1: \chapter{The D\O\ detector}

2: 

3: \authors{R.~Jesik, F.~Stichelbaut, K.~Yip, A.~Zieminski}

4: 

5: \def\Do{\mbox{D\O}}

6: \def\pp{$p\bar{p}$}

7: \def\ptmu{$p_T^{\mu}$}

8: \def\pt{$p_T$}

9: \def\ptb{$p_T^b$}

10: \def\ptc{$p_T^c$}

11: \def\etamu{$\eta^{\mu}$}

12: \def\dsdptmu{\mbox{d$\sigma_b^{\mu}/\mathrm{d}p_T^{\mu}$}}

13: \def\dsdptb{\mbox{d$\sigma^b/\mathrm{d}p_T^b$}}

14: \def\bb{\mbox{$b\bar{b}$}}

15: \def\cc{\mbox{$c\bar{c}$}}

16: \def\QQ{\mbox{$Q\bar{Q}$}}

17: \def\ptuu{\mbox{$p_T^{\mu\mu}$}}

18: \def\bsdsphi{\mbox{$B_s^0 \rightarrow D_s^- + \mu^+ + \nu_{\mu}$}}

19: \def\bsds3pi{\mbox{$B_s^0 \rightarrow D_s^- + 3\pi^{\pm}$}}

20: \def\bsdslX{\mbox{$B_s^0 \rightarrow D_s^- + \ell^+ + X$}}

21: \def\bsdsnpi{\mbox{$B_s^0 \rightarrow D_s^- + n\pi^{\pm}$}}

22: \def\bks{\mbox{$B_d^0 \rightarrow K_s + J/\psi$}}

23: \def\jpsi{\mbox{$J/\psi$}}

24: \def\bkspsi{\mbox{$B_d^0 \rightarrow J/\psi K_S^0$}}

25: \def\bkst{$B_d^0 \rightarrow K^{*\circ} \mu^+\mu^-$}

26: \def\bkstee{\mbox{$B_d^0 \rightarrow K^{*\circ} e^+e^-$}}

27: \def\buu{\mbox{$B_s^0 \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-$}}

28: \def\bsuu{ \mbox{$b \rightarrow s \mu^+\mu^-$}}

29: \def\dskkp{\mbox{$D_s^- \rightarrow K^+ K^- \pi^-$}}

30: \def\dsphi{\mbox{$D_s^- + \mu^+$}}

31: \def\dsmunu{\mbox{$D_s^-\, \mu^+\, \nu_{\mu}$}}

32: \def\ds3pi{\mbox{$D_s^- + 3\pi^{\pm}$}}

33: \def\kspsi{\mbox{$K_s + J/\psi$}}

34: \def\QQmumu{\mbox{$Q\bar{Q}\rightarrow \mu \mu$}}

35: \def\QQmu{\mbox{$Q\bar{Q}\rightarrow \mu$}}

36: \def\QQee{\mbox{$Q\bar{Q}\rightarrow e e$}}

37: 

38: 

39: 

40: The D\O\ Run II detector \cite{upgrade} shown in Fig.~\ref{d0det}

41: builds on the detector's previous strengths of excellent calorimetry

42: and muon detection in an extended rapidity range. The major addition to

43: the apparatus is a precision tracking system,

44: consisting of a silicon vertex detector surrounded by an eight layer central

45: fiber tracker. These detectors are located inside a 2 T solenoid magnet.

46: 

47: \section{The silicon vertex detector}

48: 

49: \begin{figure}[t]

50: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ch4/d0det.ps,height=9.5cm}}

51: \caption{The D\O\ detector}

52: \label{d0det}

53: \end{figure}

54: 

55: The silicon vertex detector\index{\Do\ silicon vertex detector}(SMT), shown in

56: Fig.~\ref{SMT}, is a hybrid barrel and disk design. The central detector,

57: covering $|z| < 32$ cm, consists of six  barrels with disks interspersed

58: between them.

59: Each barrel module consists of four radial layers of detector

60: ladders located at a radius of 2.7, 4.5, 6.6, and 9.5 cm,

61: respectively. Layers one and three have 50 $\mu$m pitch double sided

62: silicon microstrip detectors (with axial and $90^\circ$ strips) in

63: the four inner barrels, and have single sided (axial strip) detectors

64: in the two end barrels. Layers two and four have double sided detectors

65: with axial and 2$^\circ$ stereo strips. Each disk module has twelve

66: wedge-shaped double sided

67: detectors (extending radially from 2.7 to 10 cm) with 30$^\circ$ stereo angle.

68: The forward detector

69: consists of six disks of similar design (three located near each end of 

70: the central detector) plus four larger 24-wedge disks made of single sided

71: detectors, located at z = $\pm$ 110 cm and $\pm$ 120 cm. The detector

72: is read out using SVX-II chips and has 800,000 total channels.   

73: The silicon vertex detector provides tracking information out

74: to $|\eta|$ = 3 and gives a reconstructed vertex position resolution

75: of 15-40 $\mu$m in $r-\phi$ and 75-100 $\mu$m in $z$, depending on

76: the track multiplicity of the vertex.  

77: 

78: \section{The central fiber tracker}

79: 

80: The central fiber tracker\index{\Do\ central fiber tracker} consists of 74,000 scintillating fibers

81: mounted on eight concentric carbon fiber cylinders at radii from

82: 19.5 to 51.5 cm. Each cylinder supports four layers of fibers, one

83: doublet in the axial direction and one doublet oriented at a 

84: $3^\circ$ helical stereo angle for odd numbered cylinders and at

85: $-3^\circ$ for even ones. The fibers are multi-clad and

86: have a diameter of

87: 830 $\mu$m. Clear fiber waveguides carry the light 

88: for about ten meters from the scintillating fibers to the 

89: visible light photon counters situated in cryostats under the

90: calorimeter. These are silicon devices that have a

91: quantum efficiency of over $80\%$ and a gain of about 50,000.

92: They operate at a temperature of about 10 K. Digitization is

93: also performed with SVX-II chips and the axial fibers are used

94: to form fast level 1 trigger track objects.

95: 

96: \begin{figure}[bh]

97: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ch4/d0smt.eps,width=0.95\textwidth}}

98: \caption{The D\O\ silicon vertex detector}

99: \label{SMT}

100: \end{figure}

101: 

102: The combined silicon vertex detector and central fiber tracker

103: have excellent tracking performance. The full coverage of the

104: entire combined detector extends out to $|\eta|$ =  1.6.

105: Tracks will be reconstructed with high efficiency ($\sim 95\%$ 

106: in the central region) with a resolution of 

107: $\sigma_{p_T}/p_{T}^2 \sim 0.002$. The silicon detector disks

108: allow efficient tracking out to an $|\eta|$ of 3.  

109:      

110: \section{Electromagnetic pre-shower detectors}

111: Another important piece of the upgrade is the new pre-shower 

112: detectors attached to the inner surfaces of the calorimeter

113: cryostats. These scintillating strip detectors greatly improve

114: electron identification by providing a finer grain spatial match

115: to the inner tracker than is obtained by the calorimeter alone.

116: This reduces electron trigger backgrounds by a factor of 5-10.

117: We will be able to trigger on electrons with $p_T$ down to 1.5 

118: GeV/$c$, and out to an $|\eta|$ of 2.5.

119: 

120: The calorimeter\index{\Do\ calorimetry} itself remains unchanged from its Run I

121: configuration. It is a uranium-liquid argon sampling calorimeter with fine

122: longitudinal and transverse segmentation, $\Delta\eta \times \Delta\phi = 0.1

123: \times 0.1$, that allows electromagnetic showers to be distinguished from

124: hadronic jets. It has full coverage out to $|\eta| = 4$ with energy resolutions

125: of $15\%/\sqrt{E}$ for electromagnetic showers and $80\%/\sqrt{E}$ for hadronic

126: jets.

127: 

128: \section{Muon Spectrometers}

129: 

130: The central part of the muon system\index{\Do\ muon detector} (covering the $|\eta| < 1$ range) includes 94 proportional drift tubes (PDT), barrel scintillator counters (A-PHI) and cosmic ray veto scintillator counters. There are three PDT layers (A, B, and C) with three or four 5-cm-thick, $\pm 5$-cm-wide drift cells per layer. A $r - \phi$ magnetic field, with an average magnitude of 16.7 kGauss, is contained in  an iron toroid sandwiched between layers A and B of the PDT system. The A-PHI counters have nine segments in the $z$ direction and 80 segments in the $\phi$ direction. There are 630 A-PHI counters in total.

131: 

132: 	The forward muon system (located at both endcaps) covers the $\eta$ [$\pm1, \pm2$] region of the \Do\ detector. It includes mini-drift tubes (MDT's with A, B, and C layers) with three or four decks of 1-cm square cells per layer. Iron toroids are located between the A and B layers of the MDT systems. The average magnitude of the field is 16.0 kGauss. Three layers of PIXEL scintillating counters, located next to corresponding MDT stations, have a $4.5^\circ$ $\phi$-segmentation and a 0.1 $\eta$-segmentation.

133: 

134:  The upgraded muon system offers excellent efficiency, purity, and coverage. We are 

135: able to trigger on muons with $p_T$ down to 1.5 GeV/$c$, and

136: out to an $|\eta|$ of 2.      

137: 

138: 

139: \section{Trigger system}

140: 

141: Significant upgrades to the trigger\index{\Do\ trigger system} and data

142:  acquisition systems are also required to operate in the high luminosity ($L = 2 \times 10^{32}$cm$^{-2}$

143: S$^{-1}$), high rate (7 MHz) environment of the upgraded TeVatron. The D\O\

144: Run II trigger consists of three levels.

145: 

146: \subsection{Trigger levels}

147: 

148: The first level (L1) trigger consists of

149: signals from the axial layers of the CFT, the pre-shower detectors, the 

150: calorimeter, and the muon scintillators and tracking chambers. The level 1

151:  trigger hardware for each of these systems examine the event and report

152: information to an array of front-end digitizing crates which have sufficient

153: memory to retain data from 32 crossings. Trigger decisions are made in less

154: than 4.2 $\mu$s at this level, providing deadtimeless operation with a maximum

155: accept rate of 10 kHz. Upon a level 1 trigger accept, the entire event is 

156: digitized and moved into a series of 16 event buffers to await a level 2

157: decision.

158: 

159: %\subsection{The level 2 trigger}

160: The level 2 (L2) trigger will reduce the L1 accept rate of 10 kHz by 

161: roughly a factor of 10 within 100 $\mu$s by correlating multi-detector

162: objects in an event. In the first stage, or preprocessor stage, each

163: detector system builds a list of trigger information. This information

164: is then transformed into physics objects such as energy clusters or 

165: tracks. The time required for the formation of these objects is about

166: 50 $\mu$s. These objects are then sent to the level 2 global processor

167: where they are combined and trigger decisions are made. For example, 

168: spacial coorelations between tracking segments, pre-shower 

169: depositions, and calorimeter energy depostions may all be used to 

170: select electron candidates. The deadtime of the level 2 trigger is

171: expected to be less than $5\%$.

172: 

173: %\subsection{The level 3 trigger}

174: The third and final stage (L3) of the trigger will reconstruct events

175: in a farm of PC processors with a final accept rate of 50 Hz. 

176: 

177: 

178: \subsection{Level 1 muon triggers}

179: \label{sec_trigger}

180: 

181: D\O\ Level 1 muon trigger

182: \index{\Do\ muon trigger! Level 1! description} 

183: (L1MU)\cite{muon} identifies muon candidates by using combinatorial logic that makes use of tracks from L1 Central Fiber Tracker (L1CFT) trigger and hits from all muon detector elements: drift chambers and scintillation counters.	The central, north and south regions of the detector are divided into octants. The L1MU triggers are formed locally in each octant. For the purpose of this report the L1MU trigger terms are labelled by two digits and two letters

184: \index{\Do\ muon trigger! Level 1! notation}

185: : L1MU(i, j, A, B).

186: \begin{itemize}

187:    \item The first number refers to the number of muons requested:

188:    \item The second number corresponds to an approximate value of 

189:                     the muon \pt{} threshold in GeV/$c$. 

190:    The nominal values are 2,4,7 and 11 GeV/c.

191:    \item The first letter refers to the covered $\eta^{\mu}$ region:

192:    \begin{itemize}

193:       \item C = Central, with $\mid \eta^{\mu} \mid \leq 1$;

194:       \item A = All, with $\mid \eta^{\mu} \mid \leq 1.6$;

195:       \item X = eXtended, with $\mid \eta^{\mu} \mid \leq 2$.

196:    \end{itemize}

197:    \item Finally, the second letter describes the muon tag criterium:

198:    \begin{itemize}

199:       \item M stands for Medium tag, requiring a L1CFT track matched with the PDT or MDT centroids, and with at least one layer-scintillator confirmation.

200:       \item T stands for Tight tag, requiring a L1CFT track combined with the PDT or MDT centroids, and with a two layer-scintillator confirmation.

201:    \end{itemize}

202: \end{itemize}

203: 

204: \subsection{Level 1 muon trigger rates and efficiencies}

205: 

206:     Performance of various muon triggers was evaluated in Ref.~\cite{FS_note}.

207: For this analysis we concentrated on:

208:    \begin{itemize}

209:       \item the single muon trigger L1MU(1,4,A,T) 

210:       \item and the dimuon trigger L1MU(2,2,A,M). 

211:     \end{itemize}

212: 

213: The $\eta^{\mu}$

214: coverage of both triggers extends to $\mid \eta^{\mu} \mid \leq 1.6$ and 

215: effective

216: muon \pt{} thresholds are 2 GeV/c for the dimuon trigger and 4 GeV/c for the

217: single muon trigger. Muons with \pt{} $>$ 1.5 GeV/c have a chance to penetrate

218: the calorimeter, muons with \pt{} $>$ 3.5 GeV/c have a chance to be detected in

219: the entire muon detector, including B and C layers outside of the toroid

220: magnet.

221:  

222:     To estimate the QCD  trigger rates, we used the 

223: dijet 

224: ISAJET events generated in 6 \pt{} intervals (2--5, 5--10, 10--20, 40--80

225: and 80--500) with 1, 3, 5 or 7 additional minimum bias interactions

226: (\pt{} between 1 and 100 GeV/$c$) per event. 

227: The background trigger rates were computed

228: with the assumptions of an instantaneous luminosity of 

229: $2\times10^{32}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$, a beam crossing time interval of

230: 132 ns and a dijet total cross section of 57 mb.

231:     Studies of

232: Ref.\cite{FS_note} indicate that the expected Level 1 trigger rates at this 

233: instantaneous

234: luminosity are approximately

235: 400 Hz and 80 Hz for the L1MU(2,2,A,T) and L1MU(1,4,A,T) triggers, 

236: respectively.

237: \index{\Do\ muon trigger! Level 1! trigger rates}%

238: The event samples used in these studies  contained about 1000 events each. 

239: Therefore some rate calculation could

240: suffer from large fluctuation due to the small number of selected events.

241: The absolute rates obtained from these samples 

242: could be underestimated by a factor up to two.

243: 

244: 

245:     For the trigger efficiency studies we have used a sample of \bks\ events processed through the latest version

246: of D0GEANT and the trigger simulator. Trigger efficiencies are normalized to the numbers of events with $\mid \eta^{\mu}\mid < 1.6$ and 

247:     kinematic cuts imposed on $p_T^{\mu}$, and $p_T^{\mu\mu}$ as

248:     specified in the Table~\ref{ta:trigger}.

249: \index{\Do\ muon trigger! Level 1! efficiency for dimuon events}%

250:  A large difference between efficiencies for the L1MU(1,4,A,M) and  

251: L1MU(1,4,A,T) triggers reflects the fact that the "tight" tag condition

252: requires two scintillator signals for each muon. This requirement reduces the

253: geometrical acceptance of the trigger due to a limited coverage of the 

254: scintillating

255: counters at the bottom of the detector.

256: 

257: \begin{table}

258: \centering

259: \begin{tabular}{l||c||c|c} \hline \hline

260:    $p_T^{\mu\mu}$ & $ > 2.0$ GeV/c & $> 5.0$ GeV/c& $> 5.0$ GeV/c \\

261:    $p_T^{\mu}$ & $    > 1.5$ GeV/c & $> 1.5$ GeV/c& $> 3.0$ GeV/c \\ \hline

262:     L1MU(2,2,A,M)  &27\% & 46\% & 57\%  \\

263:     L1MU(1,4,A,M)  &33\% & 69\% & 78\%  \\

264:     L1MU(1,4,A,T)  &15\% & 32\% & 49\%  \\

265:   dimuon or single (M) &41\% & 71\% & 80\%  \\

266:   dimuon or single (T) &32\% & 55\% & 67\%  \\

267: \hline \hline

268: \end{tabular}\vspace*{4pt}

269: \caption[Trigger efficiencies for dimuon events preselected with the kinematic

270: cuts listed~]{Trigger efficiencies for dimuon events preselected with the

271: kinematic cuts listed}

272: \label{ta:trigger}

273: \end{table}

274: 

275: 

276:  The trigger rates at the instantenous luminosity of 2 $10^{32} cm^{-2}s^{-1}$

277: due to dimuons from the

278:     genuine $Q{\bar Q}$ signal

279: \index{\Do\ muon trigger! Level 1! $Q{\bar Q}$ dimuon rates} 

280:     are $\approx$ 13 Hz ($\approx$ 4 Hz for $p_T^{\mu\mu}> $ 5 GeV/c). The 13

281:     Hz combines contributions from: \cc\ pair production (2.5 Hz), \bb\ pair

282:     production (9.5 Hz) and $b \rightarrow J/\psi +X$ decays (1.0 Hz). A

283:     requirement of dimuon $p_T^{\mu\mu} > 2$ GeV/$c$ reduces the rate to 9~Hz.

284: 

285: To estimate the contribution from $J/\psi$ production

286: \index{\Do\ muon trigger! Level 1! $J/\psi$ event rates} 

287: to the single muon 

288: trigger rate, we normalized the relevant Monte Carlo samples 

289: ($b\rightarrow J/\psi + X$ and prompt $J/\psi$'s)

290: to the CDF measurement of the 

291: $J/\psi$ cross sections in the kinematic range $p_T^{J/\psi} > 5$ GeV/$c$ 

292: and $\mid \eta(J/\psi) \mid <0.6$~\cite{CDFpsi}.  

293: With this normalization we find that the irreducible L1 trigger rate 

294: for signal events is at least 4.0 Hz for prompt $J/\psi$'s 

295: and 0.8 Hz for $J/\psi$'s from $b$-quark decays

296: ($J/\psi$ with $p_T^{J/\psi} > 2$ GeV/$c$ and $\mid \eta^{J/\psi} \mid <1.5$).   

297: 

298: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

299: %               SVT study

300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

301: %\section{Impact of a Silicon Track Trigger }

302: %\label{sec_svt}

303: 

304: \subsection{Level 2 and Level 3 muon triggers}

305: 

306: 	The second level of the muon trigger

307: \index{\Do\ muon trigger!Level 2 and 3! description} 

308: (L2MU) uses calibration and more precision timing information to improve the quality of muon candidates. Fast processors and a highly parallelized data pathway are the basis of the L3 muon trigger (L3MU). L3MU improves the resolution and the rejection efficiency of L2MU candidates. This is accomplished by performing local muon tracking, by adding inputs form the calorimeter and the sillicon micro-strip tracker (SMT) and by performing more analytical calculations on CFT tracks and PDT and A-PHI hits with the calibrated data.

309: The performance of the  L2MU and L3MU triggers has not been fully evaluated at the time of this writing.

310: 

311:     In addition, we expect to have the STT (Silicon Tracker Trigger)

312: \index{\Do\ Silicon Tracker Trigger} 

313:   preprocessor installed

314: in the middle of 2002. The STT will be part of the Level 2 trigger and will

315: provide an option of triggering on displaced vertices (impact parameter

316: significance). It will also further improve momentum resolution of muon tracks.

317: 

318:    The STT will allow to tag $B$ decays using displaced secondary

319:          vertices or tracks with large impact 

320:          parameters. The expected impact parameter resolution in 

321: the transverse plane can be parametrized as~\cite{FS_note}:

322:          \begin{equation}

323:           \sigma^2(d_0) = (12.6 \ \mu\mathrm{m})^2 +

324:                        \left(\frac{36.6\ \mu\mathrm{m}\, GeV}

325:           {p\times\sin^{3/2}\theta}\right)^2

326:          \end{equation}

327: 

328: This dependence on particle momentum and polar angle is illustrated

329: in Fig.~\ref{IMPACT}.

330: \index{\Do\ Silicon Tracker Trigger!

331:  impact parameter resolution} 

332: 

333: 

334: \begin{figure}[t]

335: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ch4/btag_sigmad0.eps,height=7cm}}

336: \caption{Expected impact parameter uncertainty dependence on track momentum and

337: polar angle.}

338: \label{IMPACT} 

339: \end{figure}

340: 

341: In Fig.~\ref{IMPACT_KST} we show the impact parameter  significance, $S =

342: d_0/\sigma(d_0)$,  for the \bkst{} decay products, under the condition that all

343: four charged particles are produced with $p_T \geq 0.5$ GeV/$c$ (muons with

344: $p_T \geq 1.5$ GeV/$c$). On the average 1.8   particles from the \bkst{} decay

345: will have an impact parameter significance greater than 2. This number

346: increases to 3.2 for events preselected by a request of a 400 $\mu$m

347: transversal separation between primary and secondary vertices.

348: 

349: \begin{figure}[bh]

350: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ch4/btag_sip.eps,height=7cm}}

351: \caption{Significance distribution for STT tracks reconstructed in \bkst{}

352: events with all four charge particles produced with $p_T \geq 0.5$ GeV/$c$.}

353: \label{IMPACT_KST}

354: \end{figure}

355: 

356:     Therefore, once STT becomes operational, we intend to use a simple $B$ tagging algorithm based on 

357: the number of tracks in the event 

358:          with a significance greater than $S_{min}$ to improve our Level 2

359:          trigger rates for selecting \bb\ events. The algorithm was tested on 

360: charged tracks with

361:         $p_T > 0.5$ GeV/$c$;

362:        $\mid \eta \mid < 1.6$;

363: 	and with hits in at least 3 layers of the SVX~\cite{FS_note}. As shown

364: 	in Fig.~\ref{BTAG_EFF}  an

365:         efficiency of 50\% can be achieved by requesting at least two tracks 

366:     per event

367:         with an impact parameter significance greater than 2. Similarily, requiring at least one track with an  impact parameter significance

368: greater than 5 permits the reduction of the background rate by a factor

369: 10 while keeping 50\% of the signal (assuming a primary vertex smearing

370: of 30 $\mu$m). 

371: \index{\Do\ Silicon Tracker Trigger!

372:  efficiency} 

373: 

374: \begin{figure}[t]

375: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ch4/btag_effbks.eps,height=7cm}}

376: \caption{\bb{} event tagging efficiency as a function of $S_{min}$ with either

377: one or two tracks in the event satisfying the condition $S > S_{min}$.}

378: \label{BTAG_EFF}

379: \end{figure}

380: 

381: Finally, we have studied the effect of the STT trigger on the separation of the

382: $J/\psi$ signal due to $b$-quark decays from the prompt $J/\psi$ production.

383: In case we need to suppress the prompt $J/\psi$ signal, requiring at least 

384: one track with $\mid S_B \mid > 2.5$ provides a factor 7

385: reduction at the 30\% cost to the non-prompt $J/\psi$ signal.

386: \index{\Do\ Silicon Tracker Trigger! 

387:  prompt $J/\psi$ separation}

388: 

389: \subsection {Low \pt\ dielectron trigger}

390: 

391:  \Do\ has also introduced a dielectron trigger\cite{electron} aimed at

392: detection of soft electron pairs, primarily from $J/\psi$ dielectron decays.

393: \index{\Do\ dielectron trigger}%

394: Level 1 electron candidates are selected with a transverse energy deposit $E_T>2.0~GeV$ in the 

395: EM calorimeter trigger towers, and with a low $\rm p_T>1.5~GeV/c$ track coincident 

396: with a pre-shower cluster. The two ``electrons'' are required to have opposite signs 

397: and to match  within a quadrant in $\phi$ with the EM deposits. 

398: In the forward rapidity region ($1.5<|\eta|<2.5$) the trigger is based on EM deposits 

399: and preshower clusters only, since no tracking 

400: coverage is available.

401:  

402:  The dielectron Level 2 trigger is based on a refined spatial matching between tracks and

403: $\rm 0.2\times 0.2$ EM trigger towers as well as on the information on the  EM fraction of the clusters and their isolation. Finally, invariant mass and angular criteria are applied 

404: to select $J/\psi$ dielectron  decays. 

405: 

406: 	Efficiencies and rates for this trigger have been estimated using {\it ISAJET} generated events 

407: overlaid with 2 extra interactions. Trigger rates at the nominal Run II luminosity 

408: are expected to be  below 1~kHz at Level 1 and about 150~Hz at Level 2.

409:  The expected yield of

410:  triggered $B_d^0~\to~J/\psi~K^0_s$ events is  

411: $15\times 10^3$ for an integrated luminosity of 2\,fb$^{-1}$. 

412: 

413: 

414: 

415: 

416: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

417: %                     REFERENCES

418: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

419: \clearpage

420: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

421: 

422: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

423: % D0 references

424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%

425: \bibitem{upgrade} S. Abachi {\it et al. ``The D\O\ upgrade''}, \Do Note 2542, \\

426: \verb"http://www-d0.fnal.gov/hardware/upgrade/upgrade.html".

427: 

428: \bibitem{FS_note}F.~Stichelbaut, M.~Narain and A. Zieminski,

429:    {\it Triggers for $B$ Physics Studies in Run II}, 

430:    \Do{} note 3354 (December 1997).

431: 

432: \bibitem{muon}K. Jones {\it et al.}, 

433: \verb"http://hound.physics.arizona.edu/l1mu/l1mu.htm"; \\

434: C. Leonidopoulos (for the \Do\ Collab.) CHEP 2001 talk - in press.

435: 

436: \bibitem{electron} P.~ Grannis and A.~ Lucotte, {\it ``Extending the

437: sensitivity to sin(2$\beta$) in the $B^0/{\bar B^0}$ system using a low pt

438: electron $J/\psi \rightarrow e^+e^-$ trigger at the upgrade \Do\ detector''},

439: \Do{} Note 3596 (1999).

440:  

441: \bibitem{CDFpsi}F. Abe {\it et al.}, CDF Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf

442: 76}, 4675 (1996). 

443: 

444: \bibitem{d0gstar} D\O\ RunII GEANT,\\

445: \verb"http://www-d0.fnal.gov/newd0/d0atwork/computing/MonteCarlo/".

446: 

447: \end{thebibliography}

448: %\end{document}

449: