1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{espcrc2}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: % \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
10:
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13:
14:
15: \usepackage{epsfig}
16:
17:
18: % if you have landscape tables
19: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
20:
21: % put your own definitions here:
22: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
23: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
24: % ...
25: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
26: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
27: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
28:
29: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
30: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
31:
32: % declarations for front matter
33: \title{Future physics with polarized ep colliders}
34:
35: \author{A. De Roeck\address{CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland}
36: \thanks{Invited talk presented at the
37: ``International Workshop on the Spin Structure of the Proton and
38: Polarized Collider Physics'', ECT$^*$, Trento, Italy,
39: July 23-28, 2001.}
40: }
41:
42:
43: \begin{document}
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46: We discuss some of the physics opportunities at polarized
47: $ep$-colliders. Recent studies for polarized $ep$-colliders include
48: HERA, EIC and THERA.
49: \vspace{1pc}
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
53: \maketitle
54:
55:
56:
57:
58: \section{Introduction}
59: \vspace{1mm}
60: \noindent
61:
62:
63:
64:
65:
66: The commissioning of the first electron-proton collider HERA
67: (27.5~GeV electrons on 820~GeV protons)
68: eight
69: years ago opened up a completely new kinematical domain
70: in deep inelastic scattering (DIS), and the two HERA experiments have provided
71: a multitude of new insights into the structure of the
72: proton and the photon since then.
73: It is therefore natural to
74: assume that the operation of $ep$-colliders with polarized proton and electron
75: beams
76: will add vital new information to our picture of the spin structure of the
77: nucleon.
78: Possible high energy $ep$-collider projects
79: presently under discussion are listed in Table~\ref{tab1}.
80:
81:
82: HERA has just been upgraded
83: to reach a higher luminosity. It has excellent detectors, and the
84: electron beam is already polarized.
85: The polarization of the proton beam is technically more
86: involved than for the electron beam, since protons do not
87: polarize naturally in the HERA ring.
88: Hence beams from a source of polarized protons have to be
89: accelerated through the whole chain and the
90: polarization has to be kept during the process.
91: The technical aspects of this project are elaborated in~\cite{barber}.
92: Based on these studies, it seems realistic to assume that
93: HERA could be operated with polarized electron and proton beams, each
94: polarized to about 70\%, acumulating a luminosity of
95: 500~pb$^{-1}$ when integrated over several years.
96:
97:
98: The Electron Ion Collider (EIC)~\cite{erhic}
99: --if built at BNL-- will need a polarized
100: electron accelerator, most likely a LINAC, added to the RHIC polarized
101: proton rings, and will probably also need a dedicated
102: experiment. THERA~\cite{thera}
103: will need TESLA to be built at DESY (or tangential
104: to the TEVATRON), polarized protons in the proton ring, and a new
105: detector.
106: The advantage of the EIC
107: is its large reachable luminosity, imperative for
108: polarized studies. At HERA the luminosity is (just) enough for most
109: topics but its advantage lies in its larger kinematical reach. THERA
110: reaches even further in the $x$ and $Q^2$ plane, but its
111: relatively low luminosity of 40 pb$^{-1}$/year
112: may be a handicap for many studies.
113:
114: Most detailed studies for polarized $ep$-scattering at a collider have been
115: made in a series of workshops for HERA~\cite{gehr,works} and these will
116: serve as a basis
117: for the discussion in this paper. Many of these studies have been carried over
118: to EIC in the last two years. For THERA polarized studies have only been
119: briefly explored so far.
120:
121:
122: Here we will discuss measurements of $g_1(x,Q^2)$ at low $x$, the
123: extraction of the polarized gluon density $\Delta G(x,Q^2)$ in a wide
124: kinematic range using several processes, the extraction of the
125: spin structure function $g_5(x,Q^2)$ from charged current events,
126: photoproduction studies and studies on the helicity structure of the
127: high $Q^2$ region.
128:
129:
130:
131: \begin{table}
132: \caption{Possible future $ep$-collider facilities for polarized scattering}
133: \label{tab1}
134: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
135: \hline
136: Machine & Lumi/year & $\sqrt{s}$ \\
137: \hline
138: HERA & 150 pb$^{-1}$& 320 GeV \\
139: Electron-Ion & $ 4$ fb$^{-1}$ & 30-100 GeV\\
140: Collider (EIC) & & \\
141: THERA & 40 (250) pb$^{-1}$ & 1-1.6 TeV \\
142: (TESLA$\otimes$HERA) & & \\
143: \hline
144: \end{tabular}
145: \end{table}
146:
147:
148:
149: \section{The polarized structure function \boldmath $g_1(x,Q^2)$}
150: \vspace{1mm}
151: \noindent
152: The outstanding advantage of a high energy $ep$-collider
153: is that it can measure
154: structure functions at very small $x$
155: and very large $Q^2$. The kinematical reach is shown in
156: Fig.~\ref{fig:kin} for the different
157: machines.
158: %with a possible binning for measurements
159: %of the polarized structure function $g_1(x,Q^2)$.
160: %In the quark parton model
161: %$g_1$ can be interpreted as the (charge square weighted) density
162: %of quarks with helicity parallel to the nucleon spin minus
163: %quarks with anti-parallel helicity.
164: The region covered by present fixed target experiments is
165: shown as well. The region can be extended by several orders of magnitude
166: both in $x$ and $Q^2$.
167: The regions of the three colliders overlap.
168: At HERA measurements at
169: values of $Q^2$ up to
170: $2\cdot 10^4$ GeV$^2$ are reached, and
171: values of $x$ below $ 10^{-5}$.
172: Hence such data will allow for detailed QCD tests similar to the ones
173: in the unpolarized case.
174:
175: An example for HERA is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:g1p}.
176: The low-$x$ behaviour of $g_1$ is indicated in the figure:
177: the straight line is an
178: extrapolation based on Regge phenomenology, and the upper curve
179: presents a scenario suggested in~\cite{abhay} where
180: $g_1$ rises as $1/(x \ln^2(x))$, which is the maximally singular
181: behaviour still consistent with integrability requirements.
182: The low $x$ behaviour of $g_1$ by itself is an interesting
183: topic as discussed in~\cite{Kwiecins}.
184:
185:
186:
187:
188: \begin{figure}[t!]
189: \begin{center}
190: \epsfig{file=xq23.eps,bbllx=90pt,bblly=230pt,bburx=500pt,bbury=600pt,width=8cm}
191: %\epsfig{file=xq22.ps,bbllx=90pt,bblly=230pt,bburx=500pt,bbury=0pt,width=8cm}
192: %\epsfig{file=nekin,bbllx=50pt,bblly=250pt,bburx=550pt,bbury=600pt,width=8cm}
193: \caption{Measurable $x-Q^2$ region for a polarized HERA with the
194: presently explored regions by fixed targer
195: experiments. The energies used are for
196: THERA: $E_p = 920, E_e=500$ GeV;
197: HERA: $E_p = 920, E_e=27$ GeV;
198: eRHIC: $E_p=250, E_e=10$ GeV and
199: $ E_p=50, E_e=5$ GeV, and roughly $0.01 < y < 1.0$.}
200: \label{fig:kin}
201: \end{center}
202: \end{figure}
203:
204: An EIC has as expected a more restricted range, as shown in
205: Fig.~\ref{fig:g1peic}. However the error bars can be substantially
206: smaller due to the high luminosity of 4 fb$^{-1}$/year.
207: THERA would reach $x$ values down to 10$^{-6}$, but needs at least
208: one fb$^{-1}$ of data.
209:
210:
211:
212: \begin{figure}[t!]
213: \begin{center}
214: ~ \epsfig{file=lowx.eps,bbllx=0pt,bblly=0pt,bburx=560pt,bbury=560pt,width=7cm}
215: \caption{ The statistical uncertainty on the structure function $g_1$ of
216: the proton
217: measurable at HERA, evolved to a value of
218: $Q^2 = 10$ GeV$^2$ for an integrated luminosity of
219: 500 pb$^{-1}$. The SMC measurements are shown for comparison.}
220: \label{fig:g1p}
221: \end{center}
222: \end{figure}
223:
224: \begin{figure}[t!]
225: \begin{center}
226: \epsfig{file=erhic_g1_q2.eps,bbllx=0pt,bblly=40pt,bburx=550pt,bbury=550pt,width=7cm}
227: %\epsfig{file=xq2_hera.eps,bbllx=0pt,bblly=40pt,bburx=500pt,bbury=390pt,width=8cm}
228: %\epsfig{file=nekin,bbllx=50pt,bblly=250pt,bburx=550pt,bbury=600pt,width=8cm}
229: \caption{
230: The statistical uncertainty on the structure function $g_1$ of
231: the proton
232: measurable at EIC,
233: for an integrated luminosity of
234: 400 pb$^{-1}$.}
235: \label{fig:g1peic}
236: \end{center}
237: \end{figure}
238:
239:
240:
241: Note that the expected asymmetries at low $x$, i.e. $x \sim 10^{-4}$ are
242: relatively small, about $10^{-3}$, which puts strong requirements
243: on the control of the systematic effects, as discussed in~\cite{works}.
244: At the lowest $x$ values at THERA, the asymmetries
245: may be even smaller, and the potential to actually
246: extract a polarized structure function at these values still needs to
247: demonstrated.
248:
249:
250:
251:
252:
253: It would be very advantageous to have
254: polarized low-$x$ neutron data which would
255: enable to measure
256: singlet and non-singlet polarized structure functions at low $x$.
257: A study was made using polarized $^3$He at HERA~\cite{abhay}, from which
258: $g_1^n$ can be extracted. If the machine can provide polarized $^3$He
259: with a luminosity comparable to the one for the protons, such a program
260: can be carried out.
261: A recent new idea is to store polarized deutrons~\cite{derb}.
262: Due to the small
263: gyromagnetic anomaly
264: value the storage and acceleration problems are less severe
265: for deutrons and
266: it could be possible to keep the polarization at HERA
267: even without the use of
268: Siberian snake magnets for deuterons. However the spin
269: cannot
270: be flipped by spin rotators from transverse to longitudinal
271: polarization in the interaction regions, and other means, such as the
272: recently suggested use of external radial frequency fields must be considered
273: for arranging that the spins align longitudinally at the interaction
274: points.
275: %Hence one has to make
276: %a judicious choise of the spin orbit and use RF-dipoles to
277: %llign the spins at the collision points.
278: For polarized deuteron beams
279: the changes to the present HERA machine could be more modest, and,
280: if one can instrument the region around the beam-pipe to tag the
281: spectator in the deuteron nucleus, it can give simultaneously
282: samples of scattering on $p$ and $n$.
283: An intense polarized deuteron source is however needed.
284: Furthermore, so far the accelerating and storing
285: of polarized deuteron beams
286: has been studied to a much lesser extend than
287: for polarized protons.
288:
289: With proton and neutron data available one can measure the Bjorken
290: sum rule $\int g_1^p dx -\int g_1^ndx$,
291: presently measured to about 10\% precision.
292: E.g. EIC data will allow to measure this sum rule, a key test for QCD,
293: to a few \% precision.
294:
295: \section{The polarized gluon distribution $\Delta G(x,Q^2)$}
296: \vspace{1mm}
297: \noindent
298: The high quality $g_1$ data from the fixed target experiments allows for
299: quantitative QCD studies of the polarized structure function data, from
300: which polarized parton distributions are extracted~\cite{abhay}.
301: The relatively small contribution of the quarks to
302: the spin of the proton,
303: as follows from the 'spin puzzle',
304: leads to a rather large value of the polarized gluon.
305: The precision is however rather limited.
306: The measurements from present
307: day data for the first moment of the
308: polarized gluon distribution give typically $\int \Delta G(x)~{\rm d}x
309: = 0.9 \pm 0.3({\rm exp})\pm 1.0({\rm theory})$ at $Q^2=1$~GeV$^2$.
310: The theoretical error on this
311: quantity is dominated by the extrapolation into
312: the yet unmeasured low-$x$ region.
313: %~\cite{altarelli}.
314: Including
315: future HERA data will improve the experimental error to about 0.2.
316: The theoretical error
317: is expected to decrease by more than a
318: factor 2 once $g_1(x,Q^2)$ is measured at low $x$.
319: At an EIC one expects to reduce the statistical uncertainty even to 0.08
320: with about 10 fb$^{-1}$, as discussed
321: in ~\cite{lichtenstadt}.
322:
323:
324:
325: It is crucial for our full understanding of the proton spin that
326: the prediction of a large polarized gluon is
327: confirmed by direct measurements
328: of $\Delta G$.
329: HERA has shown
330: that the large centre of mass system (CMS) energy allows
331: for several processes to be used to extract the unpolarized gluon
332: distribution.
333: These include jet
334: and high $p_t$ hadron production, charm production
335: both in DIS and photoproduction, and correlations between
336: multiplicities of the current and target hemisphere of the events
337: in the Breit frame.
338: %and
339: %exclusive vector meson production.
340:
341:
342: %\begin{figure}[t!]
343: %\begin{center}
344: %\epsfig{file=dgprocf2.ps,bbllx=30pt,bblly=275pt,bburx=580pt,bbury=565pt,width=10cm}
345: %\caption{Di-jets: Sensitivity to $\Delta G/G$ (a) and $x\Delta G$ (b)
346: % for three different polarized gluon distributions shown
347: %as solid lines and a luminosity
348: %of 500~pb$^{-1}$, for $Q^2=20~{\rm GeV}^2$.}
349: %\label{fig-g-500}
350: %\end{center}
351:
352: \begin{figure}[t!]
353: \begin{center}
354: \epsfig{file=track500.ps,bbllx=30pt,bblly=275pt,bburx=580pt,bbury=565pt,width=8.5cm}
355: \caption{High $p_t$
356: hadrons: Sensitivity to $\Delta G/G$ (a) and $x\Delta G$ (b)
357: for three different polarized gluon distributions shown
358: as solid lines and a luminosity
359: of 500~pb$^{-1}$, for $Q^2=20~{\rm GeV}^2$.}
360: \label{fig-t-500}
361: \end{center}
362: \end{figure}
363:
364:
365:
366: The most promising process for a direct
367: extraction of $\Delta G$ at HERA is di-jet production, as discussed
368: in ~\cite{radel}.
369: The underlying idea is to isolate boson-gluon fusion events, i.e.~a process
370: where the gluon distribution enters at the Born level.
371: Jets are selected
372: with a $p_t>5$~GeV and are restricted to the acceptance
373: of a typical existing HERA detector by
374: the requirement $|\eta^{jet}_{LAB}| < 2.8$, where
375: $\eta^{jet}_{LAB}$ is the pseudo-rapidity in the laboratory system.
376: The resulting measurable range in
377: $x$ (of the gluon) is $0.002 < x < 0.2$ with typically 6 measurable
378: data points.
379: At an EIC
380: the measurable range is reduced to
381: $0.02 < x < 0.3$.
382: The reach at THERA is $0.0005 < x < 0.1$ but an event sample of
383: several hundered pb$^{-1}$
384: will be needed.
385:
386: Instead of jets, single hadrons
387: with high transverse momentum $p_t$ opposite in azimuthal angle
388: in the $\gamma^*p$ frame can be used.~\cite{bravar}.
389: In a study for HERA
390: two charged tracks with a $p_t$ larger than 1.5 GeV are
391: required~\cite{tracks}.
392: The resulting gluon distribution is
393: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig-t-500} and compared to
394: several predicted gluon distributions. A similar level of discriminating power
395: as for the di-jet events is obtained, except in the highest $x$
396: region, where the di-jets are superior.
397: %The gluon distributions are the Gehrmann-Stirling
398: %(GS) sets A and C~\cite{GS}, which
399: %result from a QCD analysis of $g_1$ data,
400: %and a gluon distribution obtained from instanton calculations
401: %\cite{kochelev}.
402: These measurements allow for the determination of the
403: {\it shape} of $\Delta G(x)$.
404: The errors on the individual points for the di-jet measurement
405: on $\Delta G(x)/G(x)$ are in the range from 0.007 to 0.1.
406: The total error on $\Delta G(x)/G(x)$ in the complete range is 0.02.
407:
408:
409:
410: An exploratory study was made, using the values of $\Delta G(x)$
411: obtained from the di-jet
412: analysis as an extra constraint in the fit of $g_1$ data discussed above.
413: The improvement of the errors on the first
414: moment of $\Delta G$ due to the inclusion of di-jet data
415: is shown in Table~\ref{tab-hera}.
416: \begin{table}[t]
417: \caption{\label{tab-hera} The expected statistical
418: uncertainty in the determination of
419: the first moment of the gluon distribution at $Q^{2} = 1$ GeV$^2$
420: (500~pb$^{-1}$), see text.}
421: \hfil
422: \begin{tabular}{||l|c||}
423: \hline\hline
424: {\bf Analysis Type} & {\boldmath $\delta (\int \Delta G~{\rm d}x)$} \\
425: \hline \hline
426: 1. $g_1$ fixed target & 0.3 \\
427: \hline
428: 2. $g_1$ fixed target + HERA & 0.2 \\
429: \hline
430: 3. di-jets at HERA & 0.2 \\
431: \hline
432: 4. combined 2 \& 3 & 0.1 \\
433: \hline\hline
434: \end{tabular}
435: \hfil
436: \end{table}
437: The first two rows give the values quoted before, namely for the NLO QCD
438: analysis without and with projected
439: HERA data for $g_1$. The third row shows the expected error if
440: only the di-jet asymmetry is added to the fixed target
441: $g_1$ data, and the fourth
442: row shows the total improvement using all available information.
443:
444: %In all, polarized HERA can make a very important contribution to the
445: %measurement of $\Delta G$ and hence to the understanding of the
446: %spin structure of the nucleon, in a unique
447: %kinematic range. This constitutes therefore one of the major trump
448: %cards for the physics case of polarized HERA.
449:
450:
451: \begin{figure}[t!]
452: \centering \epsfig{file=g5m.eps,width=.38\textwidth}
453: \caption{Spin asymmetries $A^{W^-}$
454: for charged current
455: events for a total
456: luminosity of 500 pb$^{-1}$.
457: %The parton
458: % densities GS--A from \protect\cite{GS} were used.
459: The error bars represent
460: the statistical uncertainty of the measurement.}
461: \label{fig_results}
462: \end{figure}
463:
464:
465:
466: \section{Polarized quark distributions}
467: \label{sec:pquark}
468: \vspace{1mm}
469: \noindent
470:
471:
472:
473: In present fixed target experiments information on the flavour decomposition
474: can be obtained from semi-inclusive measurements,
475: i.e.~measurements where a final state hadron is tagged.
476: At HERA one has the additional option to study quark flavours in
477: a more inclusive, and therefore fragmentation function independent mode,
478: via charged current interactions.
479: The asymmetry is defined by
480: \begin{equation}
481: A^{W\mp} =
482: \frac{d\sigma^{W^\mp}_{\uparrow\downarrow}-d\sigma^{W^\mp}_{\uparrow\uparrow}}
483: {d\sigma^{W^\mp}_{\uparrow\downarrow}+d\sigma^{W^\mp}_{\uparrow\uparrow}}
484: \nonumber\\
485: % = \frac{\pm 2bg^{W^\mp}_1+ag^{W^\mp}_5}{aF^{W^\mp}_1\pm
486: % bF^{W^\mp}_3}
487: \approx \frac{g^{W^{\mp}}_5}{F^{W^{\mp}}_1} \label{eq_as}
488: \end{equation}
489: with
490: %$a = 2(y^2-2y+2)$
491: %and $b = y(2-y)$, and
492: $g^{W^-}_5 = \Delta u+\Delta c - \Delta\bar{d} -
493: \Delta
494: \bar{s} $, $g^{W^+}_5 = \Delta d+\Delta s - \Delta\bar{u} - \Delta\bar{c}$.
495: A Monte Carlo study, including detector effects, was made for the
496: measurements of the asymmetry and the extraction of $g_5$~\cite{contreras2}.
497: The total missing transverse momentum (which is a signal for the
498: escaping neutrino) was required to be $P_{Tmiss}>15$ GeV, and the region
499: $Q^2>225$ GeV$^2$ has been selected for this analysis.
500: The results for the asymmetries for both HERA and THERA
501: are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_results}.
502: The error bars indicate the statistical precision
503: of the measurement. The asymmetries are very large
504: and significant measurements can be produced at THERA down to
505: $x= 10^{-3}$.
506: These charged current measurements, with both
507: $e^+$ and $e^-$ beams, can be used to
508: extract e.g.~the $\Delta u$ and $\Delta d$ distributions.
509:
510:
511: \section{Photoproduction}
512: \vspace{1mm}
513: \noindent
514: Photoproduction processes have been shown to be sensitive probes
515: for the polarized parton structure in the proton AND in the
516: photon. Single jet production has been studied in~\cite{gehr}.
517: In~\cite{gamma} it was shown that also
518: a high $p_t$ track analyses yields
519: a similar sensitivity, with only modest luminosity
520: requirements.
521:
522:
523:
524: \begin{figure}[t!]
525: \begin{center}
526: ~ \epsfig{file=zproc5.eps,width=8cm}
527: \caption{Polarized photoproduction of di-jets ($E_{T,1} > 8$~GeV,
528: $E_{T,2} > 6$~GeV):
529: asymmetries for direct (first column) and resolved (second and third
530: column) photon contributions as function of the rapidity of the first
531: jet and for different orientations of the second jet.
532: Second and third column correspond to different scenarios for
533: the parton content of the polarized photon suggested
534: in~\protect\cite{grvgamma}.
535: The error bars shown
536: correspond to a Monte Carlo sample of 50~pb\protect{$^{-1}$}.
537: %for the GS(C) parton distributions and include parton showering,
538: %hadronization, jet finding and jet clustering effects.}
539: }
540: \label{fig:phoprod}
541: \end{center}
542: \end{figure}
543:
544:
545: Polarized photoproduction of di-jets has been investigated in detail,
546: including in particular effects due to
547: parton showering, hadronization, jet finding and jet clustering.
548: It could be demonstrated that, although
549: these effects yield sizable corrections, the measurable asymmetry will
550: largely be preserved at the hadron level~\cite{gamma}.
551: An example for the correspondence of parton and hadron level asymmetries is
552: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:phoprod}, obtained with a moderate integrated
553: luminosity of only 50~pb$^{-1}$.
554: A first idea on the discriminative power on the photon
555: structure of future measurements
556: can however be gained by comparing the predictions obtained
557: with the two (minimal and maximal) polarization scenarios
558: proposed in~\cite{grvgamma}, as done in Fig.~\ref{fig:phoprod}.
559:
560:
561:
562:
563:
564:
565:
566: Finally, it can be pointed out that a measurement of the total
567: polarized photoproduction cross section $\Delta \sigma_{\gamma p} (\nu)$
568: as function of the photon-proton CMS energy $\nu$
569: at HERA would contribute to a precise understanding of the
570: Drell-Hearn-Gerasimov sum rule, as discussed in~\cite{dhg}.
571: In particular the Regge behaviour of the energy dependence
572: of the polarized cross
573: section can be tested. The sensitivity which could be reached with EIC is
574: about one order of magnitude larger than the one for HERA.
575:
576:
577:
578:
579: \section{Effects at high $Q^2$}
580: \vspace{1mm}
581: \noindent
582:
583: At an $ep$-collider the region of
584: high $Q^2$ offers the largest chance of discovering new physics.
585: Such new physics could manifest itself through the production
586: of new particles, such as Leptoquarks or SUSY particles in RP
587: violating models, contact interactions, etc.
588: A general study was made based on the
589: contact interaction formalism~\cite{virey}.
590: It was
591: demonstrated that a fully polarized HERA would be very instrumental
592: in disentangling the chiral structure of the new interactions.
593: With 250 pb$^{-1}$ data samples for polarized $e^+$ and
594: $e^-$ beams, for each of the 2 spin orientations,
595: the asymmetries are sensitive to
596: contact interactions to scales
597: larger than 7 TeV (95\% C.L.).
598: In the presence of a signal these different
599: combinations of cross sections into the seven different asymmetries
600: allow a complete identification of the chiral structure of the new
601: interactions, i.e.~whether the interactions are LL, RR, LR or LR or
602: a combination of those (where L and R denote the left and right handed
603: fermion helicities for the lepton and quark respectively).
604:
605: This study has been further extended to the special case of
606: leptoquark-like production~\cite{virey2}: asymmetries like the ones above
607: would allow to pin down the chiral properties of the couplings
608: to these new
609: particles.
610:
611: An interesting
612: possibility is the effect induced by QCD
613: instantons~\cite{kochelev} to the proton structure function.
614: Non-perturbative instanton fluctuations
615: describe the quantum tunnelling between different gauge rotated classical
616: vacua in QCD.
617: Due to the quark helicity flip at the quark-instanton vertex, the
618: contribution to the spin-dependent cross sections of instantons is
619: very different from the one of the perturbative quark-gluon vertex.
620: Furthermore, in the instanton liquid model~\cite{instanton}
621: the contribution of instantons to the proton structure
622: is expected to become increasingly more important with increasing
623: $Q^2$~\cite{kochelev}.
624:
625: These high $Q^2$ studies may be most relevant for HERA and THERA.
626: For THERA both $e^+$ and $e^-$ beams will be needed and
627: minimum integrated luminosities of
628: order 100-200 pb$^{-1}$/beam.
629:
630:
631:
632:
633: \section{Other Topics}
634: Many other topics on polarization can be studied at an
635: $ep$-collider, e.g.
636: target fragmentation properties, transversity, DHG, issues related
637: to diffraction, spin transfer in $\Lambda $ polarization,
638: semi-inclusive measurements to extract the polarized quark distributions,
639: etc. Further details can be found in~\cite{works}.
640:
641: \section{Conclusions}
642:
643: Polarized $ep$-colliders with a
644: centre of mass energies of 100-1000 GeV
645: will allow to make unique
646: measurements in polarized deep inelastic scattering as well as
647: photoproduction.
648:
649: The necessity
650: for low-$x$ measurements of the structure functions, and
651: determination of the polarized gluon
652: distribution $\Delta G$ have
653: been wildly advocated by the spin physics community over the last five years.
654: $ep$-colliders can play a pivotal role in this field since they are able
655: to give conclusive insight on both of these issues.
656:
657:
658: Polarized $ep$-colliders
659: will also contribute to the flavour decomposition of the quark spin
660: distributions, and the very intriguing possibility
661: to measure polarized parton distributions in the photon.
662: Furthermore --not discussed in this review-- new insight is expected
663: on spin transfer in quark fragmentation and spin effects in
664: diffractive scattering.
665: Finally, a polarized HERA or THERA will be very instrumental in the study and
666: interpretation of possible deviations from the Standard
667: Model expectation in the high-$Q^2$
668: region, if observed.
669:
670: However the required luminosity for any such machine should be at least
671: 100 pb$^{-1}$/year, preferably even more. The polarizations of the beams
672: should be larger than 50-60\%. If EIC will be the world's only
673: polarized collider, it would be useful to consider having an
674: extention of the CMS energy, via an upgrade of the
675: $e$-LINAC energy e.g. from 10 to 20-30 GeV, to cover an as large
676: kinematic region as possible. If new detectors are required or
677: can be afforded, particular care should be taken on the design,
678: learning from shortcomings from the present HERA detectors, in
679: e.g. the small angle instrumentation~\cite{krasny}.
680: Polarized deuterons seem an attractive addition or even alternative
681: to polarized protons, and are perhaps easier to accelerate and store, but
682: detailed machine studies need to be performed to confirm these ideas.
683:
684: In all, polarized scattering experiments have in the last decades
685: often revealed surprises, hence a polarized collider seems an attractive
686: future option
687: with a rich program.
688:
689:
690: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
691:
692:
693: \bibitem{barber}
694: SPIN at HERA Collaboration, L.V.~Alekseeva et al., University of
695: Michigan preprint UM-HE-96-20 (1996); UM-HE-99-05 (1999);\\
696: http://www-mpy.desy.de/proton\_pol/.
697:
698:
699:
700: \bibitem{erhic} see http://quark.phy.bnl.gov/$\tilde{\;\;}$raju/yale\_ \\
701: eRHIC.html
702:
703:
704: %\bibitem{erhic} see http://quark.phy.bnl.gov/~raju/yale\_eRHIC.html.
705:
706: \bibitem{thera} Appendix to the TESLA TDR:
707: THERA: electron proton scattering at $\sqrt{s} \sim $ 1 TeV,
708: H.~Abramowicz et al., DESY-01-011 (2001).
709:
710:
711: \bibitem{gehr}
712: Proceedings of the workshop 'Physics with Polarized Protons at
713: HERA', Eds. A. De Roeck and T. Gehrmann DESY-98-01.
714:
715:
716: \bibitem{works}Proceedings of the workshop
717: ``Polarized Protons at High Energies - Accelerator Challenges and
718: Physics Opportunities'' ed. A. De Roeck, D. Barber and G. R\"{a}del,
719: DESY-PROC--1999--03 (1999).
720:
721:
722:
723: \bibitem{abhay} A. De Roeck et al.,
724: Eur. Phys. J. C6 (1999) 131
725:
726: \bibitem{Kwiecins} J. Kwiecinski, Acta Phys. Polon. {\bf B29} (1998) 1201.
727:
728: \bibitem{derb}
729: Y. Derbenev, private communications, and \\
730: V. Anferov and Y. Derbenev, Phys. Rev. PRST-AB 12, 1345 (2000).\\
731: A. Skrinsky, proc. of the workshop EPIC99, ed. L.C. Bland et al.,
732: Bloomington, USA, April 1999, World Scientific.
733:
734:
735:
736: %\bibitem{altarelli} G. Altarelli et al.,
737: %Nucl. Phys. {\bf B496} (1997) 337.
738:
739: %\bibitem{raedel}
740: %A. De Roeck et al., Proc. of Workshop
741: %``Future physics at HERA'', Eds.\ G. Ingelman, A. De Roeck, R. Klanner, DESY %(1996) 803 ({\tt hep-ph/9610315}).
742:
743: \bibitem{lichtenstadt} J. Lichtenstadt, these proceedings.
744:
745: \bibitem{radel} G. Radel, these proceedings.
746:
747: \bibitem{bravar} A. Bravar, D. von Harrach and A. Kotzinian,
748: Phys. Lett. {\bf B421} (1998) 359.
749:
750: \bibitem{tracks} G. R\"adel and A. De Roeck,
751: ({\tt hep-ph/9711382}).
752:
753:
754:
755: %\bibitem{GS}
756: %T. Gehrmann and W.J. Stirling, Phys. Rev. {\bf D53} (1996) 6100.
757:
758:
759:
760:
761:
762:
763:
764: \bibitem{contreras2} J.G. Contreras, A. De Roeck and M. Maul,
765: ({\tt hep-ph/9711418}).
766:
767:
768: \bibitem{gamma}
769: J.~Butterworth, N.~Goodman, M.~Stratmann and W.~Vogelsang,
770: ({\tt hep-ph/9711250}).
771:
772: \bibitem{grvgamma}
773: M.~Gl\"uck and W.~Vogelsang, Z. Phys. {\bf C55} (1992) 353; {\bf C57} (1993)
774: 309;\\
775: M.~Gl\"uck, M.~Stratmann and W.~Vogelsang, Phys. Lett. {\bf B337} (1994) 373.
776:
777:
778: \bibitem{dhg}
779: S.D.~Bass, and A.~De Roeck,
780: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C18} (2001) 538.
781:
782: \bibitem{virey} J.M. Virey, ({\tt hep-ph/9710423}).
783:
784: \bibitem{virey2} P. Taxil, E. Tugcu, J.M. Virey,
785: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C14} (2000) 178.
786:
787: \bibitem{kochelev}
788: N. Kochelev,
789: Phys. Rev. {\bf D57} (1998) 5542.
790:
791: \bibitem{instanton} T. Sch\"afer and E.V. Shuryak,
792: Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 70} (1998) 426\\
793: D.I. Diakonov, ({\tt hep-ph/9602375}).
794:
795:
796: \bibitem{krasny}
797: W. Krasny, these proceedings.
798:
799: \end{thebibliography}
800:
801: \end{document}
802: In addition to the physics programme at the polarized $ep$-collider,
803: it would be possible to study polarized
804: proton-nucleon collisions in a fixed target experiment
805: in the polarized HERA proton beam. This proposed
806: experiment, presently called HERA--$\vec{{\rm N}}$, would
807: require a polarized internal nucleon target and a
808: dedicated new spectrometer~\cite{nowak}.
809: The two main physics issues
810: are the careful investigation of twist-3 effects in the transition
811: region between non-perturbative
812: and perturbative QCD via single spin asymmetries (no polarized beam
813: required) and
814: the measurement of $\Delta G/G$ in photon and charmonium production via
815: double spin asymmetries.
816:
817:
818:
819:
820: Finally we note that the polarized physics program also contains
821: a proposal for a fixed target experiment, namely
822: to use the 820 GeV polarized proton beam on a polarized proton target and
823: study single and double spin asymmetries\cite{nowak}.
824: The physics program is similar to the one
825: of the hadron-hadron collider RHIC, but at a
826: CMS energy of about 40 GeV. Thus complementary measurements can be made, in
827: particular on $\Delta G$, from $J/\psi$ and photon plus jet production in
828: polarized $pp$
829: collisions. This is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig5},
830: where the statistical accuracy of
831: the measurements is compared with two scenarios for $\Delta G(x)$.
832: A luminosity of 320 pb$^{-1}$ is assumed for the HERA measurement,
833: corresponding to a few years of data taking (assuming
834: $3.10^{13}$ atoms/cm$^2$ for the polarized target).
835: Since this measurement accesses the polarized gluon density in the high
836: $x$ region, it is complementary to the measurements discussed before.
837: This measurement however
838: requires a new experiment with a wide angle acceptance,
839: presently called HERA-$\vec{N}$.
840:
841:
842:
843:
844:
845:
846:
847:
848:
849: \begin{figure}[t!] % fig 1
850: %\centerline{\epsfig{file=hera_ep_fig3.eps,height=3.5in,width=3.5in}}
851: \centerline{\epsfig{file=hera_ep_fig4.eps,height=3.5in,width=4in}}
852: \vspace{10pt}
853: \caption{
854: Expected statistical accuracy for the determination of $\Delta G(x)$
855: from polarized $pp\rightarrow \gamma+jet+X$, for a luminosity of 320 pb$^{-1}$
856: in an optimized detector.}
857: \label{fig5}
858: \end{figure}
859:
860: \bibitem{heraspin}
861: J.~Feltesse and A.~Sch\"afer, Proceedings of the workshop
862: ``Future Physics at HERA'', Hamburg 1995/96, eds. G.~Ingelman, A.~De~Roeck
863: and R.~Klanner, DESY (Hamburg, 1996), p.757ff.
864:
865: \bibitem{hermes} HERMES Collaboration, K. Coulter et al., {\it Proposal}
866: DESY-PRC 90/01 (1990); {\it Technical Desing Report} DESY-PRC 93/06 (1993).
867: In the case of single inclusive jet and hadron production, it is not
868: possible to make a clean separation between direct and resolved photon
869: contributions, the selection of a certain rapidity region only enhances
870: or suppresses one of them. A better discrimination is possible, if
871: the inclusive production of di-jets is considered, since the di-jet
872: rapidities allow (at lowest order) for a reconstruction of the
873: incoming parton momenta, in particular to define
874: the 'observed' parton momentum inside the photon $x_{\gamma}^{OBS}$.
875: The resulting data can then be binned in $x_{\gamma}^{OBS}$, and one
876: usually attributes all events with $x_{\gamma}^{OBS}>0.75$ to 'direct'
877: processes.
878:
879: