1: %\documentstyle[aps,preprint,epsfig]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps,tighten]{revtex}
3: \documentclass{elsart}
4: %\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
5: \usepackage{amssymb,epsfig}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8: \begin{frontmatter}
9:
10: \title{Anomalous diffusion in non-equilibrium relativistic heavy-ion
11: rapidity spectra}
12: \vspace{-1cm}
13: \author{A. Lavagno}
14: \address{
15: Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino and INFN,
16: Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy}
17: \date{\today }
18: \maketitle
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: There is experimental and theoretical evidence that the broad rapidity
22: distribution of net proton yield ($p-\overline{p}$) in central
23: heavy-ion collisions at SPS energies could be a signal of
24: non-equilibrium properties of the system.
25: We show that the broad rapidity shape can be well reproduced in the framework
26: of a non-linear relativistic
27: Fokker-Planck dynamics which incorporates non-extensive
28: statistics and anomalous diffusion.
29: \end{abstract}
30: \end{frontmatter}
31: \vspace{-0.5cm}
32: \noindent {\it PACS:} 25.75.-q; 05.20.-y; 05.90.+m \\
33: \noindent
34: {\it Keywords:} High energy collisions, non-extensive statistics,
35: rapidity spectra.
36:
37: \vspace{-0.5cm}
38: \section{Introduction}
39: \vspace{-0.5cm}
40: In relativistic heavy-ion collisions nuclear matter
41: is believed to be compressed
42: to high baryon density and nuclei undergoing central collisions
43: reduce strongly
44: their original longitudinal momentum. This loss of rapidity,
45: usually referred as baryon stopping, is an important characteristic
46: to understand the reaction mechanism at high energy density.
47:
48: %The evolution of the incoming baryons was studied
49: %at AGS and SPS energies. The deep minimum in the net proton
50: %($p-\overline{p}$) rapidity
51: %distribution at $y_{cm}\approx 0$, observed in proton-proton collisions,
52: %has been practically filled up in the central Pb-Pb collisions at $158$ A GeV/c
53: %measuring a broad and flat rapidity distribution \cite{na49}.
54:
55: Isotropic thermal models fail to reproduce the broad and flat
56: rapidity distribution observed in the central Pb-Pb collisions
57: at $158$ A GeV/c \cite{na49}.
58: Collective and anisotropic flows must be considered
59: (with the introduction of new parameters) to take into account
60: the experimental spectra \cite{na44,braun}.
61: Complicate evolution codes take only partially into account of such
62: distributions and the physical evolution of the system is not
63: completely understood \cite{cape}.
64:
65: %It is a very important issue to understand whether the system is able
66: %to reach full thermalization or nonequilibrium properties are
67: %present even in the case of central heavy ion collisions;
68: %up to now the answer of this question is not
69: %unique and has been the subject of theoretical studies \cite{bass}.
70:
71: In this paper we study the evolution of the rapidity distribution from
72: a macroscopic point of view by using
73: a non-linear relativistic Fokker-Planck equation and we
74: show that the observed broad rapidity shape could be a signal of
75: non-equilibrium properties of the system.
76: Let us note that a similar approach, within a linear Fokker-Planck equation,
77: has been previously studied in Ref.\cite{wol} by using a linear drift in the
78: space of the rapidity and a free parameter diffusion coefficient. With this
79: choice, the author found a strongly violation of the fluctuation-dissipation
80: theorem. We will see that generalizing the Brownian motion to the relativistic
81: kinetic variables, the standard Einstein relation is satisfied and
82: Tsallis non-extensive statistics emerges in a natural way from the
83: non-linearity of the Fokker-Planck equation.
84:
85: \vspace{-0.5cm}
86: \section{Non-linear Fokker-Planck equation in relativistic dynamics}
87: \vspace{-0.5cm}
88: A class of anomalous diffusions are currently described through the
89: non-linear Fokker-Planck equation (NLFPE)
90: \begin{equation}
91: \frac{\partial}{\partial t}[f(y,t)]^{\mu}=\frac{\partial}{\partial y}
92: \left [ J(y) [f(y,t)]^\mu+D \frac{\partial}{\partial y}[f(t,y)]^\nu
93: \right ] \; ,
94: \label{nlfpe}
95: \end{equation}
96: where $D$ and $J$ are the diffusion and drift coefficients, respectively.
97: Tsallis and Bukman \cite{tsallis} have shown that, for
98: linear drift, the time dependence solution of the above equation is a
99: Tsallis-like distribution with $q=1+\mu-\nu$. The norm of the distribution is
100: conserved for all times only if $\mu=1$, therefore we will
101: limit the discussion to the case $\nu=2-q$.
102:
103: We are going to study the time evolution of the particle distribution
104: by means the above NLFPE in the rapidity space.
105: Basic assumption of our analysis is that the rapidity distribution $y$ is
106: not appreciably influenced by transverse dynamics which is considered
107: in thermal equilibrium. Such hypothesis is well
108: confirmed by the experimental data and adopted in many theoretical
109: works \cite{na49,na44,braun}.
110: A crucial r\^ole in the solution of the above NLFPE
111: plays the choice of the diffusion and the drift coefficients.
112: Such a choice influences the time evolution of the system and its equilibrium
113: distribution.
114:
115: Since the temperature at freeze-out exceeds $100$ MeV, Boltzmann
116: approximation is usually adopted and the single particle equilibrium
117: distribution is written as
118: \begin{eqnarray}
119: E\frac{d^3N}{d^3p}\propto E\, \exp(-E/T)
120: \equiv m_\perp \, \cosh(y) \,
121: \exp(-m_\perp \cosh(y)/T) \; ,
122: \label{distri}
123: \end{eqnarray}
124: where $y$ is the rapidity, $m_\perp=\sqrt{m^2+p_\perp^2}$
125: is the transverse mass, $T$ is the temperature.
126: Imposing the validity of the Einstein
127: relation for Brownian particle, we can generalize to the relativistic case
128: the standard expressions of diffusion and drift coefficients as follows
129: \begin{equation}
130: D=\gamma \, T\; , \ \ \ \ \ J(y)=\gamma \, m_\perp \sinh(y)
131: \equiv \gamma \, p_\parallel \; ,
132: \label{coeffi}
133: \end{equation}
134: where $p_\parallel$ is the longitudinal momentum and $\tau$
135: is a common constant.
136: It is easy to see that the above coefficients give
137: us the Boltzmann stationary distribution (\ref{distri}) in the
138: linear Fokker-Planck equation ($q=\nu=1$)\footnote{This result cannot be
139: obtained if one assumes a linear drift
140: coefficient as in Ref.\cite{wol}.}, while
141: the stationary solution of the NLFPE (\ref{nlfpe})
142: with $\nu=2-q$ is a Tsallis-like
143: distribution with the relativistic energy $E=m_\perp \cosh(y)$.
144: In the light of the above results, we generalize the results of Tsallis-Bukman
145: by searching as a solution of the NLFPE (\ref{nlfpe}) the following
146: time dependent Tsallis-like distribution
147: \begin{equation}
148: f_q(y,m_\perp,t)=
149: \Big \{1-(1-q)\,\beta(t)\, m_\perp \cosh[y-y_m(t)]\Big\}^{1/(1-q)} \; .
150: \end{equation}
151: The unknown functions $\beta (t)=1/T(t)$ and $y_m(t)$
152: have been derived by means numerical integration of
153: Eq.(\ref{nlfpe}) with initial $\delta$-function condition depending
154: on the value of the experimental projectile rapidities.
155: The rapidity distribution at fixed time is then
156: obtained by numerical integration over the transverse mass
157: $m_\perp$ (or transverse momentum) as follows
158: \begin{equation}
159: \frac{dN}{dy}(y,t)=c\, \int_m^\infty \!\! m^2_\perp \, \cosh(y)
160: \, f_q(y,m_\perp,t) \, dm_\perp \; ,
161: \label{raint}
162: \end{equation}
163: where $c$ is the normalization constant fixed by the total number of the
164: particles.
165: Rapidity spectra calculated from (\ref{raint}) will ultimately depend on two
166: parameters: the ``interaction'' time $\tau=\gamma t$ and the non-extensive
167: parameter $q$. Therefore, no more free parameters are used
168: in this analysis respect to previous theoretical studies \cite{na44,braun,cape}.
169:
170:
171: \vspace{-0.5cm}
172: \section{Results and Conclusions}
173: \vspace{-0.5cm}
174: We have studied the time dependent rapidity distribution (\ref{raint})
175: in the case of central
176: Pb+Pb collisions at 158 GeV/c and our results are compared with the
177: net proton experimental NA49 data \cite{na49}.
178: The obtained spectra are normalized
179: to 164 protons and the beam rapidity is fixed to $y_{\rm cm}=2.9$ (in the
180: c.m. frame) \cite{na49}.
181: In Fig.1 we show the calculated rapidity spectra compared with the experimental
182: data. The full line corresponds to the NLFPE solution (\ref{raint}) at
183: $\tau=0.82$ and $q=1.25$; the dashed line corresponds to the solution
184: of the linear case ($q=1$) at $\tau=1.2$.
185: %Imposing the validity of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem,
186: %it is not possible to reproduce the experimental rapidity shape at any time.
187: Only in the non-linear case ($q\ne 1$) exists a (finite) time for which
188: the obtained rapidity spectra well reproduces the broad experimental shape.
189: A value of $q\ne 1$ implies anomalous superdiffussion in the rapidity space,
190: i.e., $[y(t)-y_M(t)]^2$ scale like $t^\alpha$ with $\alpha>1$ \cite{tsallis}.
191:
192:
193: \begin{figure}[ht]
194: \parbox{6cm}{
195: \scalebox{0.6}{
196: \includegraphics*[-10,450][570,770]{fig2b.ps}}
197: }
198:
199: \parbox{14cm}{\vspace{-1cm}
200: \caption{
201: Rapidity spectra for net proton production ($p-\overline{p}$) in
202: central Pb+Pb collisions at 158A GeV/c (grey circles are data reflected about
203: $y_{cm}=0$) \cite{na49}. Full line corresponds
204: to our results by using a non-linear evolution equation ($q=1.25$),
205: dashed line corresponds to the linear case ($q=1$).
206: }}
207: \vspace{0.5cm}
208: \end{figure}
209:
210:
211: We have studied the rapidity spectra from a
212: macroscopic point of view. A good agreement with the experimental
213: data is reached assuming a deviation from the equilibrium and a non-linear
214: evolution which implies non-extensive Tsallis-like distribution.
215: Non-extensive features in relativistic collisions are outlined in
216: several works \cite{lava,wilk,rafe,bedia,beck},
217: even if a microscopic justification of these effects is still lacking.
218: In Ref.\cite{cape}, the authors show that diquark breaking during inelastic
219: collisions in dual parton model could be responsible for the observed baryon
220: stopping. The possible connection between the nature of these inelastic collisions
221: and the above observed non-extensive statistical effects is under investigations.
222:
223:
224: %In our analysis we have not considered any collective effects, usually
225: %introduced in many theoretical calculations. Such effects are all
226: %contained in the parameter $q$.
227: %Respect to standard calculations of the equilibrium rapidity spectra,
228: %no more free parameters are introduced in this study.
229:
230: \noindent
231: {\it Acknowledgments.} It is a pleasure to thank Prof. P. Quarati and Prof.
232: G. Wilk for fruitful discussions and comments.
233:
234: \vspace{-0.5cm}
235: \begin{thebibliography}{30}
236: \vspace{-0.5cm}
237: \bibitem{na49}
238: H. Appelsh\"auser et al. (NA49 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 2471.
239: \bibitem{na44}
240: I.G. Bearden et al. (NA44 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2080.
241: \bibitem{braun}
242: P. Braun-Munzinger et al., Phys. Lett. B 344 (1995) 43; B 356 (1996) 1.
243: \bibitem{cape}
244: A. Capella, C.A. Salgado, Phys. Rev. C 60 (1999) 054906.
245: %\bibitem{bass}
246: %S.A. Bass et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 4092
247: %\bibitem{bass1}
248: %S.A. Bass, A. Dumitru, Phys. Rev. C 61 (2000) 064909.
249: \bibitem{wol}
250: G. Wolschin, Eur. Phys. J. A 5 (1999) 85.
251: \bibitem{tsallis}
252: C. Tsallis, D.J. Bukman, Phys. Rev. E 54 (1996) R2197.
253: \bibitem{lava}
254: W.M. Alberico, A. Lavagno, P. Quarati, Eur. Phys. J. (2000) 499.
255: %W.M. Alberico, A. Lavagno, P. Quarati, Nucl. Phys. A (2001) ??;
256: %A. Lavagno, P. Quarati, to appear in {\it Chaos, Solitons and Fractals}.
257: \bibitem{wilk}
258: G. Wilk, Z. Wlodarczyk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2770.
259: %O.V. Utyuzh,
260: %G. Wilk, Z. Wlodarczyk, J. Phys. G 26 (2000) L39; G. Wilk, Z. Wlodarczyk,
261: %to appear in {\it Chaos, Solitons and Fractals}.
262: \bibitem{rafe}
263: D.B. Walton, J. Rafelski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 31.
264: \bibitem{bedia}
265: I. Bediaga, E.M.F. Curado, J.M. de Miranda, Physica A 286 (2000) 156.
266: \bibitem{beck}
267: C. Beck, Physica A 286 (2000) 164.
268:
269: \end{thebibliography}
270: \end{document}
271:
272:
273:
274: