1: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,showpacs,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: \documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amssymb]{revtex4}
4: %\documentstyle[aps,preprint]{revtex}
5: %\tighten
6: \newcommand{\fslash}[1]{\ooalign{\hfil/\hfil\crcr$#1$}}
7: \newcommand{\lda}{\stackrel{\leftarrow}{D}}
8: \begin{document}
9: \preprint{\vbox{ Submitted to European Physical Journal C
10: }}
11: \title{Couplings between pion and charmed mesons}
12: \author{Hungchong Kim}
13: \email{hung@phya.yonsei.ac.kr}
14: \author{Su Houng Lee}
15: \affiliation{%
16: Institute of Physics and Applied Physics, Yonsei University,
17: Seoul 120-749, Korea
18: }
19: \begin{abstract}
20: We compute the couplings $DD^*\pi$,$D_1D^*\pi$,$D^*D^*\pi$, $D_1 D_1\pi$
21: using QCD sum rules.
22: These couplings are important inputs in the meson exchange model calculations
23: used to estimate the amount of $J/\psi$ absorption due to pions and rho
24: mesons in heavy ion collisions.
25: Our sum rules are constructed at the first order in the pion
26: momentum $p_\mu$, which give the couplings that are not trivially
27: related to the soft-pion theorem.
28: Our calculated couplings, which somewhat depend upon
29: the values of the heavy meson decay constants,
30: are $g_{DD^*\pi}=8.2 \pm 0.1$,
31: $g_{D_1 D^* \pi} = 15.8 \pm 2~{\rm GeV}$,
32: $g_{D^* D^* \pi}= 0.3 \pm 0.03$ and
33: $g_{D_1 D_1 \pi}= 0.17 \pm 0.04$.
34:
35:
36: \end{abstract}
37:
38: \pacs{11.55.Hx,13.20.Fc,12.38.Lg,14.40.Lb}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
39: % Classification Scheme.
40: %\keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
41: %display desired
42: \maketitle
43:
44: \section{Introduction}
45: \label{sec:intro}
46:
47: $J/\psi$ suppression~\cite{Matsui:1986dk} seems to be one of the
48: most promising signal for QGP formation in RHIC. Indeed the recent
49: data at CERN~\cite{Abreu:2000ni} show an anomalous suppression of $J/\psi$
50: formation, which seems to be a consequence of QGP
51: formation~\cite{Blaizot:2000ev}. However, before coming to a conclusion,
52: one has to estimate the amount of $J/\psi$ suppression due to hadronic
53: final state interactions.
54: %Quantitative estimate of the $J/\psi$ dissociation processes is
55: %important for understanding the anomalous $J/\psi$
56: %signal recently observed at CERN~\cite{Abreu:2000ni}.
57: %To interpret the signal as the $J/\psi$ suppression during
58: %the quark-gluon plasma formation, hadronic dissociation cross sections
59: %have to be subtracted from the signal.
60: Consequently, there have been a number of works,using various
61: models~\cite{Kharzeev:1994pz,Kharzeev:1996tw,Martins:1995hd,Wong:2000zb,Wong:2001td,Matinian:1998cb,Haglin:2000xs,Oh:2001qr,Lin:2000ad,Haglin:2001ar},
62: calculating the $J/\psi$
63: absorption cross section by light mesons. However,
64: the estimate varies by an order of magnitude near threshold.
65: At this stage, it is necessary to probe each model calculations further to
66: spell out their corrections and uncertainties.
67:
68: In the effective meson-exchange model
69: approaches~\cite{Matinian:1998cb,Haglin:2000xs,Oh:2001qr,Lin:2000ad,Haglin:2001ar}, important ingredients are
70: the couplings between open charm mesons and light mesons.
71: Precise determination of the couplings reduces uncertainties in the
72: calculation of the dissociation process.
73: Moreover, a complete set of low-lying open charm mesons
74: $D(1870), D^*(2010), D_1(2420)$
75: has to be included. This is especially necessary in order to probe
76: the cross section above the threshold.
77: To provide the basic building blocks for such a model calculation, we
78: use QCD sum rules~\cite{Shifman:1979bx,Shifman:1979by}
79: and calculate the couplings $DD^*\pi$,$D^*D^*\pi$,$D_1 D_1\pi$,$D_1D^*\pi$.
80: These can be used to improve the existing effective model
81: calculations, which can be applied to future calculation~\cite{Song}
82: of the $J/\psi$ dissociation process.
83:
84:
85: At present, there are two approaches in the literature to calculate
86: the coupling in the QCD sum rule approach,
87: light-cone QCD sum rules
88: (LCQSR)~\cite{Belyaev:1995zk,Aliev:1997bp,Colangelo:1998rp} relying
89: on the operator product expansion near the light cone, and the
90: conventional QCD sum
91: rules~\cite{Colangelo:1994es,Colangelo:1995ph,DiBartolomeo:1995ir}
92: based on the short-distance expansion.
93: Predictions from LCQSR heavily depend on the twist-2 pion wave function
94: at the middle
95: point, whose value, however, has been at the core of debates
96: for a long time~\cite{Chernyak:1984ej}. Furthermore, the duality
97: issue in constructing the continuum needs to be carefully
98: considered~\cite{Kim:2000ku}.
99: Instead, the conventional QCD sum
100: rules~\cite{Colangelo:1994es,Colangelo:1995ph,DiBartolomeo:1995ir}
101: do not suffer from such an uncertainty as the QCD parameters appearing
102: in this approach are determined from the low-energy theorems such as
103: PCAC and the soft-pion theorem.
104: Though QCD duality again needs to be applied carefully in these
105: sum rules~\cite{Kim:2000rg,Kim:2000ur},
106: the uncertainties from the QCD side can be substantially reduced.
107:
108: In this work, we provide a systematic approach to calculate the
109: couplings using the conventional QCD sum rules. Our sum rules will
110: be constructed at the first order in the pion momentum
111: ${\cal O} (p_\mu)$. We improve
112: the previous sum rule calculations of the $DD^*\pi$ and $D^*D^*\pi$
113: couplings~\cite{Colangelo:1994es,Colangelo:1995ph,DiBartolomeo:1995ir}.
114: In particular, QCD duality will be correctly applied according
115: to the recent suggestion in Refs.~\cite{Kim:2000rg,Kim:2000ur}.
116: Also in constructing a sum rule for $DD^*\pi$, we advocate
117: the use of a different structure function.
118: We then construct similar sum rules for the couplings, $D_1D_1\pi$ and
119: $D_1 D^* \pi$, which may be important for
120: future calculation of the $J/\psi$ dissociation process
121: accompanying $D_1$ meson~\cite{Song}.
122:
123:
124:
125:
126:
127:
128:
129: \section{OPE for General Correlation function}
130: \label{sec:general}
131:
132: In this section, we schematically describe a general procedure
133: to perform the operator product expansion (OPE) of
134: the general correlation function with a pion,
135: \begin{eqnarray}
136: \Pi (p,q) =
137: i\int d^4 x e^{iq\cdot x} \langle 0 | T \{ {\bar d}(x) \Gamma_1 c(x),
138: {\bar c}(0) \Gamma_2 u(0) \} | \pi (p) \rangle \ .
139: \label{general_cor}
140: \end{eqnarray}
141: $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$ denote specific gamma matrices
142: corresponding to the coupling of concern. In later sections,
143: we will use this general prescription, by simple replacements, to calculate
144: the OPE for the correlation function of concern.
145: For instance, to calculate the $D D^* \pi$ coupling,
146: we will have $\Gamma_1 = \gamma_\mu$ and $\Gamma_2 = i\gamma_5$.
147:
148: To calculate the coupling that is not trivially related by
149: chiral symmetry, we will consider the correlation function at the first
150: order of the pion momentum $p_\mu$ in its expansion. The soft-pion limit
151: of the correlation function is just a chiral rotation of a vacuum correlation
152: function ({\it i.e.,without the pion}), which provides a coupling that is
153: trivially related to the vacuum correlation function.
154: For example, in the case of the pion-nucleon coupling~\cite{Birse:1996zh},
155: the soft-pion limit leads to Goldberger-Treiman relation with $g_A=1$,
156: which gives the coupling 30 \% lower than its experimental value.
157: To determine the coupling more precisely, one needs to go beyond the
158: soft-pion limit.
159: %A similar argument can be found from
160: %the QCD sum rule calculation of the pion-nucleon coupling~\cite{Birse:1996zh}.
161:
162: First, we restrict ourselves to the OPE diagram shown in Fig.~\ref{fig1} (a).
163: For this diagram, we can rewrite the correlation function
164: into the form
165: \begin{eqnarray}
166: -i \int {d^4 k \over (2\pi)^4}
167: Tr\left [ i {\fslash{q} -\fslash{k}+m_c \over (q-k)^2 -m^2_c}
168: \Gamma_2 D_{aa} (k,p) \Gamma_1 \right ] \ .
169: \label{opetree}
170: \end{eqnarray}
171: The Roman indices denote colors.
172: The free $c$-quark propagator has been used in obtaining this.
173: $D_{ab} (k,p)$, which is shown by the blob in the figure,
174: denotes the quark-antiquark component with a pion.
175: This can be separated into three pieces depending on the
176: Dirac matrices involved,
177: \begin{eqnarray}
178: D_{ab} (k,p) = \delta_{ab} \left [ i\gamma_5 A(k,p) +
179: \gamma_\alpha \gamma_5 B^\alpha (k,p) +
180: \gamma_5 \sigma_{\alpha \beta} C^{\alpha \beta} (k,p) \right ] \ .
181: \end{eqnarray}
182: The three invariant functions of $k,p$ are defined by
183: \begin{eqnarray}
184: A(k,p) &=& {1 \over 12} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} {1\over n !}
185: \langle 0 | {\bar d} \lda_{\alpha_1}\cdot \cdot \cdot
186: \lda_{\alpha_n} i\gamma_5 u
187: | \pi (p) \rangle (2\pi)^4
188: { \partial^n \over i\partial k_{\alpha_1} \cdot \cdot \cdot
189: i\partial k_{\alpha_n} }
190: \delta^{(4)}(k) \ ,
191: \nonumber \\
192: B^\alpha (k,p) &=& {1 \over 12} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} {1\over n !}
193: \langle 0 | {\bar d} \lda_{\alpha_1}\cdot \cdot \cdot \lda_{\alpha_n}
194: \gamma^\alpha \gamma_5 u | \pi (p) \rangle (2\pi)^4
195: { \partial^n \over i \partial k_{\alpha_1} \cdot \cdot \cdot i
196: \partial k_{\alpha_n} }
197: \delta^{(4)}(k) \ ,
198: \nonumber \\
199: C^{\alpha \beta} (k,p) &=& - {1 \over 24} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} {1\over n !}
200: \langle 0 | {\bar d} \lda_{\alpha_1}\cdot \cdot \cdot \lda_{\alpha_n}
201: \gamma_5 \sigma^{\alpha \beta} u | \pi (p) \rangle (2\pi)^4
202: { \partial^n \over i\partial k_{\alpha_1} \cdot \cdot \cdot
203: i\partial k_{\alpha_n} }
204: \delta^{(4)}(k) \ .
205: \end{eqnarray}
206: Since we are constructing the sum rules at the order ${\cal O} (p_\mu)$,
207: we need to evaluate the pion matrix elements at ${\cal O} (p_\mu)$.
208: Noting that the pion matrix elements involved are symmetric
209: under exchanges of any pair of indices $\alpha_1 \cdot \cdot \cdot
210: \alpha_n$ and using the soft-pion theorem and PCAC, we straightforwardly
211: obtain the followings,
212: \begin{eqnarray}
213: \langle 0 | {\bar d} \lda_{\alpha_1}
214: i\gamma_5 u | \pi (p) \rangle &=& {\langle {\bar q} q \rangle \over f_\pi}
215: ip_{\alpha_1} \ ,
216: \nonumber \\
217: \langle 0 | {\bar d} \lda_{\alpha_1} \lda_{\alpha_2}\lda_{\alpha_3}
218: i\gamma_5 u | \pi (p) \rangle &=&
219: {im_0^2 \langle {\bar q} q \rangle \over 12 f_\pi}
220: (p_{\alpha_1} g_{\alpha_2 \alpha_3} +
221: p_{\alpha_2} g_{\alpha_1 \alpha_3} + p_{\alpha_3} g_{\alpha_1 \alpha_2}) \ ,
222: \nonumber \\
223: \langle 0 | {\bar d}
224: \gamma^\alpha \gamma_5 u | \pi (p) \rangle &=& ip^\alpha f_\pi \ ,
225: \nonumber \\
226: \langle 0 | {\bar d} \lda_{\alpha_1} \lda_{\alpha_2}
227: \gamma_\alpha \gamma_5 u | \pi (p) \rangle &=&
228: if_\pi \delta^2 \left [ p_\alpha g_{\alpha_1\alpha_2}{5\over 18} -
229: (p_{\alpha_2} g_{\alpha\alpha_1}
230: +p_{\alpha_1} g_{\alpha\alpha_2}){1\over 18} \right ] \ ,
231: \nonumber \\
232: \langle 0 | {\bar d} \lda_{\alpha_1}
233: \gamma_5 \sigma_{\alpha \beta} u | \pi (p) \rangle
234: &=&
235: i(p_\alpha g_{\beta\alpha_1}-p_\beta g_{\alpha \alpha_1})
236: {\langle {\bar q} q \rangle \over 3 f_\pi} \ ,
237: \nonumber \\
238: \langle 0 | {\bar d} \lda_{\alpha_1}\lda_{\alpha_2}\lda_{\alpha_3}
239: \gamma_5 \sigma_{\alpha \beta} u | \pi (p) \rangle \ ,
240: \nonumber \\
241: ={im_0^2 \langle {\bar q} q \rangle \over 36 f_\pi}
242: &\Big [& p_\alpha (g_{\alpha_1 \alpha_2} g_{\alpha_3\beta}
243: +g_{\alpha_1 \alpha_3} g_{\alpha_2\beta}
244: +g_{\alpha_3 \alpha_2} g_{\alpha_1\beta} ) - (\alpha \leftrightarrow \beta)
245: \Big ] \ .
246: \end{eqnarray}
247: Here $m_0^2$ and $\delta^2$ are defined via
248: \begin{eqnarray}
249: \langle {\bar q} D^2 q \rangle = {m_0^2 \over 2}
250: \langle {\bar q} q \rangle\ ,
251: \nonumber \\
252: \langle 0| {\bar d} g_s {\tilde {\cal G}}^{\alpha\beta}
253: \gamma_\beta u | \pi(p) \rangle = i \delta^2 f_\pi p^\alpha\ .
254: \end{eqnarray}
255: Up to twist-5, these are all the possibilities coming from the
256: expansion of the quark-antiquark components at the order ${\cal
257: O}(p_\mu)$.
258:
259: The additional contribution to the OPE is shown by Fig.~\ref{fig1} (b)
260: where one gluon emitted from the $c$-quark propagator is combined
261: with the quark-antiquark component.
262: Specifically, the $c$-quark propagator with one gluon being attached
263: is given by~\cite{Reinders:1985sr}
264: \begin{eqnarray}
265: -{g_s {\cal G}_{\alpha \beta} \over 2 (k^2 -m^2_c)^2 }
266: \left [ k^\alpha \gamma^\beta - k^\beta \gamma^\alpha
267: + (\fslash{k} + m_c) i \sigma^{\alpha \beta} \right ]\ ,
268: \end{eqnarray}
269: where ${\cal G}_{\alpha \beta} = t^A G_{\alpha \beta}$.
270: The color matrices $t^A$ are normalized via $Tr(t^A t^B) = \delta^{AB}/2$.
271: Taking the gluon stress tensor into the quark-antiquark component, one
272: can write down the correlation function into the form
273: \begin{eqnarray}
274: \Pi(p,q) &=& 2i \int {d^4 k \over (2\pi)^4}
275: Tr \Bigg \{ {2(q-k)_\theta \gamma_\delta +(\fslash{q} -\fslash{k}+im_c)
276: i\sigma_{\theta\delta} \over \left [ (q-k)^2-m_c^2 \right ]^2 }
277: \nonumber \\
278: &&\times \Gamma_2
279: \left [ \gamma_5 \sigma_{\rho\lambda} B^{\rho\lambda\theta\delta}(k,p)
280: +\gamma^\tau \epsilon^{\theta\delta\alpha\beta}
281: D_{\tau\alpha\beta}(k,p) \right ]
282: \Gamma_1
283: \Bigg \} \ .
284: \label{opeglu}
285: \end{eqnarray}
286: At the order ${\cal O} (p_\mu)$, the two functions appearing
287: above are given by
288: \begin{eqnarray}
289: B^{\rho\lambda\theta\delta} &=& -{m_0^2 \langle {\bar q} q \rangle
290: \over 12\times 32 f_\pi} (g^{\rho\theta}g^{\lambda\delta}
291: -g^{\rho\delta}g^{\lambda\theta})p^\alpha
292: (2\pi)^4 {\partial\over\partial k_\alpha}
293: \delta^{(4)}(k)\ ,
294: \\
295: D_{\tau\alpha\beta} &=& -{i \delta^2 f_\pi \over 3 \times 32}
296: (p_\alpha g_{\tau\beta} - p_\beta g_{\tau \lambda})
297: (2\pi)^4 \delta^{(4)}(k) \ .
298: \end{eqnarray}
299: Another function involving the pion matrix element of the form
300: \begin{eqnarray}
301: \langle 0| {\bar d} \gamma_5 \gamma_\tau g_s {\cal G}_{\theta\delta} u|\pi(p)
302: \rangle
303: \end{eqnarray}
304: is of the order ${\cal O} (m_q)$, which therefore has been neglected.
305:
306: Once the Dirac matrices $\Gamma_i~(i=1,2)$ are given, we can
307: straightforwardly calculate the corresponding
308: OPE from Eqs.~(\ref{opetree}) and (\ref{opeglu}).
309: These give the OPE up to twist-5 at the order ${\cal O} (p_\mu)$.
310: Below, we will use this formalism to calculate the
311: couplings $DD^*\pi$, $D^*D^*\pi$,$D_1D_1\pi$, and $D^*D_1\pi$
312: by choosing appropriate Dirac matrices for them.
313:
314:
315:
316:
317:
318: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
319: \section{Sum rule for $D D^* \pi$}
320: \label{sec:ddspi}
321: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
322:
323: In this section, we construct a sum rule for the $D D^* \pi$ coupling
324: using the correlation function
325: \begin{eqnarray}
326: \Pi_\mu (p,q) =
327: i\int d^4 x e^{iq\cdot x} \langle 0 | T \{ {\bar d}(x) \gamma_\mu c(x),
328: {\bar c}(0) i\gamma_5 u(0) \} | \pi (p) \rangle\ .
329: \end{eqnarray}
330: As two momenta are involved in the correlation function,
331: one can separate the correlation function into the following two pieces
332: \begin{eqnarray}
333: \Pi_\mu = F_1 (p,q) p_\mu + F_2 (q,p) q_\mu \ .
334: \label{sep1}
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: We construct a sum rule for $F_1 (p=0,q)$, which gives
337: a coupling determined at the order ${\cal O}(p_\mu)$.
338: Defining the $D^*D\pi$ coupling by~\cite{Belyaev:1995zk}
339: \begin{eqnarray}
340: \langle D^*(q)|D(q-p)\pi(p)\rangle = g_{D^*D\pi} p\cdot \epsilon
341: \end{eqnarray}
342: and using
343: \begin{eqnarray}
344: \langle D | {\bar c} i\gamma_5 u |0\rangle = {m_D^2 f_D \over m_c}
345: \;; \quad
346: \langle 0 | {\bar d} \gamma_\mu c |D^*\rangle = m_{D^*} f_{D^*} \epsilon_\mu\ ,
347: \end{eqnarray}
348: the low-lying pole contribution to $F_1 (p=0,q)$
349: is given by
350: \begin{eqnarray}
351: -{m_D^2 m_{D^*} f_D f_{D^*} g_{DD^*\pi}
352: \over
353: m_c (q^2-m^2_{D^*}) (q^2 - m_D^2)}\ .
354: \label{phen1}
355: \end{eqnarray}
356:
357: A slightly different sum rule using the same correlation function can be
358: found in
359: Refs.~\cite{Colangelo:1994es,Colangelo:1995ph}.
360: Specifically, the correlation function in that approach was decomposed into
361: \begin{eqnarray}
362: \Pi_\mu = A p_\mu + B (2q-p)_\mu
363: \label{col}
364: \end{eqnarray}
365: and a sum rule was constructed for the function $A$. Note, by
366: comparing this with Eq.~(\ref{sep1}), one can immediately see that
367: $A=F_1+F_2/2$. Thus, in the expansion in terms of the external
368: momentum $p_\mu$, the function $A$ involves the term at the zeroth
369: order in $p_\mu$ ({\it i.e.} $F_2$), which can be trivially
370: obtained from a vacuum correlation function via the soft-pion theorem,
371: as well as the term of the first
372: order in $p_\mu$ ({\it i.e.,} $F_1$). To avoid the trivial contribution
373: obtained from the soft-pion theorem, we choose to work with the
374: decomposition of Eq.~(\ref{sep1}).
375: %The piece that
376: %survives in the soft-pion limit ({\it i.e.}, $F_2$) is problematic
377: %because the correlation function in the limit gives a coupling
378: %trivially related to a vacuum correlation function ({\it i.e.,
379: %without a pion}). As the function $A$ in the decomposition
380: %Eq.~(\ref{col}) contains the term that survives in the soft-pion
381: %limit, it may not give a non-trivial coupling.
382: Furthermore, as
383: mentioned in Ref.~\cite{Belyaev:1995zk}, the function $A$ can
384: contain some contribution from a possible resonance (scalar
385: particle $D_0$), which can give an additional uncertainty in the
386: prediction.
387:
388:
389:
390: Following the general strategy given in Sec.~\ref{sec:general},
391: we obtain the OPE for the correlation function,
392: \begin{eqnarray}
393: F_1(q,p=0) &=& {1 \over q^2-m_c^2}
394: \left [ m_c f_\pi -{2 \over 3} {\langle {\bar q} q\rangle \over f_\pi }
395: \left ( 2-{m_c^2 \over q^2-m_c^2} \right )
396: -{10 \over 9} {\delta^2 f_\pi m_c \over q^2 -m_c^2 }
397: \left (1+ {m_c^2 \over q^2-m_c^2 } \right )
398: \right ]
399: \nonumber \\
400: &+&{m_0^2\over 6 f_\pi} \langle{\bar q} q\rangle
401: \left [ {5 \over 6(q^2-m_c^2)^2} + {4 m_c^2 \over 3(q^2-m_c^2)^3}
402: -{4 m_c^4 \over (q^2-m_c^2)^4}\right ]\ .
403: \label{ope1}
404: \end{eqnarray}
405: Note, the leading OPE has a simple pole in $q^2$. According to QCD
406: duality, higher resonance contributions lying along the positive
407: $q^2$ are matched with the imaginary part of the OPE above a
408: certain threshold $S_0$ which is taken much higher than the
409: low-lying pole. Since the simple pole structure $1/(q^2-m_c^2)$
410: does not have nonanalytic structures in the duality region ($q^2
411: \ge S_0$), it should not pick up the continuum contribution.
412: However, it is an often practice that the double-variable
413: dispersion relation is used to obtain a spectral density for a
414: given OPE. Then by naively restricting the dispersion integral
415: below the continuum threshold, one picks up the continuum
416: contribution even from the OPE of the form $1/(q^2-m_c^2)$. In
417: this prescription, the continuum contribution is a simple (and
418: unphysical) pole at the continuum
419: threshold~\cite{Kim:2000rg,Kim:2000ur,Kim:2000ku}. (See for
420: example Eq.(3.12) of Ref.~\cite{DiBartolomeo:1995ir}.) This pole
421: at the continuum threshold does not resemble at all the higher
422: resonance contributions lying along the positive $q^2$.
423: In fact, this pole at the continuum is mathematically spurious.
424: To illustrate this in detail, let's determine the spectral density for
425: the OPE $1/(q^2-m_c^2)$ from the double dispersion relation when
426: the external momentum is zero,
427: \begin{eqnarray}
428: {1 \over q^2 - m_c^2} = \int_0^\infty ds {b(s) \over (s-q^2)^2}\ .
429: \label{double}
430: \end{eqnarray}
431: Under the successive Borel transformations~\cite{Kim:2000ur}, one can
432: determine the spectral function
433: \begin{eqnarray}
434: b(s) = - \theta (s-m_c^2)\ .
435: \label{bs}
436: \end{eqnarray}
437: When we put it back to the double dispersion relation, we have
438: to reproduce the OPE $1/(q^2-m_c^2)$. Anything additional
439: to it is mathematically spurious. Using Eq.(\ref{bs}) in
440: Eq.(\ref{double}) and doing the integration by part, we obtain
441: \begin{eqnarray}
442: \int_0^\infty ds {- \theta (s-m_c^2) \over (s-q^2)^2}=
443: {1 \over q^2 - m_c^2} +
444: {\theta (s-m_c^2) \over s-q^2} \Bigg |^\infty_0
445: \end{eqnarray}
446: The second term is mathematically spurious as it is additional to the
447: one that we had started with. But when it is restricted by the continuum
448: threshold $S_0$, the upper limit is changed to $S_0$
449: and the second term has a pole at the continuum threshold.
450: However,
451: since the pole comes from the spurious term, its contribution to the
452: sum rule is spurious.
453:
454:
455:
456: Nonetheless, one may argue from an intuition that the continuum
457: contribution should be present as the current can couple to higher
458: resonances. In fact, it may be possible to build such a
459: contribution if one uses a more sophisticated current than the
460: simple current of the form ${\bar q} \Gamma c$. We believe that
461: the absence of the continuum is due to a limitation of the
462: current of the form ${\bar q} \Gamma c$. But we believe that,
463: as we demonstrated above, it is {\it ad hoc}
464: to build the continuum contribution from the OPE of the form
465: $1/(q^2-m_c^2)$.
466:
467:
468:
469:
470:
471: We now match Eq.(\ref{phen1}) with Eq.(\ref{ope1}) to get a sum rule
472: for the $D^* D \pi$ coupling. For simplicity, we neglect the mass
473: difference between $D^*$ and $D$ and set them to $m_{D^*} =
474: m_D =m_{av}\equiv (m_{D^*}+m_D)/2$.
475: Under the Borel transformation (with the Borel mass $M^2$), the final
476: sum rule reads,
477: \begin{eqnarray}
478: g_{D D^* \pi} f_D f_{D^*} +
479: T_1 M^2 &=& {m_c \over m_{av}^3} M^2 e^{(m^2_{av} - m_c^2)/M^2} \Bigg \{
480: m_c f_\pi -{4\over 3 f_\pi} \langle{\bar q}q\rangle
481: \nonumber \\
482: &+&\left [ -{2\over 3f_\pi} m_c^2 \langle{\bar q}q\rangle +
483: {10 \over 9}\delta^2f_\pi m_c -{5\over 36 f_\pi} m_0^2 \langle{\bar q}q\rangle
484: \right ] {1\over M^2}
485: \nonumber \\
486: &+&\left [-{5\over 9} \delta^2 f_\pi m_c^3 +{1\over 9f_\pi} m_0^2
487: m_c^2 \langle{\bar q}q\rangle \right ] {1\over M^4}
488: + {m_0^2 m_c^4 \langle{\bar q}q\rangle \over 9f_\pi M^6}
489: \Bigg \} \ .
490: \label{bddspi}
491: \end{eqnarray}
492: Here $T_1$ denotes the transitions from the low-lying resonance to
493: higher resonances. We will linearly fit the RHS within a Borel window
494: to determine the coupling as well as the transition strength $T_1$.
495:
496:
497:
498: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
499: \section{Sum rule for $D^* D^* \pi$}
500: \label{sec:dsdspi}
501: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
502:
503:
504:
505: We now construct a sum rule for the $D^* D^* \pi$ coupling.
506: The $D^* D^* \pi$ sum rule can be constructed from the correlation function
507: (by setting $\Gamma_1 = \gamma_\mu$ and $\Gamma_2 = \gamma_\nu$ in
508: Eq.~(\ref{general_cor})).
509: \begin{eqnarray}
510: \Pi_{\mu\nu} (p,q) =
511: i\int d^4 x e^{iq\cdot x} \langle 0 | T \{ {\bar d}(x) \gamma_\mu c(x),
512: {\bar c}(0) \gamma_\nu u(0) \} | \pi (p) \rangle\ .
513: \label{dsdspicor}
514: \end{eqnarray}
515: Saturating the correlation function by the $D^*$ intermediate
516: state and introducing the coupling via
517: \begin{eqnarray}
518: \langle D^*(q,\epsilon_2) | \pi(p) D^*(q-p,\epsilon_1) \rangle
519: =i {2\over f_\pi} g_{D^*D^*\pi}\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}
520: \epsilon_1^\alpha \epsilon_2^\beta p^\mu q^\nu\ ,
521: \label{dsdsphen}
522: \end{eqnarray}
523: the low-lying pole contribution at the first order in $p_\mu$
524: is given by~\cite{DiBartolomeo:1995ir}
525: \begin{eqnarray}
526: - {2 g_{D^*D^*\pi} f^2_{D^*} m^2_{D^*}
527: \over f_\pi (q^2-m_{D^*}^2)^2} \epsilon_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu} p^\mu q^\nu\ .
528: \end{eqnarray}
529:
530:
531: The OPE part can be computed by following the general
532: prescription described in Sec.~\ref{sec:general}.
533: After taking out the common factor of
534: $\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu} p^\mu q^\nu$, we obtain the OPE side
535: \begin{eqnarray}
536: {f_\pi \over q^2-m_c^2}
537: + {2\over 3f_\pi} {m_c \langle {\bar q} q \rangle \over (q^2-m_c^2)^2}
538: + {8\over 9} {f_\pi \delta^2 \over (q^2-m_c^2)^2}
539: -{10\over 9} {f_\pi \delta^2 m_c^2 \over (q^2-m_c^2)^3}
540: -{2\over 3f_\pi} {m_c^3 m_0^2 \langle {\bar q} q \rangle \over (q^2 -m_c^2)^4}
541: \ .
542: \label{sspope}
543: \end{eqnarray}
544: The terms involving $m_0^2$ are different from the one in
545: Ref.~\cite{DiBartolomeo:1995ir}.
546: By matching the two sides, we obtain
547: the sum rule for the $D^*D^*\pi$ coupling
548: \begin{eqnarray}
549: g_{D^*D^*\pi} f^2_{D^*}
550: &+& T_2 M^2
551: = {f_\pi \over 2 m_{D^*}^2} e^{(m_{D^*}^2-m_c^2)/M^2}
552: \nonumber \\
553: &\times& \Bigg [ f_\pi M^2
554: - {2\over 3 f_\pi} m_c \langle{\bar q}q \rangle -
555: {8\over 9} f_\pi \delta^2
556: -{5\over 9} f_\pi \delta^2 {m_c^2 \over M^2}
557: + {m_c^3 m_0^2 \langle{\bar q}q \rangle \over 9 f_\pi M^4}
558: \Bigg ]\ .
559: \label{dsdspisum}
560: \end{eqnarray}
561: Here, $T_2$ denotes the transitions from $D^* \rightarrow
562: higher~ resonance ~states$.
563:
564:
565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
566: \section{Sum rule for $D_1 D_1 \pi$}
567: \label{sec:d1d1pi}
568: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
569:
570: For the coupling $D_1 D_1 \pi$, we use the correlation function
571: involving axial-vector currents,
572: \begin{eqnarray}
573: i\int d^4 x e^{iq\cdot x} \langle 0 |
574: T \{ {\bar d}(x) \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 c(x),
575: {\bar c}(0) \gamma_\nu \gamma_5 u(0) \} | \pi (p) \rangle \ .
576: \end{eqnarray}
577: Comparing this correlation function with Eq.~(\ref{dsdspicor}),
578: one can easily see that the OPE for this correlation function
579: can be obtained by replacing $m_c \rightarrow -m_c$ in
580: Eq.~(\ref{sspope}).
581: We introduce the $D_1D_1\pi$ coupling similarly as Eq.~(\ref{dsdsphen}).
582: Then it is a simple matter to construct a sum rule for the $D_1 D_1 \pi$
583: coupling. Namely, by replacing $m_c \rightarrow -m_c$ in
584: Eq.~(\ref{dsdspisum}), we have
585: \begin{eqnarray}
586: g_{D_1D_1\pi} f^2_{D_1}
587: &+& T_3 M^2
588: = {f_\pi \over 2 m^2_{D_1}} e^{(m_{D_1}^2-m_c^2)/M^2}
589: \nonumber \\
590: &\times& \Bigg [ f_\pi M^2
591: + {2\over 3 f_\pi} m_c \langle{\bar q}q \rangle -
592: {8\over 9} f_\pi \delta^2
593: -{5\over 9} f_\pi \delta^2 {m_c^2 \over M^2}
594: - {m_c^3 m_0^2 \langle{\bar q}q \rangle \over 9 f_\pi M^4}
595: \Bigg ]\ .
596: \label{11pisum}
597: \end{eqnarray}
598: Again, $T_3$ denotes the transitions from $D_1 \rightarrow
599: higher~ resonance~ states$.
600:
601:
602: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
603: \section{Sum rule for $D_1 D^* \pi$}
604: \label{sec:d1dspi}
605: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
606:
607: The $D_1 D^* \pi$ coupling can be calculated from the correlation
608: function
609: \begin{eqnarray}
610: i\int d^4 x e^{iq\cdot x} \langle 0 |
611: T \{ {\bar d}(x) \gamma_\mu c(x),
612: {\bar c}(0) \gamma_\nu \gamma_5 u(0) \} | \pi (p) \rangle \ .
613: \end{eqnarray}
614: Refs.~\cite{Aliev:1997bp,Colangelo:1998rp} calculated the coupling
615: using the light-cone QCD sum rules.
616: Both references considered the structure
617: function proportional to $g_{\mu\nu}$ but the OPE in either approaches
618: are different.
619: Here we choose to work with the structure function proportional
620: to $q_\mu p_\nu + q_\nu p_\mu$, which turns out to be rather simple.
621:
622: %which gives us an impression that the calculated
623: %couplings in these works may not be reliable.
624: %In fact, within our QCD sum rule approach facilitating
625: %the short distance expansion, this sum rule at the
626: %order ${\cal O}(p_\mu)$ is not converging
627: %fast enough. Therefore, the QCD prediction may not
628: %be precise enough.
629:
630:
631: In constructing the phenomenological side, we follow
632: Ref.~\cite{Aliev:1997bp} where the structure
633: proportional to $q_\mu p_\nu + q_\nu p_\mu$
634: is given by
635: \begin{eqnarray}
636: g_{D_1 D^* \pi} {m_{D_1} \over m_{D^*}} {f_{D^*} \over q^2 - m_{D^*}^2}
637: {f_{D_1} \over q^2 - m_{D_1}^2}\ .
638: \end{eqnarray}
639: Note, $g_{D_1 D^* \pi}$ has one dimension due to the
640: way that the coupling is introduced in Ref.~\cite{Aliev:1997bp}, which is
641: in contrast to the other dimensionless couplings.
642: The OPE side can be calculated straightforwardly.
643: It takes the simple form of
644: \begin{eqnarray}
645: -f_\pi \left [ {1\over q^2-m_c^2} -
646: {10 \over 9} {m_c^2 \over (q^2 -m_c^2)^3}
647: \right ] \ .
648: \end{eqnarray}
649: The terms containing $\delta^2$ from
650: the expansion of $A(k,p)$ is canceled
651: with the similar term coming from $D_{\tau \alpha \beta}$.
652: Setting $m_{D^*} = m_{D_1}= {\bar m} \equiv (m_{D^*}+m_{D_1})/2 $
653: and matching the two sides,
654: we obtain
655: \begin{eqnarray}
656: g_{D_1 D^* \pi} f_{D^*}f_{D_1} + T_4 M^2
657: = f_\pi e^{({\bar m}^2 -m_c^2)/M^2}
658: \left [ M^2 -{5\over 9} {m_c^2 \over M^2} \right ] \ .
659: \label{bd1dspi}
660: \end{eqnarray}
661:
662:
663: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
664: \section{Analysis and results}
665: \label{sec:analysis}
666: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
667:
668: In our analysis, we use the following set of the QCD parameters,
669: \begin{eqnarray}
670: &&m_0^2 = 0.8~{\rm GeV}^2
671: \;; \quad
672: \langle {\bar q} q \rangle = (-0.24~{\rm GeV})^3
673: \;; \quad
674: \delta^2 =0.2~{\rm GeV}^2
675: \nonumber \\
676: &&m_c =1.34 ~{\rm GeV}
677: \;; \quad
678: f_\pi =131~{\rm MeV}\ .
679: \end{eqnarray}
680: For the hadron masses, we use~\cite{Groom:2000in}
681: \begin{eqnarray}
682: m_{D}=1.87~{\rm GeV}
683: \;; \quad
684: m_{D^*}=2.01~{\rm GeV}
685: \;; \quad
686: m_{D_1}=2.42~{\rm GeV}\ .
687: \end{eqnarray}
688: We plot the Borel curves for the couplings $DD^*\pi$, $D_1D^*\pi$
689: in Figs.~\ref{fig2} and \ref{fig3} using
690: Eqs.~(\ref{bddspi}) and (\ref{bd1dspi}) respectively.
691: The corresponding
692: curves for the $D^*D^*\pi$ and $D_1D_1\pi$ couplings are shown in
693: Fig.~\ref{fig3}. To get the couplings, we need to fit each curve
694: with a straight line within an appropriately chosen Borel window.
695: The intersection between the best fitting curve and the vertical
696: axis at $M^2=0$ gives the values $f_D f_{D^*} g_{DD^*\pi}$,
697: $f_{D_1}f_{D^*} g_{D_1D^*\pi}$, $f^2_{D^*}g_{D^*D^*\pi}$ and
698: $f^2_{D_1}g_{D_1D_1\pi}$. All the curves are well-fitted with a
699: straight line above minimum Borel mass, which depending on sum rules,
700: ranging from 2 - 3 GeV$^2$. In that region,
701: the higher dimensional terms are suppressed.
702: When we shift the Borel window by 0.5 GeV$^2$, the results reduce by 10 \%.
703:
704: Table~\ref{tab:table1} shows the best fit values and the chosen
705: Borel window. For $f_D f_{D^*} g_{DD^*\pi}$, our value is
706: substantially smaller than 0.51 GeV$^2$ obtained from the light-cone QCD sum
707: rule analysis~\cite{Belyaev:1995zk}. The origin of
708: the difference may be traced back to the use of the asymptotic pion wave
709: functions. In the light-cone sum rules, the values of the
710: twist-2 and twist-3
711: wave functions at the middle point, $\varphi_\pi(1/2) \sim1.2$ and
712: $\varphi_p(1/2)\sim 1.5$, enter as leading terms
713: in the OPE. But in our sum rules, these middle points are replaced
714: by the integrated strengths of the wave functions $\int_0^1 du
715: \varphi_\pi(u) =1$, $\int_0^1 du \varphi_p(u) =1$, which are
716: well-fixed by low-energy theorems. Though our approach is
717: different from the similar calculations in
718: Refs.~\cite{Colangelo:1994es,DiBartolomeo:1995ir}, our result for
719: $f_D f_{D^*} g_{DD^*\pi}$ agrees with them. Also our value of
720: $f_{D^*}^2 g_{D^*D^*\pi}$ agrees with the results in
721: Ref.~\cite{Colangelo:1998rp}.
722: Our result for $f_{D_1} f_{D^*} g_{D_1D^*\pi}$, 0.948 GeV$^3$, is
723: somewhat larger than 0.68 GeV$^3$ from Ref.\cite{Aliev:1997bp},
724: which is obtained from the structure function proportional to $g_{\mu\nu}$.
725:
726: To get the couplings, we need to determine $f_D$, $f_{D_1}$ and $f_{D^*}$.
727: One may calculate these using QCD sum rules of two-point correlation
728: function in the vacuum. Currently
729: these values are not known precisely.
730: According to Ref.~\cite{Colangelo:1998rp}, they are
731: $f_D=170$ MeV, $f_{D^*}=220$ MeV and $f_{D_1}=240$ MeV. A somewhat
732: different set of the decay constants can be found in Ref.\cite{Aliev:1997bp},
733: $f_D=160$ MeV, $f_{D^*}=240$ MeV and $f_{D_1}=300$ MeV.
734: Using these, we obtain the coupling constants,
735: \begin{eqnarray}
736: &&g_{DD^*\pi}=8.29~ (8.07)
737: \;; \quad
738: g_{D_1 D^* \pi} = 17.95 ~(13.6)~{\rm GeV} \nonumber \\
739: && g_{D^* D^* \pi}= 0.33~(0.278)
740: \;; \quad
741: g_{D_1 D_1 \pi}= 0.208~(0.133)\ .
742: \end{eqnarray}
743: where the numbers (the ones in the
744: parenthesis) are obtained by using the decay constants
745: given in Ref.~\cite{Colangelo:1998rp} (Ref.\cite{Aliev:1997bp}).
746: To make a more precise prediction, one may need to determine
747: the decay constants precisely.
748: To summarize, we present in table~\ref{tab:table2} our
749: results in comparison
750: with the other previous calculations.
751:
752: These couplings are important ingredients for estimating the
753: absorption cross section of $J/\psi$ by $\pi$ mesons.
754: Up to now meson exchange models in the calculation of the absorption
755: cross section
756: are based on a effective chiral lagrangian with only pseudoscalars
757: ($D, \pi$) and vector mesons ($J/\psi, D^*$). We believe that the addition
758: of the axial partner of $D^*$, namely the $D_1$ meson, will reduce the
759: value for the existing calculation. The reason is the following.
760: Consider the dissociation of $J/\psi$ by pions into $D$ and $D^*$.
761: In the existing meson exchange calculations, the diagrams contributing
762: to the process are the contributions from the s-channel $D$ meson, the
763: t-channel $D^*$ mesons and the direct four point coupling, which gives
764: a non-trivial contribution. The form of the couplings are obtained
765: from the chiral SU(4) lagrangian with vector mesons introduced in
766: the massive Yang-Mills approach.
767: We believe that the addition of $D_1$ meson
768: will partly cancel the contribution from the direct four point coupling.
769: This is so because this is precisely how the Adler consistency condition
770: for the $\rho -\pi$ forward scattering amplitude
771: is obtained in the massive Yang Mills approach~\cite{Lee:1995wx}.
772: Namely, one has to
773: introduce the axial partner of $\rho$, namely $a_1$ meson, whose contribution
774: in the s-channel will cancel the direct four point coupling of the
775: $\rho \rho \pi \pi$ and make the amplitude vanish in the soft pion limit.
776: Similar cancellation will occur between the direct four point coupling
777: of $J/\psi-\pi-D-D^*$ and the
778: $J/\psi+\pi \rightarrow D_1 \rightarrow D+D^*$
779: contribution. Of course, how big the cancellation actually is in this
780: particular case has to be studied in detail and that will be done in
781: the future work reported in Ref.~\cite{Song}.
782:
783: \acknowledgments
784: The work by Hungchong Kim was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant
785: KRF-2001-015-DP0104. The work by Su Houng Lee was supported by the KOSEF
786: 1999-2-111-005-5, by the Yonsei University Research Grant, and by
787: the Ministry of Education 2000-2-0689.
788:
789:
790: \begin{references}
791: %\begin{thebibliography}{99}
792:
793: %\cite{Matsui:1986dk}
794: \bibitem{Matsui:1986dk}
795: T.~Matsui and H.~Satz,
796: %``J / Psi Suppression By Quark - Gluon Plasma Formation,''
797: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 178}, 416 (1986).
798: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B178,416;%%
799:
800: %\cite{Abreu:2000ni}
801: \bibitem{Abreu:2000ni}
802: M.~C.~Abreu {\it et al.} [NA50 Collaboration],
803: %``Evidence for deconfinement of quarks and gluons from the J/psi suppression pattern measured in Pb Pb collisions at the CERN-SPS,''
804: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 477}, 28 (2000).
805: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B477,28;%%
806:
807:
808: %\cite{Blaizot:2000ev}
809: \bibitem{Blaizot:2000ev}
810: J.~Blaizot, M.~Dinh and J.~Ollitrault,
811: %``Transverse energy fluctuations and the pattern of J/psi suppression in Pb Pb collisions,''
812: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 85}, 4012 (2000)
813: [arXiv:nucl-th/0007020].
814: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0007020;%%
815:
816: %\cite{Kharzeev:1994pz}
817: \bibitem{Kharzeev:1994pz}
818: D.~Kharzeev and H.~Satz,
819: %``Quarkonium interactions in hadronic matter,''
820: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 334}, 155 (1994)
821: [hep-ph/9405414].
822: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9405414;%%
823:
824:
825: %\cite{Kharzeev:1996tw}
826: \bibitem{Kharzeev:1996tw}
827: D.~Kharzeev, H.~Satz, A.~Syamtomov and G.~Zinovev,
828: %``On the sum rule approach to quarkonium hadron interactions,''
829: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 389}, 595 (1996)
830: [hep-ph/9605448].
831: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605448;%%
832:
833:
834: %\cite{Martins:1995hd}
835: \bibitem{Martins:1995hd}
836: K.~Martins, D.~Blaschke and E.~Quack,
837: %``Quark exchange model for charmonium dissociation in hot hadronic matter,''
838: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 51}, 2723 (1995)
839: [hep-ph/9411302].
840: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411302;%%
841:
842:
843: %\cite{Wong:2000zb}
844: \bibitem{Wong:2000zb}
845: C.~Wong, E.~S.~Swanson and T.~Barnes,
846: %``Cross sections for pi and rho induced dissociation of J/psi and psi',''
847: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62}, 045201 (2000)
848: [hep-ph/9912431].
849: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912431;%%
850:
851: %\cite{Wong:2001td}
852: \bibitem{Wong:2001td}
853: C.~Wong, E.~S.~Swanson and T.~Barnes,
854: %``Heavy quarkonium dissociation cross sections in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,''
855: nucl-th/0106067.
856: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0106067;%%
857:
858: %\cite{Matinian:1998cb}
859: \bibitem{Matinian:1998cb}
860: S.~G.~Matinian and B.~Muller,
861: %``A model of charmonium absorption by light mesons,''
862: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 58}, 2994 (1998)
863: [nucl-th/9806027].
864: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9806027;%%
865:
866:
867: %\cite{Haglin:2000xs}
868: \bibitem{Haglin:2000xs}
869: K.~L.~Haglin,
870: %``Charmonium dissociation in hadronic matter,''
871: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 61}, 031902 (2000)
872: [nucl-th/9907034].
873: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9907034;%%
874:
875:
876: %\cite{Oh:2001qr}
877: \bibitem{Oh:2001qr}
878: Y.~Oh, T.~Song and S.~H.~Lee,
879: %``J/psi absorption by pi and rho mesons in meson exchange model with anomalous parity interactions,''
880: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 63}, 034901 (2001)
881: [nucl-th/0010064].
882: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0010064;%%
883:
884: %\cite{Lin:2000ad}
885: \bibitem{Lin:2000ad}
886: Z.~Lin and C.~M.~Ko,
887: %``A model for J/psi absorption in hadronic matter,''
888: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62}, 034903 (2000)
889: [nucl-th/9912046].
890: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9912046;%%
891:
892:
893: %\cite{Haglin:2001ar}
894: \bibitem{Haglin:2001ar}
895: K.~L.~Haglin and C.~Gale,
896: %``Hadronic interactions of the J/psi,''
897: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 63}, 065201 (2001)
898: [nucl-th/0010017].
899: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0010017;%%
900:
901:
902: %\cite{Shifman:1979bx}
903: \bibitem{Shifman:1979bx}
904: M.~A.~Shifman, A.~I.~Vainshtein and V.~I.~Zakharov,
905: %``QCD And Resonance Physics. Sum Rules,''
906: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 147}, 385 (1979).
907: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B147,385;%%
908:
909: %\cite{Shifman:1979by}
910: \bibitem{Shifman:1979by}
911: M.~A.~Shifman, A.~I.~Vainshtein and V.~I.~Zakharov,
912: %``QCD And Resonance Physics: Applications,''
913: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 147}, 448 (1979).
914: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B147,448;%%
915:
916: \bibitem{Song}
917: T. Song, Y. Oh and S. H. Lee,
918: {\it in preparation}.
919:
920: %\cite{Belyaev:1995zk}
921: \bibitem{Belyaev:1995zk}
922: V.~M.~Belyaev, V.~M.~Braun, A.~Khodjamirian and R.~Ruckl,
923: %``D* D pi and B* B pi couplings in QCD,''
924: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 6177 (1995)
925: [hep-ph/9410280].
926: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9410280;%%
927:
928:
929: %\cite{Colangelo:1998rp}
930: \bibitem{Colangelo:1998rp}
931: P.~Colangelo and F.~De Fazio,
932: %``QCD interactions of heavy mesons with pions by light-cone sum rules,''
933: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 4}, 503 (1998)
934: [hep-ph/9706271].
935: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706271;%%
936:
937: %\cite{Aliev:1997bp}
938: \bibitem{Aliev:1997bp}
939: T.~M.~Aliev, N.~K.~Pak and M.~Savci,
940: %``The strong coupling constants of excited positive parity heavy mesons in light-cone QCD,''
941: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 390}, 335 (1997)
942: [hep-ph/9608351].
943: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9608351;%%
944:
945:
946: %\cite{Colangelo:1994es}
947: \bibitem{Colangelo:1994es}
948: P.~Colangelo, G.~Nardulli, A.~Deandrea, N.~Di Bartolomeo, R.~Gatto and F.~Feruglio,
949: %``On the coupling of heavy mesons to pions in QCD,''
950: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 339}, 151 (1994)
951: [hep-ph/9406295].
952: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9406295;%%
953:
954:
955: %\cite{Colangelo:1995ph}
956: \bibitem{Colangelo:1995ph}
957: P.~Colangelo, F.~De Fazio, G.~Nardulli, N.~Di Bartolomeo and R.~Gatto,
958: %``Strong coupling of excited heavy mesons,''
959: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 6422 (1995)
960: [hep-ph/9506207].
961: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9506207;%%
962:
963:
964: %\cite{DiBartolomeo:1995ir}
965: \bibitem{DiBartolomeo:1995ir}
966: N.~Di Bartolomeo, R.~Gatto, F.~Feruglio and G.~Nardulli,
967: %``Heavy meson hyperfine splitting: A Complete 1/m(Q) calculation,''
968: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 347}, 405 (1995)
969: [hep-ph/9411210].
970: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411210;%%
971:
972: %\cite{Chernyak:1984ej}
973: \bibitem{Chernyak:1984ej}
974: V.~L.~Chernyak and A.~R.~Zhitnitsky,
975: %``Asymptotic Behavior Of Exclusive Processes In QCD,''
976: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 112}, 173 (1984).
977: %%CITATION = PRPLC,112,173;%%
978:
979:
980: %\cite{Kim:2000ku}
981: \bibitem{Kim:2000ku}
982: H.~Kim, S.~H.~Lee and M.~Oka,
983: %``Proper construction of the continuum in light-cone QCD sum rules,''
984: hep-ph/0011072.
985: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011072;%%
986:
987: %\cite{Kim:2000rg}
988: \bibitem{Kim:2000rg}
989: H.~Kim,
990: %``Comment on 'Determination of pion baryon coupling constants from QCD sum rules',''
991: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 61}, 019801 (2000)
992: [nucl-th/9903040].
993: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9903040;%%
994:
995: %\cite{Kim:2000ur}
996: \bibitem{Kim:2000ur}
997: H.~Kim,
998: %``Use of double dispersion relation in QCD sum rules with external fields,''
999: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 103}, 1001 (2000)
1000: [nucl-th/9906081].
1001: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9906081;%%
1002:
1003: %\cite{Birse:1996zh}
1004: \bibitem{Birse:1996zh}
1005: M.~C.~Birse and B.~Krippa,
1006: %``Determination of the pion-nucleon coupling constant from QCD sum rules,''
1007: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 373}, 9 (1996)
1008: [hep-ph/9512259].
1009: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9512259;%%
1010:
1011: %\cite{Reinders:1985sr}
1012: \bibitem{Reinders:1985sr}
1013: L.~J.~Reinders, H.~Rubinstein and S.~Yazaki,
1014: %``Hadron Properties From QCD Sum Rules,''
1015: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 127}, 1 (1985).
1016: %%CITATION = PRPLC,127,1;%%
1017:
1018:
1019: %\cite{Groom:2000in}
1020: \bibitem{Groom:2000in}
1021: D.~E.~Groom {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
1022: %``Review of particle physics,''
1023: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 15}, 1 (2000).
1024: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C15,1;%%
1025:
1026:
1027: %\cite{Navarra:2000ji}
1028: \bibitem{Navarra:2000ji}
1029: F.~S.~Navarra, M.~Nielsen, M.~E.~Bracco, M.~Chiapparini and C.~L.~Schat,
1030: %``D* D pi and B* B pi form factors from QCD sum rules,''
1031: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 489}, 319 (2000)
1032: [arXiv:hep-ph/0005026].
1033: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005026;%%
1034:
1035: %\cite{Lee:1995wx}
1036: \bibitem{Lee:1995wx}
1037: S.~H.~Lee, C.~Song and H.~Yabu,
1038: %``Photon - vector meson coupling and vector meson properties at low temperature pion gas,''
1039: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 341}, 407 (1995)
1040: [arXiv:hep-ph/9408266].
1041: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9408266;%%
1042: \end{references}
1043: %\end{thebibliography}
1044: \eject
1045:
1046:
1047: \begin{table}
1048: \caption{\label{tab:table1}The best fitted values for the couplings
1049: are listed here along with the chosen Borel window. Overal shift of the
1050: Borel window by 0.5 GeV$^2$ to higher mass region gives 10 \% error.
1051: }
1052: \begin{ruledtabular}
1053: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
1054: Borel Window (GeV$^2$) & fitted value \\
1055: \hline
1056: $2.5 \le M^2 \le 3.5$ & $f_D f_{D^*} g_{DD^*\pi}=0.31$ GeV$^2$\\
1057: $3\le M^2 \le 4$ & $f_{D_1}f_{D^*}g_{D_1D^*\pi}=0.948$ GeV$^3$\\
1058: $2\le M^2 \le 3$ & $f^2_{D^*}g_{D^*D^*\pi}=0.016$ GeV$^2$\\
1059: $2\le M^2 \le 3$ & $f^2_{D_1}g_{D_1D_1\pi}=0.012$ GeV$^2$\\
1060: \end{tabular}
1061: \end{ruledtabular}
1062: \end{table}
1063:
1064:
1065: \begin{table}
1066: \caption{\label{tab:table2}Comparison of our results with the other
1067: published results. The results of
1068: Refs.\cite{Belyaev:1995zk,Colangelo:1998rp,Aliev:1997bp}
1069: are from light-cone QCD sum rules, the results from
1070: Refs.\cite{Colangelo:1994es,DiBartolomeo:1995ir} are
1071: from the conventional sum rules, and the result of Ref.\cite{Navarra:2000ji}
1072: is from the three-point sum rules.
1073: }
1074: \begin{ruledtabular}
1075: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
1076: & $g_{DD^*\pi}$ & $g_{D_1 D^* \pi}$ (GeV) &
1077: $g_{D^* D^* \pi}$ & $g_{D_1 D_1 \pi}$ \\
1078: \hline
1079: this work & $8.2\pm 0.1$ & $15.8 \pm 2$ & $0.3\pm 0.03$ & $0.17 \pm 0.04$\\
1080: Ref.\cite{Belyaev:1995zk} & $12.5\pm 1$ & & & \\
1081: Ref.\cite{Colangelo:1998rp} & $11.85\pm 2.1$ & & $0.31\pm 0.08$ & \\
1082: Ref.\cite{Aliev:1997bp} & & $10\pm 2$ & & \\
1083: Refs.\cite{Colangelo:1994es,DiBartolomeo:1995ir} & $9\pm 2$ &
1084: & $0.35\pm 0.08$ & \\
1085: Ref.\cite{Navarra:2000ji} & $5.7\pm 4$ & & & \\
1086: \end{tabular}
1087: \end{ruledtabular}
1088: \end{table}
1089:
1090:
1091: \begin{figure}
1092: \caption{The OPE diagrams considered in this work.
1093: The blob in (a) denotes the quark-antiquark component with a pion
1094: and the blob in (b) denotes quark-antiquark-gluon component
1095: with a pion.
1096: }
1097: \label{fig1}
1098:
1099: \setlength{\textwidth}{6.1in} % adjustable for camera-ready copy.
1100: \setlength{\textheight}{9.in} % for now.
1101: %\begin{figure}
1102: \centerline{%
1103: \vbox to 2.4in{\vss
1104: \hbox to 3.3in{\special{psfile=fig1.ps angle=0.
1105: hscale=70 vscale=70
1106: hoffset=-100 voffset=0
1107: % hoffset=-160 voffset=0
1108: }\hss}}
1109: }
1110:
1111: %\bigskip
1112: \vspace{50pt}
1113: \end{figure}
1114:
1115:
1116: \begin{figure}
1117: \caption{The Borel curves for the $DD^*\pi$ coupling
1118: from Eqs.~(\ref{bddspi}).
1119: Here the RHS of the equation is plotted with respect to
1120: the Borel mass $M^2$.
1121: }
1122: \label{fig2}
1123:
1124: \setlength{\textwidth}{6.1in} % adjustable for camera-ready copy.
1125: \setlength{\textheight}{9.in} % for now.
1126: %\begin{figure}
1127: \centerline{%
1128: \vbox to 2.4in{\vss
1129: \hbox to 3.3in{\special{psfile=fig2.ps angle=270.
1130: hscale=65 vscale=50
1131: hoffset=-100 voffset=170
1132: % hoffset=-160 voffset=0
1133: }\hss}}
1134: }
1135:
1136: %\bigskip
1137: \vspace{100pt}
1138: %\eject
1139: \end{figure}
1140:
1141:
1142: \begin{figure}
1143: \caption{The Borel curves for the $D_1D^*\pi$ coupling
1144: from Eq.(\ref{bd1dspi}).
1145: Here the RHS of the equation is plotted with respect to
1146: the Borel mass $M^2$.
1147: }
1148: \label{fig3}
1149:
1150: \setlength{\textwidth}{6.1in} % adjustable for camera-ready copy.
1151: \setlength{\textheight}{9.in} % for now.
1152: %\begin{figure}
1153: \centerline{%
1154: \vbox to 2.4in{\vss
1155: \hbox to 3.3in{\special{psfile=fig3.ps angle=270.
1156: hscale=65 vscale=48
1157: hoffset=-100 voffset=175
1158: % hoffset=-160 voffset=0
1159: }\hss}}
1160: }
1161:
1162: %\bigskip
1163: \vspace{100pt}
1164: %\eject
1165: \end{figure}
1166:
1167: \begin{figure}
1168: \caption{The Borel curves for the $D^*D^*\pi$ and $D_1D_1\pi$ couplings
1169: given in Eqs.~(\ref{dsdspisum}) (\ref{11pisum}).
1170: Here the RHS of the equations are plotted with respect to
1171: the Borel mass $M^2$.
1172: }
1173: \label{fig4}
1174:
1175: \setlength{\textwidth}{6.1in} % adjustable for camera-ready copy.
1176: \setlength{\textheight}{9.in} % for now.
1177: %\begin{figure}
1178: \centerline{%
1179: \vbox to 2.4in{\vss
1180: \hbox to 3.3in{\special{psfile=fig4.ps angle=270.
1181: hscale=55 vscale=55
1182: hoffset=-100 voffset=200
1183: % hoffset=-160 voffset=0
1184: }\hss}}
1185: }
1186:
1187: %\bigskip
1188: \vspace{100pt}
1189: \end{figure}
1190:
1191:
1192: \end{document}
1193: