1: \chapter{The CDF Detector}
2:
3: \authors{M.~Paulini, A.B.~Wicklund}
4:
5: \section{Introduction}
6:
7: The CDF detector has evolved over a twenty year period.
8: CDF was the first experiment at the Tevatron to perform
9: quantitative measurements of $b$-quark production,
10: using single-lepton and $J/\psi$ samples in
11: Run 0 (1988-1989). CDF was the first hadron collider
12: experiment to successfully employ a silicon vertex
13: detector (SVX). The four layer, axial readout
14: SVX (Run~Ia) and SVX' (Run~Ib) detectors were
15: used to discover the top quark through detection
16: of the $b$-quark decay chain. They were also used for
17: a systematic program of $b$-physics studies, including
18: $B$-lifetimes, $B\overline{B}$ mixing, discovery
19: of the $B_c$, and measurement of $CP$ violation
20: in the $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K_S^0$ mode. In the course
21: of this program, CDF has developed the techniques to
22: identify $B$ hadron final states in $J/\psi$ and
23: $\ell\nu D$ semileptonic modes, and to flavor tag
24: these states using away-side lepton and jet-charge
25: tags and toward side fragmentation correlations.
26: As a byproduct, CDF has developed control sample
27: strategies to calibrate particle identification using
28: relativistic rise d$E$/d$x$, to optimize flavor tagging
29: efficiency, and to measure material effects
30: (energy loss and radiation length corrections) needed
31: for precision mass measurements. CDF has published over fifty
32: papers on $B$ physics with the Run 0 and Run~I data. In addition
33: to Run~I physics data, CDF recorded data on a variety
34: of specialized triggers in order to estimate rates and
35: backgrounds for the Run~II program. Although the Run~II
36: $B$-physics program at CDF will be technically more
37: challenging than Run~I, CDF starts with the advantage
38: of extensive experience and benchmark data.
39:
40: The upgraded CDF detector and physics program for Run~II is described in detail in
41: the CDF Technical Design Report~\cite{cdf_tdr}. The
42: additional upgrades for time-of-flight and innermost
43: silicon detector are described in the PAC proposal P909~\cite{cdf_p909}.
44: Below we summarize the Run~II detector configuration,
45: with expected performance including particle identification,
46: issues for central solenoidal detectors, CDF $B$-physics trigger
47: plans, and offline analysis issues.
48:
49: \section{CDF Run~II Detector}
50:
51: The main upgrades to the CDF detector for Run~II
52: can be summarized as follows:
53: \index{CDF!detector improvements}
54: \begin{itemize}
55: \item[-]{Fully digital DAQ system designed for 132 ns bunch crossing times}
56: \item[-]{Vastly upgraded silicon detector}
57: \subitem{707,000 channels compared with 46,000 in Run~I}
58: \subitem{Axial, stereo, and 90$^\circ$ strip readout}
59: \subitem{Full coverage over the luminous region along the beam axis}
60: \subitem{Radial coverage from 1.35 to 28 cm over $|\eta| < 2$}
61: \subitem{Innermost silicon layer(``L00'') on beampipe with 6 $\mu$m axial hit resolution}
62: \item[-]{Outer drift chamber capable of 132 ns maximum drift}
63: \subitem{30,240 sense wires, 44-132 cm radius, 96 d$E$/d$x$ samples possible per track}
64: \item[-]{Fast scintillator-based calorimetry out to $|\eta| \simeq 3$}
65: \item[-]{Expanded muon coverage out to $\eta \simeq 1.5$}
66: \item[-]{Improved trigger capabilities}
67: \subitem{Drift chamber tracks with high precision at Level-1}
68: \subitem{Silicon tracks for detached vertex triggers at Level-2}
69: \item[-]{Expanded particle identification via time-of-flight and d$E$/d$x$}
70: \end{itemize}
71:
72: \begin{figure}[t]
73: \centerline{\epsfxsize=13cm \epsfbox{ch3/cdfelev.ps}}
74: %\epsfbox{trackvol.ps}
75: \vspace*{.2cm}
76: \caption[CDF detector elevation view]{Elevation view of the Run~II CDF detector}
77: \label{fig:cdfelev}
78: \end{figure}
79:
80: \begin{table}[htbp]
81: \begin{center}
82: \begin {tabular} {l c}
83: \hline \hline
84: COT & \\ \hline
85: Radial coverage & 44 to 132 cm \\
86: Number of superlayers & 8 \\
87: Measurements per superlayer & 12 \\
88: Readout coordinates of SLs & +2$^\circ$ 0$^\circ$ -2$^\circ$ 0$^\circ$ +2$^\circ$ 0$^\circ$ -2$^\circ$
89: 0$^\circ$ \\
90: Maximum drift distance & 0.88 cm \\
91: Resolution per measurement & 180 $\mu$m \\
92: Rapidity coverage & $|\eta| \leq 1.0$ \\
93: Number of channels & 30,240 \\
94: %Material thickness & 1.3\% ${\rm X_{0}}$ \\ \hline \hline
95: %Occupancy @ 2E32/132 & 10\% at inner superlayer \\ \hline \hline
96: Layer 00 & \\ \hline
97: Radial coverage &1.35 to 1.65 cm \\
98: Resolution per measurement & 6 $\mu$m (axial) \\
99: %Readout pitch & 25 $\mu$m (r-$\phi$)\\
100: Number of channels & 13,824 \\
101: SVX II & \\ \hline
102: Radial coverage & 2.4 to 10.7 cm, staggered quadrants \\
103: Number of layers & 5 \\
104: Readout coordinates &r-$\phi$ on one side of all layers \\
105: Stereo side &r-z, r-z, r-sas, r-z, r-sas (sas $\equiv
106: \pm 1.2^\circ$ stereo) \\
107: Readout pitch & 60-65 $\mu$m r-$\phi$; 60-150 $\mu$m stereo\\
108: Resolution per measurement & 12 $\mu$m (axial) \\
109: Total length & 96.0 cm \\
110: Rapidity coverage & $|\eta| \leq 2.0$ \\
111: Number of channels & 423,900 \\
112: %Material thickness & 3.5\% ${\rm X_{0}}$ \\
113: %Power dissipated & 1.8 KW \\ \hline \hline
114: ISL & \\ \hline
115: Radial coverage & 20 to 28 cm \\
116: Number of layers & one for $|\eta|<1$; two for $1<|\eta|<2$ \\
117: Readout coordinates & r-$\phi$ and r-sas (sas$\equiv \pm 1.2^\circ$ stereo)
118: (all layers)\\
119: Readout pitch & 110 $\mu$m (axial); 146 $\mu$m (stereo) \\
120: Resolution per measurement & 16 $\mu$m (axial) \\
121: Total length & 174 cm \\
122: Rapidity coverage & $|\eta| \leq 1.9$ \\
123: Number of channels & 268,800 \\
124: %Material thickness & 2\% ${\rm X_{0}}$ \\
125: \hline \hline
126: \end{tabular}
127: \end{center}
128: \vspace*{.2cm}
129: \caption[CDF tracking systems]{Design parameters of the CDF tracking systems}
130: \label{tb_tracking}
131: \end{table}
132:
133: The CDF detector features excellent charged particle tracking
134: and good electron and muon identification in the central region.
135: The detector is built around a 3 m diameter 5 m long superconducting
136: solenoid operated at 1.4 T. The overall CDF Run~II detector
137: schematic is shown in elevation view in Fig.~\ref{fig:cdfelev}.
138: The CDF tracking system includes a central outer drift chamber (COT),
139: a double-sided five layer inner silicon detector (SVX II),
140: a double-sided two layer intermediate silicon tracker (ISL),
141: and a single layer rad-hard detector mounted on the beampipe (L00).
142: COT tracks above 1.5 GeV/c are available for triggering at Level-1 (XFT);
143: SVX layers 0-3 are combined with XFT tracks at Level-2 (SVT).
144: The main parameters of the CDF tracking system are summarized in
145: Table~\ref{tb_tracking}.
146:
147: Outside the solenoid, Pb-scintillator
148: electromagnetic (EM) and Fe-scintillator hadronic (HAD) calorimeters cover
149: the range $|\eta| < 3.6$.
150: \index{CDF!calorimetry}
151: Both the central ($|\eta| < 1.1$) and plug ($1.1 < |\eta| < 3.6$)
152: electromagnetic calorimeters have fine grained shower profile detectors
153: at electron shower maximum, and preshower pulse height detectors
154: at approximately $1 X_o$ depth.
155: Electron identification is
156: accomplished using $E/p$ from the EM calorimeter and also in the shower maximum and
157: preshower detectors; using $HAD/EM\sim 0$; and using shower shape and position
158: matching in the shower max detectors. Together with COT d$E$/d$x$, CDF gets
159: $\sim$10$^{-3}$ $\pi/e$ rejection in the central region.
160: The calorimeter cell segmentation is summarized in
161: Table~\ref{calseg}. A comparison of the central and plug
162: calorimeters is given in Table~\ref{plugcomp}.
163:
164: \begin{table}
165: \begin{center}
166: \begin {tabular} {l|c|c}
167: \hline \hline
168: $|\eta|$ Range & $\Delta\phi$ & $\Delta\eta$ \\
169: \hline
170: 0. - 1.1 (1.2 h) & $15^{\circ}$ & $\sim0.1$ \\
171: 1.1 (1.2 h) - 1.8 & $7.5^{\circ}$ & $\sim0.1$ \\
172: 1.8 - 2.1 & $7.5^{\circ}$ & $\sim0.16$ \\
173: 2.1 - 3.64 & $15^{\circ}$ & 0.2 $-$ 0.6 \\
174: \hline \hline
175: \end{tabular}
176: \vspace*{.2cm}
177: \caption[CDF calorimeter segmentation]{CDF II Calorimeter Segmentation}
178: \label{calseg}
179: \end{center}
180: \end{table}
181:
182: The calorimeter steel serves
183: as a filter for muon detection in the central (CMU) and
184: extension (CMX) muon proportional chambers, over the
185: range $|\eta| < 1$, $p_T > 1.4$ GeV/c.
186: \index{CDF!muon systems} Additional iron
187: shielding, including the magnet yoke, provides a muon filter
188: for the upgrade muon chambers (CMP) in the range $|\eta| < 0.6$, $p_T >2.2$ GeV/c.
189: The (non-energized) forward toroids from Run~I
190: provide muon filters for intermediate $1.0 < |\eta| < 1.5$
191: muon chambers (IMU) for $p_T > 2$ GeV/c. Scintillators for
192: triggering are included in CMP, CMX, and IMU.
193: Muon identification is accomplished by matching track segments in the muon chambers
194: with COT/SVX tracks; matching is available in $R\Phi$ for all detectors and
195: in the $Z$ views in CMU and CMX.
196: The muon systems are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:overcmu}.
197:
198: \begin{table}
199: \begin{center}
200: \begin {tabular} {l|c|c}
201: \hline \hline
202: & Central & Plug \\
203: \hline
204: EM: & &\\
205: Thickness & $19 X_0, 1 \lambda$ & $21 X_0, 1 \lambda$ \\
206: Sample (Pb) & $0.6 X_0$ & $0.8 X_0$ \\
207: Sample (scint.) & 5 mm & 4.5 mm \\
208: WLS & sheet & fiber \\
209: Light yield & $160$ pe/GeV & $300$ pe/GeV \\
210: Sampling res. & $11.6\%/\sqrt{E_T}$ & $14\%/\sqrt{E}$ \\
211: Stoch. res. & $14\%/\sqrt{E_T}$ & $16\%/\sqrt{E}$ \\
212: Shower Max. seg. (cm)& 1.4$ \phi \times $(1.6-2.0) Z& $0.5\times0.5$ UV\\
213: Pre-shower seg. (cm)& $1.4 \phi\times 65$ Z & by tower \\
214: \hline
215: Hadron: &&\\
216: Thickness& $4.5 \lambda$ & $7 \lambda$\\
217: Sample (Fe)&1 to 2 in.& 2 in.\\
218: Sample (scint.)& 10 mm & 6 mm\\
219: WLS & finger & fiber\\
220: Light yield& $\sim40$ pe/GeV & $39$ pe/GeV\\
221: \hline \hline
222: \end{tabular}
223: \vspace*{.2cm}
224: \caption[CDF central/plug calorimeters]{Central and Plug Upgraded Calorimeter
225: Comparison}
226: \label{plugcomp}
227: \end{center}
228: \end{table}
229:
230: \begin{table}[t]
231: \begin{center}
232: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
233: \hline \hline
234: & CMU & CMP & CMX & IMU \\ \hline
235: Pseudo-rapidity coverage
236: & $|\eta|\leq 0.6$ & $|\eta|\leq 0.6$
237: & $0.6 \leq |\eta|\leq 1.0 $
238: & $1.0 \leq |\eta|\leq 1.5 $ \\
239: Drift tube cross-section
240: & 2.68 x 6.35~cm & 2.5 x 15~cm & 2.5 x 15~cm & 2.5 x 8.4~cm \\
241: Drift tube length & 226~cm & 640~cm & 180~cm & 363~cm \\
242: Max drift time
243: & ${800~{\rm ns}}$ & 1.4~$\mu {\rm s}$
244: & 1.4~$\mu {\rm s}$ & 800~{\rm ns} \\
245: Total drift tubes (present) & 2304 & 864 & 1536 & none \\
246: Total drift tubes (Run~II) & 2304 & 1076 & 2208 & 1728 \\
247: Scintillation counter thickness & & 2.5~cm & 1.5~cm & 2.5~cm \\
248: Scintillation counter width & & 30~cm & 30-40~cm & 17~cm \\
249: Scintillation counter length & & 320~cm & 180~cm & 180~cm \\
250: Total counters (present) & & 128 & 256 & none \\
251: Total counters (Run~II) & & 269 & 324 & 864 \\
252: Pion interaction lengths & 5.5 & 7.8 & 6.2 & 6.2-20 \\
253: Minimum muon $p_T$
254: & 1.4~GeV/c & 2.2 ~GeV/c & 1.4~GeV/c & 1.4-2.0~GeV/c\\
255: Multiple scattering resolution
256: & 12~cm/$p$ & 15~cm/$p$ & 13~cm/$p$ &13-25~cm/$p$\\ \hline \hline
257: \end{tabular}
258: \vspace*{.2cm}
259: \caption[CDF muon detectors]{Design Parameters of the CDF II Muon Detectors.
260: Pion interaction lengths and multiple scattering are computed at a reference
261: angle of $\theta =90^{\circ}$ in CMU and CMP, at an angle of
262: $\theta=55^{\circ}$ in CMX, and for a range of angles for the IMU.}
263: \label{tab:overcmu}
264: \end{center}
265: \end{table}
266:
267: The Run~II CDF detector configuration
268: allows electron and muon identification with drift chamber tracking
269: over the range $|\eta| < 1.0$, with additional coverage out to
270: $|\eta| \sim 1.5$ using stand-alone silicon tracking. Typical
271: thresholds are $p_T > 1$ GeV/c (electrons), $p_T > 1.5$ GeV/c (muons).
272: Calibration of electron and muon identification is accomplished
273: {\it in situ} with large samples of $J/\psi$'s and photon conversions.
274:
275: Photon identification is done using the EM calorimetry, using the preshower
276: and shower maximum detectors to separate $\pi^0/\gamma$. Channels like
277: $B\rightarrow J/\psi\eta$ can be reconstructed with the calorimeter. Rare decays
278: such as $B\rightarrow K^*\gamma$ use photon conversions to obtain
279: precision $\gamma$ reconstruction.
280:
281: Asymptotic tracking resolutions are $\sigma(p_T) \simeq 0.0007~p_T^2$
282: ($|\eta < 1.1$), and $\sigma(p_T) \simeq 0.004~p_T^2$
283: ($|\eta| < 2$ -stand-alone SVX tracking). The SVX detectors provide
284: typical impact parameter resolution of
285: 15 ($R-\phi$- view) and 30 ($Z$- view) $\mu m$. For example, this results in
286: mass resolution of around 20 MeV for $B^0\rightarrow\pi^+\pi^-$
287: and proper time resolution of 45 fs for $B_s^0 \rightarrow D_s^-\pi^+$.
288:
289: \begin{figure}[t]
290: \centerline{\epsfxsize=4.5in \epsfbox{ch3/tof_with_dedx.ps}}
291: %\epsfbox{trackvol.ps}
292: \vspace*{.2cm}
293: \caption[CDF particle identification]{Time difference as a function of momentum
294: for $\pi, K, p$ at a radius of 140 cm, expressed in ps and separation power,
295: assuming 100 ps resolution. The dashed line shows the $K/\pi$ separation using
296: $dE/dx$ in the COT.}
297: \label{fig:pid}
298: \end{figure}
299:
300: Particle identification to separate pions, kaons, protons,
301: and electrons is provided by d$E$/d$x$ and time-of-flight
302: (TOF) detectors ($|\eta| < 1$):
303: \begin{itemize}
304: \item {$1/\beta^2$ d$E$/d$x$ in both COT and SVX}
305: \item {Relativistic rise d$E$/d$x$ in COT}
306: \subitem{$\simeq$1 $\sigma$ $\pi-K$ separation, $p > 2$ GeV/c}
307: \item {TOF bars outside the COT (1.4 m radius)}
308: \subitem{$\simeq$100 ps resolution}
309: \subitem{2$\sigma$ $K-\pi$ separation at 1.5 GeV/c}
310: \end{itemize}
311: Figure~\ref{fig:pid} shows the expected separation
312: as a function of momentum.
313: The low momentum particle identification provides flavor
314: tagging with kaons, both on the away side $\overline{b}$-jet, and
315: on the same side as the trigger $B$ (e.g., $B^0_s$ correlated with
316: $K^+$, $\overline{B^0_s}$ with $K^-$); it should also provide
317: useful kaon separation for charm reconstruction, e.g. $B^0_s\rightarrow D_s^-\pi^+$.
318: Above 2 GeV/c, the COT $dE/dx$ provides a statistical
319: separation of pions and kaons. This will be crucial for
320: determination of $CP$ asymmetries in $B^0\rightarrow\pi^+\pi^-$
321: and $B^0_s\rightarrow K^+K^-$. The d$E$/d$x$ and TOF calibrations can
322: be determined {\it in situ} using pions and protons
323: from $K_S$ and $\Lambda$ decays, kaons from $\phi \rightarrow K^+K^-$,
324: electrons from conversion photons, and muons from $J/\psi$ decay.
325:
326:
327: \section[Issues for Central Solenoidal Detectors]
328: {Issues for Central Solenoidal Detectors at the Tevatron}
329:
330: In the Run~II detector
331: full charged particle tracking using the SVX and the COT
332: is confined to $\eta < 1.1$. Since all $B$-physics
333: triggers are track based, and rely on COT tracks in the Level-1
334: trigger, the $B$ triggers are basically limited to this
335: $\eta$ range. Furthermore, in order to achieve a reasonable
336: Lorentz boost for the triggered $B$ hadrons, it is necessary
337: to select events with $p_T(B)$ above some minimum cutoff, typically
338: of order 4-6 GeV/c. In terms of production rates, this is not
339: really a severe limitation. At 10$^{32}$ luminosity, the total
340: $b\overline{b}$ production rate is around 10 kHz at the
341: Tevatron (eg. 10$^{11}$ events per fb$^{-1}$), much more than the
342: CDF data acquisition rate of $\simeq$75 Hz to tape. Since
343: $B$ production at high $p_T$ peaks at small $|y|$, the kinematic
344: restriction is such that about 6\% of $B$-hadrons are produced in
345: the region $|y|<1$ and $p_T>6$ GeV/c (e.g., 1.2 kHz of $B$+$\overline{B}$ at
346: 10$^{32}$.
347:
348: Thus, the basic trigger strategy is to select $B$ decays to
349: specific final states in the central region, for example
350: $B^0\rightarrow J/\psi K_S$ or $B^0_s\rightarrow D^-_s\pi^+$,
351: with charged particle tracks confined to $|\eta| < 1$. For mixing
352: and $CP$ studies, flavor tagging is accomplished using either the away-side
353: $\overline{B}$ or same-side fragmentation correlations. The
354: fragmentation correlations give a highly efficient flavor tag
355: ($\simeq$ 70\% in Run~I), since the tagging tracks are guaranteed
356: to be in the central region. The away side tagging would be limited
357: if tracking were confined to $|\eta| < 1$, but the stand-alone
358: SVX tracking extends the coverage in $\eta$, and so is expected to
359: greatly improve efficiency for jet-charge and lepton
360: tagging of away-side $b$-jets.
361:
362: There are some advantages to the central detector
363: configuration:
364: \begin{itemize}
365: \item{The Tevatron beamspot is small ($\sim 25 \mu$m) in
366: the transverse plane. This feature is exploited at the trigger level in CDF Run~II,
367: using the SVX detector to identify large-impact parameter tracks
368: from $B$ decays in the level-2 trigger. This requires the
369: Tevatron beam to be aligned parallel to the detector axis,
370: due to the long ($\sim 60$cm) luminous region in $Z$.
371: The $SVT$- trigger will yield a highly pure sample of inclusive
372: $B$ decays, approximately 10$^8$ $b\overline{b}$ events per fb$^{-1}$.}
373:
374: \item{With the $p_T(B)$ cut, the proper time resolution
375: is adequate for demanding analyses such as $B_s$ mixing
376: (e.g., 45 fs on $B_s\rightarrow D_s^-\pi^+$)}
377:
378: \item{The $p_T(B)$ requirement also improves the ratio
379: of $B$ production to QCD background. While the total $b\overline{b}$
380: cross section is of order 0.2\% of the minimum bias rate, the
381: high-$p_T$ $b$-jet cross section is measured to be 2\% of the
382: QCD jet rate, in the $p_T$ range of interest for CDF.}
383:
384: \item{In the central region, tracks are well spread out in $Z$,
385: and CDF has demonstrated highly efficient track reconstruction
386: for $b\overline{b}$ events.}
387: \end{itemize}
388:
389: \section{Trigger Strategies}
390:
391: The main $B$-physics goals for CDF Run~II make use of the following
392: final states. Of course in each case, other final states, both
393: inclusive and exclusive, are used as calibration samples, and so the triggers
394: must be designed to be inclusive.
395: \begin{itemize}
396: \item{$B^0\rightarrow J/\psi K_S$ for $\sin{2\beta}$}
397: \item{$B^0_s\rightarrow J/\psi\phi$ for $CP$ and $\Delta\Gamma$}
398: \item{$B\rightarrow \mu^+\mu^- K^{(*)}$ rare decays}
399: \item{$B^0_s\rightarrow D_s^-\pi^+$ for $B_s$ mixing}
400: \item{$B_s\rightarrow D_s^-\ell^+\nu$ for $B_s$ mixing}
401: \item{$B^0_{(s)}\rightarrow K^{*0}\gamma, \phi\gamma$ using photon conversion $\gamma
402: \rightarrow e^+e^-$}
403: \item{$B^0\rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-$, $B^0_s\rightarrow K^+K^-$ for CKM
404: angle $\gamma$}
405: \end{itemize}
406: This is of course only a partial list. CDF has a three-level trigger
407: design. Level-1 is pipelined so as to be deadtimeless. Digitized
408: data are stored in 42$\times$132 ns buffers to create and count trigger
409: primitives (electrons, muons, COT tracks, and combinations of these).
410: Level-2 is a global trigger that allows finer grained electron and
411: muon track matching, and more sophisticated
412: combinations of trigger primitives (for example, opposite charged
413: lepton pairs with invariant mass requirements).
414: Level-2 finds SVT-tracks using four SVX II layers; these are
415: matched to the XFT/COT tracks found in level-1 to define high
416: resolution, large impact parameter $b$-decay candidates. Level-2
417: also matches electrons to the central shower-maximum detector. Finally, Level-3
418: provides offline quality tracking and calorimeter reconstruction.
419:
420: Using Run~I data, CDF has carefully optimized the use of bandwidth
421: for Run~II triggers. The basic trigger requirements can be
422: summarized as follows:
423: \begin{itemize}
424: \item{ Dimuons and dielectrons}
425: \subitem{Level-1: Two leptons with COT matched to muon chambers or central calorimeter}
426: \subitem{Level-2,3: Additional mass, charge, and $\Delta\Phi$ cuts}
427: \item{Single Leptons}
428: \subitem{Level-1: Single leptons matched to muon chambers or central calorimeter}
429: \subitem{Level-2,3: Additional requirement of accompanying SVT track}
430: \item{$B$ hadronic triggers}
431: \subitem{Level-1: two tracks, opposite charge, $\Delta\Phi$ cuts}
432: \subitem{Level-2,3: two SVX tracks, impact parameter and $ct$ cuts}
433: \end{itemize}
434: Thresholds for dilepton and two-track triggers are typically 1.5-2.0 GeV/c,
435: and for single leptons 3-4 GeV/c. Level-3 can make additional cuts in order
436: to divide the data into manageable data sets; for example, a high mass
437: cut will be used to define a $B\rightarrow\pi\pi$ stream based on
438: the two-track triggers, while other SVX track requirements will be used
439: to make a $b\rightarrow c$ generic hadronic sample.
440:
441: The total trigger bandwidth, including $B$ physics, is
442: designed to be 40 kHz (level-1), 300 Hz (Level-2) and 75 Hz Level-3).
443: Thus, the maximum rate level-3 would be 750 nb at 10$^{32}$ luminosity.
444: $B$ triggers are expected to require about half of that bandwidth.
445: Table~\ref{tab:rate} gives the expected bandwidth requirements for
446: the trigger streams.
447:
448: \begin{table}
449: \begin{center}
450: \begin{tabular}{l|r|r|r}
451: \hline\hline
452: Trigger & L1 $\sigma$ [nb] & L2 $\sigma$ [nb] & L3 $\sigma$ [nb]\\
453: \hline
454: $B\rightarrow h^+h^-$ & 252,000 & 560 & 100 \\
455: $B\rightarrow \mu \mu (X)$ & 1100 & 90 & 40\\
456: $J/\psi \rightarrow ee$ & 18000 & 100 & 6\\
457: Lepton plus displaced track & 9000 &130 & 40\\
458: \hline \hline
459: \end{tabular}
460: \vspace*{.2cm}
461: \caption[CDF $B$-physics trigger rates]{Trigger rates for the main CDF II $B$-physics triggers}
462: \label{tab:rate}
463: \end{center}
464: \end{table}
465:
466: \section{Offline Analysis and Simulation}
467: CDF has estimated rates for literally hundreds of
468: reconstructable decay modes that come in on the lepton or
469: SVT two-track triggers. Table~\ref{tab:cdfyield} lists
470: some examples.
471:
472: \begin{table}
473: \begin{center}
474: \begin{tabular}{l|r}
475: \hline\hline
476: Physics Channel & Event yield (2 fb$^{-1}$)\\
477: \hline
478: $b\rightarrow J/\psi X$ & 28,000,000\\
479: $B^0\rightarrow J/\psi K^0_S$ & 28,000\\
480: $B_s\rightarrow D_s\pi$ & 10,000\\
481: $B_s\rightarrow D_s\ell\nu$ & 30,000\\
482: $B\rightarrow \mu^+\mu^- K^{(*)}$ & 50\\
483: $B\rightarrow K^*\gamma$ & 200\\
484: $B\rightarrow \pi\pi,K\pi, KK$ & 30,000\\
485: \hline \hline
486: \end{tabular}
487: \vspace*{.2cm}
488: \caption[CDF $B$-physics event yields]{Event yields expected from CDF Run~II
489: $B$-physics triggers}
490: \label{tab:cdfyield}
491: \end{center}
492: \end{table}
493:
494: %For two of the more important physics goals, $\sin{2\beta}$ and
495: %$B_s$ mixing, Fig.~\ref{fig:lumlim} shows the respective $\sin{2\beta}$ error and
496: %$x_s$ 5-$\sigma$ reach as a function of integrated luminosity.
497: Detailed studies of the physics reach expected for CDF may be found elsewhere
498: in this document. We discuss briefly two issues that enter into calculations of
499: sensitivity, namely flavor tagging and generic simulation.
500:
501: %\begin{figure}[h]
502: %\centerline{
503: %\epsfxsize=4.2in
504: %\epsfbox{ch3/lumlim.ps}
505: %}
506: %\epsfbox{trackvol.ps}
507: %\caption{Error on $\sin{2\beta}$ (left) and 5$\sigma$ reach
508: %for $x_s$ (right) versus CDF II integrated luminosity.}
509: %\label{fig:lumlim}
510: %\end{figure}
511:
512: \subsection{Flavor Tagging}
513: CDF measured the flavor tagging efficiencies and dilutions for
514: three methods in the Run~I mixing and $\sin{2\beta}$ analyses:
515: ``same side'' (fragmentation correlation) tagging, jet-charge
516: tagging, and soft electron and muon tagging. To understand
517: the ``same side'' tagging at least qualitatively, CDF
518: analyzed $B^{**}$ production using large samples
519: of semileptonic $B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\ell\nu$ decays
520: and applied these to tune the PYTHIA event generator.
521: This gave qualitative agreement with observed same-side
522: tagging efficiencies, including the observed differences between
523: $B^0$ and $B^+$ tagging caused by kaons and protons. For jet-charge
524: algorithms, the tagging was optimized initially using
525: PYTHIA and HERWIG event generators, but actual efficiencies and
526: dilutions were measured with data, for example, by fitting the
527: $B^0\overline{B^0}$ mixing amplitude or by direct comparison
528: of tagging in $B^{\pm}\rightarrow J/\psi K^{\pm}$. Soft lepton
529: tags were calibrated similarly. For the $\sin{2\beta}$ analysis the
530: combined tagging efficiency, including correlations between tags,
531: was $\epsilon D^2$ = 6.3$\pm$1.7\%.
532:
533: CDF extrapolates the Run~I efficiencies and dilutions to
534: Run~II conditions, taking into account the standalone silicon
535: tracking to $|\eta|\sim 2$, and including kaon tagging based on
536: TOF. This gives estimates of $\epsilon D^2 \sim$ 9.1\% for $B^0\rightarrow J/\psi K_S$
537: and $\epsilon D^2 \sim$ 11.3\% for $B_s\rightarrow D_s^-\pi^+$.
538: The basic strategies for calibrating and optimizing the tagging
539: efficiencies for each method would be similar to Run~I. For example,
540: the same side tags can be optimized using semileptonic decays
541: $B^{0,+}\rightarrow D^{(*)}\ell\nu$ and $B^0_s\rightarrow D_s^{(*)}\ell\nu$,
542: including the effects of fragmentation kaons.
543: Opposite side tags can be optimized on the same semileptonic channels,
544: or on inclusive samples such as $b\rightarrow J/\psi X$ (e.g., by
545: comparing tagging rates for prompt and long lived $J/\psi$'s).
546: Same-side tags for $\sin{2\beta}$ can be calibrated using
547: $B^{\pm}\rightarrow J/\psi K^{\pm}$ and $B^0\rightarrow J/\psi K^{*0}$.
548: Opposite side tags would be calibrated using $B^{\pm}\rightarrow J/\psi K^{\pm}$.
549: Thus, there are a variety of data channels and cross checks
550: that are available to understand each tagging method. Event generator
551: Monte Carlo's play a role in helping to model same-side tags, including
552: the effects of kaons, and in understanding correlations and variations
553: of dilution with kinematics.
554:
555: \subsection{Monte Carlo Issues}
556: \index{CDF!detector simulation}
557: CDF has adopted a GEANT based detector simulation for Run~II,
558: which is used for optimization of track reconstruction,
559: muon matching, jet energy analysis, SVT response, etc. The calorimeter response
560: has to be tuned to match data from testbeam, Run~I, and eventually Run~II.
561: It is obviously straightforward to understand the efficiency
562: for signals such as $B^0\rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-$, where the generation is
563: trivial, and the detector response depends only on tracking and SVT efficiency.
564: The main concern for $B$ triggers is backgrounds. For lepton-based
565: triggers, these can be estimated from Run~I data. For hadronic triggers
566: such as $B^0\rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-$, CDF can set limits on backgrounds
567: using Run~I data, and can use the PYTHIA generator (plus SVT simulation)
568: to estimate the backgrounds from real $b\overline{b}$ events. The backgrounds
569: that dominate $B^0\rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-$ at the trigger level do not
570: appear to come from real $b\overline{b}$ events but from QCD backgrounds that
571: fake the impact parameter trigger; this conclusion comes from comparison
572: of trigger rates with $b\overline{b}$ Monte Carlo,
573: and also by examining Run~I data, comparing
574: high mass two-track rates rates from QCD and real $b\overline{b}$ events.
575: Thus, while CDF can certainly estimate backgrounds from real $b\overline{b}$ events
576: in the SVT two-track trigger sample (these come in due to real
577: $b$-hadron lifetimes), it cannot reliably simulate ``QCD'' backgrounds
578: in this sample (these depend critically on offline SVX reconstruction).
579:
580:
581:
582: \clearpage
583: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
584: \bibitem{cdf_tdr}The CDFII Collaboration, ``The CDF Detector Technical Design Report'',
585: FERMILAB-Pub-96/390-E
586:
587: \bibitem{cdf_p909}The CDFII Collaboration ``Proposal for Enhancement of the CDF II
588: Detector: an Inner Silicon Layer and a Time of Flight Detector'',
589: submitted to the PAC, October 1998
590:
591: \end{thebibliography}
592: