1: \section{Introduction}
2:
3: Hadronic scattering at high energy, or small Bjorken's $x$, uncovers
4: a novel regime of QCD where the coupling is small ($\alpha_s\ll 1$) but
5: the parton densities are so large that conventional perturbation theory
6: breaks down, via strong non-linear effects
7: \cite{GLR,MQ,BM87,AM0,MV94,AGL,AM2,AM1,Larry01,Levin}.
8: In a previous paper \cite{PI}, to be referred to as ``Paper I''
9: throughout this text, we have outlined the construction of an
10: effective theory which is well suited to study the non-linear phenomena
11: at small $x$ and has a transparent physical interpretation: It portrays
12: the gluon component of the hadron wavefunction (the relevant
13: component at small $x$) as a {\it Color Glass Condensate} (CGC).
14: This is a multiparticle quantum state with
15: high occupation numbers, but to the accuracy of interest it can be
16: represented as a classical stochastic color field
17: with a probability law determined by a functional Fokker-Planck equation.
18:
19: The latter is a renormalization group equation (RGE) which shows how to
20: construct the effective theory by integrating out quantum fluctuations
21: in the background of a strong color field (the CGC).
22: The non-linear effects included in the RGE via this background field
23: describe interactions among the gluons
24: produced in the quantum evolution towards small $x$.
25: This leads to a non-linear
26: generalization of the BFKL equation \cite{BFKL} whose
27: general structure has been originally identified in Refs. \cite{JKLW97},
28: in an effort to give a field-theoretical justification to
29: the McLerran-Venugopalan model for the gluon distribution
30: of a large nucleus \cite{MV94,K96,JKMW97,KM98}. But previous attempts
31: \cite{JKW99} to compute the coefficients in this equation
32: (beyond the linear, or BFKL, approximation \cite{JKLW97})
33: have suffered from technical complications and, moreover, appear
34: to be inconsistent
35: with the results obtained from other perturbative approaches
36: \cite{B,K,W}.
37:
38:
39: In this paper, we continue the
40: analysis in Paper I and compute explicitly the coefficients
41: in the RGE alluded to above. As recently reported in Ref. \cite{SAT},
42: the non-linear effects encoded in these coefficients lead to
43: {\it gluon saturation}, that is, to a limitation on the maximum
44: gluon density in the hadron wavefunction as $x\to 0$.
45: In contrast to the linear BFKL
46: equation, which predicts the exponential growth of the gluon distribution
47: function with $\tau\equiv \ln(1/x)$, our corresponding result
48: grows only linearly, and thus respects the unitarity bounds.
49: This is consistent with a previous result by Mueller \cite{AM2},
50: and also with some recent analyses \cite{LT99,B00,LL,Levin}
51: of the Balitsky--Kovchegov equations \cite{B,K},
52: which are encoded too in our RGE \cite{RGE}
53: (see also Sect. \ref{sec:BK} below).
54:
55: This paper is quite technical and relies heavily on the results of
56: Paper I. To facilitate its reading and prepare the calculations to follow,
57: it is convenient to summarize, in the remaining part of this Introduction,
58: the general structure of the effective theory and its quantum evolution.
59: In this introductory discussion, we shall follow the presentation
60: in Paper I, to which the reader may refer for more details, but we shall also
61: anticipate some of the results to be obtained later in this paper.
62: The remaining sections are organized as follows:
63: In Section II we present the explicit calculation of the
64: ``real correction', i.e., the charge-charge correlator $\chi$
65: which plays the role of the diffusion kernel in the functional RGE.
66: In Section III we do the same for the ``virtual correction'', i.e.,
67: the one-point function $\sigma$ which plays the role of a force term.
68: In Section IV, we present the final
69: result for the RGE, and discuss its general structure and
70: some of its remarkable properties.
71: We emphasize, in particular, the Hamiltonian structure of this
72: equation, and its relation with a similar equation by Weigert \cite{W}.
73: In Section V, we derive evolution
74: equations for observables from the general RGE. In the weak field
75: limit, we thus recover the BFKL equation for the unintegrated gluon
76: distribution. In the general non-linear case, we obtain the
77: coupled evolution equations for Wilson-line correlators originally
78: derived by Balitsky and (in the large $N_c$ limit) also by Kovchegov.
79: In Section VI we present conclusions and perspectives.
80: Some explicit calculations, as well as the presentation of
81: the background field gluon propagator, are deferred to the four
82: Appendices.
83:
84:
85: \subsection{The effective theory for the CGC}
86: \label{sec:EFT}
87:
88: The effective theory applies to gluon correlations in the hadron
89: wavefunction as measured in deep inelastic
90: scattering at small Bjorken's $x$. It is formulated in the hadron
91: infinite momentum frame, where small $x$ corresponds to soft
92: longitudinal momenta\footnote{Throughout, we
93: use light-cone vector notations, that is,
94: $v^\mu=(v^+,v^-,{\bf v}_\perp)$, with
95: $v^+\equiv (1/\sqrt 2)(v^0+v^3)$,
96: $v^-\equiv (1/\sqrt 2)(v^0-v^3)$, and ${\bf v}_\perp
97: \equiv (v^1,v^2)$. The dot product reads $k\cdot x = k^- x^+ + k^+ x^-
98: - {\bf k}_\perp \cdot {\bf x}_\perp$. The hadron four-momentum
99: reads $P^\mu=(P^+,0,0_\perp)$, with $P^+\to \infty$.}
100: $k^+=xP^+$, with $P^+$ the hadron momentum, and $x\ll 1$.
101: The main physical assumption, which is a posteriori verified in
102: the construction of the effective theory, is that the ``fast''
103: partons in the hadron wavefunction (i.e., the excitations with
104: relatively large longitudinal momenta $p^+\gg k^+$) can be replaced,
105: as far as their effects on the soft correlation functions are
106: concerned, by a classical random {\it color source} $\rho^a(x)$,
107: whose gross properties are determined by the kinematics.
108:
109: The separation of scales in longitudinal momenta ($p^+\gg k^+$)
110: implies a corresponding separation in (light-cone) energies
111: ($p^-\sim p_\perp^2/2p^+\,\ll\,k^- \sim k_\perp^2/2k^+$),
112: and therefore also in (light-cone) time scales: The lifetime
113: $\Delta x^+ \sim 1/k^- \propto k^+$ of the
114: soft gluons is much shorter than the characteristic time scale
115: $\sim 1/p^- \propto p^+$ for the dynamics of the fast
116: partons. Thus, the latter appear to the soft gluons
117: as nearly on-shell colored particles which propagate on
118: the light-cone ($z\simeq t$, or $x^-\simeq 0$)
119: with large $p^+$ momenta. The associated color charge density
120: $\rho^a(x)$ is therefore
121: {\it static} (i.e., independent of $x^+$), {\it localized} near the
122: light-cone (within a small distance $\Delta x^- \sim 1/p^+ \ll 1/k^+$),
123: and {\it random} (since this is the instantaneous color charge in the
124: hadron ``seen'' by the soft gluons at the arbitrary time of their
125: emission). The correlations of $\rho$ are encoded in a
126: gauge-invariant {\it weight function} $W_\tau[\rho]$. This is the
127: probability density for having a color charge distribution with
128: density $\rho_a(x^-,{\bf x}_{\perp})$, normalized as:
129: \be\label{norm}
130: \int {\cal D}\rho\, \,W_\tau[\rho]\,=\,1\,.\ee
131: Note that we use the momentum-space rapidity
132: $\tau\equiv\ln(P^+/k^+) = \ln(1/x)$ to indicate the
133: dependence of the weight function upon the soft scale $k^+$.
134:
135: Thus, in this effective theory, the
136: equal-time\footnote{Only equal-time correlators are needed, since these
137: are the only ones to be measured by a small-$x$ external probe, which
138: is absorbed almost instantaneously by the hadron. In eq.~(\ref{clascorr}),
139: it is understood that the fields $A^i_a(x^+,\vec x)$ involve only Fourier
140: modes with longitudinal momenta $k^+=xP^+$.}
141: gluon correlation functions at the scale $k^+ =
142: xP^+$ are obtained as (with ${\vec x}\equiv (x^-,{\bf x}_{\perp})$):
143: \be\label{clascorr}
144: \langle A^i_a(x^+,\vec x)A^j_b(x^+,\vec y)
145: \cdots\rangle_\tau\,=\,
146: \int {\cal D}\rho\,\,W_\tau[\rho]\,{\cal A}_a^i({\vec x})
147: {\cal A}_b^j({\vec y})\cdots\,,\ee
148: where ${\cal A}_a^i\equiv {\cal A}_a^i[\rho]$ is the
149: solution to the classical Yang-Mills equations with source
150: $\rho_a$ :
151: \be
152: (D_{\nu} F^{\nu \mu})_a(x)\, =\, \delta^{\mu +} \rho_a(x)\,,
153: \label{cleq0}
154: \ee
155: in the light-cone (LC)
156: gauge $A^+_a=0$, which is the gauge which allows for the most
157: direct contact with the gauge-invariant physical quantities
158: \cite{AM1,PI}. For instance,
159: the gluon distribution function
160: ($\equiv$ the total number of gluons per unit rapidity
161: with longitudinal momentum $k^+=xP^+$ and transverse momentum
162: $k_\perp^2 \le Q^2$) is obtained as \cite{AM1,PI}
163: \be\label{GCL}
164: x G(x,Q^2)&=&\frac{1}{\pi}
165: \int {d^2k_\perp \over (2 \pi)^2}\,\Theta(Q^2-
166: k_\perp^2)\,\Bigl\langle\,
167: |{\cal F}^{+i}_a(\vec k)|^2\Bigr\rangle_\tau\,.\ee
168: where ${\cal F}^{+i}_a=\partial^+ {\cal A}^i_a$ is the
169: electric field associated to the classical solution
170: ${\cal A}_a^i[\rho]$, and $\vec k \equiv (k^+,{\bf k}_\perp)$
171: with $k^+=xP^+=P^+{\rm e}^{-\tau}$.
172:
173: To deduce explicit expressions for these classical fields,
174: it is preferable to express the LC-gauge solution
175: ${\cal A}_a^i$ in terms of color source $\tilde\rho_a$
176: in the {\it covariant} gauge $\partial^\mu \tilde A_\mu =0$
177: (COV-gauge). This is possible since both the measure and the
178: weight function in the functional integral (\ref{clascorr})
179: are gauge-invariant, so that the classical average can be done
180: equally well by integrating over the COV-gauge $\tilde\rho$.
181: In terms of this latter, the classical solution
182: ${\cal A}_a^\mu[\tilde\rho]$
183: is known explicitly \cite{PI}, and reads:
184: ${\cal A}_a^+=0$ (the gauge condition), ${\cal A}^-_a=0$, and
185: (in matrix notations appropriate for the adjoint representation:
186: $\tilde\rho\equiv \tilde\rho_a T^a$, etc.)
187: \begin{mathletters}\be\label{Aclass}\,
188: {\cal A}^i\,
189: (\vec x) &=&{i \over g}\, U(\vec x) \,\partial^i U^\dagger(\vec x),\\
190: U^{\dagger}(x^-,x_{\perp})&=&
191: {\rm P} \exp
192: \left \{
193: ig \int_{-\infty}^{x^-} dz^-\,{\alpha}(z^-,x_{\perp})
194: \right \},\label{Udef}\\
195: - \nabla^2_\perp \alpha({\vec x})&=&\tilde\rho(\vec x).
196: \label{alpharho}\ee\label{Atilde}\end{mathletters}
197: This is the gauge-transform, with gauge function $U(\vec x)$,
198: of the corresponding solution in the COV-gauge, which has only
199: one non-trivial component: $\tilde{\cal A}^\mu_a
200: =\delta^{\mu +}\alpha_a({\vec x})$.
201: All the fields above are static, i.e., independent of $x^+$.
202: Since $\tilde\rho$, and therefore $\alpha$, are localized at
203: $\Delta x^- < 1/k^+$, the associated field ${\cal A}^i$ appears
204: effectively as a $\theta$--function :
205: \be\labe{APM}
206: {\cal A}^i(x^-,x_\perp)\,\approx\,\theta(x^-)\,
207: \frac{i}{g}\,V(\del^i V^\dagger)
208: \,\equiv\,\theta(x^-){\cal A}^i_\infty(x_\perp),\ee
209: to any probe with a much lower longitudinal resolution
210: (i.e., with momenta $q^+\ll k^+$). On the same resolution scale:
211: \be\labe{UTAF}
212: U^{\dagger}(x^-,x_{\perp})\,\approx \,
213: \theta(x^-)\,V^\dagger(x_{\perp}) + \theta(-x^-),\qquad\,
214: {\cal F}^{+i}(\vec x) \,\approx\,\delta(x^-)\,
215: {\cal A}^{i}_\infty(x_\perp).\ee
216: In the equations above, $V$ and $V^\dagger$ are
217: the asymptotic values of the respective
218: gauge rotations as $x^-\to\infty$ :
219: \be\labe{v}
220: V^\dagger(x_{\perp})\,\equiv\,{\rm P} \exp
221: \left \{
222: ig \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dz^-\,\alpha (z^-,x_{\perp})
223: \right \}.\ee
224: In practice, $U(x^-,x_{\perp})=V(x_{\perp})$ for any
225: $x^-\gg 1/k^+$.
226:
227:
228: Note that the solution to the classical non-linear equation
229: is known exactly, which makes this approach particularly convenient
230: to study the non-linear physics at small $x$. The classical
231: approximation should be indeed appropriate in this regime, which
232: is characterized by weak coupling and large occupation numbers.
233: On the other hand, the weight function $W_\tau[\rho]$
234: is obtained via a quantum calculation in which the quantum
235: fluctuations with momenta $k^+\simle p^+ \simle P^+$ are
236: integrated out in layers of $p^+$, and in the background of
237: the classical fields ${\cal A}^i$ \cite{JKMW97,JKLW97,PI}.
238: This calculation captures the basic
239: mechanism leading to large gluon densities --- namely, the BFKL-type
240: of evolution towards small $x$ ---, while also including non-linear
241: effects (i.e., rescatterings among the produced gluons)
242: via the background fields. In the saturation regime, where one
243: expects color fields as strong as ${\cal A}^i\sim 1/g$
244: (corresponding, via eq.~(\ref{GCL}),
245: to gluon densities of order $1/\alpha_s$
246: \cite{AM1,JKMW97,AM2,SAT}), the background field calculation
247: must be carried out {\it exactly}, i.e., to all orders in ${\cal A}^i$.
248:
249: \subsection{The quantum evolution of the effective theory}
250: \label{QEVOL}
251:
252:
253: To describe the quantum evolution, it is convenient to introduce
254: an arbitrary separation scale $\Lambda^+$ such as
255: $k^+ \simle \Lambda^+ \ll P^+$, and assume that the
256: ``fast'' quantum modes with momenta $p^+ \gg\Lambda^+$ have been
257: already integrated out and replaced, to the accuracy of interest, by
258: a classical color source $\rho_a(\vec x)$ with weight function
259: $W_\Lambda[\rho]$. On the other hand, the ``soft'' gluons with momenta
260: $p^+ <\Lambda^+$ are still explicitly present in the theory.
261: The correlation functions at the soft scale
262: $k^+$ are then obtained from the following generating functional :
263: \be\labe{PART}
264: {Z}[J]\,=\,\int {\cal D}\rho\,\,W_\Lambda[\rho]
265: \,\,\left\{\frac{\int^\Lambda {\cal D}A_a^\mu\,
266: \delta(A^+_a)\,\,{\rm e}^{\,iS[A,\,\rho]-i\int J\cdot A}}
267: {\int^\Lambda {\cal D}A_a^\mu\,\delta(A^+_a)\,\,{\rm e}^{\,iS[A,\,\rho]}}
268: \right\}.\ee
269: where the ``external current'' $J^\mu_a$ is just a device to generate
270: Green's functions via functional differentiations,
271: and should not be confused with the physical source $\rho$.
272: Eq.~(\ref{PART}) is written fully in the LC gauge (in particular, $\rho$
273: is the LC-gauge color source), and involves
274: two functional integrals: ({\it a}) a quantum path integral
275: over the soft gluon fields $A^\mu$, which generates ($\rho$-dependent)
276: quantum expectation values at fixed $\rho$, e.g.,
277: \be\labe{2point}
278: \langle {\rm T}\,A^\mu(x)A^\nu(y)\rangle [\rho]
279: \,=\,\frac{\int^\Lambda {\cal D}A\,\delta(A^+)
280: \,\,A^\mu(x)A^\nu(y)\,\,{\rm e}^{\,iS[A,\,\rho]}}
281: {\int^\Lambda {\cal D}A\,\delta(A^+)\,\,{\rm e}^{\,iS[A,\,\rho]}}
282: ,\ee
283: and ({\it b}) a classical average over $\rho$.
284: As discussed in Paper I, eq.~(\ref{PART}) has the typical structure
285: to describe correlations in a glass.
286:
287:
288: The action $S[A,\,\rho]$ in eqs.~(\ref{PART}) and (\ref{2point})
289: reads as follows \cite{JKLW97} :
290: \be\label{ACTION}
291: S[A,\rho]\,=\,- \int d^4x \,{1 \over 4} \,F_{\mu\nu}^a F^{\mu\nu}_a
292: \,+\,{i \over {gN_c}} \int d^3 \vec x\, {\rm Tr}\,\Bigl\{ \rho(\vec x)
293: \,W[A^-](\vec x)\Bigr\}\,\equiv\,S_{YM}\,+\,S_W,\,\,
294: \ee
295: where $W[A^-]$ is a Wilson line in the temporal direction:
296: \be\label{WLINE}
297: W[A^-](\vec x)\, =\,{\rm P}\, \exp\left[\,ig\int dx^+ A^-(x) \right].
298: \ee
299: In the classical, or saddle point, approximation $\delta S/\delta A^\mu
300: =0$, the action (\ref{ACTION}) generates the desired equations
301: of motion, that is, eqs.~(\ref{cleq0}) with $A^-=0$. This shows that
302: the classical field in eqs.~(\ref{Atilde}) is the tree-level background
303: field in which propagate the quantum fluctuations.
304: The general non-linear structure of $S_W$ in eq.~(\ref{WLINE}),
305: which plays a role only for the quantum corrections (in that it
306: generates new interaction vertices; cf. Sect. \ref{FRULES}
307: below), reflects our eikonal approximation for the interaction
308: between fast particles moving in the plus direction (here represented
309: by $\rho$) and the comparatively slow gluon fields.
310:
311:
312: In the above formulae, the intermediate scale $\Lambda^+$
313: enters at two levels: as an upper cutoff on the
314: longitudinal momenta $p^+$ of the quantum gluons, and in
315: the weight function $W_\Lambda[\rho]$ for the classical source.
316: Of course, the
317: final results for correlation functions at the scale $k^+$
318: must be independent of this arbitrary scale :
319: \be
320: \Lambda^+ \frac{\del {Z}[J]}{\del \Lambda^+}\,=\,0.\ee
321: %\equiv\,\frac{\del {Z}[J]}{\del \tau}\,=\,0,\ee
322: This constraint can be formulated as a
323: renormalization group equation (RGE) for $W_\Lambda[\rho]$ which
324: governs its evolution with decreasing $\Lambda^+$.
325:
326: The initial conditions for this evolution are determined by the
327: properties of the hadronic matter at $\Lambda^+ \sim P^+$.
328: These are not really under control in perturbation theory,
329: but one can try to rely on some non-perturbative model,
330: like the valence quark model. The initial conditions might be under better
331: control in the high density environment of a very large nucleus,
332: since we expect the coupling constant to be weaker at high density.
333: The indeterminancy of evolution equations due to initial conditions is hardly a new problem in QCD, since the DGLAP and BFKL equations are both
334: limited by such uncertainty. In these cases, and we also hope
335: here\footnote{The approximate solutions to the RGE recently
336: found in Ref. \cite{SAT} appear to confirm this expectation.},
337: the solution of the evolution equation for arbitrarily high energies
338: is universal and its generic properties are largerly independent of the initial conditions.
339:
340:
341: Starting with these initial conditions, one then proceeds with the
342: quantum evolution down to the soft scale of interest
343: $\Lambda^+ \sim xP^+\ll P^+$.
344: In this process, the original source at the scale
345: $P^+$ gets dressed by the quantum fluctuations with momenta
346: $\Lambda^+ < |p^+| < P^+$. We treat this process in perturbation theory, in the ``leading logarithmic approximation'' (LLA)\footnote{Indeed, it is only
347: to this accuracy that the assumed separation of scales in the problem is
348: maintained by quantum corrections.}
349: --- i.e., by retaining only the terms
350: enhanced by the large logarithm $\ln(1/x)$, to all orders in
351: $(\alpha_s\ln(1/x))^n$) ---,
352: which, by itself, is also the accuracy of the BFKL equation,
353: but we go beyond BFKL in that we resum also finite density effects,
354: which are expected to become increasingly
355: important as we go to smaller and smaller $\Lambda^+$ (or Bjorken's $x$).
356: We do that by performing a background field calculation, that is,
357: by integrating out the quantum fluctuations at one step
358: in the background of the classical field generated by the color
359: source at the previous step, with the background field simulating
360: (via its correlations) the finite density effects in the system.
361:
362: To be more explicit,
363: let us describe one step in this renormalization group procedure
364: in some detail. Assume that we know the effective theory at
365: the scale $\Lambda^+$ --- as specified by the
366: corresponding weight function $W_\Lambda[\rho]\equiv W_\tau[\rho]$,
367: with $\tau=\ln(P^+/\Lambda^+)$ ---, and we are interested
368: in correlations at the softer scale
369: $k^+ \sim b\Lambda^+$ with $b\ll 1$, but such as $\alpha_s\ln(1/b)< 1$, for
370: perturbation theory in powers of $\alpha_s\ln(1/b)$ to make sense.
371: Our purpose is to construct the new weight function
372: $W_{b\Lambda}[\rho]\equiv W_{\tau+\Delta\tau}[\rho]$,
373: with $\Delta\tau\equiv \ln(1/b)$, which would determine the
374: gluon correlations at this softer scale. As compared to
375: $W_\tau[\rho]$, this new weight function must include also the
376: quantum effects induced by the ``semi-fast'' gluons
377: with longitudinal momenta in the strip
378: \be\labe{strip}\,\,
379: b\Lambda^+ \,\,\ll\,\, |p^+|\,\, \ll\,\,\Lambda^+\,.\ee
380: To compute these effects, it is convenient to decompose the gluon field
381: in eq.~(\ref{PART}) as follows
382: \be
383: A^\mu_c\,=\,{\cal A}^\mu_c[\rho]+a^\mu_c+\delta A^\mu_c,\ee
384: where ${\cal A}^\mu_c$ is the tree-level field,
385: $a^\mu_c$ represents the semi-fast fluctuations, and
386: $\delta A^\mu_c$ refers to the remaining modes with
387: $|p^+| \le b\Lambda^+$.
388: By integrating out the fields $a^\mu$, some
389: new correlations are induced at the soft scale $b\Lambda^+$
390: via the coupling $\delta A^-_c\delta\rho_c$,
391: where $\delta\rho_c$
392: is the color charge of the semi-fast gluons.
393: These correlations have to be computed to lowest order
394: in $\alpha_s\ln(1/b)$, but to all orders in the
395: background fields ${\cal A}^i$.
396: This is essentially an one-loop calculation, but with the exact
397: background field propagator of the semi-fast gluons.
398: The new correlations are eventually absorbed
399: into the functional change $\Delta W \equiv W_{\tau+\Delta\tau} - W_\tau$
400: in the weight function. Since $\Delta W\propto \Delta \tau$,
401: this evolution is most conveniently formulated as a (functional)
402: renormalization group equation for $W_\tau[\rho]$, which reads
403: \cite{JKLW97,PI}
404: \be\label{RGE}
405: {\del W_\tau[\rho] \over {\del \tau}}\,=\,\alpha_s
406: \left\{ {1 \over 2} {\delta^2 \over {\delta
407: \rho_\tau^a(x_\perp) \delta \rho_\tau^b(y_\perp)}} [W_\tau\chi_{xy}^{ab}] -
408: {\delta \over {\delta \rho_\tau^a(x_\perp)}}
409: [W_\tau\sigma_{x}^a] \right\}\,,
410: \ee
411: in compact notation where repeated color indices
412: (and coordinates) are understood to be summed (integrated) over. The
413: coefficients $\sigma_{x}^a\equiv \sigma_a(x_\perp)$ and
414: $\chi_{xy}^{ab}\equiv\chi_{ab}(x_\perp,y_\perp)$ in the above
415: equation are related to the 1-point and 2-point functions
416: of the color charge $\delta\rho_a(x)$
417: of the semi-fast gluons via the following relations:
418: \be\label{sigperp}
419: \alpha_s\ln{1\over b}\,\sigma_a ({x}_\perp)&\equiv &
420: \int dx^- \,\langle\delta \rho_a(x)\rangle\,,\nn
421: \alpha_s\ln{1\over b}\,\chi_{ab}(x_\perp, y_\perp)&\equiv &
422: \int dx^- \int dy^-\,
423: \langle\delta \rho_a(x^+,\vec x)\,
424: \delta \rho_b(x^+,\vec y)\rangle\,,\ee
425: where the brackets denote the average over quantum fluctuations
426: in the background of the tree-level color fields ${\cal A}^i$,
427: as shown in eq.~(\ref{2point}).
428:
429: In writing eq.~(\ref{RGE}), we have also anticipated the longitudinal
430: structure of the quantum evolution, which will become manifest only
431: after performing the quantum calculations in the next sections. Specifically,
432: we shall see that the {\it induced source} $\langle\delta \rho_a(x)\rangle$
433: ($\equiv$ the correction to $\rho$ generated by the gluons
434: with $p^+$ in the strip (\ref{strip})) has support at
435: % $x^-$ in the strip
436: \be\label{stripx-}
437: 1/\Lambda^+\,\,\simle\,\,x^-\,\,\simle\,\,1/(b\Lambda^+)\,.\ee
438: By induction, we shall deduce that $\rho_a(\vec x)$ ($\equiv$ the color
439: source generated by the quantum evolution down to
440: $\Lambda^+=P^+{\rm e}^{-\tau}$) has support
441: at\footnote{The fact that the source has support at {\it
442: positive} $x^-$, rather than at generic $x^-$ with $|x^-|\simle x^-_\tau$
443: will be seen to be related to our specific gauge-fixing prescription;
444: cf. Sect. \ref{sec:sigmaA}.}
445: $0\le x^-\simle x^-_\tau$ with
446: \be\label{xtau}
447: x^-_\tau\,\equiv\, 1/\Lambda^+\,=\,x^-_0{\rm e}^{\tau},\qquad
448: x^-_0\,\equiv\, 1/P^+\,.\ee
449: Thus, the color source is built in layers of $x^-$, with a one-to-one
450: correspondence between the $x^-$--coordinate of a given layer and the
451: $p^+$--momenta of the modes that have been integrated to generate that layer.
452: %This correspondence is most conveniently expressed
453: %in terms of the corresponding {\sl rapidities}. We have already
454: %introduced the {\sl momentum} rapidity
455: %$\tau\equiv\ln(P^+/\Lambda^+) = \ln(1/x)$ to specify
456: %the longitudinal momentum. Let us similarly introduce
457: %a {\sl space-time} rapidity $\eta$ to indicate the
458: %longitudinal coordinate $x^-\,$; this is defined as (for positive $x^-$):
459: %\be\label{etarapdef} \eta
460: When some new quantum modes, with rapidities
461: $\tau <\tau' <\tau+\Delta\tau$, are integrated out,
462: the preexisting color source at
463: $0 < x^-< x^-_\tau$ % (or {\sl space-time} rapidities $\eta <\tau$)
464: remains unchanged, but some new source is added in
465: the interval (\ref{stripx-}).
466: %(i.e., $x^-_\tau < x^-< x^-_{\tau+\Delta\tau}$).
467: Because of that, %the corresponding change in the weight function
468: $\Delta W \equiv W_{\tau+\Delta\tau} - W_\tau$ involves only the
469: change in $\rho_a$ within that last interval. In the
470: continuum limit, this generates the functional derivatives of
471: $W_\tau$ with respect to $\rho_a(\vec x)$ at $x^-=x^-_\tau$
472: {\it only}, that is, the derivatives with respect to
473: \be\label{rhotau}
474: \rho_{\tau}^a(x_\perp)
475: \,\equiv\, \rho^a(x^-=x^-_\tau,x_\perp),\ee
476: as shown in eq.~(\ref{RGE}).
477:
478: On the other hand, given the separation of scales in the problem,
479: the detailed longitudinal structure of the quantum effects should
480: not be too important, and this too has been anticipated in writing
481: eqs.~(\ref{RGE})--(\ref{sigperp}): In the same way as the original
482: source with support at $x^-\simle 1/\Lambda^+$ appears effectively
483: as a $\delta$-function to the semi-fast gluons (with
484: wavelenghts $\Delta x^-\sim 1/p^+ \gg 1/\Lambda^+$),
485: the induced source $\langle\delta \rho\rangle$,
486: although relatively delocalized as compared
487: to $\rho$ (cf. eq.~(\ref{stripx-})), appears to the
488: soft gluons with $k^+\simle b\Lambda^+$ as a rather
489: sharp color distribution around $x^-\simeq x^-_\tau$.
490: Thus, the soft gluons can probe only
491: %(and also the
492: %small-$x$ external probe in DIS) are sensitive only to the
493: the {\it two-dimensional} color charge distribution
494: in the transverse plane, as obtained after integrating out $x^-$,
495: cf. eq.~(\ref{sigperp}).
496: This explains the 2-dimensional structure of the coefficients
497: $\sigma$ and $\chi$ in the RGE (\ref{RGE}).
498:
499:
500: Eq.~(\ref{RGE}) has the structure of the diffusion equation: It
501: is a second-order (functional) differential equation whose r.h.s.
502: is a total derivative (as necessary to conserve the total
503: probability; cf. Sect. \ref{sect:PROP}). Thus, this equation describes
504: the quantum evolution as a diffusion (with diffusion ``time'' $\tau$)
505: of the probability density $W_\tau[\rho]$
506: in the functional space spanned by $\rho_a(x^-,x_\perp)$.
507: For this equation to be useful, its coefficients $\sigma$
508: and $\chi$ must be known explicitly as functionals of $\rho$.
509: It is therefore more convenient to use the COV-gauge source
510: $\tilde\rho_a$, or the associated Coulomb field $\alpha_a$,
511: as the functional variable to be averaged over. Indeed,
512: $\sigma$ and $\chi$ depend upon the color source
513: via the classical field ${\cal A}^i$, which is most directly
514: related to $\alpha_a$, cf. eqs.~(\ref{Atilde}).
515:
516: As explained in Ref. \cite{PI}, when going from the (background)
517: LC-gauge to the COV-gauge, the induced color charge $\sigma$ acquires
518: a new contribution, in addition to the color rotation with matrix
519: $U^\dagger$. This is so because the transformation between
520: the two gauges depends upon the charge content in the problem: this
521: was $\rho$ at the initial scale $\Lambda^+$, thus giving a gauge
522: transformation $U^\dagger[\rho]$, but it becomes $\rho+\delta\rho$,
523: with fluctuating $\delta\rho$, at the new scale $b\Lambda^+$,
524: thus inducing a fluctuating component in the corresponding
525: gauge function $U^\dagger[\rho+\delta\rho]$.
526: After averaging out the quantum fluctuations, one is left with a RGE for
527: $W_\tau[\tilde\rho]$ which is formally similar to eq.~(\ref{RGE}), but
528: with $\rho \to \tilde\rho$,
529: $\chi\to \tilde\chi$, and $\sigma\to \tilde\sigma$, where:
530: \begin{mathletters}
531: \label{tildesc}
532: \be\label{tildechi}
533: \tilde \chi_{ab}(x_\perp,y_\perp)&\equiv&
534: V^{\dagger}_{ac}(x_\perp)\,
535: \chi_{cd}(x_\perp,y_\perp)\,V_{d b}(y_\perp),\\
536: \tilde\sigma_a (x_\perp)&\equiv&
537: V^{\dagger}_{ab}(x_\perp)\,\sigma_b(x_\perp)- \delta\sigma_a(x_\perp),
538: \label{tildesig} \\
539: \delta\sigma_a(x_\perp)&\equiv&
540: {g\over 2}\,f^{abc}\int d^2y_\perp\,\,
541: \tilde\chi_{cb}(x_\perp,y_\perp)\,
542: \langle y_\perp|\,\frac{1}{-\grad^2_\perp}\,|
543: x_\perp\rangle\,,\label{sigclas}
544: \ee\end{mathletters}
545: with $V$ and $V^\dagger$ as defined in eq.~(\ref{v}).
546: The correction $-\delta\sigma$, to be referred to as the
547: ``classical polarization'', is the result of the quantum evolution
548: of the gauge transformation itself.
549:
550: It turns out that the RGE is most conveniently written as
551: an equation for $W_\tau[\alpha]\equiv
552: W_\tau[\tilde\rho= - \nabla^2_\perp \alpha]$, in which case it reads:
553: \be\labe{RGEA0}
554: {\del W_\tau[\alpha] \over {\del \tau}}\,=\,\alpha_s
555: \left\{ {1 \over 2} {\delta^2 \over {\delta
556: \alpha_\tau^a(x_\perp) \delta \alpha_\tau^b(y_\perp)}}
557: [W_\tau\eta_{xy}^{ab}] -
558: {\delta \over {\delta \alpha_\tau^a(x_\perp)}}
559: [W_\tau\nu_{x}^a] \right\}\,,
560: \ee
561: where $\alpha^a_\tau(x_\perp)\equiv
562: \alpha^a(x^- = x^-_\tau,x_\perp)$ (cf. eq.~(\ref{rhotau})), and
563: \begin{mathletters}
564: \be\label{nudef}
565: \nu^a (x_\perp)&\equiv&\int d^2z_\perp\,
566: \langle x_\perp|\,\frac{1}{-\grad^2_\perp}\,|z_\perp\rangle\,
567: \tilde\sigma^a (z_\perp),\\
568: \eta^{ab}(x_\perp,y_\perp)&\equiv&\int d^2z_\perp \int d^2u_\perp\,
569: \langle x_\perp|\,\frac{1}{-\grad^2_\perp}\,|z_\perp\rangle\,
570: \tilde\chi^{ab}(z_\perp,u_\perp)\,
571: \langle u_\perp|\,\frac{1}{-\grad^2_\perp}\,|y_\perp\rangle\,.
572: \label{etadef}\ee
573: \label{nueta}\end{mathletters}
574: This form has, in particular, the advantage to eliminate any explicit
575: reference to the arbitrary infrared cutoff $\mu$ which enters
576: the solution to eq.~(\ref{alpharho}) for $\alpha$ :
577: \be\labe{alpha}
578: \alpha ({\vec x})
579: %\,=\,\int d^2y_\perp\,
580: %\langle x_\perp|\,\frac{1}{-\grad^2_\perp}\,|y_\perp\rangle\,
581: %\tilde\rho (x^-,{\bf y}_\perp)
582: \,=\,-\int \frac{d^2y_\perp}{2\pi}\,
583: \ln\Bigl(|{\bf x}_\perp - {\bf y}_\perp|\mu\Bigr)\,
584: \tilde\rho (x^-,{\bf y}_\perp).\ee
585: It is our ultimate goal in this paper to compute explicitly the
586: quantities $\eta$ and $\nu$ as functionals of the field
587: $\alpha$, and thus completely specify the RGE (\ref{RGEA0}).
588:
589:
590:
591: \subsection{Feynman rules for $\chi$ and $\sigma$}
592: \label{FRULES}
593:
594: The basic quantum calculation is that of the quantities
595: $\chi$ and $\sigma$ in the LC gauge.
596: The necessary Feynman rules can be
597: readily derived from the action (\ref{ACTION}) \cite{JKLW97,PI}, and are
598: summarized here for later reference. Eqs.~(\ref{sigperp}) involve the color
599: charge $\delta\rho_a$ of the semi-fast fields $a^\mu_c$. To
600: the order of interest, this reads
601: \begin{equation}\label{delta12}
602: \delta \rho_a (x) =\delta \rho_a^{(1)} (x)+\delta \rho_a^{(2)} (x),
603: \end{equation}
604: where $\delta \rho^{(1)}$ is linear in the fluctuations
605: $a^\mu$, while $\delta \rho^{(2)}$ is quadratic\footnote{To compare
606: with the corresponding formulae in Paper I (see, e.g., eqs. (4.41)--(4.42)
607: in Ref. \cite{PI}), please note a change in our
608: normalization conventions: Here, the various fields preserve their
609: natural normalization fixed by the action (\ref{ACTION}).
610: By contrast, in Paper I we have rescaled the classical fields
611: and sources by a factor $1/g$.}:
612: \be\label{rho10}
613: \delta \rho_a^{(1)} (x) & = &
614: -2i g{\cal F}^{+i}_{ac} (\vec x) a^{ic} (x) + \nonumber \\
615: & & +g\rho^{ac} (\vec x)
616: \int dy^+ \langle x^+ |{\rm PV}\,{1 \over i\partial^-} |y^+ \rangle
617: a^{c-}(y^+,\vec x), \\
618: \delta \rho_a^{(2)}(x)& = &
619: g f^{abc} [\partial^+ a^{b}_{i}(x)
620: ]a^{c}_{i}(x)
621: \nonumber\\ &{-}& (g^2/N_c) \,\rho^{b}({\vec x})
622: \int dy^+ a^{-c}(y^+,{\vec x}) \int dz^+ a^{-d}(z^+,{\vec x})
623: \nonumber\\ &{}& \nonumber\,\,\,\, \times\,
624: \biggl\{\theta (z^+ -y^+)
625: \theta (y^+ -x^+) {\rm Tr} \,(T^a T^c T^d T^b)
626: \\ &{}&\nonumber
627: \qquad+\ \theta (x^+ -z^+) \theta (z^+ -y^+) {\rm Tr} \,(T^a T^b T^c T^d)
628: \\ &{}&\qquad
629: +\ \theta (z^+ -x^+) \theta (x^+ -y^+) {\rm Tr}\,(T^a T^d T^b T^c) \biggr\}.
630: \label{rho2}
631: \ee
632: In the right hand sides of these equations, the terms involving
633: $a^i_c$ come from the three-gluon vertex in
634: $S_{YM}$, while the terms involving $a^-_c$
635: come from the two- and three-point vertices in $S_W$.
636: It is understood here that only the soft modes with
637: $k^+\simle b\Lambda^+$ are to be kept in the products of fields.
638:
639: Consider first the following charge-charge
640: correlator\footnote{Our notations are such that
641: $\hat\chi$ and $\chi$ or $\hat\sigma$ and $\sigma$ differ
642: just by a factor of $\alpha_s\ln(1/b)$.} which enters
643: eq.~(\ref{sigperp}) for $\chi$ :
644: \be\label{chi00}
645: {\hat \chi}_{ab}({\vec x},{\vec y}) \, \equiv \,
646: \langle\delta \rho_a(x^+,\vec x)\,
647: \delta \rho_b(x^+,\vec y)\rangle\,.\ee
648: By time homogeneity (recall that the background fields
649: ${\cal A}^i$ are static), this equal-time 2-point function
650: is actually independent of time. When evaluating $\hat\chi$
651: within our present accuracy,
652: it is sufficient to keep only the terms of first order in fluctuations:
653: $\delta \rho \sim \delta \rho^{(1)}$. These are given by
654: eq.~(\ref{rho10}) which implies (in condensed notations,
655: where the PV prescription in $1/p^-$ and the condition
656: $x^+=y^+$ are implicit):
657: \be\label{chi0}
658: \hat\chi_{ab}(\vec x,\vec y)\,=\,g^2
659: \left\langle \left(-2i{\cal F}^{+i}
660: a^i + \,\rho {1 \over i\partial^-} a^- \right)_x^a
661: \left(
662: 2i a^i {\cal F}^{+i} +a^- {1 \over
663: i\partial^-} \rho \right)_y^b \right\rangle.
664: \ee
665: This involves the propagator
666: \be\label{delAcorr}
667: iG^{\mu\nu}_{ab}(x,y)[{\cal A}]&\equiv&
668: \langle {\rm T}\,a_a^\mu(x) a_b^\nu(y)\rangle\ee
669: of the semi-fast gluons in the background of the tree-level fields
670: ${\cal A}^i$, and in the LC-gauge ($a^+=0$).
671: Given the specific structure of the background field (\ref{Atilde}),
672: it has been possible to construct this
673: propagator {\it exactly}, i.e., to all orders in ${\cal A}^i$
674: \cite{AJMV95,HW98,PI}. The resulting expression, to be
675: extensively used in what follows, is presented in Appendix A.
676:
677: The construction of the propagator in Refs.
678: \cite{AJMV95,HW98,PI} has relied in an
679: essential way on the separation of scales in the problem:
680: Because of their low $p^+$ momenta ($p^+\ll \Lambda^+$),
681: the semi-fast gluons $a^\mu$ are unable to discriminate the
682: longitudinal structure of the source, but rather ``see'' this
683: as a $\delta$-function at $x^-=0$. One is thus reduced to the
684: problem of the scattering off a $\delta$-type potential,
685: whose solution is known exactly. But this also means that,
686: strictly speaking, the propagator (\ref{delAcorr}) is known
687: only far away from the support of the source
688: (for $|x^-| \gg 1/\Lambda^+$), where ${\cal A}^i$
689: takes the approximate form in eq.~(\ref{APM}).
690: It is thus an important self-consistency check on the
691: calculations to follow to verify that $\chi$ and $\sigma$
692: are indeed insensitive to the internal structure of the source.
693:
694: Still for the construction of the propagator, it has been
695: more convenient to impose the strip restriction (\ref{strip})
696: on the LC-energy $p^-$, rather than on the longitudinal
697: momentum $p^+$ \cite{PI}. Indeed, to LLA, the quantum effects are
698: due to nearly on-shell gluons, for which the constraint (\ref{strip})
699: is equivalent to the following constraint on $p^-$ :
700: \be\labe{strip-}\,
701: \Lambda^- \,\ll\, |p^-| \,\ll\, \Lambda^-/b\,,\ee
702: where $\Lambda^-\equiv Q_\perp^2/2\Lambda^+$, and
703: $Q_\perp$ is some typical transverse momentum.
704: (Recall that we assume all the transverse momenta
705: to be comparable; thus, to LLA, it makes no difference
706: what is the precise value of $Q_\perp$.)
707: But the condition (\ref{strip-}) is better adapted to the
708: present background field problem,
709: where we have homogeneity in time (so that we can work in
710: the $p^-$--representation), but strong
711: inhomogeneity in $x^-$ (cf. eqs.~(\ref{APM}) and (\ref{UTAF})).
712:
713: A final subtlety refers to
714: the choice of a gauge condition in the LC-gauge propagator:
715: Recall that, even after imposing the condition $A^+=0$,
716: one has still the freedom to perform $x^-$--independent
717: gauge transformations. This ambiguity shows up as an unphysical
718: pole at $p^+=0$ in the gluon propagator. Since in our calculations
719: with strip restriction on $p^-$, $p^+$ is not restricted anylonger,
720: an $i\epsilon$ prescription is needed to regulate this pole.
721: This is important since, as our calculations show,
722: the final results for $\chi$ and $\sigma$ are generally dependent
723: upon this $i\epsilon$ prescription.
724: In fact, the discrepancy between our results below and those
725: reported in Refs. \cite{JKW99} may be partially
726: attributed to using different gauge-fixing prescriptions.
727:
728: For consistency with the retarded boundary conditions
729: (${\cal A}^i\to 0$ for $x^- \to -\infty$)
730: imposed on the classical solution (\ref{Atilde}),
731: we shall use a retarded $i\epsilon$ prescription also
732: in the LC-gauge propagator of the quantum fluctuations (see Appendix A).
733: With this choice, the induced source $\langle\delta \rho\rangle$
734: appears to have support only at {\it positive} $x^-$, as shown
735: eq.~(\ref{stripx-}). We have also verified that, by using advanced
736: prescriptions (both in the classical and the quantum calculations),
737: the support of $\langle\delta \rho\rangle$ would be rather at {\it negative}
738: $x^-$ (but with $|x^-|$ still constrained as in eq.~(\ref{stripx-})).
739: In both cases, however, the same results are finally
740: obtained for $\chi$ and $\sigma$ after integrating out the
741: (prescription-dependent) longitudinal structure.
742: Thus, the RGE comes up the same with both retarded and advanced
743: prescriptions. On the other hand,
744: we have not been able to give a sense to calculations with
745: other prescriptions, like principal value or Leibbrandt-Mandelstam.
746: (For instance, when computed with a principal value prescription,
747: the coefficients $\sigma$ and $\chi$ appear to be sensitive to the
748: internal structure of the source in $x^-$, which contradicts the
749: assumed separation of scales.)
750:
751: We conclude this introductory section by giving
752: explicit expressions for $\chi$ and $\sigma$
753: in terms of the background field
754: propagator $G^{\mu\nu}_{ab}(x,y)$ of the semi-fast gluons.
755: For $\chi$, we use eqs.~(\ref{sigperp}) and (\ref{chi0}) to deduce that
756: \be\label{chi1}
757: \alpha_s\ln{1\over b}\,
758: \chi_{ab}({\bf x}_\perp,{\bf y}_\perp)\,=\,
759: \int dx^- \int dy^-\,\hat\chi_{ab}(\vec x,\vec y),\ee
760: with (in matrix notations)
761: \be\label{chi2}
762: \frac{1}{g^2}\,\hat \chi(\vec x, \vec y) &=&i\,
763: 2{\cal F}^{+i}_x\, \langle x|G^{ij}|y\rangle \,2{\cal F}^{+j}_y \, +\,
764: 2{\cal F}^{+i}_x\,\langle x|G^{i-}\,{1 \over i\partial^-}|y\rangle \, \rho_y
765: \nonumber\\&{}&\,\,\,\,-\,
766: \rho_x \, \langle x|{1 \over i\partial^-}\, G^{-i}|y\rangle \,
767: 2{\cal F}^{+i}_y\,+\,i
768: \rho_x \langle x|{1 \over i\partial^-} G^{--} {1 \over i\partial^-}
769: |y\rangle\,\rho_y.\ee
770: The equal-time limit is implicit here; it is achieved
771: by taking $y^+=x^++\epsilon$ within
772: the time-ordered propagator (\ref{delAcorr})
773: \cite{PI}. Diagramatically, all the above contributions to $\chi$
774: are represented by {\it tree-like} Feynman graphs (no loops),
775: with vertices proportional to $\rho$
776: or ${\cal F}^{+i}$ (see Fig. \ref{CHIFIG}).
777: Since, physically, these are quantum corrections associated
778: with the emission of a real (semi-fast) gluon, we shall sometimes
779: refer to $\chi$ or $\hat\chi$ as the {\it real correction}.
780: (In the weak field approximation, $\chi$ is responsible
781: for the real piece of the BFKL kernel \cite{JKLW97,PI};
782: see also Sect. \ref{sec:BFKL} below.)
783: \begin{figure}
784: \protect\epsfxsize=12.cm{\centerline{\epsfbox{CHIFIG.eps}}}
785: \caption{Feynman diagrams for the four contributions
786: to $\chi$ given in eq.~(\ref{chi2}).}
787: \label{CHIFIG}
788: \end{figure}
789:
790:
791:
792: To the same accuracy, the induced source $\langle\delta \rho\rangle$
793: involves only the terms in $\delta\rho$ of second order
794: in the fluctuations :
795: \be\labe{JIND}\,
796: \hat\sigma_a(\vec x)\,\equiv\,\langle\delta \rho_a(x)\rangle\,
797: \,=\,\langle\delta \rho_a^{(2)}(x)\rangle,\ee
798: with $\delta \rho_a^{(2)}$ given by eq.~(\ref{rho2}).
799: This yields
800: \be\label{sigma0}
801: \alpha_s\ln{1\over b}\,\sigma_a ({\bf x}_\perp)\,=\,
802: \int dx^- \, {\rm Tr } \,(T^a \hat\sigma(\vec x)),\ee
803: where:
804: \be\label{sigma}
805: \hat\sigma(\vec x)&\equiv&-g \partial^+_y G^{ii}(x,y)\Big |_{x=y}\,
806: +\,ig^2\rho({\vec x})\Bigl\langle x\bigg|
807: {1 \over i \partial^-} \,G^{--} {1 \over i\partial^-}\bigg|x
808: \Bigr\rangle\nn
809: &\equiv&\hat\sigma_1(\vec x)\,+\,\hat\sigma_2(\vec x).
810: \ee
811: In writing $\hat\sigma_2$ as above, we have used compact but
812: formal notations for the second contribution
813: to $\delta \rho_a^{(2)}$ in eq.~(\ref{rho2}), which is non-local
814: in time. Diagramatically, the two terms in eq.~(\ref{sigma})
815: are represented by the one-loop diagrams displayed
816: in Fig. \ref{SIGFIG}. These are vertex and self-energy corrections
817: which in the weak field limit (i.e., to linear order in $\rho$)
818: generate the virtual piece of the BFKL kernel \cite{JKLW97,PI}.
819: Accordingly, we shall refer to $\sigma$ or $\hat\sigma$ as the
820: {\it virtual correction}.
821:
822:
823: \begin{figure}
824: \protect\epsfxsize=14.cm{\centerline{\epsfbox{SIGFIG.eps}}}
825: \caption{Feynman diagrams for $\hat\sigma_1$ (a) and
826: $\hat\sigma_2$ (b,c,d). The wavy line with a blob denotes the
827: background field propagator of the semi-fast gluons;
828: the continuous line represents the source $\rho$; the precise
829: vertices can be read off eq.~(\ref{rho2}).}
830: \label{SIGFIG}
831: \end{figure}