1:
2: \documentstyle{elsartwb}
3:
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5:
6: \input epsf.sty
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10:
11: \begin{frontmatter}
12: \title{\bf Boost-invariant particle production in transport equations$^*$ }
13: \thanks{Research supported in part by the Polish State Committee for
14: Scientific Research, grant 2 P03B 09419 }
15: \author{Katarzyna Bajan, Wojciech Florkowski}
16: \address{The H. Niewodnicza\'nski Institute of Nuclear Physics, \\
17: ul. Radzikowskiego 152, PL-31342 Krak\'ow, Poland}
18:
19: \begin{abstract}
20: The boost-invariant tunneling of particles along the hyperbolas of
21: constant invariant time $\tau=\sqrt{t^2-z^2}$ is included in the
22: transport equations describing formation of the quark-gluon plasma in
23: strong color fields. The non-trivial solutions of the transport
24: equations exist if the boost-invariant distance between the tunneling
25: particles, measured in the quasirapidity space $\eta=1/2 \ln
26: ((t+z)/(t-z))$, is confined to a finite interval $\Delta \eta$. For
27: realistic values of $\Delta \eta$ the
28: solutions of the transport equations show similar characteristics to
29: those found in the standard approach, where the tunneling takes place
30: at constant time $t$. In the limit $\Delta \eta \rightarrow
31: \infty$, the initial color fields decay instantaneously.
32:
33: \end{abstract}
34: \end{frontmatter}
35: \vspace{-7mm} PACS: 25.75.-q, 05.20.Dd, 24.85.+p
36:
37: \section{Introduction}
38:
39: In this paper we solve transport equations describing production of the
40: quark-gluon plasma in strong color fields. A novel feature of our approach
41: is the implementation of the boost-invariant tunneling along the hyperbolas
42: of constant invariant time $\tau =\sqrt{t^{2}-z^{2}}$ \ into the framework
43: of the relativistic kinetic theory. In this way we generalize the previous
44: results of Refs. \cite{BCapp,BCDFosc,DFcft,DFhq}.
45:
46: In the standard WKB description of the tunneling process \cite{cnn,gm}, the
47: particles tunnel at fixed time $t.$ They emerge from the vacuum at a certain
48: distance from each other, and their longitudinal momenta vanish (in the
49: center-of-mass frame of a pair). In Refs. \cite{BCapp,BCDFosc,DFcft,DFhq,km}%
50: , the WKB results were used to fix the longitudinal-momentum dependence of
51: the production rates of quarks and gluons. The effect of the finite distance
52: appearing between the tunneling particles is more difficult to include. One
53: assumes usually that this distance is small, and the non-local character of
54: the tunneling process is neglected. This approximation is not always valid.
55: For large transverse mass, the distance between the tunneling particles may
56: be quite substantial and should be taken into account.
57:
58: The main difficulty connected with the non-local features of the tunneling
59: concerns the causal properties of sequential decays. In this case one cannot
60: define which pair is produced earlier or later, which leads to ambiguity in
61: the determination of the decay probabilities. Nevertheless, at very high
62: energies a solution to this problem exists \cite{BCDFtun}. Assuming that the
63: pairs are produced at fixed invariant time $\tau =\sqrt{t^{2}-z^{2}}$, one
64: introduces a Lorentz-invariant sequence of pair production, and the
65: requirements of causality can be naturally fulfilled. The tunneling of
66: particles along the hyperbolas of constant invariant time leads to finite
67: longitudinal momenta of the created particles. Thus, the production rates in
68: the kinetic equations should include also this extra effect.
69:
70: The boost-invariant description of the tunneling process was the main
71: ingredient of the simulation program used to describe the space-time
72: evolution of the color-flux tubes \cite{DFsim,Dyrek}. In particular, this
73: program was applied in the investigations of intermittency \cite
74: {BCDFPint} and soft photon emission \cite{CFphot}. In the present paper
75: the boost-invariant tunneling along the hyperbolas of constant invariant
76: time is included in the kinetic equations. In contrast to the simulation
77: studies \cite{BCDFPint,CFphot}, which were restricted to the case of the
78: elementary color fields, we now deal with stronger fields. Similarities and
79: differences between the present approach and Refs. \cite{BCapp,BCDFosc} are
80: discussed in detail.
81:
82: \section{Pair production in strong chromoelectric fields}
83:
84: \subsection{Boost-invariant tunneling}
85:
86: A semi-classical boost-invariant description of pair production in
87: chromoelectric fields was introduced in Ref. \cite{BCDFtun}. In this
88: approach the tunneling particles move along the hyperbola of constant
89: invariant time
90: %
91: \begin{equation}
92: \tau =\sqrt{t^{2}-z^{2}}. \label{tau}
93: \end{equation}
94: If the virtual particles start their motion at $z=0$, see Fig. 1, the
95: end points of the tunneling trajectory may be determined from the
96: energy-momentum conservation laws \
97: %
98: \begin{equation}
99: E_{f}=\sqrt{m_{\perp }^{2}+p_{f\parallel }^{2}}=F\ z_{f},\qquad
100: p_{f\parallel }=F\left( t_{f}-\tau \right) . \label{eppar}
101: \end{equation}
102: %
103: Here $E_{f}$ and $p_{f\parallel }$ are the energy and the longitudinal
104: momentum of the particle at the space-time point where it emerges from the
105: vacuum, $m_{\perp}$ is the transverse mass, and $F$ is a constant
106: force acting on the particle (in this Section we shall concentrate our
107: discussion on the case $F>0$ only). Using the rapidity variable $y$ we may write
108: %
109: \begin{equation}
110: E_{f}=m_{\perp }\cosh y_{f}\ ,\qquad p_{f\parallel }=m_{\perp }\sinh y_{f}\ .
111: \label{yf}
112: \end{equation}
113: %
114: In the analogous way we define the quasirapidity variable $\eta $, which
115: gives
116: \begin{equation}
117: t_{f}=\tau \cosh \eta _{f}\ ,\qquad z_{f}=\tau \sinh \eta _{f}.
118: \label{etaf}
119: \end{equation}
120: Equations (\ref{eppar}), (\ref{yf}) and (\ref{etaf})\ yield \cite{BCDFtun}
121: \begin{equation}
122: \sinh y_{f}=\frac{m_{\perp }}{2F\tau},\qquad \eta _{f}=2\ y_{f}.
123: \label{sinhyf}
124: \end{equation}
125:
126: \begin{figure}[b]
127: \epsfysize=9cm
128: \par
129: \begin{center}
130: \mbox{\epsfbox{tun.eps}}
131: \end{center}
132: \caption{Boost-invariant tunneling of particles along the
133: trajectory of constant invariant time $\tau=\sqrt{t^2-z^2}$}
134: \label{fig1}
135: \end{figure}
136:
137: An interesting feature of Eq. (\ref{sinhyf}) is that the kinematical
138: quantities characterizing the tunneling particles depend on $\tau $, i.e.,
139: pairs with different momenta are created at different invariant times. This
140: is an effect of the boundary conditions which describe expansion of the
141: system. For very large $\tau $, when the boundary of the field is far away
142: from the center of the system we recover the standard results: $p_{f \parallel
143: }=0,\ z_{f}=m_{\perp }/F$ and $t_{f}=\tau $.
144:
145:
146: Although the boundary conditions change the kinematics of the tunneling
147: process, the probability of tunneling per unit volume of space-time does not
148: change \cite{BCDFtun}. Thus, we may use the well established formula for the
149: production rate \cite{cnn,gm,schwinger,gi}
150: \begin{equation}
151: \frac{dN}{d^{4}x\ d^{2}p_{\perp }}=\frac{F}{4\pi ^{3}}\left| \ln \left( 1\mp
152: \exp \left( -\frac{\pi m_{\perp }^{2}}{F}\right) \right) \right| .
153: \label{rate0}
154: \end{equation}
155: Here the minus sign is appropriate for fermions (in our case for quarks and
156: antiquarks) and the plus sign should be used for bosons (in our case for
157: gluons). Eq. (\ref{rate0})\ gives the rate integrated over the longitudinal
158: momentum. The $p_{\parallel }$-dependence may be taken into account by the
159: following modification of (\ref{rate0})\
160: \begin{equation}
161: \frac{dN}{d\Gamma }\equiv p^{0}\frac{dN}{d^{4}x\ d^{3}p}=\frac{F}{4\pi ^{3}}%
162: \left| \ln \left( 1\mp \exp \left( -\frac{\pi m_{\perp }^{2}}{F}\right)
163: \right) \right| \delta \left( y-\eta +\frac{1}{2}\eta _{f}\right) .
164: \label{rate}
165: \end{equation}
166: The production rate (\ref{rate})\ is boost invariant and reduces to the
167: previous formula\ if divided by $p^{0}$ and integrated over $p_{\parallel }$.
168: Moreover, the rapidity of the particles which are produced at $\eta =\eta
169: _{f}$ is simply $y_{f}=\frac{1}{2}\eta _{f}$, the result required by the
170: condition of the boost-invariant tunneling discussed above. In the limit of
171: large invariant times or large color fields we find $\eta
172: _{f}\longrightarrow 0$, hence the standard formula for tunneling is
173: recovered: the longitudinal momenta of particles tunneling at $z=0$ are zero.
174:
175: \subsection{Boost-invariant variables $w$ and $v$}
176:
177: In the next Sections we shall use the boost-invariant variables introduced
178: in Refs. \cite{BCprd,BCzfc}
179: \begin{equation}
180: u=\tau ^{2}=t^{2}-z^{2},\quad w=tp_{\Vert }-zE,\quad \mathbf{p}_{\bot },
181: \label{binvv1}
182: \end{equation}
183: and also
184: \begin{equation}
185: v=Et-p_{\Vert }\ z=\sqrt{w^{2}+m_{\perp }^{2}u}. \label{binvv2}
186: \end{equation}
187: From these two equations one can easily find the energy and the longitudinal
188: momentum of a particle
189: \begin{equation}
190: E=p^{0}=\frac{vt+wz}{u},\quad p_{\Vert }=\frac{wt+vz}{u}. \label{binvv3}
191: \end{equation}
192: The invariant measure in the momentum space is
193: %
194: \begin{equation}
195: dP = d^2p_\perp {dp_\parallel \over p^0} = d^2p_\perp {dw \over v}.
196: \label{dP}
197: \end{equation}
198: %
199: In addition we have
200: %
201: \begin{equation}
202: w=\tau m_{\perp }\sinh \left( y-\eta \right) ,\qquad v=\tau m_{\perp }\cosh
203: \left( y-\eta \right) . \label{binvv4}
204: \end{equation}
205: Equation (\ref{binvv4}) allows us to rewrite the production rate in the
206: form
207: \begin{equation}
208: \frac{dN}{d\Gamma }
209: = p^{0}\frac{dN}{d^{4}x\ d^{3}p}=\frac{F}{4\pi ^{3}}\left|
210: \ln \left( 1\mp \exp \left( -\frac{\pi m_{\perp }^{2}}{F}\right) \right)
211: \right| \delta \left( w-w_{0}\right) v, \label{rate1}
212: \end{equation}
213: where
214: \begin{equation}
215: w_{0}= \tau m_{\perp }\sinh \left( y_{f}-\eta _{f}\right) =-\tau m_{\perp
216: }\sinh \left( \frac{\eta _{f}}{2}\right) =-\frac{ m_{\perp }^{2}}
217: {2F}. \label{wf}
218: \end{equation}
219:
220: \subsection{Finite-size corrections}
221:
222: Comparing Eqs. (\ref{binvv1}) and (\ref{wf}) we find that the
223: longitudinal momenta of the tunneling particles at $z=0$ are $-
224: m_{\perp}^{2}/ (2F \tau)$. Thus, for large invariant times $p_{\Vert }
225: \rightarrow 0$. On the other hand, in the limit of small invariant
226: times $p_{\Vert }$ becomes infinite. As we shall see in more detail in
227: Section 4, this divergence leads to infinite values of color
228: currents at $\tau=0$, and to infinite decay rate of the initial
229: chromoelectric field. The physical origin of this singularity is
230: the possibility of the creation of particles at infinite values of
231: $t$ and $z$, which correspond to small values of the invariant time $\tau$.
232: In practice, we always deal with finite systems and such tunneling
233: cannot take place. In order to take into account such finite-size
234: corrections we impose an additional condition on the tunneling process,
235: namely \cite{Dyrek}
236: %
237: \begin{equation}
238: 2 \eta_f = 4 \hbox{Arcsinh} \left( \frac{m_{\perp }}{2F\tau} \right)
239: < \Delta \eta.
240: \label{deltaeta}
241: \end{equation}
242: %
243: Here $\Delta \eta$ is a parameter which determines the space-time
244: region in quasirapidity, $|\eta| < \Delta \eta$, where the tunneling
245: is possible. The tunneling particles should fit into this region,
246: hence the distance between the emerging members of a pair
247: should be smaller than $\Delta \eta$.
248: As a consequence, our final expression for
249: the production rate is
250: \footnote{We neglect here the boundary effects:
251: The tunneling processes can start from a place close to the edge of the
252: system and may have not enough space to fit into the allowed
253: region. Such situations should be eliminated by introducing
254: an additional constraint.}
255: %
256: \begin{eqnarray}
257: \!\!\!\!\!\!\frac{dN}{d\Gamma }&=&\frac{F}{4\pi ^{3}}
258: \left|
259: \ln \left( 1\mp \exp \left( -\frac{\pi m_{\perp }^{2}}{F}\right) \right)
260: \right|
261: \theta\left[2\tau F \sinh \left( {\Delta \eta \over 4} \right)- m_{\perp }
262: \right]
263: \delta \left( w-w_{0}\right) v, \nonumber \\
264: & &
265: \label{rate2}
266: \end{eqnarray}
267: %
268: where $\theta $ is the step function
269: \begin{equation}
270: \theta (x)=1\quad \hbox{for}\quad x>0,\quad \theta (x)=0\quad \hbox{for}%
271: \quad x\leq 0. \label{stepfun}
272: \end{equation}
273: %
274: We note that condition (\ref{deltaeta}) was also used in the
275: simulation program \cite{DFsim,Dyrek}. In that case, the allowed
276: region in the quasirapidity space was determined by the actual size of
277: a decaying color flux tube. In the present study, the size of $\Delta
278: \eta$ is suggested by the rapidity range accessible in the
279: ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions at SPS and RHIC.
280: In the following, we consider three typical values:
281: $\Delta \eta = 4, 6$ and 8.
282:
283:
284:
285: \section{Semi-classical kinetic equations for quark-gluon plasma}
286:
287: In the {\it abelian dominance approximation}, the equations for quarks,
288: antiquarks and gluons have the form
289: \cite{BCDFosc,heinz,egv}
290: %
291: \begin{equation}
292: \left( p^{\mu }\partial _{\mu } \pm g{\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}\cdot
293: {\bf F}^{\mu \nu }p_{\nu }\partial _{\mu }^{p}\right)
294: G^\pm_{i}(x,p)=\frac{dN^\pm_{i}}{d\Gamma }, \label{kineq}
295: \end{equation}
296: %
297: \begin{equation}
298: \left( p^{\mu }\partial _{\mu }+g{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}\cdot
299: {\bf F}^{\mu \nu }p_{\nu }\partial _{\mu }^{p}\right)
300: \tilde{{G}}_{ij}(x,p)=
301: \frac{d{\tilde{N}}_{ij}}{d\Gamma }, \label{kineg}
302: \end{equation}
303: %
304: where $G^+_{i}(x,p)\ $, $G^-_{i}(x,p)$ and $\tilde{{G}}_{ij}(x,p)$
305: are the phase-space densities of quarks, antiquarks and gluons, respectively.
306: Here $g$ is the strong coupling constant, and $i,j=(1,2,3)$ are color
307: indices. The terms on the left-hand-side describe the free motion of the
308: particles and the interaction of the particles with the mean field $\mathbf{F%
309: }_{\mu \nu }$. The terms on the right-hand-side describe production of
310: quarks and gluons due to the decay of the field. The distribution functions
311: $G^{\pm}_i$ and $\tilde{{G}}_{ij}$ include the spin degeneracy factors.
312: In the numerical calculations we neglect the quark masses and assume that
313: Eq. (\ref{kineq}) holds for $N_f$=3 flavors. We note that Eqs. (\ref{kineq})
314: and (\ref{kineg}) do not include the thermalization effects. The latter can
315: be taken into account in the relaxation time approximation
316: (see for example Refs. \cite{bbr,bn,brs}).
317:
318:
319: The only non-zero components of the tensor ${\bf F}_{\mu \nu }=(F_{\mu
320: \nu }^{3},F_{\mu \nu }^{8})$ are those corresponding to the chromoelectric
321: field ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}$, which may be written as
322: \begin{equation}
323: {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}={\bf F}^{30}{=-2}\frac{d\mathbf{h}}{du}=-%
324: \frac{1}{\tau }\frac{d\mathbf{h}}{d\tau }. \label{binve}
325: \end{equation}
326: %
327: Here $\mathbf{h}$ is a function of the variable $u=\tau ^{2}$ only
328: (note that ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}$ is invariant under Lorentz
329: boosts along the $z$-axis). The quarks couple to the chromoelectric
330: field ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}$ through the charges \cite{huang}
331: %
332: \begin{equation}
333: {\small \mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{1}{\small =}\frac{1}{2}\left( 1,\sqrt{%
334: \frac{1}{3}}\right) {\small ,\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{2}{\small =}\frac{%
335: 1}{2}\left( -1,\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\right) {\small ,\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}%
336: }_{3}{\small =}\left( 0,-\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\right) {\small .}
337: \label{qcharge}
338: \end{equation}
339:
340: The gluons couple to ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}$ through the charges ${%
341: \mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}$ defined by relation
342: \begin{equation}
343: {\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}={\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}-{%
344: \mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{j}. \label{gcharge}
345: \end{equation}
346:
347: According to our discussion from the previous Section, the production rates
348: of quarks and antiquarks in the chromoelectric field ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}$
349: are
350: %
351: \begin{equation}
352: \frac{dN^\pm_{i}}{d\Gamma } = {\cal R}_{i}(\tau,p_\perp)
353: \delta \left( w \mp w_{i}\right) v,
354: \label{qrate}
355: \end{equation}
356: %
357: where we have defined
358: %
359: \begin{eqnarray}
360: {\cal R}_{i}(\tau,p_\perp) &=&
361: \frac{\Lambda _{i}}{4\pi ^{3}}\left| \ln \left(
362: 1-\exp \left( -\frac{\pi p_{\bot }^{2}}{\Lambda _{i}}\right) \right) \right|
363: \theta\left[2\tau\Lambda_i \sinh\left({\Delta \eta \over 4}\right)
364: - p_{\perp } \right],
365: \label{Ri} \\
366: \nonumber \\
367: \nonumber \\
368: \Lambda _{i} &=& \left( g\left| {\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}\cdot {%
369: \mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}\right| -\sigma _{q}\right) \theta \left( g\left| {%
370: \mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}\cdot {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}\right|
371: -\sigma _{q}\right),
372: \label{Lami}
373: \end{eqnarray}
374: and
375: \begin{equation}
376: w_{i}=-\frac{p_{\perp }^{2}}{2\Lambda _{i}}
377: \hbox{sign}\left( {\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}
378: \cdot {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}\right) .
379: \label{wi}
380: \end{equation}
381:
382: The quantity $\Lambda _{i}$ describes the effective force acting on the
383: tunneling quarks. The effect of the screening of the initial field by the
384: tunneling particles is taken into account by the subtraction of the
385: ''elementary force'' characterized by the string tension $\sigma _{q}$.
386:
387: Similarly, for gluons we have
388: \begin{equation}
389: \frac{d\tilde{N}_{ij}}{d\Gamma } =
390: \tilde{\mathcal{R}}_{ij}(\tau,p_\perp)
391: \delta \left( w-w_{ij}\right) v,
392: \label{grate}
393: \end{equation}
394: %
395: where
396: %
397: \begin{eqnarray}
398: \tilde{\mathcal{R}}_{ij}(\tau,p_\perp) &=&
399: \frac{\Lambda _{ij}}{4\pi ^{3}}\left|
400: \ln \left( 1+\exp \left( -\frac{\pi p_{\bot }^{2}}{\Lambda _{ij}}\right)
401: \right) \right|
402: \theta\left[2\tau\Lambda_{ij} \sinh\left({\Delta \eta \over 4}\right)
403: - p_{\perp } \right],
404: \label{Rij} \\
405: \nonumber \\
406: \nonumber \\
407: \Lambda _{ij} &=& \left(g\left| {\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}\cdot {%
408: \mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}\right| -\sigma _{g}\right) \theta \left( g\left| {%
409: \mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}\cdot {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}\right|
410: -\sigma _{g}\right),
411: \label{Lamij}
412: \end{eqnarray}
413: and
414: \begin{equation}
415: w_{ij}=-\frac{p_{\perp }^{2}}{2\Lambda _{ij}}
416: \hbox{sign}\left( {\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}\cdot {%
417: \mbox{\boldmath
418: $\cal E$}}\right) .
419: \label{wij}
420: \end{equation}
421: %
422: We note that the string tension of a tube spanned by gluons is three times
423: stronger than that of a quark tube, $\sigma _{g}=3\sigma _{q}$ \cite{DFcft}.
424:
425: The implementation of the boost invariance in Eqs. (\ref{kineq}) and
426: (\ref{kineg}) leads us to the following form of the transport equations
427: \cite{BCDFosc}
428:
429: \newpage
430:
431: \begin{equation}
432: \frac{\partial G^\pm_{i}}{\partial \tau }
433: \mp g{\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i} \cdot
434: \frac{d{\bf h}}{d\tau }\frac{\partial G^\pm_{i}}{\partial w}=\tau
435: {\cal R}_{i}\left( \tau ,p_{\bot }\right)
436: \delta \left( w \mp w_{i}(\tau, p_{\bot })\right) , \label{kineq1}
437: \end{equation}
438: %
439: \begin{equation}
440: \frac{\partial \tilde{G}_{ij}}{\partial \tau }
441: -g{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij} \cdot
442: \frac{d\mathbf{h}}{d\tau }\frac{\partial \tilde{G}_{ij}}{\partial w}=\tau
443: \tilde{{\cal R}}_{ij}\left( \tau ,p_{\bot }\right)
444: \delta \left( w-w_{ij}(\tau ,p_{\bot })\right) . \label{kineg1}
445: \end{equation}
446: %
447: Their formal solution is
448: \begin{equation}
449: G^\pm_{i}\left( \tau ,w,p_{\bot }\right) =\int_{0}^{\tau }d\tau^{\prime }\
450: \tau^{\prime } \, {\cal R}_{i}\left(\tau^{\prime },p_{\bot }\right)
451: \delta\left( \Delta h_{i}\left( \tau ,\tau ^{\prime }\right)
452: \pm w - w_i(\tau^\prime, p_{\bot }) \right),
453: \label{kineqs}
454: \end{equation}
455: \begin{equation}
456: \!\!\!\!\!
457: \tilde{G}_{ij}\left( \tau ,w,p_{\bot }\right) =\int_{0}^{\tau }d\tau
458: ^{\prime }\ \tau ^{\prime }\ \tilde{{\cal R}}_{ij}\left( \tau
459: ^{\prime },p_{\bot }\right) \delta \left( \Delta h_{ij}\left( \tau ,\tau
460: ^{\prime }\right) +w - w_{ij}(\tau^\prime, p_{\bot })\right), \label{kinegs}
461: \end{equation}
462: where
463: %
464: \begin{equation}
465: \Delta h_{i}\left(\tau ,\tau ^{\prime }\right)
466: \equiv g{\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}\cdot
467: \left[{\bf h}\left(\tau \right) -
468: {\bf h}\left(\tau ^{\prime }\right) \right], \nonumber
469: \end{equation}
470: \begin{equation}
471: \Delta h_{ij}\left( \tau ,\tau^{\prime }\right)
472: \equiv g{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij} \cdot
473: \left[{\bf h}\left( \tau \right) -
474: {\bf h}\left( \tau ^{\prime }\right) \right].
475: \label{hs}
476: \end{equation}
477: %
478: One may notice that the distribution functions (\ref{kineqs}) and (\ref{kinegs})
479: satisfy the following symmetry relations
480: \begin{equation}
481: G^-_{i}\left( \tau ,w,p_{\bot }\right) =G^+_{i}\left( \tau
482: ,-w,p_{\bot }\right) ,\quad \tilde{G}_{ij}\left( \tau ,w,p_{\bot
483: }\right) =\tilde{G}_{ji}\left( \tau ,-w,p_{\bot }\right) .
484: \label{symofg}
485: \end{equation}
486: We note also that the time integrals in (\ref{kineqs}) and (\ref{kinegs})
487: reveal the non-Markovian character of the particle production mechanism: the
488: behavior of the system at a time $\tau $ is determined by the whole
489: evolution of the system in the time interval $0\leq \tau ^{\prime }\leq
490: \tau$.
491:
492: \section{Color currents}
493:
494: Equations (\ref{kineq}) and (\ref{kineg}) show how the particles behave under the
495: influence of the field. In order to obtain a self-consistent set of
496: equations we should have also the dynamic equation for the field. It can be
497: written in the following Maxwell form
498: \begin{equation}
499: \partial _{\mu }{\bf F}^{\mu \nu }(x)={\bf j}^{\nu }(x)+{\bf j}%
500: _{D}^{\nu }(x), \label{Maxwell}
501: \end{equation}
502: where ${\bf j}^{\nu }$ is the \textit{conductive current} (related to the
503: simple fact that particles carry color charges ${\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}%
504: _{i}$ and ${\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij})$ and ${\bf j}_{D}^{\nu }$ is
505: the \textit{displacement current} (induced by the tunneling of quarks and
506: gluons from the vacuum).
507:
508: \subsection{\protect\bigskip Conductive current}
509:
510: The form of the conductive current is standard
511: %
512: \begin{eqnarray}
513: && {\bf j}^{\nu }(x)=g\int dP \, p^{\nu }\left[ N_{f}\sum_{i=1}^{3}{%
514: \mbox{\boldmath
515: $\epsilon$}}_{i}\left( G^+_{i}(x,p)-G^-_{i}(x,p)\right)
516: +\sum_{i,j=1}^{3}{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}\tilde{G}_{ij}(x,p)\right].
517: \nonumber \\
518: &&
519: \label{condcur}
520: \end{eqnarray}
521: %
522: Substituting the quark and gluon distribution functions (\ref{kineqs}) and
523: (\ref{kinegs}) into Eq. (\ref{condcur}), and using
524: Eqs. (\ref{binvv3}) and (\ref{symofg}) we find that ${\bf j}^\nu(x)$
525: has the following space-time structure
526: %
527: \begin{equation}
528: {\bf j}^{\nu }(x)=\left[ {\bf j}^{0}(x),0,0,{\bf j}^{3}(x)\right]
529: =[z,0,0,t]{\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}\left( \tau \right) , \label{condcur1}
530: \end{equation}
531: %
532: where
533: %
534: \begin{eqnarray}
535: {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}\left( \tau \right) &=&\frac{2g}{u}
536: \int d^{2}p_{\bot} \frac{dw\ w}{v}
537: \left[ N_{f}\sum_{i=1}^{3}{\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}%
538: _{i}\,G^+_{i}\left( \tau ,w,p_{\bot }\right) +\sum_{i>j}^{3}{%
539: \mbox{\boldmath
540: $\eta$}}_{ij}\, \tilde{G}_{ij}\left( \tau ,w,p_{\bot }\right) \right].
541: \nonumber \\
542: & &
543: \label{condcur2}
544: \end{eqnarray}
545: %
546: The use of the explicit form of the distribution functions $G_{i}$ and $%
547: \tilde{G}_{ij}$ in Eq. (\ref{condcur2}) gives
548: %
549: \begin{eqnarray}
550: {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}\left( \tau \right) &=&-\frac{2gN_{f}}{u}%
551: \sum_{i=1}^{3}{\mbox{\boldmath
552: $\epsilon$}}_{i}\int_{0}^{\tau }d\tau ^{\prime }\ \tau ^{\prime }\int
553: d^{2}p_{\bot }\frac{{\cal R}_{i}\left( \tau^\prime, p_{\bot }\right) \left[
554: \Delta h_{i}-w_{i}(p_{\perp },\tau ^{\prime })\right] }{\sqrt{\left[ \Delta
555: h_{i}-w_{i}(p_{\perp },\tau ^{\prime })\right] ^{2}+p_{\perp }^{2}u}}
556: \nonumber \\
557: &&-\frac{2g}{u}\sum_{i>j}^{3}{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}%
558: _{ij}\int_{0}^{\tau }d\tau ^{\prime }\ \tau ^{\prime }\int d^{2}p_{\bot }%
559: \frac{\tilde{{\cal R}}_{ij}\left( \tau^\prime, p_{\bot }\right)
560: \left[ \Delta
561: h_{ij}-w_{ij}(p_{\perp },\tau ^{\prime })\right] }{\sqrt{\left[ \Delta
562: h_{ij}-w_{ij}(p_{\perp },\tau ^{\prime })\right] ^{2}+p_{\perp }^{2}u}}.
563: \nonumber \\
564: &&
565: \label{condcur4}
566: \end{eqnarray}
567:
568:
569: \subsection{\protect\bigskip Displacement current}
570:
571: The structure of the displacement current is less obvious. One can find the
572: form of ${\bf j}_{D}^{\nu }$ through the analysis of the energy and
573: momentum conservation laws for both the matter (quarks and gluons) and the
574: field
575: \begin{equation}
576: \partial _{\mu }T_{\hbox{\small matter}}^{\mu \nu}(x)+
577: \partial _{\mu }T_{\hbox{\small field}}^{\mu \nu}(x)=0.
578: \label{enmomcon3}
579: \end{equation}
580: The $\nu =0$ component of this equation gives for the field part
581: \begin{equation}
582: \partial_{\mu }T_{\hbox{\small field}}^{\mu 0}
583: =\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left( \frac{1}{2}
584: {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}^{2}\right) ={\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}\cdot }%
585: \frac{\partial {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}}{\partial t}=-{\bf F}%
586: ^{30}\cdot \frac{\partial {\bf F}^{03}}{\partial t}, \label{enmomcon3a}
587: \end{equation}
588: %
589: and for the matter part
590: %
591: \begin{eqnarray}
592: \partial _{\mu }T_{\hbox{\small matter}}^{\mu 0}
593: &=&-g{\bf F}^{\mu \nu }\cdot \int dP\ p^{0}\
594: p_{\nu }\ \partial _{\mu }^{p}\left[ N_{f}\sum_{i=1}^{3}{%
595: \mbox{\boldmath
596: $\epsilon$}}_{i}\left( G^+_{i}-G^-_{i}\right) +\sum_{i,j=1}^{3}{%
597: \mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}\tilde{G}_{ij}\right] \nonumber \\
598: &&+\int dP\ p^{0}\left[ N_{f}\sum_{i=1}^{3}\left( \frac{dN^+_{i}}{d\Gamma }+%
599: \frac{d N^-_{i}}{d\Gamma }\right) +\sum_{i,j=1}^{3}\frac{d\tilde{%
600: N}_{ij}}{d\Gamma }\right] , \label{enmomcon3b}
601: \end{eqnarray}
602: where we used Eqs. (\ref{kineq}) and (\ref{kineg}). Using the last results we
603: may write
604: %
605: \begin{eqnarray}
606: {\bf F}^{30} \cdot \frac{\partial {\bf F}^{03}}{\partial t}
607: &=&{\bf F}^{30} \cdot g \int dP\, p^{3}
608: \left[ N_{f}\, \sum_{i=1}^{3}{\mbox{\boldmath
609: $\epsilon$}}_{i}\left( G^+_{i}-G^-_{i}\right) +\sum_{i,j=1}^{3}{%
610: \mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}\tilde{G}_{ij}\right]
611: \nonumber \\
612: &&+{\bf F}^{30}\cdot \int dP\ \left[ N_{f}\ \sum_{i=1}^{3}\frac{p^{0}{%
613: \mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}}{\ {\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}\cdot
614: {\bf F}^{30}}\left( \frac{dN^+_{i}}{d\Gamma }+\frac{dN^-_{i}}{%
615: d\Gamma }\right) \right.
616: \nonumber \\
617: &&+\left. \sum_{i>j}^{3}\frac{p^{0}{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}}{{%
618: \mbox{\boldmath
619: $\eta$}}_{ij}\cdot {\bf F}^{30}}\left( \frac{d\tilde{N}_{ij}}{d\Gamma
620: }+\frac{d\tilde{N}_{ji}}{d\Gamma }\right) \right] .
621: \end{eqnarray}
622: %
623: Similarly, we may analyze the $\nu =3$ component of Eq. (\ref{enmomcon3}).
624: The conclusion is that the field equations (\ref{Maxwell}) represent a
625: sufficient condition for the conservation of energy and momentum if the
626: displacement current has the structure
627: \begin{equation}
628: {\bf j}_{D}^{\nu }(x)=\left[{\bf j}_{D}^{0}(x),0,0,{\bf j}%
629: _{D}^{3}(x)\right] =[z,0,0,t]{\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}_{D}\left( \tau
630: \right) \label{convcur1}
631: \end{equation}
632: %
633: where
634: %
635: \begin{eqnarray}
636: {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}_{D}\left( \tau \right) &=&\frac{N_{f}}{\tau^2 }%
637: \sum_{i=1}^{3}\frac{{\mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}}{{%
638: \mbox{\boldmath
639: $\epsilon$}}_{i}\cdot {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}}\int dw \,
640: d^{2}p_{\bot }\left( \frac{dN^+_{i}}{d\Gamma }+\frac{dN^-_{i}}{%
641: d\Gamma }\right) \nonumber \\
642: &&\ \ \ +\frac{1}{\tau^2 }\sum_{i>j}^{3}\frac{{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}}{{%
643: \mbox{\boldmath
644: $\eta$}}_{ij}\cdot {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}}\int dw \,
645: d^{2}p_{\bot }\left( \frac{d\tilde{N}_{ij}}{d\Gamma }+\frac{d\tilde{N%
646: }_{ji}}{d\Gamma }\right) . \label{convcur4}
647: \end{eqnarray}
648: %
649: Integration over $w$ in Eq. (\ref{convcur4}) can be easily done
650: \begin{eqnarray}
651: {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}_{D}\left( \tau \right) &=&
652: \frac{2 N_{f}}{\tau ^{2}}\sum_{i=1}^{3}\frac{{%
653: \mbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}}_{i}}{{\mbox{\boldmath
654: $\epsilon$}}_{i}\cdot {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}}\int d^{2}p_{\bot }%
655: \sqrt{w_{i}^{2}+p_{\bot }^{2}u} \,\,
656: {\cal R}_{i}\left(\tau, p_{\bot }\right)
657: \nonumber \\
658: &&\ \ +\frac{2}{\tau ^{2}}%
659: \sum_{i>j}^{3}\frac{{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}}{{\mbox{\boldmath
660: $\eta$}}_{ij}\cdot {\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}}\int d^{2}p_{\bot }\sqrt{%
661: w_{ij}^{2}+p_{\bot }^{2}u} \,\,
662: \tilde{{\cal R}}_{ij}\left(\tau, p_{\bot }\right).
663: \label{convcur5}
664: \end{eqnarray}
665:
666: We note that the form of Eqs. (\ref{condcur1}) and (\ref{convcur1})
667: implies that both the conductive and displacement currents are
668: conserved separately
669: %
670: \begin{equation}
671: \partial _{\nu }\,{\bf j}^\nu(x)=0, \hspace{1.5cm}
672: \partial _{\nu }\,{\bf j}_D^\nu(x)=0.
673: \label{condcur3}
674: \end{equation}
675:
676: We also note that the integral over $p_\perp$ is restricted by
677: condition (\ref{deltaeta}), implicitly included in
678: ${\cal R}_{i}$ and $\tilde{{\cal R}}_{ij}$. If we did not use
679: our finite-size correction, the displacement current would diverge
680: at small $\tau$, ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}_{D}(\tau) \sim \tau^{-2}$,
681: and the field equation would be singular, compare Eq. (\ref{biMaxwell0}).
682: In the standard case (with zero longitudinal momenta of the tunneling
683: particles and with no finite-size corrections), the quantities $w_i$
684: and $w_{ij}$ are zero, hence
685: ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}_{D}(\tau) \sim \tau^{-1}$ for small $\tau$,
686: and the field equation is regular in the limit $\tau \rightarrow 0$
687:
688:
689: \subsection{Field equations}
690:
691: With the all substitutions required by the boost invariance, the field
692: equation (\ref{Maxwell}) may be written as
693: \begin{equation}
694: \frac{d{\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}
695: \left( \tau \right) }{d\tau}=
696: -\tau\left[ {\mbox{\boldmath
697: $\cal J$}}\left( \tau \right) +{\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}_{D}\left( \tau
698: \right) \right] \label{biMaxwell0}
699: \end{equation}
700: or
701: \begin{equation}
702: \frac{d^{2}\mathbf{h}\left( \tau \right) }{d\tau ^{2}}=\frac{1}{\tau }\frac{d%
703: \mathbf{h}\left( \tau \right) }{d\tau }+\tau ^{2}\left[ {\mbox{\boldmath
704: $\cal J$}}\left( \tau \right) +{\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}_{D}\left( \tau
705: \right) \right] . \label{biMaxwell}
706: \end{equation}
707: This is an integro-differential equation for the function $\mathbf{h}\left(
708: \tau \right)$, because the conductive current ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal J$}}%
709: \left( \tau \right)$ depends not only on $\mathbf{h}\left( \tau \right) $
710: but also on all the values of $\mathbf{h(}\tau ^{\prime })$ for $0\leq \tau
711: ^{\prime }\leq \tau $. Eq. (\ref{biMaxwell}) has to be solved numerically
712: step by step for given initial values. These are taken in the form
713: \cite{BCDFosc,DFcft}
714: %
715: \begin{equation}
716: {\bf h}(0)=0,\quad \frac{1}{\tau }\frac{d{\bf h}}{d\tau }%
717: (0)=-{\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}_{0}{\,=}-\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma _{g}}{\pi r^{2}%
718: }}k\mathbf{q}. \label{initcon}
719: \end{equation}
720: %
721: Here the Gauss law has been used to determine the initial strength of
722: the chromoelectric field ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}_{0}$ in terms of
723: the transverse radius of the color-flux-tube ($\pi r^2$= 1 fm$^2$),
724: the string tension ($\sigma_g= 3 \sigma_q =$ 3 GeV/fm), and the number
725: of color charges $k$. Since the exchange of color charges at the
726: initial stage of a heavy-ion collision leads to the color fields
727: spanned by gluons \cite{bironk}, we assume that $\mathbf{q}$ is one of
728: the gluon color charges ${\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{ij}$. In practice
729: we take ${\bf q}={\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}_{12}$, so only the third
730: component of the chromoelectric field, ${\mbox{\boldmath $\cal
731: E$}}^{(3)}$, is present in our numerical calculations. The solution
732: of Eq. (\ref{biMaxwell}) is independent of the initial condition for
733: $\mathbf{h}\left(\tau \right)$ because of the cancellations
734: connected with the gauge transformation which leaves ${\mbox{\boldmath
735: $\cal E$}}$ unchanged.
736:
737:
738: \begin{figure}[b]
739: \epsfysize=7cm
740: \par
741: \begin{center}
742: \mbox{\hspace{-4cm} \epsfbox{el1.eps}}
743: \end{center}
744: \caption{Time dependence of the chromoelectric field for different
745: values of $k$. The maximal quasirapidity interval allowed for tunneling
746: is fixed, $\Delta\eta$=6.}
747: \label{pole}
748: \end{figure}
749:
750: \begin{figure}[b]
751: \epsfysize=7cm
752: \par
753: \begin{center}
754: \mbox{\hspace{-4cm} \epsfbox{el2.eps}}
755: \end{center}
756: \caption{Time dependence of the chromoelectric field for different
757: values of $\Delta \eta$. The initial field strength is fixed,
758: $k=3$.}
759: \label{pole1}
760: \end{figure}
761:
762: In Fig. \ref{pole} we plot the time dependence of the chromoelectric
763: field, as calculated from Eqs. (\ref{biMaxwell}) and (\ref{initcon})
764: for different values of the parameter $k$. The maximal allowed
765: quasirapidity interval $\Delta \eta$ is 6 in this case. We observe the
766: field oscillations with the frequency growing with $k$. The shape of
767: the oscillations is almost identical to those found before in
768: Ref. \cite{BCDFosc}. Clearly, the modification of the tunneling
769: process does not affect the field behavior in this case. In
770: Fig. \ref{pole1} we show the time dependence of the field for the
771: fixed initial strength, $k=3$, and for different values of $\Delta
772: \eta $. In the three considered cases, $\Delta \eta$ = 4, 6 and 8, the
773: field oscillations are very similar. Looking in more detail, we
774: observe that with increasing $\Delta \eta $, the chromoelectric field
775: decreases faster at the very initial stage of the process, i.e., for
776: $0<\tau <0.1$ fm. Later the decrease of the field is weaker and for
777: $\tau \sim 0.3$ fm the values of the chromoelectric fields are
778: approximately the same for different values of $\Delta \eta$. For
779: longer times one may notice that the period of the field oscillations
780: is slightly longer for larger values of $\Delta \eta$ -- a faster
781: initial decay of the field causes a faster back reaction of the induced
782: currents, and the subsequent slow down of the decay.
783:
784:
785:
786:
787: \section{Energy density and pressure of the plasma}
788:
789:
790: The energy-momentum tensor of the quark-gluon plasma has a structure
791: %
792: \begin{equation}
793: T_{\hbox{\small matter}}^{\mu \nu }=\left[ \varepsilon \left( \tau \right)
794: +P\left( \tau \right) \right] u^{\mu }u^{\nu }-P\left( \tau \right) g^{\mu
795: \nu }, \label{tmunu}
796: \end{equation}
797: where in our two-dimensional model
798: \begin{equation}
799: u^{\mu }=\frac{1}{\tau }\left( t,z\right) . \label{umu}
800: \end{equation}
801: %
802: It is important to emphasize that in our case the standard form of the
803: energy-momentum tensor, Eq. (\ref{tmunu}), does not follow from the assumption
804: of the local thermodynamic equilibrium, but it is a direct consequence of the
805: boost-invariance. Eq. (\ref{tmunu}) can be derived directly from the definition
806: of the
807: energy-momentum tensor with the help of the symmetry relations (\ref{symofg}).
808: The conservation law (\ref{enmomcon3}) together with Eq. (\ref{tmunu}) imply
809: %
810: \begin{equation}
811: \frac{d }{d \tau }\left[ \varepsilon \left( \tau \right)
812: + \frac{1}{2}{\mbox{\boldmath $\cal E$}}^{2}(\tau) \right] =-\frac{%
813: \varepsilon \left( \tau \right) +P\left( \tau \right) }{\tau }.
814: \label{bjork}
815: \end{equation}
816: %
817: In the absence of the fields Eq. (\ref{bjork}) is reduced to the Bjorken
818: equation describing the evolution of the energy density in a boost-invariant
819: hydrodynamic model \cite{bjorken}. On the other hand, neglecting the expansion
820: effects, described by the term on the right-hand-side of Eq. (\ref{bjork}),
821: we obtain the simple conservation law for the total energy of the field
822: and matter.
823:
824:
825:
826:
827:
828:
829: The non-equilibrium energy density $\varepsilon $ and the non-equilibrium
830: pressure $P$ are
831: \begin{equation}
832: \varepsilon \left( \tau \right) =\frac{1}{u}\int d^{2}p_{\bot }\,\,dw\,v\,%
833: \left[ N_{f}\,\sum_{i=1}^{3}\left( G_{i}^{+}+G_{i}^{-}\right)
834: +\sum_{i,j=1}^{3}\tilde{G}_{ij}\right] \label{epstau}
835: \end{equation}
836: and
837: \begin{equation}
838: P\left( \tau \right) =\frac{1}{u}\int d^{2}p_{\bot }\,\,dw\,\frac{w^{2}}{v}\,%
839: \left[ N_{f}\,\sum_{i=1}^{3}\left( G_{i}^{+}+G_{i}^{-}\right)
840: +\sum_{i,j=1}^{3}\tilde{G}_{ij}\right] . \label{Peps}
841: \end{equation}
842:
843:
844: The time dependence of the energy density $\varepsilon \left( \tau \right)$,
845: following from Eq. (\ref{epstau}), is shown in Figs. \ref{ene} and
846: \ref{ene1}. In Fig. \ref{ene} we fix the maximal quasirapidity interval
847: $\Delta \eta =6$ and show the results for different strengths of the initial field,
848: $k=$ 2, 3 and 5. We observe that the energy density grows very rapidly and reaches
849: maximum at a fraction of a fermi. Later the energy density decreases, which
850: is an effect connected with the longitudinal expansion of the system, imposed
851: by the boost invariance. The maximal values of the energy density are very
852: close to those found in Ref. \cite{BCDFosc}. In Fig. \ref{ene1} we show the
853: results for the fixed initial value of the field, $k=3$, and for different
854: quasirapidity intervals, $\Delta \eta =$ 4, 6 and 8. It is interesting
855: to observe that with increasing values of $\Delta \eta$ the maximal energy
856: density gets smaller. This behavior is connected with the time dependence of
857: the chromoelectric field. For larger values of $\Delta \eta $ the decay of the
858: field is slower (except for the very beginning of the decay process) and the
859: growth of the energy density is weaker.
860:
861:
862: \begin{figure}[t]
863: \epsfysize=7cm
864: \par
865: \begin{center}
866: \mbox{\hspace{-4cm} \epsfbox{en1.eps}}
867: \end{center}
868: \caption{Time dependence of the energy density of the plasma, Eq. (57),
869: for different values of $k$ and $\Delta \eta$ =6. }
870: \label{ene}
871: \end{figure}
872:
873:
874: \begin{figure}[t]
875: \epsfysize=7cm
876: \par
877: \begin{center}
878: \mbox{\hspace{-4cm} \epsfbox{en2.eps}}
879: \end{center}
880: \caption{Time dependence of the energy density of the plasma
881: for different values of $\Delta \eta$ and $k=3$.}
882: \label{ene1}
883: \end{figure}
884:
885:
886: We have checked that our numerically evaluated functions $\varepsilon
887: (\tau)$ and $P(\tau)$ obey Eq. (\ref{bjork}). The time-dependence of
888: the non-equilibrium pressure $P (\tau)$ is depicted in Figs.
889: \ref{c} and \ref{c1}. One can notice that the minima of $P(\tau)$
890: correspond to the extremes of the chromoelectric field. At these points the
891: longitudinal momenta of the particles practically vanish and the field is
892: the strongest. This behavior reminds oscillations of a simple string.
893: Another interesting feature of the process discussed here is that the ratio
894: $P\left( \tau \right)/\varepsilon \left( \tau \right)$ oscillates
895: around the mean value $P/\varepsilon \sim 1/3$, which corresponds to the
896: equilibrium limit. Imposing condition
897: $P/\varepsilon = 1/3$ in Eq. (\ref{bjork}) we may treat this expression
898: as an equation determining $\varepsilon$ (the time dependent
899: chromoelectric field enters here as the only input). We have found
900: that the solutions of this equation are very good approximations of the
901: exact solutions shown in Fig. \ref{ene} and \ref{ene1}.
902:
903:
904: \begin{figure}[t]
905: \epsfysize=7cm
906: \par
907: \begin{center}
908: \mbox{\hspace{-4cm} \epsfbox{mom1.eps}}
909: \end{center}
910: \caption{Time dependence of the pressure of the plasma, as defined by
911: Eq. (58), $k=2, 3, 5$ and $\Delta \eta$ = 6.}
912: \label{c}
913: \end{figure}
914:
915:
916: \begin{figure}[t]
917: \epsfysize=7cm
918: \par
919: \begin{center}
920: \mbox{\hspace{-4cm} \epsfbox{mom2.eps}}
921: \end{center}
922: \caption{Time dependence of the pressure of the plasma,
923: $k= 3$ and $\Delta \eta$ = 4, 6, 8.}
924: \label{c1}
925: \end{figure}
926:
927: \section{Conclusions}
928:
929:
930: In this paper, the boost invariant tunneling has been incorporated into the
931: framework of the kinetic theory describing production of the quark-gluon
932: plasma in strong color fields. Our description of the tunneling process
933: includes the effect of a finite space-like distance formed between the
934: particles. Such a distance appears, since the energy and momentum
935: conservation laws should be satisfied locally during the tunneling. In our
936: approach, the particles emerging from the vacuum have finite longitudinal
937: momenta, which is a direct consequence of the tunneling along the
938: trajectories of constant invariant time.
939:
940: We restrict the possibility of creation of pairs at very large distances (in
941: order to retain the boost-invariance of the system, this condition is
942: formulated in the quasirapidity space). In this way we mimic the
943: constraints imposed by the fact that total energies of the realistic systems
944: are finite. \ We find that the finite-size corrections are crucial to have
945: non-trivial solutions of the kinetic equations. For the realistic
946: finite-size corrections (as suggested by the accessible rapidity range in
947: the present experiments with the ultra-relativistic heavy-ions) we find the
948: solutions of the kinetic equations which are very close (qualitatively and
949: quantitatively) to the results of \ the previous investigations: the
950: chromoelectric fields oscillate, and large densities of quarks and gluons
951: are produced in a very short time. The increase of the region allowed for
952: tunneling does not lead to the increase of the \ produced maximal energy
953: density of quarks and gluons. This feature of the model can be used to
954: interpret small differences in many characteristics of the heavy-ion
955: collisions at the SPS and RHIC energies.
956:
957:
958: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
959:
960: \bibitem{BCapp} A. Bia\l as and W. Czy\.z, Acta Phys. Pol.
961: {\bf B17} (1986) 635
962:
963: \bibitem{BCDFosc} A. Bia\l as, W. Czy\.z, A. Dyrek, and W. Florkowski,
964: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B296} (1988) 611
965:
966: \bibitem{DFcft} A. Dyrek and W. Florkowski, Acta Phys. Pol.
967: {\bf B19} (1988) 947
968:
969: \bibitem{DFhq} A. Dyrek and W. Florkowski, Il Nuovo Cim.
970: {\bf 102A} (1989) 1013
971:
972: \bibitem{cnn} A. Casher, H. Neuberger, and S. Nussinov,
973: Phys. Rev. {\bf D20} (1979) 179
974:
975: \bibitem{gm} N. K. Glendenning and T. Matsui, Phys. Rev. {\bf D28}
976: (1983) 2890
977:
978: \bibitem{km} K. Kajantie and T. Matsui, Phys. Lett. {\bf B164} (1985) 373
979:
980: \bibitem{BCDFtun} A. Bia\l as, W. Czy\.z, A. Dyrek, and W. Florkowski,
981: Zeit. f. Physik {\bf C46} (1990) 439
982:
983: \bibitem{DFsim} A. Dyrek and W. Florkowski, Acta Phys. Pol.
984: {\bf B22} (1991) 325
985:
986: \bibitem{Dyrek} A. Dyrek, preprint TPJU 18/1990.
987:
988: \bibitem{BCDFPint} A. Bia\l as, W. Czy\.z, A. Dyrek, W. Florkowski, and
989: R. Peschanski, Phys. Lett. {\bf B229} (1989) 398
990:
991: \bibitem{CFphot} W. Czy\.z and W. Florkowski, Zeit. f. Phys.
992: {\bf C61} (1994) 171
993:
994: \bibitem{schwinger} J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. {\bf 82} (1951) 664
995:
996: \bibitem{gi} M. Gyulassy and A. Iwazaki, Phys. Lett. {\bf B165}
997: (1985) 157
998:
999: \bibitem{BCprd} A. Bia\l as and W. Czy\.z, Phys. Rev. {\bf D30}
1000: (1984) 2371
1001:
1002: \bibitem{BCzfc} A. Bia\l as and W. Czy\.z, Zeit. f. Phys.
1003: {\bf C28} (1985) 255
1004:
1005: \bibitem{heinz} U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 51} (1983) 351;
1006: Ann. of Phys. (NY) {\bf 161} (1985) 48; Phys. Lett. {\bf B144}
1007: (1984) 228
1008:
1009: \bibitem{egv} H.-Th. Elze, M. Gyulassy, and D. Vasak,
1010: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B276} (1986) 706; Phys. Lett. {\bf B177} (1986)
1011: 402
1012:
1013: \bibitem{bbr} B. Banerjee, R.S. Bhalerao, and V. Ravishankar,
1014: Phys. Lett. {\bf B224} (1989) 16
1015:
1016: \bibitem{bn} R.S. Bhalerao and G. C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. {\bf C61}
1017: (2000) 054907
1018:
1019: \bibitem{brs} J.C.R. Bloch, C.D. Roberts and S.M. Schmidt,
1020: Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 117502
1021:
1022: \bibitem{huang} K. Huang, {\it Quarks, Leptons and Gauge Fields},
1023: World Scientific Publ. Co., Singapore 1982, p. 245
1024:
1025: \bibitem{bironk} T. S. Biro, H. B. Nielsen, and J. Knoll,
1026: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B245} (1984) 449
1027:
1028: \bibitem{bjorken} J. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. {\bf D27} (1983) 140
1029:
1030: \end{thebibliography}
1031:
1032:
1033:
1034:
1035: \end{document}
1036: