1:
2: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
4:
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6: \usepackage{dcolumn}
7: \usepackage{bm}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{Electric Field Effects and the\\
12: Experimental Value of the Muon g-2 Anomaly}
13:
14: \author{A. Widom}
15: \author{Y.N. Srivastava}
16: \affiliation{Physics Department, Northeastern University, Boston MA 02115}
17: \affiliation{Physics Department \& INFN, University of Perugia, Perugia Italy}
18:
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: The electric field corrections to the recently measured muon
22: magnetic moment g-2 anomaly are considered from both the classical
23: (BMT) and the quantum mechanical (Dirac) viewpoints. In both views,
24: we prove that the electric field inducing the horizontal betatron
25: tune does not renormalize the anomaly frequency. With this result
26: kept in mind, the experimental muon magnetic moment anomaly
27: is in closer agreement with standard model predictions than
28: has been previously reported.
29: \end{abstract}
30:
31: \pacs{29.20.Fj, 29.27.Bd, 29.27.Fh, 13.35.Bv, 13.30.Em}
32: \maketitle
33:
34: There has been considerable experimental effort in accurately
35: determining\cite{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8} the muon magnetic moment anomalous
36: \begin{math} g \end{math}-factor
37: \begin{equation}
38: \kappa =(g-2)/2 .
39: \end{equation}
40: The measurement is performed via the magnetic field induced anomaly
41: frequency
42: \begin{equation}
43: \omega_\kappa =\left|{e\kappa {\bf B}\over Mc}\right|.
44: \end{equation}
45:
46: The increased precision of the most recent experimental
47: determinations\cite{7,8} of \begin{math} \kappa \end{math}
48: is mainly due to the technical progress that
49: has been made in producing a uniform magnetic field
50: \begin{math} {\bf B} \end{math} which is thought to
51: yield a very accurately determined frequency
52: \begin{math} \nu =(\omega_\kappa /2\pi ) \end{math}. It has been
53: claimed \cite{7,8} that the anomaly \begin{math} \nu \end{math}
54: is known to within
55: \begin{math} \Delta \nu \sim 5\times 10^{-2}\ Hz \end{math} by signal
56: averaging over experimental runs with finite (due to muon decay)
57: time intervals obeying
58: \begin{math} \Delta t\sim 7\times 10^{-3}\ sec \end{math} .
59: Thus, there is an experimental uncertainty product
60: \begin{math} \Delta \nu \Delta t \sim 4\times 10^{-4}<<1 \end{math}.
61: With \begin{math} N\sim 3\times 10^9 \end{math} muon decay
62: events, the reported frequency resolution also obeys
63: \begin{math}
64: (\delta \nu /\nu )\sim 10^{-6}<1/\sqrt{N}\sim 2\times 10^{-5}
65: \end{math}.
66:
67: For a muon with kinetic energy
68: \begin{math} {\cal E}=Mc^2\gamma \end{math},
69: it has been proposed from a classical spin viewpoint\cite{5,6,7,8},
70: that the anomaly frequency Eq.(2) has an additional electric field
71: induced shift \begin{math} \delta \omega_{\perp \kappa }\end{math} given by
72: \begin{equation}
73: {\delta \omega_{\perp \kappa} \over \omega_\kappa }=
74: \left<\left\{{1\over \kappa (\gamma^2-1)}-1\right\}
75: {({\bf v\times E})\cdot {\bf B}\over c|{\bf B}|^2}\right>,
76: \end{equation}
77: where \begin{math} <...> \end{math} denotes an average over the
78: cyclotron orbits of the muon beam. To minimize the electric field
79: effect, one attempts to choose the energy so that the term within
80: brackets \begin{math} \{...\} \end{math} is as small in absolute
81: magnitude as is experimentally possible.
82:
83: The reported discrepancies\cite{5,6,7,8} between the
84: standard model and experimental values of
85: \begin{math} \kappa \end{math} are in part due to
86: the overestimate of experimental electric field effects
87: and the underestimate of standard model values and errors therein.
88: When \begin{math} \delta \omega_\kappa \end{math}
89: is properly computed, the experimental determination of
90: \begin{math} \kappa \end{math} must be evaluated anew.
91: We find that the experimental value is thereby drawn closer to
92: the standard model value.
93:
94: As we show in what follows, the contribution to the anomaly
95: frequency
96: \begin{math} \delta \omega_{\perp \kappa } \end{math}
97: due to the electric field
98: \begin{math} {\bf E}_\perp \end{math} (perpendicular to
99: \begin{math} {\bf B} \end{math}) vanishes. The rule
100: \begin{math} \delta \omega_{\perp \kappa}=0 \end{math} is most easily
101: proved employing quantum mechanics via the Dirac equation. However
102: the result may also be understood from a classical viewpoint.
103: Both the quantum and classical arguments will be discussed in
104: what follows.
105:
106: To evaluate Eq.(3) from a classical viewpoint, let us discuss the
107: muon motion projected on to a plane perpendicular to the uniform
108: magnetic field \begin{math} {\bf B} \end{math};
109: i.e. let us define the position and velocity, respectively,
110: \begin{equation}
111: {\bf r}_\perp
112: =\left({{\bf B\times }({\bf r \times B})\over |{\bf B}|^2}\right)
113: \ \ {\rm and}\ \ {\bf v}_\perp
114: =\left({{\bf B\times }({\bf v \times B})\over |{\bf B}|^2}\right).
115: \end{equation}
116: Employing the Lorentz force on the muon charge
117: \begin{equation}
118: M{d(\gamma {\bf v})\over dt}=e\big({\bf E}+({\bf v\times B})/c\big),
119: \end{equation}
120: with
121: \begin{equation}
122: {\bf \rho }={c\over e}
123: \left({{\bf B\times }(M\gamma {\bf v})\over |{\bf B}|^2}\right)
124: \ \ {\rm and}\ \ {\bf r}_\perp ={\bf \rho }+{\bf R},
125: \end{equation}
126: we have in virtue of Eqs.(5) and (6) that
127: \begin{eqnarray}
128: {d{\bf \rho }\over dt}&=&{c\over |{\bf B}|^2}
129: \left\{{\bf B\times }\big({\bf E}
130: +({\bf v\times B})/c \big)\right\}\nonumber \\
131: &=&\left({c{\bf B\times E}\over |{\bf B}|^2}\right)+{\bf v}_\perp
132: \end{eqnarray}
133: and in virtue of Eqs.(6) and (7) we have the desired result
134: \begin{equation}
135: {d{\bf R}\over dt}=\left({c{\bf E\times B}\over |{\bf B}|^2}\right).
136: \end{equation}
137:
138: As discussed in a more leisurely fashion in previous work\cite{9},
139: the curvature length
140: \begin{math} |{\rho }|=(cM\gamma |{\bf v}_\perp |/|e{\bf B}|) \end{math}
141: of the muon path is the usual one for experimentally determining
142: the muon transverse momentum. The coordinate
143: \begin{math} {\bf R} \end{math} locates the center of the cyclotron
144: orbit. The center \begin{math} {\bf R} \end{math} of the cyclotron
145: orbit can also drift if an electric field acts on the muon charge in
146: accordance with Eq.(8).
147:
148: In fact, the entire horizontal electric field correction in Eq.(3)
149: is due to the motion of the cyclotron orbit center velocity in Eq.(8).
150: The classically predicted frequency shift is {\em exactly} given by
151: \begin{equation}
152: {\delta \omega_{\perp \kappa} \over \omega_\kappa }={1\over c^2}
153: \left<\left\{{1\over \kappa (\gamma^2-1)}-1\right\}
154: {\bf v}_\perp \cdot \left({d{\bf R}\over dt}\right)\right>.
155: \end{equation}
156: The velocity \begin{math} {\bf v}_\perp \end{math} circulates
157: with a cyclotron angular velocity
158: \begin{math} \omega_c =|e{\bf B}/Mc\gamma | \end{math},
159: while the center of the orbit \begin{math} {\bf R} \end{math}
160: circulates with an angular velocity
161: \begin{math} \Omega_\perp \end{math} of the horizontal tune;
162: Experimentally\cite{8},
163: \begin{equation}
164: (\Omega_\perp /\omega_c)\approx 7.0\times 10^{-2}.
165: \end{equation}
166: In any case, the classical time average in Eq.(9) involves
167: the two frequencies
168: \begin{math}
169: \left<\cos\{(\omega_c \pm \Omega_\perp )t+\Theta\}\right>\approx 0
170: \end{math}
171: leading to a vanishing frequency shift
172: \begin{math}
173: (\delta \omega_{\perp \kappa }/\omega_\kappa )\approx 0
174: \end{math}.
175:
176: That the electric field components \begin{math} {\bf E}_\perp \end{math}
177: perpendicular to \begin{math} {\bf B} \end{math} do not induce an
178: anomaly frequency shift can be made abundantly clear by employing
179: quantum theory via the Dirac equation for the muon. For electrostatic
180: \begin{math} {\bf E}=-{\bf grad}\Phi \end{math} and magnetostatic
181: \begin{math} {\bf B}=curl{\bf A} \end{math} fields and with
182: the gauge invariant momentum
183: \begin{math} {\bf \Pi}=-i\hbar {\bf grad}-(e/c){\bf A} \end{math},
184: the Dirac Hamiltonian is given by
185: \begin{equation}
186: {\cal H}=c{\bf \alpha \cdot \Pi }+\beta Mc^2 +e\Phi +H_\kappa ,
187: \end{equation}
188: where
189: \begin{equation}
190: H_\kappa =
191: -\left({\hbar e\kappa \over 2Mc}\right)(\beta {\bf \Sigma \cdot B}
192: -i\beta \gamma_5{\bf \Sigma \cdot E}).
193: \end{equation}
194:
195: The discussion of the Dirac equation will proceed in
196: three steps: (i) We consider the case in which only the magnetic field
197: is present\cite{10}. For motion in a plane perpendicular to the magnetic
198: field, the anomaly frequency in Eq.(2) arises because the operator
199: \begin{equation}
200: \left({\hbar \omega_\kappa \over 2}\right) \Lambda =
201: \left({\hbar e\kappa \over 2Mc}\right)\beta {\bf \Sigma \cdot B}=
202: \left({\hbar \omega_\kappa \over 2}\right)\beta \Sigma_3.
203: \end{equation}
204: is conserved. (ii) We now add the electric field components
205: \begin{math} {\bf E}_\perp \end{math} and prove
206: that \begin{math} \Lambda \end{math} is again conserved for planar
207: motions. Thus, the frequency shift
208: \begin{math} \delta \omega_{\perp \kappa } \end{math} due to
209: \begin{math} {\bf E}_\perp \end{math} is then {\em strictly zero}.
210: This is a {\em rigorous} quantum selection rule. (iii) When the field
211: component
212: \begin{math} {\bf E}_{||} \end{math}
213: parallel to the magnetic field is included there will be a frequency
214: shift due to normal (out of the plane) oscillations in the muon beam.
215: The implications of these results for the experimental determination
216: of \begin{math} \kappa \end{math} will be discussed below.
217:
218: In zero electric field and a uniform magnetic field with
219: \begin{math} {\bf A}=(1/2){\bf B\times r} \end{math},
220: the Dirac Hamiltonian reads
221: \begin{eqnarray}
222: {\cal H}_{\bf B}(p_z)&=&c\alpha_3 p_z
223: +c{\bf \alpha_\perp \cdot \Pi_\perp }
224: +\beta Mc^2 -(\hbar \omega_\kappa /2)\Lambda \nonumber \\
225: &=&H_{\bf B}(p_z)-(\hbar \omega_\kappa /2)\Lambda .
226: \end{eqnarray}
227: For motion in the plane, the operator
228: \begin{math} \Lambda =\beta \Sigma_3 \end{math}
229: is conserved
230: \begin{equation}
231: \left[{\cal H}_{\bf B}(p_z=0),\Lambda \right]=0.
232: \end{equation}
233: One may diagonalize the ``in plane'' motion according to
234: \begin{math} H_{\bf B}(p_z=0)\psi_{{\cal E}\pm}={\cal E}
235: \psi_{{\cal E}\pm } \end{math}
236: and \begin{math}
237: \Lambda \psi_{{\cal E}\pm}=\pm \psi_{{\cal E}\pm }
238: \end{math}.
239: Thus, the in plane motion energy states obey
240: \begin{equation}
241: {\cal H}_{\bf B}(p_z=0)\psi_{{\cal E}\pm}=
242: \{{\cal E}\mp (\hbar \omega _\kappa /2)\}\psi_{{\cal E}\pm}.
243: \end{equation}
244: \medskip
245: \par \noindent
246: {\bf Theorem I:} {\em For planar motions in a uniform magnetic field,
247: the Bohr transition frequency
248: \begin{math} \omega_\kappa =({\cal E}_--{\cal E}_+)/\hbar \end{math}
249: for chiral spin rotations is precisely the anomaly frequency of} Eq.(2).
250: \medskip
251:
252: Let us now consider the theoretical case where, in addition to the
253: uniform magnetic field \begin{math} {\bf B} \end{math}, there exists
254: an in plane electric field
255: \begin{math}
256: {\bf E}_\perp =-\nabla_\perp \Phi_\perp ({\bf r}_\perp ).
257: \end{math}
258: For this case Eq.(14) is modified to read
259: \begin{eqnarray}
260: {\cal H}_{{\bf B,E}_\perp }(p_z)&=&H_{{\bf B,E}_\perp }(p_z)
261: -(\hbar \omega_\kappa /2)\Lambda \nonumber \\
262: H_{{\bf B,E}_\perp }(p_z)&=&c\alpha_3 p_z
263: +c{\bf \alpha_\perp \cdot \Pi_\perp }+\beta Mc^2 \nonumber \\
264: &+&e\Phi_\perp +\left({\hbar e\kappa \over 2Mc}\right)
265: i\beta \gamma_5{\bf \Sigma}_\perp {\bf \cdot E}_\perp .
266: \end{eqnarray}
267: Remarkably, for planar motions the operator
268: \begin{math} \Lambda =\beta \Sigma_3 \end{math}
269: is still conserved
270: \begin{equation}
271: \left[{\cal H}_{{\bf B,E}_\perp }(p_z=0),\Lambda \right]=0.
272: \end{equation}
273: Again, one may diagonalize the in plane motion according to
274: \begin{math}
275: H_{{\bf B,E}_\perp }(p_z=0)\psi _{\tilde{\cal E} \pm}=
276: \tilde{\cal E}
277: \psi _{\tilde{\cal E} \pm}
278: \end{math}
279: and
280: \begin{math}
281: \Lambda \psi _{\tilde{\cal E} \pm}=\pm \psi _{\tilde{\cal E} \pm}
282: \end{math} so that
283: \begin{equation}
284: {\cal H}_{{\bf B,E}_\perp }(p_z=0)
285: \psi _{\tilde{\cal E} \pm}=
286: \{\tilde{\cal E} \mp (\hbar \omega _\kappa /2)\}
287: \psi _{\tilde{\cal E} \pm}.
288: \end{equation}
289: \medskip
290: \par \noindent
291: {\bf Theorem II:} {\em For planar motions with both a uniform magnetic
292: field and any in plane electric field,
293: the Bohr transition frequency
294: \begin{math}
295: \omega_\kappa =(\tilde{\cal E}_--\tilde{\cal E}_+)/\hbar
296: \end{math}
297: for chiral spin rotations is precisely the anomaly frequency of} Eq.(2)
298: {\em with a strictly zero frequency shift}.
299:
300: The above theoretical quantum mechanical proof of
301: \begin{math} \delta \omega_{\perp \kappa} =0 \end{math},
302: employing the conservation law for the operator
303: \begin{math} \Lambda=\beta \Sigma_3 \end{math},
304: is a central result of this work.
305: For the full Hamiltonian in Eqs.(11) and (12),
306: \begin{math} \Lambda \end{math} is not quite
307: conserved. In detail,
308: \begin{math}
309: \dot{\Lambda }=(i/\hbar)\left[{\cal H},\Lambda \right]
310: \end{math}
311: is given by
312: \begin{equation}
313: \dot{\Lambda }=-\left({2cp_z\over \hbar }\right)i\beta \gamma_5
314: +\left({\kappa eE_z\over Mc}\right)\gamma_5.
315: \end{equation}
316: The {\em only frequency shift that can arise} is due solely to
317: non-planar motions with momentum
318: \begin{math}
319: p_z=({\bf p}\cdot{\bf B})/|{\bf B}|
320: \end{math}
321: out of the plane driven by the electric field component
322: \begin{math}
323: E_z=({\bf E}\cdot{\bf B})/|{\bf B}|
324: \end{math}.
325: The vertical betatron oscillation correction is thus a bit more subtle.
326: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
327:
328: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
329: From a classical relativistic viewpoint, the planar motions of the muons
330: may be considered to be within a circulating ``hoop'' with an ``effective
331: mass''
332: \begin{equation}
333: M_{eff}c^2=\tilde{\cal E}.
334: \end{equation}
335: The effective classical Lagrangian for the vertical betatron
336: oscillation in the \begin{math} z \end{math}-direction may then
337: be shown to be
338: \begin{equation}
339: L_{||}(v_z,z)=-\tilde{\cal E}\sqrt{1-\left({v_z\over c}\right)^2}
340: -e\Phi_{||}(z),
341: \end{equation}
342: where the electric field \begin{math} E_z=-(d\Phi_{||}(z)/dz) \end{math}
343: describes the restoring force of the vertical betatron oscillation at
344: frequency
345: \begin{equation}
346: \Omega_{||}=\sqrt{n}\omega_c
347: \end{equation}
348: where \begin{math} n \end{math} is the electric field index. The
349: betatron oscillator Lagrangian in Eq.(22) renormalizes the
350: anomaly frequency according to the relativistic Doppler frequency shift
351: formula
352: \begin{equation}
353: \hbar \bar{\omega }_\kappa =\left<
354: (\tilde{\cal E}_--\tilde{\cal E}_+)
355: \sqrt{1-\left({v_z\over c}\right)^2}\ \right>,
356: \end{equation}
357: i.e. the classical (transverse) Doppler shift for
358: \begin{math} |v_z|<<c \end{math}
359: is given by
360: \begin{equation}
361: {\delta \omega_{||\kappa }\over \omega_\kappa}\approx
362: -{1\over 2}\left<\left({v_z\over c}\right)^2\right>\approx
363: -\left({\Omega_{||}^2\over 2c^2}\right)\left<z^2\right>.
364: \end{equation}
365:
366: An alternative quasi-classical argument for the vertical
367: betatron induced shift reads as follows: (i) The number
368: \begin{math} N>>1 \end{math} of ``quanta'' in the vertical betatron
369: oscillation for a total energy \begin{math} {\cal E} \end{math} and
370: transverse energy \begin{math} \tilde{\cal E} \end{math}
371: is given by the Bohr rule
372: \begin{eqnarray}
373: N&=&\oint \left({p_zdz\over 2\pi \hbar}\right), \nonumber \\
374: cp_z&=&\sqrt{({\cal E}-e\Phi_{||}(z))^2-\tilde{\cal E}^2}.
375: \end{eqnarray}
376: (ii) The velocity
377: \begin{math}
378: v_z=(\partial {\cal E}/\partial p_z)_{\tilde{\cal E},z}
379: \end{math}
380: determines the vertical betatron tune frequency via
381: \begin{eqnarray}
382: \left(\partial N\over \partial {\cal E}\right)_{\tilde{\cal E}}
383: &=&\oint \left(
384: {\partial p_z\over \partial \cal E}
385: \right)_{\tilde{\cal E},z}\left({dz\over 2\pi \hbar }\right),
386: \nonumber \\
387: \left(\partial N\over \partial {\cal E}\right)_{\tilde{\cal E}}
388: &=&\oint \left({dz\over 2\pi \hbar v_z}\right)=
389: \left({1 \over \hbar \Omega_{||}}\right), \nonumber \\
390: \left(\partial N\over \partial \tilde{\cal E}\right)_{\cal E}
391: &=&-\oint {\tilde{\cal E}\over {\cal E}-e\Phi_{||}(z)}
392: \left({dz\over 2\pi \hbar v_z}\right).
393: \end{eqnarray}
394: The maximum vertical betatron amplitude
395: \begin{math} z_0 \end{math} obeys
396: \begin{equation}
397: {\cal E}=\tilde{\cal E}+ e\Phi_{||}(z_0)-e\Phi_{||}(0),
398: \end{equation}
399: and without loss of generality we may choose
400: \begin{math} \Phi_{||}(0)=0 \end{math}.
401: Eqs.(27) and (28) then imply
402: \begin{eqnarray}
403: \left({\partial {\cal E}\over \partial \tilde{\cal E}}\right)_N
404: &=& -\left({\partial N\over \partial \tilde{\cal E}}\right)_{\cal E}
405: \left({\partial {\cal E}\over \partial N}\right)_{\tilde{\cal E}}
406: \nonumber \\
407: \left({\partial {\cal E}\over \partial \tilde{\cal E}}\right)_N &=&
408: \left<{\tilde{\cal E}
409: \over \tilde{\cal E}+e\{\Phi_{||}(z_0)-\Phi_{||}(z)\}}\right>,
410: \end{eqnarray}
411: where the average is over the vertical betatron oscillation.
412: The frequency shift
413: \begin{equation}
414: \left({\delta \omega_{||\kappa }\over \omega_\kappa }\right)=1-
415: \left({\partial {\cal E}\over \partial \tilde{\cal E}}\right)_N
416: \end{equation}
417: thereby obeys
418: \begin{equation}
419: \left({\delta \omega_{||\kappa }\over \omega_\kappa }\right)=
420: \left<{e\{\Phi_{||}(z)-\Phi_{||}(z_0)\}
421: \over \tilde{\cal E}+e\{\Phi_{||}(z_0)-\Phi_{||}(z)\}}\right>.
422: \end{equation}
423: For an oscillator with
424: \begin{math} \tilde{\cal E}>>|e\{\Phi_{||}(z_0)| \end{math}
425: Eq.(31) reads
426: \begin{equation}
427: {\delta \omega_{||\kappa }\over \omega_\kappa}\approx
428: -\left({\Omega_{||}^2\over 2c^2}\right)\left<z^2\right>,
429: \end{equation}
430: in agreement with Eq.(25). Finally, Eq.(32) yields the standard
431: vertical betatron frequency shift formula
432: \begin{equation}
433: \left({\delta \omega_{||\kappa }\over \omega_\kappa}\right)
434: \approx -\left({n\over 2\rho_0^2}\right)\left<z^2\right>
435: \approx -0.23\times 10^{-6}.
436: \end{equation}
437: since \begin{math} n\approx 0.137 \end{math} and the cyclotron
438: radius \begin{math} \rho_0\approx 711.2\ cm \end{math}
439: \cite{7,8}.
440:
441:
442: \begin{figure}[bp]
443: \scalebox {0.5}{\includegraphics{fig1g2q}}
444: \caption{The value of $\kappa =(g-2)/2$ is shown together with estimated
445: errors. Reading from top to bottom: (i) the experimental BNL data with
446: the ``over compensation'' of the electric field corrections as reported
447: in \cite{7}, (ii) the experimental data as analyzed employing the quantum
448: Dirac equation of this work and thereby including only the vertical
449: betatron tune, (iii) the theoretical standard model calculation as
450: reported in \cite{11}, (iv) the theoretical standard model calculation
451: as reported in \cite{12} and (v) the theoretical standard model calculation
452: as reported in \cite{13,14}.}
453: \label{fig1}
454: \end{figure}
455:
456:
457:
458: Shown in Fig.1 are the central values and error ranges for the
459: BNL experimental measurement of \begin{math} \kappa \end{math}
460: as well as the more recent {\em standard model theory} values
461: and error ranges.
462:
463: The original experimental report over-compensated
464: the electric field correction to \begin{math} \omega_\kappa \end{math}.
465: The electric field \begin{math} {\bf E}_\perp \end{math} contributes
466: zero to a frequency shift as shown above employing the Dirac
467: wave function for the muon beam. From a classical viewpoint, when the
468: muons are first injected into the beam line, the ``kick'' slightly
469: off-centers the orbit setting the center
470: \begin{math} {\bf R} \end{math}
471: of the cyclotron orbit to rotate at the horizontal betatron
472: frequency \begin{math} \Omega_\perp \end{math}. This effect on
473: \begin{math} \omega_\kappa \end{math} averages
474: away to zero. The Dirac wave function analysis thus yields a lower
475: magnitude of the electric field shift than was previously reported.
476: The resulting \begin{math} \kappa \end{math} with the Dirac
477: equation analysis is pictured in Fig.1. This describes
478: the only possible electric field correction to
479: \begin{math} \omega_\kappa \end{math} as given by Eq.(33)
480:
481: The damping of the horizontal betatron mode velocity
482: \begin{math} {\bf V}=(d{\bf R}/dt) \end{math} takes place in an
483: estimated time of \begin{math}\sim 168\ microsec \end{math}.
484: In this regard, if the damping of the vertical betatron coordinate
485: \begin{math} z \end{math} takes place in a comparable time, then
486: the vertical betatron contribution Eq.(33) may also be moot.
487:
488: The nature and values of the direct vertical betatron
489: measurements have not yet been made available to the physics
490: community. If the vertical tune relaxation times are sufficiently small,
491: then the standard model theory and the
492: \begin{math} (g-2) \end{math} experiment would be brought
493: into {\em yet closer agreement} than is shown in Fig.1.
494:
495:
496:
497:
498:
499:
500:
501:
502:
503:
504:
505: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
506: \bibitem{1} G. Charpak et. al. {\it Il Nuovo Cimento} {\bf 37}, 1241 (1965).
507: \bibitem{2} J. Bailey et. al. {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B28}, 287 (1968).
508: \bibitem{3} J. Bailey et. al. {\it Il Nuovo Cimento} {\bf A9}, 369 (1972).
509: \bibitem{4} J. Bailey et. al. {\it Nuc. Phys.} {\bf B150}, 1 (1979).
510: \bibitem{5} R.M. Carey et. al. {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 82}, 1632 (1999).
511: \bibitem{6} H.N. Brown et. al. {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D62}, 091101 (2000).
512: \bibitem{7} H.N. Brown et. al. {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 86}, 2227 (2001).
513: \bibitem{8} O. Rind, et. al., {\it SLAC Workshop on $e^+e^-$ Physics at
514: Intermediate Energies}, April 2001, {\bf arXiv:hep-ex}/0106101 (2001).
515: \bibitem{9} Y.N. Srivastava and A. Widom, {\bf arXiv:hep-ph}/0109020 (2001).
516: \bibitem{10} A. Widom and Y.N. Srivastava, {\bf arXiv:hep-ph}/9612290 (1996).
517: \bibitem{11} M. Davier and A. H\"ocker, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B435},
518: 427 (1998)
519: \bibitem{12} F. Jegerlehner {\bf arXiv:hep-ph}/0104304 (2001).
520: \bibitem{13} M. Knecht and A. Nyffeler {\bf arXiv:hep-ph}/0111058 (2001).
521: \bibitem{14} M. Knecht, A. Nyffeler, M. Perrottet and E. de Rafael
522: {\bf arXiv:hep-ph}/0111059 (2001).
523:
524: \end{thebibliography}
525:
526: \end{document}
527:
528:
529:
530:
531:
532: