma^{\pm}
260: \equiv \frac{ d \sigma_{ N_1 \stackrel{\rightarrow}{N_2} \rightarrow l^{\pm} X} }
261: {d\eta d{k_1}_T^2}.
262: \label{abbr}
263: \end{equation}
264: We use this abbreviation as well as the following
265: \begin{equation}
266: \sigma^{\pm} = \bar \sigma^{\pm} + p_{N_2} \Delta \sigma^{\pm},
267: \end{equation}
268: where $\bar \sigma^{\pm} ( \Delta \sigma^{\pm} )$ is the spin averaged
269: (polarization) part of cross section in the whole text.
270:
271: The Born cross section is proportional to factor
272: $ \Sigma_0 = \Sigma (x_2^0)$,\\
273: where
274: \begin{equation}
275: \Sigma (x_2)
276: = \frac{ \pi \alpha^2}{4N_cs_w^4}
277: \frac{ |V_{ii'}|^2 {\hat B}_{ii'} }
278: {{\hat s}((\hat s-m_W^2)^2+m_W^2\Gamma_W^2)D }
279: F_{i'}^{(2)}(x_2,Q^2),
280: \label{Sigma}
281: \end{equation}
282: In the expressions (\ref{CS_born}),(\ref{Sigma})
283: the combination of the quark densities for a second nucleon
284: has the form
285: \begin{equation}
286: F_{i'}^{(2)}(x_2,Q^2)=\bar q_{i'}(x_2,Q^2)
287: -c_{i'}p_{N_2}\Delta q_{i'}(x_2,Q^2),
288: \end{equation}
289: where $(\Delta)q_i(x,Q^2)=f_i^{+}(x,Q^2) (-)+ f_i^{-}(x,Q^2)$
290: are (longitudinally polarized) spin averaged quark densities,
291: $c_{i'}=-1(+1)$ for quark(antiquark).
292:
293: The form of the Born cross section (\ref{CS_born}) is convenient as
294: the factorized part in the so-called 'soft' $O(\alpha^3)$ cross section
295: (see Sect.3,4) and here let us present more simple expression for
296: the Born cross section of the processes (\ref{1}) as a convolution of
297: partonic cross section with two parton distribution functions which
298: we will use in the rest of this section
299: \begin{equation}
300: %\hspace{-1.2cm}
301: \sigma^{\pm}_0
302: = \frac{ \pi \alpha^2}{4N_cs_w^4}
303: \sum_{i,i'} \int dx_1
304: \frac{ |V_{ii'}|^2 {\hat B}_{ii'}^0 }
305: {{\hat s_0}((\hat s_0-m_W^2)^2+m_W^2\Gamma_W^2)D }
306: q_i(x_1,Q^2) F_{i'}^{(2)}(x_2^0,Q^2).
307: \label{CS_born2}
308: \end{equation}
309:
310: Let us define the polarization single asymmetries as
311: normalized difference of the cross sections with specific spin configurations
312: \begin{equation}
313: A^{l^{\pm}}(\eta,{k_1}_T)=
314: \frac{\sigma^{\pm}(p_{N_2}=1)-\sigma^{\pm}(p_{N_2}=-1)}
315: {\sigma^{\pm}(p_{N_2}=1)+\sigma^{\pm}(p_{N_2}=-1)} =
316: \frac{\Delta \sigma^{\pm}}{\bar \sigma^{\pm}}.
317: \end{equation}
318: Supposing that CKM matrix has diagonal form $V_{ii'}=\delta_{ii'}$
319: we can see that flavors of initial quarks and antiquarks are
320: $ i= d, s, b;\ i'=\bar u, \bar c, \bar t \ $ for (\ref{1qp}) subprocess,
321: $ i=\bar u, \bar c, \bar t;\ i'= d, s, b \ $ for (\ref{2qp}) subprocess,
322: $ i=u, c, t;\ i'=\bar d, \bar s, \bar b \ $ for (\ref{3qp}) subprocess,
323: $ i=\bar d, \bar s, \bar b;\ i'= u, c, t \ $ for (\ref{4qp}) subprocess.
324: Neglecting the contributions of the heavy quarks $(c,b,t)$
325: (the strange quark contribution $s \bar u \rightarrow W^-$
326: is neglected too as we suppose $V_{s\bar u} $ equals zero)
327: we can write the Born single asymmetries as
328: \begin{equation}
329: A^{l^+}_0(\eta,{k_1}_T)=
330: -\frac{\int dx_1(u'(x_1)\Delta \bar d(x_2^0)-\bar d'(x_1)\Delta u(x_2^0))}
331: {\int dx_1(u'(x_1) \bar d(x_2^0)+\bar d'(x_1) u(x_2^0))},\
332: \label{a1}
333: \end{equation}
334: \begin{equation}
335: A^{l^-}_0(\eta,{k_1}_T)=A^{l^+}_0(\eta,{k_1}_T)(u \leftrightarrow d).
336: \label{a2}
337: \end{equation}
338: Here
339: $$ u'(x_1)=K_t u(x_1),\ \bar u'(x_1)=K_t \bar u(x_1),\
340: d'(x_1)=K_u d(x_1),\ \bar d'(x_1)=K_u \bar d(x_1), $$
341: \begin{equation}
342: K_{t(u)}=\frac{{\hat t}^2({\hat u}^2)}
343: {{\hat s}((\hat s-m_W^2)^2+m_W^2\Gamma_W^2)D }|_{x_2=x_2^0}
344: \label{K}
345: \end{equation}
346: (we suppress the argument $Q^2$ in the quark distributions of formulas
347: (\ref{a1},\ref{K})).
348:
349: The physically allowed region of $x_1$ and $x_2$ (see Fig 2.)
350: is given by
351: \begin{equation}
352: -\frac{U+m_N^2-m_l^2}{S+T+m_N^2} \leq x_1 \leq 1, \ \ \
353: x_2^0 \leq x_2 \leq 1.
354: \end{equation}
355: Let us remark that in the region of large $x_1$ and small
356: ${k_1}_T/\sqrt{S}$ the expression
357: $x_2^0$ does almoust not depend on $x_1$ ($x_2^0 \approx -T/S$).
358: Dividing the region of integration in (\ref{a1},\ref{a2})
359: by parameter $x_1^*$
360: (we can choose such a value of $x_1^*$ in order to have well defined
361: polarized quark densities in the region $x_1 < x_1^*$)
362: we obtain the expression
363: \begin{equation}
364: \Delta u(-T/S) \int_{x_1^*}^1 dx_1 \bar d'(x_1)\ - \
365: \Delta \bar d(-T/S) \int_{x_1^*}^1 dx_1 u'(x_1) =
366: \label{final}
367: \end{equation}
368: $$ =A^{l^+}_0(\eta,{k_1}_T)
369: \int_{x_1^{min}}^{1} dx_1(u'(x_1) \bar d(x_2^0)+\bar d'(x_1) u(x_2^0))$$
370: $$ - \int_{x_1^{min}}^{x_1^*} dx_1
371: (\Delta u(x_2^0)\bar d'(x_1) -\Delta \bar d(x_2^0) u'(x_1) ) $$
372: and analogously for $A^{l^-}$ by replacing $u \leftrightarrow d$.
373:
374: Off-shell approach, which we used gives the possibility
375: to investigate the polarized quark densities in the region
376: of very small $x$.
377: Really, the expression $-T/S$ under conditions of collider experiment
378: can reach
379: very small values, so using, for example, RHIC kinematics point
380: $\sqrt{S}=500 GeV$,
381: $ {k_1}_T = 10GeV$, $\eta=2$ we can see that $-T/S$ does not
382: exceed 0.0027.
383: That minimum value of $x$ is about one order of magnitude
384: below the values quoted in studies where
385: on-shell approximation for the $W$-boson was used.
386:
387: So, equations (\ref{final}) connect the polarized quark densities
388: in the region of small $x$ with the observable single asymmetries,
389: combination of unpolarized quark densities
390: and polarized quark densities in the region where they are
391: well defined.
392: If the three of the supplementary measurable quantities (for example
393: double asymmetries $A_{\pm}(x,y)$ from Ref.\cite{my3} and QPM-expression
394: for $g_1(x)$) are used, equations (\ref{final}) allow to determine
395: the low-$x$ behavior of polarized $u-$ and $d-$quark and antiquark
396: distributions in nucleon.
397:
398:
399: \section{Contribution of additional virtual particles to the cross section}
400: %
401: To extract the reliable data on single asymmetries with high precision
402: from hadron collider
403: experiment, it is necessary to consider higher order electroweak
404: radiative corrections.
405: The final state photonic corrections to
406: processes of $W$-production in unpolarized pp-collisions were calculated
407: in Ref.\cite{FSR}.
408: More accurate calculation of these electroweak corrections
409: have been suggested in Ref.\cite{pp}, where both initial and final state
410: radiation have been included, and the collinear singularity
411: associated with final state photon radiation is regularized by the lepton
412: mass. On the contrary, the collinear singularities associated with initial
413: state radiation are subtracted and adsorbed into the parton distribution
414: functions. Due to these results do not contain the quark masses, but
415: depend analytically on other unphysical parameter $\delta_{\theta}$,
416: which determines a collinear region.
417:
418: In this paper we present the new explicit
419: formulae for EWC to inclusive single $W$-production in polarized hadron-hadron
420: collisions, where by analogy to the calculations of the radiative
421: corrections to the hadron current in the deep inelastic scattering
422: of lepton by nucleons \cite{bardin,bom_z,BS2,my1} we used a finite quark
423: masses to regularise the collinear singularities. In Sect.5 we consider
424: the dependence of the results on various quark masses and
425: the comparison of them with the results for EWC, when the strategy
426: of collinear singularity extraction has been employed.
427:
428: As in final state only charged lepton is detected
429: we use for calculation
430: the covariant method \cite{covar}, which has conclusive advantage:
431: the results are independent of unphysical
432: parameter -- maximum soft photon energy $E_{cut}$
433: (see for example Ref.\cite{pp}).
434:
435: The one-loop contribution of additional virtual particles
436: (V-contribution) has been calculated in t'Hooft-Feynman gauge
437: and in on-mass renormalization scheme which uses
438: $\alpha, m_W, m_Z,$ Higgs boson mass $m_H$ and the fermion masses
439: as independent parameters. The virtual one-loop diagrams are shown
440: in Fig.3.
441:
442: The cross section of V-contribution is proportional to the Born cross
443: section and could be written as
444: \begin{equation}
445: \sigma _V^{\pm}
446: = \sum_{i,i'} \int dx_1 q_i(x_1,Q^2)
447: \hat \delta^{ii'} _{V}|_{x_2=x^0_2}
448: \Sigma_0.
449: \label{v}
450: \end{equation}
451: Here factor $\delta^{ii'} _{V} $ is polarization independent and
452: consists of seven terms
453: \begin{equation}
454: \delta^{ii'} _V = \delta _W +\delta _{Vl} +\delta^{ii'}_{Vq} +
455: \delta_{Sl}+ \delta_{Sq} +\delta^{ii'}_{\gamma W}+\delta^{ii'}_{ZW}.
456: \label{delta}
457: \end{equation}
458: We do not repeat here the explicit expressions for all these
459: contributions but instead refer the readers to Ref.\cite{BS2},\cite{BS1}.
460: Let us consider the meaning of various terms in (\ref{delta}).
461: The correction $\delta _W$ is the
462: $W$-boson self-energy contribution (Fig.3,1), which has a slightly
463: modified form from what is presented in Ref.\cite{BS2}. This is due to
464: resonant $W$ boson production
465: \begin{equation}
466: \delta _W = 2 Re \frac{s-m_W^2-im_W\Gamma_W}{(s-m_W^2)^2+m_W^2\Gamma_W^2}
467: {\hat \Sigma}^W_T(s) ,
468: \end{equation}
469: where
470: ${\hat \Sigma}^W_T(s)$ is the renormalized transverse part of the
471: $W$-boson self energy
472: (it can be found from formula (6.1) of Ref.\cite{BS1}).
473: The term $\delta _{Vl}$ is the leptonic vertex correction (Fig.3,2)
474: (see formula (2.10) of Ref.\cite{BS2}),
475: $\delta^{ii'} _{Vq}$ is the quark vertex correction (Fig.3,3)
476: (see formula (2.11) of Ref.\cite{BS2}, we left the flavour indices at
477: this correction and boxes contributions),
478: $\delta _{Sl}$ is the neutrino self energy contribution (Fig.3,4)
479: (see formula (2.12) of Ref.\cite{BS2}).
480: Up-quarks self energy contribution (Fig.3,5) (down-quarks
481: self energy contribution equals zero) is given by
482: \begin{equation}
483: \delta _{Sq}
484: = -\frac {\alpha}{4\pi} \biggl[Q^2 _u \left ( \ln \frac {m_Z^2}
485: {m^2_u} -2 \ln \frac {m^2_u} {\lambda ^2} \right )
486: -Q^2_d \left( \ln \frac {m_Z^2} {m^2_d}
487: -2 \ln \frac {m^2 _d} {\lambda ^2}
488: \right) +\frac{3}{2} \biggr].
489: \end{equation}
490: This expression is obtained from formula (5.46) of Ref.\cite{BS1}
491: (see also the remark below it).
492:
493: We recalculated the box contributions through the
494: quantities $I^{\gamma W}_{1,2}$ and $I^{ZW}_{1,2}$ of Ref.\cite{BS2}
495: and present them here to stress their dependence on flavour of
496: quarks and the channel of reaction:
497: $\gamma W$ box contribution (Fig.3,6 and Fig.3,7)
498: \begin{equation}
499: \delta^{u \bar d} _{\gamma W} =
500: \delta^{\bar u d} _{\gamma W} =
501: \delta _{\gamma W},\ \
502: \delta^{d \bar u} _{\gamma W} =
503: \delta^{\bar d u} _{\gamma W} =
504: \delta _{\gamma W}(t \leftrightarrow u, i \leftrightarrow i'),
505: \end{equation}
506: where
507: \begin{equation}
508: \delta _{\gamma W} =\frac {2\alpha}{\pi} Re Q_l
509: (Q_iI^{\gamma W, i}_1(s,t)+Q_{i'}I^{\gamma W, i'}_2(s,u));
510: \end{equation}
511: $ZW$ box contribution (Fig.3,6 and Fig.3,7)
512: \begin{equation}
513: \delta^{u \bar d} _{ZW} =
514: \delta^{\bar u d} _{ZW} =
515: \delta _{ZW},\ \
516: \delta^{d \bar u} _{ZW} =
517: \delta^{\bar d u} _{ZW} =
518: \delta _{ZW}(t \leftrightarrow u, i \leftrightarrow i'),
519: \end{equation}
520: where
521: \begin{eqnarray}
522: \delta _{ZW} &=&\frac {2\alpha}{\pi} Re [
523: ((v_l+a_l)(v_i+a_i)
524: +(v_{\nu}+a_{\nu})(v_{i'}+a_{i'}))I_1^{ZW}(s,t)
525: \nonumber \\&&
526: +((v_l+a_l)(v_{i'}+a_{i'})
527: +(v_{\nu}+a_{\nu})(v_i+a_i))I_2^{ZW}(s,u)].
528: \end{eqnarray}
529:
530: The vector and axial vector couplings constants $v_i,\ a_i$ of the
531: $i$-fermion--$Z$ vertex are determined from
532: the electric charge ($Q_i$) of fermion expressed in units of
533: proton's charge (e.g. $Q_u \equiv Q_{\bar u}=+2/3$,
534: $Q_l=-1$) and
535: the 3-component of the weak fermion isospin ($I_i^3$)
536: $$ v_i=\frac{I_i^3-2s_wQ_i}{2s_wc_w},\ \
537: a_i=\frac{I_i^3}{2s_wc_w}.$$
538:
539: Let us present the cross section of V-contribution as the sum of
540: infrared divergent (IR) and IR-finite parts
541: \begin{equation}
542: \sigma^{\pm}_V=\sigma^{\pm,IR}_V+\sigma^{\pm,F}_V
543: = \sum_{i,i'} \int dx_1 q_i(x_1,Q^2)
544: \Sigma_0
545: ( \hat \delta^{IR}_{V} + \hat \delta^{F}_{V} )|_{x_2=x^0_2}.
546: \label{IRV}
547: \end{equation}
548: Infrared divergent part of V-contribution
549: is regularized with the help of photon mass $\lambda$ and for
550: the correction $\delta^{IR}_{V}$ we find
551: \begin{equation}
552: \delta^{IR}_V=\frac {\alpha}{2\pi}\log \frac s {\lambda ^2}J(0),
553: \end{equation}
554: where the expression for $J(0)$ will be considered in the next section.
555: The finite part of V-contribution cross section contains correction
556: \begin{equation}
557: \delta^{F}_V=
558: \delta^{ii'}_V - \delta^{IR}_V
559: =\delta^{ii'}_V(\lambda^2 \rightarrow s).
560: \end{equation}
561:
562:
563: \section{ The photon bremsstrahlung
564: $ N_1 \stackrel{\rightarrow}{N_2} \rightarrow l^{\pm} \gamma X $}
565: %
566: In order to get infrared finite results for the hadronic process
567: cross section we have to
568: include the real bremsstrahlung correction (Fig.4).
569:
570: The differential cross section for the partonic process with emission
571: of one real photon reads
572: \begin{equation}
573: %\hspace{-0.5cm}
574: d\sigma_{q_i \stackrel{\rightarrow}{q_{i'}} \rightarrow l\nu \gamma}
575: = \frac{\alpha^3|V_{ii'}|^2}{2^6\pi^2s_w^4N_c}\frac{1}{s}
576: \sum_{pol}^{-} |R|^2 \delta (p_1+p_2-k_1-k_2-k)
577: \frac{d^3k_1}{2{k_1}_0}
578: \frac{d^3k_2}{2{k_2}_0}
579: \frac{d^3k}{2{k}_0},
580: \end{equation}
581: where squared matrix element\footnote{
582: For the calculation of matrix element we used the standard
583: Feynman rules and the procedure of separation of diagram
584: Fig.4,4 into the initial and final state radiation parts according to
585: Ref.\cite{FSR}. As a result, 'initial' part of our matrix element
586: completely coincides with formula (2.14) of Ref.\cite{FSR}.}
587: is the sum of initial state (index $i$),
588: final state (index $f$) and interference terms respectively
589: \begin{equation}
590: \sum_{pol}^{-} |R|^2 =
591: (R_{i}R_{i}^+)^{nn'} + (R_{f}R_{f}^+)^{nn'} +
592: (R_{i}R_{f}^+ +R_{f}R_{i}^+)^{nn'},
593: \end{equation}
594:
595: $$
596: (R_{i}R_{i}^+)^{nn'} =
597: -\Pi_q\Pi_q^+
598: Sp[ {(G_i^{nn'})}^{\mu \rho} U_{i,p}^n
599: {({G_i^{nn'}}^T)}^{\mu '}_{\rho} U_{i,a}^n ]
600: Sp[ \gamma_{\mu} U_{f,a}^{n'} \gamma_{\mu '} U_{f,p}^{n'} ],
601: $$
602: $$
603: (R_{f}R_{f}^+)^{nn'} =
604: -\Pi_l\Pi_l^+
605: Sp[ \gamma_{\mu} U_{i,p}^{n} \gamma_{\mu '} U_{i,a}^{n} ]
606: Sp[ {(G_f^{n'})}^{\mu \rho} U_{f,a}^{n'}
607: {({G_f^{n'}}^T)}^{\mu '}_{\rho} U_{f,p}^{n'} ],
608: $$
609: $$ (R_{i}R_{f}^+ + R_{f}R_{i}^+ )^{nn'} =
610: - \Pi_l\Pi_q^+
611: (\ Sp[ {(G_i^{nn'})}^{\mu \rho} U_{i,p}^n \gamma_{\mu '} U_{i,a}^n ]
612: Sp[ \gamma_{\mu} U_{f,a}^{n'} {{(G_f^{n'}}^T)}^{\mu '}_{\rho} U_{f,p}^{n'} ]
613: $$
614: $$ + Sp[ \gamma_{\mu} U_{i,p}^n {({G_i^{nn'}}^T)}^{\mu '}_{\rho} U_{i,a}^n ]
615: Sp[ {(G_f^{n'})}^{\mu \rho} U_{f,a}^{n'} \gamma_{\mu '} U_{f,p}^{n'} ] \ ).
616: $$
617: Indices $n,\ n'$ denote the type of the processes:
618: $n=-(+)$ for $q \bar q (\bar q q)$ initial state, and
619: $n'=-(+)$ for $l^- \bar \nu (l^+ \nu)$ final state, and
620: $\Pi_l (\Pi_q) $ is a $W$-boson propagator in the case of the lepton(quark)
621: bremsstrahlung
622: \begin{equation}
623: %\hspace{-2.0cm}
624: \Pi_l=1/(s-m_W^2+im_W\Gamma _W),
625: \ \Pi_q=-1/(s-2kq-m_W^2+im_W\Gamma _W)=1/(z+t_{w\Gamma}),
626: \end{equation}
627: $$ t_{w\Gamma}=t_w-im_W\Gamma _W, \ \ t_w=v-s+m_W^2, q=p_1+p_2.\ $$
628:
629: As the kinematical variables of the radiated process we use in this case
630: \begin{eqnarray}
631: z=2kk_1, \; z_1=2kp_1,\; t_1=(p_2-k_2)^2,\; u_1=2kp_2=v+z-z_1,
632: \nonumber \\
633: v=2kk_2=s+u+t-m_1^2-m_2^2-m_l^2,
634: \end{eqnarray}
635: where $k$ is a 4-momentum of the radiated photon.
636:
637: The matrices $U$ originate from the products of bispinor amplitudes and
638: the expressions $(1 \pm \gamma_5)$:
639: \begin{equation}
640: %\hspace{-2.0cm}
641: U_{i,p}^- = (1-\gamma_5)\hat p_1,\
642: U_{i,a}^- = (1+\gamma_5 \hat \eta_2)(\hat p_2 - m_2),\
643: U_{i,p}^+ = (1-\gamma_5)\hat p_2,\
644: U_{i,a}^+ = \hat p_1 - m_1,
645: \end{equation}
646: $$ U_{f,a}^- = (1-\gamma_5)\hat k_2,\
647: U_{f,p}^- = \hat k_1 + m,\
648: U_{f,a}^+ = (1-\gamma_5)\hat k_1,\
649: U_{f,p}^+ = \hat k_2,\ (\hat p=\gamma^{\mu}p_{\mu})$$
650: and the
651: matrices $G$ originate from the fermion propagator and $WW\gamma$-vertex:
652: \begin{equation}
653: {(G_i^{-n'})}^{\mu \rho} =
654: Q_i\gamma^{\mu}\frac{2p_1^{\rho}-\hat k \gamma^{\rho}}{z_1} -
655: Q_{i'}\frac{2p_2^{\rho}-\gamma^{\rho}\hat k}{u_1}\gamma^{\mu} +
656: {(G_i^{W^{n'}})}^{\mu \rho},
657: \end{equation}
658: $$ {(G_i^{+n'})}^{\mu \rho} =
659: Q_{i}\frac{-2p_1^{\rho}+\gamma^{\rho}\hat k}{z_1}\gamma^{\mu} -
660: Q_{i'}\gamma^{\mu}\frac{-2p_2^{\rho}+\hat k \gamma^{\rho}}{u_1} +
661: {(G_i^{W^{n'}})}^{\mu \rho}, $$
662: $$ {(G_f^{-})}^{\mu \rho} =
663: Q_{l}\frac{2k_1^{\rho}+\gamma^{\rho}\hat k}{z}\gamma^{\mu} +
664: {(G_f^{W^-})}^{\mu \rho},\
665: {(G_f^{+})}^{\mu \rho} =
666: -Q_{l}\gamma^{\mu}\frac{2k_1^{\rho}+\hat k \gamma^{\rho}}{z} +
667: {(G_f^{W^+})}^{\mu \rho}, $$
668: $$ {(G_f^{W^+})}_{\mu \rho} =
669: \gamma^{\rho '}\frac{1}{2kq}C^3_{\rho \mu \rho '}(-k,q,k-q),\
670: {(G_f^{W^-})}_{\mu \rho} =
671: \gamma^{\nu '}\frac{1}{2kq}C^3_{\rho \nu '\mu}(-k,k-q,q), $$
672: $$ {(G_i^{W^+})}_{\mu \rho} =
673: \gamma^{\nu '}\frac{1}{2kq}C^3_{\rho \nu '\mu} (-k,q,k-q),\
674: {(G_i^{W^-})}_{\mu \rho} =
675: \gamma^{\rho '}\frac{1}{2kq}C^3_{\rho \mu \rho '}(-k,k-q,q), $$
676: where the matrix $C^3$ corresponds to $WW\gamma$-vertex and for
677: the minimal standard model reads
678: $$ C^3_{\mu \nu \rho} (p^0,p^+,p^-) =
679: g_{\rho \nu} (p^- - p^+)_{\mu}
680: + g_{\mu \nu} (p^+ - p^0)_{\rho}
681: + g_{\mu \rho } (p^0 - p^-)_{\nu}. $$
682:
683: After transition to hadron-hadron cross section according to
684: prescription of QPM,
685: we can present the cross section of bremsstrahlung
686: (R-contribution) by splitting it into a soft IR-part and a hard
687: contribution \cite{covar} (we again use the abbreviation (\ref{abbr})
688: for the double cross section $\sigma^{\pm}$)
689: \begin{equation}
690: \sigma_R^{\pm}=
691: \sigma_R^{\pm,IR}
692: + \sigma_R^{\pm,F} .
693: \label{sir}
694: \end{equation}
695: The infrared divergent part (the first term) of expression (\ref{sir}) reads
696: (we made the substitution $dx_2=d\hat v/D$)
697: \begin{equation}
698: \sigma_R^{\pm,IR} =
699: \sum_{i,i'} \int dx_1 q_i(x_1,Q^2) {\hat \Sigma}_R^{IR},
700: \label{IRR}
701: \end{equation}
702: where
703: \begin{equation}
704: \hat \Sigma_R^{IR}
705: = -\frac{\alpha}{\pi} \int_{\hat v_{min}}^{\hat v_{max}} d\hat v
706: {\Sigma(x_2)} I[\hat F^{IR}].
707: \end{equation}
708: The procedure of integration over the photon phase space
709: defined as $I[A]$ is described by (\ref {int}) in Appendix A.
710: And for $ F^{IR}$,
711: using the method of separation of IR-terms \cite{covar} we find
712: \begin{equation}
713: %\hspace{-1.2cm}
714: F^{IR}=Q_l^2\frac{m_l^2}{z^2}
715: +c_lQ_lQ_i\frac{t}{zz_1}
716: -c_lQ_lQ_{i'}\frac{u}{zu_1}
717: +Q_i^2\frac{m_1^2}{z_1^2}
718: -Q_iQ_{i'}\frac{s}{z_1u_1}
719: +Q_{i'}^2\frac{m_2^2}{u_1^2},
720: \end{equation}
721: where
722: \begin{equation}
723: c_l= \biggl \{
724: \begin{array}{cc}
725: +1 \ \ \ \mbox{ for (\ref{1qp}) and (\ref{4qp}) subprocesses, }\\
726: -1 \ \ \ \mbox{ for (\ref{2qp}) and (\ref{3qp}) subprocesses. }
727: \end{array}
728: \end{equation}
729:
730: Introducing
731: $J(\hat v)=\hat v \lim \limits_{\lambda \to 0} I[\hat F^{IR}]$
732: we obtain two parts of the soft cross section:
733: \begin{equation}
734: \hat \Sigma_R^{IR} =
735: -\frac{\alpha}{\pi} {\Sigma}_0 J(0)
736: \int \limits _{\hat v_{min}}^{\hat v_{max}}\frac{d\hat v}{\hat v}
737: +\frac{\alpha}{\pi}
738: \int \limits _{\hat v_{min}}^{\hat v_{max}} d\hat v
739: (\Sigma _0 J(0)/\hat v - {\Sigma(x_2)} I[\hat F^{IR}]).
740: \end{equation}
741: The second term is infrared free and lower limit of integration for it
742: equals zero, and the first one contains infrared divergence.
743: In the center-of-mass-system of initial hadrons the limits of
744: integration are
745: \begin{eqnarray}
746: \hat v_{min}=(\stackrel{\rightarrow}{k} =0)=2\lambda {k_{2}}_0 = \lambda \tilde v,\ \
747: \tilde v \approx \frac{D^2+TU}{D\sqrt{S}},
748: \nonumber \\
749: \hat v_{max}=({x_2}_{max}=1)=D(1-x_2^0)
750: \end{eqnarray}
751: and the infrared divergent part of bremsstrahlung cross section
752: has the form
753: $ -{\alpha}/{\pi} \Sigma_0 J(0)\log ({\hat v_{max}}/{\lambda \tilde v })$.
754:
755: Summing up IR-parts of the V- and R- contributions (formulas (\ref{IRV})
756: and (\ref{IRR})) we get
757: \begin{eqnarray}
758: & \sigma_R^{\pm,IR}&
759: + \sigma_V^{\pm,IR} =
760: \sum_{i,i'} \int dx_1 q_i(x_1,Q^2)
761: \frac{\alpha}{2\pi}\Sigma_0 J(0)
762: \log \frac{ {\tilde v}^2 {\hat s}_0 }{\hat v_{max}^2}
763: \nonumber \\
764: &&
765: + \sum_{i,i'} \int dx_1 q_i(x_1,Q^2)
766: \frac{\alpha}{\pi}
767: \int \limits _{0}^{\hat v_{max}} d\hat v
768: \frac{\Sigma _0 J(0)-\Sigma(x_2) J(\hat v)}{\hat v},
769: \end{eqnarray}
770: as a result infrared divergences completely cancel out.
771:
772: During the calculation of $I[\hat F^{IR}]$
773: the following expressions are used
774: \begin{eqnarray}
775: I[\frac{1}{z^2}]=\frac{1}{m_l^2v},
776: &&I[\frac{1}{z_1^2}]=\frac{1}{m_1^2v},
777: \nonumber \\
778: I[\frac{1}{zz_1}]=-\frac{1}{vt}\log\frac{t^2}{m^2_lm_1^2},
779: &&I[\frac{1}{zu_1}]=-\frac{1}{vu}\log\frac{u^2}{m_l^2m_2^2},
780: \nonumber \\
781: I[\frac{1}{z_1u_1}]=\frac{1}{vs}\log\frac{s^2}{m_1^2m_2^2},
782: &&I[\frac{1}{u_1^2}]=\frac{1}{m_2^2v},
783: \end{eqnarray}
784: and therefore $ J(\hat v) $ has the form (we remind
785: that $\hat v=D(x_2-x_2^0)$)
786: \begin{eqnarray}
787: \label{j}
788: J(\hat v)&=&
789: Q_l^2 - c_lQ_lQ_i \log\frac{\hat t^2}{m^2_lm_1^2} +
790: c_lQ_lQ_{i'} \log\frac{\hat u^2}{m_l^2m_2^2}
791: \nonumber \\
792: &&
793: + Q_i^2 - Q_iQ_{i'}\log\frac{\hat s^2}{m_1^2m_2^2} + Q_{i'}^2.
794: \end{eqnarray}
795:
796: After extraction of infrared singularity from partonic process cross section
797: and integrating over whole phase space of real photon (see Appendix A)
798: we can present the
799: hard contribution cross section of inclusive process
800: $ N_1 \stackrel{\rightarrow}{N_2} \rightarrow l^{\pm} \gamma X $ in the form
801: \begin{equation}
802: \sigma^{\pm,F}_R =
803: \sum_{i,i'} \int dx_1dx_2 q_i(x_1,Q^2) F_{i'}^{(2)}(x_2,Q^2)
804: {\hat \Sigma}^F_R,
805: \end{equation}
806: where
807: \begin{eqnarray}
808: \Sigma^F_R &=&\frac{\alpha^3}{8s_w^4sN_c}|V_{ii'}|^2
809: (Q_l^2\Pi_l\Pi_l^+V_l+Q_l Re[\Pi_lV_{lq}]+V_q
810: \nonumber \\
811: &&+Q_l\Pi _l\Pi_l^+ Re[V_{lw}]+ Re[\Pi_l]V_{qw}+\Pi_l\Pi_l^+V_w),
812: \end{eqnarray}
813: and
814: $$\Pi_l\Pi_l^+= 1/((s-m_W^2)^2+m_W^2\Gamma_W^2).$$
815: The subscript in $V$ means the origin of bremsstrahlung photon:
816: $l/q/w$ refers to the radiation from lepton (Fig.4,3) /
817: quark (Fig.4,1 and Fig.4,2) / $W$-boson (Fig.4,4) legs respectively.
818: Double subscript corresponds to the same interference term.
819: The expressions for the quantities $V$ can be found in Appendix B.
820:
821: So, we get three terms of $O(\alpha^3)$ cross section which
822: include radiative corrections:
823: infrared finite part of V(and R)-contribution $\sigma^{\pm,F}_{V(R)}$
824: and the part $(\sigma^{\pm,IR}_V + \sigma^{\pm,IR}_R)$, where
825: infrared divergence cancelled out in the sum
826: \begin{equation}
827: \sigma^{\pm}_{EWC} = \sigma^{\pm,F}_{V} + \sigma^{\pm,F}_{R}
828: + (\sigma^{\pm,IR}_V + \sigma^{\pm,IR}_R).
829: \end{equation}
830: All of these terms depend on a second hadron
831: polarization. This dependence is factorized in the expression
832: $ F_{i'}^{(2)}(x_2,Q^2) $, which is containing only in
833: $\Sigma(x_2)$ and $\Sigma_0$. Such a factorization gives the possibility
834: to obtain the cross section of a single $W$-production in unpolarized
835: nucleon-nucleon collisions by doing a simple replacment
836: \begin{equation}
837: F_{i'}^{(2)}(x_2,Q^2) \rightarrow q_{i'}(x_2,Q^2).
838: \end{equation}
839:
840: \section{Discussion of numerical results and conclusions}
841: %
842: In the following the scale of radiative corrections and their effect
843: on the observables of the processes (1)
844: will be discussed
845: \footnote{A program of numerical calculations of the cross sections
846: and single spin asymmetries
847: of processes (1) (in FORTRAN) including $O(\alpha)$
848: electroweak corrections is available by contacting to author via e-mail}.
849: First of all we compare the numerical estimations of our formulas
850: to the results of the calculations Ref.\cite{pp} for the unpolarized
851: $p \bar p \rightarrow l^{\pm} X$.
852: We have calculated (Fig.5) $\mu^+$ transverse momentum spectrum
853: as a function of ${k_1}_T$ for the process
854: $p \bar p \rightarrow \mu^{+} X$ at $\sqrt{S}=1.8 TeV$ (Tevatron kinematics).
855: The integration over pseudorapidity ($-1.2 \leq \eta \leq 1.2$) had been done
856: and the MRS LO 98 set of unpolarized parton distribution functions
857: \cite{MRS98} are used.
858: It can be seen from comparison of Fig. 5 and Fig.7,b of Ref.\cite{pp}
859: the total EWC have a similar behavior: $O(\alpha^3)$ cross section
860: in the region $25GeV<{k_1}_T<34 GeV$ is a little bit higher
861: than Born cross section; the EWC contribution to the cross section
862: is insignificant at ${k_1}_T \sim 35(37)GeV$ for Ref.\cite{pp}(our)
863: calculations; and in the region ${k_1}_T > 39 GeV$ the total EWC
864: reduce the Born cross section in both approaches, so in the resonance
865: region (${k_1}_T \sim m_W/2$) the difference between Born and $O(\alpha^3)$
866: cross sections is $\sim 0.004(0.003)nb/GeV$ for Ref.\cite{pp}(our)
867: calculations.
868:
869: The main uncertainty for hadronic part of the EWC in our approach
870: is the quark mass dependence. From Fig. 6 it can be seen that in the region
871: ${k_1}_T < 40 GeV$ the difference between corrections at
872: various values of quark masses is rather essential:
873: so increasing $m_u, m_d$ by a factor of 10 the correction decreases
874: for $\sim 0.05$. In the vicinity of ${k_1}_T \sim m_W/2$
875: and for ${k_1}_T > m_W/2$ the discussed difference does not exceed $0.02$.
876: For the calculation of $O(\alpha^3)$ cross section of Fig.5
877: and also for the rest analysis we used the values of the current quark
878: masses of $m_u=5MeV,\ m_d=8MeV$, considering the arguments
879: concerning the choice of these not well-defined parameters,
880: which are discussed in Ref.\cite{bom_z} (page 1101, and references therein).
881: However for quark masses of such an order a quite good correspondence
882: with the results of calculations by the collinear singularity extraction
883: method is reached (parameter $\delta_{\theta}\geq 10^{-4}$).
884:
885: To estimate the scale of radiative effects and it's influence on
886: observable quantities in the processes (1), the numerical
887: calculations of the cross sections (Fig.7 and Fig.9), the total
888: EWC $\delta_{l^{\pm}}^u $ to spin-averaged part of cross section (Fig.8)
889: \begin{equation}
890: \sigma^{\pm}_{EWC}=
891: {\bar \sigma_0^{\pm}} (1+\delta_{l^{\pm}}^u )
892: + {p_{N}}_2 {\Delta \sigma_0^{\pm}} (1+\delta_{l^{\pm}}^p )
893: \end{equation}
894: and the single spin asymmetries
895: $A^{l^{\pm}}$ taking into consideration EWC (Fig.10)
896: at typical values for future experiment STAR at the collider RHIC
897: ($\sqrt{S}=500\ GeV$, $-1\leq \eta \leq 2$, $\Delta \Phi=2\pi$)
898: have been made.
899: We used the following standard set of electroweak parameters:
900: $\alpha=1/137.036$,\ $m_W=80.43 GeV$,\ $m_Z=91.19 GeV$,\ $M_H=300.0 GeV$,
901: the fermion masses:
902: $ \ m_u=5 MeV$,\ $m_d=8 MeV$,\ $m_s=150 MeV$,\ $m_c=1.5 GeV$,
903: $\ m_b=4.5 GeV$,\ $m_t=30.0 GeV$;
904: the GRV94 proton parametrization of parton distribution
905: functions \cite{GRV94} for unpolarized quarks and
906: the GRSV96 LO proton parametrization of parton spin densities
907: \cite{GRSV96}.
908: We have selected for the $Q^2$ in these $Q^2$-dependent distributions
909: as well as in Ref.\cite{pp} $Q^2=m_W^2$, since trying to use for $Q$
910: an explicit momentum transfer in the partonic reaction
911: (e.g. $Q^2=\hat s$ for Born and final state radiation cross sections)
912: we have not obtained some noticeable difference for the numerical
913: estimation of the observable quantities.
914: And at last, as the contributions to the observables of investigated
915: processes which have different origin are not distinguishable
916: experimentally, we did not conduct the comparative analysis for them.
917:
918: We present in Fig.7 the numerical results for the spin-averaged
919: part of the double differential cross section as a function of ${k_1}_T$
920: for the different values of pseudorapidity. As we can see, for $e^+$
921: and $e^-$ in the final state EWC are essential and increase the Born
922: cross section in the region ${k_1}_T < m_W/2$ for $\eta =-1,\ 0$; the EWC
923: are not significant at small ${k_1}_T$ for $\eta >1$,
924: and in the region ${k_1}_T \geq m_W/2$ for all values $\eta$.
925: For $\mu^+$ and $\mu^-$ in the final state EWC are most essential
926: in the resonance region for $\eta=-1,\ 0$, and at the small ${k_1}_T$
927: in the case $\eta= 1.5,\ 2$ (EWC decrease the Born cross section).
928:
929: It can be seen from Fig.8, where the corrections $\delta^u$ to
930: spin-averaged part of Born cross sections are represented,
931: that muon corrections are lower than that of electron
932: (difference is approximately $0.12$).
933: This fact corresponds to a common character of EWC
934: dependence on masses which regularize the collinear singularity
935: (the mass $m_{\mu}$ is more than $m_e$ by $2\times 10^2$ times)
936: and which were discussed in the beginning of this section.
937: General features of the corrections behavior for all cases
938: ($e^{\pm},\mu^{\pm}$) and for different $\eta$
939: are the increase in the region ${k_1}_T < m_W/2$, the sharp falling
940: in the vicinity of resonance and smooth growth at ${k_1}_T > m_W/2$.
941: The corrections to transverse mass distribution, which are represented
942: on Fig.9 of Ref.\cite{pp} have a similar behavior.
943:
944: The scale and the behavior of the radiative corrections to
945: polarization part of the Born cross section are shown in Fig.9, but
946: as this part of the cross section is unobservable we shall
947: not analyze it in details, and consider the influence the radiative
948: effects to observable quantities -- polarization asymmetries
949: (\ref{a1}),(\ref{a2}).
950: So, Fig.10 shows Born asymmetries $A_0$ together with the EWC corrected
951: results. One can see that the corrections to asymmetries are significant
952: and decrease the Born value practically in the whole investigated region
953: except the region of small ${k_1}_T$ and large $\eta$.
954: Let us remark that the corrections are almost independent of particle mass
955: in the final state ($m_e$ or $m_{\mu}$).
956: In other words the ratios of the cross sections (i.e. asymmetries)
957: are much less sensible to the values of masses than the cross sections
958: themselves.
959: For the same reason the corrections to asymmetries do not depend
960: practically on the choice of quark masses too.
961: So, if we change the masses of
962: the light quarks from $m_u=5 MeV,\ m_d=8 MeV$ to the extreme value
963: $m_u=m_d=0.33 GeV$ we get a shift of radiative corrected asymmetries
964: by less than $0.01$ in a whole investigated region, and in the region
965: $\eta=2$, ${k_1}_T=10 GeV$,
966: which is very important for the quark density analysis at low $x$
967: (see Section 1)
968: this shift equals $0.0032(0.0021)$ for $\mu^-(\mu^+)$ case.
969: Thus we can suppose that our approach to the calculation
970: of radiative corrections
971: to the single spin asymmetries is practically free from
972: the quark masses uncertainty.
973:
974: In conclusion we have presented the scheme to use the
975: processes of the single $W$-boson production
976: possible at hadron-hadron colliders
977: for the investigation of the nucleon spin structure.
978: An approach is proposed
979: for the determination $u-$ and $d-$ quark (and antiquark) spin densities
980: at low $x$ by a set of the observable quantities.
981: The electroweak radiative corrections to the differential cross sections
982: and the single spin asymmetries of the processes (1) are calculated.
983: The obtained formulas do not depend on any parameters of the
984: infrared divergence extraction (e.g. maximum soft photon energy).
985: We checked that EWC to asymmetries do practically not depend on the masses
986: of the quarks which regulate in our approach the collinear singularity.
987: Our results can be used for
988: studies of nucleon spin at hadron-hadron colliders (RHIC and HERA).
989: An analysis of the numerical results for the collider experiment STAR
990: at RHIC shows that the radiative corrections prove to be important.
991:
992: \section{Acknowledgments}
993: %
994: Author wishes to thank A.N.Ilychev for the assistance in calculation
995: of the scalar integrals from Appendix A.
996:
997: \input{app-a.tex}
998:
999: \input{app-b.tex}
1000:
1001: \begin {thebibliography}{99}
1002: \bibitem {EMC} J. Ashman et al. Phys. Lett. B {\bf 206} (1988) 364;\
1003: J. Ashman et al. Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 328} (1989) 1
1004: \bibitem {CERN} B. Adeva et al. Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58} (1998) 112001
1005: \bibitem {SLAC} (E142) P.L. Anthony et al. Phys. Rev. D {\bf 54} (1996) 6620;\
1006: (E143) K. Abe et al. Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58} (1998) 112003;\
1007: (E154) K. Abe et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79} (1997) 26;\
1008: (E155) P.L. Anthony et al. Phys. Lett. B {\bf 493} (2000) 19
1009: \bibitem {HERMES} A. Airapetian et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84} (2000) 2584
1010: \bibitem {semi-SMC} (SMC) B. Adeva et al. Phys. Lett. B {\bf 420} (1998) 180
1011: \bibitem {semi-HERMES}
1012: (HERMES) K. Ackerstaff et al. Phys. Lett. B {\bf 464} (1999) 123
1013: \bibitem {now16} RSC Coll. Proposal on spin Physics using the RHIC
1014: Polarized Collider. (1992), August;
1015: G. Bunce et al. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 50} (2000) 525
1016: \bibitem {tevat} "Acceleration of polarized protons to 120 GeV and 1TeV
1017: at Fermilab", Univ. of Michigan, (1995), July {\it HE 95-09}
1018: \bibitem {now15} W.-D Nowak (1996) DESY 96-095
1019: \bibitem {AL} C. Bourrely et al. Phys. Rept. {\bf 177} (1989) 319
1020: %%\bibitem {3LHC} S.M. Berman et al. Phys. Rev. D {\bf 4} (1971) 3388
1021: \bibitem {vec_pol} I.V. Akushevich, N.M. Shumeiko J. Phys. G {\bf 20} (1994) 513
1022: \bibitem {my3} N.M. Shumeiko, S.I. Timoshin, V.A. Zykunov
1023: J.Phys G {\bf 23} (1997) 1593
1024: \bibitem {FSR} F. Berends, R. Kleiss Z. Phys. C {\bf 27} (1985) 365
1025: \bibitem {pp} U. Baur, S. Keller, D. Wackeroth Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59} (1999) 013002
1026: \bibitem{bardin} D.Yu. Bardin et al. Preprint JINR E2-87-595 Dubna (1987)
1027: \bibitem {bom_z} M. B\"ohm, H. Spiesberger Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 294} (1987) 1081
1028: \bibitem {BS2} M. B\"ohm, H. Spiesberger Nucl.Phys. B {\bf 304} (1988) 749
1029: \bibitem {my1} V.A. Zykunov, S.I. Timoshin, N.M. Shumeiko
1030: Yad.Fiz {\bf 58} (1995) 2021 (Engl. Transl.:
1031: Phys. of Atom. Nuclei {\bf 58} (1995) 1911)
1032: \bibitem {covar} D.Yu. Bardin, N.M. Shumeiko Nucl.Phys.
1033: B {\bf 127} (1977) 242; Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 29} (1979) 969
1034: \bibitem {BS1} M. B\"ohm et al. Forschr.Phys. {\bf 34} (1986) 687
1035: \bibitem{MRS98} A.D. Martin et al. August {\it Durham preprint DTP/98/52} (1998)
1036: \bibitem{GRV94} M. Gluck et al. {\it DESY 94-206 } (1994)
1037: \bibitem{GRSV96} M. Gluck et al. Phys. Rev. D {\bf 53} (1996) 4775
1038: \end {thebibliography}
1039:
1040: \newpage
1041: \input{fig.tex}
1042:
1043: \end{document}