1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

2: \usepackage{graphicx}

3: %\setlength{\topmargin}{-1cm}

4: %\setlength{\evensidemargin}{0cm}

5: %\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0cm}

6: %\setlength{\textwidth}{15cm}

7: %\setlength{\textheight}{22cm}

8: \setlength{\baselineskip}{.6cm}

9: \setlength{\parindent}{30pt}

10: \setlength{\parskip}{6pt}

11: 

12: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}

13: \def\NIM{Nucl. Instrum. Methods}

14: \def\NIMA{Nucl. Instrum. Methods A}

15: \def\NPB{Nucl. Phys.}

16: \def\PLB{Phys. Lett. B}

17: \def\PRL{Phys. Rev. Lett.}

18: \def\PRD{Phys. Rev. D}

19: \def\ZPC{Z. Phys. C}

20: \def\EPJ{Eur. Phys. J. C}

21: 

22: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

23: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}

24: \newcommand{\Lam}{\Lambda_{c}^{+}}

25: \newcommand{\Lambar}{\bar{\Lambda}_{c}^{+}}

26: \newcommand{\Lamvec}{\vec{\Lambda}_{c}^{+}}

27: \newcommand{\Lambarvec}{\vec{\bar{\Lambda}}_{c}^{{}_{{}_+}}}

28: 

29: \begin{document}

30: %\begin{flushright}

31: %KOBE--FHD--01--??\\

32: %August~~~2001

33: %\end{flushright}

34: 

35: \begin{center}

36: \baselineskip=1cm

37: {\Large \bf Charmed Hadron Production \\

38: in Neutrino Reactions \\

39: and Polarized $s$--quark Distribution\footnote[1]{Talk presented by 

40: K. Sudoh at the NuFACT'01 workshop, Tsukuba, Japan, May 24--30 (2001).}} 

41: 

42: \baselineskip=0.6cm

43: \vspace{1.5cm}

44: Kazutaka ~SUDOH \\

45: \vspace{0.2cm}

46: {\em Graduate School of Science and Technology, \\ 

47: Kobe University, Nada, Kobe 657--8501, Japan} \\

48: {\tt E-mail:sudou@radix.h.kobe-u.ac.jp}

49: 

50: \vspace{0.8cm}

51: Toshiyuki ~MORII \\

52: \vspace{0.2cm}

53: {\em Faculty of Human Development, \\

54: Kobe University, Nada, Kobe 657--8501, Japan} \\

55: {\tt E-mail:morii@kobe-u.ac.jp}

56: \end{center}

57: 

58: \vspace{1.0cm} 

59: \noindent

60: \begin{center}

61: {\bf Abstract}

62: \end{center}

63: 

64: In order to obtain information about the polarized strange quark 

65: distribution, we studied the semi--inclusive $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ production 

66: in neutrino and polarized proton collisions. 

67: We found that these reactions are effective to clearly extract the 

68: polarization of strange quark by measuring the spin correlation between 

69: the target proton and the produced $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ baryon. 

70: 

71: \noindent

72: PACS numbers: 13.15.g, 13.88.e, 14.20.Lq

73: \clearpage

74: 

75: Proton spin puzzle is currently one of the most challenging topics 

76: in high energy spin physics. 

77: As is well known, proton spin is composed of the spin and orbital 

78: angular momentum of quarks and gluons which constitute proton. 

79: The polarized parton distribution plays an important role on 

80: the spin structure of proton. 

81: However, knowledge of the polarized sea quark distribution remain still 

82: poor. 

83: In order to understand the spin structure of proton, we need more 

84: information about the polarized sea quark distribution functions. 

85: Recently, HERMES group has reported \cite{HERMES99} that direct 

86: measurement of the strange sea is required to explain the violation of 

87: the Ellis--Jaffe sum rule \cite{Ellis74}. 

88: So far, there are several parametrization models of the strange quark 

89: distribution. 

90: Though the most simplest case is to assume the flavor ${\rm SU(3)}_f$, 

91: a new parametrization taken account of the violation of ${\rm SU(3)}_f$ 

92: is also recently proposed \cite{Leader99}. 

93: 

94: Here we focus on the polarized $s$/$\bar{s}$ quark distribution. 

95: To examine the polarized $s$/$\bar{s}$ quark distribution, we have 

96: studied semi--inclusive $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ neutrino production; 

97: $\nu + \vec{p} \ra l^- + \Lamvec + X$, 

98: $\bar{\nu} + \vec{p} \ra l^+ + \Lambarvec + X$, 

99: which might be observed at the planned factory, where arrows attached 

100: to particles mean that these particles are polarized. 

101: Since in the naive quark model, the $\Lam$ baryon is composed of a heavy 

102: $c$--quark and anti--symmetrically combined light $u$ and $d$--quarks, 

103: we can assume the polarization of $\Lam$ baryon to be the one of $c$--quark. 

104: In addition, $\Lam$ is dominantly produced by the fragmentation of 

105: $c$--quark which is originated from $s$--quark through the $t$--channel 

106: $W$ exchange at the leading order. 

107: Therefore, there can be a correlation between the $s$--quark 

108: polarization and the produced $c$--quark polarization. 

109: Hence we can expect that the measurement of the spin correlation 

110: between the incident proton and the produced $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ gives us 

111: information about the polarized $s$/$\bar{s}$--quark distribution in proton. 

112: 

113: For above processes, we calculated the double spin asymmetry $A_{LL}^H$ 

114: for final state hadron specified by $H$ ($\Lam$ or $\Lambar$), 

115: which is given by 

116: \begin{equation}

117: A_{LL}^{H}=\frac{d\Delta\sigma/dp_{T}}{d\sigma/dp_{T}} ,

118: \label{ALL}

119: \end{equation}

120: where $p_T$ is a transverse momentum of final hadron $H$. 

121: $d\Delta\sigma$ represents the spin--dependent differential cross 

122: section and is defined in terms of $d\sigma_{h h^{\prime}}$ as 

123: \begin{equation}

124: d\Delta\sigma \equiv \frac{1}{4} [ d\sigma_{++} - d\sigma_{+-}

125: + d\sigma_{--} - d\sigma_{-+}] ,

126: \end{equation}

127: with definite helicities $h$ and $h^{\prime}$ for incoming 

128: proton and outgoing $\Lam$/$\Lambar$, respectively. 

129: 

130: For $\Lam$ production, the spin--dependent differential 

131: cross section is given 

132: \begin{equation}

133: d\Delta\sigma(\nu p\ra l^{-}\Lam X)

134: =\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 \Delta s(x)+{\rm U}_{cd}^2 \Delta d(x)\right\}dx

135: \left(\frac{d\Delta\hat{\sigma}}{d\hat{t}}

136: \right)d\hat{t}\Delta D_c^{\Lam} (z)dz ,

137: \end{equation}

138: where $\Delta s(x)$ and $\Delta d(x)$ are the polarized 

139: $s$--quark and $d$--quark distribution functions, respectively.

140: ${\rm U}_{cs}$ and ${\rm U}_{cd}$ are CKM parameters. 

141: $\Delta D_c^{\Lam}(z)$ is the polarized fragmentation function of 

142: outgoing charm quark decaying into $\Lam$. 

143: We used the model of Peterson {\em et al.} \cite{Peterson83} as the 

144: unpolarized fragmentation function, which is given by \cite{PDG98} 

145: \begin{equation}

146: D_c^{\Lam}(z)=\frac{1}{z[1-\frac{1}{z}-\frac{\epsilon_p}{1-z}]^2}

147: ~~~~~~~~~\epsilon_p\sim 0.25~~\mbox{for}~~\Lam . 

148: \end{equation}

149: Unfortunately, the polarized fragmentation function is not yet 

150: established because of lack of experimental data. 

151: By analogy with the study on $\Lambda$ polarization \cite{deFlorian98}, 

152: we took the 

153: following ansatz: 

154: \begin{equation}

155: \Delta D_c^{\Lam}(z)=C_c^{\Lam}(z) D_c^{\Lam}(z) , 

156: \end{equation}

157: where $C_c^{\Lam}(z)$ is the scale--independent spin transfer 

158: coefficient. 

159: Here we apply the analysis on $\Lambda$ production to $\Lam$ production 

160: and choose the following two models; $C_c^{\Lam}(z)=1$ (the naive 

161: nonrelativistic quark model) and $C_c^{\Lam}(z)=z$ (the jet 

162: fragmentation models \cite{Bartl80}). 

163: The double spin asymmetry $A_{LL}^{\Lam}$ is described in terms of 

164: the spin transfer coefficient $C_c^{\Lam}(z)$ and the ratio of the 

165: parton distribution functions as 

166: \begin{equation}

167: A_{LL}^{\Lam}\propto C_c^{\Lam}(z)\frac{\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 \Delta s(x)

168: +{\rm U}_{cd}^2 \Delta d(x)\right\}}{\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 s(x)

169: +{\rm U}_{cd}^2 d(x)\right\}}. 

170: \end{equation}

171: Thus $A_{LL}^{\Lam}$ is proportional to linear combination of 

172: the polarized $s$--quark and $d$--quark distribution function. 

173: Therefore, $\Lam$ production is not so good process for clearly 

174: extracting the $s$--quark distribution, since the contribution from 

175: the valence $d$--quark is large. 

176: 

177: On the contrary, $A_{LL}^{\Lambar}$ in $\Lambar$ production can be

178: represented as 

179: \begin{equation}

180: A_{LL}^{\Lambar}\propto C_c^{\Lam}(z)\frac{\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 \Delta 

181: \bar{s}(x)+{\rm U}_{cd}^2 \Delta \bar{d}(x)\right\}}

182: {\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 \bar{s}(x)+{\rm U}_{cd}^2 \bar{d}(x)\right\}} 

183: =C_c^{\Lam}(z)\frac{\Delta \bar{s}(x)}{\bar{s}(x)}

184: =C_c^{\Lam}(z)\frac{\Delta s(x)}{s(x)}, 

185: \end{equation}

186: in which the $\bar{d}$--quark contribution can be eliminated and thus 

187: $A_{LL}^{\Lambar}$ is directly proportional to the strange quark 

188: distribution function. 

189: Therefore, we can clearly extract the polarized strange quark 

190: distribution $\Delta s(x)$. 

191: Note that above equation is derived in both the flavor ${\rm SU(3)}_f$ 

192: case ($\Delta \bar{u}(x)=\Delta \bar{d}(x)=\Delta \bar{s}(x)$)

193: and the non--${\rm SU(3)}_f$ case 

194: ($\Delta \bar{u}(x)=\Delta \bar{d}(x)=\lambda \Delta \bar{s}(x)$\footnote

195: {$\lambda$ represent a degree of ${\rm SU(3)}_f$ violation and is a 

196: parameter which should be determined from experiments \cite{Leader99}.}). 

197: 

198: Setting a charm quark mass $m_c = 1.5$ GeV and the relevant collider 

199: energy $\sqrt{s}=50$ GeV, we numerically calculated the 

200: spin--independent and dependent differential cross sections and the 

201: double spin asymmetry. 

202: As for the parton distribution functions, we used the GRV98 \cite{GRV98} 

203: parametrization as the unpolarized parton distribution function, 

204: and the AAC \cite{AAC} and ``standard scenario'' of 

205: GRSV00 \cite{GRSV00} parametrizations for the polarized one. 

206: 

207: We show the double spin asymmetry in Fig. \ref{fig1} as a function of 

208: $p_T$ at $\sqrt{s}=50$ GeV for $\Lam$ production (left panel) and for 

209: $\Lambar$ production (right panel). 

210: In order to suppress the contributions from the diffractive process and 

211: higher twist corrections, we have imposed the kinematical cut on $p_T$ 

212: as $p_T > 2$ GeV in numerical calculations. 

213: In figures, the bold and normal lines show the case of AAC 

214: parametrization and ``standard scenario'' of GRSV00 parametrization, 

215: respectively. 

216: The solid lines represent the spin transfer coefficient 

217: $C_c^{\Lam}(z)=1$ case, while the dashed lines represent 

218: $C_c^{\Lam}(z)=z$ case. 

219: 

220: As shown in figures, $A_{LL}^{\Lam}$ in the smaller $p_T$ regions does 

221: not depend on the model of polarized parton distribution functions, 

222: and is strongly affected by the shape of the spin transfer coefficient 

223: $C_c^{\Lam}(z)$. 

224: Therefore, The $\Lam$ production is effective for extracting information 

225: about the polarized fragmentation function $\Delta D_c^{\Lam}(z)$. 

226: On the other hand, measuring $A_{LL}^{\Lambar}$ in larger $p_T$ regions 

227: is quite effective for testing the model of polarized parton 

228: distribution functions, since the ambiguity of the polarized 

229: fragmentation function is small and we see a big difference between two 

230: parametrization models. 

231: 

232: In summary, to extract information about the polarized strange quark 

233: distribution in proton, the semi--inclusive $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ production 

234: in neutrino--polarized proton collisions was studied. 

235: $\Lambar$ production is most promising not only for testing but also 

236: for directly extracting the polarized strange quark distribution 

237: $\Delta s(x)$ by measuring $A_{LL}^{\Lambar}$. 

238: 

239: \begin{figure}[t!]

240:  \begin{center}

241:    \includegraphics[width=16pc, keepaspectratio]{fig1.eps}

242:    \includegraphics[width=16pc, keepaspectratio]{fig2.eps}

243:  \end{center}

244: \caption{

245: $p_T$ distribution of double spin asymmetries at $\sqrt{s}=50$ GeV

246: for $\Lam$ production (left panel) and 

247: for $\Lambar$ production (right panel). 

248: }

249: \label{fig1}

250: \end{figure}

251: 

252: \begin{thebibliography}{00}

253: \bibitem{HERMES99}

254: HERMES Collaboration, K. Ackerstaff {\em et al.}, 

255: \Journal{\PLB}{464}{123}{1999}. 

256: \bibitem{Ellis74}

257: J.Ellis and R. L. Jaffe, 

258: \Journal{\PRD}{9}{1444}{1974}; \Journal{\PRD}{10}{1669}{1974}. 

259: \bibitem{Leader99}

260: E. Leader, A. V. Sidorov, D. B. Stamenov, 

261: \Journal{\PLB}{462}{189}{1999}. 

262: \bibitem{Peterson83}

263: C. Peterson, D.Schlatter, I. Schmitt, P. M. Zerwas, 

264: \Journal{\PRD}{27}{105}{1983}. 

265: \bibitem{PDG98}

266: Particle Data Group, C. Coso {\em et al.}, 

267: \Journal{\EPJ}{3}{1}{1998}. 

268: \bibitem{deFlorian98}

269: D. de Florian, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang, 

270: \Journal{\PRD}{57}{5811}{1998}. 

271: \bibitem{Bartl80}

272: A. Bartl, H. Fraas, W. Majerotto, 

273: \Journal{\ZPC}{6}{335}{1980}. 

274: \bibitem{GRV98}

275: M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, A. Vogt, 

276: \Journal{\EPJ}{5}{461}{1998}. 

277: \bibitem{AAC}

278: Asymmetry Analysis Collaboration, Y. Goto {\em et al.}, 

279: \Journal{\PRD}{62}{034017}{2000}. 

280: \bibitem{GRSV00}

281: M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang, 

282: \Journal{\PRD}{63}{094005}{2001}. 

283: \end{thebibliography}

284: \end{document}

285: 

286: