1: %% ****** Start of file template.snomass ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: % This is a template for producing files for use with REVTEX 4.0
5: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
6: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
7: %
8: % REVTEX 4.0 can be downloaded from ftp://aps.org/pub/tex/macros/revtex4/
9: %
10: % Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
11: % author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
12: %
13: % DO NOT redefine any existing LaTeX/RevTeX macros. All such
14: % macros/shortcuts must be expanded BEFORE submission.
15: % Avoid stacked in-line mathematical expressions---stacked
16: % expressions should be used only in displayed equations.
17: % Graphics should be prepared using either times or helvetica
18: % fonts and submitted in eps format.
19: %
20: % Your .tex and .eps files should be named with your paper
21: % identification number (e.g., xxx.tex, xxxfig1.eps, xxxfig2.eps,
22: % etc.). All labels for equations, tables and figures should
23: % also include your paper identification number (e.g., xxxeq1,
24: % xxxfig1, xxxtab1, etc).
25: %
26: % If you need assistance in preparation of your files or have any
27: % questions, please contact Patricia Monohon (pmonohon@slac.stanford.edu)
28: %
29: % When completed please compress your source files (including graphics
30: % and a pdf of the completed paper) and submit them via anonymous ftp to
31: % ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/incoming/snowmass2001
32: %
33:
34: %\documentclass[superscriptaddress, preprint]{revtex4}
35: \documentclass{revtex4}
36:
37: \usepackage{graphicx}
38: \setlength{\textheight}{241mm}
39: \setlength{\textwidth}{170mm}
40:
41:
42: \begin{document}
43: % You should use BibTeX and revtex.bst for references
44: \bibliographystyle{revtex}
45:
46: \def\ba{\begin{eqnarray}}
47: \def\ea{\end{eqnarray}}
48: \def\bq{\begin{equation}}
49: \def\eq{\end{equation}}
50: \def\lsim{\mathrel{\raisebox{-.6ex}{$\stackrel{\textstyle<}{\sim}$}}}
51: \def\gsim{\mathrel{\raisebox{-.6ex}{$\stackrel{\textstyle>}{\sim}$}}}
52: \newcommand{\sla}[1]{/\!\!\!#1}
53:
54:
55: % Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report
56: % number and your conference paper identification number on the
57: % title page in preprint mode. Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.
58: \preprint{CALT-68-2356}
59: \preprint{MADPH-01-1246}
60:
61: %Title of paper
62: \title{VLHC predictions for $H\to\tau\tau$ in weak boson fusion}
63: % Optional argument for running titles on pages
64: %\title[]{}
65:
66: % repeat the \author .. \affiliation etc. as needed
67: % \email, \thanks, \homepage, \altaffiliation all apply to the current
68: % author. Explanatory text should go in the []'s, actual e-mail
69: % address or url should go in the {}'s for \email and \homepage.
70: % Please use the appropriate macro for the type of information
71:
72: % \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last
73: % \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the
74: % other information
75:
76: \author{T.~Plehn}
77: %\email[]{plehn@pheno.physics.wisc.edu}
78: %\homepage[]{Your web page}
79: %\thanks{}
80: %\altaffiliation{}
81: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin,
82: Madison, WI 53706, USA}
83:
84: \author{S.~Su}
85: %\email[]{shufang@theory.caltech.edu}
86: \affiliation{California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA}
87:
88: \author{D.~Zeppenfeld}
89: %\email[]{dieter@pheno.physics.wisc.edu}
90: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin,
91: Madison, WI 53706, USA}
92:
93:
94: %Collaboration name if desired (requires use of superscriptaddress
95: %option in \documentclass). \noaffiliation is required (may also be
96: %used with the \author command).
97: %\collaboration{}
98: %\noaffiliation
99:
100: %%%\date{\today}
101:
102: \begin{abstract}
103: % insert abstract here
104: Higgs production in weak boson fusion with subsequent decay $H\to \tau\tau
105: \to e\mu\sla p_T$ provides a means to measure Higgs Yukawa couplings and
106: Higgs interactions to weak bosons. The potential precision of cross section
107: measurements at a VLHC is investigated.
108: \end{abstract}
109:
110: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
111: % \pacs{}
112:
113: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract and \pacs
114: \maketitle
115:
116: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
117: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
118:
119: %\section{Introduction}
120: %\label{sec:intro}
121:
122: Precision measurements of Higgs boson properties are an important goal
123: of any post-LHC accelerator. The LHC is expected to yield a determination
124: of the Higgs boson mass at the $10^{-3}$ level~\cite{ATLAS,CMS}. A
125: combination of observations of the Higgs boson, in various decay channels
126: ($H\to\gamma\gamma,\;WW,\;ZZ,\;\tau\tau$), in inclusive searches and
127: in the weak boson fusion (WBF) channel, is expected
128: to yield measurements of various Higgs partial widths with accuracies of
129: order 10--20\%~\cite{zknr}. A linear collider (LC) can improve these
130: measurements by up to one order of magnitude, achieving
131: a clean separation of individual couplings~\cite{lc}.
132:
133: In contrast, very little is known about the capabilities of a higher energy
134: hadron collider for improving our knowledge of the Higgs sector. In this note
135: we analyze a particular weak boson fusion process, $qq\to qqH,\; H\to\tau\tau$
136: with subsequent leptonic tau decays, within the SM,
137: as a case study for possible VLHC
138: reach in precision measurements of Higgs couplings. Unlike gluon fusion, WBF
139: has small NLO QCD corrections, thus promising small systematic uncertainties.
140: Second, the $H\to\tau\tau$ decay modes~\cite{prz_tautau}
141: are key processes in the coupling determination at the LHC.
142: We closely follow this previous LHC analysis and determine signal rates
143: and cross sections for the main physics backgrounds in $pp$ collisions
144: at $E_{\rm cm}=50$, 100, and 200 TeV. These cross sections allow
145: for a first estimate of the statistical accuracy of coupling measurements at a
146: VLHC.
147:
148: %\section{Processes and Cuts}
149: %\label{sec:cuts}
150:
151: The signal process is $qq\to qqH$, which is mediated by $t$-channel $W$ and
152: $Z$ exchange. We consider $H\to\tau\tau$ decays with subsequent leptonic
153: decays of both taus, i.e. the final state is $jj\ell^+{\ell'}^-\sla p_T$
154: where, for simplicity, we only consider the $e^\pm\mu^\mp$
155: combinations.%~\footnote{$\ell^+{\ell'}^-=e^+e^-,\;\mu^+\mu^-$ states
156: %roughly double the statistics but require the analysis of a variety of
157: %$\gamma/Z\to\ell^+\ell^-$ backgrounds.}.
158: In a previous LHC
159: analysis~\cite{prz_tautau} it was found that the physics backgrounds,
160: $Zjj$ production with $Z\to\tau^+\tau^-$, dominate overall backgrounds.
161: Reducible backgrounds are mostly from leptonic decays of $W$ pairs, e.g.
162: from top-decays or $WWjj$ events. These can be distinguished from tau pairs
163: by the angular correlation of charged lepton momenta and
164: %$\sla{\bf p}_T$.
165: the missing momentum vector.
166: Thus, we only consider QCD $Zjj$ and electroweak $Zjj$ production, i.e.
167: $\tau^+\tau^-jj$ production at order $\alpha_s^2\alpha^2$ and $\alpha^4$,
168: respectively. These backgrounds and the signal are generated as in
169: Ref.~\cite{prz_tautau} and include off-shell $Z$'s and photon-$Z$
170: interference.
171:
172: As compared to the LHC analysis we impose a higher $p_T$ of the
173: two forward ``tagging jets'' and a larger dijet invariant mass of these
174: two candidate quark jets. Specifically the signal is required
175: to have two jets and two charged leptons with
176: %
177: \ba
178: \label{eq:basic}
179: & p_{T_j} \geq 30~{\rm GeV} \, , \; \; |\eta_j| \leq 5.0 \, , \; \;
180: \triangle R_{jj} \geq 0.6 \, , \nonumber\\
181: & p_{T\ell_1} \geq 20~{\rm GeV} \, ,\; \;
182: p_{T\ell_2} \geq 10~{\rm GeV} \, ,\; \;
183: |\eta_{\ell}| \leq 3 \, , \; \; \triangle R_{j\ell} \geq 0.6 \, ,
184: \ea
185: %
186: the two jets must be separated by at least 4.2 units of pseudorapidity,
187: reside in opposite detector hemispheres and the two charged leptons
188: must lie between the two jet definition cones of radius 0.6. The
189: neutrinos must lead to missing transverse momentum of 50~GeV or more
190: and we require
191: %
192: \begin{equation}
193: \label{eq:mjj}
194: M_{jj} > 1000~{\rm GeV}
195: \end{equation}
196: %
197: for the invariant mass of the two tagging jets. All other cuts are as in
198: Ref.~\cite{prz_tautau}.
199:
200: The surviving $e\mu\sla p_T+2$~jet events allow a reconstruction of the
201: original tau-pair invariant mass by making use of the large boost of the
202: individual taus and their decay products~\cite{tautaumass}: the charged
203: leptons trace the original tau directions and the transverse momenta of $e$,
204: $\mu$ and missing neutrinos allow to solve for the $\tau^+$ and $\tau^-$
205: energies. The reconstruction relies on good missing transverse momentum
206: resolution. We assume a performance of
207: VLHC detectors equivalent to ATLAS, i.e. energy smearing and $\sla p_T$
208: resolution is handled as in Ref.~\cite{prz_tautau} and reproduces ATLAS
209: simulations for $H/A\to\tau\tau$ events~\cite{cavalli}.
210:
211: \begin{figure}
212: \includegraphics{mtautau.ps}%
213: \caption{Reconstructed tau-pair invariant mass distribution at a VLHC of
214: (a) 50 TeV and (b) 100 TeV center of mass energy. Signal peaks for
215: $m_H=120$, 140, and 155~GeV are added to the combined physics backgrounds
216: from electroweak and QCD $\tau\tau jj$ production. See text for cuts.}
217: \label{fig:tautaumass}
218: \end{figure}
219:
220: The resulting reconstructed $M_{\tau\tau}$-spectra are shown in
221: Figure~\ref{fig:tautaumass} for VLHC energies of 50 and 100~TeV.
222: The Higgs peak is clearly visible above the physics backgrounds,
223: even for Higgs masses as large as 155~GeV. The statistical significance
224: of the signal can be estimated by considering the signal and background rates
225: in a reasonable mass window, which we take as
226: $m_H-15~{\rm GeV}<M_{\tau\tau}<m_H+15~{\rm GeV}$.
227:
228:
229: Resulting cross sections are given in Table~\ref{tab:rates}.
230: It is quite remarkable that we may expect signal to background ratios well
231: above 1 over the entire intermediate mass range. This is combined with large
232: signal rates, of order hundreds to a thousand, for an integrated luminosity
233: of 100~fb$^{-1}$. Given the expected number of signal events, $S$, and
234: background events, $B$, we can estimate the statistical error with which the
235: signal cross section can be estimated as
236: $\Delta\sigma_H/ \sigma_H = \sqrt{S+B}/S$.
237: The corresponding statistical errors are listed in the last column of
238: Table~\ref{tab:rates} and reside in the 5--10\% range for a 50~TeV machine
239: and Higgs masses between 120 and 150 GeV, and improve to the 3--6\% range
240: for a 200 TeV machine.
241:
242: The numbers presented in the left half of
243: Table~\ref{tab:rates} do not include efficiency
244: factors for jets or for lepton identification and isolation. In previous
245: studies these factors amounted to overall efficiency factors of 0.67 for
246: signal and backgrounds~\cite{prz_tautau}.
247: (Note that geometric acceptance is included in our
248: simulation.) Other reduction factors for the signal will arise from parton
249: shower corrections: including QCD radiation, the selection of the 2 quark jets
250: is not unique. Misidentified tagging jets then tend to fall below
251: the $M_{jj}$ threshold of Eq.~(\ref{eq:mjj}). Since QCD radiation is
252: relatively suppressed for the $t$-channel color singlet exchange of the
253: signal, this effect is modest~\cite{wbfexp} and we may assume an overall
254: efficiency of $\epsilon_{\rm WBF}=0.5$ for WBF processes compared to
255: $\epsilon=0.67$ for the QCD $Zjj$ background.
256:
257: The cross sections of Table~\ref{tab:rates} do not yet make use of another
258: characteristic of WBF events: they are mediated by the $t$-channel exchange of
259: a colorless object. Destructive interference between initial and final state
260: radiation in such processes leads to suppressed gluon radiation in the
261: central region, between the two quark jets~\cite{bjgap}. QCD
262: background processes, which are dominated by $t$-channel gluon exchange,
263: predominantly radiate in the central region. This difference can be exploited
264: by a veto on central jets, in the region
265: \bq
266: \eta_{j,min}^{\rm tag} +0.6 < \eta_j^{\rm veto}
267: < \eta_{j,max}^{\rm tag} -0.6\; . \label{eq:etaveto}
268: \eq
269: A detailed study on feasible $p_T$ thresholds at a VLHC is still needed. For
270: the LHC, an parton level analysis indicates that a veto of central
271: jets of $p_T>20$~GeV will suppress the signal by a factor $P_{\rm surv}=0.9$,
272: while analogous factors for the EW and the QCD $Zjj$ backgrounds are 0.75
273: and 0.3, respectively~\cite{DR_thesis}. Due to the increased $M_{jj}$
274: values and the larger rapidity distance between the quark jets of the signal,
275: these numbers may improve at a VLHC. However, higher $p_T$ thresholds
276: of vetoed jets will
277: counteract such improvements. We take the LHC values as an educated guess
278: for a VLHC as well. Including these efficiency factors and survival
279: probabilities, signal and background rates are given in the right half of
280: Table~\ref{tab:rates}. Signal to background rates improve further, due to the
281: background suppression of the central jet veto. However, the statistical
282: accuracy of the cross section determination suffers somewhat, due to the
283: more realistic assumptions on reconstruction efficiencies. Nevertheless,
284: statistical errors of 5\% or better are possible at a VLHC with a mere
285: 100~fb$^{-1}$ of data. This can be improved significantly by including
286: other tau decay channels like hadronic decays of one tau and leptonic
287: decays into $e^+e^-\sla p_T,\; \mu^+\mu^-\sla p_T$~\cite{prz_tautau,zknr}.
288:
289: A point of concern are Higgs backgrounds. $H\to WW\to e\mu\sla p_T$
290: events become the dominant reducible $WW$ background for Higgs masses above
291: 125~GeV at the LHC, and contribute about a third of the overall background
292: at $m_H=150$~GeV~\cite{prz_tautau}.
293: The same should be expected at a VLHC. In addition,
294: gluon fusion becomes a more pronounced source of $Hjj$ events at the
295: higher VLHC energies~\cite{oleari}, and thus the clean separation of
296: gluon fusion and WBF cross sections will require additional efforts.
297: However, we do not expect these complications to significantly alter the
298: previous optimistic findings.
299:
300: We conclude that a VLHC can study $H\to\tau\tau$ decays with
301: high precision in WBF events. Integrated luminosities of a few hundred
302: fb$^{-1}$ provide high statistics and clean samples which allow to measure
303: $H\tau\tau$ Yukawa couplings with statistical errors at the $10^{-2}$ level.
304: At the same time the small QCD NLO corrections to WBF promise small systematic
305: errors. Detailed studies of WBF channels at a VLHC are required to assess
306: experimental systematic errors.
307:
308: \begin{table}[t]
309: \caption{Signal and background cross sections (in fb) for
310: $qq\to qqH,\;H\to\tau\tau \to e\mu\sla p_T$ events at a VLHC of center of mass
311: energy 50, 100, and 200~TeV, for SM Higgs masses between 120 and 160~GeV.
312: The $S/B$ and $\sqrt{S+B}/S$ columns give signal to background ratios and
313: statistical errors for a determination of the signal cross section with
314: 100~fb$^{-1}$ of data. The first two columns give these estimates without
315: taking into account reconstruction efficiencies or a central jet veto.
316: The second set uses LHC inspired assumptions for $\epsilon$ and $P_{\rm surv}$.
317: See text for details. }
318: \label{tab:rates}
319: \begin{tabular}{c|c|cccc|cc|cc}\hline
320: $E_{\rm cm} $&$m_H$ &Signal
321: &QCD&
322: EW &
323: ${\rm QCD}+{\rm EW}$&
324: $S/B$&$\sqrt{S+B}/S$ & $S/B$&$\sqrt{S+B}/S$ \\
325: &&& $\tau\tau{jj}$ & $\tau\tau{jj}$ & $\tau\tau{jj}$
326: & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$L=100\ {\rm fb}^{-1}$, $\epsilon \equiv 1$}
327: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$L=100\ {\rm fb}^{-1}$, $\epsilon = \epsilon_{\rm LHC}$}
328: \\ \hline
329: &120&4.98&2.48&0.83&3.31&1.50&5.8\%&2.76&7.8\% \\
330: &130&3.86&1.04&0.38&1.42&2.72&6.0\%&4.95&8.3\% \\
331: 50 &140&2.48&0.56&0.22&0.78&3.17&7.3\%&5.70&10.3\% \\
332: TeV&150&1.23&0.36&0.16&0.52&2.38&10.7\%&4.22&14.9\% \\
333: &155&0.70&0.31&0.14&0.44&1.59&15.3\%&2.81&20.7\% \\
334: &160&0.23&0.27&0.12&0.39&0.59&34\%&1.04&44\%\\ \hline
335:
336: &120&10.67&6.84&2.07&8.91&1.20&4.1\%&2.23&5.5\% \\
337: &130&8.32&2.94&0.95&3.89&2.14&4.2\%&3.96&5.8\% \\
338: 100 &140&5.37&1.57&0.55&2.12&2.53&5.1\%&4.63&7.1\% \\
339: TeV&150&2.66&1.00&0.38&1.38&1.93&7.6\%&3.49&10.4\% \\
340: &155&1.51&0.84&0.33&1.17&1.29&10.8\%&2.33&14.5\%\\
341: &160&0.49&0.71&0.29&1.00&0.49&25\%&0.87&31\% \\ \hline
342:
343: &120&20.6&16.9&4.43&21.3&0.96&3.1\%&1.83&4.1\% \\
344: &130&16.1&7.35&2.04&9.38&1.71&3.1\%&3.23&4.3\% \\
345: 200 &140&10.4&3.98&1.19&5.17&2.01&3.8\%&3.75&5.2\% \\
346: TeV &150&5.16&2.55&0.81&3.36&1.54&5.7\%&2.84&7.6\% \\
347: &155&2.92&2.14&0.70&2.84&1.03&8.2\%&1.90&10.8\% \\
348: &160&0.95&1.83&0.62&2.45&0.39&19.4\%&0.71&23.7\% \\ \hline
349:
350: \end{tabular}
351: \end{table}
352:
353: \vspace{-0.25in}
354: \begin{acknowledgments}
355: This research was supported in part by the University of Wisconsin Research
356: Committee with funds granted by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and
357: in part by the U.~S.~Department of Energy under grant
358: No.~DE-FG02-95ER40896. S.S. was supported by DOE grant DE-FG03-92-ER-40701.
359: \end{acknowledgments}
360:
361: \vspace{-0.2in}
362:
363: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
364:
365: \vspace{-0.15in}
366:
367: \bibitem{ATLAS}
368: ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS TDR,
369: %ATLAS Detector and Physics Performance Technical Design Report,
370: report CERN/LHCC/99-15 (1999).
371:
372: \bibitem{CMS}
373: G.~L.~Bayatian {\it et al.}, CMS Technical Proposal,
374: report CERN/LHCC/94-38 (1994);
375: %D. Denegri, %Prospects for Higgs (SM and MSSM) searches at LHC,
376: %talk in the Circle Line Tour Series, Fermilab, October 1999,
377: %(http://www-theory.fnal.gov/CircleLine/DanielBG.html);
378: R. Kinnunen and D. Denegri, %Expected SM/SUSY Higgs observability in CMS,
379: CMS NOTE 1997/057.
380:
381: \bibitem{zknr}
382: D.~Zeppenfeld, R.~Kinnunen, A.~Nikitenko and E.~Richter-Was,
383: %``Measuring Higgs boson couplings at the LHC,''
384: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 013009 (2000)
385: [hep-ph/0002036].
386: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002036;%%
387:
388: \bibitem{lc}
389: TESLA TDR, report DESY-2001-011, ECFA-2001-209.
390:
391: \bibitem{prz_tautau}
392: T.~Plehn, D.~Rainwater and D.~Zeppenfeld,
393: %``A method for identifying H --> tau tau --> e+- mu-+ missing p(T)
394: %at the CERN LHC,''
395: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D61}, 093005 (2000).
396: %[hep-ph/9911385].
397: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911385;%%
398: %\href{\wwwspires?eprint=HEP-PH/9911385}{SPIRES}
399:
400: \bibitem{tautaumass}
401: R.~K.~Ellis {\it et al.}, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B297}, 221 (1988).
402:
403: \bibitem{cavalli}
404: D.~Cavalli {\it et al.}, ATLAS Internal Note PHYS-NO-051, Dec. 1994.
405:
406: \bibitem{wbfexp}
407: See e.g. the talks by K.~Jakobs and A.~Nikitenko at the ``Workshop
408: on the Future of Higgs Physics'', May 3--5, 2001, Fermilab.
409:
410: \bibitem{bjgap}
411: Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, V.~A.~Khoze, and S.~Troyan, in {\it
412: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Physics in Collisions},
413: (1986) ed.\ M.~Derrick (World Scientific, 1987) p.365;
414: J.~D.~Bjorken, Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf A7}, 4189 (1992);
415: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D47}, 101 (1993).
416:
417: \bibitem{DR_thesis}
418: D.~Rainwater, PhD thesis, hep-ph/9908378.
419: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908378;%%
420:
421: \bibitem{oleari}
422: C.~Oleari and D.~Zeppenfeld, hep-ph/0110338.
423:
424: \end{thebibliography}
425:
426:
427: \end{document}
428:
429: % figures should be put into the text as floats.
430: % Use the graphicx package (distributed with LaTeX2e).
431: % See the LaTeX Graphics Companion by Michel Goosens, Sebastian Rahtz,
432: % and Frank Mittelbach for instance.
433: %
434: % Here is an example of the general form of a figure:
435: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
436: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
437: %
438: % \begin{figure}
439: % \includegraphics{}%
440: % \caption{}
441: % \label{}
442: % \end{figure}
443:
444: % tables follow here or maybe be put in the text
445: %
446: % Here is an example of the general form of a table:
447: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
448: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
449: % Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the
450: % \begin{tabular}{} command.
451: %
452: % \begin{table}
453: % \caption{}
454: % \label{}
455: % \begin{tabular}{}
456: % \end{tabular}
457: % \end{table}
458:
459: % If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.
460: %\begin{acknowledgments}
461: % put your acknowledgments here.
462: %\end{acknowledgments}
463:
464: % Create the reference section using BibTeX:
465: \bibliography{wbf.bbl}
466: %
467: % ****** End of file template.snowmass ******
468:
469:
470:
471: %\begin{table}[t]
472: %\caption{signal over background }
473: %\label{wbftab1}
474: %\begin{tabular}{c|c|cccc|cc}\hline
475: %$E_{\rm cm} $&$m_H$ &Signal
476: %&QCD&
477: %EW &
478: %${\rm QCD}+{\rm EW}$&
479: %$S/B$&$\sqrt{S+B}/S$ \\
480: %&&& $\tau\tau{jj}$ & $\tau\tau{jj}$ & $\tau\tau{jj}$ &&$L=100\ {\rm fb}^{-1}$
481: %\\ \hline
482: %&120&4.98&2.50&&&&\\
483: %&130&3.86&1.11&&&&\\
484: %50 &140&2.48&0.62&&&&\\
485: %TeV&150&1.23&0.42&&&&\\
486: %&155&0.70&0.35&&&&\\
487: %&160&0.23&0.30&&&&\\ \hline
488:
489: %&120&10.67&&&&&\\
490: %&130&8.32&&&&&\\
491: %100 &140&5.37&&&&&\\
492: %TeV&150&2.66&&&&&\\
493: %&155&1.51&&&&&\\
494: %&160&0.49&&&&&\\ \hline
495:
496: %&120&20.57&16.92&&&&\\
497: %&130&16.07&7.48&&&&\\
498: %200 &140&10.38&4.17&&&&\\
499: %TeV &150&5.16&2.77&&&&\\
500: %&155&2.92&2.34&&&&\\
501: %&160&0.95&2.03&&&&\\ \hline
502:
503:
504:
505:
506: %\end{tabular}
507: %\end{table}
508: