1: %%only change the website address - 18/4/2000

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%

4: %% ws-p8-50x6-00.tex : 20-11-97

5: %% This Latex2e file rewritten from various sources for use in the

6: %% preparation of the (smaller [8.50''x6.00'']) single-column proceedings 

7: %% Volume, latest version by R. Sankaran with acknowledgements to Susan 

8: %% Hezlet and Lukas Nellen. Please comments to:rsanka@wspc.com.sg

9: %%

10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

11: %

12: \documentclass{ws-p8-50x6-00}

13: 

14: \begin{document}

15: 

16: \title{New Results from NA49}

17: 

18: \author{V.~Friese for the NA49 collaboration}

19: 

20: \address{Fachbereich Physik der Universit\"at Marburg\\ 

21: Renthof 5, 35032 Marburg, Germany\\

22: E-mail: volker.friese@physik.uni-marburg.de}

23: 

24: \maketitle

25: 

26: \abstracts{

27: We present recent results of the SPS experiment NA49 on 

28: production of strange particles and event-by-event fluctuations

29: of mean $p_t$ and of charged particle ratios in central Pb+Pb

30: collisions at various beam energies (40, 80, 158 AGeV) as well as

31: in different collisions at 158 AGeV, going from p+p over light-ion

32: collisions to peripheral and central Pb+Pb.}

33: 

34: \section{Introduction}

35: A possible interpretation of the data collected by the various heavy-ion

36: experiments at the CERN-SPS over the past few years is that a deconfined

37: state of nuclear matter is already reached in central Pb+Pb collisions

38: at top SPS energy (158 AGeV)\cite{qgp}. This immediately triggers

39: the question whether the transition point can be

40: experimentally pinned down by varying the collision energy or the size

41: of the collision system. The experiment NA49\cite{na49} aims to investigate

42: this question by studying hadronic observables, predominantly strangeness

43: production, for different beam energies (40, 80 and 158 AGeV) as well as

44: for different colliding systems, such as p+p, C+C and Pb+Pb at various 

45: centralities. Further data taking at even lower beam energies (20, 30 AGeV)

46: is foreseen for the year 2002.

47: 

48: 

49: \section{Energy Dependence of Hadronic Observables}

50: 

51: \subsection{Kaon and $\Lambda$ Production}

52: NA49 can identify charged kaons by time-of-flight measurement near

53: midrapidity and by the specific energy loss at forward rapidities.

54: $\Lambda$ baryons are identified in NA49 by their V0 decay topology.

55: The $m_t$ spectra for both particles types are well described by

56: exponentials. For the kaons, we find comparable slopes (220-240 MeV)

57: for all three energies, the slopes for $K^-$ being slightly lower

58: than those of $K^+$. In the case of $\Lambda$, the slopes increase

59: slightly with beam energy.

60: 

61: The rapidity distributions for kaons are shown in fig.~\ref{fig:kaon}a

62: for 40 AGeV. We observe the $K^+$ to have a somewhat broader distribution

63: than the $K^-$, which also holds for the other energies. The rapidity

64: distribution of the $\Lambda$ (fig.~\ref{fig:lambda}) seems to develop a 

65: plateau around midrapidity when going from 40 AGeV to 158 AGeV. For the latter

66: case, the shape of the distribution at large $|y|$ is not yet determined,

67: leaving some uncertainty to the $4\pi$ extrapolation.

68: 

69: 

70: 

71: \begin{figure}[t]

72:  \begin{center}

73:   \leavevmode

74:   \epsfxsize=11.8cm

75: %  \epsfbox{/home/friese/tagung/ismd01/procs/kaon.eps}

76:   \epsfbox{kaon.eps}

77:  \end{center}

78:  \vspace{-0.5cm}

79:  \caption{(a) kaon rapidity distributions for

80:  40 AGeV; (b) energy dependence of the $K/\pi$ ratio at midrapidity. Note

81:  that the RHIC results are not on horizontal scale.}

82:  \label{fig:kaon}

83: \end{figure}

84: 

85: Fig.~\ref{fig:kaon}b shows the $K/\pi$ ratio at midrapidity as a function

86: of $\sqrt{s}$. For 80 AGeV, the analysis of pion production is not yet

87: finished, so we restrict ourselves to the data at 40 and 158 AGeV.

88: While a continuous rise in $K^-/\pi^-$ from AGS\cite{agskaon} over SPS to RHIC energies

89: is observed, the $K^+/\pi^+$ ratio seems to reach a maximum at or slightly 

90: above top AGS energy. This behaviour is more pronounced in the case of $\Lambda$

91: (fig.~\ref{fig:lambda}). 

92: 

93: \begin{figure}[b]

94:  \begin{minipage} [b] {5.9cm}

95:   \begin{center}

96:    \leavevmode

97:    \epsfxsize5.9cm

98: %   \epsfbox{/home/friese/tagung/ismd01/procs/lambda_rapspec.eps}

99:    \epsfbox{lambda_rapspec.eps}

100:   \end{center}

101:  \end{minipage}

102:  \begin{minipage} [b] {5.9cm}

103:   \begin{center}

104:    \leavevmode

105:    \epsfxsize5.9cm

106:    \epsfbox{lam2pi_dndy.eps}

107: %   \epsfbox{/home/friese/tagung/ismd01/procs/lam2pi_dndy.eps}

108:   \end{center}

109:  \end{minipage}

110:  \vspace{-1cm}

111:  \caption{(left) $\Lambda$ rapidity distributions in central Pb+Pb at 40, 80 and

112: 158 AGeV; (right) $\Lambda/\pi$ ratio at midrapidity as function of beam energy. 

113: AGS data taken

114: from\protect\cite{agslambda}}

115:  \label{fig:lambda}

116: \end{figure}

117: 

118: The $K/\pi$ ratios in full phase space are shown in fig.~\ref{fig:kaon2}. 

119: In contrast to $K^-/\pi^-$, the $K^+/\pi^+$ ratio clearly shows

120: a non-monotonic behaviour.

121: Most models, including hadron gas models as well as microscopic transport 

122: models, fail to reproduce such a trend. It is

123: therefore interesting that the statistical model of the early stage\cite{marek}

124: indeed predicts a non-monotonic behaviour in the strangeness-to-pion

125: ratio, assuming a phase transition at about 40 AGeV. 

126: 

127: 

128: \begin{figure}[bp]

129:  \begin{minipage} [t] {5.6cm}

130:   \begin{center}

131:    \leavevmode

132:    \epsfxsize5.6cm

133:    \epsfbox{kaon2.eps}

134: %   \epsfbox{/home/friese/tagung/ismd01/procs/kaon2.eps}

135:   \end{center}

136:   \vspace{-0.5cm}

137:   \caption{Full phase space $K/\pi$ ratio in Pb+Pb as a function of 

138: beam energy.}

139:   \label{fig:kaon2}

140:  \end{minipage}

141:  \hfill

142:  \begin{minipage} [t] {5.6cm}

143:   \begin{center}

144:    \leavevmode

145:    \epsfxsize5.6cm

146:    \epsfbox{phipt.eps}

147: %   \epsfbox{/home/friese/tagung/ismd01/procs/phipt.eps}

148:   \end{center}

149:   \vspace{-0.5cm}

150:   \caption{$\Phi_{pt}$ as a function of the number of participants at 158

151:  AGeV for two

152:   different rapidity ranges}

153:  \label{fig:phipt}

154:  \end{minipage}

155: \end{figure}

156: 

157: 

158: \subsection{Charge Fluctuations}

159: Event-by-event charge fluctuations have lately been proposed as a

160: signal of the quark-gluon plasma\cite{charge}. As a measure of these

161: fluctuations, we have determined $\tilde D = \langle N_{ch} \rangle \langle 

162: \delta R^2 \rangle / (C_\mu C_y)$, where $\langle\delta R^2\rangle$ denotes

163: the fluctuations

164: in the ratio of the numbers of positively and negatively charged hadrons,

165: as a function of the rapidity window $\Delta y$. 

166: We obtain similar values around 4 for all

167: three beam energies, corresponding to the expectation for an

168: uncorrelated pion gas, whereas a QGP was predicted to yield values 

169: between 1 and 2.

170: However, the correction factors $C_\mu$ and $C_y$, which account for the 

171: finite net charge within the acceptance and global charge 

172: conservation\cite{koch},

173: are still under debate; hence at the moment we do not draw a definite

174: conclusion from the data observed.

175: 

176: 

177: \section{System Size Dependence of Hadronic Observables}

178: 

179: \subsection{Kaon and $\phi$ Production}

180: The $\phi$ meson is measured in NA49\cite{phipaper} via the invariant mass of its

181: decay products $K^+K^-$.

182: When comparing the $\phi/\pi$ ratio in central collisions of light ions

183: to that in peripheral collisions of heavy nuclei, we find that the

184: number of participants may not be the right variable to characterise

185: the reaction, because it does not take into account the collision

186: geometry\cite{blume}. When using the variable $R-b/2$, with $R$ being the

187: nuclear radius and $b$ the impact parameter of the collision, we find a smooth evolution in $\phi$ enhancement when

188: going from p+p over C+C to peripheral and central Pb+Pb. 

189: The same is true when studying the $K/\pi$ ratio

190: in p+p, C+C, Si+Si and Pb+Pb at different centralities (fig.~\ref{fig:rb2}).

191: 

192: \begin{figure}[htp]

193:  \begin{center}

194:   \leavevmode

195:   \epsfxsize11.8cm

196:   \epsfbox{rb2.eps}

197: %  \epsfbox{/home/friese/tagung/ismd01/procs/rb2.eps}

198:  \end{center}

199:  \vspace{-0.5cm}

200:  \caption{$\phi/\pi$ (left) and $K/\pi$ (right) ratios for different collisions types

201:  at 158 AGeV as a function of $R-b/2$ ($\langle\pi^\pm\rangle

202: =(\langle\pi^+\rangle + \langle\pi^-\rangle)/2)$}

203:  \label{fig:rb2}

204: \end{figure}

205: 

206: 

207: 

208: \subsection{Mean $p_T$ fluctuations}

209: The observable $\Phi_{pt}$, measuring the non-statistical event-by-event

210: fluctuations in the mean $p_T$\cite{phipt}, has been studied by NA49

211: at 158 AGeV for the set of collision types mentioned in the previous

212: sections. Fig.~\ref{fig:phipt} gives the result as a function of $N_{part}$

213: for two different rapidity windows. At forward rapidity, we obtain

214: very small values of $\Phi_{pt}$, almost indepent of $N_{part}$.

215: Around midrapidity, however, we observe a rise in $\Phi_{pt}$ up to

216: $N_{part} \approx 100$, from where it stays constant up to central

217: Pb+Pb. This is contrary to the expectations, which suggest a decrease

218: in $\Phi_{pt}$ when going from elementary collisions to larger systems

219: where increasing equlibration suppresses the fluctuations. An 

220: interpretation of this findings is still lacking.

221: 

222: 

223: %\section*{Acknowledgments}

224: %\input authors.tex

225: 

226: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

227: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}

228: \def\NIM{\em Nucl.~Instrum.~Methods}

229: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl.~Instrum.~Methods}~A}

230: \def\NPA{{\em Nucl.~Phys.}~A}

231: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl.~Phys.}~B}

232: \def\PLB{{\em Phys.~Lett.}~B}

233: \def\PRL{\em Phys.~Rev.~Lett.}

234: \def\PRD{{\em Phys.~Rev.}~D}

235: \def\ZPC{{\em Z.~Phys.}~C}

236: \def\PRC{{\em Phys.~Rev.}~C}

237: \def\APP{{\em Acta Phys.~Pol.}~B}

238: \bibitem{qgp} R.~Stock, \Journal{\PLB}{456}{277}{1999}

239: \bibitem{na49} S.~V.~Afanfasiev {\it et al}, \Journal{\NIMA}{430}{210}{1999}

240: \bibitem{agskaon} L.~Ahle {\it et al}, \Journal{\PRD}{57}{466}{1998} \\

241: L.~Ahle {\it et al}, \Journal{\PRD}{58}{3523}{1998} \\

242: L.~Ahle {\it et al}, \Journal{\PLB}{476}{1}{2000}

243: \bibitem{agslambda} S.~Ahmad {\it et al}, \Journal{\PLB}{382}{35}{1996} \\

244: G.~Rai {\it et al}, \Journal{\NPA}{661}{162c}{1999}

245: \bibitem{marek} M.~Ga\'zdicki and M.~I.~Gorenstein, \Journal{\APP}{30}{2705}{1999}

246: \bibitem{charge} S.~Jeon and V.~Koch, \Journal{\PRL}{85}{2076}{2000}

247: \bibitem{koch} M.~Bleicher, S.~Leon and V.~Koch, \Journal{PRC}{62}{061902(R)}{2000}

248: \bibitem{phipaper} S.~V.~Afanasiev {\it et al.}, \Journal{\PLB}{491}{59}{2000}

249: \bibitem{blume} C.~Blume, Proceedings of {\em Quark Matter 2001}, to be published

250: \bibitem{phipt} M.~Ga\'zdicki and S.~Mr\'owczy\'nski, \Journal{\ZPC}{54}{127}{1992}

251: 

252: \end{thebibliography}

253: 

254: \end{document}

255: 

256: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

257: %% End of  ws-p8-50x6-00.tex  

258: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

259: 

260: