1: \documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}
2: %%\hoffset=-1.5cm
3: %\voffset=2.cm
4:
5: \oddsidemargin=-8mm
6: \topmargin=-90pt
7: \textwidth=180mm
8: \columnsep=4mm
9: \textheight=61pc
10: \tolerance=1000
11:
12: \input epsf
13:
14: \newcommand{\frat}[2]{\frac{\textstyle #1}{\textstyle #2}}
15: \newcommand{\dmn}[2]{\mbox{$#1\!\cdot\! 10^{#2}\,$}}
16: \newcommand{\xmn}[2]{\mbox{$#1\!\times\! 10^{#2}\,$}}
17: \newcommand{\vf}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
18: \newcommand{\nomer}[1]{\mbox{$\cal N$\hspace{-.5ex}\raisebox{.3ex}
19: {\underline{\tiny 0}$\!$} #1}}
20: \newcommand{\grpicture}[1]
21: {\epsfxsize=200pt
22: \hspace{10mm} \parbox{200pt}{\epsfbox{#1.ps}} \vspace{10mm}
23: }
24:
25: \begin{document}
26: \begin{center}
27: {\Large {\bf
28: Diquark condensate and quark interaction\\ with instanton liquid}}\\
29: \vspace{0.5cm}
30: S. V. Molodtsov, G. M. Zinovjev$^\dagger$\\
31: \vspace{0.5cm}
32: {\small\it State Research Center,
33: Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics,
34: 117259, Moscow, RUSSIA}\\
35: $^\dagger$
36: {\small \it
37: Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics,\\
38: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
39: UA-03143, Kiev, UKRAINE}
40: \end{center}
41: \vspace{0.5cm}
42: \begin{abstract}
43: The interaction of light quarks and instanton liquid is analyzed at finite
44: density of quark/baryon matter and in the phase of nonzero values of diquark
45: (colour) condensate. It is shown that instanton liquid perturbation produced
46: by such an interaction results in an essential increase of the critical value
47: of quark chemical potential $\mu_c$ which provokes the perceptible increase of
48: quark matter density around the expected onset of the colour
49: superconductivity phase.
50: \end{abstract}
51: \vspace{0.5cm}
52:
53: PACS: 11.15 Kc, 12.38-Aw
54: \\
55: \\
56: %\newpage
57: %\baselineskip 0.9cm
58: %\noindent
59:
60: \vspace{0.5cm}
61: \noindent
62: The intriguing history of studying the structure of strongly interacting matter
63: abounded in many interesting but somewhat contradictory phenomenological
64: results up to the advent of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Since the time of its
65: discovery the possible existence of quark-gluon plasma (QGP) phase is one of
66: the most fundamental predictions of QCD. This phase is phenomenologically
67: understood as a matter state where quarks and gluons being under extreme
68: conditions of high temperature (T) and(or) quark/baryon density (driven by the
69: corresponding chemical potential $\mu$) are able to propagate relatively freely
70: over the considerable (of course, on the hadron scale) distances. Even the
71: simplest quantitative estimates of QGP physical characteristics were so
72: verysimilar that they allowed to launch the process of QGP experimental study
73: in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. And although the first series of
74: experiments at SPS CERN and AGS BNL have provided us with encouraging
75: results a new generation of experiments is necessary to make convincing
76: conclusions. The physical programme for new experimental research certainly
77: needs serious quantitative analysis of the QCD phase diagram.
78:
79: It seemed lattice QCD could be able to resolve the problem starting even on
80: the first theoretical principles. However, up to now this approach was
81: effective and apparently reliable in producing the results mainly around the
82: temperature axis of the ($\mu$---T)-plane and, unfortunately, relies on the
83: field theory formulation in imaginary time. Nevertheless, lattice QCD has
84: corraborated the phenomenological expectations that its phase structure is
85: quite rich \cite{karsh}. In particular, nowadays we know that the chiral
86: symmetry of initial QCD Lagrangian becomes broken and the quarks are getting
87: to be confined when the temperature decreases below a critical value. Moreover,
88: the lattice calculations show us that both physical phenomena result from the
89: corresponding phase transitions and their critical temperatures practically
90: coincide. The latter observation indicates that both fundamental phenomena
91: could be tightly knitted and it should heuristically play an important role to
92: illuminate the confinement mechanism.
93:
94: The features of the QCD matter at high baryon densities remains poorly
95: understood in spite of the recent splash of renewed activity \cite{0}. One of
96: the major theoretical reasons comes from serious technical difficulties of
97: lattice simulations with Monte-Carlo techniques due to the complex fermion
98: determinant in QCD at finite quark densities. From the phenomenological side
99: the recent experimental data are not very informative for developing the
100: theory in this direction. It is clear that present and future experiments with
101: heavy ions at higher and higher energies should produce the strong interacting
102: matter rather at higher temperature and closer to the temperature axis of the
103: ($\mu$---T)-plane. In such a situation the phenomenological treatment of
104: studying along the $\mu$-axis should basically rely on the astrophysical
105: observations of the compact stars. In the meantime, it was demonstrated that
106: the diquark pairing in colour anti-triplet attractive channel induced by the
107: instanton interaction vertex should be much more effective than an one-gluon
108: exchange and at sufficiently large quark/baryon densities and small T could
109: lead to colour superconductivity and a sophisticated picture of the QCD phase
110: diagram \cite{0}.
111:
112: The present paper continues our preceding one \cite{mz} where the light quark
113: interactions with the instanton liquid (IL) at nonzero values of quark/baryon
114: chemical potentials were investigated in the phase of broken chiral symmetry
115: within the improved method of calculating the generating function of the IL
116: theory \cite{we0}. The new treatment of the functional integral is mainly
117: related to take into account the IL back-reaction upon the quark presence
118: which was always considered negligible. In fact, this effect is pretty weak
119: and should manifest itself in the leading order of expansion in the effective
120: coupling. Nevertheless, it was qualitatively argued that the interaction of IL
121: and quarks could increase the quark matter density around the onset of
122: expected colour superconductivity. As known \cite{diakcar}, \cite{rapp} this
123: density occurred to be surprisingly small ($n_q\sim 0.062~{\mbox{fm}}^{-3}$)
124: and, hence, the diquark phase would come to play already at the density of
125: nuclear matter ($n_n\simeq 0.45~{\mbox{fm}}^{-3}$ and quark matter density is
126: taken to be three times larger than the conventional nuclear one).
127:
128: Here we obtain the quantitative estimate of the corresponding critical
129: chemical potential $\mu_c$ analyzing the system of the Gorkov equations for
130: the colour superconductor which we further calculate. We do not introduce any
131: simplification of the initial Lagrangian trying to deal with the 'exact'
132: four-quark interaction which is generated by (anti-)instantons. Such an
133: intention is simply compulsory because it is dictated by the precision of
134: problem where the effects of the IL perturbation are expected to be of the
135: same order of magnitude compared to the terms which could usually be
136: ignored.
137:
138: Let us point out that in the IL approach \cite{2} the generating functional has
139: the following factorized form
140: $$
141: {\cal Z}~=~{\cal Z}_g~\cdot~{\cal Z}_\psi~.
142: $$
143: Here the first factor provides us with information on the gluon condensate
144: whereas the fermion factor ${\cal Z}_\psi$ serve to describe the quark
145: practice in the instanton environment \cite{diakcar}, \cite{2}. In what follows
146: we use the notations of Ref. \cite{mz} where the dimensionless variables
147: (motivated by the form of interquark interaction kernel) were introduced, for
148: example, for the chemical potential it looks like $\mu\to \mu\bar\rho/2$ and
149: for the momenta $k_i\bar\rho/2 \to k_i,~i=1, \dots, 4$ where $\bar\rho$ is
150: the average size of pseudoparticle (PP). The quark determinant ${\cal Z}_\psi$
151: may be transformed with the auxiliary integration over the parameter $\lambda$
152: to the following form (for the colour $SU(3)$ group with the quarks of two
153: flavours $N_f=2$):
154: \begin{eqnarray}
155: \label{1}
156: &&{\cal Z}_\psi\simeq\int d\lambda~\int D\psi^\dagger D\psi~\exp\left\{
157: n\bar\rho^4\left(\ln\frat{n\bar\rho^4}{\lambda~N}-1\right)\right\}
158: \times\nonumber\\
159: %[-.2cm]
160: %\\[-.25cm]
161: &&\times\exp\left\{\int \frat{dk}{\pi^4}~\sum_{f=1}^{2}\psi^\dagger_{f}(k)
162: ~2~(-\hat k-i\hat\mu)\psi_{f}(k)+V\right\}~,%\nonumber
163: \\
164: &&V=2\lambda~(\psi^{\dagger L}_1~L_1~\psi_1^{L})
165: (\psi^{\dagger L}_2~L_2~\psi_2^{L})+
166: 2\lambda~(\psi^{\dagger R}_1~R_1~\psi_1^{R})
167: (\psi^{\dagger R}_2~R_2~\psi_2^{R})~,\nonumber
168: \end{eqnarray}
169: where $\psi_f^{T}=(\psi_f^{R},\psi_f^{L}),~f=1,2$ are the quark fields with the
170: spinors of definite chirality,
171: $\psi_f^{L,R}=P_\pm~\psi_f,~P_\pm=\frat{1\pm\gamma_5}{2}$, $n$ is the IL
172: density, $\mu_\nu=({\vf 0},\mu)$ and $N$ is the normalizing factor. For clarity
173: we take it to be equal a unity but, in principle, it could play a role of free
174: model parameter. This factor is inessential for the models with the fixed
175: value of the packing fraction parameter $n\bar\rho^4$ but in the model where
176: it is admissible for variation the weak logarithmic dependence on N appears.
177: The factors $2$ in Eq. (\ref{1}) come with making use of the dimensionless
178: variables. The term of four-fermion quark interaction $V$ may be directly
179: expressed with the chiral components as
180: $$(\psi^{\dagger L}_f~L_f~\psi_f^{L})=
181: \int \frat{dp_f dq_f}{\pi^8}~\psi^{\dagger L}_{f\alpha_f i_f}(p_f)~
182: L_{\alpha_f i_f}^{\beta_f j_f}(p_f,q_f;\mu)~\psi_f^{L\beta_f j_f}(q_f)~,$$
183: it being known that for the right hand fields the substitution $L \to R$
184: should be performed. The kernels $L_{\alpha_f i_f}^{\beta_f j_f}$ are defined
185: by the functions $h_i,~i=1, \dots, 4$ and the zero modes (the solutions of the
186: Dirac equation with the chemical potential $\mu$ in the PP field)
187: \begin{eqnarray}
188: h_4(k_4,k;\mu)&=&\frat{\pi}{4 k}
189: \{(k-\mu-ik_4)[(2k_4+i\mu)f^{-}_{1}+i(k-\mu-ik_4)f^{-}_2]+\nonumber\\
190: &+&(k+\mu+ik_4)[(2k_4+i\mu)f^{+}_{1}-i(k+\mu+ik_4)f^{+}_2]\}~,\nonumber
191: \end{eqnarray}
192: \begin{eqnarray}
193: h_i(k_4,k;\mu)&=&\frat{\pi~k_i}{4 k^2}
194: \left\{(2k-\mu)(k-\mu-ik_4)f^{-}_{1}+(2k+\mu)(k+\mu+ik_4)f^{+}_1+
195: \right.\nonumber\\
196: &+&\left[2(k-\mu)(k-\mu-ik_4)-\frat{1}{k}(\mu+ik_4)[k_4^{2}+(p-\mu)^2]
197: \right]f^{-}_{2}+\nonumber\\
198: &+&\left.
199: \left[2(k+\mu)(k+\mu+ik_4)+\frat{1}{k}(\mu+ik_4)[k_4^{2}+(p+\mu)^2]
200: \right]f^{+}_{2}\right\}~,\nonumber
201: \end{eqnarray}
202: where $k=|{\vf k}|$ if the spatial components of 4-vector $k_\nu$ are
203: considered and
204: $$f_1^{\pm}=
205: \frat{I_1(z^\pm)K_0(z^\pm)-I_0(z^\pm)K_1(z^\pm)}
206: {z^\pm}~,\\
207: f_2^{\pm}=\frat{I_1(z^\pm)K_1(z^\pm)}{z^2_{\pm}}~,~~
208: z^\pm=\frat{\rho}{2}\sqrt{k_4^{2}+(k\pm\mu)^2}~,
209: $$
210: with the modified Bessel functions $I_i,~K_i~(i=0,1)$.
211: Let us introduce the scalar function $h(k_4,k;\mu)$ related to
212: three-dimensional component
213: $h_i(k_4,k;\mu)=h(k_4,k;\mu)~\frat{k_i}{k}~,i=1,2,3$
214: (we omit the arguments of functions $h_i$ when it does not mislead).
215: $$L_{\alpha i}^{\beta j}(p,q;\mu)=S^{i k}(p;\mu)
216: \epsilon^{k l}~U^{\alpha}_{l}~U^{\dagger\sigma}_{\beta}
217: \epsilon^{\sigma n}S^{+}_{n j}(q;-\mu)~,
218: $$
219: $S(p;\mu)=(p+i\mu)^{-}~h^{+}(p;\mu)~,~~
220: S^+(p;-\mu)=\stackrel{*}h\!\!{^{-}}(p;-\mu)(p+i\mu)^{+}$ where it is valid
221: for the conjugated function $\stackrel{*}h_\mu(p;-\mu)=h_\mu(p;\mu)$ and
222: $\epsilon$ is an antisymmetric matrix with $\epsilon_{12}=-\epsilon_{21}=1$.
223: Here $p^\pm$ and other similar designations are used for the four-vectors
224: spanned by $\sigma^\pm_{\nu}$-matrices,
225: $\sigma^{\pm}_\mu=(\pm i{\vf \sigma},1),$ (${\vf \sigma}$ is the three-vector
226: of the Pauli matrices), for example, $p^\pm=p^\nu\sigma^\pm_{\nu}$ and
227: $U$ is a matrix of rotations in the colour space.
228: The similar relations are valid for the right hand components
229: $$(\psi^{\dagger R}_f~R_f~\psi_f^{R})=
230: \int \frat{dp_f dq_f}{\pi^8}~\psi^{\dagger R}_{f\alpha_f i_f}(p_f)~
231: R_{\alpha_f i_f}^{\beta_f j_f}(p_f,q_f;\mu)~\psi_f^{R\beta_f j_f}(q_f)~,$$
232: with the kernel
233: $$R_{\alpha i}^{\beta j}(p,q;\mu)=T^{ik}(p;\mu)
234: \epsilon^{k l}~U^{\alpha}_{l}~U^{\dagger\sigma}_{\beta}
235: \epsilon^{\sigma n}T^{+}_{n j}(q;-\mu)~,
236: $$
237: where $T(p;\mu)=(p+i\mu)^{+}~h^{-}(p;\mu)~,~~
238: T^+(p;-\mu)=\stackrel{*}h\!\!{^{+}}(p;-\mu)(p+i\mu)^{-}$.
239: The components of matrices $(p+i\mu)^{\pm}$ and $h^{\mp}(p;\mu)$ commute
240: because the vector-function ${\vf h}(p)$ is spanned by the vector ${\vf p}$
241: only. Then the following identities are easily understood
242: $$T(p;\mu)=S^{+}(p;-\mu)~,~~T^+(p;-\mu)=S(p;\mu)~.$$
243: In what follows we omit the $\mu$-dependence of matrices $T,~T^+$ as the
244: chemical
245: potential enters the matrix $T$ being always positive and the matrix $T^+$
246: being negative only. Besides, two other identities would also be helpful
247: $$\sigma_2 T^{T}(p)\sigma_2=T^+(p)~,~~
248: \sigma_2 T^{+ T}(p)\sigma_2=T(p)~,
249: $$
250: where $T^T$ means a transposed matrix.
251:
252: Dealing with the following averages interesting to study the diquark
253: condensates (\ref{1})
254: $$
255: \langle\psi^{L,R}_{1\alpha i}(p)\psi^{L,R}_{2\beta j}(q)\rangle=
256: \epsilon_{12}~\epsilon_{\alpha\beta}~\pi^4~\delta(p+q)~F^{L,R}_{ij}(p)~,
257: $$
258: $$
259: \langle\psi^{L}_{f\alpha i}(p)\psi^{\dagger R}_{g\beta j}(q)\rangle=
260: \delta_{fg}~\delta_{\alpha\beta}~\pi^4~\delta(p-q)~G^{LR}_{ij}(p)~,
261: $$
262: and making use of the effective action of Eq. (\ref{1}) one may obtain the
263: Gorkov equations similar to ones treated in Ref. \cite{rapp}
264: \begin{eqnarray}
265: \label{2}
266: &&\left[G_{0}^{+}(p)\right]^{-1}~F^L(p)-\Sigma^R(p)~G^{LR~T}(-p)=0~,
267: \nonumber\\
268: &&\left[G_{0}^{+}(p)\right]^{-1}~G^{LR}(p)-
269: \Sigma^R(p)~F^{+R~T}(p)=1~,
270: \nonumber\\
271: [-.2cm]
272: \\[-.25cm]
273: &&\left[G_{0}^{-}(p)\right]^{-1}~F^R(p)-
274: \Sigma^L(p)~G^{RL~T}(-p)=0~,\nonumber\\
275: &&\left[G_{0}^{-}(p)\right]^{-1}~G^{RL}(p)-
276: \Sigma^L(p)~F^{+L~T}(p)=1~,\nonumber
277: \end{eqnarray}
278: where $\left[G_0^{\pm}(p)\right]^{-1}=-2~(p+i\mu)^\pm$ means the free Green
279: function, $\Sigma^{R}(p)=\Delta^{R}~T(p)~\epsilon~T^{T}(-p)$,
280: $\Sigma^{L}(p)=\Delta^{L}~T^{+}(p)~\epsilon~T^{+T}(-p)$ and
281: $\Delta^{L,R}$ denotes a gap. The form of $\Sigma$-matrices results from the
282: kernel structure of equations if averaging over colour orientations done
283: (remember that we consider colour stochastic ensemble). In order to complete
284: Eqs. (\ref{2}) we need the following gap equations
285: $$\epsilon \Delta^{R}=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~
286: \int \frat{dq}{\pi^4} \left[T^{+}(q)~F^{R}(q)~T^{+T}(-q)-
287: T^{+}(-q)~F^{R~T}(q)~T^{+T}(q) \right]~,
288: $$
289: $$\epsilon \Delta^{L}=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~
290: \int \frat{dq}{\pi^4} \left[T(q)~F^{L}(q)~T^{T}(-q)-
291: T(-q)~F^{L~T}(q)~T^{T}(q) \right]~.
292: $$
293: Apparently, the right hand sides of these equations are proportional $\epsilon$
294: because they are the differences a matrix and its transposed form. Similar
295: equations are valid for the conjugated matrices
296: \begin{eqnarray}
297: \label{3}
298: F^{+L~T}(p)&\left[G_{0}^{-}(p)\right]^{-1}&-G^{RL~T}(-p)~\Sigma^{+R}(p)=0~,
299: \nonumber\\
300: G^{RL}(p)&\left[G_{0}^{-}(p)\right]^{-1}&-
301: F^R(p)~\Sigma^{+R}(p)=1~,
302: \nonumber\\
303: [-.2cm]
304: \\[-.25cm]
305: F^{+R~T}(p)&\left[G_{0}^{+}(p)\right]^{-1}&-
306: G^{LR~T}(-p)~\Sigma^{+L}(p)=0~,\nonumber\\
307: G^{LR}(p)&\left[G_{0}^{+}(p)\right]^{-1}&-
308: F^L(p)~\Sigma^{+L}(p)=1~,\nonumber
309: \end{eqnarray}
310: with the corresponding gap equations
311: $$\epsilon \Delta^{+R}=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~
312: \int \frat{dq}{\pi^4} \left[T^{T}(-q)~F^{+R~T}(q)~T(q)-
313: T^{T}(q)~F^{+R}(q)~T(-q) \right]~,
314: $$
315: $$\epsilon \Delta^{+L}=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~
316: \int \frat{dq}{\pi^4} \left[T^{+T}(-q)~F^{+L~T}(q)~T^{+}(q)-
317: T^{+T}(q)~F^{+L}(q)~T^{+}(-q) \right]~,
318: $$
319: where $\Sigma^{+R}(p)=\Delta^{+R}~T^{+T}(-p)~\epsilon~T^{+}(p)$ and
320: $\Sigma^{+L}(p)=\Delta^{+L}~T^{T}(-p)~\epsilon~T(p)$.
321: In this paper we limit ourselves to treating the diquark condensate only.
322: However,
323: as known \cite{rapp} the mixed phase of non-zero values both chiral and colour
324: condensates could exist at $\mu_c\sim 300~{\mbox{MeV}}$ realizing the
325: transitional regime for the onset of colour superconducting phase. In order to
326: bring this phase to the play the equation system should be extended including
327: another averages as
328: $$
329: \langle\psi^{L,R}_{f\alpha i}(p)\psi^{\dagger L,R}_{g\beta j}(q)\rangle=
330: \delta_{fg}~\delta_{\alpha\beta}~\pi^4~\delta(p-q)~G^{LL,RR}_{ij}(p)~.
331: $$
332:
333: From the Eqs. (\ref{2}) and (\ref{3}) we find
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: G^{LR}(p)&=&G_0^{+}(p)+G_0^{+}(p)~\Sigma^R(p)~F^{+R~T}(p)~,
336: \nonumber\\
337: F^{+R~T}(p)&=&G^{LR~T}(-p)~\Sigma^{+L}(p)~G_0^{+}(p)~.
338: \nonumber
339: \end{eqnarray}
340: With the auxiliary matrices $C^{+L}(p)=\Delta^{+L}~T^{+}(-p)~T(p)$,
341: $C^{R}(p)=\Delta^{R}~T(p)~T^{+}(-p)$ we may rewrite the matrices $\Sigma$ as
342: $$\Sigma^{+L}(p)=\epsilon~C^{+L}(p)~,~~\Sigma^{R}(p)=C^{R}(p)~\epsilon~.
343: $$
344: The identities for $T$-matrix mentioned above help to show the validity of
345: the relations
346: $$\epsilon~C^{+L~T}(-p)~\epsilon^T=C^{+L}(p)~,$$
347: $$\epsilon~C^{R~T}(-p)~\epsilon^T=C^{R}(p)~.$$
348: And for the Green function we have
349: $$G^{LR}(p)=G_0^{+}(p)+G_0^{+}(p)~C^{R}(p)~\epsilon~G^{LR~T}(-p)~\epsilon~
350: C^{+L}(p)~G_0^{+}(p)~.
351: $$
352: Combining the properties of $C$ matrices together with the identities for free
353: Green functions
354: $$\sigma_2~G_0^{\pm T}(p)~\sigma_2=~G_0^{\mp}(p)~,
355: $$
356: we are able to get the complete equation for calculating the function $G^{LR}$
357: in the form
358: $$\epsilon~G^{LR}(-p)~\epsilon^T=
359: G_0^{-}(-p)+G_0^{-}(-p)~C^{+L}(p)~G^{LR}(p)~C^{R}(p)~G_0^{-}(-p)~.$$
360: The vector-function ${\vf{ h}}(p)$ being spanned by the vector ${\vf{ p}}$
361: helps to conclude that all the matrices $G_0^{\pm}$, $C^{+L}$, $C^R$ commute
362: with each other. Then searching the solution for the Green function
363: $G^{LR}$ by iterating one finds immediately that the Green function commutes
364: with those matrices and finally obtains the equation to calculate it in the
365: form
366: $$G^{LR}(p)=[1+H(p)]~G_0^{+}(p)+H^2(p)~G^{LR}(p)~,$$
367: or
368: $$[1-H(p)]~G^{LR}(p)=G_0^{+}(p)~,
369: $$
370: where $H(p)=G_0^{+}(p)~C^R(p)~G_0^{-}(-p)~C^{+L}(p)$.
371:
372: The structure of matrices $H(p)$ allows us to conclude that their sum
373: $$H(p)+H(-p)=\alpha(p)~$$
374: and product
375: $$H(p)~H(-p)=\beta(p)~,$$
376: are proportional to the unity matrices (it is clear by definition that
377: $\alpha(-p)=\alpha(p),~\beta(-p)=\beta(p)$).
378:
379: Introducing notation $g_\nu=h_\nu(-p)$ we are able to present the functions
380: $\alpha(p)$ and $\beta(p)$ in the compact form as
381: $$\alpha(p)=4~\Delta^R~\Delta^{+L}~[-4~A(p)~(hg)+2~(p^2+\mu^2)~(h^2)~(g^2)]~,
382: $$
383: where
384: $$A(p)=(p^2+\mu^2)~(hg)-2i~\mu~p(g_4 h-h_4 g)~.
385: $$
386: and a scalar product is naturally defined $(hg)=\sum_{i=1}^4 h_i g_i$
387: together with the functions $(h^2)$ and $(g^2)$ squared. Getting the last term
388: of $A(p)$ we used the designation of scalar function ${\vf h}$ mentioned above
389: and for the function $\beta$ we have
390: $$\beta(p)=16~\left(\Delta^R\right)^2~
391: \left(\Delta^{+L}\right)^2~\left(p^2+\mu^2\right)^2~(h^2)^2~(g^2)^2~.
392: $$
393:
394: As both functions $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are spanned by the unit matrices the
395: solution for the Green function may be given in
396: $$G^{LR}(p)=\frat{G_0^{+}(p)~[1-H(-p)]}{1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p)}~.
397: $$
398: The gap equation then looks like
399: \begin{equation}
400: \label{gap}
401: \Delta^L=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c (N_c-1)}~\int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~
402: \frat{\alpha(p)-2~\beta(p)}{\Delta^{+L}(1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p)}~.
403: \end{equation}
404: We are interested in the solution of the form
405: $\Delta^{R}=\Delta^{+L}=\Delta^{L}=\Delta^{+R}$ at $\lambda<0$,
406: which is dictated by the symmetries of four-quark interaction kernels. Let us
407: remember that any kernel for every quark sort traditionally carries the
408: imaginary unit factor $i$ \cite{2}, \cite{dp2}. The sign choice of $\lambda$
409: relies on this fact but, in principle, there is an alternative
410: $\Delta^{R}=\Delta^{+L}=-\Delta^{L}=-\Delta^{+R}$ for $\lambda>0$, if the
411: kernels are redefined. An analysis shows that the denominator of
412: Eq. (\ref{gap})
413: is always positive and, therefore, the solution of this equation does exist at
414: pretty large $\lambda$.
415:
416: The quark matter state at finite chemical potential is defined by the saddle
417: point of functional Eq. (\ref{1}) which we treat further maintaining the
418: first nonvanishing contribution which is the figure-eight type diagram
419: (see, for example, \cite{diakcar}),
420: $$I=2~(N_c-1)~\int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~
421: \frat{\alpha(p)-2~\beta(p)}{1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p)}~.
422: $$
423: In our consideration this contribution to the generating functional
424: ($Z_\psi\sim e^{W}$) would occur to be
425: \begin{equation}
426: \label{GZ}
427: W=-n\bar\rho^4~\ln\lambda+\lambda~\langle Y\rangle~,
428: ~~\langle Y\rangle\simeq I~.
429: \end{equation}
430: For the simplest situation of constant IL density the saddle point equation
431: reads
432: $$n\bar\rho^4-\lambda~\langle Y\rangle=0~.
433: $$
434: Comparing it with the gap equation Eq. (\ref{gap}) one could notice the
435: peculiar feature which is very practical to keep numerical calculations under
436: control. The saddle point equation leads to the condition of gap independent
437: of $\mu$.
438:
439: It was demonstrated in Refs. \cite{we0}, \cite{we} that the quark backreaction
440: upon IL could be perturbatively estimated by studying the small variations of
441: the IL parameters $\delta n$ and $\delta \rho$ around their equilibrium values
442: $n$ and $\bar\rho$. Such variations are incorporated by the IL theory if the
443: deformable (crumpled) (anti~-~)\-in\-stan\-tons of size $\rho$, being
444: the function of
445: $x$ and $z$, i.e. $\rho\to\rho(x,z)$, are treated as the saturating
446: configurations of the functional integral. In addition, the variations of zero
447: modes in the interaction vertices of quark determinant at the transformation
448: $\bar\rho \to \bar\rho+\delta\rho$ should be taken into account. Then as the
449: output we have that for the long wave length excitations (for example,
450: $\pi$-mesons) the deformation field describes colourless scalar excitations of
451: IL with the mass gap $M$ of the order of several hundreds MeV,
452: $M^2=\frat{\nu}{\kappa}$ where $\nu=\frat{b-4}{2}$, $b=\frat{11~N_c-2~N_f}{3}$,
453: $\kappa$ is the kinetic coefficient being derived within the quasi-classical
454: approach. $N_c$ and $N_f$ are the numbers of quark colours and flavours,
455: respectively. Our estimates give for this coefficient value of a few single
456: instanton actions $\beta=8\pi^2/g^2$, i.e. $\kappa\sim c~\beta$
457: (with the factor $c\sim 1.5$ --- $6$ according to the ansatz taken for the
458: saturating configurations) \cite{we}.
459:
460: Then, besides the diagrams with four legs (see, the term $V$ in (\ref{1}))
461: the extra diagrams with the scalar field attached (relatively speaking, the
462: derivative in $\rho$ of the vertex function in which the variation of the
463: functions describing the zero mode
464: \begin{equation}
465: \label{4}
466: h_i\to h_i+\frat{\partial h_i}{\partial \rho}~\delta\rho~,~~
467: i=1, \dots, 4~,
468: \end{equation}
469: should be performed) are generated. Due to the diquark condensate presence
470: handling the Lagrangian is substantially simplified if one
471: restricts oneself with the leading contributions coming from the tadpole
472: diagrams. Indeed, the leading contributions come from the term $V$ and the
473: term shown in Fig. 1 where two vertices are linked with the propagator
474: $\frat{1}{M^2}$ of scalar field.
475:
476: \begin{figure}[htb]
477: %\grpicture{eight}
478: \centerline{\epsfig{file=1.eps,width=5.cm}}
479: \vspace*{-.1 cm}
480: \caption{The diagram of tadpole approach (see, the text).
481: The solid (dashed) lines correspond to the fermion (scalar) field.}
482: \end{figure}
483:
484:
485: Analyzing the modified Lagrangian it is easy to see that the form of
486: the Gorkov equations would be the same if everywhere $\Sigma$ is meant as an
487: improved one $\Sigma+\delta\Sigma$ in which the correction $\delta\Sigma$
488: is constructed with the modified functions Eq. (\ref{4}). Moreover, the
489: result for the Green function is formally the same if the modified
490: functions $\Sigma$ are meant. In particular, the form of gap equation is also
491: retained because its kernel includes again the differences of the matrices
492: which are constructed from the derivatives in $\rho$ of matrices $T,~T^{+}$
493: and their transposed forms. This difference is spanned by the unit vector as
494: well. However, the following substitutions
495: $$\alpha(p)\to\alpha(p)+\delta\alpha(p)~,$$
496: $$\beta(p)\to\beta(p)+\delta\beta(p)~,$$
497: where
498: $$\delta\alpha(p)=J~\frat{\partial \alpha}{\partial\rho}~,$$
499: $$\delta\beta(p)=J~\frat{\partial \beta}{\partial\rho}~,$$
500: are supposed to be performed and here $J$ is the contribution of figure-eight
501: type diagram with the scalar field propagator as an external leg
502: $$J=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~\frat{1}{n\bar\rho^4\kappa}
503: \frat{1}{4 M^2}~I~.
504: $$
505: Let us mention that effectively a dependence on the kinetic term $\kappa$
506: disappears (remember that $M^2=\frat{\nu}{\kappa}$) and its precise value is
507: not operative in the approximation
508: developed. The derivative of the figure-eight type diagram which will shortly
509: be necessary to proceed looks like
510: $$\frat{\partial I}{\partial \rho}=2~(N_c-1)~\int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~
511: \left\{\frat{1-\beta(p)}{(1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p))^2}~\delta \alpha(p)+
512: \frat{\alpha(p)-2}{(1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p))^2}~\delta \beta(p)\right\}~.
513: $$
514: And finally the modification of generating functional should be accommodated
515: bringing Eq. (\ref{GZ}) to the form
516: $$W=-n\bar\rho^4~\left(\ln\frat{n\bar\rho^4}{\lambda}-1\right)+
517: \lambda~\langle Y\rangle~.$$
518: Then the new (if the variation of the IL density is absorbed) equation to
519: calculate the saddle point reads
520: $$n\bar\rho^4-\lambda~(n\bar\rho^4)'\ln\frat{n\bar\rho^4}{|\lambda|}-
521: \lambda~\langle Y\rangle=0~.
522: $$
523: and the IL density is \cite{we0}
524: \begin{equation}
525: \label{ilden}
526: n\bar\rho^4=\frat{\nu}{2\beta\xi^2}+
527: \left[\left(\frat{\nu}{2\beta\xi^2}\right)^2+
528: \frat{\left(\frat{\delta I}{\delta\rho}\right)^{'}}{\beta \xi^2}~
529: \frat{\Gamma(\nu+1/2)}{2\sqrt{\nu}~\Gamma(\nu)}
530: \right]^{1/2}~,
531: \end{equation}
532: where the prime available means the derivative in $\lambda$, the constant
533: $\xi^2=\frat{27}{4}\frat{N_c}{N_c^{2}-1} \pi^2$
534: is a measure of interaction in the stochastic ensemble of PPs with an average
535: size as\\
536: $\bar\rho\Lambda=\exp\left\{-\frat{2N_c}{2\nu-1}\right\}$.
537: The derivative in $\lambda$ of the figure-eight type diagram looks like
538: $$\left(\frat{\delta I}{\delta \rho}\right)^{'}=
539: 4~(N_c-1)\frat{\Delta^{'}}{\Delta}~
540: \int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~\left\{
541: \frat{1+\alpha-6\beta+\alpha\beta+\beta^2}
542: {(1-\alpha+\beta)^3}~\delta \alpha+
543: \frat{-4+7\alpha+4\beta-\alpha\beta-\alpha^2}
544: {(1-\alpha+\beta)^3}~\delta \beta\right\}~
545: $$
546: and the derivative $\Delta^{'}$ is defined by the following equation
547: $$\frat{N_c (N_c-1)}{2\lambda^2}=\frat{2\Delta^{'}}{\Delta^3}
548: \int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~
549: \frat{2\beta-2\beta^2+2\alpha\beta-\alpha^2}
550: {(1-\alpha+\beta)^2}~.
551: $$
552:
553: \begin{figure}[htb]
554: %\grpicture{diqmevtd}
555: \centerline{\epsfig{file=2.eps,width=6.8cm}}
556: \vspace*{-.1 cm}
557: \caption{The saddle point $\lambda$ as the function of
558: chemical potential $\mu$ at $N_c=3$ and $N_f=2$.
559: The solid lines correspond to the phase of broken chiral symmetry (the lower
560: one absorbs the IL perturbation). The dashed lines correspond to the colour
561: superconductivity phase (the left hand one does not include the tadpole
562: contribution whereas the right hand one does.}
563: \end{figure}
564:
565:
566: Fig. 2 shows the results of calculating the parameter $\lambda$ (which is
567: proportional to the free energy within the precision of one loop approximation)
568: as the function of chemical potential at $N_c = 3, N_f = 2.$ The dashed lines
569: expose a behaviour in the phase of nonzero values of diquark condensate (the
570: left hand line (lower line) corresponds to the calculations if the quark
571: interaction with
572: IL is ignored) whereas the solid lines show the behaviours in the phase of
573: broken chiral symmetry (upper line for the quark interaction with IL ignored)
574: \cite{mz}. The saddle point parameter
575: $\lambda_1$ of Ref. \cite{mz} and that exploited in the present paper are
576: related as
577: $\lambda_1^{2}=-\frat{\lambda~n\bar\rho^4}{2(N_c-1)N_c}$.
578: The crossing points of the curves are fixing the onset of colour
579: superconducting phase. As mentioned above, actually, there is a transitional
580: region of mixed phase where both chiral and diquark condensates develop
581: non-zero magnitudes and the descent is not so steep. However, these details
582: are inessential for further discussion. What is more interesting to be noticed
583: comes from the crossing point of lower solid and dashed lines positioned
584: on the plot.
585:
586: \begin{figure}[htb]
587: %\grpicture{den1}
588: \centerline{\epsfig{file=3.eps,width=6.8cm}}
589: \vspace*{-.1 cm}
590: \caption{The quark density being defined by the crossing point of the upper
591: solid and left hand dashed lines in Fig. 2. The solid line corresponds to the
592: stable phase and the dashed one corresponds to the metastable one.}
593: \end{figure}
594:
595:
596: The first crossing point (along the $\mu$-axis) which corresponds
597: to the approach without the tadpole contributions included looks to be slightly
598: larger in magnitude than that obtained earlier $\mu_c\simeq 300~{\mbox{MeV}}$
599: in Refs. \cite{diakcar}, \cite{rapp}. However, it does not signal about
600: shifting the critical point to larger values of $\mu$ in the approach dealing
601: with the initial Lagrangian. The IL parameters of various approaches are
602: sometimes slightly different and, in principle, could be optimized fitting,
603: for example, $\Lambda_{QCD}$. Thus, the shift of $\mu_c$ value pointed out is
604: well within a precision of the IL theory. Regarding the second crossing point
605: (when IL is perturbed by quarks) the conclusion could be more indicative. Here
606: $\mu_á$ becomes significantly larger. The corresponding quark matter densities
607: as the functions of chemical potential for both approaches are depicted in
608: Fig. 3 and Fig. 4. Apparently, on both plots the density values corresponding
609: to the onset of colour superconductivity phase are noticeably larger than the
610: density of normal nuclear matter. Perhaps, our result could be taken as a
611: general indication on the considerable role of supplementary (insignificant
612: on the instanton background) interactions of light quarks. They are able to
613: change the estimate of critical density for colour diquark condensation
614: drastically.
615:
616: \begin{figure}[htb]
617: %\grpicture{den2}
618: \centerline{\epsfig{file=4.eps,width=6.8cm}}
619: \vspace*{-.1 cm}
620: \caption{The quark density being defined by the crossing point of the lower
621: solid and left hand dashed lines in Fig. 2. The solid line corresponds to the
622: stable phase and the dashed one corresponds to the metastable one.}
623: \end{figure}
624:
625:
626: Now we would like to comment on the crossing point of upper dashed and lower
627: solid lines which is not shown in Fig. 2. It corresponds the unrealistic values
628: of $\mu_á$ and in that region the IL is hardly applicable. One of the limits
629: for IL approach coming from the very large values of chemical potential points
630: out that with quark matter density increasing the average interquark distances
631: may become very small and the 'Coulomb' (perturbative) field strengths would
632: occur to be comparable with the (anti-)instanton ones. Then the
633: (anti-)instanton superposition is not a proper configuration to saturate the
634: functional integral. Thus, our conclusion resulting from the approach
635: developed gives a message that the quark perturbation of IL leads
636: the corresponding curves to move apart inherent in the phases of non-zero
637: values of diquark
638: and chiral condensates in Fig. 2. The 'chiral' curve becomes steeper but
639: 'diquark' curve is displaced to the larger values of $\mu$ increasing its
640: critical value. It looks like giving more reliability to our understanding of
641: the perturbative fields role in the IL theory could provide us with more
642: accurate estimates for the phenomena considered.
643:
644: \begin{figure}[htb]
645: %\grpicture{dencomtd}
646: \centerline{\epsfig{file=5.eps,width=6.8cm}}
647: \vspace*{-.1 cm}
648: \caption{ The IL density for the approach at $N_c=3$ and $N_f=2$. The solid
649: line corresponds to the calculation in the phase of broken chiral symmetry.
650: Both dashed lines correspond to the calculation in the phase of non-zero
651: diquark condensate values. The lower dashed line gives the estimate of IL
652: density without the tadpole contributions included.
653: Regarding the upper dashed line see the text.}
654: \end{figure}
655:
656: Fig. 5 demonstrates the IL density as the function of $\mu$ when the quark
657: backreaction is incorporated in the phase of broken chiral symmetry (solid
658: curve) and in the phase of non-zero values of diquark condensate (dashed
659: curve). It is interesting to notice that the curves manifest the different
660: character of quark influence on IL. In the phase of broken chiral symmetry
661: the density is almost constant in the suitable interval of $\mu$ whereas in
662: the colour superconducting phase quickly disappears. It is interesting that
663: for the former the corresponding analogue of the tadpole contribution
664: $\left(\frat{\delta I}{\delta\rho}\right)^{'}$ in Eq. (\ref{ilden}) is strictly
665: positive and, therefore, can lead to the increase of the IL density (gluon
666: condensate) which is truely insignificant and demonstrates simply the approach
667: sensitivity to the dynamical quark mass variation \cite{mz}. In the latter
668: case the sign of tadpole contribution is changing.
669: As seen from Fig. 5 it leads
670: to the drastic change of the IL density behaviour and the gluon condensate is
671: getting weaker. Strictly speaking this effect has already been discussed in
672: \cite{kerb}.
673:
674:
675:
676: \noindent
677: The authors are partly supported by STCU\#015c,
678: CERN-INTAS 2000-349, NATO~2000-PST.CLG 977482 Grants. S.V.M.
679: expresses his gratitude to Dr. P. Giubellino and
680: Dr. P. Kuijer for interesting discussions of the QGP physics and support.
681: Authors also indebted to the Faberge Fund for providing us with the excellent
682: working conditions.
683:
684:
685:
686: \newpage
687: \newpage
688: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
689: %-1
690: \bibitem{karsh}
691: F. Karsh, hep-lat/0103314.
692: %0
693: \bibitem{0}
694: K. Rrajagopal, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 651} (1999) 150c;\\
695: M. Alford, hep-ph/0110150.
696: %1
697: \bibitem{mz}
698: S. V. Molodtsov, G. M. Zinovjev,
699: hep-ph/0111355;\\
700: Proceedings LATTICE 2001.
701: %2
702: \bibitem{we0}
703: S. V. Molodtsov, A. M. Snigirev, and G. M. Zinovjev,
704: appear in Yad. Fiz. (2002);\\
705: hep-ph/0004212.
706: %3
707: \bibitem{diakcar}
708: G.W. Carter and D. I. Diakonov, Phys. Rew. D {\bf 60}, 016004 (1999).
709: %4
710: \bibitem{rapp}
711: R. Rapp, T. Sch\"afer, E. V. Shuryak, and M. Velkovsky, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)
712: {\bf 280} (2000) 35.
713: %5
714: \bibitem{2}
715: D. I. Diakonov and V. Yu. Petrov, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 245}, 259 (1984);\\
716: D. I. Diakonov and V. Yu. Petrov, in {\it Hadronic Matter under Extreme
717: Conditions},\\
718: edited by V. Shelest and G. Zinovjev
719: (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1986) p. 192; \\
720: D. I. Diakonov, V. Yu. Petrov, and P. V. Pobylitsa,
721: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 226}, 471 (1989);\\
722: C. G. Callan, R. Dashen, and D. J. Gross,
723: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 17}, 2717 (1978);\\
724: E.-M. Ilgenfritz and M. M\"uller-Preussker,
725: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 184}, 443 (1981);\\
726: T. Sch\"afer and E. V. Shuryak, Rev. Mod. Phys.
727: {\bf 70}, 323 (1998).
728: %6
729: \bibitem{dp2}
730: D. I. Diakonov, M. V. Polyakov, and C. Weiss,
731: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 461}, 539 (1996);\\
732: D. I. Diakonov, hep-ph/9802298.
733: %7
734: \bibitem{we}
735: S. V. Molodtsov, A. M. Snigirev, and G. M. Zinovjev,
736: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60} 056006 (1999);\\
737: S. V. Molodtsov, A. M. Snigirev, and G. M. Zinovjev,
738: in {\it Lattice Fermions and Structure\\ of the Vacuum},
739: edited by V. Mitrjushkin and G. Schierholz,
740: (Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 2000) p. 307;\\
741: S. V. Molodtsov, A. M. Snigirev, and G. M. Zinovjev, Yad. Fiz. {\bf 63},
742: 975 (2000).
743: \bibitem{kerb}
744: N. O. Agsyan, D. Ebert, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 637} (1998)
745: 135;\\
746: N. O. Agasyan, B. O. Kerbikov, V. I. Shevchenko, Phys. Rep. {\bf 320} (1999)
747: 131;\\
748: D. Ebert, V. V. Khudyakov, K. G. Klimenko, V. Ch. Zhukovsky,
749: hep-ph/0106110;
750: \\
751: D. Ebert, V. V. Khudyakov, K. G. Klimenko, H. Toki,
752: V. Ch. Zhukovsky, hep-ph/0108185.
753: \end{thebibliography}
754: \end{document}
755:
756: