1: %====================================================================%

2: %                  MPROCL.TEX     27-Feb-1995                        %

3: % This latex file rewritten from various sources for use in the      %

4: % preparation of the medium-size proceedings Volume, latest version  %

5: % by Susan Hezlet with acknowledgments to Lukas Nellen.              %

6: % Some changes are due to David Cassel.                              %

7: %====================================================================%

8: 

9: \documentstyle[mprocl,epsfig]{article}

10: \font\eightrm=cmr8

11: 

12: \bibliographystyle{unsrt} %for BibTeX-sorted numerical labels by 

13:                           %order of first citation.

14: 

15: \arraycolsep1.5pt 

16: 

17: \input{rotate}

18: 

19: % A useful Journal macro

20: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}

21: 

22: % Some useful journal names

23: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}

24: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}

25: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}

26: \def\NPA{{\em Nucl. Phys.} A}

27: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}

28: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.}  B}

29: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}

30: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}

31: \def\PRC{{\em Phys. Rev.} C}

32: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} C}

33: % Some other macros used in the sample text

34: \def\st{\scriptstyle}

35: \def\sst{\scriptscriptstyle}

36: \def\mco{\multicolumn}

37: \def\epp{\epsilon^{\prime}}

38: \def\vep{\varepsilon}

39: \def\ra{\rightarrow}

40: \def\ppg{\pi^+\pi^-\gamma}

41: \def\vp{{\bf p}}

42: \def\ko{K^0}

43: \def\kb{\bar{K^0}}

44: \def\al{\alpha}

45: \def\ab{\bar{\alpha}}

46: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

47: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

48: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}

49: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}

50: \def\CPbar{\hbox{{\rm CP}\hskip-1.80em{/}}}%temp replacement due to no font

51: 

52: 

53: %

54: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  BOLDFACE GREEK LETTERS   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

55: \newcommand{\xbf}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $ #1 $}}

56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

57: 

58: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

59: \newcommand{\Gen}{\mbox{G$_{C}^{n}$}}

60: \newcommand{\GenQ}{\mbox{G$_{C}^{n}({\mathrm{Q}}^2)$}}

61: \newcommand{\Genq}{\mbox{G$_{E}^{n}({\bf q}^2)$}}

62: \newcommand{\Gdipole}{\mbox{G$_{D}$}}

63: \newcommand{\Gmn}{\mbox{G$_{M}^{n}$}}

64: \newcommand{\Gmnq}{\mbox{G$_{M}^{n}({\bf q}^2)$}}

65: \newcommand{\sQsq}{\mbox{\scriptsize Q$^2$=0}}

66: \newcommand{\vbl}{\mbox{\large\bf $\vert$}}

67: \newcommand{\vQzero}{\mbox{$^{\vbl}_{\sQsq}$}}

68: \newcommand{\Qsq}{\mbox{Q$^2$}}

69: \newcommand{\Qquad}{\mbox{Q$^4$}}

70: \newcommand{\rms}{\mbox{$<\!r_{n}^2\!\!>$}}

71: \newcommand{\rquad}{\mbox{$<\!r_{n}^4\!\!>$}}

72: \newcommand{\fourth}{\mbox{$4^{th}$}}

73: \newcommand{\rdelta}{\mbox{$<\!r_{N \to \Delta}^2\!\!>$}}

74: \newcommand{\GCndelta}{\mbox{G$_{\mathrm{C}2}^{N \to \Delta}$}}

75: \newcommand{\GCndeltaq}{\mbox{G$_{\mathrm{C}2}^{N \to \Delta}$({\bf q}$^2$)}}

76: \newcommand{\GMndeltaq}{\mbox{G$_{\mathrm{M}1}^{N \to \Delta}$({\bf q}$^2$)}}

77: \newcommand{\GCndeltaQ}{\mbox{G$_{\mathrm{C}2}^{N \to \Delta}$(\Qsq)}}

78: \newcommand{\Qndelta}{\mbox{${\cal Q}_{N \to \Delta}$}}

79: \newcommand{\NDelta}{\mbox{$N$$\to$$\Delta$}}

80: \newcommand{\etal}{\mbox{\it et~al.}}

81: 

82: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

83: %%BEGINNING OF TEXT                          

84: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

85: 

86: \begin{document}

87: 

88: \title{Relations between $N$ and $\Delta$ electromagnetic form factors

89: \footnote{Excited Nucleons and Hadronic Structure, Proceedings of the 

90: NSTAR 2000 conference, 

91: Eds. V. D. Burkert, L.Elouadrhiri, J.J. Kelly,

92: R. C. Minehart, World Scientific, Singapore, 2001, pg. 59}

93: }

94: 

95: \author{A. J. Buchmann}

96: 

97: \address{Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of T\"ubingen, 

98: D-72076 T\"ubingen,\\ Germany\\E-mail: alfons.buchmann@uni-tuebingen.de}   

99: 

100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

101: % You may repeat \author \address as often as necessary      %

102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

103: 

104: \maketitle\abstracts{ 

105: The inclusion of two-body exchange currents in the constituent quark model

106: leads to several new relations between the electromagnetic form factors of 

107: nucleon and $\Delta(1232)$. These are: (i) the neutron charge form factor

108: can be expressed as the difference between proton and $\Delta^+$ 

109: charge form factors, and (ii) the $N \to \Delta$ charge quadrupole $(C2)$

110: transition form factor is connected to the

111: charge monopole $(C0)$ form factor of the neutron. The latter

112: relation is used to estimate the charge radius of constituent quarks. 

113: Furthermore, we find that exchange currents

114: do {\it not} modify the $SU(6)$ relation between the magnetic 

115: $N \to \Delta$ and the magnetic neutron

116: form factor. Consequently, after including exchange currents,

117: the $C2/M1$ ratio in the $N \to \Delta$ transition can be expressed as a 

118: ratio of the elastic charge and magnetic neutron form factors as 

119: follows 

120: $$

121: \frac{C2}{M1}({\bf q}^2) = \frac{M_N}{2 \sqrt{{\bf q}^2}} 

122: \frac{G_{C}^{n}({\bf q}^2)}{G_M^{n}({\bf q}^2)} \, .  

123: $$

124: }

125: 

126: \section{Introduction}

127: 

128: Baryons are complicated many-particle systems composed of valence

129: quarks, which carry the quantum numbers, and 

130: nonvalence quark degrees of freedom, such as 

131: quark-antiquark ($q \bar q$) pairs and gluons. 

132: The constituent quark model with two-body exchange currents

133: describes both these aspects baryon structure~\cite{Buc91}.  One-body

134: currents describe the interaction of the photon with one valence quark at

135: a time.  Two-body exchange currents are connected with the exchange

136: particles and with $q \bar q$ pairs.

137: Baryon properties which are dominated by

138: two-body exchange currents show their common dynamical origin in

139: analytical interrelations between them.

140: 

141: A new quark model relation between the neutron 

142: charge form factor \Gen\ and the quadrupole transition form factor \GCndelta\ 

143: is used in order to predict \GCndelta\

144: and the C2/M1 ratio from the elastic neutron form factor data.

145: An astonishingly good agreement with the 

146: direct pion electroproduction data is found~\cite{Gra00}.

147: 

148: \section{$N$ and $\Delta$ charge monopole form factors} 

149: 

150: In a quark potential model with gluon and pion 

151: exchange currents the baryon charge consists of a sum of 

152: one- and two-quark pieces: $\rho({\bf q})= \rho_{[1]}({\bf q}) + 

153: \rho_{[2]}({\bf q})$. After a multipole expansion up to quadrupole terms, 

154: the one- and two-body quark operators corresponding to

155: Fig.1 can be schematically written as

156: \bea

157: \label{eq:structure}

158: \rho_{[1]}({\bf  q}) & \approx & 

159: [Y^0({\bf r}_i) \times Y^0({\bf q})]^0

160: -\sqrt{5}  [Y^2({\bf r}_i) \times Y^2({\bf q})]^0 \nonumber \\

161: \rho_{[2]}({\bf q}) & \approx & 

162: [[\xbf{\sigma}_i \times \xbf{\sigma}_j]^0 \times Y^0({\bf q})]^0

163: +\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[\, [\xbf{\sigma}_i \times \xbf{\sigma}_j]^2 \times

164: Y^2({\bf q})\, ]^0.

165: \eea 

166: where ${\bf r}_i$ is the spatial, and $\xbf{\sigma}_i$ the spin operator 

167: of a single quark, 

168: ${\bf q}$ is the three-momentum transfer of the photon, and

169: $Y^l$ a spherical harmonic of rank $l$.

170: The spin-dependent two-body terms come from the exchange current diagrams in

171: Fig.~\ref{fig:feynmec}(b-d). 

172: 

173: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

174: %             FIG.1

175: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

176: \begin{figure}[h]

177: $$\mbox{

178: \epsfxsize 11.5 true cm

179: \epsfysize 4.0 true cm

180: \setbox0= \vbox{

181: \hbox { \centerline{

182: \epsfbox{feynmec.ps}

183: }} %  end hbox

184: } % end vbox

185: \box0

186: } $$

187: \vspace{-0.8cm}

188: \caption[Exchange currents]{Feynman diagrams of the four vector

189: current $J^{\mu}=(\rho, {\bf J})$:

190: photon ($\gamma$) coupling to (a) one-body current $J^{\mu}_{[1]}$, 

191: and to (b-d) two-body gluon and pion exchange currents $J^{\mu}_{[2]}$.

192: Diagrams (b-d) must be taken into account in order to satisfy the continuity

193: equation $q_{\mu}J^{\mu}=0$ for the electromagnetic current 

194: $J_{\mu}$. They represent the nonvalence (gluon and pion) degrees of 

195: freedom in the nucleon in the presence of an external electromagnetic field.}

196: \label{fig:feynmec}

197: \end{figure}

198:  

199: Evaluating these operators between three-quark proton wave functions, one 

200: obtains for the proton charge radius \cite{Buc91}

201: \be

202: \label{rpmec}

203: r^2_{p}   =  b^2 + r_{\gamma q}^2+ 

204: {b^2\over 2 m_q}  

205: \bigl ( \delta_g(b) - \delta_{\pi}(b) \bigr ).

206: \ee

207: Here, $b$ is the quark core (matter) radius of the nucleon, 

208: $r_{\gamma q}$ the finite charge radius of the constituent quark,

209: and $m_q$ the constituent quark mass satisfying $M_N=3 m_q$.

210: The terms proportional to $\delta_g(b)$ and $\delta_{\pi}(b)$ 

211: describe the gluon and pion exchange current contributions to 

212: the charge radius. These functions also express 

213: the gluon and pion contributions to the $N$-$\Delta$ 

214: mass splitting:

215: $

216: M_{\Delta}-M_N=\delta_g(b)+\delta_{\pi}(b).

217: $ 

218: The proton charge radius 

219: is mainly determined by the  

220: valence quark terms $b^2$ and $r_{\gamma q}^2$, i.e., 

221: the one-body current depicted in Fig.\ref{fig:feynmec}(a);

222: the exchange currents of Fig.\ref{fig:feynmec}(b-c) provide

223: only a small correction to $r^2_{p}$.

224: 

225: In contrast, the Sachs charge form factor of the neutron $G_C^n(q^2)$ 

226: (see Fig.\ref{nchaff99}) 

227: and the corresponding charge radius $r_n^2=-6 (d/d{\bf q}^2) 

228: G_C^n({\bf q}^2) \mid_{{\bf q}^2=0}$  are dominated by the 

229: quark-antiquark pair exchange currents, and one obtains~\cite{Buc91}

230: \be

231: \label{eq:rnmec}

232: r^2_{n}   =  -{b^2\over 3m_q} \bigl ( \delta_g(b)+ \delta_{\pi}(b) \bigr )

233: =-b^2  \left ( \frac{M_{\Delta}-M_N}{M_N} \right ). 

234: \ee

235: The above relations show that the spin-dependent gluon and pion exchange

236: potentials, which generate the $N$-$\Delta$ mass splitting, are

237: also responsible for the nonvanishing neutron charge radius via the

238: corresponding spin-spin term in Eq.(\ref{eq:structure}).

239: The valence quark terms $b^2$ and $r_{\gamma q}^2$ 

240: do not appear in Eq.(\ref{eq:rnmec}). The reasons for this will become 

241: clear soon. 

242: 

243: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

244: %             FIG. neutron charge form factor 

245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

246: \begin{figure}[t]

247: $$\hspace{0.2cm} \mbox{

248: \epsfxsize 9.0 true cm

249: \epsfysize 11.5 true cm

250: \setbox0= \vbox{

251: \hbox {

252: \epsfbox{nchafft.eps}

253: } % end hbox

254: } % end vbox

255: \rotr0

256: } $$

257: \vspace{-0.8cm}

258: \caption[Interpretation]{

259: Neutron charge form factor $G_C^n(Q^2)$ (upper curves) and the

260: $N \to \Delta$ quadrupole transition form factor 

261: $G_{C2}^{p \to \Delta^+}(Q^2)$ (lower curve) 

262: as a function of four-momentum transfer $Q^2=-q^2$ as predicted 

263: quark model with exchange currents \cite{Buc91,Buc97b}. 

264: The lower curve is 

265: $G_{C2}^{p \to \Delta^+}(Q^2)=-3\sqrt{2}\, \, G_C^n(Q^2)/Q^2$\, as

266: predicted by the quark model with exchange currents~\cite{Buc00a}.

267: The data are from Ref.~\cite{Her99}.}

268: \label{nchaff99}

269: \end{figure}

270: 

271: The charge radii of all charged $\Delta$(1232) states are calculated 

272: in the same $N_c=3$ quark model as~\cite{Buc97}  

273: \be

274: \label{rdel}

275: r^2_{\Delta} = b^2 + r^2_{\gamma q}+ {b^2\over 6 m_q} (5\delta_g(b) -

276: \delta_{\pi}(b)), \quad r^2_{\Delta^0}=0.

277: \ee

278: The charge form factor of the $\Delta^0$ and the corresponding 

279: charge radius are zero (for $N_c=3$) 

280: as it should be on general grounds \cite{Col85}. Subtracting 

281: Eq.(\ref{rdel}) from Eq.(\ref{rpmec})  and Eq.(\ref{eq:rnmec})   

282: the valence quark contributions $b^2$ and $r_{\gamma q}^2$ cancel,  

283: and one finds~\cite{Buc97} 

284: \be

285: \label{crdn}

286: r^2_p-r^2_{\Delta^+} = r^2_n \, , \qquad r^2_n-r^2_{\Delta^0} = r^2_n . 

287: \ee

288: 

289: Eqs.(\ref{crdn}) are the first moments

290: of the more general 

291: relations~\cite{Buc00a} between the charge form factors of the 

292: $N$ and $\Delta$

293: \be

294: \label{crdnff}

295: G_C^{p}({\bf q}^2)-G_C^{\Delta^+}({\bf q}^2)= G_C^{n}({\bf q}^2) \, ,

296: \qquad

297: G_C^{n}({\bf q}^2)-G_C^{\Delta^0}({\bf q}^2)= G_C^{n}({\bf q}^2) \, .

298: \ee

299: Including the $\Delta^{++}$ and the $\Delta^-$ charge states 

300: this can be written in closed form as

301: \be

302: \label{crdnff2}

303: G_C^{\Delta}({\bf q}^2)=\left ( G_C^{p}({\bf q}^2)- G_C^{n}({\bf q}^2)\right )

304: e_{\Delta},

305: \ee 

306: where $e_{\Delta}=(1+2 T_3)/2$ is the $\Delta$ charge.

307: These relations are {\it not}  equivalent to the  

308: $SU(6)$ result 

309: $G_C^{\Delta}=(G_C^p+G_C^n)/2 +(G_C^p-G_C^n) T_3$, where $T_3$ is the 

310: third component of the $\Delta$ isospin.          

311: Eq.(\ref{crdnff2}) contains the important symmetry breaking effect

312: coming from the spin-spin term in Eq.(\ref{eq:structure}).

313: 

314: Dillon and Morpurgo \cite{Mor99} have 

315: recently shown that Eq.(\ref{crdn}) is a direct

316: consequence of the underlying $SU(6)$ spin-flavor symmetry 

317: {\it and } the quark-gluon dynamics of quantum chromodynamics. 

318: They have also shown that 

319: three-body currents slightly modify, but do not invalidate the general

320: relationship between the proton, neutron, and $\Delta$ charge radii.

321: The work of Dillon and Morpurgo makes it clear that Eq.(\ref{crdn}) 

322: originally found in the quark model with exchange currents, 

323: is a general relation if three-body operators and

324: strange quark loops are neglected.

325: 

326: Considering constituent quarks with an arbitrary 

327: number of colors $N_c$, one can generalize these 

328: findings~\cite{Buc00b}. Eq.(\ref{crdn}) then no longer

329: holds for arbitrary $N_c$, but the relation

330: \be

331: \label{crdn1}

332: r^2_p-r^2_{\Delta^+} =r^2_n-r^2_{\Delta^0}

333: \ee

334: is valid for {\it any} $N_c$.

335: It is broken only by three-body $O(1/N_c^2)$ terms,

336: which are suppressed compared to the two-body terms included.

337: For $N_c=3$, $r_{\Delta^0}^2=0$ and we reobtain Eq.(\ref{crdn}). 

338: The general $N_c$ analysis gives the $N-\Delta$ charge radius

339: relationship a rigorous theoretical foundation~\cite{Buc00b}. 

340: 

341: The following discussion suggests a 

342: connection between the $N-\Delta$ mass and charge radius difference.

343: We recall that the spin-spin structure 

344: $\xbf{\sigma}_i \cdot \xbf{\sigma}_j$ in 

345: Eq.(\ref{eq:structure})

346: is responsible for the splitting between $N$ and  $\Delta$ charge radii.

347: It leads to a $\Delta$ charge radius that is 

348: larger than the proton charge radius by an amount that is equal to the 

349: negative neutron charge radius. 

350: The neutron charge radius is nonzero, because the spin-spin term

351: in Eq.(\ref{eq:structure}) gives different matrix elements for 

352: quark pairs in spin~0 and spin~1 states.

353: This splitting 

354: of the $N$ and $\Delta$ charge radii is of the same generality as,

355: and closely connected with the $N-\Delta$ mass splitting due to the 

356: spin-spin interaction in the Hamiltonian. The latter is repulsive 

357: in quark pairs with spin 1 and makes the $\Delta$ heavier than the nucleon. 

358: Combining Eq.(\ref{eq:rnmec}) and Eq.(\ref{crdn}) and the fact

359: that baryon charge radii and masses have the same large $N_c$ operator

360: expansion \cite{Buc00b} we conjecture that 

361: \be

362: \label{charge mass}

363: \frac{r^2_{\Delta^+}-r_p^2}{r^2_{\Delta^0}-r_n^2}

364:  =\frac{M_{\Delta^+}-M_p}{M_{\Delta^0}-M_n}

365: \ee

366: contains some of the three-body corrections not included in Eq.(\ref{crdn1}).

367: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

368: %    Table 1

369: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

370: %

371: \goodbreak

372: \begin{table}[htb]

373: \caption[Magnetic moments]{$\Delta$(1232) magnetic moments

374: based on the relations suggested in this paper.

375: As input the experimental proton and neutron

376: magnetic moments are used. The  experimental range for the

377: $\Delta^{++}$ magnetic moment is $\mu_{\Delta^{++}}=(3.7-7.5)$ $\mu_N$ 

378: \cite{PDG94}. 

379: For the $N \to \Delta$ transition magnetic moment experimental values

380: lie between $\mu_{p \to \Delta^+}=(3.5-4.2)$ $\mu_N$ \cite{Buc97b}. 

381: All entries are in given in units of nuclear magnetons $\mu_N=e/(2M_p)$.  }

382: \begin{center}

383: \nobreak

384: %

385: %

386: \begin{tabular}[h]{| l | r | r |} 

387: \hline

388: Baryon  & Quark Model & $SU(6)$  \\  \hline

389: %

390: %

391: $ \Delta^{++} $ & $ 5.28 $ & $5.58$ \\

392: %

393: %

394: $ \Delta^{+} $ & $ 2.64 $ & $2.79$ \\ 

395: %

396: %

397: $ \Delta^{0} $ & $ 0.000 $ & $0.000 $  \\ 

398: %

399: %

400: $ \Delta^{-} $ & $ -2.64 $ & $-2.79$  \\

401: %

402: %

403: $ p\to \Delta^{+} $ & $ 2.70 $ & $ 2.70 $  \\

404: %

405: %

406: $ n\to \Delta^{0} $ & $ 2.70 $ & $ 2.70 $  \\

407: \hline

408: %

409: \end{tabular} 

410: \end{center}

411: \end{table}

412: 

413: \goodbreak 

414: \section{$N$ and $\Delta$ magnetic dipole form factors} 

415: \nobreak

416: 

417: The quark model with two-body exchange currents also

418: relates the magnetic form factors of the $N$ and  $\Delta$

419: \be

420: \label{relmag}

421: G_M^{\Delta}({\bf q}^2) = 3 

422: \left ( G_M^p({\bf q}^2) + G_M^n({\bf q}^2) \right ) e_{\Delta}.

423: \ee

424: Eq.(\ref{relmag}) differs from the $SU(6)$ relation~\cite{Beg64}:  

425: $G_M^{\Delta}=G_M^p e_{\Delta}$. 

426: There is no difference between the quark model with 

427: exchange currents and the $SU(6)$ result if the 

428: additional $SU(6)$

429: relation $G_M^n=-2G_M^p/3$ is used in Eq.(\ref{relmag}).

430: Our predictions for the $\Delta$ magnetic moments 

431: based on Eq.(\ref{relmag}) are given in Table 1.

432: We observe that the $\Delta^+$ magnetic moment is 

433: only slightly smaller than the proton magnetic moment.

434: 

435: \goodbreak 

436: \section{$N \to \Delta$ charge quadrupole transition form factor}

437: \label{subsec:ndquad}

438: \nobreak

439: 

440: In the constituent quark model with exchange currents a connection

441: between the neutron charge form factor $G_C^n({\bf q}^2)$ 

442: and the $N\to\Delta$ quadrupole transition form factor 

443: $G_{C2}^{p \to \Delta^+}({\bf q}^2)$ emerges \cite{Buc00a}:

444: \be

445: \label{qnff} 

446: G_{C2}^{p \to \Delta^+}({\bf q}^2)= -{3 \sqrt{2}\over {\bf q}^2} 

447: G_C^n({\bf q}^2)= -{3 \sqrt{2}\over {\bf q}^2} 

448: \left ( G_C^p({\bf q}^2) - G_C^{\Delta^+}({\bf q}^2) \right ), 

449: \ee

450: which is plotted in Fig.\ref{nchaff99} (lower curve).

451: 

452: In the low-momentum transfer limit we derive from Eq.(\ref{qnff})

453: that the $N \to \Delta$ transition quadrupole moment $Q_{p \to \Delta^+}$ 

454: is determined by the neutron charge radius~\cite{Buc97}

455: \be

456: \label{quad}

457: Q_{p \to \Delta} ={ r_n^2 \over \sqrt{2}}.

458: \ee

459: We recall that $Q_{p \to \Delta^+}$ is 

460: in combination with the $\Delta^+$ quadrupole moment $Q_{\Delta^+}$ 

461: a measure of the intrinsic deformation of the nucleon and $\Delta$.

462: The quantities that determine the intrinsic deformation

463: are the intrinsic quadrupole moments $Q_0^p$ and $Q_0^{\Delta}$.

464: The connection between the observable (spectroscopic) 

465:  $Q_{p\to\Delta^+}$ and the

466: $Q_{\Delta^+}$ and corresponding intrinsic quadrupole moments 

467: has recently been evaluated in different models~\cite{Buc00c}. 

468: In the quark model we find using the empirical neutron charge 

469: radius~\cite{kopecky} 

470: $Q_0^p = -Q_0^{\Delta^+}=-Q_{\Delta^+} = -\sqrt{2} Q_{p \to \Delta}= 

471: -r_n^2=+0.113$ fm$^2$. A negative $C2/M1$ ratio therefore implies  

472: a prolate (cigar-shaped)  intrinsic deformation of the nucleon and an

473: oblate (pancake-shaped) intrinsic deformation of the $\Delta$. 

474: 

475: The quark model with exchange currents explains $Q_{p \to \Delta^+}$

476: as a {\it double spin flip} of two quarks, with all valence quarks 

477: remaining in the dominant, spherically symmetric $L=0$ state. 

478: The spin-flip of {\it two} quarks comes from the tensor structure 

479: in Eq.(\ref{eq:structure}). 

480: The latter is closely related to the tensor term in the Hamiltonian,

481: which via the $D$ waves in the $N$ and $\Delta$ 

482: also contributes  to $Q_{p \to \Delta^+}$. This orbital excitation 

483: of a valence quark   

484: amounts to about 20$\%$ (due to the smallness of the $D$ wave amplitudes)

485: of the double spin flip amplitude~\cite{Buc97}.

486: We conclude that the {\it collective} $q{\bar q}$ degrees of freedom

487: are mainly responsible for the deformation of the $N$ and $\Delta$.

488: The importance of the spin tensor in Eq.(\ref{eq:structure}) 

489: for a complete explanation of the $N \to \Delta$ quadrupole transition

490: moment in the quark model was anticipated by Morpurgo \cite{Mor89}.

491: 

492: We have also calculated the radius of the $N \to \Delta$

493: transition quadrupole form factor~\cite{Buc97b},  

494: and obtained\footnote{The term 

495: ${1 \over 4}b^2$ in Eq.(53) of Ref.\cite{Buc97b} should be replaced 

496: by ${11 \over 20} b^2$.}

497: \be

498: \label{quadrad}

499: r^{2}_{Q, \, p \to \Delta^+}= {11\over 20}\, b^2 +r^2_{\gamma q}.

500: \ee

501: Unlike in Eq.(\ref{rpmec}) 

502: there is no correction from two-body exchange currents in Eq.(\ref{quadrad}),

503: which makes the quadrupole transition radius an ideal observable 

504: to experimentally determine the quark charge radius $r_{\gamma q}$.

505: With the help of Eq.(\ref{qnff}) the quadrupole 

506: transition radius can be expressed 

507: as

508: \be

509: r^2_{Q,\, p \to \Delta^+}= ({18/r_n^2}) \, {(d/d{\bf q}^2)^2}

510: G_C^n({\bf q}^2)\bigl \vert_{{\bf q}^2=0}=\frac{3}{10}\frac{r_n^4}{r_n^2}, 

511: \ee 

512: where $r_n^4$ is the fourth moment of the neutron charge distribution.

513: Because the quark core radius $b$ is fixed by Eq.(\ref{eq:rnmec}), 

514: one can extract the charge radius of the light constituent 

515: quarks from the $G_C^n({\bf q}^2)$ data. 

516: A recent fit~\cite{Gra00} to the 

517: $G_C^n$  data determines the fourth moment of $G_C^n$ as

518: $r_n^4=-0.32$ fm$^4$ and the transition quadrupole radius as 

519: $r^2_{Q, \, p \to \Delta^+}=0.84(21)$fm$^2$.     

520: An additional data point of $G_C^n$ at $Q^2=0.9$ GeV$^{-2}$ would 

521: reduce the error by a factor of three. 

522: From Eq.(\ref{quadrad}) and Eq.(\ref{eq:rnmec}) we obtain 

523: $r^2_{\gamma q}=0.64$ fm$^2$, a rather large constituent quark charge radius.

524: This implies a proton charge radius of about 1 fm.

525: 

526: \goodbreak 

527: \section{$N \to \Delta$ magnetic dipole transition form factor}

528: \nobreak

529: After including

530: the gauge-invariant two-body exchange currents of Fig.\ref{fig:feynmec}(b-d), 

531: the $SU(6)$ Beg-Lee-Pais relation~\cite{Beg64}  between the 

532: magnetic $N\to \Delta$ transition and the neutron magnetic moments 

533: $\mu_{p \to \Delta^+}=-\sqrt{2} \mu_n$ remains unchanged, 

534: and holds even at finite momentum transfers

535: \be

536: \label{magff} 

537: G_M^{p \to \Delta^+}({\bf q}^2)= -\sqrt{2}\, G_M^n({\bf q}^2),  \qquad 

538: \mu_{p\to \Delta^+}= -\sqrt{2} \, \mu_n. 

539: \ee

540: The $N \to \Delta$ transition magnetic moment predicted by Eq.(\ref{magff}) 

541: underestimates the empirical value~\cite{Bec97}

542: $\mu_{p\to \Delta^+}^{exp}=(3.5-4.0) \, \mu_N$ by about $(30-50)\%$. 

543: 

544: On the other hand, replacing  $G_M^n$ with the help of 

545: Eq.(\ref{relmag}) allows to consider the problem from a different perspective

546: \be

547: \label{transmm}

548: G_M^{p \to \Delta^+}({\bf q}^2) 

549: = \sqrt{2} \left ( G_M^{p}({\bf q}^2) -

550: { 1\over 3} \, G_M^{\Delta^+}({\bf q}^2) \right ), \quad 

551: \mu_{p\to \Delta^+}= \sqrt{2} 

552: \left ( \mu_p - \frac{1}{3} \mu_{\Delta^+} \right ).  

553: \ee

554: Eq.(\ref{transmm}), which describes the 

555: transition magnetic form factor in terms of the magnetic form factors of the

556: two baryons involved in the transition,  constraints  

557: $\mu_{p \to \Delta^+}$ to values  below $3 \mu_N$.

558: In order to make $\mu_{p\to \Delta^+}$ larger

559: one needs an unacceptably small or 

560: even a negative value for the $\Delta^+$ magnetic moment.

561: Thus, $\mu_{p \to \Delta^+}^{exp}$ most likely includes diagrams that

562: should not be included in the definition of          

563: the proper strength of the electromagnetic $\gamma N \Delta$ vertex. 

564: An analogous observation has been made for the $\pi N \Delta$ coupling 

565: strength~\cite{Buc99}. 

566: 

567: For the radius of the $N \to \Delta$ magnetic transition form factor,

568: $r^2_{M, \, p \to \Delta^+}$  we find

569: \be

570: r^2_{M, \, p \to \Delta^+}= \frac{-\sqrt{2}\, \mu_n}{\mu_{p \to \Delta^+}} 

571: \,\,  r^2_{M, \, n} \ , 

572: \ee

573: where 

574: $r^2_{M, \,  n}$ is the magnetic radius of the neutron.

575: With the $SU(6)$ result of Eq.(\ref{magff}), which is 

576: equivalent to the quark model result with two-body exchange currents, 

577: we obtain $r^2_{M, \, p \to \Delta^+}=r^2_{M, \, n}$.

578: If $\mu_{p \to \Delta^+}>-\sqrt{2}\,\mu_n$ we get 

579: $r^2_{M, \, p \to \Delta^+}<r^2_{M, \, n}$, contradicting the experimental

580: observation that the $N \to \Delta$ magnetic transition form factor drops 

581: off faster than the magnetic neutron form factor.

582: 

583: \goodbreak 

584: \section{$C2/M1$ ratio in the $N \to \Delta$ transition}

585: \nobreak

586: 

587: Combining Eq.({\ref{qnff}) and Eq.(\ref{magff}) we find that the 

588: ratio of the charge quadrupole and magnetic dipole 

589: $N\to \Delta$ transition form factors can be expressed 

590: in terms of the elastic neutron form factors~\cite{Buc00a}

591: \be

592: \label{c2m1}

593: \frac{C2}{M1}({\bf q^2}) = 

594: \frac{M_N}{2 \sqrt{{\bf q}^2} } {G_{C}^{n}({\bf q}^2)

595: \over G_M^{n}({\bf q}^2)}, 

596: \qquad

597: \frac{C2}{M1}=-\frac{M_N \omega_{cm}}{6}\, \frac{r_n^2}{2 \mu_n},

598: \ee

599: where the last expression is obtained in the zero momentum transfer limit.

600: Here, $r_n^2$ is the neutron charge radius (in fm$^2$), 

601: $\mu_n$ the neutron magnetic moment (divided by $\mu_N=e/(2 M_N)$), 

602: and $\omega_{cm}$ is the center of mass

603: energy of the photon-nucleon system at the $\Delta$ resonance. 

604: Fig.\ref{fig:ratio} shows the prediction~\cite{Gra00} of $C2/M1$ based on 

605: the elastic neutron form factor data and Eq.(\ref{c2m1}). 

606: Sign and magnitude of the $C2/M1$ ratio calculated in this way 

607: are in astonishingly good agreement with direct pion 

608: electroproduction data~\cite{Bar99,c2old}. This supports our finding 

609: that the neutron and $N \to \Delta$ 

610: quadrupole transition form factors are related as suggested by 

611: Eq.(\ref{c2m1}).

612: 

613: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

614: %             FIG. 3: ratio C2/M1

615: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

616: \begin{figure}[htb]

617: \hspace{-0.1 cm} 

618: \epsfxsize 12.3 true cm   

619: \epsfysize 5.8 true cm 

620: \epsfbox{c2m1sqn.eps}

621: \caption{\label{fig:ratio}

622:   Ratio $C2/M1$ from the fit to \Gen\ (solid curve)~\protect\cite{Gra00} 

623: and from

624:   calculations of Ref.~\protect\cite{Buc00a} (dashed curve) in comparison with

625:   experimental results taken from Refs.~\protect\cite{Bar99,c2old}.}

626: \end{figure}

627: 

628: 

629: \goodbreak 

630: \section{Summary}

631: \nobreak

632: 

633: By including two-body currents 

634: in the constituent quark model we have found a number of new relations 

635: between the elastic electromagnetic form factors of the $N$ and $\Delta$.

636: These relations contain the effect of the SU(6) symmetry breaking

637: spin-spin term in the charge operator of Eq.(\ref{eq:structure}). 

638: The latter lifts the degeneracy of the nucleon and $\Delta$

639: charge form factors and shows that their difference 

640: is equal to the neutron charge form factor.

641: Dillon and Morpurgo have recently proven that the ensuing 

642: Eq.(\ref{crdn}), which relates proton, neutron, and $\Delta$ charge

643: radii is generally valid if the (numerically small) 

644: three-quark operators and strange quark loops are neglected.

645: Furthermore, in a large $N_c$  approach we find that 

646: the relation $G_C^p(Q^2) - G_C^{\Delta^+}(Q^2)= 

647: G_C^n(Q^2) - G_C^{\Delta^0}(Q^2)$ holds 

648: {\it for any $N_c$ } and that it is 

649: broken only by small three-body $O(1/N_c^2)$ terms, which also

650: underlines its generality.

651: 

652: The $N \to \Delta$ quadrupole transition form factor $G_{C2}^{p \to \Delta}$

653: is found to be expressable in terms of the neutron charge form factor 

654: $G_C^n$. Eq.(\ref{qnff}) displays the underlying $SU(6)$ symmetry and

655: its breaking due to the spin-dependent two-body exchange currents.

656: The $SU(6)$ relation between the

657: $N \to \Delta$ magnetic dipole transition form factor 

658: and the magnetic neutron form factor is not changed 

659: by the two-body exchange currents of Fig.\ref{fig:feynmec}.

660: Even after the inclusion of spatial two-body currents the 

661: $N \to \Delta$ transition magnetic moment is 

662: given by the Beg-Lee-Pais relation.

663: 

664: In summary, our theory leads to a number of new relations 

665: between the electromagnetic form factors

666: of the nucleon and the $\Delta$. In particular,  

667: the $C2/M1$ ratio in the electromagnetic $N \to \Delta$ transition 

668: is given by the ratio of the elastic neutron charge and magnetic form factors.

669: The good agreement between our prediction for the $C2/M1$ ratio and the 

670: pion electroproduction data supports our analysis. 

671: Our work makes it clear 

672: that the deformation of the nucleon and the 

673: neutron charge radius are 

674: related phenomena. They are different manifestations

675: of the $q\bar q$ degrees of freedom in the nucleon, which are 

676: in leading order expressable by two-body exchange currents.

677: 

678: 

679: \noindent 

680: {\bf Acknowledgement:} This work is supported by the DFG BU813/2-1 

681: and Jefferson Lab.} 

682: 

683: \vspace*{-2pt}

684: 

685: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

686: \bibitem{Buc91}  A. Buchmann, E. Hern\'andez, and K. Yazaki, 

687: \Journal{\PLB}{269}{35}{1991};

688: \Journal{\NPB}{569}{661}{1994}.

689: \bibitem{Gra00} P. Grabmayr and A. J. Buchmann,

690: \Journal{\PRL}{86}{2237}{2001}. 

691: \bibitem{Buc97} A. J. Buchmann, E. Hern\'andez, and A. Faessler,

692: \Journal{\PRC}{55}{448}{1997}.

693: \bibitem{Col85} S. Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry, Cambridge University Press,

694: 1985.

695: \bibitem{Buc97b} A. J. Buchmann, Z. Naturforsch. {\bf 52a}, 877 (1997).

696: \bibitem{Buc00a} A. J. Buchmann, \Journal{\NPA}{670}{174}{2000}.

697: \bibitem{Mor99} G. Dillon and G. Morpurgo, 

698: \Journal{\PLB}{448}{107}{1999}. 

699: \bibitem{Buc00b} A. J. Buchmann and R. F. Lebed,  

700: \Journal{\PRD}{62}{096005}{2000}.

701: \bibitem{Buc00c} A. J. Buchmann and E. M. Henley, 

702: \Journal{\PRC}{63}{001}{2001}.

703: \bibitem{Her99} 

704: C. Herberg {\it et} al., Eur. Phys. J.{\bf A5} (1999) 131; J. Becker 

705: {\it et} al., ibid.; 

706: M. Ostrick {\it et} al., \Journal{\PRL}{83}{276}{1999}; 

707: I. Passchier {\it et}  al., \Journal{\PRL}{82}{4988}{1999}; 

708: for refs. to the other data see Ref.\cite{Buc97b}.

709: \bibitem{PDG94} L. Montanet {\it et} al., 

710: \Journal{\PRD}{50}{1173}{1994}.  

711: \bibitem{Bec97} R. Beck {\it et} al., \Journal{\PRL}{78}{606}{1997};

712:  G. Blanpied {\it et} al., \Journal{\PRL}{79}{4337}{1997}.

713: \bibitem{Beg64} M. A. B. Beg, B. W. Lee and A. Pais,

714: \Journal{\PRL}{13}{514}{1964}.  

715: \bibitem{Mor89} G. Morpurgo, \Journal{\PRD}{40}{2997}{1989}.  

716: \bibitem{Buc99} A. J. Buchmann and E. M. Henley,

717: \Journal{\PLB}{484}{255}{2000}. 

718: \bibitem{kopecky}  S. Kopecky \etal, \Journal{\PRL}{74}{2427}{1995} 

719: \bibitem{Bar99}  P. Bartsch {\it et} al.,

720: Baryons' 98, Bonn, Germany, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999,

721:  eds. D. W. Menze and B. Metsch, pg. 757; M. O. Distler, ibid., 

722: pg. 753; R. Gothe, ibid. pg. 394, and these proceedings.

723: \bibitem{c2old} R. Siddle \etal, \Journal{\NPB}{35}{93}{1971};  

724:  J.C. Alder \etal, \Journal{\NPB}{46}{573}{1972}.  

725: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

726: \end{thebibliography}

727: \eject

728: 

729: \end{document}

730: 

731: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

732: % End of mprocl.tex  %

733: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

734: 

735: 

736: 

737: 

738: 

739: 

740: 

741: 

742: