1: \newpage
2: \section{\label{sec:iv}Weak annihilation in the rare radiative $B\to \rho\gamma$ decay
3: and the $B\to\gamma \ell\nu$ form factors}
4: Results obtained in the previous Chapter allow us to
5: fully describe semileptonic $B_{(s)}$ and $D_{(s)}$ decays.
6: We now discuss rare radiative decays of heavy mesons
7: induced by the flavour-changing neutral currents (FCNC) such as
8: $B\to K^*\gamma$ and $B\to\rho\gamma$ decays. This Chapter is based on Refs.
9: \cite{bmns,ms1}.
10:
11: The investigation of rare semileptonic $B$ decays induced by the
12: flavour-changing neutral current transitions $b\to s$ and $b\to d$ represents an important
13: test of the standard model or its extentions.
14: Rare decays are forbidden at the tree level in the standard model and occur
15: at the lowest order only through
16: loop diagrams. This fact opens the possibility to probe the structure of the
17: electroweak sector at large mass scales due to contributions of virtual particles
18: in the loop diagrams. Interesting
19: information about the structure of the theory is contained in the Wilson coefficents in the
20: effective Hamiltonian
21: which describes the $b\to s,d$ transition at low energies.
22: These Wilson coefficients take different values in different theories with testable
23: consequences in rare $B$ decays
24: \cite{hewett,rizzo,mmoriond,burdman_asym,mnsplb2,mnsplb3,mnsplb4,aliball}.
25:
26: Among rare $B$ decays the radiative decays $b\to s\gamma$ and $b\to d\gamma$ have the
27: largest probabilites. The $b\to s\gamma$ transitions are CKM favoured and have larger
28: branching ratios than the $b\to d\gamma$ transitions.
29: The $b\to s\gamma$ transition has been observed by CLEO in the exclusive channel
30: $B\to K^*\gamma$ in 1993 \cite{cleo_rare_excl} and measured inclusively in 1995
31: \cite{cleo_rare_incl}. The $B\to \rho\gamma$ decay will be extensively studied by BaBar and BELLE.
32:
33: Any reliable extraction of the perturbative
34: (short-distance) effects encoded in the Wilson coefficients of the effective
35: Hamiltonian requires an accurate separation of the nonperturbative
36: (long-distance) contributions, which therefore should be known with
37: high accuracy.
38:
39: In rare exclusive semileptonic decays one faces several types of
40: long-distance contributions which arise in the meson transition amplitude of the
41: effective Hamiltonian, which contains penguin and 4-quark operators
42: (see \cite{gp} for more details).
43:
44: The dominant long-distance effects for the radiative decays arise from
45: the electromagnetic penguin operator and is given in terms of the form factor
46: $T_1(q^2=0)$.
47:
48: The 4-quark operators generate many different contributions:
49:
50: One of them is the so-called long-range charming penguins, i.e. intermediate
51: $c\bar c$ states in the $q^2$-channel which include the $c\bar c$ resonances
52: ($\psi, \psi'$, ...) and the charmed hadronic continuum.
53: The charming penguins are crucial for rare semileptonic decays $b\to (s,d)l^+l^-$,
54: but provide only a small contribution for the radiative decays $b\to (s,d)\gamma$
55: \cite{kruger,nonfact,mplb3}: In the factorization approximation
56: the $c\bar c$ contribution precisely vanishes due to the gauge invariance \cite{mplb3},
57: whereas the nonfactorizable effects turn out to be only at the level of few percent
58: \cite{nonfact}.
59:
60: Another effect of the 4-quark operators is the so-called weak annihilation which
61: corresponds to the annihilation of quarks in the channel of the initial or
62: final mesons.
63:
64: In the $B\to K^*\gamma$ decay the weak annihilation is negligible compared to the
65: penguin effect: it is suppressed by two powers of the small parameter $\lambda\simeq 0.2$
66: of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix. In $B\to \rho\gamma$
67: both effects have the same order in $\lambda$ and must be taken into account.
68:
69: The penguin contribution is known rather well.
70: On the other hand, the WA in $B\to \rho\gamma$ has been studied in less detail: the relevant
71: form factors were analysed within sum rules \cite{wa-sr1,wa-sr2}
72: and perturbative QCD \cite{korch}. However, some contributions to these form factors were
73: neglected. These contributions may be relevant if precise measurements become available.
74:
75: We now apply the dispersion approach to the weak annihilation in the $B^-\to \rho^-\gamma$ decay.
76:
77: In the factorization approximation \cite{neubertstech} the weak-annihilation amplitude can be represented as the product
78: of meson leptonic decay constants and matrix elements of the weak current between
79: meson and photon. The latter contain the meson-photon transition form factors and
80: contact terms which are determined by the equations of motion. The photon can be emitted from the
81: loop containing the $b$ quark which is described by $B\gamma$ transition form factors. It can also
82: be emitted from the loop containing only light quarks described by the $\rho\gamma$
83: transition form factors (Fig \ref{fig:diag}).
84:
85: \begin{center}
86: \begin{figure}[hb]
87: \mbox{\epsfig{file=ch4-fig1.eps,width=12cm}}
88: \caption{\label{fig:diag}
89: Diagrams describing the weak annihilation process for $B\to\rho\gamma$ in the
90: factorization approximation:
91: (a) The photon is emitted from the loop containing the $b$ quark,
92: (b) The photon is emitted from the loop containing only light quarks.}
93: \end{figure}
94: \end{center}
95:
96: We calculate the $B\gamma$ form factors within our relativistic dispersion approach which
97: expresses these form factors in terms of the $B$ meson wave function.
98: We demonstrate that the form factors calculated by the dispersion approach
99: behave in the limit $m_b\to\infty$ in agreement with perturbative QCD.
100: The $B$ meson wave function was previously tested in the $B\to$ light meson weak decays and
101: is known quite well, allowing us to provide reliable numerical estimates for the $B\gamma$ form factors.
102:
103: The $\rho\gamma$ transition form factor is related to the divergence of the vector and
104: axial-vector currents. In the case of the axial-vector current it is
105: proportional to the light-quark masses if the classical equation of motion is applied.
106: Because the quark momenta in the loop are high, these masses have to be identified with
107: current quark masses. For this reason the corresponding $\rho\gamma$ form factor was neglected in previous
108: analyses \cite{wa-sr1,wa-sr2}.
109: We find however that this argument is not correct: this form factor
110: remains finite in the limit of vanishing light quark mass $m\to 0$ and behaves like
111: $\sim M_\rho f_\rho/M_B^2$ which means the violation of the classical equation of motion.
112: Here we present the result for the $\rho\gamma$ transition form factor.
113: A detailed discussion of the anomaly appearing for the matrix element
114: $\langle \rho\gamma|\partial_\nu A_\nu|0\rangle$ can be found in Ref. \cite{ms1}
115:
116: Finally, we provide numerical estimates of the weak-annihilation amplitude
117: taking into account the $B\gamma$, $\rho\gamma$ transition form factors, and the
118: contact term contributions.
119:
120: In section \ref{sec:iv.1} the effective Hamiltonian for the $b\to d$ transition and the general
121: structure of the amplitude are presented. In Section \ref{sec:iv.2} we discuss the photon emission from the
122: $B$ meson loop and obtain the $B\gamma$ transition form factors within the dispersion
123: approach.
124: Section \ref{sec:iv.3} contains results for the $\rho\gamma$ transition form factors.
125: In Section \ref{sec:iv.4} the numerical estimates are given. The concluding Section \ref{sec:iv.5}
126: summarises our results for the weak annihilation.
127:
128: %\newpage
129: %____________________________________________________________________________________
130: \subsection{\label{sec:iv.1}The effective Hamiltonian, the amplitude and the decay rate}
131: The amplitude of the weak radiative
132: $B\to \rho$ transition is given by the matrix element of the effective Hamiltonian
133: for the $b\to d$ transition
134: \begin{eqnarray}
135: A(B\to\rho\gamma)=\langle \gamma(q_1)\rho(q_2)|H_{\rm eff}(b\to d)|B(p) \rangle,
136: \end{eqnarray}
137: where $p$ is the $B$ momentum, $q_2$ is the $\rho$ momentum, and $q_1$ is the photon
138: momentum, $p=q_1+q_2$, $q_1^2=0$, $q_2^2=M_\rho^2$, $p^2=M_B^2$.
139: The effective weak Hamiltonian has the structure\cite{nunu,gws,burasmuenz,ali}:
140: \begin{eqnarray}
141: \label{Heff}
142: H_{\rm eff}(b\to d) &=& \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\,\xi_t
143: C_{7\gamma}(\mu){\cal O}_{7\gamma}
144: -\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}{\xi_u}
145: \left (C_1(\mu){\cal O}_1+C_2(\mu){\cal O}_2\right),
146: \end{eqnarray}
147: where only operators relevant for the penguin and weak ahnnihilation effects are listed.
148: $G_F$ is the Fermi constant, $\xi_q=V^*_{qd}V_{qb}$, $C_i$'s are the Wilson
149: coefficients and ${\cal O}_i$'s are the basis operators
150: \begin{eqnarray}
151: {\cal O}_{7\gamma} &=& \frac{e}{8\pi^2}\,
152: \bar d_{\alpha}\sigma_{\mu\nu}
153: m_b(\mu)\left (1+\gamma_5\right )\, b_{\alpha}\, F_{\mu\nu}, \\
154: {\cal O}_1 &=& \bar d_{\alpha}\gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma_5)u_{\alpha}\;
155: \bar u_{\beta}\gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma_5) b_{\beta},\nonumber
156: \\
157: {\cal O}_2 &=& \bar d_{\alpha}\gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma_5) u_{\beta}\;
158: \bar u_{\beta}\gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma_5) b_{\alpha}.
159: \end{eqnarray}
160: with $e=\sqrt{4\pi\alpha_{\rm em}}$. Other notations are given in Eq. (\ref{notations}).
161:
162: The amplitude can be parametrized as follows
163: \begin{eqnarray}
164: A(B^-\to\rho^-\gamma)=\frac{eG_F}{\sqrt{2}}
165: \left[
166: \epsilon_{q_1\epsilon^\ast_1 q_2 \epsilon_2^\ast}F_{\rm PC}
167: +i \epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} \left(g_{\nu\mu}\,pq_1-p_\mu q_{1\nu}\right)F_{\rm PV}
168: \right],
169: \end{eqnarray}
170: where $F_{\rm PC}$ and $F_{\rm PV}$ are the parity-conserving and
171: parity-violating invariant amplitudes, respectively.
172: $\epsilon_2$($\epsilon_1$) is the
173: $\rho$-meson (photon) polarization vector. We use the short-hand notation
174: $\epsilon_{abcd}=\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}a^{\alpha}b^{\beta}c^{\mu}d^{\nu}$
175: for any 4-vectors $a,b,c,d$.
176:
177: For the decay rate one finds
178: \begin{eqnarray}
179: \label{rate}
180: \Gamma(B^-\to\rho^-\gamma)=\frac{G^2_F\,\alpha_{em}}{16}M_B^3
181: \left(1-{M^2_\rho}/{M_B^2}\right)^3
182: \left( |F_{\rm PC}|^2+|F_{\rm PV}|^2 \right).
183: \end{eqnarray}
184: %\newpage
185:
186: %*************************************************************************************************************************
187: \subsubsection{The penguin amplitude}
188: The main contribution to the amplitude is given by the
189: electromagnetic penguin operator $O_{7\gamma}$:
190: \begin{eqnarray}
191: A_{\rm peng}(B\to\rho\gamma)&=&
192: -\frac{eG_F}{\sqrt{2}}\xi_t C_7\frac{m_b}{2\pi^2} T_1(0)
193: \left(
194: \epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^* q_2 \epsilon_2^*}
195: +i\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}(g_{\nu\mu}\,pq_1-p_\mu q_{1\nu})
196: \right),
197: \end{eqnarray}
198: where $T_1$ is the form factor of the $B\to\rho$ transition through
199: the tensor current \cite{wsb,m1,m2,ms}.
200: The corresponding contribution to the invariant amplitudes is therefore
201: \begin{eqnarray}
202: \label{fpeng}
203: F^{\rm peng}_{\rm PC}=F^{\rm peng}_{\rm PV}=-\xi_t C_7\frac{m_b}{2\pi^2}T_1(0).
204: \end{eqnarray}
205:
206: %*************************************************************************************************************************
207: \subsubsection{The weak annihilation amplitude}
208: The radiative $B\to\rho \gamma$ transition also receives contribution from the
209: 4-fermion operators ${\cal O}_1$ and ${\cal O}_2$.
210: For the charged $B^-\to\rho^-(q_2)\gamma(q_1)$ transition the corresponding amplitude reads
211: \begin{eqnarray}
212: \label{WA}
213: A_{\rm WA}(B^-\to\rho^-\gamma)&=&-\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\xi_u
214: \langle \rho(q_2)\gamma(q_1)|\bar d\gamma_\nu(1-\gamma_5)u\cdot
215: \bar u\gamma_\nu(1-\gamma_5)b|B(p)\rangle,
216: \end{eqnarray}
217: In what follows we suppress the lable WA.
218: Neglecting the nonfactorizable soft-gluon exchanges, i.e. assuming vacuum saturation,
219: the complicated matrix element in Eq. (\ref{WA}) is reduced to simpler quantities -
220: the meson-photon matrix elements of the bilinear quark currents and the
221: meson decay constants. The latter are defined as usual
222: \begin{eqnarray}
223: \langle \rho(q_2)|\bar d\gamma_\nu u|0\rangle &=& \epsilon_{2\nu}^\ast M_\rho f_\rho, \qquad f_\rho>0,
224: \nonumber \\
225: \langle 0|\bar u\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 b|B(p)\rangle &=& ip_\nu f_B,\qquad f_B>0.
226: \end{eqnarray}
227: It is convenient to isolate the parity-conserving contribution which emerges from the
228: product of the two equal-parity currents, and the parity-violating contribution
229: which emerges from the product of the two opposite-parity currents.
230:
231: %\subsubsection{The parity-violating amplitude}
232: \vspace{.4cm}
233: \underline{\it The parity-violating contribution}
234: \vspace{.4cm}
235:
236: The parity-violating contribution to the weak annihilation amplitude
237: has the form
238: \begin{eqnarray}
239: \label{apva}
240: A_{\rm PV}(B\to\rho\gamma)&=&\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\xi_u a_1
241: \left\{
242: \langle \rho\gamma|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
243: \langle 0|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B \rangle
244: +
245: \langle \rho|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
246: \langle \gamma|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B \rangle \right\}.
247: \end{eqnarray}
248: Here $a_1$ is an effective Wilson coefficient, which we take as $a_1=C_1+C_2/N_c$
249: at the scale $\sim$ 5 GeV.
250:
251: It is convenient to denote
252: \begin{eqnarray}
253: A^{\rm PV}_1=\langle \rho^-(q_2)|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
254: \langle \gamma(q_1)|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B^-(p) \rangle
255: \end{eqnarray}
256: and
257: \begin{eqnarray}
258: A^{\rm PV}_2=
259: \langle \rho^-(q_2)\gamma(q_1)|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
260: \langle 0|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B^-(p) \rangle.
261: \end{eqnarray}
262:
263:
264: \noindent 1. Let us start with $A^{\rm PV}_1$.
265: One can write
266: \begin{eqnarray}
267: \langle \gamma(q_1)|\bar u \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 b|B^-(p) \rangle=
268: e\,\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} T^B_{\mu\nu}
269: \end{eqnarray}
270: where
271: \begin{eqnarray}
272: T^B_{\mu\nu}(p,q_1)&=&i\int dx e^{iq_1x}\langle 0|T(J_\mu(x),\bar u\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 b)|B^-(p)\rangle,
273: \end{eqnarray}
274: and
275: \begin{eqnarray}
276: J_\mu(x)=\frac23\bar u\gamma_\mu u
277: -\frac13 \bar d\gamma_\mu d
278: -\frac13 \bar b\gamma_\mu b
279: \end{eqnarray}
280: is the electromagnetic quark current.
281:
282: The amplitude $T^B_{\mu\nu}$ in general contains 5 independent Lorentz structures
283: and can be parametrised in various ways.
284:
285: A possible way is to write $T^B_{\mu\nu}$ as follows
286: \begin{eqnarray}
287: \label{qq}
288: T^B_{\mu\nu}=T^{\perp}_{\mu\nu}+\frac{ip_{\mu}p_\nu}{pq_1} C_1
289: +\frac{ip_{\mu}q_\nu}{pq_1} C_2,
290: \end{eqnarray}
291: where
292: \begin{eqnarray}
293: \label{tperpL}
294: T^{\perp}_{\mu\nu}&=&i\left(g_{\mu\nu}pq_1-p_{\mu}q_{1\nu}\right)F_{1A}(q_1^2)
295: \nonumber\\
296: &+&i\left(q_1^2\,p_{\mu}-{pq_1}\,q_{1\mu}\right)q_{1\nu}F_{2A}(q_1^2)
297: \nonumber\\
298: &+&i\left(q_1^2\,p_{\mu}-{pq_1}\,q_{1\mu}\right)p_{\nu}F_{3A}(q_1^2).
299: \end{eqnarray}
300: is transverse with respect to $q_{1\mu}$,
301: \begin{eqnarray}
302: \label{tperp}
303: q_1^\mu \,T^{\perp}_{\mu\nu}=0.
304: \end{eqnarray}
305: The Lorentz structures in this expansion are chosen such that they contain no singularity for
306: $q_1^2\to 0$.
307:
308: The invariant amplitudes $C_1$ and $C_2$ in the longitudinal structure can be determined using
309: the conservation of the
310: electromagnetic current $\partial_\mu J_\mu=0$, which leads to the relation
311: \begin{eqnarray}
312: \label{eq3}
313: q_{1\mu} T^B_{\mu\nu}(p,q_1)&=&-\langle 0|[\hat Q, \bar d\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 u]|B^-(p)\rangle
314: \nonumber\\
315: &=&iQ_Bf_B p_\nu.
316: \end{eqnarray}
317: This gives
318: \begin{eqnarray}
319: C_1&=&Q_Bf_B,
320: \nonumber\\
321: C_2&=&0.
322: \end{eqnarray}
323: In particular, $C=-f_B$ for the $B^-$ meson. Notice however, that the longitudinal part of the amplitude
324: in this form is {\it not a contact term}.\footnote{We recall that according to the usual definition,
325: a contact term is a quantity which is represented by the delta-function and its dirivatives in the coordinate
326: space. One can then easily check, that the Fourier transform of the expression $\frac{ip_{\mu}p_\nu}{pq_1}$
327: is not a contact term.} This means that some of the invariant amplitudes in the transverse part
328: are mixtures of the true form factors (i.e. quantities with definite and known analytic properties) and
329: remnants of the contact terms.
330:
331: After setting $q_1^2=0$ and multiplying by $\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}$
332: (this very combination is needed for $A_1^{\rm PV}$) only some of the Lorentz structures
333: contribute and we find
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: \label{ttt}
336: \epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}T^B_{\mu\nu}|_{q_1^2=0}=i\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}
337: \left\{(g_{\mu\nu}pq_1-p_{\mu}q_{1\nu})F_{1A}(0)-p_\mu p_{\nu}
338: \frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}\right\},
339: \end{eqnarray}
340: where we have used the relation $q_1p=\frac{1}{2}(M_B^2-M_\rho^2)$ for $q_1^2=0$.
341:
342: The parametrization of Eq. (\ref{qq}) is of course not unique and there are other
343: possibilities. There is however only one choice when the longitudinal part is
344: a pure contact term. Such a choice, which is also the most natural one, is prompted by the structure of
345: the Feynman diagram:
346:
347: Let us rewrite the usual electromagnetic coulping of the quark as follows ($q_1=k'-k$):
348: \begin{eqnarray}
349: (m+\hat k')\gamma_\mu(m+\hat k)
350: =(m+\hat k')\left\{\gamma_\mu-\hat q_1\,\frac{q_{1\mu}}{q_1^2} \right\}(m+\hat k)+
351: \frac{q_{1\mu}}{q_1^2}\,\left[(k'^2-m^2) (m+\hat k)-(k^2-m^2) (m+\hat k')\right].
352: \end{eqnarray}
353: The first term is explicitly transverse with respect to $q_{1\mu}$ and leads to $T^\perp_{\mu\nu}$.
354:
355: \noindent
356: The second term, containing the factors $(k^2-m^2)$ and $(k'^2-m^2)$, leads to the contact term
357: $$ip_\nu\frac{q_{1\mu}}{q_1^2}f_B.$$
358:
359: Finally, we come to the following parametrization
360: \begin{eqnarray}
361: \label{qqprime}
362: T^B_{\mu\nu}=T^{'\perp}_{\mu\nu}+\frac{iq_{1\mu}p_\nu}{q^2_1} C'_1
363: +\frac{iq_{1\mu}q_{1\nu}}{q^2_1} C'_2,
364: \end{eqnarray}
365: with
366: \begin{eqnarray}
367: \label{tperpLprime}
368: T^{'\perp}_{\mu\nu}&=&i\left(g_{\mu\nu}-\frac{q_{1\mu}q_{1\nu}}{q_1^2}\right)pq_1\,F'_{1A}(q_1^2)
369: \nonumber\\
370: &+&i\left(p_{\mu}-\frac{pq_1}{q_1^2}\,q_{1\mu}\right)q_{1\nu}F'_{2A}(q_1^2)
371: \nonumber\\
372: &+&i\left(p_{\mu}-\frac{pq_1}{q_1^2}\,q_{1\mu}\right)p_{\nu}F'_{3A}(q_1^2).
373: \end{eqnarray}
374: Notice, that this is the only parametrization of the amplitude, which provides a distinct separation
375: of the amplitude:
376: form factors in the gauge-invariant transverse part of the amplitude, and contact terms in the
377: longitudinal part of the amplitude.
378:
379: Clearly, $F'_{1A}=F_{1A}$, whereas other form factors of the sets $F$ and $F'$ are different.
380: Now the Lorentz structures contain explicit singularities for $q_1^2=0$ which must cancel each
381: other in the amplitude $T^B_{\mu\nu}$. This leads to the constraints on the form factors at
382: $q_1^2=0$
383: \begin{eqnarray}
384: -q_1p\,F_{1A}'(0)-q_1p\,F_{2A}'(0)+C'_2&=&0,
385: \nonumber\\
386: \label{relationsffs}
387: -q_1p\,F_{3A}'(0)+C'_1&=&0.
388: \end{eqnarray}
389: Equation (\ref{eq3}) gives
390: \begin{eqnarray}
391: C'_1&=&-f_B,
392: \nonumber\\
393: C'_2&=&0,
394: \end{eqnarray}
395: and hence
396: \begin{eqnarray}
397: F'_{1A}(0)&=&-F'_{2A}(0),
398: \nonumber\\
399: F'_{3A}(0)&=&-\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}.
400: \end{eqnarray}
401: By virtue of the relations (\ref{relationsffs}), for the amplitude $A^{\rm PV}_1$ at $q_1^2=0$ we find
402: \begin{eqnarray}
403: A^{\rm PV}_1&=&
404: ie\,f_\rho M_\rho \epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}\left\{
405: g_{\mu\nu}pq_1 F_{1A}(0)
406: +p_{\mu}q_{1\nu}F_{2A}(0)
407: -p_\mu p_{\nu}F_{3A}(0)\right\}
408: \nonumber\\
409: &=&
410: ie\,f_\rho M_\rho \epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}\left\{
411: (g_{\mu\nu}pq_1-p_{\mu}q_{1\nu})F_{1A}(0)-p_\mu q_{1\nu}\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}\right\}.
412: \end{eqnarray}
413: Notice that the contact term does not contribute to the amplitude {\it directly}, but
414: {\it indirectly} determines the value of the form factor $F_{3A}(0)$.
415:
416:
417: \noindent 2. Let us now turn to $A_2^{\rm PV}$.
418:
419: Using the equation of motion for the quark fields ($Q_u=2/3\;e$, $Q_d=-1/3\;e$)
420: \begin{eqnarray}
421: i\gamma_\nu\partial^\nu q(x)&=& m q(x) - Q_q A_\nu \gamma^\nu q(x),
422: \nonumber\\
423: i\partial^\nu \bar q(x)\gamma_\nu&=& -m \bar q(x) + Q_q A_\nu \bar q(x)\gamma^\nu ,
424: \end{eqnarray}
425: one obtains for $A_2^{\rm PV}$
426: \begin{eqnarray}
427: A^{\rm PV}_2&=&ip_\nu f_B \langle \rho^-\gamma|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
428: \nonumber\\
429: &=&
430: f_B \langle \rho^-\gamma|\partial_\nu(\bar d \gamma_\nu u)|0 \rangle
431: \nonumber\\
432: &=&-(Q_d-Q_u)e\,\langle \rho^-\gamma|A^\nu \bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle
433: \nonumber\\
434: &=&e\,\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu} g_{\mu\nu}f_\rho M_\rho f_B +O(m_u,m_d).
435: \end{eqnarray}
436: Now the full contribution is due to the contact terms only, since the
437: transverse form-factor part of the amplitude $\langle \rho^-\gamma|\bar d \gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle$
438: vanishes after the multiplication by $p_\nu$.
439:
440: %\newpage
441: \noindent 3. For the sum we find
442: \begin{eqnarray}
443: A^{\rm PV}_1+A^{\rm PV}_2&=&ie\,f_\rho M_\rho \epsilon_1^{\ast\mu}\epsilon_2^{\ast\nu}
444: \left(g_{\mu\nu}pq_1-p_{\mu}q_{1\nu}\right)\left[F_{1A}(0)+\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}\right]
445: \end{eqnarray}
446: Summing the contributions of the photon emission from the $B$-meson loop and the $\rho$-meson
447: loop gives the amplitude $A_{\rm PV}$ which can be represented in the form
448: $A_{\rm PV}=\epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} T_\mu$ with
449: $q_1^\mu T_\mu=0$ as required by gauge invariance.
450: The weak-annihilation contribution to the form factor $F_{\rm PV}$
451: for the $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ decay takes the form (after redefining $F_{1A}=2F_A/M_B$)
452: \begin{eqnarray}
453: \label{fpv}
454: F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}=\xi_u a_1 f_\rho M_\rho\;\left[\frac{2F_{A}}{M_B}+\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}\right].
455: \end{eqnarray}
456: Notice that in addition to the form factor contribution $\sim F_{A}$, there is a contribution
457: proportional to $f_B$. The latter is determined by the contact terms: namely,
458: the contact terms which are present in the amplitudes of the photon
459: emission from the $B$ meson loop and from the $\rho$-meson loop do not cancel each other,
460: but lead to a nonvanishing contribution.\footnote{
461: Here we disagree with the recent statement of \cite{khodjct} that contact terms cancel each other
462: and do not contribute to the final amplitude. The conclusion of \cite{khodjct} is based on choosing
463: the longitudinal part of the amplitude in the form
464: $\left\{g_{\mu\nu}+\frac{q_{2\mu}q_{2\nu}}{q_2q_1}\right\}f_B$
465: which is {\it not a contact term} according to the usual definition of the latter.
466: As a result, the invariant amplitude of \cite{wa-sr1,wa-sr2,khodjct} at $q_1^2=0$ corresponds to the combination
467: $F_A+\frac{M_Bf_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}$.
468: We take this relationship into account when comparing numerical results from different approaches
469: later in this section.}
470: In the amplitude of the $B^+\to\rho^+\gamma$ decay
471: the contact term proportional to $f_B$ changes sign, and also
472: $F_A^{B^+}=-F_A^{B^-}$ as can be obtained from charge conjugation of
473: the amplitude $A_{\rm PV}$. For the $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ decay the contact term
474: proportional to $f_B$ is absent.
475:
476: %\newpage
477: \vspace{.4cm}
478: \underline{\it The parity-conserving amplitude}
479: \vspace{.4cm}
480: %\subsubsection{The parity-conserving amplitude}
481:
482: This amplitude reads
483: \begin{eqnarray}
484: \label{apc}
485: A_{\rm PC}(B\to\rho\gamma)&=&-\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\xi_u a_1
486: \left\{\langle \rho|\bar d\gamma_\nu u|0 \rangle \langle \gamma|\bar u \gamma_\nu b|B \rangle
487: +
488: \langle \gamma\rho|\bar d\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 u |0 \rangle
489: \langle 0| \bar u\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 b|B \rangle \right\}.
490: \end{eqnarray}
491: The $B\to\gamma$ amplitude from the first term in the brackets contains the form factor
492: $F_V(q_2^2=M_\rho^2)$:
493: \begin{eqnarray}
494: \langle \gamma(q_1)|\bar u\gamma_\nu b|B(p)\rangle =
495: e\,\epsilon_{\nu\mu p q_1} \epsilon_1^{\ast\mu} \;\frac{2F_V}{M_B}.
496: %,\qquad
497: %\epsilon_2^\nu\langle \gamma(q_1)|\bar u\gamma_\nu b|B(p)\rangle=
498: %-e\,\epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^\ast q_2\epsilon_2^\ast}\;{2F_V}/{M_B}.
499: \end{eqnarray}
500: The second term in (\ref{apc}) can be reduced to the divergence of the
501: axial-vector current and contains another form factor, $G_V$: namely,
502: \begin{eqnarray}
503: \langle 0|\bar u\gamma_\nu \gamma_5 b|B\rangle
504: \langle \gamma\rho|\bar d\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 u|0 \rangle&=&
505: f_B \langle \gamma\rho|\partial_\nu \bar d\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 u |0 \rangle
506: \nonumber\\
507: &=&
508: e\,f_B G_V \epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^\ast q_2\epsilon_2^\ast}.
509: \end{eqnarray}
510: Thus, the weak annihilation contribution to $F_{\rm PC}$ reads
511: \begin{eqnarray}
512: \label{fpc}
513: F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}=\xi_u a_1 M_\rho f_\rho\left[\frac{2F_V}{M_B}-\frac{f_B\;G_V}{M_\rho f_\rho}\right].
514: \end{eqnarray}
515: Summing up, within the factorization approximation the weak annihilation amplitude
516: can be expressed in terms of the three form factors $F_A$, $F_V$, and $G_V$.
517:
518: \newpage
519: %=========================================================================================================
520: \subsection{\label{sec:iv.2}Form factors for the $B\to\gamma\ell\nu$ transition}
521: In this section we derive formulas for the form factors $F_{A,V}$
522: describing the weak transition $B\to\gamma l\nu$
523: within the dispersion approach
524: to the transition form factors.
525: Recall that the
526: form factors $F_{A,V}$ describe the transition of the $B$-meson to the photon with the momentum
527: $q_1$, $q_1^2=0$, induced by the axial-vector (vector) current with the momentum transfer
528: $q_2$, $q_2^2=M_\rho^2$. For technical reasons, it is convenient to treat the form factor $F_{A(V)}$ as describing the
529: amplitude of the photon-induced transition of the $B$-meson into a $b\bar u$ axial-vector
530: (vector) virtual particle with the corresponding factor $1/(s-q_2^2)$ in the dispersion integral.
531: Then we can directly apply the equations obtained in Chapter II for
532: meson-to-meson transition form factors.
533:
534: \subsubsection{The form factor $F_A$}
535: The form factor $F_A$ is given by the diagrams of Fig \ref{fig:Fa}.
536: Fig \ref{fig:Fa}a shows $F_A^{(b)}$,
537: the contribution to the form factor of the process when the $b$ quark interacts with the
538: photon; Fig \ref{fig:Fa}b describes the contribution of the process when the quark $u$ interacts while
539: $b$ remains a spectator. One has
540: \begin{eqnarray}
541: F_A=F_A^{(b)}+F_A^{(u)}.
542: \end{eqnarray}
543: \begin{center}
544: \begin{figure}[hb]
545: \mbox{\epsfig{file=ch4-fig2.eps,width=12cm}}
546: \caption{\label{fig:Fa}
547: Diagrams for the form factor $F_A$: a) $F_A^{(b)}$, b) $F_A^{(u)}$.}
548: \end{figure}
549: \end{center}
550: The $B^-$ meson is described
551: by the vertex $\bar b(k_b)\; i\gamma_5 u(k_u)\;G(s)/{\sqrt{N_c}}$, with
552: $G(s)=\varphi_B(s)(s-M_B^2)$. The $B$-meson wave function $\varphi_B$ is normalized according to
553: the relation (\ref{norma}).
554:
555: It is convenient to change the direction of the quark line in the loop diagram of
556: Fig \ref{fig:Fa}b. This is done by performing the charge conjugation of the matrix element
557: and leads to a sign change for the $\gamma_\nu\gamma_5$ vertex.
558:
559: Now both diagrams in Fig \ref{fig:Fa} a,b are reduced to the diagram of Fig \ref{fig:Fat}
560: which defines the form factor $F_A^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)$: Setting $m_1=m_b$, $m_2=m_u$ gives
561: $F_A^{(b)}$:
562: $$
563: F_A^{(b)}=Q_b F_A^{(1)}(m_b,m_u).
564: $$
565: Similarly, setting $m_1=m_u$, $m_2=m_b$
566: gives $F_A^{(u)}$,
567: $$F_A^{(u)}=-Q_u F_A^{(1)}(m_u,m_b).
568: $$
569: \begin{center}
570: \begin{figure}[hb]
571: \mbox{\epsfig{file=ch4-fig3.eps,width=4.5cm}}
572: \caption{\label{fig:Fat}
573: The triangle diagram for $F_A^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)$. The cut corresponds to calculating the
574: imaginary part in the variable $p^2$. }
575: \end{figure}
576: \end{center}
577: For the diagram of Fig \ref{fig:Fat} (quark 1 emits the photon, quark 2 is the spectator)
578: the trace reads
579: \begin{eqnarray}
580: \nonumber
581: &&-{\rm Sp}\;i\gamma_5(m_2-\hat k_2)\gamma_\nu\gamma_5(m_1+\hat k'_1)\gamma_\mu(m_1+\hat k_1)
582: \nonumber\\
583: &&\qquad=4i(k_1+k_1')_\mu(m_1 k_2+m_2 k_1)_\nu+
584: 4i(g_{\mu\nu}q_\alpha-g_{\mu\alpha}q_\nu)(m_1 k_2+m_2 k_1)_\alpha.
585: \end{eqnarray}
586: The spectral density of the form factor $F^{(1)}_A(m_1,m_2)$ in the variable $p^2$, $p=k_1+k_2$,
587: is the coefficient of the structure $g_{\mu\nu}$ obtained after the integration of the trace over
588: the quark phase space. Performing necessary calculations, we arrive at the following single
589: dispersion integral
590:
591: %\newpage
592: \begin{eqnarray}
593: \label{fadisp}
594: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(1)}&=&\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int\limits_{(m_b+m_u)^2}^\infty
595: \frac{ds\;\varphi_B(s)}{(s-M_\rho^2)}
596: \nonumber\\
597: &&\times
598: \left\{
599: \left(m_1\log\left(\frac{s+m_1^2-m_2^2+\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}
600: {s+m_1^2-m_2^2-\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}\right)
601: +(m_2-m_1)\frac{\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_b^2,m_u^2)}{s}
602: \right)\right.
603: \nonumber\\
604: &&+\left. \frac{1}{pq_1}\left(
605: \frac{\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_b^2,m_u^2)}{2s}-
606: m_1^2\log\left(\frac{s+m_1^2-m_2^2+\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}
607: {s+m_1^2-m_2^2-\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}\right)\right)
608: \right\}.
609: \end{eqnarray}
610: For $q_1^2=0$ one has $pq_1=(M_B^2-M_\rho^2)/2$.
611:
612: Now, let us analyse the behaviour of the form factor in the limit $m_b\to\infty$.
613: To this end it is convenient to rewrite the spectral representation (\ref{fadisp})
614: in terms of the light-cone variables as follows (see \cite{amn1} for details)
615: \begin{eqnarray}
616: \label{fa-lc}
617: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)&=&\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int
618: \frac{dx_1 dx_2 dk_\perp^2}{x_1^2 x_2}\delta(1-x_1-x_2)
619: \frac{\varphi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}
620: \nonumber\\
621: &&\qquad\qquad\times\left\{m_1x_2+m_2 x_1-(m_1-m_2)k_\perp^2/pq_1\right\}.
622: \end{eqnarray}
623: Here $x_i$ is the fraction of the $B$-meson light-cone momentum carried by the
624: quark $i$, and
625: $$
626: s=m_1^2/x_1+m_2^2/x_2+k_\perp^2/x_1x_2.
627: $$
628: For the form factors $F_{A}^{(u)}$ and $F_{A}^{(b)}$ one obtains
629: \begin{eqnarray}
630: \label{fau}
631: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(u)}&=&-Q_u\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx dk_\perp^2}{x_u^2 x_b}
632: \frac{\varphi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_u\,x_b+m_b\,x_u+\frac{2(m_b-m_u)k_\perp^2}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}
633: \right\}, \nonumber
634: \\
635: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(b)}&=&\;\;\;Q_b\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx dk_\perp^2}{x_b^2 x_u}
636: \frac{\varphi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_b\,x_u+m_u\,x_b+\frac{2(m_u-m_b)k_\perp^2}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2}
637: \right\}, \nonumber
638: \end{eqnarray}
639: with
640: \begin{eqnarray}
641: s=\frac{m_b^2}{x_b}+\frac{m_u^2}{x_u}+\frac{k_\perp^2}{x_u x_b}.
642: \end{eqnarray}
643: Recall that the $B$-meson decay constant is given in terms of the
644: wave function by Eq. (\ref{fp}).
645: Due to the wave function $\varphi_B(s)$, the integral in the heavy quark limit is dominated
646: by the region $x_u=\bar\Lambda/m_b$, $x_b=1-\bar\Lambda/m_b$,
647: where $\bar\Lambda$ is a constant of order $M_B-m_b$. This leads to the following expansion
648: of the form factors in the $1/m_b$ series
649: \begin{eqnarray}
650: \label{hqlimit}
651: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(u)}&=&-Q_u\frac{f_B}{\bar\Lambda m_b}+...\nonumber\\
652: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{A}^{(b)}&=&\;\;\,\,Q_b\frac{f_B}{m_b^2}+...
653: \end{eqnarray}
654: Clearly, the dominant contribution in the heavy quark limit comes from the process
655: when the light quark emits the photon, whereas the emission of the photon from the heavy
656: quark gives only a $1/m_b$ correction. The expressions (\ref{hqlimit}) for the form factor
657: $F_{A}^{(u)}$ agrees with the result of Ref. \cite{korch},
658: while we have found a different sign for $F_{A}^{(b)}$.
659:
660: %+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
661: %\newpage
662: \subsubsection{The form factor $F_V$}
663: The consideration of the form factor $F_{V}$ is very similar to the form factor $F_{A}$.
664: $F_V$ is determined by the two diagrams shown in Fig \ref{fig:Fv}:
665: Fig \ref{fig:Fv}a gives $F_V^{(b)}$, the contribution of the process when the $b$ quark interacts with the
666: photon; Fig \ref{fig:Fv}b describes the contribution of the process when the quark $u$ interacts.
667: One has
668: \begin{eqnarray}
669: F_V=F_V^{(b)}+F_V^{(u)}.
670: \end{eqnarray}
671: \begin{center}
672: \begin{figure}[hb]
673: \mbox{\epsfig{file=ch4-fig4.eps,width=12cm}}
674: \caption{\label{fig:Fv}Diagrams for the form factor $F_V$: a) $F_V^{(b)}$, b) $F_V^{(u)}$.}
675: \end{figure}
676: \end{center}
677: It is again convenient to change the direction of the quark line in the loop diagram of
678: Fig \ref{fig:Fv}b
679: describing $F_V^{(u)}$
680: by performing the charge conjugation of the matrix element. For the vector current $\gamma_\nu$
681: in the vertex the sign does not change (in contrast to the $\gamma_\nu\gamma_5$ case
682: considered above).
683:
684: Then both diagrams in Fig \ref{fig:Fv} a, b are
685: reduced to the diagram of Fig \ref{fig:Fvt} which gives the
686: form factor $F_V^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)$: Setting $m_1=m_b$, $m_2=m_u$ gives $F_V^{(b)}$:
687: $$
688: F_V^{(b)}=Q_b F_V^{(1)}(m_b,m_u).
689: $$
690: Setting $m_1=m_u$, $m_2=m_b$ gives $F_V^{(u)}$
691: $$F_V^{(u)}=Q_u F_V^{(1)}(m_u,m_b).
692: $$
693: \begin{center}
694: \begin{figure}[hb]
695: \mbox{\epsfig{file=ch4-fig5.eps,width=4.2cm}}
696: \caption{\label{fig:Fvt} The triangle diagram for $F_V^{(1)}(m_1,m_2)$.
697: The cut corresponds to calculating the imaginary part in the variable $p^2$.}
698: \end{figure}
699: \end{center}
700: The trace corresponding to the diagram of Fig 4 (1 - active quark, 2 - spectator) reads
701: \begin{eqnarray}
702: -{\rm Sp}\;
703: \left[i\gamma_5(m_2-\hat k_2)\gamma_\nu (m_1+\hat k'_1)\gamma_\mu(m_1+\hat k_1)
704: \right]=
705: -4\epsilon_{\nu\mu \alpha q_1}(m_1 k_2+m_2 k_1)_\alpha.
706: \nonumber
707: \end{eqnarray}
708: The spectral representation for the form factor takes the form
709: \begin{eqnarray}
710: %\nonumber
711: \frac{2}{M_B}F_V^{(1)}&=&\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}
712: \int\limits_{(m_b+m_u)^2}^\infty
713: \frac{ds\;\varphi_B(s)}{(s-M_\rho^2)}
714: \\
715: \nonumber
716: &&\times\left\{
717: (m_2-m_1)\frac{\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_b^2,m_u^2)}{s}+
718: m_1\log\left(\frac{s+m_1^2-m_2^2+\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}
719: {s+m_1^2-m_2^2-\lambda^{1/2}(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}\right)
720: \right\}.
721: \end{eqnarray}
722: To analyse the heavy quark limit $m_b\to\infty$ we again represent the form factor
723: in terms of the light-cone variables
724: \begin{eqnarray}
725: \label{fv-lc}
726: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(1)}&=&-\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}
727: \int \frac{dx_1 dx_2 dk_\perp^2}{x_1^2 x_2}\delta(1-x_1-x_2)
728: \frac{\varphi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left(m_1x_2+m_2 x_1\right).
729: \end{eqnarray}
730: For $F_{V}^{(u)}$ and $F_{V}^{(b)}$ the corresponding expressions read
731: \begin{eqnarray}
732: \label{fvu}
733: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(u)}&=&-Q_u\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx dk_\perp^2}{x_u^2 x_b}
734: \frac{\varphi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_u\,x_b+m_b\,x_u\right\}, \nonumber
735: \\
736: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(b)}&=&-Q_b\frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{4\pi^2}\int \frac{dx dk_\perp^2}{x_b^2 x_u}
737: \frac{\varphi_B(s)}{s-M_\rho^2}\left\{m_b\,x_u+m_u\,x_b\right\}, \nonumber
738: \end{eqnarray}
739: By the same procedure as used for $F_A$, we obtain in the limit $m_b\to\infty$
740: \begin{eqnarray}
741: \label{hqlimit1}
742: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(u)}&=&-Q_u\frac{f_B}{\bar\Lambda m_b}+...\nonumber\\
743: \frac{2}{M_B}F_{V}^{(b)}&=&-Q_b\frac{f_B}{m_b^2}+...
744: \end{eqnarray}
745: The dominant contribution in the heavy quark limit again comes from the process
746: when the light quark emits the photon. Now both form factors $F_{V}^{(u)}$ and $F_{V}^{(b)}$
747: in (\ref{hqlimit1}) perfectly agree with the expansions obtained in \cite{korch}.
748:
749: As seen from Eqs. (\ref{hqlimit}) and (\ref{hqlimit1}), one finds $F_A=F_V$ in the heavy quark limit,
750: in agreement with the large-energy effective theory \cite{leet}.
751:
752: %********************************
753: \newpage
754: \subsection{\label{sec:iv.3}The form factor $G_V$}
755: The form factor $G_V$ is determined by the divergence of the matrix element of the charged current
756: between the vacuum and the $\rho^-\gamma$ state,
757: \begin{eqnarray}
758: ip_\nu\langle \gamma(q_1)\rho^-(q_2)|\bar d\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 u|0\rangle=
759: eG_V \epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^\ast q_2\epsilon_2^\ast}.
760: \end{eqnarray}
761: The corresponding diagrams are shown in Fig \ref{fig:rhogamma}.
762: \begin{center}
763: \begin{figure}[hb]
764: \mbox{\epsfig{file=ch4-fig6.eps,width=10cm}}
765: \vspace{.25cm}
766: \caption{\label{fig:rhogamma} Diagrams describing the amplitude
767: $\langle \gamma(q_1)\rho^-(q_2)|\bar d \gamma_\nu\gamma_5 q|0\rangle$, $p=q_1+q_2$, $p^2=M_B^2$.
768: The diagram (a) is multiplied by the $d$-quark charge, and
769: the diagram (b) is multiplied by the $u$-quark charge.
770: The cut corresponds to the calculation of the imaginary part in the variable $q_2^2$. }
771: \end{figure}
772: \end{center}
773: If the classical equations of motion are applied, the form factor $G_V$ is proportional to the
774: light-quark masses.
775: This is the reason why this form factor was neglected in previous
776: analyses \cite{sr1,gp}. However, a proper calculation shows that this argument is not correct:
777: in fact the classical equations
778: of motions do not hold and the divergence contains the anomaly.
779:
780: The anomalous behavior of the divergence of the axial-vector current in the chiral limit
781: is a well-known phenomenon discovered in the two-photon amplitude
782: $\langle \gamma\gamma|\partial_\nu \bar q\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 q|0\rangle$ \cite{abj}.
783: A very clear way to demonstrate the anomaly is to start with the matrix element of the axial vector
784: current and to calculate the spectral representations for the relevant form factors.
785: The anomaly is then obtained by performing the divergence at the final stage of the calculation \cite{dz}.
786: A similar treatment applied to the matrix element $\langle \gamma\rho^-|\bar d\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 u|0\rangle$
787: leads to the form factor $G_V$ which does not vanish in the limit $m\to 0$.
788: We will present a detailed discussion of the anomaly in radiative $B$ decays in a separate
789: publication \cite{ms1}. Here we only quote the final result: considering the spectral
790: representation in the variable $q_2^2$ and introducing the appropriate $\rho$-meson radial wave function
791: $\psi_\rho(s)$, one finds the following expression for the form factor $G_V$
792: \begin{eqnarray}
793: \label{gvd}
794: G_V=\sqrt{N_c}(Q_u+Q_d)\left[-\frac{M_B^2}{4\pi^2}\int\frac{ds\;\psi_\rho(s)\,(s-M_\rho^2)}{(s-M_B^2-i0)^2}\right].
795: \end{eqnarray}
796: $\psi_\rho(s)$ is normalized according to the relation (for massless quarks)
797: \begin{eqnarray}
798: \label{norma1}
799: \frac{1}{8\pi^2}\int\limits_{0}^\infty ds\; s\;|\psi_\rho(s)|^2=1.
800: \end{eqnarray}
801: Clearly, $G_V$ is finite for $m=0$ which means a violation of the classical equations
802: of motion for the axial-vector current. Eq. (\ref{gvd}) describes the anomaly which
803: takes place for the $\gamma\rho$ final state as well as for the $\gamma\gamma$ one.
804: There is however an important difference between the two cases:
805: For the $\gamma\gamma$ final state the divergence remains finite in the limit $m\to 0$ and
806: $p^2=M_B^2\to\infty$.
807: For the $\rho\gamma$ final state the divergence is finite for $m\to 0$ but
808: decreases as $1/p^2$ for $p^2\to\infty$.
809: It is convenient to introduce the parameter $\kappa$ such that
810: \begin{eqnarray}
811: \label{kappa}
812: G_V= (Q_u+Q_d)\;\kappa\frac{M_\rho f_\rho}{M_B^2},
813: \end{eqnarray}
814: with $\kappa$ staying finite for $m=0$ and $M_B\to\infty$.
815:
816:
817: %*****************************************************************************
818: %\newpage
819: \subsection{\label{sec:iv.4}Numerical estimates}
820:
821: Table \ref{table:wa-comparison} presents formulas for the penguin and the weak-annihilation
822: invariant amplitudes for the $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ and $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ decays.
823:
824: Before giving numerical estimates, let us look at the scaling behavior of the form factors
825: in the limit $M_B\to\infty$:
826: \begin{eqnarray}
827: T_1(0)\sim M_B^{-3/2} \cite{lcsr},
828: \quad F_{A,B}\sim M_B^{-1/2}, \quad G_V\sim M_B^{-2}
829: \end{eqnarray}
830: such that
831: \begin{eqnarray}
832: F^{\rm peng}\sim M_B^{-1/2}, \quad F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV,PC}\sim M_B^{-3/2}.
833: \end{eqnarray}
834: The terms proportional to $f_B$ ($f_B\sim 1/\sqrt{M_B}$) are $1/M_B$-suppressed
835: compared with the terms containing the form factors $F_{A,V}$.
836: As we see below numerically this leads to a suppression by a factor of $4-5$.
837: \begin{table}[htb]
838: \caption{\label{table:wa-comparison} The penguin and the weak-annihilation invariant amplitudes
839: for the $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ and $B^0(b\bar d)\to\rho^0\gamma$ decays. }
840: \centering
841: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
842: Quantity & $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ & $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ \\
843: \hline
844: $F^{\rm peng}$ &
845: $-\xi_t C_7\frac{m_b}{2\pi^2}T^{B^-\to\rho^-}_1(0)$ &
846: $-\xi_t C_7\frac{m_b}{2\pi^2}T^{B^0\to\rho^0}_1(0)$ \\
847: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}$ &
848: $\xi_u a_1 M_\rho f_\rho\;\left(\frac{2F^{B^-}_{A}}{M_B}+\frac{2f_B}{M_B^2-M_\rho^2} \right)$ &
849: $\xi_u a_2 M_\rho f_{\rho^0}\;\left(\frac{2F^{B^0}_{A}}{M_B}\right)$ \\
850: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}$ &
851: $\xi_u a_1 M_\rho f_\rho\;\left(\frac{2F^{B^-}_V}{M_B}-(Q_u+Q_d)\;\kappa\frac{f_B}{M^2_B}\right)$ &
852: $\xi_u a_2 M_\rho f_{\rho^0}\;\left(\frac{2F^{B^0}_V}{M_B}-2\;Q_u\;\kappa\frac{f_B}{M^2_B}\right)$
853: \end{tabular}
854: \end{table}
855: We now proceed to numerical estimates for the $B$-meson decay.
856: The scale-dependent Wilson coefficients $C_i(\mu)$ and $a_1(\mu)$ take the following values
857: at the renormalization scale $\mu\simeq 5$ GeV \cite{ali}:
858: \begin{eqnarray}
859: C_1=1.1,\quad C_2=-0.241, \quad C_{7\gamma}=-0.312, \quad a_1=C_1+C_2/N_c\simeq 1.02.
860: \quad a_2=C_2+C_1/N_c\simeq 0.27\pm 0.1.
861: \end{eqnarray}
862: The penguin form factor was previously calculated within the dispersion approach
863: with the result $T_1^{B^-\to\rho^-}(0)=0.27\pm 0.3$, see Table \ref{table:fitsb2pi}
864: in Chapter IV.
865: Using the same parameters and the $B$ meson wave function as in Chapter IV, we obtain the
866: form factors $F_{A,B}$ shown in Table \ref{table:wa-results}.
867: Our result for the form factor $F_V$ is in good agreement with the estimates from other approaches.
868: The form factor $F_A$ agrees well with the constraints from perturbative QCD and turns out to be
869: considerably larger than the corresponding sum rule estimate.
870:
871: The value of the $G_V$ is sensitive to the details of the $\rho$ meson wave function
872: $\psi_\rho$. The reason for that is the presence of the term $(s-M_\rho^2)$ in the integrand in Eq.
873: (\ref{gvd}) which changes sign in the integration region. Assuming $\psi_\rho(s)\simeq {\beta^2}/{(\beta^2+s)^2}$ and setting
874: $\beta=0.8$ GeV, which gives a good description of the $\rho$ meson radius, leads to
875: $\kappa=-1.8$.
876: Conservatively, we take $-\kappa<2.0$ and use this result for further estimates.
877: The form factor $G_V$ does not contribute more than a few \% to the full amplitude, but
878: can sizeably correct the weak-annihilation part, especially for the
879: $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ decay.
880: \begin{table}[htb]
881: \caption{\label{table:wa-results} The weak-annihilation form factors
882: $F_A$, $F_V$ and $G_V$. The accuracy of our estimates
883: is about 10\%. The sum rule results are recalculated from \protect\cite{wa-sr2}
884: according to the relation
885: $-F^{SR}_{A}=F^{\rm SR}_{1}{M_B}/{f_{\rho^-}}+f_B/M_B$
886: and
887: $-F^{SR}_{V}=F^{\rm SR}_{2}{M_B}/{f_{\rho^-}}$.
888: The results from \protect\cite{korch}
889: are recalculated according to
890: $-F_{A,V}=\frac{1}{2}f^{\protect\cite{korch}}_{A,V}$
891: for
892: $\bar \Lambda=0.5$ GeV. According to our estimates, $\kappa$ related to $G_V$
893: is found in the range $-\kappa<2.0$. }
894: \centering
895: \begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|}
896: & Disp Approach & SR \cite{wa-sr2} & pQCD\cite{korch} \\
897: \hline
898: $-F^{B^-}_{A}$ & 0.120 & 0.110 & $\ge$0.09 \\
899: $-F^{B^-}_{V}$ & 0.092 & 0.091 & $\ge$0.09 \\
900: $G^{\rho^-}$ & $0.002\,\kappa$ & \\
901: \hline
902: $F^{B^0}_{A}$ & 0.055 & 0.037 & \\
903: $F^{B^0}_{V}$ & 0.043 & 0.046 & \\
904: $G^{\rho^0}$ & $0.0055\,\kappa$ & &
905: \end{tabular}
906: \end{table}
907: Using the obtained form factors and the decay constants $f_B=180$ MeV,
908: $f_\rho=210$ MeV, $f_{\rho}^0=210$ MeV,
909: we arrive at the results for the penguin and weak annihilation
910: invariant amplitudes shown in Table \ref{table:wa-resamp}.
911:
912: Our results for $F^{\rm peng}$ and $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}$ amplitudes agree with the sum rule results
913: \cite{wa-sr2}. We would like to notice, however, that the anatomy of $F^{\rm WA}$ in our analysis is
914: different. Namely, we have found $F_A$ considerably larger than the sum rule result.
915: But after including the contact term $\sim f_B$ which
916: we have come to $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}$ close to the sum rule estimate \cite{wa-sr2}.
917:
918: If the form factor $G_V$ is not taken into account, our estimate for
919: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}$ agrees with the sum rules. Notice, however, that the contribution of
920: $G_V$ is enhanced for the $B^0$ decay compared to the $B^-$ decay.
921: Therefore, if the value $\kappa\simeq -1\div -2$ is confirmed by the future analysis,
922: the $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}$ for the $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ decay might appear sizeably increased.
923: For a definite conclusion a more accurate study of the form factor $G_V$ is necessary.
924:
925: \begin{table}[htb]
926: \caption{\label{table:wa-resamp} Results for the invariant amplitudes and their ratios for the
927: $B^-\to\rho\gamma$ and $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ decays. In the Standard Model $|\xi_u/\xi_t|\simeq 0.4$.
928: According to our estimates $-\kappa\le 2$.}
929: \centering
930: \begin{tabular}{|l|r|r|}
931: Quantity & $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ & $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ \\
932: \hline
933: $F^{\rm peng}$, in MeV &
934: $20\,\xi_t$ &
935: $14\,\xi_t$ \\
936: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}$, in MeV [this work]&
937: $-5.6\,a_1\,\xi_u$ &
938: $ 1.9\,a_2\,\xi_u$ \\
939: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}$, in MeV [this work]&
940: $-6.0\,(1+0.06\,\kappa)\,a_1\,\xi_u$ &
941: $ 2.5\,(1-0.3\,\kappa)\,a_2\,\xi_u$ \\
942: \hline
943: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}/F^{\rm peng}$ [this work] &
944: $-0.28\,a_1\,\xi_u/\xi_t$ &
945: $0.14\,a_2\,\xi_u/\xi_t$ \\
946: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}/F^{\rm peng}$ [this work] &
947: $-0.33\,(1+0.06\,\kappa)\,a_1\,\xi_u/\xi_t$ &
948: $0.18\,(1-0.33\,\kappa )\,a_2\,\xi_u/\xi_t$ \\
949: \hline
950: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PV}/F^{\rm peng}$ \cite{ap,wa-sr2} &
951: $-0.3\,a_1\,\xi_u/\xi_t$ &
952: $0.15\,a_2\,\xi_u/\xi_t$ \\
953: $F^{\rm WA}_{\rm PC}/F^{\rm peng}$ \cite{ap,wa-sr2} &
954: $-0.3\,a_1\,\xi_u/\xi_t$ &
955: $0.15\,a_2\,\xi_u/\xi_t$
956: \end{tabular}
957: \end{table}
958:
959: The calculated form factors and the ratios of the weak-annihilation to the penguin
960: amplitudes is one of the necessary ingredients for the calculation of the
961: branching ratios of the $B\to\rho\gamma$ decays, Isospin and CP Asymmetries.
962: In addition to the above ratios, these quantities contain the phase induced by the strong
963: interactions and the CP-violating phase of the CKM matrix (see \cite{ap} for details).
964: The corresponding analysis was done recently in \cite{ap} using the value
965: $F^{\rm WA}/F^{\rm peng}\simeq -0.3\;{\xi_u}/{\xi_t}$ and
966: $F^{\rm WA}/F^{\rm peng}\simeq 0.03\;{\xi_u}/{\xi_t}$ for $B^-\to\rho^-\gamma$ and
967: $B^0\to\rho^0\gamma$ decays, respectively.
968:
969: %==================================================================================================
970: \subsection{\label{sec:iv.5}Discussion}
971: We have analysed the weak annihilation for the radiative decay $B\to\rho\gamma$
972: in the factorization approximation.
973:
974: \noindent 1. Making use of the dispersion approach,
975: we have calculated the form factors
976: $F_A$ and $F_V$ describing the radiative semileptonic weak
977: transition $B\to\gamma l\nu$.
978: They are given by the diagrams with photon emitted from the $B$ meson
979: loop. We have performed the $1/m_b$ expansion of the spectral representations for
980: these form factors and demonstrated them to exhibit a behaviour in agreement with the
981: large-energy limit of QCD.
982:
983: \noindent 2. We have analysed the contribution to the weak annihilation amplitude from the diagram
984: when the photon is emitted from the loop containing only light quarks.
985: For the parity-conserving process this quantity is related to the divergence of
986: the axial-vector current
987: \begin{eqnarray}
988: \langle \gamma(q_1)\rho^-(q_2)|\partial_\nu \bar d \gamma_\nu \gamma_5 u|0\rangle=
989: e\epsilon_{q_1\epsilon_1^\ast q_2\epsilon^\ast_2}(Q_u+Q_d)\;\kappa\;{f_\rho M_\rho}/{M_B^2}.
990: \end{eqnarray}
991: with $\kappa$ staying finite in the chiral limit $m\to 0$ and estimated to be $-\kappa\leq 2$.
992: The anomalous behavior of this amplitude has the similar origin as the anomalous behaviour of
993: the matrix element $\langle \gamma(q_1)\gamma(q_2)|\partial_\mu A_\mu|0\rangle$.
994: Let us stress this important result: the axial-vector current
995: {\it is not conserved in the chiral limit} opposite to the common belief.
996:
997: \noindent 3. We have also included contact terms which were missed in some of the
998: previous analyses. Numerical estimates for the
999: weak annihilation contribution to the $B\to\rho\gamma$ amplitude are given
1000: in Table \ref{table:wa-results}.
1001:
1002: \newpage
1003: