1: \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: %----------------------------- DEFINITIONS --------------------------------%
5:
6: \newcommand{ \be}{\begin{equation}}
7: \newcommand{ \ee}{\end{equation}}
8: \newcommand{ \bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
9: \newcommand{ \eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
10: \newcommand{ \mysmall}[1]{\scriptscriptstyle #1} % a smaller #
11: \newcommand{ \smallmax}{{\rm\scriptstyle max}}
12: \newcommand{ \smallmin}{{\rm\scriptstyle min}}
13: \newcommand{ \mw}{M_{\mysmall{W}}}
14: \newcommand{ \mz}{M_{\mysmall{Z}}}
15: \newcommand{ \mh}{M_{\mysmall{H}}}
16: \newcommand{ \gl}{g_{\mysmall{L}}}
17: \newcommand{ \gr}{g_{\mysmall{R}}}
18: \newcommand{ \fl}{f_{\mysmall{L}}}
19: \newcommand{ \fr}{f_{\mysmall{R}}}
20: \newcommand{ \flr}{f_{\mysmall{L} \mysmall{R}}}
21: \newcommand{ \fx}{f_{\mysmall{X}}}
22: \newcommand{ \flov}{\bar{f}_{\mysmall{L}}}
23: \newcommand{ \frov}{\bar{f}_{\mysmall{R}}}
24: \newcommand{ \flrov}{\bar{f}_{\mysmall{L} \mysmall{R}}}
25: \newcommand{ \nuov}{\bar{\nu}}
26: \newcommand{ \Aov}{\bar{A}}
27: \newcommand{ \Bov}{\bar{B}}
28: \newcommand{ \Cov}{\bar{C}}
29:
30: \newcommand{ \fxov}{\bar{f}_{\mysmall{X}}}
31: \newcommand{ \ct} {c_{\mysmall{W}}}
32: \newcommand{ \st} {s_{\mysmall{W}}}
33: \newcommand{ \sideast}{\marginpar{\mysmall\em ~~~~~~(*)}}
34: \newcommand{ \fig}[1]{fig.~\ref{figure:#1}}
35: \newcommand{ \eq}[1]{eq.~(\ref{eq:#1})}
36: %\newcommand{ \ref}[1]{ref.~\cite{#1}}
37: \newcommand{ \mt} {m_t}
38: \newcommand{ \gev} {\mbox{ GeV}}
39: \newcommand{ \mev} {\mbox{ MeV}}
40: \newcommand{ \kev} {\mbox{ KeV}}
41: \newcommand{ \seff} {s^2_{eff}}
42: \newcommand{ \ms} {\overline{\mbox{MS}}}
43: \newcommand{ \cl} {\mbox{ 95\% C.L.}}
44: \newcommand{ \psl} {p \kern-.45em{/}}
45: \newcommand{ \qsl} {q \kern-.45em{/}}
46: \newcommand{ \lsim} {\raisebox{-.7ex}{$\stackrel{\textstyle <}{\sim}\,$}}
47: \newcommand{ \gsim} {\raisebox{-.7ex}{$\stackrel{\textstyle >}{\sim}\,$}}
48: \newcommand{\BeSeven}{$\!\!\!\!\phantom{A}^7$Be~}
49: \newcommand{\BEight}{$\!\!\!\!\phantom{A}^8$B~}
50: \newcommand{ \bm} {\boldmath}
51: \newcommand{ \eom} {E_\omega}
52: \newcommand{ \zom} {z_\omega}
53:
54: \begin{document}
55:
56: %-------------------------- TITLE PAGE --------------------------------%
57: \begin{titlepage}
58: \begin{flushright}
59: % \small
60: BUTP 2002/01\\
61: % hep-ph/00xxxxx \\
62: % \today
63: January 2002
64: \end{flushright}
65: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
66:
67: \begin{center}
68: \vspace{1cm}
69: {\LARGE \bf Elastic Scattering of Neutrinos off
70: Polarized Electrons\footnote{Work partially supported by
71: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds.}}
72:
73:
74: \vspace{1cm}
75: {\large\bf P.~Minkowski$^a$ and
76: M.~Passera$^{a,b}$}
77:
78: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
79: \vspace{.8cm}
80: {\it $^a$ Institut f\"{u}r Theoretische Physik,
81: Universit\"{a}t Bern \\
82: Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland \\
83: Email: {\rm mink@itp.unibe.ch} \\
84: \vspace{3mm}
85: $^b$ Dipartimento di Fisica ``G.~Galilei'', Universit\`{a}
86: di Padova and \\ INFN, Sezione di Padova, Via Marzolo 8,
87: I-35131, Padova, Italy \\
88: Email: {\rm passera@pd.infn.it}}
89:
90:
91: \vspace{2cm}
92: {\large\bf Abstract}
93: \end{center}
94:
95:
96: \vspace{3mm}
97: \noindent
98: We calculate the cross sections for elastic $\nu_l + e^- \rightarrow
99: \nu_l + e^-$ and $\nuov_l + e^- \rightarrow \nuov_l + e^-$ scattering
100: ($l=e$, $\mu$ or $\tau$) in the Born approximation and with exactly
101: fixed polarization states of target and final-state electrons,
102: discussing their sensitivity to the incident (anti)neutrino flavor. We
103: suggest investigation of the flavor composition of a (anti)neutrino
104: beam by a flux-independent analysis of the scattering of its
105: constituents off polarized electrons.
106:
107: \end{titlepage}
108:
109:
110: %----------------------------- TEXT -------------------------------------%
111: %2345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567
112: % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
113:
114: \noindent The main objective of this letter is to present analytic
115: formulae for the differential cross sections of the elastic
116: scatterings $\nu_l + e^- \rightarrow \nu_l +e^-$ and $\nuov_l +e^-
117: \rightarrow \nuov_l+e^-$ ($l=e$, $\mu$ or $\tau$), and to propose
118: investigation of the flavor of (anti)neutrinos by a flux-independent
119: analysis of their elastic scattering off polarized electrons. We
120: investigate these scattering processes to lowest order in the
121: electroweak interaction with all polarization states specified. We
122: neglect terms of order $r/\mw^2$, where $r$ indicates any of the
123: Mandelstam variables intervening in the scattering process and $\mw$
124: is the $W$ boson mass. Neutrinos and antineutrinos are considered
125: massless.
126:
127:
128: Consider the frame of reference in which the electron is initially at
129: rest and let the initial electron polarization vector lie in an
130: arbitrary direction {\boldmath{$\hat{n}$}}. If we choose helicity to
131: describe the polarization of the final-state electron, the Standard
132: Model (SM) prediction for the elastic neutrino--electron differential
133: cross section is
134: %
135: \be
136: \left[\frac{d\sigma}{dE}\right]^{\hat{n},\pm}_\nu
137: \! = \; \frac{2mG_{\mu}^2}{\pi}
138: \left[\,\gl^2 A_\pm(E)
139: +\gr^2 B_\pm(E)
140: \left(1-z\right)^2 -\gl \gr C_\pm(E)
141: \frac{m z}{\nu}\right],
142: \label{eq:fullpolarNu}
143: \ee
144: %
145: where
146: %
147: \bea
148: A_\pm(E) &=& \frac{1}{2}\left(1+c_\alpha \right)
149: \left( 1\mp \cos\theta \right) \nonumber \\
150: % = \frac{1}{2}\left(1+c_\alpha \right)
151: %\left[ 1 \mp \left(1+\frac{m}{\nu}\right)
152: %\frac{T}{l} \right] \nonumber \\
153: B_\pm(E) &=& \left[ \frac{1}{2} \left(1-c_\alpha \right)
154: + \frac{m z c_\alpha}{2(\nu-T)} \right]
155: \left[1\pm \left(1+\frac{m}{T-\nu}\right)
156: \frac{T}{l}\right] \nonumber \\
157: C_\pm(E) &=& \frac{1}{2}\left(1+c_\alpha \right)
158: \left( 1 \pm \frac{T-2\nu}{l} \right). \nonumber
159: \eea
160: %
161: The upper (lower) sign indicates positive (negative) helicity of the
162: recoil electron and $c_\alpha$ is the cosine of the angle between
163: {\boldmath{$\hat{n}$}} and the incoming neutrino
164: momentum. $G_{\mu}=1.16637(1) \times 10^{-5}\gev^{-2}$ is the Fermi
165: coupling constant, $m$ is the electron mass, $\gl = \sin^2
166: \!\theta_{\mysmall{W}} \pm 1/2$ (upper sign for $\nu_e$ and $\nuov_e$,
167: lower sign for $\nu_{\mu,\tau}$ and $\nuov_{\mu,\tau}$), $\gr =
168: \sin^2\!\theta_{\mysmall{W}}$, and $\sin^2\!\theta_{\mysmall{W}}
169: \approx 0.23$ is the squared sine of the weak mixing angle. In this
170: elastic process, $E$, the electron recoil energy, ranges from $m$ to
171: $E_{\smallmax} =$ $[m^2 +(2\nu +m)^2]/[2(2\nu +m)]$, where $\nu$ is
172: the incident neutrino energy in the frame of reference in which the
173: electron is initially at rest. Also, $l=\sqrt{E^2-m^2}$ and $T=E-m$
174: are the final electron three-momentum and kinetic energy, $z=T/\nu$,
175: and $\cos\theta = (1+m/\nu)(T/l)$ is the cosine of the angle between
176: the momenta of the recoil electron and incident neutrino. For
177: simplicity of notation, only the $E$ dependence of the functions
178: $A_\pm$, $B_\pm$ and $C_\pm$ has been explicitly indicated.
179: Note that the differential cross section in \eq{fullpolarNu} includes
180: an integration over the nontrivial dependence on the azimuthal angle
181: of the final-state electron momentum, with the $z$-axis taken along the
182: direction of the incoming neutrino momentum.
183:
184: The corresponding formula for the elastic antineutrino--electron
185: differential cross section is
186: \be
187: \left[\frac{d\sigma}{dE}\right]^{\hat{n},\pm}_{\nuov}
188: \! = \; \frac{2mG_{\mu}^2}{\pi}
189: \left[\, \gl^2 \Aov_\pm(E) \left(1-z\right)^2
190: +\gr^2 \Bov_\pm(E) -\gl \gr \Cov_\pm(E)
191: \frac{m z}{\nu}\right],
192: \label{eq:fullpolarANu}
193: \ee
194: %
195: where
196: %
197: \bea
198: \Aov_\pm(E) &=& \left[ \frac{1}{2} \left(1+c_\alpha \right)
199: - \frac{m z c_\alpha}{2(\nu-T)} \right]
200: \left[1\mp \left(1+\frac{m}{T-\nu}\right)
201: \frac{T}{l}\right] \nonumber \\
202: \Bov_\pm(E) &=& \frac{1}{2}\left(1-c_\alpha \right)
203: \left( 1\pm \cos\theta \right) \nonumber \\
204: \Cov_\pm(E) &=& \frac{1}{2}\left(1-c_\alpha \right)
205: \left( 1 \mp \frac{T-2\nu}{l} \right). \nonumber
206: \eea
207: %
208: We refer the reader to ref.~\cite{BKS-MP} for radiative corrections
209: (RC) to unpolarized neutrino--electron scattering. RC are not included
210: in the results of the present paper.
211:
212:
213: If we sum over the helicities of the final-state electron,
214: \eq{fullpolarNu} immediately leads us to (the superscript $s$ indicates
215: the sum over the helicities)
216: %
217: \bea
218: \left[\frac{d\sigma}{dE}\right]_{\nu}^{\hat{n},s}
219: &=& \frac{2mG_{\mu}^2}{\pi}
220: \left[ \left( 1+ c_\alpha \right)
221: \left(\,\gl^2 -\gl \gr \frac{mz}{\nu}\right)
222: \right. \nonumber \\
223: & & \left. +\;\;\gr^2 \left(1-z\right)^2\left(
224: 1-c_\alpha + \frac{m z c_\alpha}{\nu-T}
225: \right) \right],
226: \label{eq:polarNu}
227: \eea
228: %
229: in agreement with ref.~\cite{RS}. As we can see from
230: \eq{fullpolarANu}, the corresponding formula for
231: antineutrino--electron scattering is simply obtained by interchanging
232: $\gl$ and $\gr$ and inverting the sign of $c_\alpha$ in
233: \eq{polarNu}. Furthermore, if the initial-state electrons are not
234: polarized, then we must also average over their polarizations, thus
235: obtaining the well-known SM result for the unpolarized $\nu_l-e^-$
236: elastic scattering computed long ago by 't~Hooft \cite{tH} (the
237: superscript $a$ indicates the average over the initial polarizations
238: of the electron)
239: %
240: \be
241: \left[\frac{d\sigma}{dE}\right]_{\nu}^{a,s} = \;
242: \frac{2mG_{\mu}^2}{\pi} \left[\, \gl^2 +\gr^2
243: \left(1-z\right)^2 -\gl \gr
244: \frac{m z}{\nu}\right].
245: \label{eq:unpolar}
246: \ee
247: %
248: Once again, for $\nuov_l-e^-$ scattering we should just interchange
249: $\gl$ and $\gr$.
250:
251:
252: Irrespective of the final helicity of the electron, we note that when
253: the initial-state electron is polarized towards the incoming neutrino
254: (i.e.~when $c_{\alpha}=-1$), the differential cross section
255: \eq{fullpolarNu} does not depend on $\gl$ and is therefore independent
256: of the neutrino flavor. If, on the contrary, we reverse the
257: polarization of the initial-state electron (i.e.~when
258: $c_{\alpha}=+1$), \eq{fullpolarNu} depends both on $\gl$ and on $\gr$,
259: and is different for $\nu_e$ and $\nu_{\mu,\tau}$. This can be seen in
260: the upper panel of \fig{diffsigma}, where we have plotted the
261: differential cross sections for polarized $\nu_l-e^-$ elastic
262: scattering for an incident neutrino energy $\nu=0.862 \mev$, summing
263: over the helicities of the final-state electron. (This value of $\nu$
264: was chosen for its relevance in the study of solar neutrinos:
265: $\nu=0.862\mev$ is the energy of the monochromatic neutrinos produced
266: by electron capture on \BeSeven in the solar interior.) Solid (dotted)
267: lines indicate $\nu_e$ ($\nu_{\mu,\tau}$) and their thickness
268: represents the two different initial-state electron polarizations
269: $c_{\alpha}=+1$ and $c_{\alpha}=-1$ (thick and thin,
270: respectively). The thin solid and thin dotted curves overlap, while
271: the thick ones differ significantly. The lower panel of
272: \fig{diffsigma} shows the corresponding differential cross sections
273: for polarized $\nuov_l-e^-$ elastic scattering, with the same value
274: $\nu=0.862\mev$ for reasons of comparison.
275:
276:
277: Lead by these simple considerations, we introduce
278: $P_{f}^{h}(\nu,c_\alpha)$, the polarization asymmetry
279: defined as
280: %
281: \be
282: P_{f}^{h}(\nu,c_\alpha) \; \; = \; \; \frac{
283: {\displaystyle \left[\sigma\right]^{\hat{n},h}_f -
284: \left[\sigma\right]^{-\hat{n},h}_f}}{
285: {\displaystyle \left[\sigma\right]^{\hat{n},h}_f +
286: \left[\sigma\right]^{-\hat{n},h}_f}} \; ,
287: \label{eq:P}
288: \ee
289: %
290: where the superscript $h$ can be either $\pm$ or $s$ (we remind the
291: reader that the superscript $\pm$ indicates positive or negative
292: helicity of the final-state electron, while $s$ denotes their sum),
293: $f=\nu_l$ or $\nuov_l$ ($l=e$, $\mu$ or $\tau$), and
294: $\left[\sigma\right]^{\hat{n},h}_f$ is the total cross section
295: %
296: \be
297: \left[\sigma\right]^{\hat{n},h}_f \; = \;
298: \int_m^{E_\smallmax}
299: \left[\frac{d\sigma}{dE}\right]^{\hat{n},h}_f dE
300: \label{eq:Sigma}
301: \ee
302: %
303: ($[\sigma]^{-\hat{n},h}_f$ is the corresponding total cross section
304: when the initial electron polarization vector lies in the direction
305: {\boldmath{$-\hat{n}$}}). Similarly, employing differential cross
306: sections rather than total ones, one can also define the polarization
307: asymmetry parameter $p_{f}^{h}(\nu,E,c_\alpha)$.
308:
309:
310: The polarization asymmetry provides a sensitive tool to investigate
311: the flavor of the incoming (anti)neutrinos. In the upper panel of
312: \fig{PNA} we plotted $P_{f}^{h}(\nu,c_\alpha)$ for incident neutrinos
313: of energy $\nu \in [1\kev, 10\mev]$ and $c_\alpha=1$; the optimal
314: value $c_\alpha=1$ was chosen to maximize the flavor sensitivity of
315: the asymmetry parameter. In this panel, the three thick (thin) lines
316: indicate $\nu_e$ ($\nu_{\mu,\tau}$); plots for positive and negative
317: helicity of the recoil electron have been drawn dashed and dotted,
318: respectively, while solid lines have been employed for final helicity
319: sums. If we focus on the solid lines, we notice their dependence on
320: the incident neutrino flavor. We also note that, for neutrino
321: scattering, the dependence on the flavor would be increased if the
322: final helicity could be measured, and attention limited to events with
323: positive helicity (upper panel, dashed lines). The lower panel of
324: fig.~2 shows the corresponding plots of $P_{f}^{h}(\nu,1)$ for
325: antineutrinos.
326:
327:
328: The flavor composition of a $\nu_l$ (or $\nuov_l$) beam can be
329: investigated in a flux-independent way by measuring the number of
330: scattering events off electrons polarized along and opposite to the
331: direction of the incoming neutrino (or antineutrino) momentum. The
332: comparison of this experimental measurement with the SM prediction
333: [obtained via eqs.~(\ref{eq:P}) and (\ref{eq:Sigma})] provides us with
334: the flavor content of the incident $\nu_l$ (or $\nuov_l$) beam,
335: i.e.~the fraction of $\nu_e$ ($\nuov_e$) vs.~$\nu_{\mu,\tau}$
336: ($\nuov_{\mu,\tau}$) in the incident flux. Conversely, if the incoming
337: (anti)neutrino flavor is known, this comparison provides the fraction
338: of neutrinos vs.~antineutrinos.
339:
340:
341: The use of the polarization asymmetry parameter for
342: (anti)neutrino--electron scattering was advocated long ago to test the
343: predictions of different models for a unified theory of
344: electromagnetic and weak interactions \cite{tg}. More recently, the
345: scattering of $\nu_e$ and $\nuov_e$ on a polarized electron target has
346: been suggested as a test of the neutrino magnetic moment
347: \cite{RS}. The analyses of this note provide new and explicit
348: motivation for the idea of scattering (anti)neutrinos off polarized
349: electrons.
350:
351:
352: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ACKNOWLEDG %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
353: %\bigskip
354: It is a pleasure to thank
355: C.~Broggini, R.~S.~Raghavan, A.~Rossi and A.~Sirlin for
356: very useful comments and discussions.
357:
358: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% REFERENCES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
359: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
360:
361: \bibitem{BKS-MP} Radiative corrections to neutrino--electron
362: scattering have been investigated by several authors. We refer
363: the reader to
364: J.~N.~Bahcall, M.~Kamionkowski and A.~Sirlin,
365: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51} (1995) 6146,
366: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9502003;%%
367: for simple and compact results,
368: M.~Passera, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 113002 and
369: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011190;%%
370: BUTP 2001/02 [hep-ph/0102212], to appear
371: in Comments Nucl.~Part.~Phys.,
372: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102212;%%
373: for recent results on QED corrections, and to references therein.
374:
375: \bibitem{RS} T.~I.~Rashba and V.~B.~Semikoz,
376: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 479} (2000) 218.
377: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003099;%%
378:
379: \bibitem{tH} G.~'t Hooft, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 37} (1971) 195.
380: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B37,195;%%
381:
382: \bibitem{tg} T.~Garavaglia, Lett.\ Nuovo Cim.\ {\bf 29} (1980) 572.
383: %%CITATION = NCLTA,29,572;%%
384:
385: \end{thebibliography}
386:
387:
388: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
389: \begin{figure}[tbp]
390: \vspace{-6cm}\hspace{-4cm}\includegraphics[width=21cm]{fig1.ps}
391: \vspace{-7cm}
392: \caption{\sf Polarized differential cross sections for $\nu_l-e$
393: (upper panel) and $\nuov_l-e$ (lower panel) elastic
394: scatterings. $\nu=0.862\mev$. Solid (dotted) lines indicate $\nu_e$
395: ($\nu_{\mu,\tau}$). Thick and thin lines represent, respectively,
396: $c_{\alpha}=+1$ and $c_{\alpha}=-1$.}
397: \label{figure:diffsigma}
398: \end{figure}
399:
400:
401: \begin{figure}[tbp]
402: \vspace{-6cm}\hspace{-4cm}\includegraphics[width=21cm]{fig2.ps}
403: \vspace{-7.5cm}
404: \caption{\sf $P_{f}^{h}(\nu,c_\alpha\!\!=\!\!1)$ for incident
405: neutrinos (upper panel) and antineutrinos (lower panel) of energy $\nu
406: \in [1\kev, 10\mev]$. Thick (thin) lines correspond to $\nu_e$ and
407: $\nuov_e$ ($\nu_{\mu,\tau}$ and $\nuov_{\mu,\tau}$). Dashed (dotted)
408: lines represent polarization asymmetries for positive (negative)
409: helicity of the final-state electron, while solid curves indicate
410: helicity sums.}
411: \label{figure:PNA}
412: \end{figure}
413:
414:
415:
416: \end{document}
417:
418:
419:
420:
421:
422:
423:
424:
425:
426:
427:
428:
429:
430:
431:
432:
433:
434:
435:
436: