1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

2: \usepackage{graphicx}

3: \setlength{\topmargin}{-0.5cm}

4: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0cm}

5: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.5cm}

6: \setlength{\textwidth}{15cm}

7: \setlength{\textheight}{22cm}

8: \setlength{\baselineskip}{.6cm}

9: \setlength{\parindent}{30pt}

10: \setlength{\parskip}{6pt}

11: \setlength{\footskip}{2cm}

12: 

13: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}

14: \def\NIM{Nucl. Instrum. Methods}

15: \def\NIMA{Nucl. Instrum. Methods A}

16: \def\NPB{Nucl. Phys.}

17: \def\PLB{Phys. Lett. B}

18: \def\PRL{Phys. Rev. Lett.}

19: \def\PRD{Phys. Rev. D}

20: \def\ZPC{Z. Phys. C}

21: \def\EPJ{Eur. Phys. J. C}

22: 

23: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

24: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}

25: \newcommand{\Lam}{\Lambda_{c}^{+}}

26: \newcommand{\Lambar}{\bar{\Lambda}_{c}^{+}}

27: \newcommand{\Lamvec}{\vec{\Lambda}_{c}^{+}}

28: \newcommand{\Lambarvec}{\vec{\bar{\Lambda}}_{c}^{{}_{{}_+}}}

29: 

30: \begin{document}

31: \thispagestyle{empty}

32: \begin{flushright}

33: KOBE--FHD--02--02\\

34: January~~~2002

35: \end{flushright}

36: 

37: \vspace{1cm}

38: \begin{center}

39: \baselineskip=1cm

40: {\Large \bf Polarized $s$--quark Distribution \\

41: in Charmed Hadron Leptoproduction\footnote[2]{Talk presented at SPIN2001 

42: (The 3rd Circum--Pan--Pacific Symposium on ``High Energy Spin Physics''), 

43: Beijing, China, Octobar 2001.}}

44: 

45: \baselineskip=0.6cm

46: \vspace{1.5cm}

47: {\large Kazutaka ~SUDOH} \\

48: \vspace{0.5cm}

49: {\em Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University, \\

50: Nada, Kobe 657--8501, JAPAN} \\

51: \vspace{0.3cm}

52: E-mail: {\tt sudou@radix.h.kobe-u.ac.jp}

53: \end{center}

54: 

55: \vspace{2cm}

56: \noindent

57: \begin{center}

58: {\bf ABSTRACT}

59: \end{center}

60: 

61: In order to extract the polarized strange quark density in proton, 

62: we studied the semi--inclusive $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ leptoproduction 

63: in charged current DIS at THERA energies. 

64: We indicate that measurements of the spin correlation between 

65: the incident proton and the produced $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ baryon gives us 

66: information about the polarized strange quark distribution. 

67: 

68: \vspace{0.5cm}

69: \noindent

70: PACS numbers: 13.60.-r, 13.88.+e, 14.20.Lq

71: \clearpage

72: 

73: \section{Introduction}

74: 

75: Proton spin puzzle is currently one of the most challenging topics 

76: in high energy spin physics. 

77: As is well known, proton spin is composed of the spin and orbital 

78: angular momentum of quarks and gluons. 

79: The polarized parton distribution function (PDF) plays an important 

80: role on deep understandings of the spin structure of proton. 

81: However, knowledge about the polarized sea quark distribution remains 

82: still poor. 

83: In order to understand the spin structure of proton, we need more 

84: information about the polarized sea quark distribution functions. 

85: Recently, HERMES group has reported \cite{HERMES99} that direct 

86: measurement of the strange sea is required to explain the violation of 

87: the Ellis--Jaffe sum rule \cite{Ellis74}. 

88: So far, there are several parametrization models of the strange quark 

89: distribution. 

90: Though the most simplest case is to assume the flavor ${\rm SU(3)}_f$, 

91: a new parametrization taken account of the violation of ${\rm SU(3)}_f$ 

92: is also recently proposed \cite{Leader99}. 

93: 

94: The study of heavy quark production in deep inelastic scattering (DIS) 

95: is one of the promising way to access the parton density in proton, 

96: since heavy quark is not main constituents of proton and is only 

97: produced in hard processes. 

98: Heavy quark leptoproduction in neutral current DIS has already measured 

99: by some collaborations at HERA. 

100: However, no measurement of heavy quark production in charged current 

101: DIS has been so far done at HERA due to the small cross section. 

102: We can expect that the cross section for charged current heavy quark 

103: production will be several times larger at THERA than at 

104: HERA \cite{Gladilin01}. 

105: THERA is a future high energy $ep$ collider which uses electron or 

106: positron from the linear collider TESLA at energies of 250 GeV to 800 

107: GeV and proton from HERA at energy 920 GeV. 

108: Thus, charged current heavy quark production is also interesting and 

109: challenging topics. 

110: 

111: In this work, to examine the polarized $s$/$\bar{s}$ quark distribution, 

112: we have studied semi--inclusive $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ leptoproduction 

113: in charged current DIS; 

114: $l^+ + \vec{p} \ra \bar{\nu} + \Lamvec + X$, 

115: $l^- + \vec{p} \ra \nu + \Lambarvec + X$, 

116: where arrows attached to particles mean that these particles are polarized. 

117: These processes might be observed in the forthcoming THERA experiments. 

118: Since in the naive quark model, the $\Lam$ baryon is composed of a heavy 

119: $c$--quark and anti--symmetrically combined light $u$ and $d$--quarks, 

120: we can assume the polarization of $\Lam$ baryon to be the one of charm quark. 

121: In addition, $\Lam$ is dominantly produced by the fragmentation of 

122: charm quark which is originated from strange quark through the $t$--channel 

123: $W^{\pm}$ boson exchange at the leading order. 

124: Therefore, there can be a correlation between the strange quark 

125: polarization and the produced charm quark polarization. 

126: Hence we can expect that the measurement of the spin correlation 

127: between the incident proton and the produced $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ gives us 

128: information about the polarized $s$/$\bar{s}$ quark distribution in proton. 

129: 

130: \section{Double Spin Asymmetry}

131: 

132: For above processes, we calculated the double spin asymmetry $A_{LL}^H$ 

133: for final state hadron specified by $H$ ($\Lam$ or $\Lambar$), 

134: which is given by 

135: \begin{equation}

136: A_{LL}^{H}\equiv 

137: \frac{[ d\sigma_{++} - d\sigma_{+-}+ d\sigma_{--} - d\sigma_{-+}]/dp_{T}}

138: {[ d\sigma_{++} + d\sigma_{+-}+ d\sigma_{--} + d\sigma_{-+}]/dp_{T}}

139: =\frac{d\Delta\sigma/dp_{T}}{d\sigma/dp_{T}} ,

140: \label{ALL}

141: \end{equation}

142: where $d\sigma_{+-}$, for instance, denotes that the helicity of proton 

143: is positive and the one of $H$ is negative. 

144: $p_T$ is a transverse momentum of final hadron $H$. 

145: 

146: For $\Lam$ production, the spin--dependent differential 

147: cross section at leading order level can be generally written by 

148: \begin{equation}

149: d\Delta\sigma(l^{+} p\ra \bar{\nu} \Lam X)

150: =\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 \Delta s(x)+{\rm U}_{cd}^2 \Delta d(x)\right\}dx

151: \left(\frac{d\Delta\hat{\sigma}}{d\hat{t}}

152: \right)d\hat{t}\Delta D_c^{\Lam} (z)dz ,

153: \end{equation}

154: where $\Delta s(x)$ and $\Delta d(x)$ are the polarized 

155: $s$--quark and $d$--quark distribution functions, respectively.

156: ${\rm U}_{cs}$ and ${\rm U}_{cd}$ are CKM parameters. 

157: $\Delta D_c^{\Lam}(z)$ is the polarized fragmentation function of 

158: outgoing charm quark decaying into $\Lam$. 

159: We used the model of Peterson {\em et al.} \cite{Peterson83} as the 

160: unpolarized fragmentation function \cite{PDG98}. 

161: Unfortunately, we have at present no data about the polarized 

162: fragmentation function because of lack of experimental data. 

163: By analogy with the study on $\Lambda$ polarization \cite{deFlorian98}, 

164: we took the 

165: following ansatz: 

166: \begin{equation}

167: \Delta D_c^{\Lam}(z)=C_c^{\Lam}(z) D_c^{\Lam}(z) , 

168: \end{equation}

169: where $C_c^{\Lam}(z)$ is the scale--independent spin transfer 

170: coefficient. 

171: Here we apply the analysis on $\Lambda$ production to $\Lam$ production 

172: and choose the following two models; $C_c^{\Lam}(z)=1$ (the naive 

173: nonrelativistic quark model) and $C_c^{\Lam}(z)=z$ (the jet 

174: fragmentation models \cite{Bartl80}) to evaluate cross sections. 

175: 

176: The double spin asymmetry $A_{LL}^{\Lam}$ is described in terms of 

177: the spin transfer coefficient $C_c^{\Lam}(z)$ and the ratio of 

178: the PDF's as 

179: \begin{equation}

180: A_{LL}^{\Lam}\propto C_c^{\Lam}(z)\frac{\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 \Delta s(x)

181: +{\rm U}_{cd}^2 \Delta d(x)\right\}}{\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 s(x)

182: +{\rm U}_{cd}^2 d(x)\right\}}. 

183: \end{equation}

184: Thus $A_{LL}^{\Lam}$ is proportional to linear combination of 

185: the polarized $s$--quark and $d$--quark distribution function. 

186: Since the contribution from the valence $d$--quark is large, the 

187: $s$--quark distribution is not so clearly extracted in $\Lam$ production 

188: case. 

189: 

190: On the contrary, $A_{LL}^{\Lambar}$ in $\Lambar$ production can be

191: represented as 

192: \begin{equation}

193: A_{LL}^{\Lambar}\propto C_c^{\Lam}(z)\frac{\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 \Delta 

194: \bar{s}(x)+{\rm U}_{cd}^2 \Delta \bar{d}(x)\right\}}

195: {\left\{{\rm U}_{cs}^2 \bar{s}(x)+{\rm U}_{cd}^2 \bar{d}(x)\right\}} 

196: =C_c^{\Lam}(z)\frac{\Delta \bar{s}(x)}{\bar{s}(x)}

197: \simeq C_c^{\Lam}(z)\frac{\Delta s(x)}{s(x)}, 

198: \end{equation}

199: in which the $\bar{d}$--quark contribution and CKM parameters can be 

200: eliminated, and then $A_{LL}^{\Lambar}$ is directly proportional to the 

201: strange quark distribution function alone. 

202: Therefore, we can clearly extract the polarized strange quark 

203: distribution $\Delta s(x)$. 

204: Note that above equation is derived in both cases; the flavor 

205: ${\rm SU(3)}_f$ case ($\Delta \bar{u}(x)=\Delta \bar{d}(x)=\Delta \bar{s}(x)$)

206: and the non--${\rm SU(3)}_f$ case 

207: ($\Delta \bar{u}(x)=\Delta \bar{d}(x)=\lambda \Delta \bar{s}(x)$\footnote

208: {$\lambda$ represent a degree of ${\rm SU(3)}_f$ violation and is a 

209: parameter which should be determined from experiments \cite{Leader99}.}). 

210: 

211: \section{Numerical Results}

212: 

213: Setting a charm quark mass $m_c = 1.5$ GeV and the relevant collider 

214: energy $\sqrt{s}=300$ GeV, we numerically calculated the 

215: spin--independent and dependent differential cross sections and the 

216: double spin asymmetry. 

217: As for the PDF's, we used the GRV98 \cite{GRV98} parametrization as 

218: the unpolarized PDF, and the AAC \cite{AAC} and ``standard scenario'' of 

219: GRSV01 \cite{GRSV01} parametrizations for the polarized one. 

220: 

221: We show the double spin asymmetry in Fig. \ref{fig1} as a function of 

222: $p_T$ at $\sqrt{s}=300$ GeV for $\Lam$ production (left panel) and for 

223: $\Lambar$ production (right panel). 

224: In order to suppress the contributions from the diffractive process and 

225: higher twist corrections, we have imposed the kinematical cut on $p_T$ 

226: as $p_T > 2$ GeV in numerical calculations. 

227: In figures, the bold and normal lines show the case of AAC 

228: parametrization and ``standard scenario'' of GRSV01 parametrization, 

229: respectively. 

230: The solid lines represent the spin transfer coefficient 

231: $C_c^{\Lam}(z)=1$ case, while the dashed lines represent 

232: $C_c^{\Lam}(z)=z$ case. 

233: 

234: As shown in figures, $A_{LL}^{\Lam}$ in smaller $p_T$ regions does 

235: not depend on the model of polarized PDF's, and is strongly affected 

236: by the shape of the spin transfer coefficient $C_c^{\Lam}(z)$. 

237: Therefore, The $\Lam$ production is effective for extracting information 

238: about the polarized fragmentation function $\Delta D_c^{\Lam}(z)$. 

239: In addition, we can directly measure the polarized strange quark 

240: distribution function, though the parametrization model dependence 

241: is not so large. 

242: On the other hand, for $\Lambar$ production $A_{LL}^{\Lambar}$ for 

243: GRSV01 parametrization rapidly decreases in larger $p_T$ regions, and 

244: we see big difference between two parametrization models. 

245: Therefore, measuring $A_{LL}^{\Lambar}$ in larger $p_T$ regions 

246: is quite effective for testing the model of polarized PDF's, since 

247: the ambiguity of the polarized fragmentation function becomes small. 

248: 

249: \section{Summary}

250: 

251: In summary, to extract information about the polarized strange quark 

252: distribution in proton, the semi--inclusive $\Lam$/$\Lambar$ production 

253: in charged current DIS in unpolarized lepton--polarized proton 

254: collisions was studied. 

255: $\Lambar$ production is most promising not only for testing the 

256: parametrization models of PDF's but also for directly extracting the 

257: polarized strange quark distribution $\Delta s(x)$ by measuring the 

258: double spin asymmetry $A_{LL}^{\Lambar}$. 

259: 

260: \vspace{0.5cm}

261: \begin{figure}[htbn]

262: \begin{center}

263:   \includegraphics[width=17pc, keepaspectratio]{fig1.eps}

264:   \includegraphics[width=17pc, keepaspectratio]{fig2.eps}

265: \end{center}

266: \caption{

267: $p_T$ distribution of double spin asymmetries at $\sqrt{s}=300$ GeV

268: for $\Lam$ production (left panel) and 

269: for $\Lambar$ production (right panel). 

270: }

271: \label{fig1}

272: \end{figure}

273: 

274: \begin{thebibliography}{00}

275: \bibitem{HERMES99}

276: HERMES Collaboration, K. Ackerstaff {\em et al.}, 

277: \Journal{\PLB}{464}{123}{1999}. 

278: \bibitem{Ellis74}

279: J.Ellis and R. L. Jaffe, 

280: \Journal{\PRD}{9}{1444}{1974}; \Journal{\PRD}{10}{1669}{1974}. 

281: \bibitem{Leader99}

282: E. Leader, A. V. Sidorov, D. B. Stamenov, 

283: \Journal{\PLB}{462}{189}{1999}. 

284: \bibitem{Gladilin01}

285: L. Gradilin and I. Redondo, hep--ph/0105126. 

286: \bibitem{Peterson83}

287: C. Peterson, D.Schlatter, I. Schmitt, P. M. Zerwas, 

288: \Journal{\PRD}{27}{105}{1983}. 

289: \bibitem{PDG98}

290: Particle Data Group, C. Coso {\em et al.}, 

291: \Journal{\EPJ}{3}{1}{1998}. 

292: \bibitem{deFlorian98}

293: D. de Florian, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang, 

294: \Journal{\PRD}{57}{5811}{1998}. 

295: \bibitem{Bartl80}

296: A. Bartl, H. Fraas, W. Majerotto, 

297: \Journal{\ZPC}{6}{335}{1980}. 

298: \bibitem{GRV98}

299: M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, A. Vogt, 

300: \Journal{\EPJ}{5}{461}{1998}. 

301: \bibitem{AAC}

302: Asymmetry Analysis Collaboration, Y. Goto {\em et al.}, 

303: \Journal{\PRD}{62}{034017}{2000}. 

304: \bibitem{GRSV01}

305: M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang, 

306: \Journal{\PRD}{63}{094005}{2001}. 

307: \end{thebibliography}

308: \end{document}

309: 

310: