1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{espcrc2}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: % \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
10:
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: % if you have landscape tables
14: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
15:
16: % put your own definitions here:
17: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
18: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
19: % ...
20:
21: %
22: \def\lapproxeq{\lower .7ex\hbox{$\;\stackrel{\textstyle
23: <}{\sim}\;$}}
24: \def\gapproxeq{\lower .7ex\hbox{$\;\stackrel{\textstyle
25: >}{\sim}\;$}}
26: %
27:
28:
29: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
30: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
31: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
32:
33: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
34: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
35:
36: % declarations for front matter
37: \title{Spin structure function $g_1$ at low $x$: status and plans}
38:
39: \author{B. Bade\l ek\address[MCSD]{Physics Department, Uppsala University, Box 530,
40: S - 751 21 Uppsala, Sweden, and \\
41: \mbox{}\hspace{2mm}Institute of Experimental Physics,
42: Warsaw University, Hoza 69, PL - 00 681 Warsaw, Poland}%
43: \thanks{Supported in part by the KBN grants 2 P03B 05119 and
44: \mbox{}\hspace{1.5mm}SPUB nr 621/E-78/SPUB-M/CERN/P-03/DZ298/2000}}
45:
46: \begin{document}
47:
48: \begin{abstract}
49: A brief review of measurements and expectations concerning the spin structure function
50: $g_1$ of the nucleon at low values of the scaling variable $x$ is given.
51: \vspace{1pc}
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
55: \maketitle
56:
57: \section{INTRODUCTION}
58: The spin-dependent structure function $g_1$ is specially
59: interesting at low $x$, i.e. at high parton densities, where new dynamical
60: mechanisms may be revealed. Its knowledge there is needed for
61: evaluating the spin sum rules ne\-ces\-sary to understand
62: the origin of nucleon spin.
63: The behaviour of $g_1$ at $x\lapproxeq$ 0.001 and in the scaling region, $Q^2
64: \gapproxeq$1 GeV$^2$,
65: is unknown. Spin independent structure function $F_2$ rises there,
66: in agreement with QCD and contrary to the Regge model predictions.
67: A great opportunity to explore the spin dependent phenomena in the
68: region of low $x$ would be through polarising the proton beam at HERA.
69: In the fixed target experiments, low values of $x$ are correlated
70: with low values of $Q^2$.
71: %The low $Q^2$
72: %($Q^2$ \lapproxeq 1 GeV$^2$) spin-sensitive data come from
73: %the E143 experiment at SLAC \cite{e143} (moderate $x$)
74: %and now also from the SMC at CERN \cite{optimal,t15} (low $x$).
75: Theoretical analysis of these results thus requires a suitable
76: extrapolation of $g_1$ to the low $Q^2$ region
77: where the dynamical mechanisms, like the Vector Meson Dominance (VMD),
78: can be important.
79: % (as they do in spin-independent interactions).
80: For large $Q^2$ the VMD contribution to $g_1$ vanishes as $1/Q^4$
81: and can usually be neglected.
82: Moreover, the partonic contribution to $g_1$
83: which controls the structure functions in the deep inelastic domain
84: and which scales there {\it modulo} logarithmic corrections, has to be
85: suitably extended to the low $Q^2$ region.
86: In the $Q^2$=0 limit $g_1$ should be a finite function of $W^2$,
87: free from any kinematical singularities or zeros.
88:
89: \section{PRESENT INFORMATION ON THE $g_1$ OF THE NUCLEON}
90: \subsection{Results of measurements}
91: As a result of a large experimental effort over the years, proton and
92: deuteron $g_1$ was measured for 0.000 06 $< x <$ 0.8, cf. Fig.
93: 1, \cite{bbjkjk} (and refe\-ren\-ces therein).
94: Direct measurements on the neutron are limited to $x\gapproxeq$ 0.02 (see
95: e.g. \cite{hermes}).
96: Recent measurements by HERMES \cite{hermes}
97: are not shown in Fig. 1; those results
98: cover the region $x\gapproxeq$ 0.005 and do not change the overall picture.
99: The region of lowest $x$ values was
100: explored only by the SMC due to the high energy
101: of the muon beam, the demand of a final state hadron in the analysis \cite{smchad}
102: and the implementation of a dedicated low $x$ trigger with a calorimeter signal
103: \cite{smct15}, the two latter requirements efficiently removing the dominant
104: $\mu e$ scattering background. No significant spin effects were observed there.
105:
106:
107: %\vspace{-9pt}
108: \begin{figure}[htb]
109: %\framebox[55mm]{\rule[-21mm]{0mm}{43mm}}
110: \includegraphics*[width=6cm]{xg1p.eps}
111: \vspace{-5pt}
112: \caption{Summary of the $xg_1^{p}$ as a function of $x$ at the
113: {\it measured} $Q^2$.
114: The insets show the SMC data for $Q^2 <$ 1 GeV$^2$. Errors are statistical.
115: The curves, calculated at ($x,Q^2$) values of the SMC data, result of the model
116: described in Section 2.5. Figure taken from \cite{bbjkjk}.}
117: \label{fig:xg1p}
118: \end{figure}
119: %
120: %%%%%%%\begin{figure}[htb]
121: %\vspace{9pt}
122: %\framebox[55mm]{\rule[-21mm]{0mm}{43mm}}
123: %%%%%%%\includegraphics*[width=6cm]{xg1d.eps}
124: %%%%%%\vspace{-5pt}
125: %%%%%%%\caption{As in Figure 1 but for $xg_1^{d}$. }
126:
127: %%%%%%\label{fig:xg1d}
128: %%%%%%\end{figure}
129: %
130: %\vspace{-5pt}
131:
132: As seen in Fig.1 the scaling violation in $g_1(x,Q^2)$
133: is weak: the average $Q^2$ is about 10 GeV$^2$ for the SMC
134: and almost an order of magnitude less for the SLAC and HERMES experiments.
135: For the SMC data \cite{smct15}, $\langle x \rangle$ = 0.0001 corres\-ponds to
136: $\langle Q^2 \rangle$ = 0.02 GeV$^2$; $Q^2$ becomes larger than 1 GeV$^2$
137: for $x\gapproxeq$ 0.003.
138: %The behaviour of $g_1$ at low $x$ and in the scaling region is thus unknown.
139: At low $x$ results on $g_1$ have large errors but it seems that
140: $g_1^p$ is positive
141: and $g_1^d$ and $g_1^n$ are negative there. Statistical errors dominate
142: in that kinematic interval.
143: It should be noted that a direct result of all measurements is the
144: longitudinal cross section asymmetry, $A_{\|}$ which permits to
145: extract the virtual photon -- proton asymmetry, $A_1$ and finally,
146: using $F_2$ and $R$, to get $g_1$.
147:
148:
149: \subsection{Regge pole model expectations}
150:
151: The low $x$ behaviour of $g_1$ for fixed $Q^2$ reflects the high energy behaviour
152: of the virtual Compton scattering cross section with centre-of-mass
153: energy squared, $W^2$. This is the Regge limit of the (deep) inelastic scattering
154: where the Regge pole exchange model should be applicable.
155: According to this model, $g_1(x,Q^2) \sim x^{-\alpha}$ for
156: $x \rightarrow 0$ and fixed $Q^2$, where
157: $\alpha$ is the intercept of the Regge trajectory, here corresponding
158: to axial vector mesons. It is expected that $\alpha \sim 0$ for both
159: $I=0$ and $I=1$ trajectories, \cite{hei}.
160: This behaviour of $g_1$ should go smoothly to the $W^{2 \alpha}$
161: dependence for $Q^2 \rightarrow 0$. It is also expected that
162: the flavour singlet part of the $g_1$ should have a similar low $x$ behaviour
163: as the nonsinglet one.
164: Regge model predictions for $g_1$ become unstable against the QCD evolution which
165: generates more singular behaviour of $g_1$ than that given by
166: $x^{-\alpha}$.
167:
168: Other predictions based on the Regge model are:
169: $g_1\sim$ {ln}$x$, \cite{clo_rob} and
170: $g_1\sim$ 2~{ln}(1/$x$)--1, \cite{bass_land}. A perverse behaviour,
171: $g_1\sim$1/$(x$ln$^2x)$, recalled in \cite{clo_rob}, is not valid
172: for $g_1$, \cite{misha}.
173:
174: The Regge model prediction, $g_1\sim x^0$, has in the past often been
175: used to obtain the $x\rightarrow$ 0 extrapolation of $g_1$ (see Fig. 2)
176: required to extract its first moments (cf. \cite{qcd_old} and references therein).
177:
178:
179: \begin{figure}[htb]
180: \includegraphics*[width=6cm]{fig3.eps}
181: %\framebox[55mm]{\rule[-21mm]{0mm}{43mm}}
182:
183: \vspace{-9pt}
184: \caption{Three scenarios of the possible behaviour of $g_1^p$ at low $x$
185: \cite{hera_study}.}
186: \label{fig:g1extrapo}
187: \end{figure}
188:
189: \vspace{-5pt}
190: The low $x$ data of the SMC \cite{smct15} include the kinematic region where
191: $W^2=(p+q)^2$ is high, $W^2$\gapproxeq 100 GeV$^2$, and $W^2\ll Q^2$.
192: Thus the Regge model should be applicable there.
193: However for those data $W^2$ changes very little:
194: from about 100 GeV$^2$ at $x=$ 0.1 to about 220 GeV$^2$ at $x=$ 0.0001,
195: contrary to a strong change of $Q^2$: from about 20 GeV$^2$
196: to about 0.01 GeV$^2$ respectively.
197: Thus those data cannot test the Regge
198: behaviour of $g_1$ through the $x$ dependence of the latter.
199:
200: \subsection{QCD fit to the world data on $g_1^N$}
201:
202: Next-to-leading (NLO) order QCD analyses of the $Q^2$ dependence of $g_1$
203: had been performed on the $g_1$ data \cite{qcd_old,roland,qcd_bb} and have
204: indicated a large contribution of gluon polarisation to the proton spin
205: albeit determined with very large errors.
206:
207: Extrapolations of QCD fit results to the unmeasured low $x$ region give
208: all three structure functions, $g_1^p$, $g_1^d$ and $g_1^n$
209: negative ($g_1^p$ becomes such below the
210: lowest $x$ data point used in the fit), due to a large negative singlet
211: contribution. It should be stressed that
212: the $g_1$ results for $x$ values below these of the data do not influence
213: the results of the fit. Thus there is no reason to expect that
214: the partons at very low $x$ behave as those in the measured (larger $x$) region.
215: Nevertheless the low $x$ QCD extrapolations are
216: presently being used to get the $x\rightarrow$ 0 extrapolation of $g_1$
217: \cite{qcd_old}, necessary to evaluate its first moments. They
218: strongly disagree with the Regge asymptotic form, cf. Fig. 2.
219:
220: \vspace{-5pt}
221:
222: \subsection{ln$^2(1/x)$ corrections to $g_1$}
223:
224: The small $x$ behaviour of $g_1(x,Q^2)$ is controlled by the double
225: logarithmic ln$^2(1/x)$ contributions, i.e. by those terms of the perturbative
226: expansion which correspond to the powers of ln$^2(1/x)$ at each order
227: of the expansion \cite{bartels}.
228: The ln$^2(1/x)$ effects go beyond the standard (i.e. ln$Q^2$)
229: LO (and NLO) QCD evolution.
230: It is convenient to resum these terms
231: using the unintegrated (spin-dependent) parton
232: distributions.
233: The resulting integrated parton distributions contain nonperturbative
234: parts, $\Delta p^0_j(x)$,
235: corresponding to low transverse momenta of partons,
236: to be parametrised semiphenomenologically.
237:
238: A complete formalism incorporating the LO Altarelli--Parisi evolution
239: and the ln$^2(1/x)$ resummation at low $x$ has been built for $g_1^p$
240: \cite{jkbb_p,jkbz_p}. It has been shown that the nonsinglet part of $g_1$
241: is dominated by ladder diagrams while a contribution of the nonladder
242: bremsstrahlung diagrams is important for the singlet part. Results are
243: presented in Fig. 3; small $x$ effects suppress the very strong
244: $x$ dependence of $g_1$ resulting from pure Altarelli--Parisi evolution.
245:
246: \begin{figure}[htb]
247: \includegraphics*[width=7cm]{jkbz.eps}
248: %\framebox[55mm]{\rule[-21mm]{0mm}{43mm}}
249:
250: \vspace{-5pt}
251: \caption{$g_1^p(x,Q^2)$ at $Q^2$=10 GeV$^2$ after including
252: the ln$^2(1/x)$ corrections. A thick solid line
253: corresponds to full calculations, a dashed one -- only the ladder ln$^2(1/x)$
254: resummation with LO Altarelli-Parisi evolution, a dotted one - pure LO
255: Altarelli-Parisi evolution and a thin solid line - the nonperturbative
256: input to $g_1$ \cite{jkbz_p}.}
257:
258: \label{jkbz}
259: \end{figure}
260:
261: Even if the ln$^2(1/x)$ effects are not important
262: in the $x$ range of the fixed target experiments
263: they significantly affect $g_1$ in the low $x$ region
264: which may be probed at the polarised HERA.
265:
266: \subsection{Nonperturbative effects in $g_1$}
267:
268: At the low $x$, low $Q^2$ region, $g_1$ was represented by \cite{bbjkjk}:
269: \begin{equation}
270: g_1(x,Q^2)=g_{1}^{VMD}(x,Q^2) + g_{1}^{part}(x,Q^2)
271: \label{g1tot}
272: \end{equation}
273: The partonic contribution, $g_1^{part}$ is at low $x$
274: controlled by the ln$^2(1/x)$ terms resummed using unintegrated
275: parton distributions, cf. section 2.4.
276: This formalism is very suitable for extrapolating
277: $g_1$ to the region of low $Q^2$ at fixed $W^2$.
278: Results for $ g_{1}^{part}(x,Q^2)$ are shown as a curve in Fig.1.
279: The VMD contribution, $g_1^{VMD}(x,Q^2)$, was taken as:
280: \begin{equation}
281: g_{1}^{VMD}(x,Q^2) = {pq\over 4 \pi} \sum_{v=\rho,\omega,\phi}
282: { m_v^4 \Delta \sigma_{v}(W^2) \over \gamma_v^2
283: (Q^2+m_v^2)^2}
284: \end{equation}
285: \vskip-0.1cm
286: where
287: $\gamma_v^2$ are determined from the leptonic widths of the vector mesons
288: and $m_v$ is the mass of the vector meson $v$.
289: Unknown vector meson -- nucleon cross sections
290: $\Delta \sigma _{v}=(\sigma_{1/2} - \sigma_{3/2})/2$ (subscripts
291: refer to the projections of the total spin on the vector meson momentum)
292: were taken proportional (with a proportionality coeffcient $C$)
293: to the appropriate combinations of the nonperturbative contributions
294: $\Delta p_j^0(x)$ to the polarised quark and antiquark distributions.
295: The $\Delta p^0_j(x)$ behave as $x^0$ for $x\rightarrow$0.
296: As a result the cross sections $\Delta \sigma_{v}$ behave as
297: $1/W^2$ at large $W^2$ that corresponds to zero intercepts of
298: the appropriate Regge trajectories.
299: Exact $x$ dependence of $\Delta p_j^0(x)$ was included.
300:
301: The statistical accuracy of the SMC data is too poor to constraint
302: the value of the coefficient $C$.
303: The SLAC E143 data \cite{e143} preferred a small
304: negative value of C which is consistent with the results of
305: the phenomenological analysis of the sum rules \cite{IOFFE}.
306: Similar analysis of the neutron and deuteron spin
307: structure functions
308: was inconclusive.
309:
310:
311: \section{$g_1$ AT FUTURE COLLIDERS}
312:
313: \subsection{$g_1^p$}
314:
315: Presently the form of the $x\rightarrow$ 0 extrapolation of the $g_1$
316: provides the largest error on its first moment: the contribution
317: from the unmeasured low $x$ region amounts from about 2 to 10$\%$ of the
318: integral in the measured range, depending whether the Regge model
319: or the QCD is used for the extrapolation (cf. \cite{qcd_old} and
320: references therein). An empirical insight into the validity of different
321: low $x$ mechanisms would be possible through polarising
322: the proton beam at HERA. This would extend the measured region
323: of $x$ down to approximately 0.000 06 at $Q^2\gapproxeq$ 1 GeV$^2$.
324:
325: Polarised $ep$ ($eA$) colliders (HERA, EIC) will also have a potential to explore
326: the transition between the photoproduction and scaling region,
327: 0$< Q^2 \lapproxeq$ 1 GeV$^2$ \cite{hera_study_lowq,eic}.
328: Photoproduction measurements would
329: constraint the spin dependent Regge model and Regge contribution to the
330: Drell-Hearn-Gerasimov sum rule. Measurements in the transition region would
331: impose new limits on $g_1$ models containing both perturbative and nonperturbative
332: components.
333:
334:
335:
336: \subsection{$g_1^\gamma$}
337:
338: Spin dependent structure function of the photon, $g_1^\gamma$,
339: can in principle become accessible
340: in the future linear $e^+e^-$ or $e\gamma$ linear colliders, \cite{strat}.
341: The latter mode would be particularly suitable for probing the photon
342: structure at low values of $x$. The $g_1^\gamma (x,Q^2)$ has been analysed
343: \cite{jkbz_g} within the formalism
344: %based upon the unintegrated spin dependent parton
345: %distributions incorporating the LO Altarelli-Parisi evolution and the double
346: %ln$^2(1/x)$ resummation and
347: being an extension of that developed
348: for the $g_1^p$i, \cite{jkbz_p}. It was found that e.g. different scenarios
349: for the
350: nonperturbative spin dependent gluon content of the photon
351: give significantly different values of $g_1^\gamma$ at $x\sim$10$^{-5}$.
352:
353:
354:
355: \section{OUTLOOK}
356: The spin dependent structure function $g_1$ at low $x$ is both fascinating in
357: itself and necessary for understanding the origin of the proton spin.
358: Future colliders, HERA and EIC (and $e\gamma$ one for the {$g_1^\gamma$})
359: would give us a great opportunity to explore it.
360:
361:
362:
363:
364:
365: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
366: \bibitem{bbjkjk} B. Bade\l ek, J. Kiryluk and J. Kwieci\'nski, Phys. Rev.
367: D61 (1999) 014009.
368: \bibitem{hermes} HERMES, A. Fantoni, these proceedings.
369: \bibitem{smchad} SMC, B. Adeva et al., Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 112001.
370: \bibitem{smct15} SMC, B. Adeva et al., Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 072004 and
371: erratum: ibid D62 (2000) 079902.
372: \bibitem{hei} R.L. Heimann, Nucl. Phys. B64 (1973) 429.
373: \bibitem{clo_rob} F.E. Close and R.G. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B336 (1994) 257.
374: \bibitem{bass_land} S.D. Bass and P.V. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. B336 (1994) 537.
375: \bibitem{misha} J. Kuti in The Spin Structure of the Nucleon,
376: World Scientific, Singapore, 1996; M.G. Ryskin, private communication (Durham, 1998).
377: \bibitem{qcd_old} SMC, B. Adeva et al., Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 112002.
378: \bibitem{roland} For a review of older QCD analyses of $g_1$ see e.g.
379: R. Windmolders, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 79 (1999) 51.
380: \bibitem{qcd_bb} J. Bl\"umlein and H. B\"ottcher, DESY 01-107 (2001) and
381: hep-ph/0107317.
382: \bibitem{bartels} J. Bartels, B.I. Ermolaev and M.G. Ryskin, Z. Phys.
383: C70 (1996) 273; C72 (1996) 627.
384: \bibitem{jkbb_p} B. Bade\l ek and J. Kwieci\'nski, Phys. Lett., B418 (1998) 229.
385: \bibitem{jkbz_p} J. Kwieci\'nski and B. Ziaja, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 054004.
386: \bibitem{e143} E143, K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 112003.
387: \bibitem{IOFFE} V. Burkert and B.L. Ioffe, Phys. Lett. B296 (1992) 223;
388: B.L. Ioffe, Yad. Fiz. 60 (1997) 1866 [Phys. At. Nucl. 60 (1997) 1707].
389: \bibitem{hera_study} A. De Roeck et al., Eur. Phys. J. C6 (1999) 121.
390: \bibitem{hera_study_lowq} S.D. Bass and A. De Roeck, Eur. Phys. J. C18 (2001) 531.
391: \bibitem{eic} A. Deshpande, these proceedings.
392: \bibitem{strat} M. Stratmann, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 82 (2000) 400.
393: \bibitem{jkbz_g} J. Kwieci\'nski and B. Ziaja, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 054022.
394: \end{thebibliography}
395:
396:
397:
398: \end{document}
399: