1: %% TEMPLATE for articles submitted to the full-tex econf proceedings
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% Please do not remove lines commented out with %+
5: %% these are for the editors' use.
6: %%
7: %% Questions? Send email to : mpeskin@slac.stanford.edu
8: %%
9:
10: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
11: \usepackage{epsfig}
12: \usepackage{amssymb}
13:
14: %\newcommand{\de}{\partial}
15:
16:
17: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
18: %% Do not change these:
19: \textwidth=6.0in \textheight=8.25in
20:
21: %% Adjust these for your printer:
22: \leftmargin=-0.3in \topmargin=-0.20in
23:
24:
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26: % personal abbreviations and macros
27: % the following package contains macros used in this document:
28: \input econfmacros.tex
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %
31: % To include an item in the INDEX of the conference volume,
32: % flag it with \index{<item name>}
33: % The use of this macro is illustrated in the text.
34: %
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \def\Title#1{\begin{center} {\Large {\bf #1} } \end{center}}
38:
39: \begin{document}
40:
41: \def\qslash{\not{\hbox{\kern-2pt $q$}}}
42:
43:
44: \Title{Effective description of QCD at high density}
45:
46: \bigskip\bigskip
47:
48: %+\addtocontents{toc}{{\it R. Casalbuoni}}
49: %+\label{Casalbuoni Start}
50:
51: \begin{raggedright}
52:
53: {\it Roberto Casalbuoni\index{Casalbuoni, R.}\\
54: Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universita'\\
55: Sezione INFN di Firenze\\
56: I-50125 Firenze, ITALY}
57: \bigskip\bigskip
58: \end{raggedright}
59:
60: \section{Introduction} Ideas about color superconductivity
61: go back to almost 25 years ago \cite{barrois}, but only recently
62: this phenomenon has received a lot of attention (for recent
63: reviews see refs. \cite{wilczek1,hsu}). The naive expectation is
64: that at very high density, due to the asymptotic freedom, quarks
65: would form a Fermi sphere of almost free fermions. However,
66: Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer proved that the Fermi surface of
67: free fermions is unstable in presence of an attractive, arbitrary
68: small, interaction. Since in QCD the gluon exchange in the
69: $\bar 3$ channel is attractive one expects the formation of a
70: coherent state of particle/hole pairs (Cooper pairs). An easy
71: way to understand the origin of this instability is to remember
72: that the Fermi energy distribution for free fermions at zero
73: temperature is given by $f(E)=\theta(\mu-E)$ and therefore, the
74: maximum value of the energy (Fermi energy) is $E_F=\mu$. Then
75: consider the grand-potential $F=E-\mu N$. Adding or subtracting
76: a particle (or adding a hole) to the Fermi surface does not
77: change $F$, since $F\to (E\pm E_F)-\mu(N\pm 1)=F$. We see that
78: the Fermi sphere of free fermions is higly degenerate. This is
79: the origin of the instability, because if we add to the Fermi
80: sphere two particles bounded with a binding energy $E_B$, the
81: grand potential decreases, since $F-F_B=-E_B<0$. Therefore in
82: presence of an arbitrarily small attractive interaction, it is
83: energetically more favorable for fermions to pair and form
84: condensates.
85:
86: We will discuss the methods for the quantitative evaluation of
87: the condensates via a toy model. We will present also the results
88: for the 2SC and CFL phases. Then we will introduce the effective
89: lagrangian describing the low energy degrees of freedom of the
90: CFL phase, that is the Goldstone bosons associated to the global
91: symmetry breaking. We will then show how to formulate in a
92: convenient way the idea of quasi-particles near the Fermi
93: surface, introducing a formalism similar to the one used in heavy
94: quark effective theory \cite{HQET}. Next we will couple the
95: quasi-particles to the Goldstone bosons in such a way to obtain
96: the right gap term in the fermionic lagrangian. Using a weak
97: coupling expansion, justified by asymptotic freedom, we will be
98: able to evaluate the self-energy of the Goldstone bosons. The
99: expansion at low momenta will allow us to get some of the
100: couplings appearing in the low-energy effective lagrangian. The
101: remaining couplings are then obtained through an analogous
102: evaluation of the gluon self-energy.
103:
104: \section{Color condensation}
105:
106: Thee physics of fermions at finite density and zero temperature
107: can be treated in a systematic way by using Landau's idea of
108: quasi-particles. An example is the Landau theory of Fermi
109: liquids. A conductor is treated as a gas of almost free
110: electrons. However these electrons are dressed ones, where the
111: dressing takes into account the interactions which are neglected
112: in this description. According to Polchinski
113: \cite{Polchinski:1992ed} this procedure just works because the
114: interactions can be integrated away in the usual sense of the
115: effective theories. Of course, this is a consequence of the
116: special nature of the Fermi surface, which is such that there are
117: practically no relevant or marginal interactions. In fact, all
118: the interactions are irrelevant except for the four-fermi
119: couplings between pairs of opposite momentum. Quantum corrections
120: make the attractive ones relevant, and the repulsive ones
121: irrelevant. This explains the instability of the Fermi surface of
122: free fermions against attractive four-fermi interactions, but we
123: would like to understand better the physics underlying the
124: formation of the condensates and how the idea of quasi-particles
125: comes about. To this purpose we will make use of a toy model
126: involving two Fermi oscillators describing, for instance, spin up
127: and spin down. Of course, in a finite-dimensional system there is
128: no spontaneous symmetry breaking, but this model is useful just
129: to illustrate the main points. We assume our dynamical system to
130: be described by the following Hamiltonian containing a quartic
131: coupling between the oscillators \beq H=\epsilon(a_1^\dagger
132: a_1+a_2^\dagger a_2)+Ga_1^\dagger a_2^\dagger a_1 a_2. \eeqn We
133: will study this model by using a variational principle. We start
134: introducing the following normalized trial wave-function
135: $|\Psi\rangle$\beq |\Psi\rangle=\left(\cos\theta+\sin\theta\,
136: a_1^\dagger a_2^\dagger\right)|0\rangle. \eeqn The di-fermion
137: operator, $a_1a_2$, has the following expectation value \beq
138: \Gamma\equiv\,\langle\Psi|\,a_1 a_2|\Psi\rangle =
139: -\sin\theta\cos\theta\label{gamma}. \eeqn Then we determine the
140: value of $\theta$ by looking for the minimum of the expectation
141: value of $H$ on the trial state \beq
142: \langle\Psi|H|\Psi\rangle=2\epsilon\sin^2\theta- G\Gamma^2. \eeqn
143: We get \beq 2\epsilon\sin 2\theta+2G\Gamma \cos 2\theta=0\,
144: \longrightarrow \, \tan 2\theta=-\frac{G\Gamma} \epsilon. \eeqn By
145: using the expression (\ref{gamma}) for $\Gamma$ we obtain the gap
146: equation \beq \Gamma=-\frac 1 2 \sin 2\theta=\frac 1 2
147: \frac{G\Gamma}{\sqrt{\epsilon^2+G^2\Gamma^2}}, \eeqn or \beq
148: 1=\frac 1 2 \frac{G}{\sqrt{\epsilon^2+\Delta^2}},\eeqn where
149: $\Delta=G\Gamma$. Therefore the gap equation can be seen as the
150: equation determining the ground state of the system, since it
151: gives the value of the condensate. We can now introduce the idea
152: of quasi-particles in this particular context. Let us write the
153: hamiltonian $H$ as the sum of two pieces, a quadratic one, plus
154: another piece containing the interaction term defined in such a
155: way to have zero expectation value on the ground state
156: $|\Psi\rangle$. We have \beq H=H_0+H_{\rm res},\eeqn with \beq
157: H_0=\epsilon(a_1^\dagger a_1+a_2^\dagger a_2)-G\Gamma(a_1 a_2-
158: a_1^\dagger a_2^\dagger),\eeqn and \beq H_{\rm res}=G(a_1^\dagger
159: a_2^\dagger+\Gamma)\left(a_1 a_2-\Gamma\right),\eeqn where we
160: have neglected a constant term $ G\Gamma^2$. Let us now look for
161: a transformation on the Fermi oscillator variables such that
162: $H_0$ acquires a canonical form (Bogoliubov transformation). Such
163: a transformation is \beq
164: A_1=a_1\cos\theta-a_2^\dagger\sin\theta,~~~A_2=a_1^\dagger
165: \sin\theta +a_2\cos\theta,\eeqn and we get \beq H_0=
166: (\epsilon-\sqrt{\epsilon^2+\Delta^2})+\sqrt{\epsilon^2+\Delta^2}(A_1^\dagger
167: A_1+A_2^\dagger A_2).\eeqn Furthermore we can check that \beq
168: A_{1,2}|\Psi\rangle=0.\eeqn Therefore the operators $A_i^\dagger$
169: create out of the vacuum quasi-particles of energy \beq
170: E=\sqrt{\epsilon^2+\Delta^2}.\eeqn We see that the condensation
171: gives rise to the fermionic energy gap, $\Delta$. The Bogoliubov
172: transformation realizes the dressing of the original operators
173: $a_i$ and $a_i^\dagger$ to the quasi-particle ones $A_i$ and
174: $A_i^\dagger$. Of course, the interaction is still present, but
175: part of it has been absorbed in the dressing process, and the
176: hope is that in such a way one is able to get a better starting
177: point for a perturbative expansion. As we have said this point of
178: view has been very fruitful in the Landau theory of conductors.
179:
180: Let us now discuss what have been done in order to determine the
181: gap in QCD at high density (see \cite{wilczek1}). At
182: asymptotically high-density one can, in principle, perform the
183: calculation starting from first principles, since QCD is weakly
184: coupled \cite{Son:1999uk} (for a more complete list of references
185: see \cite{wilczek1}). However the actual calculations are
186: unlikely to be extrapolated below a chemical potential of order
187: 10$^8$ $GeV$ \cite{Rajagopal:2000rs}. Since the interesting
188: density regime for neutron stars and heavy ions is for
189: $\mu\lesssim 500~MeV$, one has to use phenomenological
190: interactions known to capture the essential features of QCD. In
191: the case of two massless flavors one can use the instanton vertex
192: producing a four-fermi interaction. For more flavors use has been
193: made of the one-gluon exchange approximation or, again, of a
194: four-fermi interaction with color, flavor, and spin structure
195: identical to the one gluon exchange case. A practical way to
196: arrive at the gap equation is to write down the Schwinger-Dyson
197: equation for the case at hand, ignoring vertex corrections. One
198: gets an equation of the type \beq \Sigma(k)=-\frac{1}{2\pi^4}\int
199: d^4q\,G^{-1}(q)V(k-q), \eeqn where $G^{-1}(q)$ is the full
200: propagator and $V(p)$ is the vertex function, momentum
201: independent for a point-like interactions. This is an integral
202: equation for the self-energy which appears on the right-hand side
203: in $G^{-1}(q)$. Since one expects a diquark condensate it is
204: convenient to introduce the Nambu-Gorkov fields
205: \beq\Psi=\left(\matrix{\psi\cr\bar\psi^T}\right), \eeqn The wave
206: operator is then postulated of the form \beq G(q)=G(q)_{\rm
207: free}+\Sigma=\left(\matrix{\qslash+\mu\gamma_0 &
208: \gamma_0\Delta\gamma_0\cr \Delta &
209: (\qslash-\mu\gamma_0)^T}\right), \eeqn equivalent to introduce in
210: the lagrangian a mass gap term of the type $\psi^T C\Delta\psi$.
211: For a four-fermi interaction $\Delta$ is a matrix in
212: color-flavor-spin space. In the gluon-exchange case there is also
213: a momentum dependence. The typical gap equation for a four-fermi
214: interaction (neglecting antiparticle contribution) is
215: \beq\Delta=4G\int_0^\Lambda \frac{d^4 p}{(2\pi)^4}
216: \Big(\frac{\Delta}{p_0^2+ (|\vec p|-\mu)^2 +\Delta^2}\Big)
217: \label{18}.\eeqn When the interaction strength, $G\to 0$, and
218: $\Delta\ll\mu,\,\Lambda$, one finds \beq \Delta\propto \Delta
219: \mu^2\, G \log(\mu/\Delta)~{\to}~
220: \Delta\propto\mu\exp(-c/(G\mu^2)). \eeqn Replacing the effective
221: four-fermi interaction with one-gluon exchange one expects \beq
222: \Delta\propto\mu\exp(-c/g^2). \eeqn But taking into account the
223: gluon propagator one gets a double-log contribution due to a
224: collinear infrared divergence arising from the gluon propagator.
225: This divergence is regulated, for $q\to 0$, by the inverse of the
226: penetration length, which turns out to be of order $\Delta$
227: \cite{casa2}. In the weak coupling limit one gets
228: \cite{Son:1999uk} \beq \Delta\propto \Delta g^2
229: (\log(\mu/\Delta))^2~{\to}~ \Delta\propto\mu\exp(-c/g). \eeqn The
230: gap at large ${\mu}$ is much larger in QCD than in the case of a
231: point-like interaction. If the coupling $g$ is evaluated at $\mu$
232: and we assume $1/g^2\approx \log\mu$ the exponential gives a very
233: weak suppression and for $\mu\to\infty$ we have $\Delta\to\infty$
234: and $\Delta/\mu\to 0$. Color superconductivity is bounded to
235: dominate physics at high density.
236:
237: The phase structure of QCD at high density depends on the number
238: of flavors and there are two very interesting cases,
239: corresponding to two massless flavors (2SC) \cite{barrois,2SC}
240: and to three massless flavors (CFL) \cite{CFL1,CFL2}
241: respectively. In this talk we will be mainly concerned with the
242: latter case. The two cases correspond to very different patterns
243: of symmetry breaking. If we denote left- and right-handed quark
244: fields by $q_{iL(R)}^\alpha$ with $\alpha=1,2,3$, the $SU(3)_c$
245: color index, and $i=1,\cdots,N_f$ the flavor index ($N_f$ is the
246: number of massless flavors), in the 2SC phase the previous
247: calculations give the following color-flavor-spin structure
248: for the condensate
249: \beq \langle q_{iL(R)}^\alpha(\vec p\,)
250: C q_{jL(R)}^\beta(-\vec p\,)\rangle=\frac{\Delta}{G} \epsilon_{ij}
251: \epsilon^{\alpha\beta3}. \label{2SC} \eeqn Here $C=i\gamma^2\gamma^0$ is the
252: charge-conjugation matrix. The resulting symmetry
253: breaking pattern (barring $U(1)$ factors) is \cite{barrois,2SC}
254: \beqa &SU(3)_c\otimes SU(2)_L\otimes SU(2)_R&\CR&\downarrow&\CR
255: &SU(2)_c\otimes SU(2)_L\otimes SU(2)_R& \eeqan The color group
256: $SU(3)_c$ breaks down to the subgroup
257: $SU(2)_c$ but no global symmetry is broken. Although the baryon
258: number, $B$, is broken, there is a combination of $B$ and of the
259: broken color generator, $T_8$, which is unbroken in the 2SC phase.
260: Therefore no massless Goldstone bosons are present in this phase.
261: On the other hand, five gluon fields acquire mass whereas three
262: are left massless. It is worth to notice that for the electric
263: charge the situation is very similar to the one for the baryon
264: number. Again a linear combination of the broken electric charge
265: and of the broken generator $T_8$ is unbroken in the 2SC phase.
266: The condensate (\ref{2SC}) gives rise to a gap, $\Delta$, for
267: quarks of color 1 and 2, whereas the two quarks of color 3 remain
268: un-gapped (massless). The resulting effective low-energy theory
269: has been described in \cite{sannino}.
270:
271: Numerically, by choosing a cutoff $\Lambda=800~MeV$ (see eq.
272: (\ref{18})), and fixing the coupling $G$ in such a way to
273: reproduce correctly the physics at zero density and temperature,
274: one finds \cite{wilczek1} \beqa
275: \mu&=&400~MeV~\Rightarrow~\Delta=106~MeV,\CR
276: \mu&=&500~MeV~\Rightarrow~\Delta=145~MeV. \eeqan
277:
278: In this contribution we will be mainly interested in the
279: formulation of the effective theory for three massless quarks.
280: An analysis similar to the previous one for this case leads to
281: the condensate \cite{CFL1,CFL2} \beq \langle{q^i_\alpha}_L(\vec
282: p\,)C{q^j_\beta}_L(-\vec p\,)\rangle=\frac{1}G
283: P^{ij}_{\alpha\beta}, \eeqn with \beq P^{ij}_{\alpha\beta}=\frac 1
284: 3 (\Delta_8+\frac 1 8
285: \Delta_1)\delta^i_\alpha\delta^j_\beta+\frac 1
286: 8\Delta_1\delta^i_\beta\delta^j_\alpha. \eeqn This originates the
287: breaking \beqa &SU(3)_c\otimes SU(3)_L\otimes SU(3)_R\otimes
288: U(1)_B\otimes U(1)_A&\CR &\downarrow&\\ &SU(3)_{c+L+R}\otimes
289: Z_2\otimes Z_2& \eeqan The $U(1)_A$ symmetry is broken at the
290: quantum level by the anomaly, but it gets restored at very high
291: density since the instanton contribution is suppressed
292: \cite{anomaly, small1,son1}. Again, for $\Lambda =800~MeV$, a
293: convenient choice for $G$ and $\mu=400~MeV$,
294: one gets \cite{wilczek1}
295: \beq \Delta_8=80~MeV,~~~\Delta_1 =-176~MeV. \label{channel} \eeqn
296: The condensate can also be written in the form \beq \langle
297: q_{iL(R)}^\alpha(\vec p\,) C q_{jL(R)}^\beta(-\vec
298: p\,)\rangle\propto \epsilon^{ijX} \epsilon_{\alpha\beta
299: X}+\kappa(\delta^i_\alpha\delta^j_\beta+\delta_\beta^i\delta_\alpha^j)
300: \label{CFL}. \eeqn Notice that $\kappa=0$ corresponds to
301: $\Delta_1=-2\Delta_8$. Due to the Fermi statistics, the
302: condensate must be symmetric in color and flavor. As a
303: consequence the two terms appearing in eq. (\ref{CFL}) correspond
304: to the $(\mathbf{\bar 3},\mathbf{\bar 3})$ and
305: $(\mathbf{6},\mathbf{6})$ channels of $SU(3)_c\otimes
306: SU(3)_{L(R)}$. It turns out that $\kappa$ is small \cite{CFL1,
307: small1,small2} and therefore the condensation occurs mainly in
308: the $(\mathbf{\bar 3},\mathbf{\bar 3})$ channel (see also eq.
309: (\ref{channel})). The expression (\ref{CFL}) shows that the ground
310: state is left invariant by a simultaneous transformation of
311: $SU(3)_c$ and $SU(3)_{L(R)}$. This is called Color Flavor Locking
312: (CFL). The $Z_2$ symmetries arise since the condensate is left
313: invariant by a change of sign of the left- and/or right-handed
314: fields. As for the 2SC case the electric charge is broken but a
315: linear combination with the broken color generator $T_8$
316: annihilates the ground state. On the contrary the baryon number
317: is broken. Therefore there are $8+2$ broken global symmetries
318: giving rise to 10 Goldstone bosons. The one associated to
319: $U(1)_A$ gets massless only at very high density. The color group
320: is completely broken and all the gauge particles acquire mass.
321: Also all the fermions are gapped.
322:
323:
324:
325:
326:
327:
328:
329:
330: \section{Effective theory for the CFL phase}
331:
332:
333: We start introducing the Goldstone fields as the phases of the
334: condensates in the $(\mathbf{\bar 3},\mathbf{\bar 3})$ channel
335: \cite{casa1,hong1}\begin{equation} X_\alpha^i\approx
336: \epsilon^{ijk}\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}\langle q^j_{\beta
337: L}q^k_{\gamma L}\rangle^*,~~~ Y_\alpha^i\approx
338: \epsilon^{ijk}\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}\langle q^j_{\beta
339: L}q^k_{\gamma L}\rangle^*. \end{equation} Since quarks belong to
340: the representation $(\mathbf{3},\mathbf{3})$ of $SU(3)_c\otimes
341: SU(3)_{L(R)}$ and transform under $U(1)_B\otimes U(1)_A$
342: according to \beq qq_L\to e^{i(\alpha+\beta)} q_L,~~~q_R\to
343: e^{i(\alpha-\beta)} q_R,~~~e^{i\alpha}\in U(1)_B,~~~e^{i\beta}\in
344: U(1)_A, \eeqn the transformation properties of the fields $X$ and
345: $Y$ under the total symmetry group $G=SU(3)_c\otimes
346: SU(3)_L\otimes SU(3)_R\otimes U(1)_B\otimes U(1)_A$ are ($g_c\in
347: SU(3)_c$, $g_{L(R)}\in SU(3)_{L(R)}$) \beq X\to g_cXg_L^T
348: e^{-2i(\alpha+\beta)},~~~Y\to g_cYg_R^T e^{-2i(\alpha-\beta)}.
349: \eeqn The fields $X$ and $Y$ are $U(3)$ matrices and as such they
350: describe $9+9=18$ fields. Eight of these fields are eaten up by
351: the gauge bosons, producing eight massive gauge particles.
352: Therefore we get the right number of Goldstone bosons, $10 =18-8$.
353: These fields correspond to the breaking of the global symmetries
354: in $G$ (18 generators) to the symmetry group of the ground state
355: $H=SU(3)_{c+L+R}\otimes Z_2\otimes Z_2$ (8 generators). For the
356: following it is convenient to separate the $U(1)$ factors in $X$
357: and $Y$ in order to get new fields belonging to $SU(3)$ \beq
358: X=\hat X e^{2i(\phi+\theta)},~~~Y=\hat Y
359: e^{2i(\phi-\theta)},~~~\hat X,\hat Y\in SU(3). \eeqn The fields
360: $\phi$ and $\theta$ can be also described in an a more invariant
361: way through the determinants of $X$ and $Y$ \beq d_X={\rm
362: det}(X)=e^{6i(\phi+\theta)},~~~d_Y={\rm
363: det}(Y)=e^{6i(\phi-\theta)}, \eeqn with transformation properties
364: under $G$ \beq \hat X\to g_c\hat X g_L^T,~~~\hat Y\to g_c\hat Y
365: g_R^T,~~~\phi\to\phi-\alpha,~~~\theta\to\theta-\beta. \eeqn The
366: breaking of the global symmetry can be discussed in terms of
367: gauge invariant fields $d_X$, $d_Y$
368: and\beq\Sigma^i_j=\sum_\alpha (\hat Y_\alpha^j)^* \hat
369: X_\alpha^i\to \Sigma=\hat Y^\dagger \hat X. \eeqn The $\Sigma$
370: field describes the 8 Goldstone bosons corresponding to the
371: breaking of the chiral symmetry $SU(3)_L\otimes SU(3)_R$, as it
372: is made clear by the transformation properties of $\Sigma^T$,
373: \beq \Sigma^T\to g_L \Sigma^T g_R^\dagger.\eeqn That is $\Sigma^T$
374: transforms exactly as the usual chiral field. The other two
375: fields $d_X$ and $d_Y$ provide the remaining two Goldstone bosons
376: corresponding to the breaking of the $U(1)$ factors.
377:
378: In order to build up an invariant lagrangian it is convenient to define
379: the following currents
380: \beq
381: J_X^\mu=\hat X D^\mu \hat X^\dagger=\hat X(\partial^\mu\hat X^\dagger+\hat
382: X^\dagger g^\mu),~~~J_Y^\mu=\hat Y D^\mu \hat Y^\dagger=\hat
383: Y(\partial^\mu\hat Y^\dagger+\hat Y^\dagger g^\mu),
384: \eeqn
385: with $g_\mu=ig_s g_\mu^a T^a/2$ the gluon field and $T^a=\lambda_a/2$ the
386: $SU(3)_c$ generators.
387: These currents have simple transformation properties under the full symmetry
388: group $G$, \beq J^\mu_{X,Y}\to g_c J^\mu_{X,Y}g_c^\dagger.\eeqn The most general
389: lagrangian, up to two derivative terms, invariant under $G$, the rotation
390: group $O(3)$ (Lorentz invariance is broken by the chemical potential term) and
391: the parity transformation defined as \beq\hat X(\vec x,t)\leftrightarrow
392: \hat Y(-\vec x,t),~~
393: \phi(\vec x,t)\to\phi(-\vec x,t),~~ \theta(\vec x,t)\to -\theta(-\vec x,t),~~
394: \eeqn
395: is \cite{casa1}
396: \beqa
397: &&{\cal L}=-\frac{F_T^2}4{\rm
398: Tr}\left[\left(J^0_X-J^0_Y)^2\right)\right]-\alpha_T\frac{F_T^2}4{\rm
399: Tr}\left[\left(J^0_X+J^0_Y)^2\right)\right]+\frac 12 (\partial_0\phi)^2+\frac
400: 12(\partial_0\theta)^2\CR
401: &+&\frac{F_S^2}4{\rm Tr}\left[\left(\vec J_X-\vec
402: J_Y)^2\right)\right]+\alpha_S\frac{F_S^2}4{\rm
403: Tr}\left[\left(\vec J_X+\vec
404: J_Y)^2\right)\right]-\frac{v_\phi^2}2|\vec\nabla\phi|^2-
405: \frac{v_\theta^2}2|\vec\nabla\theta|^2.\label{lagrangian1}
406: \eeqan Using $SU(3)_c$ color gauge invariance
407: we can choose $\hat X=\hat Y^\dagger$, making 8 of the Goldstone
408: bosons disappear and giving mass to the gluons. The properly
409: normalized Goldstone bosons, $\Pi^a$, are given in this gauge by \beq \hat
410: X=\hat Y^\dagger =e^{i\Pi^a T^a/F_T}. \eeqn Expanding eq.
411: (\ref{lagrangian1}) at the lowest order in the fields we get \beq
412: {\cal L}\approx\frac 12 (\partial_0\Pi^a)^2+\frac 12
413: (\partial_0\phi)^2+\frac 12(\partial_0\theta)^2 -\frac{v^2}
414: 2|\vec\nabla\Pi^a|^2-\frac{v_\phi^2}2|\vec\nabla\phi|^2-
415: \frac{v_\theta^2}2|\vec\nabla\theta|^2,\eeqn with $v=F_s/F_T$. The
416: gluons $g_0^a$ and $g_i^a$ acquire Debye and Meissner masses
417: given by \beq m_D^2=\alpha_Tg_s^2 F_T^2,~~~m_M^2=\alpha_Sv^2g_s^2
418: F_T^2. \label{masses}\eeqn It should be stressed that these are not the true
419: rest
420: masses of the gluons, since there is a large wave function
421: renormalization effect making the gluon masses of the order of the
422: gap $\Delta$ (see later) \cite{casa2}. Since
423: this description is supposed to be valid at low energies (we
424: expect much below the gap $\Delta$), we could also decouple the
425: gluons solving their classical equations of motion neglecting
426: the kinetic term. The result from eq. (\ref{lagrangian1}) is \beq
427: g_\mu=-\frac 12 \left(\hat X\partial_\mu\hat X^\dagger+\hat
428: Y\partial_\mu\hat Y^\dagger\right). \eeqn It is easy to show that
429: substituting this expression in eq. (\ref{lagrangian1}) one gets \cite{casa2}
430: \beq {\cal L}=\frac{F_T^2}4\left({\rm
431: Tr}[\dot\Sigma\dot\Sigma^\dagger]-v^2{\rm
432: Tr}[\vec\nabla\Sigma\cdot\vec\nabla\Sigma^\dagger]\right)+ \frac
433: 12\left(\dot\phi^2-v_\phi^2|\vec\nabla\phi|^2\right)+ \frac
434: 12\left(\dot\theta^2-v_\phi^2|\vec\nabla\theta|^2\right). \eeqn
435: The first term is nothing but the chiral lagrangian
436: except for the breaking of the Lorentz invariance. This is a way of
437: seeing the quark-hadron continuity, that is the continuity
438: between the CFL and the nuclear matter in three flavor QCD. The
439: identification is perfect if one realizes that in nuclear matter
440: the pairing may occur in such a way to give rise to a superfluid
441: due to the breaking of the baryon number as it happens in CFL
442: \cite{schafer2}.
443:
444:
445: \section{Fermions near the Fermi surface}
446:
447: We will introduce now the formalism described in ref.
448: \cite{hong2} in order to evaluate several quantities of interest
449: appearing in the effective lagrangian. This formulation is based
450: on the observation that, at very high-density, the energy
451: spectrum of a massless fermion is described by states
452: $|\pm\rangle$ with energies $E_\pm =-\mu\pm|\vec p|$ where
453: $\mu$ is the quark number chemical potential. For energies much
454: lower than the Fermi energy $\mu$, only the states $|+\rangle$
455: close to the Fermi surface. i.e. with $|\vec p\,|\approx\mu$,
456: can be excited. On the contrary, the states $|-\rangle$ have
457: $E_-\approx -2\mu$ and therefore they decouple.
458:
459: This can be seen more formally by writing the
460: four-momentum of the fermion as \beq p^\mu=\mu
461: v^\mu+\ell^\mu\label{momentum},\eeqn where $v^\mu=(0,\vec v_F)$, and $\vec v_F$
462: is the Fermi velocity defined as $\vec v_F=\partial E/\partial\vec p|_{\vec
463: p=\vec
464: p_F}$. For massless fermions $|\vec v_F|=1$. Since the hamiltonian for a
465: massless Dirac
466: fermion in a chemical potential $\mu$ is \beq
467: H=-\mu+\vec\alpha\cdot\vec
468: p\,,~~~\vec\alpha=\gamma_0\vec\gamma, \eeqn one has \beq
469: H=-\mu(1-\vec\alpha\cdot \vec v_F)+\vec \alpha\cdot\vec\ell.\eeqn
470: Then, it is convenient to introduce the projection operators \beq
471: P_\pm=\frac{1\pm\vec\alpha\cdot\vec v_F}2,\eeqn such that \beq
472: H|+\rangle=\vec\alpha\cdot\vec\ell\, |+\rangle,~~~
473: H|-\rangle=(-2\mu+\vec\alpha\cdot\vec\ell )\,|-\rangle.\eeqn
474:
475:
476:
477: We can define
478: fields corresponding to the states $|\pm\rangle$ through the
479: decomposition \beq \psi(x)=\sum_{\vec v_F}\, e^{-i\mu v\cdot
480: x}\left[\psi_+(x)+\psi_-(x)\right],\eeqn where an average over the
481: Fermi velocity $\vec v_F$ is
482: performed. The velocity-dependent fields $\psi_\pm (x)$ are given
483: by ($v^\mu=(0,\vec v_F)$)
484: \beq \psi_\pm(x)=e^{i\mu v\cdot
485: x}\left(\frac{1\pm\vec\alpha\cdot\vec
486: v_F}2\right)\psi(x)~=~\int_{|\ell
487: |<\delta}\frac{d^4\ell}{(2\pi)^4} e^{-i\,\ell\cdot
488: x}\psi_\pm(\ell).\label{psimeno}\eeqn Since we are interested at
489: physics near the Fermi surface we integrate out all the modes
490: with $|\ell|>\delta$, where $\delta$ is a cut-off such that
491: $\delta\ll\mu$. At the same time we will choose $\delta$ greater than
492: the energy gap, $\Delta$. Since, as we shall see, physics around the Fermi
493: surface is effectively two-dimensional, the results do not depend on the
494: value of $\delta$. Substituting inside the Dirac part of the QCD
495: lagrangian density one obtains ($V^\mu=(1,\vec v_f)$, $\tilde
496: V^\mu=(1,-\vec v_F)$)\beq {\cal L}=\sum_{\vec v_F}
497: \left[\psi_+^\dagger iV\cdot D\psi_++\psi_-^\dagger(2\mu+ i\tilde
498: V\cdot D)\psi_-+(\bar\psi_+i\Dslash_\perp\psi_- + {\rm
499: h.c.})\right],\eeqn where $\Dslash_\perp=D_\mu\gamma^\mu_\perp$ and
500: \beq
501: \gamma^\mu_\perp~=~\frac 1 2 \gamma_\nu\left(2 g^{\mu\nu}-
502: V^\mu\tilde V^\nu-\tilde V^\mu V^\nu \right).
503: \eeqn
504:
505:
506:
507: We notice that the fields appearing in this
508: expression are evaluated at the same Fermi velocity because
509: off-diagonal terms are cancelled by the rapid oscillations of the
510: exponential factor in the $\mu\to\infty$ limit. This behaviour
511: can be referred to as the Fermi velocity superselection rule.
512:
513: At the leading order in $1/\mu$ one has
514: \beq iV\cdot
515: D\psi_+=0,~~~~\psi_-= -\frac{i}{2\mu}\gamma_0\Dslash_\perp\psi_+,\eeqn
516: showing
517: the decoupling of $\psi_-$ for $\mu\to\infty$. The
518: equation for $\psi_+$ shows also that only the energy and the
519: momentum parallel to the Fermi velocity are relevant variables in
520: the problem. We have an effective two-dimensional theory.
521:
522: Eliminating the field $\psi_-$ we get \beq {\cal L}=\sum_{\vec
523: v_F}\left[\psi_+^\dagger iV\cdot D\psi_+-\frac 1{2\mu+i \tilde
524: V\cdot
525: D}\,\psi_+^\dagger(\Dslash_\perp)^2\psi_+\right].\label{effective}
526: \eeqn
527:
528: The previous remarks apply to any theory describing massless
529: fermions at high density. The next step will be to couple this
530: theory in a $SU(3)_L\otimes SU(3)_R\otimes SU(3)_c$ invariant way
531: to Nambu-Goldstone bosons (NGB) describing the appropriate
532: breaking for the CFL phase. Using a gradient expansion we
533: get an explicit expression for the decay coupling constant of
534: the Nambu-Goldstone bosons as well for their velocity.
535:
536:
537: \section{Goldstone bosons self-energy}
538:
539: The invariant coupling between fermions and Goldstone fields
540: reproducing the symmetry breaking pattern of eq.
541: (\ref{CFL}) is proportional to \beq
542: \gamma_1\,Tr[\psi_L^T\hat X^\dagger]\,C\, Tr[\psi_L
543: \hat X^\dagger]+\gamma_2\,Tr[\psi_L^TC\hat X^\dagger\psi_L \hat X^\dagger]+{\rm
544: h.c.},\label{invariant}\eeqn and analogous relations for the
545: right-handed fields. Here the spinors are meant to be Dirac
546: spinors. The trace is operating over the group indices of the
547: spinors and of the Goldstone fields. Since the vacuum expectation
548: value of the Goldstone fields is $\langle \hat X\rangle=\langle
549: \hat Y\rangle=1$, we see that this coupling induces the right breaking
550: of the symmetry. In the following we will consider only the case
551: $\gamma_2=-\gamma_1\propto\Delta/2$, where $\Delta$ is the gap
552: parameter.
553:
554: Since the transformation properties under the symmetry group of
555: the fields at fixed Fermi velocity do not differ from those of
556: the quark fields, for both left-handed and right-handed fields
557: we get the effective lagrangian density \cite{casa2}\beqa {\cal
558: L}&=&\sum_{\vec v_F} \frac 1 2
559: \Big[\sum_{A=1}^9\left(\psi_+^{A\dagger}iV\cdot
560: D\psi_+^A+\psi_-^{A\dagger}i\tilde V\cdot
561: D\psi_-^A-{\Delta_A}\left({\psi_-^A}^TC\psi_+^A+{\rm
562: h.c.}\right)\right)\CR&-&{\Delta}\sum_{I=1,3}\left(Tr[(\psi_-
563: X_1^\dagger)^T C\epsilon_I(\psi_+
564: X_1^\dagger)\epsilon_I]+\rm{h.c.}\right)\Big],
565: \label{interaction}\eeqan where we have introduced the fields
566: $\psi_\pm^A$:
567: \beq\psi_\pm=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sum_{A=1}^9\lambda_A\psi^A_\pm.\eeqn
568: Here $\lambda_a~(a=1,...,8)$ are the Gell-Mann matrices normalized
569: as follows: $Tr(\lambda_a\lambda_b)=2\delta_{ab}$ and
570: $\lambda_9=\sqrt{ 2/ 3}~{\bf {1}}$. Furthermore
571: $\Delta_1=\cdots=\Delta_8=\Delta$, $\Delta_9=-2\Delta$, and
572: $X_1=\hat X-1$. Notice that the NGB fields couple to fermionic
573: fields with opposite Fermi velocities. In this expression, as in
574: the following ones, the field $\psi_-$ is defined as $\psi_+$ with
575: $\vec v_F\to-\vec v_F$, and therefore it is not the same as the
576: one defined in (\ref{psimeno}).
577:
578: The formalism becomes more compact by introducing
579: the Nambu-Gorkov fields \beq \chi=\left(\matrix{\psi_+\cr
580: C\psi^*_-}\right).\eeqn It is important to realize that the fields
581: $\chi$ and $\chi^\dagger$ are not independent variables. In fact,
582: since we integrate over all the Fermi surface, the fields
583: $\psi_-^*$ and $\psi_+$, appearing in $\chi$, appear also in
584: $\chi^\dagger$ when $\vec v_F\to -\vec v_F$. In order to avoid
585: this problem we can integrate over half of the Fermi surface, or,
586: taking into account the invariance under $\vec v_F\to -\vec v_F$,
587: we can simply integrate over all the sphere with a weight $1/8\pi$
588: instead of $1/4\pi$: \beq \sum_{\vec v_F}=\int\frac{d\vec
589: v_F}{8\pi}.\eeqn Then the first three terms in the lagrangian
590: density (\ref{interaction}) become \beq {\cal L}_0=\int\frac{d\vec
591: v_F}{8\pi}~ \frac 1 2\sum_{A=1}^9
592: \chi^{A\dagger}\left[\matrix{iV\cdot D & \Delta^A\cr\Delta^A
593: &i\tilde V\cdot D^*}\right]\chi^A,\label{kinetic}\eeqn so that, in
594: momentum space the free fermion propagator is \beq
595: S_{AB}(p)=\frac{2\delta_{AB}}{V\cdot p\,\tilde V\cdot
596: p-\Delta_A^2}\left[\matrix{\tilde V\cdot p & -\Delta_A\cr-\Delta_A
597: & V\cdot p}\right].\eeqn
598:
599: We are now in position to evaluate the
600: self-energy of the Goldstone bosons through their couplings to the
601: fermions at the Fermi surface. There are two one-loop
602: contributions \cite{casa2}, one from the coupling $\Pi\chi\chi$
603: and a tadpole from the coupling $\Pi\Pi\chi\chi$ arising from eq.
604: (\ref{interaction}). The tadpole diagram contributes only to the
605: mass term and it is essential to cancel the external momentum
606: independent term arising from the other diagram. Therefore, as
607: expected, the mass of the NGB's is zero. The contribution at the
608: second order in the momentum expansion is given by
609: \beq
610: i\, \frac{21-8\ln 2}{72\pi^2 F_T^2} \int\frac{d\vec
611: v_F}{4\pi}\sum_{a=1}^8 \Pi^a\,V\cdot p\, \tilde V\cdot p\,\Pi^a.
612: \eeqn Integrating over the velocities and going back to the
613: coordinate space we get \beq{\cal L}_{\rm eff}^{\rm kin}=
614: \frac{21-8\ln 2} {72\pi^2 F_T^2}\sum_{a=1}^8
615: \left(\dot\Pi^a\dot\Pi^a-\frac 1 3|\vec\nabla\Pi_a|^2\right).
616: \eeqn We can now determine the decay coupling constant $F_T$
617: through the requirement of getting the canonical normalization
618: for the kinetic term; this implies \beq F_T^2=\frac {\mu^2(21-8\ln
619: 2)}{36\pi^2},\eeqn a result obtained by many authors
620: using different methods (for a complete list of the relevant
621: papers see the first reference of \cite{wilczek1}). We see also
622: that $v^2=1/3$. The origin of the pion velocity $1/\sqrt{3}$ is
623: a direct consequence of the integration over the Fermi velocity.
624: Therefore it is completely general and applies to all the NGB's
625: in the theory, including the ones associated to the breaking of
626: $U(1)_V$ and $U(1)_A$ ($v_\phi^2=v_\theta^2=1/3$); needless to
627: say, higher order terms in the expansion $1/\mu$ could change
628: this result.
629:
630: The breaking of the Lorentz invariance exhibited by the pion
631: velocity different from one, can be seen also in the matrix
632: element $\langle 0|J_\mu^a|\Pi^b\rangle$. Its evaluation gives
633: \cite{casa2} \beq\langle 0|J_\mu^a|\Pi^b\rangle=iF_T\delta_{ab}
634: \tilde p_\mu, ~~~~\tilde p^\mu=(p^0, \vec p/3).\eeqn The current
635: is conserved, as a consequence of the dispersion relation
636: satisfied by the NGB's.
637:
638: \section{Gluons self-energy}
639:
640: The other couplings appearing in our effective lagrangian can be
641: obtained via a direct calculation of $m_D$ and $m_M$
642: \cite{casa2}. This is done evaluating the one-loop contribution
643: to the gluon self-energy. Also in this case there are two
644: contributions, one coming from the gauge coupling to the
645: fermions, whereas the other arises from the second term (sea-gull
646: like) appearing in the fermion effective lagrangian of eq.
647: (\ref{effective}). The results we find are \cite{casa2} \beq
648: m_D^2=g_s^2 F_T^2,~~~ m_M^2=\frac 1 3 m_D^2. \eeqn Comparison
649: with equation (\ref{masses}) shows that \beq \alpha_S=\alpha_T=1.
650: \eeqn
651:
652: Performing a gradient expansion of the gluon self-energy one
653: finds that there is a wave function renormalization of order
654: $g_s\mu /\Delta \gg 1$ \cite{casa2}. In fact, considering the
655: different components of the gluon field, the temporal, $g_0^a$
656: and the longitudinal, $g_L^{i\, a}$, and transverse, $g_T^{i\,
657: a}$ ones, defined as\beqa g_L^{i\, a}&=&\frac{\vec p\cdot \vec
658: g^a}{|\vec p|^2}\, p^i,\CR g_T^{i\, a}&=&g^{i\, a}-g_L^{i\,
659: a}~,\eeqan the following dispersion relations are obtained \beqa
660: g^{0a}:~~~3\alpha_1\,E^2-\alpha_1\,|\vec p\,|^2&=&m^2_D,\CR
661: g^{ia}_L:~~\alpha_1\,E^2-\alpha_2\,\frac{|\vec
662: p\,|^2}3&=&m_M^2,\CR g^{ia}_T:~~\alpha_1\,E^2-\alpha_3\,|\vec
663: p\,|^2&=&m_M^2,\eeqan where \beqa \alpha_1&=&\frac{\mu^2
664: g_s^2}{216\Delta^2\pi^2}\left(7+\frac{16}{3}\ln 2\right),~\CR
665: \alpha_2&=&-~\frac{\mu^2 g_s^2}{3240
666: \Delta^2\pi^2}\left(59-\frac{688}{3}\ln 2\right),~\CR
667: \alpha_3&=&-\frac{\mu^2
668: g_s^2}{3240\Delta^2\pi^2}\left(41-\frac{112}{3}\ln 2\right)~.
669: \eeqan The coefficients of the energy give just the square of the
670: wave function renormalization (notice that we have neglected the
671: term coming from the free equation of motion, since the
672: renormalization part is much bigger than one). If we extrapolate
673: in momenta up to order $\Delta$ we see that the physical masses
674: of the gluons turn out to be of the order of the gap energy
675: ($\approx 1.70\Delta$) \cite{casa2}. The validity of this
676: extrapolation has been recently confirmed in ref.
677: \cite{Gusynin:2001tt}. Wave function renormalization of order
678: $g_s\mu/\Delta$ for gauge fields in a dense fermionic medium
679: appears to be a rather general phenomenon. For instance,
680: consider the 2SC phase. The low energy degrees of freedom are 3
681: gluons and the almost free quarks of color 3. The symmetries
682: determining the effective lagrangian are: the gauge symmetry
683: $SU(2)_c$ and rotation invariance (Lorentz is broken being at
684: finite density). For the gluons one gets \cite{Rischke:2001cn}
685: \beq{\cal L}_{{\rm eff}}=\frac\epsilon 2\vec E^a\cdot\vec
686: E^a-\frac 1{2\lambda}\vec B^a\cdot\vec B^a, \eeqn with a
687: propagation velocity for the gluons given by $ v=1/
688: \sqrt{\epsilon\lambda}$\,. Values of $\epsilon$ and $\lambda$
689: different from 1 originate from wave function renormalization.
690: One finds \cite{Rischke:2001cn}\beq \epsilon=1+\frac{g_s^2\mu^2}
691: {18\pi^2\Delta^2}\approx\frac{g_s^2\mu^2}{18\pi^2\Delta^2},
692: ~~~\lambda=1. \eeqn The strong coupling constant gets modified
693: \beq \alpha_s~\to~\alpha'_s=\frac{g^2_{\rm eff}}{4\pi
694: v}=\frac{g_s^2}{4\pi\sqrt{\epsilon}}=\frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}}
695: \frac{g_s\Delta}{\mu}, \eeqn due to the changes in the propagation
696: velocity and in the Coulomb force\beq g_s^2/r\to g_s^2/(\epsilon
697: r)~~ \Rightarrow~~ g_s^2\to g^2_{\rm eff}=g_s^2/\epsilon.\eeqn
698: Similar results hold for the massive gluons of type 4, 5, 6 and 7
699: which acquire a mass of order $\Delta$. Exceptions are the
700: spatial components (but not the time one) of the gluon 8. In this
701: case there is no wave function renormalization of the time
702: derivative and the mass is of order $g_s\mu$
703: \cite{Casalbuoni:2001ha}. Also the em dielectric constant gets
704: modified by the in-medium effects both in the CFL and in the 2SC
705: phases \cite{Litim:2001mv} \beq
706: \tilde\epsilon=1+\frac{r}{18\pi^2}\frac{\tilde
707: e^2\mu^2}{\Delta^2}, \eeqn where $\tilde e$ is the in-medium
708: rotated electric charge, and \beq r= 4 ~{\rm in~ CFL},~~ r=1~{\rm
709: in~ 2SC}. \eeqn
710:
711:
712: \begin{center}
713: {\bf Acknowledgments}
714: \end{center}\noindent
715: I would like to thank R. Gatto, M. Mannarelli and G. Nardulli for their
716: precious collaboration in the works originating this contribution.
717:
718:
719:
720:
721: %\newpage
722:
723: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
724:
725: \bibitem{barrois}
726:
727: B. Barrois, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 129}, 390 (1977);
728: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B129,390;%%
729: S. Frautschi, {\it Proceedings of workshop on hadronic matter at
730: extreme density}, Erice 1978; D. Bailin and A. Love, Phys.\ Rep.\
731: {\bf 107} (1984) 325.
732: %%CITATION = PRPLC,107,325;%%
733:
734: \bibitem{wilczek1}
735: K.~Rajagopal and F.~Wilczek,
736: %``The condensed matter physics of QCD,''
737: hep-ph/0011333;
738: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011333;%%
739:
740: \bibitem{hsu}
741: S.D.H. Hsu,
742: hep-ph/0003140;
743: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003140;%%
744: D.K. Hong, Acta Phys. Pol. {\bf B32} (2001) 1253, hep-ph/0101025;
745: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101025;%%
746: M. Alford, hep-ph/0102047.
747: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102047;%%
748:
749: \bibitem{HQET}
750: N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, Phys. Lett. {\bf B232} (1989) 113 ;
751: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B232,113;%%
752: {\it ibidem} Phys. Lett. {\bf B237} (1990) 527;
753: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B237,527;%%
754: E. Eichten and B. Hill, Phys.
755: Lett. {\bf B234} (1990) 511;
756: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B234,511;%%
757: H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. {\bf B240}
758: (1990) 447;
759: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B240,447;%%
760: for a recent review see
761: A. V. Manohar and M.B. Wise
762: {\it Heavy Quark Physics}, Cambridge University Press (2000).
763:
764: \bibitem{Polchinski:1992ed}
765: J.~Polchinski,
766: %``Effective field theory and the Fermi surface,''
767: Lectures presented at TASI 92,
768: hep-th/9210046.
769: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9210046;%%
770:
771:
772: \bibitem{Son:1999uk}
773: D.~T.~Son,
774: %``Superconductivity by long-range color magnetic
775: %interaction in high-density quark matter,''
776: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59} (1999) 094019, hep-ph/9812287.
777: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812287;%%
778:
779:
780: \bibitem{Rajagopal:2000rs}
781: K.~Rajagopal and E.~Shuster,
782: %``On the applicability of weak-coupling results in high density QCD,''
783: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62} (2000) 085007, hep-ph/0004074.
784: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004074;%%
785:
786: \bibitem{casa2}
787: R.~Casalbuoni, R.~Gatto and G.~Nardulli,
788: %``Dispersion laws for in-medium fermions
789: %and gluons in the CFL phase of QCD,''
790: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 498} (2001) 179, hep-ph/0010321.
791: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010321;%%
792:
793:
794: \bibitem{2SC}
795:
796: M. Alford, K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf
797: 422}, 247 (1998), hep-ph/9711395;
798: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711395;%%
799: R. Rapp, T. Sch\"afer, E.V. Shuryak and M. Velkovsky, Phys.\ Rev.\
800: Lett.\ {\bf 81}, 53 (1998), hep-ph/9711396.
801: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711396;%%
802:
803: \bibitem{CFL1}
804:
805: M. Alford, K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 537},
806: 443 (1999), hep-ph/9804403.%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804403;%%
807:
808: \bibitem{CFL2}
809:
810: T. Sch\"afer and F. Wilczek, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf
811: 82}, 3956 (1999), hep-ph/9811473.%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811473;%
812:
813: \bibitem{sannino}
814:
815: R. Casalbuoni, Z. Duan and F. Sannino, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62},
816: 094004 (2000), hep-ph/0004207; %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004207;%%
817: {\it ibidem} D {\bf 63},
818: 114026 (2001), hep-ph/0011394.%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011394;%%
819:
820:
821: \bibitem{anomaly}
822:
823: R. Rapp, T. Sch\"afer , E.V. Shuryak and M. Velkovsky, Ann.\ of
824: Phys.\ {\bf 280}, 35 (2000), hep-ph/9904353.%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904353;%%
825:
826:
827: \bibitem{small1}
828:
829: T. Sch\"afer, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 575}, 269 (2000),
830: hep-ph/9909574.%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9909574;%%
831:
832:
833:
834:
835:
836: \bibitem{son1}
837:
838: D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 074012
839: (2000), hep-ph/9910491;
840: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9910491;%%
841: {\it ibidem} Erratum D {\bf 62},
842: 059902 (2000), hep-ph/0004095.
843: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004095;%%
844:
845: \bibitem{small2}
846:
847: I.A. Shovkovy and L.C. Wijewardhana, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 470},
848: 189 (1999), hep-ph/9910225.%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9910225;%%
849:
850:
851: \bibitem{casa1}
852:
853: R. Casalbuoni and R. Gatto, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 464}, 111
854: (1999) ,
855: hep-ph/9908227.%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908227;%%
856:
857: \bibitem{hong1}
858:
859: D.K. Hong, M. Rho and I. Zahed, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 468}, 261
860: (1999),
861: hep-ph/9906551.%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9906551;%%
862:
863:
864:
865: \bibitem{schafer2}
866:
867: T.Sch\"afer and F. Wilczek, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 82}, 3956
868: (1999), hep-ph/9811473.%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811473;%%
869:
870: \bibitem{hong2}
871:
872: D.K. Hong, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 473}, 118 (2000),
873: hep-ph/9812510; %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812510;%%
874: D.K. Hong {\it Nuclear Physics} B {\bf 582}, 451 (2000),
875: hep-ph/9905523; %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905523;%%
876: S.R. Beane, P.F. Bedaque and M.J. Savage, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf
877: 483}, 131 (2000), hep-ph/0002209.
878: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002209;%%
879:
880: \bibitem{Gusynin:2001tt}
881: V.~P.~Gusynin and I.~A.~Shovkovy,
882: %``Collective modes of color-flavor locked phase of dense QCD at finite temperature,''
883: hep-ph/0108175.
884: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108175;%%
885:
886:
887: \bibitem{Rischke:2001cn}
888:
889: D.~H.~Rischke, D.~T.~Son and M.~A.~Stephanov,
890: %``Asymptotic deconfinement in high-density QCD,''
891: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87} (2001) 062001, hep-ph/0011379.
892: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011379;%%
893:
894:
895: \bibitem{Casalbuoni:2001ha}
896:
897: R.~Casalbuoni, R.~Gatto, M.~Mannarelli and G.~Nardulli,
898: %``Effective gluon interactions in the colour superconductive phase of two
899: %flavor QCD,''
900: hep-ph/0107024.
901: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107024;%%
902:
903:
904: \bibitem{Litim:2001mv}
905:
906: D.~F.~Litim and C.~Manuel,
907: %``Photon self-energy in a color superconductor,''
908: hep-ph/0105165.
909: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105165;%%
910: \end{thebibliography}
911:
912:
913: \end{document}
914: