1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \section{Equations of Motion \label{sect-eom}}
3:
4: The dynamics of the condensate are completely determined by the evolution equations in space and time for the long-wavelength fields. In the following, the coarse-grained equations of motions are derived. First, the theory with exact chiral symmetry is analyzed. This is an idealized case, which significantly simplifies some of our formulas, and allows for the study of massless bosonic waves, the Goldstone modes. Such modes are present not only in particle physics, but also in condensed matter physics (e.g. spin waves). The low temperature behavior of the pion is well-known from chiral perturbation theory \cite{sm} and, accordingly, the pion is massive and chiral symmetry is explicitly broken. Therefore, for a completely consistent discussion one should work with massive pions. This is the topic of the second section.
5:
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: \subsection{Chiral Limit \label{sect-eom-chiral}}
8:
9: The Lagrangian of the O(N) sigma model with no explicit symmetry breaking term is given by
10: %
11: \be
12: L(\sigma,\vec{\pi}) = \frac{1}{2}(\partial \sigma)^2 + \frac{1}{2}(\partial \vec{\pi})^2 - U(\sigma,\vec\pi)\,~,
13: \label{lag}
14: \ee
15: %
16: where $\sigma$ and $\vec{\pi}$ are the sigma and the $N-1$ component pion fields, and the potential is given by
17: %
18: \be
19: U(\sigma,\vec\pi) = \frac{\lambda}{4}(\sigma^2 + \vec{\pi}^2-f_\pi^2)^2\,~.
20: \ee
21: %
22: Note that the fermionic part of the original sigma model Lagrangian (\ref{lagsigma}) has been neglected here. This is allowed since our focus is on the condensate formed in the symmetry broken phase where quark degrees of freedom are confined already. In the hadronic phase a natural choice would be nucleons. However, we justify their exclusion by their mass, which is much larger than the other scales involved. Therefore, processes that involve nucleons would be strongly suppressed with respect to pure bosonic interactions.
23: The evolution of the fields under thermal equilibrium circumstances has been well studied by several authors (see for example \cite{bochkarev}). The usual procedure is to express the fields as
24: %
25: \be
26: \sigma(t,\vec x) = v + \sigma_f(t,\vec x)\,~~~ \mbox{and}~~~~~\pi_i(t,\vec x) =\pi_{if}(t,\vec x), ~~i=1,...,N-1\,~.
27: \label{eq}
28: \ee
29: %
30: Here $v$ is the chiral order parameter, the thermal average at temperature $T$, chosen to lie along the sigma direction. $\sigma_f$ is the fluctuation about $v$, along the radial direction and $\pi_{if}$ is the fluctuation of the $i$th component of the pion field about zero, in the azimuthal direction.
31:
32: As explained in section \ref{sect-dcc-prev}, there is good reason to believe that a more realistic picture involves an out-of-equilibrium evolution of the fields. The approach we take is a semiclassical description. The idea is that instead of (\ref{eq}), we decouple the fields into their low and high frequency modes. This can be done, for example, by introducing a momentum scale $\Lambda_c$, as in \cite{bodecker}. Then one integrates out the high frequency modes, and obtains an effective classical theory for the long wavelengths. The fields can be separated as follows:
33: %
34: \be
35: \sigma(x) &=& \tilde{\sigma}(x) + \sigma_f(x)\nonumber\\
36: \pi_i(x) &=& \tilde\pi_i(x) + \pi_{if}(x)\,~, ~~i=1,...,N-1
37: \label{slow-fast}
38: \ee
39: %
40: \begin{itemize}
41: \item $\tilde{\sigma}$ and $\tilde{\pi}$ are slowly varying condensate fields, representing low frequency modes with momentum $\mid\vec{k}\mid<\Lambda_c$, occupied by a large number of particles. These soft modes lie entirely in the non-perturbative regime, and may be treated as classical fields.
42: \item $\sigma_f$ and $\pi_{if}$ are high frequency, fast modes, with $\mid\vec{k}\mid>\Lambda_c$. These hard modes, representing quantum and thermal fluctuations, constitute a heat bath.
43: \end{itemize}
44: %
45: The problem to be solved, then, is to describe the evolution of low frequency classical fields that are embedded into a thermal bath. In our approach, the soft modes follow classical equations of motion, whereas the effect of the hard thermal modes is taken into account in a perturbative manner. We are well aware that any perturbative treatment can be a target of criticism, since the sigma model is a strongly coupled effective theory. However, one can still determine qualitative aspects using this model.
46:
47: Euler-Lagrange field equations are derived after inserting (\ref{slow-fast}) in the Lagrangian (\ref{lag}). For the sigma field one obtains
48: %
49: \be
50: &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \partial^2\tilde\sigma +\lambda\tilde\sigma^3 + 3\lambda\sigma_f^2\tilde\sigma + \lambda\tilde\sigma\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_i^2 + 3\lambda\sigma_f\tilde\sigma^2 + \lambda\tilde\sigma\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\pi_{if}^2 + 2\lambda\tilde\sigma\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_i^2\pi_{if} - \lambda f_\pi^2\tilde\sigma \nonumber \\
51: &+& \lambda\sigma_f^3 + \lambda\sigma_f\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_i^2 + \lambda\sigma_f\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\pi_{if}^2 + 2\lambda\sigma_f\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_i^2\pi_{if} - \lambda f_\pi^2\sigma_f = 0\,~,
52: \label{01}
53: \ee
54: %
55: and for the $i$th component of the pion field
56: %
57: \be
58: &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \partial^2\tilde\pi_i + \lambda\tilde\pi_i^3 + 3\lambda\pi_{if}^2\tilde\pi_i + 3\lambda\tilde\pi_i^2\pi_{if} + \lambda\tilde\pi_i\sum_{j\neq i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_j^2 + \lambda\tilde\pi_i\sum_{j\neq i=1}^{N-1}\pi_{jf}^2 + 2\lambda\tilde\pi_i\sum_{j\neq i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_j\pi_{jf} \nonumber \\
59: &+& \lambda\pi_{if}^3 + \lambda\pi_{if}\sum_{j\neq i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_j^2 + \lambda\pi_{if}\sum_{j\neq i=1}^{N-1}\pi_{jf}^2 + 2\lambda\pi_{if}\sum_{j\neq i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_j\pi_{jf} +\lambda\tilde\pi_i\tilde\sigma^2 +\lambda\tilde\sigma^2\pi_{if} \nonumber \\
60: &+& \lambda\sigma_f^2\tilde\pi_i + \lambda\sigma_f^2\pi_{if} + 2\lambda\tilde\sigma\sigma_f\tilde\pi_i + 2\lambda\tilde\sigma\sigma_f\pi_{if} - \lambda f_{\pi}^2\tilde\pi_i - \lambda f_{\pi}^2\pi_{if} = 0 \,\, .
61: \label{02}
62: \ee
63: %
64: Now we average the equations of motion over time and length scales that are short compared to the scales characterizing the change in the slow fields, but long relative to the scales of the quantum fluctuations. This is known as coarse-graining. The thermal average of high frequency fluctuations is $\langle\sigma_f(x)\rangle = 0$ and $\langle\vec\pi_f(x)\rangle = 0$, while $\langle\tilde\sigma(x)\rangle = \tilde\sigma(x)$ and $\langle\tilde\pi_i(x)\rangle = \tilde\pi_i(x)$. Throughout this work the notation $\langle{\cal O}\rangle$ refers to the non-equilibrium ensemble average of an operator $\cal O$. The equilibrium ensemble average is denoted by $\langle{\cal O}\rangle_{eq}$. It should be noted that we allow for a nonzero ensemble average not only along the sigma direction, but also in the pion direction. In other words, we allow the formation of disoriented chiral condensates. The coarse-grained equations of motion are
65: %
66: \be
67: &&\!\! \partial^2\tilde\sigma + \lambda\tilde\sigma^3 + 3\lambda\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle\tilde\sigma + \lambda\tilde\sigma\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_i^2 + \lambda\tilde\sigma\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle - \lambda f_\pi^2\tilde\sigma \nonumber\\
68: && + 2\lambda\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\langle\sigma_f\pi_{if}\rangle\tilde\pi_i - \lambda f_\pi^2\tilde\sigma = 0\,~,
69: \label{1}
70: \ee
71: %
72: and
73: %
74: \be
75: &&\!\! \partial^2\tilde\pi_i + \lambda\tilde\pi_i^3 + 3\lambda\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle\tilde\pi_i + \lambda\tilde\pi_i\sum_{j\neq i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_j^2 + \lambda\tilde\pi_i\sum_{j\neq i=1}^{N-1}\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle + 2\lambda\sum_{j\neq i=1}^{N-1}\tilde\pi_j\langle\pi_{if}\pi_{jf}\rangle \nonumber\\
76: && + \lambda\tilde\pi_i\tilde\sigma^2 + \lambda\tilde\pi_i\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle + 2\lambda\tilde\sigma\langle\pi_{if}\sigma_f\rangle - \lambda f_\pi^2\tilde\pi_i = 0\,~.
77: \label{2}
78: \ee
79: %
80: The cross correlations between the fluctuations of different fields are nonzero, $\langle\varphi_i\varphi_j\rangle\neq 0$; however, when averaging, all cubic fluctuations of the form $\langle\varphi_i\varphi_j\varphi_k\rangle$ were considered zero, meaning that only {\bf one-loop} order is included. Later in this section the extension to two-loops is presented.
81:
82: In the broken symmetry phase, $T<T_c$, we can separate the non-equilibrium condensate fields into their equilibrium value and a slow fluctuation about this. Choose the equilibrium condensate along the sigma direction:
83: %
84: \be
85: \tilde\sigma(x) &=& v(x) + \sigma_s(x)\nonumber\\
86: \tilde\pi_i(x) &=& \pi_{is}(x),~~~i=1,...,N-1\,~.
87: \label{philow}
88: \ee
89: %
90: For now, let us assume that this equilibrium condensate is static and homogeneous, $v(x)=v$. Clearly, this need not be the case, and we will address this issue later. The thermal equilibrium ensemble of the hard fluctuations is affected by the presence of the condensate. Full ensemble averages, which are basically the two-point functions of the thermalized fields, can be written as
91: %
92: \be
93: &&\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle = \langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq} + \delta\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle \nonumber \\
94: &&\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle = \langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle_{eq} + \delta\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle \nonumber \\
95: &&\langle\sigma_f\pi_{if}\rangle = \delta\langle\sigma_f\pi_{if}\rangle \nonumber \\
96: &&\langle\pi_{if}\pi_{jf}\rangle = \delta\langle\pi_{if}\pi_{jf}\rangle \, .
97: \label{fluct}
98: \ee
99: %
100: The deviations in the fluctuations, $\delta\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle$, $\delta\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle$, $\delta\langle\sigma_f\pi_{if}\rangle$, and $\delta\langle\pi_{if}\pi_{jf}\rangle$, are the responses of the fast modes to the presence of slow $\sigma_s$ and $\vec\pi_s$ background fields. These responses are proportional to the slow modes raised to some positive power. A detailed discussion, including an explicit evaluation using linear response theory, is presented in section \ref{sect-response}. Notice the absence of $\langle\sigma_f\pi_{if}\rangle_{eq}$ and $\langle\pi_{if}\pi_{jf}\rangle_{eq}$. The reason is that the correlation functions in equilibrium, in the absence of a background, are diagonal.
101:
102: Equations (\ref{1}) and (\ref{2}) must also hold in equilibrium, at fixed temperature. Setting $\sigma_s=0$ and $\vec\pi_s=0$ results in an equation satisfied by the equilibrium condensate:
103: %
104: \be
105: \lambda v^3 + 3\lambda v\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq} + \lambda v\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle_{eq} - \lambda f_\pi^2v = 0 \,~.
106: \ee
107: This has two solutions:
108: %
109: \be
110: v =0\,~, ~~~~~ T>T_c\,~,
111: \ee
112: %
113: and
114: %
115: \be
116: v^2 = f_\pi^2 - 3\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq} - (N-1)\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle_{eq}\,~, ~~~T<T_c \,~.
117: \label{equilib}
118: \ee
119: %
120: We are interested in the second solution (\ref{equilib}), since this represents the low temperature, symmetry broken phase. Since all components of the pion field are equivalent, we could write the sum as $\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle_{eq} = \langle\vec\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq} = (N-1)\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle_{eq}$, where now $\pi_{if}$ is one of the components. This is a convention that we adopt throughout the rest of the paper. The equations describing the evolution of the condensate fields are readily obtained after inserting (\ref{fluct}) and (\ref{philow}) into (\ref{1}) and (\ref{2}):
121: %
122: \be
123: &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \partial^2\sigma_s + 2\lambda v^2\sigma_s + \lambda v\left[3\delta\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle + (N-1)\delta\langle\pi_f^2\rangle\right] = - \lambda\left(\sigma_s^3 + 3v\sigma_s^2 + (N-1)v\pi_s^2 \right. \nonumber\\
124: &&\!\!\!\! \left. + (N-1)v\sigma_s\pi_s^2 + 2(N-1)\delta\langle\sigma_f\pi_f\rangle\pi_s + 3\sigma_s\delta\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle + (N-1)\sigma_s\delta\langle\pi_f^2\rangle\right)
125: \ee
126: %
127: and
128: %
129: \be
130: &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \partial^2\pi_{is} + 2\lambda\pi_{is}\left[\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle_{eq} - \langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq}\right] + 2\lambda v\delta\langle\pi_{if}\sigma_f\rangle = - \lambda\left(\pi_{is}^3 + 2v\sigma_s\pi_{is} + \sigma_s^2\pi_{is} \right.\nonumber\\
131: &&\left. + (N-2)\pi_{is}\pi_s^2 + 2\sigma_s\delta\langle\pi_{if}\sigma_f\rangle + 3\pi_{is}\delta\langle\pi_{if}^2\rangle + \pi_{is}\delta\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle \right.\nonumber\\
132: && \left. + (N-2)\pi_{is}\delta\langle\pi_f^2\rangle + 2(N-2)\pi_s\delta\langle\pi_{if}\pi_f\rangle\right)\,~.
133: \ee
134: %
135: The above set of equations is a coupled non-linear integro-differential equations (see section \ref{sect-response}), and it is hardly possible to solve, even with access to supercomputers. Let us assume only small deviation from equilibrium, $|\sigma_s|, |\pi_s|\ll v$, neglecting higher order terms. The linearized field equations read
136: %
137: \be
138: \partial^2\sigma_s + 2\lambda v^2\sigma_s + \lambda v\left[3\delta\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle + (N-1)\delta\langle\pi_f^2\rangle\right] = 0 \,~,
139: \label{sigmaeom}
140: \ee
141: %
142: and
143: %
144: \be
145: \partial^2\pi_s + 2\lambda\pi_s\left[\langle\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq} - \langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq}\right] + 2\lambda v\delta\langle\pi_f\sigma_f\rangle = 0 \,~.
146: \label{pioneom}
147: \ee
148: %
149: Remember, $\pi_s$ and $\pi_f$ refer to one of the $N-1$ components of the pion field. The three physical pions, $\pi^0$ and $\pi^\pm$, are the degrees of freedom in the $N=4$ model. Also, the above results were obtained with the assumption of fixed temperature, and so the equilibrium condensate was constant. In reality, the temperature drops as time elapses, and $v$ changes with it (see previous discussion in section \ref{sect-dcc-prev}).
150:
151: We close this section by stating the results when accuracy is extended up to {\bf two-loop} order. Technically this means that, when averaging equations (\ref{01}) and (\ref{02}), we need to keep the three-point functions too. The ensemble average of the product of three fields is given by:
152: %
153: \be
154: &&\langle\sigma_f^3\rangle = \langle\sigma_f^3\rangle_{eq} + \delta\langle\sigma_f^3\rangle \nonumber\\
155: &&\langle\sigma_f\pi_f^2\rangle = \langle\sigma_f\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq} + \delta\langle\sigma_f\pi_f^2\rangle \nonumber\\
156: &&\langle\pi_f^3\rangle = \delta\langle\pi_f^3\rangle \nonumber\\
157: &&\langle\sigma_f^2\pi_f\rangle = \delta\langle\sigma_f^2\pi_f\rangle \,~.
158: \ee
159: %
160: On account of cubic couplings one finds nonzero $\langle\sigma_f^3\rangle_{eq}$ and $\langle\sigma_f\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq}$. These are evaluated in the usual way (see section \ref{sect-response}) by performing an expansion in the coupling constant of the exponential of the action \cite{peskin}. When including these terms, the equilibrium value of the condensate is modified compared to its previous expression (\ref{equilib}):
161: %
162: \be
163: v^2 = f_\pi^2 - 3\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq} - (N-1)\langle\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq} - \frac{\langle\sigma_f^3\rangle_{eq}}{v} - (N-1)\frac{\langle\sigma_f\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq}}{v}\,~.
164: \ee
165: %
166: The linearized equations of motion acquire some extra terms compared to equations (\ref{sigmaeom}) and (\ref{pioneom}):
167: %
168: \be
169: \partial^2\sigma_s + \bar m_\sigma^2\sigma_s + \lambda v\left[3\delta\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle + (N-1)\delta\langle\pi_f^2\rangle\right] + \lambda\delta\langle\sigma_f^3\rangle + \lambda(N-1)\delta\langle\sigma_f\pi_f^2\rangle = 0 \,~,\nonumber\\
170: \label{sigmaeom2}
171: \ee
172: %
173: where
174: \be
175: \bar m_\sigma^2 = \lambda\left(2v^2 - \frac{\langle\sigma_f^3\rangle_{eq}}{v} - (N-1)\frac{\langle\sigma_f\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq}}{v}\right)\,~,
176: \ee
177: %
178: and
179: %
180: \be
181: \partial^2\pi_s + 2\lambda v\delta\langle\sigma_f\pi_f\rangle + \tilde m_\pi^2\pi_s + \lambda\delta\langle\pi_f^3\rangle + \lambda\delta\langle\sigma_f^2\pi_f\rangle= 0\,~,
182: \label{pioneom2}
183: \ee
184: %
185: where
186: %
187: \be
188: \tilde m_\pi^2 = \lambda\left(2\langle\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq} - 2\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq} - \frac{\langle\sigma_f^3\rangle_{eq}}{v} - (N-1)\frac{\langle\sigma_f\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq}}{v}\right) \,~.
189: \ee
190: %
191:
192: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
193: \subsection{Explicit Chiral Symmetry Breaking \label{sect-eom-nochiral}}
194:
195: The explicit breaking of symmetry is implemented in the Lagrangian through the presence of a term linear in the sigma field (see discussion in \ref{sect-sigmamodel}). The potential term is
196: %
197: \be
198: U(\sigma, \vec\pi) = \frac{\lambda}{4}\left(\sigma^2+\vec\pi^2-v_0^2\right) + H\sigma\, ~.
199: \ee
200: %
201: Since the procedure to obtain the effective equations of motions is identical to the above derived massless pion case, we are going to sketch the major steps of the derivation, giving details only where the physics is different: i) separate the low and high frequency modes of the fields as in (\ref{slow-fast}); ii) write down Euler-Lagrange equations; iii) average these with respect to the statistics of the hard modes; iv) separate the condensate fields into their equilibrium value and the slow fluctuations about these as in (\ref{philow}); v) break the hard fluctuations into a sum of equilibrium fluctuations and deviations from these as in (\ref{fluct}); vi) drop all terms other than linear in the fields.
202:
203: One of the significant differences between the two cases is in the behavior of the equilibrium condensate, which now at one-loop order satisfies the following equation:
204: %
205: \be
206: \lambda v^3 + \lambda\left(3\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq} + (N-1)\langle\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq}\right)v - \lambda v_0^2v - H = 0 \,~.
207: \label{equilibm}
208: \ee
209: %
210: Similarly, notice, that unlike before, $v=0$ is not a solution of (\ref{equilibm}). This means that the condensate is never fully dissolved by fluctuations, not even at high temperatures, and the symmetry is never restored. This should come as no surprise, though, since including a finite pion mass means that the $O(N)$ symmetry is only approximate. The linearized equations of motion are
211: %
212: \be
213: \partial^2\sigma_s + \bar m_\sigma^2\sigma_\sigma + \lambda v\left[3\delta\langle\sigma_f^2\rangle + (N-1)\delta\langle\pi_f^2\rangle\right] = 0
214: \label{sigmaeomm}
215: \ee
216: %
217: \be
218: \bar m_\sigma^2 = 2\lambda v^2 + \frac{H}{v}\,~,
219: \label{sigmamassh}
220: \ee
221: %
222: and
223: %
224: \be
225: \partial^2\pi_s + \bar m_\pi^2\pi_s + 2\lambda v\delta\langle\sigma_f\pi_f\rangle + 2\lambda\pi_s\left[\langle\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq} - \langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq}\right] = 0
226: \label{pioneomm}
227: \ee
228: %
229: \be
230: \bar m_\pi^2 = \frac{H}{v} = \frac{f_\pi}{v}m_\pi^2 \,~.
231: \label{pionmassh}
232: \ee
233: %
234: When the strength of the symmetry breaking diminishes, $H\rightarrow 0$, the results of the previous section are recovered.
235:
236:
237: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
238: \subsection{Discussion \label{sect-eom-discuss}}
239:
240: Equations (\ref{sigmaeom}) and (\ref{pioneom}), derived above for the theory with exact chiral symmetry, and (\ref{sigmaeomm}) and (\ref{pioneomm}) when the symmetry is explicitly broken, constitute the basis of the study presented in the rest of this dissertation. Let us enumerate some of the focal points:
241: \begin{itemize}
242: \item The mass of the sigma meson, $\bar m_\sigma$, is given in terms of the equilibrium condensate, $v$, and as such, it is temperature dependent, since $v$ includes thermal fluctuations of the fields. However, the fluctuations themselves are dependent on the sigma mass. Therefore, in order to determine the temperature dependence of the mass, one has to perform a self-consistent evaluation. This analysis is presented in Chapter \ref{sect-masses}.
243:
244: \item In the theory with exact chiral symmetry the mass of the pion is zero. Goldstone's Theorem requires that it remains zero at every order in perturbation theory. However, equation (\ref{pioneom}) for the pion condensate shows a mass, $\tilde m_\pi^2 = 2\lambda\left[\langle\pi_f^2\rangle_{eq} - \langle\sigma_f^2\rangle_{eq}\right]\neq 0$, that is non-vanishing at finite temperature. This is an apparent violation of Goldstone's Theorem. It is apparent only, because in Chapter \ref{sect-masses} it is shown that Goldstone's Theorem is not violated.
245:
246: \item The effect of hard modes on the condensate enters through the deviation of the field fluctuations from their equilibrium values. This is nothing but the response of the fast modes to the presence of the slow ones. In this work these deviations are identified as time-delayed response functions, and are evaluated using linear response theory. The response functions {\sl renormalize} the equations of motion and give rise to {\sl dissipation}. The consequences of such renormalization is the modification of the properties of particles in the condensate, such as mass, and changes in their speed of travel (see Chapter \ref{sect-masses}). Due to the possible interaction with the hard modes decay channels open up and particles can scatter. These processes are responsible for the dissipation of the condensate. For detailed discussion see Chapters \ref{sect-dissip1} and \ref{sect-dissip2}.
247:
248: \end{itemize}
249:
250: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
251: \section{Response Functions \label{sect-response}}
252:
253: Studying the dynamics of the condensates means solving equations (\ref{sigmaeom}) and (\ref{pioneom}) in the chiral limit, and equations (\ref{sigmaeom2}) and (\ref{pioneom2}) for the theory with massive pions, together with some initial conditions. An important step towards this goal is the evaluation of the response functions.
254:
255: Linear response theory is a very convenient tool when one is interested in monitoring the effect of an an external field applied to a system initially in thermal equilibrium and this effect is small (for a comprehensive introduction see \cite{walecka}). The response function expresses the difference between the expectation value of an operator before and after an external perturbation has been turned on. Consider a perturbation described by ${\hat H}_{perturbed}$, and turned on at time $t_0$.
256: %
257: \be
258: \delta\langle\hat{\cal O}(t)\rangle & = & \langle\hat{\cal O}(t)\rangle_{perturbed} - \langle\hat{\cal O}(t)\rangle \nonumber \\
259: &=& i\int_{t_0}^t dt'\langle\left[{\hat H}_{pert.}(t'),\hat{\cal O}(t)\right]\rangle_{unperturbed} \,~.
260: \label{linrespgen}
261: \ee
262: %
263: The expectation value is evaluated in the unperturbed ensemble. Extension of this expression to spatial coordinates is straightforward.
264:
265: Our program is to use the result of linear response theory to evaluate the effects of the soft condensate fields on the thermal medium. According to (\ref{linrespgen}), these are just the commutators of the field operators at different powers evaluated at two separate space-time points in the fully interacting, but unperturbed ensemble. The initial conditions are set by the assumption that in heavy-ion collisions the system reaches a state of approximate local thermal equilibrium, then it cools while expanding and reaches the critical temperature. We define the initial time $t=0$ by when the critical temperature is reached. This implies $\sigma_s(0,\vec{x})=0$ and $\vec\pi_s(0,\vec{x})=0$. The general expressions to be evaluated are:
266: %
267: \be
268: \delta\langle\sigma_f^n(x)\pi_f^m(x)\rangle = i\int_0^t dt'\int d^3x'\langle\left[H_{perturbed}(x'),\sigma_f^n(x)\pi_f^m(x)\right]\rangle_{eq}
269: \label{linresp}
270: \ee
271: %
272: The respective powers $n$ and $m$ are identified from (\ref{sigmaeom}), (\ref{pioneom}), (\ref{sigmaeomm}), and (\ref{pioneomm}).
273: Let us emphasize that the responses should be evaluated in the unperturbed, equilibrium ensemble, which does include all the interactions between the different modes.
274:
275: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
276: \subsection{Couplings Between Different Modes \label{sect-coupling}}
277:
278: The possible couplings between low and high frequency modes are determined by evaluating the potential $U(\sigma,\vec\pi)$, with the fields separated into their slow and fast components:
279: %
280: \be
281: \sigma &=& v + \sigma_s + \sigma_f \,~,\\
282: \vec\pi &=& \vec\pi_s + \vec\pi_f \nonumber\,~.
283: \ee
284: %
285: The resulting Hamiltonian contains positive powers of the $\sigma_s$ and
286: $\vec\pi_s$ fields. For small departures from equilibrium it is enough to
287: keep the dominant, at most linear terms only. With this assumption, the
288: relevant couplings are the following\footnote{These couplings refer to the
289: massless pion case. The couplings involving massive pions are the same with
290: the replacement $f_\pi^2\rightarrow f_\pi^2 - m_\pi^2/\lambda$.}:
291: %
292: \be
293: && H_{\sigma_s\sigma_f} = \lambda(3v^2-f_\pi^2)\sigma_s\sigma_f + 3\lambda v\sigma_s\sigma_f^2 + \lambda\sigma_s\sigma_f^3\nonumber\\
294: && H_{\pi_s\pi_f} = \lambda(v^2-f_\pi^2)\pi_s\pi_f + \lambda\pi_s\pi_f^3\nonumber\\
295: && H_{\sigma_s\pi_f} = \lambda v\sigma_s\pi_f^2\nonumber\\
296: && H_{\pi_s\sigma_f\pi_f} = \lambda\pi_s\sigma_f^2\pi_f + 2 \lambda v\pi_s\sigma_f\pi_f\nonumber\\
297: && H_{\sigma_s\sigma_f\pi_f} = \lambda\sigma_s\sigma_f\pi_f^2
298: \label{ham}
299: \ee
300: %
301: As before, $\pi_{s,f}$ refer to one of the $N-1$ components of the pion field.
302: Next, we focus on the detailed evaluation of the two-point functions of the thermalized fields. According to the our treatment, these have only linear dependence on the non-thermal fields, and are obtained by inserting (\ref{ham}) in (\ref{linresp}). The technical details of this derivation are uninteresting and so we only state the results:
303: %
304: \be
305: \delta\langle\sigma_f^2(x)\rangle = 3i\lambda v\int_0^t dt'\int d^3x'\sigma_s(x')\langle\left[\sigma_f^2(x'),\sigma_f^2(x)\right]\rangle_{eq.} \,~,
306: \label{phi1}
307: \ee
308: %
309: \be
310: \delta\langle\pi_f^2(x)\rangle = i \lambda v\int_0^t dt'\int d^3x' \sigma_s(x')\langle\left[\pi_f^2(x'),\pi_f^2(x)\right]\rangle_{eq.}\,~,
311: \label{phi2}
312: \ee
313: %
314: \be
315: \delta\langle\sigma_f(x)\pi_f(x)\rangle = 2i\lambda v\int_0^t dt'\int d^3x' \pi_s(x')\langle\left[\sigma_f(x')\pi_f(x'),\sigma_f(x)\pi_f(x)\right]\rangle_{eq.} \,~.
316: \label{phi1phi2}
317: \ee
318: %
319: The three-point functions can readily be read off when inserting (\ref{ham}) into equation (\ref{linresp}). In what follows, the evaluation and physical interpretation of the expectation values is pursued.
320:
321: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
322: \subsection{The Expectation Values}
323:
324: Obtaining explicit expressions for (\ref{phi1}), (\ref{phi2}), and (\ref{phi1phi2}), requires the evaluation of the expectations values of the commutators. Based on the commutator relation
325: %
326: \be
327: [AB,CD] = A[B,C]D + [A,C]BD + CA[B,D] + C[A,D]B \,~,
328: \ee
329: %
330: the results are
331: %
332: \be
333: \langle\left[\sigma_f^2(x'),\sigma_f^2(x)\right]\rangle_{eq.} &=& 2 \left(D_\sigma^<(x,x')^2 - D_\sigma^>(x,x')^2\right) \,~,\nonumber\\
334: \langle\left[\pi_f^2(x'),\pi_f^2(x)\right]\rangle_{eq.} &=& 2 \left(D_\pi^<(x,x')^2 - D_\pi^>(x,x')^2 \right) \,~,\nonumber\\
335: \langle\left[\sigma_f(x')\pi_f(x'),\sigma_f(x)\pi_f(x)\right]\rangle_{eq.} &=& D_\sigma^<(x,x')D_\pi^<(x,x') - D_\sigma^>(x,x')D_\pi^>(x,x') \,~.\nonumber
336: \label{expect}
337: \ee
338: %
339: Keeping in mind that $t'<t$, where $t$ is the time elapsed after switching on the perturbation, and $t'$ is the time-variable that has its values in the $[0,t]$ interval (see (\ref{linrespgen})), the following notation has been introduced:
340: %
341: \be
342: && D_\sigma^>(x,x')\equiv \langle\sigma_f(x)\sigma_f(x')\rangle_{eq.}\,~, ~~~ D_\pi^>(x,x')\equiv \langle\pi_f(x)\pi_f(x')\rangle_{eq.}\,~,\nonumber\\
343: \mbox{and}\nonumber\\
344: && D_\sigma^<(x,x')\equiv \langle\sigma_f(x')\sigma_f(x)\rangle_{eq.}\,~, ~~~ D_\pi^<(x,x')\equiv \langle\pi_f(x')\pi_f(x)\rangle_{eq.}\,~.
345: \label{propag}
346: \ee
347: %
348: The functions $D^>$ and $D^<$ are known to define the spectral function, which is the inverse Fourier-transform of the thermal average of the commutator:
349: %
350: \be
351: \rho(k) &=& D^>(k)-D^<(k) \nonumber\\
352: &=& \int d^4xe^{ik(x-x')}\left(D^>(x,x') - D^<(x,x')\right) \nonumber\\
353: &=& \int d^4ke^{ik(x-x')}\langle\left[\varphi(x),\varphi(x')\right]\rangle_{eq.}\,~,
354: \ee
355: %
356: where $\varphi=\sigma_f,\pi_f$, and $x=(t,\vec x)$ and $k=(k^0,\vec{k})$ are four-vectors in coordinate and momentum space. This spectral density is a crucial ingredient of finite temperature field theories, since it determines the real time propagator, otherwise known as the thermal Green's function:
357: %
358: \be
359: D(x,x') &=& \int\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}e^{-ik(x-x')}D(k)\nonumber\\
360: &=& \int\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}e^{-ik(x-x')}\left(\Theta(t-t')+f(k^0)\right)\rho(k)\,~.
361: \label{relprop}
362: \ee
363: %
364: Other useful relations are
365: %
366: \be
367: && D_i^>(k) = (1 + f(k^0))\rho_i(k)\,~,\nonumber\\
368: && D_i^<(k) = f(k^0)\rho_i(k)\,~,~~~i=\sigma,\pi\,~,
369: \label{><}
370: \ee
371: where $f(k^0) = (e^{k^0\beta}-1)^{-1}$ is the Bose-Einstein distribution and $\beta = T^{-1}$. Significant physics is carried in (\ref{relprop}): the poles of this real-time propagator correspond to quasi-particle (collective mode) excitations. The energies and lifetimes of the mesons of our interest are determined in Chapters \ref{sect-masses} and \ref{sect-dissip1} respectively. More on the properties of spectral densities is found in \cite{lebellac}. Another approach to finite temperature field theory, the imaginary time approach, is presented in \cite{kapusta}.
372:
373: The final results of this section are the two-point functions of thermalized fields in terms of spectral functions, obtained by the insertion of (\ref{><}) and (\ref{expect}) in the expressions (\ref{phi1}), (\ref{phi2}), and (\ref{phi1phi2}):
374: \be
375: \delta\langle\sigma_f^2(x)\rangle &=& i3\lambda v\int_0^t dt'\int d^3x'\sigma_s(x')2\left(D_\sigma^<(x,x')^2 - D_\sigma^>(x,x')^2\right)\nonumber\\
376: &=& - i6\lambda v\int d^4x'\sigma_s(x')\int\frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4}\int\frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4}e^{-i(p+q)(x-x')}\nonumber\\
377: && \qquad \qquad \qquad\qquad\times \rho_\sigma(p)\rho_\sigma(q)(1+f(p^0)+f(q^0))
378: \label{1^2}
379: \ee
380: %
381: \be
382: \delta\langle\pi_f^2(x)\rangle &=& - i2\lambda v\int d^4x'\sigma_s(x')\int\frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4}\int\frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4} e^{-i(p+q)(x-x')}\nonumber\\
383: && \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\times \rho_\pi(p)\rho_\pi(q)(1+f(p^0)+f(q^0))
384: \label{2^2}
385: \ee
386: %
387: \be
388: \delta\langle\sigma_f(x)\pi_f(x)\rangle &=&
389: - i2\lambda v\int d^4x'\pi_s(x')\int\frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4}\int\frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4}e^{-i(p+q)(x-x')} \nonumber\\
390: && \qquad \qquad\qquad \times \rho_\sigma(p)\rho_\pi(q)(1+f(p^0)+f(q^0))\,~.
391: \label{12}
392: \ee