1: %%only change the website address - 18/4/2000
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %%
4: %% ws-p8-50x6-00.tex : 20-11-97
5: %% This Latex2e file rewritten from various sources for use in the
6: %% preparation of the (smaller [8.50''x6.00'']) single-column proceedings
7: %% Volume, latest version by R. Sankaran with acknowledgements to Susan
8: %% Hezlet and Lukas Nellen. Please comments to:rsanka@wspc.com.sg
9: %%
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: %
12: \documentclass{ws-p8-50x6-00}
13:
14: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
15: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
16: \def\nn{\nonumber \\}
17: %\def\qqg{$q {\bar q}g$}\nonumber\\
18: \def\l{\lambda}
19:
20: \def\qq{$q {\bar q}$}
21: \def\pp{$p_{\perp}$}
22: \def\x{x_{\perp}}
23: \def\y{y_{\perp}}
24: \def\k{k_{\perp}}
25: %\def\l{l'_{\perp}}
26: \def\r{\rho_{\perp}}
27: \def\0{0_{\perp}}
28:
29:
30:
31:
32:
33: \begin{document}
34:
35: \title{
36: {\normalsize DESY 01-185 \hfill\mbox{ }}\\[5ex]
37: Physics at HERA II}
38:
39: \author{W. Buchm\"uller}
40:
41: \address{Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22603 Hamburg, Germany
42: \\E-mail: buchmuwi@mail.desy.de}
43:
44:
45: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
46: % You may repeat \author \address as often as necessary %
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48:
49: \maketitle
50:
51: \abstracts{
52: Deep inelastic electron proton scattering at HERA II will allow precise
53: studies of QCD and stringent tests of physics beyond the standard model. We
54: discuss these two aspects of DIS with emphasis on the regime of high gluon
55: densities at small $x$ and on scalar quark production in supersymmetric
56: theories with broken R-parity.}
57:
58: \section{Introduction}
59:
60: In deep inelastic scattering at HERA one studies the interactions of
61: electrons with quarks in a wide range of momentum transfers $Q^2$ and
62: center-of-mass energies $\sqrt{\hat{s}}= \sqrt{xs}$, up to
63: $\sqrt{\hat{s}}_{max} = 318$~GeV. The `Virtues of HERA' have been
64: identified long ago\cite{mai83}. DIS at small $Q^2$ probes the structure
65: of the proton and allows a variety of QCD tests. DIS at large $Q^2$ is
66: sensitive to electroweak interactions, to a possible structure of quarks
67: and electrons and, last but not least, to new particles and interactions
68: predicted by extensions of the standard model.
69:
70: HERA I has made important contributions to all of these topics. The increase
71: of luminosity by a factor of 10 and the availability of longitudinal
72: polarization for electrons and positrons at HERA II will widen the
73: physics scope substantially. In the following we
74: shall illustrate this with some examples concerning strong interactions,
75: electroweak interactions and physics beyond the standard model. This
76: complements the reports of the H1\cite{els01} and ZEUS\cite{fos01}
77: collaborations on their physics program at HERA II. Detailed discussions
78: can be found in the proceedings of previous HERA workshops\cite{hera87}
79: as well as in the review articles \cite{ac99,wol01}.
80:
81:
82: \section{Beyond the Standard Model}
83:
84: In connection with the Higgs mechanism of mass generation for vector bosons
85: and fermions new physics beyond the standard model is expected at energies
86: ${\cal O}$(1~TeV). There are two classes of extensions of the standard model.
87: In the first class a revolutionary change is predicted, either as quark-lepton
88: compositeness or as manifestations of large extra dimensions. One then expects
89: towers of excitations of the known elementary particles, either excited
90: quarks and leptons or Kaluza-Klein excitations related to the TeV string
91: scale. In the second class of extensions only a `mild' modification of the
92: standard model is predicted, the occurence of supersymmetry, where each
93: particle aquires a superpartner. These extensions successfully predict the
94: unification of all interactions at the GUT scale ${\cal O}(10^{16}$~GeV).
95: Via the seesaw mechanism they can also naturally account for the small
96: neutrino masses indicated by the solar and atmospheric neutrino deficits.
97:
98: \begin{figure}
99: \vspace*{-.5cm}
100: \centerline{
101: \epsfig{figure=exn.eps,width=6cm}
102: \epsfig{figure=rpar.eps,width=5.5cm}}
103: \caption{Bounds on coupling versus mass for excited
104: neutrinos\protect\cite{exneu} (left), and
105: scalar quarks\protect\cite{zrp} (right).}
106: \label{rpar}
107: \end{figure}
108:
109: HERA is particularly sensitive to those new particles for which single
110: production is possible in ep-collisions. These include excited quarks
111: and leptons, leptoquarks and scalar quarks in supersymmetric models with
112: broken R-parity. For excited neutrinos the LEP limit of 200~GeV could be
113: significantly extended as shown on the left in fig.~(\ref{rpar}).
114: On the right the range of upper limits on couplings of scalar quarks is
115: shown as function of the squark mass for a class of supersymmetric models.
116: The Yukawa couplings determine the production cross section, e.g.
117: $\sigma(e_R^+ d_R\rightarrow \widetilde{u}_i) \propto {\lambda'}_{1i1}^2$, with
118: $\widetilde{u}_1 = \widetilde{u}$, $\widetilde{u}_2 = \widetilde{c}$,
119: $\widetilde{u}_3 = \widetilde{t}$.
120:
121: \begin{figure}
122: \vspace*{-.5cm}
123: \centerline{
124: \epsfig{figure=extra.eps,width=6cm}
125: \epsfig{figure=brad.eps,width=6cm}}
126: \caption{Effect of large extra dimensions of size $\sim 1/M_s$ (left) and of a
127: finite quark radius $R_q$ (right) on the neutral current DIS cross section.
128: From ref.\protect\cite{extrah1}.}\label{extra}
129: \end{figure}
130:
131: Heavier particles beyond the kinematic reach of HERA lead to effective
132: four-fermion interactions\cite{kuz01} with strength $4\pi/\Lambda^2$.
133: Depending on the chirality structure lower bounds on $\Lambda$ up to 9~TeV
134: have been obtained. For the vector-current coupling the bound on $\Lambda$ can
135: be interpreted as an upper bound on the electromagnetic quark radius.
136: The present limit is $R_q = 1.6\times 10^{-16}$~cm (cf.~fig.~(\ref{extra})).
137: Contact interactions are also induced by the Kaluza-Klein tower of gravitons
138: in theories with large extra dimensions. The present bound on the
139: corresponding mass scale is about 1~TeV (cf.~fig.~(\ref{extra})). At
140: HERA II all these bounds can be improved by about a factor of three.
141:
142: Supersymmetric theories with broken R-parity are for HERA the most promising
143: extensions of the standard model\cite{psd96}. In a class of these models
144: Majorana neutrino masses are generated radiatively. It is then possible to
145: relate the neutrino mixing matrix to squark production cross sections in
146: ep-collisions\cite{bw01}. The analyses of the solar and atmospheric neutrino
147: anomalies favour large neutrino mixings and therefore a neutrino mass matrix
148: of the form
149: \bea
150: m_{\nu ij} = m f_{ij}\;,
151: \eea
152: where $m < 1$~eV and $f_{ij} = {\cal O}(1)$ for all $i,j=1\ldots 3$. As we
153: shall see, the large mixings among the neutrinos can lead to large couplings of
154: electrons to new particles. The small value of the neutrino mass scale $m$
155: can be generated radiatively or by mass mixing via the seesaw mechanism.
156:
157: In the supersymmetric standard model Yukawa interactions are described by the
158: superpotential
159: \bea\label{neumass}
160: W = h_{eij} E^c_i L_j H_1 + h_{dij} Q_i D^c_j H_1 +
161: h_{uij} Q_i U^c_j H_2\;,
162: \eea
163: where $H_1$ and $H_2$ are two Higgs doublets with vacuum expectation
164: values $v_i=\langle H_i \rangle$, $i=1,2$, and $v_2/v_1 = \tan{\beta}$.
165: The fact that the lepton
166: doublets $L_i$ and the Higgs doublet $H_1$ have the same hypercharge,
167: and therefore identical gauge quantum numbers, motivates the introduction
168: of an additional R-parity violating part of the superpotential,
169: \bea\label{superR}
170: W_R = {1\over 2}\l_{ijk} L_i L_j E^c_k + \l'_{ijk} L_i Q_j D^c_k\;.
171: \eea
172: The couplings $\l$ and $\l'$ are in principle arbitrary. However, the
173: same reason that leads to the introduction of these R-parity violating
174: couplings also
175: suggests the following connection between $\l$, $\l'$ and the Yukawa couplings
176: $h_e$ and $h_d$,
177: \bea\label{connect}
178: \l_{ijk} = \l_i h^T_{ejk}+\l_j h^T_{eik}\;, \quad \l'_{ijk} = \l'_i h_{djk}\;.
179: \eea
180: $W_R$ is then obtained from $W$ by a rotation among the fields $(L_i,H_1)$.
181: Such a `flavour alignment' suppresses the rates of flavour changing processes
182: in the down quark sector ($\Delta S = 1,2, \Delta B = 1,2$).
183:
184: $W_R$ violates lepton number\cite{glt01}. Hence, Majorana neutrino masses
185: are induced,
186: \bea
187: m_{\nu ij} = \l'_i\l'_j m_{\nu}^{(d)} + \l_i\l_j m_{\nu}^{(e)}\;,
188: \eea
189: where $m_{\nu}^{(d,e)}$ depends on the Yukawa couplings $h_{d,e}$ and the
190: soft supersymmetry breaking parameters. In order to obtain the neutrino
191: mass matrix (\ref{neumass}) one needs $\l_i,\l'_j = {\cal O}(1)$. The choice
192: $\l_i=\l'_j=1$ leads to the `democratic' mixing matrix.
193:
194: Predictions of this model with R-parity breaking are certain flavour changing
195: processes, e.g. $BR(D^0 \rightarrow \mu\mu,\mu e) \sim 10^{-5}$ and, in
196: particular, the couplings for squark production, for instance,
197: \bea
198: \l'_{111} \sim {m_d\over v} \tan{\beta} \sim 0.003\; ,
199: \quad \l'_{122} \sim {m_s\over v} \tan{\beta} \sim 0.05\;.
200: \eea
201: The value of $\l'_{111}$ is consistent with the upper bound from neutrinoless
202: double beta-decay. The present upper bound\cite{h1rp} $\l'_{122} < 0.29$ based
203: on 37~pb$^{-1}$ suggests that the sensitity of $\l'_{122} \sim 0.05$ will
204: be reached at HERA II.
205:
206:
207: \section{Electroweak Interactions}
208:
209: DIS at large $Q^2 \sim 10^4$~GeV$^2$ has so far tested electroweak
210: unification, i.e., the approximate equality of neutral current and
211: charged current cross section, $\sigma(NC) \sim \sigma(CC)$. At HERA II
212: polarization will allow to test the classic prediction of the electroweak
213: theory,
214: \bea
215: \sigma^{CC}(e^-_R p) = \sigma^{CC}(e^+_L p) = 0 \;.
216: \eea
217: The exchange of right-handed $W_R$-bosons leads to a non-zero cross section.
218: One expects a sensitivity to masses $m_{W_R} \simeq 600\ldots 800$~GeV,
219: which corresponds to the present bounds from direct production and electroweak
220: precision tests\cite{rpp00}.
221: \begin{figure}
222: \begin{center}
223: \vspace*{-.5cm}
224: \epsfig{figure=UPGRADE_CC_polarisation.eps,width=6cm}
225: \label{pol}
226: \end{center}
227: \caption{Charged current cross section as function of polarization $P$.
228: Preliminary ZEUS data for $P=0$ and Monte Carlo simulations for $P\neq 0$.
229: From ref.\protect\cite{fus01}.}
230: \end{figure}
231: The expected precision for the charged current cross section obtained after
232: one year of running is shown in fig.~(\ref{pol}) as function of the degree of
233: polarisation $P$.
234:
235: The weak mixing angle $\sin^2(\theta_W)(M_Z)$ can be determined from a
236: measurement of the polarization asymmetry
237: \bea
238: A(e_L^- - e_R^-) =
239: {d\sigma(e_L^-)-d\sigma(e_R^-)\over d\sigma(e_L^-)+d\sigma(e_R^-)}\;.
240: \eea
241: For an integrated luminosity of 500~pb$^{-1}$ one expects an error of about
242: $1\%$\cite{hai01}. This is less accurate, but complementary to the LEP and
243: SLC measurements.
244:
245: Polarization is also crucial to determine the properties of discovered new
246: particles. For instance, for the scalar quarks discussed in the previous
247: section one has
248: \bea
249: \sigma(e_R^+ p \rightarrow \widetilde{c} X) \propto {\l'}_{122}^2\ ,\quad
250: \sigma(e_L^+ p \rightarrow \widetilde{c} X) = 0\; .
251: \eea
252: Such a measurement would prove that the discovered new scalar colour-triplet
253: particle is the superpartner of a left-handed quark.
254:
255: \section{Strong Interactions}
256:
257: In deep inelastic scattering at HERA I many features of QCD have already been
258: studied in great detail. These include
259: \begin{itemize}
260:
261: \item proton and photon structure functions,
262:
263: \item jets and event shapes,
264:
265: \item determination of $\alpha_s$,
266:
267: \item hadronic final states,
268:
269: \item instanton induced processes,
270:
271: \item production of charm and bottom,
272:
273: \item vector meson production,
274:
275: \item diffractive processes.
276:
277: \end{itemize}
278: All these quantities and processes will be studied with higher precision at
279: HERA II, and in particular the search for instanton induced
280: processes\cite{rs01} will be significantly improved.
281:
282: In the following I shall concentrate on those aspects which
283: have been most intriguing at HERA I. These are
284:
285: \begin{enumerate}
286:
287: \item the rapid rise of parton densities at small $x$\cite{h1zrise}, and
288:
289: \item the large fraction of diffractive events at small $x$\cite{h1zdiff} .
290:
291: \end{enumerate}
292:
293: The rise of the structure functions at small $x$ has been anticipated
294: based on the QCD renormalization group equations for moments\cite{rx74}
295: and the corresponding DGLAP evolution
296: equations\cite{dglap} for parton densities in the GRV model\cite{grv93}.
297: In addition, at small $x$ large logarithms $\sim \alpha_s \ln{1/x}$
298: become important and have to be resummed. This is achieved
299: by means of the BFKL equation\cite{bfkl} which leads to the prediction
300: of a power-like growth, $F_2 \propto x^{-\lambda}$. The rapid rise
301: at small $x$ reflects the strong radiation of gluons at high energies
302: leading to large gluon densities. However, it still remains to be understood
303: to what extent this rise can be described perturbatively and where it
304: reflects non-perturbative effects, i.e., screening corrections\cite{grv83}
305: and input parton distributions.
306:
307: \begin{figure}
308: \begin{center}
309: \vspace*{-.5cm}
310: \epsfig{figure=gluon.ps,width=9cm}
311: \end{center}
312: \caption{Gluon distribution function determined by a NLO-QCD fit to the
313: structure function $F_2(x,Q^2)$ based on H1 data\protect\cite{wal01} and ZEUS
314: data\protect\cite{nag01}, respectively.
315: \label{gluon}}
316: \end{figure}
317:
318: \begin{figure}
319: \vspace*{-.5cm}
320: \centerline{
321: \epsfig{figure=gluon_F2_jets.ps,width=5.5cm}
322: \epsfig{figure=d01-100f6.eps,width=6cm}}
323: \caption{Gluon distribution function extracted from a NLO-QCD fit to dijet
324: rates (left); the charm contribution to $F_2$ (right). \label{jcgluon}}
325: \end{figure}
326:
327: In order to identify possible non-perturbative effects, it is important to
328: check how accurately the DGLAP approach describes different processes.
329: A particularly interesting quantity is the gluon density which can be
330: extracted from scaling violations of the structure functions,
331: \begin{equation}
332: xg(x,Q^2) \propto \frac{\partial F_2(x,Q^2)}{\partial\ln Q^2}\;. \label{ctrans}
333: \end{equation}
334: The gluon density extracted in a NLO analysis from the H1 and ZEUS data
335: is shown in fig.~(\ref{gluon}) for different values of $Q^2$. The related
336: determination of $\alpha_s$ has by now reached the remarkable
337: precision\cite{alh1,alz},
338: \bea
339: \alpha_s(M_Z^2) &=& 0.1150 \pm 0.0017 (exp) \pm 0.005 (theory)\ (H1),\\
340: \alpha_s(M_Z^2) &=& 0.117 \pm 0.001 (stat + uncorr)
341: \pm 0.005 (corr) \ (ZEUS, prel.).
342: \eea
343: Note, that the total error of the H1 result is dominated by the theoretical
344: uncertainty.
345:
346: Contrary to structure functions, the gluon
347: density enters at leading order in the dijet cross section and in $F^c_2$,
348: the charm contribution to the structure function $F_2$. In fig.~(\ref{jcgluon})
349: the NLO gluon density extracted from dijets is compared with the one
350: determined from scaling violations; further, the corresponding prediction
351: for $F^c_2$ is compared with data.
352: It is clear that the higher accuracy at HERA II will lead to a stringent
353: test of the DGLAP framework, which will require NNLO theoretical
354: calculations for structure functions and jet cross sections.
355:
356: \begin{figure}
357: \begin{center}
358: \vspace*{-.5cm}
359: \epsfig{figure=d00-174f7b-col.eps,width=6cm}
360: \end{center}
361: \caption{Diffractive dijet cross section as function of
362: $z_P^{(jets)} ( = \beta)$,
363: compared with predictions based on different diffractive gluon densities.
364: The corresponding gluon densities $g(z,\mu^2)$ are shown in the upper pannel.
365: From ref.\protect\cite{h101}.}
366: \label{h1dij}
367: \end{figure}
368:
369: A puzzling phenomenon in DIS at small $x$ is the occurence of a large
370: fraction ${\cal O} (10 \%)$ of diffractive events\cite{h1zdiff}.
371: This came as a big surprise for most experts in QCD, although it had
372: been anticipated based on Regge theory\cite{dl87}. However, the large rapidity
373: gap events in DIS are difficult to understand in the parton picture
374: to which almost everybody became used during the past 25 years because of the
375: successes of perturbative QCD.
376:
377: We now have learned that, like inclusive structure functions, also diffractive
378: structure functions
379: can be expressed as convolution of parton cross sections with diffractive
380: parton densities\cite{tv94,bs94}. This factorization has been proven
381: for inclusive and diffractive DIS with corresponding rigour\cite{col98}.
382: The variation of the leading twist structure function with
383: $Q^2$ is given by
384: \begin{eqnarray}
385: \lefteqn{ Q^2 {\partial\over \partial Q^2} F_2^D(\xi,\beta,Q^2) =} \\
386: &&2\sum_q e_q^2x {\alpha_s\over 2\pi}
387: \int_{\beta}^1 {db\over b}
388: \left(P_{qq}\left({\beta\over b}\right){dq(b,\xi,\mu^2)\over d\xi}
389: + P_{qg}\left({\beta\over b}\right){dg(b,\xi,\mu^2)\over d\xi}\right)\;.
390: \nonumber\label{ftd}
391: \end{eqnarray}
392: Here $\xi \equiv x_P$ is the fraction of momentum lost by the proton, and
393: $\beta=Q^2/(Q^2+M^2)$ where $M$ is the diffractive mass, $M^2=(q+\xi P)^2$.
394: For comparison, in inclusice DIS, $x=Q^2/(Q^2+W^2)$ where $W^2=(q+P)^2$
395: is the total invariant mass squared of the complete hadronic system.
396: $dq/d\xi$ and $dg/d\xi$ are the diffractive quark and gluon densities,
397: respectively, and $P_{qq}$ and $P_{qg}$ are the usual splitting functions.
398: Note, that the $Q^2$-evolution affects only the $\beta$-dependence of the
399: structure function and not the $\xi$-dependence. Hence, the $\xi$-dependence
400: is an entirely non-perturbative property of the proton. It corresponds
401: to the dependence on the total hadronic energy $W$ for fixed $\beta$, since
402: $W^2 \simeq Q^2/x = Q^2/(\xi\beta)$.
403: In models with Regge factorization\cite{is85} the $\xi$-dependence is
404: given by Regge theory. For the diffractive gluon density one has
405: $dg(\xi,\beta,Q^2)/d\xi \propto \xi^{1-2\alpha_P(0)} g(\beta,Q^2)$.
406:
407: \begin{figure}
408: \begin{center}
409: \epsfig{figure=fig5.ps,width=9cm}
410: \end{center}
411: \caption{Prediction for the diffractive structure function $x_P F_2^{D(3)}$
412: compared with H1 data. The dashed lines correspond to the leading twist
413: contribution with the twist-4 component added. The leading twist contribution
414: is shown by the dotted lines. From ref.\protect\cite{gbw01}.\label{f2dgbw}}
415: \end{figure}
416:
417: Diffractive DIS can be analyzed in analogy to inclusive DIS\cite{gs96}.
418: The diffractive structure function yields the diffractive quark
419: distribution. Its scaling violation, and also diffractive
420: dijet and charm production determine the diffractive gluon density.
421: In fig.~(\ref{h1dij}) the measured dijets rates (lower panel) are compared
422: with predictions based on different diffractive gluon densities $g(z,\mu^2)$
423: (upper panel) which have been extracted from fits to the diffractive
424: structure function. At present quantitative tests
425: are just beginning. From HERA II we can expect a precise determination of
426: the diffractive gluon density. Here also higher twist effects have to be taken
427: into account at large $\beta$\cite{bex99,ht01}. The results of a recent
428: analysis including such effects are shown in fig.~(\ref{f2dgbw}).
429:
430: \begin{figure}
431: \begin{center}
432: \epsfig{figure=f2d.eps,width=10cm}
433: \end{center}
434: \caption{Diffractive DIS in the proton rest frame (left) and
435: the Breit frame (right); asymmetric quark fluctuations correspond to
436: diffractive quark scattering, asymmetric gluon fluctuations to diffractive
437: boson-gluon fusion. \label{f2d}}
438: \end{figure}
439:
440: What do we learn from a determination of diffractive quark and gluon densities?
441: A comparison of inclusive and diffractive DIS is particularly interesting
442: in the proton rest frame\cite{bjo72}. Here diffractive and non-diffractive
443: processes can be understood as scattering of partonic fluctuations of the
444: photon on the proton. The diffractive quark and gluon densities then
445: correspond to asymmetric quark and gluon fluctuations (cf.~fig.~(\ref{f2d}))
446: projected onto the colour singlet state.
447: The formation of the final state is a non-perturbative phenomenon which
448: depends on soft momenta and the properties of confinement. Hence, a comparison
449: of diffractive and non-diffractive processes should help to understand
450: non-perturbative properties of the proton. Correspondingly, one expects that
451: at small $x$ diffractive and non-diffractive processes have a similar
452: dependence on the total hadronic energy $W$\cite{bh96}.
453:
454: \begin{figure}[t]
455: \begin{center}
456: \parbox{10.5cm}{~\epsfig{file=difpdf.ps,
457: width=5cm}\hspace{0.5cm}~\epsfig{file=difq2zc.ps,width=5cm}}
458: \end{center}
459: \caption{Diffractive singlet quark and gluon distributions at an initial
460: scale $Q_0^2$ and after $Q^2$ evolution (left); diffractive structure function
461: $F_2^{D(3)}$ for different values of $Q^2$ compared with ZEUS
462: data\protect\cite{zeus99}. The arrows indicate the value of $\beta$ beyond
463: which higher twist terms are expected to become important.
464: From ref.\protect\cite{bgh99}.\label{dqgd} }
465: \end{figure}
466:
467: An interesting toy model for a comparison of inclusive and diffractive DIS
468: is a large hadronic target\cite{mlv94,hw98}. In this model the cross section
469: for a dipole of transverse size $y$ is of the Glauber-type\cite{nz91}
470: \begin{equation}
471: \sigma(y) = \sigma_0 \left(1 - e^{-ay^2}\right)\;.
472: \end{equation}
473: The corresponding diffractive\cite{bgh99,gbw01} and
474: inclusive\cite{bgh99,mue99} parton densities have been explicitly calculated.
475: The model can also be used to estimate saturation and higher twist
476: effects\cite{gbw99}.
477:
478: For the diffractive quark and gluon densities one obtains\cite{bgh99}
479: \bea
480: \xi^2\frac{dq\left(\beta,\xi,Q_0^2\right)}{d\xi} = \frac{a\Omega N_c
481: (1-\beta)}{2\pi^3} f_q(\beta)\; , \label{qdif} \\
482: \xi^2\frac{dg\left(\beta,\xi,Q_0^2\right)}{d\xi} = \frac{a\Omega N_c^2
483: (1-\beta)^2}{2\pi^3\beta} f_g(\beta)\; . \label{gdif}
484: \eea
485: Here $\Omega$ is the transverse size of the target, $N_c$ is the number of
486: colours, and $Q_0$ is the scale where the model calculation is matched
487: to the perturbative evolution. A non-trivial dependence of the parton
488: densities on $\xi = x_P$ may be introduced
489: by assuming a $\xi$-dependence either of the transverse size\cite{bgh99},
490: i.e.,
491: $\Omega = \Omega(\xi)$, or of the saturation scale\cite{gbw01} $a=a(\xi)$,
492: leading to the same phenomenology.
493: Note, that the functions $f_q(\beta)$ and $f_g(\beta)$ are parameter free
494: predictions of the model.
495: The singlet quark density $d\Sigma/d\xi = 6 dq/d\xi$ and the
496: gluon density $dg/d\xi$ are shown in fig.~(\ref{dqgd}). Their
497: $\beta$-dependence is an interesting non-perturbative property of the proton.
498:
499: Fig.~(\ref{dqgd}) also shows a comparison between a theoretical
500: prediction\cite{bgh99} for the diffractive structure function and the presently
501: available ZEUS data\cite{zeus99}.
502: Further data from HERA I and HERA II will allow an
503: extension to larger values of $Q^2$ where theory predicts almost no change.
504: It will be important to check whether the DGLAP approach is indeed
505: correct for the diffractive structure function. Further, because of
506: the high statistics at HERA II it will be possible to determine the diffractive
507: gluon density also from dijet and charm production. One can then study the
508: non-perturbative dependence on $\xi$ and the normalization relative
509: to the inclusive gluon density. Particularly interesting will be
510: the comparison of event shapes in inclusive and diffractive DIS. In this way
511: we will get for the first time some insight into the regime of high gluon
512: densities in QCD\cite{kwx97}.
513:
514:
515: \section{Summary}
516:
517: The increase in luminosity at HERA II will allow precise measurements
518: of various observables and processes in QCD. Particularly interesting is the
519: determination of $\alpha_s$, where already now the precision of LEP has
520: almost been reached. The comparison of the measured running coupling
521: $\alpha_s(\mu^2)$ with lattice calculations will lead to an important
522: quantitative test of QCD. Further, the
523: search for instantons can be improved, and one can test
524: the DGALP framework by comparing determinations of the gluon density
525: from different processes. In this way, HERA can probe the regime of
526: high gluon densities in a clean and controlable way.
527:
528: The high luminosity and polarization will also lead to new tests of the
529: electroweak theory. Searches for physics beyond the standard model will be
530: significantly improved, in particular with respect to scalar quark production
531: in models with R-parity breaking. Clearly, this sensitivity will also
532: allow the discovery of phenomena not anticipated in this contribution.
533:
534:
535:
536: \section*{Acknowledgments}
537:
538: I would like to thank T.~Gehrmann, K.~Golec-Biernat, D.~Haidt, M.~Klein,
539: M.~Kuze, P.~Schleper and G.~Wolf for their help in the preparation of
540: this contribution and the organizers of DIS2001 for the splendid hospitality
541: in Bologna.
542:
543: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
544:
545: \bibitem{mai83}
546: L.~Maiani, {\it The Virtues of HERA}, in Proc. {\it Experimentation at HERA},
547: Amsterdam 1983, DESY HERA 83/20
548:
549: \bibitem{els01}
550: E.~Elsen, these proceedings
551:
552: \bibitem{fos01}
553: B.~Foster, these proceedings
554:
555: \bibitem{hera87}
556: Proc.~{\it The HERA Workshop}, Vol.~I,II, Hamburg 1987, ed. R.~D.~Peccei;\\
557: Proc.~{\it Physics at HERA}, Vol.~I,II,III, Hamburg 1991,
558: eds. W.~Buchm\"uller, G.~Ingelman;\\
559: Proc.~{\it Future Physics at HERA}, Hamburg 1996, eds. G.~Ingelman,
560: A.~De Roeck, R.~Klanner
561:
562: \bibitem{ac99}
563: H.~Abramowicz, A.~Caldwell, Rev.~Mod.~Phys. {\bf 71} (1999) 1275
564:
565: \bibitem{wol01}
566: G.~Wolf, hep-ex/0105055
567:
568: \bibitem{exneu}
569: H1 Collaboration, Paper 956 submitted to ICHEP 2000, Osaka, Japan
570: ZEUS Collaboration, Paper 1040 submitted to ICHEP 2000, Osaka, Japan
571:
572: \bibitem{zrp}
573: ZEUS collaboration, abstract 1042, submitted to ICHEP00, Osaka
574:
575: \bibitem{kuz01}
576: For a recent review and references, see\\
577: M.~Kuze, {\it Searches for new physics at HERA}, hep-ex/0106030
578:
579: \bibitem{extrah1}
580: H1 Collaboration, C.~Adloff et al., Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 479} (2000) 358;\\
581: H1 Collaboration, Abstract 951 submitted to ICHEP00, Osaka, Japan
582:
583: \bibitem{psd96}
584: E.~Perez, Y.~Sirois, H.~Dreiner, Proc.~{\it Future Physics at HERA},
585: Hamburg 1996, eds. G.~Ingelman, A.~De Roeck, R.~Klanner, p. 297
586:
587: \bibitem{bw01}
588: W.~Buchm\"uller, R.~R\"uckl, in preparation
589:
590: \bibitem{glt01}
591: For a recent discussion and references, see\\
592: A.~de~Gouv\^ea, S.~Lola, K.~Tobe, Phys.~Rev.~{\bf D 63} (2001) 035004
593:
594: \bibitem{h1rp}
595: H1 Collaboration, C.~Adloff et al., Eur.~Phys.~J. {\bf C 20} (2001) 639
596:
597: \bibitem{fus01}
598: T.Fusayasu, Moriond Conf. on {\it Electroweak Interactions}, Les Arcs, 2001
599:
600: \bibitem{rpp00}
601: Review of Particle Physics, Eur.~Phys.~J. {\bf C 15} (2000) 1
602:
603: \bibitem{hai01}
604: J.~Bl\"umlein, M.~Klein, T.~Riemann, in Proc. {\it The HERA Workshop},
605: Vol.~II, Hamburg 1987, ed. R.~D.~Peccei, p.687;\\
606: D.~Haidt, private communication
607:
608: \bibitem{rs01}
609: A.~Ringwald, F.~Schrempp, Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 503} (2001) 331
610:
611: \bibitem{h1zrise}
612: H1 Collaboration, I.~Abt et al., Nucl.~Phys. {\bf B 407} (1993) 515;\\
613: ZEUS Collaboration, M.~Derrick et al., Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 316} (1993) 412
614:
615: \bibitem{h1zdiff}
616: ZEUS Collaboratin, M.~Derrick et al., Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 315} (1993) 481;\\
617: H1 Collaboration, T.~Ahmed et al., Nucl.~Phys. {\bf B 429} (1994) 477
618:
619: \bibitem{rx74}
620: A.~de~Rujula et al., Phys.~Rev.~{\bf D 10} (1974) 1649
621:
622: \bibitem{dglap}
623: V.~N.~Gribov, L.~N.~Lipatov, Sov.~J.~Nucl.~Phys. {\bf 15} (1972) 438, 675;\\
624: G.~Altarelli, G.~Parisi, Nucl.~Phys. {\bf B 126} (1977) 298;\\
625: Yu.~L.~Dokshitzer, Sov.~Phys.~JETP {\bf 46} (1977) 641
626:
627: \bibitem{grv93}
628: M.~Gl\"uck, E.~Reya, A.~Vogt, Phys.~Lett.~{\bf 306 B} (1993) 391
629:
630: \bibitem{bfkl}
631: L.~N.~Lipatov, Sov.~J.~Nucl.~Phys. {\bf 23} (1976) 338;\\
632: V.~S.~Fadin, E.~A.~Kuraev, L.~N.~Lipatov, Phys.~Lett. {\bf 60 B} (1975) 50;
633: Sov.~Phys.~JETP {\bf 44} (1976) 443; {\it ibid.} {\bf 45} (1977) 199;\\
634: Y.~Y.~Balitski, L.~N.~Lipatov, Sov.~J.~Nucl.~Phys. {\bf 28} (1978) 822
635:
636: \bibitem{grv83}
637: L.~V.~Gribov, E.~M.~Levin, M.~G.~Ryskin, Phys.~Rep.~{\bf 100} (1993) 481;\\
638: for a review and references, see\\
639: A.~H.~Mueller, Proc.~{\it QCD: Perturbative or nonperturbative?},
640: Autumn School Lisbon 1999, hep-ph/9911289
641:
642: \bibitem{abf01}
643: For a recent discussion and references, see\\
644: G.~Altarelli, R.~Ball, S.~Forte, Nucl.~Phys. {\bf B 599} (2001) 383
645:
646: \bibitem{wal01}
647: H1 Collaboration, R.~Wallny, these proceedings
648:
649: \bibitem{nag01}
650: ZEUS Collaboration, K.~Nagano, these proceedings
651:
652: \bibitem{alh1}
653: H1 Collaboration, C.~Adloff et al., Eur.~Phys.~J. {\bf C 21} (2001) 33
654:
655: \bibitem{alz}
656: ZEUS Collaboration, A.~Cooper-Sarkar, these proceedings
657:
658: \bibitem{dl87}
659: A.~Donnachie, P.~V.~Landshoff, Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 191} (1987) 309
660:
661: \bibitem{tv94}
662: L.~Trentadue, G.~Veneziano, Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 323} (1994) 201
663:
664: \bibitem{bs94}
665: A.~Berera, D.~E.~Soper, Phys.~Rev. {\bf D 50} (1994) 4328
666:
667: \bibitem{col98}
668: J.~C.~Collins, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 57} (1998) 3051
669:
670: \bibitem{is85}
671: G.~Ingelman, P.~E.~Schlein, Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 152} (1985) 256
672:
673: \bibitem{gs96}
674: T.~Gehrmann, W.~J.~Stirling, Z.~Phys. {\bf C 70} (1996) 89
675:
676: \bibitem{h101}
677: H1 Collaboration, C.~Adloff et al., Eur.~Phys.~J. {\bf C 20} (2001) 29
678:
679: \bibitem{bex99}
680: J.~Bartels, J.~Ellis, H.~Kowalski, M.~W\"usthoff, Eur.~Phys.~J.
681: {\bf C 7} (1999) 443
682:
683: \bibitem{ht01}
684: A.~Hebecker, T.~Teubner, Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 498} (2001) 16
685:
686: \bibitem{gbw01}
687: K.~Golec-Biernat, M.~W\"usthoff, Eur.~Phys.~J. {\bf C 20} (2001) 313
688:
689: \bibitem{bjo72}
690: J.~D. Bjorken, AIP Conf.~Proc. No.6, eds. M.~Bander et al.
691: (AIP, New York, 1972) p. 151;\\
692: J.~D. Bjorken, J.~B.~Kogut, Phys.~Rev. {\bf D 8} (1973) 1341
693:
694: \bibitem{bh96}
695: W.~Buchm\"uller, A.~Hebecker, Nucl.~Phys. {\bf B 476} (1996) 203;\\
696: W.~Buchm\"uller, Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 353} (1995) 335
697:
698: \bibitem{mlv94}
699: L.~McLerran, R.~Venugopalan, Phys.~Rev. {\bf D 49} (1994) 2233
700:
701: \bibitem{hw98}
702: A.~Hebecker, H.~Weigert, Phys.~Lett. {\bf B 432} (1998) 215
703:
704: \bibitem{nz91}
705: N.~N.~Nikolaev, B.~G.~Zakharov, Z.~Phys. {\bf C 49} (1991) 607
706:
707: \bibitem{bgh99}
708: W.~Buchm\"uller, T.~Gehrmann, A.~Hebecker, Nucl.~Phys. {\bf B 537} (1999) 477
709:
710: \bibitem{mue99}
711: A.~H.~Mueller, Nucl.~Phys. {\bf B 558} (1999) 285
712:
713: \bibitem{gbw99}
714: K.~Golec-Biernat, M.~W\"usthoff, Phys.~Rev. {\bf D 59} (1999) 014017;
715: {\it ibid.} Phys.~Rev. {\bf D 60} (1999) 114023
716:
717: \bibitem{zeus99}
718: ZEUS Collaboration, J.~Breitweg et al., Eur.~Phys.~J. {\bf C 6} (1999) 43
719:
720: \bibitem{kwx97}
721: J.~Jalilian~Marian, A.~Kovner, A.~Leonidov, H.~Weigert, Nucl.~Phys.
722: {\bf B 504} (1997) 415;\\
723: A.~Kovner, J.~G.~Milhano, H.~Weigert, Phys.~Rev. {\bf D 62} (2000) 114005
724:
725: \end{thebibliography}
726:
727: \end{document}
728:
729: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
730: %% End of ws-p8-50x6-00.tex
731: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
732:
733: